VTE Prophylaxis in the Hospitalized Patient: Importance and Strategies for Improved Compliance...
-
Upload
alanna-galloway -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
1
Transcript of VTE Prophylaxis in the Hospitalized Patient: Importance and Strategies for Improved Compliance...
VTE Prophylaxis in VTE Prophylaxis in the Hospitalized the Hospitalized
Patient: Patient: Importance and Importance and Strategies for Strategies for
Improved Improved ComplianceComplianceAndrew H. Dombro, M.D.Andrew H. Dombro, M.D.
Instructor of MedicineInstructor of MedicineDivision of General Internal Medicine, Hospital Division of General Internal Medicine, Hospital
Medicine SectionMedicine SectionUniversity of Colorado Health Sciences CenterUniversity of Colorado Health Sciences Center
OverviewOverview
Background / Prevalence of VTEBackground / Prevalence of VTE Benefits / Rationale for VTE prophylaxisBenefits / Rationale for VTE prophylaxis Identification of hospitalized patients most Identification of hospitalized patients most
at riskat risk Methods of VTE prophylaxisMethods of VTE prophylaxis National Consensus Standards for National Consensus Standards for
Prevention and Care of VTE (CMS as well?)Prevention and Care of VTE (CMS as well?) Factors related to under-use of established Factors related to under-use of established
guidelines guidelines Strategies to improve complianceStrategies to improve compliance
Background / Prevalence of Background / Prevalence of VTEVTE
PE is responsible for up to PE is responsible for up to 200K deaths per year in the 200K deaths per year in the United StatesUnited States¹¹
PE remains the most common PE remains the most common preventablepreventable cause of hospital cause of hospital death, accounting for up to death, accounting for up to 10%²10%²
DVT/PE is DVT/PE is muchmuch more common more common in the hospitalized patient -- in the hospitalized patient -- medical and surgical³medical and surgical³
1. Horlander, KT, Mannino, DM, Leeper, KV. 1. Horlander, KT, Mannino, DM, Leeper, KV. Arch Intern MedArch Intern Med 2003; 163:1711 2003; 163:17112. Pendleton R et al. Am J Hemat. 2005;79:229-237.3. Edelsberg J et al. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2006; 63: 16S-22S
Background / PrevalenceBackground / Prevalence
VTE is more than 130 times greater VTE is more than 130 times greater among among hospitalizedhospitalized patients than patients than community residentscommunity residents¹¹ half of community-based cases nursing half of community-based cases nursing
home patients home patients oror within 90 days of within 90 days of hospital discharge hospital discharge
60% of all cases occurred in either 60% of all cases occurred in either hospitalized, recently d/c’d, or NH hospitalized, recently d/c’d, or NH patients!patients!
Hospitalization for acute Hospitalization for acute medicalmedical illnessillness is associated with up to an is associated with up to an 8-8-fold increasefold increase in relative risk for VTE in relative risk for VTE
1. Heit, JA, Melton, LJ, Lohse, CM, et al. 1. Heit, JA, Melton, LJ, Lohse, CM, et al. Mayo Clin ProcMayo Clin Proc 2001; 76: 1102 2001; 76: 1102
Background / PrevalenceBackground / Prevalence Death occurs in about 6% of DVT cases within Death occurs in about 6% of DVT cases within
one month of diagnosisone month of diagnosis11
Death occurs in about 12% of PE cases within Death occurs in about 12% of PE cases within one month of diagnosisone month of diagnosis11
Up to 25% of distal DVT can propagate into Up to 25% of distal DVT can propagate into proximal DVTproximal DVT²²
Pulmonary emboli are detected in approximately Pulmonary emboli are detected in approximately 50% of patients with proximal DVT50% of patients with proximal DVT²²
Recurrent DVT:Recurrent DVT: Can occur in 30% of DVT patients within 10 Can occur in 30% of DVT patients within 10
years after initial treatment³years after initial treatment³
1. American Heart Association. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics – 2005 Update.2. Anand, SA et al. JAMA. 1998;279:1094-1099.3. Prandoni P et al. Haemotologia 2007; 92: 199-205
Background / Background / Prevalence¹Prevalence¹
Without prophylaxisWithout prophylaxis, overall , overall DVTDVT incidence in hospitalized medical and incidence in hospitalized medical and general surgical patients is 10-40% general surgical patients is 10-40% 40-60% following major orthopedic surgery40-60% following major orthopedic surgery
Without prophylaxis,Without prophylaxis, fatal PEfatal PE occurs occurs with the following frequency in with the following frequency in hospitalized patients:hospitalized patients: 0.1-0.8% undergoing elective general 0.1-0.8% undergoing elective general
surgerysurgery 2-3% undergoing elective hip replacement2-3% undergoing elective hip replacement 4-7% undergoing surgery for fractured hip!4-7% undergoing surgery for fractured hip!
1. 1. Geerts WH et al. Chest. 2004;126(3 suppl):338S-400S
Background / PrevalenceBackground / Prevalence
Without prophylaxis, reported VTE occurrence Without prophylaxis, reported VTE occurrence in the ICU ranges between <10% to nearly in the ICU ranges between <10% to nearly 100%!!100%!! Virtually Virtually allall critical care patients are at moderate to critical care patients are at moderate to
high riskhigh risk Up to 10% to 15% of patients with cancer may develop Up to 10% to 15% of patients with cancer may develop
a VTEa VTE11
Malignancy independent factor for decreased early Malignancy independent factor for decreased early and late survival after VTE eventand late survival after VTE event²²
1. Viale PH, Schwartz RN. Clin J Onco Nurs. 2004;8:455-461.2. Heit JA et al. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:445-453
Consequences of Consequences of Unprevented VTEUnprevented VTE
Fatal PE Fatal PE -- usually occurs without warning and often -- usually occurs without warning and often with no potential to resuscitate¹with no potential to resuscitate¹
Patient discomfortPatient discomfort associated with VTE associated with VTE Initial pain and discomfortInitial pain and discomfort Post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS)²Post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS)² Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary
Hypertension (CTPH)³Hypertension (CTPH)³ $$$$ spent in the investigation of suspected and spent in the investigation of suspected and
treatment of documented VTEtreatment of documented VTE Risk of treatmentRisk of treatment once VTE occurs once VTE occurs Increased Increased length of length of initialinitial hospital stay hospital stay More frequent hospital More frequent hospital readmissionreadmission Increased Increased future riskfuture risk of VTE of VTE (4)(4)
1. Anderson FA et al. 1. Anderson FA et al. Arch Intern MedArch Intern Med 1991; 151: 933-8 1991; 151: 933-82. Büller, HR et al. Chest. 2004;126:4018-4288.3. Pengo V et al. N EnglJ Med. 2004;350:2257-2264.4. Heit JA et al. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160:761-8
Benefits / Rationale of VTE Benefits / Rationale of VTE ProphylaxisProphylaxis
DVT and PE are prevalent and serious DVT and PE are prevalent and serious complicationscomplications11
Difficult to predict with any certainty which Difficult to predict with any certainty which patients will develop VTEpatients will develop VTE²²
Patients can experience VTE weeks after Patients can experience VTE weeks after surgerysurgery22
Clinical consequences of VTE, including Clinical consequences of VTE, including mortality, are commonmortality, are common33
Health burden associated with VTE is expected Health burden associated with VTE is expected to grow dramatically during coming years, in to grow dramatically during coming years, in part due to aging population part due to aging population (4)(4)
1. 1. Geerts WH et al. Chest. 2004;126(3 suppl):338S-400S.2. White RH et al. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:1525-1531.3. Pengo V et al. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2257-2264.4. Stein PQ et al. 4. Stein PQ et al. Arch Intern MedArch Intern Med 2004. 164:2260-65 2004. 164:2260-65
Benefits / Rationale of VTE Benefits / Rationale of VTE Prophylaxis¹Prophylaxis¹
Hospital-acquired DVT/PE is Hospital-acquired DVT/PE is usuallyusually clinically silent --clinically silent --oonly 1/3 present with nly 1/3 present with classic symptoms²classic symptoms²
Overall incidence likely underestimated³Overall incidence likely underestimated³ Screening, either by physical exam or Screening, either by physical exam or
noninvasive testing, is not clinically effective noninvasive testing, is not clinically effective or cost effectiveor cost effective
Prophylaxis is far more effective for Prophylaxis is far more effective for preventing death/morbidity from VTE than preventing death/morbidity from VTE than is treatment of established diseaseis treatment of established disease
1. Geerts WH et al. Chest. 2004;126(3 suppl):338S-400S2. Turkstra F et al. Ann Intern Med 1997; 126: 775-813. Kyrle PA et al. Lancet 2005; 365: 1163-74
Benefits / Rationale of VTE Benefits / Rationale of VTE prophylaxisprophylaxis
Effective and safe prophylactic measures are Effective and safe prophylactic measures are available for most high-risk patients available for most high-risk patients (1,2)(1,2)
pharmacologic prophylaxis lowers the risk of pharmacologic prophylaxis lowers the risk of symptomatic and asymptomatic VTE in symptomatic and asymptomatic VTE in medical patients by 50%-75%!medical patients by 50%-75%!
little or no increase in rates of clinically little or no increase in rates of clinically important bleeding complicationsimportant bleeding complications
Based on solid principles and scientific Based on solid principles and scientific evidence from large numbers of randomized evidence from large numbers of randomized clinical trials³clinical trials³
Most hospitalized patients have one or more Most hospitalized patients have one or more risk factor for VTE – and importantly, these are risk factor for VTE – and importantly, these are cumulativecumulative(4)(4)
1. Gerotziafas, GT, Samama, MM. 1. Gerotziafas, GT, Samama, MM. Curr Opin Pulm MedCurr Opin Pulm Med 2004; 10:356 2004; 10:3562. Clagett, GP, Reisch, JS. 2. Clagett, GP, Reisch, JS. Ann SurgAnn Surg 1988; 208:227 1988; 208:2273. Patel R et al. 3. Patel R et al. J Crit CareJ Crit Care 2005; 20:34-7 2005; 20:34-74. Dorfman, et al. 4. Dorfman, et al. J Clin Pharm TherapJ Clin Pharm Therap 2006; 31: 455-9 2006; 31: 455-9
Benefits of VTE Benefits of VTE ProphylaxisProphylaxis
Appropriate VTE Appropriate VTE prophylaxis prophylaxis achieves two very achieves two very desirable results:desirable results: Improved patient Improved patient
outcomesoutcomes Reduced costsReduced costs
No No definitivedefinitive way to predict which way to predict which patients will acquire VTEpatients will acquire VTE11
Risk factors for VTE have been Risk factors for VTE have been reportedreported1,21,2
Preexisting and surgical risk factors for Preexisting and surgical risk factors for VTE can be cumulative for patients VTE can be cumulative for patients undergoing surgeryundergoing surgery33
Patients undergoing hip or knee Patients undergoing hip or knee replacement or hip fracture surgery are replacement or hip fracture surgery are among those at highest riskamong those at highest risk11
1. Geerts WH et al. Chest. 2004;126(3 suppl):338S-400S.2. Heit JA et al Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:809-815.3. Geerts WH, et al. Chest. 2001;119:132S-175S.
Risk Factors: Predicting Risk Factors: Predicting VTEVTE
VTE Risk: Medical and VTE Risk: Medical and Surgical Patient Surgical Patient
Characteristics Characteristics (1,2)(1,2) History of VTEHistory of VTE Family history VTEFamily history VTE MalignancyMalignancy Increased age (possibly Increased age (possibly ≥ ≥
41)41) CHFCHF AMIAMI Ischemic CVAIschemic CVA Pregnancy/PostpartumPregnancy/Postpartum Infection/SepsisInfection/Sepsis Prolonged immobilizationProlonged immobilization Acute/chronic lung diseaseAcute/chronic lung disease Hypotension/shockHypotension/shock
Inflammatory disease Inflammatory disease (including IBD)(including IBD)
Estrogen therapyEstrogen therapy Obesity (BMI>25)Obesity (BMI>25) Tobacco useTobacco use Varicose veinsVaricose veins Inhibitor deficiency statesInhibitor deficiency states
Antiphospholipid Ab’sAntiphospholipid Ab’s Protein C/SProtein C/S Factor V Leiden (3-7%)Factor V Leiden (3-7%) Prothrombin Gene Prothrombin Gene
Mutation (2%)Mutation (2%) AT IIIAT III
1. Geerts WH et al. Chest. 2004;126(3 suppl):338S-400S; Heit JA et al. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:809-815.2. Kikura, M, Takada, T, Sato, S. Preexisting morbidity as an independent risk factor for perioperative acute2. Kikura, M, Takada, T, Sato, S. Preexisting morbidity as an independent risk factor for perioperative acute thromboembolism syndrome. Arch Surg 2005; 140:1210thromboembolism syndrome. Arch Surg 2005; 140:1210
Surgical Risk FactorsSurgical Risk Factors
ProcedureProcedure Surgical siteSurgical site Surgical techniqueSurgical technique AnestheticAnesthetic Duration of procedureDuration of procedure Presence of infectionPresence of infection Postoperative immobilizationPostoperative immobilization
Virchow’s TriadVirchow’s Triad¹¹
Vascular InjuryVascular Injury²²
Recurrent DVT/PERecurrent DVT/PESurgerySurgery
Cancer treatmentCancer treatmentTraumaTrauma
Venipuncture Venipuncture AtherosclerosisAtherosclerosis
IV drug IV drug administrationadministration
Risk Factors are Cumulative3
1. Anderson, FA et al. Circulation.2003;107:I-9--I-10.2. Viale PH, Schwartz RN. Clin J Onco Nurs. 2004;8:455-461.3. Rosendaal FR. Lancet. 1999;353:1167-1173.
Hypercoaguable State2
Hereditary risk factorsBleeding disorders
Malignancy
Venous Stasis²
ObesityImmobility
Chronic heart diseaseAge above 40
Extended VTE Risk Extended VTE Risk Following Hospital Following Hospital
DischargeDischarge VTE can occur for up to 3 months after total VTE can occur for up to 3 months after total
knee and hip arthroplastyknee and hip arthroplasty11
Hypercoagulability can persist for 6 weeks Hypercoagulability can persist for 6 weeks after hip fractureafter hip fracture22
Venous function was significantly impaired for Venous function was significantly impaired for up to 42 days following hip fracture surgeryup to 42 days following hip fracture surgery33
Recurrent DVT:Recurrent DVT: 30% of DVT patients 8 to 10 years after 30% of DVT patients 8 to 10 years after
initial treatmentinitial treatment44
1. White RH et al. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:1525-1531.2. Wilson D et al. Injury. 2001;32:765-770.3. Wilson D et al. Injury. 2002;33:33-39.4. American Heart Association. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics – 2005 Update.
Features of an Ideal VTE Features of an Ideal VTE Prophylaxis RegimenProphylaxis Regimen
EffectiveEffective SafeSafe Good complianceGood compliance Easily administeredEasily administered No laboratory monitoring neededNo laboratory monitoring needed Cost effectiveCost effective
Methods of VTE Methods of VTE ProphylaxisProphylaxis
Mechanical:Mechanical: Graduated Compression Stockings Graduated Compression Stockings
(GCS)(GCS) Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Intermittent Pneumatic Compression
Devices (IPC)Devices (IPC)
PharmacologicPharmacologic
Mechanical ProphylaxisMechanical Prophylaxis
AdvantagesAdvantages Lack of bleeding Lack of bleeding
potentialpotential11
No clinically important No clinically important side effectsside effects
No laboratory monitoring No laboratory monitoring neededneeded22
IPC stimulates IPC stimulates endogenous fibrinolytic endogenous fibrinolytic activity (ractivity (reduces educes plasminogen activator plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 levels by inhibitor-1 levels by unknown mechanism) unknown mechanism) 22
DisadvantagesDisadvantages No mechanical prophylaxis No mechanical prophylaxis
options have been shown to options have been shown to reduce the risk of death or reduce the risk of death or PEPE11
Must be worn continuously: Must be worn continuously: pre-, intra- and pre-, intra- and postoperatively for 72 postoperatively for 72 hourshours1 1
GCS can cause impairment GCS can cause impairment in tissue oxygenation (PVD)in tissue oxygenation (PVD)33
GCS need to be sized and GCS need to be sized and fitted properlyfitted properly33
1. Geerts WH et al. Chest. 2004;126(3 suppl):338S-400S.2. Davis P. J Ortho Nurs. 2004;8:50-56. 3. Agu O et al. Br J Surg. 1999;86:992-1004.
Pharmacologic ProphylaxisPharmacologic Prophylaxis
Aspirin – NOT recommended as sole prophylaxis Aspirin – NOT recommended as sole prophylaxis agentagent11
Low-dose unfractionated heparin (LDUH)Low-dose unfractionated heparin (LDUH)22
Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH)Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH)22
EnoxaparinEnoxaparin DalteparinDalteparin TinzaparinTinzaparin
Vitamin K antagonist (VKA)Vitamin K antagonist (VKA)11
WarfarinWarfarin Factor Xa inhibitorFactor Xa inhibitor22
FondaparinuxFondaparinux
Choice of pharmacologic agent depends on VTE risk reduction, complication rate and proper dosing of agent2
1. Geerts WH et al. Chest. 2004;126(3 suppl):338S-400S. 2. Pendleton R et al. Am J Hemat. 2005;79:229-237.
Risky BusinessRisky Business The majority of hospitalized medical The majority of hospitalized medical
andand surgical patients are at increased surgical patients are at increased risk of VTE²risk of VTE²
Risks appear to be cumulative¹Risks appear to be cumulative¹ Risk Risk stratificationstratification is cumbersome, not is cumbersome, not
adequately validated, and therefore not adequately validated, and therefore not as widely agreed-upon in as widely agreed-upon in medicalmedical patients as in surgical patientspatients as in surgical patients
Guidelines, however, do exist Guidelines, however, do exist (2,3)(2,3)
1. Dorfman, et al. 1. Dorfman, et al. J Clin Pharm TherapJ Clin Pharm Therap 2006; 31: 455-9 2006; 31: 455-92. Edelsberg, J et al. 2. Edelsberg, J et al. Am J Health-Syst PharmAm J Health-Syst Pharm 2006. 63: S16-S22 2006. 63: S16-S223. Geerts WH et al. Chest. 2004;126(3 suppl):338S-400S.
ACCP Recommendations ACCP Recommendations (since 1986)(since 1986)
Geerts, WH, Geerts, WH, et al.et al. CHESTCHEST 2004; 126: 2004; 126: 338s-400s338s-400s
VTE Prophylaxis UsageVTE Prophylaxis Usage Varies markedly, overall remaining abysmally lowVaries markedly, overall remaining abysmally low
Audit of 384 patients with VTEAudit of 384 patients with VTE¹¹:: 201 (52%) received prophylaxis 201 (52%) received prophylaxis
(112 anticoagulation, 31 mechanical prophylaxis, 58 combination)(112 anticoagulation, 31 mechanical prophylaxis, 58 combination) 183 (48%) No prophylaxis183 (48%) No prophylaxis 13 deaths due to PE13 deaths due to PE
One study showed that One study showed that only 46%only 46% of hospitalized medical of hospitalized medical patients, with risk factors for VTE, received appropriate patients, with risk factors for VTE, received appropriate prophylaxis²prophylaxis²
Various studies show a VTE prophylaxis rate in surgical Various studies show a VTE prophylaxis rate in surgical patients varying from 38% to 94% patients varying from 38% to 94% (3,4)(3,4)
true even amongst orthopedic surgeons³true even amongst orthopedic surgeons³
1. Goldhaber et al. Chest 2000:118:1680-1684.
2. Ageno et al. Haematologia 2002; 87: 746-50
3. Stratton et al. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160: 334-40
4.Anderson et al. J Thromb Thrombol 1998; 5: S7-S11
VTE Prophylaxis UsageVTE Prophylaxis Usage Even when used, guideline Even when used, guideline
recommendations often not followedrecommendations often not followed Grade IA ACCP recommendations were Grade IA ACCP recommendations were
followed from 45% (hip fracture surgery) followed from 45% (hip fracture surgery) to 84% (elective THR) of the time¹to 84% (elective THR) of the time¹
Retrospective study – overall compliance Retrospective study – overall compliance rate 13.3% in greater than 120,000 rate 13.3% in greater than 120,000 hospital admissions²hospital admissions²
2.8% Neurosurgery2.8% Neurosurgery 52.4 % Orthopedic Surgery52.4 % Orthopedic Surgery 13.3 % Medicine13.3 % Medicine
1. Statton et al. 1. Statton et al. Arch Intern MedArch Intern Med 2000; 160: 334-40 2000; 160: 334-402. Yu HT et al. 2. Yu HT et al. Am J Health Syst PharmAm J Health Syst Pharm 2007. 64: 69-76 2007. 64: 69-76
VTE Prophylaxis UsageVTE Prophylaxis Usage
HospitalistsHospitalists found superior!¹ found superior!¹ Pneumonia Care + VTE prophylaxisPneumonia Care + VTE prophylaxis 96.0% vs. 61.9%96.0% vs. 61.9%
1. William D et al. 1. William D et al. Am J Manag CareAm J Manag Care 2007. 13:129-32 2007. 13:129-32
Contributing Factors to Contributing Factors to Under Use – Physician Under Use – Physician
Related Related (1,2)(1,2)
Lack of awareness / unfamiliarity with Lack of awareness / unfamiliarity with guidelinesguidelines
Perception that VTE is not a significant or Perception that VTE is not a significant or frequent problemfrequent problem
Patients will be ambulatory “soon enough”Patients will be ambulatory “soon enough” Concern over bleeding risks (surgical sites Concern over bleeding risks (surgical sites
and elsewhere)and elsewhere) Guidelines seem complicated or difficult to Guidelines seem complicated or difficult to
applyapply Patients so ill on admission that VTE Patients so ill on admission that VTE
concerns don’t “hit the radar screen”concerns don’t “hit the radar screen” More difficult to More difficult to changechange habits than to habits than to
incorporate a incorporate a newnew habit habit1. Geerts et al. 1. Geerts et al. ChestChest 2004; 126: 338S-400S 2004; 126: 338S-400S2. Cabana et al. 2. Cabana et al. JAMAJAMA 1999; 282: 1458-65 1999; 282: 1458-65
Contributing Factors to Contributing Factors to Under use -- Under use --
Environmental¹Environmental¹ Not under physicians’ direct control, Not under physicians’ direct control,
such as acquisition of new resources or such as acquisition of new resources or facilitiesfacilities
Lack of timeLack of time Financial constraints (increased Financial constraints (increased
practice costs, lack of reimbursement)practice costs, lack of reimbursement) Increased legal liabilityIncreased legal liability
1. Cabana et al. JAMA 1999; 282: 1458-651. Cabana et al. JAMA 1999; 282: 1458-65
Contributing Factors to Contributing Factors to Under Use – Institution Under Use – Institution
Related¹Related¹ Lack of standardized order sets for Lack of standardized order sets for
VTE prophylaxisVTE prophylaxis Lack of user-friendly patient risk Lack of user-friendly patient risk
assessment tools/mechanismsassessment tools/mechanisms Logistical limitations of health care Logistical limitations of health care
management systems, for instance management systems, for instance lack of medical informatics systems lack of medical informatics systems with computerized “prompts”with computerized “prompts”
1. Cabana et al. JAMA 1999; 282: 1458-651. Cabana et al. JAMA 1999; 282: 1458-65
National Consensus National Consensus Standards for Prevention Standards for Prevention
and Care of VTEand Care of VTE JCAHO and National Quality Forum (NQF) JCAHO and National Quality Forum (NQF)
-- project began 9/04-- project began 9/04 Eight different measures have been Eight different measures have been
recommended by the Technical Advisory recommended by the Technical Advisory Panel (TAP) for pilot testing this year. Panel (TAP) for pilot testing this year. Regarding VTE prophylaxis, these include:Regarding VTE prophylaxis, these include: VTE Risk Assessment (RA)/Prophylaxis within VTE Risk Assessment (RA)/Prophylaxis within
24 hours of hospital admission24 hours of hospital admission VTE Risk Assessment (RA)/Prophylaxis within VTE Risk Assessment (RA)/Prophylaxis within
24 hours of transfer to ICU24 hours of transfer to ICU Incidence of Potentially Preventable Hospital-Incidence of Potentially Preventable Hospital-
acquired VTEacquired VTE
Center for Medicare and Center for Medicare and Medicaid ServicesMedicaid Services
CMS is strongly considering using CMS is strongly considering using VTE prophylaxis as a core safety VTE prophylaxis as a core safety compliance and performance compliance and performance measuremeasure This will directly affect hospital / This will directly affect hospital /
physician reimbursements (i.e., pay for physician reimbursements (i.e., pay for performance)performance)
The Literature – What Has The Literature – What Has Worked?Worked?
Respected leaders within institutions¹Respected leaders within institutions¹ Clinical audits with Clinical audits with feedback feedback (2,3)(2,3)
Clinical decision support tools (83% → 95%) Clinical decision support tools (83% → 95%) (4)(4)
Clinical guidelines combined with chart Clinical guidelines combined with chart monitoring monitoring (5)(5)
Nursing/patient education for increased Nursing/patient education for increased compliance with SCD’s compliance with SCD’s (6)(6)
Establishment of protocols, combined with staff Establishment of protocols, combined with staff education and a daily computer driven reminder education and a daily computer driven reminder (reporting tool) for morning rounds in ICU (reporting tool) for morning rounds in ICU (7)(7)
Computer based reminders Computer based reminders (8)(8)
1. Winkler, et al. 1. Winkler, et al. Arch Intern MedArch Intern Med 1985; 145:314-7 1985; 145:314-72. Williams, et al. 2. Williams, et al. Ann R Coll Surg EnglAnn R Coll Surg Engl 1997; 79:55-7 1997; 79:55-73. Greco, et al. 3. Greco, et al. NEJMNEJM 1993; 329: 1271-4 1993; 329: 1271-44. Durieux, et al. 4. Durieux, et al. JAMAJAMA 2000; 283: 2816-21 2000; 283: 2816-215. Phillips, et al. 5. Phillips, et al. Thromb HaemostThromb Haemost 1997; 77: 283-8 1997; 77: 283-86. Stewart, D et al. 6. Stewart, D et al. Ann SurgAnn Surg 2006. 72: 921-3 2006. 72: 921-37. Wahl, WL et al. 7. Wahl, WL et al. Surgery Surgery 2006. 140: 648-92006. 140: 648-98. Patterson R. Proc 8. Patterson R. Proc AMIA SympAMIA Symp 1998. 573-6 1998. 573-6
Future Directions -- UCHSCFuture Directions -- UCHSC
Increase overall VTE prophylaxis Increase overall VTE prophylaxis compliancecompliance
Improved methods of risk Improved methods of risk stratificationstratification
Increased adherence to established Increased adherence to established guidelinesguidelines
Proposed results:Proposed results: Improved patient safety and outcomesImproved patient safety and outcomes Improved adherence to JHACO / CMS Improved adherence to JHACO / CMS
standards and institutionally standards and institutionally established compliance targets/goalsestablished compliance targets/goals
Proposed Study - UCHSCProposed Study - UCHSC
Prospective historical controlled trialProspective historical controlled trial Develop simple, useable method of VTE Develop simple, useable method of VTE
risk stratificationrisk stratification Utilize prompts – written and eventually Utilize prompts – written and eventually
electronicelectronic Measure compliance rates compared to Measure compliance rates compared to
historic rateshistoric rates
MethodsMethods Using established risk factors, develop simple, Using established risk factors, develop simple,
useable method of risk stratifications for useable method of risk stratifications for clinicians, using methods that have proved clinicians, using methods that have proved effective¹effective¹ Initially paper admission/transfer ordersInitially paper admission/transfer orders With CPOE, add as “pop-up”²With CPOE, add as “pop-up”² Include current ACCP guidelinesInclude current ACCP guidelines
Use medication reconciliation sheets/orders as Use medication reconciliation sheets/orders as reminderreminder Forms would be mandatory for all Forms would be mandatory for all
admissions/transfersadmissions/transfers Again, with CPOE, would be contained thereinAgain, with CPOE, would be contained therein
Measure rates of physician compliance and Measure rates of physician compliance and choice of method on high-risk patients (2 or choice of method on high-risk patients (2 or more risk factors) pre and post implementationmore risk factors) pre and post implementation
1. McCaffrey R et al. 1. McCaffrey R et al. Worldviews Evid Based NursWorldviews Evid Based Nurs 2007; 4:14-20 2007; 4:14-202. Paterno MD et al. 2. Paterno MD et al. AMIA Annu Symp ProcAMIA Annu Symp Proc 2006; 1058 2006; 1058
General ConclusionsGeneral Conclusions VTE prophylaxis is justified, low-risk, and VTE prophylaxis is justified, low-risk, and
indicated in indicated in mostmost hospitalized patients hospitalized patients Good for patientsGood for patients Good for hospitalsGood for hospitals
Overall, VTE prophylaxis is under-utilizedOverall, VTE prophylaxis is under-utilized Hospitals and physicians will soon be judged on Hospitals and physicians will soon be judged on
compliancecompliance Each hospital needs a Each hospital needs a standardizedstandardized approach for approach for
VTE prophylaxis to improve complianceVTE prophylaxis to improve compliance protocols, pre-printed orders, risk stratification, etc.protocols, pre-printed orders, risk stratification, etc. Multi-disciplinary approachMulti-disciplinary approach auditingauditing
Thanks …Thanks …