Vol. LVII Allentown, PA Friday, January 13, 2017 No....

1

Vol. LVII Allentown, PA Friday, January 13, 2017 No. 29

2

THE COURTThe Hon. Edward D. Reibman, President Judge

The Hon. Carol K. McGinley, Judge The Hon. Robert L. Steinberg, Judge

The Hon. J. Brian Johnson, Judge The Hon. Kelly L. Banach, Judge

The Hon. James T. Anthony, Judge The Hon. Maria L. Dantos, Judge

The Hon. Michele A. Varricchio, JudgeThe Hon. Douglas G. Reichley, JudgeThe Hon. Daniel K. McCarthy, Judge

LEHIGH LAW JOURNAL (USPS 309560)

Owned and Published by THE BAR ASSOCIATION OF LEHIGH COUNTY

1114 Walnut Street, Allentown, PA 18102 www.lehighbar.org

HON. WILLIAM H. PLATT, President PATRICK J. REILLY, President-Elect

MICHELLE M. FORSELL, Vice President JAMES J. KOZUCH, Secretary SARAH M. JOLLY, Treasurer

SUSAN G. MAURER, Historian THOMAS F. TRAUD, JR., Law Journal Committee

RAY BRIDGEMAN, Executive Director GRAIG M. SCHULTZ, Case Editor

Copyright © 2017 Bar Association of Lehigh County

The Lehigh Law Journal is published every Friday. All legal notices must be submitted in typewritten form and are published exactly as submitted by the advertiser. Neither the Law Journal nor the printer will assume any respon-sibility to edit, make spelling corrections, eliminate errors in grammar or make any changes in content.

The Law Journal makes no representation as to the quality of services offered by any advertiser in this publication.

Legal notices must be received at 1114 W. Walnut St., Allentown, PA 18102, before 4 p.m. the preceding Monday. Telephone (610) 433-6204. Advance issues $100.00 per year. Single copies $2.00. Payment of annual dues to the Bar As sociation of Lehigh County includes year’s subscription to Lehigh Law Journal.

Printed at 206 S. Keystone Ave., Sayre PA 18840Periodical postage paid at Allentown, PA 18102 and

at additional mailing offices.

POSTMASTER: Send address changes to The Lehigh Law Journal, 1114 W. Walnut St., Allentown, PA 18102.

5

For Lease 3535 High Point Blvd, Bethlehem

Cindy McDonnell Feinberg, CCIM [email protected] 610-709-6231 Gregg M. Feinberg, Esq. [email protected] 610-709-6233

Contact Cindy @ 610-360-9733 to see this great property

2,368 sq ft finished medical office suite

3,550 sq ft unfinished office suite Flexible floor plan, private

entrances and park-like setting

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY / ETHICS MATTERSRepresentation, consultation and expert testimony in disciplinary

matters and matters involving ethical issues, bar admissions and the Rules of Professional Conduct

James C. Schwartzman, Esq.Vice Chairman, Judicial Conduct Board of Pennsylvania • Former Chairman,

Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of PA • Former Chairman, Continuing Legal Education Board of the Supreme Court of PA • Former Chairman, Supreme Court of PA Interest on Lawyers Trust Account Board • Former

Federal Prosecutor • Named by his peers as Best Lawyers in America 2015 Philadelphia Ethics and Professional Responsibility Law “Lawyer of the Year”

1818 Market Street, 29th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19103

(215) 751-2863

6

Saltzman & Gordon, LLC an established Lehigh Valley family law firm is now seeking a full-time associate, part-time associate, full-time legal secretary and part-time legal secretary. Preferred applicants should have a minimum of 3 years’ experience in family law. Please send resume and cover letter to: [email protected] or via fax to (610) 435-7652. All correspondence will be strictly confidential.

1-13

LEHIGH COUNTY JUDGES SEEK APPLICANTS TO FILL TRUSTEE VACANCY FOR

HARRY C. TREXLER TRUST

The judges of the Court of Common Pleas of Lehigh County are seeking candidates for appointment as trustee of the Trexler Trust to succeed the Reverend Daniel G. Gambet upon the expiration of his second 10-year term on May 17, 2017. The five Trexler Trustees administer this multimillion dollar trust created by the Will of Harry C. Trexler and award grants to charitable and non-profit organizations, to the City of Allentown for its parks and to the County of Lehigh for the Nature Preserve.

To learn more about the Trust, visit its website at www.trexlertrust.org.

Individuals interested in being considered for the trustee vacancy may apply only by submission of the application available on the Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas website at www.lccpa.org/trexlertrust. The deadline for ap-plications is February 17, 2017.

1-13

7

The BALC Facebook page is updated regularly with meeting reminders and event notices, and includes photo albums, discussion boards, links, and much more. “Like” us at www.facebook.com/BarAssociationLehighCounty

PARALEGAL (BETHLEHEM)

KingSpry, a progressive, expanding regional law firm seeks a top notch full-time paralegal for our family law group.

Requirements: proficient in Microsoft Word, Outlook, Excel and PowerPoint and QuickBooks. Possess transcription skills; excellent interpersonal, organizational, communication and phone skills, self-starter and able to juggle multiple proj-ects and deadlines; able to work independently and as part of the team in a fast-paced environment.

Position provides administrative support to two to three (2-3) attorneys, client contact, scheduling appointments/maintaining calendars, drafting of pleadings and agreements, creating and maintaining files.

Qualified applicants should submit resume and cover letter with salary requirements. Full benefit package provided.

Please submit cover letter and resume to Sarah O’Steen [email protected]; (610) 332-0314 fax.

1-13

8

ATTORNEY II

The County of Lehigh is looking for an Attorney responsible for rendering legal services and supplying legal advice on matters affecting the Lehigh County Office of Children and Youth Ser-vices (LCOCYS). Work is confined to Juvenile Dependency and Child Protective Services Law. This position will have office space located in the Child Advocacy Center.

Responsible for conducting necessary legal research preliminary to the rendering of decisions affecting LCOCYS operations in the execution of documents or in the preparation for trial of specific cases, including, but not limited to the following hearings: shelter care, adjudication, permanency review, miscellaneous juvenile court and appellate; directing the preparation of pleadings, briefs, orders, etc.; leading in or conducting research in rendering legal opinions for judicial hearings and hearings before judges; prepar-ing legal opinions for administrative officials; trying and arguing cases in court involving Juvenile Dependency and Child Protective Services Law; perform related work as required.

A Juris Doctorate Degree—Member of the PA Bar with 2 years of progressively responsible experience in professional legal work required. Juvenile Dependency Court experienced preferred.

Hourly Rate: $50.00 /hr. (maximum 1000 hrs. per rolling year).

A criminal background check required. Must be proficient in computer research and possess the ability to use Word and/or WordPerfect. Must have possession of a certificate or eligibility for a certificate of admission to the Bar of the Supreme Court of PA; OR possession of a certification of admission to the Bar of the highest court of another state, with preparatory steps taken to become a member of the Bar of the Supreme Court of PA required.

Submit: A completed County application, resume and cover letter via the County’s Website at www.lehighcounty.org or apply in person at Lehigh County Human Resources, 17 South 7th Street, Room 103, Allentown, PA 18101. EOE.

1-13

Commonwealth vs. Sacco280

Lehigh 7-17 op

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA vs. SHARIE SACCO

Conflict of Interest—Theft by Deception—Theft by Unlawful Taking or Disposition—Tampering With Records or

Information—Unauthorized Use of Automobile or Other Vehicle—Motion to Suppress—GPS Tracking—Unlawful Search—Fourth Amendment—Expectation of Privacy—Custodial Interrogation—Miranda Warnings—Criminal

Investigation—Fifth Amendment—Coercion.

The Court denied defendant’s motion to suppress the use of a GPS tracker which was placed on the vehicle which was used by the defendant, but owned by her employer. The Court reasoned that the use of the GPS tracker was not the product of an unlawful search because the defendant did not own the vehicle which was subjected to tracking, and because the defendant was not tracked via GPS outside of her normal working hours. Ad-ditionally, the Court denied defendant’s motion to suppress statements which she made to an investigator who was also employed by her employer. The Court reasoned that the employer’s investigation was non-criminal in nature, and therefore, the employer was not required to provide the defendant with Miranda warnings. Similarly, there was no basis to suppress because the defendant was not coerced into making statements to the investigator.

In the Court of Common Pleas of Lehigh County, Pennsyl-vania—Criminal Division. No. CR-3630-2016. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania vs. Sharie Sacco.

Bernard anderson, esquire, senior deputy attorney General, on behalf of the Commonwealth.

eric dowdle, esquire, on behalf of the Defendant.

steinBerG, J., December 21, 2016. The defendant, Sharie Sacco, is charged with Conflict of Interest,1 Theft by Deception,2

Theft by Unlawful Taking or Disposition,3 Tampering With Records or Information4 (4 counts), and Unauthorized Use of Automobile or Other Vehicle.5 It is alleged that the defendant, while employed as a Construction Manager with the Pennsylvania Turnpike Com-mission, padded the hours she worked, and used the vehicle pro-

1 65 Pa. C.S. §1103(a).2 18 Pa. C.S. §3922(a)(1).3 18 Pa. C.S. §3921(a).4 18 Pa. C.S. §4104(a).5 18 Pa. C.S. §3928(a).

10

Commonwealth vs. Sacco 281

Lehigh 7-17 op

vided to her, which was owned by the Turnpike Commission, for non-work-related matters. By submitting false time records, it is alleged that she received $5,918 in compensation to which she was not entitled.

On November 9, 2016, counsel for the defendant filed an “Amended Omnibus Pre-Trial Motions.” A hearing on that amend-ed motion was held on November 14, 2016.6 During that hearing, Robert Brautigam, a special investigator with the Turnpike Com-mission, testified. Mr. Brautigam identified himself as an investiga-tor, but not a law enforcement officer. He testified that he lacked arrest powers.

The defense, in their motion, seeks to suppress the use of a GPS tracker placed on the vehicle used by the defendant. The tracker, which was placed behind the rear passenger wheel, pro-vided GPS coordinates from April 10, 2015 to June 5, 2015. The use of the tracker was done without any court authorization. It is alleged that the use of the GPS tracker was the “product of an unlawful search.”7

The defense also contends that an interview with the defen-dant on October 15, 2015, constituted a custodial interrogation for which Miranda warnings were required, but not provided to the defendant. In that vein, it is also alleged that the interrogation violated her rights under Garrity v. New Jersey.8

BACKGROUND

The defendant, according to the interview conducted with her by investigators with the Turnpike Commission (hereinafter PTC), was employed by the PTC for over thirty-two (32) years. For the past eleven (11) years, she was a Construction Manager responsible for “overseeing and managing PTC construction proj-ects.” During the course of this investigation, she was based at the Quakertown Maintenance Facility, where her duties consisted of

6 Defense counsel had filed earlier versions of the amended motion, but the amended motion was the subject of the hearing.

7 “Amended Omnibus Pre-Trial Motions,” (hereinafter OPTM), at ¶13.8 385 U.S. 493 (1967).

11


Lehigh 7-17 op

managing a PTC resurfacing contract, overseeing her inspectors, and inspecting the work completed by the contractor.9 Each day she completed her project documentation, “including her CDS Inspector Daily Reports and SAP time and attendance.”10

Surveillance of the defendant was conducted between April 10, 2015 and June 5, 2015. The investigation revealed that “on the thirty-nine (39) days that Defendant worked and reported her time in SAP ... that she falsified her work time on all thirty-nine (39) days.”11 Specifically, the defendant reported in SAP that she worked 438 hours, but the investigation concluded she only worked a total of 311 hours. Likewise, her CDS Inspector Daily Reports re-flected that on twenty-eight (28) of the thirty-nine (39) days, she reported starting work earlier than she did, and also consistently claimed that she worked later than she did.12

A PTC vehicle was issued to the defendant, and its use was prohibited for “private purposes.” Surveillance revealed that the defendant made frequent personal stops while driving the PTC vehicle. She was authorized to use the vehicle for her daily com-mute between her home in Emmaus and the Quakertown facility, as well as various worksites. However, the defendant was fre-quently traveling home during her claimed working hours and remained home for hours at a time. Her reporting of commuting miles reflected only one round trip per day. The investigation concluded that she recorded her extra mileage as “business” rather than “commute” mileage.

As part of the investigation, an interview was conducted with the defendant by investigators with the PTC. The interview was not recorded. Prior to that interview, the defendant was contacted and it was recommended that she get union representation. On October 15, 2015, an interview, which lasted over an hour, was

9 Commonwealth’s Exhibit 7, at pp. 1-2.10 Id.; see “Affidavit of Probable Cause Attachment” which explains that PTC em-

ployees such as the defendant are “required to self-report their time worked into the PTC’s System, Applications, and Products (SAP) payroll system. PTC employees are required to log onto the SAP system and input both the total and type of hours worked.”

11 Id. at ¶14.12 Id. at ¶¶15-16.

12


Lehigh 7-17 op

conducted with the defendant. She was told to be “truthful,” and the interview was conducted in the presence of the defendant’s union representative. Investigator Brautigam described the inter-view as an administrative investigation, not a criminal investigation.

The defendant initially denied falsifying her SAP and CDS reports. When confronted with the surveillance evidence, she eventually agreed that the time reported in SAP was not accurate. She explained that she frequently took phone calls from home throughout the day and night when she was not physically at work, and suggested that she felt she was “working 24/7.”13 When asked to justify why she reported extra hours in SAP when she wasn’t working, the defendant stated several times, “I don’t know what to say.”14

The defendant also admitted to the investigators that she would use her PTC vehicle to run personal errands. She admitted going to the supermarket, a drug store, and Dries Do-It Center in Macungie. She also admitted going home to let her dogs out. The defendant explained that she also used the vehicle to drive to her chiropractor’s office in Allentown on several occasions. She further admitted to driving her neighbor to church in the PTC vehicle on one occasion.

DISCUSSION

a. GPS Tracking Device

The conundrum presented in this suppression motion is whether an investigator with the PTC may install a GPS tracking device (hereinafter GPS) on a vehicle owned by the PTC, but as-signed to the defendant, without her knowledge, and without a court order. Additionally, the defendant contends that she is en-titled to the protections of the Fourth Amendment because the investigation by the PTC was referred to the Office of the Attorney General (hereinafter OAG), and the information amassed from the GPS is an indispensable part of the prosecution. In that regard, if the investigation was commenced by the OAG, a court order would

13 Commonwealth’s Exhibit 7, at p. 3.14 Id.

13


Lehigh 7-17 op

be required. Here, the PTC conducted an investigation without judicial oversight, and under circumstances which would be im-permissible by the OAG.

In United States v. Jones, ___ U.S. ___, 132 S. Ct. 945 (2012), in an opinion written by Justice scalia, it was held that the attach-ment of a GPS tracking device to a vehicle and the subsequent use of that device to monitor the vehicle’s movements on public streets was a search within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. Id. at 949. See also, Commonwealth v. Arthur, 62 A.3d 424, 428 (Pa. Super. 2013) (Placement of a GPS device on defendant’s car con-stituted a search); State v. Jean, 372 P.3d 1019 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016) (Jones held for the first time that the installation of a GPS on a vehicle constituted a trespass and the use of the GPS to monitor the vehicle’s movements constituted a search under the Fourth Amendment.). Therefore, the installation of the GPS would gener-ally require a court order. See 18 Pa. C.S. §5761.

The conclusion that the placement of the GPS constitutes a search, and if conducted by the OAG would require a court order, does not end the inquiry. Further analysis must be undertaken because, although the defendant had exclusive use of the vehicle for her employment, the vehicle was owned by the PTC. How-ever, in light of Jones, the fact that the PTC owned the vehicle does not mean that the defendant’s privacy interests were not in-fringed. Justice scalia “held that the [information] of what consti-tutes a search as delineated in Katz[15] ... was incomplete. ... In Katz, the Supreme Court stated that ‘the Fourth Amendment protects people, not places.’ ” Arthur, supra (citations omitted). Justice scalia further explained that “Katz supplemented but did not replace traditional jurisprudence that linked Fourth Amendment rights to property rights and thus protects individuals from govern-ment actions that constitute a trespass. ... Thus, the majority held that while not all trespassory searches offend the Fourth Amend-ment, those that involve, ‘persons, houses, papers, and effects’ do invoke that protection, whether or not the individual had a reason-able expectation of privacy under Katz in the item at the time the trespass took place. ... ” Id. (citations omitted). However, the “defendant ... has the preliminary burden of establishing standing and a legitimate expectation of privacy. ... A defendant must sepa-

14


Lehigh 7-17 op

rately establish a legitimate expectation of privacy in the area searched or thing seized.” Id. (quoting Commonwealth v. Burton, 973 A.2d 428, 435 (Pa. Super. 2009)) (en banc). As explained in Burton:

An expectation of privacy is present when the individ-ual, by his conduct, exhibits an actual (subjective) expectation of privacy and that the subjective expectation is one that so-ciety is prepared to recognize as reasonable. The constitu-tional legitimacy of an expectation of privacy is not dependent on the subjective intent of the individual asserting the right but on whether the expectation is reasonable in light of all the surrounding circumstances.

Id.

The analysis in Arthur recognized that though “Pennsylvania courts have not addressed the concept of the legitimate expectation in light of Jones, several other states and federal courts have.” Id. at 429. For example, in United States v. Shephard, 2012 WL 3117513 (6th Cir. August 1, 2012), the defendant failed to dem-onstrate any legitimate expectation of privacy because he did not own, drive, or occupy the vehicle. See also, State v. Estrella, 286 P.3d 150 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2012) (Defendant did not have a reason-able expectation of privacy because he did not provide any evidence that he had permission to drive employer’s van or had any interest in it when GPS was attached.). “[T]hose courts who have applied Jones have been reluctant to extend its holding to individuals absent proof of ownership or a strong showing of a possessory interest in the vehicle.” Arthur, supra at 430. In Jones, the defendant did not own the vehicle; it belonged to his wife, but he was the exclusive driver. As a result, he had the rights of a bailee and standing to challenge the GPS. Jones, supra at 946 and n.2. See also, State v. Mitchell, 323 P.3d 69 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014). In Jean, while finding no standing to assert a Fourth Amendment challenge, this issue was analyzed as follows:

Here, there is no evidence the owner of the truck made a ‘full transfer’ of the truck to Jean, nor is there any evidence of a delivery and acceptance. There is no evidence the

15 Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967).

15


Lehigh 7-17 op

owner placed the truck in Jean’s actual or constructive pos-session so ‘as to exclude the possession of the owner and all other persons and give [Jean] for the time being the sole custody and control thereof ’. Id. There is no evidence Jean ever possessed the keys to the truck. In sum, even if Jean may have occasionally operated the truck as a co- driver while in the owner’s presence, there is no evidence the owner did not reserve his right to possess and control the truck at all times. Therefore, there is no evidence that Jean was a bailee of the truck.

Supra at 1024.

Here, the vehicle was placed in the defendant’s exclusive custody and control. She drove the vehicle without the owner present. She possessed the keys to the vehicle. She was more than an occasional operator of the vehicle. She had a privacy interest in the vehicle sufficient to confer standing to contest the place-ment of the GPS even though the vehicle was owned by PTC. Furthermore, the PTC Employee Handbook is silent regarding an expectation of privacy.16 See City of Ontario, Cal. v. Quon, 560 U.S. 746, 755 (2010) (“It is well-settled that the Fourth Amend-ment’s protection extends beyond the sphere of criminal inves-tigations. ... The Amendment guarantees the privacy, dignity, and security of persons against certain arbitrary and invasive acts of the Government without regard to whether the government actor is investigating crime or performing another function. ... The Fourth Amendment applies as well when the Government acts in its capacity as an employer. ... Individuals do not lose Fourth Amendment rights merely because they work for the government instead of a private employer.”). See also, O’Connor v. Ortega, 480 U.S. 709, 717 (1987).

Therefore, “where an employee has a legitimate expectation of privacy, an employer’s intrusion on that expectation ‘for non-investigatory, work-related purposes, as well as for investigations of work-related misconduct, should be judged by the standard of reasonableness under all the circumstances.’ ” Quon, supra at 757

16 See Employee Handbook at p. 44.

16


Lehigh 7-17 op

(quoting O’Connor, 480 U.S. at 725-26). See also, James v. Hampton, 592 Fed. Appx. 449 (6th Cir. 2015) (If the employee does have an expectation of privacy, “the warrantless search must be reasonable both at its inception and its scope. A search is justified at its inception ‘when there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that the search will turn up evidence that the employee is guilty of work-related misconduct’ ... The search is reasonable in scope when it is ‘reasonably related to the objec-tives of the search and not excessively intrusive in light of ... the nature of the misconduct.’ ”); Demaine v. Samuels, 29 Fed. Appx. 671, 675 (2002) (“The defendant’s actions are properly evaluated under the more lenient reasonableness standard be-cause the search took place during an internal work-related investigation. ‘ The crucial question is not whether the investi-gation involves actions arising out of the [employee’s] duties, but whether the investigation’s objective is to discipline or to seek criminal prosecution.’ ”). See also, U.S. v. Simons, 206 F.3d 392, 399-400 (4th Cir. 2000).

In Cunningham v. New York State Department of Labor, 997 N.E.2d 468 (N.Y. 2013) the State of New York, suspecting that one of its employees was submitting false time reports, attached a GPS device to the employee’s car. It was held that the Inspector General did not violate the State or Federal Con-stitution by failing to seek a warrant before attaching a GPS device. However, it was held that the search was not reasonable because it was not “reasonable in scope” because it was “exces-sively intrusive.” Id. at 473. “Where an employer conducts a GPS search without making a reasonable effort to avoid tracking an employee outside of business hours, the search as a whole must be considered unreasonable.” Id.

Here, the failure to secure a court order is dependent upon whether the workplace exception to the warrant requirement applies. As stated in O’Connor, “the government employer does not lose its special need for the efficient and proper operation of the workplace merely because the evidence obtained was evidence of a crime.” Supra at 723. Additionally, the workplace

17


Lehigh 7-17 op

exception remains applicable even when the uncovered crime is later turned over for criminal investigation. Simons, supra at 400 (collecting cases).17

A review of the investigation by the PTC in this case dis-closes that similar to Cunningham, it was a workplace investiga-tion involving false time reports. The length of the GPS portion of this investigation lasted approximately fifty-one (51) days. The major difference between Cunningham and the within case is that the GPS was attached to Cunningham’s personal vehicle. The vehicle in this case was not only owned by the PTC, but in light of the limitations on its use, the defendant was not tracked outside of her normal work hours.

Although the use of the GPS by the PTC without judicial oversight presents a significant and unacceptable risk of abuse, this Court, under the current state of the law, cannot find their search to be unreasonable. However, if the GPS had been at-tached to the defendant’s personal vehicle, the result in this case would have been otherwise. It was expressed best in the concur-ring opinion in Cunningham, wherein it was stated that the “imprimatur of warrantless GPS tracking will almost certainly

17 New York v. Burger, 482 U.S. 691, 716 (1987) (holding that “[t]he discovery of evidence of crimes in the course of an otherwise proper administrative inspection does not render that search illegal or the administrative scheme suspect”); Ferguson v. City of Charleston, 186 F.3d 469, 477 n.7 (4th Cir. 1999) (observing that eventual use in a criminal proceeding of evidence obtained during a special needs search does not “preclude [ ] application of the special needs balancing test”), cert. granted, 528 U.S. 1187 (2000). In Simons, the violation of FBIS’ Internet policy happened also to be a violation of criminal law; this does not mean that FBIS lost the capacity and interests of an em-ployer. See Gossmeyer v. McDonald, 128 F.3d 481, 492-93 (7th Cir. 1997) (concluding that presence of law enforcement personnel at search of employee’s office by government employer did not preclude application of O’Connor); see also, 4 Wayne R. LaFave, Search and Seizure §10.3(d), at 87-88 (3d ed. 1996) (noting that conclusion that warrant require-ment does not apply when employer is investigating work-related criminal conduct is consistent with reasoning of O’Connor); cf., United States v. Nasser, 476 F.2d 1111, 1123-24 (7th Cir. 1973) (upholding as reasonable under the Fourth Amendment a govern-ment employer’s electronic surveillance of an employee that yielded evidence of criminal misconduct, based upon the relationship of the search to the employee’s work duties); cf. also, Waters v. Churchill, 511 U.S. 661 (1994) (plurality opinion) (stating that, in the First Amendment context, “the government as employer indeed has far broader powers than does the government of sovereign”).

18


Lehigh 7-17 op

replace less intrusive methods for investigating government em-ployees with electronic surveillance.” Supra at 477.18

b. PTC Interview of Defendant

The defendant contends that when she was interviewed by Investigator Brautigam, he was required to provide her with Mi-randa warnings. She also cites Garrity v. State of New Jersey, 385 U.S. 493 (1967), as added support to seek suppression of her state-ments. Garrity holds the statements of public employees are co-erced if obtained under a threat that invocation of the Fifth Amendment will result in job termination.

Garrity is inapposite because in that case the officers, who were being criminally investigated, were given a choice to either incriminate themselves or forfeit their jobs. The interview with the defendant, which was conducted with her union representative, did not have any elements of coercion. The interview was con-ducted as part of an administrative investigation, not a criminal investigation. No evidence was presented that she faced termina-tion if she did not consent to the interview or asserted her Fifth Amendment privileges. She was advised about the nature of the interview, and she acknowledged “her responsibility as a PTC employee to be completely honest and forthright during the inter-view.”19 Her responsibilities are found in the Employee Handbook, which states the following:

EMPLOYEE RESPONSIBILITY

As an employee of the Commission, you are required to report any illegal or inappropriate acts. Failure or refusal to cooperate or answer appropriate or reasonable questions surrounding an investigation could result in disciplinary action up to and including termination.[20]

18 The PTC and the OAG during the hearing in this matter expressed a rather cavalier attitude towards the privacy rights of government employees, essentially asserting that permitting carte blanche searches are permissible. This opinion should not be a ve-hicle for that interpretation of the law.

19 See Commonwealth’s Exhibit 7, at p. 1.20 See Commonwealth’s Exhibit 1, Employee Handbook, at p. 40.

19


Lehigh 7-17 op

In Uniformed Sanitation Men Association v. Commission of Sanitation of the City of New York, 392 U.S. 280 (1968), it was held that public employees are entitled, like all other persons, to the benefit of Constitution, including the privilege against self-incrimination. However, they cannot be presented with the choice between surrendering their constitutional rights or their jobs. “[P]ublic employees ... subject themselves to dismissal if they refuse to account for their performance of their public trust, after proper proceedings, which do not involve an attempt to coerce them to relinquish their constitutional rights.” Id. at 285. See also, Di-Ciacco v. Civil Service Commission of City of Philadelphia, 389 A.2d 703, 709 (Pa. Commw. 1978) (Public employers can question their employees on matters relating to their employment and dis-miss them on the basis of their answer or for refusing to answer. They may do so as long as they have not indicated to the employee that assertion of his constitutional right to remain silent ... will constitute grounds for discharge.).

Here, nothing was said to the defendant which would have led her to believe that if she remained silent she would automati-cally lose her job or suffer severe employment sanctions for remain-ing silent. The evidence presented at the suppression hearing is also silent regarding any attempt to coerce the defendant to relin-quish her constitutional rights against self-incrimination in poten-tial future criminal proceedings. See Criswell v. State, 45 N.E.3d 46 (Ind. Ct. App. 2015) (citing Uniformed Sanitation Men, 392 U.S. at 284-85).

Finally, there are no cases that have suggested that Miranda warnings are required in investigations which are non-criminal in nature. Commonwealth v. McLaughlin, 375 Pa. 97, 103, 379 A.2d 1056, 1058 (1977); see also, Commonwealth v. Heggins, 809 A.2d 908, 915 (Pa. Super. 2002) (Defendant’s inculpatory statements to counselors were not the product of a custodial interrogation requir-ing Miranda warnings because counselors were not the equivalent of law enforcement); Boulware v. Battaglia, 344 F. Supp. 889, 902 (D. Del. 1972) (No obligation to inform individual of Miranda warnings in every instance in which he would be entitled to exercise Fifth Amendment rights. The requirement of Miranda arises only after being taken into custody not as part of a civil investigation.).

20


Lehigh 7-17 op

For all the foregoing reasons, the defendant’s motions to suppress must be dismissed.

ORDER

AND NOW, this 21st day of December, 2016, after hearing held in the above- captioned matter;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the “Motion to Suppress Search—GPS Tracker” is DENIED;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the “Motion to Suppress —Statements to Investigators” is DENIED.

21

22

LEHIGH LAW JOURNAL

ESTATE AND TRUST NOTICESNotice is hereby given that, in the

estates of the decedents set forth below, the Register of Wills has granted letters testamentary or of administration to the persons named. Notice is also hereby given of the existence of the trusts of the deceased settlors set forth below for whom no personal representatives have been appointed within 90 days of death. All persons having claims or de-mands against said estates or trusts are requested to make known the same, and all persons indebted to said estates or trusts are requested to make payment, without delay, to the executors or administrators or trustees or to their attorneys named below.

FIRST PUBLICATION

Boynton, Rufus, dec’d.Late of City of Allentown. Administrator: John R. Boynton c/o Samuel R. Kasick, Esquire, 523 W. Linden St., Allentown, PA 18101-1415.Attorney: Samuel R. Kasick, Esquire, 523 W. Linden St., Al-lentown, PA 18101-1415.

Dancs, Geneva M., dec’d.Late of Lehigh. Executrix: Marsha Beck, 4448 Lenni Circle, Emmaus, PA 18049.

Fridirici, Anna Mae, dec’d.Late of Macungie. Executor: Mark S. Fridirici c/o The Roth Law Firm, 123 North Fifth Street, Allentown, PA 18102.Attorney: Robert B. Roth, Es-quire, The Roth Law Firm, 123 North Fifth Street, Allentown, PA 18102.

Glass, Helen C., dec’d.Late of Lehigh. Executrix: Mary C. Floyd, 330 Keen Terrace, Apt. B., Sebas-tian, FL 32958.

Grabias, Stella A., dec’d.Late of Allentown. Executrix: Eleanor Lucas c/o Kathleen M. Collins, Esquire, 1125 S. Cedar Crest Boulevard, Suite 205, Allentown, PA 18103.Attorney: Kathleen M. Collins, Esquire, 1125 S. Cedar Crest Boulevard, Suite 205, Allen-town, PA 18103.

Grosset, James F., III a/k/a James F. Grosset, dec’d.Late of Allentown. Executrix: Linda J. Ehret c/o Emily A. Zettlemoyer, Esquire, Zettlemoyer Law Office, LLP, 53 North 3rd Street, Emmaus, PA 18049.Attorneys: Emily A. Zettlemoy-er, Esquire, Zettlemoyer Law Office, LLP, 53 North 3rd Street, Emmaus, PA 18049.

Hahn, Robert J. a/k/a Robert James Hahn, dec’d.Late of North Whitehall Town-ship. Administratrix: Carla M. Rossi c/o Edward H. Butz, Esquire, 7535 Windsor Drive, Suite 200, Allentown, PA 18195.Attorneys: Edward H. Butz, Esquire, Lesavoy Butz & Seitz LLC, 7535 Windsor Drive, Suite 200, Allentown, PA 18195.

Heilman, Elzabeth May a/k/a Elizabeth M. Heilman, dec’d.Late of Allentown. Executrix: Jane Ann Heilman a/k/a Jane Ann Corriveau c/o

NewsLine ______________January 13, 2017

The 2017 Bar Admissions Ceremony & New Member Reception

The 2017 Bar Admissions Ceremony will be held on January 27, 2017 at 4:00 p.m. in Courtroom 2A of the Lehigh County Courthouse. All individuals interested in participating must obtain a Bar Admissions Ceremony Information Packet from the Court Administrator’s Office in Room 614 or request an electronic copy by sending an e-mail to [email protected]. The packet contains instructions, a sample petition, a sample proposed order, and an application form. The application form only must be completed and returned to the Court Administrator’s Office by January 18, 2017. If you prefer to file the application electronically, please send it to [email protected]. Please be advised that failure to file the application form by the deadline may prevent the applicant from participating in the ceremony. Petitions and proposed orders for admission should not be presented to Court Administration or to the judges prior to the ceremony on January 27, 2017. Instead, please bring your petition and proposed order with you to the Bar Admissions Ceremony.

Family and friends are welcome to attend the New Member Reception and Happy Hour will be held at The Barristers Club

immediately following the ceremony. Please join us for cocktails and hors d’oeuvres in the BALC Ballroom.

Thank you to our event sponsor

NewsLine 2

Dear Bar Association Member,

The Bar Association of Lehigh County has started the Annual Ask for the Lehigh County Lawyer’s Charitable Fund Grant. This year’s theme is “School Programs in Need” and we are asking all organizations applying to keep that in mind as they complete their request.

We are proud to remind all lawyers that the Bar Association of Lehigh County has conducted an Assistance Program to benefit area 501c3 organizations to provide much needed assistance to our surrounding communities for many years. This program has raised over $200,000 throughout that time and distributed these funds to many deserving area organizations.

This year to assist these organizations, we are asking each lawyer to give generously to help support those in our local community. Remember, these contributions stay in the Greater Lehigh Valley area.

The Program is administered through the Lehigh Valley Community Foundation and all gifts are tax deductible to the fullest extent of the law. The Foundation will acknowledge all gifts for tax purposes.

We will recognize all those nonprofit organizations receiving funds as part of our Law Day celebration in May.

Past years’ contributions went to the Crime Victims Council of the Lehigh Valley, Dream Come True, The Lehigh Valley Zoo, Community Bike Works, The Victory House, Angel 34, Miracle League of the Lehigh Valley and many more.

NewsLine 3

Please help by sending your check today, payable to the Lehigh Valley Community Foundation and mail to:

Lehigh County Lawyer’s Charitable Fund Grant

Lehigh Valley Community Foundation 840 West Hamilton Street, Suite 310

Allentown, PA 18101

or go to www.lehighbar.org for credit card donations Thank you for your generous donation!

Kristin Noonan, Esquire

Community Service Committee, Chair

Ray Bridgeman, Executive Director, BALC

NewsLine 4

LEHIGH COUNTY PARALEGAL ASSOCIATION

LUNCH & LEARN

TechnoEthics: Digital Security in the Modern Age

Presented by:

Nathan Paulson

Thursday, January 26, 2017 at 12:00 pm Bar Association of Lehigh County

1114 W. Walnut Street Allentown, PA 18102

Please join us for a lunchtime seminar to explore security challenges, rewards and best practices for protecting data. This presentation has been adapted to the specific needs of the paralegal audience.

No fee for LCPA members $25.00 for guests

$10.00 for students

Please RSVP by January 23, 2017 to the Lehigh County Bar Association

610-433-6204 x12 or [email protected]

CLE UPDATE for the week of: January 13, 2017

PBI Group Cast Seminar “Making Use of Trusts for Asset Protection

of the Middle Class” Wednesday, January 18, 2017

Explore different types of Irrevocable Asset Protection Trusts and learn how they work to accomplish your client’s goal of asset protection. Examine how specific trust terms can accomplish client goals. Get tips for holding real estate in an Asset Protection Trust. Learn about income tax and gift tax considerations in drafting an Asset Protection Trust and get tips about choice of trust terms and selection of assets to protect. Protect assets from the costs of long-term care and creditors and reduce Pennsylvania Inheritance Tax.

Registration and Breakfast: 8:30 AM Seminar: 9:00 AM – 12:15PM

2 Substantive & 1 Ethics Credits (Integrated) Tuition: $249.00

To Register Call PBI @ 1.800.932.4637

PBI Group Cast Seminar “Hot Topics in Capital Cases”

Friday, January 20, 2017

LEARN ABOUT THE ANATOMY OF A MITIGATION INVESTIGATION

Know how to prepare for and conduct interviews Pick up tips for identifying and working with a mitigation

expert Gain practical advice to ensure that your investigation is

thorough and complete DNA FOR CAPITAL CASE LAWYERS

Review DNA Basics and the science behind it Know what happens in the laboratory; evaluation and

test results Explore DNA issues encountered before and during trial

UNDERSTAND TRAUMA AND ITS EFFECTS Learn the multiple causes of trauma and the populations

that suffer from it Hear about the wide range of outcomes caused by

childhood trauma Discuss PTSD and other trauma-related disorders

STAY UP TO DATE ON THE LATEST PENALTY TRIAL LEGAL ISSUES

Registration and Boxed Lunch: 11:30 AM Seminar: 12:00 PM – 4:15PM

4 Substantive Credits; Tuition: $179.00 To Register Call PBI @ 1.800.932.4637

CLE Update 2

PBI Group Cast Seminar “Death and Taxes”

Monday, January 23, 2017

DISCOVER NEW WAYS TO SAVE YOUR CLIENT’S MONEY Examine the Pennsylvania inheritance tax return and learn how to utilize exemption and deductions to save your clients’ money. Learn how to calculate the inheritance taxes in a way that yields the least financial impact on the estate. Learn how to advise other clients about estate planning options that will save their family money in the long run.

WALK THROUGH THE PENNSYLVANIA INHERITANCE TAX RETURN

On a step-by step basis, examine each line of the PA inheritance tax return and compare/contrast that filing with the federal estate tax return

Look at how the decedent’s final income tax return impacts the estate tax filing too

Come away with the confidence to complete and file an inheritance tax return if you have never done one before

LEARN THE BASICS OF INHERITANCE TAX RETURNS The assets included in the taxable estate The deductions of the estate How assets are valued, including family businesses Calculation of inheritance taxes

PROGRAM SCHEDULE Overview/Reconciliation/Schedule J Schedules A, AU – Real Estate Schedules B, D & E – Stocks, Bonds, Notes, Cash Schedules C, C-SB – Closely Held Businesses Schedules F & G – Jointly Held Property, Non-probate,

Misc. Schedules H & I – Funeral & Administrative Expenses,

Debts, Liens Schedule J – Charitable Bequests Schedule K – Life Estates, Annuities, Etc. Differences between Rev 1500 and Fed 706 Decedent’s last return



CLE Update 3

PBI Group Cast Seminar “Trends in Municipal Finance” Wednesday, January 25, 2017

TACKLE THESE TOUGH ISSUES Role of Solicitor in a Bond Issue

Whether they’re full time employees or in private practice, municipal solicitors in Pennsylvania handle a wide variety of legal work, including litigation, contracts and labor matters. Although a municipality may retain separate bond counsel, the solicitor must take steps to protect the client before a bond is issued.

LEGAL CHALLENGES FACING DISTRESSED MUNICIPALITIES Many municipalities are finding it difficult to balance their budgets and pay long-term obligations such as pensions and post-retirement benefits. Some face a downward spiral of continuing deficits and unpaid obligations. This session reviews the legal challenges that commonly confront distressed municipalities, and how the Act 47 process and Chapter 9 bankruptcy work.

BEYOND PLAIN VANILLA PUBLIC BOND ISSUE This session will examine some of the reasons for issuing bonds beyond a normal project or refunding – such as the recently-created city revitalization and improvement zone (CRIZ) authority and pension obligation bonds – the benefits and drawbacks of doing so, and the legal challenges that they may face.

CONTINUING DISCLOSURE LANDSCAPE This session will review the continuing disclosure obligations of municipal issuers under SEC Rule 15c2-12, documents that must be filed with the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board, recent SEC enforcement actions and best practices for municipal issuers.



Don’t forget – if you want to see an up-to-date schedule of CLE courses being held at BALC, log on to: www.lehighbar.org At the top of the home page point on ‘CLE Seminars’ and on the drop down menu click on ‘CLE Seminar Listing’, open the file and see what’s scheduled. For more course information, go to our ‘Calendar’ and click on the date of the course you are interested in for full information. It’s that easy!

CLE Update 4

PBI Group Cast Seminar “Using Social Media Effectively and

Ethically in Your Practice” Tuesday, January 31, 2017

Social media has infiltrated the practice of law at every point of the profession. Many attorneys, from large and small firms alike, know the importance of social media but are unaware of how to use it effectively. This new program will explore what lawyers need to know about the use of LinkedIn, Facebook and Twitter. Attendees will walk away with a better understanding of the do’s and don’ts of social media as it relates to communications, marketing, public relations, and the practice of law.

Examine the Ins and Outs of Social Media What’s appropriate for business How to use it for marketing and public relations The difference between using it personally and

professionally What your firm should/should not share on social media The best way to use it for practicing law

FAQs - You Will Learn: Strategy on how social media should be used How to identify your target audience using social media Best approaches to marketing legal services through

social media Different uses for Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn What amount of time you should devote to social media How to avoid getting into ethical trouble Distinctions/similarities between blogging and social

media Guidelines for your profile Best practices for effective content sharing The real secrets to social media success

Registration and Boxed Lunch: 10:30 AM Seminar: 11:00 AM – 2:30 PM

2 Substantive & 1 Ethics Credits (Integrated) Tuition: $249.00


New Jersey CLE credits may be earned by submitting to the New Jersey CLE Board upon an audit request, your Pennsylvania CLE Board report as documentation of programs attended and credits earned. You can get a copy of this report at www.pacle.org. All courses accredited through the Bar Association of Lehigh County and courses accredited through the PBI being held at BALC qualify toward New Jersey requirements.

CLE Update 5

PBI Group Cast Seminar “Litigating the

Employment Discrimination Case” Wednesday, February 1, 2017

ESTABLISH EFFECTIVE INVESTIGATION TECHNIQUES Watch vignettes designed to refine your issue spotting

skills Hear from practitioners on both sides regarding what

they are looking for in an effective investigation Learn how common pitfalls in handling investigations play

out in litigation LEARN STRATEGIES FOR HANDLING THE CHARGE PROCESS Choosing the agency Navigating the intake process Defending the charge



PBI Group Cast Seminar “Practical Medicaid Planning” Thursday, February 2, 2017

PRACTICAL MEDICAID PLANNING: Join PBI’s panel of Medicaid experts as they offer you an overview of three core areas of planning for Medicaid benefits. Walk away with a practical resource manual and a good foundation on these issues: The Basics – Learn eligibility rules, spend-down techniques, asset transfer rules and more. Crisis Planning: Keeping Mom Protected When Dad Goes into the Nursing Home – Know the key issues to address when a client comes to you for advice about a family member who has been admitted to a nursing home with little to no pre-planning. Discover the strategies available to married couples, as well as single applicants. Medicaid and Veterans Planning with Annuities – Explore immediate annuity planning techniques to help your client qualify for Medicaid and Veterans’ benefits. Spousal annuities and “short term” gift and annuity planning will be explained.



CLE Update 6

BALC LUNCH AND LEARN SEMINAR SPECIAL 2 HOUR TRAINING SESSION

$20.00 TUITION FEE FOR ALL WHO ATTEND (includes lunch and 2 Substantive CLE credits)

LEGAL SUPPORT STAFF WELCOME

“WCAIS Update”

WCAIS: The Workers’ Compensation Automation and Integration System

Presented by: Judge Brian J. Puhala,

Judge Cathleen A. Sabatino Judge Daniel G. Snyder

Judge Manager Karen A. Wertheimer Friday, February 3, 2017

Get an update on the latest about WCAIS!

Get all of your questions answered by this expert

panel of Judges and their support staff.

BALC Lunch & Learn Seminar Registration & Lunch: 11:45 AM Seminar: 12:15 PM – 2:15 PM

2 Substantive Credits Tuition for All: $20.00

To Register Call Nancy @ 610.433.6401 Ext: 16 E-mail: [email protected]

The CLE Department wants to continue to welcome walk-ins to the Lunch & Learn seminars but we may no longer be able to offer lunch to those who wish to attend but have not pre-registered. The department kindly requests, whenever possible to pre-register at least one or two days prior to a seminar. This is necessary in making arrangements for handouts and apprising the caterer.

To Register: Call: Nancy @ 610.433.6401 Ext: 16

Or E-mail: [email protected]

CLE Update 7

PBI Group Cast Seminar “Tell Me More: Stories to Attract and Engage”

Thursday, February 9, 2017 One of the many challenges attorneys face today is communicating their firm’s unique offerings, culture, and other intangibles to a variety of audiences. Stories are an excellent (and often overlooked) way to humanize facts and invite people to experience what makes you different. This lively, upbeat program explores the benefits of using stories to frame issues, engage audiences and inspire action. You will discover where to find good stories in your everyday life, how to craft them, and where to tell them. When done correctly, a good story cuts through the noise and increases the “re-tell” value of your message.

Registration and Boxed Lunch: 11:30 AM Seminar: 12:00 PM – 4:15 PM


PBI Group Cast Seminar “Black History Month Civil Rights Update”

Friday, February 10, 2017 Examine what is happening at the intersection of human rights and corporate decision-making. This intersection is evolving rapidly and it is worth your attention. Ray Brown and Wanda Akin stand at the forefront of this nexus of doing what is right for humanity and doing what is prudent for your clients. Corporate decision-makers who ignore, or even seek to mask human rights transgressions put their employees at risk of criminal penalties, companies at risk of enormous civil fines, and shareholders at risk of unanticipated and unforeseeable losses and reputational harm.

Discover the growing International hotbed of litigation The United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework devotes one of its three sections to the Corporate Responsibility to Respect Human Rights. The U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum laid to rest a small corner of the issue of corporate liability, but it left open the discussion of supply chain issues, mergers and acquisitions, licensing and franchising, and other perils for multi-nationals under the Alien Tort Claims Act. Industry organizations are currently challenging the implementation of SEC regulations handed down to comply with the Conflict Minerals provisions of Dodd-Frank.

Registration and Breakfast: 8:00 AM Seminar: 8:30 AM – 3:30 PM

5 Substantive & 1 Ethics Credits (Integrated) Boxed lunch included with tuition

Tuition: $299.00 To Register Call PBI @ 1.800.932.4637

CLE Update 8

PBI Group Cast Seminar “Alcohol Law”

Tuesday, February 21, 2017 With the passage of Act 39 in August 2016, Pennsylvania lawmakers have opened a new chapter for businesses and consumers regarding the sale of alcohol for the first time since the end of Prohibition. The new laws present a number of opportunities and challenges for businesses engaged in the manufacture, distribution and sale of wine, beer, liquor and hard cider both within and outside the Commonwealth. PBI’s experienced faculty will bring you the latest developments about what is now legal and how the new laws impact your clients in manufacturing, distribution and the retail aspects of alcohol.



PBI Group Cast Seminar

“18th Annual Estate and Elder Law Symposium” Wednesday, February 22, 2017

In this one-day Symposium PBI will feature some of the most popular sessions from their annual Estate Law Institute and Elder Law Institute. Whether you have a general practice or you concentrate in estate law, elder law or both, you will find this course offers just what you need.


5 Substantive & 1 Ethics Credits Boxed lunch included with tuition; Tuition: $299.00


PBI Group Cast Seminar “Internet Legal Research”

Thursday, February 23, 2017 With over 620 million websites, the amount of information available on the web is staggering; making a simple web search overwhelming. Identify techniques to efficiently comb through the vast amount of online data, receive pointers to narrow your search results and discover resources to perform traditional and deep/invisible web searches. Discover how to navigate the different search engines on your smartphone or tablet as well as online to locate cases and other information important to your practice. Gain an understanding of social media searching, the limitations of using free sites and learn how to navigate the variety of resources available to you.

Registration and Boxed Lunch: 12:00 PM Seminar: 12:30 PM – 3:45 PM; Tuition: $249.00

2 Substantive & 1 Ethics Credits (Integrated) To Register Call PBI @ 1.800.932.4637

CLE Update 9

PBI Group Cast Seminar “From File to Trial:

8 Keys to Success in Court and Beyond” Friday, February 24, 2017

Judge Drummond was a successful trial lawyer for two decades and has spent the last decade doing one thing – presiding over jury and bench trials. Combining his own experience with his jury surveys, he brings you persuasion techniques that you can use from the day the case comes into your office to verdict. Making a good first impression is persuasion. Equip yourself with a checklist for jury selection, opening statements, direct examination, cross examination and closing arguments. Discover the top ten things a judge wants during a trial. The Trial Notebook is the most ignored but most powerful tool for all phases of the case.

Registration and Breakfast: 8:00 AM Seminar: 8:30 AM – 3:30 PM; Tuition: $299.00

Boxed lunch included with tuition 5 Substantive & 1 Ethics Credits (Integrated)


PBI Group Cast Seminar

“Trial Skills/Cross Examination with Judge Bernstein”

Tuesday, February 28, 2017

Through the use of popular movie clips and a recreation of real life cross-examination by some of Pennsylvania’s most prominent and successful civil litigators, you will discover the keys to effective cross-examination. Learn how to get the answers you are seeking from both expert and lay witnesses. Join Judge Mark Bernstein, one of Pennsylvania’s foremost authorities on evidence and cross-examination, along with one of Philadelphia’s top plaintiffs’ counsel – Larry Bendesky – for an insightful and entertaining program. Walk away with a renewed confidence in your ability to conduct the most effective cross examination.

Registration and Boxed Lunch: 12:00 PM Seminar: 12:30 PM – 3:45 PM


CLE Update 10

CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION AT BALC

The Bar Association of Lehigh County is certified by the Continuing Legal Education Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania as a continuing legal education provider and regularly schedules seminars which update lawyers on current developments in varied areas of the law and provide continuing legal education credit hours to meet Pennsylvania Supreme Court requirements.

In addition to substantive law, practice and procedures, the seminar schedule includes ethics and professionalism topics. Most BALC programs are videotaped at the time of original presentation. These videos are shown at a subsequent date for the benefit of lawyers who may have missed the original presentations.

Video “Compliance Camps” are presented close to the end of each of the three CLE compliance periods to assist attorneys who may need additional education hours by a specified date.

Seminars are held at the BALC’s “Barristers’ Club” headquarters building, located at 1114 Walnut Street in Allentown, near center city and in easy reach of attorneys located in Lehigh and surrounding counties. In addition to our live seminars, we also have the capability of serving as a “downlink” for simulcast seminars offered by other providers, such as the Pennsylvania Bar Institute.

The Continuing Legal Education schedule is published weekly in the Lehigh Law Journal CLE Update. The schedule may also be accessed on our calendar via our internet address at www.lehighbar.org. To utilize that option, at the top of the home page point on ‘CLE Seminars’ and on the drop down menu click on ‘CLE Seminar Listing’, open the file and see what’s scheduled. For more course information, go to our ‘Calendar’ and click on the date of the course you are interested in for full information.

The Bar Association of Lehigh County offers a discounted seminar tuition rate to BALC and Northampton County members. Legal support staff and paralegal students are also welcome to attend at a discounted rate. Additionally, we have a financial hardship policy which provides for a further reduced fee for attendance at CLE seminars upon written petition to the CLE Coordinator.

CLE Update 11

To Our Members with 50(+) Years Practicing Law:

On behalf of the Continuing Legal Education Committee of the Bar Association of Lehigh County, we would like to thank our 50(+) year members for their dedication to the practice of law.

As a small token of appreciation for their years of service to the community, the Continuing Legal Education Department of the Bar Association of Lehigh County would like to recognize our 50+ year members by offering all future BALC Lunch & Learn CLE seminars to them at no charge.

We sincerely hope those who have completed this mile stone come and enjoy lunch on us while earning one substantive or ethics credit at no charge.

2017 Inductees are: The Honorable William Platt

E. Keller Kline, III Rudolph Zieger, Jr.

CLE Update 12

BALC CLE REGISTRATION FORM

Name:___________________________________________

PA Sup.CT.ID_____________________________________ Member of the Bar Association of: [ ] Lehigh [ ] Northampton [ ] Other_______________________ [ ] Legal Support Staff Register by: Phone 610.433.6401, Ext. 16; FAX 610.770.9826; E-Mail [email protected] or Mail your registration to: BALC, 1114 Walnut Street, Allentown PA 18102.

[ ] February 3: “WCAIS Update” Special 2 Hour Session $20.00 tuition fee for all who attend

TOTAL AMOUNT ENCLOSED $_________________________ Please make checks payable to & mail to: BALC, 1114 W Walnut St, Allentown PA 18102.

CHANGE OF PBI POLICY

Because of low attendance at many PBI Simulcast seminars in recent months, PBI has adopted a policy to cancel programs when the registration does not justify the direct costs. PBI may cancel programs approximately ten (10) days before the scheduled date of the presentation under these circumstances.

Although PBI no longer charges extra tuition for walk-ins, to avoid cancellation of seminars which you would like to attend, please pre-register.

Call the PBI Registration Number at: 1.800.932.4637 before the program if you plan to

register “at the door”.

NewsLine 5

YOUNG LAWYERS DIVISION Upcoming Happy Hours:

February 2, 2017: Sunset Grille

March 2, 2017: 99 Bottles

Stay tuned for details of additional upcoming

Young Lawyers Division events!!

YLD events are a great opportunity to meet and network with other young attorneys.

Guests are welcome!

Questions or requests for future Happy Hour Locations?

Email: [email protected]

NewsLine 6

The Lawyers Lunch Table

A treasured tradition is returning for all Lawyers and Judges. There is a standing reservation for Lunch at Bell Hall, 612 W. Hamilton St, on the 1st Thursday of the month, 12PM. Please come out enjoy some camaraderie with other colleagues.

Please RSVP to: Robert Donatelli

610-391-1800 [email protected]

NewsLine 7

2017 Calendar

January 2017

January 16: Bar Association Holiday- Office Closed

January 27: Bar Admissions & New Member Reception

February

February 13: Bar Memorials 9am Courtroom A

February 15: Barristers Inn 5:30pm

February 16: Board Meeting 4:30pm

February 20: BALC Office Closed

March

March 15: Barristers Inn 5:30pm

March 16: Board Meeting 4:30pm

April

April 14: BALC Office Closed

April 19: Barristers Inn 5:30pm

April 20: Board Meeting 4:30pm

NewsLine 8

NOTES

23

LEHIGH LAW JOURNAL

Emily A. Zettlemoyer, Esquire, Zettlemoyer Law Office, LLP, 53 North 3rd Street, Emmaus, PA 18049.Attorneys: Emily A. Zettlemoy-er, Esquire, Zettlemoyer Law Office, LLP, 53 North 3rd Street, Emmaus, PA 18049.

Henseler, Barbara W. a/k/a Bar-bara Ann Henseler a/k/a Barbara Williams Henseler, dec’d.Late of South Whitehall Town-ship. Executrix: Lois E. Henseler.Attorneys: Robert M. Knauer, Esquire, Knauer & Davenport, 143 North Eighth St., Allen-town, PA 18101.

Hoffman, George, dec’d.Late of Allentown. Executor: Alan S. Hoffman c/o Rebecca M. Young, Esq. and Lia K. Snyder, Esq., Young & Young, 119 E. Main Street, Macungie, PA 18062.Attorneys: Rebecca M. Young, Esq. and Lia K. Snyder, Esq., Young & Young, 119 E. Main Street, Macungie, PA 18062.

Hoke, Germaine A., dec’d.Late of Salisbury. Executor: Brian K. Hoke, 40 Hoch Avenue, Topton, PA 19562.Attorney: E. Keller Kline, III, Esquire, 731 W. Turner Street, Allentown, PA 18102.

Kauffman, Franklin L. a/k/a Franklin L. Kauffman, Sr., dec’d.Late of Catasauqua. Executor: Craig F. Kauffman c/o Jeffrey F. Hussar, Esquire,

946 Third Street, Whitehall, PA 18052.Attorney: Jeffrey F. Hussar, Esq., 946 Third Street, White-hall, PA 18052.

Klingaman, Dennis D. a/k/a D. D. Klingaman a/k/a Dennis Klingaman, dec’d.Late of 5356 Vera Cruz Road, Emmaus. Personal Representative: George F. Klingaman c/o James A. Rit-ter, Esquire, Gross McGinley, LLP, 111 E. Harrison St., Suite 2, Emmaus, PA 18049-2916.Attorneys: James A. Ritter, Es-quire, Gross McGinley, LLP, 111 E. Harrison Street, Suite 2, Emmaus, PA 18049-2916.

Kramer, Shirley M., dec’d.Late of Alburtis. Executrix: Sherryann Oels c/o Rebecca M. Young, Esq. and Lia K. Snyder, Esq., Young & Young, 119 E. Main Street, Macungie, PA 18062.Attorneys: Rebecca M. Young, Esq. and Lia K. Snyder, Esq., Young & Young, 119 E. Main Street, Macungie, PA 18062.

Lynch, Edward A., Jr. a/k/a Edward A. Lynch, dec’d.Late of the Township of Lower Milford. Co-Executrices: Marisa L. Lynch and Sarah S. Lynch c/o Bradford D. Wagner, Esquire, 662 Main Street, Hellertown, PA 18055-1726.Attorney: Bradford D. Wagner, Esquire, 662 Main Street, Hel-lertown, PA 18055-1726, (610) 838-6563.

Miller, Sarah K., dec’d.Late of Whitehall.

24

LEHIGH LAW JOURNAL

Executor: E. Keller Kline, III, 731 W. Turner Street, Allen-town, PA 18102.Attorney: E. Keller Kline, III, Esquire, 731 W. Turner Street, Allentown, PA 18102.

Reisteter, Lorraine a/k/a Lor-raine Irene Reisteter, dec’d.Late of Bethlehem. Executor: Lynn Newbould, 21 Rittenhouse Circle, Newtown, PA 18940.

Remaley, Romaine E. a/k/a Romaine E.E. Remaley, dec’d.Late of 7765 Penn Street, Em-erald. Executor: Dean Remaley c/o Feldman Law Offices, P.C., 221 N. Cedar Crest Blvd., Allentown, PA 18104.Attorneys: Samuel F. Feldman, Esquire, Feldman Law Offices, P.C., 221 N. Cedar Crest Blvd., Allentown, PA 18104.

Roberts, Ruth E. a/k/a Ruth Roberts, dec’d.Late of Allentown. Executor: Randy S. Roberts a/k/a Randy Scott Roberts c/o Michael Ira Stump, Esquire, 207 E. Main Street, Suite 100, Macungie, PA 18062.Attorney: Michael Ira Stump, Esquire, 207 E. Main Street, Suite 100, Macungie, PA 18062.

Schubert, Robert H., dec’d.Late of 3840 Brunner Court, Whitehall. Executor: Wayne R. Schubert c/o Linda S. Luther-Veno, Es-quire, 2204 Walbert Avenue, Allentown, PA 18104.Attorney: Linda S. Luther-Veno, Esquire, 2204 Walbert Avenue, Allentown, PA 18104.

Executor: Michael Fudali c/o Daniel G. Dougherty, Esq., 881 3rd St., Suite B-3, Whitehall, PA 18052.Attorney: Daniel G. Dougherty, Esq., 881 3rd St., Suite B-3, Whitehall, PA 18052.

Netwall, Jean J. a/k/a Jean Jeanette Netwall, dec’d.Late of Orefield. Executrices: Pamela A. Hariegle and Debra J. Netwall.Attorneys: Martin J. Karess, Esquire, Law Office of Martin J. Karess PC, 215 North Ninth St., Allentown, PA 18102.

Parry, Fay A., dec’d.Late of 100 Ramapo Trail, Apt. HB, Upper Macungie. Personal Representative: Scott C. George c/o Thomas A. Cape-hart, Esquire, Gross McGinley, LLP, 33 South 7th Street, P.O. Box 4060, Allentown, PA 18105-4060.Attorneys: Thomas A. Capehart, Esquire, Gross McGinley, LLP, 33 South 7th Street, P.O. Box 4060, Allentown, PA 18105-4060.

Perry, Diane L. a/k/a Diane Levy Perry, dec’d.Late of Emmaus. Executor: David M. Perry c/o Rebecca M. Young, Esq. and Lia K. Snyder, Esq., Young & Young, 119 E. Main Street, Macungie, PA 18062.Attorneys: Rebecca M. Young, Esq. and Lia K. Snyder, Esq., Young & Young, 119 E. Main Street, Macungie, PA 18062.

Plarr, Katherine B., dec’d.Late of Allentown.

25

LEHIGH LAW JOURNAL

Sedora, Kathleen M., dec’d.Late of Allentown. Administratrix: Rosanne M. Westgate c/o Noonan Law Of-fice, 526 Walnut Street, Allen-town, PA 18101-2394.Attorneys: Noonan Law Office, 526 Walnut Street, Allentown, PA 18101-2394.

Supp, Marion A. a/k/a Marian A. Supp, dec’d.Late of North Whitehall Town-ship. Executor: Charles D. Supp c/o Karl F. Longenbach, Esquire, 425 West Broad St., P.O. Box 1920, Bethlehem, PA 18016-1920.Attorney: Karl F. Longenbach, Esquire, 425 West Broad St., P.O. Box 1920, Bethlehem, PA 18016-1920, (610) 867-8150.

Turner, Linda D. a/k/a Linda Diane Turner, dec’d.Late of Macungie. Executrix: Diana Lynn Smer-don c/o Emily A. Zettlemoyer, Esquire, Zettlemoyer Law Of-fice, LLP, 53 North 3rd Street, Emmaus, PA 18049.Attorneys: Emily A. Zettlemoy-er, Esquire, Zettlemoyer Law Office, LLP, 53 North 3rd Street, Emmaus, PA 18049.

Witzell, Allan F. a/k/a Allan Witzell, dec’d.Late of Emmaus. Executor: Douglass P. Witzell c/o Emily A. Zettlemoyer, Es-quire, Zettlemoyer Law Office, LLP, 53 North 3rd Street, Em-maus, PA 18049.Attorneys: Emily A. Zettlemoy-er, Esquire, Zettlemoyer Law Office, LLP, 53 North 3rd Street, Emmaus, PA 18049.

SECOND PUBLICATION

Buschi, Marie a/k/a Marie C. Buschi a/k/a Marie Buschi, M.D. a/k/a Marie C. Buschi, M.D., dec’d.Late of Coopersburg. Executrix: Ann F. Buschi, 1414 Gable Drive, Coopersburg, PA 18036.Attorneys: Keith R. Pavlack, Esquire, Pavlack Law Offices, P.C., 1415 Blakeslee Blvd. Dr. E., Lehighton, PA 18235.

Crum, Shirley J., dec’d.Late of the City of Allentown. Executrix: Caroline Gonzalez c/o Norris, McLaughlin & Mar-cus, P.A., 515 West Hamilton Street, Suite 502, Allentown, PA 18101.Attorneys: Robert Donatelli, Esquire, Norris, McLaughlin & Marcus, P.A., 515 West Hamil-ton Street, Suite 502, Allen-town, PA 18101.

Guardino, Julia F., dec’d.Late of Allentown. Julia F. Guardino, Settlor. Trustee: Marie A. Plessl Lennox c/o James R. Wishchuk, JD, Esquire, 2310 Walbert Avenue, Suite 103, Allentown, PA 18104-1360.Attorney: James R. Wishchuk, JD, Esquire, 2310 Walbert Av-enue, Suite 103, Allentown, PA 18104-1360.

Leiderman, Frederick F., III, dec’d.Late of the City of Bethlehem. Co-Executors: Tiffany A. Kocher and Frederick F. Leiderman, IV c/o Gail Weiner Shearer, Es-quire, 70 E. Broad Street, P.O. Box 1426, Bethlehem, PA 18016-1426.

26

LEHIGH LAW JOURNAL

Attorney: Gail Weiner Shearer, Esquire, 70 E. Broad Street, P.O. Box 1426, Bethlehem, PA 18016-1426.

Maruscak, John T. a/k/a John Maruscak, dec’d.Late of the City of Allentown. Co-Executors: John T. Marus-cak and Lucille Maruscak-Kopack c/o Beth A. Dobis Beers, Esquire, Attorney at Law, 315 E. Main Street, Bath, PA 18014.Attorney: Beth A. Dobis Beers, Esquire, Attorney at Law, 315 E. Main Street, Bath, PA 18014.

Navitsky, Joan L., dec’d.Late of Lower Macungie Town-ship. Administrator: Eric M. Mika, Esq., 26 East Centre Street, Shenandoah, PA 17976.Attorneys: Eric M. Mika, Esq., Toole, Mika & Jones, LLC, 26 East Centre Street, Shenando-ah, PA 17976.

Noonan, Constance S., dec’d.Late of Allentown. Executor: Thomas K. Noonan c/o Noonan Law Office, 526 Walnut Street, Allentown, PA 18101-2394.Attorneys: Noonan Law Office, 526 Walnut Street, Allentown, PA 18101-2394.

Onufer, George a/k/a George S. Onufer a/k/a George Stephen Onufer, dec’d.Late of Zionsville. Administratrix C.T.A.: Mrs. Deborah A. Saab.Attorneys: John D. Lychak, Esquire, Law Offices of John D. Lychak, P.C., 60 W. Broad Street, Suite 98, Bethlehem, PA 18018.

Patterson, Jennifer I. a/k/a Jen-nifer Ivora Patterson, dec’d.Late of Macungie. Jennifer I. Patterson Living Trust established March 29, 1995, restated in full December 30, 2003.Jennifer I. Patterson a/k/a Jen-nifer Ivora Patterson, Settlor.Trustee: Matthew J. Patterson c/o Rebecca M. Young, Esq. and Lia K. Snyder, Esq., Young & Young, 119 E. Main Street, Macungie, PA 18062.Attorneys: Rebecca M. Young, Esq. and Lia K. Snyder, Esq., Young & Young, 119 E. Main Street, Macungie, PA 18062.

Rhoads, Debra A., dec’d.Late of Catasauqua. Executor: Alfred C. Rhoads, Jr. c/o Everett Cook, Esquire, 2309 MacArthur Road, Whitehall, PA 18052.Attorney: Everett Cook, Es-quire, 2309 MacArthur Road, Whitehall, PA 18052.

Roth, Robert H. a/k/a Robert Roth, dec’d.Late of Orefield. Executors: William J. Roth and Joy L. Hunsicker c/o David B. Schwartz, Esquire, 44 E. Broad St., Suite 15, Bethlehem, PA 18018.Attorney: David B. Schwartz, Esquire, 44 E. Broad St., Suite 15, Bethlehem, PA 18018, (610) 691-3151.

Ruch, Willard G., dec’d.Late of Whitehall. Executor: David L. Lakatosh, Jr. c/o Charles W. Stopp, Es-quire, Steckel and Stopp, LLC, 125 S. Walnut Street, Suite 210, Slatington, PA 18080.

27

LEHIGH LAW JOURNAL

Attorneys: Charles W. Stopp, Esquire, Steckel and Stopp, LLC, 125 S. Walnut Street, Suite 210, Slatington, PA 18080.

Smith, Minnie V., dec’d.Late of the City of Allentown. Executrix: Dorothea Terry c/o Norris, McLaughlin & Marcus, P.A., 515 West Hamilton Street, Suite 502, Allentown, PA 18101.Attorneys: Robert Donatelli, Esquire, Norris, McLaughlin & Marcus, P.A., 515 West Hamil-ton Street, Suite 502, Allen-town, PA 18101.

Sutton, Theresa F., dec’d.Late of Emmaus. Executrix: Michelle A. Seel c/o Charles W. Stopp, Esquire, Steckel and Stopp LLC, 125 S. Walnut Street, Suite 210, Slat-ington, PA 18080.Attorneys: Charles W. Stopp, Esquire, Steckel and Stopp LLC, 125 S. Walnut Street, Suite 210, Slatington, PA 18080.

THIRD PUBLICATION

Bright, Mary L., dec’d.Late of Allentown. Executor: John R. Bright, 1161 S. 3rd St., Allentown, PA 18103.Attorney: Kristen Snyder, Es-quire, 1215 Manor Dr., Ste. 202, Mechanicsburg, PA 17055.

Byers, Lyda M., dec’d.Late of Zionsville. Executrix: Joyce B. Doyle c/o Charles A. Waters, Esquire, Steckel and Stopp LLC, 125 S. Walnut Street, Suite 210, Slat-ington, PA 18080.Attorneys: Charles A. Waters, Esquire, Steckel and Stopp LLC,

125 S. Walnut Street, Suite 210, Slatington, PA 18080.

Campion, Reverend Joseph J. a/k/a Joseph J. Campion, dec’d.Late of Bethlehem. Executor: Thomas J. Campion c/o James R. Wishchuk, JD, Esquire, 2310 Walbert Avenue, Suite 103, Allentown, PA 18104-1360.Attorney: James R. Wishchuk, JD, Esquire, 2310 Walbert Av-enue, Suite 103, Allentown, PA 18104-1360.

Deisenroth, Melvin T., dec’d.Late of Allentown. Executor: Ted W. Deisenroth c/o James R. Wishchuk, JD, Esquire, 2310 Walbert Avenue, Suite 103, Allentown, PA 18104-1360.Attorney: James R. Wishchuk, JD, Esquire, 2310 Walbert Av-enue, Suite 103, Allentown, PA 18104-1360.

Deisenroth, Melvin T., dec’d.Late of Allentown. Melvin T. Deisenroth, Settlor.Trustee: Ted W. Deisenroth c/o James R. Wishchuk, JD, Es-quire, 2310 Walbert Avenue, Suite 103, Allentown, PA 18104-1360.Attorney: James R. Wishchuk, JD, Esquire, 2310 Walbert Av-enue, Suite 103, Allentown, PA 18104-1360.

Kern, Richard W., Sr. a/k/a Richard W. Kern a/k/a Rich-ard Walter Kern, Sr., dec’d.Late of Allentown. Executor: Richard W. Kern, Jr. c/o Anthony G. O’Malley, Jr.,

28

LEHIGH LAW JOURNAL

Esq., Law Office of Anthony G. O’Malley, Jr., 233 Pershing Blvd., Whitehall, PA 18052.Attorneys: Anthony G. O’Malley, Jr., Esq., Law Office of Anthony G. O’Malley, Jr., 233 Pershing Blvd., Whitehall, PA 18052.

Moyer, Sandra Alexandra a/k/a Alexandra Sandra Moyer, dec’d.Late of Allentown. Executor: George F. Motter, V, 18022 Doty Avenue, Torrance, CA 90504.

Nederostek, Alfred A. a/k/a Skeeter Nederostek, dec’d.Late of Whitehall. Executor: Dennis M. Madaya, 3360 Crestview La., Walnut-port, PA 18088.

Scherer, Anne E., dec’d.Late of Whitehall. Administrator: Jonathan S. Scherer c/o Jeffrey F. Hussar, Esquire, 946 Third Street, Whitehall, PA 18052.Attorney: Jeffrey F. Hussar, Esq., 946 Third Street, White-hall, PA 18052.

Stuart, Mary Frances, dec’d.Late of South Whitehall Town-ship. Executrix: Jane Stuart Noel c/o Norris, McLaughlin & Marcus, P.A., 515 West Hamilton Street, Suite 502, Allentown, PA 18101.Attorneys: Dolores A. Laputka, Esquire, Norris, McLaughlin & Marcus, P.A., 515 West Hamil-ton Street, Suite 502, Allen-town, PA 18101.

Yulick, Joseph, dec’d.Late of Center Valley.

Executor: James Kuchinsky, 853 Schuylkill Mountain Road, Schuylkill Haven, PA 17972.Attorneys: J. Robert Zane, Es-quire, Zane, Rossi, Conville & Harley, 38 St. John Street, P.O. Box 96, Schuylkill Haven, PA 17972.

ORPHANS’ COURT DIVISION AUDIT LIST

JUDGE J. BRIAN JOHNSON

9:00 A.M.—JANUARY 27, 2017

Estates/Trust of: Atty.Iulia Malone Trust; L. RothJoseph V. Fry; L. SnyderRonald N. Hubler Trust; W.G. Mal-

kamesHarvey D. Kern; L. RothGregory Samuel Tyson; L. SnyderSara K. Miller Trust; R.N. NanovicWendy A. W. Parr

C. of O.C. DivisionJ-6, 13

INDIVIDUAL FICTITIOUS NAME NOTICES

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pur-suant to the provisions of Act 295 of 1982, as amended, of intention to file, or the filing of, in the Office of the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania at Harrisburg, Pennsyl-vania, a certificate for the conduct of a business in Pennsylvania, under the assumed or fictitious name, style or designation of

Name: BA PRINTING with its principal place of business at: 6009 Hamilton Blvd., Allentown, PA 18106.

The names and address of the persons owning or interested in said business are: Joey M. Binder and Troy M. Binder, 6009 Hamilton Blvd., Allentown, PA 18106

J-13

Name: ENTRYLEVELGRADS.COM with its principal place of busi-ness at: 3375 Fairland Dr., Sch-necksville, PA 18078.

29

LEHIGH LAW JOURNALThe name and address of the per-

son owning or interested in said business are: Corey J. Dewalt, 3375 Fairland Dr., Schnecksville, PA 18078.

J-13

Name: HOPE FOR GARDENS with its principal place of business at: 5848 Kernsville Road, Orefield, PA 18069.

The name and address of the per-son owning or interested in said business are: Teresa Ann Hope, 5848 Kernsville Road, Orefield, PA 18069.

J-13

Name: KEITH MILL TRUCKING with its principal place of business at: 122 Cold Stream Court, Emmaus, PA 18049.

The name and address of the per-son owning or interested in said business are: Jeffrey Keith Miller, 122 Cold Stream Court, Emmaus, PA 18049.

J-13

Name: LEHIGH VALLEY SPARX with its principal place of business at: 438 3rd Ave., Bethlehem, PA 18018.

The name and address of the per-son owning or interested in said business are: Kellina Patricia Yarrish, 438 3rd Ave., Bethlehem, PA 18018.

J-13

Name: ON YOUR TABLE with its principal place of business at: 3754 Catherine Avenue, Allentown, PA 18103.

The name and address of the per-son owning or interested in said business are: Kimberly Slack, 3754 Catherine Avenue, Allentown, PA 18103.

J-13

Name: SUGAR & SPICE CULI-NARY CENTER with its principal place of business at: 316 East Lynn-wood Street, Allentown, PA 18103.

The name and address of the per-son owning or interested in said

business are: Sharon M. Styffe, 316 East Lynnwood Street, Allentown, PA 18103.

J-13

CORPORATE FICTITIOUS NAME NOTICE

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pur-suant to the provisions of Act 295 of 1982, as amended, of intention to file, or the filing of, in the Office of the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania at Harrisburg, Pennsyl-vania, a certificate for the conduct of a business in Pennsylvania, under the assumed or fictitious name, style or designation of

Name: IRON VALLEY REAL ES-TATE OF LEHIGH VALLEY with its principal place of business at: 1146 S. Cedar Crest Blvd., Allentown, PA 18103.

The name of the entity owning or interested in said business is: Allen-town Group, LLC.

J-13

LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY NOTICE

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Certificate of Organization for a Domestic Limited Liability Company has been filed with the Department of State of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania at Harrisburg, Pennsyl-vania, pursuant to the provisions of the Limited Liability Company Law of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Act of December 7, 1994 (P.L. 703, No. 106), by the following company:

LEDAMETE GRASS FARM, LLCThe Certificate of Organization

was filed on December 22, 2016.REBECCA M. YOUNG, ESQ.YOUNG & YOUNG119 E. Main StreetMacungie, PA 18062

J-13

NOTICE

EUGENE J. McGUIRE D.D.S., PChas been incorporated under the

30

LEHIGH LAW JOURNALprovisions of Chapter 29 of the Busi-ness Corporation Law of 1988 as a Professional Corporation.

J-13

NOTICE OF AMENDMENT CHANGING NAME

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Certificate of Amendment was filed with the Department of State of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, at Harrisburg, Pennsylvania on Decem-ber 28, 2016 pursuant to the provi-sions of the Pennsylvania Limited Liability Act of 1994. The purpose of the amendment is to change Revolu-tionary Vapes LLC name to Graduate Solutions LLC.

J-13

NOTICE

Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas

No.: 2016-cv-2533

Jack Curran, Plaintiff

v. Thomas P. Florio d/b/a

Kneading Hands Massage, Defendant

————Thomas P. Florio d/b/a Kneading

Hands Massage, you have been sued in the following action pending in the Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas for personal injuries.

If you wish to defend, you must enter a written appearance person-ally or by attorney and file your de-fenses or objections in writing with the Court. You are warned that if you fail to do so the case may proceed without you and a judgment may be entered against you without further notice for the relief requested by the plaintiff. You may lose money or property or other rights important to you.

You should take this paper to your lawyer at once. If you do not have a lawyer, go to or telephone the office

set forth below. This office can pro-vide you with information about hir-ing a lawyer.

If you cannot hire a lawyer, this office may be able to provide you with information about agencies that may offer legal services to eligible persons at a reduced fee or no fee.

LAWYER REFERRAL SERVICEP.O. Box 1324Allentown, PA 18105-1324(610) 433-7094

J-13

PRIVATE DETECTIVE LICENSE NOTICE

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on January 5, 2017 a petition in the application of Ivan P. Markovitch for renewal of an Individual Private De-tective License was filed under CP-39-MD-0004469-2016 in Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas in accordance with the Private Detective Act. The Court has set a hearing for January 23, 2017 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 2C before the Honorable James T. Anthony for said petition. All persons interested in this matter may appear and show cause, if they have any, why this application should not be granted.

J-13, 20

CHANGE OF NAME NOTICE

In the Court of Common Pleas of Lehigh County

Civil Action—Law

NO. 2017-C-0029

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on January 5, 2017, the Petition of Brandon William Thomas Glazebrook for a Change of Name has been filed in the above named Court, praying for a Decree to change the name of Petitioner from Brandon William Thomas Glazebrook to Bailey Rose Forester.

The Court has fixed Friday, March 3, 2017 at 9:30 A.M. in Courtroom No. 1A, Lehigh County Courthouse,

31

LEHIGH LAW JOURNALAllentown, Pennsylvania, as the date and place for the hearing of said Petition. All persons interested in the proposed change of name may appear and show cause, if any they have, why the prayer of said Petitioner should not be granted.

J-13

NOTICE OF MARSHAL’S SALE OF REAL ESTATE

In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of

Pennsylvania

No. 5:16-CV-00808-LS

U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE,

SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS TRUSTEE, SUCCESSOR BY

MERGER TO LASALLE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS

TRUSTEE FOR THE REGISTERED HOLDERS OF LB-UBS

COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE TRUST 2006 C-1, COMMERCIAL

MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-C1,

Plaintiffv.

HSP LEHIGH VALLEY WAREHOUSE LP,

Defendant————

Marshal’s Sale of Real Estate on January 27, 2017, at 10:00 A.M., at

the U.S. Marshal’s Service, 2110 U.S. Courthouse, 601 Market St., Phila-delphia, PA 19106.

TO BE SOLD: All that certain tract of land known as 910 Nestle Way, Upper Macungie Township (Breinigs-ville), Lehigh County, Pennsylvania, as more particularly described in Exhibit A to the Mortgage recorded on January 10, 2006, at Instrument Number 7316921 in the Lehigh County Recorder of Deeds.

SEIZED IN EXECUTION as the Property of HSP LEHIGH VALLEY WAREHOUSE LP. Judgment entered July 27, 2016 in the amount of $54,918,448.16, plus interest and costs through the date of the Mar-shal’s sale.

The improvements are commer-cial.

10% of the bid is due at the time of sale in the form of money order, cashier’s check or certified funds (no cash); the balance is due 10 days after the Court confirms the sale. Other terms and conditions to be announced at the sale. Schedule of Distribution will be filed by Plaintiff ’s attorney within 30 days of the date of sale.

For more information, contact Daniel Mullin, Esq. at (215) 665-8500.

D-23, 30; J-6, 13

32

LEHIGH LAW JOURNAL

SHERIFF’S SALE OF VALUABLE REAL ESTATE

———the following Real Estate will be

sold at Sheriff ’s Sale At 10:00 A.M.

Friday, January 27, 2017

in the Courthouse, Fifth and Hamilton Streets

Allentown, Pennsylvania.

Purchasers Must Immediately Pay 10% of the Purchase Price by

Certified Check.TO ALL PARTIES IN INTEREST

AND CLAIMANT:Upon all sales where the filing of

a Schedule of Distribution is re-quired, the said Schedule will be filed by the Sheriff on a date specified by the Sheriff not later than thirty (30) days after sale and a Deed will be delivered to the PURCHASER and distribution will be made in accor-dance with the Schedule unless ex-ceptions are filed thereto within ten (10) days thereafter.

On sales where the filing of a Schedule of Distribution is not re-quired, a Deed will be delivered to the PURCHASER after the expiration of twenty (20) days from the date of sale, unless exceptions are taken to the sale within that period.

NO. 1

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2015-C-3487, Lakeview Loan Servic-ing, LLC v. Helen E. A Imre, owner of property situate in the City of Allen-town, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania, being 1611 1/2 West Turner Street, Allentown, PA 18102.

Tax Assessment No. 54965944-2700 1.

Improvements thereon: A Resi-dential Dwelling.

Attorneys Nora C. Viggiano, Esquire

KML Law Group, P.C.

NO. 3

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2016-C-1558, U.S. Bank National Association, As Trustee for the Penn-sylvania Housing Finance Agency v. Hector M. Gonzalez, Jr. and Angelica Gonzalez, owners of property situate in the Township of Hanover, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania, being 1818 Tacoma Street, Allentown, PA 18109.

Tax Assessment No. 64182391-7121-1.

Improvements thereon: A Resi-dential Dwelling House.

Attorneys Leon P. Haller, Esquire Purcell, Krug & Haller

NO. 4

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2015-C-3611, U.S. Bank National Association, As Trustee for the Penn-sylvania Housing Finance Agency v. Rose Mosella and Stephen Mosella, owners of property situate in the Borough of Fountain Hill, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania, being 711 South Bergen Street, Bethlehem, PA 18015.


Improvements thereon: A Resi-dential Dwelling House.

Attorneys Leon P. Haller, Esquire Purcell, Krug & Haller

NO. 5

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2015-C-981, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Abdul Conteh, owner of property situate in the Township of Whitehall, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania, being 175 Shiloh Court, Whitehall, PA 18052.


33

LEHIGH LAW JOURNALImprovements thereon: Single

Family Dwelling.Attorneys

Manley Deas Kochalski LLC

NO. 6

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2013-C-3037, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Successor by Merger to Wachovia Bank, National Association v. Mi-chael H. Nimeh, Paula F. Nimeh, owners of property situate in the City of Allentown, Lehigh County, Penn-sylvania, being 3078 Salisbury Drive, Allentown, PA 18103-6346.


Improvements thereon: Residen-tial Dwelling.

Attorneys Phelan Hallinan Diamond

& Jones, LLP

NO. 7

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2016-C-1072, Ditech Financial LLC f/k/a Green Tree Servicing LLC v. David Molitoris and Kathy Molitoris, owners of property situate in the Township of Whitehall, Lehigh Coun-ty, Pennsylvania, being 5209 Third Street, Whitehall, PA 18052.



Attorneys KML Law Group, P.C.

NO. 8

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2016-C-2079, Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, Doing Business As Christiana Trust, Not in Its Indi-vidual Capacity, But Solely As Trus-tee for BCAT 2015-14ATT v. Ariana

DeRoche, owner of property situate in the City of Allentown, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania, being 123 S. Blank Street, Allentown, PA 18102.

Tax Assessment No. 54968845-7163.

Improvements thereon: Residen-tial Real Estate.

Attorneys Andrew J. Marley, Esquire

Stern & Eisenberg, PC

NO. 9

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2016-C-1885, Ditech Financial LLC f/k/a Green Tree Servicing LLC v. Jennifer L. Chahine, owner of prop-erty situate in the City of Allentown, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania, being 2424 West Union Street a/k/a 2420-2426 West Union Street, Allentown, PA 18104.




NO. 10

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2016-C-1070, U.S. Bank National Association, As Trustee for Specialty Underwriting and Residential Fi-nance Trust Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2007-BC1 v. Shelley A. Perkins and Daniel B. Perkins, owners of property situate in the Township of Lower Macungie, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania, being 2490 Danfield Way, Macungie, PA 18062.




34

LEHIGH LAW JOURNAL

NO. 11

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2016-C-0792, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Marisol Martinez, owner of prop-erty situate in the City of Bethlehem, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania, being 306 2nd Avenue, Bethlehem, PA 18018-5601.




& Jones, LLP

NO. 12

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2015-C-1161, U.S. Bank National Association, As Trustee for MASTR Asset Backed Securities Trust 2005-AB1, Mortgage Pass-Through Cer-tificates, Series 2005-AB1 v. Ram-dass Aggarwal, Uma Aggarwal, owners of property situate in the Township of Upper Macungie, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania, being 6894 Lehigh Court, Allentown, PA 18106-9541.




& Jones, LLP

NO. 13

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2016-C-1293, Fifth Third Mortgage Company v. Robert C. Manns, Lisa C. Manns, owners of property situate in the Township of Lower Macungie, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania, being 2610 Fieldview Drive, Macungie, PA 18062-8414.




& Jones, LLP

NO. 14

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2015-C-3341, HSBC Bank USA, Na-tional Association As Trustee for Mortgageit Securities Corp., Mort-gage Loan Trust, Series 2007-1, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates v. Ana V. Diaz, owner of property situate in the City of Allentown, Le-high County, Pennsylvania, being 419 1/2 North 10th Street, Allen-town, PA 18102.


Improvements thereon: Single Family Dwelling.

Attorneys Manley Deas Kochalski LLC

NO. 15

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2016-C-1949, LSF9 Master Participa-tion Trust v. Miguel A. Colon, owner of property situate in the Township of Whitehall, Lehigh County, Penn-sylvania, being 1431 Presidential Drive, Whitehall, PA 18052.


Improvements thereon: Single Family Dwelling.

Attorneys Manley Deas Kochalski LLC

NO. 16

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2016-C-1655, Apex Bank f/k/a Bank of Camden v. Raul Garcia-Ortiz,

35

LEHIGH LAW JOURNALowner of property situate in the City of Allentown, Lehigh County, Penn-sylvania, being 931 Pine Street, Al-lentown, PA 18102 a/k/a 931 W. Street, Allentown, PA 18102 a/k/a 931 1/2 West Pine Street, Allentown, PA 18102.

Tax Assessment Nos. 54978197-7055 and 549781977055-1.

Improvements thereon: Residen-tial Property.

Attorneys Powers Kirn & Associates, LLC

NO. 17

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2015-C-1311, Bank of America, N.A., Successor by Merger to BAC Home Loans, LP f/k/a Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP v. Nisreen G. Safi, owner of property situate in the City of Allentown, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania, being 875 North Kear-ney Street, Allentown, PA 18109.



Attorneys Nora C. Viggiano, Esquire

KML Law Group, P.C.

NO. 18

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2014-C-1583, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Michael Welz, William J. Welz (Deceased), owners of prop-erty situate in the Township of Upper Saucon, Lehigh County, Pennsylva-nia, being 5966 Saratoga Lane, Coo-persburg, PA 18036.




NO. 19

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2015-C-2824, Deutsche Bank Na-tional Trust Company, As Trustee for Soundview Home Loan Trust 2006-WF2, Asset-Backed Certificates, Se-ries 2006-WF2 v. George A. Fullerton, owner of property situate in the City of Bethlehem, Lehigh County, Penn-sylvania, being 1310 West Rosemont Drive, Bethlehem, PA 18018-1644.




& Jones, LLP

NO. 20

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2012-C-0475, PNC Bank, National Association v. Bruce E. Barker Jr., owner of property situate in the Bor-ough of Fountain Hill, Lehigh Coun-ty, Pennsylvania, being 831 School Street, Fountain Hill, PA 18015.



Attorney Michael T. McKeever, Esquire

NO. 21

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2013-C-3148, U.S. Bank National Association v. Leroy A. Campbell, Marcia R. Campbell, owners of prop-erty situate in the Township of White-hall, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania, being 5008 Foxdale Drive, Whitehall, PA 18052-2233.




& Jones, LLP

36

LEHIGH LAW JOURNAL

NO. 22

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2015-C-1086, Bayview Loan Servic-ing, LLC v. Terrance C. Knight a/k/a Terrance Knight, Susan T. Badu a/k/a Susan Badu, owners of prop-erty situate in the Township of Salis-bury, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania, being 1408 Garden Avenue, Allen-town, PA 18103-8322.




& Jones, LLP

NO. 23

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2016-C-1726, U.S. Bank National Association, As Trustee, for Residen-tial Asset Mortgage Products, Inc., Mortgage Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-EFC1, by Its Servicer Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC v. Linda M. Clark, owner of property situate in the City of Allentown, Lehigh County, Penn-sylvania, being 148 East Walnut Street, Allentown, PA 18109.



Attorneys Jessica N. Manis, Esquire

Stern & Eisenberg PC

NO. 24

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2016-C-2042, Wilmington Trust Na-tional Association, As Successor Trustee to Citibank, N.A., As Trustee for Bear Stearns Asset Backed Secu-rities I Trust 2005-Cl1, Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2005-CL1 v. An-drew Langoussis a/k/a Andrew N. Langoussis, owner of property situate

in the City of Bethlehem, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania, being 1610 West Broad Street, Bethlehem, PA 18018.


Improvements thereon: Residen-tial Dwelling House.

Attorneys Udren Law Offices, P.C.

NO. 25

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2015-C-1778, Bank of America, N.A. v. Victor J. Montes and Angela M. Riccio, owners of property situate in the Township of Upper Macungie, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania, being 835 Spring White Drive, Breinigsville, PA 18031.



Attorney Michael. T. McKeever, Esquire

NO. 26

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2012-C-1991, Bank of America, N.A. v. Inez Rogers a/k/a Inez M. Rogers, owner of property situate in the City of Allentown, Lehigh County, Penn-sylvania, being 142 West Turner Street, Allentown, PA 18102.




NO. 27

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2015-C-0017, Deutsche Bank Na-tional Trust Company, As Trustee, in Trust for the Registered Holders of Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I Inc.

37

LEHIGH LAW JOURNALTrust 2006-HE6, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-HE6 v. Maryann Raab and John S. Raab, owners of property situate in the Borough of Alburtis, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania, being 348 Avi Drive, Alburtis, PA 18011.



Attorney Robert W. Williams, Esquire

NO. 28

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2016-C-0174, Deutsche Bank Na-tional Trust Company, As Trustee for New Century Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 2005-C, Asset Backed Pass-Through Certificates c/o Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC v. Stephen J. Polak and Jean A. Polak and Anad Associates, LLC, owners of property situate in the City of Allentown, Le-high County, Pennsylvania, being 226 Lone Avenue, Allentown, PA 18104.



Attorneys Jessica N. Manis, Esquire

Stern & Eisenberg PC

NO. 29

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2016-C-1161, Bawld Guy Note Fund, LLC v. Anilkumarr A. Laad, owner of property situate in the City of Allen-town, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania, being 330 N. 7th Street, Allentown, PA 18102.



Attorneys Stephen M. Hladik, Esquire

Hladik, Onorato & Federman, LLP

NO. 30

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2014-CV-2836, The Bank of New York Mellon f/k/a The Bank of New York, As Trustee for the Certificate-holders of the CWABS, Inc., Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2005-16 v. Delbis Collado, owner of property situate in the City of Allentown, Le-high County, Pennsylvania, being 432 1/2 N. 4th Street, Allentown, PA 18102.



Attorneys Stephen M. Hladik, Esquire

Hladik, Onorato & Federman, LLP

NO. 31

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2015-C-1413, LSF8 Master Participa-tion Trust v. Tanya-Jo Hermanovitch, Record Owner and Heir of Irene Her-manovitch, Estate of Irene Hermano-vitch c/o Tanya-Jo Hermanovitch and Coleen Hermanovitch, Executri-ces of Estate, Donald Hunt, Heir of Irene Hermanovitch, Michelle Herma-novitch, Heir of Irene Hermanovitch, owners of property situate in the Township of Salisbury, Lehigh Coun-ty, Pennsylvania, being 1726 Graham Street, Bethlehem, PA 18015.



Attorney Keri P. Ebeck, Esquire

NO. 33

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2016-C-1582, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Molly M. Flood, owner of property

38

LEHIGH LAW JOURNALsituate in the City of Allentown, Le-high County, Pennsylvania, being 2040 West Washington St. a/k/a 2038 West Washington Street, Al-lentown, PA 18104-4044.




& Jones, LLP

NO. 35

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2015-C-1191, Deutshe Bank Na-tional Trust Company As Trustee for Novastar Mortgage Funding Trust, Series 2006-5 Novastar Home Equity Loan Asset-Backed Certificates, Se-ries 2006-5 v. Randolph W. Koons, Last Record Owner, Rose Ellen Griffith Also Known As Rose E. Koons Also Known As Rose Ellen Koons, Individually and As Known Heir of Randolph W. Koons, Stacy L. Tabor, Known Heir of Randolph W. Koons, Unknown Heirs, Successors, Assigns and All Persons, Firms or Associa-tions Claiming Right, Title or Interest From or Under Randolph W. Koons, Last Record Owner, owners of prop-erty situate in the Township of Upper Saucon, Lehigh County, Pennsylva-nia, being 4868 Route 309, Center Valley, PA 18034.




NO. 36

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2015-C-200, Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC v. Todd K. Huber, Aimee M. Hu-

ber, owners of property situate in the Township of Upper Saucon, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania, being 5032 Remington Drive, Coopersburg, PA 18036-1378.




& Jones, LLP

NO. 37

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2006-ML-1514, Northwestern Lehigh School District v. Lawrence W. Heint-zelman, Jr., owner of property situate in the Township of Lynn, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania, being 7181 and 7188 Gun Club Road, Lynn Township, PA.

Tax Assessment Nos. 54196811-7930-1, 541968875185-1, 5419-77130080-1, 541977079988-1.

Improvements thereon: Rural Without Buildings, Single Family Property and Vacant Land.

Attorneys Jeffrey P. Kelly, Esquire

Portnoff Law Associates, Ltd.

NO. 38

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2015-ML-3236, Allentown School District v. Arthur W. DeWalt, owner of property situate in the City of Al-lentown, Lehigh County, Pennsylva-nia, being 926 W. Gordon Street, Allentown, PA.


Improvements thereon: Res. Conv. 3 Apts. Property.



39

LEHIGH LAW JOURNAL

NO. 39

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2015-ML-0994, Parkland School District v. Karen R. Tamerler, owner of property situate in the Township of Upper Macungie, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania, being 6130 Hilltop Road, Upper Macungie, PA.


Improvements thereon: Single Family—Detached.



NO. 40

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2015-ML-2707, Allentown School District v. Milad Azar, owner of prop-erty situate in the City of Allentown, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania, being 808 N. 9th Street, Allentown, PA.


Improvements thereon: Single Family—Row.



NO. 41

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2015-ML-2669, Allentown School District v. Milad Azar, owner of prop-erty situate in the City of Allentown, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania, being 392 W. Greenleaf Street, Allentown, PA.


Improvements thereon: Single Family—Row.



NO. 43

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2015-ML-2229, Allentown School District v. A-Treat Bottling Co., owner of property situate in the City of Allentown, Lehigh County, Penn-sylvania, being 2022 E. Livingston Street, Allentown, PA.


Improvements thereon: Industrial Property.



NO. 45

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2015-ML-2190, Allentown School District v. A-Treat Bottling Co., owner of property situate in the City of Allentown, Lehigh County, Penn-sylvania, being 2011 Union Boule-vard, Allentown, PA.





NO. 46

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2015-ML-2189, Allentown School District v. A-Treat Bottling Co., owner of property situate in the City of Allentown, Lehigh County, Penn-sylvania, being 2014 E. Livingston Street, Allentown, PA.





40

LEHIGH LAW JOURNAL

NO. 47

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2016-C-0771, Reverse Mortgage So-lutions, Inc. v. Barbara A. Hall, Gary K. Hall, owners of property situate in the Township of Upper Saucon, Le-high County, Pennsylvania, being 6545 Walnut Lane, Coopersburg, PA 18036.




NO. 48

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2016-C-1053, The Bank of New York Mellon f/k/a The Bank of New York As Successor Trustee for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., As Trustee for the Benefit of the Certificateholders of Equity One ABS, Inc. Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2002-4 v. Marilyn Nalevanko a/k/a Mary A. Nalevanko, Norman A. Nalevanko a/k/a Norman F. Nalevanko, owners of property situate in the City of Bethlehem, Lehigh County, Pennsyl-vania, being 1501 Elliot Avenue, Bethlehem, PA 18018.

Tax Assessment No. 64179589-3472 1 f/k/a G11NW4D-14-5.



NO. 49

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2016-C-1392, First Commonwealth Federal Credit Union v. Leonardo Valencia and Monica Cock, owners of property situate in the Township of Heidelberg, Lehigh County, Penn-sylvania, being 6273 Hillside Road, Germansville, PA 18053.


Improvements thereon: Dwelling.Attorneys

Michael R. Nesfeder, Esquire Fitzpatrick Lentz & Bubba, P.C.

NO. 50

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2016-C-1975, Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC v. Denise M. Corriveau a/k/a Denise Corriveau, owner of property situate in the Township of Whitehall, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania, being 408 5th Street, Whitehall, PA 18052-6416.




& Jones, LLP

NO. 51

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2015-C-4079, Deutsche Bank Na-tional Trust Company As Trustee for Indymac Indx Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-AR27, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2006-AR27 v. Adriana Ocasio, Known Heir of Ron-aldo Aleman, Edda Aleman, Indi-vidually and As Known Heir of Ron-aldo Aleman, Lydia Gomez, Known Heir of Ronaldo Aleman, Martha Barzana, Known Heir of Ronald Ale-man, Unknown Heirs, Successors, Assigns and All Persons, Firms or Associations Claiming Right, Title or Interest From or Under Ronaldo Ale-man, owners of property situate in the City of Allentown, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania, being 2419 South Law Street, Allentown, PA 18103.

Tax Assessment No. 02-6406-40624480-0000001.



41

LEHIGH LAW JOURNAL

NO. 52

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2015-C-0508, James B. Nutter & Company v. Earl T. Weller, in His Capacity As Heir of Earl R. Weller and Amber E. Royball, in Her Capacity As Heir of Earl R. Weller and Unknown Heirs, Successors, Assigns and All Persons, Firms or Associations Claiming Right, Title or Interest, From or Under Earl R. Weller, De-ceased, owners of property situate in the Township of Upper Milford, Le-high County, Pennsylvania, being 4456 Mill Road, Emmaus, PA 18049.

Tax Assessment Nos. 54839862-9721 1 and 548398709017 1.


Attorneys Harry B. Reese, Esquire

Powers Kirn & Associates, LLC

NO. 53

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2015-N-908, Univest Bank and Trust Co. v. K.E. Hunsicker Properties, LLC, owner of property situate in the Township of North Whitehall, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania, being 3524 Route 309 and 3438 Route 309, Orefield, PA.

Tax Assessment Nos. 54686565-7629-1 and 546865830766-1.

Improvements thereon: Commer-cial Property.

Attorney Jack M. Seitz, Esquire

NO. 54

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2015-N-904, Univest Bank and Trust Co. v. Kevin E. Hunsicker Funeral Home, Inc. and Kevin Hunsicker, owners of property situate in the Township of Washington, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania, being 4212-14 Main Street, Slatedale, PA 18079.

Tax Assessment Nos. 55427014-2231-1 and 554270045097-1.

Improvements thereon: Commer-cial Property.

Attorney Jack M. Seitz, Esquire

NO. 55

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2015-C-367, The Bank of New York Mellon f/k/a The Bank of New York, As Trustee for CWABS, Inc., Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2005-3 v. Carline Selamy, owner of property situate in the City of Bethlehem, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania, being 1144 Raymond Avenue, Bethlehem, PA 18018.



Attorney Robert W. Williams, Esquire

NO. 56

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2014-C-3345, HSBC Bank USA Na-tional Association, As Trustee in Trust for the Registered Holders of Ace Securities Corp., Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 2006-NC3, Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates v. Anh Quach and Patrick Quach, own-ers of property situate in the Town-ship of South Whitehall, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania, being 1935 Whitehall Avenue, South Whitehall Twp., PA.


Improvements thereon: Residen-tial Dwelling/Single Family Home.

Attorneys Anita J. Murray, Esquire Eckert Seamans Cherin

& Mellott, LLC

42

LEHIGH LAW JOURNAL

NO. 57

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2014-C-1076, Ditech Financial Inc. v. Todd Lisetski and Neda Lisetski, owners of property situate in the City of Allentown, Lehigh County, Penn-sylvania, being 4238 Creek Road, Allentown, PA 18104.



Attorneys McCabe, Weisberg and

Conway, P.C.

NO. 58

By virtue of a writ of execution No. 2015-C-3867, Bank of America, N.A. v. Theresa Forro, Known Surviving Heir of Mathias R. Forro and Stephen Forro, Known Surviving Heir of Math-

ias Forro and Margaret Hopkins, Known Surviving Heir of Mathias R. Forro and Unknown Surviving Heirs of Mathias R. Forro, owners of prop-erty situate in the City of Allentown, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania, being 1427 Salisbury Road, Allentown, PA 18103 and *Stanley Avenue, Allen-town, PA 18103.

Tax Assessment Nos. 64164644-1888 1 and 641646359906 1.


Attorneys McCabe, Weisberg and

Conway, P.C.JOSEPH N. HANNA Sheriff of Lehigh County, PAMatthew R. Sorrentino, County Solicitor Richard Brent Somach, Sheriff ’s Solicitor

D-30; J-6, 13

43

LEHIGH LAW JOURNAL

DELI TO: VER

PERIODICAL PUBLICATION* Dated Material. Do Not Delay. Please Deliver Before Tuesday, January 17, 2017

Vol. LVII Allentown, PA Friday, January 13, 2017 No....

Documents

Transcript of Vol. LVII Allentown, PA Friday, January 13, 2017 No....