Evaluation of the Quality of a Prognosis for an Industrial Product using the Regression Analysis
VS - Evaluation, Management, Prognosis VEGETATIVE STATE - Evaluation, Management & Prognosis Dr...
-
Upload
myles-perry -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
0
Transcript of VS - Evaluation, Management, Prognosis VEGETATIVE STATE - Evaluation, Management & Prognosis Dr...
VS - Evaluation, Management, Prognosis
VEGETATIVE STATE -
Evaluation, Management & Prognosis
Dr Keith AndrewsRoyal Hospital for Neuro-disability,
London, UK
VS - Evaluation, Management, Prognosis
Vegetative State Nomenclature/Definitions
• Prolonged coma
• Coma vigile
• Parasomnia
• Akinetic mutism
• Apallic syndrome
• Decerebrate dementia
VS - Evaluation, Management, Prognosis
Recovery Continuum
Coma
Vegetative State
Minimal Conscious State
‘Cognitive Impaired States’‘Norma
l’
.
VS - Evaluation, Management, Prognosis
•Breathing spontaneously
•Sleep-awake pattern
•Reflex responses to stimulation
•No ‘meaningful’ response
Clinical Features of VS
VS - Evaluation, Management, Prognosis
Problematic Presentations
• Grasp Reflex
• Swallowing
• Chewing & Tongue Pumping/Thrusting
• Bruxism
• Grunts & Groans
• Smiles & Frowns
• Relaxation Response
VS - Evaluation, Management, Prognosis
Minimally Conscious State
“Severely altered consciousness in
which the patient does not meet
the criteria for coma or the
vegetative state because there is
inconsistent but reproducible or
sustained behavioural evidence
of self or environmental
awareness”
Aspen WP 2001
VS - Evaluation, Management, Prognosis
MCS - Reproducibility
•Consistency of Response
•Complexity of Response
VS - Evaluation, Management, Prognosis
MCS- Complexity v Consistency
• The simpler the response (e.g. eye blink, finger movement) the higher the frequency required.
• The more complex the response (e.g. saying a few words) the lower the frequency required.
VS - Evaluation, Management, Prognosis
MCS - Diagnostic Responses
• Simple command following
• Gestural or verbal ‘yes’/’no’ responses (regardless of accuracy)
• Purposeful behaviour including movements or affective behaviours contingent to relevant stimulation.
VS - Evaluation, Management, Prognosis
MCS - Purposeful Behaviour
• Appropriate smiling/crying to linguistic/ visual emotional but not neutral topics.
• Vocalisation/gestures in direct response to content of question
• Reaching for object - demonstrating location and direction of reach
• Touching/holding objects -recognition of size and shape
• Eye pursuit/sustained fixation
VS - Evaluation, Management, Prognosis
Other Conditions
• Coma
• (Brain [Stem] Death)
• Locked-in- Syndrome
VS - Evaluation, Management, Prognosis
Differential Diagnosis (1)Condition Coma Veg. State Min. Cons
State Locked-in Syndrome
Self Awareness
- - Partial Full
Cyclical Eye Opening
- + + +
Motor function
Reflex & Postural
Postures or
withdraws. Occasional
non-purpose
Localises. Reach for objects.
Automatic movements
Quadriplegic.
Vertical eye movement
Experience pain
No No ? Yes
Respiratory Function
Depressed or varied
Normal Normal Normal
VS - Evaluation, Management, Prognosis
Differential Diagnosis (2)
Condition Coma Veg. State Min. Cons State
Locked-in Syndrome
Auditory Function
None Startle. Brief
orientation
Localise. Inconsist
commands-following
Preserved
Visual Function
None Startle. Brief
orientation
Sustained visual fix. Sustained pursuit.
Preserved.
VS - Evaluation, Management, Prognosis
Differential Diagnosis (3)
Condition Coma Veg. State Min. Cons State
Locked-in Syndrome
Communication None None Contingent vocalisat/n. Inconsist
verbal/n or gesture
Aphonic/ anarthric. Verical eye movement
and blinking
Emotion None None or reflex
smiling crying
Contingent smiling or
crying
Preserved
VS - Evaluation, Management, Prognosis
Misdiagnosis of VS
• Tresch et al (1991) 18% of long term patients diagnosed as PVS
• Childs et al (1993) 37% admitted to rehabilitation unit.
• Andrews et al (1996) 43% admitted with a diagnosis of VS for longer than 6 months.
VS - Evaluation, Management, Prognosis
Outcome - Referrered as VS
0
2
46
8
10
12
1416
18
No
. of
Ptn
ts
Remained VS Emerge Misdiag
25%
33%
43%
(n=40)
N=40
VS - Evaluation, Management, Prognosis
Misdiagnosis - Outcome
0 20 40 60 80 100
% of Misdiagnosed Patients
Spell message
Make choices
Simple Maths
Orientated TPP
Write messages
VS - Evaluation, Management, Prognosis
Misdiagnosis - Characterisitics
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Misdiagnosed Patients
Blind orVisuallyImpaired
Physicallydisabled
100%
65%
VS - Evaluation, Management, Prognosis
Causes of Misdiagnosis
• Too ill
• Fatigue
• Missed windows of opportunity
• Physical disability/Poor positioning
• Blind
• Inexperience of observer
• Too short an assessment period
VS - Evaluation, Management, Prognosis
Inter-disciplinary Team
Patient FamilyDoctor
Nurse
Physio OT SALT
Music Therapist
SocialWorker
Psychol
Dietician
OralHygienist
ClinicalEngin Dentist
VS - Evaluation, Management, Prognosis
Principles of Rehabilitation Prevent secondary
complications
Provide environment for
recovery
Treatment
Modify the patient
Modify the environment
Support the family Change Society
VS - Evaluation, Management, Prognosis
The Vegetative Patient
• Physically dependent
• Complex neurological complications
• Cognitively impaired
• Medically vulnerable
• Family in crisis
VS - Evaluation, Management, Prognosis
Medical Needs
• Epilepsy
• Fluid & electrolyte balance
• Infections (UTI & RTI)
• Respiratory function
• Drug control of spasticity
• Stimulants
• Systems control - e.g. diabetes
VS - Evaluation, Management, Prognosis
Health Management
• Nutrition
• Posture & positioning
• Spasticity
• Bowel function
• Bladder function
• Tracheostomy
VS - Evaluation, Management, Prognosis
Recovery - Opportunities
•Nutritional state
•Good positioning
•General health
•Control of medication
•Sensory regulation
VS - Evaluation, Management, Prognosis
Sensory Regulation
• Controllable environment
• Staff awareness
• Family awareness
• Specialist knowledge
• Equipment
VS - Evaluation, Management, Prognosis
Sensory Assessment
Vision
Hearing
Smell
Taste
Touch
+
Arousal
None
Reflex
Withdrawal
Localisation
Differentiating
.
VS - Evaluation, Management, Prognosis
Method of Showing Awareness
•Eye blink
•Move finger
•Hand thrust
•Knee or foot movement
•Shrug shoulder
•Head turn
VS - Evaluation, Management, Prognosis
Assessment - Basic Requirements
• Good nutritional state
• Good health
• Seated with good posture
• At least some muscle movement
VS - Evaluation, Management, Prognosis
Communication - Optimal Conditions
• After rest period
• Windows of opportunity
• Short sessions
• Repeated
• Over period of time
VS - Evaluation, Management, Prognosis
Factors Affecting Assessment
• Physical ability to respond
• Desire/willingness to respond
• Ability to observe accurately
• Time available for observation/assessment
• Reliable assessment tools
VS - Evaluation, Management, Prognosis
Support Patient/Family
Information Involvement Counselling Welfare information Ward based support groups Peer support National groups
VS - Evaluation, Management, Prognosis
Family effect on outcome?
Anxiety Guilt Wishful thinking Anger Expectations v Reality
VS - Evaluation, Management, Prognosis
Why Bother?
• Diagnosis and Misdiagnosis
• Recovery v optimal maintenance
• Long term requirements/ benefits
• Cost to state
• Cost to family