Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Units 3 And 4 - NRC ... · subject: vogtle electric generating...

May 7, 2020 Mr. Michael Yox Regulatory Affairs Director Southern Nuclear Operating Company 7825 River Road, Bldg. 302, Vogtle 3&4 Waynesboro, GA 30830 SUBJECT: VOGTLE ELECTRIC GENERATING PLANT, UNITS 3 AND 4 - NRC

INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT 05200025/2020001, 05200026/2020001 Dear Mr. Yox: On March 31, 2020, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at the Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Units 3 and 4. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which the inspectors discussed on April 16, 2020, with Mr. M. Meier, SNC Vice President of Regulatory Affairs, and other licensee and contractor staff members. The inspection examined a sample of construction activities conducted under your Combined License (COL) as it relates to safety and compliance with the Commission’s rules and regulations and with the conditions of these documents. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel. No findings or violations of more than minor significance were identified during this inspection. This letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be made available for public inspection and copying at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and at the NRC Public Document Room in accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 2.390, “Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding.”

Sincerely, /RA/

Nicole C. Coovert, Chief Construction Inspection Branch 1

Division of Construction Oversight Docket Nos.: 5200025, 5200026 License Nos: NPF-91, NPF-92 Enclosure: NRC Inspection Report (IR) 05200025/2020001, 05200026/2020001 w/attachment: Supplemental Information

M. Yox 2

cc w/ encls: Resident Manager Resident Inspector Oglethorpe Power Corporation Vogtle Plant Units 3 & 4 Alvin W. Vogtle Nuclear Plant 8805 River Road 7821 River Road Waynesboro, GA 30830 Waynesboro, GA 30830 Mr. Barty Simonton Office of the Attorney General Team Leader 40 Capitol Square, SW Environmental Radiation Program Atlanta, GA 30334 Air Protection Branch Environmental Protection Division Southern Nuclear Operating Company 4244 International Parkway, Suite 120 Document Control Coordinator Atlanta, GA 30354-3906 3535 Colonnade Parkway Birmingham, AL 35243 Brian H. Whitley Regulatory Affairs Director Anne F. Appleby Southern Nuclear Operating Company Olgethorpe Power Corporation 3535 Colonnade Parkway, BIN N-226-EC 2100 East Exchange Place Birmingham, AL 35243 Tucker, GA 30084 Mr. Michael Yox County Commissioner Site Regulatory Affairs Director Office of the County Commissioner Vogtle Units 3 & 4 Burke County Commission 7825 River Road, Building 302 (ESB) Waynesboro, GA 30830 Bin 6031 Waynesboro, GA 30830 Mr. Wayne Guilfoyle Commissioner District 8 Augusta-Richmond County Commission 4940 Windsor Spring Rd Hephzibah, GA 30815 Gwendolyn Jackson Burke County Library 130 Highway 24 South Waynesboro, GA 30830 Mr. Reece McAlister Executive Secretary Georgia Public Service Commission Atlanta, GA 30334

M. Yox 3

Email [email protected] (Amanda Gibson) [email protected] (Amy Chamberlian) [email protected] (Brian Whitley) [email protected] (Bill Jacobs) [email protected] (Michael M. Corletti) [email protected] (C.R. Pierce) [email protected] (David Jones) [email protected] (David Hinds) [email protected] (David Lewis) [email protected] (Dale Fulton) [email protected] (Ed Burns) [email protected] (Ed David) [email protected] (SNC Document Control) [email protected] (George Taylor) [email protected] (Zachary S. Harper) [email protected] (James Beard) [email protected] (Jeremiah Haswell) [email protected] (Jim Warren) [email protected] (John Bozga) [email protected] (Joseph Hegner) [email protected] (Karl Gross) [email protected] (Kara Stacy) [email protected] (Kelli Roberts) [email protected] (Kathryn M. Sutton) [email protected] (Kenneth O. Waugh) [email protected] (Markus Popa) [email protected] (Mike Meier) [email protected] (Scott Peterson) [email protected] (Melissa Smith) [email protected] (M.W. Price) [email protected] (MKWashington) [email protected] (Mark Humphrey) [email protected] (Marvin Fertel) [email protected] (Michael Mariotte) [email protected] (Robert Temple) [email protected] (Paul Gunter) [email protected] (Paul Bessette) [email protected] (Peter Sena,III) [email protected] (Ravi Joshi) [email protected] (Roger Wink) [email protected] (Steve A. Bennett) [email protected] (Steven Jackson) [email protected] (Shemetha Jones) [email protected] (Storm Kauffman) [email protected] (Steve Leighty) [email protected] (Steve Roetger) [email protected] (Stephanie Agee) [email protected] (Tom Clements) [email protected] (Vanessa Quinn)

M. Yox 4

[email protected] (Wayne Marquino) [email protected] (William Birge) [email protected] (Eddie R. Grant) [email protected] (Gary Becker) [email protected] (Neil Haggerty) [email protected] (Daniel Williamson)

SUBJECT: VOGTLE ELECTRIC GENERATING PLANT, UNITS 3 AND 4 - NRC

INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT 05200025/2020001, 05200026/2020001 DATED: MAY 7, 2020 Distribution Ho Nieh, NRR M. King, NRR V. Hall, NRR M. Webb, NRR T. Fredette, NRR L. Dudes, RII J. Munday, RII W. Jones, RII M. Bailey, RII S. Rose, RII B. Davis, RII N. Coovert, RII R2DCO PUBLIC ADAMS Accession No.: ML20128J831

OFFICE RII: DCO RII: DCO RII: DCO RII: DCO RII: DCO RII: DCO RII: DCO RII: DCO RII: DCO RII: DCO NAME Lisa

Castelli Guillermo

Crespo Brian

Griman Alain

Artayet Patrick Heher

Nicholas Karlovich

Brian Kemker

Jonathan Kent

Andrew Lerch

J. Lizardi-Barreto

DATE 4/22/2020 4/21/2020 4/21/2020 4/21/2020 4/22/2020 4/27/2020 4/27/2020 4/27/2020 4/24/2020 4/23/2020 OFFICE RII: DCO RII: DCO RII: DCO RII: DCO RII: DCO RI: DCO RII: DCO NAME Robert

Mathis Anthony Ponko

Steven Smith

Sarah Temple

Denise Terry-Ward

Jose Vasquez

Nicole Coovert

DATE 4/21/2020 4/21/2020 4/27/2020 4/27/2020 4/27/2020 4/30/2020 5/7/2020

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region II Docket Numbers: 5200025

5200026

License Numbers: NPF-91 NPF-92

Report Numbers: 05200025/2020001 05200026/2020001

Licensee: Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.

Facility: Vogtle Unit 3 Combined License Vogtle Unit 4 Combined License

Location: Waynesboro, GA

Inspection Dates: January 1, 2020 through March 31, 2020

Inspectors: A. Artayet, Senior Construction Inspector, DCO L. Castelli, Senior Construction Inspector, DCO G. Crespo, Senior Construction Inspector, DCO B. Griman, Project Engineer (RIDP), DRP P. Heher, Resident Inspector, DCO N. Karlovich, Resident Inspector, DCO B. Kemker, Senior Resident Inspector, DCO J. Kent, Construction Inspector, DCO A. Lerch, Construction Inspector, DCO J. Lizardi-Barreto, Construction Inspector, DCO R. Mathis, Test Inspector, DCO A. Ponko, Senior Construction Inspector, DCO S. Smith, Senior Construction Inspector, DCO S. Temple, Resident Inspector, DCO D. Terry-Ward, Construction Inspector, DCO J. Vasquez, Construction Inspector, DCO

Approved by: Nicole C. Coovert, Branch Chief Construction Inspection Branch 1

2

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

Inspection Report (IR) 05200025/2020001, 05200026/2020001; 01/01/2020 through 03/31/2020; Vogtle Unit 3 Combined License, Vogtle Unit 4 Combined License, routine integrated inspection report. This report covers a three-month period of inspection by regional and resident inspectors, and announced Inspections, Tests, Analysis, and Acceptance Criteria (ITAAC) inspections. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s program for overseeing the construction of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 2506, Construction Reactor Oversight Process General Guidance and Basis Document. A. NRC-Identified and Self Revealed Findings

None B. Licensee-Identified Violations

None

3

REPORT DETAILS Summary of Plant Construction Status Unit 3: The licensee assembled the rebar and framework in preparation for concrete placement over the shield building (SB) conical roof and was completing the shield building construction. In the containment building, the licensee continued with installation of reactor coolant system (RCS) and passive core cooling system (PXS) instrumentation, electrical conduits and cables (safety and non-safety related), and with the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) required hydrostatic testing on the nuclear steam supply systems and commenced hydrostatic testing of the containment piping penetrations. The licensee was nearing the end of the construction of the auxiliary building structure. Major electrical and instrumentation equipment, in the auxiliary building and the main control room (MCR), have been installed and termination of cables was ongoing. Unit 4: The licensee continued with shield building construction. In the containment building, the licensee completed construction on the operating deck frame work and was completing installation of RCS and PXS large bore piping. The licensee continued construction of the auxiliary building structure from elevation 117’- 6” to 160’ and routing of electrical raceways. The licensee completed placement of all remaining large modules and components (e.g., RCS stages 1, 2, 3 automatic depressurization system (ADS) module (Q6-01) and polar crane) inside the Unit 4 containment vessel (CV) and set the Unit 4 CV top head. 1. CONSTRUCTION REACTOR SAFETY

Cornerstones: Design/Engineering, Procurement/Fabrication, Construction/Installation, Inspection/Testing

IMC 2503, Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria (ITAAC) - Related Work Inspections 1A01 (Unit 3) ITAAC Number 2.1.02.02a (13) / Family 06F

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors performed a direct inspection of construction activities associated with ITAAC Number 2.1.02.02a (13). The inspectors used the following NRC IPs/sections to perform this inspection:

• 65001.B-02.04-Production Controls • 65001.B-02.06-Records

The inspectors observed in-process manual welding activities associated with Unit 3

reactor cooling system (RCS). Specifically, the inspectors observed manual gas tungsten arc welding (GTAW) on weld FW01 for the reactor coolant pump (RCP) 1A canopy seal. The inspectors observed manual GTAW on the intermediate pass to determine if the canopy seal was welded in accordance with PCI Energy Services welding procedure 8MN-GTAW-RCP Canopy, and ASME Code, Section III, Subsection NB. The inspectors reviewed the weld process traveler and weld material withdrawal slip to determine if traceability of the ER308L weld wire and weld operator IDs were

4

controlled and quality control hold points were observed and signed-off in accordance with the ASME Code, Section III, Subsections NCA and NB. The inspectors also reviewed the weld traveler entries to determine if they were dated and signed-off for material identification, cleanliness, and fit-up in accordance with the ASME Code, Section III, Subsections NCA-4134.10 and NB-4230. The inspectors determined if the required weld joint gap, stud stretch tensioning, and minimum preheat temperature were in accordance with the weld traveler and the weld procedure specification (WPS). The inspectors reviewed the WPS to determine if the WPS was qualified in accordance with ASME Code, Section IX. The inspectors reviewed the weld traveler to verify the nondestructive examination performed on the weld met the requirements of ASME Code, Section III, Subsection NB-5000.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1A02 (Unit 3) ITAAC Number 2.1.02.05a.i (19) / Family 14A (Unit 4) ITAAC Number 2.1.02.05a.i (19) / Family 14A

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors performed a direct inspection of construction activities associated with ITAAC Number 2.1.02.05a.i (19). The inspectors used the following NRC IPs/sections to perform this inspection:

• 65001.09-02.02 - Attributes of Electrical Cable installation • 65001.09-02.03 - Documentation

The inspectors interviewed personnel and reviewed documents associated with the

design and installation of raceways for seismic Category (SC) I RCS components to verify the design of raceways and their supports was completed as specified in the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) and quality requirements from 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion III. This review was performed to determine if:

• licensee records established a design basis for raceways and supports to withstand seismic design basis loads thus preventing loss of safety function of the seismic Category (SC) I equipment;

• processes used for raceway engineering calculations, design control, and records control met the technical and quality requirements contained in the UFSAR; and

• design drawings were consistent with the analyzed configurations. The inspectors reviewed a sample of design calculations for raceways and supports to determine if the structural design met the applicable design criteria in the specifications and that design methodology, used in design calculations, was in accordance with UFSAR commitments and quality requirements described by 10 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion III. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed design calculations to determine if the licensee adequately considered the following design attributes:

5

• raceway type and materials; • design of supplementary steel; • seismic category classification; • seismic analysis, including damping value, self-weight excitation, decoupling

considerations, floor response spectra/time history input, and seismic anchor reactions;

• assumptions and open items; and • design inputs, load conditions and combinations.

The inspectors also reviewed these design documents to determine if:

• calculations were readily retrievable, controlled, and identified by subject, originator, reviewer, approver, and date and revisions were easily retrievable and subjected to the same rigor of the original approval;

• documentation included the objective, inputs and their sources, background data, assumptions, and computer inputs and conclusions; and

• design verification was performed by a competent individual or group other than those who performed the original design.

The inspectors reviewed design specifications, procedures and drawings to determine whether UFSAR design requirements were correctly translated into the implementing specifications, general notes drawings, installation procedures, and work instructions. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed specification APP-G1-V8-001 to verify that it required SC I supports for raceways containing Class 1E circuits, as required by section 8.3.2 of the UFSAR. In addition, the inspectors reviewed installation specifications and procedures to verify raceway supports and post-installed anchors were compliant with design specifications and requirements. The inspectors also reviewed design output documents to verify that work instructions used by construction personnel, for the installation of SC I raceway supports, included appropriate quantitative or qualitative acceptance criteria as defined by design documents. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed design drawings to verify seismic peak accelerations for trapeze, cantilevered, and wall mounted raceway supports were translated from design calculations in accordance with the requirements of Nuclear Quality Assurance (NQA)-1, Basic Requirement 3. The inspectors sampled three work packages to verify supports for safety related raceways were installed in accordance with the requirements of installation procedure APP-G1-E1-003 and specification APP-1230-ERY-001. The inspectors also sampled five condition reports (CRs) to verify technical evaluations associated with raceway supports were consistent with design basis requirements of Appendix C, Section 2.2.1 of the Combined Licenses (COLs) for Units 3 and 4.

b. Findings


1A03 (Unit 3) ITAAC Number 2.1.02.05a.i (19) / Family 14A

(Unit 4) ITAAC Number 2.1.02.05a.i (19) / Family 14A

6

a. Inspection Scope


• 65001.E-02.01-Design Basis Requirements • 65001.E-02.03-Qualification • 65001.E-02.04-Documentation • 65001.E-02.06-Problem Identification and Resolution

The inspectors reviewed the qualification records for solenoid operated globe valves

(commodity code PV13) to verify if the components were qualified in accordance with the UFSAR, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 323-1974, IEEE 344-1987, and IEEE 382-1996. The inspectors reviewed the equipment qualification data package (EQDP) and equipment qualification summary report (EQSR) to verify if the qualification methodology was in accordance with the methodology in APP-GW-G1-002 and APP-GW-VP-010. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed the test sequence to verify if it followed the test sequence outlined in IEEE 323-1974, Section 6.3.2 and IEEE 382-1996, Section 6.3.2. The inspectors reviewed the test plan for seismic and harsh environment qualification to determine if the test plan incorporated the design basis requirements. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed the test conditions specified in the qualification plan, results, EQDP, and EQSR to determine if they met the requirements specified in the design specification, valve data sheets, and section 5.4 and section 3 of the UFSAR. For seismic qualification, the inspectors reviewed the plan to determine if the following parameters met Chapter 3 of the UFSAR, the design basis, IEEE 344, IEEE 382 and APP-1000-S2C-056:

• vibration aging; • resonance search; • OBE testing; and • seismic test profile.

For harsh environment, the inspectors reviewed the plan to determine if it established the following parameters in accordance with the design basis, APP-GW-VP-030, and IEEE 323 for normal, abnormal and design basis conditions:

• temperature; • pressure; • radiation; • humidity; • cycle aging; • external pressurization; and • thermal aging.

The inspectors reviewed the qualification results in the qualification report (QR) to verify if the test was conducted in accordance with the qualification plan and if the results from qualification testing met the acceptance criteria in IEEE 323, IEEE 344,

7

IEEE 382 or a functional test specified by the qualification plan. In addition, the inspectors reviewed the margin applied to the above parameters to determine if the margin met that required by IEEE 323-1974 Section 6.3.1.5. The inspectors reviewed the EQDP to determine if the valve specimens tested were similar to the reactor head vent valves, RCS-PL-V150A, RCS-PL-V150B, RCS-PL-V150C, and RCS-PL-V150D. The inspectors reviewed test anomalies listed in the EQDP and EQSR for APP-PV13-Z0D-101 to verify if they were dispositioned to an engineering analysis, installation instruction, additional testing, or were acceptable to use as is. The inspectors also reviewed qualification document acceptance by the licensee to determine if the equipment qualification (EQ) task force acceptance was performed in accordance with the licensee's procedure. The inspectors reviewed EQTF-PV13-VBR-012 to determine if it concluded that the ITAAC requirements were met in accordance with ND-EN-VNP-006. In addition, the inspectors reviewed the document package to determine if the EQDP and EQSR met the documentation requirements in IEEE 323-1974 Section 8 and IEEE 344-1987 Section 10.

b. Findings


1A04 (Unit 3) ITAAC Number 2.1.02.08d.ii (33) / Family 03F

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors performed a direct inspection of construction activities associated with ITAAC Number 2.1.02.08d.ii (33). The inspectors used the following NRC IPs/sections to perform this inspection:

• 65001.A.02.02 - Installation Records Review • 65001.A.02.03 - Independent Assessment/Measurement Inspection • 65001.F-02.01-Design Document Review

The inspectors reviewed the principal closure document (PCD) and associated

Westinghouse calculation for this ITAAC to determine if the calculated flow resistance for each as-built fourth-stage ADS sub-loop valve and piping was less than the values listed in the acceptance criteria. The inspectors verified the assumptions and values used were acceptable for both the design and as-built calculations and the results from the as-built calculation were bounded by the design resistances listed in the ITAAC acceptance criteria, which were also used in the Chapter 15 safety analysis of the UFSAR. The inspectors also conducted a walkdown and performed independent measurements for a sample of dimensions on sub-loop A and sub-loop C to determine if they matched the piping isometrics and the values used in the calculation.

b. Findings


8

1A05 (Unit 3) ITAAC Number 2.1.03.06.i (75) / Family 05A (Unit 4) ITAAC Number 2.1.03.06.i (75) / Family 05A

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors performed a direct inspection of construction activities associated with ITAAC Number 2.1.03.06.i (75). The inspectors used the following NRC IPs/sections to perform this inspection:



design and installation of raceways for seismic Category I reactor system (RXS) components to verify the design of raceways and their supports was completed as specified in the UFSAR and quality requirements from 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion III. This review was performed to determine if:



• design drawings were consistent with the analyzed configurations. The inspectors reviewed a sample of design calculations for raceways and supports to determine if the structural design met the applicable design criteria in the specifications and that design methodology, used in design calculations, was in accordance with UFSAR commitments and quality requirements described by 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion III. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed design calculations to determine if the licensee considered the following design attributes:








9

The inspectors reviewed design specifications, procedures and drawings to determine whether UFSAR design requirements were correctly translated into the implementing specifications, general notes drawings, installation procedures, and work instructions. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed specification APP-G1-V8-001 to verify that it required SC I supports for raceways containing Class 1E circuits, as required by section 8.3.2 of the UFSAR. In addition, the inspectors reviewed installation specifications and procedures to verify raceway supports and post-installed anchors were compliant with design specifications and requirements. The inspectors also reviewed design output documents to verify that work instructions used by construction personnel, for the installation of SC I raceway supports, included appropriate quantitative or qualitative acceptance criteria as defined by these design documents. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed design drawings to verify seismic peak accelerations for trapeze, cantilevered, and wall mounted raceway supports were translated from design calculations in accordance with the requirements NQA-1, Basic Requirement 3. The inspectors sampled three work packages to verify supports for safety related raceways were installed in accordance with the requirements of installation procedure APP-G1-E1-003 and specification APP-1230-ERY-001. The inspectors also sampled five CRs to verify technical evaluations associated with raceway supports were consistent with design basis requirements of Appendix C, Section 2.1.3 of the COLs for units 3 and 4.

b. Findings


1A06 (Unit 3) ITAAC Number 2.2.01.02a (91) / Family 06F

a. Inspection Scope


• 65001.03-02.03 - Installation and Welding • 65001.03-02.06 - Nondestructive Examination (NDE) • 65001.B-02.04-Production Controls • 65001.B-02.05-Inspection

The inspectors reviewed the S&W weld data sheet (WDS) associated with containment penetration P01 and field weld SV3-CAS-PLW-820-10 on the outlet side of ball valve V014 of line-no. L015 for the compressed and instrument air system (CAS) to determine if the 2-inch diameter valve was installed in accordance with the ASME Code Section III, Subsection NC, for Class 2 components. The inspectors reviewed the WDS to verify if the established quality control (QC) inspection hold points were signed-off for cleanliness, fit-up with alignment tack welds, and final visual

10

examination was in accordance with Subsection NCA-4134.10 and NC-4230. The inspectors also reviewed the entries on the WDS to determine whether the traceability of the welders and welding rods were maintained in accordance with NC-4122 and NC-4300.

b. Findings


1A07 (Unit 3) ITAAC Number 2.2.01.05.i (98) / Family 11A

(Unit 4) ITAAC Number 2.2.01.05.i (98) / Family 11A

a. Inspection Scope




design and installation of raceways for seismic Category I containment system (CNS) components to verify the design of raceways and their supports was completed as specified in the UFSAR and quality requirements from 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion III. This review was performed to determine if:



• design drawings were consistent with the analyzed configurations. The inspectors reviewed a sample of design calculations for raceways and supports to determine if the structural design met the applicable design criteria in the specifications and that design methodology, used in design calculations, was in accordance with UFSAR commitments and quality requirements described by 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion III. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed the design calculations to determine if the licensee considered the following design attributes:

• raceway type and materials; • design of supplementary steel; • seismic category classification;

11

• seismic analysis, including damping value, self-weight excitation, decoupling considerations, floor response spectra/time history input, and seismic anchor reactions;






The inspectors reviewed design specifications, procedures and drawings to determine whether UFSAR design requirements were correctly translated into the implementing specifications, general notes drawings, installation procedures, and work instructions. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed specification APP-G1-V8-001 to verify that it required SC I supports for raceways containing Class 1E circuits, as required by section 8.3.2 of the UFSAR. In addition, the inspectors reviewed installation specifications and procedures to verify raceway supports and post-installed anchors were compliant with design specifications and requirements. The inspectors also reviewed design output documents to verify that work instructions used by construction personnel, for the installation of SC I raceway supports, included appropriate quantitative or qualitative acceptance criteria as defined by these design documents. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed design drawings to verify seismic accelerations for trapeze, cantilevered, and wall mounted raceway supports were translated from design calculations in accordance with the requirements NQA-1, Basic Requirement 3. The inspectors also sampled three work packages to verify supports for safety related raceways were installed in accordance with the requirements of installation procedure APP-G1-E1-003 and specification APP-1230-ERY-001. The inspectors also sampled five CRs to verify technical evaluations associated with raceway supports were consistent with design basis requirements of Appendix C, Section 2.1.2 of the COLs for units 3 and 4.

b. Findings


1A08 (Unit 3) ITAAC Number 2.2.01.08 (109) / Family 08F

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors performed a direct inspection of construction activities associated with ITAAC Number 2.2.01.08 (109). The inspectors used the following NRC IPs/sections to perform this inspection:

12

• 65001.09-02.02 - Attributes of Electrical Cable installation • 65001.F-02.04-General QA Review

The inspectors observed the termination of safety-related cables at two Unit 3

electrical penetration assemblies (EPAs), SV3-IDSB-EY-P31Y and SV3-IDSB-EY-P30Z. The terminations observed for both EPAs occurred outside of containment in the non-radiological portion of the auxiliary building. The inspectors observed the installations to verify they were performed in accordance with the work package instructions. The inspectors observed the splicing to verify the splice kit used was appropriate for the size of the cables being spliced in accordance with the work package and the actual observed size of the cables. The inspectors also observed the splices to verify the cables were cleaned and the splices were configured in accordance with the directions of the splice kit contained in the work packages. The inspectors observed the terminations to verify QC hold points were followed in accordance with the work packages. The inspectors also observed the terminations to verify the cables were the type and size specified by combined wiring drawings. The inspectors observed the following cables being terminated associated with EPA SV3-IDSB-EY-P30Z:

• SV3-PXS-EW-PLV130AQZB(3); • SV3-PXS-EW-PLV130AQZB(4); • SV3-PXS-EW-PLV108ARZB; • SV3-PXS-EW-PLV130AQZB; • SV3-PXS-EW-PLV123ANZB; • SV3-SFS-EW-PLV075HZB; and • SV3-SFS-EW-PLV033HZB.

The inspectors observed cable SV3-PXS-EW-PLV117AAXB being terminated for EPA SV3-IDSB-EY-P31Y.

b. Findings



a. Inspection Scope


• 65001.06-02.04 - Testing and Verification • 65001.06-02.05 - Problem Identification and Resolution • 65001.C-02.01 - Program and Procedure Reviews • 65001.C-02.02 - Construction Test Observation

13

• 65001.C-02.03 - Construction Test Record Review • 65001.C-02.04 - General Quality Assurance Review • 65001.C-A2.03 - Piping

The inspectors performed a direct inspection of ASME Section III hydrostatic testing

activities associated with the PXS. The inspectors reviewed work packages for the piping and components associated with SV3-PXS-TH-H8003A (accumulator (ACC) A and associated piping), SV3-PXS-TH-H8013A (inside containment isolation valve to outside containment isolation valve for N2 supply line for ACCs), SV3-PXS-TH-H8001A (core makeup tank (CMT) A and associated piping), and SV3-PXS-TH-H8019A (CMT A instrument tubing) ASME Section III hydrostatic tests. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed the work package instructions and the licensee's procedure for construction pressure testing to determine whether the following test attributes were included:

• the system boundary included all pressure vessels, piping, pumps, and valves that were part of the piping system to be tested;

• the system was vented during the filling operation; • water quality was specified as required by the latest licensee approved

specifications for the temperatures to be present during the test; • temperature requirements were stated to verify components were maintained

above the nil ductility transition temperature during hydrostatic pressure testing;

• minimum hydrostatic test pressure was as specified in the applicable design and/or fabrication specification;

• maximum hydrostatic test pressure was less than the limits in the applicable design and/or fabrication specification;

• hydrostatic test pressure was maintained for a minimum of 10 minutes before initiation of the examination for leakage; and

• examination for leakage included all joints, connections, and regions of high stress, such as openings, attachments, and thickness transition sections at a pressure equal to the design pressure or three-fourths of the test pressure, whichever was greater.

The inspectors conducted walkdowns prior to the tests to verify valve positions and system boundaries were set up in accordance with the system boundary maps within the work packages. The inspectors also verified the fill points and vent points were set up in accordance with the work packages. The inspectors also observed the SV3-PXS-TH-H8001A and SV3-PXS-TH-H8019A ASME Section III hydrostatic tests to determine if the testing was conducted in accordance with the requirements of ASME Section III, Subsection NB-6000, the work package instructions, and the licensee's procedure for construction pressure testing. Specifically, the inspectors observed the tests to determine if:

• the latest revisions of the test procedures were available and used by all crew members;

• minimum crew requirements were met; • test prerequisites were met; • joints, including welded joints, were left uninsulated and exposed for

examination during the tests; • valve lineup/system checklists were completed; • water quality and temperature were as stated in the procedures;

14

• calibrated pressure gauges of the required range were installed where required;

• calibrated relief valves of the required set point and capacity were installed where required;

• testing was performed as required by the approved procedure; • crew actions were correct and timely during the performance of the test and

coordination existed among crew members to conduct the test; • temporary modifications such as jumpers, strainers, spool pieces, or blank

flanges were installed and tracked per established administrative controls; and • post-test valve lineup/system checklists were completed.

The inspectors also reviewed the results from the SV3-PXS-TH-H8003A, SV3-PXS-TH-H8013A, SV3-PXS-TH-H8001A, and SV3-PXS-TH-H8019A ASME Section III hydrostatic tests to determine if the results conformed to the requirements of ASME Section III, Subsection NB-6000. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed the test results to determine if they were sufficient to furnish identifiable and retrievable evidence of activities affecting quality and were reviewed and verified to be complete per the licensee’s procedures.

b. Findings


1A10 (Unit 3) ITAAC Number 2.2.03.05a.i (165) / Family 14A

(Unit 4) ITAAC Number 2.2.03.05a.i (165) / Family 14A

a. Inspection Scope




design and installation of raceways for seismic Category I PXS components to verify that design of raceways and their supports was completed as specified in the UFSAR and quality requirements from 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion III. This review was performed to determine if:



• design drawings were consistent with the analyzed configurations.

The inspectors reviewed a sample of design calculations for raceways and supports to determine if the structural design met the applicable design criteria in the

15

specifications and that design methodology, used in design calculations, was in accordance with UFSAR commitments and quality requirements described by 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion III. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed design calculations to determine if the licensee considered the following design attributes:








The inspectors reviewed design specifications, procedures and drawings to determine whether UFSAR design requirements were correctly translated into the implementing specifications, general notes drawings, installation procedures, and work instructions. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed specification APP-G1-V8-001 to verify that it required SC I supports for raceways containing Class 1E circuits, as required by section 8.3.2 of the UFSAR. In addition, the inspectors reviewed installation specifications and procedures to verify raceway supports and post-installed anchors were compliant with design specifications and requirements. The inspectors also reviewed design output documents to verify that work instructions used by construction personnel, for the installation of SC I raceway supports, included appropriate quantitative or qualitative acceptance criteria as defined by these design documents. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed design drawings to verify seismic peak accelerations for trapeze, cantilevered, and wall mounted raceway supports were translated from design calculations in accordance with the requirements NQA-1, Basic Requirement 3. The inspectors also sampled three work packages to verify supports for safety related raceways were installed in accordance with the requirements of installation procedure APP-G1-E1-003 and specification APP-1230-ERY-001. The inspectors also sampled five CRs to verify technical evaluations associated with raceway supports were consistent with design basis requirements of Appendix C, Section 2.2.3 of the COLs for units 3 and 4.

16

b. Findings



a. Inspection Scope


• 65001.03-02.03 - Installation and Welding • 65001.03-02.04 - Post Weld Heat Treatment • 65001.03-02.06 - Nondestructive Examination (NDE) • 65001.03-02.07 - Review of Records • 65001.07-02.01 - General Installation • 65001.B-02.02-Welding Procedure Qualification • 65001.B-02.03-Welder Qualification • 65001.B-02.04-Production Controls • 65001.B-02.05-Inspection

The inspectors reviewed documents associated with field weld SV3-SGS-PLW-042-4

on the inlet side of main steam isolation valve (MSIV) V040-B to verify if the 38-inch diameter valve was installed in accordance with the requirements of the ASME Code Section III, Subsection NC, for Class 2 components. The inspectors reviewed the S&W WDS entries to determine if QC inspection hold points were signed-off and dated for material identification, internal cleanliness, bevel-end preparations, and fit-up in accordance with the ASME Code, Section III, Subsections NCA-4134.10 and NC-4230. The inspectors also reviewed the entries on the WDS to determine whether the traceability of the welders/welding operators and weld filler materials were maintained in accordance with NC-4122 and NC-4300. The inspectors reviewed welding procedure specification WPS1-4.4C30 with five supporting procedure qualification records to verify if the WPS for manual GTAW/shielded metal arc welding (SMAW) and machine GTAW processes was qualified in accordance with ASME Code Section IX, Article II. The inspectors reviewed 13 performance qualification records for nine welders and two welding operators to verify if they were tested and certified in accordance with the requirements of the ASME Code Section IX, Article III. The inspectors reviewed five certified material test reports (CMTRs) for ER80S-B2 rods/wire and E8018-B2 electrodes to verify if the test results for chemical analysis and mechanical properties were in accordance with the requirements of ASME Section II-Part C, SFA-5.28 and SFA-5.5, respectively, and ASME Section III, NC-2400. The inspectors reviewed the S&W postweld heat treatment data sheet, and Superheat company heat treatment cycle authorization and wrapping specifications sheets with time-temperature strip charts to verify whether the holding time and temperature along

17

with the heating and cooling rates used for stress-relief at completion of the field weld were performed in accordance with ASME Code Section III, NC-4620. The inspectors also reviewed MISTRAS computed radiographic images for field weld SV3-SGS-PLW-042-4 to determine whether the image brightness compared at the body of the wire image quality indicator and area of interest were in accordance with the requirements of the ASME Code Section III, Subsection NC-5000, and Section V, Article 2.

b. Findings




a. Inspection Scope


• 65001.09-02.02 - Attributes of Electrical Cable installation • 65001.09-02.03 - Documentation • 65001.E-02.04-Documentation


design and installation of raceways for SC I protection and safety monitoring system (PMS) components to verify that design of raceways and their supports was completed as specified in the UFSAR and quality requirements from 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion III. This review was performed to determine if:



• design drawings were consistent with the analyzed configurations. The inspectors reviewed a sample of design calculations for raceways and supports to determine if the structural design met the applicable design criteria in the specifications and that design methodology, used in design calculations, was in accordance with UFSAR commitments and quality requirements described by 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion III. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed design calculations to determine if the licensee considered the following design attributes:

• raceway type and materials; • design of supplementary steel;

18

• seismic category classification; • seismic analysis, including damping value, self-weight excitation, decoupling







The inspectors reviewed design specifications, procedures and drawings to determine whether UFSAR design requirements were correctly translated into the implementing specifications, general notes drawings, installation procedures, and work instructions. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed specification APP-G1-V8-001 to verify that it required SC I supports for raceways containing Class 1E circuits, as required by section 8.3.2 of the UFSAR. In addition, the inspectors reviewed installation specifications and procedures to verify raceway supports and post-installed anchors were compliant with design specifications and requirements. The inspectors also reviewed design output documents to verify that work instructions used by construction personnel, for the installation of SC I raceway supports, included appropriate quantitative or qualitative acceptance criteria as defined by these design documents. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed design drawings to verify seismic peak accelerations for trapeze, cantilevered, and wall mounted raceway supports were translated from design calculations in accordance with the requirements NQA-1, Basic Requirement 3. The inspectors also sampled three work packages to verify supports for safety related raceways were installed in accordance with the requirements of installation procedure APP-G1-E1-003 and specification APP-1230-ERY-001. The inspectors also sampled five CRs to verify technical evaluations associated with raceway supports were consistent with design basis requirements of Appendix C, Section 2.5.2 of the COLs for units 3 and 4.

b. Findings



a. Inspection Scope

19


• 65001.22-A6.03.02 - Installation Activities

The inspectors reviewed 2.5.02.11-U3-SumRep-Rev 0, “PCD Summary Report ITAAC

2.5.02.11 (550) Protection and Safety Monitoring System Design Process Summary Report: Installation Phase”, and associated references to verify that the PMS development process provided for specific documentation and reviews for the PMS installation phase. The inspectors reviewed the PCD to verify if it provided a roadmap to the documentation that fulfills the inspections, tests, analyses and acceptance criteria for ITAAC 2.5.02.11, part e), in accordance with 10 CFR 52.99. The inspectors previously performed a direct inspection of construction activities associated with ITAAC 2.5.2.11, parts b), c), and d) as documented in inspection report 05200025/2019002 and 05200026/2019002 (ML19220B678). The inspectors observed in-process installation of PMS software to verify the installers followed the directions in field change notice (FCN) SV3-GW-GCW-300 and the installed software cyclic redundancy check was performed in accordance with Appendix A of the FCN. Additionally, the inspectors observed the installation of software to verify the CDs used to install software were in accordance with the FCN. Specifically, the inspectors observed the installation of software in the B division maintenance and test cabinet (MTC) cabinet and a sample of the installation of software on the processors in C division cabinet BCCC01 and B division cabinet BCCB01. For the BCCB01 cabinet, the inspectors observed the installation of software on the BPLC1_1 processor. For the BCCC01 cabinet, the inspectors observed the installation of software on the BPLC1_1, BPLC1_2, and LCLC1_1 processors. The inspectors reviewed the FCN to verify it was written in accordance with the licensee’s FCN procedure guide. The inspectors also compared the FCN to the latest configuration management release reports to verify the software version to be installed by the FCN was the latest version that had been released to the site per the configuration management release reports. As part of the review of the licensee’s PCD for ITAAC 2.5.02.11, the inspectors reviewed the PMS cabinet component test procedure and the associated energization procedures for the bistable/coincidence logic cabinet (BCC) and MTC to verify they were written in accordance with the requirements in the initial test program ( ITP) procedure development procedure. The inspectors also reviewed the procedures referenced in the PCD to verify the roles defined in it matched the description of the roles in the procedures.

b. Findings



(Unit 4) ITAAC Number 2.5.02.12 (551) / Family 10F

20

a. Inspection Scope


• 65001.22-A6.03.02 - Installation Activities • 65001.22-A6.03.03 - Safety Analysis

The inspectors reviewed APP-GW-GLR-155, AP1000 Design Certification 2.5.02.12:

“The Process Used to Design, Test, Install, and Maintain the PMS Software Technical Report,” and associated references, to verify if it provided a roadmap to the documentation that fulfills the inspections, tests, analysis and acceptance criteria for the PMS installation and maintenance phase requirements of ITAAC 2.5.02.12. The inspectors previously performed a direct inspection of construction activities associated with APP-GW-GLR-155 for the PMS design and testing phase requirements of ITAAC 551 as documented in inspection report 05200025/2019002 and 05200026/2019002 (ML19220B678). The inspectors reviewed SV0-IVV-JQR-021, “Vogtle AP1000 Protection and Safety Monitoring System Independent Verification and Validation Summary Report,” to verify that independent verification and validation (IV&V) activities were conducted in accordance with WNA-PV-00054-WAPP, “AP1000 Protection and Safety Monitoring System Software Verification and Validation Plan.” Specifically, the inspectors sampled the following IV&V activities to verify that they were complete for the installation and checkout phase for the PMS software development:

• installation configuration audit; • installation checkout; • hazard analysis; • security analysis; • risk analysis; and • V&V final report generation.

The inspectors also reviewed WNA-WI-00572-WAPP, “AP1000 PMS Software Maintenance Work Instruction During Installation and Checkout Phase,” to verify that the process for software maintenance was established in accordance with WCAP-16096-P-A, “Software Program Manual for Common Q Systems.”

b. Findings




a. Inspection Scope


21

• 65001.09-02.02 - Attributes of Electrical Cable installation • 65001.09-02.03 - Documentation • 65001.E-02.04-Documentation


design and installation of raceways for seismic Category I Class 1E DC power and uninterruptible power system (IDS) components to verify that design of raceways and their supports was completed as specified in the UFSAR and quality requirements from 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion III. This review was performed to determine if:



• design drawings were consistent with the analyzed configurations.

The inspectors reviewed a sample of design calculations for raceways and supports to determine if the structural design met the applicable design criteria in the specifications and that design methodology, used in design calculations, was in accordance with UFSAR commitments and quality requirements described by 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion III. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed design calculations to determine if the licensee considered the following design attributes:








The inspectors reviewed design specifications, procedures and drawings to determine whether UFSAR design requirements were correctly translated into the implementing specifications, general notes drawings, installation procedures, and work instructions. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed specification APP-G1-V8-001 to verify that it required SC I supports for raceways containing Class 1E circuits, as required by section 8.3.2 of the UFSAR. In addition, the inspectors reviewed installation

22

specifications and procedures to verify raceway supports and post-installed anchors were compliant with design specifications and requirements. The inspectors also reviewed design output documents to verify that work instructions used by construction personnel, for the installation of SC I raceway supports, included appropriate quantitative or qualitative acceptance criteria as defined by these design documents. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed design drawings to verify seismic peak accelerations for trapeze, cantilevered, and wall mounted raceway supports were translated from design calculations in accordance with the requirements NQA-1, Basic Requirement 3. The inspectors also sampled three work packages to verify supports for safety related raceways were installed in accordance with the requirements of installation procedure APP-G1-E1-003 and specification APP-1230-ERY-001. The inspectors also sampled five CRs to verify technical evaluations associated with raceway supports were consistent with design basis requirements of Appendix C, Section 2.6.3 of the COLs for units 3 and 4.

b. Findings


1A16 (Unit 3) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.02a.i.a (760) / Family 01F

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors performed a direct inspection of construction activities associated with ITAAC Number 3.3.00.02a.i.a (760). The inspectors used the following NRC IPs/sections to perform this inspection:

• 65001.02-02.01 - Inspection of Concrete Placement • 65001.02-02.07 - Problem Identification and Resolution • 65001.A- As-Built Attributes for SSCs associated with ITAAC • 65001.A.02.01 - Observation of in-Process Installation Activities • 65001.A.02.02 - Installation Records Review • 65001.A.02.03 - Independent Assessment/Measurement Inspection • 65001.A.02.04 - Review As-built Deviations/Nonconformance • 65001.F-02.01-Design Document Review • 65001.F-02.04-General QA Review

The inspectors observed concrete placement activities, reviewed quality records, and

performed independent inspection of the Vogtle Unit 3 containment internal structure operating deck at elevation 135'-3". The inspectors reviewed a sample of design drawings to determine whether the design documents defined the final design and arrangement of the containment internal structure operating deck and whether the design implemented was in accordance with

23

UFSAR section 3.8.3 and Vogtle Unit 3 COL, Appendix C, Section 3.3. The inspectors reviewed a sample of design changes associated with the steel reinforcement, embedments, and concrete to verify design changes were conducted in accordance with the requirements of procedure APP-GW-GAP-420. Additionally, the inspectors reviewed the dispositions to the design changes to verify the changes from the original design did not make substantial changes that would require reevaluation of the design calculations. The inspectors reviewed a sample of CRs associated with the steel reinforcement, embedments, and concrete to verify the evaluations and corrective actions were conducted in accordance with the licensee's corrective action program (CAP); the issues were identified and documented in a timely manner; and the issues were classified and resolved commensurate with their safety significance. The inspectors reviewed the trending codes applied to each CR to verify they were correctly identified, tracked, and trended in accordance with ND-AD-002-025, "Issue Identification, Screening, and Dispatching." The inspectors reviewed a sample of nonconformances associated with the steel reinforcement, embedments, and concrete to verify the nonconformances had technical evaluations and were dispositioned in accordance with APP-GW-GAP-428, "Nonconformance and Disposition Report." Additionally, the inspectors observed repairs and rework resulting from the nonconformances to verify they were conducted in accordance with the dispositions. The inspectors independently inspected the steel reinforcement, embedments, and adjacent concrete surfaces prior to concrete placement to determine whether:

• steel reinforcement and embedments were installed in accordance with the

design drawings, design changes, ACI 349-01, and SV3-CC01-Z0-031; • adjacent concrete surfaces were prepared in accordance with ACI 349-01 and

SV3-CC01-Z0-031; and • nonconformances were identified and resolved prior to concrete placement.

The inspectors observed concrete placement activities to determine whether concrete was placed in lifts; placement drop distances did not exceed requirements; and concrete in the concrete trucks and at the point of placement was uniformly mixed in accordance with American Concrete Institute (ACI) 349-01, SV3-CC01-Z0-026, and SV3-CC01-Z0-031. The inspectors observed field engineering and QC inspections throughout the concrete placement to verify inspection was performed during placement as required by ACI 349-01, SV3-CC01-Z0-031, and 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3210. The inspectors performed independent inspection and measurements of the as-built concrete to determine whether the as-built configuration was in accordance with ACI 349-01, SV3-CC01-Z0-031, and the work package.

b. Findings


1A17 (Unit 3) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.02a.i.b (761) / Family 01F

a. Inspection Scope

24

The inspectors performed a direct inspection of construction activities associated with ITAAC Number 3.3.00.02a.i.b (761). The inspectors used the following NRC IPs/sections to perform this inspection:

• 65001.02-02.01 - Inspection of Concrete Placement • 65001.A- As-Built Attributes for SSCs associated with ITAAC • 65001.A.02.04 - Review As-built Deviations/Nonconformance • 65001.B-02.03-Welder Qualification • 65001.F- Inspection of the ITAAC-Related Design and Fabrication Requirements • 65001.F-02.01-Design Document Review

The inspectors reviewed structural calculations and design drawings for the conical

roof, passive cooling system (PCS) tank, and connections between the conical roof and tension ring to verify that the design basis was correctly translated into design output documents as required by 10 CFR Part 50 Appendix B, Criterion III, Design Control. Specifically, the inspectors verified if the assumptions, load combinations, and methodology used in the calculations were consistent with UFSAR section 3.8.4 and Appendix 3H. The inspectors also verified if the required reinforcing steel areas determined by structural analysis were correctly translated into the design drawings used for construction of the conical roof slab, knuckle region, compression ring, PCS tank walls, and PCS tank roof slab. The inspectors reviewed a sample of 12 engineering and design coordination reports (E&DCRs) and one design change proposal (DCP) to verify if design changes were performed in accordance with 10 CFR Part 50 Appendix B, Criterion III, Design Control. Specifically, the inspectors verified if the design changes were subject to control measures commensurate with those applied to the original design and were approved by the organization that performed the original design or the designated responsible organization. The inspectors also reviewed the E&DCRs and DCP to verify if a technical justification was provided for the design change; deviations from applicable quality standards such American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) N690-94 and ACI 349-01 were controlled; and the revised design was correctly translated into the updated design output documents. The inspectors observed the welds between the conical roof built-up radial girders and the stiffened beam seats attached to the tension ring to verify if the weld types and dimensions were consistent with the calculations, design drawings, and E&DCRs. The inspectors also reviewed three welder qualification records to verify if the welders making these welds were qualified to do so in accordance with American Welding Society (AWS) D1.1:2000. The inspectors noted that the welders were qualified in accordance with ASME Section IX which is allowed by AWS D1.1:2000 Section 4.1.2.1. The inspectors observed in progress installation of the main radial and circumferential reinforcing bars being installed in the conical roof slab to verify if the sizes, spacing, material designation, grade, lap splices, and layout of the bars were consistent with the applicable design drawings, E&DCRs, construction specification SV3-CC01-Z0-31, and ACI 349-01. The inspectors also reviewed a mechanical splicer qualification record to verify if the splicers installing the mechanical splices connecting the radial reinforcing bars to the

25

tension ring were qualified in accordance with construction specification SV3-CR01-Z0-010. The inspectors reviewed license amendment request (LAR) 16-031R1 associated with revisions to the conical roof structure and PCS tank to verify if deviations in the approved design where being identified, documented, and reconciled using the appropriate change process.

b. Findings


1A18 (Unit 3) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07aa (789) / Family 09A

(Unit 4) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07aa (789) / Family 09A

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors performed a direct inspection of construction activities associated with ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07aa (789). The inspectors used the following NRC IPs/sections to perform this inspection:

• 65001.09-02.01 - Physical Separation of Cables

The inspectors performed a program review of the proprietary cable manager

programs WIRED, SetRoute, and TEAMWorks to determine if the color-coding controls, for Class 1E electrical cables, communication cables associated with only one division, and the raceways that route these cables inside containment were identified by the appropriate color code in accordance with section 8.3.2.3 of the UFSAR. The inspectors interviewed responsible personnel, reviewed construction drawings and design specifications, and observed licensee activities to verify if controls were in place for labeling of cables and raceways in accordance with color code requirements in the UFSAR. The inspectors verified if the licensee used Section 6.6, Raceway Control, of Bechtel document 26139-00-4MP-T81C-N3302, Raceways and Accessories, revision (Rev.) 6 to install raceways; used Section 6.5, Cable Card Control of Bechtel document 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3303, Cable Installation, Rev. 6 to install cable; and used the divisional designations from the raceway installation/cable pull work order and associated drawings to apply the correct color coded label as specified in Section 3.12 Identification/Marking from WEC document SV3-G1-V8-001, AP1000 Electrical Installation Specification, Rev. 7.

b. Findings


1A19 (Unit 3) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07ab (790) / Family 09A

(Unit 4) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07ab (790) / Family 09A

a. Inspection Scope

26

The inspectors performed a direct inspection of construction activities associated with ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07ab (790). The inspectors used the following NRC IPs/sections to perform this inspection:

• 65001.09-02.03 - Documentation


programs WIRED, SetRoute, and TEAMWorks to determine if the color coding controls, for Class 1E electrical cables, communication cables associated with only one division, and the raceways that route these cables inside the non-radiologically controlled areas of the auxiliary building were identified by the appropriate color code in accordance with section 8.3.2.3 of the UFSAR. The inspectors interviewed responsible personnel, reviewed construction drawings and design specifications, and observed licensee activities to Verify if controls were in place for labeling of cables and raceways in accordance with color code requirements in the UFSAR. The inspectors verified if the licensee used Section 6.6 Raceway Control of Bechtel document 26139-00-4MP-T81C-N3302, Raceways and Accessories, Rev. 6 to install raceways; used Section 6.5, Cable Card Control of Bechtel document 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3303, Cable Installation, Revision 6 to install cable; and used the divisional designations from the raceway installation/cable pull work order and associated drawings to apply the correct color coded label as specified in Section 3.12 Identification/Marking from WEC document SV3-G1-V8-001, AP1000 Electrical Installation Specification, Rev. 7.

b. Findings

No findings were identified. 1A20 (Unit 3) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07ab (790) / Family 09A

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors performed a direct inspection of construction activities associated with ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07ab (790). The inspectors used the following NRC IPs/sections to perform this inspection:

• 65001.09-02.01 - Physical Separation of Cables • 65001.09-02.03 - Documentation • 65001.A.02.02 - Installation Records Review

The inspectors performed a direct inspection of in-process installation of raceways and

cables in rooms 12101, 12104, and 12113 at elevation 66’-6” in the non-radiologically controlled areas of the auxiliary building. The construction activities inspected were associated with ITAAC number 3.3.00.07ab - (790). The inspectors performed a review of work procedures, construction drawings, design specifications, and performed walkdowns of the rooms selected for Division A and B safety-related 250VDC battery banks and the 250VDC spare battery switchgear. The inspectors reviewed raceway sizes, locations, separation from other raceways from different divisions and non-class 1E raceways. The inspectors also took

27

measurements of the as-installed separations by use of a measuring device or visual observations to determine if the requirements of IEEE Standard 384 "IEEE Standard Criteria for Independence of Class 1E Equipment and Circuits" 1981 and specification SV3-G1-V8-001, AP1000 Electrical Installation Specification, Rev.7 were met. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed the work activities associated with the sampled cables to determine if:

• the installation of safety-related power and control/signal wiring and protective measures used on these cables immediately following cable pull activities were in compliance with procedure 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3303-CPM1F2 Cable Installation, Rev. 1;

• the location of raceway supports and maximum spacing of supports were in compliance with procedure 26139-000-4MP-T81CN3302, Raceways and Accessories, Rev. 6; and

• color coding and identification of raceways and cables, were in compliance with VEGP 3&4 UFSAR, section 8.3.2, and discrepancies from installation requirements were placed in their corrective action program.

The inspectors reviewed and discussed cable manufacturer requirements compared to installation procedures used, such as: pulling tensions, bend radius, and application of pulling compounds. Inspectors reviewed and discussed with the licensee the use of pull cards used for the installation of a sample of cables. The inspectors reviewed lug sizes and type for main battery feeder cables to determine if they were in compliance with installation procedure 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3303-CPM1F2 “Cable Installation,” Rev. 1.

b. Findings


1A21 (Unit 3) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07ac (791) / Family 09A

(Unit 4) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07ac (791) / Family 09A

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors performed a direct inspection of construction activities associated with ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07ac (791). The inspectors used the following NRC IPs/sections to perform this inspection:

• 65001.09-02.03 - Documentation

The inspectors performed a program review of the proprietary cable manager programs WIRED, SetRoute, and TEAMWorks to determine if the color coding controls, for Class 1E electrical cables, communication cables associated with only one division, and the raceways that route these cables inside the radiologically controlled areas of the auxiliary building were identified by the appropriate color code in accordance with section 8.3.2.3 of the UFSAR.

28

The inspectors interviewed responsible personnel, reviewed construction drawings and design specifications, and observed licensee activities to verify if controls were in place for labeling of cables and raceways in accordance with color code requirements in the UFSAR. The inspectors verified if the licensee used Section 6.6, Raceway Control, of Bechtel document 26139-00-4MP-T81C-N3302, Raceways and Accessories, Rev. 6 to install raceways; used Section 6.5, Cable Card Control, of Bechtel document 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3303, Cable Installation, Rev. 6 to install cable; and used the divisional designations from the raceway installation/cable pull work order and associated drawings to apply the correct color coded label as specified in Section 3.12, Identification/Marking, from WEC document SV3-G1-V8-001, AP1000 Electrical Installation Specification, Rev. 7.

b. Findings


1A22 (Unit 3) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07ba (792) / Family 09A

(Unit 4) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07ba (792) / Family 09A

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors performed a direct inspection of construction activities associated with ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07ba (792). The inspectors used the following NRC IPs/sections to perform this inspection:



programs WIRED, SetRoute, and TEAMWorks to determine if controls existed to verify that Class 1E electrical cables and communication cables inside containment associated with only one division were routed in raceways assigned to the same division in accordance with UFSAR section 8.3.2.4.2. The inspectors interviewed responsible personnel, reviewed construction drawings and design specifications, and observed licensee activities to verify if WIRED would not allow users to route cables in raceways of other divisions. Specifically, the inspectors verified if WIRED would indicate an error if the user attempted to route different divisional cables through the same raceway. The WIRED cable pull ticket provided the raceways/conduit through which the cable would be routed such that the path could be reviewed for any errors before being installed. The inspectors verified if the raceways were designed and tracked in WIRED such that Class 1E electrical cables and communication cables associated with only one division were routed in raceways assigned to the same division in accordance with Section 4.5.4, Raceway Separation, of WEC document SV3-G1-E1-003, Raceway Design, Discipline Design Criteria, Rev. 3. The inspectors also verified if the licensee used Section 6.6, Raceway Control, of Bechtel document 26139-00-4MP-T81C-N3302, Raceways and Accessories, Rev. 6 to install raceways; used Section 6.5, Cable Card Control, of Bechtel document 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3303, Cable Installation, Rev. 6 to install cables; and used raceway installation/cable pull work orders and associated

29

drawings to verify correct routing of Class 1E and non-Class 1E cables in their associated raceways.

b. Findings


1A23 (Unit 3) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07ba (792) / Family 09A

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors performed a direct inspection of construction activities associated with ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07ba (792). The inspectors used the following NRC IPs/sections to perform this inspection:

• 65001.09-02.02 - Attributes of Electrical Cable installation

The inspectors observed the installation of Class 1E electrical cables into raceways

inside the containment building for electrical equipment associated with the normal residual heat removal system (RNS) and the PXS. Specifically, the inspectors observed the installation of Class 1E cables SV3-RNS-EW-PLV002APZB, SV3-RNS-EW-PLV002AQZB, SV3-PXS-EW-PLV108BYZB, SV3-PXS-EW-PLV108ASZB, SV3-RNS-EW-PLV001AQZD, SV3-PXS-EW-100701FZA, SV3-RNS-EW-PLV002BBXB, SV3-PXS-EW-PLV130APZB, SV3-PXS-EW-PLV130ARZB, SV3-PXS-EW-100704CZD, and SV3-PXS-EW-100704JZD into their respective raceways to verify the following attributes were in accordance with the design installation specification, work packages, or pull tickets:

• cables were routed in the correct location (i.e., respective room and raceway sections);

• cable bend radii were not exceeded during the cable pull; • cable mark numbers indicated in the pull tickets matched the labels on the

cables; • cable voltage and temperature ratings, and descriptions specified on the pull

tickets were as specified on the cables; and • cable insulation remained undamaged during the pulls.

b. Findings


1A24 (Unit 3) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07bb (793) / Family 09A

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors performed a direct inspection of construction activities associated with ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07bb (793). The inspectors used the following NRC IPs/sections to perform this inspection:


30

• 65001.A.02.01 - Observation of in-Process Installation Activities The inspectors observed cable terminations of cables SV3-IDSB-EW-EA6DXB, SV3-

IDSB-EW-EA6AXB, and SV3-IDSB-EW-EA5AXB in Unit 3 Division B low voltage fuse panels. Cables SV3-IDSB-EW-EA6DXB and SV3-IDSB-EA6AXB are associated with fuse panel IDSB-EA-6. Cable SV3-IDSB-EW-EA5AXB is associated with fuse panel IDSB-EA-5. Specifically, the inspectors observed the terminations to verify:

• the terminations were torqued to the values specified in the work order; • the cables were placed in the correct locations in accordance with drawings; • the crimping tools were calibrated; • the crimping tools used were appropriate for the lugs used in accordance with

the work order; • the lug nuts were the correct type in accordance with the work order; and • the cable bend radii were not violated in accordance with the work order.

The inspectors observed the installation of Class 1E fiber optic cables SV3-PMS-EW-JDILCC02BZC, SV3-PMS-EW-JDILCC02CZC, SV3-PMS-EW-JDMTCC0101BZC, and SV3-PMS-EW-JDILCC02DZC into raceways inside the non-radiological portion of the auxiliary building. These fiber optic cables were communication cables between cabinets in Division C. The inspectors observed the installation of the fiber optic cables to verify the following attributes were in accordance with the design installation specification and pull ticket:


• cable bend radii were not exceeded during the cable pull; • cables were not pushed or pulled past any other cables in the raceway; • cable mark numbers indicated in the pull tickets matched the labels on the

cable; • cable descriptions specified on the pull tickets were as specified on the cables;

and • cable insulation remained undamaged during the pulls.

The inspectors observed the installation of a Class 1E electrical cable into raceways inside the radiological portion of the auxiliary building for electrical equipment associated with the RNS. Specifically, the inspectors observed the partial installation of cable SV3-RNS-EW-PLV022AXA into its respective raceways to verify the following attributes were in accordance with the pull ticket or the work package:


• cable bend radii was not exceeded during the cable pull; • cable mark number indicated in the pull ticket matched the label on the cable; • cable voltage and temperature ratings, and description specified on the pull

ticket were as specified on the cable; and • cable insulation remained undamaged during the pull.

31

b. Findings



(Unit 4) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07bb (793) / Family 09A

a. Inspection Scope


• 65001.09-02.01 - Physical Separation of Cables • 65001.09-02.03 - Documentation


programs WIRED, SetRoute, and TEAMWorks to determine if controls existed to verify that Class 1E electrical cables and communication cables inside the non-radiologically controlled areas of the auxiliary building associated with only one division were routed in raceways assigned to the same division in accordance with UFSAR section 8.3.2.4.2. The inspectors interviewed responsible personnel, reviewed construction drawings and design specifications, and observed licensee activities to verify if WIRED would not allow users to route cables in raceways of other divisions. Specifically, the inspectors verified if WIRED would indicate an error if the user attempted to route different divisional cables through the same raceway. The WIRED cable pull ticket provides the raceways/conduit through which the cable will be routed such that the path can be reviewed for any errors before being installed. The inspectors determined if the raceways were designed and tracked in WIRED such that Class 1E electrical cables and communication cables associated with only one division were routed in raceways assigned to the same division in accordance with Section 4.5.4 “Raceway Separation” of WEC document SV3-G1-E1-003, Raceway Design, Discipline Design Criteria, Rev. 3. The inspectors also determined if the licensee used Section 6.6, Raceway Control, of Bechtel document 26139-00-4MP-T81C-N3302, Raceways and Accessories, Rev. 6 to install raceways; used Section 6.5, Cable Card Control, of Bechtel document 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3303, Cable Installation, Rev. 6 to install cables; and use raceway installation/cable pull work orders and associated drawings to verify correct routing of Class 1E and non-Class 1E cables in their associated raceways.

b. Findings



32

a. Inspection Scope


• 65001.09-02.01 - Physical Separation of Cables • 65001.09-02.03 - Documentation • 65001.A.02.01 - Observation of in-Process Installation Activities


cables in rooms 12101, 12104, and 12113 at elevation 66’-6” in the non-radiologically controlled areas of the auxiliary building. The construction activities inspected were associated with ITAAC number 3.3.00.07bb - (793). The inspectors performed a review of work procedures, construction drawings, and design specifications and performed walkdowns of the rooms selected for Division A and B safety-related 250VDC battery banks and the 250VDC spare battery switchgear. The inspectors reviewed raceway sizes, locations, separation from other raceways from different divisions and non-class 1E raceways. The inspectors also took measurements of the as-installed separations by use of a measuring device or visual observations to determine if the requirements of IEEE Standard 384 "IEEE Standard Criteria for Independence of Class 1E Equipment and Circuits" 1981 and specification SV3-G1-V8-001, AP1000 Electrical Installation Specification, Revision 7 were met. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed the work activities associated with the sampled cables to determine if:


• the location of raceway supports and maximum spacing of supports were in compliance with procedure 26139-000-4MP-T81CN3302, Raceways and Accessories, Rev. 6;

• color coding and identification of raceways and cables, were in compliance with VEGP 3&4 UFSAR, section 8.3.2; and

• discrepancies from installation requirements were placed in their corrective action program.

The inspectors reviewed and discussed cable manufacturer requirements compared to installation procedures used, such as: pulling tensions, bend radius, and application of pulling compounds. Inspectors reviewed and discussed with the licensee the use of pull cards used for the installation of a sample of cables. The inspectors reviewed lug sizes and type for main battery feeder cables to determine if they were in compliance with installation procedure 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3303-CPM1F2 Cable Installation, Rev. 1.

b. Findings


33

1A27 (Unit 3) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07bc (794) / Family 09A

(Unit 4) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07bc (794) / Family 09A

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors performed a direct inspection of construction activities associated with ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07bc (794). The inspectors used the following NRC IPs/sections to perform this inspection:



programs WIRED, SetRoute, and TEAMWorks to determine if controls existed to verify that Class 1E electrical cables and communication cables inside the radiologically controlled areas of the auxiliary building associated with only one division were routed in raceways assigned to the same division in accordance with UFSAR section 8.3.2.4.2. The inspectors interviewed responsible personnel, reviewed construction drawings and design specifications, and observed licensee activities to verify if WIRED would not allow users to route cables in raceways of other divisions. Specifically, the inspectors determined if WIRED would indicate an error if the user attempted to route different divisional cables through the same raceway. The WIRED cable pull ticket provides the raceways/conduit through which the cable will be routed such that the path can be reviewed before being installed for any errors. The inspectors verified if the raceways were designed and tracked in WIRED such that Class 1E electrical cables and communication cables associated with only one division were routed in raceways assigned to the same division in accordance with Section 4.5.4, Raceway Separation, of WEC document SV3-G1-E1-003, “Raceway Design Discipline Design Criteria,” Rev. 3. The inspectors also verified if the licensee used Section 6.6, Raceway Control, of Bechtel document 26139-00-4MP-T81C-N3302, “Raceways and Accessories,” Rev. 6 to install raceways; used Section 6.5 Cable Card Control of Bechtel document 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3303, “Cable Installation,” Rev. 6 to install cables; and used raceway installation/cable pull work orders and associated drawings to verify correct routing of Class 1E and non-Class 1E cables in their associated raceways.

b. Findings


1A28 (Unit 3) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07bc (794) / Family 09A

a. Inspection Scope

34

The inspectors performed a direct inspection of construction activities associated with ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07bc (794). The inspectors used the following NRC IPs/sections to perform this inspection:

• 65001.A.02.01 - Observation of in-Process Installation Activities

The inspectors observed the setup of a cable pull for a Class 1E electrical cable into

raceways inside the radiological portion of the auxiliary building for electrical equipment associated with the RNS. The inspectors walked down the cable tray route to verify the route was in accordance with the pull ticket. The inspectors also observed the setup to verify the cable marks, cable voltage and temperature ratings, and descriptions specified on the cable were in accordance with the pull ticket.

b. Findings


1A29 (Unit 3) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07c.i.a (795) / Family 09A

(Unit 4) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07c.i.a (795) / Family 09A

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors performed a direct inspection of construction activities associated with ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07c.i.a (795). The inspectors used the following NRC IPs/sections to perform this inspection:



programs WIRED, SetRoute, and TEAMWorks to determine if controls existed to verify separation between Class 1E divisions located in fire areas in the non-radiologically controlled areas of the auxiliary building located in fire areas were consistent with Table 3.3-3 of Appendix C of the Vogtle units 3 and 4 COL. The inspectors interviewed responsible personnel, reviewed construction drawings and design specifications, and observed licensee activities to verify if controls were in place for separation of divisions in fire areas in accordance with the above requirements. Specifically, the inspectors determined if the design engineering authority would review the output of the WIRED cable route and if it was in accordance with Table 3.3.-3 of the Tier 1 section, Rev. 7, of the UFSAR. The inspectors also determined if the licensee installed the cables in accordance with Section 6.4, Work Preparation/Execution Plan, of Bechtel procedure 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3303, “Cable Installation,” Rev. 6 and if design changes to the routing were handled by the cable pulling crews in accordance with Section 6.5, Cable Card Control, of the same procedure.

b. Findings


35

1A30 (Unit 3) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07c.i.a (795) / Family 09A

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors performed a direct inspection of construction activities associated with ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07c.i.a (795). The inspectors used the following NRC IPs/sections to perform this inspection:



cables in rooms 12101, 12104, and 12113 at elevation 66’-6” in the non-radiologically controlled areas of the auxiliary building. The construction activities inspected were associated with ITAAC number 3.3.00.07c.i.a (795). The inspectors performed a review of work procedures, construction drawings, and design specifications and performed walkdowns of the rooms selected for Division A and B safety-related 250VDC battery banks and the 250VDC spare battery switchgear. The inspectors reviewed raceway sizes, locations, separation from other raceways from different divisions and non-class 1E raceways, measurements of the as-installed separations by use of a measuring device or visual observations to determine if the requirements of IEEE Standard 384 "IEEE Standard Criteria for Independence of Class 1E Equipment and Circuits" 1981 and specification SV3-G1-V8-001, AP1000 Electrical Installation Specification, Rev. 7 were met. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed the work activities associated with the sampled cables to determine if:





The inspectors reviewed and discussed cable manufacturer requirements compared to installation procedures used, such as: pulling tensions, bend radius, and application of pulling compounds. Inspectors reviewed and discussed with the licensee the use of pull cards used for the installation of a sample of cables. The inspectors reviewed lug sizes and type for main battery feeder cables to determine if they were in compliance with installation procedure 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3303-CPM1F2 Cable Installation, Rev. 1.

b. Findings


36

1A31 (Unit 3) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07c.i.b (796) / Family 09A (Unit 4) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07c.i.b (796) / Family 09A

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors performed a direct inspection of construction activities associated with ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07c.i.b (796). The inspectors used the following NRC IPs/sections to perform this inspection:



programs WIRED, SetRoute, and TEAMWorks to determine if controls existed to verify separation between Class 1E divisions in the radiologically controlled areas of the auxiliary building located in fire areas are consistent with Table 3.3-3 of Appendix C of the Vogtle units 3 and 4 COL. The inspectors interviewed responsible personnel, reviewed construction drawings, design specifications, and observed licensee activities to verify if controls were in place for separation of divisions in fire areas in accordance with the above requirements. Specifically, the inspectors determined that the design engineering authority would review the output of the WIRED cable route to verify it was in accordance with Table 3.3.-3 of Appendix C of the Vogtle 3 and 4 COL. The inspectors also determined that the licensee installed the cables in accordance with Section 6.4 Work Preparation/Execution Plan of Bechtel procedure 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3303, Cable Installation, Rev. 6 and if design changes to the routing were handled by the cable pulling crews in accordance with Section 6.5, Cable Card Control, of the same procedure.

b. Findings


1A32 (Unit 3) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07d.i (799) / Family 09A

(Unit 4) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07d.i (799) / Family 09A

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors performed a direct inspection of construction activities associated with ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07d.i (799). The inspectors used the following NRC IPs/sections to perform this inspection:



programs WIRED, SetRoute, and TEAMWorks to determine if controls existed to verify that separation between Class 1E raceways of different divisions and between

37

Class1E raceways and non-Class 1E raceways inside the main control room (MCR) and the remote shutdown panel were in accordance with the acceptance criteria of this ITAAC per Appendix C of the Vogtle units 3 and 4 COL. The inspectors interviewed responsible personnel, reviewed construction drawings and design specifications, and observed licensee activities to verify if controls were in place for separation of cables and raceways in accordance with the requirements above. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed drawings showing the routing of raceways inside the main control room to determine if separation was indicated. The inspectors discussed the use of barriers for isolation between different divisions of safety related and between Class1 E and non-Class 1E raceways. The inspectors verify if WIRED did not track minimum separation distances between Class 1E divisions and Class 1E and non-Class 1E divisions but did route the cables into existing raceways. The inspectors verified if the design engineering authority reviewed the routing of the cables with existing 3-dimensional modeling drawings of the plant and determine if the separation criteria were met in accordance with Section 4.5.4 Raceway Separation of WEC document SV3-G1-E1-003, Raceway Design, Discipline Design Criteria, Rev. 3. The inspectors also determined if the licensee used Section 6.6, Raceway Control, of Bechtel document 26139-00-4MP-T81C-N3302, Raceways and Accessories, Rev. 6 to install raceways; used Section 6.5 Cable Card Control of Bechtel document 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3303, Cable Installation, Rev. 6 to install cables; and used raceway installation/cable pull work order and associated drawings to verify correct routing of Class 1E cables and associated raceways.

b. Findings


1A33 (Unit 3) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07d.ii.a (800) / Family 09A

(Unit 4) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07d.ii.a (800) / Family 09A

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors performed a direct inspection of construction activities associated with ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07d.ii.a (800). The inspectors used the following NRC IPs/sections to perform this inspection:



programs WIRED, SetRoute, and TEAMWorks to determine if controls existed to verify that cable horizontal and vertical separation between Class 1E raceways of different divisions and between Class1E raceways and non-Class 1E raceways inside containment were in accordance with the acceptance criteria of this ITAAC per Appendix C of the Vogtle units 3 and 4 COL. The inspectors interviewed responsible personnel, reviewed construction drawings and design specifications, and observed licensee activities to verify if controls were in place for separation of cables and raceways in accordance with the requirements

38

above. Specifically, the inspectors determined if WIRED did not track minimum separation distances between Class 1E divisions and Class 1E and non-Class 1E divisions but did route the cables into existing raceways. The inspectors verified if the design engineering authority reviewed the routing of the cables with existing 3-dimensional modeling drawings of the plant and determined if the separation criteria were met in accordance with Section 4.5.4, Raceway Separation, of WEC document SV3-G1-E1-003, Raceway Design, Discipline Design Criteria, Rev. 3. The inspectors also verified if the licensee used Section 6.6, Raceway Control, of Bechtel document 26139-00-4MP-T81C-N3302, Raceways and Accessories, Rev. 6 to install raceways; used Section 6.5, Cable Card Control, of Bechtel document 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3303, Cable Installation, Rev. 6 to install cables; and used raceway installation/cable pull work order and associated drawings to verify correct routing of Class 1E cables and associated raceway.

b. Findings


1A34 (Unit 3) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07d.ii.b (801) / Family 09A

(Unit 4) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07d.ii.b (801) / Family 09A

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors performed a direct inspection of construction activities associated with ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07d.ii.b (801). The inspectors used the following NRC IPs/sections to perform this inspection:


The inspectors performed a program review of the proprietary cable manager programs WIRED, SetRoute, and TEAMWorks to determine if controls existed to verify cable horizontal and vertical separation between Class 1E raceways of different divisions and between Class1E raceways and non-Class 1E raceways inside the non-radiologically controlled areas in the auxiliary building and were in accordance with the acceptance criteria of this ITAAC per Appendix C of the Vogtle units 3 and 4 COL. The inspectors interviewed responsible personnel, reviewed construction drawings and design specifications, and observed licensee activities to verify if controls were in place for separation of cables and raceways in accordance with the requirements above. Specifically, the inspectors determined if WIRED did not track minimum separation distances between Class 1E divisions and Class 1E and non-Class 1E divisions but did route the cables into existing raceways. The inspectors verified if the design engineering authority reviewed the routing of the cables with existing 3-dimensional modeling drawings of the plant and determined if the separation criteria were met in accordance with Section 4.5.4, Raceway Separation, of WEC document SV3-G1-E1-003, “Raceway Design Discipline Design Criteria,” Rev. 3. The inspectors also determined if the licensee used Section 6.6, Raceway Control, of Bechtel document 26139-00-4MP-T81C-N3302, “Raceways and Accessories,” Rev. 6 to install

39

raceways; used Section 6.5, Cable Card Control, of Bechtel document 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3303, “Cable Installation,” Rev. 6 to install cables; and used raceway installation/cable pull work order and associated drawings to verify correct routing of Class 1E cables and associated raceway.

b. Findings


1A35 (Unit 3) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07d.ii.b (801) / Family 09A

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors performed a direct inspection of construction activities associated with ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07d.ii.b (801). The inspectors used the following NRC IPs/sections to perform this inspection:



cables in rooms 12101, 12104, and 12113 at elevation 66’-6” in the non-radiologically controlled areas of the auxiliary building. The inspectors performed a review of work procedures, construction drawings, and design specifications and performed walkdowns of the rooms selected for Division A and B safety-related 250VDC battery banks and the 250VDC spare battery switchgear. The inspectors reviewed raceway sizes, locations, separation from other raceways from different divisions and non-class 1E raceways. The inspectors also took measurements of the as-installed separations by use of a measuring device or visual observations to determine if the requirements of IEEE Standard 384 "IEEE Standard Criteria for Independence of Class 1E Equipment and Circuits" 1981 and specification SV3-G1-V8-001, AP1000 Electrical Installation Specification, Rev. 7 were met. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed the work activities associated with the sampled cables to determine if:





40

The inspectors reviewed and discussed cable manufacturer requirements compared to installation procedures used, such as: pulling tensions, bend radius, and application of pulling compounds. Inspectors reviewed and discussed with craft representatives the use of pull cards used for the installation of a sample of cables. The inspectors reviewed lug sizes and type for main battery feeder cables to determine if they were in compliance with installation procedure 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3303-CPM1F2 Cable Installation, Rev. 1.

b. Findings


1A36 (Unit 3) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07d.ii.c (802) / Family 09A

(Unit 4) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07d.ii.c (802) / Family 09A

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors performed a direct inspection of construction activities associated with ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07d.ii.c (802). The inspectors used the following NRC IPs/sections to perform this inspection:



programs WIRED, SetRoute, and TEAMWorks to determine if controls existed to verify cable horizontal and vertical separation between Class 1E raceways of different divisions and between Class1E raceways and non-Class 1E raceways inside the radiologically controlled areas in the auxiliary building, and were in accordance with the acceptance criteria of this ITAAC per Appendix C of the Vogtle units 3 and 4 COL. The inspectors interviewed responsible personnel, reviewed construction drawings and design specifications, and observed licensee activities to verify if controls were in place for separation of cables and raceways in accordance with the requirements above. Specifically, the inspectors determined if WIRED did not track minimum separation distances between Class 1E divisions and Class 1E and non-Class 1E divisions but did route the cables into existing raceways. The inspectors verified if the design engineering authority reviewed the routing of the cables with existing 3-dimensional modeling drawings of the plant and determined if the separation criteria were met in accordance with Section 4.5.4, Raceway Separation, of WEC document SV3-G1-E1-003, “Raceway Design Discipline Design Criteria,” Rev. 3. The inspectors also determined if the licensee used Section 6.6, Raceway Control, of Bechtel document 26139-00-4MP-T81C-N3302, “Raceways and Accessories,” Rev. 6 to install raceways; used Section 6.5, Cable Card Control, of Bechtel document 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3303, “Cable Installation,” Rev. 6 to install cables; and used raceway installation/cable pull work order and associated drawings to verify correct routing of Class 1E cables and associated raceway.

b. Findings

41

No findings were identified. 1A37 (Unit 3) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07d.iii.a (803) / Family 09A

(Unit 4) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07d.iii.a (803) / Family 09A

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors performed a direct inspection of construction activities associated with ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07d.iii.a (803). The inspectors used the following NRC IPs/sections to perform this inspection:



programs WIRED, SetRoute, and TEAMWorks to determine controls existed to verify that if cable horizontal and vertical separation between Class 1E raceways of different divisions and between Class1E raceways and non-Class 1E raceways inside containment was not provided then the circuits were run in enclosed raceways or barriers were provided were in accordance with UFSAR section 8.3.2.4.2. The inspectors reviewed approved drawings, design criteria, design specifications and procedures to determine if separation requirements between Class 1E raceways of different divisions and between Class 1E raceways and non-Class 1E raceways were met in accordance with the above requirements. Specifically, the inspectors determined if the separation criteria were incorporated into the raceway/cable design and the details documented into the WIRED program which provides quality assurance cable and raceway installation records. These records are utilized by SETROUTE when/if the required minimum separation distances were not met inside containment. The inspectors reviewed these computerized programs and documents to determine if any circuits (cables) were identified with not meeting the separation requirements and routed in enclosed raceways or with an installed barrier(s) to meet the requirements of IEEE 384. The inspectors also reviewed a sample of completed WIRED and SETROUTE cable pull tickets along with existing CRs to determine if separation requirements were documented into the actual installation details.

b. Findings


1A38 (Unit 3) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07d.iii.b (804) / Family 09A

(Unit 4) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07d.iii.b (804) / Family 09A

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors performed a direct inspection of construction activities associated with ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07d.iii.b (804). The inspectors used the following NRC IPs/sections to perform this inspection:

42



programs WIRED, SetRoute, and TEAMWorks to determine controls exist to verify that if cable horizontal and vertical separation between Class 1E raceways of different divisions and between Class1E raceways and non-Class 1E raceways inside the non-radiologically controlled area of the auxiliary building was not provided then the circuits are run in enclosed raceways or barriers were provided are in accordance with UFSAR section 8.3.2.4.2. The inspectors reviewed approved drawings, design criteria, design specifications, standards and procedures to determine if separation requirements between Class 1E raceways of different divisions and between Class 1E raceways and non-Class 1E raceways were met in accordance with the above requirements. Specifically, the inspectors determined if the separation criteria were incorporated into the raceway/cable design and the details documented into the WIRED program which provides quality assurance cable and raceway installation records. These records are utilized by SETROUTE when/if the required minimum separation distances were not met inside the non-radiologically controlled area of the auxiliary building. The inspectors reviewed these computerized programs and documents to determine if any circuits (cables) were identified as not meeting the separation requirements and routed in enclosed raceways or with an installed barrier(s) to meet the requirements of IEEE 384. The inspectors also reviewed a sample of completed WIRED and SETROUTE cable pull tickets along with existing CRs to determine if separation requirements (if any) were documented into the actual installation details.

b. Findings


1A39 (Unit 3) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07d.iii.b (804) / Family 09A

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors performed a direct inspection of construction activities associated with ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07d.iii.b (804). The inspectors used the following NRC IPs/sections to perform this inspection:

• 65001.09-02.01 - Physical Separation of Cables • 65001.09-02.03 - Documentation • 65001.A.02.01 - Observation of in-Process Installation Activities


cables in rooms 12101, 12104, and 12113 at elevation 66’-6” in the non-radiologically controlled areas of the auxiliary building.

43

The inspectors performed a review of work procedures, construction drawings, and design specifications and performed walkdowns of the rooms selected for Division A and B safety-related 250VDC battery banks and the 250VDC spare battery switchgear. The inspectors reviewed raceway sizes, locations, separation from other raceways from different divisions and non-class 1E raceways. The inspectors took measurements of the as-installed separations by use of a measuring device or visual observations to determine if the requirements of IEEE Standard 384 "IEEE Standard Criteria for Independence of Class 1E Equipment and Circuits" 1981 and specification SV3-G1-V8-001, AP1000 Electrical Installation Specification, Rev. 7 were met. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed the work activities associated with the sampled cables to determine if:





The inspectors reviewed and discussed, with the licensee, cable manufacturer requirements compared to installation procedures used, such as: pulling tensions, bend radius, and application of pulling compounds. Inspectors also reviewed and discussed with the licensee the use of pull cards used for the installation of a sample of cables. The inspectors reviewed lug sizes and type for main battery feeder cables to determine if they were in compliance with installation procedure 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3303-CPM1F2 Cable Installation, Rev. 1.

b. Findings


1A40 (Unit 3) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07d.iii.c (805) / Family 09A

(Unit 4) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07d.iii.c (805) / Family 09A

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors performed a direct inspection of construction activities associated with ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07d.iii.c (805). The inspectors used the following NRC IPs/sections to perform this inspection:



programs WIRED, SetRoute, and TEAMWorks to determine controls existed to verify that if cable horizontal and vertical separation between Class 1E raceways of different

44

divisions and between Class1E raceways and non-Class 1E raceways inside the radiologically controlled area of the auxiliary building was not provided then the circuits were run in enclosed raceways or barriers were provided were in accordance with UFSAR section 8.3.2.4.2. The inspectors reviewed approved drawings, design criteria, design specifications, standards and procedures to determine if separation requirements between Class 1E raceways of different divisions and between Class 1E raceways and non-Class 1E raceways were met in accordance with the above requirements. Specifically, the inspectors determined if the separation criteria were incorporated into the raceway/cable design and the details documented into the WIRED program, which provides quality assurance cable and raceway installation records. These records are utilized by SETROUTE when/if the required minimum separation distances were not met inside the radiologically controlled area of the auxiliary building. The inspectors reviewed these computerized programs and documents to determine if any circuits (cables) were identified as not meeting the separation requirements and routed in enclosed raceways or with an installed barrier(s) to meet the requirements of IEEE 384. The inspectors also reviewed a sample of completed WIRED and SETROUTE cable pull tickets along with existing CRs to determine if separation requirements (if any) were documented into the actual installation details.

b. Findings


1A41 (Unit 3) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07d.iv.a (806) / Family 09A

(Unit 4) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07d.iv.a (806) / Family 09A

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors performed a direct inspection of construction activities associated with ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07d.iv.a (806). The inspectors used the following NRC IPs/sections to perform this inspection:



programs WIRED, SetRoute, and TEAMWorks to determine if controls existed to verify the installations of safety related raceways, cables and wiring were in accordance with the ITAAC acceptance criteria per Appendix C of the Vogtle units 3 and 4 COL. The inspectors reviewed approved drawings, design criteria, design specifications, standards and procedures to determine if separation requirements were maintained between Class 1E divisions and between Class 1E divisions and non-Class 1E cables, and to determine if these details were met in accordance with the above requirements. Specifically, the inspectors determined if the separation criteria were incorporated into the raceway/cable design and documented into the WIRED program, which provides

45

cable and raceway installation records. These records are utilized by SETROUTE when/if the required separation distances were less than the requirements and not run in enclosed raceways or provided with a barrier(s) inside containment. The inspectors reviewed these computerized programs and documents to determine if any circuits (cables) were identified as not meeting the separation requirements and routed in enclosed raceways or with an installed barrier(s) to meet the requirements of IEEE 384. The inspectors also reviewed a sample of completed WIRED and SETROUTE cable pull tickets along with existing CRs to determine if separation requirements (if any) were documented into the actual installation details.

b. Findings


1A42 (Unit 3) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07d.iv.b (807) / Family 09A

(Unit 4) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07d.iv.b (807) / Family 09A

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors performed a direct inspection of construction activities associated with ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07d.iv.b (807). The inspectors used the following NRC IPs/sections to perform this inspection:


The inspectors performed a program review of the proprietary cable manager programs WIRED, SetRoute, and TEAMWorks to determine if controls existed to verify cable horizontal and vertical separation between Class 1E raceways of different divisions and between Class 1E raceways and non-Class 1E raceways inside non-radiologically controlled areas in the auxiliary building was not provided and the circuits were not in enclosed raceways nor barriers were provided, were then analyzed in accordance with the acceptance criteria of this ITAAC per Appendix C of the Vogtle units 3 and 4 COL. The inspectors reviewed approved drawings, design criteria, design specifications, standards and procedures to determine if separation requirements were maintained between Class 1E divisions and between Class 1E divisions and non-Class 1E cables, and to determine if these details were met in accordance with the above requirements. Specifically, the inspectors determined if the separation criteria were incorporated into the raceway/cable design and documented into the WIRED program, which provides quality assurance cable and raceway installation records. These records are utilized by SETROUTE when/if the required separation distances were less than requirements and not run in enclosed raceways or provided with a barrier(s) inside the non-radiologically controlled area of the auxiliary building.

46

The inspectors reviewed these computerized programs and documents to determine if any circuits (cables) were identified as not meeting the separation requirements and routed in enclosed raceways or with an installed barrier(s) to meet the requirements of IEEE 384. The inspectors also reviewed a sample of completed WIRED and SETROUTE cable pull tickets along with existing CRs to determine if separation requirements (if any) were documented into the actual installation details.

b. Findings


1A43 (Unit 3) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07d.iv.b (807) / Family 09A

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors performed a direct inspection of construction activities associated with ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07d.iv.b (807). The inspectors used the following NRC IPs/sections to perform this inspection:

• 65001.09-02.01 - Physical Separation of Cables • 65001.09-02.03 - Documentation • 65001.A.02.02 - Installation Records Review


cables in rooms 12101, 12104, and 12113 at elevation 66’-6” in the non-radiologically controlled areas of the auxiliary building. The inspectors performed a review of work procedures, construction drawings, and design specifications and performed walkdowns of the rooms selected for Division A and B safety-related 250VDC battery banks and the 250VDC spare battery switchgear. The inspectors reviewed raceway sizes, locations, separation from other raceways from different divisions and non-class 1E raceways. The inspectors took measurements of the as-installed separations by use of a measuring device or visual observations to determine if the requirements of IEEE Standard 384 "IEEE Standard Criteria for Independence of Class 1E Equipment and Circuits" 1981 and specification SV3-G1-V8-001, AP1000 Electrical Installation Specification, Revision 7 were met. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed the work activities associated with the sampled cables to determine if:



• color coding and identification of raceways and cables, were in compliance with VEGP 3&4 UFSAR, section 8.3.2; and.

47



b. Findings


1A44 (Unit 3) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07d.iv.c (808) / Family 09A

(Unit 4) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07d.iv.c (808) / Family 09A

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors performed a direct inspection of construction activities associated with ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07d.iv.c (808). The inspectors used the following NRC IPs/sections to perform this inspection:


The inspectors performed a program review of the proprietary cable manager programs WIRED, SetRoute, and TEAMWorks to determine if controls existed to verify cable horizontal and vertical separation between Class 1E raceways of different divisions and between Class1E raceways and non-Class 1E raceways inside radiologically controlled areas in the auxiliary building was not provided and the circuits were not in enclosed raceways nor barriers provided, were then analyzed in accordance with the acceptance criteria of this ITAAC per Appendix C of the Vogtle units 3 and 4 COL. The inspectors reviewed approved drawings, design criteria, design specifications, standards and procedures to determine if separation requirements were maintained between Class 1E divisions and between Class 1E divisions and non-Class 1E cables, and to determine if these details were met in accordance with the above requirements. Specifically, the inspectors determined that the separation criteria were incorporated into the raceway/cable design and documented into the WIRED program which provides quality assurance cable and raceway installation records. These records are utilized by SETROUTE when/if the required minimum separation distances were less than the requirements and not run in enclosed raceways or provided with a barrier(s) inside the radiologically controlled area of the auxiliary building. The inspectors reviewed these computerized programs and documents to determine if any circuits (cables) were identified as not meeting the separation requirements and

48

routed in enclosed raceways or with an installed barrier(s) to meet the requirements of IEEE 384. The inspectors also reviewed a sample of completed WIRED and SETROUTE cable pull tickets along with existing CRs to determine if separation requirements (if any) were documented into the actual installation details.

b. Findings


1A45 (Unit 3) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07d.v.a (809) / Family 09A

(Unit 4) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07d.v.a (809) / Family 09A

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors performed a direct inspection of construction activities associated with ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07d.v.a (809). The inspectors used the following NRC IPs/sections to perform this inspection:



programs WIRED, SetRoute, and TEAMWorks to determine if controls existed to verify that cable horizontal and vertical separation between Class 1E raceways of different divisions and between Class1E raceways and non-Class 1E raceways inside containment if not provided and the circuits were not in enclosed raceways nor barriers provided, and neither were they analyzed, then the circuits were treated as Class 1E circuits in accordance with the acceptance criteria of this ITAAC, per Appendix C of the Vogtle units 3 and 4 COL. The inspectors interviewed responsible personnel, reviewed design specifications, and applicable procedures, and observed licensee activities to verify if controls were in place to identify wiring in containment that would have been addressed by this lack of separation. No deviations from the separation criteria were identified within WIRED or SetRoute nor from drawing reviews or site walkdowns.

b. Findings


1A46 (Unit 3) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07d.v.b (810) / Family 09A

(Unit 4) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07d.v.b (810) / Family 09A

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors performed a direct inspection of construction activities associated with ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07d.v.b (810). The inspectors used the following NRC IPs/sections to perform this inspection:

49



programs WIRED, SetRoute, and TEAMWorks to determine if controls existed to verify that cable horizontal and vertical separation between Class 1E raceways of different divisions and between Class1E raceways and non-Class 1E raceways inside non-radiologically controlled areas in the auxiliary building if not provided and the circuits were not in enclosed raceways nor barriers provided and neither were they analyzed, then the circuits were treated as Class 1E circuits in accordance with the ITAAC acceptance criteria, per Appendix C of the Vogtle units 3 and 4 COL. The inspectors interviewed responsible personnel, reviewed construction drawings, design specifications, applicable procedures, and observed licensee activities to verify if controls were in place to identify wiring in the non-radiologically controlled areas in the auxiliary building that would have been addressed by this lack of separation. No deviations from the separation criteria were identified within WIRED or SetRoute except for the lighting circuits inside the MCR, these circuits were treated as Class 1E due to lack of separation or any type of analysis. The inspectors were not able to identify any other separation deviation from drawing review or site walkdowns.

b. Findings


1A47 (Unit 3) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07d.v.b (810) / Family 09A

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors performed a direct inspection of construction activities associated with ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07d.v.b (810). The inspectors used the following NRC IPs/sections to perform this inspection:



cables in rooms 12101, 12104, and 12113 at elevation 66’-6” in the non-radiologically controlled areas of the auxiliary building. The construction activities inspected were associated with ITAAC number 3.3.00.07d.v.b (810). The inspectors performed a review of work procedures, construction drawings, and design specifications and performed walkdowns of the rooms selected for Division A and B safety-related 250VDC battery banks and the 250VDC spare battery switchgear. The inspectors reviewed raceway sizes, locations, separation from other raceways from different divisions and non-class 1E raceways. The inspectors took measurements of the as-installed separations by use of a measuring device or visual observations to determine if the requirements of IEEE Standard 384 "IEEE Standard Criteria for Independence of Class 1E Equipment and Circuits" 1981 and specification SV3-G1-V8-001, AP1000 Electrical Installation Specification, Rev. 7 were met.

50

Specifically, the inspectors reviewed the work activities associated with the sampled cables to determine if:

• the installation of safety-related power and control/signal wiring and protective measures used on these cables immediately following cable pull activities were in compliance with procedure 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3303-CPM1F2 Cable Installation, Rev 1;

• the location of raceway supports and maximum spacing of supports were in compliance with procedure 26139-000-4MP-T81CN3302, Raceways and Accessories, Rev 6;




b. Findings

No findings were identified. 1A48 (Unit 3) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07d.v.c (811) / Family 09A

(Unit 4) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07d.v.c (811) / Family 09A

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors performed a direct inspection of construction activities associated with ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07d.v.c (811). The inspectors used the following NRC IPs/sections to perform this inspection:



programs WIRED, SetRoute, and TEAMWorks to determine if controls existed to verify that cable horizontal and vertical separation between Class 1E raceways of different divisions and between Class1E raceways and non-Class 1E raceways inside radiologically controlled areas in the auxiliary building, if not provided and the circuits were not in enclosed raceways, barriers were not provided neither were they analyzed, then the circuits were treated as Class 1E circuits in accordance with the ITAAC acceptance criteria, per Appendix C of the Vogtle units 3 and 4 COL. The inspectors interviewed responsible personnel, reviewed design specifications, applicable procedures, and observed licensee activities to confirm that controls were in place to identify wiring in the radiologically controlled areas of the auxiliary building that would have been addressed by this lack of separation. No deviations from the

51

separation criteria were identified within WIRED or SetRoute nor from drawing reviews or site walkdowns.

b. Findings


1A49 (Unit 3) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07e (812) / Family 09A

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors performed a direct inspection of construction activities associated with ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07e (812). The inspectors used the following NRC IPs/sections to perform this inspection:


The inspectors observed the installation of a Class 1E fiber optic cable SV3-PMS-EW-

JDQDPB0101DZB into raceways inside the non-radiological portion of the auxiliary building. This fiber optic cable is a communication cable between the Division B and Division C qualified data processing cabinets associated with the PMS. Specifically, the inspectors observed the installation of the fiber optic cable into its raceways to verify the following attributes were in accordance with the design installation specification and pull ticket:


• cable bend radii were not exceeded during the cable pull; • cable was not pushed or pulled past any other cables in the raceways; • cable mark numbers indicated in the pull tickets matched the labels on the

cables; • cable descriptions specified on the pull tickets were as specified on the cables;

and • cable insulation remained undamaged during the pulls.

b. Findings



(Unit 4) ITAAC Number 3.3.00.07e (812) / Family 09A

a. Inspection Scope



52


programs WIRED, SetRoute, and TEAMWorks to determine if controls existed to verify that Class 1E communication cables, which interconnect two divisions were routed and separated such that the PMS voting logic is not defeated by the loss of any single raceway or fire area in accordance with the ITAAC acceptance criteria, per Appendix C of the Vogtle units 3 and 4 COL. The inspectors reviewed approved drawings, design specifications and procedures to determine if separation requirements for Class 1E communication cables that would interconnect two divisions were separated by raceway routing or barriers to maintain the integrity of the PMS voting logic.

b. Findings



a. Inspection Scope


• 65001.03-02.03 - Installation and Welding • 65001.B-02.04-Production Controls

The inspectors performed an inspection of two stainless steel field welds during piping

installation for the ADS of the RCS to verify if manual GTAW was performed in accordance with the requirements of the ASME Code Section III, Subsection NB, for Class 1 components. The inspectors observed an intermediate weld pass of deposited stringer beads for field weld SV4-RCS-PLW-03A-1 in the horizontal position that joins an 18-inch diameter pipe for line L136A to the branch connection nozzle of the RCS hot leg L001A to verify the ability of the welders to deposit sound weld metal into the adjoining bevels and each sequential weld stringer beads was in accordance with welding procedure WPS 1-8.8T01. The inspectors reviewed the associated S&W WDS to verify if the established QC inspection hold points were signed-off for cleanliness and fit-up in accordance with NCA-4134.10 and NB-4230. The inspectors also reviewed the entries on the WDS to determine whether the traceability of the welding rods and welders were maintained in accordance with NB-4122 and NB-4300. In addition, the inspectors observed the root pass inside the pipe through the butt joint opening for field weld SV4-RCS-PLW-03B-1 that joined a 14-inch diameter pipe for line L137A to the 18-inch tee fitting branch connection to verify the ability of the welder to deposit a sound weld root pass with complete penetration in accordance with NB-4423(c) for a single-welded butt joint. The inspectors reviewed the associated S&W WDS to verify if the established QC inspection hold points were signed-off for cleanliness and fit-up in accordance with NCA-4134.10 and NB-4230. The inspectors

53

also reviewed the entries on the WDS to determine whether the traceability of the welding rods and welders were maintained in accordance with NB-4122 and NB-4300.

b. Findings



a. Inspection Scope


• 65001.03-02.03 - Installation and Welding • 65001.B-02.04-Production Controls • 65001.B-02.05-Inspection

The inspectors performed an inspection of two stainless steel pipe field welds in the

temporary modular assembly building for the ADS of the RCS to sparger A and B to verify if manual GTAW was performed in accordance with the requirements of the ASME Code Section III, Subsection ND, for Class 3 components. The inspectors observed tacking of the pipe fit-ups, partial internal root pass welds with use of oxygen analyzer, and intermediate weld passes for both field welds SV4-RCS-PLW-017-5 and SV4-RCS-PLW-01G-5 in the vertical position for 18-inch diameter pipe lines L063A and L063B to verify the ability of the welders to deposit sound weld metal in accordance with welding procedure WPS 1-8.8T01. The inspectors reviewed the associated S&W WDS SV4-RCS-PLW-01G-5 to verify if the established QC inspection hold points were signed-off for cleanliness and fit-up in accordance with NCA-4134.10 and ND-4230. The inspectors also reviewed the entries on the WDS to determine whether the traceability of the welding rods and welders were maintained in accordance with ND-4122 and ND-4300. In addition, the inspectors reviewed the associated S&W WDS SV4-RCS-PLW-01G-5 to verify if the established QC inspection hold points were signed-off for internal cleanliness and fit-up in accordance with NCA-4134.10 and NC-4230. The inspectors also reviewed the entries on the WDS to determine whether the traceability of the welding rods and welders were maintained in accordance with ND-4122 and ND-4300.

b. Findings



a. Inspection Scope

54


• 65001.06-02.01 - General Installation

The inspectors observed the rigging, lifting, and setting of module 1102-Q6-01 in Unit

4 to determine if the activities were performed in accordance with the licensee's procedures and ASME Code requirements. Module 1102-Q6-01 is a mechanical module located above the pressurizer that contains ADS stage 1, 2, and 3 piping and valves along with associated supports. The inspectors also reviewed the licensee's rigging plan for installation of the module. The inspectors selected a sample of parameters from the rigging plan and observed the lift of the module to determine if the selected parameters were within the limits specified in the rigging plan. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed the wind speed and total load to verify the stresses on the module were not exceeded in accordance with the rigging plan. The inspectors also observed the lift to determine if the crane was lifting the module from the lifting lugs on the module frame as described in the rigging plan. The inspectors reviewed the completed rigging plan to determine if steps were met and signed-off by appropriate, qualified personnel.

b. Findings

No findings were identified. 1A54 (Unit 4) ITAAC Number 2.1.02.08d.v (36) / Family 07A

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors performed a direct inspection of construction activities associated with ITAAC Number 2.1.02.08d.v (36). The inspectors used the following NRC IPs/sections to perform this inspection:

• 65001.06-02.01 - General Installation • 65001.A- As-Built Attributes for SSCs associated with ITAAC

The inspectors performed an inspection of the two Unit 4 ADS spargers to verify the

centerline of the connection of each of the sparger arms to the sparger hub was less than 11.5 feet below the in-containment refueling water and storage tank (IRWST) overflow level as specified in Table 2.1.2-4 of Appendix C of the Vogtle Unit 4 COL. The inspectors observed the setup in the module assembly building for the licensee's survey of the centerline of sparger A to a reference point, the calibration of the survey equipment, and the survey request sheet to determine whether the survey setup was in accordance with the licensee's survey procedure. The inspectors observed the survey of the elevation of the two spargers to the reference point once they were installed in the IRWST to verify it was done in accordance with the survey procedure. The inspectors reviewed the as-built elevation verification drawing and its references to verify if information incorporated into the drawing was accurate. The inspectors independently validated the licensee's final calculations in the as-built elevation verification document used to determine the

55

centerline of the connection of the sparger arms to the sparger hub for each sparger were conservative, accurate, and met the acceptance criteria of the ITAAC.

b. Findings



a. Inspection Scope


• 65001.11-02.03 - Installation and Welding • 65001.B-02.04-Production Controls

The inspectors reviewed PCI Energy Services weld process traveler 915504-002 for

field weld FW-SV4-FTT-07 to verify if the dissimilar metal welding of the fuel transfer tube annular machined ring to the 36-inch diameter containment vessel penetration sleeve was performed in accordance with the requirements of the ASME Code Section III, Subsection NE. The inspectors reviewed the entries on the weld traveler to determine whether the traceability of the weld filler metals and welders were maintained in accordance with NE-4122 and NE-4300. The inspectors also reviewed the weld traveler to verify if the established QC inspection hold points were signed-off for acceptance of the fit-up and final liquid penetrant examination in accordance with NCA-4134.10, NE-4230, and NE-5350.

b. Findings



a. Inspection Scope


• 65001.11-02.03 - Installation and Welding • 65001.B-02.04-Production Controls • 65001.B-02.05-Inspection

56

The inspectors reviewed CB&I weld traveler U4-S8/S9 to verify the circumferential weld seam that joins the second and third ring assemblies of the containment vessel was welded in accordance with the 2001 Edition including 2002 Addenda of the ASME Code Section III, Subsection NE, for Class MC metal containment components. The inspectors verified the fit-up, temporary attachments, preheat, tack welds, and hold point sign-off were performed in accordance with Article NE-4000. In addition, the inspectors reviewed two Daily Welding Material Distribution Logs to verify traceability of E91T1-GM-H4 weld filler material lot numbers and welder identifications were maintained in accordance with NE-4100 and NE-4300 for flux-cored arc welding. The inspectors observed shielded metal arc welding at various locations of staggered intermittent welds on the outside of the horizontal seam to verify each welder's (159, 231, 447, and 3016) ability to deposit sound weld metal was performed in accordance with CB&I ASME IX welding procedure WPS E9018M H4 R.

b. Findings


1A57 (Unit 4) ITAAC Number 2.2.03.08c.iv.01 (183) / Family 03A

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors performed a direct inspection of construction activities associated with ITAAC Number 2.2.03.08c.iv.01 (183). The inspectors used the following NRC IPs/sections to perform this inspection:

• 65001.A.02.01 - Observation of in-Process Installation Activities • 65001.A.02.03 - Independent Assessment/Measurement Inspection

The inspectors observed the licensee perform surveying and performed an

independent inspection for PXS DVI lines SV4-PXS-PL-L112A/B, SV4-PXS-PL-L114, SV4-PXS-PL-L116A/B, SV4-PXS-PL-L117A/B, SV4-PXS-PL-L118A/B, SV4-PXS-PL-L123A/B, SV4-PXS-PL-L124A/B, and SV4-PXS-PL-L125A/B. The inspectors observed surveying to determine whether the surveying was done in accordance with procedures. Additionally, the inspectors observed surveying of the outside of these pipe lines to verify the selection of survey points included the maximum elevations for each line in accordance with the ITAAC acceptance criteria. The inspectors performed an independent walk-down of these pipe lines and the IRWST to verify the maximum elevations of the pipe lines were lower than the bottom inside surface of the IRWST as specified in Table 2.2.3-4 of Appendix C of the Vogtle Unit 3 COL.

b. Findings



a. Inspection Scope

57


• 65001.03-02.03 - Installation and Welding • 65001.07-02.01 - General Installation • 65001.B-02.04-Production Controls • 65001.B-02.05-Inspection • 65001.B-02.06-Records

The inspectors reviewed documents and observed GTAW with induction preheating

associated with field weld SV4-SGS-PLW-032-4 for line L006A on the inlet side of main steam isolation valve (MSIV) V040-A to verify the 38-inch diameter valve was installed in accordance with the requirements of welding procedure WPS 1-4.4C30 and ASME Code Section III, Subsection NC, for Class 2 components. The inspectors reviewed the S&W WDS entries to determine if QC inspection hold points were signed-off and dated for material identification, internal cleanliness, bevel-end preparations, and fit-up in accordance with the ASME Code, Section III, Subsections NCA-4134.10 and NC-4230. The inspectors also reviewed the entries on the WDS to determine whether the traceability of the welders (JEL4968, JMB4293, and RAM3966) and weld filler material (ER80S-B2: heat-nos. 1181P, 1182J, and 1203K) were maintained in accordance with NC-4122 and NC-4300. The inspectors reviewed documents and observed GTAW and SMAW with induction preheating associated with field weld SV4-SGS-PLW-032-3 for line L007A on the outlet side of MSIV V040-A to verify the 38-inch diameter valve was installed in accordance with the requirements of welding procedure WPS 1-4.4C30 and ASME Code Section III, Subsection ND, for Class 3 components. The inspectors reviewed the S&W WDS entries to determine if QC inspection hold points were signed-off and dated for material identification, internal cleanliness, bevel-end preparations, and fit-up in accordance with the ASME Code, Section III, Subsections NCA-4134.10 and ND-4230. The inspectors also reviewed the entries on the WDS to determine whether the traceability of the welder (JCD4541) and weld filler material (ER80S-B2: heat-no. 1203K) were maintained in accordance with ND-4122 and ND-4300.

b. Findings



a. Inspection Scope


• 65001.12-02.01 - General Installation • 65001.A.02.01 - Observation of in-Process Installation Activities

58

• 65001.A.02.03 - Independent Assessment/Measurement Inspection The inspectors performed an inspection of the Unit 4 main control room emergency

habitability system (VES) filter shielding to verify the as-built shielding met the functional requirements and conformed to the system design description of the UFSAR, section 6.4.2 and the Vogtle Unit 4 COL, Section 2.2.5 and Table 2.2.5-1. The inspectors performed a walkdown of the installed shielding to verify shielding existed below the filtration unit and was within its vertical projection as specified in the ITAAC acceptance criteria. The inspectors observed the licensee's inspection of the VES air filter assembly shielding panel, including the dimensions, material, and location within the assembly, to verify the shielding panel was of the correct dimensions and material as specified in the design drawings. The inspectors observed the final installed air filter unit assembly to verify the shielding panel was not damaged or altered during installation. In addition, the inspectors reviewed selected portions of quality records including the PCD, Quality Verification Document Package, and design drawings for the VES filter assembly.

b. Findings



a. Inspection Scope


• 65001.22-A6.03.02 - Installation Activities

The inspectors reviewed 2.5.02.11-U4-SumRep-Rev 0, “PCD Summary Report ITAAC

2.5.02.11 (550) Protection and Safety Monitoring System Design Process Summary Report: Installation Phase,” and associated references to verify that the PMS development process provided for specific documentation and reviews for the PMS installation phase. The inspectors reviewed the PCD to verify if it provided a roadmap to the documentation that fulfills the inspections, tests, analyses and acceptance criteria for ITAAC 2.5.02.11, part e), in accordance with 10 CFR 52.99. The inspectors previously performed a direct inspection of construction activities associated with ITAAC 2.5.2.11, parts b), c), and d) as documented in inspection report 05200025/2019002 and 05200026/2019002 (ML19220B678). The inspectors observed in-process installation of PMS software to verify the installers followed the directions in FCN SV3-GW-GCW-300 and the installed software cyclic redundancy check was performed in accordance with Appendix A of the FCN. Additionally, the inspectors observed the installation of software to verify the CDs used to install software were in accordance with the FCN. Specifically, the inspectors observed the installation of software in the B division MTC cabinet and a sample of the installation of software on the processors in C division cabinet BCCC01 and B division cabinet BCCB01. For the BCCB01 cabinet, the inspectors observed the installation of software on the BPLC1_1 processor. For the BCCC01 cabinet, the inspectors

59

observed the installation of software on the BPLC1_1, BPLC1_2, and LCLC1_1 processors. The inspectors reviewed the FCN to verify it was written in accordance with the licensee’s FCN procedure guide. The inspectors also compared the FCN to the latest configuration management release reports to verify the software version to be installed by the FCN was the latest version that had been released to the site per the configuration management release reports. As part of the review of the licensees PCD for ITAAC 2.5.02.11, the inspectors reviewed the PMS cabinet component test procedure and the associated energization procedures for the BCC and MTC cabinets to verify if they were written in accordance with the requirements in the ITP procedure development procedure. The inspectors also reviewed the procedures called out in the PCD to verify the roles defined in it matched the description of the roles in the procedures. In addition, the inspectors reviewed the PCD to verify the procedures cited were applicable for Unit 4 and the processes and roles described were the same as Unit 3.

b. Findings



a. Inspection Scope


• 65001.A- As-Built Attributes for SSCs associated with ITAAC • 65001.A.02.04 - Review As-built Deviations/Nonconformance • 65001.F- Inspection of the ITAAC-Related Design and Fabrication Requirements • 65001.F-02.01-Design Document Review

The inspectors reviewed structural calculations for the conical roof, PCS tank, and

connections between the conical roof and tension ring to verify that the design basis was correctly translated into design output documents as required by 10 CFR Part 50 Appendix B, Criterion III, Design Control. Specifically, the inspectors verified if the assumptions, load combinations, and methodology used in the calculations were consistent with UFSAR section 3.8.4 and Appendix 3H. The inspectors reviewed a sample of 12 E&DCRs and one DCP to verify if design changes were performed in accordance with 10 CFR Part 50 Appendix B, Criterion III, Design Control. Specifically, the inspectors verified if the design changes were subject to control measures commensurate with those applied to the original design and were approved by the organization that performed the original design or the designated responsible organization. The inspectors also reviewed the E&DCRs and DCP to verify if a technical justification was provided for the design change; deviations from applicable quality standards such AISC N690-94 and ACI 349-01 were controlled; and the revised design was correctly translated into the updated design output documents.

60

The inspectors reviewed LAR 16-031R1 associated with revisions to the conical roof structure and PCS tank to verify if deviations in the approved design where being identified, documented, and reconciled using the appropriate change process.

b. Findings



a. Inspection Scope


• 65001.01-02.05 - Steel Structures • 65001.A- As-Built Attributes for SSCs associated with ITAAC • 65001.A.02.04 - Review As-built Deviations/Nonconformance • 65001.B-02.06-Records • 65001.F- Inspection of the ITAAC-Related Design and Fabrication Requirements

The inspectors reviewed documentation and performed field inspections associated

with the receipt inspection of tension ring (TR) modules located at elevation 266’-5” on the shield building. The inspectors reviewed documentation associated with the fabrication of the modules, reviewed design specifications, engineering & design coordination reports (E&DCRs), nonconformance & disposition reports (N&Ds) and performed field measurements. The inspectors reviewed a sample of receipt inspection documentation for TR modules TR05 and TR09. The inspectors reviewed CMTRs for reinforcement couplers, steel plates, and for deformed wire tie bars to determine whether the materials used in the assembly of the TR modules was in conformance with the requirements specified in table 3.8.4-6 of UFSAR and Section 10.0 of specification APP-1208-Z0-001. The inspectors performed a field inspection of modules TR-05 and TR-09. Specifically, the inspectors performed independent measurements to determine whether the as-built configuration of the modules was in conformance with the design drawings and section 3H.5.6.1 of the UFSAR. The inspectors also measured the thickness of the modules between the inner and outer steel plates, spacing between mechanical couplers on the inner-top plates, and verified the identification of each module to determine if they were in accordance with design drawings and documentation contained in the purchase orders. The inspectors sampled E&DCRs to verify whether any design changes, associated with the assembly and manufacturing of the modules, were approved by Westinghouse Electric Company LLC and in conformance with AWS D1.1, 2000. The inspectors also sampled N&Ds to verify whether nonconforming conditions were dispositioned and complied with the final design requirements of specification APP-1208-Z0-001 and design drawings.

61

b. Findings



a. Inspection Scope


• 65001.01-02.05 - Steel Structures • 65001.B-02.04-Production Controls • 65001.B-02.05-Inspection

The inspectors observed machine flux-cored arc welding (FCAW) on outside vertical weld seams AI-19/20 (azimuth 155 degrees) and AI-20/21 (azimuth 163 degrees) during assembly of air inlet panels between elevations 248'-6" and 266'-4" for the shield building to verify the ability of the welding operators to deposit sound weld metal on intermediate weld passes in accordance with the AWS D1.1:2000 structural welding code for steel. The inspectors reviewed entries on the associated CB&I weld travelers U4-AI-19/20 and U4-AI-20/21 to verify if the established QC inspection hold points were signed-off for cleanliness and fit-up, and traceability of the welding operators were maintained in accordance with the CB&I general welding procedure specification.

b. Findings



a. Inspection Scope


• 65001.01-02.05 - Steel Structures • 65001.B-02.03-Welder Qualification • 65001.B-02.04-Production Controls • 65001.B-02.05-Inspection • 65001.B-02.06-Records

62

The inspectors reviewed CB&I weld travelers and spreadsheets of the following vertical and horizontal weld seams for construction of the shield building to verify welding and inspections were performed in accordance with the CB&I general welding procedure WS-SP-45001, ANSI N690-1994 standard, and AWS D1.1:2000 code for structural steel welding:

• two weld travelers of the vertical inside-outside weld seams 0910B/0910C (azimuth 180 degrees) and 11F/11G (azimuth 205 degrees); and

• two weld spreadsheets of the horizontal inside-outside weld seams 08M/09LM and 11A/12AB.

Specifically, the inspectors reviewed entries on the associated weld travelers and spreadsheets to verify if the established QC inspection hold points for cleanliness, fit-up, and magnetic particle inspection of temporary attachment removal areas (including plate thickness measurements) were signed-off as acceptable in accordance with CB&I WS-SP-45001 and AWS D1.1 code. The inspector also reviewed entries on the weld travelers and spreadsheets to verify traceability of the certified welders/welding operators and weld filler metals were maintained for these four weld seams in accordance with CB&I WS-SP-45001. The inspectors reviewed performance qualification records for SMAW, semi-automatic and machine FCAW, and submerged-arc welding (SAW) processes to verify welders/welding operators were tested and certified in accordance with ASME Section IX. The inspectors reviewed CB&I AWS reports of ultrasonic examinations performed on the inside and outside portions of these four weld seams to verify that the 10% sample of ultrasonic examinations for each weld seam were deemed acceptable in accordance with ANSI N690-94: Section Q1.26 "Nondestructive Examination" and AWS D1.1.

b. Findings


IMC 2504, Construction Inspection Program – Inspection of Construction and Operational Programs 1P01 Construction QA Criterion 16

• 35007-A16.04 - Inspection Requirements and Guidance • 35007-A16.04.01 - Inspection of QA Implementing Documents • 35007-A16.04.02 - Inspection of QA Program Implementation -

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed issues entered into the licensee's CAP to assess issues that

might warrant additional follow-up inspection, to assess repetitive or long-term issues, to assess adverse performance trends, and to verify the CAP appropriately included regulatory required non-safety related SSCs. The inspectors periodically attended the licensee's CAP review meetings, held discussions with licensee and contractor personnel, and performed reviews of CAP activities during the conduct of other baseline inspection procedures. The inspectors reviewed conditions entered into the

63

licensee's CAP to determine whether the issues were appropriately classified in accordance with the licensee's quality assurance program and CAP implementing procedures. The inspectors reviewed corrective actions associated with conditions entered into the CAP to determine whether appropriate actions to correct the issues were identified and implemented effectively, including immediate or short-term corrective actions, in accordance with the applicable quality assurance program requirements and 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI. Additionally, the inspectors reviewed the corrective actions taken to determine whether they were commensurate with the significance of the associated conditions in accordance with the licensee's CAP implementing procedures. The inspectors completed reviews of CAP entry logs to verify issues from all aspects of the project, including equipment, human performance, and program issues, were being identified by the licensee and its contractors at an appropriate threshold and entered into the CAP as required by licensee's CAP implementing procedures.

b. Findings


1P02 Construction QA Criterion 16

• 35007-A16.04.02 - Inspection of QA Program Implementation

a. Inspection Scope The inspectors selected an issue that was entered into the licensee's CAP for

additional follow-up inspection. The inspectors reviewed a sample SNC CRs regarding units 3 and 4 nuclear island structures. The inspectors reviewed the licensee's evaluations and corrective actions to verify the following attributes were performed in accordance with the licensee's CAP implementing procedures:

• complete and accurate identification of the cause of the problem in a timely manner commensurate with its safety significance and ease of discovery;

• consideration of the extent of condition, generic implications, common cause, trending, and previous occurrences; and

• classification and prioritization of the resolution of the problem commensurate with its safety significance.

The inspectors reviewed the associated N&D reports to verify the hardware nonconformances had technical evaluations and were dispositioned in accordance with APP-GW-GAP-428, "Nonconformance and Disposition Report." The inspectors reviewed an associated E&DCR to verify the design change had a technical evaluation and was reviewed and approved in accordance with APP-GW-GAP-420, "Engineering and Design Coordination Reports." The inspectors conducted a field walkdown of each item, when available, to verify the actions were completed.

b. Findings


64



a. Inspection Scope The inspectors reviewed N&D SV3-IDSD-GNR-000015 regarding the switching of the

neutral and power conductors for a cable in one of the Unit 3 Division D 120-volt distribution panels. The inspectors reviewed the N&D to verify the hardware nonconformance had a technical evaluation and was dispositioned in accordance with APP-GW-GAP-428, "Nonconformance and Disposition Report." The inspectors observed the in-process termination of the cables to determine if the issue had been completely and correctly characterized and the corrective actions were implemented.

b. Findings




a. Inspection Scope The inspectors reviewed the licensee’s corrective actions associated with CR

50004237, Hilti TZ Post-Installed Anchor Nut Thread Engagement, to verify corrective actions were completed in accordance with the licensee’s CAP. This CR was written to address 3/8-inch TZ Hilti bolts that were installed prior to July 16, 2018, that lacked adequate thread engagement.

b. Findings

Introduction

The NRC opened an unresolved item (URI) as follow up to the inspection activities for

CR 50004237, Hilti TZ Post-Installed Anchor Nut Thread Engagement. The URI is being opened to determine if the performance deficiency is material to the acceptance criteria of an ITAAC.

Description CR 50004237 was written by the electrical QC group to address a condition adverse to

quality related to the TZ Hilti bolts. Specification SV3/SV4-SS01-Z0-011, Post Installed Anchors for seismic Category I Buildings and Structures, on page 15, section 20, states in part: "Projection of the anchor shall be such that after final tightening of the nut the end of the bolt is not lower than flush with the top of the nut." QC inspectors were concerned that for Hilti type TZ anchors, which have a tapered end, the resulting thread engagement would result in less than full thread engagement between the bolt and nut. In addition, a request for information (RFI) was initiated and

65

stated that: if any portion of the bolt’s threads are above the surface of the nut, full thread engagement will have been accomplished.

Further details provided in the CR indicated that 3/8-inch TZ Hilti bolted installed prior to July 16, 2018, were accepted based on a previous revision of SV3/SV4-SS01-Z0-011 and therefore could have resulted in installations without full thread engagement.

In addition, technical evaluation (TE) 50006637, which was used to close CR 50004237, stated that the previous installed TZ Hilti bolts were acceptable since they met the approved specification at that time.

During the week of January 17, 2020, inspectors determined that the condition adverse to quality identified in CR 50004237, which dealt with inadequate thread engagement for 3/8-inch Hilti TZ Post-Installed anchors, never adequately evaluated the extent of condition with respect to the population in question. This issue was identified as a performance deficiency; however, a URI was opened to determine whether the performance deficiency is material to the acceptance criteria of an ITAAC. In response, the licensee opened CR 50039089 to address this concern. (URI 05200025/2020001-01, Failure to Adequately Address CR 50004237 for Impacts to 3/8-Inch TZ Hilti Bolts).

4. OTHER INSPECTION RESULTS 4OA5 Other Activities .1 ITAACs 2.1.02.07a.i (24) and 2.2.03.07a.i (170) – Closed NON 99901441/2014-201-03

a. Inspection Scope The inspectors reviewed corrective actions to address Notice of Nonconformance

(NON) 99901441/2014-201-03 (Ref. ADAMS Accession numbers ML14231B268 and ML18152B785). The NON documented issues discovered during a vendor inspection at Curtiss-Wright QualTech NP which impacted ITAACs 2.1.02.07a.i (24) and 2.2.03.07a.i (170). NON 99901441/2014-201-03 documented test control issues that were not consistent with requirements specified in customer orders and the QualTech quality assurance manual. Specifically, the NON identified five examples, where test requirements were not satisfied with no evaluations of the test deviations. The testing under review was documented under EGS-TR-HC1741-01. The testing was performed on Firewall III insulated cables manufactured by Rockbestos-Surprenant Cable Corporation (RSCC) for a loss of coolant accident (LOCA/DBA) environmental qualification. The corrective actions were based on conducting training of all engineering staff on the requirements of the QualTech NP Huntsville Operations SOP 15.1, Revision H. This training was to emphasize the importance of generating a notice of anomaly (NOA) to officially document any deviation/anomaly even if customer witness is present. The training was conducted between 9/30/2014 and 10/1/2014 in four separate sessions that included 30 staff members. There was a second set of training sessions given to all Engineering Verifiers on the requirements to perform a complete technical review of technical documents, including verifying the closure of all NOAs and the determination if any additional NOAs need to be generated per QualTech NP Huntsville Operations SOP 3.4, revision E.

66

The inspectors reviewed additional corrective actions that revised the original test report EGS-TR-HC1741-01 to incorporate the NOAs and the certificate of conformance/compliance associated with the squib valve qualification testing. The inspectors reviewed training scope and attendance sheets and the revised test report EGS-TR-HC1741-01 and found that it was responsive to this NON as documented in IR 99901441/2014-201. Therefore, the issues discovered during this vendor inspection at Curtiss-Wright QualTech NP, have been resolved and no longer impact the acceptance criteria of ITAACs 2.1.02.07a.i (24) and 2.2.03.07a.i (170). NON 99901441/2014-201-03 is considered closed. Note that per license amendments 85 (Unit 3) and 84 (Unit 4) ITAACs 2.1.02.07a.i (24) and 2.2.03.07a.i (170) are now ITAACs 2.1.02.05a.i (19) and 2.2.03.05a.i (165).

b. Findings


4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit .1 Exit Meeting. On April 16, 2020, the inspectors presented the inspection results to Mr. M. Meier, SNC

Vice President of Regulatory Affairs, and other licensee and contractor staff members. Proprietary information was reviewed during the inspection period but was not included in the inspection report.

67

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

KEY POINTS OF CONTACT Licensees and Contractor Personnel R. Beilke, ITAAC Project Manager C. Calia, SNC PI-CAP Manager C. Castell, SNC Licensing Engineer J. Ealick, SNC CAP supervisor S. Gambill, SNC Electrical Test Engineer D. Gray, SNC Electrical ITAAC B. Hirmanpour, SNC I&C Manager J. Hughes, SNC ITAAC (I&C/Electrical) Supervisor J. Hurst, WEC ASME N. Kellenberger, SNC Licensing Supervisor S. Leighty, SNC Licensing Supervisor D. Martrano, WEC Test Coordinator E. Odem, SNC Supervisor, Maintenance Preservation T. Petrak, SNC ITAAC Manager K. Phelps, SNC ECP Manager L. Pritchett, SNC Licensing Engineer K. Roberts, SNC, Licensing Manager G. Scott, SNC Licensing Engineer N. Wetherell, SNC Electrical Test Manager M. Wilson, SNC Electrical Test Engineer M. Yox, SNC Regulatory Affairs Director

LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED Item Number Type Status Description 05200025/2020001-01

URI Open Failure to Adequately Address CR 50004237 for Impacts to 3/8-Inch TZ Hilti Bolts (Section 1P04)

99901441/2014-201-03 NON Closed Failure to document and evaluate test deviations (Section 4OA5)

68

LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED

Section 1 [2503 Documents] Section 1A01 PCI Energy Services Welding Procedure Specification 8MN-GTAW-RCP CANOPY, Revision 1 PCI Energy Services Weld Process Traveler No. 915701-003 for RCP 1A, Revision 0, dated 9/18/2019 Westinghouse Drawing SV3-MP01-V2-011, "AP1000 REACTOR COOLANT PUMP GENERAL ASSEMBLY," Revision 0 Westinghouse Drawing SV3-MP01-V2-013, "AP1000 REACTOR COOLANT PUMP GENERAL ASSEMBLY," Revision 0 Section 1A02 Design Specification SV3-G1-V8-001, AP1000 Electrical Installation Specification, Revision 7 APP-1230-ERY-001, Cross Matrix Raceway/Supports at Elevation 100'-0'' In Auxiliary Building, Revision 0 SV3-SS01-Z0-011, Post-Installed Anchors for Seismic Category Buildings and Structures, Revision 1 APP-CE01-Z0-002, Design Specification for Supply, Installation, Inspection and Testing of Post-Installed Anchor Bolts, Revision 2 Calculation APP-SH25-S3C-001, AP1000 Seismic Category I Standard Cable Tray Supports, Revision 1 APP-1210-SHC-001, Structural Analysis and Design of Cable Tray Supports in the Auxiliary Building Areas 3 Through 6, El. 66-6, Revision 2 APP-1250-SHC-202, Structural Analysis of Additional Cable Tray Supports in the Auxiliary Building, Areas 1 and 2, El. 153-3, Revision 0 APP-1250-SHC-301, Structural Analysis of Cable Conduit Supports in Auxiliary Building, Area 2, El. 135-3, Revision 0 APP-G1-EWC-004, Maximum Design for Raceway Weights and Cable Fuel Loading for W, X(A), X(B), Y, and Z Cable Trays and Conduits, Revision 1 APP-SH25-S3C-002, AP1000 Seismic Category I Standard Conduit Supports, Revision 2 APP-1000-S2C-056, Nuclear Island Seismic Floor Response Spectra, Revision 2 Procedures SV3-G1-E1-003, Raceway Design, Discipline Design Criteria, Revision 3 NCSP03-82, Electrical Raceway Installation, Revision 07.01 APP-GW-GMP-006, AP1000 Component Numbering Procedure, Revision 9 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3212, Post-Installed Anchors and Core Drilling, Revision 2 SV3-GW-S1-006, AP1000 Design Guide for Raceway Systems, Revision 4 SV3-SH25-E9-100, Tray Support Selection Guidelines, Revision 2 APP-GW-C1-003, Selection Manual of Standard Attachments, Revision 5 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N6204, Field Control Material and Traceability, Revision 4 Condition Reports 50005311, Cable Tray Supports Fabricated to Earlier Design Revision

69

50022022, Cable Tray Supports Span Exceeds Maximum Length 50001687, Misfabrication and Installation of Cable Tray Support SV3-1221-SH-E016 50031436, Damaged Conduit Support 50031252, Cable Tray Support SV3-1133-SH-E526 Installed Out of tolerance Drawings SV3-SH25-E9-100, Tray Support Selection Guidelines, Revision 2 SV3-ECS-E9-010, Cable Tray Notes and Details Drawings Sheet 1, Revision 8 SV3-ECS-E9-101, Conduit Notes and Support Details, Revision 1 SV3-ECS-E9-030, Conduit Notes and Details Sheet 1, Revision 12 SV3-ECS-E9-031, Conduit Notes and Details Sheet 2, Revision 11 APP-ECS-E9-062, Cable Tray Notes and Details Sheet 1 of 2, Revision 0 APP-ECS-E9-063, Cable Tray Notes and Details Sheet 2 of 2, Revision 0 APP-1231-ER-607, Auxiliary Building Area 1 EL. 100-0 Conduit Supports Plan View (Sheet 7), Revision 1 APP-1231-ER-602, Auxiliary Building Area 1 EL. 100-0 Conduit Supports Plan View (Sheet 2), Revision 4 APP-1231-ER-645, Auxiliary Building Area 1 EL. 100-0 Conduit Supports Details (Sheet 35), Revision 0 APP-SH25-VF-001, Fabrication Requirements Tray Supports Seismic Cat I Trapeze Support Detail, Revision 2 APP-SH25-VF-008, Fabrication Requirements Try Supports Seismic Cat I propped Cantilever Unbraced support Details, Revision 2 APP-SH25-VF-014, Fabrication requirements Tray supports Seismic Cat I Cantilever Vertical Riser, Revision 3 SV3-0000-S9-001, Structural Steel General Notes, Revision 8 Work Packages SV3-1231-SHW-800050, U3 Install Conduit Supports, Aux, elevation 100-0, Area 1, Room 12305 SV3-1231-SHW-800051, U3 Install Conduit Supports, Aux, elevation 100-0, Area 1, Room 12305 SV3-1231-SHW-800053, U3 Install Conduit Supports, Aux, Elevation 100-6, Area 1, room 12305 26139-000-2QI-Q07C-N3302, Quality Control Instruction for Raceway and Accessories, Revision 3 Section 1A03 APP-GW-G1-002, AP1000 Equipment Qualification Methodology, Revision 5 APP-GW-VP-010, Equipment Qualification Methodology and Documentation Requirements for AP1000 Safety-Related Valves and Valve Appurtenances, Revision 3 APP-GW-VP-030, AP1000 Environmental Conditions, Revision 6 APP-1000-S2C-056, Nuclear Island Seismic Floor Response Spectra, Revision 2 APP-PV13-Z0-001, Design Specification for Solenoid Valves ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III, Class 1, 2, and 3, Revision 10 APP-PV13-Z0R-001, Solenoid Valves, ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III, Class 1, 2, and 3 Valve Data Sheet Report, Revision 8 APP-PV13-Z0D-101, PV13 Datasheet 101, Revision 7 APP-PV13-Z0D-111, PV13 Datasheet 111, Revision 3 QP526-5688-26-2, High Level Qualification Test Procedure for Process Solenoid Valve Models V526-5631-36 and V526-5688-26, Revision L

70

QR526-5631-36-1, ASME QME-1 EQ Qualification Report for V526-5631-36 & DS101, Revision C APP-PV13-VBR-011, Equipment Qualification Summary Report for Valcor Solenoid-Operated Globe Valve Assemblies for Use in the AP1000 Plant, Revision 0 APP-PV13-VBR-012, Equipment Qualification Data Package for Valcor Solenoid-Operated Globe Valve Assemblies for Use in the AP1000 Plant, Revision 0 APP-PV13-VMM-001, PV13 Solenoid Valve Instruction Manual, Revision 3 APP-PV13-VPC-001, Assessment of Seismic Margin From PV13 Test, Revision 0 ND-EN-VNP-006, Equipment Qualification Data Package (EQDP) Review and Acceptance, Version 4.0 EQTF-PV13-VBR-012, EQTF Signature Package (APP-PV13-VBR-012), Revision 1 Section 1A04 SV3-RCS-ITR-800033, "Unit 3 Inspections and Associated Analysis of each Fourth-stage ADS Sub-loop: ITAAC 2.1.02.08d.ii, NRC Index Number: 33," Revision 0 APP-PXS-M3C-019, "IRWST/Containment Sump Injection Lines and ADS Line Resistances," Revision 5 SV3-RCS-PLW-03A, "Reactor Coolant System Containment Building Room 11301 ADS Stage 4 Piping West Compartment," Revision 2 SV3-RCS-PLW-03B, "Reactor Coolant System Containment Building Room 11301 ADS Stage 4 Piping West Compartment," Revision 2 Section 1A05 Design Specification SV3-G1-V8-001, AP1000 Electrical Installation Specification, Revision 7 APP-1230-ERY-001, Cross Matrix Raceway/Supports at Elevation 100'-0'' In Auxiliary Building, Revision 0 SV3-SS01-Z0-011, Post-Installed Anchors for Seismic Category Buildings and Structures, Revision 1 APP-CE01-Z0-002, Design Specification for Supply, Installation, Inspection and Testing of Post-Installed Anchor Bolts, Revision 2 Calculation APP-SH25-S3C-001, AP1000 Seismic Category I Standard Cable Tray Supports, Revision 1 APP-1210-SHC-001, Structural Analysis and Design of Cable Tray Supports in the Auxiliary Building Areas 3 Through 6, El. 66-6, Revision 2 APP-1250-SHC-202, Structural Analysis of Additional Cable Tray Supports in the Auxiliary Building, Areas 1 and 2, El. 153-3, Revision 0 APP-1250-SHC-301, Structural Analysis of Cable Conduit Supports in Auxiliary Building, Area 2, El. 135-3, Revision 0 APP-G1-EWC-004, Maximum Design for Raceway Weights and Cable Fuel Loading for W, X(A), X(B), Y, and Z Cable Trays and Conduits, Revision 1 APP-SH25-S3C-002, AP1000 Seismic Category I Standard Conduit Supports, Revision 2 APP-1000-S2C-056, Nuclear Island Seismic Floor Response Spectra, Revision 2 Procedures SV3-G1-E1-003, Raceway Design, Discipline Design Criteria, Revision 3 NCSP03-82, Electrical Raceway Installation, Revision 07.01 APP-GW-GMP-006, AP1000 Component Numbering Procedure, Revision 9 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3212, Post-Installed Anchors and Core Drilling, Revision 2 SV3-GW-S1-006, AP1000 Design Guide for Raceway Systems, Revision 4 SV3-SH25-E9-100, Tray Support Selection Guidelines, Revision 2

71

APP-GW-C1-003, Selection Manual of Standard Attachments, Revision 5 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N6204, Field Control Material and Traceability, Revision 4 Condition Reports 50005311, Cable Tray Supports Fabricated to Earlier Design Revision 50022022, Cable Tray Supports Span Exceeds Maximum Length 50001687, Misfabrication and Installation of Cable Tray Support SV3-1221-SH-E016 50031436, Damaged Conduit Support 50031252, Cable Tray Support SV3-1133-SH-E526 Installed Out of tolerance Drawings SV3-SH25-E9-100, Tray Support Selection Guidelines, Revision 2 SV3-ECS-E9-010, Cable Tray Notes and Details Drawings Sheet 1, Revision 8 SV3-ECS-E9-101, Conduit Notes and Support Details, Revision 1 SV3-ECS-E9-030, Conduit Notes and Details Sheet 1, Revision 12 SV3-ECS-E9-031, Conduit Notes and Details Sheet 2, Revision 11 APP-ECS-E9-062, Cable Tray Notes and Details Sheet 1 of 2, Revision 0 APP-ECS-E9-063, Cable Tray Notes and Details Sheet 2 of 2, Revision 0 APP-1231-ER-607, Auxiliary Building Area 1 EL. 100-0 Conduit Supports Plan View (Sheet 7), Revision 1 APP-1231-ER-602, Auxiliary Building Area 1 EL. 100-0 Conduit Supports Plan View (Sheet 2), Revision 4 APP-1231-ER-645, Auxiliary Building Area 1 EL. 100-0 Conduit Supports Details (Sheet 35), Revision 0 APP-SH25-VF-001, Fabrication Requirements Tray Supports Seismic Cat I Trapeze Support Detail, Revision 2 APP-SH25-VF-008, Fabrication Requirements Try Supports Seismic Cat I propped Cantilever Unbraced support Details, Revision 2 APP-SH25-VF-014, Fabrication requirements Tray supports Seismic Cat I Cantilever Vertical Riser, Revision 3 SV3-0000-S9-001, Structural Steel General Notes, Revision 8 Work Packages SV3-1231-SHW-800050, U3 Install Conduit Supports, Aux, elevation 100-0, Area 1, Room 12305 SV3-1231-SHW-800051, U3 Install Conduit Supports, Aux, elevation 100-0, Area 1, Room 12305 SV3-1231-SHW-800053, U3 Install Conduit Supports, Aux, Elevation 100-6, Area 1, room 12305 26139-000-2QI-Q07C-N3302, Quality Control Instruction for Raceway and Accessories, Revision 3 Section 1A06 WEC Construction Isometric Drawing SV3-CAS-PLW-820-R2, "Compressed and Instrument Air System Auxiliary Building Room 12405 Service Air Containment", Revision 2 S&W Weld Data Sheet, SV3-CAS-PLW-820-10, 11/19/2019 Section 1A07 Design Specification SV3-G1-V8-001, AP1000 Electrical Installation Specification, Revision 7 APP-1230-ERY-001, Cross Matrix Raceway/Supports at Elevation 100'-0'' In Auxiliary Building, Revision 0

72

SV3-SS01-Z0-011, Post-Installed Anchors for Seismic Category Buildings and Structures, Revision 1 APP-CE01-Z0-002, Design Specification for Supply, Installation, Inspection and Testing of Post-Installed Anchor Bolts, Revision 2 Calculation APP-SH25-S3C-001, AP1000 Seismic Category I Standard Cable Tray Supports, Revision 1 APP-1210-SHC-001, Structural Analysis and Design of Cable Tray Supports in the Auxiliary Building Areas 3 Through 6, El. 66-6, Revision 2 APP-1250-SHC-202, Structural Analysis of Additional Cable Tray Supports in the Auxiliary Building, Areas 1 and 2, El. 153-3, Revision 0 APP-1250-SHC-301, Structural Analysis of Cable Conduit Supports in Auxiliary Building, Area 2, El. 135-3, Revision 0 APP-G1-EWC-004, Maximum Design for Raceway Weights and Cable Fuel Loading for W, X(A), X(B), Y, and Z Cable Trays and Conduits, Revision 1 APP-SH25-S3C-002, AP1000 Seismic Category I Standard Conduit Supports, Revision 2 APP-1000-S2C-056, Nuclear Island Seismic Floor Response Spectra, Revision 2 Procedures SV3-G1-E1-003, Raceway Design, Discipline Design Criteria, Revision 3 NCSP03-82, Electrical Raceway Installation, Revision 07.01 APP-GW-GMP-006, AP1000 Component Numbering Procedure, Revision 9 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3212, Post-Installed Anchors and Core Drilling, Revision 2 SV3-GW-S1-006, AP1000 Design Guide for Raceway Systems, Revision 4 SV3-SH25-E9-100, Tray Support Selection Guidelines, Revision 2 APP-GW-C1-003, Selection Manual of Standard Attachments, Revision 5 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N6204, Field Control Material and Traceability, Revision 4 Condition Reports 50005311, Cable Tray Supports Fabricated to Earlier Design Revision 50022022, Cable Tray Supports Span Exceeds Maximum Length 50001687, Misfabrication and Installation of Cable Tray Support SV3-1221-SH-E016 50031436, Damaged Conduit Support 50031252, Cable Tray Support SV3-1133-SH-E526 Installed Out of tolerance Drawings SV3-SH25-E9-100, Tray Support Selection Guidelines, Revision 2 SV3-ECS-E9-010, Cable Tray Notes and Details Drawings Sheet 1, Revision 8 SV3-ECS-E9-101, Conduit Notes and Support Details, Revision 1 SV3-ECS-E9-030, Conduit Notes and Details Sheet 1, Revision 12 SV3-ECS-E9-031, Conduit Notes and Details Sheet 2, Revision 11 APP-ECS-E9-062, Cable Tray Notes and Details Sheet 1 of 2, Revision 0 APP-ECS-E9-063, Cable Tray Notes and Details Sheet 2 of 2, Revision 0 APP-1231-ER-607, Auxiliary Building Area 1 EL. 100-0 Conduit Supports Plan View (Sheet 7), Revision 1 APP-1231-ER-602, Auxiliary Building Area 1 EL. 100-0 Conduit Supports Plan View (Sheet 2), Revision 4 APP-1231-ER-645, Auxiliary Building Area 1 EL. 100-0 Conduit Supports Details (Sheet 35), Revision 0 APP-SH25-VF-001, Fabrication Requirements Tray Supports Seismic Cat I Trapeze Support Detail, Revision 2

73

APP-SH25-VF-008, Fabrication Requirements Try Supports Seismic Cat I propped Cantilever Unbraced support Details, Revision 2 APP-SH25-VF-014, Fabrication requirements Tray supports Seismic Cat I Cantilever Vertical Riser, Revision 3 SV3-0000-S9-001, Structural Steel General Notes, Revision 8 Work Packages SV3-1231-SHW-800050, U3 Install Conduit Supports, Aux, elevation 100-0, Area 1, Room 12305 SV3-1231-SHW-800051, U3 Install Conduit Supports, Aux, elevation 100-0, Area 1, Room 12305 SV3-1231-SHW-800053, U3 Install Conduit Supports, Aux, Elevation 100-6, Area 1, room 12305 26139-000-2QI-Q07C-N3302, Quality Control Instruction for Raceway and Accessories, Revision 3 Section 1A08 WO SV3-P30Z-EWW-1034726, "U3 Aux- Terminate Cables at EPA SV3-IDSB-EY-P30Z-ORC-Pacakge 2 Room 12304," Revision 0 WO SV3-P30Z-EWW-1034728, "U3 Aux- Material Tracking Package for termination of cables at EPA SV3-IDSB-EY-P30Z-ORC," Revision 0 WO SV3-P31Y-EWW-1033892, "U3 Aux- Terminate Cables at EPA SV3-IDSB-EY-P31Y-ORC- all modules Room 12304," Revision 0 WO SV3-P31Y-EWW-1034885, "U3 Aux Material Tracking Package for termination of cables at EPA SV3-IDSB-EY-P31Y-ORC," Revision 0 Drawings SV3-PXS-E5-PLV130A02, "Combined Wiring Diagram APP-PXS-PL-V130A IRWST Gutter Drain ISOL A Valve SH 2 of 3," Revision 2 SV3-PXS-E5-PLV108A02, "Combined Wiring Diagram APP-PXS-PL-V108A PRHRH HX Control A Valve SH 2 of 3," Revision 2 SV3-PXS-E5-PLV123A01, "Combined Wiring Diagram APP-PXS-PL-V123A IRST Injection Isol Valve SH 1 of 2," Revision 2 SV3-SFS-E5-PLV07503, "Combined Wiring Diagram APP-SFS-PL-V075 SFS Reactor Cavity Post Accident Containment Floodup Valve SH 3 of 3," Revision 1 SV3-SFS-E5-PLV03303, "Combined Wiring Diagram APP-SFS-PL-V033 Refueling Cavity Pit Drain Valve SH 3 of 3," Revision 1 SV3-PXS-E5-PLV117A04, "Combined Wiring Diagram APP-PXS-PL-V117A Cont. Recirc. A Isolation Valve SH 4 of 5," Revision 3 Section 1A09 Procedures: NCSP 03-77, "Construction Pressure Testing," Revision 5 QS 14.02, "Inspection Report System," Revision 11 Work Packages SV3-PXS-THW-1043721, "ASME III - PXS HYDROTEST SV3-PXS-TH-H8001A FOR ISO(s) SV3-PXS-PLW-01K / 01L / 01M / 01N / 01V / 01W / 05A / 010 / 011 / 050 / 052 / 053 / 205 / 206 / 255 / 256 / 325 / 326 / 335 / 336 / 500 / 501 / 510 / 511 / 512 / 66A / 66B / 66C / 66E / 66F / 66G / 66M / 66N / 66Q / 66R / 66U / 66X / 66Z & SV3-CVS-PLW-090 / 092 / 093 / 096 / 531 / 532," Revision 0

74

SV3-PXS-THW-1043727, "ASME III - PXS HYDROTEST SV3-PXS-TH-H8003A FOR ISO(s) SV3-PXS-PLW-01E / 013 / 014 / 66G / 66P / 640 / 680 / 700 / 730 / 731 / 750 / 760 / 761 / 820," Revision 0 SV3-PXS-THW-1043736, "ASME III - PXS HYDROTEST SV3-PXS-TH-H8013A FOR ISO(s) SV3-PXS-PLW-810 / 900," Revision 0 SV3-PXS-THW-1052473, "ASME III - PXS HYDROTEST(s) SV3-PXS-TH-H8019A / H8020A / H8021A / H8022A FOR ISO(s) SV3-PXS-PLW-205 / 206 / 207 / 208 / 255 / 256 / 325 / 326 / 327 / 328 / 335 / 336 / 510 / 512 / 520 / 521 / 705 / 706 / 720 / 730 / 735 / 736 / 760 / 770 & SV3-PXS-JTW-205 / 206 / 207 / 208 / 255 / 256 / 325 / 326 / 327 / 328 / 335 / 336 / 705 / 706 / 735 / 736," Revision 0 Section 1A10 Design Specification SV3-G1-V8-001, AP1000 Electrical Installation Specification, Revision 7 APP-1230-ERY-001, Cross Matrix Raceway/Supports at Elevation 100'-0'' In Auxiliary Building, Revision 0 SV3-SS01-Z0-011, Post-Installed Anchors for Seismic Category Buildings and Structures, Revision 1 APP-CE01-Z0-002, Design Specification for Supply, Installation, Inspection and Testing of Post-Installed Anchor Bolts, Revision 2 Calculation APP-SH25-S3C-001, AP1000 Seismic Category I Standard Cable Tray Supports, Revision 1 APP-1210-SHC-001, Structural Analysis and Design of Cable Tray Supports in the Auxiliary Building Areas 3 Through 6, El. 66-6, Revision 2 APP-1250-SHC-202, Structural Analysis of Additional Cable Tray Supports in the Auxiliary Building, Areas 1 and 2, El. 153-3, Revision 0 APP-1250-SHC-301, Structural Analysis of Cable Conduit Supports in Auxiliary Building, Area 2, El. 135-3, Revision 0 APP-G1-EWC-004, Maximum Design for Raceway Weights and Cable Fuel Loading for W, X(A), X(B), Y, and Z Cable Trays and Conduits, Revision 1 APP-SH25-S3C-002, AP1000 Seismic Category I Standard Conduit Supports, Revision 2 APP-1000-S2C-056, Nuclear Island Seismic Floor Response Spectra, Revision 2 Procedures SV3-G1-E1-003, Raceway Design, Discipline Design Criteria, Revision 3 NCSP03-82, Electrical Raceway Installation, Revision 07.01 APP-GW-GMP-006, AP1000 Component Numbering Procedure, Revision 9 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3212, Post-Installed Anchors and Core Drilling, Revision 2 SV3-GW-S1-006, AP1000 Design Guide for Raceway Systems, Revision 4 SV3-SH25-E9-100, Tray Support Selection Guidelines, Revision 2 APP-GW-C1-003, Selection Manual of Standard Attachments, Revision 5 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N6204, Field Control Material and Traceability, Revision 4 Condition Reports 50005311, Cable Tray Supports Fabricated to Earlier Design Revision 50022022, Cable Tray Supports Span Exceeds Maximum Length 50001687, Misfabrication and Installation of Cable Tray Support SV3-1221-SH-E016 50031436, Damaged Conduit Support 50031252, Cable Tray Support SV3-1133-SH-E526 Installed Out of tolerance Drawings

75

SV3-SH25-E9-100, Tray Support Selection Guidelines, Revision 2 SV3-ECS-E9-010, Cable Tray Notes and Details Drawings Sheet 1, Revision 8 SV3-ECS-E9-101, Conduit Notes and Support Details, Revision 1 SV3-ECS-E9-030, Conduit Notes and Details Sheet 1, Revision 12 SV3-ECS-E9-031, Conduit Notes and Details Sheet 2, Revision 11 APP-ECS-E9-062, Cable Tray Notes and Details Sheet 1 of 2, Revision 0 APP-ECS-E9-063, Cable Tray Notes and Details Sheet 2 of 2, Revision 0 APP-1231-ER-607, Auxiliary Building Area 1 EL. 100-0 Conduit Supports Plan View (Sheet 7), Revision 1 APP-1231-ER-602, Auxiliary Building Area 1 EL. 100-0 Conduit Supports Plan View (Sheet 2), Revision 4 APP-1231-ER-645, Auxiliary Building Area 1 EL. 100-0 Conduit Supports Details (Sheet 35), Revision 0 APP-SH25-VF-001, Fabrication Requirements Tray Supports Seismic Cat I Trapeze Support Detail, Revision 2 APP-SH25-VF-008, Fabrication Requirements Try Supports Seismic Cat I propped Cantilever Unbraced support Details, Revision 2 APP-SH25-VF-014, Fabrication requirements Tray supports Seismic Cat I Cantilever Vertical Riser, Revision 3 SV3-0000-S9-001, Structural Steel General Notes, Revision 8 Work Packages SV3-1231-SHW-800050, U3 Install Conduit Supports, Aux, elevation 100-0, Area 1, Room 12305 SV3-1231-SHW-800051, U3 Install Conduit Supports, Aux, elevation 100-0, Area 1, Room 12305 SV3-1231-SHW-800053, U3 Install Conduit Supports, Aux, Elevation 100-6, Area 1, room 12305 26139-000-2QI-Q07C-N3302, Quality Control Instruction for Raceway and Accessories, Revision 3 Section 1A11 SV3-SGS-PLW-042-R3, Piping Isometric Drawing "Steam Generator System Auxiliary Building Room 12404 Main Steam Line B", Revision 3 S&W Weld Data Sheet (WDS) SV3-SGS-PLW-042-4 (Work Package SV3-SGS-P0W-800038) for inlet side of MSIV V040B (S/N BX235), (3 pages) 05/19/2018 S&W Welding Procedure Specification (WPS) ASME Section IX, WPS1-4.4C30 (five supporting PQRs PQ576A, PQ576B, PRN 4/31P-100, PRN 4/3P-101, and CPQR-4-4-TS-A02), Revision 7, 3/5/2019 S&W Record of Welder Performance Qualification Test - ASME Section IX Groove Weld, Test-No. 1CS-02 for GTAW only, ID/Symbols JAR4727 (1/22/19) and JEK1054 (2/5/19) S&W Record of Welder Performance Qualification Test - ASME Section IX Groove Weld, Test-No. 1CS-03 for GTAW/SMAW, ID/Symbols CF6962 (2/2/18), EBF8327 (5/25/18), FJD8470 (2/2/18), and SBC3874 (6/15/18) S&W Record of Welder Performance Qualification Test - ASME Section IX Groove Weld, Test-No. 1SS-02 for GTAW only, ID/Symbols FJD8470 (2/2/18), RP4532 ((2/10/18), and SBC3874 (6/15/18) S&W Record of Welding Operator Performance Qualification Test - ASME Section IX Groove Weld, Test-No. 1CS-22-ORV/ODV-A and -B for Direct Visual/Remote Control, ID/Symbols BJS7283 (11/29/18) and RP4532 (8/29/18) Lincoln Electric Company CMTR 6338965, ES-RBBK, 1/8" X 18" ER80S-B2, Q3 Lot: 1181N, 03/28/2014

76

Lincoln Electric Company CMTR 6338992, ES-RAZW, 0.035" Superglide Orbital TIG ER80S-B2, Q3 Lot: 1182A, 03/28/2014 Lincoln Electric Company CMTR 6339162, ES-ZBBV, 1/8" X 14" Excalibur E8018-B2, Q3 Lot: 1182J, 03/20/2014 Lincoln Electric Company CMTR 6339162, ES-ZBBW, 5/32" X 14" Excalibur E8018-B2, Q3 Lot: 1182L, 07/18/2014 S&W Post Weld Heat Treatment Data Sheet, Work Package (WP) SV3-SGS-P0W-8000038 (Revision 0) page 67 of 237, Weld-No. SV3-SGS-PLW-042-4, 10/16/2019 Superheat Heat Treatment Cycle Authorization (HTCA), SH WO# 19040, WP page 106 of 237, Weld-No. SV3-SGS-PLW-042-4, 05/14/2019 Superheat Wrapping Specifications Sheets, SH WO# 19040, WP pages 107-108 of 237, Weld-No. SV3-SGS-PLW-042-4, 05/14/2019 Superheat time-temperature strip charts, SH WO# 19040, WP pages 110-116, Weld-No. SV3-SGS-PLW-042-4, 05/15/2019 MISTRAS Nondestructive Examination Report Magnetic Particle Examination V-19-MT-301-2584, Final MT pipe to weld Weld-No. SV3-SGS-PLW-042-4, 06/27/2019 MISTRAS Computed Radiography Examination Report V19-RT-302-0429 (10 views), pre-PWHT RT, 05/14/2019 MISTRAS Computed Radiography Examination Report V19-RT-302-0445 (10 views), final RT, 06/27/2019 Section 1A12 Design Specification SV3-G1-V8-001, AP1000 Electrical Installation Specification, Revision 7 APP-1230-ERY-001, Cross Matrix Raceway/Supports at Elevation 100'-0'' In Auxiliary Building, Revision 0 SV3-SS01-Z0-011, Post-Installed Anchors for Seismic Category Buildings and Structures, Revision 1 APP-CE01-Z0-002, Design Specification for Supply, Installation, Inspection and Testing of Post-Installed Anchor Bolts, Revision 2 Calculation APP-SH25-S3C-001, AP1000 Seismic Category I Standard Cable Tray Supports, Revision 1 APP-1210-SHC-001, Structural Analysis and Design of Cable Tray Supports in the Auxiliary Building Areas 3 Through 6, El. 66-6, Revision 2 APP-1250-SHC-202, Structural Analysis of Additional Cable Tray Supports in the Auxiliary Building, Areas 1 and 2, El. 153-3, Revision 0 APP-1250-SHC-301, Structural Analysis of Cable Conduit Supports in Auxiliary Building, Area 2, El. 135-3, Revision 0 APP-G1-EWC-004, Maximum Design for Raceway Weights and Cable Fuel Loading for W, X(A), X(B), Y, and Z Cable Trays and Conduits, Revision 1 APP-SH25-S3C-002, AP1000 Seismic Category I Standard Conduit Supports, Revision 2 APP-1000-S2C-056, Nuclear Island Seismic Floor Response Spectra, Revision 2 Procedures SV3-G1-E1-003, Raceway Design, Discipline Design Criteria, Revision 3 NCSP03-82, Electrical Raceway Installation, Revision 07.01 APP-GW-GMP-006, AP1000 Component Numbering Procedure, Revision 9 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3212, Post-Installed Anchors and Core Drilling, Revision 2 SV3-GW-S1-006, AP1000 Design Guide for Raceway Systems, Revision 4 SV3-SH25-E9-100, Tray Support Selection Guidelines, Revision 2 APP-GW-C1-003, Selection Manual of Standard Attachments, Revision 5

77

26139-000-4MP-T81C-N6204, Field Control Material and Traceability, Revision 4 Condition Reports 50005311, Cable Tray Supports Fabricated to Earlier Design Revision 50022022, Cable Tray Supports Span Exceeds Maximum Length 50001687, Misfabrication and Installation of Cable Tray Support SV3-1221-SH-E016 50031436, Damaged Conduit Support 50031252, Cable Tray Support SV3-1133-SH-E526 Installed Out of tolerance Drawings SV3-SH25-E9-100, Tray Support Selection Guidelines, Revision 2 SV3-ECS-E9-010, Cable Tray Notes and Details Drawings Sheet 1, Revision 8 SV3-ECS-E9-101, Conduit Notes and Support Details, Revision 1 SV3-ECS-E9-030, Conduit Notes and Details Sheet 1, Revision 12 SV3-ECS-E9-031, Conduit Notes and Details Sheet 2, Revision 11 APP-ECS-E9-062, Cable Tray Notes and Details Sheet 1 of 2, Revision 0 APP-ECS-E9-063, Cable Tray Notes and Details Sheet 2 of 2, Revision 0 APP-1231-ER-607, Auxiliary Building Area 1 EL. 100-0 Conduit Supports Plan View (Sheet 7), Revision 1 APP-1231-ER-602, Auxiliary Building Area 1 EL. 100-0 Conduit Supports Plan View (Sheet 2), Revision 4 APP-1231-ER-645, Auxiliary Building Area 1 EL. 100-0 Conduit Supports Details (Sheet 35), Revision 0 APP-SH25-VF-001, Fabrication Requirements Tray Supports Seismic Cat I Trapeze Support Detail, Revision 2 APP-SH25-VF-008, Fabrication Requirements Try Supports Seismic Cat I propped Cantilever Unbraced support Details, Revision 2 APP-SH25-VF-014, Fabrication requirements Tray supports Seismic Cat I Cantilever Vertical Riser, Revision 3 SV3-0000-S9-001, Structural Steel General Notes, Revision 8 Work Packages SV3-1231-SHW-800050, U3 Install Conduit Supports, Aux, elevation 100-0, Area 1, Room 12305 SV3-1231-SHW-800051, U3 Install Conduit Supports, Aux, elevation 100-0, Area 1, Room 12305 SV3-1231-SHW-800053, U3 Install Conduit Supports, Aux, Elevation 100-6, Area 1, room 12305 26139-000-2QI-Q07C-N3302, Quality Control Instruction for Raceway and Accessories, Revision 3 Section 1A13 VOGTLE ELECTRIC GENERATING PLANT, UNITS 3 AND 4 - NRC INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORTS 05200025/2019002,05200026/2019002 WNA-RL-06533-SV0, Configuration Management Release Report, Revision 0 GIC-AP1000-SSSE-19-014, Supplemental Release Information for Vogtle AP1000 PMS Software, Revision 0 B-GEN-ITPA-011, ITP Administrative and Test Procedure Development, Version 8.1 B-GEN-ITPCI-001, PMS Cabinets, Version 3.0 B-GEN-ITPCI-001-F004, Cabinet Energization Instructions for BCC PMS Cabinets, Version 1.0 B-GEN-ITPCI-001-003, PMS Cabinet Energization Test Procedure for MTC", Version 1.0 SV3-GW-GCW-300, Vogtle Unit 3 AP1000 PMS Initial Software Installation, Revision 0

78

2.5.02.11-U3-SumRep-Rev 0, PCD Summary Report ITAAC 2.5.02.11 (550) Protection and Safety Monitoring System Design Process Summary Report: Installation Phase, Revision 0 ND-EN-VNP-014, Vogtle 3&4 Instrumentation and Control Field Change Notice Implementation, Version 6.0 Section 1A14 APP-GW-GLR-155, AP1000 Design Certification 2.5.02.12: The Process Used to Design, Test, Install, and Maintain the PMS Software Technical Report, Revision 1 SV0-IVV-JQR-021, Vogtle AP1000 Protection and Safety Monitoring System Independent Verification and Validation Summary Report, Revision 5 WNA-PV-00054-WAPP, AP1000 Protection and Safety Monitoring System Software Verification and Validation Plan, Revision 8 WNA-WI-00572-WAPP, AP1000 PMS Software Maintenance Work Instruction During Installation and Checkout Phase, Revision 4 WCAP-16096-P-A, Software Program Manual for Common Q Systems, Revision 4 Section 1A15 Design Specification SV3-G1-V8-001, AP1000 Electrical Installation Specification, Revision 7 APP-1230-ERY-001, Cross Matrix Raceway/Supports at Elevation 100'-0'' In Auxiliary Building, Revision 0 SV3-SS01-Z0-011, Post-Installed Anchors for Seismic Category Buildings and Structures, Revision 1 APP-CE01-Z0-002, Design Specification for Supply, Installation, Inspection and Testing of Post-Installed Anchor Bolts, Revision 2 Calculation APP-SH25-S3C-001, AP1000 Seismic Category I Standard Cable Tray Supports, Revision 1 APP-1210-SHC-001, Structural Analysis and Design of Cable Tray Supports in the Auxiliary Building Areas 3 Through 6, El. 66-6, Revision 2 APP-1250-SHC-202, Structural Analysis of Additional Cable Tray Supports in the Auxiliary Building, Areas 1 and 2, El. 153-3, Revision 0 APP-1250-SHC-301, Structural Analysis of Cable Conduit Supports in Auxiliary Building, Area 2, El. 135-3, Revision 0 APP-G1-EWC-004, Maximum Design for Raceway Weights and Cable Fuel Loading for W, X(A), X(B), Y, and Z Cable Trays and Conduits, Revision 1 APP-SH25-S3C-002, AP1000 Seismic Category I Standard Conduit Supports, Revision 2 APP-1000-S2C-056, Nuclear Island Seismic Floor Response Spectra, Revision 2 Procedures SV3-G1-E1-003, Raceway Design, Discipline Design Criteria, Revision 3 NCSP03-82, Electrical Raceway Installation, Revision 07.01 APP-GW-GMP-006, AP1000 Component Numbering Procedure, Revision 9 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3212, Post-Installed Anchors and Core Drilling, Revision 2 SV3-GW-S1-006, AP1000 Design Guide for Raceway Systems, Revision 4 SV3-SH25-E9-100, Tray Support Selection Guidelines, Revision 2 APP-GW-C1-003, Selection Manual of Standard Attachments, Revision 5 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N6204, Field Control Material and Traceability, Revision 4 Condition Reports 50005311, Cable Tray Supports Fabricated to Earlier Design Revision 50022022, Cable Tray Supports Span Exceeds Maximum Length

79

50001687, Misfabrication and Installation of Cable Tray Support SV3-1221-SH-E016 50031436, Damaged Conduit Support 50031252, Cable Tray Support SV3-1133-SH-E526 Installed Out of tolerance Drawings SV3-SH25-E9-100, Tray Support Selection Guidelines, Revision 2 SV3-ECS-E9-010, Cable Tray Notes and Details Drawings Sheet 1, Revision 8 SV3-ECS-E9-101, Conduit Notes and Support Details, Revision 1 SV3-ECS-E9-030, Conduit Notes and Details Sheet 1, Revision 12 SV3-ECS-E9-031, Conduit Notes and Details Sheet 2, Revision 11 APP-ECS-E9-062, Cable Tray Notes and Details Sheet 1 of 2, Revision 0 APP-ECS-E9-063, Cable Tray Notes and Details Sheet 2 of 2, Revision 0 APP-1231-ER-607, Auxiliary Building Area 1 EL. 100-0 Conduit Supports Plan View (Sheet 7), Revision 1 APP-1231-ER-602, Auxiliary Building Area 1 EL. 100-0 Conduit Supports Plan View (Sheet 2), Revision 4 APP-1231-ER-645, Auxiliary Building Area 1 EL. 100-0 Conduit Supports Details (Sheet 35), Revision 0 APP-SH25-VF-001, Fabrication Requirements Tray Supports Seismic Cat I Trapeze Support Detail, Revision 2 APP-SH25-VF-008, Fabrication Requirements Try Supports Seismic Cat I propped Cantilever Unbraced support Details, Revision 2 APP-SH25-VF-014, Fabrication requirements Tray supports Seismic Cat I Cantilever Vertical Riser, Revision 3 SV3-0000-S9-001, Structural Steel General Notes, Revision 8 Work Packages SV3-1231-SHW-800050, U3 Install Conduit Supports, Aux, elevation 100-0, Area 1, Room 12305 SV3-1231-SHW-800051, U3 Install Conduit Supports, Aux, elevation 100-0, Area 1, Room 12305 SV3-1231-SHW-800053, U3 Install Conduit Supports, Aux, Elevation 100-6, Area 1, room 12305 26139-000-2QI-Q07C-N3302, Quality Control Instruction for Raceway and Accessories, Revision 3 Section 1A16 Condition Reports 50033617, EDCR APP-1150-GEF-850016 Unit 3 Containment, 11/6/19 50036125, Containment West Blockout Concrete, 12/6/19 70000174, Anchor Bolts M2, M3 and M10, 2/8/19 70000183, Containment Concrete Placement 135'-3" North Area 2 & 3 (Rebar Fabrication & Installation), 2/19/19 70000351, Containment Unit 3 West Crane Rail Blockout, 11/21/19 70000405, A06 Verticals Unit 3 Crane Rail Blockout, 12/19/19 70000406, Unit 3 Crane Rail East Blockout, 12/20/19 Drawings: SV3-1100-CEB-012, "Containment Concrete Embedment at El 135'-3" Bill of Material," Revision 3 SV3-1130-CCK-009, "Construction Joint Sketch at El. 132'-11" & 153'-10 1/2"," Revision 0

80

SV3-1150-CC-125, "Containment/Shield Buildings Concrete Floor @ El. 135'-3" Areas 1 & 2," Revision 1 SV3-1150-CC-345, "Containment/Shield Buildings Concrete Floor @ El. 135'-3" Areas 3 & 4," Revision 1 SV3-1150-CE-012, "Containment Concrete Embedment at El 135'-3" Detail B Plan View," Revision 1 SV3-1150-CE-013, "Containment Concrete Embedment at El 135'-3" Detail C Plan View," Revision 2 SV3-1150-CE-017, "Containment Concrete Embedment at El 135'-3" Detail G," Revision 1 SV3-1150-CR-013, "Containment Concrete Reinforcement CA 55 Top," Revision 3 SV3-1150-CR-015, "Containment Concrete Reinforcement Drawing CA01 South RC Slab Bottom," Revision 1 SV3-1150-CR-016, "Containment Concrete Reinforcement Drawing CA01 South RC Slab Top," Revision 1 SV3-1150-CR-017, "Containment Concrete Reinforcement Drawing Plan View 1 Dowels CA01 and CA02," Revision 2 SV3-1150-CR-022, "Containment Concrete Reinforcement Drawing Section C, C1 & D Floor at El. 135'-3"," Revision 1 SV3-1150-CR-030, "Containment Concrete Reinforcement CA56 & CA57 Top," Revision 2 SV3-1150-CR-035, "Containment Concrete Reinforcement Drawing CA01 South West Dowels Plan and Section," Revision 1 SV3-1150-CR-036, "Containment Concrete Reinforcement Drawing CA01 South East Dowels Plan and Section," Revision 2 SV3-1150-CR-037, "Containment Concrete Reinforcement Drawing SPL51 North Area Bottom," Revision 1 SV3-1150-CR-038, "Containment Concrete Reinforcement Drawing SPL51 North-East Area Bottom," Revision 1 SV3-1150-CR-040, "Containment Concrete Reinforcement Drawing SPL51 North Area Top," Revision 1 SV3-1150-CR-041, "Containment Concrete Reinforcement Drawing SPL51 North-East Area Top," Revision 1 SV3-1150-CR-043, "Containment Concrete Reinforcement SPL51 Type Details (Sheet 1)," Revision 1 SV3-1150-CR-045, "Containment Concrete Reinforcement Drawing CA55 Bottom," Revision 0 SV3-1150-CR-047, "Containment Concrete Reinforcement CA55, CA56, CA57 & CA58 Type Details," Revision 0 SV3-1150-CR-345, "Containment/Shield Buildings Concrete Floor @ El. 135'-3" Areas 3 and 4," Revision 1 SV3-1150-SS-200, "Containment SPL51 Steel Frame Operating Floor (Room 11500) Plan View Q-Deck, Grating & Holes," Revision 3 SV3-1150-SS-204, "Containment SPL51 Steel Frame Operating Floor (Room 11500) Plan View Q-Deck Plan View Part 3," Revision 2 SV3-1150-SS-205, "Containment SPL51 Steel Frame Operating Floor (Room 11500) Studs Plan View Part 1," Revision 1 SV3-CA01-S5-04009, "Containment Building Area 4 Module CA01_04 Structural Outline Specific Details-III," Revision 0 SV3-CA01-S5-11008, "Containment Building Area 4 Module CA01 Submodule CA01_11 Structural Outline Specific Details II," Revision 0 SV3-CA01-S5-12008, "Containment Building Area 3 Module CA01_12 Structural Outline Specific Details-II," Revision 0 SV3-CA01-S5-13011, "Containment Building Area 3 Module CA01_13 Structural Outline Vertical Section / Views IV," Revision 0

81

SV3-CA01-S8-600, "Containment Areas 1 & 4 Fuel Handling System Refuel Rail Arrangement General Assembly," Revision 1 SV3-CA01-S8-604, "Containment Areas 1 & 4 Fuel Handling System East Rail Assembly & Fabrication Details," Revision 1 SV3-CA01-S8-605, "Containment Areas 1 & 4 Fuel Handling System East Rail Assembly & Fabrication Details," Revision 1 SV3-CA01-S8-607, "Containment Areas 1 & 4 Fuel Handling System East Rail Assembly & Fabrication Details," Revision 1 SV3-CA01-S8-608, "Containment Areas 1 & 4 Fuel Handling System West Rail Assembly & Fabrication Details," Revision 1 SV3-CA01-S8-609, "Containment Areas 1 & 4 Fuel Handling System East Rail Assembly & Fabrication Details," Revision 1 SV3-CA01-S8-610, "Containment Areas 1 & 4 Fuel Handling System West Rail Assembly & Fabrication Details," Revision 1 SV3-CA01-S8-611, "Containment Areas 1 & 4 Fuel Handling System West Rail Assembly & Fabrication Details," Revision 1 Engineering and Design Coordination Reports: APP-1150-GEF-850016, "Embedment Clash with Rebar in SPL51 North Area," Revision 0 APP-CA01-GEF-850753, "Refueling Crane Rail Tolerance Discrepancy (ESR 50024343)," Revision 0 SV0-CA01-GEF-000130, "CA01 East Crane Rail Embedment Interferences," Revision 0 SV0-CA01-GEF-000215, "Refuel Embed Splice Weld Modification (ESR 50029258)," Revision 0 SV0-CA01-GEF-000216, "Fuel Handling System Rail Assembly Closure Plate Modification (ESR 50039688)," Revision 0 SV0-CC01-GEF-000448, "Additional Construction Joint at 135'-0''," Revision 0 SV0-CC01-GEF-000448, "ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION JOINT AT 135'-0"," Revision 0 SV0-CC01-GEF-000465, "CV A2-3 CA01 Blockout Sections Refuel Crane Rail (ESR 50012270)," Revision 0 SV0-CR01-GEF-001089, "Additioanl Spacing Tolerance for Verticals in East and West Refuel," Revision 0 SV0-CR01-GEF-001139, "CV A1 top CA01 CA55 Intersection El 135-3 Rebar Requires Coupler," Revision 0 SV0-CR01-GEF-001140, "50001630 CV A1 El 135 CA55 Box Beam Interference with Reinforcement," Revision 0 SV0-CR01-GEF-001173, "Containment Type 4NB Change Operating Deck (ESR 50008907)," Revision 0 SV0-CR01-GEF-001250, "Containment Operating Deck Rebar Layout Impacted by Penetration Location (ESR 50033182)," Revision 0 SV3-1150-GEF-000008, "Reinforcement at Main Steam Support Plates EL. 135'-3'' Containment SPL51 Slab (ESR50008163)," Revision 0 SV3-CA01-GEF-000158, "CA01 Refuel Machine Rail Embed Support Option (ESR 50032333)," Revision 0 SV3-CA55-GEF-000016, "CA55 Slab Blockout (ESR 50008908)," Revision 0 SV3-CA55-GEF-000017, "V A1 CA55 Vent Blockout Rebar Interference (ESR 50009593)," Revision 0 SV3-CA55-GEF-000018, "CV A1 CA55 Vent Blockout Rebar Interference 2 (ESR 50010312)," Revision 0 SV3-CC01-GEF-000117, "135'-3" CJ at Refuel for South Placement (ESR 50009286)," Revision 0 SV3-CC01-GEF-000128, "Construction Joint for MSL Area CV A3 Elev 135'-3" (ESR 50014107)," Revision 0

82

SV3-CE01-GEF-000111, "Post Installed Embed Option for U3 Containment Floor EL 135-3 South (ESR 50011409)," Revision 0 SV3-SS01-GEF-000119, "SPL51 Stud interference with Closure Plate P21, CV A3 (ESR 50013615)," Revision 0 Nonconformance and Disposition Reports: APP-SS01-GEF-850439, "SPL51 Seq 4 decking modification (ESR 50009981)," Revision 0 SV3-1150-GNR-000011, "APP-1150-GEF-850016 Missing Changes (ESR50033800)," Revision 0 SV3-CA01-GNR-001235, "Wood Cast in Concrete Beneath CA01-35 bottom plate in SW corner of CA01 (ESR 50034099)," Revision 0 SV3-CA01-GNR-001236, "Reactor Fuel Handling System Rail Assembly (Embed Installation) (ESR 50034960)," Revision 0 SV3-CC01-GNR-000575, "Containment Unit 3 West Crane Rail Blockout Missing Bars (ESR 50035023)," Revision 0 SV3-CC01-GNR-000581, "Voids Underneath SV3-CA01-S8-610 and SV3-CA01-S8-611 (ESR 50036495)," Revision 0 SV3-CE01-GNR-000350, "SV3-1150-CE-102 Plate P20 out of tolerance," Revision 0 SV3-CR01-GNR-000010, "T-Head Reinforcing Assembly are without Req. Performance Testing," Revision 0 SV3-CR01-GNR-001067, "Containment Concrete Placement 135'-3" North Area 2 & 3 (ESR 50013878)," Revision 0 SV3-CR01-GNR-001100, "Containment West Refueling Crane Rail Installation Issues (ESR 50033180)," Revision 0 SV3-CR01-GNR-001103, "Type 3NA Weld Option to gain access to the SV3-CR01-GNR-001067 (ESR 50033675)," Revision 0 SV3-CR01-GNR-001105, "Reinforcement at Main Steam Support Plates EL. 135'-3" Containment SPL51 Slab per ESR 50033181," Revision 0 SV3-CR01-GNR-001113, "Two Type A06 #9 bars are missing in the East Crane Rail Block Out (ESR 50037279)," Revision 0 SV3-CR01-GNR-001114, "Damaged #6 T-Headed Rebar in East Crane Rail Block Out, Cnmt Elev. 135'-3" (ESR 50037327)," Revision 0 SV3-CR01-GNR-001115, "East Crane Rail Block out Rebar Issues, Elev. 135'-3'' (ESR 50037421)," Revision 0 SV3-SS01-GNR-000778, "Containment Internal Structure SPL51 Seq 4 TOS OOT (ESR 50009444)," Revision 0 Procedures and Specifications: 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3210, "Concrete Operations," Revision 6 APP-GW-GAP-420, "Engineering and Design Coordination Reports," Revision 18 APP-GW-GAP-428, "Nonconformance and Disposition Report." Revision 16 ND-AD-002, "Nuclear Development Program Corrective Action Program," Revision 30.0 ND-AD-002-025, "Issue Identification, Screening, and Dispatching," Revision 2.0 ND-AD-002-026, "Corrective Action Program Processing," Revision 2.0 ND-AD-002-027, "Nonconforming Items," Revision 5.0 SV3-CC01-Z0-026, "Safety Related Mixing and Delivering Concrete," Revision 8 SV3-CC01-Z0-031, "Safety Related Placing Concrete and Reinforcing Steel," Revision 8 Work Orders SV3-1150-CCW-800000, "Containment Concrete Placement 135'-3" South West Area 1 (Rebar Fabrication & Installation)," Revision 0

83

SV3-1150-CEW-1005565, "Containment Embed Installation 135'-3" Area 2 & 3 (MSL Embed installation)," Revision 0 SV3-1150-CRW-1004601, "Containment Concrete Placement 135'-3" North Area 2 & 3 (Rebar Fabrication & Installation)," Revision 0 SV3-1150-CRW-1004604, "Containment Concrete Placement 135'-3" Southeast Area 4 (Rebar Fabrication & Installation)," Revision 0 Section 1A17 WEC Structural Calculations APP-1278-CCC-001, Enhanced Shield Building Roof Design Conical Roof Equivalent Static Analysis, Revision 6 APP-1278-CCC-007, Shield Building Roof PCS Tank Walls and Roof Design, Revision 1 APP-1278-CCC-015, Shield Building, Conical Roof Detailed Reinforcement Design, Revision 2 APP-1278-S3C-001, Enhanced Shield Building Roof Design Compression Ring, Revision 1 APP-1278-S3C-015, Shield Building, Conical Roof, Built-up Plate Girder Calculation, Revision 0 Specifications APP-GW-C1-001, AP1000 Civil/Structural Design Criteria, Revision 2 APP-GW-C1-001, AP1000 Civil/Structural Design Criteria, Revision 5 SV3-CR01-Z0-010-R6, SPECIFICATION FOR SUPPLY AND INSTALLATION OF MECHANICAL SPLICES FOR REINFORCING STEEL SV3-CR01-Z0-011, Furnishing of Safety Related Reinforcing Steel, Westinghouse Safety Class C NUCLEAR SAFETY RELATED, Revision 4 SV3-CC01-Z0-031, Safety Related Placing Concrete and Reinforcing Steel, Westinghouse Seismic Category I, Safety Class C NUCLEAR SAFETY, Revision 8 Drawings SV3-1000-P2-901-R2, NUCLEAR ISLAND GENERAL ARRANGEMENT SECTIONS A-A SV3-1070-P2-001-R1, NUCLEAR ISLAND GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN AT EL. 289-10 SV3-1278-CC-001-R1, SHIELD BUILDING ROOF SECTION A-A SV3-1278-SS-005-R3, SHIELD BUILDING ROOF AREA 8 CONICAL ROOF STRUCTURAL FRAMING PLAN I SV3-1278-SS-007-R3, SHIELD BUILDING ROOF AREA 8 CONICAL ROOF PARTIAL STRUCTURAL FRAMING PLAN A SV3-1278-SS-008-R3, SHIELD BUILDING ROOF AREA 8 CONICAL ROOF PARTIAL STRUCTURAL FRAMING PLAN B SV3-1278-SS-009-R3, SHIELD BUILDING ROOF AREA 8 CONICAL ROOF SECTION A-A SV3-1278-SS-010-R3, SHIELD BUILDING ROOF AREA 8 CONICAL ROOF SECTION B-B SV3-1278-SS-011-R3, SHIELD BUILDING ROOF AREA 8 CONICAL ROOF SECTION C-C SV3-1278-SS-012-R3, SHIELD BUILDING ROOF AREA 8 CONICAL ROOF TYPICAL ROOF SECTOR SECTIONS AND VIEWS SV3-1278-SS-013-R3, SHIELD BUILDING ROOF AREA 8 CONICAL ROOF TYPICAL ROOF SECTOR BREAK DOWN & STUDS LOCATION PLAN SV3-1278-SS-014-R3, SHIELD BUILDING ROOF AREA 8 CONICAL ROOF NON-TYPICAL ROOF SECTOR SECTIONS AND VIEWS SV3-1278-SS-015-R3, SHIELD BUILDING ROOF AREA 8 CONICAL ROOF NON-TYPICAL ROOF SECTOR BREAK DOWN & STUDS LOCATION PLAN SV3-1278-SS-016-R3, SHIELD BUILDING ROOF AREA 8 CONICAL ROOF PARTIAL PLAN COMPRESSION RING CIRCULAR BEAM SV3-1278-SS-017-R3, SHIELD BUILDING ROOF AREA 8 CONICAL ROOF DETAIL A PARTIAL PLAN COMPRESSION RING INTERIOR MEMBERS

84

SV3-1278-SS-018-R2, SHIELD BUILDING ROOF AREA 8 CONICAL ROOF STANDARD STRUCTURAL DETAILS I SV3-1278-SS-019-R3, SHIELD BUILDING ROOF AREA 8 CONICAL ROOF STANDARD STRUCTURAL DETAILS II SV3-1278-SS-020-R3, SHIELD BUILDING ROOF AREA 8 CONICAL ROOF STANDARD STRUCTURAL DETAILS III SV3-1278-SS-021-R3, SHIELD BUILDING ROOF AREA 8 CONICAL ROOF STANDARD WELD DETAILS I SV3-1278-SS-022-R3, SHIELD BUILDING ROOF AREA 8 CONICAL ROOF STANDARD WELD DETAILS II SV3-1278-SS-023-R4, SHIELD BUILDING ROOF AREA 8 CONICAL ROOF GENERAL NOTES SV3-1278-SS-024-R2, SHIELD BUILDING ROOF AREA 8 CONICAL ROOF SECTION J-J SV3-1278-SS-025-R2, SHIELD BUILDING ROOF AREA 8 CONICAL ROOF SECTION K-K SV3-1278-SS-026-R2, SHIELD BUILDING ROOF AREA 8 CONICAL ROOF SECTION L-L SV3-1278-SS-027-R2, SHIELD BUILDING ROOF AREA 8 CONICAL ROOF SECTION M-M SV3-1278-SS-028-R2, SHIELD BUILDING ROOF AREA 8 CONICAL ROOF SECTION N-N SV3-1278-SS-034-R1, SHIELD BUILDING ROOF AREA 8 CONICAL ROOF SECTION P-P SV3-1278-SS-035-R1, SHIELD BUILDING ROOF AREA 8 CONICAL ROOF STANDARD STRUCTURAL DETAILS IV SV3-1278-SS-036-R1, SHIELD BUILDING ROOF AREA 8 CONICAL ROOF STANDARD WELD DETAILS III SV3-1278-SS-037-R1, SHIELD BUILDING ROOF AREA 8 CONICAL ROOF STANDARD WELD DETAILS IV SV3-1278-CR-010-R1, CONICAL ROOF CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT PLAN VIEW GENERAL ARRANGEMENT BOTTOM LAYERS SV3-1278-CR-011-R2, CONICAL ROOF CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT PLAN VIEW GENERAL ARRANGEMENT WALL CONNECTION SV3-1278-CR-012-R1, CONICAL ROOF CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT PLAN VIEW GENERAL ARRANGEMENT TOP LAYERS SV3-1278-CR-013-R1, CONICAL ROOF CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT BOTTOM (RADIAL) SV3-1278-CR-014-R1, CONICAL ROOF CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT BOTTOM REINFORCEMENT DETAIL 2 SV3-1278-CR-015-R1, CONICAL ROOF CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT BOTTOM REINFORCEMENT DETAILS 3,4 SV3-1278-CR-016-R1, CONICAL ROOF CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT BOTTOM REINFORCEMENT (CIRCUMFERENTIAL) SV3-1278-CR-017-R1, CONICAL ROOF CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT TOP REINFORCEMENT (CIRCUMFERENTIAL) SV3-1278-CR-018-R1, CONICAL ROOF CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT TOP REINFORCEMENT (RADIAL) EXPOSED ROOF SV3-1278-CR-019-R1, CONICAL ROOF CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT TOP REINFORCEMENT DETAIL 5 SV3-1278-CR-020-R1, CONICAL ROOF CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT TOP REINFORCEMENT DETAIL 6 SV3-1278-CR-021-R1, CONICAL ROOF CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT TOP REINFORCEMENT (RADIAL) NOT EXPOSED ROOF SV3-1278-CR-022-R1, CONICAL ROOF CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT TOP REINFORCEMENT DETAILS 7,8 SV3-1278-CR-023-R1, CONICAL ROOF CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT TOP REINFORCEMENT DETAILS 9,10

85

SV3-1278-CR-024-R2, CONICAL ROOF CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT SECTION A-A RADIAL AND VERTICAL BARS ARRANGEMENT SV3-1278-CR-025-R1, CONICAL ROOF CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT SECTION B-B CIRCUMFERENTIAL BARS ARRANGEMENT SV3-1278-CR-027-R2, PCCS TANK OUTER WALL CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT (VERTICAL) SV3-1278-CR-029-R1, PCCS TANK INNER WALL CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT GENERAL ARRANGEMENT SV3-1278-CR-030-R1, PCCS TANK INNER WALL CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT (VERTICAL) SV3-1278-CR-032-R1, PCCS TANK ROOF CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT GENERAL ARRANGEMENT BOTTOM LEVEL SV3-1278-CR-033-R1, PCCS TANK ROOF CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT GENERAL ARRANGEMENT TOP LEVEL SV3-1278-CR-036-R1, PCCS TANK OUTER WALL CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT SECTION F-F RADIAL & CIRCUM. BARS ARRANGEMENT CMC Rebar Shop Drawings SV3-CR01-C8-801221-R0, CONICAL SHIELD ROOF BOT. LAYER 1ST COURSE SV3-CR01-C8-801222-R0, CONICAL SHIELD ROOF BOT. LAYER SECOND COURSE SV3-CR01-C8-801223-R0, CONICAL SHIELD ROOF BOT. LAYER THIRD COURSE SV3-CR01-C8-801224-R0, CONICAL SHIELD ROOF BOT. LAYER FOURTH COURSE SV3-CR01-C8-801225-R0, CONICAL SHIELD ROOF TOP LAYER FIRST COURSE SV3-CR01-C8-801226-R0, CONICAL SHIELD ROOF TOP LAYER SECOND COURSE SV3-CR01-C8-801227-R0, CONICAL SHIELD ROOF TOP LAYER THIRD COURSE SV3-CR01-C8-801228-R0, CONICAL SHIELD ROOF TOP LAYER FOURTH COURSE SV3-CR01-C8-801241-R0, CONICAL SHIELD ROOF RADIAL REINF. BOT. LAYER SV3-CR01-C8-801242-R0, CONICAL SHIELD ROOF RADIAL REINF. TOP LAYER C1 & C2 SV3-CR01-C8-801243-R0, CONICAL SHIELD ROOF RADIAL REINF. TOP LAYER C3, C4, & C SV3-CR01-C8-801244-R0, CONICAL SHIELD ROOF RADIAL REINF. BEND SCHEDULE Engineering and Design Coordination Reports (E&DCRs) SV0-1278-GEF-000014, SB Conical Roof Reinforcement Configuration Changes (EFIN34120), Revision 0 APP-1208-GEF-370, Shield Building Roof PCS Tank Walls and Roof Design, Revision 0 APP-1278-GEF-071, Shield Building, Conical Roof Structure, Girder Stiffeners Weld Access Holes, Revision 0 APP-1278-GEF-092, Shield Building PCS Tank Structure. APP-1278-CCC-007 model updates, Revision 0 APP-1278-GEF-093, Enhanced Shield Building Roof Update on Compression Ring Design, Revision 0 APP-1278-GEF-368, Enhanced Shield Building Roof Design Conical Roof Equivalent Static Analysis, Revision 0 APP-1278-GEF-381, Conical Roof Compression Ring Calculation, Interaction Equation Clarification, Revision 0 APP-1278-GEF-382, Conical Roof Compression Ring Calculation, Connection Design Clarification, Revision 0 APP-1278-GEF-395, Shield Building Roof and PCS Tank Construction Joint Analysis, Revision 0 APP-1278-GEF-850071, Conical Roof to Tension Ring Welded Connection Changes, Revision 0

86

APP-1278-GEF-850133, Shield Building Conical Roof Rebar Adjustments (II) ESR#50017956-, Revision 0 APP-1278-GEF-850134, Shield Building Conical Roof Rebar Adjustments (III) ESR#50017956-, Revision 0 Miscellaneous Affected Document List, APP-1278-S3C-015, Revision 0_ADL Westinghouse AP1000 Design Change Proposal, APP-GW-GEE-4952, Changes to Connection Reinforcement between PCCS Exterior Wall and Shield Building Conical Roof, Revision 0 Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Vogtle Electric Generating Plant Units 3 and 4, Revision to License Amendment and Exemption Request: Shield Building Roof Changes (LAR 16-031R1), June 16, 2017

Southern Nuclear Operating Company, ND-17-1051, Enclosure 8, Revision to Protected Information for Request for License Amendment Regarding Shield Building Roof Changes, (Withheld Information), (LAR 16-031R1)

CBI Services, Inc., Welder Performance Qualification Record for Welder ID AJL7286 CBI Services, Inc., Welder Performance Qualification Record for Welder ID MBC2409 CBI Services, Inc., Welder Performance Qualification Record for Welder ID MNT3760 Bechtel, Initial Mechanical Rebar Splicer Qualification Record for Splicer ID DB9471 Section 1A18 Bechtel Procedures 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3302, RACEWAYS AND ACCESSORIES, Revision 6 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3303, CABLE INSTALLATION, Revision 6 SV3-G1-V8-001, AP1000 Electrical Installation Specification, Revision 7 Section 1A19 Bechtel Procedures 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3302, RACEWAYS AND ACCESSORIES, Revision 6 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3303, CABLE INSTALLATION, Revision 6 SV3-G1-V8-001, AP1000 Electrical Installation Specification, Revision 7 Section 1A20 APP-1212-ER-103, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Battery Monitoring Conduit Arrangement Room 12101, Revision 4. APP-1212-ER-106, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Non-Class 1E Conduit Arrangement Plan at Elevation 66-6, Revision 4. APP-1212-ERB-001, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Cable Tray Bill of Material at Elevation 66-6, Revision 9. APP-ECS-E9-030, Conduit Notes and Details, Revision 15 APP-ECS-E9-031, Conduit Notes and Details, Sheet 2, Revision 13 APP-ECS-E9-032, Conduit Notes and Details, Sheet 3, Revision 12 APP-ECS-E9-033, Conduit Notes and Details, Sheet 4, Revision 17 APP-ECS-E9-034, Conduit Notes and Details, Sheet 5, Revision 8 APP-ECS-E9-040, Electrical Raceway and Cable Identification Markers, Revision 3 Miscellaneous Documents: UFSAR, Appendix 3F, Cable Trays and Cable Tray Supports UFSAR, Chapter 8 APP-G1-E1-003, Raceway Design, Discipline Design Criteria, Revision 3. APP-GW-E1-001, Electrical Systems Design Criteria, Revision 4. WEMMEX Report - U3 Cable Routes. WEMMEX Report - U3 Raceway Status.

87

IEEE Standard 384, "IEEE Standard Criteria for Independence of Class 1E Equipment and Circuits," 1981 ND-18-0868, Docket Nos 52-025, 52-026, Notice of Notice of Uncompleted ITAAC 225-days Prior to Initial Fuel Load, Item 3.3.00.07c.i.a [Index Number 795] Design Specifications APP-G1-V8-001, AP1000 Electrical Installation Specification, Revision 7 Work Package SV3-1210-ERW-EL1071/WP-7.3 Work Package Planning, Development, approval, and Closure, Revision 0 SV3-1210-ERW-EL1071, WORK PACKAGE, Install Conduit Sleeves/Electrical Penetrations in Wall 20A header above dura-steel walls for Room 12112 & 12113, Revision 7.2 Procedures 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N1204, Construction Implementation and Closing of Work Packages, Revision 12. 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3302, Raceways and Accessories, Revision 6. 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3303, Cable Installation, Revision 6. Status Reports: Excel Spread Sheet, U3 Cable Status - Construction Status Report for Room 12101, file date created 02/21/2020 Excel Spread Sheet, U3 Cable Status - Construction Status Report for Room 12104, file date created 02/21/2020 Excel Spread Sheet, U3 Cable Status - Construction Status Report for Room 12113, file date created 02/21/2020 Drawings APP-1211-ER-001, Auxiliary Building Area 1 Cable Tray Arrangement Plan at Elevation 66-6, Revision 8. APP-1211-ER-101, Auxiliary Building Area 1 Conduit Arrangement Plan at Elevation 66-6, Revision14. APP-1211-ER-102, Auxiliary Building Area 1 Conduit Arrangement at Elevation 66-6 Sections and Details, Revision 2. APP-1211-ER-103, Auxiliary Building Area 1 Conduit Arrangement Plan at Elevation 66-6 Room 12104, Revision 2. APP-1212-ER-001, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Cable Tray Arrangement Plan at Elevation 66-6, Revision 12. APP-1212-ER-101, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Class 1E Conduit Arrangement Plan at Elevation 66-6, Revision 15. APP-1212-ER-102, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Conduit Arrangement at Elevation 66-6 Sections and Details, Revision 2. Section 1A21 Bechtel Procedures 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3302, RACEWAYS AND ACCESSORIES, Revision 6 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3303, CABLE INSTALLATION, Revision 6 SV3-G1-V8-001, AP1000 Electrical Installation Specification, Revision 7 Section 1A22 Westinghouse Procedures

88

APP-EW21-E1-001, AP1000 Standard Raceway and Cable Separation and Segregation, Revision 4 SV3-G1-E1-002, Wire and Cable Design Criteria, Revision 2 SV3-G1-E1-003, Raceway Design, Discipline Design Criteria, Revision 3 SV3-G1-V8-001, AP1000 Electrical Installation Specification, Revision 7 SV3-GW-E1-001, Electrical System Design Criteria, Revision 4 Bechtel Procedure 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3302, RACEWAYS AND ACCESSORIES, Revision 6 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3303, CABLE INSTALLATION, Revision 6 Pull Tickets SV3-PSS-EW-PLV001BJZD[PT], Revision 0 SV3-IDSA-EW-DD1AXA[PT], Revision 0 SV3-IDSA-EW-DD1BXA[PT], Revision 0 SV3-IDSA-EW-DS1AXA[PT], Revision 0 SV3-IDSB-EW-DD1AXB[PT], Revision 1 SV3-IDSC-EW-DD1BXC[PT], Revision 3 SV3-IDSD-EW-DD1BXD[PT], Revision 0 SV3-CVS-EW-PLV047BXD[PT], Revision 0 SV3-RCS-EW-100202FZB[PT], Revision 1 Section 1A23 SV3-RNS-EW-PLV002APZB[PT], "600V 16AWG cable," Revision 3 SV3-RNS-EW-PLV002AQZB[PT], "600V 16AWG cable," Revision 3 SV3-PXS-EW-PLV108BYZB[PT], "600V 16 AWG cable," Revision 2 SV3-PXS-EW-PLV108ASZB[PT], "600V 16 AWG cable," Revision 2 WO SV3-PXS-EWW-1039652, "U3-CT Pull PXS-1E Cable from SV3-IDSB-EY-P30Z-IRC and associated EQP- ELEV 1072 Room 11306 Area 0," Revision 0 SV3-RNS-EW-PLV001AQZD[PT], "600V 16 AWG cable," Revision 0 WO SV3-IDSD-EWW-1053742, "U3 CT- Bulk Cable Pull (IRC pulls) to EPA P14Z- EL 107-2- Area 2 Room 11306," Revision 0 SV3-PXS-EW-100701FZA[PT], "600V 16 AWG cable," Revision 0 WO SV3-PXS-EWW-1039649, "U3-CT Pull PXS-1E Cable from SV3-IDSA-EY-P11Z-IRC and associated EQP Elev 1176 Room 11400 area 0," Revision 0 SV3-RNS-EW-PLV002BBXB[PT], "600V 4/C 240 KCMIL," Revision 2 WO SV3-RNS-EWW-1030673, "U3 CT Pull RNS Cable from SV3-IDSB-EY-P31Y-IRC and associated EQP," Revision 0 SV3-PXS-EW-PLV130APZB[PT], "600V 16 AWG cable," Revision 2 SV3-PXS-EW-PLV130ARZB[PT], "600V 16 AWG cable," Revision 2 WO SV3-SFS-EWW-1029925, "U3 CT Pull Cable Sys SFS From SV3-IDSB-EY-P30Z-IRC and associated EQP (Exception)," Revision 0 SV3-PXS-EW-100704CZD[PT], "600V 16 AWG cable," Revision 0 SV3-PXS-EW-100704JZD[PT], "600V 16 AWG cable," Revision 0 WO SV3-IDSD-EWW-1053742, "U3 CT Bulk Cable Pull (IRC pulls) to EPA P14Z EL 107-2 Area 2 Room 11306," Revision 0 SV3-G1-V8-001, "AP1000 Electrical installation Specification", Revision 7 Section 1A24 WO SV3-IDS-EWW-1048138, "U3 Aux Terminate IDS-1 Cables in SV3-IDSB-EA-2 and Associated EQP," Revision 0

89

SV3-IDSB-E3-EA601, "Panel Schedule IDSB-EA-6 Class 1E Fuse Panel Auxiliary Bldg.," Revision 2 SV3-IDSB-E3-EA501, "Panel Schedule IDSB-EA-5 Class 1E Fuse Panel Auxiliary Bldg.," Revision 1 SV3-IDSB-E5-EA501, "Wiring Diagram Class 1E 120 VAC Fuse Panel IDSB-EA-5," Revision 2 SV3-PMS-EW-JDILCC02BZC[PT], "2 Fiber Multimode," Revision 0 SV3-PMS-EW-JDILCC02CZC[PT], "2 Fiber Multimode," Revision 0 SV3-PMS-EW-JDMTCC0101BZC[PT], "2 Fiber Multimode," Revision 0 SV3-PMS-EW-JDILCC02DZC [PT], "2 Fiber Multimode," Revision 0 SV3-G1-V8-001, "AP1000 Electrical installation Specification", Revision 7 SV3-RNS-EW-PLV022AXA[PT], "600 4/C 350 KCMIL Cable," Revision 0 SV3-RNS-EWW-1030639, "U3 Aux Pull RNS Cable from SV3-IDSA-DS-1 and Associated EQP," Revision 0 Section 1A25 Westinghouse Procedures APP-EW21-E1-001, AP1000 Standard Raceway and Cable Separation and Segregation, Revision 4 SV3-G1-E1-002, Wire and Cable Design Criteria, Revision 2 SV3-G1-E1-003, Raceway Design, Discipline Design Criteria, Revision 3 SV3-G1-V8-001, AP1000 Electrical Installation Specification, Revision 7 SV3-GW-E1-001, Electrical System Design Criteria, Revision 4 Bechtel Procedures 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3302, RACEWAYS AND ACCESSORIES, Revision 6 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3303, CABLE INSTALLATION, Revision 6 Section 1A26 APP-1212-ER-103, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Battery Monitoring Conduit Arrangement Room 12101, Revision 4. APP-1212-ER-106, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Non-Class 1E Conduit Arrangement Plan at Elevation 66-6, Revision 4. APP-1212-ERB-001, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Cable Tray Bill of Material at Elevation 66-6, Revision 9. APP-ECS-E9-030, Conduit Notes and Details, Revision 15 APP-ECS-E9-031, Conduit Notes and Details, Sheet 2, Revision 13 APP-ECS-E9-032, Conduit Notes and Details, Sheet 3, Revision 12 APP-ECS-E9-033, Conduit Notes and Details, Sheet 4, Revision 17 APP-ECS-E9-034, Conduit Notes and Details, Sheet 5, Revision 8 APP-ECS-E9-040, Electrical Raceway and Cable Identification Markers, Revision 3 Miscellaneous Documents UFSAR, Appendix 3F, Cable Trays and Cable Tray Supports UFSAR, Chapter 8 APP-G1-E1-003, Raceway Design, Discipline Design Criteria, Revision 3. APP-GW-E1-001, Electrical Systems Design Criteria, Revision 4. WEMMEX Report - U3 Cable Routes. WEMMEX Report - U3 Raceway Status. IEEE Standard 384, "IEEE Standard Criteria for Independence of Class 1E Equipment and Circuits," 1981 ND-18-0868, Docket Nos 52-025, 52-026, Notice of Notice of Uncompleted ITAAC 225-days Prior to Initial Fuel Load, Item 3.3.00.07c.i.a [Index Number 795]

90

Design Specifications APP-G1-V8-001, AP1000 Electrical Installation Specification, Revision 7 Work Package: SV3-1210-ERW-EL1071/WP-7.3 Work Package Planning, Development, approval, and Closure, Revision 0 SV3-1210-ERW-EL1071, WORK PACKAGE, Install Conduit Sleeves/Electrical Penetrations in Wall 20A header above dura-steel walls for Room 12112 & 12113, Revision 7.2 Procedures 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N1204, Construction Implementation and Closing of Work Packages, Revision 12. 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3302, Raceways and Accessories, Revision 6. 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3303, Cable Installation, Revision 6. Status Reports Excel Spread Sheet, U3 Cable Status - Construction Status Report for Room 12101, file date created 02/21/2020 Excel Spread Sheet, U3 Cable Status - Construction Status Report for Room 12104, file date created 02/21/2020 Excel Spread Sheet, U3 Cable Status - Construction Status Report for Room 12113, file date created 02/21/2020 Drawings APP-1211-ER-001, Auxiliary Building Area 1 Cable Tray Arrangement Plan at Elevation 66-6, Revision 8. APP-1211-ER-101, Auxiliary Building Area 1 Conduit Arrangement Plan at Elevation 66-6, Revision14. APP-1211-ER-102, Auxiliary Building Area 1 Conduit Arrangement at Elevation 66-6 Sections and Details, Revision 2. APP-1211-ER-103, Auxiliary Building Area 1 Conduit Arrangement Plan at Elevation 66-6 Room 12104, Revision 2. APP-1212-ER-001, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Cable Tray Arrangement Plan at Elevation 66-6, Revision 12. APP-1212-ER-101, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Class 1E Conduit Arrangement Plan at Elevation 66-6, Revision 15. APP-1212-ER-102, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Conduit Arrangement at Elevation 66-6 Sections and Details, Revision 2. Section 1A27 Westinghouse Procedures APP-EW21-E1-001, AP1000 Standard Raceway and Cable Separation and Segregation, Revision 4 SV3-G1-E1-002, Wire and Cable Design Criteria, Revision 2 SV3-G1-E1-003, Raceway Design, Discipline Design Criteria, Revision 3 SV3-G1-V8-001, AP1000 Electrical Installation Specification, Revision 7 SV3-GW-E1-001, Electrical System Design Criteria, Revision 4 Bechtel Procedures 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3302, RACEWAYS AND ACCESSORIES, Revision 6 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3303, CABLE INSTALLATION, Revision 6

91

Section 1A28 SV3-RNS-EW-PLV022AXA[PT], 600 4/C 350 KCMIL Cable, Revision 0 SV3-RNS-EWW-1030639, U3 Aux Pull RNS Cable from SV3-IDSA-DS-1 and Associated EQP, Revision 0 Section 1A29 VEGP 3 & 4 Tier 1 Table 3.3-3 of Appendix C Combined License - Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) Bechtel Procedures 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3303, CABLE INSTALLATION, Revision 6 Section 1A30 APP-1212-ER-103, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Battery Monitoring Conduit Arrangement Room 12101, Revision 4. APP-1212-ER-106, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Non-Class 1E Conduit Arrangement Plan at Elevation 66-6, Revision 4. APP-1212-ERB-001, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Cable Tray Bill of Material at Elevation 66-6, Revision 9. APP-ECS-E9-030, Conduit Notes and Details, Revision 15 APP-ECS-E9-031, Conduit Notes and Details, Sheet 2, Revision 13 APP-ECS-E9-032, Conduit Notes and Details, Sheet 3, Revision 12 APP-ECS-E9-033, Conduit Notes and Details, Sheet 4, Revision 17 APP-ECS-E9-034, Conduit Notes and Details, Sheet 5, Revision 8 APP-ECS-E9-040, Electrical Raceway and Cable Identification Markers, Revision 3 Miscellaneous Documents UFSAR, Appendix 3F, Cable Trays and Cable Tray Supports UFSAR, Chapter 8 APP-G1-E1-003, Raceway Design, Discipline Design Criteria, Revision 3. APP-GW-E1-001, Electrical Systems Design Criteria, Revision 4. WEMMEX Report - U3 Cable Routes. WEMMEX Report - U3 Raceway Status. IEEE Standard 384, "IEEE Standard Criteria for Independence of Class 1E Equipment and Circuits," 1981 ND-18-0868, Docket Nos 52-025, 52-026, Notice of Notice of Uncompleted ITAAC 225-days Prior to Initial Fuel Load, Item 3.3.00.07c.i.a [Index Number 795] Design Specifications APP-G1-V8-001, AP1000 Electrical Installation Specification, Revision 7 Work Package: SV3-1210-ERW-EL1071/WP-7.3 Work Package Planning, Development, approval, and Closure, Revision 0 SV3-1210-ERW-EL1071, WORK PACKAGE, Install Conduit Sleeves/Electrical Penetrations in Wall 20A header above dura-steel walls for Room 12112 & 12113, Revision 7.2 Procedures 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N1204, Construction Implementation and Closing of Work Packages, Revision 12. 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3302, Raceways and Accessories, Revision 6.

92

26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3303, Cable Installation, Revision 6. Status Reports Excel Spread Sheet, U3 Cable Status - Construction Status Report for Room 12101, file date created 02/21/2020 Excel Spread Sheet, U3 Cable Status - Construction Status Report for Room 12104, file date created 02/21/2020 Excel Spread Sheet, U3 Cable Status - Construction Status Report for Room 12113, file date created 02/21/2020 Drawings APP-1211-ER-001, Auxiliary Building Area 1 Cable Tray Arrangement Plan at Elevation 66-6, Revision 8. APP-1211-ER-101, Auxiliary Building Area 1 Conduit Arrangement Plan at Elevation 66-6, Revision14. APP-1211-ER-102, Auxiliary Building Area 1 Conduit Arrangement at Elevation 66-6 Sections and Details, Revision 2. APP-1211-ER-103, Auxiliary Building Area 1 Conduit Arrangement Plan at Elevation 66-6 Room 12104, Revision 2. APP-1212-ER-001, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Cable Tray Arrangement Plan at Elevation 66-6, Revision 12. APP-1212-ER-101, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Class 1E Conduit Arrangement Plan at Elevation 66-6, Revision 15. APP-1212-ER-102, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Conduit Arrangement at Elevation 66-6 Sections and Details, Revision 2. Section 1A31 VEGP 3 & 4 Tier 1 Table 3.3-3 of Appendix C Combined License - Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) Bechtel Procedures 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3303, CABLE INSTALLATION, Revision 6 Section 1A32 Drawings: APP-1242-ER-001, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Cable Tray Arrangement Plan at Elevation 117-6, Revision 10 APP-1242-ER-002, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Cable Tray Arrangement Plan at Elevation 117-6 Sections and Details, Revision 1 APP-1242-ER-102, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Class 1E Conduit Arrangement Plan at Elevation 117-6 Room 12401 (partial) & 12411, Revision 6 APP-1242-ER-103, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Class 1E Conduit Arrangement Plan at Elevation 117-6 Room 12412, Revision 5 APP-1242-ER-104, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Class 1E Conduit Arrangement Plan at Elevation 117-6 Room 12401, Revision 5 APP-1242-ER-112, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Class 1E Conduit Arrangement Plan at Elevation 117-6 Sections & Details (Sheet 1), Revision 1 APP-1242-ER-113, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Class 1E Conduit Arrangement Plan at Elevation 117-6 Sections & Details (Sheet 2), Revision 1 Westinghouse Procedures

93

SV3-G1-E1-003, Raceway Design, Discipline Design Criteria, Revision 3 Bechtel Procedures 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3302, RACEWAYS AND ACCESSORIES, Revision 6 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3303, CABLE INSTALLATION, Revision 6 Section 1A33 Bechtel Procedures 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3302, RACEWAYS AND ACCESSORIES, Revision 6 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3303, CABLE INSTALLATION, Revision 6 Westinghouse Procedures APP-EW21-E1-001, AP1000 Standard Raceway and Cable Separation and Segregation, Revision 4 SV3-G1-E1-003, Raceway Design, Discipline Design Criteria, Revision 3 SV3-G1-V8-001, AP1000 Electrical Installation Specification, Revision 7 Section 1A34 Bechtel Procedures 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3302, RACEWAYS AND ACCESSORIES, Revision 6 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3303, CABLE INSTALLATION, Revision 6 Westinghouse Procedures APP-EW21-E1-001, AP1000 Standard Raceway and Cable Separation and Segregation, Revision 4 SV3-G1-E1-003, Raceway Design, Discipline Design Criteria, Revision 3 SV3-G1-V8-001, AP1000 Electrical Installation Specification, Revision 7 Section 1A35 APP-1212-ER-103, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Battery Monitoring Conduit Arrangement Room 12101, Revision 4. APP-1212-ER-106, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Non-Class 1E Conduit Arrangement Plan at Elevation 66-6, Revision 4. APP-1212-ERB-001, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Cable Tray Bill of Material at Elevation 66-6, Revision 9. APP-ECS-E9-030, Conduit Notes and Details, Revision 15 APP-ECS-E9-031, Conduit Notes and Details, Sheet 2, Revision 13 APP-ECS-E9-032, Conduit Notes and Details, Sheet 3, Revision 12 APP-ECS-E9-033, Conduit Notes and Details, Sheet 4, Revision 17 APP-ECS-E9-034, Conduit Notes and Details, Sheet 5, Revision 8 APP-ECS-E9-040, Electrical Raceway and Cable Identification Markers, Revision 3 Miscellaneous Documents UFSAR, Appendix 3F, Cable Trays and Cable Tray Supports UFSAR, Chapter 8 APP-G1-E1-003, Raceway Design, Discipline Design Criteria, Revision 3. APP-GW-E1-001, Electrical Systems Design Criteria, Revision 4. WEMMEX Report - U3 Cable Routes. WEMMEX Report - U3 Raceway Status. IEEE Standard 384, "IEEE Standard Criteria for Independence of Class 1E Equipment and Circuits," 1981

94

ND-18-0868, Docket Nos 52-025, 52-026, Notice of Notice of Uncompleted ITAAC 225-days Prior to Initial Fuel Load, Item 3.3.00.07c.i.a [Index Number 795] Design Specifications APP-G1-V8-001, AP1000 Electrical Installation Specification, Revision 7 Work Package SV3-1210-ERW-EL1071/WP-7.3 Work Package Planning, Development, approval, and Closure, Revision 0 SV3-1210-ERW-EL1071, WORK PACKAGE, Install Conduit Sleeves/Electrical Penetrations in Wall 20A header above dura-steel walls for Room 12112 & 12113, Revision 7.2 Procedures 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N1204, Construction Implementation and Closing of Work Packages, Revision 12. 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3302, Raceways and Accessories, Revision 6. 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3303, Cable Installation, Revision 6. Status Reports Excel Spread Sheet, U3 Cable Status - Construction Status Report for Room 12101, file date created 02/21/2020 Excel Spread Sheet, U3 Cable Status - Construction Status Report for Room 12104, file date created 02/21/2020 Excel Spread Sheet, U3 Cable Status - Construction Status Report for Room 12113, file date created 02/21/2020 Drawings APP-1211-ER-001, Auxiliary Building Area 1 Cable Tray Arrangement Plan at Elevation 66-6, Revision 8. APP-1211-ER-101, Auxiliary Building Area 1 Conduit Arrangement Plan at Elevation 66-6, Revision14. APP-1211-ER-102, Auxiliary Building Area 1 Conduit Arrangement at Elevation 66-6 Sections and Details, Revision 2. APP-1211-ER-103, Auxiliary Building Area 1 Conduit Arrangement Plan at Elevation 66-6 Room 12104, Revision 2. APP-1212-ER-001, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Cable Tray Arrangement Plan at Elevation 66-6, Revision 12. APP-1212-ER-101, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Class 1E Conduit Arrangement Plan at Elevation 66-6, Revision 15. APP-1212-ER-102, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Conduit Arrangement at Elevation 66-6 Sections and Details, Revision 2. Section 1A36 Bechtel Procedures 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3302, RACEWAYS AND ACCESSORIES, Revision 6 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3303, CABLE INSTALLATION, Revision 6 Westinghouse Procedures APP-EW21-E1-001, AP1000 Standard Raceway and Cable Separation and Segregation, Revision 4 SV3-G1-E1-003, Raceway Design, Discipline Design Criteria, Revision 3

95

SV3-G1-V8-001, AP1000 Electrical Installation Specification, Revision 7 Section 1A37 Westinghouse Specifications APP-GW-E1-001, Electrical Systems Design Criteria, Revision 4 APP-G1-E1-003, Raceway Design, Discipline Design Criteria, Revision 3 APP-G1-V8-001, AP1000 Electrical Installation Specification, Revision 7 APP-G1-E1-003, Raceway Design, Discipline Design Criteria, Revision 3 APP-G1-E1-002, Wire and Cable Design Criteria, Revision 2 Bechtel Procedures 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N1204, Construction Implementation and Closing of Work Packages, Revision 12 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3302, Raceways and Accessories, Revision 6 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3303, Cable Installation, Revision 6 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3304, Cable Terminations, Revision 5 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N8401, Quality Reporting, Revision 4 Drawings APP-1242-ER-001, Auxiliary Building Area 2, Cable Tray Arrangement, Plan at Elevation 117-6, Revision 10 APP-1242-SH-228, Auxiliary Building Area 2, El. 117-6 Raceway Supports, Details (Sheet 19), Revision 0 Miscellaneous Construction Automation TEAMWorks, file shared date 01/09/2020 Excel Spread Sheet, IEEE384 Barriers NI, file date created 2020-0 1 -10 IEEE Standard 384, "IEEE Standard Criteria for Independence of Class 1E Equipment and Circuits," 1981 ND-18-0813, Docket Nos 52-025, 52-026, Resubmittal of Notice of Uncompleted ITAAC 225-days Prior to Initial Fuel Load ND-18-0814, Docket Nos 52-025, 52-026, Resubmittal of Notice of Uncompleted ITAAC 225-days Prior to Initial Fuel Load ND-18-0817, Docket Nos 52-025, 52-026, Resubmittal of Notice of Uncompleted ITAAC 225-days Prior to Initial Fuel Load SETROUTE Tutorial, file shared date 01/09/2020 Pull Tickets SV3-IDSB-EW-DS1BXB[PT], WIRED cable pull ticket, dated 2018-09-07, Revision 0 SV3-IDSB-EW-EA8BDYB[PT], WIRED cable pull ticket, dated 2019-07-23, Revision 1 SV3-IDSS-EW-EA1AAYS[PT], WIRED cable pull ticket, dated 2018-09-20, Revision 1 SV3-IDSB-EW-DS1DXB[PT], WIRED cable pull ticket, dated 2018-09-07, Revision 0 SV3-IDSB-EW-DC1NZB[PT], WIRED cable pull ticket, dated 2019-11-18, Revision 1 SV3-IDSB-EW-DC1NZB[PT], WIRED cable pull ticket, F-APP-GH50-Z0-100-1, dated 2019-12-02, Rev: 2 AP1000 Design Control Document (DCD), Tier 2, Chapter 8, section 8.3.4 UFSAR, Appendix 3F, Cable Trays and Cable Tray Supports UFSAR, Chapter 8 Existing Condition Reports Reviewed 50032627 IDS System Designed Cables Missing in WEMMEX/WIRED Database

96

50027108 Cables missing from WIRED database and E5 drawings 50022458Cable Pullby installation tension not monitored/no usage of lubricants Section 1A38 Westinghouse Specifications APP-GW-E1-001, Electrical Systems Design Criteria, Revision 4 APP-G1-E1-003, Raceway Design, Discipline Design Criteria, Revision 3 APP-G1-V8-001, AP1000 Electrical Installation Specification, Revision 7 APP-G1-E1-003, Raceway Design, Discipline Design Criteria, Revision 3 APP-G1-E1-002, Wire and Cable Design Criteria, Revision 2 Bechtel Procedures 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N1204, Construction Implementation and Closing of Work Packages, Revision 12 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3302, Raceways and Accessories, Revision 6 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3303, Cable Installation, Revision 6 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3304, Cable Terminations, Revision 5 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N8401, Quality Reporting, Revision 4 Drawings APP-1242-ER-001, Auxiliary Building Area 2, Cable Tray Arrangement, Plan at Elevation 117-6, Revision 10 APP-1242-SH-228, Auxiliary Building Area 2, El. 117-6 Raceway Supports, Details (Sheet 19), Revision 0 Miscellaneous Construction Automation TEAMWorks, file shared date 01/09/2020 Excel Spread Sheet, IEEE384 Barriers NI, file date created 2020-0 1 -10 IEEE Standard 384, "IEEE Standard Criteria for Independence of Class 1E Equipment and Circuits," 1981 ND-18-0813, Docket Nos 52-025, 52-026, Resubmittal of Notice of Uncompleted ITAAC 225-days Prior to Initial Fuel Load ND-18-0814, Docket Nos 52-025, 52-026, Resubmittal of Notice of Uncompleted ITAAC 225-days Prior to Initial Fuel Load ND-18-0817, Docket Nos 52-025, 52-026, Resubmittal of Notice of Uncompleted ITAAC 225-days Prior to Initial Fuel Load SETROUTE Tutorial, file shared date 01/09/2020 Pull Tickets SV3-IDSB-EW-DS1BXB[PT], WIRED cable pull ticket, dated 2018-09-07, Revision 0 SV3-IDSB-EW-EA8BDYB[PT], WIRED cable pull ticket, dated 2019-07-23, Revision 1 SV3-IDSS-EW-EA1AAYS[PT], WIRED cable pull ticket, dated 2018-09-20, Revision 1 SV3-IDSB-EW-DS1DXB[PT], WIRED cable pull ticket, dated 2018-09-07, Revision 0 SV3-IDSB-EW-DC1NZB[PT], WIRED cable pull ticket, dated 2019-11-18, Revision 1 SV3-IDSB-EW-DC1NZB[PT], WIRED cable pull ticket, F-APP-GH50-Z0-100-1, dated 2019-12-02, Rev: 2 AP1000 Design Control Document (DCD), Tier 2, Chapter 8, section 8.3.4 UFSAR, Appendix 3F, Cable Trays and Cable Tray Supports UFSAR, Chapter 8 Existing Condition Reports Reviewed

97

50032627 IDS System Designed Cables Missing in WEMMEX/WIRED Database 50027108 Cables missing from WIRED database and E5 drawings 50022458Cable Pullby installation tension not monitored/no usage of lubricants Section 1A39 APP-1212-ER-103, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Battery Monitoring Conduit Arrangement Room 12101, Revision 4. APP-1212-ER-106, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Non-Class 1E Conduit Arrangement Plan at Elevation 66-6, Revision 4. APP-1212-ERB-001, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Cable Tray Bill of Material at Elevation 66-6, Revision 9. APP-ECS-E9-030, Conduit Notes and Details, Revision 15 APP-ECS-E9-031, Conduit Notes and Details, Sheet 2, Revision 13 APP-ECS-E9-032, Conduit Notes and Details, Sheet 3, Revision 12 APP-ECS-E9-033, Conduit Notes and Details, Sheet 4, Revision 17 APP-ECS-E9-034, Conduit Notes and Details, Sheet 5, Revision 8 APP-ECS-E9-040, Electrical Raceway and Cable Identification Markers, Revision 3 Miscellaneous Documents UFSAR, Appendix 3F, Cable Trays and Cable Tray Supports UFSAR, Chapter 8 APP-G1-E1-003, Raceway Design, Discipline Design Criteria, Revision 3. APP-GW-E1-001, Electrical Systems Design Criteria, Revision 4. WEMMEX Report - U3 Cable Routes. WEMMEX Report - U3 Raceway Status. IEEE Standard 384, "IEEE Standard Criteria for Independence of Class 1E Equipment and Circuits," 1981 ND-18-0868, Docket Nos 52-025, 52-026, Notice of Notice of Uncompleted ITAAC 225-days Prior to Initial Fuel Load, Item 3.3.00.07c.i.a [Index Number 795] Design Specifications APP-G1-V8-001, AP1000 Electrical Installation Specification, Revision 7 Work Package SV3-1210-ERW-EL1071/WP-7.3 Work Package Planning, Development, approval, and Closure, Revision 0 SV3-1210-ERW-EL1071, WORK PACKAGE, Install Conduit Sleeves/Electrical Penetrations in Wall 20A header above dura-steel walls for Room 12112 & 12113, Revision 7.2 Procedures 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N1204, Construction Implementation and Closing of Work Packages, Revision 12. 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3302, Raceways and Accessories, Revision 6. 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3303, Cable Installation, Revision 6. Status Reports Excel Spread Sheet, U3 Cable Status - Construction Status Report for Room 12101, file date created 02/21/2020 Excel Spread Sheet, U3 Cable Status - Construction Status Report for Room 12104, file date created 02/21/2020

98

Excel Spread Sheet, U3 Cable Status - Construction Status Report for Room 12113, file date created 02/21/2020 Drawings APP-1211-ER-001, Auxiliary Building Area 1 Cable Tray Arrangement Plan at Elevation 66-6, Revision 8. APP-1211-ER-101, Auxiliary Building Area 1 Conduit Arrangement Plan at Elevation 66-6, Revision14. APP-1211-ER-102, Auxiliary Building Area 1 Conduit Arrangement at Elevation 66-6 Sections and Details, Revision 2. APP-1211-ER-103, Auxiliary Building Area 1 Conduit Arrangement Plan at Elevation 66-6 Room 12104, Revision 2. APP-1212-ER-001, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Cable Tray Arrangement Plan at Elevation 66-6, Revision 12. APP-1212-ER-101, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Class 1E Conduit Arrangement Plan at Elevation 66-6, Revision 15. APP-1212-ER-102, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Conduit Arrangement at Elevation 66-6 Sections and Details, Revision 2. Section 1A40 Westinghouse Specifications APP-GW-E1-001, Electrical Systems Design Criteria, Revision 4 APP-G1-E1-003, Raceway Design, Discipline Design Criteria, Revision 3 APP-G1-V8-001, AP1000 Electrical Installation Specification, Revision 7 APP-G1-E1-003, Raceway Design, Discipline Design Criteria, Revision 3 APP-G1-E1-002, Wire and Cable Design Criteria, Revision 2 Bechtel Procedures 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N1204, Construction Implementation and Closing of Work Packages, Revision 12 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3302, Raceways and Accessories, Revision 6 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3303, Cable Installation, Revision 6 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3304, Cable Terminations, Revision 5 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N8401, Quality Reporting, Revision 4 Drawings APP-1242-ER-001, Auxiliary Building Area 2, Cable Tray Arrangement, Plan at Elevation 117-6, Revision 10 APP-1242-SH-228, Auxiliary Building Area 2, El. 117-6 Raceway Supports, Details (Sheet 19), Revision 0 Miscellaneous Construction Automation TEAMWorks, file shared date 01/09/2020 Excel Spread Sheet, IEEE384 Barriers NI, file date created 2020-0 1 -10 IEEE Standard 384, "IEEE Standard Criteria for Independence of Class 1E Equipment and Circuits," 1981 ND-18-0813, Docket Nos 52-025, 52-026, Resubmittal of Notice of Uncompleted ITAAC 225-days Prior to Initial Fuel Load ND-18-0814, Docket Nos 52-025, 52-026, Resubmittal of Notice of Uncompleted ITAAC 225-days Prior to Initial Fuel Load ND-18-0817, Docket Nos 52-025, 52-026, Resubmittal of Notice of Uncompleted ITAAC 225-days Prior to Initial Fuel Load

99

SETROUTE Tutorial, file shared date 01/09/2020 Pull Tickets SV3-IDSB-EW-DS1BXB[PT], WIRED cable pull ticket, dated 2018-09-07, Revision 0 SV3-IDSB-EW-EA8BDYB[PT], WIRED cable pull ticket, dated 2019-07-23, Revision 1 SV3-IDSS-EW-EA1AAYS[PT], WIRED cable pull ticket, dated 2018-09-20, Revision 1 SV3-IDSB-EW-DS1DXB[PT], WIRED cable pull ticket, dated 2018-09-07, Revision 0 SV3-IDSB-EW-DC1NZB[PT], WIRED cable pull ticket, dated 2019-11-18, Revision 1 SV3-IDSB-EW-DC1NZB[PT], WIRED cable pull ticket, F-APP-GH50-Z0-100-1, dated 2019-12-02, Rev: 2 AP1000 Design Control Document (DCD), Tier 2, Chapter 8, section 8.3.4 UFSAR, Appendix 3F, Cable Trays and Cable Tray Supports UFSAR, Chapter 8 Existing Condition Reports Reviewed 50032627 IDS System Designed Cables Missing in WEMMEX/WIRED Database 50027108 Cables missing from WIRED database and E5 drawings 50022458Cable Pullby installation tension not monitored/no usage of lubricants Section 1A41 Westinghouse Specifications APP-GW-E1-001, Electrical Systems Design Criteria, Revision 4 APP-G1-E1-003, Raceway Design, Discipline Design Criteria, Revision 3 APP-G1-V8-001, AP1000 Electrical Installation Specification, Revision 7 APP-G1-E1-003, Raceway Design, Discipline Design Criteria, Revision 3 APP-G1-E1-002, Wire and Cable Design Criteria, Revision 2 Bechtel Procedures 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N1204, Construction Implementation and Closing of Work Packages, Revision 12 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3302, Raceways and Accessories, Revision 6 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3303, Cable Installation, Revision 6 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3304, Cable Terminations, Revision 5 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N8401, Quality Reporting, Revision 4 Drawings APP-1242-ER-001, Auxiliary Building Area 2, Cable Tray Arrangement, Plan at Elevation 117-6, Revision 10 APP-1242-SH-228, Auxiliary Building Area 2, El. 117-6 Raceway Supports, Details (Sheet 19), Revision 0 Miscellaneous Construction Automation TEAMWorks, file shared date 01/09/2020 Excel Spread Sheet, IEEE384 Barriers NI, file date created 2020-0 1 -10 IEEE Standard 384, "IEEE Standard Criteria for Independence of Class 1E Equipment and Circuits," 1981 ND-18-0813, Docket Nos 52-025, 52-026, Resubmittal of Notice of Uncompleted ITAAC 225-days Prior to Initial Fuel Load ND-18-0814, Docket Nos 52-025, 52-026, Resubmittal of Notice of Uncompleted ITAAC 225-days Prior to Initial Fuel Load

100

ND-18-0817, Docket Nos 52-025, 52-026, Resubmittal of Notice of Uncompleted ITAAC 225-days Prior to Initial Fuel Load SETROUTE Tutorial, file shared date 01/09/2020 Pull Tickets SV3-IDSB-EW-DS1BXB[PT], WIRED cable pull ticket, dated 2018-09-07, Revision 0 SV3-IDSB-EW-EA8BDYB[PT], WIRED cable pull ticket, dated 2019-07-23, Revision 1 SV3-IDSS-EW-EA1AAYS[PT], WIRED cable pull ticket, dated 2018-09-20, Revision 1 SV3-IDSB-EW-DS1DXB[PT], WIRED cable pull ticket, dated 2018-09-07, Revision 0 SV3-IDSB-EW-DC1NZB[PT], WIRED cable pull ticket, dated 2019-11-18, Revision 1 SV3-IDSB-EW-DC1NZB[PT], WIRED cable pull ticket, F-APP-GH50-Z0-100-1, dated 2019-12-02, Rev: 2 AP1000 Design Control Document (DCD), Tier 2, Chapter 8, section 8.3.4 UFSAR, Appendix 3F, Cable Trays and Cable Tray Supports UFSAR, Chapter 8 Existing Condition Reports Reviewed 50032627 IDS System Designed Cables Missing in WEMMEX/WIRED Database 50027108 Cables missing from WIRED database and E5 drawings 50022458Cable Pullby installation tension not monitored/no usage of lubricants Section 1A42 Westinghouse Specifications APP-GW-E1-001, Electrical Systems Design Criteria, Revision 4 APP-G1-E1-003, Raceway Design, Discipline Design Criteria, Revision 3 APP-G1-V8-001, AP1000 Electrical Installation Specification, Revision 7 APP-G1-E1-003, Raceway Design, Discipline Design Criteria, Revision 3 APP-G1-E1-002, Wire and Cable Design Criteria, Revision 2 Bechtel Procedures 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N1204, Construction Implementation and Closing of Work Packages, Revision 12 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3302, Raceways and Accessories, Revision 6 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3303, Cable Installation, Revision 6 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3304, Cable Terminations, Revision 5 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N8401, Quality Reporting, Revision 4 Drawings APP-1242-ER-001, Auxiliary Building Area 2, Cable Tray Arrangement, Plan at Elevation 117-6, Revision 10 APP-1242-SH-228, Auxiliary Building Area 2, El. 117-6 Raceway Supports, Details (Sheet 19), Revision 0 Miscellaneous Construction Automation TEAMWorks, file shared date 01/09/2020 Excel Spread Sheet, IEEE384 Barriers NI, file date created 2020-0 1 -10 IEEE Standard 384, "IEEE Standard Criteria for Independence of Class 1E Equipment and Circuits," 1981 ND-18-0813, Docket Nos 52-025, 52-026, Resubmittal of Notice of Uncompleted ITAAC 225-days Prior to Initial Fuel Load

101

ND-18-0814, Docket Nos 52-025, 52-026, Resubmittal of Notice of Uncompleted ITAAC 225-days Prior to Initial Fuel Load ND-18-0817, Docket Nos 52-025, 52-026, Resubmittal of Notice of Uncompleted ITAAC 225-days Prior to Initial Fuel Load SETROUTE Tutorial, file shared date 01/09/2020 Pull Tickets SV3-IDSB-EW-DS1BXB[PT], WIRED cable pull ticket, dated 2018-09-07, Revision 0 SV3-IDSB-EW-EA8BDYB[PT], WIRED cable pull ticket, dated 2019-07-23, Revision 1 SV3-IDSS-EW-EA1AAYS[PT], WIRED cable pull ticket, dated 2018-09-20, Revision 1 SV3-IDSB-EW-DS1DXB[PT], WIRED cable pull ticket, dated 2018-09-07, Revision 0 SV3-IDSB-EW-DC1NZB[PT], WIRED cable pull ticket, dated 2019-11-18, Revision 1 SV3-IDSB-EW-DC1NZB[PT], WIRED cable pull ticket, F-APP-GH50-Z0-100-1, dated 2019-12-02, Rev: 2 AP1000 Design Control Document (DCD), Tier 2, Chapter 8, section 8.3.4 UFSAR, Appendix 3F, Cable Trays and Cable Tray Supports UFSAR, Chapter 8 Existing Condition Reports Reviewed 50032627 IDS System Designed Cables Missing in WEMMEX/WIRED Database 50027108 Cables missing from WIRED database and E5 drawings 50022458Cable Pullby installation tension not monitored/no usage of lubricants Section 1A43 APP-1212-ER-103, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Battery Monitoring Conduit Arrangement Room 12101, Revision 4. APP-1212-ER-106, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Non-Class 1E Conduit Arrangement Plan at Elevation 66-6, Revision 4. APP-1212-ERB-001, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Cable Tray Bill of Material at Elevation 66-6, Revision 9. APP-ECS-E9-030, Conduit Notes and Details, Revision 15 APP-ECS-E9-031, Conduit Notes and Details, Sheet 2, Revision 13 APP-ECS-E9-032, Conduit Notes and Details, Sheet 3, Revision 12 APP-ECS-E9-033, Conduit Notes and Details, Sheet 4, Revision 17 APP-ECS-E9-034, Conduit Notes and Details, Sheet 5, Revision 8 APP-ECS-E9-040, Electrical Raceway and Cable Identification Markers, Revision 3 Miscellaneous Documents UFSAR, Appendix 3F, Cable Trays and Cable Tray Supports UFSAR, Chapter 8 APP-G1-E1-003, Raceway Design, Discipline Design Criteria, Revision 3. APP-GW-E1-001, Electrical Systems Design Criteria, Revision 4. WEMMEX Report - U3 Cable Routes. WEMMEX Report - U3 Raceway Status. IEEE Standard 384, "IEEE Standard Criteria for Independence of Class 1E Equipment and Circuits," 1981 ND-18-0868, Docket Nos 52-025, 52-026, Notice of Notice of Uncompleted ITAAC 225-days Prior to Initial Fuel Load, Item 3.3.00.07c.i.a [Index Number 795] Design Specifications APP-G1-V8-001, AP1000 Electrical Installation Specification, Revision 7

102

Work Package SV3-1210-ERW-EL1071/WP-7.3 Work Package Planning, Development, approval, and Closure, Revision 0 SV3-1210-ERW-EL1071, WORK PACKAGE, Install Conduit Sleeves/Electrical Penetrations in Wall 20A header above dura-steel walls for Room 12112 & 12113, Revision 7.2 Procedures 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N1204, Construction Implementation and Closing of Work Packages, Revision 12. 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3302, Raceways and Accessories, Revision 6. 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3303, Cable Installation, Revision 6. Status Reports Excel Spread Sheet, U3 Cable Status - Construction Status Report for Room 12101, file date created 02/21/2020 Excel Spread Sheet, U3 Cable Status - Construction Status Report for Room 12104, file date created 02/21/2020 Excel Spread Sheet, U3 Cable Status - Construction Status Report for Room 12113, file date created 02/21/2020 Drawings APP-1211-ER-001, Auxiliary Building Area 1 Cable Tray Arrangement Plan at Elevation 66-6, Revision 8. APP-1211-ER-101, Auxiliary Building Area 1 Conduit Arrangement Plan at Elevation 66-6, Revision14. APP-1211-ER-102, Auxiliary Building Area 1 Conduit Arrangement at Elevation 66-6 Sections and Details, Revision 2. APP-1211-ER-103, Auxiliary Building Area 1 Conduit Arrangement Plan at Elevation 66-6 Room 12104, Revision 2. APP-1212-ER-001, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Cable Tray Arrangement Plan at Elevation 66-6, Revision 12. APP-1212-ER-101, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Class 1E Conduit Arrangement Plan at Elevation 66-6, Revision 15. APP-1212-ER-102, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Conduit Arrangement at Elevation 66-6 Sections and Details, Revision 2. Section 1A44 Westinghouse Specifications APP-GW-E1-001, Electrical Systems Design Criteria, Revision 4 APP-G1-E1-003, Raceway Design, Discipline Design Criteria, Revision 3 APP-G1-V8-001, AP1000 Electrical Installation Specification, Revision 7 APP-G1-E1-003, Raceway Design, Discipline Design Criteria, Revision 3 APP-G1-E1-002, Wire and Cable Design Criteria, Revision 2 Bechtel Procedures 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N1204, Construction Implementation and Closing of Work Packages, Revision 12 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3302, Raceways and Accessories, Revision 6 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3303, Cable Installation, Revision 6 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3304, Cable Terminations, Revision 5

103

26139-000-4MP-T81C-N8401, Quality Reporting, Revision 4 Drawings APP-1242-ER-001, Auxiliary Building Area 2, Cable Tray Arrangement, Plan at Elevation 117-6, Revision 10 APP-1242-SH-228, Auxiliary Building Area 2, El. 117-6 Raceway Supports, Details (Sheet 19), Revision 0 Miscellaneous Construction Automation TEAMWorks, file shared date 01/09/2020 Excel Spread Sheet, IEEE384 Barriers NI, file date created 2020-0 1 -10 IEEE Standard 384, "IEEE Standard Criteria for Independence of Class 1E Equipment and Circuits," 1981 ND-18-0813, Docket Nos 52-025, 52-026, Resubmittal of Notice of Uncompleted ITAAC 225-days Prior to Initial Fuel Load ND-18-0814, Docket Nos 52-025, 52-026, Resubmittal of Notice of Uncompleted ITAAC 225-days Prior to Initial Fuel Load ND-18-0817, Docket Nos 52-025, 52-026, Resubmittal of Notice of Uncompleted ITAAC 225-days Prior to Initial Fuel Load SETROUTE Tutorial, file shared date 01/09/2020 Pull Tickets SV3-IDSB-EW-DS1BXB[PT], WIRED cable pull ticket, dated 2018-09-07, Revision 0 SV3-IDSB-EW-EA8BDYB[PT], WIRED cable pull ticket, dated 2019-07-23, Revision 1 SV3-IDSS-EW-EA1AAYS[PT], WIRED cable pull ticket, dated 2018-09-20, Revision 1 SV3-IDSB-EW-DS1DXB[PT], WIRED cable pull ticket, dated 2018-09-07, Revision 0 SV3-IDSB-EW-DC1NZB[PT], WIRED cable pull ticket, dated 2019-11-18, Revision 1 SV3-IDSB-EW-DC1NZB[PT], WIRED cable pull ticket, F-APP-GH50-Z0-100-1, dated 2019-12-02, Rev: 2 AP1000 Design Control Document (DCD), Tier 2, Chapter 8, section 8.3.4 UFSAR, Appendix 3F, Cable Trays and Cable Tray Supports UFSAR, Chapter 8 Existing Condition Reports Reviewed 50032627 IDS System Designed Cables Missing in WEMMEX/WIRED Database 50027108 Cables missing from WIRED database and E5 drawings 50022458Cable Pullby installation tension not monitored/no usage of lubricants Section 1A45 Miscellaneous ND-18-0813, Docket Nos 52-025, 52-026, Resubmittal of Notice of Uncompleted ITAAC 225-days Prior to Initial Fuel Load, Enclosure 4 - Completion Plan for Uncompleted ITAAC 3.3.00.07d.v.a [Index Number 809] SV3-GW-E1-001, Electrical System Design Criteria, Revision 4 Westinghouse Procedures APP-EW21-E1-001, AP1000 Standard Raceway and Cable Separation and Segregation, Revision 4 Specifications SV3-G1-V8-001, AP1000 Electrical Installation Specification, Revision 7

104

Section 1A46 Miscellaneous ND-18-0814, Docket Nos 52-025, 52-026, Resubmittal of Notice of Uncompleted ITAAC 225-days Prior to Initial Fuel Load, Enclosure 4 - Completion Plan for Uncompleted ITAAC 3.3.00.07d.v.b [Index Number 810] Westinghouse Procedures APP-EW21-E1-001, AP1000 Standard Raceway and Cable Separation and Segregation, Revision 4 Drawings APP-1242-ER-001, Auxiliary Building Area 2, Cable Tray Arrangement, Plan at Elevation 117-6, Revision 10 Specifications SV3-G1-V8-001, AP1000 Electrical Installation Specification, Revision 7 Section 1A47 APP-1212-ER-103, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Battery Monitoring Conduit Arrangement Room 12101, Revision 4. APP-1212-ER-106, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Non-Class 1E Conduit Arrangement Plan at Elevation 66-6, Revision 4. APP-1212-ERB-001, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Cable Tray Bill of Material at Elevation 66-6, Revision 9. APP-ECS-E9-030, Conduit Notes and Details, Revision 15 APP-ECS-E9-031, Conduit Notes and Details, Sheet 2, Revision 13 APP-ECS-E9-032, Conduit Notes and Details, Sheet 3, Revision 12 APP-ECS-E9-033, Conduit Notes and Details, Sheet 4, Revision 17 APP-ECS-E9-034, Conduit Notes and Details, Sheet 5, Revision 8 APP-ECS-E9-040, Electrical Raceway and Cable Identification Markers, Revision 3 Miscellaneous Documents UFSAR, Appendix 3F, Cable Trays and Cable Tray Supports UFSAR, Chapter 8 APP-G1-E1-003, Raceway Design, Discipline Design Criteria, Revision 3. APP-GW-E1-001, Electrical Systems Design Criteria, Revision 4. WEMMEX Report - U3 Cable Routes. WEMMEX Report - U3 Raceway Status. IEEE Standard 384, "IEEE Standard Criteria for Independence of Class 1E Equipment and Circuits," 1981 ND-18-0868, Docket Nos 52-025, 52-026, Notice of Notice of Uncompleted ITAAC 225-days Prior to Initial Fuel Load, Item 3.3.00.07c.i.a [Index Number 795] Design Specifications APP-G1-V8-001, AP1000 Electrical Installation Specification, Revision 7 Work Package SV3-1210-ERW-EL1071/WP-7.3 Work Package Planning, Development, approval, and Closure, Revision 0

105

SV3-1210-ERW-EL1071, WORK PACKAGE, Install Conduit Sleeves/Electrical Penetrations in Wall 20A header above dura-steel walls for Room 12112 & 12113, Revision 7.2 Procedures 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N1204, Construction Implementation and Closing of Work Packages, Revision 12. 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3302, Raceways and Accessories, Revision 6. 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3303, Cable Installation, Revision 6. Status Reports Excel Spread Sheet, U3 Cable Status - Construction Status Report for Room 12101, file date created 02/21/2020 Excel Spread Sheet, U3 Cable Status - Construction Status Report for Room 12104, file date created 02/21/2020 Excel Spread Sheet, U3 Cable Status - Construction Status Report for Room 12113, file date created 02/21/2020 Drawings APP-1211-ER-001, Auxiliary Building Area 1 Cable Tray Arrangement Plan at Elevation 66-6, Revision 8. APP-1211-ER-101, Auxiliary Building Area 1 Conduit Arrangement Plan at Elevation 66-6, Revision14. APP-1211-ER-102, Auxiliary Building Area 1 Conduit Arrangement at Elevation 66-6 Sections and Details, Revision 2. APP-1211-ER-103, Auxiliary Building Area 1 Conduit Arrangement Plan at Elevation 66-6 Room 12104, Revision 2. APP-1212-ER-001, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Cable Tray Arrangement Plan at Elevation 66-6, Revision 12. APP-1212-ER-101, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Class 1E Conduit Arrangement Plan at Elevation 66-6, Revision 15. APP-1212-ER-102, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Conduit Arrangement at Elevation 66-6 Sections and Details, Revision 2. Section 1A48 Miscellaneous ND-18-0817, Enclosure 4 - Vogtle Electric Generating Plant (VEGP) Unit 3 and Unit 4, Completion Plan for Uncompleted ITAAC 3.3.00.07d.v.c [index Number 811] SV3-GW-E1-001, Electrical System Design Criteria, Revision 4 Westinghouse Procedures APP-EW21-E1-001, AP1000 Standard Raceway and Cable Separation and Segregation, Revision 4 Specifications SV3-G1-V8-001, AP1000 Electrical Installation Specification, Revision 7 Section 1A49 SV3-PMS-EW-JDQDPB0101DZB[PT], "2 Fiber, Multimode Cable," Revision 0 SV3-G1-V8-001, "AP1000 Electrical Installation Specification", Revision 7 Section 1A50

106

Westinghouse Procedures APP-EW21-E1-001, AP1000 Standard Raceway and Cable Separation and Segregation, Revision 4 Drawings APP-1242-ER-001, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Cable Tray Arrangement Plan at Elevation 117-6, Revision 10 APP-1242-ER-002, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Cable Tray Arrangement Plan at Elevation 117-6 Sections and Details, Revision 1 APP-1242-ER-102, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Class 1E Conduit Arrangement Plan at Elevation 117-6 Room 12401 (partial) & 12411, Revision 6 APP-1242-ER-103, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Class 1E Conduit Arrangement Plan at Elevation 117-6 Room 12412, Revision 5 APP-1242-ER-104, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Class 1E Conduit Arrangement Plan at Elevation 117-6 Room 12401, Revision 5 APP-1242-ER-112, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Class 1E Conduit Arrangement Plan at Elevation 117-6 Sections & Details (Sheet 1), Revision 1 APP-1242-ER-113, Auxiliary Building Area 2 Class 1E Conduit Arrangement Plan at Elevation 117-6 Sections & Details (Sheet 2), Revision 1 Specifications SV3-G1-V8-001, AP1000 Electrical Installation Specification, Revision 7 Section 1A51 WEC SV4-RCS-PLW-03A-R2, "Reactor Coolant System, Containment Building Room 11301, ADS Stage 4 Piping West Compartment," Revision 2 S&W Weld Data Sheet, Weld-No. SV4-RCS-PLW-03A-1, 06/13/2019 WEC SV4-RCS-PLW-03B-R2, "Reactor Coolant System, Containment Building Room 11301, ADS Stage 4 Piping West Compartment," Revision 2 S&W Weld Data Sheet, Weld-No. SV4-RCS-PLW-03B-1, 07/16/2019 S&W Welding Procedure Specification (WPS) ASME Section IX, WPS1-8.8T01, Revision 10 Section 1A52 WEC SV4-RCS-PLW-017-R0, "Reactor Coolant System, Containment Building Room 11601, Piping to Sparger A," Revision 0 S&W Weld Data Sheet, Weld-No. SV4-RCS-PLW-017-5, 01/18/2020 WEC SV4-RCS-PLW-01G-R0, "Reactor Coolant System, Containment Building Room 11701 and 11500, ADS Piping to Sparger B," Revision 0 S&W Weld Data Sheet, Weld-No. SV4-RCS-PLW-01G-5, 01/14/2020 S&W Welding Procedure Specification (WPS) ASME Section IX, WPS1-8.8T01, Revision 10 Section 1A53 SV4-SS30-Z0-001, "AP1000 RCS Primary Equipment Supports Design Specification", Revision 4 SV4-Q601-MHH-003, "Installing Q601 Module", Revision 0 Section 1A54 SWR4-1058786, "Unit 4 Containment Sparger A Measurements," 1/14/19 SWR4-1124533, "Unit 4 Elevation of ADS Spargers," Revision 0 SV4-MW01-FSK-891550, "Unit 4 ADS Sparger As-Built Elevation Verification," Revision 0 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3201, "Construction Survey," Revision 5

107

Section 1A55 SV4-FT01-V1-510-R2, "AP1000 Fuel Transfer Tube Equipment General Arrangement", Revision 2 AP1-2991, "Fuel Transfer Tube Installation, CV Sleeve Closure Plate", Revision 0 915504 FW-SV4-FTT-07, "Attachment 07A - Weld Process Traveler", 01/02/2020 Section 1A56 CB&I Weld Traveler U4-S8/S9U, "Weld S8 Ring to S9 Ring Circumferential Seam", 11/25/2019 CB&I Daily Welding Material Distribution Log (2 pages), 12/04/2019 CB&I Welding Procedure Specification E9018M H4 R, Revision 8 Section 1A57 Drawings SV4-PXS-PLW-015, "Passive Core Cooling System Containment BLDG Room 11206 Containment Recirc. to DVI-A," Revision 1 SV4-PXS-PLW-016, "Passive Core Cooling System Containment BLDG Room 11206 Common Injection header to DVI-A," Revision 2 SV4-PXS-PLW-017, "Passive Core Cooling System Containment BLDG Room 11206 Common Injection Header to DVI-A," Revision 1 SV4-PXS-PLW-018, "Passive Core Cooling System Containment BLDG Room 11305/11206 from IRWST to DVI-A," Revision 0 SV4-PXS-PLW-029, "Passive Core Cooling System Containment Building Room 11207 from IRWST to DVI-B," Revision 0 SV4-PXS-PLW-02E, "Passive Core Cooling System Containment Building Room 11207 IRWST to DVI-B & RNS Pump Suction," Revision 1 SV4-PXS-PLW-02N, "Passive Core Cooling System Containment Building Room 11207 IRWST & Cont. Recirc. to DVI-B," Revision 1 SV4-PXS-PLW-02U, "Passive Core Cooling System Containment Building Room 11207 IRWST & Cont. Recirc. to DVI-B," Revision 1 SV4-PXS-PLW-02X, "Passive Core Cooling System Containment Building Room 11207 IRWST & Cont. Recirc. to DVI-B," Revision 1 Procedures 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3201, "Construction Survey," Revision 5 NCSP 02-24, "ITAAC Support Activities (AP1000)," Revision 03.00 NCSP 03-24, "Field Surveying," Revision 05.00 Section 1A58 SV4-SGS-PLW-032-R3, Piping Isometric Drawing "Steam Generator System Auxiliary Building Room 12406 Main Steam Line A", Revision 3 S&W Weld Data Sheet (WDS) SV3-SGS-PLW-032-4 (Work Package SV4-SGS-P0W-800023) for inlet side of MSIV V040A (S/N BX865), 11/12/2019 S&W Welding Material Requisition (WMR) 495716, 03/10/2020 S&W Weld Data Sheet (WDS) SV3-SGS-PLW-032-3 (Work Package SV4-SGS-P0W-800023) for outlet side of MSIV V040A (S/N BX865), 11/3/2019 S&W Welding Material Requisition (WMR) 495714, 03/12/2020 Section 1A59 Drawing SV4-MS59-V2-001, "AP1000 Vendor Drawing Air Filter Unit Assembly Sheet 1 of 2," Revision 0

108

Drawing SV4-MS59-V2-002, "AP1000 Vendor Drawing Air Filter Unit Assembly Sheet 2 of 2," Revision 0 Report SV4-VES-ITR-800880, "Unit 4 ITAAC 2.2.05.07e Principle Closure Document VES-MS-05 Filter Shielding (12401-NS-01) Inspection Report," Revision 0 SV4-MS59-VQQ-001, "Quality Verification Document Package," Revision 2 Section 1A60 WNA-RL-06533-SV0, Configuration Management Release Report, Revision 0 GIC-AP1000-SSSE-19-014, Supplemental Release Information for Vogtle AP1000 PMS Software, Revision 0 B-GEN-ITPA-011, ITP Administrative and Test Procedure Development, Version 8.1 B-GEN-ITPCI-001, PMS Cabinets, Version 3.0 B-GEN-ITPCI-001-F004, Cabinet Energization Instructions for BCC PMS Cabinets, Version 1.0 B-GEN-ITPCI-001-003, PMS Cabinet Energization Test Procedure for MTC", Version 1.0 SV3-GW-GCW-300, Vogtle Unit 3 AP1000 PMS Initial Software Installation, Revision 0 2.5.02.11-U4-SumRep-Rev 0, PCD Summary Report ITAAC 2.5.02.11 (550) Protection and Safety Monitoring System Design Process Summary Report: Installation Phase, Revision 1 ND-EN-VNP-014, Vogtle 3&4 Instrumentation and Control Field Change Notice Implementation, Version 6.0 B-GEN-ITPCI-001, PMS Cabinets, Version 3.0 ND-EN-VNP-014, Vogtle 3&4 Instrumentation and Control Field Change Notice Implementation, Version 6.0 Section 1A61 WEC Structural Calculations APP-1278-CCC-001, Enhanced Shield Building Roof Design Conical Roof Equivalent Static Analysis, Revision 6 APP-1278-CCC-007, Shield Building Roof PCS Tank Walls and Roof Design, Revision 1 APP-1278-CCC-015, Shield Building, Conical Roof Detailed Reinforcement Design, Revision 2 APP-1278-S3C-001, Enhanced Shield Building Roof Design Compression Ring, Revision 1 APP-1278-S3C-015, Shield Building, Conical Roof, Built-up Plate Girder Calculation, Revision 0 Engineering and Design Coordination Reports (E&DCRs) SV0-1278-GEF-000014, SB Conical Roof Reinforcement Configuration Changes (EFIN34120), Revision 0 APP-1208-GEF-370, Shield Building Roof PCS Tank Walls and Roof Design, Revision 0 APP-1278-GEF-071, Shield Building, Conical Roof Structure, Girder Stiffeners Weld Access Holes, Revision 0 APP-1278-GEF-092, Shield Building PCS Tank Structure. APP-1278-CCC-007 model updates, Revision 0 APP-1278-GEF-093, Enhanced Shield Building Roof Update on Compression Ring Design, Revision 0 APP-1278-GEF-368, Enhanced Shield Building Roof Design Conical Roof Equivalent Static Analysis, Revision 0 APP-1278-GEF-381, Conical Roof Compression Ring Calculation, Interaction Equation Clarification, Revision 0 APP-1278-GEF-382, Conical Roof Compression Ring Calculation, Connection Design Clarification, Revision 0 APP-1278-GEF-395, Shield Building Roof and PCS Tank Construction Joint Analysis, Revision 0 APP-1278-GEF-850071, Conical Roof to Tension Ring Welded Connection Changes, Revision 0

109

APP-1278-GEF-850133, Shield Building Conical Roof Rebar Adjustments (II) ESR#50017956-, Revision 0 APP-1278-GEF-850134, Shield Building Conical Roof Rebar Adjustments (III) ESR#50017956-, Revision 0 Miscellaneous Affected Document List, APP-1278-S3C-015, Revision 0_ADL Westinghouse AP1000 Design Change Proposal, APP-GW-GEE-4952, Changes to Connection Reinforcement between PCCS Exterior Wall and Shield Building Conical Roof, Revision 0 Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Vogtle Electric Generating Plant Units 3 and 4, Revision to License Amendment and Exemption Request: Shield Building Roof Changes (LAR 16-031R1), June 16, 2017

Southern Nuclear Operating Company, ND-17-1051, Enclosure 8, Revision to Protected Information for Request for License Amendment Regarding Shield Building Roof Changes, (Withheld Information), (LAR 16-031R1)

Section 1A62 Design Specification APP-1208-Z0-001, Specification for the Fabrication and Field Erection of the SC Panels and the Conical Roof Steel Structure for the AP 1000 Shield Building, Revision 2 Module TR-05 Purchase Order SV4-1278-SC-TR05, AP1000 Tension Ring Structural Modules Group 43 HII Mechanical JP 8226-F, Date: 3-20-2019 SV4-1278-SC-TR05, Loose Parts Box Documentation Package for AP1000 Tension Ring Structural Modules Group 43 HII Mechanical JO 8226-F, Date: 3-20-2019 Drawings SV4-1278-SC-431, Shield Building Air Inlet Structure and Tension Ring Structure Steel Panels Tension Ring Panel Group 43, Revision 0 SV4-1278 -SC-432, Shield Building Air Inlet and Tension Ring Structure Steel Panels Tension Ring Panel Group 43, Revision 0 SV4-1278-SC-433, Shield Building Air Inlet and Tension Ring Structure Steel Panels Tension Ring Panel Group 43, Revision 0 SV4-1278-SC-435, Shield Building Air Inlet and Tension Ring Structure Steel Panels Tension Ring Panel Group 43, Revision 0 SV4-1278-SC-434, Shield Building Air Inlet and Tension Ring Structure Steel Panels Tension Ring Panel Group 43, Revision 0 SV4-1278-SC-904, Shield Building Air Inlet and Tension Ring Structure Steel Panels General Details, Revision 0 SV4-1278-SC-913, Shield Building Air Inlet and Tension Ring Structure Steel Panels Tension Ring Panel Group 43, Revision 0 SV4-1278-V0-850316, AP1000 Shield Building Tension Ring Structure Steel Panel Group 43 Assembly, Revision 3 SV4-1278-V0-850323, AP1000 Shield Building Tension Ring Structure Steel Panel Assembly, Revision 3 SV4-1278-V0-850324, AP1000 Shield Building Tension Ring Structure Steel Panel Group 43 Assembly, Revision 3 SV4-1278-V0-850325, AP1000 Shield Building Tension Ring Structure Steel Panel Group 43 Assembly, Revision 3

110

SV4-1278-V0-850326, AP1000 Shield Building Tension Ring Structure Steel Panel Group 43 Assembly, Revision 3 SV4-1278-V0-850319, AP1000 Shield Building Tension Ring Structure Steel Panel Group 43 Assembly, Revision 3 SV4-1278-V0-850330, AP1000 Shield Building Tension Ring Structure Steel Panel Group 43 Assembly, Revision 2 SV4-1278-V0-850362, AP1000 Shield Building Tension Ring Structure Steel Panel Group 43 Assembly, Revision 3 SV4-1278-V0-850334, AP1000 Shield Building Tension Ring Structure Steel Panel Group 43 Weld Joint Index Map, Revision 2 SV4-1278-V0-850335, AP1000 Shield Building Tension Ring Structure Steel Panel Group 43 Weld Joint Index Map, Revision 2 SV4-1278-V0-850336, AP1000 Shield Building Tension Ring Structure Steel Panel Group 43 Weld Joint Index Map, Revision 2 SV4-1278-V0-850338, AP1000 Shield Building Tension Ring Structure Steel Panel Group 43 Weld Joint Index Map, Revision 2 SV4-1278-V0-850339, AP1000 Shield Building Tension Ring Structure Steel Panel Group 43 Weld Joint Index Map, Revision 2 SV4-1278-V0-850317, AP1000 Shield Building Tension Ring Structure Steel Panel Group 43 Assembly, Revision 3 Module TR-09 Purchase Order 132176-D100.SB005, SV4-1278-SC-TR09, Tension Ring Structural Modules Group 41 HII Mechanical JO 8226-F, Date: 5-15-2019 SV4-1278-SC-TR09, Loose Parts Documentation Package for Tension Ring Structural Modules Group 41 HII Mechanical JO 8226-F, Date: 5-29-2019 Material Receiving Report 26139-SV4-MRI-19-05332-000, Shield Panel / 26139-MRR-19-05332 Fabrication Panel TR-09, Group 41, Date: 5-31-2019 Drawings SV4-1278-SC-411, Shield Building Air Inlet and Tension Ring Structure Steel Panels Group 41, Revision 0 SV4-1278-SC-412, Shield Building Air Inlet and Tension Ring Structure Steel Panels Group 41 Details 1, Revision 0 SV4-1278-SC-413, Shield Building Air Inlet and Tension Ring Structure Steel Panels Group 41 Details 2, Revision 0 SV4-1278-SC-414, Shield Building Air Inlet and Tension Ring Structure Steel Panels Group 41 Details 3, Revision 0 SV4-1278-SC-415, Shield Building Air Inlet and Tension Ring Structure Steel Panels Group 41 Details 4, Revision 0 SV4-1278-V0-850180, AP1000 Shield Building Tension Ring Structure Steel Panel Group 41 Assembly, Revision 6 SV4-1278-V0-850181, AP1000 Shield Building Tension Ring Structure Steel Panel Group 41 Assembly, Revision 7 SV4-1278-V0-850182, AP1000 Shield Building Tension Ring Structure Steel Panel Group 41 Assembly, Revision 7 SV4-1278-V0-850184, AP1000 Shield Building Tension Ring Structure Steel Panel Group 41 Assembly, Revision 7

111

SV4-1278-V0-850185, AP1000 Shield Building Tension Ring Structure Steel Panel Group 41 Assembly, Revision 7 SV4-1278-V0-850186, AP1000 Shield Building Tension Ring Structure Steel Panel Group 41 Assembly, Revision 7 SV4-1278-V0-850188, AP1000 Shield Building Tension Ring Structure Steel Panel Group 41 Assembly, Revision 7 SV4-1278-V0-850190, AP1000 Shield Building Tension Ring Structure Steel Panel Group 41 Assembly, Revision 7 SV4-1278-V0-850191, AP1000 Shield Building Tension Ring Structure Steel Panel Group 41 Assembly, Revision 7 SV4-1278-V0-850385, AP1000 Shield Building Tension Ring Structure Steel Panel Group 41 Assembly, Revision 7 SV4-1278-V0-850194, AP1000 Shield Building Tension Ring Structure Steel Panel Group 41 Weld Joint Assembly, Revision 5 SV4-1278-V0-850195, AP1000 Shield Building Tension Ring Structure Steel Panel Group 41 Weld Joint Index Map, Revision 5 SV4-1278-V0-850200, AP1000 Shield Building Tension Ring Structure Steel Panel Group 41 Weld Joint Assembly, Revision 5 Certified Material Test Reports (CMTRs) 17NNI1042, Deformed Wire Nelson D2S (D2L Mod.) and D2L, Date: 9-06-2017 17NNI1021, Lenton Couplers, Date: 9-20-2017 16NNI1010, ASTM A572-07 Grade 50 Plate, Date: 7-21-2017 Engineering & Design Coordination Reports (E&DCRs) APP-1278-GEF-056, AP1000 Shield Building AI/TR Bulkhead Adjustments, Revision 0 APP-1278-GEF-400, Shield Building Air-Inlet Structure and Tension Ring Drawings, Revision 0 APP-1278-GEF850000, 1278 Tension Ring Add. Bracing, Revision 0 APP-1278-GEF-850034, Lifting Lug Extension Inside Tension Ring, Revision 0 APP-1278-GEF-850095, TR Bulkhead Access Hole Request (Groups 41 &43), Revision 0 APP-1278-GEF-850097, TR Groups 41, 42 &43 Fab Structure Allowance (TRICA), Revision 0 APP-HA04-GEF-850013, SB; AI/TR Panel Bulkheads & Holes, Revision 0 Nonconformance & Disposition Reports (N&Ds) APP-1278-GNR-850202, HII Mechanical NCR 3824 A, SV4-1278-SC-TR05, TR9007 weld size unable to be met, Revision 0 APP-1278-GNR-850225, HII Mechanical NCR 3927 A, SV4-1278-SC-TR08, WPS 1050 used CJP joint of TR9001, Revision 0 APP-1278-GNR-850255, HII Mechanical NCR 4060 A, SV4-1278-SC-TR05 Maximum Interpass (100F), Revision 0 APP-1278-GNR-850274, HII Mechanical NCR 4069 A, SV4-1278-SC-TR09, Maximum Interpass (100F), Revision 0 Section 1A63 CB&I Traveler 231124-004-QA-TRV-AI051, U4-AI-19/20 Vert I/O, "Weld Air Inlet Panels together, Inside & Outside," 06/01/2009 CB&I Traveler 231124-004-QA-TRV-AI052, U4-AI-20/21 Vert I/O, "Weld Air Inlet Panels together, Inside & Outside," 06/01/2009 CB&I, 181816-000-WS-SP-45001, "General Welding Procedure Specification for AWS D1.1, AWS D1.4, AWS D1.6, and ASME Section IX Qualified WPS's," Revision 1 Section 1A64

112

181816-000-WS-SP-45001, "General Welding Procedure Specification for AWS D1.1, AWS D1.4, AWS D1.6, and ASME Section IX Qualified WPS's," Revision 1 Traveler 231122-004-QA-TRV-09036, U4-0910B/0910C Vert I/O, "Weld Vertical Seam I/O," Piece Mark 09/10B & C6-Panel Assy., 04/01/2019 231122-004-IN-RP-C0372, "Material Clean-Up Sketch - Nuclear" (vertical weld outside thickness check of temporary attachment removal areas), 02/17/2020 231122-004-IN-RP-C0373, "Material Clean-Up Sketch - Nuclear" (vertical weld inside thickness check of temporary attachment removal areas), 02/17/2020 231122-004-IN-RP-M0595, "Magnetic Particle Examination Report" (outside vertical weld temporary attachment removal areas), 02/17/2020 231122-004-IN-RP-M0601, "Magnetic Particle Examination Report" (inside vertical weld temporary attachment removal areas), 02/17/2020 231122-004-IN-RP-U0534, "AWS Report of Ultrasonic Testing of Welds" (outside vertical weld), 02/17/2020 231122-004-IN-RP-U0548, "AWS Report of Ultrasonic Testing of Welds" (inside vertical weld), 02/17/2020 Standard Test Number FCA-F6-2G-1/2 (ID of welder 63172102) Standard Test Number FCA-F6-3G-1 (ID of welders 63135669, 63185914, 63186772) Standard Test Number FCA-F6-3G4G-1 (ID of welder 63172102) Standard Test Number FCA-F6-2G3G4G-1/2 (ID of welder 63135669) Standard Test Number FCA-F6-2G3G4G-1 (ID of welders 63131793, 63185914, 63186772, 63188028, 63192652, 63192847) Standard Test Number FCA-Machine-3G-1 (ID of welders 63131793, 63135669, 63172102, 63188028) Standard Test Number SMA-F4-3G-1 (ID of welder 63135669) Standard Test Number SMA-F4-2G3G4G-1/2 (ID of welder 63135669) Standard Test Number SMA-F4-2G3G4G-1 (ID of welders 63131793, 63188028) Traveler 231122-004-QA-TRV-11018, U4-11F/11G Vert I/O, "Weld Vertical Seams for Panels U4 11F 11G I/O," 06/05/2018 231122-004-IN-RP-C0064, "Material Clean-Up Sketch - Nuclear" (vertical inside/outside thickness checks of temporary attachment removal areas), 06/18/2018 231122-004-IN-RP-M0092, "Magnetic Particle Examination Report" (inside/outside vertical weld temporary attachment and backing bar removal areas), 06/18/2018 231122-004-IN-RP-U0081, "AWS Report of Ultrasonic Testing of Welds" (inside vertical weld), 06/18/2018 231122-004-IN-RP-U0082, "AWS Report of Ultrasonic Testing of Welds" (outside vertical weld), 06/18/2018 Standard Test Number FCA-F6-2G3G4G-1/2 (ID of welder 63013293) Standard Test Number FCA-F6-2G3G4G-1 (ID of welders 63081812, 63089545) Standard Test Number FCA-Machine-3G-1/2 (ID of welder 63013293) Standard Test Number FCA-Machine-3G-1 (ID of welders 631081812, 63089545) Standard Test Number SMA-F4-2G3G4G-1/2 (ID of welders151773, 63081812) Spreadsheet for traveler U4-0809 Horiz I/O Set No. 231122-004-QA-TRV-08032, Set No. "U4-08M/09LM Horiz I/O," (6 pages), 02/22/2020 231122-004-IN-RP-C0374, "Material Clean-Up Sketch - Nuclear" (round seam outside thickness check of temporary attachment removal areas), 03/11/2020 231122-004-IN-RP-C0375, "Material Clean-Up Sketch - Nuclear" (round seam inside thickness check of temporary attachment removal areas), 03/11/2020 231122-004-IN-RP-M0602, "Magnetic Particle Examination Report" (inside round seam of temporary attachment removal areas), 03/11/2020 231122-004-IN-RP-M0603, "Magnetic Particle Examination Report" (outside round seam of temporary attachment removal areas), 03/11/2020

113

231122-004-IN-RP-U0543, "AWS Report of Ultrasonic Testing of Welds" (inside round seam at 53" CW from 08M/08L vert.), 03/09/2020 231122-004-IN-RP-U0544, "AWS Report of Ultrasonic Testing of Welds" (outside round seam at 53" CW from 0910A/D vert.), 03/06/2020 Standard Test Number SMA-F4-2G-1/2 (ID of welders 63171681, 63172102) Standard Test Number SMA-F4-3G4G-1 (ID of welders 63171681, 63172102) Standard Test Number SMA-F4-2G3G4G-1 (ID of welders 63024616, 63139404, 63142916, 63155564, 63184679, 631852912, 63186904, 63192652, 63192847, 63193980) Standard Test Number SAW-2G-1/2 (ID of welding operator 63073907) Standard Test Number SAW-2G-3/4 (ID of welding operators 63024690, 63089545, 63171680, 63171681, 63172488, 631852912) Spreadsheet for traveler U4-1112 Horiz I/O Set No. 231122-004-QA-TRV-11028, Set No. "U4-11A/12AB Horiz I/O," (8 pages), 06/27/2018 231122-004-IN-RP-C0114, "Material Clean-Up Sketch - Nuclear" (round seam outside thickness check of temporary attachment removal areas), 08/06/2018 231122-004-IN-RP-M0121, "Magnetic Particle Examination Report" (inside round seam of temporary attachment removal areas), 08/06/2018 231122-004-IN-RP-M0127, "Magnetic Particle Examination Report" (outside round seam of temporary attachment removal areas), 08/06/2018 231122-004-IN-RP-U0117, "AWS Report of Ultrasonic Testing of Welds" (outside round seam at 119" left of 12A/12B vert.), 08/06/2018 231122-004-IN-RP-U0118, "AWS Report of Ultrasonic Testing of Welds" (inside round seam at 40" right of 12A/12B vert.), 08/06/2018 Standard Test Number SMA-F4-2G-1/2 (ID of welders 63171683, 63172488, 63182443) Standard Test Number SMA-F4-3GD-1/2 (ID of welder 1988161) Standard Test Number SMA-F4-3G-1 (ID of welder 1988161) Standard Test Number SMA-F4-3G4G-1 (ID of welders 63171683, 63172488, 63182443) Standard Test Number SMA-F4-2G3G4G-1/2 (ID of welders 151773, 1988161, 63013293, 63081812, 63129813) Standard Test Number SMA-F4-2G3G4G-1 (ID of welders 63019625, 63078214, 63083839, 63089545, 63089757) Standard Test Number SAW-2G-3/4 (ID of welding operators 63013293, 63023529, 63081812, 63129813, 63170736) [2504 Documents] Section 1P01 APP-GW-GAP-420, "Engineering and Design Coordination Reports," Revision 19 APP-GW-GAP-428, "Nonconformance and Disposition Report," Revision 17 ND-AD-002, "Nuclear Development Program Corrective Action Program," Revision 30.0 ND-AD-002-025, "Issue Identification, Screening, and Dispatching," Revision 2.0 ND-AD-002-026, "Corrective Action Program Processing," Revision 2.0 ND-AD-002-027, "Nonconforming Items," Revision 6.0 Section 1P02 Condition Reports 50030035, Nonconformace Installation of Precast Panels, Unit 4 North Auxiliary Building between Wall P, Wall Q and Room-12406 at elevation 117'-6", 9/25/19 50033144, NI4 - Containment - C16 Base-plate, 10/31/19 50034086, SPL 18 Columns, 11/12/19 50034086, SPL 18 Columns, 11/12/19 50034643, Storage of Safety Related Structural Bolts, 11/18/19

114

50037935, SV4- RM 12405 and 12406 Post Concrete Slab Loading, 1/6/20 50041539, Unit 4 AUX WP 139A Q-Line Elevation 135'-3" to 156'-0" Embed Additional Reinforcement, 2/11/20 Engineering and Design Coordination Reports SV4-SS01-GEF-000035, "U4 Containment - SPL18/51 Column Installation - C16 base plate interference (ESR 50020254)," Revision 0 Nonconformance and Disposition Reports SV4-1140-GNR-000005, "U4 Containment - SPL18/51 Column Structual Connections (ESR 50034270)," Revision 0 SV4-CC01-GNR-000349, "Unit 4 Auxiliary Building - Rooms 12405 & 12406 Premature Loading (ESR 50037938)," Revision 0 SV4-CE01-GNR-000204, "U4 AUX WP 139A Q-Line Elevation 135'-3" to 156'-0" Embed Additional Reinforcement (ESR 50041785)," Revision 0 SV4-SS01-GNR-000152, "Shoring at room 12306 (ESR 50007794)," Revision 0 SV4-SS01-GNR-000190, "NI4 - SPL18 Sequence 1 Steel Platform Installation, EL 118'-6" - COL C08 Plumbness (ESR 50025270)," Revision 0 SV4-SS01-GNR-000197, "U4 Containment - SPL51 - Columns C13 thru C18 OOT for Plumbness (ESR 50026897)," Revision 0 SV4-SS01-GNR-000209, "Unit # 4 Aux Installation of Precast Panels, between Wall P & Wall Q (ESR 50030049)," Revision 0 SV4-SS01-GNR-000220, "NI4 - Containment - C16 Base-plate trimmed incorrectly (ESR 50033169)," Revision 0 Procedures APP-GW-GAP-420, "Engineering and Design Coordination Reports," Revision 19 APP-GW-GAP-428, "Nonconformance and Disposition Report," Revision 17 ND-AD-002, "Nuclear Development Program Corrective Action Program," Revision 30.0 ND-AD-002-025, "Issue Identification, Screening, and Dispatching," Revision 2.0 ND-AD-002-026, "Corrective Action Program Processing," Revision 2.0 ND-AD-002-027, "Nonconforming Items," Revision 6.0 Section 1P03 SV3-IDSD-GNR-000015, "Swap BK-1 and BK-4 conductors for Cable SV3-IDSD-EW-EA2BXD," Revision 0 Section 1P04 CR 50039089, NRC - Identified inadequate resolution of DR 50004237 for Hilt Anchorage Thread Engagement CR 50004237, Hilti TZ Post-Installed Anchor Nut Thread Engagement TE 50006637, Hilti TZ Post-Installed Anchor Nut Thread Engagement SV3-SS01-Z0-011, Post-Installed Anchors for Seismic Category I Buildings and Structures "Nuclear Safety Related," Revision01 Section 4OA5 EGS-TR-HC1741-01, Test Report for LOCA/DBA Environmental Qualification Test of Firewall III Insulated Wire/Cable Manufactured by RSCC Wire and Cable, LLC, Revision A 2014-004, Quality Assurance Corrective Action Report, dated: 07/23/2014. 2014-092, Notice of Anomaly, dated: 08/20/2014.

116

LIST OF ACRONYMS ACI American Concrete Institute ADS Automatic Depressurization System AFT As-found Tolerance AISC American Institute of Steel Construction ALT As-left Tolerance ANI Authorized Nuclear Inspector AOV Air-Operated Valve ASL Approved Suppliers List ASME American Society of Mechanical Engineers ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials AWS American Welding Society BPV Boiler and Pressure Vessel CAQ Condition Adverse to Quality CAR Corrective Action Record CB&I Chicago Bridge and Iron CFR Code of Federal Regulations CMT Core Makeup Tank CMTR Certified Material Test Report COL Combined License CR Condition Report DBE Design Basis Earthquake DCD Design Control Document DCP Design Change Proposal DR Deficiency Report DVI Direct Vessel Injection E&DCR Engineering & Design Coordination Report ECP Employee Concerns Program ECS Main AC Power System EDM Electrical Discharge Machine EPA Electrical Penetration Assemblies ESF Engineered Safety Feature ESFAS Engineered Safeguards Features Actuation System FAT Factory Acceptance Testing FLA Full Load Amperes FSAR Final Safety Analysis Report GTAW Gas Tungsten Arc Welding IDS Class 1E DC and UPS System IEEE Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers IMC Inspection Manual Chapter IR Inspection Report IRWST In-containment Refueling Water Storage Tank ISI Inservice Inspection ITAAC Inspections, Tests, Analysis, and Inspection Criteria ITP Initial Test Program LCS Local Control Stations LIV Licensee-Identified Violation LRA Locked Rotor Amperes MCC Motor Control Centers

117

MCR Main Control Room MOV Motor-Operated Valves N&D Nonconformance and Disposition Reports NCR Nonconformances NCV Non-Cited Violation NDE Nondestructive Examination NEC National Electrical Code NFPA National Fire Protection Association NON Notice of Nonconformance NQA Nuclear Quality Assurance NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission PARS Publicly Available Records PCD Principal Closure Document PCI PCI Energy Services PCI Product Identify Certification PCS Passive Containment Cooling System PJP Partial Joint Penetration PLS Plant Control System PMS Protection and Safety Monitoring System PNQCM Project Nuclear Quality Control Manual POV Power-Operated Valves PRS Plant Reference Simulator PT Liquid Penetrant Examination PXS Passive Core Cooling System QA Quality Assurance QAPD Quality Assurance Data Packages QC Quality Control QME Qualification of Active Mechanical Equipment RC Reinforced Concrete RCP Reactor Coolant Pump RCS Reactor Coolant System RG Regulatory Guide RIR Receipt Inspection Report RMS Root Mean Square RNS Normal Residual Heat Removal System RPV Reactor Pressure Vessel RT Reactor Trip RTNSS Regulatory Treatment of Non-Safety Systems RTS Reactor Trip System S&W Stone & Webster SC Steel Composite SCAQ Significant Condition Adverse to Quality SCWE Safety Conscious Work Environment SFS Spent Fuel Pool SL Service Level SMAW Shielded Metal Arc Welding SOV Solenoid-Operated Valve SRV Safety-Relief Valve SSC Structures, Systems, and Components SSE Safe Shutdown Earthquake

118

TE Technical Evaluations TNA Training Needs Analysis TSC Technical Support Center UFSAR Updated Final Safety Analysis Report UT Ultrasonic Examination VEGP Vogtle Electric Generating Plant VT Visual Examination WDS Weld Data Sheet WEA Work Environment Assessments WEC Westinghouse Electric Company WMR Welding Material Requisitions WPS Welding Procedure Specification

119

ITAAC INSPECTED

120

No. ITAAC No. Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analysis

Acceptance Criteria

121

13 2.1.02.02a 2.a) The components identified in Table 2.1.2-1 as ASME Code Section III are designed and constructed in accordance with ASME Code Section III requirements. 2.b) The piping identified in Table 2.1.2-2 as ASME Code Section III is designed and constructed in accordance with ASME Code Section III requirements. 3.a) Pressure boundary welds in components identified in Table 2.1.2‑1 as ASME Code Section III meet ASME Code Section III requirements. 3.b) Pressure boundary welds in piping identified in Table 2.1.2-2 as ASME Code Section III meet ASME Code Section III requirements. 4.a) The components identified in Table 2.1.2-1 as ASME Code Section III retain their pressure boundary integrity at their design pressure. 4.b) The piping identified in Table 2.1.2-2 as ASME Code Section III retains its pressure boundary integrity at its design pressure. 5.b) Each of the lines identified in Table 2.1.2-2 for which functional capability is required is designed to withstand

Inspection will be conducted of the as-built components and piping as documented in the ASME design reports. Inspection of the as-built pressure boundary welds will be performed in accordance with the ASME Code Section III. A hydrostatic test will be performed on the components and piping required by the ASME Code Section III to be hydrostatically tested. Inspection will be performed for the existence of a report verifying that the as-built piping meets the requirements for functional capability. Inspection will be performed for the existence of an LBB evaluation report or an evaluation report on the protection from dynamic effects of a pipe break. Section 3.3, Nuclear Island Buildings, contains the design descriptions and inspections, tests, analyses, and acceptance criteria for protection from the dynamic effects of pipe rupture.

The ASME Code Section III design reports exist for the as-built components and piping identified in Tables 2.1.2‑1 and 2.1.2‑2 as ASME Code Section III. A report exists and concludes that the ASME Code Section III requirements are met for non-destructive examination of pressure boundary welds. A report exists and concludes that the results of the hydrostatic test of the components and piping identified in Table 2.1.2‑1 and Table 2.1.2‑2 as ASME Code Section III conform with the requirements of the ASME Code Section III. A report exists and concludes that each of the as-built lines identified in Table 2.1.2-2 for which functional capability is required meets the requirements for functional capability. An LBB evaluation report exists and concludes that the LBB acceptance criteria are met by the as-built RCS piping and piping materials, or a pipe break evaluation report exists and concludes that protection from the dynamic effects of a

122


Acceptance Criteria

combined normal and seismic design basis loads without a loss of its functional capability. 6. Each of the as-built lines identified in Table 2.1.2-2 as designed for LBB meets the LBB criteria, or an evaluation is performed of the protection from the dynamic effects of a rupture of the line.

line break is provided.

123

19 2.1.02.05a.i 5.a) The seismic Category I equipment identified in Table 2.1.2‑1 can withstand seismic design basis loads without loss of safety function. 7.a) The Class 1E equipment identified in Table 2.1.2-1 as being qualified for a harsh environment can withstand the environmental conditions that would exist before, during, and following a design basis accident without loss of safety function for the time required to perform the safety function.

i) Inspection will be performed to verify that the seismic Category I equipment and valves identified in Table 2.1.2-1 are located on the Nuclear Island. ii) Type tests, analyses, or a combination of type tests and analyses of seismic Category I equipment will be performed. iii) Inspection will be performed for the existence of a report verifying that the as-built equipment including anchorage is seismically bounded by the tested or analyzed conditions. i) Type tests, analyses, or a combination of type tests and analyses will be performed on Class 1E equipment located in a harsh environment. ii) Inspection will be performed of the as-built Class 1E equipment and the associated wiring, cables, and terminations located in a harsh environment.

i) The seismic Category I equipment identified in Table 2.1.2‑1 is located on the Nuclear Island. ii) A report exists and concludes that the seismic Category I equipment can withstand seismic design basis loads without loss of safety function. iii) A report exists and concludes that the as-built equipment including anchorage is seismically bounded by the tested or analyzed conditions. i) A report exists and concludes that the Class 1E equipment identified in Table 2.1.2-1 as being qualified for a harsh environment can withstand the environmental conditions that would exist before, during, and following a design basis accident without loss of safety function for the time required to perform the safety function. ii) A report exists and concludes that the as-built Class 1E equipment and the associated wiring, cables, and terminations identified in Table 2.1.2‑1 as being qualified for a harsh environment are bounded by type tests, analyses, or a combination of type tests and analyses.

124


Acceptance Criteria

24 2.1.02.07a.i Not used per Amendment No. 85 7.a) The Class 1E equipment identified in Table 2.1.2-1 as being qualified for a harsh environment can withstand the environmental conditions that would exist before, during, and following a design basis accident without loss of safety function for the time required to perform the safety function.

Not used per Amendment No. 85 i) Type tests, analyses, or a combination of type tests and analyses will be performed on Class 1E equipment located in a harsh environment.

Not used per Amendment No. 85 i) A report exists and concludes that the Class 1E equipment identified in Table 2.1.2-1 as being qualified for a harsh environment can withstand the environmental conditions that would exist before, during, and following a design basis accident without loss of safety function for the time required to perform the safety function.

33 2.1.02.08d.ii 8.d) The RCS provides automatic depressurization during design basis events.

ii) Inspections and associated analysis of each fourth-stage ADS sub-loop (four valves and associated piping connected to each hot leg) will be conducted to verify the line routing is consistent with the line routing used for design flow resistance calculations.

ii) The calculated flow resistance for each fourth-stage ADS sub-loop valves and piping is: Loop 1: Sub-loop A: < 5.91x10-7 ft/gpm2 Sub-loop C: < 6.21x10-7 ft/gpm2 Loop 2: Sub-loop B: < 4.65x10-7 ft/gpm2 Sub-loop D: < 6.20x10-7 ft/gpm2

125


Acceptance Criteria

36 2.1.02.08d.v 8.d) The RCS provides automatic depressurization during design basis events.

v) Inspections of the elevation of the ADS stage 4 valve discharge will be conducted. vi) Inspections of the ADS stage 4 valve discharge will be conducted. viii) Inspection of the elevation of each ADS sparger will be conducted.

v) The minimum elevation of the bottom inside surface of the outlet of these valves is greater than plant elevation 110 feet. vi) The discharge of the ADS stage 4 valves is directed into the steam generator compartments. viii) The centerline of the connection of the sparger arms to the sparger hub is < 11.5 feet below the IRWST overflow level.

126

75 2.1.03.06.i 6. The seismic Category I equipment identified in Table 2.1.3‑1 can withstand seismic design basis loads without loss of safety function. 9.a) The Class 1E equipment identified in Table 2.1.3-1 as being qualified for a harsh environment can withstand the environmental conditions that would exist before, during, and following a design basis accident without loss of safety function for the time required to perform the safety function.

i) Inspection will be performed to verify that the seismic Category I equipment identified in Table 2.1.3‑1 is located on the Nuclear Island. ii) Type tests, analyses, or a combination of type tests and analyses of seismic Category I equipment will be performed. iii) Inspection will be performed for the existence of a report verifying that the as-built equipment including anchorage is seismically bounded by the tested or analyzed conditions. i) Type tests, analysis, or a combination of type tests and analysis will be performed on Class 1E equipment located in a harsh environment. ii) Inspection will be performed of the as-built Class 1E equipment and the associated wiring, cables, and terminations located in a harsh environment.

i) The seismic Category I equipment identified in Table 2.1.3‑1 is located on the Nuclear Island. ii) A report exists and concludes that the seismic Category I equipment can withstand seismic design basis loads without loss of safety function. iii) A report exists and concludes that the as-built equipment including anchorage is seismically bounded by the tested or analyzed conditions. i) A report exists and concludes that the Class 1E equipment identified in Table 2.1.3-1 as being qualified for a harsh environment can withstand the environmental conditions that would exist before, during, and following a design basis accident without loss of safety function for the time required to perform the safety function. ii) A report exists and concludes that the as-built Class 1E equipment and the associated wiring, cables, and terminations identified in Table 2.1.3-1 as being qualified for a harsh environment are bounded by type tests, analyses, or a combination of type tests and analyses.

127


Acceptance Criteria

91 2.2.01.02a 2.a) The components identified in Table 2.2.1-1 as ASME Code Section III are designed and constructed in accordance with ASME Code Section III requirements. 2.b) The piping identified in Table 2.2.1-2 as ASME Code Section III is designed and constructed in accordance with ASME Code Section III requirements. 3.a) Pressure boundary welds in components identified in Table 2.2.1-1 as ASME Code Section III meet ASME Code Section III requirements. 3.b) Pressure boundary welds in piping identified in Table 2.2.1-2 as ASME Code Section III meet ASME Code Section III requirements. 4.a) The components identified in Table 2.2.1-1 as ASME Code Section III retain their pressure boundary integrity at their design pressure. 4.b) The piping identified in Table 2.2.1-2 as ASME Code Section III retains its pressure boundary integrity at its design pressure.

Inspection will be conducted of the as-built components and piping as documented in the ASME design reports. Inspection of the as-built pressure boundary welds will be performed in accordance with the ASME Code Section III. i) A hydrostatic or pressure test will be performed on the components required by the ASME Code Section III to be tested. A hydrostatic or pressure test will be performed on the piping required by the ASME Code Section III to be pressure tested.

The ASME Code Section III design reports exist for the as-built components and piping identified in Table 2.2.1-1 and 2.2.1-2 as ASME Code Section III. A report exists and concludes that the ASME Code Section III requirements are met for non‑destructive examination of pressure boundary welds. i) A report exists and concludes that the results of the pressure test of the components identified in Table 2.2.1-1 as ASME Code Section III conform with the requirements of the ASME Code Section III. A report exists and concludes that the results of the pressure test of the piping identified in Table 2.2.1-2 as ASME Code Section III conform with the requirements of the ASME Code Section III.

128

98 2.2.01.05.i 5. The seismic Category I equipment identified in Table 2.2.1‑1 can withstand seismic design basis loads without loss of structural integrity and safety function. 6.a) The Class 1E equipment identified in Table 2.2.1-1 as being qualified for a harsh environment can withstand the environmental conditions that would exist before, during, and following a design basis accident without loss of safety function for the time required to perform the safety function. 6.d) The non-Class 1E electrical penetrations identified in Table 2.2.1-1 as being qualified for a harsh environment can withstand the environmental conditions that would exist before, during, and following a design basis accident without loss of containment pressure boundary integrity.

i) Inspection will be performed to verify that the seismic Category I equipment and valves identified in Table 2.2.1-1 are located on the Nuclear Island. ii) Type tests, analyses, or a combination of type tests and analyses of seismic Category I equipment will be performed. iii) Inspection will be performed for the existence of a report verifying that the as-built equipment including anchorage is seismically bounded by the tested or analyzed conditions. i) Type tests, analyses, or a combination of type tests and analyses will be performed on Class 1E equipment located in a harsh environment. ii) Inspection will be performed of the as-built Class 1E equipment and the associated wiring, cables, and terminations located in a harsh environment. i) Type tests, analyses, or a combination of type tests and analyses will be performed on non‑Class 1E electrical penetrations located in a harsh environment. ii) Inspection will be performed of the as-

i) The seismic Category I equipment identified in Table 2.2.1‑1 is located on the Nuclear Island. ii) A report exists and concludes that the seismic Category I equipment can withstand seismic design basis dynamic loads without loss of structural integrity and safety function. iii) The as-built equipment including anchorage is seismically bounded by the tested or analyzed conditions. i) A report exists and concludes that the Class 1E equipment identified in Table 2.2.1-1 as being qualified for a harsh environment can withstand the environmental conditions that would exist before, during, and following a design basis accident without loss of safety function for the time required to perform the safety function. ii) A report exists and concludes that the as-built Class 1E equipment and the associated wiring, cables, and terminations identified in Table 2.2.1-1 as being qualified for a harsh environment are bounded by type tests, analyses, or a combination of type tests and analyses.

129


Acceptance Criteria

built non-Class 1E electrical penetrations located in a harsh environment.

i) A report exists and concludes that the non-Class 1E electrical penetrations identified in Table 2.2.1‑1 as being qualified for a harsh environment can withstand the environmental conditions that would exist before, during, and following a design basis accident without loss of containment pressure boundary integrity. ii) A report exists and concludes that the as-built non-Class 1E electrical penetrations identified in Table 2.2.1-1 as being qualified for a harsh environment are bounded by type tests, analyses, or a combination of type tests and analyses.

130


Acceptance Criteria

109 2.2.01.08 8. Containment electrical penetration assemblies are protected against currents that are greater than the continuous ratings.

An analysis for the as-built containment electrical penetration assemblies will be performed to demonstrate (1) that the maximum current of the circuits does not exceed the continuous rating of the containment electrical penetration assembly, or (2) that the circuits have redundant protection devices in series and that the redundant current protection devices are coordinated with the containment electrical penetration assembly’s rated short circuit thermal capacity data and prevent current from exceeding the continuous current rating of the containment electrical penetration assembly.

Analysis exists for the as-built containment electrical penetration assemblies and concludes that the penetrations are protected against currents which are greater than their continuous ratings.

131

159 2.2.03.02a 2.a) The components identified in Table 2.2.3-1 as ASME Code Section III are designed and constructed in accordance with ASME Code Section III requirements. 2.b) The piping identified in Table 2.2.3-2 as ASME Code Section III is designed and constructed in accordance with ASME Code Section III requirements. 3.a) Pressure boundary welds in components identified in Table 2.2.3-1 as ASME Code Section III meet ASME Code Section III requirements. 3.b) Pressure boundary welds in piping identified in Table 2.2.3-2 as ASME Code Section III meet ASME Code Section III requirements. 4.a) The components identified in Table 2.2.3-1 as ASME Code Section III retain their pressure boundary integrity at their design pressure. 4.b) The piping identified in Table 2.2.3-2 as ASME Code Section III retains its pressure boundary integrity at its design pressure. 5.b) Each of the lines identified in Table 2.2.3-2 for which functional capability is required is designed to withstand

Inspection will be conducted of the as-built components and piping as documented in the ASME design reports. Inspection of the as-built pressure boundary welds will be performed in accordance with the ASME Code Section III. A hydrostatic test will be performed on the components and piping required by the ASME Code Section III to be hydrostatically tested. Inspection will be performed for the existence of a report verifying that the as-built piping meets the requirements for functional capability. Inspection will be performed for the existence of an LBB evaluation report or an evaluation report on the protection from dynamic effects of a pipe break. Section 3.3, Nuclear Island Buildings, contains the design descriptions and inspections, tests, analyses, and acceptance criteria for protection from the dynamic effects of pipe rupture.

The ASME Code Section III design reports exist for the as‑built components and piping identified in Table 2.2.3‑1 and 2.2.3-2 as ASME Code Section III. A report exists and concludes that the ASME Code Section III requirements are met for non-destructive examination of pressure boundary welds. A report exists and concludes that the results of the hydrostatic test of the components and piping identified in Table 2.2.3‑1 and 2.2.3-2 as ASME Code Section III conform with the requirements of the ASME Code Section III. A report exists and concludes that each of the as-built lines identified in Table 2.2.3-2 for which functional capability is required meets the requirements for functional capability. An LBB evaluation report exists and concludes that the LBB acceptance criteria are met by the as-built RCS piping and piping materials, or a pipe break evaluation report exists and concludes that protection from the dynamic effects of a

132


Acceptance Criteria



133

165 2.2.03.05a.i 5.a) The seismic Category I equipment identified in Table 2.2.3‑1 can withstand seismic design basis loads without loss of safety function. 7.a) The Class 1E equipment identified in Table 2.2.3-1 as being qualified for a harsh environment can withstand the environmental conditions that would exist before, during, and following a design basis accident without loss of safety function for the time required to perform the safety function.

i) Inspection will be performed to verify that the seismic Category I equipment and valves identified in Table 2.2.3-1 are located on the Nuclear Island. ii) Type tests, analyses, or a combination of type tests and analyses of seismic Category I equipment will be performed. iii) Inspection will be performed for the existence of a report verifying that the as-built equipment including anchorage is seismically bounded by the tested or analyzed conditions. i) Type tests, analyses, or a combination of type tests and analyses will be performed on Class 1E equipment located in a harsh environment. ii) Inspection will be performed of the as-built Class 1E equipment and the associated wiring, cables, and terminations located in a harsh environment.

i) The seismic Category I equipment identified in Table 2.2.3-1 is located on the Nuclear Island. ii) A report exists and concludes that the seismic Category I equipment can withstand seismic design basis dynamic loads without loss of safety function. For the PXS containment recirculation and IRWST screens, a report exists and concludes that the screens can withstand seismic dynamic loads and also post-accident operating loads, including head loss and debris weights. iii) A report exists and concludes that the as-built equipment including anchorage is seismically bounded by the tested or analyzed conditions. For the PXS containment recirculation and IRWST screens, a report exists and concludes that the as-built screens including their anchorage are bounded by the seismic loads and also post-accident operating loads, including head loss and debris weights. i) A report exists and concludes that the Class 1E equipment identified in Table

134


Acceptance Criteria

2.2.3-1 as being qualified for a harsh environment can withstand the environmental conditions that would exist before, during, and following a design basis accident without loss of safety function for the time required to perform the safety function. ii) A report exists and concludes that the as-built Class 1E equipment and the associated wiring, cables, and terminations identified in Table 2.2.3‑1 as being qualified for a harsh environment are bounded by type tests, analyses, or a combination of type tests and analyses.

183 2.2.03.08c.iv.01 8.c) The PXS provides RCS makeup, boration, and safety injection during design basis events.

iv) Inspections of the elevation of the following pipe lines will be conducted: 1. IRWST injection lines; IRWST connection to DVI nozzles v) Inspections of the elevation of the following tanks will be conducted: 2. IRWST

iv) The maximum elevation of the top inside surface of these lines is less than the elevation of: 1. IRWST bottom inside surface v) The elevation of the bottom inside tank surface is higher than the direct vessel injection nozzle centerline by the following: 2. IRWST ≥ 3.4 ft

135

220 2.2.04.02a 2.a) The components identified in Table 2.2.4-1 as ASME Code Section III are designed and constructed in accordance with ASME Code Section III requirements. 2.b) The piping identified in Table 2.2.4-2 as ASME Code Section III is designed and constructed in accordance with ASME Code Section III requirements. 3.a) Pressure boundary welds in components identified in Table 2.2.4-1 as ASME Code Section III meet ASME Code Section III requirements. 3.b) Pressure boundary welds in piping identified in Table 2.2.4‑2 as ASME Code Section III meet ASME Code Section III requirements. 4.a) The components identified in Table 2.2.4-1 as ASME Code Section III retain their pressure boundary integrity at their design pressure. 4.b) The piping identified in Table 2.2.4-2 as ASME Code Section III retains its pressure boundary integrity at its design pressure. 5.b) Each of the lines identified in Table 2.2.4-2 for which functional capability is required is designed to withstand

Inspection will be conducted of the as-built components and piping as documented in the ASME design reports. Inspection of the as-built pressure boundary welds will be performed in accordance with the ASME Code Section III. A hydrostatic test will be performed on the components and piping required by the ASME Code Section III to be hydrostatically tested. Inspection will be performed for the existence of a report concluding that the as-built piping meets the requirements for functional capability. Inspection will be performed for the existence of an LBB evaluation report or an evaluation report on the protection from effects of a pipe break. Section 3.3, Nuclear Island Buildings, contains the design descriptions and inspections, tests, analyses, and acceptance criteria for protection from the dynamic effects of pipe rupture.

The ASME Code Section III design reports exist for the as‑built components and piping identified in Tables 2.2.4-1 and 2.2.4-2 as ASME Code Section III. A report exists and concludes that the ASME Code Section III requirements are met for non-destructive examination of pressure boundary welds. A report exists and concludes that the results of the hydrostatic test of the components and piping identified in Tables 2.2.4-1 and 2.2.4-2 as ASME Code Section III conform with the requirements of the ASME Code Section III. A report exists and concludes that each of the as-built lines identified in Table 2.2.4-2 for which functional capability is required meets the requirements for functional capability. An LBB evaluation report exists and concludes that the LBB acceptance criteria are met by the as-built RCS piping and piping materials, or a pipe break evaluation report exists and concludes that protection from the dynamic effects of a

136


Acceptance Criteria



137

522 2.5.02.02.i 2. The seismic Category I equipment, identified in Table 2.5.2-1, can withstand seismic design basis loads without loss of safety function. 3. The Class 1E equipment, identified in Table 2.5.2-1, has electrical surge withstand capability (SWC), and can withstand the electromagnetic interference (EMI), radio frequency interference (RFI), and electrostatic discharge (ESD) conditions that would exist before, during, and following a design basis accident without loss of safety function for the time required to perform the safety function. 4. The Class 1E equipment, identified in Table 2.5.2-1, can withstand the room ambient temperature, humidity, pressure, and mechanical vibration conditions that would exist before, during, and following a design basis accident without loss of safety function for the time required to perform the safety function.

i) Inspection will be performed to verify that the seismic Category I equipment identified in Table 2.5.2‑1 is located on the Nuclear Island. ii) Type tests, analyses, or a combination of type tests and analyses of seismic Category I equipment will be performed. iii) Inspection will be performed for the existence of a report verifying that the as-built equipment including anchorage is seismically bounded by the tested or analyzed conditions. Type tests, analyses, or a combination of type tests and analyses will be performed on the equipment. Type tests, analyses, or a combination of type tests and analyses will be performed on the Class 1E equipment identified in Table 2.5.2-1.

i) The seismic Category I equipment identified in Table 2.5.2‑1 is located on the Nuclear Island. ii) A report exists and concludes that the seismic Category I equipment can withstand seismic design basis loads without loss of safety function. iii) A report exists and concludes that the as-built equipment including anchorage is seismically bounded by the tested or analyzed conditions. A report exists and concludes that the Class 1E equipment identified in Table 2.5.2‑1 can withstand the SWC, EMI, RFI, and ESD conditions that would exist before, during, and following a design basis accident without loss of safety function for the time required to perform the safety function. A report exists and concludes that the Class 1E equipment identified in Table 2.5.2-1 can withstand the room ambient temperature, humidity, pressure, and mechanical vibration conditions that would exist before, during, and following a design basis accident without loss of safety function for the time

138


Acceptance Criteria

required to perform the safety function.

550 2.5.02.11 11. The PMS hardware and software is developed using a planned design process which provides for specific design documentation and reviews during the following life cycle stages: a) Not used b) System definition phase c) Hardware and software development phase, consisting of hardware and software design and implementation d) System integration and test phase e) Installation phase

Inspection will be performed of the process used to design the hardware and software.

A report exists and concludes that the process defines the organizational responsibilities, activities, and configuration management controls for the following: a) Not used. b) Specification of functional requirements. c) Documentation and review of hardware and software. d) Performance of system tests and the documentation of system test results, including a response time test performed under maximum CPU loading to demonstrate that the PMS can fulfill its response time criteria. e) Performance of installation tests and inspections.

139

551 2.5.02.12 12. The PMS software is designed, tested, installed, and maintained using a process which incorporates a graded approach according to the relative importance of the software to safety and specifies requirements for: a) Software management including documentation requirements, standards, review requirements, and procedures for problem reporting and corrective action. b) Software configuration management including historical records of software and control of software changes. c) Verification and validation including requirements for reviewer independence.

Inspection will be performed of the process used to design, test, install, and maintain the PMS software.

A report exists and concludes that the process establishes a method for classifying the PMS software elements according to their relative importance to safety and specifies requirements for software assigned to each safety classification. The report also concludes that requirements are provided for the following software development functions: a) Software management including documentation requirements, standards, review requirements, and procedures for problem reporting and corrective action. Software management requirements may be documented in the software quality assurance plan, software management plan, software development plan, software safety plan, and software operation and maintenance plan; or these requirements may be combined into a single software management plan. b) Software configuration management including historical records of software

140


Acceptance Criteria

and control of software changes. Software configuration management requirements are provided in the software configuration management plan. c) Verification and validation including requirements for reviewer independence. Verification and validation requirements are provided in the verification and validation plan.

597 2.6.03.02.i 2. The seismic Category I equipment identified in Table 2.6.3‑1 can withstand seismic design basis loads without loss of safety function.

i) Inspection will be performed to verify that the seismic Category I equipment identified in Table 2.6.3‑1 is located on the Nuclear Island. ii) Type tests, analyses, or a combination of type tests and analyses of seismic Category I equipment will be performed. iii) Inspection will be performed for the existence of a report verifying that the as-built equipment including anchorage is seismically bounded by the tested or analyzed conditions.

i) The seismic Category I equipment identified in Table 2.6.3‑1 is located on the Nuclear Island. ii) A report exists and concludes that the seismic Category I equipment can withstand seismic design basis loads without loss of safety function. iii) A report exists and concludes that the as-built equipment including anchorage is seismically bounded by the tested or analyzed conditions.

141


Acceptance Criteria

760 3.3.00.02a.i.a 2.a) The nuclear island structures, including the critical sections listed in Table 3.3-7, are seismic Category I and are designed and constructed to withstand design basis loads as specified in the Design Description, without loss of structural integrity and the safety-related functions. 3.) Walls and floors of the nuclear island structures as defined on Table 3.3-1 except for designed openings or penetrations, provide shielding during normal operations.

i) An inspection of the nuclear island structures will be performed. Deviations from the design due to as-built conditions will be analyzed for the design basis loads, and for radiation shielding.

i.a) A report exists which reconciles deviations during construction, including Table 3.3-1 wall and floor thicknesses, and concludes that the as-built containment internal structures, including the critical sections, conform to the approved design and will withstand the design basis loads specified in the Design Description without loss of structural integrity or the safety-related functions, and without impacting compliance with the radiation protection licensing basis.

761 3.3.00.02a.i.b 2.a) The nuclear island structures, including the critical sections listed in Table 3.3-7, are seismic Category I and are designed and constructed to withstand design basis loads as specified in the Design Description, without loss of structural integrity and the safety-related functions. 3.) Walls and floors of the nuclear island structures as defined on Table 3.3-1 except for designed openings or penetrations, provide shielding during normal operations.

i) An inspection of the nuclear island structures will be performed. Deviations from the design due to as-built conditions will be analyzed for the design basis loads, and for radiation shielding.

i.b) A report exists which reconciles deviations during construction, including Table 3.3-1 wall and floor thicknesses, and concludes that the as-built shield building structures, including the critical sections, conform to the approved design and will withstand the design basis loads specified in the Design Description without loss of structural integrity or the safety-related functions, and without impacting compliance with the radiation protection licensing basis.

142


Acceptance Criteria

789 3.3.00.07aa 7.a) Class 1E electrical cables, communication cables associated with only one division, and raceways that route the Class 1E electrical cables and the communication cables are identified according to applicable color-coded Class 1E divisions.

Inspections of the as-built Class 1E cables and the as-built raceways that route the Class 1E cables will be conducted.

a) Class 1E electrical cables, and communication cables associated with only one division, and the raceways that route these cables inside containment are identified by the appropriate color code.

790 3.3.00.07ab 7.a) Class 1E electrical cables, communication cables associated with only one division, and raceways that route the Class 1E electrical cables and the communication cables are identified according to applicable color-coded Class 1E divisions.


b) Class 1E electrical cables, and communication cables associated with only one division, and the raceways that route these cables in the non-radiologically controlled area of the auxiliary building are identified by the appropriate color code.

791 3.3.00.07ac 7.a) Class 1E electrical cables, communication cables associated with only one division, and raceways that route the Class 1E electrical cables and the communication cables are identified according to applicable color-coded Class 1E divisions.


c) Class 1E electrical cables, and communication cables associated with only one division, and the raceways that route these cables in the radiologically controlled area of the auxiliary building are identified by the appropriate color code.

143


Acceptance Criteria

792 3.3.00.07ba 7.b) Class 1E divisional electrical cables and communication cables associated with only one division are routed in their respective divisional raceways.

Inspections of the as-built Class 1E divisional cables and the as-built raceways that route the Class 1E cables will be conducted.

a) Class 1E electrical cables and communication cables inside containment associated with only one division are routed in raceways assigned to the same division. There are no other safety division electrical cables in a raceway assigned to a different division.

793 3.3.00.07bb 7.b) Class 1E divisional electrical cables and communication cables associated with only one division are routed in their respective divisional raceways.


b) Class 1E electrical cables and communication cables in the non-radiologically controlled area of the auxiliary building associated with only one division are routed in raceways assigned to the same division. There are no other safety division electrical cables in a raceway assigned to a different division.

794 3.3.00.07bc 7.b) Class 1E divisional electrical cables and communication cables associated with only one division are routed in their respective divisional raceways.


c) Class 1E electrical cables and communication cables in the radiologically controlled area of the auxiliary building associated with only one division are routed in raceways assigned to the same division. There are no other safety division electrical cables in a raceway assigned to a different division.

144


Acceptance Criteria

795 3.3.00.07c.i.a 7.c) Separation is maintained between Class 1E divisions in accordance with the fire areas as identified in Table 3.3-3.

i) Inspections of the as-built Class 1E division electrical cables, as-built communication cables associated with only one division, and the as-built raceways that route the Class 1E divisional electrical cables and communication cables located in the fire areas identified in Table 3.3-3 will be conducted.

i.a) Results of the inspection will confirm that the separation between Class 1E divisions in the non-radiologically controlled area of the auxiliary building is consistent with Table 3.3-3.

796 3.3.00.07c.i.b 7.c) Separation is maintained between Class 1E divisions in accordance with the fire areas as identified in Table 3.3-3.

i) Inspections of the as-built Class 1E division electrical cables, as-built communication cables associated with only one division, and the as-built raceways that route the Class 1E divisional electrical cables and communication cables located in the fire areas identified in Table 3.3-3 will be conducted.

i.b) Results of the inspection will confirm that the separation between Class 1E divisions in the radiologically controlled area of the auxiliary building is consistent with Table 3.3-3.

145

799 3.3.00.07d.i 7.d) Physical separation is maintained between Class 1E divisions and between Class 1E divisions and non-Class 1E cables.

Inspections of the as-built raceways that route Class 1E cables will be performed to confirm that the separation between raceways that route Class 1E cables of different divisions, and between raceways that route Class 1E cables and raceways that route non-Class 1E cables is consistent with the following: i) Within the main control room and remote shutdown room (non-hazard areas), the minimum separation for low-voltage power cables and below is defined by one of the following: 1) For configurations involving open configurations to enclosed configurations with low-voltage power cables, the minimum vertical separation is 3 inches and the minimum horizontal separation is 1 inch. 2) For configurations involving an enclosed raceway and an open raceway with low-voltage power cables, the minimum vertical separation is 1 inch if the enclosed raceway is below the open raceway. 3) For configurations involving enclosed raceways, the minimum separation is 1 inch in both

Results of the inspection will confirm that the separation between raceways that route Class 1E cables of different divisions, and between raceways that route Class 1E cables and raceways that route non-Class 1E cables is consistent with the following: i) Within the main control room and remote shutdown room (non-hazard areas) the minimum separation for low-voltage power cables and below meets one of the following: 1) For configurations involving open configurations to enclosed configurations with low-voltage power cables, the vertical separation is 3 inches or more and the horizontal separation is 1 inch or more. 2) For configurations that involve an enclosed raceway and an open raceway with low-voltage power cables, the minimum vertical separation may be reduced to 1 inch if the enclosed raceway is below the open raceway. 3) For configurations that involve enclosed raceways, the minimum separation is 1 inch in both horizontal and

146


Acceptance Criteria

horizontal and vertical directions. 4) For configurations involving open configurations, and an enclosed raceway and an open raceway, with instrumentation and control cables, the minimum separation is 1 inch in both horizontal and vertical directions.

vertical directions. 4) For configurations that involve open configurations, and an enclosed raceway and an open raceway, with instrumentation and control cables, the minimum separation is 1 inch in both horizontal and vertical directions.

147

800 3.3.00.07d.ii.a 7.d) Physical separation is maintained between Class 1E divisions and between Class 1E divisions and non-Class 1E cables.

Inspections of the as-built raceways that route Class 1E cables will be performed to confirm that the separation between raceways that route Class 1E cables of different divisions, and between raceways that route Class 1E cables and raceways that route non-Class 1E cables is consistent with the following: ii.a) Within other plant areas (hazard areas), the minimum separation is defined by one of the following: 1) The minimum vertical separation is 5 feet and the minimum horizontal separation is 3 feet. 2) The minimum vertical separation is 12 inches and the minimum horizontal separation is 6 inches for raceways containing only instrumentation and control and low-voltage power cables ≤2/0 AWG. This minimum vertical separation is 3 inches for the configuration with a conduit above and crossing the open tray at an angle equal to or greater than 45 degrees. 3) The minimum vertical separation is 12 inches and the minimum horizontal separation is 6

Results of the inspection will confirm that the separation between raceways that route Class 1E cables of different divisions, and between raceways that route Class 1E cables and raceways that route non-Class 1E cables is consistent with the following: ii.a) Within other plant areas inside containment (hazard areas), the separation meets one of the following: 1) The vertical separation is 5 feet or more and the horizontal separation is 3 feet or more. 2) The minimum vertical separation is 12 inches and the minimum horizontal separation is 6 inches for raceways containing only instrumentation and control and low-voltage power cables ≤2/0 AWG. This minimum vertical separation may be reduced to 3 inches for the configuration with a conduit above and crossing the open tray at an angle equal to or greater than 45 degrees. 3) The minimum vertical separation is 12 inches and the minimum horizontal separation is 6 inches between a conduit and an open configuration for low-

148

inches between a conduit and an open configuration for low- voltage power cables greater than 2/0 AWG but not greater than 750 kcmil. The vertical separation is 3 inches if a conduit is above and crossing an open tray at an angle equal to or greater than 45 degrees. 4) For configurations that involve exclusively limited energy content cables (instrumentation and control), the minimum vertical separation is 1 inch and the minimum horizontal separation is 1 inch. 5) For configurations involving an enclosed raceway and an open raceway with low-voltage power cables, the minimum vertical separation is 1 inch if the enclosed raceway is below the open raceway. 6) For configuration involving enclosed raceways, the minimum separation is 1 inch in both horizontal and vertical directions. 7) The minimum vertical separation is 1 inch and the minimum horizontal separation is 1 inch for configurations with a non-safety conduit and a free air safety cable with low-

voltage power cables greater than 2/0 AWG but not greater than 750 kcmil. The vertical separation may be reduced to 3 inches if a conduit is above and crossing an open tray at an angle equal to or greater than 45 degrees. 4) For configurations that involve exclusively limited energy content cables (instrumentation and control), the minimum vertical separation is 1 inch and the minimum horizontal separation is 1 inch. 5) For configurations that involve an enclosed raceway and an open raceway with low-voltage power cables, the minimum vertical separation is 1 inch if the enclosed raceway is below the open raceway. 6) For configurations that involve enclosed raceways, the minimum vertical and horizontal separation is 1 inch. 7) The minimum vertical separation is 1 inch and the minimum horizontal separation is 1 inch for configurations with a non-safety conduit and a free air safety cable with low-voltage power cables and below.

149


Acceptance Criteria

voltage power cables and below.

150

801 3.3.00.07d.ii.b 7.d) Physical separation is maintained between Class 1E divisions and between Class 1E divisions and non-Class 1E cables.

Inspections of the as-built raceways that route Class 1E cables will be performed to confirm that the separation between raceways that route Class 1E cables of different divisions, and between raceways that route Class 1E cables and raceways that route non-Class 1E cables is consistent with the following: ii.b) Within other plant areas (limited hazard areas), the minimum separation is defined by one of the following: 1) The minimum vertical separation is 5 feet and the minimum horizontal separation is 3 feet. 2) The minimum vertical separation is 12 inches and the minimum horizontal separation is 6 inches for raceways containing only instrumentation and control and low-voltage power cables ≤ 2/0 AWG. This minimum vertical separation is 3 inches for the configuration with a conduit above and crossing the open tray at an angle equal to or greater than 45 degrees. 3) The minimum vertical separation is 12 inches and the minimum horizontal

Results of the inspection will confirm that the separation between raceways that route Class 1E cables of different divisions, and between raceways that route Class 1E cables and raceways that route non-Class 1E cables is consistent with the following: ii.b) Within other plant areas inside the non-radiologically controlled area of the auxiliary building (limited hazard areas), the separation meets one of the following: 1) The vertical separation is 5 feet or more and the horizontal separation is 3 feet or more. 2) The minimum vertical separation is 12 inches and the minimum horizontal separation is 6 inches for raceways containing only instrumentation and control and low-voltage power cables ≤ 2/0 AWG. This minimum vertical separation may be reduced to 3 inches for the configuration with a conduit above and crossing the open tray at an angle equal to or greater than 45 degrees. 3) The minimum vertical separation is 12 inches and the minimum horizontal

151

separation is 6 inches between a conduit and an open configuration for low- voltage power cables greater than 2/0 AWG but not greater than 750 kcmil. The vertical separation is 3 inches if a conduit is above and crossing an open tray at an angle equal to or greater than 45 degrees. 4) For configurations that involve exclusively limited energy content cables (instrumentation and control), the minimum vertical separation is 1 inch and the minimum horizontal separation is 1 inch. 5) For configurations involving an enclosed raceway and an open raceway with low-voltage power cables, the minimum vertical separation is 1 inch if the enclosed raceway is below the open raceway. 6) For configuration involving enclosed raceways, the minimum separation is 1 inch in both horizontal and vertical directions. 7) The minimum vertical separation is 1 inch and the minimum horizontal separation is 1 inch for configurations with a non-safety conduit and a free air safety cable with low-

separation is 6 inches between a conduit and an open configuration for low- voltage power cables greater than 2/0 AWG but not greater than 750 kcmil. The vertical separation may be reduced to 3 inches if a conduit is above and crossing an open tray at an angle equal to or greater than 45 degrees. 4) For configurations that involve exclusively limited energy content cables (instrumentation and control), the minimum vertical separation is 1 inch and the minimum horizontal separation is 1 inch. 5) For configurations that involve an enclosed raceway and an open raceway with low-voltage power cables, the minimum vertical separation is 1 inch if the enclosed raceway is below the open raceway. 6) For configurations that involve enclosed raceways, the minimum vertical and horizontal separation is 1 inch 7) The minimum vertical separation is 1 inch and the minimum horizontal separation is 1 inch for configurations with a non-safety conduit and a free air safety cable with low-

152


Acceptance Criteria



153

802 3.3.00.07d.ii.c 7.d) Physical separation is maintained between Class 1E divisions and between Class 1E divisions and non-Class 1E cables.

Inspections of the as-built raceways that route Class 1E cables will be performed to confirm that the separation between raceways that route Class 1E cables of different divisions, and between raceways that route Class 1E cables and raceways that route non-Class 1E cables is consistent with the following: ii.c) Within other plant areas (limited hazard areas), the minimum separation is defined by one of the following: 1) The minimum vertical separation is 5 feet and the minimum horizontal separation is 3 feet. 2) The minimum vertical separation is 12 inches and the minimum horizontal separation is 6 inches for raceways containing only instrumentation and control and low-voltage power cables ≤2/0 AWG. This minimum vertical separation is 3 inches for the configuration with a conduit above and crossing the open tray at an angle equal to or greater than 45 degrees. 3) The minimum vertical separation is 12 inches and the minimum horizontal

Results of the inspection will confirm that the separation between raceways that route Class 1E cables of different divisions, and between raceways that route Class 1E cables and raceways that route non-Class 1E cables is consistent with the following: ii.c) Within other plant areas inside the radiologically controlled area of the auxiliary building (limited hazard areas), the separation meets one of the following: 1) The vertical separation is 5 feet or more and the horizontal separation is 3 feet or more. 2) The minimum vertical separation is 12 inches and the minimum horizontal separation is 6 inches for raceways containing only instrumentation and control and low-voltage power cables ≤ 2/0 AWG. This minimum vertical separation may be reduced to 3 inches for the configuration with a conduit above and crossing the open tray at an angle equal to or greater than 45 degrees. 3) The minimum vertical separation is 12 inches and the minimum horizontal

154

separation is 6 inches between a conduit and an open configuration for low- voltage power cables greater than 2/0 AWG but not greater than 750 kcmil. The vertical separation is 3 inches if a conduit is above and crossing an open tray at an angle equal to or greater than 45 degrees. 4) For configurations that involve exclusively limited energy content cables (instrumentation and control), the minimum vertical separation is 1 inch and the minimum horizontal separation is 1 inch. 5) For configurations involving an enclosed raceway and an open raceway with low-voltage power cables, the minimum vertical separation is 1 inch if the enclosed raceway is below the open raceway. 6) For configuration involving enclosed raceways, the minimum separation is 1 inch in both horizontal and vertical directions. 7) The minimum vertical separation is 1 inch and the minimum horizontal separation is 1 inch for configurations with a non-safety conduit and a free air safety cable with low-

separation is 6 inches between a conduit and an open configuration for low- voltage power cables greater than 2/0 AWG but not greater than 750 kcmil. The vertical separation may be reduced to 3 inches if a conduit is above and crossing an open tray at an angle equal to or greater than 45 degrees. 4) For configurations that involve exclusively limited energy content cables (instrumentation and control), the minimum vertical separation is 1 inch and the minimum horizontal separation is 1 inch. 5) For configurations that involve an enclosed raceway and an open raceway with low-voltage power cables, the minimum vertical separation is 1 inch if the enclosed raceway is below the open raceway. 6) For configurations that involve enclosed raceways, the minimum vertical and horizontal separation is 1 inch. 7) The minimum vertical separation is 1 inch and the minimum horizontal separation is 1 inch for configurations with a non-safety conduit and a free air safety cable with low-

155


Acceptance Criteria



803 3.3.00.07d.iii.a 7.d) Physical separation is maintained between Class 1E divisions and between Class 1E divisions and non-Class 1E cables.

Inspections of the as-built raceways that route Class 1E cables will be performed to confirm that the separation between raceways that route Class 1E cables of different divisions, and between raceways that route Class 1E cables and raceways that route non-Class 1E cables is consistent with the following: iii) Where minimum separation distances are not maintained, the circuits are run in enclosed raceways or barriers are provided.

Results of the inspection will confirm that the separation between raceways that route Class 1E cables of different divisions, and between raceways that route Class 1E cables and raceways that route non-Class 1E cables is consistent with the following: iii.a) Where minimum separation distances are not met inside containment, the circuits are run in enclosed raceways or barriers are provided.

804 3.3.00.07d.iii.b 7.d) Physical separation is maintained between Class 1E divisions and between Class 1E divisions and non-Class 1E cables.


Results of the inspection will confirm that the separation between raceways that route Class 1E cables of different divisions, and between raceways that route Class 1E cables and raceways that route non-Class 1E cables is consistent with the following: iii.b) Where minimum separation distances are not met inside the non-radiologically controlled area of the auxiliary building, the circuits are run in enclosed raceways or barriers are provided.

156


Acceptance Criteria

805 3.3.00.07d.iii.c 7.d) Physical separation is maintained between Class 1E divisions and between Class 1E divisions and non-Class 1E cables.


Results of the inspection will confirm that the separation between raceways that route Class 1E cables of different divisions, and between raceways that route Class 1E cables and raceways that route non-Class 1E cables is consistent with the following: iii.c) Where minimum separation distances are not met inside the radiologically controlled area of the auxiliary building, the circuits are run in enclosed raceways or barriers are provided.

806 3.3.00.07d.iv.a 7.d) Physical separation is maintained between Class 1E divisions and between Class 1E divisions and non-Class 1E cables.

Inspections of the as-built raceways that route Class 1E cables will be performed to confirm that the separation between raceways that route Class 1E cables of different divisions, and between raceways that route Class 1E cables and raceways that route non-Class 1E cables is consistent with the following: iv) Separation distances less than those specified above and not run in enclosed raceways or provided with barriers are based on analysis

Results of the inspection will confirm that the separation between raceways that route Class 1E cables of different divisions, and between raceways that route Class 1E cables and raceways that route non-Class 1E cables is consistent with the following: iv.a) For areas inside containment, a report exists and concludes that separation distances less than those specified above and not provided with enclosed raceways or barriers have been analyzed.

157


Acceptance Criteria

807 3.3.00.07d.iv.b 7.d) Physical separation is maintained between Class 1E divisions and between Class 1E divisions and non-Class 1E cables.


Results of the inspection will confirm that the separation between raceways that route Class 1E cables of different divisions, and between raceways that route Class 1E cables and raceways that route non-Class 1E cables is consistent with the following: iv.b) For areas inside the non-radiologically controlled area of the auxiliary building, a report exists and concludes that separation distances less than those specified above and not provided with enclosed raceways or barriers have been analyzed.

158


Acceptance Criteria

808 3.3.00.07d.iv.c 7.d) Physical separation is maintained between Class 1E divisions and between Class 1E divisions and non-Class 1E cables.


Results of the inspection will confirm that the separation between raceways that route Class 1E cables of different divisions, and between raceways that route Class 1E cables and raceways that route non-Class 1E cables is consistent with the following: iv.c) For areas inside the radiologically controlled area of the auxiliary building, a report exists and concludes that separation distances less than those specified above and not provided with enclosed raceways or barriers have been analyzed.

159


Acceptance Criteria

809 3.3.00.07d.v.a 7.d) Physical separation is maintained between Class 1E divisions and between Class 1E divisions and non-Class 1E cables.

Inspections of the as-built raceways that route Class 1E cables will be performed to confirm that the separation between raceways that route Class 1E cables of different divisions, and between raceways that route Class 1E cables and raceways that route non-Class 1E cables is consistent with the following: v) Non-Class 1E wiring that is not separated from Class 1E or associated wiring by the minimum separation distance or by a barrier or analyzed is considered as associated circuits and subject to Class 1E requirements.

Results of the inspection will confirm that the separation between raceways that route Class 1E cables of different divisions, and between raceways that route Class 1E cables and raceways that route non-Class 1E cables is consistent with the following: v.a) For areas inside containment, non-Class 1E wiring that is not separated from Class 1E or associated wiring by the minimum separation distance or by a barrier or analyzed is treated as Class 1E wiring.

160


Acceptance Criteria

810 3.3.00.07d.v.b 7.d) Physical separation is maintained between Class 1E divisions and between Class 1E divisions and non-Class 1E cables.


Results of the inspection will confirm that the separation between raceways that route Class 1E cables of different divisions, and between raceways that route Class 1E cables and raceways that route non-Class 1E cables is consistent with the following: v.b) For areas inside the non-radiologically controlled area of the auxiliary building, non-Class 1E wiring that is not separated from Class 1E or associated wiring by the minimum separation distance or by a barrier or analyzed is treated as Class 1E wiring.

161


Acceptance Criteria

811 3.3.00.07d.v.c 7.d) Physical separation is maintained between Class 1E divisions and between Class 1E divisions and non-Class 1E cables.


Results of the inspection will confirm that the separation between raceways that route Class 1E cables of different divisions, and between raceways that route Class 1E cables and raceways that route non-Class 1E cables is consistent with the following: v.c) For areas inside the radiologically controlled area of the auxiliary building, non-Class 1E wiring that is not separated from Class 1E or associated wiring by the minimum separation distance or by a barrier or analyzed is treated as Class 1E wiring.

812 3.3.00.07e 7.e) Class 1E communication cables which interconnect two divisions are routed and separated such that the Protection and Safety Monitoring System voting logic is not defeated by the loss of any single raceway or fire area.

Inspections of the as-built Class 1E communication cables will be conducted.

Class 1E communication cables which interconnect two divisions are routed and separated such that the Protection and Safety Monitoring System voting logic is not defeated by the loss of any single raceway or fire area.

162


Acceptance Criteria

880 2.2.05.07e 7e) Shielding below the VES filter is capable of providing attenuation that is sufficient to ensure main control room doses are below an acceptable level during VES operation.

Inspection will be performed for the existence of a report verifying that the as-built shielding meets the requirements for functional capability.

A report exists and concludes that the as-built shielding identified in Table 2.2.5-1 meets the functional requirements and exists below the filtration unit, and within its vertical projection.

Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Units 3 And 4 - NRC ... · subject: vogtle electric generating...

Documents

Transcript of Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Units 3 And 4 - NRC ... · subject: vogtle electric generating...