Volatility Characteristics of Electronic Cigarette Aerosols

20
Volatility Characteristics of Electronic Cigarette Aerosols Jacob Swanson 1,2 , Noah Bock 1,2 , Will Northrop 1 1 Dept. of Mechanical Engineering University of Minnesota Twin Cities 2 Dept. of Integrated Engineering Minnesota State University Mankato 2015 Cambridge Particle Meeting

Transcript of Volatility Characteristics of Electronic Cigarette Aerosols

Volatility Characteristics of

Electronic Cigarette Aerosols

Jacob Swanson1,2, Noah Bock1,2, Will Northrop1

1Dept. of Mechanical Engineering

University of Minnesota – Twin Cities

2Dept. of Integrated Engineering

Minnesota State University – Mankato

2015 Cambridge Particle Meeting

E-Cigarettes (“E-Cigs”) produce an inhalable

aerosol by vaporizing a mixture of liquids

• Nearly all E-cigs use battery to power a heating coil in

contact with a wicking material saturated with E-liquid

• Some are disposable.

2015 Cambridge Particle Meeting 2

Four standard “E-liquid” constituents

• Glycerol, C3H8O3

– Produces aerosol that resembles smoke

• Propylene Glycol, C3H8O2

– Nicotine carrier, reduces viscosity

• Nicotine (0 – 24 mg·mL-1)

– Generally pharma grade

• Flavoring

– FDA approved PG-based food flavoring

Glycerol

Propylene glycol

Nicotine

32015 Cambridge Particle Meeting

E-cigs are emerging as a safe

alternative to tobacco cigarettes

• Manufacturers claim E-cigs to be safe

(no “toxic chemicals”)

• User perception of safety: 50% say

“safer” vs 2% say “less safe” in the UK

(http://www.ash.org.uk/)

• 2.5 million E-cig users compared to 45

million smokers in the U.S. (3 mil+ in

the UK)

• 13% of high school students use E-cigs

42015 Cambridge Particle Meeting

5

May, 2015 - http://www.independent.co.uk/

2015 Cambridge Particle Meeting

Experimental objectives

• Construct apparatus that allows

continuous, automated use of a typical

E-cig

• Characterize size, concentration, and

composition particles in E-cig aerosol

• Explore the impact of E-liquid

additives and power on E-cig aerosol

• Determine temporal variability of

aerosol properties

62015 Cambridge Particle Meeting

Battery powered E-cig apparatus

Air in

Aerosol out

Solenoid

Kanthal (FeCrAl)

heating coil

Cotton wick

Battery

enclosure

20 mm

72015 Cambridge Particle Meeting

Battery powered E-cig apparatus

Air in

Aerosol out

Solenoid

Kanthal (FeCrAl)

Heating Coil

Cotton Wick

Battery

Enclosure

20 mm

82015 Cambridge Particle Meeting

Primary limitations: battery life and

E-liquid consumption (~ 10 puffs)

E-Smoking Cycle Simulator (E-SCSTM)

+ -4 V

DC Power Supply

Air in

Aerosol out

5 V input signal

Syringe pump

92015 Cambridge Particle Meeting

Experimental apparatus and instruments

HEPA MFC

DAQ

E-cig

LII

CS

Vent

DilutionCPC

EEPSThe MFC controller pulses

in synchronization with the

E-cig to simulate a user

taking a puff

20 L/min, 0.1 Hz, 3 s pulse

10 L/min

102015 Cambridge Particle Meeting

1500:1

Flavoring and nicotine content have

little impact E-particleTM emissions

1.E+07

1.E+08

1.E+09

1.E+10

5 50 500

dN

/dlo

gD

p,

part

/cm

3

Dp, nm

PG/VG Mix

Flavored No Nicotine

Flavored With Nicotine

Concentrations ~ 1 x 109 particles/cm3 ~ same as tobacco smoke

112015 Cambridge Particle Meeting

The following slides all show

“solid particles” measured

downstream of a catalytic stripper

122015 Cambridge Particle Meeting

1. Averages of 10 puffs

2. Extended evaluation of the life of

the coil

0.0E+00

5.0E+05

1.0E+06

1.5E+06

2.0E+06

100 102 104 106 108 110

Co

nc

en

tra

tio

n, p

art

/cm

3

Puffs

Puff sequence shows highly repeatable

solid E-particle emissions

132015 Cambridge Particle Meeting

Increasing power increases solid particle

emissions; flavoring has little effect

0.E+00

2.E+06

4.E+06

6.E+06

8.E+06

1.E+07

1 10 100

dN

/dlo

gD

p, p

art

/cm

3

Dp (nm)

PG/VG 18 W

PG/VG 13 W

142015 Cambridge Particle Meeting

1 10 100

Dp (nm)

Flavor No Nicotine 13 W

Flavor With Nicotine 13 W

PG/VG 13 W

0.0E+00

5.0E+05

1.0E+06

1.5E+06

2.0E+06

0 100 200 300 400

Co

nc

en

tra

tio

n, p

art

/cm

3

Puffs

Small variation likely due to inconsistent wick saturation

400 puffs shows solid particle emissions

are relatively stable over coil life

152015 Cambridge Particle Meeting

0.E+00

1.E+06

2.E+06

3.E+06

0 200 400 600

Co

nc

en

tra

tio

n, p

art

/cm

3

Puffs

0 200 400 600

Puffs

Flavored E-liquids with and without nicotine

show similar results to standard PG / VG

162015 Cambridge Particle Meeting

Flavor, no nicotine Flavor, with nicotine

LII does not respond to solid E-particles,

suggesting they are not primarily carbon

0

5

10

15

20

25

0 100 200 300

Mass c

on

cen

tra

tio

n,

µg

/m3

Puffs

EEPS LII

172015 Cambridge Particle Meeting

Solid E-particles were collected on silver

membrane filters for Laser Induced

Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) analysis

• ~ 3 µg/m3 for 3 seconds @ 2.6 L/min = 0.39 ng/puff

• 350 puffs

• ~ 1 µg of solid particles per cm2 of filter

CSHEPA MFC

DAQ

E-cig

Filter Area = 0.128 cm2

182015 Cambridge Particle Meeting

LIBS results not conclusive – only

calcium identified above LOD

192015 Cambridge Particle Meeting

0

1000

2000

3000

Ag 328 Ag 338 Ca Cr Rb

Inte

ns

ity (

a.u

.)

Flavored with nicotine Unloaded filter

We thank TSI for loan of the LIBS for this work

Summary

• Semi-volatile E-particles (~ 60 nm in size) are emitted in extremely high concentrations

• 10 nm solid particles are emitted in lower concentrations (1 x 106 part/cm3) and their composition is unknown

• Time (# puffs), E-liquid, flavoring, nicotine all had relatively little impact of solid and semi-volatile E-particle emissions

• Future work includes better LIBS analysis and FTIR detection of gases of interest (HCHO, N2O)

202015 Cambridge Particle Meeting