VJ^^^ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY … · VJ^^"^ I UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL...

RRFAK- 3 . ^

V J ^ * ^ " ^

I UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION 4

Science and Ecosystem Support Division Enforcement and investigations Branch

980 College Station Road Athens, Georgia 30605-2720

March 17, 2009

4SESD-EIB

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Aquifer Test Report for Sonford Products Site Flowood, Mississippi SESD Project No. 08-0350

FROM:

THRU:

TO:

Brian Stiiggow, Environmental Engineer Superfiand and Air Section /

Mike Bowden, Chief Superftmd and Air Section

Keriema Newman Superftind Division

The attached report has been completed. If you have any questions or comments,

please feel free to contact me at (706) 355-8619 or striggow.brian(^epa.gov.

Attachment

cc: Reggie Dawkins, Black & Veatch

10655522

RSASKOWS

Text Box

RSASKOWS

Text Box

United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 4

Science and Ecosystem Support Division 980 College Station Road

Athens, Georgia 30605-2720

^^^° '' %

^-»t PRO^*^

Aquifer Testing at Sonford Products Site Slug Test Results

3506 Payne Drive Flowood, Mississippi

March 17, 2009 SESD Project Identification Number: 08-0350

Requestor: Keriema Newman USEPA Region 4 Superfund Division 61 Forsyth St. SW Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960

SESD Project #08-0350

SESD Project Leader: Brian Striggow USEPA Region 4 Science and Ecosystem Support Division 980 College Station Road Athens, Georgia 30605-2720

Page 1 of 100

Title and Approval Sheet

Title: Aquifer Testing at Sonford Products Site Final report

Approving Official:

Approving Official's Name & Title Section Name Branch Name

Date

SESD Project Leader:

Project Leader's Name & Title Section Name Branch Name r ' • ' .

3 n/o. ' %

Date

• - . >

SESD Project #08-0350 Page 2 of 100

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION 5

METHODOLOGY 6

RESULTS ; 7

QUALITY ASSURANCE 7

REFERENCES ^ 9

Appendix A - Tables and Figures 11

Appendix B - Selected Boring Logs 17

Appendix C - Well SP129 Documentation 23

Appendix D - Well SP131 Documentation 41

Appendix E ^ Well SP133 Documentation 55

Appendix F - Well SP138 Documentation 69

Appendix G-Well SP140 Documentation 83


Aquifer Testing by Slug Tests Sonford Products

Flowood, Mississippi

SESD Project 08-0350

INTRODUCTION

The Sonford Products Site at 3506 Payne Drive in Flowood, Mississippi is currently undergoing a Remedial Investigation in a joint effort by Black&Veatch and Region 4, United States environmental Protection Agency. The site's primary contaminants are pentachlorophenol and various other organic compounds present in soils and groundwater apparently discharged to ground surface at various times during the site's operating history.

A surficial aquifer underlies the site at an approximate depth of 10 ft. A clay layer thought to be the Yazoo Clay unit appears to underlie the site at an approximate depth of 24 ft. Soil borings at the site have consistently found fme grained material from ground surface to approximately 10 ft depth and silty sands and sand from approximately 10 ft to 24 ft. Past investigations have consistently found a groundwater gradient sloped to the northwest in the surficial aquifer. To make estimates ofthe velocity of groundwater in this aquifer, the hydraulic conductivity ofthe aquifer must be determined.

The three primary means of detennining the hydraulic conductivity (K) of an aquifer are through ex-situ laboratory testing, pumping tests, and slug tests. In ex-situ testing, an undisturbed sample ofthe aquifer material is collected and submitted to laboratory testing to determine its permeability which can then be extrapolated to hydraulic conductivity. Laboratory testing gives results for the actual specimen considered, but may not reflect conditions in the overall aquifer due to heterogeneity. Pumping tests are implemented by pumping from a well and observing the water level change in the pumping well and/or nearby wells. Pumping tests offer the best estimates of entire aquifer performance due to their large scale, but can be expensive and cumbersome to implement.

Slug tests are conducted by causing a sudden change of water level in a well and monitoring the retum to equilibrium water level. The water level change is elicited by suddenly inserting or withdrawing a solid object (slug) or, as in this investigation, by the sudden release of pneumatic pressure. The scale of slug tests lies between that of ex-situ permeability analysis and pumping tests. This can be considered an advantage in that the tests can be conducted on specific areas or depths within the aquifer. Slug tests are simple to implement and can use wells installed for monitoring purposes.

SESD Project #08-0350 of 100

METHODOLOGY

A system of temporary monitoring wells was installed by the EPA science and Ecosystem Support Division during a May 2008 mobilization for the purpose of groundwater sampling at the Sonford Site proper and in down gradient areas. Four of these wells were used for slug testing. An additional well, SPl40, was established solely for slug testing the 20'-24' depth interval not covered by the other wells.

Relevant SESD procedures used in this investigation includes the following:

SESDPROC-110, Global Positioning System SESDPROC-105 Groundwater Level and Well Depth Measurement SESDPROC-301, Groundwater Sampling SESDPROC-203, Pump Operation

Direct-Push Technology (DPT) screen-point samplers were used at each ofthe well locations. These samplers use a VA' X 4' stainless steel screen contained within a protective steel drive sheath. The sheath and screen are driven to depth and the protective sheath is withdrawn leaving the screen exposed in the final 4' ofthe driven depth.

The installation of screen-point samplers involves compressing material from the borehole into the borehole walls. For slug tests to yield accurate results, the well must be vigorously developed to restore the borehole walls to the conditions in the surrounding aquifer. For this study, the wells were developed by surging with an impulse pump using a Waterra actuator while simultaneously augmenting the impulse pumping with a peristaltic pump mnning at high flow. Development was continued until turbidity dropped during surging and the well would yield low turbidity water with moderate pumping in the absence of surging.

A Geoprobe® Pneumatic Slug Tester was used for the slug tests. A transducer is zeroed and inserted in the well to below the level of any water level change anticipated. A sealing manifold is attached to the top ofthe well casing to allow air to pressurize the well while sealing the cable penefration. The transducer is connected through a signal conditioner to a laptop computer used as a data logger.

The manifold valve is closed and the well casing is pressurized with air from a foot pump. Regulators control the air pressure to a set level allowing the water level to equilibrate at a level corresponding to the regulated pressure. In this study water level depressions between 1.5 ft and 3 ft were used.

The pressure in the well is monitored on a live graph after pressurization ofthe well. When the pressure retums to the baseline value, valves on the manifold are simultaneously closed to close off the air pressure source and opened to release the pressure in the casing. This action corresponds to the withdrawal of a physical slug in traditional slug tests. The transducer and computer log the recovery ofthe water level as the well equilibrates to static conditions.


The slug tests were analyzed using the software package Geoprobe Systems® Slug Test Analysis (STA) software vl .00. For unconfined wells with a log recovery response the Slug Test Analyzer implements Bouwer-Rice algorithms to solve for the aquifer hydraulic conductivity (K).

The analysis process involves selecting a single well recovery segment from the data set, clipping out the relevant segment, and then optionally clipping out sections of data from the end ofthe test that do not confonn to the logarithmic recovery. Well parameters are entered on a worksheet and the model type (Bouwer-Rice) is confirmed. The parameters used for the model with.their description are presented in Table 2, Well Information Used in Analysis. The hydraulic conductivity is immediately available from the parameter entry page ofthe software model. The parameters used for each analysis and the results were recorded on worksheets presented in the appendices. Screen prints ofall phases of each analysis were also saved for presentation in the appendices.

RESULTS

The following table presents the hydraulic conductivity resuhs for this investigation. The result is the average of three or four separate analyses for each well. The complete results with the individual analyses and additional infonnation are presented in the appendix in Table 1, Slug Test Results.

Hydraulic Conductivity (K) results

Station ID SP131 SP133 SPI 38 SP129 SP140

Nominal Screened Interval

(ft) 12-16 12-16 14-18 16-20 20-24

Hydraulic Conductivity

- K -(cm/s) 1.2E-02 6.7E-04 1.5E-03 2.3E-02 1.3E-02

QUALITY ASSURANCE

The primary SESD procedure with direct relevancy to the slug tests is SESDPR0C-3dl, Ground Water Level and Well Depth Measurement. A single sounder was used for water level measurements and the sounder used has since been verified to be accurate to 0.03 ft in the range measured. Overall, the models show low sensitivity to the static water level and aquifer thickness inputs generated from sounder input.

The nominal lengths ofthe DPT tool components were used to establish total depth for the wells as opposed to actual measured values. The typical value of 24 ft was


taken as the depth ofthe lower confining unit for the surficial aquifer based on the boring logs for the site. Again, the models show low sensitivity to small variations in these parameters.

On site, each well was submitted to multiple measurement cycles of pneumatic depression and recovery. Upon retum, an individual software analysis was conducted on three of four ofthe measurement cycles. The final results presented are the average of the multiple analyses for each well. Table 1, Slug Test Results, also displays the Coefficient of Variation (CV) between the individual analyses at each well. The CV varied from a low of 6% at SP131 to 27% at SPl33. Given the overall low expectations for the accuracy of slug test results, this variation does not affect the validity of results.

An altemate analysis was conducted for each well as verification and the resultant values are presented in Table 1. The verification was conducted in MathCad® worksheets which are included in the appendix with each well's documentation. The worksheet uses the Bouwer-Rice model as presented in a paper by Yang and Yeh.

Relative Percent Differences between the verification and averaged results varied from -7%-46%. The variation between the models is attributed to the following factors:

1. The verification based on the Yang-Yeh paper uses a different set of polynomial matching equations to obtain the analog model constants than those used in the Geoprobe software, resulting in slightly different values for these constants.

2. The Geoprobe software model uses the 37% recovery point ofa least-squares fit line to a semi-log plot ofthe data set. The verification used the endpoints ofthe same data set as model inputs. The endpoints show the greatest deviation from the line fit, explaining some ofthe variation. Had the Yang-Yeh worksheet procedure been used as the primary solution greater attention would be paid to the processing of the model inputs.

The verification process serves to validate the overall validity ofthe Geoprobe software model. While exact agreement between models was not obtained, the overall purpose ofthe verification was achieved. The software models are considered computationally equivalent, but the data processing for the Geoprobe model is superior to that used for the verication. Given the overall limitations of slug-testing for detennining aquifer properties, the differences between the results and the verification are not significant.

As a final check, the slug test results were compared to known ranges for the geologic materials identified in the boring logs. The boring logs show that material from 12 ft to 24 ft BGS grades from silty sands to coarse sands. Known hydraulic conductivities (K) for silty sands range from approximately 10" to 10"' cm/s and for clean sands approximately 10" to 10* cm/s (Batu, after Freeze and Cherry). The slug test resuUs obtained fall within these ranges.


•J ! REFERENCES

1. Geoprobe Systems®, "Geoprobe® Pneumatic Slug Test Kit Standard Operating Procedure", Febmary 2002

2. Geoprobe Systems®, "Slug Test Analysis Software User's Guide", 2005

3. Yang, Shaw-Yang and Yeh, Hund-Der. "A Simple Approach Using Bouwer and Rice's Method for Slug Test Data Analysis." Ground Water Vol. 42, No. 5 (2004): 781-784

4. Bufler, James J. Jr. The Design, Performance, and Analysis of Slug Tests. Boca Raton: Lewis Publishers, 1998

5. Vedat,Batu. Aquifer Hydraulics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1998


Appendix A - Tables and Figures


Table 1. Slug Test Results

Station ID SPI 31 SP133 SP138 SP129 SP140

Nominal Screened Interval

(ft) 12-16 12-16 14-18 16-20 20-24

Hydraulic Conductivity

- K -(cm/s) 1.2E-02 6.7E-04 1.5E-03 2.3E-02 1.3E-02

Trial 1 1.13E-02 5.77E-04 1.62E-03 2.70E-02 1.30E-02

Trial 2 1.28E-02 5.54E-04 1.47E-03 2.85E-02 1.18E-02

Trial 3 1.23E-02 8.84E-04 1.52E-03 1.92E-02 1.59E-02

Trial 4

1.91E-02 1.23E-02

Coefficient of Variation

6% 27% 5%

2 1 % 14%

Average 1.21E-02 6.72E-04 1.54E-03 2:34E-02 1.33E-02

Geoprobe STAvl.OO Individual

Result 1.23E-02 8.84E-04 1.47E-03 1.92E-02 1.23E-02

Yang-Yeh Verification

Value 1.13E-02 5.51 E-04 1.01 E-03 2.07E-02 9.17E-03

Relative Percent

Difference 8%

46% 37% -7% 29%


Table 2. Well information used in analysis.

station ID SP131 SP133 SP138 SP129 SP140

Nominal Screened Interval 12-16 12-16 14-18 16-20 20-24

TOC Elev. 267.43 267.30 269.54 267.58 267.58

SWL 5/31/08

(ft BTOC) 10.71 10.10 13.11 10.55 11.34

SWL Elevation

(NAVD88 ft) 256.72 257.20 256.43 257.03 256.24

Ground Surface

Elevation (NAVD88 ft)

267.02 266.89 267.68 267.14 267.16

SWL (ft bgs) 10.31 9.69 11.25 10.11 10.92

Stickup (ft)

0.40 0.41 1.86 0.44 0.42

Nominal Total Depth

(ft) 16 16 18 20 24

Tool String Length

(ft) 16 16 20 20 24

Actual Total Depth

(ft) 15.60 15.59 18.14 19.56 23.58

Length of Water

Column

(ft) 5.29 5.90 6.89 9.45 12.66

Radius of Casing @

SWL (in) 0.57 0.57 0.57

0.3125 0.3125

Max Water Depression in Analysis

(ft) 1.29 1.9

2.89 1.45 4.66

Aquifer Thickness

(ft) 13.69 14.31 12.75 13.89 13.08

Description of Well-Specific Parameters.

Station ID. Ttie Sonford Site Station ID for the well location Nominal Screened Interval. This is the approximate screened interval for the temporary well. It may be taken as the depth interval for the K result. TOC Elevation. Top of Casing elevation surveyed by differential leveling from site benchmarks. SWL (ft BTOC). Static Water Level measured from top-of-casing by electronic water level sounder. SWL elevation. Derived from casing elevation and SWL Ground Surface Elevation. Ground surface adjacent to well surveyed by differrential leveling from site benchmark. SWL (ft BGS). Ground water elevation Below Ground Surface (BGS). Derived from ground elevation and SWL elevation Stickup. The protrusion above ground of the temporary well casing, derived from surface elevation and TOC elevation. Nominal total depth. The approximate total depth for the temporary well. Tool String Length. The approximate length of the temporary well tool string. First four foot increment equal to or larger than nominal total depth. Actual Total Depth. The total depth of the well derived from stickup and tool string depth. Used as TD in model. Length of Water Column. Derived from SWL and TD. Used in model as Lw. Radius of Casing. The radius of the casing at the level of water level cycling during the test. The casing section immediately above the screen is a larger internal diameter.

Used as Rc in model. Max Water Depression In analysis. The amount of water level depression that allows water level to move through a casing section of uniform diameter. Aquifer thickness. The thickness of the saturated aquifer, assuming a confining unit at 24' for this site. Used as H In model.

Additional Parameters in model

Effective Length. Length of screen and sand pack. Same as Screen Length for these temporary wells as there is no sand pack. Used In model as Le Screen Length. Approximately 4 feet for these wells. Listed as Ls but not used In model. Radius of Screen. Approximately 0.375 for these wells. Listed as Rs but not used in model. Radius of Borehole. Radlusof the borehole to the walls of the aquifer material. 0.75 in for these wells. Used in model as Rb. Radius of Transducer. Used to correct casing volume for occupation of space by transducer cable. 0.113 in for this test setup. Used In model as rt. Maximum depression of water column. Listed as Ho but not used In model.

SESD Project #08-0350 Page 14,pf 100

-. ... iA. ^^•*.am^*t-

?) :?

'M T ^

„ ~ r . \ : « t S r ' • ' ( • ' ' '•'••'

' k !^^^- -•' •.' ff' -"'iffSi" " "

m -' it

sprnzo'-zw

• • . iV

'ii^^l

'•i:''.%

'.egend • J f

® Slug-Test \ WeU

© Boring Log Location

SPI29 l6 ' -20'

«!•;••-'r-;y.---' . * ,

" . -«" .«

cvfe-'

>.-

^-Sfe

•.•.'• v •

^^t-f»,i t^(- . i>. . .-S'

J - . " I • T * - « • :

100 100 EOO 300 fif^•^'^^.'^J^T!

Sonford Products Flowood. MS

Figure 1 Slug Test Well Location's

BESIGHLB: m

ft g ^ J ^ Science and Ecosysten ^ ^ d § \ Support Division

SC/ILE: 1- = IOO-

PRgjECT No. 03-0350

08-0350 R[V.

0

Appendix B - Selected Boring Logs


BLACK & VEATCH LOG OF BORING BORING NO. SP-98

SHEET 1 OF CLIENT

U.S. EPA Reaion IV PROJECT

Sonford Products PROJECT NO.

048685 PROJECT LOCATION

Flowood, Mississippi COORDINATES GROUND ELEVATION (DATUM) TOTAL DEPTH

31' SURFACE CONDITIONS Gravel

DATE START 2/5/08

DATE FINISHED 2/5/08

SAMPLING

tu .J lU

0. a.

If

UJ K _ l UJ 0 . OQ

S E < 3 tf) Z

tf) IU

I- I IU o tf) z

tf) IU

Q I tn Z

>-IU K _l IU a. > £ O < <J »> IU

X

CORING

DRILLING CONTRACTOR U.S. EPA Reaion IV SESD DRILL RIG

Geoprobe CHECKED BY

DRILLER Jerrv Ackerman

Reginald Dawkins, Jr.

INSPECTOR Keriema Newman

APPROVED BY

IU |V IU O N

o u) z m K 3

Z O 3 z oe UJ

z > Q >

5 ° So Ul UJ

S P u ] UJ a It

CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS REMARKS

T ^

' ^ ^

100

WJ

TOC

"50"

"S3"

TOO

"57

"TOO

SES3Proect#)8-03iO

1-

2-

3-

4-

5-

6-

7-

8-

9-

10-

11-

12-

13-

14-

15-

16-

17-

IS

IS

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

-31-

Brown, silty clay Tan, silty clay with pebbles at bottom

Tan, mottled silty clay

Tan, silty clay

Tan sandy, silty clay iDamp soil at 10 feet bis

Greenish, sandy, silty clay with brown mottling

Orange, sandy, silty clay

- s -

Greenish - tan sandy silty clay grading to greenish - gray sand

'Observed ijpentachlorophenol odor.

Wet with pentachlorphenol •odor

Gray to green to gray fine-grained sand

Gray fine-grained sand

-16-'' Wet with strong jDentachlorophenol odor

Gray course-grained sand ^^Wet

Tan fine-grained sand "Wet

2 5 -Iron stained clay grading to greenish sandy, silty clay with shell fragments (Yazoo Clay)

Greenish gray sandy, silty clay with shell fragments and tan sand lenses (Yazoo Clay)

Page 19 of 100


SHEET 1 OF 1 CLIENT PROJECT

U.S. EPA Reaion IV Sonford Products PROJECT NO.


Flowood. Mississippi COORDINATES GROUND ELEVATION (DATUM)

267.41 ft (NAVD88) TOTAL DEPTH

24' SURFACE CONDITIONS

Grave l

DATE START

02/05/08 DATE FINISHED

02/05/08 SAMPLING

IU - I IU 0 . Q.

If tf)

UJ a . - I IU 0 . CO

s s »> z

U) UJ

I- I IU u tf) z

IO

U) IU

a X z o CM Z

CO

0) IU

Q I

>-UI o: _ I UJ 0. > s o < o U) Ul

a. CORING

DRILLING CONTRACTOR

U.S. E P A R e a i o n IV S E S D DRILL RIG

G e o p r o b e CHECKED BY

DRILLER

Jerry Ackerman

Reainald Dawkins, Jr.

INSPECTOR

K e r i e m a N e w m a n APPROVED BY

UJ X UJ

o a O tf)

UJ

z m K 3 Of Ul

ce

UJ

ct

s > 9° U l U l ^

n. a: 100

o Of LU U J


T5-

u:?

TOJ7

TOJ7

"BT"

"80"

TOO

SES D Pro ect #08-03)0

0

1-

2-

3-

4-

5-

6-

7-

8-

9-

10-

1 1 -

12-

13-

14-

15-

16

17-

18-

19

20

21

22

23

-24-

25-

26

27

28

29-

30

3 1 -

- Gray silty clay with tan mottling.

^ ^ :

Brown, silty clay.

Tan, silty clay with rusty mottling.

Gray clay with tan mottling.

Rust and gray silty clay.

Gray silty clay.

Gray silty sand.

Gray to tan silty sand with small amount of gravel.

Tan coarse-grained sand.

Rust colored clay grading to gray clay with shell V fragments (Yazoo Clay).

-0.5- Slight pentachlorophenol odor.

- 4 -

-6.5-• Strong pentachlorophenol odor.

W e t at approximately 11.5 feet bis.

Wet with very strong jDentachlorophenol odor.

W e t with very strong j)entaGhlorophenol odor.

^ W e t with strong jDentachlorophenol odor.

" "hJo odors.

Boring terminated at 24 feet -bis.

Page 20 of 100


SHEET 1 OF 1 CLIENT PROJECT

U.S. EPA Region IV Sonford Products PROJECT NO.


Flowood. Mississippi COORDINATES GROUND ELEVATION (DATUM)

267.31 ft (NACD88) TOTAL DEPTH

24 SURFACE CONDITIONS Grass covered.

DATE START 2/06/08


SAMPLING

Ul - I UJ 0 . IL

If

UJ a. _ l Ul 0 . ID s s < -D tf) Z

tf) Ul

I - I UJ u tf) z

U) .UJ

Q I

CM Z

tf) Ul

Q I OCO m Z

CO

Ul a: _l Ul 0. > Z O < t ) tf) UJ

K

CORING

DRILLING CONTRACTOR U.S. EPA Reaion IV SESD DRILL RIG

Geoprobe CHECKED BY

DRILLER

Jerry Ackerman

Reginald Dawkins. Jr.

INSPECTOR

Keriema Newman A P P R O V E D BY

Ul a: Ul O N u tf)

a: Ul

z m a: =)

Q : Ul

>-ce

S8 Ul X.

> X.

^ Ul S > S o a: o

UJ

Z UJ UJ > Q

^ o o Ul Ul

100

m UJ CLASSIF ICATION OF MATERIALS R E M A R K S

y?"

TB"

TOO"

"BT

"57"

TOO

"TOO

0

1 -

2-

3 -

4 -

5-

6-

7-

8-

9-

10-

1 1 -

12-

13

14-

15-

16-

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

- Gray fine-grained sand.

;(?3

SESD Pro ect #)8-03;)0

-44-

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

^ :

Brown, silty clay.

Grayish-brown to tan silty clay with orange mottling. --0.5-

Gray silty clay with orange rust colored mottling.

Gray silty clay with tan mottling.

Gray silty, clayey, fine-grained sand. 8.5

-12.5-

Observed solvent-like odor not similar to 4Dentachlorophenol odor.

Wet at approximately 12.5 Jeet bis. Wet with strong solvent-like JDdor.

Light gray to tan coarse-grained sand with black specks. '^Wetwith little odor.

V-l Light gray to tan coarse-grained sand grading to coarse-;;;.v_ grained sand with some gravel.

Gray clay (Yazoo Clay). -24-

Boring terminated at 24 feet Lbls.

Page 21 of 100


SHEET 1 OF 1 CLIENT

U.S. EPA Region IV PROJECT

Sonford Products PROJECT NO.


Flowood, Mississippi COORDINATES GROUND ELEVATION (DATUM) TOTAL DEPTH

28' SURFACE CONDITIONS Gravel

DATE START 2/07/08


SAMPLING

Ul - I Ul Q. IL

If tf)

Ul a : _ l UJ Q. ID £ Z < =) tf) z

UJ u U) z

tf) UJ

Q I 0- o " z

CO

UJ ce _l UJ 0. > Z O < o »> Ul

CORING

DRILLING CONTRACTOR U.S. EPA Region IV SESD DRILL RIG

Geoprobe DRILLER

Jerry Ackerman CHECKED BY

Reginald Dawkins, Jr.

INSPECTOR Keriema Newman

APPROVED BY

Ul a : Ul O N o tf)

a Ul

z ID 3 Z CC 3

Z O 3 Z X Ul

>

i8 Ul

>

O o Ul

So uiS

a . UJ u UJ

"~r 1 -

2-

3-

4-

5-

6-

7-

8-

9-

10-

1 1 -

12-

13-

14-

15-

16-

17-

18-

19-

20

2 1 -

22

23

24-

25

26

27-


T5"

"5T

"3:5

100

TOD"

TOO"

Tm

"57"

"37

TOO^

Tan gravely sand (Fill material).

Tan clayey gravel (Fill material). -.5-

Greenish-gray clay with tan mottling.

Gray clay with tan mottling.

Gray sandy clay with tan mottling.

Gray fine-grained sand. -10.5-

Gray to tan fine-grained sand. — 14-

Damp.

Wet.

'Wet.

Gray coarse-grained sand.

Gray to tan coarse-grained sand.

Light gray coarse-grained sand.

-16.5--. Wet.

Wet.

m Gray gravely sand. -25.5

—26-

-«e- m. - Blueish-gray clay with shel fragments (Yazoo Clay).

SESD Proect#')8-03i)0

29

30

31-

Boring terminated at 28 feet U)ls.

Page 22 of 100

Appendix C - Well SPl29 Documentation


C/) m CO

o

3

o 00

Slug Test Worksheet

Analytical Iteration

File Name for interval Initial time from data set

Final time from data set

Beginning depression forni data set

Ending depression from data set

File clipped

R-squared for straidght line fit to log plot

Effective Screen, Screen -t- sand-pack

Length of screen

Water Column, TD-SWL

Radius of screen, not used in calculations

Radius of tjorehole

3125 or .57 if water level cycles In screen sheath

radius of transducer cable

$ i<-rurated thickness of aquifer. Taken as 24' - SWL

Not used in calculations

Fully Penetrating?

K (cm/s)

Verification Parameters

Le/Rb from STAvl

A f m STAvl

B fm STAvl

C fm STAvl To fm STAvl Verification A Verification B Verification C

Verification K cm/s

Well: S P i l d Log Rie: S p i Z ' J c . J a i '

Spike #

Iteration

Intvl File

To

Tf

init SWL

final SWL

clipped?

R-sqd

Le(ft)

Ls(ft)

Lw(ft)

Rs (in)

Rb{in)

Rc (in)

rt

SWL (ft)

TD(ft)

H(ft)

Ho (in)

FP

Result

/ Q.

S F a ' j ^ i u

1 ^ , ^ ! H3-i73 - m C 7 - / ) , j n i

ye-5 \ l

0.=iHl 4

4

t } -H^ 0.375

0.75

. 3 / Z

0.113

m. i t n.T6 iB-?''?

- i - 3 vf i i v

2 •QtJt to '^

3 (ft

5 / ' / 2 ^_^ . .

i'^l «-?>-i-^2.Hn - i.<4'^^ ^ o . i ^ r

VCS^2.

6935'

/ . . -•

' I ' l

hir

ZthTf^Klu-'^

5-a

S P a - i ^ ^ z C j . - i ^ i ^

16H. i tz . -I.^^H - O.lGH KO

O ^ f f ^

, . - • •

.v-""

- 2 - 3

i . ' i l H f W - ^

(> et

(.Pi l l .- i ^

3 2 i . t 2 ' ! r

^•3.i,.0^C

- i A n -O- l lS ' • A i

o . ' iS l

/ ,''

" • ^ ^

- i -V

hWTrip-^

:

Le/Rb

A

B

C To A B C K

i H S t H z r

<?-6-55

• z ^ ^

Q i ?-y2<^

o - s ^ 5

. 2 J H

(,' 3 - ^ 2 ^

o.îê

0 . 3 7 ^ - 3 ^ 7 ^ <7.K^^

•XrOi^ltiO-^

61 ^ • • i z ^

o.^Si,

6:î'y

o o

Verification of SP 129, test 5a

Verification worksheet based on Yang & Yeh paper

L:=48-iii

r_w:= .75 ill

r w

x:~ log \ r_wj

x= 1.806

Screen length

radius of well

A;= 1.353-f 2.157x-4.027x^-^ 2.777x^-.460x''

A = 3.579

B := -.401 -I- 2.619-x - 3.267x' -t- l,548x'' - .210x'*

B =0.558

C := -1.605 -I- 9.496-x - 12,317x^ -\- 6.528-x^ - ,986x'*

C = 3.336

W_c:= 9.45ft Height of Water Column

Th:=13.89-ft Aquifer Thickness

For a partially penetrating well

A-t- Bin

EfT rad ;= r 1.1 "l

M ^ V v . r _ w ; ;

(Th - W_c)

L

r w

Eff_rad is the ln(Re/rw) term described in literature

Eff rad = 3.202


Rrod := .3125-in Internal radius of rods at SWL

R trans := .113-iii Radius of transducer cable

i 2 2 I'C := V R_rod - R_tians

-t- c -.0.291 in Effective radius of casing where water level cycles

To := 263.468-s iî^jg, ^^^ Ho ;= \-454-fi^^^^^ êvel depression

Final Times ^ at To and Tf

T f := 264.152-s Ht:=.204-ft

t := Tf - To

t = 0.684 s

r cÊff rad \ , fUo K:= ^^ = In —

2L t I Ht

K = 8.l31x 10 ^ ~ s

K = 2.065 X 10 ^ —

4 i\ IC = 2.138x 10 —

yr


• Log •ii;i[nt§p«l:|;-;:iiiif-|;] Parameter l | p p c O n i e n l a W S ^ ( ^ i ^

Requii

L<i(ft)

L. (ft)

Lw(ft)

Rs (In)

Kb (In)

JU: (In)

ed in Red

j) 4,000

|4 ;ooo

. 1 9,-150

1 0.375

j ) 0.750

Well Canstruction Parameters Site Oata

rt (In)

SWL (ft)

TD(ft)

H(f t )

Ho (In)

Woll

v) 0.113

y 10.110

';) 19.560

d 13.890

••? -1.900

Partially Penetrating

S i t e Name {

ProlBtt # 1

Well #

Test # 1

Location j

ISonford Products j

08-0350 1

SP129 1

la

iFlowood, MS 1

16-1-08 1 Date: 1 I

Fleld Tech |

Analyst: |

B. Striggow 1

B. Striaoow ' 1

L o g Name

Fi\ProIects\Sonford S_08\Slug lest\ 5P129c.dat

I n t e r v a l Name

F;\Project5\Sonford 5 OB\SljgJest\ 5PlZ9_la.lnv

S t a r t n m e End Time

—[•<8:5'>2 H l''9''73

Analys is O D c u m e n t a t l o n a n d R e p o r t s

R e s p o n s e | Log

C o n f i g u r a t i o n Unconflned

Analys is A l g o r i t h m BouMerBiRlce

Par t ia l l y P e n e t r a t i n g Pa rame te rs

W h e r e L e / R b = [e^.Qro |

"^ = |3.428 I B = |0.SS6

Baseline ( f l ) |.o.i94

t*d/t*|-'°Q°

•;V^yievv^PflWrri«i?3r:;G^

..VieyfPai-iinSjstBRpii^

Cd l - i . oao

K -Co r rec t l on smal l d ia wel ls |- i .ooo

Fully P e n e t r a t i n g Pa ramate r

0 = 1-1.000 I

D Coeff 1-4.375

Log Response Parameters

I R-squared |9.41 E-1

Amplitude |l. i93 To |0 269

Calcu la ted K

K (FT/Dav) |76,454 "~|

K ( c m / S e c ) I2.697E-2

Wel l Partially Penetrating

i.;,Prtnt;Thi5-P^ei;.;.:;;i

\tt'i'"'-'ri---.''y-ii-7-ittiji-i'.Tt-^-


CO m w D

ni'

o 00

Interval Data Set Interval: 48.542 Sec to 49.173 Sec File Nanne: F:\Projects\Sonford_5_08\Siug_test\SP129_1a.inv Log Nanfie: F:\Projects\Sonford_5_08\Slug_test\SP129c.dat Printed: Monday, February 16, 2009 22:34:06

6 . 2 6 8

1 . 0 0 0 -

0 . 1 0 0 -

0. 020

;|Trendline liTo

DATA

/ \ /

• E tl a I

- 0 . 1 0. 0 0 . 7

o o

m w o •D - I

o CO

Log Data Set File Name: F:\Projects\Sonford_5_08\Slug_test\SP129G.dat Printed: Monday, February 16, 2009 22:34:11

0.

0.

0;

0.

0.

- 0 .

- 0 .

- 0 .

t - o ,

UJ

X - 1 -

- 1 .

- 1 .

- 1 .

- 1 .

- 2 .

- 2 .

- 2 .

y -

7 -

5 -

3 -

1 -

1 -

3 -

5 -

7 -

9-

1 -

3 -

5 -

7 -

9 -

1 -

3 -

5 -

L A n

1 1

rh ^^.,,,^.

'

l l l l l l l l

I

^ * " ' 1 . ^ . » i . . i ^ a j ^ i i IpimWM

1 1

i 1

1

1

___.' 1 1 1

25 50 75 100' 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300. 325 350 TIME (S)

380

TJ ca . cn

i;!ijg;:|.:ijMewi.s|=y^] Parameter i)jj;)oiiS?nt3|Ugi3ite&^

Requlrc-c] in Red Well Construction Parameters Site Data

U;(ft)

Ls (ft)

Lw(rt)

Rs (in)

lib (In)

Rc (In)

.'44,000

t j 4,000

.r) 9.450

lj 0.375

1)0,750

,ij 0.312

rt (In)

SWL (ft)

TD(ft)

H(rt)

Ho (In)

'110.113

li 10.110

v) 19.560

y 13.690

>j -2.100

Welt Partially Penetrating

Site Name |

Project # \

Well #

Test # 1

Location {

Date j

Field Tech j

Analyst j

ISonf ord Products j

D8-03S0

SP129 1

3a

Flowood, HS 1

6-1-OB 1

IB, 5triggow 1

B, Striggow 1

Log Name

F:\Projects\Sonford S QB\SljgJest\ 5PlZ9c.dat

Interval Name F :\Pro)ecl5\Sonf ord_5_08\Slug_test\ SPI 29 3a.inv

Start Time End Tima

|151.83S I |152.493 ~

Analysis Documentation and Reports

Response

Configuration

Log

Unconfined J Baseline (ft)

Analysis Algorithm

Po!29l

Bouwer&Rlce

1

Partially Penetrating Parameters

Where Le/Rb = |64,6bo |

I B = |o.556 A = |3.428

: :yieiyParamei;efiGrai)hic;;

:;Viw"^?araiTS&pijtin»

t*d/t*|-'-ooo I cd|-i,ooo i

K-Correctlon small dia wells j-i.ooo

Fully Penetrating Parameter

C = 1-1000 I


D Coeff 1-4.487 j R-squared |9.36E 1

Amplitude |i.i4B To 10.254

Calculated K

K (FT/Dav)|80.752

K (cm/3ec) 2.849E-2

Wcll Partially Penetrating

;ii-.;fifint:Thl5:i?<!g^v

. SESD Project #08-0350 Page 31 of 100

C/5 m CO o T J

CD

O 00

Interval Data Set Interval: 151.835 Sec to 152.493 Sec File Name: F:\Projects\Sonford_5_08\Slug_test\SP129_3a.inv Log Name: F:\Projects\Sonford_5_08\Slug_test\SP129c.dat Printed: Monday, February 16, 2009 22:40:44

7 . 7 2 1 -

1. 000

<0 cu X • D CD

"c5 E

0 . 1 0 0

0. 008-

IITrendline po iJDATA

/ \ / ;

D E

P a I

- 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 3 Index

0. 4 0 . 5 0 . 6 0 . 7

CO m Crt o Tl ,3

CD

o 00

Log File

Data Set Name: F:\Projects\Sonford_5_08\Slug_test\SP129c.dat Printed: Monday, February 16, 2009 22:40:50

n n u. y-

0.7-0.5-

0.3-

0.1-

-o-.i-

-0.3-

-G.5-

£-0.7-

S-0.9-

-1.1-

-1.3-

-1.5-

-1.7-

-1.9-

-2. 1-

-2.3-

2 5

JII^^WMM MbdbJMHBI

L^^i.^ s^' '

.

1

1 W ^ i ^ L t ^ t ^ n , ^

;

•

i

;

i

1

i !

0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 380 TIME (5)

T) 01

CO CD

O O

iL6gi| iiptewaliflpNiSJ Parameter • ;|booSwtist!pri^^

Required in Red Well Construction Parameters Site Data

Le(ft)

Ls(ft)

Lw(ft)

R5(ln)

Rli (In)

Rc (In)

r 4.000

^ 4.000

,r) 9.450

^ 0,375

I 0.750

[•) 0.312

r t (In)

SWL(ft)

TD(ft)

H(f t )

Ho (In)

Wcll

10.113

';) 10.110

J.|l9.560

,17 13.890

,-ji -2.300


Site Name |

Project #:j

WelU:

Test#:|

Location: 1

Date:]

Field Tech: j

Analyst:]

ISonford Products 1

|08-035O 1

|SP129 1

|5a

iFlowood, MS j

|6-l-09 1

iB. Striggow 1

iB. Striggow 1

Log Name

F:\Pfo|ects\Sonford 5 08\5!ugje5t\ SP129c.dat

Interval Name Fi\Prolect5\Sonford_5 08\Slug_te5t\ 5P129 Sa.lnv

Start Time End Time

I263.46B I 1264.152 j


Response

Configuration

log

Unconfined

Analysis Algorithm Bouwer&Rlce


Where Le/Rb = [64,000 |

A = (3.428 I B = (0.5S6 j

Baseline (ft) jo.oio

t *d / t * | - i -ooo

;;w«y;Pafami5te!ia«fJhi(ii;h!;:

•JflewPafamateif;I5»fIrilt!6iH5:::;ii

] Cd 1-1.000 I Fully Penetrating Parameter

K-Correction small dia wells I-i. ooo C = [-1.000

Lag Response Parameters

D Coeff 1-2.831 1 R-squared |9.59E-1

Amplitude |i.065 j To I0.375

Calculated K

K(FT/Dav)[s4.S37

K (cm/Sec) ir924E-2

Well Partially Penetrating

;..jrlnt:ft!^!5? iS8;[::.: |


CO m CO o Tl

CD'

o CO

interval Data Set Interval: 263.468 Sec to 264.152 Sec File Name: F:\Projects\Sonford_5_08\Slug_test\SP129_5a.inv Log Name: F:\Projects\Sonford_5_08\Slug_test\SP129c.dat Printed: Monday, February 16, 2009 22:46:11

1 . 953

1.GOO-

• o ID CD

X

t> .0!

5 0 . 1 0 0

G. 015-—^ r - 0 . 0 0 . 0

iTrendline

ITO

iDATA

/ N ^

. ^ - ' . a c

3 D_,

0. 1 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 4 Index

0 . 5 0 . 6 0 . 7

CO m CO o "0 ,3 CD

Log Data Set File Name: F:\Projects\Sonford_5_08\Slug_test\SP129c.dat Printed: Monday, February 16, 2009 22:46:16

TIME(S)

• 0 0)

CO . CO

CO O)

o

:fL.qgi||ifntBrWl;|3Nii^ Parameter h^C^ i i j i e jM j i ^R^

Required m Red

Le(ft)

Ls(ft)

Lw(ft)

Rs (In)

Rb (In)

Rc(ln)

.>j.4.0C10

i ) 4,000 •: i

>) 9.450

^ 0.375

; j 0.750

$ 0'312

Well Construction Parameters Site Data

r t ( In)

SWL (ft)

TD(ft)

H(f t )

Ho (In)

Well

'rj 0.113

li 10,1 to •.J

' j 19.560 • • : f

U 13.890

,;;) -2,400

PartiaBy Penetrating

Site Name

Project #

Well#

Test*

Locatton

Date

Field Tech

Analyst

ISonford Products

108-0350

|5P129 1

6a

iFlowood, MS

6-1-08

la. striggow

IB. striggow 1

Log Name F;\Pro|ects\Sonford 5_0B\5!ug_test SP129c.dat

Interval Name F;\Pfoject5\Sonford_S_08\5lug_test\ 5P129_6a.lnv

Start Time End Time

1325.423 I 1326.086


Response

Conriguration

Log

Unconflned


Where Le/Rb = r; ' ;^—'. j

Analysis Algorithm BouMer&Rlce

A = |3.428 " I B = |0.556 |

Baseline (ft)

t * d / t *

0.010

1.000 Cd l-l .000 I

K-Correction small dia wells|-i,ooo


C = 1-1,000 I


• D Coeff 1-2.763 1 R-squared |9.S7E-1

Amplitude 11.056 " | To |o.379

Calculated K

K(FT/Day)r5t.050

K(cm/Sec)|i.907E-2

Woll Partially Penetrating

;yiaw;Pi aWfl|:«i'.6r4Rh|C;;

;. VJiwiPaMmet?r;bafln^


CO

m CO D TJ

CD'

o CO cn o

Interval Data Set Interval: 325.428 Sec to 326.086 Sec File Name: F:\Projects\Sonford_5_08\Slug_test\SP129_6a.inv Log Name: F:\Projects\Sonford_5_08\Slug_test\SP129c.dat Printed: Monday, February 16, 2009 22:50:39

1. 000

0. 100-CD

X

• 0

B o cn o

0. 010

0. 002

ijTrendlirte

bo i DATA O E

- o'. 0 0 .' 0 0. 1 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 4 0 . 5 0. 6 0 . 7 Index

Tl 0)

CQ CD

CO m CO

o -0

Log Data Set File Name: F:\Projects\Sonford_5_08\Slug_test\SP129c.dat Printed: Monday, Febmary 16,2009 22:50:45

0 .

0 .

0 .

0 .

0 .

- 0 .

- 0 .

- 0 .

t - o . UJ u . I

- 1 .

- 1 .

- 1 .

- 1 .

- 1 .

- 2 .

- 2 .

- 2 .

9-1

7

5

3

H 1

3

5 -

7 -

9-

1 -

3

5

7

9

1

3

5

X i ^ JAJW* miwiml ^Ite^lik..

P * tMwMMtWwrt MlRMpI

0 25 50 75 IOD 125 150 175 2 0 0 2 2 5 2 5 0 2 7 5 3(30 3 2 5 3 5 0 3 8 0 TIME(S)

r ; - j ; . ' -u^- ' ;" :/j=_t:

Appendix D - Well SPl31 Documentation


CO m CO D

CD'

=«: O 00

Slug Test Worksheet

Analytical Iteration Rie Name for interval

Initial time from data set Final time from data set

Beginning depl'ession form data set Ending depression from data set

File clipped R-squared for straidght line fit to log plot

Effective Screen, Screen -i- sand-pack Length of screen

Water Column, TD-SWL Radius of screen, not used in calculations

Radius of borehole 3125 or .57 if water level cycles in screen sheath


:urated thickness of aquifer. Taken as 24' - SWL Not used in calculations

Fully Penetrating? K (cm/s)

^ r - i s i Weil: ^ _ Log File: S F i 3 i d .r oicrT

Spike #

Iteration

Intvl File

To

Tf

init SWL

final SWL

clipped?

R-sqd

Le(ft)

Ls(f1) Lw (ft)

Rs (in)

Rb (in)

Rc (in)

rt

SWL (ft)

TD(ft)

H(ft)

Ho (in)

FP

Result

/ <?

smuct f 5-25-5

n7sz - t . ^ G ' i -O .ZOH

t l O

0.111 4

4 S'2C}

0.375

0.75

0.T7 0.113

iO .3 ' I T ' &

l ^ . 6 f } - I ' Y yf

r i c

/. i U i : i ( r ^

X <\

S ? 3 i ~ 2 ^

(27. "^f?

i n .m ' i - i . i ' ^ i . -o-i^fr

. c5

0 ' = t ^ ' ^

/ /

/ J

-_. --- ; ; ^

ns>

T\,Z7'?f*iO'^

3 ^

SF 131-1.^

2 ?7 -j-?*? 2 ' - l l . 9 f l

- M S ^ T T ' 0 . 1 a 7

r\.o

0.^30 >^ '

/ /

/

^ - 1 9 ^ ^ o /

^ l - 2 J ^ r U ^ ' ^

•

01 CO CD

CO

o

Verification Parameters Le/Rb from STAvl

A fm STAvl B fm STAvl C fm STAvl

To fm STAvl Verification A Verification B Verification C

Verification K cm/s

Le/Rb A

B C

To A B C K

(.H 3 'i-r o-Tr6

2.f=i1

g-f

i .5 '7?

& ^

^ • • • i v j ^

0- SG

l.=if:\ 3-5 73 ( 9 - ; ? ^

iti^l.-iiO-'^

Verification of SPI 31, test 3a


L:= 48-in

•_w:= .75 in

L

Screen length

radius of well

= 64

X := log

x= 1.806

A := 1.353 -F 2.157x - 4.027-x^ + 2.777-x'' - .460x''

A = 3.579

B := -.401 4- 2.619.x - 3.267x^ 4- 1.548-x'' - .210-x'*

B = 0.558

C:= -1.605 4- 9.496X- 12.317.x^ 4-6.528x' ' - .986-x''

C = 3.336

W_c := 9.45-it Height of Water Column

Th := 13.89ft Aquifer Thickness


A ^ n I [(Til - W_c)' A 4- Bin

.Eff rad := ( 1.1 ^

i n l ^ V V ' - w ; ;

L

r w

Eff_rad Is the ln(Re/rw) term described in literature

Eff rad = 3.202


Rrod := .57in Internal radius of rods at SWL

R trans := .113-in Radius of trahsducer cable

I 2 2 r c := \/ R_rod - R_tians

r c = 0.559in Effective radius of casing where water level cycles

To :-237.579s i^jjjglg,.,^ Ho:-1.288-ft Water Level depression

Final Times at To and Tf

Tf := 241,841-s -Ht:=.207ft

t := Tf - To

t = 4.262s 2

r r K

r c -Eff rad 1 , / Ho •^= = I n —

2-L t Ult

- 3 in K = 4.466 X 10 —

s

K = , . 1 3 4 x 1 0 - ' ^ s

4 ft K= 1.174X 10 — yr


; lig-|gtBtpr^^li^'lN^^ Parameter ;i?i§Oimmfalit^^

Required in Rod Well Construction Parameters Site Data

i.e(ft)

Ls(ft)

Lw(ft)

Rs (in)

Rb (In)

Rc (In)

y 4.000

^ 4,000

^ 5.290

) 0,375

y 0,750

J 0.570

rt (in)

SWL (ft)

TD(ft)

H(rt)

Ho (In)

fit O.n3

; ^ 10,310

^ 15.600

;r 13.690

r) -1.800

Site Name:

Project # :

Wel l# :

TBSt#:

Location: I

Sonford Products

08-0350

ISP131

Ila

IFlowood, MS

Date: ! 16-1-08


Field Tech:

Analyst:

IB, Striggow

IB. Striggow

Log Name

F:\Pro|ects\Sonford 5 08\Slug test\ SP131a.dat

Interval Name Fi\ProJects\Sonford_5_OB\Slug_te5t\ SP131 la.lnv

Start Time End Time

145.253 I 149.752

Ana lys is D o c u m e n t a t i o n a n d R e p o r t s

Response

Con fJQura t ian

Log

Unconfined

Baseline ( f t )

Analys is A l g o r i t h m

1^087

Bouwer8iRlce

Part ia l ly P e n e t r a t i n g Paramete rs

W h e r e L e / R b = |64,ooo j

A = 13.428 ( B = |0.556 |

^ iVia wParamstftr :GrapHc; >•

.: yfew:ii?ai•4itl«tei^^0eflriltlbils•

t*d/t*|-'.ooo Cd 1-1,000

K-Correctlon small dia wellsi-i.ooo


C = 1-1.000 I


D Coeff 1-0.477 " 1 R-squared I9.91E-1

ZZ] Amplitude 11.019 To|2.i32

Calculated K

K(FT/Day) 131,917

K (cm/Sec)Ii.i26E-2


:fii1nt;thfe.F*9gi)j'::,:iJ


CO m CO o T)

CD'

O 00

cb CO cn

Interval Data Set ~ Interval: 45.253 Sec to 49.752 Sec File Name: F:\Projects\Sonford_5_08\Slug_test\SP131_1a.inv Log Name: F:\Projects\Sonford_5_08\Slug_test\SP131a.dat Printed: Monday, February 16, 2009 23:01:24

1 3 2 . 7 5 3 -

• o m IU

X

1 0 . 0 0 0 -

1 . 0 0 0

O.IDO'

? 0 . 0 1 0 -

O.ODl-

0.000-

O.OOO-l—n —, ; ; ; , ; j j — - 0 . 1 0 . 5 1 . 0 1 . 5 2 . 0 2 . 5 3 . 0 3 . 5 4 . 0

Index

iTrendllne

iJTo

iJDATA

^"

. » ' * * ^ a c

3 a

I I

4 . 6

TJ 01

CQ CD

- . 1

O

CO m CO o

CD'

o

CJP (3 CO cn o

Log Data Set File Name: F:\Projects\Sonford_5_08\Slug_test\SP131a.dat Printed: Monday, February 16, 2009 23:01:28

J I I

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 130 200 220 240 260 280 300 TIME (5)

.liog>ii;;-Si|^Sg||i!f|j Parameter- ; i i c i | S S | i ) i : * « ! ^ ^

Requ i red In Red Well Constrt4c»ov» Parameters

Le(ft)

Ls(ft)

Lvg(ft)

Rs ((n)

Rl> (in)

Rc (In)

l) 4.000

;y 4.000

1J5.290

.^ 0.375

,^0.750

.!:) 0.570

rt (In)

SWL (ft)

TD(ft)

H(ft)

Ho (In)

Well

;3 0.113

:,.;. 10,310

'ri 15.600

i--; 13.690

.^^-1.800


Site Data

Site Name:

P ro jec t * :

Well # :

Test # :

Location:

' Date:

Field Tech:

Analyst:

Sonford Products ~ ^ . . - 1 08:0350

SP131 •--, _^^^

2a • ^

[Flowood, MS

6-1-08

B, Striggow

B. Striggow

Log Name F;\Pro]ecls\Sonford_5_08\SlugJe5t\ SP131a.dat

Interval Name F!\Pfo)ects\Sonford 5 OB\Slug_tast\ 5P131 2a. inv

Start Time End Time

122.947 |127.419


Response

Configuration

Log

Unconflned

Analysis Algorithm ;Boiiwer&Rica


Where Le/Rb = J64,ooo |

A = 13.426 j a = IQ.556

Baseline (ft) -0.141

t*d/t*|-'.OOQ Cd j i .ooo 1 K-Correction small dia wells |-i.ooo I


0 = l-l.OQO I

DCoeffl-o.sso

Amplitude |i.035


I R-squared |9.aB£-i

"J To 11.879

Calculated K

K(FT/Davl 136.217

K f cm/Sec) 11.276E-2


.;:y|8W.i?9ranie.H^ ^

;;,V(eW:ParaiiwRpeflrt

jJ^SPififePiS^^;


CO m CO D

o CO cn o

Interval Data Set Inten/al: 122.947 Sec to 127.419 Sec File Name: F:\Projects\Sonford_5_08\Slug_test\SP131_2a.inv Log Name: F:\Projects\Sonford_5_08\SlugJest\SP131a.dat Printed: Monday, February 16, 2009 23:07:21

1 5 . 0 3 2

1 0 . 0 0 0 -

S 1 .000 • X

T3 •a

0 . 1 0 0

O.OIS-L

iTrencffine

To

DATA \

/NJ **'**'^

a c 3 D ;

- 0 . 8

2" CQ CD

O O

C/) m c/J o

CD'

o 9° cb CO CJl

o


:r|0 Cr 1

MMMlMMWNtr'

I I I I I I I

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 TIME (5)

Tl 01 ca CD

:; Log ;:|] ; i i r i tegS(g]; i i iN(^ Parameter p D c i M l f i t a t i o i i f ^

Requited In Red Well Construction Parameters Site Data

Lc=(ft)

Ls(ft)

Lw(ft)

Rs (in)

Rb (In)

Rc (In)

t | 4.000

i j 4.000

.95.290

|):0,37S

.1: 0.750

^ ° ' 570

rt (In)

SWL (ft)

TD(ft)

HCft)

Ho (In)

Well

.'^0.113

..' 10.310

D 15.600

:;^: 13.690

' | - 1 .800


Site Name

Project #

Wel l#

T e s t *

Location

Date

Field Tech

Analyst

ISonford Products 1

108-0350

|SP131

3a

[Flowood, MS 1

16-1-08 1

IB, striggow 1

I B . Striggow 1

Log Name

Fi\ProJects\Sonford_5.08\5lug le5t\ SP13l3.dat

Interval Name F:\ProJect5\Sonfard_5_oa\Sli;g_tesH SP131 Sa.lnv

237.579

Start Time End Time

j J241,842 j


Response

Canngiiratloi i

Log

Unconflned


Where Le/Rb = IS^.QQQ |

Analysis Algorithm Bauwer&Rice

A = |3.428 I B = |o.5S6 |

Baseline (ft)

t*d/t*|- l-0PO

-0.117

;i?(iaw;Phrametei; Graipte^^^

i Jiciwjpariimitei^ piif (nitliils;.;

Cd 1-1.000

K-Correction small dia wells l-i.ooo


C = 1-1,000 I


D Coeff 1-0.516 I R-squared f9.90E-l

Amplitude 11.011 To|i .96i

Calculated K

K(FT/Dav)|34,715

K(cm/S0C)fl.225E-2


;::pijntTllls:!^;V;(:|


c/5 m CO o

CO U l

o

Interval Data Set Interval: 237.579 Sec to 241.842 Sec File Name: F:\Projects\Sonford_5_08\Slug_test\SP131_3a:inv Log Name: F:\Projects\Sonford_5_08\Slug_test\SP131a.dat Printed: Monday, February 16, 2009 23:11:37

2 . 1 6 1

1 . 000

•o <0

0 . 1 0 0 -

0 .032-1

liTrendline

: ; T O •

;iDATA o c 3 D I

Tl 01

CQ CD (Jl CO

o

CO m (n D T)

<D'

o (30 O CO cn o


1 . 4 -

1 . 1 -

0. 9-

0 . 7 -

0 . 5 -

0 . 3 -

0. 1 -

1 g-0.1-g - 0 . 3 -UJ

" - 0 . 5 -

- 0 . 7 -

- 0 . 9-

- 1 . 1 -

- 1 . 3 -

- 1 . 5 -

- 1 . 7 -

1 q -

-

\ \ -

1** ' "^

0 20 1

40

r i

60

mmi

1

8C

\

\ ,

100 I

12

1

0 140 160 TIME(S)

1

1 V % M _ ^

180 200

DO

f 1

220 240

Cr

m 1

260

M M

280

]

1

! i

1

300

Appendix E - Well SPl33 Documentation


CO m CO D

T)

CD'

o 00

Slug Test Worl<sheet

Analytical Iteration File Name for interval

Initial time from data set Final time from data set

Beginning depression form data set Ending depression from data set

File clipped R-squared for straidght line fit to log plot

Effective Screen, Screen 4- sand-pack Length of screen

Water Column, TD-SWL Radius of sca een, not used in c:alculations

Radius of borehole .3125 or .57 if water level cycles In sc;reen sheath


Saturated thickness of aquifer. Taken as 24' - SWL Not used in câlculations

Fully Penetrating? K (cm/s)

Verification Parameters Le/Rb from STAvl

A fm STAvl B fm STAvl C fm STAvl

To fm STAvl Verification A Verification B Verification C

Verification K cm/s

Well: S p / 3 ^ Log File: 5Pl3.^ b-Je l -

Spike # Iteration Intvl File

To Tf

init SWL final SWL

clipped? R-sqd Le(fl) Ls(fl) Lw(ft) Rs (in) Rb (in) Rc (in)

rt SWL (ft)

TD(ft) H{ft)

Ho (in) FP

Result

1 Cl

Si'1^3- U \G3-00 iCf .F - / . f 5 7 -0,/34 ^ J .395-

4 4

S.fÔ 0.375 0.75

0 S 7 0.113

<?f.6^ i?-.^^ IH'SI

- Z O -jf rtc'7

> in f i o~^

T^

«» ^ f t i i . 2,> 5 2 2 . ^

C2f. r - l ' ? 5 M - o . l n H

n a

><?l^^

. - • •

- . 2 M '

AC?

5".5^f xw-f

3 at

5?\Jêri,

^ 5 % T %0.0 - / - i f ? ' /

- 0>2iD

•a

- J ^ C.

^ , > . • ^ - ^ ^

J ' ' / , *-„

" t .

' ^

i-5Pi33^3i, ^ fH.S f n t y -f-s-l-Y -^. i f^ l ^ O

. ' i<n

/ y

- Z ^ I t /

^-vr^rw.--'

Le/Rb A B C

To A B C K

£'/

5-V2<S^ a.'Sê>

m5i< i HH.oi-^ rr

iH 3 - i : i ^ o-^^&

Z l . ^ H ^ ^ . ^ 7 9 o - e : t ^

S ' . ' ^ ' l iti.a-<(

o o

Verification of SP133, test 3b


L:= 48-in

i_w := .75-in

L

Screen length

radius of well

= 64

X := log| — r w

x = 1.806

A := 1.353 4- 2.157X - 4.027-x^ 4- 2.777x^ - .460-x'*

A = 3.579

B:= -.401 4-2.619-x-3.267-x^4- l.548.x^ - .210-x''

B = 0.558

C := -1.605 4- 9,496.x - 12.317.x^ -I- 6.528x'' - .986-x''

C = 3.336

W c := 5.9.ft Height of Water Column

Th := 14.31ft Aquifer Thickness


A 4-B-In

Eff rad := ( 1.1 ^

i n f ^ ^ v ' ' _ w ; ;

(Th - W_c)

r w

L

r w

- 1 - 1 Eff_rad is the ln(Re/rw) term described in literature

Eff rad = 2.937


Rjod ;= .57-in Internal radius of rods at SWL

R trans := .113-in Radius of transducer cable

j 2 2 r_c := yj R_rod - Rtrans

r c = 0.559 in Effective radius of casing where water level cycles

To:-854.5-s . i^Kjglg^^ Ho:- 1.894ft Water Level depression


Tf:=899s Ht:=.689-it

t := Tf - To

t = 44.5 s

r c^Eff rad \ , fHo K:= -= = In —

2-L t iHt

K = 2.17x 10 '* —

K = 5 . 5 1 1 x l 0 - ' ^

K = 570.552 — yr


irOfl ; | i l i l S ^ S l l i i i i i Parameter | , |^g6Mi iMf i f i i f f ip ts

Required In Red Well Construction Parameters Site Data

L« (ft)

Ls(ft)

Lw(ft)

Rs (in)

Rb (in)

Rc (In)

/) 4.000

.'rJ 4,000

,jj).5.900

l ) 0.375

|)o,750

0)1 0,570

rt (In)

SWL (ft)

TD(ft)

H(ft )

Ho (in)

Well

r l 0,113

v) 9.690

T): 15,590

{)l4.310

^ -2.000

Partially Penetrab'ng s

Site Name

Project #

Wel l#

Test Id

Location

Date

Field Tech

Analyst

Sonford Products

08-0350

5P133

la

Flowood, MS

:6-l-08

Brian Striggow

Brian Striggow

L o g Name FiliPro)oct5\5onford_5_08\Slug test\ SPl3aj.dat

Interval Name F:\Pfoiacts\Sonford_5_08\5lu3 test\ 5P133_la.lnv

Start Time End Time

I J26a5"oo 163.000


Response

Conftguratfon

Log

Unconfined 9 Analysis Algorithm

Bouwer&Rlce


Where Le/Rb = |6.|,ooo |

I B = |o.556 A = |3,428

Baseline (ft)

t*d/f^|-i.QOO

-0.022

;..Vi«iwPar«m«t;ei;. r8P^^

; VjBwftirflmeterPefliiitibrii-,.;.:.;:.;

Cd I-l.COO

K-correctlpn small dia wellsl-i.ooo


C = 1-1,000 I

D Coeff 1-0.022

Amplitude 10.941


I R-squared |9^95E-i

I To 142.328

Calculated K

K(FT/Dav)n.636

K(cm/SCC)|5.772E-4


Print. TNs Page


CO m CO o Tl .3

C D '

o CJO cb 00 cn

Inten/al Data Set Interval: 163.000 Sec to 268.500 Sec File Name: F:\Projects\Sonford_5_08\Slug_test\SP133_1a.inv Log Name: F:\Projects\Sonford_5_08\Slug_test\SP133b.dat Printed: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 13:39:41

1 .244 1 . 000-

10 0) X

0 . 1 0 0 -

0.010-0 .008-

HTrendDne

iJTo JIDATA a E

- 2 . 1 1 0 . 0 2 0 . 0 3 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 50 .0 60.0 Index

7 0 . 0 8 0 . 0 9 0 . 0 1 0 6 . 7

CO m CO o

o C J CJI o .

Log Data Set File Name: F:\Projects\Sonford_5_08\Slug_test\SP133b.dat Printed: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 13:39:47 • • o n '

: ^ . U -

i 1 - 3 -i

; 1 . 3 -

\ • 0 . 8 -

i 0 . 3 -

1 u.

g - 0 . 2 -X

j - 0 . 7 -1 i

1 - 1 . 2 -

1 • - 1 . 7 -

i 1 0 100

c 0

200

Cr

^ ^

.

A \

\ I 1

300 40G

w

. 500 600 TIME(S)

\

\

\

• " " ^

700

t

\

Vv

800 900

- ^

1000

1

I

i

i 1100

o o

•Lqg.|'^n!;?i^r||^i!ii)|:|] Parameter -gtSjfiyB^litatJt^^


Le(ft)

Ls(ft)

Lui(ft)

Rs (In)

Kb (in)

Rc (In)

^ 4.000

i)4.000

ijs.9ao

.i) 0.375

.;.j/0.750

I 0.570

rt (in)

SWL (ft)

TD(ft)

H(ft)

Ho (In)

Well

i ^ O.I 13

^J-9.690

9 15.590 '

^ 1 4 . 3 1 0

.y-2,100


Site Name:

Project # :

Well # :

Test # :

Location:

Date:

Field Tech:

• Analyst:

ISonford Products

108-0350

5P133

2a

IFlowood, MS

16-1-08

iBrian Striggow 1

iBrlan Striggow 1

Log Name F:\ProJect5^Sonford 5 Oa\SlugJest\ SPl33b.dat

Interval Name F;\Pro)ects\Sonford_5_08\Slug_test\ SP133_2a.inv

Start Timo End Time

522.500 629.500


Response

Configuration

Log

UfKonflned

Analysis Algorithm Bouwer&RICQ

Baseline (ft) 1-0.022 I


Where Le/Rb = [a^.ooo |

A = |'3.42e " H B = 10.556 |

\;yl6W:P««ilBtW;Gripffi

vy!*».Par«net9i}.pe^^

t*d/t*HfQ0 Cdj-i.ooo I

K-Correctlon small dia wells 11.ooo


C = 1-1.000 j


; D Coeff 1-0.021 I R-squared |9,95E-l

Amplitude |0.947 j To |44.06S

Calculated K

K(FT/Day)|1.572

K (cm/Sec) J5.544E-4 |


ifliinfcjjhtsiWwi;;


CO m CO o Tl

CD'

O CO Cfl O

Interval Data Set Interval: 522.500 Sec to 629.500 Sec File Name: F:\Projects\Sonford_5_08\Slug_test\SP133_2a.inv Log Name: F:\Projects\Sonford_5_08\Slug_test\SP133b.dat Printed: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 20:03:26

1 . 000-

0 . 1 0 0 -

o •z

0 .OIG-

0 . OQ l - l

Ij lrendline

IITO |i

IIDATA

^ - ^

o c b n I

•0 .9 1 0 . 0 2 0 . 0 3 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 5 0 . 0 6 0 . 0 Index

7 0 . 0 8 0 . 0 9 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 9 . 1

Tl QJ

CQ CD

cn o

C/) m CO D

T l

i2 CD'

CO cn o

Log Data Set File Name: F:\Projects\Sonford_5_08\Slug_test\SP133b.dat Printed: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 13:57:18

i ^ . u -1 . 8 -

1 . 3 -

0 . 8 -

0 . 3 -1 ^ u_

| - 0 . 2 -

- 0 . 7 -

- 1 . 2 -

- 1 . 7 -

- 2 . 2 -

1

^ ,

\

\

V

.

\

\

Y | f \ Cr

/ ^

1 1

1

. 1 1 1 1 1

-.

i 1

\ 1

\

\

='f v . . !

Y ^ I

1 1 1

/ !

/

' i

i

1 1 1

100 200 300 400 500 600 TD«e(S)

700 800 900 1000 1100

o o

'• Log I ;:if*srW|J^^ Parameter ijiOoQijiijejitatipi^^

Required lil Red Well Construction Parameters Site Data

Le(ft)

Ls(ft)

Lw(ft)

Rs (In)

Rb (in)

Rc (In)

j) 4.000

.rj 4.000

.},i:5,900

y 0.375

'A 0.750

| 0 , 570

rt (In)

SWL (ft)

TD(ft)

H(ft )

Ho (In)

Well

; ^0 .U3

1)9.690

fij 15.590

tj) 14.310

I -2.000


Site Name:

Project # :

Well # :

Test # :

Location:

Date:

Field Tech:

Analyst:

ISonford Products

108-0350 1

|SP133

|3b

[Flowood, MS

6-1-08

jSrian StrlggoM 1

Brian Striggow 1

Log Name F!\Pro|«cts\Sonfofd_5 OB\Slug test\ SPI33b.dat

Interval Name F:\Projects\Sonford 5 08\5ljg test\ SP133_3b.inv

Start Time End Time

[854,500 I |899,000

Analysis

Response

Configuration

Log

Unconflnad fl Analysis Algorithm

Bouwer&Rlce

Baseline (ft) -0.437 1 t*d/t*[ 1.000 Cd j - l OOP I

K-Correction small dia wellsH.000


Where Le/Rb = |64.d6o |

A = I3.42B B = 0,556


C = l-l.OOP I

Documentation and Reports

..yfeWParTOet'erGraphlci;

:Viei« Parameter Definltfew:.


D Coeff 1-0.038 I R-squared I9.87E-1

Amplitude 11.038 To [27.645

Calculated K

K(FT/Day) [2,505

K (cm/Sec) I8.838E-4


vjiViritiTbfsiPfl!^^^


CO m CO o

3 CD'

interval Data Set Interval: 854.500 Sec to 899.000 Sec File Name: F:\Projects\Sonford_5_08\Slug_test\SP133_3b.inv Log Name: F:\Projects\Sonford_5_08\Slug_test\SP133b.dat Printed: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 14:11:21

1 .388

1. 000

•a ID cu

X TD (0

0. I l l

iTrendline

jTo

DATA

y ^

. » - * * a c

2 a !

!U CQ CD

- J O

CO m CO o

ct '

o CO CJl

o


2. 0

-2.2 100 200 300 400 StDO • 6(30

TIME(S) 700 800 900 1000 ll'oO

Tl 0) CQ CD

Appendix F - Well SPl38 Documentation


CO m CO o

O 00

Tl ffi

CQ CD

Slug Test VVorksheet


File Name for interval

Initial time from data set

Final time fi-om data set

Beginning depression fomn data set


File clipped

R-squared for straidght line fit to log plot

Effective Screen, Screen 4- sand-pacJc

Length of scaeen



Radius of borehole

.3125 or .57 if water level cycles in screen sheath

radius of transduc:er cable

Saturated thickness of aquifer. Taken as 24' - SWL


Fully Penetrating?

K (cm/s)


Le/Rb firom STAvl

A fim STAvl

B fim STAvl

C fm STAvl To fm STAvl Verification A Verification B Verification C

Verification K cm/s

Well: i^f / g r Log File: ^ F IS^Jfy-s tu t

Spike # Iteration

Intvl File

To

Tf

init SWL

final SWL

clipped?

R-sqd

Le(ft)

Ls(ft)

Lw(fl)

Rs (in)

Rb (in)

Rc (in)

rt

SWL (ft)

TD(ft)

H(ft) Ho (in)

FP

Result

; 01

^ ^ O C !c

/ W ^ . * t ' 5

2 i ( , . , i S

• '2 ' ' i \ (> ' C . i H

Tnc^

0-1S1 4

4

C-^'i 0.375

0.75 ( / ' 0 7

0.113 U-zcr \ f r H IZ.7S-

^ 3 yl lnc

i ' d i z -do-^

:> <<

S P a ' ^ . l c

Sio-^-st ? / A •i^'g

- 2 . 7 ^ 0 - O . x ? ^

n C

O ' - l l l

/ /

/ /

/ ~ 3 . ^

n y

^•HCfiiO-^

> Of

SfiSfr, 3,,

i i r . o i s S i i i ' 5 ^

- 2 t i l 06

. . / t r r Vers

. -r ^ • ^

/ /

/ /

^ - y

h ^

i . ^23/rii>-'

Le/Rb

A

B

C To A B C K

i>H ^ • ' i l ^ o .^ i ,

\S'^'6

a-'^i'T o - ^ %

\ ' ( ' i ' ^H 3. •776' O.^H'C

l . i / i j x'o-i

C^ • 3 . ^ ^ ^ ^

0-3 i^i-

I U V M . 9 .^7^/0^^ r 7 A ^ ' J i ' ^

Verification of SP 138, test 2a


L:= 48-ill

r_w:= .75. i l l

L , .

Screen length

radius of well

64 X w

X := log| .r w

x= 1.806

A := 1,353 4- 2.157X - 4.027-x^ 4- 2.777-x'' - .460-x''

A = 3.579

B := -.401 4- 2.619-x - 3.267x^ 4- 1.548.x^ - .210x''

3 = 0,558

C;= -1.605 4-9.496.x-12.317-x^ 4- 6.528-x''- .986x'*

C = 3.336

W c := 6.89- ft Height of Waler Column

Th:=12.75fl Aquifer Thickness


A 4-B. hi

Eff rad := ( 1.1 "l

i n l ^ LV V ' - w y y

(Th - W_c) Eff_rad is the ln(Re/rw) term described in literature

Eff rad = 3.036


Rjod ;= .57-ill Internal radius of rods at SWL

R trans := .113-in Radius of transducer cable

. _ _ r_c := •\/ R_rod - Rtrans


To := 610,388-s ^ . . ^ ^^^ Ho := 2.790.ft ^ 3 , ^ ^ Level depression


Tf := 677.188.S Ht:=.188.ft

t := Tf - To

t = 66.8 s

r c -Eff tad 1 , /Ho j^.= = 1„ — 2L t l,Ht

- 4 111 K = 3,986 X 10 —

K =

K =

1.012X

1.048 X

s

, ^ - 3 cm

s

10^1 yr


:;L6g:|.|l[iiSJiM|ii.3K^ Parameter isbpyimeiStetiH


Le (ft)

Ls(ft)

Lw(ft)

Rs (In)

Rb (In)

Rc (In)

r| 4,000

.'••j 4.000

r)6.890

|o.375

^0.750

1^ 0.570

rt(in)

SWL (ft)

TO (f t)

H(f t )

Ho (in)

Well

.;.) 0.113

3:11,250

/ ^ 1B.140

rl 12.750

-3.000


Site Name:

Project # :

Well # :

Tes t# :

Location:

Date:

Field Tech:

Analyst:

[Sonford Products

08-0350

5P138

Ila

Flowood, MS

'6-1-08

Brian Striggow

iBrlan Striggow

L o g Name

F:\Pfojects\Sonford_5 OS\Slug test\ SP13Bb.dat


Fi\Pro)ects\Sonford 5 08\Slug_test\ SP138 la.lnv

S t a r t T ime End T ime

1148.809 216.163


Response

C o n f i g u r a t i o n

Log

Unconfined fl Analysis Algorithm

Bouwer&Rlce

Part ia l ly P e n e t r a t i n g Pa rame te rs

W h e r e L e / R b = le .QQQ |

I B = |0,556 A = [3.428

Baseline ( f t ) -0,049

i;y!')*?*f*>)Mi??-!*r?pi!!C

^MaSilPSMetSiilCflfiriitlbh^is;

t*d/t*|-LOOQ Cd -1.000

K-Correctlon small dia wells[-i.ooo


C = 1-1,000 I

D C o e f f 1-0.040

L o g Response P a r a m e t e r s

I R - s q u a r e d |9.97E-1

A m p l i t u d e [0.662 To [15.580

Ca lcu la ted K

K ( F T / D a v ) [4.596

K ( c m / S e c ) I1.622E-3

Wel l Partially Penetrating

:;,:=; PflntjrhlsPageJi

S E S D Pro jec t # 0 8 - 0 3 5 0 P a g e 7 4 o f 1 0 0

CO m CO D

, 0 CD'

4t o 00

cb CO cn o


1 . 0 0 0

0 . 1 0 0

01 o

0 . 0 1 0 -

0 . 0 0 1 I I

- 2 2 . 6

ilTrendllne

ijTo

JiOATA n E b a j

0. 0 2 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 6 0 . 0 8 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 12 0 . 9 Index •

o o

CO m CO o •D

s

o 00


100 200 500 TIME (S)

800 900 1000

Tl ffi

CQ CD

••i-^fL:|;^!irtiEiy4i|:5|?N^ Parameter i i iMid i i i ^

Required iii Red

Le(ft)

L»(ft)

Lw(rt)

Rs (In)

Rl. (In)

Rc (In)

j)4.000

'^ 4,000

J 6.890

'^ 0.375

;:)o,750

^ 0.570

Well Canstruction Parameters Site Oata

ftC") ; io . i i3

SWL (ft) ;.) 11.250

T^xfi) ai8:i4o

H(f t )

Ho (In)

Woll

912^750

-3.600


Site Name:

Project #

Well # ;

Test # :

Location:

Date:

Field Tech:

Analyst:

jSonford Products

108-0350

SP138

2a

IFlowood, MS

6-1-08 ,

iBrlan Striggow

[Brian Striggow j

Log Name

F;\Pro|ect5\Sonford 5 08\5lug test SP13Bb,dat

Interval Name F:\Projects\Sonford 5 0B\Slug_te5t\ SP138_2a.lnv

Start Time End Time

I510.3B8 I [577.189 j


Response

Configuration

Log

Unconflned 9 Analys is A l g o r i t h m

Bouwer &R Ice

Par t ia l ly P e n e t r a t i n g Pa rame te r s

W h e r e L e / R b = |64.ooo |

A = 13,426

Baseline ( f t ) [.0,045

. t*d/t*|-i-a°P I

] ] B = [0,556 I

• • . • • . • . • • • • , . , ' \

::..i.Vtew;Par«im!Jft^

:.yibwSaraiStercI?eW

Cd [-1.000 Ful ly P e n e t r a t i n g P a r a m e t e r

K -Cor rec t i on smal l ctia w e l l s | - I . D O O C = 1-1,000

D Coeff -0.040


I R-squared I9.97E-1

Amplitude [cL729 To [17.194

Calculated K

K(FT/Day)[4,i65

K (cm/Sec)[i.469E-3


iU:!iWrt:THii^F^&«:;i.|


CO

m CO D

CD' o

4t O •C»

cb CO cn


1. 000

0. 100 T3 10 cu X •D IU

o

0 . 0 1 0 -

0. 001-L-f - 2 2 . 6

i

1 iTrencfline

ITO

iDATA

•;

, • * * .

3 a 1

0. 0 2 0 . 0 40.G 6 0 . 0 Index

8 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 2 0 . 9

TJ ffi

CQ CD

^ T T j ; : - ^ - . ; . r.:::! i t r . . . .

00 o

CO m CO o Tl ,3 C D '

CO U l

o


500 HME (S)

1000

Tl 01

CQ CD

O O

ri:og:;|iIhtey«J;|i);a!^ Parameter :i:po(ajip8r!taj;lq(j^

Requ i red In Red Well Construction Parameters Site Data

Le(ft)

Ls (ft)

Lw(ft)

Rs (In)

Rb (tn)

Rc (In)

rj4.000

;^.4.000

rj 6,890

; | 0.375

j;)o.750

$ 0 . 570

rt (In)

SWL (ft)

TD(ft)

H(f t )

Ho (in)

Well

if iÔ.lis'

'an.250

j ) 18.140

^ 12.750

i^j -3.600


Site Name: I

Project #: I

Well#

Test#

Location:!

Date:

Field Tech:

Analyst:

•Sonford Products

•08-0350

|SP13B

IFlowood, MS

16-1-08

•Brian Striggow

•Brian Striggow

L o g Name

F;\Pro)ect5\Sonford 5_08\Slug test\ 5P138fa.dat

Interval Name F:\Proiects^5onford_5_06\Slug_lest\ SP138_3a,lnv

Start Time End Time

I |863.363 796,956


Response

Configuration

Log

Unconflned

Analysis Algorithm

Baseline (ft) [-0.322 "

t*d/t*IT°o''

Bouwer CiRlce


Where Le/Rb = [6.),ooo 1

A = 13.428 I B = 10.556 |

yviSyieysMl^^ter'Wa^

,;^Viwi^toffitW;6eW

] cd l-l.000 I

K-Correctlon small dia wells [-1.ooo


C = 1-1,000 I


D Coeff Foi62 I R-squared |9.9BE-t

Amplitude 11.028 To|l6.592

Calculated K

K(FT/Dav)|4.316

K (cm/Sec) 11.523E-3


•îî^S^qfei


CO m C O D

Interval Data Set Interval: 796.956 Sec to 863.363 Sec File Name: F:\Projects\Sonford_5_08\Slug_test\SP138_3a.inv Log Name: F:\Projects\Sonford_5_08\Siug_test\SP138b.dat Printed: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 15:17:37

o 00

1 . 0 0 0

0 . 1 0 0 -

-o CO CD

X

0 . 0 1 0

0 . 001-L-, - 2 2 . 6

ilTrendline ! •

iTo

jiDATA

y ^

.»*N a i

3 D

20 .0 4 0 . G 6 0 . 0 Index

80.0 1 0 0 . 0

• j j v ^ r - t i : — !

T l ffi

CQ CD

CO m CO o

o 00


X . D -

1 . 2 -

0 . 7 -

0 . 2 -

- 0 . 3 -

p - 0 . 8 -U-

a - 1 . 3 -

- 1 . 8 -

- 2 . 3 -

- 2 . 8 -

- 3 . 3 -

- T R-

\ '

\

\ ,

l ^

\

\

^^-

/ ^

j I '

\

\

^

/

/

1

0 : r 1 i

1

1

100 200 30G 400 500 TIME (5)

600 700 800 900 1000

Appendix G - Well SPl40 Documentation


CO m CO o T l

CD'

4t O 00

I o t o cn o

Slug Test Worksheet


File Name for interval.

Initial time firom data set

Final time from data set

Beginning depression form data set


File clipped

R-squared fbr straidght line fit to log plot

Effective Screen, Screen 4- sand-pack

Length of screen



Radius of borehole

.3125 or .57 if water level cycles in screen sheath


Saturated thicdcness of aquifer. Taken as 24' - SWL


Fully Penetrating?

K (cm/s)

Well: 5PIH0 Log File:

Spike #

Iteration

Intvl File

To

Tf

init SWL

final SWL

dipped?

R-sqd

Le(ft)

Ls(ft)

Lw(fl:)

Rs (in)

Rb (in)

Rc(in)

rt

SWL (ft)

TD{ft)

H(ft)

Ho (in)

FP

Result

SCiHlPry r U - r

]

a

SPlHO^ L, -2Hr62.

St^'C^2CMj - U 9 7 ^ ' j . i n 5

w * <

;5?^2_ 4

4

/ 2 r ^ S

0.375 0.75

'3129 0.113

iO- 92 2 ? . r r /3 .6>^

- l . T r<

Vx;.-5 Liaixio-"-

.6 a

Sci'<0_3<. TL. ?'?< 7^. So^ - ' - ' / l i Z - 0 -207 v^T

..?6:i

'

/ /

,_ / - i-o

l.iVoxio''-

3 i>

S f l W . . 3 ^

'r7.2HG 7 9i,H% - t . i O ' }

~ ' i 3 t

v^<;

. 'UH

y / '

/

- f , f

i'^Txw-^

H ^

ii%r^^ iZCP-ios' - f . 6 b 5 -

- • 3 ^ 1 >i«j

-77 ' /

/

y ^

~x

- v ^ . £ p ^ - i -

' • • • l lZf iD-^

T l ffi

CQ


Le/Rb ft^om STAvl

A fin STAvl

B fin STAvl

C fin STAvl To fin STAvl Verification A Verification B Verification C

Verification K <?m/s

Le/Rb A B C

To A B C K

^ ^

3 . U 2 . .<,1H

3 121 •7HC

9. i i i . Sii.

€ ^ t

?-ai .?(:>.

'S-o3c^ T'ii,'} ,ii/-3

Verification of SP140, test 4a


L := 48-ill Screen length

i-_w := .75- in radius of well

"'-<-r^) x = 1.806

A.- 1.353 4- 2.157x-4.027x^4-2,777 x''-.460-x'*

A = 3.579

D := -.401 4- 2.619.x - 3.267x^ 4- 1.548x^ - .210.x'*

8=0.558

C := -1.605 4- 9.496-x- 12.317-x^ 4- 6.528x'' - .986.x'*

C = 3.336

W c := 5.9- ft Height of Water Column

Th:=14.31-ft Aquifer Thickness

For a fully penetrating well

Eff rad := 1.1 ^

W_c L

,n- l Eff_rad is the ln(Re/rw) term described in literature

Eff rad = 3.401


Rrod := .3125-in Internal radius of rods at SWL

Rjrans := ,113in Radius of transducer cable

I 2 2 i'_c := \/ R_rod - R_tians


T o : - 118.789-s i^Ulglg^j Ho: - 1,655ft Water Level depression


Tf := 120.105-s Ht := .341ft

t := Tf - To

t = 1.316s

r c^Eff rad 1 , /'Ho K.:= -= = In

2 L t VHt

K = 3.61x 10 ^ — s

K. = 9.169x 10 ' —

K = 9.493 x 10^— •" yr


!'f^9?:f i i^Sf tcwI j I f !^^ Parameter ;|D®mBn|tStS(^^

Requir

L.: (ft)

Ls(ft)

Lw(ft]

Rs (In)

Kb (In)

Rc (In)

ed In Red

;) 4.000

;) 4.000

,l) 12.660

^0.375

;|o.750

',) 0.312


rt (In)

SWL (ft)

TD(ft)

H(f t)

Ho (In)

Well

1^0.113

;) 10.920

,9 23^580

• vJ 13.080 t;i

' i -l.SOO

Fully Penetrating '

Site Name:

Project #:

Well #:

Test #:

Location:

Date;

Field Tech:

Analyst:

ISonford Products 1

108-0350 1

|5P140 1

I ' a .

IFlowood, MS 1

|6-l-08 1

iBrlan Striggow

Brian Striggow j

Log Nama

F:\PfOjoct5\5onford_5 0B\5lug_te5t\ SP140g.dat

Interval Name F:\ProJects\5onford_5_08\Slug_test\ SPHOJa.inv

Start Time End Time

[24.021 I [26.100


Response| Log

Configuration Unconfined fl Analysis Algorithm

Bouwer&Rlce


Where Le/Rb = |64,ooo |

A = [-1.000 I B = 1-1,000 I

Baseline (ft) [-0.205

t*d/ t* | -L00O

.;iJAw^Param^er Gmitiit ;;v;-:

. ^^^^J^^,„„^_^j^^^^^^^. .

Cd 11.000

K-Corrcction small dia wellsl-i.ooo

Fully Penetrating parameter

C = [3.122 ~ |


D Coeff [ - i .sn I R-squared |9,62E-I

Amplitude 11.249 j To |o.674

Calculated K

K (FT/Day) [36,902 1

K (cm/SBC)|l.302E-2 ~ |

Well FuDy Penetrating

:--=:;,RfeilHlliiPa5|*i-y:|


CO m CO D

CD' o

o CD

cb CO CJl

o

Interval Data Set Interval: 24.021 Sec to 26.100 Sec File Name: F:\Projects\Sonford_5_08\Slug_test\SP140_1a.inv Log Name: F:\Projects\Sonford_5_08\Slug_test\SP140g.dat Printed: Tuesday, Febmary 17, 2009 15:26:39

1. 635-r

1 . 0 0 0 -

<0 B o Z c» o

G. 100

0. 036

t rendl ine

To

DATA

/U . • N

D C 3 n 1

Index

TJ ffi

(O CD 05 CD O

CO m CO D T)

CD'

o 00 I

o CO CJI

o

Log Data Set File Name: F:\Projects\Sonford_5_08\Slug_test\SP140g.dat Printed: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 15:26:45

0 . 8 -

0 . 5 -

0 . 3 -

G . l -

- 0 . 1 -

- 0 . 3 -

; p - 0 . 5 -U-

§ - 0 . 7 -LLI

X

- 0 . 9 -

- 1 . 1 -

- 1 . 3 -•

- 1 . 5 -

; - 1 . 7 -

i - 1 . 9 -i

i o -1

\

\ ^ 0 D

r

1

\

V , \

Vw_ r

i i i . ± , , , ,

0 20 40 60

. . » » . d i . ^ L

• ^ R I I I 1 I T

80

\w .. r

10 0 120 TIME (S)

iP^pP^^WBP

140

t

\

\ ^ ¥ ^ ^

160

j [

f

1

^u«

j

180 200 230

T) ffi

:;l-09;;|^|:fet?§i^!3|litNl^ Parameter i :pwiJff i tai lOJTfi i l^

Required In Red

Lc(ft)

L«(ft)

Lw(rt)

Rs (In)

Rb(ln)

Rc(ln)

^ 4.000

.r)4,0Q0

(lj 12.660

.y:0,375

ii) 0.750

g 0.312


rt (In)

SWL (ft)

TO (ft)

H(f t )

Ho (In)

Well

'^•0.113

J l 10,920

li1:23.5B0

l ) 13,080

i|-1.500

Fully Penetrating fl

Site Name j

Project # 1

Well #

Test # \

Location {

Date 1

Fleld Tech j

Analyst

ISonford Products 1

08-0350 1

[SP140 j

j3a

iFlowood, MS 1

6-1-08 1

iBrlan Striggow ]

Brian Striggow 1

Log Name

F;\Pro|ects\Sonfard_5 08\Slug_test\ SPHOg.dat

Interval Name F;\Pro)ect5\Sonford_5_08\Slug_te5t\ SPH0_3a.inv

Start Time End Time

76.878 76.509


Response

Configuration

Log

Unconflned

M


Where Le/Rb = r ; : ^ 1

Analysis Algorithm Bouwer&Rlce

A = 1-1,000 I B = 1-1.000 I Baseline (ft)

t *d / t * | -L0D0 '

-0.212

i ViaW:Piii-airieti3r<ji:ii

;i;yjaw.p«rai««ter;t>efihft!6iVfc^

cd i-l,000

K-Correctlon small dia wells! i,ooo


C = 13.122 1

D Coeff [-1.594


I R-squared |9.62E-1

Amplitude jl,209 To [0.746

Calculated K

K (FT/Day) [33.334

K(cm/Sec)|i.l76E-2

Well Fully Penetrating

v:;;\fJrhl;Th!s;p?(i ^


CO m CO o

CD' c^

4t o CJO cb CO cn o

Interval Data Set Interval: 76.878 Sec to 78.509 Sec File Name: F:\Projects\Sonford_5_08\Slug_test\SP140_3a.inv Log Name: F:\Proiects\Sonford_5_08\Slug_test\SP140g.dat Printed: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 15:52:34

1 . 499-

i . 000-

cu X - o o

0. 100

0 . 036

0 o D

liTrendline

IJDATA D C 3 o !

o'. 0 o ' l o ' 2 0 . '3 0 . '4 0 . '5 0 . ' 6 u ' . l 0 . 8 G. 9 l . ' o l . ' l - 1.'2 Index

CO m CO o T)

CD'

4t O 00


0. 8

iiniwuwuiwifiitiiiimi

100 120 TIME (5)

180 200 230

T l ffi

CQ CD CD CO

O

i-Miil-IffiîJ^îllffl&il Parameter ;ippiffimeiifelldnyp(ibi^

Requ i red In Red Well Canstruction Parameters Site Oata

Le(ft)

Ls (ft)

Lw(ft)

Rs (in)

Rb (In)

Rc (In)

t j 4.000

.t) "t.OOO

r| 12.660

. | 0 , 375

;^ :D.750

§0 312

rt(ln)

SWL (ft)

TD(ft)

H(f t )

Ho (In)

Well

'•Vci.113

i j 10.92O

: f 23,580

| ) 13.060

:|-l.SOO

Fully Penetrating

Site Name

Project #

Well*

Test*

Location

Date

Field Tech

Analyst

Sonford Products

08-0350

SP140

3b

Ffowood, MS

6-1-08

Brian Sb-lggow

isrlan Striggow

Log Name F:\Projects\Sonford 5 08\Slug test\ SP140g.dal

Interval Name F;\ProJects\SonfordJ_08\Slug_test\ SP140 3b.Inv

Start Time End Time

I |78i4S6 77,246


Response

Conflguratlan

Log

Unconflnad i Analysis Algorithm

Bouwer&Rlce


Where Le/Rb = |64,QOO "]

A = 1-1,000 I B = 1-1,000

Baseline (ft) -0.212

..\teW;Perameter aaphlcH i;;; :l

'. ;yiew;pâ|ii l:er;beflniiiii3J)55.;

t*d/t*|-i.ooo Cd [-1.000 [

K-Correctlon small dia wells |-i..ooo


ZH C = | r i 2 2


D Coeff 1-1.998 I R-squared |9,64E-1

Amplitude l i . l08 To |0 SS2

Calculated K

K (FT/Day) |45,100

K (cm/Sec) J1.591E-2

Well FuBy Penetrating

;:.piiriti!niiis:PaflS


CO m CO a TJ

,3 CD

O 00

cb CO CJl

o

Interval Data Set Interval: 77.246 Sec to 78.456 Sec File Name: F:\Projects\Sonford_5_08\Slug_test\SP140_3b.inv Log Name: F:\Projects\Sonford_5_08\Slug_test\SP140g.dat Printed: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 16:04:08

9 . 196 -

1 . 000-

IU

X

"O £ o Z CP

o 0 . 100-

0 . 0 0 9 = -

• •

Trendline

To

DATA

/ V l

a z 3 D '

- 0 . 2 - 0 . 1 Q.'o O . ' l 0 . '2 O.'s . 0 . ' 4 0 . 5 0 . ' 6 o ' . l O.'s G.'9 l . ' o i . ' l Index

Tl 01

CQ CD

O O

CO m vs o

C D ' O. 4t O 00


0. 8-

p - O . S -u.

I-O.7-1 111 X

- 0 . 9

- 1 . 1 -

- 1 . 3

- 1 . 5

- 1 . 7

- 1 . 9

- 2 . 1 0

g|MlHiimwli>ill|«»Ni»»

20 40 60 80 10 0 12 0 nME(S)

140 160 180 200 230

T l ffi

CQ CD

i^iiflO:i5~ilWeiS?Mii|ii^ Parameter ;^'(Jw:OiriiieptBtl|wflt^|)(^

Rnqulrftd n

Le(ft)

Ls(ft)

LlM(ft)

Rs (In)

Rb(ln)

Rc(ln)

Red

^ 4,000

'}j 4,000

^12.660

l ) 0.375

{J 0.750

i^ 0.312


rt (In)

SWL (ft)

TD(ft)

H(f t )

Ho (In)

Weil

,^) 0.113

y 10,920

.'I\).25.380

1^13.080 • • - \ *

jJ-1.600

Fully Penetrating

Site Name:

Project # :

Well # ;

Test # :

Location:

Date:

Fleld Tech:

Analyst:

Sonford Products

08-0350

SP140

4a

Flowbod, MS

6-1-08

iBrlan Striggow

Brian Striggow

L o g Name

F;\ProJect5\Sonford_5_08\Slug_test\ SPHOg.dat


F;\ProJect5\Sonford_5_08\Slag_tost\ SPl 40 4a.lnv

S t a r t Time End Time

| l 18.790 120,105


Response

C o n f i g u r a t i o n

Log

Unconflned

Par t ia l ly P e n e t r a t i n g Pa rame te r s

W h e r e L e / R b = |64,ooo j

Analys is A l g o r i t h m Bouwer 6Rlce

A = I-1.000 I B = 1-1.000 [

Baseline ( f t )

t * d / t *

-0,167

L:Mflwi?araiiii§iercSafijitcv.|^

: JaWPar i iw te r p i H p ^ -s. i;;;!

-1,000 ] cd[-l.OOO j Fully Penetrating Parameter

K-Correction small dia wells j-i.ooo C = [3.122


D Coeff [-1,561 I R-squared |9,74E-I

Amplitude | i .U8 To 10,712

Calculated K

K (FT/Day) 34,930

K(cm/3ec)|l.232E-2

Well Fully Penetrating

sWi*;Tb!;;P^ii«:s;3


C/) m CO o

, 0

CD'

o

00

Interval Data Set Interval: 118.790 Sec to 120.105 Sec File Name: F:\Projects\Sonford_5_08\Slug_test\SP140_4a.inv Log Name: F:\Projects\Sonford_5_08\Slug_test\SP140g.dat Printed: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 16:09:25

3 . 611-

1. OOG

X

cu

" id E

g.0. 100

0. 008

liTrendline

llTo

IDATA

^ ^

a E h _H_i

n •

I ] I I I I I I 1 I I

- 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 4 0 . 5 0 . 6 0 . 7 0 . 8 0 . 9 1.0 1 . 1 1 .2 1 .3 1 .4 Index

"0 ffi

CQ CO

O O

CO m CO a -o

Q 4


G. 8-T

20 40 60 80 100 120 TIME(S)

140 160 180 200 230

'•:v.^::'i-~:i-'.f_- ..-I'JtZ ;ir.!^ •

VJ^^^ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY … · VJ^^"^ I UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL...

Documents

Transcript of VJ^^^ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY … · VJ^^"^ I UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL...

VJ^*^^ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY … · VJ^*^"^ I UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL...

Documents

Transcript of VJ^*^^ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY … · VJ^*^"^ I UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL...

VJ^^^ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY … · VJ^^"^ I UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL...

Transcript of VJ^^^ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY … · VJ^^"^ I UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL...