McGillDAILY

THE

Volume 99, Issue 4September 14, 2009

Fumbling since 1911

SPORTS16

Science & politics Sci+Tech10-11

Culture15Speed Limits

Learn more about our strategy consulting firmImportant Campus Dates

Oliver Wyman General Management Consulting Information Session Friday, September 18th, 1:30pm – 3:00pm McGill Faculty Ballroom *Sign-up at the Career Center

Resume Deadline Friday, September 25th

1st Round Interviews Friday, October 9th

Start here.Get there faster.

Oliver Wyman is an international management consulting firm.An equal opportunity employer M/F/D/V.

Visit us at Oliverwyman.com

www.mcgilldaily.com

The McGill Daily, Monday, September 14, 2009 3News

After six years in legal limbo at the United States’ detention facility at Guantánamo Bay,

Cuba, the last remaining Canadian detainee – Omar Khadr – is one step closer to finally knowing his fate. The Supreme Court of Canada announced last week that it would hear Khadr’s case this coming November.

Their decision comes after the Harper government appealed an original ruling by the Federal Court of Canada to repatriate Khadr. The Federal Court of Appeals upheld the initial ruling, prompting the government to take the case to the Supreme Court – Canada’s highest legal authority.

Dennis Edney, Khadr’s Canadian attorney, condemned the govern-ment’s failure to provide his client with a fair trial – instead leaving him to languish in Guantánamo as he awaited an American military tribunal.

“What the public should know is that any Canadian who is detained abroad should be afford-ed the basic protection given to every other Canadian citizen abroad – and should be allowed to have a fair trial,” said Edney. “Canada violated the Section Seven rights of a Canadian. That is something we have to stand up for, and the remedy is to request [Khadr’s] return.”

Khadr is charged with war crimes, and accused of having thrown the hand grenade that killed an American medic in Afghanistan. He was 15 years old at the time of arrest – a minor under Canadian and international law – and has been detained at the offshore U.S. prison since July 2002.

While there is no international law exempting minors from stand-ing trial for war crimes, it is nev-ertheless required that prisoners under the age of 18 be housed sep-arately from adults, in an environ-ment conducive to rehabilitation. Khadr was denied this right.

At Guantánamo, he was also subjected to interrogation meth-ods involving forced nudity, sexual humiliation, and waterboarding – a practice which simulates drowning.

Last year, Khadr’s lawyers released an unsettling video show-ing a Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) agent interrogating Khadr at the prison. Khadr is shown sobbing, rocking back and forth, and crying for medical attention.

“Omar Khadr is about the rule of law. Our government has not [rec-ognized] Guantánamo Bay to be a place beyond the rule of law,” said Edney. “Our government has partic-ipated in the torture of Omar Khadr and has not apologized...and yet our government continues to make cynical comments to the Canadian public, and is less concerned with the rule of law and more with his family.”

Khadr’s father was an active mem-

ber of al-Qaeda, a known associate of Osama bin Laden, and financier of the group’s activities. He moved the family to Afghanistan in 1988, when Khadr was two years old.

Allain Cacchione, spokesper-son for the Department of Foreign Affairs, commented in an email to The Daily that the government made its decision to file the case at the Supreme Court after careful con-sideration of the legal merits of the Federal Court of Appeals’ ruling.

The Justice Department has argued that Canada does not have an obligation to protect Canadians who are imprisoned abroad, and that repatriating Khadr would set a precedent unsubstantiated by any domestic or international law.

NDP Foreign Affairs Critic Paul Deward disagreed, commenting in an email to The Daily that while it is up to the court to judge the legal validity of the government’s argu-ments, the refusal to aid citizens stranded abroad has no moral valid-ity for Canadians.

“It is of great concern to every Canadian when the government goes to the Supreme Court to argue that it has no responsibility toward a citizen. A Canadian is a Canadian is a Canadian – and the government has a responsibility to stand up for Canadians when in trouble abroad,” Deward wrote.

Activists such as Judith Rae, a University of Toronto law stu-dent and founding member of the Omar Khadr Project – an organi-zation of Canadian law students

and young lawyers advocating for Khadr’s repatriation – had hoped that President Obama’s announce-ment to close Guantánamo Bay last January would have resulted in Khadr’s prompt return. She found herself disappointed by the Harper government’s continued refusal to take action.

“This government seems deter-mined to ignore the rights of this young Canadian citizen, and pre-vent his rehabilitation, all in the

name of keeping up a ‘tough on crime’ image,” Rae said. “Omar Khadr is now one of very few people in Canadian history who’s had their case go to the Supreme Court of Canada – twice – and yet he’s still at Guantánamo. Our government is using our own tax dollars to fight to the bitter end against two court orders to repatri-ate – first the Federal Court, then the Federal Court of Appeal. For what?”

Humera JabirThe McGill Daily

Khadr case goes to Supreme CourtCanadian detained for seven years in Guantánamo seeks repatriation

Senate query to challenge new course pack systemNew printing system results in delays up to three weeks

McGill students are not the only ones upset by course pack delays this

year. Education professor Alenoush Saroyan has issued a query to the McGill Senate, which will con-vene on September 16, asking the University to publicly account for the delays, which are linked to their decision to internalize all course pack printing. The query also asks the administration to admit the move was a mistake, and not in the best interests of the faculty and stu-dents.

According to a McGill bookstore employee, no course packs were available at the start of term, on September 1, and many were still missing by the end of the first week. Since then, course packs have trick-led in, though some may not arrive until September 21 – less than two weeks before midterm season begins for undergrads.

In an email to The Daily, Alan Charade, director of Ancillary Services, said the delays were due to the late arrival of hardware and software. Since the delivery was a one-time operation, he does not anticipate the same problem to arise next term.

But many faculty and staff remain upset by the unilateral manner in which the University implemented the change. Formerly, most course pack printing and copyright concerns were handled by Eastman Custom Publishing, which worked with McGill from 1992 until its contract ran out on July 31 of this year.

Departments were notified of the switch from Eastman last spring in an email from Charade. It informed professors that the change was being made because of new provincial legislation, Bill 17, which requires public bodies like McGill to make an open call for bids when a contract runs out, and accept the lowest bidder.

Charade maintained a similar

stance, stating that, “In the end, the decision was made to avoid the risks associated with a three-year cycle of public tender processes where we were always uncertain as to whom would win the contract. This would create risk in terms of quality and would create possible transition problems each and every time we enter a contract with a new

supplier.”Charade, however, omitted the

fact that the University is not legally bound to accept the lowest bid-der. According to a McGill website explaining the bill, the University is

permitted to evaluate the bidders through a special selection commit-tee – which would operate “without knowing the prices submitted” – and to deny any supplier who has received “an unsatisfactory perfor-mance report” from another public institution in the past two years.

In spite of the logistical rea-sons for the change, many profes-

sors remained frustrated at the University’s decision.

“We were certainly not con-sulted, insofar as members of the faculty expressed an opinion. The opinion we expressed was pretty

uniformly in favour of keeping Eastman as an option,” said Political Science professor Jacob Levy.

The chair of the political science department, Professor Richard Schultz, said that although mem-bers of the Faculty of Arts tried at different times since the spring to consult with the administration, they were never given definitive

answers.“In my 30 years here at McGill,

this was the most unpleasant experience I have encountered, because of the lack of respect shown by the administration to their academic colleagues on an academic matter,” said Schultz.

Schultz also noted that though he expressed an interest in using the alternative printing system, called System B – which formerly allowed professors to have their

course packs published indepen-dently – he was informed it was no longer possible. “I see this [change] as a money maker and a move to have monopoly power,” he said.

Erin HaleThe McGill Daily

Sasha Plotnikova / The McGill Daily

“In my 30 years here at McGill, this was the most unpleasant experience I have encountered”

Professor Richard Schultz Chair, Department of Political Science

Design for The DailyNo meetings.Just show up.No experience necessary either.

design@mcgilldaily.com

• Intensive 60-Hour Program

• Classroom Management Techniques

• Detailed Lesson Planning

• ESL Skills Development

• Comprehensive Teaching Materials

• Interactive Teaching Practicum

• Internationally Recognized Certificate

• Teacher Placement Service

• Money-Back Guarantee Included

• Thousands of Satisfied Students

Teach EnglishAbroad

TESOL/TESL Teacher TrainingCertification Courses

OXFORD SEMINARS1-800-269-6719/416-924-3240

www.oxfordseminars.ca

Do You Feel Less Energetic in the Winter than in the Summer?

The Department of Psychiatry at McGill University is looking for healthy women (18-40 years old) for a study of the effects of a dietary factor and light exposure on how individuals feel and behave. The study involves a preliminary interview and two one-day experimental sessions, during which participants will ingest a protein drink, perform psychological tests, and have blood samples taken. Participants

will be compensated for their time.E-mail us at mcgill.light.study@gmail.com,

or call 514-398-5166. This study is supervised by Dr. M. Leyton.

The McGill Daily, Monday, September 14, 2009 5News

Activities NightMonday, September 14 – Tuesday, September 15 4 p.m. – 7 p.m.Shatner Ballroom

Activities Night is your one-stop to learn about the over 200 clubs and services available at McGill. You can visit booths to talk with club members, learn about their events, and sign up for vari-ous listservs. There’s bound to be a long line-up to enter the building, so we recom-mend you show up early. McGill Farmers' MarketTuesday, September 15 11 a.m. – 5 p.m.Three Bares Park

In its second year, the McGill Farmers’ Market is the place to find all things local. The market has a wide selection of organic fruits and vegetables, as well as jams, breads, spreads, and free-range meat. Locally made arts and crafts will also be on sale.Annual World Press Photo ExhibitionSeptember 4 – October 411 a.m. – 10 p.m.2111 St.Laurent

The Annual World Press Photo Exhibition is open in Montreal. The exhibition showcases the work of press photographers from around the world. The exhibit will tour 100 cities and 45 coun-tries, presenting an eye-witness record of the year’s world events.Missing Justice: Taking Action on Violence Against Aboriginal WomenWednesday, September 162 p.m. – 5 p.m.2001 St. Laurent

The 2110 Centre for Gender Advocacy and Justice for Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women invite you to a community engagement workshop to raise aware-ness about the high rates of violence against women in aboriginal communities. The workshop will be facili-tated by the Native Women’s Association and will discuss initiatives to get engaged and take action. RSVP with lflorez@nwac-hq.orgThe Path to Immortality: Lecture on SpiritualityThursday, September 17, 7:30 p.m.Shatner, 433A

The Spiritual Awareness Fellowship will be pre-senting a lecture by Arie Abravanel, astrologer and spiritual master. He will be presenting new spiritual techniques and practical steps to find your way on the spiritual path to a bet-ter life. The lecture will focus on teachings from Jesus, Buddha, and other Ascended Masters.

Wh

at’s th

e ha

ps

McGill appoints new Secretary General

Principal Heather Monroe-Blum announced in a mass email Thursday that Stephen Strople will be appointed to the position of Secretary-General for McGill University.

“As Secretary-General, Mr. Strople will be responsible for coordinating and facilitating the effective operations of University governance, Administration, including both Senate and the Board of Governors,” Monroe-Blum wrote.

Strople will also oversee the Convocation ceremonies and will

be a key decision-maker in other events that are executed by the administration.

“Strople is a person who is very familiar with these types of activi-ties. He has had a long and success-ful career and was a very successful candidate in the competition,” said McGill Press Relations spokesper-son Vaughan Dowie.

There has been no full-time Secretary-General since July 16, 2009, when former Secretary-General Johanne Pelletier resigned for personal reasons after three and a half years of service. McGill General-Counsel Maître Line Thibault assumed the position of Interim Secretary-General and will continue to serve in both positions until Strople’s tenure begins on November 1.

After Pelletier’s resignation, the administration posted a list-ing for the position online in order to solicit applications. A short-list of candidates went through

a competitive interview process, which resulted in the selection of Stephen Strople, based on his previous experience as University Secretary at the University of New Brunswick (UNB) and Academic Staff Relations Officer at York University.

Strople’s position at UNB involved the provision of legal advice and counsel on behalf of the University, interpretation of policy, regulation and procedure, over-sight of the records management program, and organization of the administration of student discipline. He will have similar responsibilities as the newest member of the McGill administration.

There was no consultation with any student organizations during the headhunting and interview pro-cesses.

Thibault was unavailable for comment.

— Ethan Feldman

Military choppers circle Montreal

Thundering military helicopters were heard by downtown residents last Wednesday through Friday, as the Canadian forces conducted training missions in the city cen-ter. Two CH-146 Griffon helicop-ters buzzed over the Complexe Desjardins and hovered over it to practice entering high-rise build-ings in an urban environment.

Steven Dieter, spokesperson for the Canadian Forces, said, in French, to La Presse that the army was training to intervene in “all sorts of threats to Canadians’ secu-rity, like a bomb or any other kind of incident.”

The exercises were conducted from 6 p.m. to midnight so as not to disturb people working downtown during the day.

— Sam Neylon

McGill solicits cell numbers for emergenciesNew system to text students important alerts

In an effort to improve student safety on campus, McGill has implemented an Automated

Notification System (ANS) that would add text messaging to the list of methods it uses to reach students in the event of an emer-gency.

The project is a joint effort between McGill’s University Safety Services and the Project Management Office (PMO) – which deals with information technol-ogy (IT) services on campus, and is similar to those implemented at Concordia and the University of Alberta.

Louise Savard, Director of University Safety, commented that the system would allow the University to effectively manage communications in an emergency, and that the system would “involve students in their own safety.”

Students are not automatically registered for the service and may choose to opt-in. University Safety has launched a poster campaign encouraging students to sub-mit their cell phone numbers on Minerva.

According to Savard, the ANS has seen sizable enrollment from students over the past few weeks, with roughly 2,000 students enroll-ing during Frosh alone.

However, some students and staff are worried that the system

would lose its impact if overused for minor emergencies or as another way to spam students – in addition to the email announcements they send on a weekly, if not daily, basis.

While Communications profes-sor Will Straw conceded that text

messaging could improve com-munication between the adminis-tration and students, he was con-cerned the system could create a culture of fear and liability – what he views as an Americanization of Canadian culture.

“[There is] this sense that the world is full of nutcases that will walk in with a gun and start shoot-ing,” Straw said.

Savard, though, has promised that McGill’s system will only be used when necessary.

Straw speculated that another potential hang-up for many stu-dents might be that unlike phone books, cell phones are private and allow the owner to define their own space.

Marlene Newton, Senior Advisor of IT Strategies, respond-ed to the privacy concerns. Telecommunication companies that process and forward notifications to students will not have access to personal information, since there are no identifiers or names tied to registered numbers.

“[Students] need to understand that their safety and security is important to us,” said Newton. “You are a mobile population.... We may not be able to reach you [other-wise].”

Courtney GrahamThe McGill Daily

NEWSBRIEFS

ConsumeReproduce

Submit (to News)

Kearsten Chau for The McGill Daily

News The McGill Daily, Monday, September 14, 20096

Former Quebec Premier Bernard Landry is calling for legislation that would make

French the mandatory language of instruction for all CEGEP students whose parents did not receive an English education in Canada. Landry, formerly the leader of the Parti Québécois, announced early this month that he believes that Bill 101 – Quebec’s central language law, which was passed in 1977 and applies to primary and secondary schools – should be extended to CEGEPs as well.

Landry’s comments were made after La Presse published statistics showing that as of September 2008, allophones, whose first language is neither French nor English, made up 39.5 per cent of students enrolled in Montreal’s elementary and second-ary public schools, while franco-phones accounted for 39 per cent.

While Landry, currently a pro-fessor at Université du Québec à Montréal, stated that the right of

Quebec’s anglophone minority to English education is “sacred and preserved by legislation,” he argued that immigrants who have chosen to live in Quebec do not have the right to choose their language of instruction.

Landry argued that manda-tory French immersion at CEGEP would enable immigrants to find jobs and better integrate them into Quebecois society.

“I think that Quebec’s history, Quebec’s politics, and Quebec’s tra-dition are more in use in [CEGEP du] Vieux Montreal than in Vanier or Dawson,” said Landry, refer-ring to two of Montreal’s English CEGEPs.

But Christopher Monette, Executive Secretary of the Dawson Student Union (DSU), insisted that as adults, CEGEP students have the right to choose their own language of instruction.

“The thing is, once you’re in CEGEP, you’re an adult. I don’t think the government can tell a respon-sible adult what kind of education they should go for,” Monette said.

Monette explained that English-language instruction in CEGEP is an

important option for francophones and allophones who want to improve their English. At present, francophones account for 15.8 per cent of the student body at Dawson College, Quebec’s largest English language CEGEP. Allophones and anglophones constitute 26 per cent and 58 per cent respectively.

“We need to do a lot of work to protect our language, but this can-not involve taking away the rights of adults. They will end up learning French somehow,” Monette said. “If there are 10,000 students at Dawson College, it is because people want to go to an English-language insti-tution.”

A motivating factor behind Bill 101’s language of instruction clause was that immigrants were primar-ily gravitating toward English com-munities in Montreal. The clause continues to play a critical role in achieving Bill 101’s overarching goal of Francization and has effec-tively reduced the number of allo-phones opting for English-language CEGEPs from 80 per cent prior to the legislation to 50 per cent today.

“It is not normal that [prior to Bill 101] immigrants were choosing

English schools,” said Landry. “It is not normal that even now, half of them go to English-speaking colleg-es. Do you know a country where ,adult or not, you have the right to choose the language of education?”

Morgan Teeple HopkinsThe McGill Daily

Landry for mandatory French in CEGEPExtension of Bill 101 would revoke English option for anglophones and allophones

Sas

ha P

lotn

ikov

a /

The

McG

ill D

aily

Prepaid long distance

*500 EXTRA minutes are based on calling from Canada to Canada/USA with a $30 recharge of VOX International card (1.2¢ a minute Canada/ USA rate). Certain fees may apply. See VOX.CA for more information.

Are long distance calls on your cell phone BURNING UP your budget?

Try VOX prepaid long distance calling cards and pay fractions.

Visit VOX.CA today and get free bonus minutes everytime you recharge your card.

Get up to

500 FREEEXTRA minutes*

No, Women’s Studies is sexist

Re: “Engineering Frosh is sexist” | Commentary | September 10

As a recent (female) McGill Engineering graduate, I took a spe-cial interest in the Hyde Park on the topic of Engineering Frosh. I take exception to the notion that “the Faculty of Engineering introduces itself to its female students as a straight man’s club in which the way to acceptance requires a woman to sacrifice certain feminist values to the ways of the dominant group.” Throughout my time in Engineering, I was introduced to a large, tight-knit group of strong, intelligent, moti-vated women who would do credit to the notion of gender equality. They showed that there is no need to sacrifice our interests or values in order to succeed in the “straight man’s club.” As for the men in the faculty, at no time did I ever witness any of the misogyny that these Frosh songs supposedly encourage. I sup-pose the first-semester workload beat these tendencies out of them.

The author’s opinion perpetu-ates the patently false idea that women are not welcome in the faculty. In fact, the faculty and its student associations have been making concerted efforts to reach out to girls who might be

swayed against enrolling by this exact opinion. Furthermore, the prejudice that engineering, as a male-dominated faculty, is auto-matically oppressive to women is insulting to all members of the faculty. Perhaps the author should turn her attention to exposing male oppression committed by the Women’s Studies department.

Kristina HussBEng Mining Engineering 2008 EUS President 2007-2008

Masculinity! HU-AH!

Re: “Engineering Frosh is sexist” | Commentary | September 10

An excerpt from the sacred engineering song, Godiva’s Hymn:

The modern engineer must be politically correct,

No more motors lubricating, no more buildings rise erect,

No more electrical capacitors whose plates are high and fair

Instead of problem solving let’s just sit around and care.

Engineering! Moosehead! Aggressive and Strong! HU-AH!

Lucas KruitwagenU2 Mechanical Engineering

The only important Thing there is Love

Dearest One,My name is Helen Kumba, I

am 26 years old girl in search of a man who understands love as trust and faith rather seeing it as a way of fun always but a matured man with sense of humor, so you should also consider trying a new thing by making a open avenue to meet and know new people as this may bring us a happy dream together. I am interested in having a rela-tionship with you, I will also like to Know you the more, you can send an email to my email address (kumbahelen08@yahoo.com) so that I can send you more details about my self including my picture.

I believe we can move from here. But bear in mind that Love has no colours barrier, no educational back ground barrier, no socio-economic barrier, religious, language, nation-ality or distance barrier, the only important Thing there is love. I am waiting for your mail and a brief information about you.

I believe we can start from here. awaiting to hear from you soon so I can send pics for more introductions.

Kisses,

Helen Kumba

Really, I agree with you

Re: “Engineering Frosh is sexist” | Commentary | September 10

I would like to express my appreciation for the article entitled “Engineering Frosh is sexist.” The view that engineering should be a “Boys’ Club,” held by an ever-diminishing number of chauvinist male engineers, has never received such attention, and certainly deserved the “boost” you have given it. I’m sure that any female student considering engineering as a vocation will appreciate the concise, all-encompassing review of the treatment of women in engi-neering at McGill you have pro-vided. Your commentary will most certainly help to rectify the minori-ty status of women in the Faculty of Engineering, and as a single, male engineer, I can’t thank you enough.

Patrick DiezU3 Electrical Engineering

Womyn helping women

Re: “Engineering Frosh is sexist” | Commentary | September 10

As one of these supposedly degraded women in engineering, what I find truly insulting and marginalizing is not some silly crude song with irrelevant gen-der pronouns (“A nickel-plated bathtub s/he wanted / a golden shower s/he got!”), but Sarah’s misguided notion that we are second-class citizens who have been helpless until she heroically stood up for our oppression.

Acacia BrovedaniU4 Software EngineeringPrevious organizer of McGill Engineering FroshFormer VP Internal of ExCESS (Electrical, Computer and Software Engineering Student Society)

The McGill Daily, Monday, September 14, 2009 7Commentary

A s I’m sure Sarah Mortimer might have imagined (per haps she even intend-

ed it!), there has been quite an uproar over her September 10 article “Engineering Frosh is sex-ist.” Mortimer’s lack of journal-istic etiquette is apparent: she made absolutely no attempt to contact an Engineering O-Week Organizer or even the Engineering Undergraduate Society prior to the publication of her sensationalistic article. As Vice President Internal of the Engineering Undergraduate Society and one of the organizers of Engineering O-Week 2009, I would like to address several of her accu-sations and assumptions, as well as some larger issues I believe to be at play in her article, although there’s more I would like to say than I have room for in this Hyde Park.

The first point I would like to raise is in regard to her many assumptions

about women in engineering. After speaking with several female engi-neers, including froshies and execu-tives of Promoting Opportunities for Women in Engineering (POWE), I was unsurprised to hear that they were very offended by Mortimer’s claims. Mortimer perpetuates the “victim status of women” by implying that women are being “oppressed” by these lyrics and are not tough enough to have a voice in this “strong, aggressive, male-dom-inated” field. I can certainly under-stand why they were so insulted by such insinuations. If Mortimer had done even the slightest amount of research into her preposterous claims, she would have soon dis-covered that the gender breakdown in engineering is much closer to 60 males to 40 females, and in Chemical Engineering, there is in fact a female majority! Civil Engineering is approx-imately at parity. Her accusations do nothing to encourage female partici-pation in the field, but rather rein-force tired stereotypes.

An equally offensive claim that Mortimer makes is that these women engineers are ignorant of their own oppression. She even says in her article that the women she spoke to enjoyed the songs and were in no way offended by them. Clearly, it takes a Cultural Studies student to enlighten these engi-neering women to the misogyny they have been subjected to with-out prior knowledge! I wonder if it had occurred to her that women engineers understand the song’s true intent – not malice towards women but rather comedy through innuendo and unity through song. She also seems to take an enor-mous leap of logic by declaring that this song is about rape, when there is absolutely no indication that it depicts anything but consensual relationships. This is not to men-tion the myriad verses where the pronouns are often switched or are in fact written about men walking into the store. As a matter of fact, I would hardly expect any sane per-

son to go out and carry out one of the actions described in these vers-es upon hearing the song – such a person would clearly be psychologi-cally disturbed.

The larger societal issue I would like to address is the suffocating polit-ical correctness prevalent here in the university setting. Too many people read too much into otherwise harm-less activities and make issues where there were none before. Instead of worrying about silly things like songs, jokes, and the spelling of words with the letters M, A , and N in them, why not focus on getting along, accepting people for who they are and what they believe? There is no need to bastardize the English language and stifle the free exchange of ideas (and jokes!) to redress some perceived injustice. Furthermore, it does a dis-service to women everywhere, not just in engineering, to imply that they cannot decide for themselves what is offensive to them.

Ultimately, what Mortimer has done is to judge an entire faculty

on the basis of a single song, even though that song is sung at every faculty Frosh. It would be as if I judged every “writer” on the basis of Sarah’s opinion piece – an even less flattering proposition. She arbitrarily singled out engineer-ing just because we happened to be the Frosh to pass her by as she was scrounging for a pseudo-issue to write about. I’m sure that if she actually took the time to talk to us scary engineers, or even to get to know us, she would find out that we don’t bite… unless you’re into that, of course. Misogyny and misandry aside though, one last thing she did really disappointed me – she left out some of the best verses!

William Farrell

HYDE PARK

Engineering Frosh is not sexist

Don’t like what you’re reading? Love what you’re reading? Send your thoughts to letters@mcgill-daily.com from your McGill email address, and keep them to 300 words or less. The Daily does not print letters that are transphobic, homophobic, racist, sexist, classist, ageist, salacious, mendacious, libel-lous, in-your-facious or otherwise hateful.

Letters

William Farrell is a U3 Civil Eng-ineering student. He’s also Vice President Internal of EUS and one of the organizers of this year’s Engineering Frosh, but the views expressed. Write him at william.farrell@mail.mcgill.ca.

[The women in engineering] showed me that there is no need to sacrifice

our interests or values in order to suc-ceed in “the straight man’s club.”

Kristina Huss BEng Mining Engineering 2008; EUS President 2007-2008

Re: “Engineering Frosh is sexist” | Commentary | September 10

Commentary The McGill Daily, Monday, September 14, 20098

This year, November 1 is not just the day that comes after Halloween, but also the

date of Montreal’s municipal elec-tions. Every four years and only during this period, municipal poli-tics take a democratic turn in this city. Politicians suddenly become accountable and are interested by what the public has to say.

Unfortunately, though, the magic “C” word of 2008, change, is not coming to Montreal any time soon. Successive administrations have failed to correct the city’s crumbling infrastructure, inject dynamism into the local economy, or adopt more honest administra-tive practices. And the next admin-istration won’t be any different.

Why is it impossible to bring change to Montreal? Some blame it on the city’s administrative structure, described as inefficient and lacking proper accountability. Others decry a Montreal tendency towards immobilisme, used to describe popular grassroots move-ments that seek to block many con-troversial projects. Still others talk of uninspired candidates who seek office and bring only more medi-ocrity to city politics. This might all be true, but the biggest source of Montreal’s stagnation lies in its dependence on the provincial gov-

ernment. Under the Canadian Consti-

tution, municipal affairs fall under the jurisdiction of the provin-cial government, and as a result, Montreal is left at the mercy of the jealous capitale nationale, Quebec City. Consecutive provincial gov-ernments of different allegiances have left the city out to dry, doling out tax points to outlying regions. Indeed, due to a strong reluctance to redraw riding maps according to population size, city residents are under-represented in the National Assembly. According to riding numbers released by the Quebec Director General of Elections, vot-ers in Gaspé have approximately 1.5 votes for every voter in Westmount-Saint-Louis, McGill University’s pro-vincial riding, and the proportion is almost four-to-one if you compare the riding with that of the Îles-de-la-Madeleine.

As a result, the provincial govern-ment routinely ignores Montreal, the motor of Quebec’s economy. Numerous are the announcements emanating from Quebec City describing infrastructure work on highways or subsidies for regional development, with Hydro-Québec providing some of the cheapest electricity in the world. In contrast, measures that would help boost Montreal’s competitiveness on the world stage as a knowledge hub, such as investing in post-secondary

education, are not even debated.Instead, the city is often vilified

for its pretensions and its future is rarely discussed in provincial elec-tions. Suffering from underfunding and general stigmatization, it comes as no surprise that there is a lack of innovation in city politics. How can Montreal take on new challenges such as urban sprawl without the proper resources? There is no doubt why municipal politics fail to attract star candidates, or even honest candidates, when the city is facing ever-growing defi-cits. How can a new mayor fix Montreal’s problems with a broken mould?

Suffering from a political and fis-cal imbalance, Montreal’s leaders need to reframe the current elec-tion. Seeking greater inde-pendence from the provincial government by recuperating tax-points needs to be at the top of all the candidates’ to-do lists.

David Searle

HYDE PARK

Alk

esiin

a C

hapm

an /

The

McG

ill D

aily

David Searle is a U2 Political Science and History student. Declare your independence to him at david.searle@mail.mcgill.ca.

EXP SURE

The Daily wants to print your photography. Submit to photos@mcgilldaily.com.

Shu Jiang

Montreal deserves a fair shake from the provinceMunicipal election candidates should seek greater freedom for the city

www.utm.utoronto.ca/mmi

The Master of Management of Innovation (MMI), University of Toronto, is an accelerated twelve-month masters program designed to complement students with a science or engineering background by providing a focused learning experience in management and economics and industry exposure through a Group Project. The curriculum provides a strong foundation in economic analysis, technology management, business strategy, finance, accounting, marketing and policy. That, combined with the option of taking graduate electives from within the University of Toronto allows the student to fine

tune the degree to their individual career demands. Classes are led by leading researchers in direct contact with students through very small and selective class sizes of no more than 24 students. Combine all this with our focused team building and leadership retreat, multiple career development seminars, (winning resume strategy, bio-writing, networking skills and dressing for success), with industry consultants and many networking opportunities, successful MMI graduates are well prepared to fast track their careers. Talented leaders are needed to manage the innovation process – are you interested?

McGill Graduate & Professional Schools Fair (SUS) - November 4, 2009Come see us at our information booth!

Solve Problems. Earn Cash.

Change Lives.

Solve some of the world’s toughest problems

for cash awards ranging from $5,000 - $1,000,000.

Looking for a challenge

BEYOND the books?

WWW.INNOCENTIVE.COM

Faculty of Science - Research Innovation Office

INVITING all SCIENCE STUDENTS interested in

(Technology Entrepreneurship Club)Science TEC

Bring your ideas and questions as we launch

cultivating their entrepreneurial skills,translating tech innovations into products,commercializing a technology,spin-offs based on university research.

Info: Erica Besso (514) 398-3897 www.mcgill.ca/science/rio

If your research results point towards new applications, learnabout the annual Fessenden Prizes in Science Innovation.

Thursday, October 1st, 200912:30 to 2:00 pmThomson House3650 McTavish

••••

Sci+Tech is looking for a columnist

Apply with three writing samples (two of which must be sample columns, 500 words

each) as well as a brief vision statement.

To submit your application, or for more information, email

scitech@mcgilldaily.com. Submissions are due

Thursday, September 24.

Is research ever value-free?Considering the ethical implications of the scientific pursuit

Science+Technology10

Though many students at last fall’s General Assembly voted in favour of condemning military research on

campus, others spoke out to oppose the motion. In an article covering the event, The Daily quoted U3 Engineering student Adam Cytrynbaum, who argued that military-fund-ed research was not necessarily objection-able.

“Military research is done to better the people of Canada and the United States,” Cytrynbaum said. “Research is independent of what it is used for.”

The notion articulated by Cytrynbaum – that technology is independent of its end use – is one that is often repeated, albeit in varied forms. Joe Schwarcz, McGill chemistry pro-fessor and director of the Office for Science and Society, has a similar opinion with regard to chemicals: “They are inanimate; they don’t make decisions. People make decisions,” he said in an interview. “The same chemical that can be used for mankind’s benefit can be used for mankind’s detriment.”

Robert Proctor, history of science professor at Stanford University and author of Value-free Science? finds, however, that there is not always a clear-cut distinction between the design of a given technology and its inevitable application.

“Part of the truth is that anything may be used or abused, but in very complex systems; oftentimes products are very end-specific…. How do you abuse a cruise missile? How do you abuse an atom bomb? Well, an atom bomb can only be used one way,” Proctor said.

But what about breaking it down to a chemical level and the substances used to

make that bomb? According to Schwarcz, “You can use the ingredients in a nuclear reaction to produce an atom bomb or to pro-duce a power station and generate electricity. [The effect] all depends on how you use it.”

In his book, Proctor disagrees. “This sup-posed neutrality describes only the simplest technologies, the most abstract principles. The seven simple machines, perhaps, or the rules of arithmetic, may be neutral in this sense. But an abstract truth often conceals a concrete lie,” he writes. “‘Guns don’t kill people, people kill people.’ Yet is it surprising that a society that surrounds itself with guns will use them?”

Use and abuse debates may sound incon-sequential at first, but the ethical implica-tions are great. For one thing, if it is true that research itself is neither good nor bad and that only the application of tech-nology matters, scientists can be absolved of responsibility for how their research is used. On the other hand, if intent is built into technologies, then researchers them-selves are directly responsible for the con-sequences.

Science and/or activism

The concept of neutral technology stems from the fact that science is widely repre-sented as a purely objective discipline, where students are taught that the truth can only be discovered through impartial hypotheses and an unbiased attitude. For this reason, many scientists fear the intrusion of partisanship in any scientific pursuit.

McGill professor David Green has exten-sive experience in conservation biology, a field populated by both activists and scientists. He is the director of the Redpath Museum and

former Chair of the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC). According to Green, COSEWIC – an orga-nization that has a mandate to give an impartial assessment of how species are doing – owes its success to its impartiality.

“I’ve come to real-ize that although the scientists on COSEWIC all think in terms of prob-ability values and values of p and assessment lines and graphs and equations… when we send that off to government ministers and managers, the thing that carries the weight is that everyone on COSEWIC agrees with it. It has got that weight of consensual opinion behind the assessment, and that’s what makes sense to politicians,” Green said.

Although he agreed that science is imbued in social and cultural values, Green argued that there is something to be said for preserv-ing objective science.

“There’s the question of integrity and believability that must be maintained,” Green said. “Reputation takes a long time to accu-mulate; it doesn’t take very long to destroy. We want science to be trusted in society; if science isn’t trustworthy in society, then there are lots of other people who would love to stand up and say, ‘Well trust us instead.’”

Proctor, however, maintains that it is possible for scientists to wear their politics on their sleeve and still be taken seriously. “Advocates are often the most ‘objective,’ meaning often the most probing, most impassioned, most able to ferret out the truth,” he said. “That’s part of the myth of value-free science – this idea that if you just

sit back and observe, you will land upon great truths. Generally speaking, you will not. The great search requires engagement, commitment, passion, including passion for the truth.”

Research as a social process

Researchers make choices about what research takes place, but they in turn are influenced by the social and cultural priori-ties that fund their work.

Green points to the idea of natural selec-tion, discovered at the same time by both Alfred Russel Wallace and Charles Darwin, as evidence of social influence. “It is not just a product of their work out in the field; I mean, why were they out in the field anyway except that it was a socially and culturally acceptable thing to do at the time?” Green said.

Proctor agreed, adding that society also has the power to determine what research should and should not take place. “I think we all have a stake in what kinds of research get done. Research priorities are expressions of social priorities,” he said. “And what a society thinks is important will shape what kind of science gets done.”

Nikki BozinoffThe McGill Daily

McGill University’s research policy will be updated this fall, a move that has student activists concerned

about ethical regulation of future military research on campus. Initially set to appear before Senate in May 2009, review of the new research policy was postponed.

Although draft polices are not made pub-licly available until after the Senate review, the most recent research policy draft distrib-uted to SSMU for consultation has removed the clauses that pertain to the review of mili-tary research.

The existing Regulations on Research Policy was updated in 1988 in response to a six-day student protest against the develop-ment of fuel-air explosive research conducted

by McGill professors, who had received grants from the U.S. Air Force and the Canadian Department of Defense.

Recent controversy surrounds research on thermobaric weapons – another type of explosive energy weapon. As recently as 2002, David Frost, professor of Mechanical Engineering at McGill, published research aimed at making these explosives more “effective.” Though not directly funded by the military, the work was done in collaboration with military researchers.

Alexandre Vidal is a U3 Environment student and representative of Demilitarize McGill, a student group that describes them-selves as “opposed to research contributing to the development of thermobaric weapons by the U.S. military.” He admits that at this point, the new policy could go either way.

“This could erase the clauses about mili-tary research policies at McGill, or it could

mean that they will be improved to ensure public transparency and ethical evaluation of research that is funded by, or done in collabo-ration with, researchers from military agen-cies,” Vidal said.

Vidal did, however, express concern with the most recent policy draft, which has no ref-erences to harmful research in its preamble.

“This is why we proposed amendments to the new research policy,” Vidal said.

The man in charge of the review, Associate Provost of Policies and Procedures William Foster, did not comment on the draft policies, suggesting instead that questions regard-ing the policy be directed to those groups involved in the consultation process.

Foster did, however, meet with Demilitarize McGill to hear their concerns about the draft. Vidal said, “[Foster] was open to consider any concern that Demilitarize McGill may have, and said that he will forward our pro-

posed amendments to the Research Policy Committee.”

SSMU is working closely with Demilitarize McGill to ensure students’ concerns are prop-erly represented. Rebecca Dooley, SSMU VP University Affairs, and the 12 other under-graduate student senators will be voicing any student concerns on the floor of the Senate.

Since the policy is still under consultation and has yet to be presented to the Senate, “[It is] difficult to say whether major concern is necessary,” Dooley said. She added that as with any policy changes at McGill, the new policy will be inspected closely.

“There is ample opportunity for students to voice any concerns they may have,” Dooley said.

Demilitarize McGill will continue to seek ethical research on campus and is working with members of the administration who are responsible for the decision-making.

Vicky Tobianah The McGill Daily

Fate of military research regulations still up in the air

Gerald Bull and members of the High Altitude Research Program (HARP) develop

their first test projectile at McGill, the “Martlet 1.” HARP was a project of the U.S. Air Force and the Canadian Department of Defence.

1962

Roman Knystautas and John H.

Lee, professors in McGill’s department of Mechanical

Engineering, conduct research on fuel-air explosives (FAE) for the U.S. Air Force.

1977-83

Former McGill students occupy the office of the

Vice-Principal (Research) to pro-test the FAE research. Six days later,

they are removed by the police.

1987

McGill amends the Regulations

on Research Policy and adds sections

10 and 11 to address research funded by military agencies.

1988

David Frost pub-lishes a paper

titled “Explosive Dispersal of Solid Particles” in col-laboration with Fan Zhang and S. Murray, two military researchers.

2001

Ben Peck / The McGill Daily

Bot

h ph

otos

cou

rtes

y of

The

McG

ill D

aily

arc

hive

s

The McGill Daily, Monday, September 14, 2009 11On physics, 4.0s, and undergrad soulsOne professor discusses why the grading system is detrimental to scientific learning

McGill Daily: Why As, rather than Bs or Cs, or making the course pass/fail?

Denis Rancourt: Well, I suspected that the students would all perform excellently, at their optimum, and the grade that corre-sponds to excellent or outstanding is A+. And that was confirmed. What I observed is that the students did extremely well in that way....It’s a student-centered grade, so it’s based on their own personal progress, and evolution, commitment, participation, and so on, in the course. So from that perspective, this was the correct grade that needed to be attributed.

MD: You didn’t have any problems with students who didn’t evolve throughout the course?

DR: On the first day of class I explained what my outlook was, what my pedagogical method was, and how under this method one expects normally, almost always except for unusual anomalies, that this is how it goes.... I did have to intervene one time, with two students in one course. And that intervention was successful.

MD: Were these students who had a problem with your method, specifically? Or were they students who just didn’t want to do the work?

DR: Well, every student-professor inter-action, relationship, and conflict is com-plex...no matter what you do, if you are changing something out of what the stu-dents become accustomed to. They know that they can put all their effort into the final exam and that will be good enough. All students have developed, I would say, a survival strategy, an optimization-of-the-grade strategy.

MD: One takes advantage of the system, rather than [focusing on] learning.

DR: Yes. So when you take that away, and say, “Actually, rank-ordering and comparing one stu-dent to the next compared to an external stan-dard, that’s not what’s going to happen in this class,” immediately there is resistance to that.... What’s interesting about this technique with regards to physics, is that this discussion in itself helps to develop you as a physicist and as a sci-entist, because you have to examine the origin, the basis of your personal motivation.... There’s all this challenging going on that’s as important as the technical side of the discipline.

MD: Well, it’s interesting that so many of these kids grow up reading Feynman [quan-

tum physicist, lock-picker, bongo-drum-play-er, and Nobel Laureate, who once compared physics to sex]...and then you get to university and it’s a whole different ball game. People aren’t rushing to the bookstore to do this in their free time.

DR: Right. There is a disconnect between the ideal – where you’re pursuing your curiosi-ties, and the subject, it has meaning for you, and connects to things in your life – there’s a real disconnect between that and the system, how it’s just a standardized walk where you’re being evaluated, graded, punished, rewarded, and they’re basically shaping you into a professional physicist and one that will be malleable enough that you’ll be able to work for employers.

MD: And that’s stifling to innovation, and to producing new ideas.

DR: Oh absolutely. It’s the opposite of encouraging independent thought.

MD: [When you were in university] did you end up getting good grades and a high grade point average (GPA) regardless of the fact that you didn’t necessarily buy into the system?

DR: Well, I am sort of a special case, because when I was going through the sys-tem, I made the classic deal with the devil, which was: This is what you need to get into graduate school, to get a good job.

MD: So you applied yourself to school, and for studying for finals?

DR: I applied myself to getting good grades, yes. But I honestly believe I was harm-ing myself in doing that. If I had to do it over again, I would not do it that way.

MD: What do you recommend people, or undergrads in particular, do if they’re stuck in the normal pedagogy?

DR: Well, I think that’s a decision that is for each individual to make.... Students who want to resist the present system, what I recommend, is that you do resist it, that you do speak out in class, that you do challenge the orthodoxy, that you do give yourself a space where discussion can occur, and that you support each other, because there is going to be backlash.... I’m highly regarded as a scientist, and when I look at the things that I’ve achieved, it wasn’t in a classroom because I had to do an assignment.... It was because I was able to create a space for myself where I could think about these things, where I could find solutions and invent...and

that gave outstanding results.MD: If the GPA doesn’t tell the whole story,

how do you get to know students to decide which ones, as a professor, you’re going to work with, or which ones you’re going to accept to your program?

DR: Well, if you mean as a professor...then I think that the absolute best way is to hire the student as a summer research undergrad student first, and then to see how we work together.... I learned early on in my career that you cannot trust the grade point average when it comes to choosing grad students.

MD: Not whatsoever?DR: Not whatsoever. If someone has a high

GPA all it tells me is that either they have a lot of facility in the technical things that were requested of them, or it means they are particu-larly obedient.... It’s very frightening. I’ve had several grad students in my career that had low GPAs, that just barely got into grad school, but I knew them, and I trusted their ability, and they excelled as researchers.... In terms of corpora-tions hiring physicists, it’s up to them.... The uni-versity should not be responsible for providing a rank order. Our primary task, as expressed in mission statements and so on, is education.... Standardized testing should be done by some-one else for different purposes. As soon as you say to a professor, “We need you to optimize the learning environment and give us rank order-ing so we can distinguish the future employees we want and don’t want”...it means that the ped-agogue in the classroom has to make a huge compromise. It’s damaging.

MD: Because it’s as though the professors are screening for good employees.

DR: But the grading tool is not an appropri-ate tool for doing that. So you’re not even doing it well, and you’re completely compromising the education dimension of it. Everything becomes centered on grades.... It means that the stu-dents are spending their time and energy trying to read your mind, trying to find out what’s an elegant solution.... Especially in the upper-level courses, the exam questions should be open-

ended, I think. Mine always are. In an open-ended question, the process, the method you end up using – all that is part of the creative pro-cess.... You shouldn’t rank order people because they chose different methods, because some people, in your view, made different decisions in how to attack the problem.

MD: It must be a lot of fun reading your students’ exams.... When you present open-ended questions, do you get a big variety of solutions?

DR: Absolutely. When I started doing this, I was thrilled to see the difference in the exams...to see this incredible variety. You got to see how the person was thinking.

MD: What do you think about the idea that so many [students of other disciplines] say that science is boring and difficult? Do you think that your pedagogy could get more kids interested in science?

DR: Oh, there is absolutely no doubt. I have proof of that. We developed this course, “Science in Society”.... They had to give it in the largest auditorium on campus, and we were filling the room with students of all dis-ciplines, all ages, community members, you name it. It was very exciting.

MD: Any other optimistic words for this new pedagogy?

DR: In my experience, it’s day and night. It’s the difference between being depressed, cram-ming for things, and being alive, taking things in, in order to make them part of your experience. It’s the difference between light and death.

MD: Are we moving toward the light side of things?

DR: Oh, absolutely not. Society is not moving in the direction of sanity. It’s very unfortunate, but that’s the way it is. If any-thing, we’re moving in the opposite direction. The degree of indoctrination, the degree of sanitizing everything is being pushed to the extreme.

MD: Well that’s a little depressing.DR: It’s not depressing. It’s reality.

— Compiled by Shannon Palus

David Frost pub-lishes a paper

titled “Explosive Dispersal of Solid Particles” in col-laboration with Fan Zhang and S. Murray, two military researchers.

Frost presents “Detonations in Heterogeneous

Explosives” to a U.S. National Research

Council committee.

2002

The U.S. Air Force refer-

ences Frost’s paper in its technology contract

solicitation titled “Methods to Direct and Focus Blast.”

2005

The McGill Daily reports McGill’s involvement in

the field of thermobaric weapons.

2007

A policy on con-ducting ethical research is pro-

posed to replace the Regulations on Research policy.

2008

New research policy is slated for approval at

Senate on May 20, 2009.

March 2009

SSMU representative successfully lobbies to postpone the discus-sion until the fall, when students and student press can be present.

April 2009

Jos

hua

Free

dman

for

The

McG

ill D

aily

Starting to feel like science courses consist solely of regurgitating 13 weeks’ worth of lecture slides? Think there might be more to learning kinematics than losing two nights of sleep before the final exam?

Denis Rancourt does. In the fall term of 2008, Rancourt, a tenured physics profes-sor at the University of Ottawa, gave each and every student in his fourth year phys-ics class the highest grade possible: an A+. On March 31, 2009, Rancourt was fired.

With over 23 years of experience teaching, he has appeared in full-page U of O ads in The Globe and Mail; his “Science in Society” course, which filled the largest auditorium available, was attended by students and community members alike.

Rancourt claims that his marking scheme was neither arbitrary nor grounds for dismissal, but rather a step toward liberating students from the grades that prevent them from truly engaging with the material.

Features12

Sasha Plotnikova / The McGill Daily

Suspension of disbeliefThe Daily’s Hannah Freeman exposes whitewashing in the film industry

John Wayne, as Genghis Khan in 1956’s The Conqueror. Mickey Rooney, in Breakfast at Tiffany’s. David Carradine, as Kwai Chang Caine in the hit seventies television series Kung Fu. It’s no secret

that since Hollywood started putting images on film, white people have dominated mainstream movie screens – frequently by throw-ing on some make-up and playing the roles of Asian characters, most often in disastrously caricatured and offensive ways. It’s also pretty apparent that equality of representation has been slow in coming: see 2007’s Grindhouse, where Nicholas Cage cameos as evil criminal genius Dr. Fu Manchu, just the latest in a long line of white actors to take the already-racist part.

But where “yellowface” has at least trailed off from its heyday, the problem of white characters co-opting non-white roles continues in full force: recently we’ve seen a spate of big-budget movie adaptations that have actively erased or are currently erasing the heroes of colour of the original sources. Between 2008’s 21, recent casting for movies like Akira, Prince of Persia, and the Twilight saga (which has cast non-Native actors to play characters of the Quileute tribe), and director M. Night Shyamalan’s upcoming movie The Last Airbender, an adaptation of critically-acclaimed cartoon Avatar, roles for non-white lead charac-ters have consistently gone to white actors, wasting strong opportuni-ties to introduce more diversity into movie theatres. What was once blatant yellowface has transitioned into a slightly more subtle form of racist casting techniques: whitewashing original sources and their characters and culture to make adaptations with white actors. In the process, the rhetoric of movie and television production companies has changed in a generally unsuccessful attempt to address modern concerns about the removal of people of colour and their stories from popular media. An unbelievably backward relic of old Hollywood, discrimination in movie casting perpetuates inequities in representa-tion.

Kevin Spacey’s 2008 film 21 is a textbook example of modern white-washing. Based on Bringing Down the House: The Inside Story of Six MIT Students Who Took Vegas for Millions, a book by Ben Mezrich that details (and embellishes) the real-life exploits of a team of mostly-MIT students that won an enormous sum of money in casinos by count-ing cards and just-barely-legal blackjack techniques, 21 was a kind of love affair between heist film and math. Involving flashy casinos, a great deal of intricate planning, and a little bit of subterfuge, it was a story certainly ripe for movie adaptation. However, in the process of transitioning from real-life to movie screen, the roles of the major-ity Asian-American group – including characters based on key play-ers like John Chang, Jeff Ma, and Mike Aponte – were given to white actors, including Spacey himself (who also served as a producer), Kate Bosworth, and relative newcomer Jim Sturgess. While Aaron Yoo and Liza Lapira’s roles ended up as largely bit parts, the (also entirely invented) romance between Bosworth and Sturgess and the tension

between Sturgess and mentor Spacey took centre stage. The motivation behind this elimination of non-white leads does

not appear to be active hatred of Asian Americans, but rather con-cerns about marketability that mask beliefs in widespread racism. The Media Action Network for Asian Americans (MANAA) report-ed on their web site: “After the ‘white-washing’ issue was raised on Entertainment Weekly’s web site, [21] producer Dana Brunetti wrote: “Believe me, I would have LOVED to cast Asians in the lead roles, but the truth is, we didn’t have access to any bankable Asian-American actors that we wanted.” This argument seems flawed: while Stacey and Bosworth are fairly well-known, Jim Sturgess’s IMDB resumé seems to boast mostly a few TV spots and the lead as Jude in the flop Across the Universe. The decision to cast the relatively unknown Sturgess rather than, say, John Cho (who excelled in this summer’s hit Star Trek and the Harold and Kumar films) or television stars Daniel Dae Kim (Lost), Masi Oka or James Kyson Lee (Heroes), or any of a multitude of other stars seems to undermine Brunetti’s claim that there were no bankable Asian-American actors available. 21 even already had Aaron Yoo, who starred in American Pastime and had a large role in 2007’s Disturbia, who was clearly available, and who could have excelled as a lead rather than a supporting role as sidekick. Furthermore, with the majority of mainstream movies featuring white leads, and actual non-white roles in adaptations given to white stars, there’s little opportu-nity for a smaller-name Asian-American actors to become “bankable.” While successes like Pixar’s Up, with its chubby Asian-American hero, and mostly-Asian cast films like Better Luck Tomorrow and Memoirs of a Geisha should significantly dispel myths about the marketabil-ity of movies with Asian leads, they clearly persist in casting rooms, leading to further whitewashing. Though significant discussion has also arisen over whether it would, in fact, be better to cast an Asian-American actor of one nationality to play a character of a different nationality (a Chinese-American actor to play a Japanese or Korean character, for example), the substitution of more white characters seems like a disastrous solution.

The persistence of whitewashing becomes even more apparent when an original fictional source offers up such a strong, careful

representation of non-white characters and cultures. Avatar: the Last Airbender was a U.S.-created Nickelodeon show, originally aimed at six to 11-year-old kids, whose fan base grew wider as it proved both original and respectful of the cultures it depicted. Its four central pro-tagonists, Aang, Sokka, Katara, and Toph Bei Fong, must restore bal-ance to the four nations of the world by defeating the imperialistic Fire Nation. For three seasons, as they travelled, they revealed a world that white creators Michael Dante DiMartino and Bryan Konietzko filled with elements drawn from ancient Asian, rather than European, influ-ences. In one episode, for example, the heroes encounter and briefly live in a society where the residents wear traditional, accurately-drawn

The McGill Daily, Monday, September 14, 2009 13

Korean hanboks. Though, problematically, Avatar used white voice actors for all of the main roles, except Filipino-American actor Dante Basco as Zuko and the late Japanese-American actor Mako as Uncle Iroh, the tele-vision show’s content and representations were highly praised.

Employing Edwin Zane, former vice presi-dent of MANAA, as a cultural consultant, Avatar and its creators took careful steps to ensure a respectful and diverse repre-sentation of its various cultures and societ-ies. As Derek Kirk Kim, Korean-American author of Eisner-winning graphic novel Same Difference and Other Stories, wrote on his blog (derekkirkkim.blogspot.com), “Everything from the costume designs, to the written language, to the landscapes, to mar-tial arts, to philosophy, to spirituality, to eat-ing utensils! – it’s all an evocative, but thinly veiled, re-imagining of ancient Asia.” Instead of including fake, generic “Asian-looking” gibberish, Avatar’s creators worked with Professor Siu-Leung Lee to include classical Chinese calligraphy; instead of vague punch-es and kicks cribbed from popular movies, they worked with martial arts consultant Sifu Kisu to give each nation a real-world style of Chinese martial arts, including Ba Gua, Hung Ga, Northern Shaolin, Tai Chi, and Chu Gar Southern Praying Mantis style. With a particu-lar emphasis on Shaolin/Tibetan Buddhist and Siberian Yupik/Inuit ethnic peoples and culture, Avatar created heroes of colour in a world unquestionably non-European. Hailed by critics and receiving multiple Emmy nomi-nations, Avatar was a success in both main-stream and commercial popularity and cul-tural verisimilitude.

Many of Avatar’s longtime fans, therefore, were thrilled at the prospect of a live-action movie, under the name The Last Airbender, to be directed by M. Night Shyamalan of The Sixth Sense and Signs. As details leaked regarding casting for the four main leads, however, an immediate outcry arose: why were Aang, Sokka, Katara, and Zuko – nearly all the major roles, and all marked as char-acters of colour by their features, hair styles, clothing, and surroundings – to be played by four Caucasian actors? Kim described why he found these casting decisions particularly painful: “The Last Airbender has the potential to be something like Star Wars – something with lasting value that could give new heroes to your average household in America. And to have something for Asian-American kids, and ethnic kids in general, to look up to. To let them know heroes can also look like them and speak fluent English like them. I think it could give immeasurable confi-dence and pride to these under-represented kids.” Instead, The Last Airbender will rein-force what Guy Aoki, Founding President of MANAA, characterized in a second open let-

ter to Paramount as a “glass ceiling blocking off Asian-American actors from playing lead protagonists.

Hearing these casting rumours, many fans of the series, as well as MANAA and the

East West Players, a prominent Asian-American theatre organization, began to decry the whitewashing, calling out Paramount for this decision. A letter-writing and protest cam-paign sprung up quickly, marshaled by fans who organized around web communities like aang-aint-white.livejournal.com and race-bending.com – the latter of which has gone on to protest other negative representations, like the hate crime scene in recent film The Goods. Commentary on the casting was gen-erally insightful; as fans pointed out, not only will The Last Airbender be an opportunity lost for non-white heroes, it will actively reinforce racist divisions. One fan, who blogs under the name anna and watched the show with her three Asian-American nephews, explained on her blog at ciderpress.livejournal.com, “My nephews will either have to succumb to it or untangle it later in life but they are already being cued to believe, to know that non-white people/PoC [people of colour] have no place as active protagonists in mainstream culture, cultural content, or society. They are being taught that culture, society, and the audi-ence really means white culture, white soci-ety, and white audience.” While her nephews and other non-white audience members are generally expected, in their average trip to the movie theatre, to be able to identify with white heroes, Paramount appears to believe that an insufficient portion of their audience would be able to relate to non-white leads, rationalizing their whitewashing of the cen-tral characters for what appear to be profit-ability concerns.

anna continued, distinguishing a genuine attempt at cultural adaptation from The Last Airbender’s problematic attitude: “The differ-ence is the filmmaker/writer/content maker’s relationship with the source; whether it is one of respect and genuine exploration of cultural themes…or whether the remade content is completely severed from the original source, context, and meaning removed, whitewashed and the ‘cool’ bits left as an exotic husk to become a product of white cultural homog-enization.”

The Last Airbender will feature three more white leads, stripping the original source

of its potential to introduce diversity into mainstream movie theaters. With so few roles

already written for non-white actors, filling these opportunities with more white actors is a significant loss. After fans wrote in to Paramount saying as much, Jesse McCartney, the white actor playing central villain Zuko of the Fire Nation, dropped out citing schedul-ing problems and was replaced by Dev Patel of Slumdog Millionaire. The other main vil-lains of the destructive Fire Nation were then cast as other non-white actors, including Cliff Curtis, of New Zealand Maori descent, and Indian-born actor and Daily Show correspon-dent Aasif Mandvi. However, the new casting ensured that the movie would feature three white leads, uniting the world and saving the Earth Nation (which Paramount explains in a

letter in response to MANAA to be comprised of “Asian, East Asian, and African characters”) in order to defeat the evil and Fire Nation, as represented by and comprised of only non-white main characters. Aoki explained, “Re-casting the sole villainous lead with an actor of colour is a concession that results in three heroic nations going to war against an evil nation of colour.” The dynamic here is possibly even more troubling than four white leads: pitting a coalition of brave white heroes against non-white villains presents as an obvious case of the menacing non-white Evil Other, while the trope of white charac-ters swooping in to redeem a nation of non-white characters with virtually no agency or autonomy is a tired, colonialist one.

Members of the production cast and crew have demonstrated a cluelessness

that indicates a general lack of concern for these issues. The casting sheet shows that the four main protagonists – all non-white in the television show – were described to potential actors as “Caucasian or any other ethnicity.” Not only is this casting descrip-tion distinctly slanted toward Caucasian actors (compare with “All ethnicities” – which technically means the same group of people but has a very different actual meaning), it reinforces “Caucasian” as the default, the normal, the ideal. Lisa Zhu, having attended an extras casting call, reported in the Daily Pennsylvanian that casting director Deedee Rickets advised prospective extras “to dress in traditional cultural ethnic attire.… If you’re Korean, wear a kimono” – confusing kimonos

and hanboks, essentially melding two distinct cultures together – and said, “It doesn’t mean you’re at a disadvantage if you didn’t come in a big African thing. But guys, even if you came with a scarf today, put it over your head so you’ll look like a Ukrainian villager or what-ever.” Further, when asked to comment on the whitewashing controversy by MTV.com, Twilight actor Jackson Rathbone, playing Sokka, said “I think it’s one of those things where I pull my hair up, shave the sides, and I definitely need a tan.… It’s one of those things where, hopefully, the audience will suspend disbelief a little bit.”

Even the accurate calligraphy of the show will reportedly be cut; Lee stated on San Francisco’s 94.1 KPFA radio in July that he would not be working on the movie produc-tion as a cultural consultant, and said that the Chinese calligraphy would be replaced with gibberish – as if the two are indistinguishable or in any way equal. Cliff Curtis, playing evil Fire Nation leader Ozai, also spoke to Sci Fi Wire about his movie costume: “It’s sort of like a cross between Roman and kind of Greek, [a] gold, Roman and Greek military/samurai military [uniform]. It’s really, really beauti-ful.” Replacing the Fire Nation’s costumes on the television show, which incorporate tra-ditional Chinese elements, with costumes of European ancestry – no matter how beautiful – loses sight of the thoroughly ancient Asian setting that made Avatar almost unique in U.S.-created television. Having largely stripped the original universe of its non-white heroic characters, its non-white writing and language, and its non-white clothing and cos-tumes, The Last Airbender has already been indisputably whitewashed.

anna recalled, in a blog post in response to the initial casting news, “During our early Christmas dinner this weekend, the oldest of the nephews, who is 13, brought up the sub-ject of the incredibly white child actors that had been picked for the film version. The three of them were confused and disappoint-ed but unable to articulate exactly why. Then the youngest, all of 7 years old, asked me whether this meant that he couldn’t be Aang when he played Avatar with his friends from now on.” The erasure of non-white characters from big-budget adaptations is not a passive problem or a victimless mistake: it is an active decision by major production companies that, considering how many movies the average North American sees in a year, significantly frames the way we think. Paramount should not be financially rewarded for apparently attempting to ensure that the only heroes we see are white ones.

The Last Airbender is still in production. For more information on the continuing protests, updates can be found at aang-aint-white.livejournal.com and racebending.com.

“It’s one of those things where I pull my hair up,

shave the sides, and I definitely need a tan”

Jackson Rathbone Hollywood actor

W ednesday nights in the northeast corner of Parc Notre Dame de Grace,

wedged between Cote St. Antoine and Girouard just north of the dog run, Alex Megelas waits patiently on a tuft of grass for followers (read: enthusiasts) of what he has termed his Anarchist Soccer Club. Through a particularly non-hierarchical ver-sion of soccer, the club aims to combat “the discriminatory practic-es that are often part of organized sports...such as sexism, homopho-bia, and machismo.”

Essentially, the Anarchist Soccer Club eradicates the hierarchy that normally exists in organized sports by stripping the game of its traditional rules. This means no score-keeping, no boundaries, no team captains, and no hands (Psych! Handballs are totally allowed!). Anything and every-thing is allowed, except for aggressive behaviour and bad-attitudes – which Megelas explains you are able to “call people out on.” Teams are picked using a number system (1, 2, 1, 2) and tend to be very flexible. Players sub in for people who aren’t on their “team,” and because rest/socializing/Gatorade breaks are frequent, teams tend to morph and be modified as the night goes on.

Though it may seem all fun-and-games, the Anarchist Soccer Club is righteously attributed to a specific set of values. By utilizing the highly connotative term “anarchist,” the club has politicized the sport of soc-cer, in reaction to the discrimination they see in sports, and the divisive sentiments that organized sports can foster (i.e. “I love this team because it is mine; I hate this team because it is not mine”). With this in mind, people join the club because it is a space where they know they will feel safe and understood. Most importantly, it is a space where they can truly enjoy themselves and the game of soccer without having to worry about inequity.

“I come because it’s fun and the people are friendly,” says Ovidiu, a 17-year-old from NDG who has been playing with the club for only two weeks. “It’s more fun than playing with people who are serious, and it’s better than having to pay money for a team.”

Ovidiu’s group included two other local teenage boys and an eight-year-old, the younger broth-er of one of Ovidiu’s friends. Part of the openness of the program includes accepting all age groups. On Wednesday nights, it’s perfectly normal to see a 15-year-old playing with – never against – a 50-year-old.

Some participants don’t even

like soccer. According to Layla AbdelRahim, a self-proclaimed anarchist, organized sports are restrictive and thus violent, limiting the body’s potential to enjoy other sorts of pleasure. AbdelRahim appreciates the Anarchist Soccer Club’s relaxed, congenial ethos, while whole-heartedly embracing the program’s implicit disorder. She goes to let her young daugh-ter run around and to build rela-tionships with people she describes as “exploding with good energy and chaos.”

The question is: Do sports have the unbounded potential to bring disparate groups together in harmony? Megelas and his crew think not. The World Cup is a spectacle; the Olympics are a capitalist commodity. International sporting events aren’t capable of bridging significant gaps. But within the local community, the Anarchist Soccer Club is proof that peace, love, and understanding can be as integral to the game of soccer as that little black-and-white orb. You’ve heard it before, people: “It’s not about winning or losing - it’s about having fun.”

The McGill Daily, Monday, September 14, 2009Sports 14

Giving hegemony a red cardAnarchist soccer club takes sports beyond winning and losing

Anna LeochaThe McGill Daily

Jus

tin K

. W

ong

for

The

McG

ill D

aily

I had barely heard of roller derby until I found myself sitting in a small, rustic café on St. Laurent

last Thursday, surrounded by vin-tage clothes and women dressed in eccentric garb. As the petite woman sitting across from me eagerly explained the rules of roller derby and the lifestyle that goes with play-ing it, I became enthralled with the sense of community that’s devel-oped around the sport.

Roller derby was originally invented in the United States as a contact sport on an oval track, in which two teams each send out five players who skate around the course. There are three “blockers,” who act as defense; both of the other two players, the “pivot” and the “jammer,” aim to score.

Once the back of the pack reach-es the starting line, jammers take off and the first “jam” begins; during

the next two minutes, they attempt to score points by passing the rest of the players on the track. After passing the pack the first time, jam-mers earn a point by legally passing an opposing blocker or pivot. The first jammer to pass all blockers and pivots wins the title of lead jammer, giving them the power to end the jam before the two minutes are fin-ished. To prevent an opponent from scoring, players are allowed to block the opposing jammer from the neck down, with a few exceptions – rules dictate that players are not allowed to use their elbows or to hit a player from behind.

Though the sport dates back to 1922, it got an overhaul in the thir-ties when promoter Leo Selzer took out a copyright on the term “Roller Derby” and, along with sportswrit-er Damon Runyon, transformed it from a more straightforward race that mainly tested players’ endur-ance into a spectator sport. Though the current Montreal Roller Derby League got its start as recently as

2006, roller derby has existed in Montreal going back at least to the sixties, when there was a team called the Montreal Fleur de Lys. An article in a June 1967 edition of the Leader Mail led with a photo of jostling players, captioned “Pardon me, ma’am! Elbows and hips are all part of the immensely popular and rough Roller Derby – even if they are ladies!” TV viewers in the region could look forward to regular roll-er derby matches with Canadian and American teams, broadcasted in French every Thursday and in English every Saturday.

The Montreal Roller Derby League was founded as a non-profit organization by Georgia W. Tush, and became the first non-U.S. mem-ber of the Women’s Flat Track Derby Association (WFTDA) in January 2009. In order to become a part of the WFTDA, certain standards must be followed. Potential mem-bers are required to submit letters of recommendation from two other teams, statistics about the number

of games they’ve played, and other paperwork.

Last week the Montreal Roller Derby Travel Team held a fundraiser at Cagibi with a clothing swap, bingo, and a bake sale in order to send the team to Tennessee for a competi-tion. The roller derby team rou-tinely tours throughout the U. S. and Canada, and had recently returned from a match in New Hampshire. One of the event’s organizers, who currently sits on the Montreal Derby Team Board of Directors, explained that roller derby is not simply a sport, but part of a lifestyle. Players must join a committee in order to play; this involves volunteering within the roller derby world, raising money through fundraising events, and generally giving your time to the roller derby community.

The players who comprise the scene in Montreal are a diverse bunch, from mothers in their for-ties to 20-something university stu-dents. Known for its sub-cultural character, roller derby is a show-

manship sport – players regularly show attitude on the track with funky attire and names such as Thora Lee Loaded and Sparkle N’ Maim. On the Montreal Roller Derby League’s web site, the biogra-phies of the teams are humourous and playful.

It’s refreshing to experience a league that focuses on enjoying its sport, having fun, and interact-ing positively with the community. And the community is supportive in kind: over 800 Montrealers showed up to the championship game. The league even had to turn spectators away due to the large numbers of people who wanted to observe this underground phenomenon.

When asked what impact roller derby has had on her life, a board of directors member jokingly replies, “My boyfriend thinks he has 17 girl-friends.” She laughs, and adds, “I’ve made the best friendships and got-ten into the best shape with three to four workouts a week, playing what I love.”

Alexis MontgomerySports Writer

Moxie in MontrealElbows and hips fly on the local roller derby track

The McGill Daily, Monday, September 14, 2009Culture 15

Life at the speed of lightPriam Poulton-McGraw reviews the CCA’s exhibit on the culture of speed

In 1909, members of the Italian movement soon to be known internationally as Futurism pub-

lished a revolutionary manifesto that read like a declaration of war. In it, they proclaimed their break with the aesthetic principles and social values that they felt anchored culture and artistic tradition to out-moded values of beauty, contem-plation, and stillness. Singing their love of energy, danger, violence, revolt, and the radically new, they embraced machinery, industry, and the triumph of technology over nature, and sought to make speed the highest principle and driving force of their social and artistic movement. Wrote F.T. Marinetti, “the world’s magnificence has been enriched by a new beauty: the beau-ty of speed.”

After a century of turbulent acceleration that has fulfilled – and perhaps even surpassed – the hun-gers of the Futurists’ imagination, it has been suggested that we are now witnessing the end of the age of speed. Mirko Zardini, Director and Chief Curator of the Canadian

Center for Architecture (CCA), makes the claim that “ecological and geopolitical constraints are forcing humanity at an accelerat-ing pace towards a world devoid of speed.” The Speed Limits exhibition at the CCA is a “critical reflection” that examines the legacy of speed and its centrality to modernity in terms of circulation and transit, construction and the built environ-ment, efficiency and productivity, measurement and representation, and the effects of speed’s demands on the human body.

While the exhibit spans the time period from the publication of the Futurist Manifesto to the present, the most dramatic sections focus on the development of the “cult of speed” in the first half of the twen-tieth century.

The section on productivity, for instance, maps the material influ-ence of discourse and strategies of efficiency on the domestic space of the kitchen, and the changing design of office spaces in response to information technology and increased volume of communica-

tion. Making use of photographs and

corporately produced “informa-tional” films from the past, Speed Limits traces the changes in office environments and architecture, from the simple office desk to enor-mous walls of vertical filing sys-tems accessed by electric lifts, and ends with the futuristic computer databases of the fifties and sixties. Unfortunately, as with other parts of the exhibit, such as the section on speed in construction and the built environment, this section stops prematurely rather than examin-ing developments in office design through to the present day.

In the “domestic” sphere, the effects of the Scientific Management Movement and Taylorism are traced through kitchen design innovations that resulted in a “fusion of home and factory” by the time of the 1950s. One film produced by the Handy Jam Organization and the U.S. Steel Company boasts the possibility of integrating a “sewing and mending center” and a “management cen-ter” into the kitchen space so as to

increase the efficiency of domestic work and effectively manage space to keep the rest of the family from “cluttering the workspace.”

Potentially a place to drive home a critique about the most literal effects of speed on human existence, the last section of the exhibit, on the impacts of speed on bodies and minds, unfortu-nately falls short of either captur-ing or expanding upon the com-plex issues and debates around this topic. While those who criticize the culture of speed talk about loss of attention and contemplation, other theorists defend cultural changes on the grounds of the relativity of our perception of speed. In his book The Global Village, Marshall McLuhan writes, “what may emerge as the most important insight of the twenty-first century is that man was not designed to live at the speed of light.” Theorists who disagree often point to the malleability of human cognition – for instance, an increase of multi-tasking and divided or par-tial attention as, at worst, a neutral practice of adaptation to chang-

ing media and the demands of the urban environment. The exhibit’s attempts to explore contemporary examples of speed and the body include video games, video instal-lations, and information about arti-ficial stimulants like caffeine and energy drinks that we use to keep our bodies up to the pace of modern life. Unfortunately, this approach comes across as more of a shallow survey of what have become clichés of our hyperactive culture.

The CCA has a well-earned reputation for its focus on innova-tive architectural practices, and socially and politically progressive thinking – especially in areas of sustainable design and reinterpre-tation of urban space. However, despite sparking some interesting suggestions, Speed Limits doesn’t completely deliver on its promised rethinking and perhaps recupera-tion of the concept of speed into new, more sustainable possibilities.

Speed Limits runs through November 8 at the Canadian Centre for Architecture (1920 Baile).

It has been suggested that we are now witnessing the end of the age of speed

Spee

d Li

mits

Exh

ibiti

ons,

20

09

View

of

the

inst

alla

tion

at t

he C

CA

. ©

CC

A,

Mon

tréa

l for

The

McG

ill D

aily

Culture The McGill Daily, Monday, September 14, 200916

Everything is in the linens

fluttering wings on the clothesline – in a backyard with brittle grass.

Body and a segment of time falling like shorts on a precarious ass crack.

A small thing waited on the fence

buried its pronoun somewhere inside the folds of an oversized General Motors T-shirt.

A smack here – a smack there – it never hurt

to be harsh.

The tractor and the hives grow closer to each other, the surface, and/or choked away.

When we walk through blocks of harsh summer sun we find bodies left over from dinner. A leopard once with green glass

eyes next to a zebra.

We work through it and grow

dining tables in the woods – cut them down from the vines and collect them

with the fire and the wood, we survive.

—Mahak Jain

Baby

Inkwell

CULTUREBRIEFS

Haunted Femininity

Paige McLachlan, Zoe Sharpe, and Arden Wray are three fine arts students at Concordia University whose first show together, Haunt, opens Tuesday. The exhibi-tion aims to reconsider the way the feminine identity occupies domestic space. Though each art-ist will present individual pieces of photography or text, the entire gallery will function as an instal-

lation showcasing fragments of highly feminized domesticity, from lace curtains on windows to cat-scratched, floral-printed furni-ture. The point is not to reinforce stereotypes, but to highlight and thereby undermine what Wray refers to as “hyper-femininity.” She explains that the convention-ally feminine way she dresses, an aesthetic centred on floral and pink, became a point of ridicule from people she hardly knew. She was called “girly,” which suggest-ed, to Wray, weakness and belit-tlement. The artists’ recourse, through their work in Haunt, is to rearticulate “soft” beauty as a façade superimposed on the

subject’s quiet distress at being judged solely based on appear-ance. While young artists’ exposi-tions are sometimes unpolished or heavy-handed – not that this is the case with Haunt – they often manage to promise something original. This show may very well fit in that tradition; the fresh-ness of perspective and the raw undertones beautifully highlight the way these artists address their concerns about femininity.

—Mikael Rubin

Haunt is at the VAV Gallery (1395 René Levesque O.) from September 14-25.

When it comes to dance, I consider myself a clas-sicist. Clean lines, strict

form, and torso control attract my attention, which is why dancer Carmen Ruiz’s in-development piece À la limite drew my interest. As part of an ongoing residency at Montréal, arts interculturels (MAI), Ruiz, a Colombian-born dancer, has choreographed a piece that, while exhibiting her rigorous training in dance, also strays considerably from what one might deem “classical.”

Drawing from her own Colombian heritage as well as a host of other influences – includ-ing Afro-Caribbean culture and her experiences as a Canadian immi-grant – À la limite is a dramatic solo work. Except for music and the presence of a projection that alternately displayed swaying leaves and human arms, the stage was bare; the audience could not help but focus their attention on the dancer. As the piece opened, Ruiz was crouched on the ground in an almost contorted state. I was struck by her resemblance to the Salvador Dali painting, “Geopoliticus Child Watching the Birth of the New Man.” The painting is one of Dali’s more ubiquitous creations, in which a man is battling to “hatch” from an egg-shaped earth while an indiffer-

ent mother and a frightened child look on.

Because I was somewhat jarred by the extremely interpretive nature of the piece itself, this painting became a point of entry through which I could understand it. The similarities between the two were inescapable. Dali’s man is being born into a modern world of politi-cal chaos, and the subtitle of Ruiz’s work is “If art is political can it also be poetic?” Moreover, much like the man in Dali’s painting, Ruiz’s face remained obscured for the first five minutes of À la limite. Both Dali and Ruiz deprive their audiences of viewing the face of their subject, as though Dali’s man becomes the everyman and Ruiz becomes the everywoman. Neither artist’s politi-cal experiences need to be matched to a face, because their experiences are universal.

If you find this art-cum-politics analogy seemingly trite, you are probably correct. After all, how many times have we discussed or heard about art as a tool for the dis-semination of a political message? Yet, for me at least, the subject is inexhaustible, especially if one con-siders the scope and variety of polit-ical circumstances and issues with which individuals grapple. For Ruiz personally, the political context of her work deals with displaced and trafficked women in the geo-graphical regions that influenced the piece itself – Colombia and the

Caribbean. If Ruiz’s political theme is geographical dislocation, then her personal expression of the topic was apt – not only because of her own immigrant experiences but also because dance, as a movement-centred artistic medium, is the per-fect reflection of politically-motivat-ed movement.

Though there were instances in À la limite during which I was struggling to understand what was going on, there were also sudden moments of striking clarity. Most memorably, at one point, Ruiz’s vio-lent and uncontrollable movements suggested the act of rape. Her body language was direct and deliberate, and her pained gaze toward the audience was difficult to meet.

What proved especially enlight-ening for me was the discussion that followed the 25-minute piece. As part of Concordia University’s School of Extended Learning, MAI collaborated with the University of the Streets Café to organize a public and informal conversation between Ruiz and her audience. The dia-logue was conducted in what was described as “Montreal-style bilin-gual,” with quite a bit of Spanish thrown in. A moderator facilitated any language barriers. When I asked Ruiz whether she believed that the international influences in her work strengthen her political message, she replied affirmatively. According to Ruiz, they give the piece a histor-ical context and provide a story for

the audience. She repeatedly dis-cussed À la limite as “being a part of who [she] was,” and that perhaps in the future she would choreograph work based solely on form. For now, though, it appears that Ruiz’s work as a dancer is inextricably linked to both the politics that have shaped her life and the cultures that bore her.

It was interesting and quite cool that spectators were allowed a win-dow into Ruiz’s artistic process. During the dialogue, there was no need to laud the artist, although one certainly could. Instead, the audience could probe, question, and challenge the artist. Ultimately, there were only a few grand pro-nouncements or artistic hang-ups

that came to light during the dis-cussion. It was more about honest back-and-forth conversation.

If contemporary dance is a new discipline to you, the experience of the University of the Streets Café project itself is valuable and authen-tic. After immersing myself in Ruiz’s world, I left MAI – on the periphery of the McGill Ghetto – and was, for a moment, startled to see familiar sights. What I had seen at MAI felt miles away.

Preanka HaiCulture Writer

Dancing around the issueCarmen Ruiz’s work in progress addresses politics through movement

The completed version of À la lim-ite will be presented at MAI (3680 Jeanne Mance) upon the conclu-sion of Carmen Ruiz’s residency, in March 2010.

Turn your swag on - write for culture* Meetings - Tuesday 5:30, Shatner B-24 *Getting money: not guaranteed.

Sal

ly L

in /

The

McG

ill D

aily

The McGill Daily, Monday, September 14, 2009 17Culture

Ready to become an optimal person?Learning optimal behaviors…. “… you can achieve an elevated level… rise to a

more elevated plateau of being, doing, feeling… & attaining the highest state a

person can attain... Become the person you can become.”

The Optimal Person

By Dr. Alvin R. Mahrer

&

The Manual of Optimal Behavior

By Dr. Alvin R. Mahrer

Available at the McGill Bookstore

& Paragraph Books

Attend a full day Lifeskills seminar on Optimal Behaviors

Details can be found at www.buddhaguy.com or call Vanier (514) 744-7500

Leadership Skills Development Workshops

If you are a student involved in campus activities as an executive, organizer or event planner, you qualify for the Leadership Training Program’s FREE Skills

Development Workshops.

Develop and build your leadership skills - attend a minimum of five workshops throughout 09/10 academic year and receive a certificate of completion.

This September and October come and check out...

Rx for Teams & Team LeadersTuesday, September 22, 5:30-7:30pm (downtown campus)Wednesday, September 30, 5:30-7:30 pm (Macdonald campus)

Having difficulty within your team? This workshop will help you better understand and diagnose team dynamic challenges, and provide useful tools and language on resolving team-based conflicts.

Budgeting, Sponsorhip & Fundraising - Earning and Managing the Big Bucks

Thursday, October 1, 5:30-7:30pm (downtown campus) Wednesday, October 7, 5:30-7:30 pm (Macdonald campus)

Wondering where you can go to get funding on campus? Off campus? Find out where the big bucks are and how to get them before other people do!

Registration for workshops: In person, one week in advance, on a first-come, first-served basis, in the First-Year Office. Macdonald campus students: send an email with your name, Student ID, club, position, McGill email and telephone number to leadership.training@mcgill.ca

For more info, drop by the First-Year Office in the Brown Building, Suite 2100, or call 514-398-6913

LEADERSHIP TRAINING PROGRAM

Have you had a “LAZY EYE”since childhood? McGill Vision Research is looking for study participants. Please call Dr. Davar Nikneshan at 514-934-1934 ext. 35307 or email mcgillvisionresearch@

gmail.com for further information.

ClassifiedsTo place an ad,via email: ads@dailypublications.orgphone : 514-398-6790fax : 514-398-8318

Cost :McGill Students & Staff : $6,70/day; $6.20/day for 3 or more days. General public : $8.10/day; $6.95/day for 3 or more days. 150 character limit. There will be a $6.00 charge per contract for any characters over the limit. Prices include taxes. MINIMUM ORDER $40.50/ 5 ads. Categories :Housing, Movers/Storage, Employment, Word Processing/Typing, Services Offered, For Sale, To Give Away, Wanted to Buy, Rides/Tickets, Lost & Found, Personal, Lessons/Courses, Notices, Volunteers, Musicians, etc. Lost & Found ads are free.

Master school of BartendingBartending and table service courses

Student rebateJob reference service

• 514-849-2828www.Bartend.ca

(on line registration possible)

Housing

Employment

4 1/2 - MTL North, renovated, large rooms, very quiet and clean, close to buses, metro and all services, 15 mins. away from downtown (Pie-IX metro station),

available Oct 1st. $545. Call (450) 661-6110

If Aldo wants to open a new loca-tion to tap the tourist market in the Old Port, local performance

artists 2boys.tv may have beaten them to it. The performance duo’s latest piece brought them out of their cabaret drag shows and into Montreal’s civic sphere, courtesy of the Les Escales Improbables bor-derless art festival.

Their third installation, bou-tiqueARCADE, was a store with nothing for sale. Housed in a con-tainer in the Old Port, the boys’ mercantile venture stocked an array of stylized shoes, while clerks – or as 2boys call them, “collaborators” – stood ready to assist the occa-sional bewildered spectator. Within each shoebox was a collection of clues and mementos – bringing to mind the work of avant-garde sculp-tor Joseph Cornell – all of which pointed to secret facets of the city. “It isn’t St. Henri or the Main. It’s more a larger location,” says mem-ber Stephen Dawson.

“There’s a little bit of deception because we’re presenting this as

a kind of boutique, and yet when people come in there really isn’t much to buy,” said Aaron Pollard, the other boy of the duo.

boutiqueARCADE deviates from Dawson and Pollard’s usual cabaret performances – dark, campy spec-tacles that bring Robert Wilson, Bette Davis, and opera together in a maelstrom of queer-psyche prob-ing.

Pollard – who was out of a job and in need of an artistic support network – joined Dawson, a gradu-ate of the National Theatre School, back in 2002, in an artistic marriage of convenience. Together they per-fected their routine with their caba-ret acts, Pollard focusing on the technological aspects of the produc-tion while Dawson, with his drag alter-ego Gigi L’Amour, handled the majority of the performance, con-sistently selling out shows.

The move from an internalized diva piece to a civic project seems to be a natural extension for 2boys. “What we do is highly theatrical; there’s a comedic element to it, there’s social critique, there’s kind, I hope, of a visual richness to it, and a landscape that’s more of a fantasy landscape than a kind of mechani-

cal reproduction of reality,” says Pollard.

Indeed, boutiqueARCADE con-served those performative aspects, as several shoeboxes functioned as “miniature theatres” with videos and even participatory objects. The visual aesthetic, meanwhile, lay in the footwear: the team picked out their own pairs of shoes to rep-resent various aspects of the city such as l’Eglise [the Church]. “[The shoes] are all ridiculous,” Pollard said. “Some of them you would never be able to wear.”

Dawson has assumed all man-ners of feminine and gay archetypes in their work: the campy diva, the helpless victim, and even the treach-erous mother. Much as 2boys.tv attempt to explore the queer iden-tity, so do they explore Montreal’s identity via the scattered memories captured in the exhibition’s videos, and their experiences living in the city. But they are artists more than they are guidebooks. Aside from the fictional environment of the art piece, “it’s the other narrative that takes place, which is extremely per-sonal; it’s random.... It’s wandering in a city,” says Dawson.

The kind of social conscious-

ness surrounding boutiqueAR-CADE expands 2boys.tv’s audience beyond cabaret spectators. The duo was interested in the dynamic that performing in the Old Port would provide, where they would be “sur-rounded by people who are from the 450, from outside the urban area of Montreal altogether, and people who aren’t necessarily as culturally literate,” said Pollard.

Therein lay the goal of Les Escales Improbables: to provide a wide spectrum of artistic media to a

wide spectrum of visitors, and to popularize the avant-garde for those outside both the cultural and municipal proper. The shoe store was a prototype for various other cities, and 2boys.tv plan to expand the installation to more locations. “It’s about valorizing a place for what’s there rather than say, what isn’t there or could be there or what you might find somewhere else,” comments Pollard, “and really rev-elling in that place.”

Joseph HenryCulture Writer

Shoe showArtists open temporary boutique in the Old Port to sell nothing

Whi

tney

Mal

lett

/ T

he M

cGill

Dai

ly

Across1. Anti Submarine Detection Investigation Committee6. Aces, sometimes10. Empirical evidence14. “The Nutcracker” lead15. Clin d’oeil, en anglais16. Bad day for Caesar17. Venus has three19. Trans-Siberian Railroad city20. Plane, e.g.21. Bully22. Opposite of plagiarize23. South American three-toed swine25. Worst place to be jilted26. Ship seeking Colchis30. Risky32. Oil source35. Popular cover by Destiny’s Child39. $9 a pack40. None, in Moliere41. Perception43. Not still44. Idiom46. To arrow as load is to bullet47. Attack ad, maybe50. Entanglement53. Warner Bros. creation54. What “it” plays

55. Take back60. Resources Information Standards Committee61. Like the Dickensian Christmas character63. Canal or lake64. Tablet65. Won’t screw to save its species66. Sebaceous cysts67. Killed, by a mobster68. Contemptuous look

Down1. Land that a yoke of oxen can plow in one day2. Bohemian, e.g.3. Spike Lee’s 1988 School ___4. “Pumping ___”5. Shift+66. Hooter7. Vitamin B38. Back9. Bias10. Among Tiberius, Hadrian, and Caesar11. Divulge12. Old or New, with-out the “ment”13. Question poser

18. Car accessory24. Not-so-clever wordplay25. Slartibartfast quote “Great things are ___.”26. American Society of Clinical Investigation27. Horse adj.28. Stairmaster homes29. Genuflections31. These ones go to 1133. Graduation march composer34. Far from ruddy36. “What’s gotten ___ you?”37. Auditory38. Adam’s apple spot

42. Huge43. __ of Aquarius45. Split hairs47. Scatter48. Wavelike design in textiles49. Fluorescent stain51. Vessel

52. People, for short54. Amazonian native56. Among straw, rasp, goose, black57. Bang-up58. Art subject59. Nicholas, for one62. Antiquity, in antiquity

The McGill Daily, Monday, September 14, 2009Compendium! 18Lies, half-truths, and New England

Anotha’ haad crosswuhdE. Mungall and C. Stanton

Pugnacious?Controversial?

Opinionated?Why not write

a column?

Write tocommentary@mcgilldaily.com

for moreinformation.

Looking for a church home while attending University? Maybe we’ve got

just what you’ve been looking for!

Consider the Church of St.Andrew & St.Paul. We are a vibrant Christian community located in the heart of Montreal’s downtown. Our College & Careers groups meet regularly for Bible Studies, social events, and retreats.

And if you visit us this September 20th we’ll treat you to lunch following the service!Service begins at 11:00am

(Sherbrooke St. @ Bishop)3415 Redpath St. Montreal, Quebec H3G 2G2514-842-3431

For more information :

youthco@standrewstpaul.comCheck us out on the web :

www.standrewstpaul.com

BLACK HOLES, NEW WORLDS AND THE UNIVERSE:

A three-part public lecture series in honour of the International Year of Astronomy.

First in the series is “Origins and Aliens: The Search for Other Earths” by Professor Sara Seager of the

Massachusetts Institute of Technology. September 21, 2009, 6 p.m., Leacock 132.

For thousands of years people have wondered, “Are we Alone”? With over 350 planets discovered to orbit nearby stars, the existence of “exoplanets” is fi rmly established. Astronomers are now able to routinely measure planetary sizes, masses, and atmospheres for a subset of hot, big exoplanets. The race to fi nd “habitable” exoplanets is on with the realization that big Earths orbiting small stars can be both discovered and characterized with existing technology. Professor Seager will present highlights of recent exoplanet discoveries and discuss when we might fi nd another Earth and what kinds of signs of life we are looking for.http://www.physics.mcgill.ca/seminars/PSC_seager.html

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

14 15 16

17 18 19

20 21 22

23 24 25

26 27 28 29 30 31

32 33 34 35 36 37 38

39 40

41 42 43

44 45 46

47 48 49 50 51 52

53 54 55 56 57 58 59

60 61 62

63 64 65

66 67 68

Solution to ‘Wicked haad crosswuhd’

Sometime after the mainland slides out of view, there’s a stretch of the ocean you pass through on the island ferry where you think you’ll never get to any land again. I remember thinking this as a child making the crossing with my brother and our father; countless times we stood on that boat – it is and always was the only way to get

to the island. Still now (though I rarely travel to the mainland), any-time I make the crossing there’s a small moment when my mind calls up my childhood self and I wonder if the boat will bring me to shore, or if it will continue its gentle rock-ing back and forth through the grey of the ocean forever.

— Amelia Schonbek

Circa 100-word story

Sal

ly L

in /

The

McG

ill D

aily

The McGill Daily, Monday, September 14, 2009 19EDITORIAL

Repatriate Omar Khadr

This week, the Supreme Court of Canada agreed to hear Omar Khadr’s case, hopeful-ly for the last time. In August, the federal government was ordered by the Federal Court of Canada to actively seek the repatriation of Khadr, who is a Canadian citizen. Stephen Harper quickly appealed this decision, as his government is confident that the American military tribunal trying Khadr is capable of delivering a sound judgment in the matter, despite the facts of Khadr’s case. Harper must ensure that Khadr is repatriated from Guantánamo Bay and given a fair trial in Canada. As a former child soldier, Khadr is entitled to rehabilitation, not the inhumane treatment he has been subjected to at Guantánamo.

Toronto-born Omar Khadr was 15 in 2002 when he was captured by American forces follow-ing a firefight in a small Afghan village. It has been alleged that Khadr threw a grenade that killed an American serviceman. While the case rests on the increasingly shaky premise that Khadr, as the last Taliban fighter standing, was the only one who could have thrown the grenade, docu-ments declassified in 2008 reveal that at least one other Taliban fighter was left alive following the battle. Post-battle reports stated that the combatant who had thrown the grenade was killed in the fighting, but these reports were later altered, casting doubt on their veracity. In any case, he was so seriously wounded that his ability to fight would have been more or less compromised.

Khadr was immediately transported to a detention facility in Bagram, Afghanistan. There, he was interrogated – often while confined to a stretcher – by United States military officials with a track record of prisoner abuse, including one offi-cer who has since been court martialled for his role in the death of a detainee.

Khadr was then transferred to Guantánamo Bay where, he was immediately segregated from the rest of the teenage detainees. While these other prisoners were granted access to English and math lessons, the Canadian was classified as a “high value detainee” (HVD), given his family’s close relation-ship with Osama bin Laden – his father, Ahmed Said Khadr, was an al-Qaeda financier and fighter.

The HVD classification meant that, unlike other teenage detainees, Khadr faced the high-est levels of interrogation. In one instance, Khadr’s lawyers claim he was bound for such a prolonged period of time that he urinated on himself and on the floor. Interrogators then used Khadr’s body to clean up the mess. What’s more, the Canadian government had been informed by the Canadian Security Intelligence Service that the torture was taking place.

Despite these reports, the Harper government remains indifferent to Khadr’s situation. Regardless of his association with al-Qaeda, Khadr, like all Canadians, deserves due process of law. The evidence against him has been obtained under torture, and is therefore invalid in a legitimate court of law. What’s more, his lawyers were prevented from seeing him for four years. And yet the Harper government has considered these trials legitimate for six long years – tacitly implying that Khadr remains guilty until proven innocent.

Khadr’s trial has been mishandled so egregiously that any guise of jus-tice has long since been destroyed. Peter Brownback, the American mili-tary judge who oversaw Khadr’s trial, contradicted international law by declaring that Khadr was not a child soldier – despite the fact that he was under 18 at the time of arrest and there is no evidence that he freely chose to join al-Qaeda. Brought to Afghanistan at the age of two, Khadr was raised by a father who instructed his children to pray for his martyrdom and viewed suicide bombing as a righteous act. Vulnerable to indoctrination from a young age, Khadr should have been better protected by the government – not left to languish in an offshore detention camp.

It’s time the Harper government listened to the courts and gave up on its stubborn opposition to Khadr’s repatriation. Even if he has committed a crime, he has lost his youth serving seven years of hard time in Guantánamo’s prisons. He deserves a fair trial in Canada and a chance at reha-bilitation. There can be no excuses: Canada’s complicity in this unlawful detention has per-sisted for far too long, and must end with the immediate repatriation of Omar Khadr.

volume 99number 4

editorial 3480 McTavish St., Rm. B-24

Montreal QC, H3A 1X9

phone 514.398.6784fax 514.398.8318

mcgilldaily.com

coordinating editor

Stephen Daviscoordinating@mcgilldaily.com

coordinating news editor Erin Hale

news editorsNiko Block

Humera JabirSam Neylon

features editorWhitney Mallett

commentary&compendium editor William M. Burton

coordinating culture editor Amelia Schonbek

culture editors Ian Beattie

Nicolas Boisvert-Novak

science+technology editor Diane Salema

mind&body editor Braden Goyette

photo editor Dominic “Papa” Popowich

graphics editor Sasha Plotnikova

production & design editorsKady Paterson

Aaron Vansintjan

web editor William Vanderbilt

copy editor Hannah Freeman

cover design Sasha Plotnikova

le délit Stéphanie Dufresne

rec@delitfrancais.com

ContributorsNikki Bozinoff, Douglas Breuer, Aleksiina Chapman, Kearsten Chau, Preanka Hai, Joseph Henry, Mahak

Jain, Shu Jiang, Joshua Freedman (CUP), Anna Leocha, Sally Lin, Alexis Montgomery, Shannon Palus,

Ben Peck, Priam Poulton-McGraw, Mik Rubin, Vicky Tobianah, Justin K. Wong

The Daily is proud to be a founding member of the Canadian University Press.

All contents © 2009 Daily Publications Society. All rights reserved. The content of this newspaper is the responsibil-

ity of The McGill Daily and does not necessarily represent the views of McGill University. Products or companies advertised in this newspaper are not necessarily endorsed by Daily staff.

Printed by Imprimerie Transcontinental Transmag. Anjou, Quebec. ISSN 1192-4608.

The Daily is published on most Mondays and Thursdays by the Daily Publications Society, an autonomous, not-for-profit

organization whose membership includes all McGill undergraduates and most graduate students.

3480 McTavish St., Rm. B-26Montreal QC, H3A 1X9

phone 514.398.6790fax 514.398.8318

advertising & general manager Boris Shedovtreasury & fiscal manager Pierre Bouillon

ad layout & design Geneviève Robertdps board of directors

Stephen Davis, Stephanie Dufresne, Max Halparin (chair@dailyproductions.org),

Thomas Kulcsar, Daniel Mayer, Alison Withers

EDITOR’S NOTE

After 25 years on the bench, The Daily is back in the game

Near as we can tell, The McGill Daily published its last sports section in 1984. Since then, we’ve been preoccupied with cul-tural, social, and political events going on at McGill and around the world. But last year, some of our editors began to wonder whether the ’84 editorial board’s decision might have been a little hasty. It quickly became obvious that we lacked any good reason for omitting sports coverage from The Daily – it seemed like sports might be wrapped up with all those cultural, social, and political issues we’re so committed to covering.

So we’re giving it a shot. We spoke with our staff-ers, sought out some unique stories, and came up with The Daily’s first sports section in 25 years.

While we recognize the value of traditional sports writ-ing, we’re hoping to take a more unorthodox approach. Our Statement of Principles signals our commitment to covering stories that affect marginalized communities – those groups whose voices often go unheard in the mainstream media. Our

sports section will operate under the same mandate: we plan on chasing down those stories that involve issues of race, gen-der, socioeconomic class, and any other slew of sticky issues that are often neglected in other publications. And while our SOP means that we never shy away from critical analysis of issues, this doesn’t mean that the section’s bound to be negative – we’re dying to investigate the potential for sports to be sub-versive and empowering. And of course, as your campus paper, we can’t wait to cover sports at McGill, especially those teams that might not get the attention or the support they deserve.

But we can’t do it alone. We need you to write sports sto-ries, read sports stories, and tell us what you think. We need to know whether we’re striking out or hitting grand slams. After all, we’re not all experts: many of us are chronically uncoor-dinated and in poor shape. We want sports to be as strong as our other sections, and we hope you’ll lend a hand. So step up to the plate – it’s the top of a new inning in Daily history.

Sas

ha P

lotn

ikov

a /

The

McG

ill D

aily

A FILM BY RICARDO TROGIA NICOLE ROBERT PRODUCTIONSTARRING JEAN-CARL BOUCHER,

CLAUDIO COLANGELO, SANDRINE BISSON

Original French Version with English Subtitles

NOW PLAYING

GO FILMS, ALLIANCE VIVAFILM PRESENT

SEX, POPSICLES AND ROCK N’ROLLDISCOVER THE DIRECTOR OF ‘QUEBEC-MONTREAL’

AND ‘DODGING THE CLOCK’ AT AGE 11.