Variance and covariance M contains the mean Sums of squares General additive models.
Variance-Covariance data of experimentalCovariance … · Variance-Covariance data of...
Transcript of Variance-Covariance data of experimentalCovariance … · Variance-Covariance data of...
1“Workshop on Nuclear Data and Uncertainty Quantification”, CCFE, Abingdon, UK, 24-25 January 2012
Variance-Covariance data of experimentalVariance Covariance data of experimental observables
in the resonance regionB. Becker, P. Schillebeeckx, S. Kopecky, J. Heyse
Joint Research Centre (JRC)IRMM - Institute for Reference Materials and MeasurementsGeel BelgiumGeel, Belgiumhttp://irmm.jrc.ec.europa.eu/http://www.jrc.ec.europa.eu/
2“Workshop on Nuclear Data and Uncertainty Quantification”, CCFE, Abingdon, UK, 24-25 January 2012
Objective WP36
Produce accurate cross section data together withProduce accurate cross section data together with
reliable covariance information in the resonance region
Reduce bias effects
Produce reliable and realistic covariance data
3“Workshop on Nuclear Data and Uncertainty Quantification”, CCFE, Abingdon, UK, 24-25 January 2012
Covariance on model cross sections, (, V)
ModelReaction(, V) (, V)
( , V ) determined by :
• Reaction model : = F () : model parameters• Reaction model : = Fm() , : model parameters– R-Matrix; HF+WF; Optical Model
C l l ti M th d f V• Calculation Method for V
– GLUP : V = D V DT with D = F/
MC i l ti (t f ti f i bl CEA C d h )– MC-simulations (transformation of variables, CEA Cadarache)
• + model parameters (, V): in resonance regionfully determined by experimentfully determined by experiment
4“Workshop on Nuclear Data and Uncertainty Quantification”, CCFE, Abingdon, UK, 24-25 January 2012
Covariance matrix of model parameters : ( , V)
(, V)Model
Reaction + Experiment (Zexp, Vz, , V)
)),(GZ(V)),(GZ()( mexp1exp,Z
Tmexp
2
• Model Gm : reaction model () + experiment ()• Reaction model: R-matrix
Resonance parameters = (R’ E J )– Resonance parameters = (R , Er, J, n, , …)
• Experimental model : parameters – Normalization, Target characteristics, Resolution, …
• Determination of reliable (, V) requires full details of the experiment and data reduction procedures
5“Workshop on Nuclear Data and Uncertainty Quantification”, CCFE, Abingdon, UK, 24-25 January 2012
Resonance shape analysis
Tm = Gm(, , )0.8
1.0
mis
sion
dE)E('T)Et()t(T ),E(totne)E('T
Gm is a model describing the observable Tm with model parameters:4
ls
0.2
0.4
0.6
Tran
msm
Mn powder n = 9.94 10-3
dE),,E(T)E,t()t(Tm e),E(T
model parameters:Resonance parameters Experimental parameters (N, TD, n, …)(t,E) response function of TOF-spectrometer 1.0
10000 20000 30000 40000 50000
-404
Res
iuda
: Least square adjustment (generalized, …)V : GLUP0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Tran
smis
sion
11VT
T )DVD(V
G U
MC Simulations + REFIT (CEA Cadarache)
10000 20000 30000 40000 50000
-4
4
Res
idua
ls
Sputtering target n = 1.92 10-2 Vexp,T )DVD(V
Neutron Energy / eVTime-of-flight
6“Workshop on Nuclear Data and Uncertainty Quantification”, CCFE, Abingdon, UK, 24-25 January 2012
Model parameters from experimental dataa) reaction experiment
800
1000 Exp. Fm(x,)
s) statisticscountingonlyVZ
)),x(FZ(V)),x(FZ()( mexp1exp,Z
Tmexp
2
(1 % at peak)
)A(eA)(F 222
2)oxx(
400
600
Cou
nt ra
te /
(1/s
stat st cscou t go yexpZ ( p )
),x,A(e2
),x(F 2o
22m
010)00013.0(5x001)30.0(100A
o 4.6 4.8 5.0 5.2 5.4
0
200C
x / unit
S th ti XS d l
2)oxx(
100)0000078.0(0018.0)(
2o
22PA
Synthetic XS model: XS shape: Gaussian Peak value: 10000 counts
),x,P(eP),x(F 2o
22
)oxx(
m
58.001)52.3(437.939P
2PA correlation depends on fit region
1058.0)0000078.0(0018.0010)00013.0(5x
2o
7“Workshop on Nuclear Data and Uncertainty Quantification”, CCFE, Abingdon, UK, 24-25 January 2012
Model parameters from experimental datareaction experiment
),x,A(e2
A),x(F 2o
22
2)oxx(
2m
),x(mFnm e),x(T
2
38001)610(100A 1.0
n = 0.01
1038.0)000024.0(0018.0010)00030.0(5x
38.001)61.0(100A
2o
0.4
0.6
0.8
ount
rate
/ (1
/s)
0 01
n = 0.001
4.6 4.8 5.0 5.2 5.40.0
0.2
Co
x / unit
n = 0.01
1082.0)000010.0(0018.0010)00011.0(5x
82.001)78.0(100A
2o
n = 0.01
8“Workshop on Nuclear Data and Uncertainty Quantification”, CCFE, Abingdon, UK, 24-25 January 2012
Model parameters from experimental dataa) reaction experiment
)B,C(VBCZ expexpZexpexp B5B
)),x(FZ(V)),x(FZ()( mexp1exp,Z
Tmexp
2
001)33.0(100A
p
800
1000 Exp. Fm(x,)
s)
%10BBand
1005
PBwith
100)000010.0(0018.0010)00015.0(5x
)(
2o
400
600
nt ra
te /
(1/s
200
400
Cou
n
4.8 4.9 5.0 5.1 5.20
x / unit001)30.0(100A
only counting statistics
100)0000078.0(0018.0010)00013.0(5x
2o
9“Workshop on Nuclear Data and Uncertainty Quantification”, CCFE, Abingdon, UK, 24-25 January 2012
Model parameters from experimental dataa) reaction experiment
)N,C(VCNZ expexpZexpexp )),x(FZ(V)),x(FZ()( mexp
1exp,Z
Tmexp
2
)000130(5x)98.1(9.98A
%2N800
1000 Exp.
N/N2 %s)
p
)0000080.0(00180.0)00013.0(5x
2o
%2
N
400
600
2 %
nt ra
te /
(1/s
200
400
Cou
n
4.8 4.9 5.0 5.1 5.20
x / unit001)30.0(100A
only counting statistics
100)0000078.0(0018.0010)00013.0(5x
2o
10“Workshop on Nuclear Data and Uncertainty Quantification”, CCFE, Abingdon, UK, 24-25 January 2012
Model parameters from experimental dataa) reaction experiment
)),x(FZ(V)),x(FZ()( mexp1exp,Z
Tmexp
2
)N,C(VCNZ expexpZexpexp
800
1000 Exp.
N/N2 %s)
p
)000130(5x)98.1(9.98A
%2N
400
600
2 % 5 %
nt ra
te /
(1/s
)0000080.0(00180.0)00013.0(5x
2o
%2
N
%5NN
)0000084.0(00179.0)00014.0(5x
)85.4(62.93A
2o
200
400
Cou
n
4.8 4.9 5.0 5.1 5.20
x / unit
11“Workshop on Nuclear Data and Uncertainty Quantification”, CCFE, Abingdon, UK, 24-25 January 2012
Model parameters from experimental dataa) reaction experiment
)),x(FZ(V)),x(FZ()( mexp1exp,Z
Tmexp
2
)N,C(VCNZ expexpZexpexp
800
1000 Exp.
N/N2 %s)
p
)000130(5x)98.1(9.98A
%2N
400
600
2 % 5 % 10 %
nt ra
te /
(1/s
)0000080.0(00180.0)00013.0(5x
2o
%2
N
200
400
Cou
n
%5NN
)0000084.0(00179.0)00014.0(5x
)85.4(62.93A
2o
%10N
)00017.0(5x)87.8(60.78A
o
4.8 4.9 5.0 5.1 5.20
x / unit%10
N
)000010.0(00179.0)(
2o
shape is not affected
12“Workshop on Nuclear Data and Uncertainty Quantification”, CCFE, Abingdon, UK, 24-25 January 2012
Model parameters from experimental datab) transmission experiment
)),x(FT(V)),x(FT()( mexp1exp,Z
Tmexp
2
)N,C(VCNT expexpZexpexp p
%10NN
1.0
N
0.6
0.8 Exp. Fm(x,)
nsm
issi
on
010)00030.0(5x41.001)63.0(100A
o
0.4
Tran 1041.0)000024.0(0018.0
)(2o
4.8 4.9 5.0 5.1 5.20.2
x / unit38.001)61.0(100A
only counting statistics
1038.0)000024.0(0018.0010)00030.0(5x
2o
13“Workshop on Nuclear Data and Uncertainty Quantification”, CCFE, Abingdon, UK, 24-25 January 2012
Model parameters from experimental datab) transmission experiment
)),x(FT(V)),x(FT()( mexp1exp,Z
Tmexp
2
)B,C(VCBT expexpZexpexp p
%10BB
21
PB
1.0
B 2P
0.6
0.8 Exp. Fm(x,)
nsm
issi
on
010)00030.0(5x41.001)66.0(100A
o
0.4
Tran 1041.0)000024.0(0018.0
)(2o
4.8 4.9 5.0 5.1 5.20.2
x / unit38.001)61.0(100A
only counting statistics
1038.0)000024.0(0018.0010)00030.0(5x
2o
14“Workshop on Nuclear Data and Uncertainty Quantification”, CCFE, Abingdon, UK, 24-25 January 2012
Model parameters from experimental datab) transmission experiment
)),x(FT(V)),x(FT()( mexp1exp,Z
Tmexp
2
)N,B,C(VCNBT expexpZexpexp p
%10BB
%10NN
21
PB
1.0
B
010)00034.0(5x61.001)2.5(0.85A
o
N 2P
0.6
0.8 Exp. Fm(x,)
nsm
issi
on
1061.0)00038.0(0018.0
)(2o
0.4
Tran
38.001)61.0(100A
only counting statistics4.8 4.9 5.0 5.1 5.20.2
x / unit
1038.0)000024.0(0018.0010)00030.0(5x
2o
15“Workshop on Nuclear Data and Uncertainty Quantification”, CCFE, Abingdon, UK, 24-25 January 2012
Peelle’s Pertinent Puzzle Solutions
1) Normalization: use estimate E[y] for normalizationcan not always be applied in practice (chicken/egg problem)
G. D’Agostini, “On the use of covariance matrix to fit correlated data”, NIM. A346 (1994) 3062
22
1 zz
2212
2k2
2y21y
1y22y1
)yy(k
zYKZ
Yexp
2) General solution: include exp. parameters as adjustable parameters
exp
additional advantage: avoid underestimation of V when Bayes’ is applied
F. Fröhner, “Assigning uncertainties to scientific data”, NSE. 126 (1997) F Fröhner “Evaluation of data with systematic errors” NSE 145 (2003) 342F. Fröhner, Evaluation of data with systematic errors , NSE 145, (2003) 342
16“Workshop on Nuclear Data and Uncertainty Quantification”, CCFE, Abingdon, UK, 24-25 January 2012
Reliable model parameters from experiment
F.H. Fröhner,
“Evaluation of Data with Systematic Errors”, NSE 145 (2003) 342y , ( )
« The optimal way to handle error-affected auxiliary quantities(“nuisance parameters”) in data fitting and parameter estimation is toadjust them on the same footing as the parameters of interest and tointegrate (marginalize) them out of the joint posterior distributionintegrate (marginalize) them out of the joint posterior distributionafterward. »
17“Workshop on Nuclear Data and Uncertainty Quantification”, CCFE, Abingdon, UK, 24-25 January 2012
Peelle’s Pertinent Puzzle: e.g. 103Rh(n,) in URR
))T,S(FZ(V))T,S(FZ()T,S()T,S(FZ
mexp1expZ
Tmexp
2m
VZexp includes 2% normalization uncertainty
150
175 60 m 0.26 mm Full covariance
V1/2 )
125
2 ) / (
barn
eV
100
E n1/2
0 50000 10000075
Neutron energy / eV
18“Workshop on Nuclear Data and Uncertainty Quantification”, CCFE, Abingdon, UK, 24-25 January 2012
Peelle’s Pertinent Puzzle: e.g. 103Rh(n,) in URR
))T,S,N(G)Y,N((V))T,S,N(G)Y,N(()T,S,N()T,S,N(G)Y,N(
mexpexp1
expY,NT
mexpexp2
m
exp,
Normalization included as model parameter
150
175 60 m 0.26 mm Fm(N,S
,T
)
V1/2 )
125
2 ) / (
barn
eV
100
E n1/2
0 25000 50000 75000 10000012500075
Neutron energy / eV
19“Workshop on Nuclear Data and Uncertainty Quantification”, CCFE, Abingdon, UK, 24-25 January 2012
Peelle’s Pertinent Puzzle: e.g. 103Rh(n,) in URR
))T,S,N(G)Y,N((V))T,S,N(G)Y,N(()T,S,N()T,S,N(G)Y,N(
mexpexp1
expY,NT
mexpexp2
m
exp,
Normalization included as model parameter
150
175 30 m 0.05 mm Evaluation Full covariance
V1/2 )
150
175 60 m 0.26 mm Evaluation Full covariance
125
) / (b
arn
eV
125
100
E n1/2 )
100
0 50000 100000 15000075
Neutron energy / eV0 50000 100000 150000
75
Neutron energy / eV
20“Workshop on Nuclear Data and Uncertainty Quantification”, CCFE, Abingdon, UK, 24-25 January 2012
Accurate cross section data (, V )
Require reliable model parameters which can only be deduced from experiment:experiment:
• Relation between experimental observables and model parameters are well defined
• All uncertainty components are identified, quantified and documented (uncorrelated & correlated)
Proposal NDS-IAEA / IRMM (Otsuka et al.)
21“Workshop on Nuclear Data and Uncertainty Quantification”, CCFE, Abingdon, UK, 24-25 January 2012
AGS - system (Analysis of Geel Spectra)Special format for full covariance information
Analysis of Geel Spectra (AGS)
• Transforms count rate spectra into observables (transmission, yields)
• Includes all features to perform a full analysis
f• Full uncertainty propagation starting from counting statistics
• Output: complete covariance matrix
S i l f f i i• Special format for covariance matrix
– Reduce space for data storage (EXFOR)– Document the sources of uncertainties due to each step
in the data reduction process
X Z Dz Sz
SZ : correlated part
DZ : uncorrelated partn values
in the data reduction process– Verify the contribution of each quantity introducing a
correlated uncertainty component!
Z pdim. (n x k)C. Bastian, Int. Soc. Optical Eng. 2867 (1997) 611
22“Workshop on Nuclear Data and Uncertainty Quantification”, CCFE, Abingdon, UK, 24-25 January 2012
TOF - spectrum and parameter vectorf(a,Y) only channel-channel operations
)Y,a(fZn.dim)counts(spectrumTOF )V,Y( Y
vectorparameter)a,...,a(a k1
TT GDGGVGV
)V,a( a
if
2l tdi lDV1)
YYYaaaZ GDGGVGV k
iik,aa a
fgG.g.e
2iyYY elementsdiagonalDV 1)
2) operationschannelchannelonlyf
definitepositiveandsymmetric:Va
Taaa
LLV Cholesky transformation
)
3)
py
matrixtriangularlowerLa
23“Workshop on Nuclear Data and Uncertainty Quantification”, CCFE, Abingdon, UK, 24-25 January 2012
TOF - spectrum and parameter vectorf(a,Y) only channel-channel operations
)Y,a(fZn.dim)counts(spectrumTOF )D,Y( Y
vectorparameter)a,...,a(a k1
TT GDGGVGV
)V,a( a
YYYaaaZ GDGGVGV
Taaa
LLV diagonalDV YY aaa
Ta
Taaa
GLLGdiagonal:GY
channelchannelonlyf
TYYYZ GDGD
DZ diagonal n - values
aaZLGS
dim (n k)T
Z DSSV DZ diagonal, n - valuesdim (n,k) ZZZZ
24“Workshop on Nuclear Data and Uncertainty Quantification”, CCFE, Abingdon, UK, 24-25 January 2012
TOF - spectrum and parameter vectorf(a,Y) only channel-channel operations
)Y,a(fZn.dim)counts(spectrumTOF )D,Y( Y
vectorparameter)a,...,a(a k1
TT GDGGVGV
)V,a( a
YYYaaaZ GDGGVGV
Taaa
LLV
TYYYZ GDGD
aaZLGS
TZ DSSV
dim (n,k)ZZZZ DSSV
AGS - format number of values to be stored dim (n k+1) number of values to be stored dim. (n, k+1)
k = total number of correlated uncertainty components
25“Workshop on Nuclear Data and Uncertainty Quantification”, CCFE, Abingdon, UK, 24-25 January 2012
TOF - spectrum and parameter vectorf(a,Y) only channel-channel operations
)Y,a(fZn.dim)counts(spectrumTOF )D,Y( Y
vectorparameter)a,...,a(a k1
TT GDGGVGV
)V,a( a
YYYaaaZ GDGGVGV
Taaa
LLV
TYYYZ GDGD
aaZLGS
TZ DSSV componentseduncorrelatDcomponentscorrelatedS ZZZZ DSSV
AGS - format number of values to be stored dim (n k+1)
componentseduncorrelatDZcomponentscorrelatedS
Z
number of values to be stored dim. (n, k+1)k = total number of correlated uncertainty components
26“Workshop on Nuclear Data and Uncertainty Quantification”, CCFE, Abingdon, UK, 24-25 January 2012
TOF - spectrum and parameter vector Example: YaZ
)Y,a(fZn.dim)counts(spectrumTOF )D,Y( Y
)V,a( 2aa 1.dimvectorparameter)a(a 1
TT GDGGVGV YYYaaaZ GDGGVGV
TaaaL diagonalDV YY
diagonal:GYi
ii,a y
afg
YGa
channelchannelonlyf
ayfgi
iii,Y
Y2
Z DaD
DZ diagonal
aZLYS
dim (n 1)T
Z DSSV DZ diagonaldim (n,1) ZZZZ
27“Workshop on Nuclear Data and Uncertainty Quantification”, CCFE, Abingdon, UK, 24-25 January 2012
TOF - spectra in AGS format and parameter vector)Z,Z,b(gZ 21 b, Z1 and Z2 not correlated
)V,b( b bkb.dim
Input Output
)V,b( b bkb.dim
)Z,Z,b(fZ 21
T
Tbbb
LLV
)V,Z( 1Z1 )Y,a(fZ 1111 11 ka.dim Z
TZZZ DSSV
TcomponentseduncorrelatD
Z
componentscorrelatedSZ
1ZT1Z1Z1Z DSSV
)V,Z( 2Z2 )Y,a(fZ 2222 22 ka.dim
pZ
2ZT2Z2Z2Z DSSV
2Z2Z2Z
28“Workshop on Nuclear Data and Uncertainty Quantification”, CCFE, Abingdon, UK, 24-25 January 2012
AGS : )Z,Z,b(gZ 21 b, Z1 and Z2 not correlatedZ1 and Z2 in AGS-format
1ZT1Z1Z1Z DSSV
2ZT2Z2Z2Z DSSV
)k(Sdi )k(Sdi
Tbbb LLV
TTTZ GVGGVGGVGV
)k,n(Sdim 11Z )k,n(Sdim 2
2Zbkb.dim
2Z2Z2Z1Z1Z1ZbbbZ GVGGVGGVGV
T2Z2Z2Z
T1Z1Z1Z
T2Z
T2Z2Z2Z
T1Z
T1Z1Z1Z
Tb
TbbbZ
GDGGDGGSSGGSSGGLLGV
T2Z2Z2Z
T1Z1Z1ZZ
GDGGDGD
2Z2Z2Z1Z1Z1Z2Z2Z2Z2Z1Z1Z1Z1ZbbbbZ
2Z2Z1Z1ZbbZ SGSGLGS
componentseduncorrelatDZ
dim. (n x k) k = kb + k1 + k2
componentscorrelatedSZ
ZTZZZ
DSSV
29“Workshop on Nuclear Data and Uncertainty Quantification”, CCFE, Abingdon, UK, 24-25 January 2012
AGS, File format
ZTZZZ
DSSV
n : number of data points (TOF)
k b f titi i t d i l t dk : number of quantities introducing correlateduncertainty components
DZ : uncorrelated part (n values)Z p ( )
SZ : matrix dimension (n x k)contains the contribution of each quantitycreating a correlated uncertainty component
X Z DZ SZ
creating a correlated uncertainty component
C. Bastian, Int. Soc. Optical Eng. 2867 (1997) 611
Observable Z (dimension n) with k sources of correlated uncertainties
30“Workshop on Nuclear Data and Uncertainty Quantification”, CCFE, Abingdon, UK, 24-25 January 2012
AGS, File format
ZTZZZ
DSSV
Storage spaceCovariance matrix
n2 elements (e.g. 32k x 8 bytes 8 Gb) ( g y )AGS representation
n (k+1) elements (32k, 20 corr. 5 Mb)
InformationCovariance matrix
no separation between components
AGS representationseparates uncorrelated and correlated components(avoid PPP)
X Z DZ SZ
C. Bastian, Int. Soc. Optical Eng. 2867 (1997) 611
Observable Z (dimension n) with k sources of correlated uncertainties
(avoid PPP)verify impact of each individual component
31“Workshop on Nuclear Data and Uncertainty Quantification”, CCFE, Abingdon, UK, 24-25 January 2012
AGS commands
Write only commands ags_mpty Create an empty AGS file
tA I t t f th AGS filags_getA Import spectra from another AGS fileags_getE Import/interpolate evaluated data from an ENDF file ags_getXY Import histogram data from an ASCII file Read/Write commands : Operations on spectra ags_addval Add a constant value to all Y-values of a spectrum ags_avgr Average Y values per channel ags_func Calculates the Y values for a special function ags_idtc Determine the dead time correction of a TOF-spectrum ags_divi Divide a spectrum by another ags mult Multiply a spectrum with anotherg _ p y pags_lico Linear combination of n spectra with n constants ags_ener Build energy from TOF X-vector ags_fit Non-linear fit of spectra ags_fxyp User-programmed function
Read Only commands Read Only commandsags_edit Edit constants and scalers attached to a spectrum ags_list List Y values of spectra with common X values ags_putX Export final result to an ASCII file ags_scan Scan the contents of an AGS file
32“Workshop on Nuclear Data and Uncertainty Quantification”, CCFE, Abingdon, UK, 24-25 January 2012
AGS, Script for transmission data
# create ags-file ags_mpty TRFAK # read sample out scaler=TOout,CMoutscaler TOout,CMout ags_getXY TRFAK /SCALER=$scaler /FROM=spout.his /ALIAS=SOUT # read sample in scaler=TOin,CMin ags_getXY TRFAK /SCALER=$scaler /FROM=spin.his /ALIAS=SIN /LIKE=A01SOUT
'out
'out
'in
'in
BCBCT
# dead time correction dtcoef=DTCOEF ags_idtc TRFAK,A01SOUT /DTIME=$dtcoef /LPSC=1 ags_idtc TRFAK,B01SIN /DTIME=$dtcoef /LPSC=1 # normalize to central monitor and divide by bin width ags_avgr TRFAK,C01SOUT /CMSC=2 ags_avgr TRFAK,D01SIN /CMSC=2 #calculate background contribution ags func TRFAK /FUN=f01 /PARFILE=PAROUT /ALIAS=SBOUT /LIKE=A01SOUTags_func TRFAK /FUN f01 /PARFILE PAROUT /ALIAS SBOUT /LIKE A01SOUTags_func TRFAK /FUN=f01 /PARFILE=PARIN /ALIAS=SBIN /LIKE=A01SOUT #subtract background ags_lico TRFAK,E01SOUT,G01SBOUT /ALIAS=SOUTNET /PAR=1.0,-1.0 ags_lico TRFAK,F01SIN,H01SBIN /ALIAS=SINNET /PAR=1.0,-1.0 #create transmission factor ags_divi TRFAK,I01SOUTNET,J01SINNET /ALIAS=TRFAK
33“Workshop on Nuclear Data and Uncertainty Quantification”, CCFE, Abingdon, UK, 24-25 January 2012
Calculation of transmission
105
Cout
Bout
Sample out105
Cin
Bin
Sample in
103
104
Cou
nts
103
104
Cou
nts
'out
'out
'in
'in
expBC
BCNT
1 10 100 1000102
Time / s1 10 100 1000
102
Time / s 0 8
1.0
to
r
Time / sTime / s
0 4
0.6
0.8
mis
sion
fact
0.2
0.4
Tran
s
1 10 100 10000.0
Time / s
34“Workshop on Nuclear Data and Uncertainty Quantification”, CCFE, Abingdon, UK, 24-25 January 2012
Output AGS_PUTX
Bin / Bin : 10.0 %Bout / Bout : 5.0 %N / N : 0 5 %
CZ = DZ + S ST XL XH Z Z Zu DZ S
VZ = DZ + S ST
N / N : 0.5 % XL XH Z Z Zu DZ S
Zu2 Bin Bout N
800 1600 0.999 0.79E-2 0.59E-2 0.35E-4 0.14E-2 -0.08E-2 0.50E-2 1600 2400 0.999 0.86E-2 0.67E-2 0.45E-4 0.18E-2 -0.10E-2 0.50E-2 2400 3200 0.999 0.92E-2 0.73E-2 0.54E-4 0.21E-2 -0.12E-2 0.50E-2 3200 4000 0.999 0.97E-2 0.78E-2 0.61E-4 0.24E-2 -0.13E-2 0.50E-2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
16000 16800 0 899 1 30E 2 1 07E 2 1 15E 4 0 51E 2 0 25E 2 0 45E 2 16000 16800 0.899 1.30E-2 1.07E-2 1.15E-4 0.51E-2 -0.25E-2 0.45E-2 16800 17600 0.818 1.24E-2 1.02E-2 1.04E-4 0.53E-2 -0.24E-2 0.41E-2 17600 18400 0.701 1.15E-2 0.93E-2 0.86E-4 0.54E-2 -0.21E-2 0.35E-2 18400 19200 0.594 1.06E-2 0.84E-2 0.71E-4 0.55E-2 -0.18E-2 0.30E-2 19200 20000 0.501 0.98E-2 0.76E-2 0.57E-4 0.56E-2 -0.15E-2 0.25E-2 20000 20800 0.504 1.00E-2 0.77E-2 0.59E-4 0.57E-2 -0.16E-2 0.25E-2 20800 21600 0.581 1.09E-2 0.85E-2 0.73E-4 0.58E-2 -0.19E-2 0.29E-2 21600 22400 0.707 1.22E-2 0.98E-2 0.97E-4 0.60E-2 -0.23E-2 0.35E-2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
964000 972000 0 999 5 91E 2 3 75E 2 14 06E 4 3 98E 2 2 18E 2 0 50E 2 964000 972000 0.999 5.91E-2 3.75E-2 14.06E-4 3.98E-2 -2.18E-2 0.50E-2 972000 980000 1.037 6.09E-2 3.89E-2 15.13E-4 4.04E-2 -2.31E-2 0.52E-2 980000 988000 1.001 6.01E-2 3.80E-2 14.46E-4 4.05E-2 -2.23E-2 0.50E-2 988000 996000 1.010 5.92E-2 3.77E-2 14.23E-4 3.96E-2 -2.20E-2 0.50E-2
35“Workshop on Nuclear Data and Uncertainty Quantification”, CCFE, Abingdon, UK, 24-25 January 2012
AGS Output -> Covariance matrix
ght /
ns
e-of
-flig
Tim
e
Time-of-flight / ns
36“Workshop on Nuclear Data and Uncertainty Quantification”, CCFE, Abingdon, UK, 24-25 January 2012
Reliable model parameters from experiment
Requirements:
Well documented experimental observables in EXFOR
Including:
- experimental details (TD, n, N, …)
- all uncertainty components (correlated and uncorrelated, AGS-
format)
- + Response function of TOF-spectrometers
Recommendation IAEA / IRMM based on the AGS - system
Otsuka et al., ND2010, JKPS 59 (2011)