Vanessa Oakes Thesis (PDF 6MB)
Transcript of Vanessa Oakes Thesis (PDF 6MB)
i
Cyclin A/CDK2 regulates
multiple G2 phase pathways
Vanessa Oakes BSc (Hons)
A thesis submitted to Queensland University of Technology
in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of
Doctor of Philosophy
AUGUST 2012
Diamantina Institute for Cancer, Immunology and Metabolic Medicine
University of Queensland, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, QLD, Australia
and
Queensland University of Technology, School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health,
Brisbane, QLD, Australia
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Statement of originality ............................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined.
Contribution by other colleagues .............................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined.
Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................................. vi
Abstract .................................................................................................................................................. viii
Publications ............................................................................................................................................. xii
List of Abbreviations .............................................................................................................................. xiii
List of Figures ........................................................................................................................................ xvii
List of Tables ......................................................................................................................................... xixx
Chapter 1 Summary of the literature. ................................................................................................. 1-54
1.1 The cell cycle, structure and function. ......................................................................................... 2
1.1.1 Stages of mitosis ................................................................................................................... 2
1.2 Cancer and the cell cycle .............................................................................................................. 6
1.3 Regulation of cell cycle................................................................................................................. 7
1.3.1 The cyclin/CDK complexes .................................................................................................... 8
1.3.2 Cell cycle checkpoints ......................................................................................................... 13
1.4 Exploiting the DNA damage checkpoints, a cancer therapy. ..................................................... 17
1.5 DNA damage pathways .............................................................................................................. 18
1.5.1 ATM/ATR ............................................................................................................................. 20
1.5.2 Chk1 and Chk2..................................................................................................................... 24
1.5.3 p53 ...................................................................................................................................... 27
1.5.4 Cdc25 ................................................................................................................................... 28
1.6 Other important cell cycle regulators ........................................................................................ 32
1.6.1 p38 MAPK ............................................................................................................................ 32
1.6.2 Claspin ................................................................................................................................. 35
1.6.3 Wee1 ................................................................................................................................... 37
1.6.4 Cdh1 .................................................................................................................................... 38
1.6.5 Plk1 ...................................................................................................................................... 40
iii
1.7 Checkpoint recovery ................................................................................................................... 42
1.8 G2/M regulation by cyclin A/CDK2 and cyclin B/CDK1 .............................................................. 44
1.9 Chk1 regulation .......................................................................................................................... 47
1.9.1 The role of Chk1 during an unperturbed cell cycle ............................................................. 50
1.9.2 Chk1 inactivation ................................................................................................................. 52
1.10 Hypothesis ................................................................................................................................ 53
1.11 Significance ............................................................................................................................... 54
1.12 Aims of the study ...................................................................................................................... 54
Chapter 2 Materials and Methods .................................................................................................... 55-82
2.1 Antibodies ................................................................................................................................... 56
2.2 Cell Biology Methods. ................................................................................................................. 58
2.2.1 Cell culture ........................................................................................................................... 58
2.2.2 Cell Synchronisation. ........................................................................................................... 59
2.2.3 Cell Treatments. .................................................................................................................. 59
2.2.4 Transfection Treatments. .................................................................................................... 60
2.2.5 Cell fixation and immunofluorescent labelling. ................................................................... 62
2.2.6 Microscopy and image acquisition ...................................................................................... 65
2.2.7 FACS Analysis ....................................................................................................................... 66
2.2.8 Cellomics .............................................................................................................................. 68
2.3 Molecular Biology Methods ....................................................................................................... 69
2.3.1 Plasmid list ........................................................................................................................... 69
2.3.2 Plasmid construct cloning........................................................................................................ 74
2.3.2.1. Generation of Cherry-Chk1 and GST-Chk1 constructs. ................................................... 74
2.3.2.1 Generation of PBD-GFP .................................................................................................... 75
2.4 Protein Biochemistry Methods. .................................................................................................. 76
2.4.1 Immunoblot Analysis ........................................................................................................... 76
2.4.2 Immunoprecipitation ........................................................................................................... 77
2.4.3 Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and immunoblot
analyses ........................................................................................................................................ 79
2.4.4 Cyclin A/CDK2 kinase assay ................................................................................................. 80
Chapter 3 Active Chk1 is present in unperturbed G2 phase ........................................................... 83-111
3.1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 84
iv
3.2 RESULTS...................................................................................................................................... 87
3.2.1 Activated Chk1 is present during an unperturbed cell cycle. ............................................. 87
3.2.2 ATR is responsible for Chk1 phosphorylation in an unperturbed cell cycle during G2 phase.
..................................................................................................................................................... 97
3.2.3 pChk1 localises to the centrosomes during mitosis. ......................................................... 101
3.3 DISCUSSION .............................................................................................................................. 104
Chapter 4 Characterising the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 phase delay ..................................... 112-146
4.1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 113
4.2 RESULTS.................................................................................................................................... 116
4.2.1 Cyclin A depletion delays G2 phase progression and entry into mitosis .......................... 116
4.2.2 Inhibition of CDK2 with a specific inhibitor delays G2 phase progression into mitosis. ... 119
4.2.3 Cyclin A/ CDK2 regulates the timing of centrosomal cyclin B/ CDK1 activation ............... 124
4.2.4 Cyclin A / CDK2 localises to the centrosomes in late G2 phase. ....................................... 129
4.2.5 Cyclin A/ CDK2 depletion or inhibition affects the exit from G2 / M checkpoint. ............ 132
4.3 DISCUSSION .............................................................................................................................. 138
Chapter 5 Chk1 is required to implement the cyclin A/ CDK2 dependent G2 phase delay .......... 147-171
5.1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 148
5.2 RESULTS.................................................................................................................................... 150
5.2.1 Chk1 contributes to the cyclin A/ CDK2 dependent G2 delay. ......................................... 150
5.2.2 Inhibition of G2 phase CDK2 causes an accumulation of G2 phase cells and activated Chk1.
................................................................................................................................................... 156
5.2.3 Chk2 siRNA cannot overcome the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 phase delay. ................ 158
5.2.4 ATR phosphorylates Chk1 to impose the cyclin A dependent G2 phase delay. ............... 161
5.2.5 Activated Chk1 is not a consequence of cyclin A siRNA induced DNA damage................ 162
5.3 DISCUSSION .............................................................................................................................. 165
Chapter 6 Cyclin A/CDK2 regulation of Chk1 ................................................................................ 172-207
6.1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 173
6.2 RESULTS.................................................................................................................................... 175
6.2.1 pChk1 and Cyclin A co-localise during G2 phase. ............................................................. 175
6.2.2 Chk1 and Cyclin A interact during G2 phase. .................................................................... 177
6.2.3 Cyclin A can phosphorylate Chk1 on Ser286 and Ser301. ................................................ 180
6.2.4 Over-expression of Chk1 delays mitotic entry. ................................................................. 181
v
6.2.5 In vivo phosphorylation of Chk1 Ser286 and Ser301 is not dependent on cyclin A/CDK2.
.................................................................................................................................................... 193
6.2.6 Chk1 mutants do not change localisation. ........................................................................ 199
6.3 DISCUSSION .............................................................................................................................. 200
Chapter 7 Identification of other G2 phase pathways regulated by cyclin A/CDK2 ..................... 208-246
7.1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 209
7.2 RESULTS .................................................................................................................................... 212
7.2.1 Plk1 inhibition resembles cyclin A/CDK2 depletion/inhibition. ........................................ 212
7.2.2 Cyclin A siRNA causes mislocalisation of Plk1. .................................................................. 214
7.2.3 Cdh1 level is reduced with cyclin A depletion. ................................................................ 2255
7.2.4 Reduction of Cdh1 does not affect the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay. ................. 2311
7.2.5 Claspin is required during the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 phase delay to regulate pChk1
levels. ........................................................................................................................................ 2322
7.3 DISCUSSION .............................................................................................................................. 240
Chapter 8 Final Discussion ............................................................................................................. 247-263
Chapter 9 References .................................................................................................................... 264-317
Chapter 10 Appendix .................................................................................................................... .318-320
10.1 Appendix 1 ............................................................................................................................. 319
vi
QUT Verified Signature
QUT Verified Signature
vii
Acknowledgements
I am indebted to my supervisor, Associate Professor Brian Gabrielli, for his advice,
assistance and support over the last few years. I am grateful for having a great mentor that
empowered me to grow as an individual both personally and professional. Sometimes it’s
the hard times, such as writing this thesis, to realise the positive outcome of the challenges
and I am sure I will continue to reflect on the many experiences you have given me.
Thanks also to my QUT supervisor, Professor Adrian Herington. Your continued support has
allowed me to get this far and I will be forever grateful.
I would sincerely like to thank past and present Gabrielli Laboratory colleagues and friends
who supported me and contributed towards this thesis. In particular I would like to
especially thank Dr Heather Beamish who has helped greatly throughout this whole process.
I would also like to individually mention the following member of the Lab; Dr Francis
Stevens, Nichole Giles, Leonore de Boer, Puji Astuti (also for sharing her Birthday),
Stephanie Le, Sabrina Kee, Max Ranall, Brittney Harrington, and Rose Boutros. Many thanks
also to Sandrine Roy for help with the Confocal/Microscopy, as well as your life guidance.
Finally, I owe a huge thank you to my family and friends who have been there from the
beginning and have willingly shared my ups and downs of life as a student. The dedication
required to finally complete this journey is attributed to my late Grandfather, Charles
Wobcke. I will always be grateful for your constant love and support.
viii
Abstract
The cell cycle is a carefully choreographed series of phases that when executed successfully
will allow the complete replication of the genome and the equal division of the genome and
other cellular content into two independent daughter cells. The inability of the cell to
execute cell division successfully can result in either checkpoint activation to allow repair
and/or apoptosis and/or mutations/errors that may or may not lead to tumourgenesis.
Cyclin A/CDK2 is the primary cyclin/CDK regulating G2 phase progression of the cell cycle.
Cyclin A/CDK2 activity peaks in G2 phase and its inhibition causes a G2 phase delay that we
have termed ‘the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay’. Understanding the key pathways that
are involved in the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay has been the primary focus of this
study.
Characterising the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay revealed accumulated levels of the
inactive form of the mitotic regulator, cyclin B/CDK1. Surprisingly, there was also increased
microtubule nucleation at the centrosomes, and the centrosomes stained for markers of
cyclin B/CDK1 activity. Both microtubule nucleation at the centrosomes and
phosphoprotein markers were lost with short-term treatment of CDK1/2 inhibition. Cyclin
A/CDK2 localised at the centrosomes in late G2 phase after separation of the centrosomes
but before the start of prophase. Thus G2 phase cyclin A/CDK2 controls the timing of entry
into mitosis by controlling the subsequent activation of cyclin B/CDK1, but also has an
unexpected role in coordinating the activation of cyclin B/CDK1 at the centrosome and in
the nucleus. In addition to regulating the timing of cyclin B/CDK1 activation and entry into
ix
mitosis in the unperturbed cell cycle, cyclin A/CDK2 also was shown to have a role in G2
phase checkpoint recovery.
Known G2 phase regulators were investigated to determine whether they had a role in
imposing the cyclin A/ CDK2 dependent G2 delay. Examination of the critical G2 checkpoint
arrest protein, Chk1, which also has a role during unperturbed G2/M phases revealed the
presence of activated Chk1 in G2 phase, in a range of cell lines. Activated Chk1 levels were
shown to accumulate in cyclin A/CDK2 depleted/inhibited cells. Further investigations
revealed that Chk1, but not Chk2, depletion could reverse the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2
delay. It was confirmed that the accumulative activation of Chk1 was not a consequence of
DNA damage induced by cyclin A depletion. The potential of cyclin A/CDK2 to regulate Chk1
revealed that the inhibitory phosphorylations, Ser286 and Ser301, were not directly
catalysed by cyclin A/CDK2 in G2 phase to regulate mitotic entry. It appeared that the ability
of cyclin A/CDK2 to regulate cyclin B/CDK1 activation impacted cyclin B/CDK1s
phosphorylation of Chk1 on Ser286 and Ser301, thereby contributing to the delay in G2/M
phase progression.
Chk1 inhibition/depletion partially abrogated the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay, and
was less effective in abrogating G2 phase checkpoint suggesting that other cyclin A/CDK2
dependent mechanisms contributed to these roles of cyclin A/CDK2. In an attempt to
identify these other contributing factors another G2/M phase regulator known to be
regulated by cyclin A/CDK2, Cdh1 and its substrates Plk1 and Claspin were examined. Cdh1
levels were reduced in cyclin A/CDK2 depleted/inhibited cells although this had little effect
x
on Plk1, a known Cdh1 substrate. However, the level of another substrate, Claspin, was
increased. Cdh1 depletion mimicked the effect of cyclin A depletion but to a weaker extent
and was sufficient at increasing Claspin levels similar to the increase caused by cyclin A
depletion. Co-depletion of cyclin A and Claspin blocked the accumulation of activated Chk1
normally seen with cyclin A depletion alone. However Claspin depletion alone did not
reduce the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay but this is likely to be a result of inhibition of
S phase roles of Claspin.
Together, these data suggest that cyclin A/CDK2 regulates a number of different
mechanisms that contribute to G2/M phase progression. Here it has been demonstrated
that in normal G2/M progression and possibly to a lesser extent in G2 phase checkpoint
recovery, cyclin A/CDK2 regulates the level of Cdh1 which in turn affects at least one of its
substrates, Claspin, and consequently results in the increased level of activated Chk1
observed. However, the involvement of Cdh1 and Claspin alone does not explain the G2
phase delay observed with cyclin A/CDK2 depletion/inhibition. It is likely that other
mechanisms, possibly including cyclin A/CDK2 regulation of Wee1 and FoxM1, as reported
by others, combine with the mechanism described here to regulate normal G2/M phase
progression and G2 phase checkpoint recovery. These findings support the critical role for
cyclin A/CDK2 in regulating progression into mitosis and suggest that upstream regulators of
cyclin A/CDK2 activation will also be critical controllers of this cell cycle transition.
The pathways that work to co-ordinate cell cycle progression are very intricate and
deciphering these pathways, required for normal cell cycle progression, is key to
xi
understanding tumour development. By understanding cell cycle regulatory pathways it will
allow the identification of the pathway/s and their mechanism/s that become affected in
tumourgenesis. This will lead to the development of better targeted therapies, inferring
better efficacy with fewer side effects than commonly seen with the use of traditional
therapies, such as chemotherapy. Furthermore, this has the potential to positively impact
the development of personalised medicines and the customisation of healthcare.
xii
Publications
De Boer, L., Oakes, V., Beamish, H., Giles, N., Stevens, F., Somodevilla-Torres, M., DeSouza,
C., and Gabrielli, B (2008). "Cyclin A/cdk2 coordinates centrosomal and nuclear mitotic
events." Oncogene 27(31): 4261-4268.
Beamish, H., de Boer, L., Giles, N., Stevens, F., Oakes, V., Gabrielli B (2009). Cyclin A/cdk2
regulates adenomatous polyposis coli-dependent mitotic spindle anchoring. Journal of
Biological Chemistry, 284, 29015-23
Boutros, R., Lorenzo, C., Mondesert, O., Jauneau, A., Oakes, V., Dozier, C., Gabrielli, B.,
Ducommun, B (2011). CDC25B associates with a centrin 2-containing complex and is
involved in maintaining centrosome integrity. Biology of the Cell, 103, 55-68.
Oakes, V., Brooks, K., Edwards, B., Ranall, M., Leo, P., Pavey, S., Pinder, A., Beamish, H.,
Mukhopadhyay, P., Lambie, D and Gabrielli B (2012). “A potent Chk1 inhibitor is selectively
cytotoxic in melanomas with high levels of replicative stress.” Oncogene.
xiii
List of Abbreviations
Ab Antibody
ACA anti-centromere antibody
Ala/A Alanine
APC/C Anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome
APS Ammonium Persulfate
ATM Ataxia telangiectasia mutated
ATP Adenosine 5'-triphosphate
ATR ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein
ATRIP ATR interacting protein
BRCA1 Breast cancer type 1 susceptibility protein
BSA Bovine Serum Albumin
Bub Budding inhibited by benomyl
BubR1 Budding inhibited by benomyl receptor 1
caff caffeine
CAK CDK activating kinase
CDK cyclin dependent kinase
CDK2i cyclin dependent kinase 2 inhibitor
Chk1 Checkpoint kinase 1
Chk1i Checkpoint kinase 1 inhibitor
Chk2 Checkpoint kinase 2
Cy3 indodicarbocyanine 3
Cy5 indodicarbocyanine 5
DAPI 4’-6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole
DDR DNA damage response
DI Diamantina Institute
DMEM Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s medium
DMP dimethyl pimelimidate
xiv
DMSO dimethyl sulfoxide
DNA Deoxyribonucleic Acid
DNA-PK DNA-dependent protein kinase
DSB Double stranded break
dsDNA double stranded DNA
DTT Dithiothreitol
EDTA Ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid
EGTA Ethylene glycol-tetra acetic acid
ERK Extracellular-signal-related kinase
FACS Fluorescence Activated Cell Sorting
FBS Foetal bovine serum
FoxM1 Forkhead protein M1
Gadd45 growth arrest and DNA damage inducible gene
G1 Gap 1
G2 Gap 2
GFP Green fluorescent protein
GST Glutathione-S transferase
h hour/s
HeLa Human cervical carcinoma cell line
H2O2 Hydrogen Peroxide
HRP Horse radish peroxidise
H3 Histone H3
HU Hydroxyurea
IgG Immunoglobulin G
IP Immunoprecipitate
IPTG Isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside
IR Ionising radiation
kDa kilo Dalton
LB Lysogeny broth
xv
M Mitosis
MAPK Mitogen-activated kinase
MeOH Methanol
MK-2 MAP kinase-activation protein kinase 2
MPM2 Mitotic Protein Marker 2
MRN Mre11, Rad50, Nbs1
MTOC Microtubule organising centre
NES Nuclear Export Signal
NLS Nuclear Localisation Signal
p38 MAPK p38 Mitogen-activated kinase
PBD Polo-box domain
PBS Phosphate buffered saline
PBST Phosphate buffered saline plus tween 20
pChk1 phosphorylated Chk1 Ser317
PCNA Proliferating cell nuclear antigen
PCR polymerase chain reaction
PI Propidium Iodide
PIKK Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase related kinase
PFA Paraformaldehyde
Plk Polo like kinase
Plk1i Polo like kinase 1 inhibitor
PP2A Protein phosphatase 2A
PY15 CDK1 phosphorylation Tyrosine 15
QUT Queensland University of Technology
RPA Replication protein A
Rb Retinoblastoma protien
S Synthesis phase
SAC Spindle assembly checkpoint
SCF Skp, Cullin, F-box containing complex
xvi
SDS Sodium dodecyl sulphate
SDS-PAGE Sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
Ser/S Serine
siRNA short interfering RNA
SS Serum supreme
SSB Single stranded DNA break
ssDNA Single stranded DNA
TBE Tris-Borate-EDTA
TBS Tris buffered saline
TBST Tris buffered saline plus tween 20
TEMED N, N, N', N'-tetramethylethylenediamine
Thr/T Threonine
TKO MEFs Triple knock-out mouse embryonic fibroblasts
Tyr/Y Tyrosine
ULP Universal Lysis Buffer
UQ University of Queensland
USP ubiquitin-specific protease
UV(R) Ultraviolet (radiation)
WT Wildtype
xvii
List of Figures
Figure 1.1 The eukaryotic cell cycle is made up of 4 separate phases. .................................................. 3
Figure 1.2 The mechanisms of the cell cycle – cellular processes and regulation of the cell cycle and
the different phases of mitosis. .............................................................................................................. 5
Figure 1.3 Cellular outcomes in response to DNA damage. ................................................................... 9
Figure 1.4 Illustration of the G2/M regulation of cyclin B/CDK1 activation. ........................................ 12
Figure 1.5 The basic structure of the DNA damage response (DDR) pathway..................................... 19
Figure 1.6 ATM-dependent response to DNA damage. ....................................................................... 23
Figure 1.7 ATR-dependent response to DNA damage. ........................................................................ 26
Figure 1.8 The ATR dependent DDR pathway is highly complex.......................................................... 33
Figure 3.1 pChk1 is present in asynchronously growing cells but strongly induced in response to DNA
damage. ................................................................................................................................................ 89
Figure 3.2 Active Chk1 is present during an unperturbed cell cycle. ................................................... 90
Figure 3.3 Chk1 siRNA effectively removes Chk1 and its typical functions. ......................................... 92
Figure 3.4 Cellomics data confirms the presence of pChk1 in an unperturbed cell cycle. .................. 95
Figure 3.5 Chk1 phosphorylation by ATR in G2 phase is required for timely mitotic entry. ................ 98
Figure 3.6 pChk1 is present at the centrosomes in G2 and Mitosis of an unperturbed cell cycle. .... 102
Figure 4.1 Cyclin A siRNA causes a G2 phase delay. ........................................................................... 117
Figure 4.2 CDK2i causes a G2 phase delay which was due to specific CDK2 inhibition. .................... 121
Figure 4.3 Cyclin A siRNA and CDK2i disconnect the coordinated activation of centrosomal and
nuclear pools of cyclin B/CDK1. .......................................................................................................... 125
Figure 4.4 Cyclin A/CDK2 is required for coordinated cyclin B/CDK1 activity. ................................... 130
Figure 4.5 Cyclin A/CDK2 localises to the centrosomes in late G2 phase. ......................................... 133
Figure 4.6 Cyclin A/CDK2 is required for exit from a G2 phase checkpoint arrest. .......................... 136
Figure 4.7 Cyclin A/CDK2 is required for exit from a G2 phase checkpoint arrest. ............................ 139
Figure 5.1 Chk1 depletion causes reversal of the cyclin A dependent G2 phase delay. .................... 151
Figure 5.2 CDK2 inhibition confirms a role for pChk1 Ser317 in the cyclin A / CDK2 dependent G2
delay. .................................................................................................................................................. 157
Figure 5.3 Chk2 does not have a role in the cyclin A dependent G2 phase delay. ............................ 159
xviii
Figure 5.4 ATR is required to phosphorylate Chk1 to induce the cyclin A dependent G2 phase delay.
........................................................................................................................................................... 163
Figure 5.5 Cyclin A siRNA does not cause DNA damage. ................................................................... 166
Figure 6.1 Cyclin A and Chk1 co-localise at the centrosomes. ........................................................... 176
Figure 6.2 Cyclin A and Chk1 co-immunoprecipitate ......................................................................... 178
Figure 6.3 Cyclin A/CDK2 phosphorylates Chk1 in vivo ..................................................................... 182
Figure 6.4 Chk1 SS317,345DD, with S286A and S301A mutations do not delay in G2 phase ........... 183
Figure 6.5 Chk1 Ser286 and Ser301 Alanine mutants cause a delay of mitotic entry. ...................... 186
Figure 6.6 Cherry-Chk1 constructs have impaired Ser317 and Ser345 phosphorylation. ................. 190
Figure 6.7 Flag Chk1 constructs are phosphorylated on Ser317 and delay mitotic entry. ................ 192
Figure 6.8 Chk1 phosphorylation on Ser286 Ser301........................................................................ 1964
Figure 6.9 SS286,301AA mutation does not affect Chk1 localisation ................................................ 201
Figure 7.1 Plk1 inhibition causes phenotypes similar to cyclin A/CDK2 depletion/inhibition. .......... 215
Figure 7.2 Plk1 overexpression did not contribute to delayed mitotic entry caused by cyclin A siRNA
treatment. .......................................................................................................................................... 218
Figure 7.3 Cyclin A affects Plk1 localisation at the centrosomes and kinetochores in mitosis. ...... 2221
Figure 7.4 Cdh1 levels are reduced with cyclin A/CDK2 depletion/inhibition. ................................ 2243
Figure 7.5 Cdh1 overexpression does not rescue the cyclin A/CDK2 G2 phase delay and itself inhibits
mitotic entry. ................................................................................................................................... 2287
Figure 7.6 Cdh1 siRNA does not rescue the cyclin A/CDK2 G2 phase delay and delays mitotic
progression also. .............................................................................................................................. 2343
Figure 7.7 Claspin is increased with cyclin A depletion. .................................................................... 235
Figure 7.8 Claspin siRNA can reduced pChk1 levels during the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay but
cannot rescue the delay. .................................................................................................................... 238
Figure 8.1 Model of Chk1 regulation during G2/M progression. ....................................................... 251
Figure 8.2 Claspin involvement and regulation during G2/M............................................................ 254
Figure 8.3 A simplified schematic of G2 regulation involving cyclin A/CDK2. ................................... 263
Figure 10.1 Cellomics data confirms the presence of pChk1 in an unperturbed cell cycle. .............. 320
xix
List of Tables
Table 1.1 Cyclin/CDKs complex are activated within specific phases of the cell cycle. ....................... 10
Table 2.1 Antibodies List. ..................................................................................................................... 57
Table 2.2 List of siRNA. ......................................................................................................................... 62
Table 2.3 List of Plasmids ..................................................................................................................... 69
Table 2.4 List of Chk1 mutagenesis primers used. ............................................................................... 70
Table 2.5 List of sequencing primers used. .......................................................................................... 74
Table 2.6 PBD-GFP cloning primers ...................................................................................................... 76
Table 2.7 Components and Volumes used for SDS-PAGE gels ............................................................. 79
1
Chapter 1
Summary of the literature
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
2
1.1 The cell cycle, structure and function.
An active cell division cycle consists of four stages. When quiescent, G0 cells commit to re-
enter the cell cycle they will enter the first gap phase of the cell cycle known as G1. In G1,
cell growth is initiated which involves the synthesis of organelles requiring both structural
proteins and enzymes. G1 also, prepares the cell for DNA replication in the subsequent
phase known as S phase or the synthesis phase. After duplication of the genome, cells will
grow further during G2 phase. Also during G2 phase, the cell will ensure that DNA
replication has occurred with complete fidelity and that all DNA damage is repaired prior to
mitotic entry. It is essential that G2 processes occur correctly as this is the penultimate
phase before cells enter mitosis. Mitosis is the most complex stage of the cell cycle and
involves the even segregation of the replicated chromosomes and the production of two
independent daughter cells (Alberts et al., 1994, Doree and Hunt, 2002, Tyson et al., 2002).
Mitosis itself is comprised of several stages that will be discussed in more detail in section
1.1.1. As Figure 1.1 depicts, the cell cycle may be a continuous process. Once cells complete
mitosis the daughter cells are capable of undergoing their own cellular divisions by re-
entering G1 or they may stop dividing and enter G0.
1.1.1 Stages of mitosis
There are distinct stages of mitosis; prophase, prometaphase, metaphase, anaphase,
telophase and cytokinesis (Figure 1.2). During prophase the chromosomes condense, the
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
3
Figure 1.1 The eukaryotic cell cycle is made up of 4 separate phases.
G1 (gap 1), S (synthesis) and G2 (gap 2) phases are collectively referred to as interphase, and
completion of the cell cycle occurs with M phase (mitosis) (Alberts et al. 1994; Doree and Hunt,
2002; Tyson et al. 2002). When not dividing, cells are considered to be in G0.
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
4
nuclear envelope breakdown (NEB) occurs and the centrosomes migrate to opposing
positions across the nucleus. The centrosome is the microtubule organising centre (MTOC)
and prior to mitosis it duplicates to facilitate the formation of a bipolar mitotic spindle
required for mitosis (See Figure 1.2). In addition the centrosomes also nucleate astral
microtubules which radiate away from the chromosomes and are required for spindle
attachment to the cell cortex, spindle orientation and positioning, and the fidelity of cell
division (Strauss et al., 2006). The duplication of the centrosomes occurs during S phase and
is regulated by cell cycle regulators including, cyclin E and CDK2 (Sterns et al., 2005).
Regulation of centrosome duplication is important as aberrant numbers of centrosomes
have been associated with increased genomic instability and cancer (Brinkley, 2001, Lingle
and Salisbury, 2000, Wang et al., 2004).
The centrosome initiated microtubules that form the spindle are captured by the
kinetochores which are associated with centromeric regions of each chromosome prior to
metaphase (prometaphase). During metaphase microtubule attachment to each
kinetochore is achieved and the tension across the kinetochore aligns the chromosomes to
the midline of the cell. Once in anaphase, sister chromatids move actively toward the
opposite centrosomes or ‘poles’ of the mitotic spindle. During telophase the chromosomes
begin to de-condense and nuclear envelopes form around the daughter chromosomes
located at opposite poles. The final stage of mitosis is cytokinesis which involves the final
separation of the daughter cells by the contracting and pinching of an actinomyosin-based
ring (Alberts et al., 1994, Nigg, 2001, Pines and Rieder, 2001) (Figure 1.2). The actinomyosin
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
5
Figure 1.2 Mechanisms of the cell cycle - cellular processes and regulation of the cell cycle and the
different phases of mitosis.
At the top of the figure cyclin/CDKs are placed above the particular stages of the cell cycle for which
they are required. The cell schematics illustrate the structural changes that occur within particular
stages of the cell cycle mitosis. The grey object indicates the centrosomes and the lines protruding
from the centrosomes are representative of microtubules (2n = a single genome, 4n = duplicated
genome). The red arrows indicate the checkpoints of the cell cycle.
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
6
ring is composed of several important proteins that are required to assist with the pinching
action between the two daughter cells. Each stage of mitosis can be visualised with the aid
of Figure 1.2.
1.2 Cancer and the cell cycle
The importance of the cell cycle was evident to early cell biologists and is made clear from
quotes such as that by Schleiden & Schwann in 1838: ‘Cell division is the only path to
immortality. Non dividing cells can live for as long as a hundred years, but they always
eventually die.’ (The Cell Cycle: An Introduction (1993) Murray, A & Hunt, T (W.H. Freeman
& Co., New York)). This statement perhaps overstates the case somewhat, but for growth
and homeostasis of all organisms there must be cell division. However, a hazard of cell
division is the possibility of incurring genetic or epigenetic errors. The worst outcome of
these errors is uncontrolled cell growth and division which is a feature associated with
tumour formation.
Cancer formation is associated with genes that promote or suppress tumour growth -
known as oncogenes or tumour suppressors, respectively. Oncogenes and tumour
suppressors often have one or more cell cycle function/s. Although the overall structure of
the cell cycle is well understood, the many pathways that contribute to its regulation are
less understood. The initiation and progression of cancer is a culmination of multiple
defects within the cell cycle. Defining a detailed understanding of the pathways that
contribute towards the normal regulation of cell cycle progression is essential to understand
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
7
how defects in these pathways contribute to cancer. This level of detail in relation to the
cell cycle is also necessary to identify potential targets, for the treatment of cancer/s, that
are characteristic of a particular defect.
The remainder of this chapter will detail the regulatory pathways critical to the research
covered in this thesis. Further in depth information will be supplied about G2/M
progression, in particular the processes and regulation required for G2/M progression in
both normal and in DNA damage situations will be discussed.
1.3 Regulation of cell cycle
The correct progression of cells through the phases of the cell cycle is controlled by the
ordered expression and activation of the cyclin dependent kinase (CDK) complexes. The
activation of cyclin/CDK complexes provides the forward impetus through the cell cycle,
whereas their inhibition can implement a ‘checkpoint’ which becomes the braking
mechanism of the cell cycle.
DNA damage activates a complex response network that incorporates cell cycle arrest, DNA
repair and possibly apoptosis if the damage cannot be repaired (Khanna and Jackson, 2001,
Niida and Nakanishi, 2006, Medema and Macurek, 2011). To repair damage to the cell,
regulatory pathways are triggered that allow the cell time for repair. This stoppage of the
cell cycle to allow repair of DNA damage is referred to as a checkpoint. In cases where
damage cannot be repaired and apoptotic signalling fails the cell will continue uncontrolled
through cell division leading to genomic mutation/s (Zhou and Elledge, 2000) (Hyka-
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
8
Nouspikel et al., 2012). Uncontrolled cellular division is a common characteristic of most
cancers and may contribute to the initiation and/or progression of tumourgenesis (Figure
1.3). Damaged DNA can be caused spontaneously by endogenous defects in S phase or
mitosis or indirectly by exogenous external stimuli such as exposure to ultraviolet radiation
(UV(R)) or ionising radiation (IR). The protein pathways that comprise these responses to
DNA damage are critical to ensure the production of identical progeny. Therefore the loss of
normal cell cycle controls such as checkpoints is a ‘hallmark’ of many human cancers
(Piwnica-Worms, 1999) and understanding the regulation of the cell cycle is critical for
understanding the formation of cancer.
1.3.1 The cyclin/CDK complexes
The cell cycle is regulated at the most basic level by the ordered activation of the CDK family
of Ser/Thr kinases (Morgan, 1995). As the name implies, the activity of these kinases is
dependent on their association with their regulatory subunit known as a cyclin. There are
approximately 30 cyclins (Okamoto and Beach, 1994, Rickert et al., 1996, Peng et al., 1998)
and 21 CDK genes but only 11 cyclins and 5 CDKs have known cell cycle functions (Rickert et
al., 1996). The major cyclins required for cell cycle progression are typically expressed
periodically in unique phases of the cell cycle, whereas CDKs remain at constant levels
throughout the cell cycle. Except for CDK1 which is a typical E2F-target gene and in some
circumstances E2F regulation may cause a reduction in CDK1. When complexed with its partner
CDK, the cyclins determine the complexes temporal and spatial activity as well as substrate
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
9
Figure 1.3 Cellular outcomes in response to DNA damage.
In all circumstances apoptosis may be initiated but is dependent on the cell, the mutations and
pathways affected. Normal cells will eventually initiate cell death once growth can no longer be
sustained.
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
10
specificity (Evans et al., 1983). The cyclin/CDK complexes required for cell cycle progression
are listed and shown in Table 1.1 and Figure 1.2, respectively.
Table 1.1 Cyclin/CDKs complex are activated within specific phases of the cell cycle.
CDK cyclin cell cycle phase when active
CDK4 cyclin D1, D2, D3 G1 phase
CDK6 cyclin D1, D2, D3 G1 phase
CDK2 cyclin E G1/S transition
CDK2 cyclin A S phase and G2 phase
CDK1 (cdc2) cyclin A G2/M transition
CDK1 (cdc2) cyclin B Mitosis
The predominant complexes required for G2 and M phases are cyclin A/CDK2 and cyclin
B/CDK1 respectively. CDK2 is required for two different phases of the cell cycle. Specifically,
CDK2 binds and functions with cyclin A during S and G2 phase (Table 1.1, Figure 1). The role
of cyclin A/CDK2 in normal G2 progression has been controversial, as investigations using
Cdk2 knockdown and Cdk2 knockout mice failed to reveal any defects in cell cycle
progression (Berthet et al., 2003, Ortega et al., 2003, Tetsu and McCormick, 2003). This was
later demonstrated to be caused by the functional redundancy with the highly homologous
CDK1 (Kaldis and Aleem, 2005, Malumbres and Barbacid, 2009, Satyanarayana & Kaldis,
2009). Conversely, there is evidence that under certain circumstances, i.e. embryonic
development, Cdk2 cannot compensate for Cdk1 (Satyanarayana, et al., 2008). However,
cyclin A/cdk does not appear to be the sole regulator of G2 phase as cyclin A can complex
with CDK1 in late G2/M mitosis and although its role is not well defined, it is thought to be
important for G2/M transition. Lastly, cyclin B complexed with CDK1 is the primary CDK
complex required for mitotic progression (King et al., 1994, Arellano and Moreno, 1997).
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
11
Inactivation of cyclin B/CDK1 is also required for mitotic exit and this is achieved by the
degradation of the cyclin B subunit which commences in anaphase with full degradation
completed by early G1 phase.
Not only are the cyclin/CDK complexes regulated by subunit interaction, their
phosphorylation/dephosphorylation adds another level of regulation ensuring tight control
of transition/s between cell cycle phases (Figure 1.4). The regulation of cyclin/CDK
complexes is controlled by reversible inhibitory phosphorylations and activating
phosphorylation. For example, CDK1 and CDK2 are inhibited by phosphorylation on Tyrosine
15 (also known as Tyr15 or PY15) and Threonine 14 (Thr14), and there is an additional
activating phosphorylation site at Thr160 on CDK2 and Thr161 on CDK1. These activating
sites are phosphorylated by CAK (CDK activating kinase) (Figure 1.4) while the inhibitory
phosphorylation sites, Tyr15 and Thr14, are catalysed by the kinases Wee1 and Myk1
(Parker and Piwnica-Worms, 1992b, Mueller et al., 1995, Liu et al., 1997, Rothblum-Oviatt et
al., 2001, Stumpff et al., 2004). The dephosphorylation of the inhibitory phosphorylation
sites, and consequent activation of cyclin/CDKs, is performed by the dual-specificity Cdc25
phosphatases. Wee1/Myk1 and Cdc25 are therefore key upstream regulators of cyclin/CDKs
that act antagonistically to regulate their activation.
The location of cyclin/CDK complexes also contributes to their regulation. Although the
cyclin/CDK complexes are predominantly activated within the nucleus, cyclin B has been
found to contain a nuclear export signal (Moore et al., 1999) which localises it to the
cytoplasm until the beginning of prophase (Porter and Donoghue, 2003). This allows for the
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
12
Figure 1.4 Illustration of the G2/M regulation of cyclin B/CDK1 activation.
Cyclin E/CDK2 and cyclin A/CDK2 are regulated by a similar mechanism at the G1/S and early S/G2
phase transitions, respectively. Wee1 phosphorylates Tyr15 (Y15) and Wee1-like kinase Myk1
phosphorylates Thr14 (T14). Both T14 and T15 are inhibitory phosphorylation sites, as indicated by
the red colouring. Cdc25 phosphatases are responsible for the removal of these inhibitory
phosphorylations. CAK catalyses the activating phosphorylation Thr161 (T161), shown in green.
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
13
initial activation of cyclin B/CDK1 to occur in the cytoplasm and controls the timing for
cyclin B/CDK1 activation in the nucleus. Therefore understanding the localised activity of
cyclin/CDK complexes will assist in understanding its role during the cell cycle. CDK activity
can be counteracted by inhibitory proteins called CDK inhibitors (CKI). There are two distinct
families of CKIs: the INK4 family and the Cip/Kip family (Sherr and Roberts, 1995). The INK4
family specifically inactivates CDK4 and CDK6 (Carnero and Hannon, 1998), while the
Cip/Kip family, is more promiscuous and can inhibit all cyclin/CDKs in vitro, but in vivo
inhibits CDK2 and in some cases CDK1 complexes only (Polyak et al., 1994, Harper et al.,
1995, Lee et al., 1995, Hengst and Reed, 1998).
1.3.2 Cell cycle checkpoints
As indicated in Figure 1.2, there are several checkpoints throughout the cell cycle. The
common goal of the checkpoint is to co-ordinate a global response to repair and maintain
genome integrity (Hartwell and Weinert, 1989, Zhou and Elledge, 2000, Harrison and Haber,
2006).
Different types of DNA damage influences the pathways that lead to a checkpoint arrest.
For example DNA damage that results in single stranded breaks (SSBs) caused by external
stimuli such as ultraviolet radiation cause the activation of ATR (Ataxia Telangiectasia and
Rad3 related) dependent pathways. Other types of DNA damage may result in double
stranded breaks (DSBs). The ATM (Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated) protein kinase activity is
predominantly stimulated by DSBs in DNA (Chan et al., 2000), such as those caused by
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
14
ionising radiation (IR) (Rotman and Shiloh, 1999). p53 activity is also very critical for
checkpoint arrest to allow DNA repair and/or apoptosis if the damage cannot be repaired
(Owen-Schaub et al., 1995, Polyak et al., 1997, Gottlieb and Oren, 1998). p53 can act
dependently or independently of ATM/ATR. The checkpoints and their pathways required to
enforce the checkpoint arrest are discussed in detail in the following sections.
1.3.2.1 G1/S phase checkpoint
The G1/S checkpoint is dependent on the tumour suppressor gene, p53, which protects
cells from undergoing tumourigenic transformation (Vogelstein et al., 2000). The rapid
induction of p53 protein levels in G1 phase in turn up-regulates the CKI, p21 in response to
some forms of DNA damage (el-Deiry et al., 1993, Levine, 1997) which binds to and inhibits
G1 phase CDKs (Gu et al., 1993, Xiong et al., 1993, Harper et al., 1995). The G1 arrest
thereby prevents the replication of damaged DNA in S phase (Ko and Prives, 1996). ATM
and ATR are involved in sensing DNA damage and can activate p53 via phosphorylation
during the G1/S checkpoint (el-Deiry et al., 1993).
1.3.2.2 S phase checkpoint
The S phase checkpoint ensures the fidelity of S phase, as it has the ability to stop or at least
slow the rate of DNA synthesis (Paulovich and Hartwell, 1995, Weinert et al., 2009, Zhou
and Elledge, 2000). The checkpoint involves either ATM or ATR activity depending on the S
phase effect. Errors in S phase commonly result in exposed single stranded DNA (ssDNA),
which then becomes coated in replication protein A (RPA). RPA localised to ssDNA is
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
15
believed to be the ‘red flag’ that initiates the checkpoint response by binding of ATR, which
subsequently leads to the stabilisation of replication forks (Katou et al., 2003, Cortez et al.,
2004, Yoo et al., 2004, Cimprich and Cortez, 2008). In situations where ATR is defective,
SSBs can be trimmed to produce DSBs, allowing ATM signalling. Use of these pathways
during the S phase checkpoint (Boddy et al., 1998, Lindsay et al., 1998, Martinho et al.,
1998, Zeng et al., 1998, Brondello et al., 1999), acts as a further safety mechanism to ensure
a checkpoint response that guarantees cell survival (Segurado and Tercero, 2009).
1.3.2.3 G2 Phase DNA damage checkpoint
The importance of the G2 checkpoint was determined by a study using primary mouse
embryonic fibroblasts (TKO MEFs) that were manipulated to remove all three
Retinoblastoma (Rb) family members and lack the G1/S checkpoint. These TKO MEFs were
able to suppress apoptosis but did not allow unconstrained cell division, that is
characteristic of cancer cells, because they arrested in G2 phase (Foijer et al., 2005).
The G2 phase checkpoint also known as the G2 phase DNA damage checkpoint has both p53
dependent and independent mechanisms (Bache et al., 1999, Chang and Eastman, 2012).
The p53-dependent arrest involves the maintenance of a long term arrest (in terms of days),
whereas p53-independent mechanisms initiate an immediate arrest that can be stable for a
matter of hours (Bunz et al., 1998). Both mechanisms target the regulation of the cyclin
B/CDK1 complex, required for M phase progression (Table 1), however the mechanisms by
which these are imposed differ. p53-independent mechanisms involve the inhibition of
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
16
Cdc25 phosphatases, whereas the dissociation of cyclin B from CDK1 leading to cyclin
B/CDK1 inactivation is caused by p53-dependent induction of Gadd45 (growth arrest and
DNA damage inducible gene) (Hermeking et al., 1997, Taylor and Stark, 2001). This is one of
several ways that p53 can block mitotic entry during a G2 checkpoint.
p53-independent mechanisms involve the apical kinases, ATR/ATM, which through their
downstream targets and subsequent phosphorylation cascades leads to cyclin B/CDK1
inactivation. ATM/ATR initiates a more rapid checkpoint response to DNA damage than p53,
however if a prolonged arrest is required p53 dependent pathways will predominate. This
may be facilitated by ATM phosphorylation of the p53 inhibitor, MDM2, as well as ATM/ATR
phosphorylation of p53 itself on Ser15 to increase p53 stability (Canman et al., 1998,
Khosravi et al., 1999, Tibbetts et al., 1999, Maya et al., 2001,).
The pathways activated during the G2 checkpoint are dependent on the extent of damage.
The rapid response facilitated by ATM/ATR will be discussed in more detail, in section 1.5.
1.3.2.4 Spindle Assembly checkpoint
The mitotic checkpoint, better known as the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC), has the
ability to stop the onset of anaphase in cells with mitotic spindle defects. For example, the
improper spindle alignment or incorrect tension of the chromosomes before division will
delay separation until the defect has been rectified (Kops et al., 2005). If a lack of tension
between the chromosomes and spindle is detected by the SAC, caused by either unattached
kinetochores or those not attached correctly, the checkpoint is activated by the inhibition of
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
17
the anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C; hereafter known as APC) cofactor,
Cdc20. The inhibition of Cdc20 causes the stabilisation of key proteins, such as securins that
are normally ubiquitinated by APC associated with Cdc20 (APCCdc20) to allow sister
chromatid separation (Holloway et al., 1993, Cohen-Fix et al., 1996, Zou et al., 1999).
Bub1-3 (Budding inhibited by benomyl) and Mad1-3 (Mitotic arrest deficient), are two of
the first protein families identified to be involved in and activated by mitotic spindle
defect/s (Fang et al., 1998a, Amon, 1999). More recently, many more proteins have been
discovered to have roles during the SAC such as Aurora B. Aurora B is necessary for BubR1
(Bub Receptor 1) phosphorylation and recruitment to the kinetochores (Ditchfield et al.,
2003, Lens et al., 2003), which is subsequently required for Bub1 involvement in the SAC
(Carvalho et al., 2003, Ditchfield et al., 2003, Lampson and Kapoor, 2005, Mistry et al.,
2008). Unsurprisingly, inhibition of Aurora B overrides the SAC, affecting chromosome
segregation (Hauf et al., 2003, Santaguida et al., 2011) and also results in the inability of
Aurora B to phosphorylate histone H3 on Serine 10 (Wei et al., 1999), a common marker of
mitosis and chromosome condensation (Hendzel et al., 1997, Goto et al., 1999, Preuss et al.,
2003).
1.4 Exploiting the DNA damage checkpoints, a cancer therapy
Many conventional chemotherapeutic agents induce DNA damage and thus target cell cycle
checkpoints (Walton et al., 2010). A high proportion of tumours are deficient in the tumour
suppressor gene p53, and are thus deficient in the G1 phase checkpoint and reliant on the
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
18
p53-independent G2/M DNA damage checkpoint pathways (Chen et al., 2012) as a
protective response to DNA damage. Tumour reliance on the G2/M checkpoint can be used
as a selective target to distinguish between normal and cancer cells. The effectiveness of G2
phase checkpoint abrogation came from the early work of Lau and Pardee in 1982: cells
arrested in G2 phase and then treated with caffeine, which causes G2/M checkpoint
abrogation, resulted in premature and lethal mitosis (Lau and Pardee, 1982). This lethality
was caused by the inability of the cells to repair the damage before entering mitosis. Since
then numerous inhibitors that target the essential G2/M checkpoint kinases have proven to
be very effective inducers of tumour regression (Zhao et al., 2002b, Sorensen et al., 2003,
Xiao et al., 2003). There are several inhibitors for checkpoint proteins that have been used
in various phase clinical trials including, Chk1, p53, Plk1 (Mross et al., 2008, Chen et al.,
2009, Strebhardt, 2010, Carrassa and Damia, 2011, Cheok et al., 2011, Bennett et al., 2012).
The specifics of these G2/M proteins will be discussed in detail in the chapter.
1.5 DNA damage pathways
DNA lesions, either SSB or DSB, act as the initial signal to activate the appropriate DNA
damage pathway. Several layers of interlinked signalling pathways encompass DNA damage
detection and response pathway/s and the intricate co-ordination of repair processes is
becoming increasingly apparent (Thompson, 2012). These layers are known as the apical
transducers, transducers and effectors (Figure 1.5). The most common proteins within these
layers are the apical transducers ATM and ATR, with signals mediated by the transducers
Chk1 and Chk2. Chk1 and Chk2 can promote cell cycle arrest, damage repair and apoptotic
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
19
Figure 1.5 The basic structure of the DNA damage response (DDR) pathway.
The basic DDR pathway includes different downstream layers consisting of Apical Transducers,
Transducers and Effectors. Additional, ‘mediator proteins’ may also be involved in the DDR pathway.
The DDR pathway utilised is determined from the type of damage.
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
20
signalling responses enforced by regulating a number of effector kinases (Niida et al., 2010,
Kasahara et al., 2010, Smith et al., 2010), such as Cdc25 and p53. There are additional
proteins which are highly involved and required to assist ATM/ATR signalling and to arrest
cells in G2 phase such as Claspin and BRCA1 (Breast Cancer 1) (Yarden et al., 2002). There
are also independent pathways such as the p38MAPK signalling network that was recently
shown to delay G2/M progression via a non-canonical ERK (Extracellular Regulated Kinase)
pathway (Astuti et al., 2009). The common feature of these pathways is that inhibition of
the cyclin/CDK complexes causes cell cycle arrest. The mechanism for the cell cycle arrest
will be addressed in the following sections, with specific focus on the ATR dependent
pathway.
1.5.1 ATM/ATR
ATM and ATR are members of the PIKK (phosphoinositide 3-kinases) family of kinases
(Khanna and Jackson, 2001) of which there are three family members. The third member of
the PIKK family is DNA-PK (DNA-dependent protein kinase) which is also a DNA double-
strand break repair enzyme. The ATM/ATR response depends on the type of damage: ATM
responds to DSBs while ATR responds to SSBs. ATM and ATR were initially thought to act via
independent pathways, based on their different substrates (Kim et al., 1999). ATM
predominantly phosphorylates Chk2, while ATR phosphorylates Chk1. There is now
evidence that these two pathways overlap. For example, activation of ATR can occur in
response to DSBs caused by IR (Gatei et al., 2003, Jazayeri et al., 2006) and ATR-dependent
phosphorylation and activation of ATM can occur in response to SSBs caused by UV(R) or
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
21
replication fork stalling (Stiff et al., 2006). The overlap is supported by the phosphorylation
status of several common ATM/ATR substrates, such as p53 (Khanna et al., 1998, Tibbetts et
al., 1999) and Chk1 (Gatei et al., 2003, Ozeri-Galai et al., 2008) in response to various forms
of DNA damage. The extent and significance of ATM/ATR signalling overlap is the subject of
controversy and ongoing research.
ATM
ATM is not considered an essential gene as knockout mice are viable (Beamish et al., 1996,
Shiloh, 2001). Notably, ATM knockouts are more sensitive to DNA damage (Meyn, 1995,
Lavin and Shiloh, 1997, Shiloh, 1997, Takao et al., 1999, Worgul et al., 2002, Worgul et al.,
2005) and are defective in radiation induced G1/S, S and G2/M checkpoint control (Painter
and Young, 1980, Paules et al., 1995). ATM is present as an auto-inhibitory homodimer and
upon activation it auto-phosphorylates on Ser1981, dissociating to form active monomers
(Bakkenist and Kastan, 2003). When active, ATM preferentially binds to DNA termini (Smith
et al., 1999) so that a rapid response to DNA damage may occur (Bakkenist and Kastan,
2003).
The MRN complex (Mre11, Rad50 and Nbs1 (Nijmegen Breakage syndrome 1)), is highly
conserved and is required for ATM activation during DNA damage repair (Lee and Paull,
2004, Dupre et al., 2006). In response to DSBs the MRN complex has an initial role in
processing double strand breaks due to its DNA nuclease and binding capabilities (Petrini,
2000). The requirement for MRN activity has been demonstrated by hypomorphs
(mutations that cause reduced function of the gene product) of Mre11 and Nbs1 which
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
22
result in AT (ataxia-telangiectasia)-like disorders (Shiloh, 1997, Petrini, 2000, Tauchi et al.,
2002b, Costanzo et al., 2004, O'Driscoll et al., 2004). Once active, ATM phosphorylates
downstream substrates such as BRCA1, Chk2 (checkpoint kinase 2), p53, H2AX (H2A histone
family), and Nbs1 ( Gatei et al., 2000, Lee and Paull, 2004). The ATM dependent checkpoint
response is outlined in Figure 1.6.
ATR
ATR is a 303kDa (kilo Daltons) protein first identified due to its homology with ATM and
Saccharomyces pombe (sp) gene Rad3 (Cimprich et al., 1996). Unlike ATM, ATR depletion is
embryonic lethal (Brown and Baltimore, 2000), and is therefore considered essential for
cellular function under normal or stressed conditions. Expression of a kinase-inactive allele
of ATR in human fibroblasts or overexpression of a kinase inactive mutant of ATR induces
cellular sensitivity to DNA damaging agents and causes deficiencies in cell cycle checkpoints
(Cliby et al., 1998, Wright et al., 1998, Helt et al., 2005). Additionally, defective splicing of
ATR mRNA in the human autosomal recessive disorder, Seckel Syndrome (O'Driscoll et al.,
2003), results in microcephaly, growth retardation, dwarfism, mental retardation and
dysmorphic facial features, and cell cycle checkpoint defects (Tauchi et al., 2002a, Tauchi et
al., 2002b, O'Driscoll et al., 2003, Frappart et al., 2005).
ATR is activated in response to SSBs and is recruited to sites of DNA lesions. ATR interacts
with specific DNA structures (Byun et al., 2005, Cortez, 2005) by binding RPA (Itakura et al.,
2004), which then leads to ATR phosphorylation of SQ/TQ sites on its targets (Figure 1.7).
Regulation of ATR kinase activity is poorly understood, however its interaction with ATRIP
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
23
Figure 1.6 ATM-dependent response to DNA damage.
MRN is required for ATM activation in response to DNA damage and the subsequent activation of its
downstream targets.
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
24
(ATR-interacting partner) appears to regulate ATR expression and affects DNA damage
signalling. Interestingly, ATR can regulate expression of ATRIP as observed by depleting cells
of these proteins using siRNAs (Cortez et al., 2001). Coincidentally, loss of either ATR or
ATRIP also results in similar defects within the cell, notably a loss of the G2/M response to
damage (Cortez et al., 2001), and demonstrates the mutually dependent relationship
between ATR and ATRIP. ATR binding to single stranded DNA via RPA may also be
influenced by ATRIP (Zou and Elledge, 2003, Wu et al., 2005, Namiki and Zou, 2006)(Figure
1.7). In response to DNA damage, ATR-ATRIP co-localise at DNA damage foci in an RPA-
dependent manner (Itakura et al., 2004). The exact role of RPA in ATR-ssDNA binding is still
unclear, as RPA was shown to be dispensable for ATR phosphorylation of Chk1 in response
to damage (Unsal-Kacmaz and Sancar, 2004, Ball et al., 2005).
ATR, as well as its downstream target Chk1, appears to have normal G2 phase roles and
although these roles are not fully understood, it is likely to resemble the checkpoint
functions, as shown in Figure 1.7.
1.5.2 Chk1 and Chk2
Checkpoint kinases 1 and 2 were identified as respective downstream targets of ATR and
ATM (Walworth et al., 1993, Murakami and Okayama, 1995). These conserved kinases have
been identified in yeast and humans (Blasina et al., 1999, Tominaga et al., 1999). The
importance of Chk1 for cellular function is demonstrated by the death of Chk1 knockout
mice at early embryonic stages of development. These embryos have abnormal nuclei
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
25
within the core of the blastocyst which reflects defective cell growth and cell checkpoints
(Liu et al., 2000, Takai et al., 2000, Zachos et al., 2003).
In yeast and mammals, ATR will phosphorylate Chk1 on Ser317 and Ser345 in response to
damage (Liu et al., 2000, Lopez-Girona et al., 2001c, Zhao and Piwnica-Worms, 2001).
Phosphorylation of Chk1 on Ser317 and Ser345 are activating phosphorylations that from
low levels, present in basal conditions, (Kaneko et al., 1999, Zhao et al., 2002a, Sorensen et
al., 2003, Tapia-Alveal et al., 2009) increase rapidly in response to DNA damage (Tapia-
Alveal and O’Connell, 2011).
Once active, Chk1 is capable of targeting Cdc25 family members for phosphorylation. Chk1
phosphorylates and inhibits the Cdc25, therefore rendering the phosphatases incapable of
activating cyclin/CDK complexes (Furnari et al., 1997, Uto et al., 2004). There are several
Chk1-dependent phosphorylation sites that are critical for Cdc25 inhibition that are
catalysed not only during the G2 checkpoint but also throughout other phases of the cell
cycle. Regulation of Cdc25 will be discussed in more detail, in section 1.5.4.
Unlike Chk1, Chk2 is not essential for pre-natal development (Hirao et al., 2000, Takai et al.,
2002). Chk2 is specifically shown to be phosphorylated by ATM in response to IR on
threonine 68 (Thr68) (Matsuoka et al., 2000, Melchionna et al., 2000), implicating Chk2 in
the DSB DNA damage response pathway. Although Chk2 has a specific role in the ATM
dependent DNA damage pathway, Chk2 deficient mice revealed that its main function is in
the p53 apoptotic pathway and not the G2 DNA damage checkpoint (Hirao et al., 2002,
Takai et al., 2002). Collectively, the data suggests that the role of Chk2 during the
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
26
Figure 1.7 ATR-dependent response to DNA damage.
ATR binds to the single stranded binding protein, RPA, which is facilitated by ATRIP. ATR activates
Chk1 which ultimately leads to a block of mitotic cyclin/CDK activation and entry into mitosis.
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
27
checkpoint is less essential than that of Chk1. Further in depth discussion regarding the role
of Chk1 will be discussed later in section 1.8.
1.5.3 p53
In response to DNA damage, p53 is phosphorylated on Ser15 and Ser20 (Chehab et al.,
2000). Phosphorylation of Ser15 is mediated by ATM or ATR and promotes its role in the
apoptotic pathway (Chehab et al., 2000). Phosphorylation of Ser15 stabilises p53 by
blocking the interaction with its negative regulatory partner Mdm2 (Maya et al., 2001).
Ser20 phosphorylation is mediated by Chk2 (Chehab et al., 2000, Tian et al., 2002), and has
also been linked to p53 stabilisation (Chehab et al., 1999).
As mentioned, p53 has functions in the G1/S checkpoint where it facilitates p21 binding and
inhibition of cyclin E/CDK2 (Harper et al., 1993, el-Deiry et al., 1993). Although the G1 arrest
is just as defective in p21-/- cells as it is in p53 -/- cells, in response to IR the arrest can only
be partially maintained. This suggests there are other p53-dependent targets that can
promote G1 phase arrest (Deng et al., 1995). However, it may be the involvement of other
p53-independent pathways that promote arrest at the G1/S boundary such as; Chk2
phosphorylation and destabilisation of Cdc25A (Falck et al., 2001), degradation of cyclin D in
response to IR (Agami and Bernards, 2000), which redistributes p21 from cyclin D/CDK2 to
inhibit cyclin E/CDK2 (Sherr and Roberts, 1999, Yu et al., 2001).
The G1/S checkpoint function of p53 is similar to its role during the G2 checkpoint arrest.
Investigation of several sarcoma cell lines with different p53 mutations revealed that p53 is
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
28
required for the G2 checkpoint (Bache et al., 1999). The role of p53 depends on the ability
of p21 and retinoblastoma protein (RB) to implement a G2 phase arrest. This occurs by the
initial inactivation of cyclin B/CDK1 activity and is followed by a decrease in cyclin B and
CDK1 levels (Flatt et al., 2000). In addition p53 mediates a p21-dependent block of CDK2
activation which leads to delayed cyclin B/CDK1 activation. Inhibition of CDK2 may also lead
to decreased CDK2-dependent function of the transcription factor NF-Y, thereby reducing
the levels of cyclin B and CDK1 (Yun et al., 2003, Yun et al., 2006). Another transcription
factor also regulated by p53 is FoxM1 (forkhead box protein M1). p53’s repression of FoxM1
consequently disrupts the level of several important G2/M phase genes, such as cyclin B,
Cdc25B, and Aurora B (Leung et al., 2001, Wang et al., 2005). Like NY-F, both p53 and CDK2
can also regulate FoxM1. The importance of these CDK2 and p53 regulated pathways is
evident in p53-/- CDK2-/- double knockout cells that are unable to arrest in G2 phase, unlike
single knockout cells (Chung and Bunz, 2010).
1.5.4 Cdc25
Cdc25s are responsible for the removal of CDK inhibitory phosphorylations (Kristjansdottir
and Rudolph, 2004, Niida and Nakanishi, 2006). There are three human Cdc25 isoforms,
Cdc25 A, B, and C (Sadhu et al., 1990, Galaktionov and Beach, 1991, Nagata et al., 1991) of
which there are several Cdc25 splice variants (Baldin et al., 1997, Forrest et al., 1999, Bureik
et al., 2000, Wegener et al., 2000) that allow for differences in cyclin/CDK substrate
preferences (Gabrielli et al., 1997). The level of Cdc25 phosphatases at the G2/M transition
allow for the modulation of cell division in response to cell enviornment.
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
29
There is approximately 60% homology in the C-terminal catalytic domains of the three
isoforms and this determines the substrate specificity of the phosphatase (Gabrielli et al.,
1997, Rudolph et al., 2001). There is only 20-25% homology within the N-terminal domain
which contains several phosphorylation sites as well as nuclear import and export signals,
which regulate activity, stability and localisation. Each Cdc25 may have various functions
during the cell cycle and in response to certain cellular responses. When active, Cdc25
promotes cell cycle progression by activating cyclin/CDK complexes but when inactive it
results in cell cycle arrest due to the inability to active the cyclin/CDK target (Figure 1.4).
Localisation can be largely governed by phosphorylation events which can promote 14-3-3
binding, effecting nuclear export signal (NES) and nuclear localisation signal (NLS) (Dalal et
al., 1999, Lopez-Girona et al., 2001b, Lindqvist et al., 2004, Astuti et al., 2010, Astuti and
Gabrielli, 2011).
The most recent conclusions are that Cdc25B and Cdc25C are typically required for G2/M,
while Cdc25A is more involved in G1/S (Gabrielli et al., 1996, Morris et al., 2000, Manke et
al., 2005). However, Cdc25A, B and C all have the ability to regulate cyclin A/CDK2 and cyclin
B/CDK1 activity which both affect the entry of cells into mitosis (Gabrielli et al., 1996,
Kramer et al., 2004, Lindqvist et al., 2005) and recent evidence has demonstrated both
Cdc25B and Cdc25C are also required for S phase (Garner-Hamrick and Fisher, 1998,
Turowski et al., 2003). Once active, cyclin B/CDK1 can then promote its own activation loop
by phosphorylating any of the Cdc25s (Mailand et al., 2002, Astuti et al., 2010). This
discloses the functional redundancy between the family members as well as the intricacy of
the environmental factors that influence Cdc25 functions.
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
30
Overexpression studies have led to the assumption that Cdc25B functions prior to Cdc25C,
to prime the cells for mitosis whilst Cdc25C is required for the full activation cyclin B/CDK1
(Gabrielli et al., 1996, Karlsson et al., 1999, Goldstone et al., 2001). Cdc25B has the ability to
move across the nuclear membrane giving it access to cyclin A/CDK2 in the nucleus and
cyclin B/CDK1 at the centrosome (Gabrielli et al., 1996, Karlsson et al., 1999, Goldstone et
al., 2001). Cdc25C is primarily cytoplasmic in interphase, and then enters the nucleus in late
prophase (Dalal et al., 1999, Graves et al., 2001, Busch et al., 2007, Esmenjaud-Mailhat et
al., 2007, ). Cdc25C has also been reported to localise, along with active CDK1, at the
centrosome in late G2 and mitosis (Busch et al., 2007, Bonnet et al., 2008). Cdc25A, localises
in both the cytoplasm and the nucleus throughout the cell cycle and peaks within the
nucleus during G2 phase (Kallstrom et al., 2005) however mitotic regulation is presumed to
be co-ordinated by Cdc25B (Goldstone et al., 2001, Loffler et al., 2006).
As mentioned previously, Cdc25s are phosphorylated by Chk1 in response to damage,
rendering them inactive (Peng et al., 1997, Uto et al., 2004). This was first demonstrated by
Chk1 phosphorylation of Cdc25C Ser216. This phosphorylation causes the binding of 14-3-3
and blocks the nuclear importation of Cdc25C (Peng et al., 1997). Cdc25B phosphorylation
on Ser323 also leads to 14-3-3 binding and cytosolic retention (Giles et al., 2003). Cdc25A
can also be regulated by Chk1 during the DDR which blocks the activation of cyclin B/CDK1
(Falck et al., 2001, Chen et al., 2003, Sorensen et al., 2003).
In response to G2 phase checkpoint signalling, Cdc25B is phosphorylated by a number of
other checkpoint kinases. In response to UV(R), p38MAPK activates MAPKAP Kinase-2 (MK-
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
31
2) (Manke et al., 2005, Lemaire et al., 2006) leading to MK-2 phosphorylation of Cdc25B
Ser323, subsequent 14-3-3 binding and checkpoint arrest (Bulavin et al., 2001). Chk1 and
Chk2 are also capable of phosphorylating Cdc25B in response to UV(R) (Manke et al., 2005),
and both MK-2 and Chk1 are the two major kinases for Ser323 phosphorylation (Boutros et
al., 2007).
There is evidence that Cdc25 are activated by phosphorylation events that disrupt the
binding of 14-3-3 proteins and increase access to substrates (Wang et al., 2007, Astuti et al.,
2010). These activating phoshorylations are CDK2/ERK pathway-dependent (Margolis et al.,
2003, Wang et al., 2007), however the activating phosphorylations are largely regulated by
dephosphorylation by PP2A (protein phosphatase 2A) (Margolis et al., 2006a). Exogenous
expression of Cdc25B either mutated activating phosphorylations or not, caused abrogation
of the G2 checkpoint (Goldstone et al., 2001, Bugler et al., 2006, Astuti et al., 2010). This
may also be a consequence of the specific role of Cdc25B in checkpoint recovery (van Vugt
et al., 2004a, Karlsson-Rosenthal and Millar, 2006, Jullien et al., 2011, ) which is likely to
involve its activation of cyclin A/CDK2, which is also required for checkpoint recovery (van
Vugt et al., 2004b, Alvarez-Fernandez et al., 2010).
Evidence has demonstrated a necessity for Cdc25B during normal G2 progression (Gabrielli
et al., 1996, Karlsson et al., 1999, Bulavin et al., 2001). Cdc25B overexpression causes
activation of cyclin B/CDK1 while overexpression of a dominant negative Cdc25B results in
inhibition of cyclin A/CDK2 activation (Goldstone et al., 2001), both of which affect mitotic
progression. The regulation of Cdc25B during a normal cell cycle involves several
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
32
phosphorylations by Chk1 (Ser230 and Ser563) (Schmitt et al., 2006) and Aurora A (Ser353)
(Dutertre et al., 2004, Cazales et al., 2005). These phosphorylation sites control normal
mitotic entry, as mutagenesis of these sites caused defective mitotic entry (Dutertre et al.,
2004, Cazales et al., 2005). Overall, Cdc25B is the primary regulator of G2 phase progression
controlling cyclin A/CDK2 and cyclin B/CDK1 activation during normal and DDRs.
1.6 Other important cell cycle regulators
In additional to the G2 checkpoints already mentioned there are other important
components that contribute to these pathways. These can be identified in Figure 1.8 and
will be discussed in the following section.
1.6.1 p38 MAPK
p38 is a member of the Mitogen Activated Protein kinase (MAPK) family that mediates a
wide variety of cellular behaviours in response to extracellular stimuli ( Han et al., 1994, Lee
et al., 1994, Rouse et al., 1994, Raingeaud et al., 1995, Foltz et al., 1997, Freshney et al.,
1997, , Pietersma et al., 1997, Shalom-Barak et al., 1998, Shapiro et al., 1998), including
UV(R) irradiation (Rouse et al., 1994, Wang et al., 1998, Bulavin et al., 2001, Reinhardt et al.,
2007).
During a G1 arrest p38 activity is required for p21 stabilisation (Kim et al., 2002, Lafarga et
al., 2009); whereas the role of p38 during G2/M progression is less well defined and is
controversial with many reports that p38 is not functional in transformed and cancer cell
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
33
Figure 1.8 The ATR dependent DDR pathway is highly complex.
The Figure outlines the very basic regulatory pathways that exist between these proteins during
G2/M. Grey lines indicate regulation by degradation.
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
34
lines (Mikhailov et al., 2007). There is evidence that p38 can function downstream of ATM
and ATR, however in response to UV(R) damage p38 can be activated in the absence of ATM
and ATR, suggesting additional modes of p38 activation (Mikhailov et al., 2004, Reinhardt et
al., 2007). In response to UV(R) exposure, p38 can lead to the phosphorylation of Cdc25B
and Cdc25C (Bulavin et al., 2001). However, later evidence revealed that Cdc25B
phosphorylation and inhibition is catalysed by the p38 downstream kinase MK-2 (Obata et
al., 2000, Manke et al., 2005, Lemaire et al., 2006).
p38 can also enhance p53 stability by causing disassociation of p53 from its negative
regulator Mdm2 in response to UV(R) (Bulavin et al., 1999, Huang et al., 1999, Huang et al.,
2000, She et al., 2000). MK-2 is also capable of stabilising p53 by phosphorylation of sites
that can also be phosphorylated by Chk1 and Chk2 (She et al., 2002). The increase in p53
stability triggers several pathways to impose inhibition of cyclin B/CDK1 (el-Deiry et al.,
1993, Hermeking et al., 1997, Zhan et al., 1999). The p38-MK-2 pathway acts independently
of ATR and ATM (Bulavin et al., 2001, Bradham and McClay, 2006) but suggests overlap
between Chk1/2 and p38 signalling that has not been fully defined (Figure 1.8).
In addition to its checkpoint function, p38 is also present during an unperturbed cell cycle.
p38 has several mitotic roles and it has been shown to contribute toward correct spindle
assembly, spindle checkpoint function, the regulation of motor proteins required for the
correct attachment between kinetochore and microtubule ends (Lee et al., 2010). p38 also
has the ability to localise to the centrosomes from late G2 until mitosis where it can
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
35
phosphorylate Cdc25B (Bulavin et al., 2001, Cha et al., 2007) suggesting p38 can regulate
the timing of mitotic entry.
1.6.2 Claspin
Claspin is largely known as a checkpoint mediating protein required for the ATR dependent
activation of both Chk1 and BRCA1 and checkpoint arrest (Kumagai and Dunphy, 2000, Lin
et al., 2004, Sorensen et al., 2004, Liu et al., 2006, Wang et al., 2006, Lee et al., 2012,
Lindsey-Boltz and Sancar, 2011). Interestingly, Claspin levels peak during S and G2 phases
before being degraded during mitosis (Bennett and Clarke, 2006, Mailand et al., 2006,
Mamely et al., 2006, Peschiaroli et al., 2006) and G1 phase (Bennett and Clarke, 2006). The
cell cycle dependent fluctuations of Claspin protein level as well as the presence of low
levels of Claspin phosphorylation on Thr916, commonly observed with DNA damage, in
asynchronous untreated cells (Bennett and Clarke, 2006) suggest that Claspin has a role in
normal cell cycle progression.
Claspin phosphorylation on Thr916 and Ser945 is ATR dependent (Kumagai and Dunphy,
2003, Clarke and Clarke, 2005). Chk1 has been shown to phosphorylate Thr916 (Chini and
Chen, 2006) however others have shown that an unidentified kinase(s) distinct from ATR
and Chk1 is responsible for the direct phosphorylation of Thr916 (Bennett et al., 2008).
Phosphorylation of Claspin is required for the formation of the binding domain essential for
Chk1s interaction with Claspin and the activation of Chk1 by ATR (Clarke and Clarke, 2005,
Freire et al., 2006, Liu et al., 2006, Lindsey-Boltz et al., 2009). Claspin recruits Chk1 to ATR
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
36
for phosphorylation after which the Claspin-Chk1 interaction weakens (Chini and Chen,
2003, Jeong et al., 2003). In addition, Chk1 and Claspin are dependent on each other for
activation and stability, respectively (Chini et al., 2006).
Claspin degradation is required for G2 checkpoint recovery. For Claspin degradation to
occur, Plk1 phosphorylates Claspin which leads to ubiquitination by the SCFβTrCP
(Skp/Cullin/F-box containing complex) ubiquitin ligase complex (Mailand et al., 2006,
Mamely et al., 2006, Peschiaroli et al., 2006). During a G2 checkpoint arrest, Claspin
degradation is blocked by the ubiquitin specific phosphatases, USP28, allowing for
continued Chk1 activation (Peschiaroli et al., 2006, Bassermann et al., 2008). In addition,
Plk1 is degraded during the G2 checkpoint arrest thus preserving Claspin stability and
blocking mitotic entry (Smits et al., 2000). Plk1 substrates, such as Claspin, are
phosphorylated to prime them for Plk1 binding however the kinase that primes Claspin for
Plk1 binding is at present unknown. It is not known whether increased Claspin stability is
sufficient to sustain the G2 phase arrest, however its degradation is sufficient to promote
checkpoint recovery (Mailand et al., 2006, Mamely et al., 2006).
As well as a role during G2 phase, Claspin is involved in ATR-Chk1 mediated S phase
checkpoint signalling (Petermann and Caldecott, 2006) and normal S phase functions.
During an unperturbed S phase Claspin binds to chromatin, maintains integrity of
replication forks (Sar et al., 2004), and binds proteins required for replication (Lee et al.,
2003, Lee et al., 2005). In particular Claspin is required for normal replication fork
progression during an unperturbed S phase (Szyjka et al., 2005, Tourriere et al., 2005,
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
37
Hodgson et al., 2007, Petermann et al., 2008) which consequently gives Claspin the ability to
control the rate of proliferation. Therefore, unsurprisingly, depletion or overexpression of
Claspin causes a reduction or increase in proliferation respectively (Lin et al., 2004).
1.6.3 Wee1
Wee1 plays an important role in co-ordinating cell growth and cell division at the G2/M
transition. Wee1 is located in the nucleus and protects the cell from premature mitotic
entry (Heald et al., 1993, Liu et al., 1997). Wee1 inhibits mitosis by phosphorylating the
conserved Tyr15 on CDK1 (Russel and Nurse 1987, Featherstone and Russell, 1991,
Lundgren et al., 1991, Parker et al., 1992, Parker and Piwnica-Worms, 1992b). Wee1 activity
and stability is directly regulated by phosphorylation which produces a binding site for 14-3-
3 (Parker and Piwnica-Worms, 1992a, Honda et al., 1997b, Wang et al., 2000). In mice, 14-3-
3 binds Wee1 and increases protein stability and activity of Wee1 (Honda et al., 1997a,
Wang, 2000). Recently, Wee1 has been shown to associate and become negatively
regulated by cyclin A/CDK2 phosphorylation on Thr239. Mutation of Thr239, or the cyclin A
binding site, of Wee1 caused increased inhibitory CDK phosphorylation by Wee1 resulting in
inhibition of G2/M progression (Li et al., 2010). Furthermore, Wee1 degradation is also
mediated by phosphorylation: Wee1 is phosphorylated by CDK1 which promotes Plk1
binding required for APC ubiquitination and βTrCP E3 ligase mediated degradation
(Watanabe et al., 2004).
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
38
1.6.4 Cdh1
Cdh1 is an adapter protein of the ubiquitin ligase, APC, and regulates the activity and
substrate specificity of the E3 ligase which plays essential functions during late mitosis/G1.
There are two cofactors required for APC function, Cdc20 and Cdh1. Cdc20 is required for
early mitotic functions, while Cdh1 is required for late mitotic/G1 entry functions. Important
mitotic regulators degraded at the end of mitosis by Cdh1 are: cyclin A (Geley et al., 2001)
and cyclin B (King et al., 1995), Plk1 (Lindon and Pines, 2004), Aurora A (Castro et al., 2002)
and FoxM1 (Laoukili et al., 2008a, Park et al., 2008, Alvarez-Fernandez, 2010a). Cdc20 is also
a Cdh1 substrate (Prinz et al., 1998, Pfleger and Kirschner, 2000) and Cdc20 compensates
for a loss of Cdh1 by degrading accumulated Cdh1 substrates (Garcia-Higuera et al., 2008, Li
et al., 2008). However, Cdh1 is critical for the fidelity of mitosis as a loss of Cdh1 results in
mitotic defects such as an increased number of binucleated cells (Garcia-Higuera et al.,
2008, Li et al., 2008).
During S, G2 and M phases a mobility shift, on an immunoblot, indicative of
phosphorylation of Cdh1 is observed (Kramer et al., 2000) and correlates with inactivation
of Cdh1 (Kramer et al., 1998, Zachariae et al., 1998a, Jaspersen et al., 1999, Lukas et al.,
1999a, Blanco et al., 2000, , Kramer et al., 2000, Yamaguchi et al., 2000). Overexpression of
Cdh1 affects many of its substrates such as cyclin B, Plk1, Claspin and Cdc20 (Gao et al.,
2009). Therefore the regulation of Cdh1 levels and activity are important for cell cycle
progression. During normal cell cycle progression the phosphatase, Cdc14, controls Cdh1
dephosphorylation (Visintin et al., 1998, Jaspersen et al., 1999). During a G2 phase
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
39
checkpoint arrest, Cdc14B translocates from the nucleus to dephosphorylate and
consequently activate Cdh1 (Bassermann et al., 2008). Cdh1 activation contributes to the
G2 checkpoint arrest by ubiquitination and consequently degradation of Plk1 (Bassermann
et al., 2008). At the same time, Claspin and Wee1 stabilisation is required for the G2
checkpoint arrest. Claspin, also a Cdh1 substrate, is blocked from Cdh1 dependent
degradation during the G2 checkpoint arrest by USP28. USP28 stabilises the G2 checkpoint
arrest by stabilising Claspin dependent Chk1 activation.
APC-Cdh1 (APCCdh1) activation is regulated by several mechanisms. One is the ubiquitination
of the APC conjugated ubiquitin enzyme E2, which provides a negative feedback loop that
eventually destroys APCCdh1 activity (Rape and Kirschner, 2004, Rape et al., 2006). Second,
the accumulation of CDK activity leads to the dissociation of Cdh1 from APC (Lukas et al.,
1999a, Kramer et al., 2000). Third, phosphorylated Cdh1 is a target of SCF complex, thereby
limiting APCCdh1 activity (Benmaamar and Pagano, 2005). Finally, in G1 phase E2F activates
the transcription of Emi1, a known inhibitor of APC (Grosskortenhaus and Sprenger, 2002,
Hsu et al., 2002).
CDK dependent phosphorylation of Cdh1 occurs on multiple sites (Hall et al., 2004). Alanine
mutations of these phosphorylation sites supports increased APCCdh1 binding and activity
(Lukas et al., 1999a, Kramer et al., 2000) and may lead to a growth arrest due to the inability
of mitotic cyclins to accumulate (Hall et al., 2004). In budding yeast, CDK1 has been shown
to phosphorylate Cdh1 to provide a binding site for Plk1 which then also phosphorylates
Cdh1 to regulate its activity (Crasta et al., 2008). In mammalian cells other CDKs are most
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
40
likely responsible for Cdh1 phosphorylation since CDK1 along with its binding partner cyclin
B is not active during S and G2 phase, when Cdh1 phosphorylation and inactivation is
apparent. Cyclin A has been shown to phosphorylate and inactivate the APCCdh1 complex
(Lukas et al., 1999a, Sorensen et al., 2001), and it is cyclin A/CDK2 that is most likely
involved in Cdh1 regulation during S and G2. In the absence of cyclin A, premature
degradation of the APC target cyclin B can ultimately affect mitotic entry (Reber et al.,
2006). However, others have shown that disruption of cyclin A binding to Cdh1 only
affected cyclin A but not other APCCdh1 substrates such as cyclin B and securin (Sorensen et
al., 2001). In Drospholia, cyclin E/CDK2 is a negative regulator of APC (Sigrist and Lehner,
1997), but in the mammalian system cyclin E/CDK2 had little effect on APC activity (Brandeis
and Hunt, 1996, Lukas et al., 1999a).
1.6.5 Plk1
Plk1 (polo-like kinase 1) is a member of the polo-like kinase family, which consists of 5
members, Plk1-5, that all contain a conserved domain known as the polo-box domain (PBD).
Plk1 is the most studied family member and is highly expressed in a number of human
cancers. Plks are important for the fidelity of mitosis and are particularly important for
cytokinesis (Barr et al., 2004).
Plk1 is a serine/threonine kinase expressed predominantly during late G2 and mitosis, and is
activated by phosphorylation on the Thr210 residue (Lee and Erikson, 1997, Qian et al.,
1998, Jang et al., 2002a, Jang et al., 2002b, Kelm et al., 2002). Once active, Plk1
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
41
phosphorylates the consensus motif Glu-Asp-X-Ser/Thr-φ (X = any amino acid, φ = a
hydrophobic residue which is frequently a leucine). The PBD is critical for Plk1 activity and it
is involved in auto-inhibition of Plk1 (Lee and Erikson, 1997, Mundt et al., 1997). The PBD is
required for the subcellular localisation of Plk1 (Song et al., 2000, Lowery et al., 2004,
Lowery et al., 2005, Lowery et al., 2007) by recognising binding to a particular phospho-
epitope (Elia et al., 2003a). Although many phospho-proteins interact with the PBD, it is
unclear if all binding proteins are Plk1 substrates or if the binding is simply required to
increase the local concentration of Plk1.
The PBD is responsible for the localisation of Plk1 to the centrosomes by binding Plk1
substrates localised at the centrosomes. Like many other Plk1 substrates, Nedd1 is primed
by CDK1 phosphorylation at the centrosomes which leads to Plk1 binding (Zhang et al.,
2009a). Plk1 localisation and function at the centrosomes is important as it is involved in
centrosomal maturation (Barr et al., 2004). Its activity is required for the recruitment of γ-
tubulin to the centrosomes and is essential for microtubule nucleation (Casenghi et al.,
2003, Haren et al., 2009, Johmura et al., 2011). Depletion of Plk1 results in defects in the
mitotic spindle and incorrect cell division (Lane and Nigg, 1996, Sumara et al., 2004,
McInnes et al., 2006, Peters et al., 2006, Lenart et al., 2007, Santamaria et al., 2007, Haren
et al., 2009).
The over-expression of PBD-GFP has been shown to displace endogenous Plk1 and resulted
in a dramatic increase in the G2 phase population (Elia et al., 2003b), indicating that Plk1 is
also required for G2 phase progression. Plk1 has essential G2 phase checkpoint roles (van
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
42
Vugt et al., 2004a). In response to the checkpoint arrest Plk1 levels are reduced and the
protein inactivated, by Cdh1 dependent degradation ( Smits et al., 2004, Bassermann et al.,
2008, ). Inversely, recovery from a checkpoint arrest requires an increase in Plk1 levels and
activation (van Vugt et al., 2004a, van Vugt and Medema, 2004, Macurek et al., 2008). Once
active, Plk1 targets several pathways for checkpoint recovery. Plk1 phosphorylates both
Claspin and Wee1 (van Vugt et al., 2004a, Watanabe et al., 2004, Mamely et al., 2006)
which leads to SCF mediated degradation and is responsible for Cdc25C activation (Kumagai
and Dunphy, 1996, Qian et al., 1998), and Cdc25B localisation (Lobjois et al., 2009). The
mechanism by which cells increase the level of Plk1 required for checkpoint recovery is
unknown but may involve FoxM1. Plk1 is a FoxM1 regulated transcript but is also a positive
regulator of FoxM1 therefore Plk1’s checkpoint recovery role may involve a positive
feedback loop (Fu et al., 2008). Because Plk1-mediated phosphorylation of FoxM1 requires
initial priming by CDK activity, this could be a key event regulated by the low levels of CDK
activity, now known to be needed for checkpoint recovery (Duursma and Cimprich, 2010).
1.7 Checkpoint recovery
Checkpoint recovery occurs after the cell has repaired the DNA damage. Therefore,
checkpoint recovery is a crucial process that determines the fate of a cell after DNA
damage. Understanding the mechanisms governing checkpoint recovery has recently
become just as important as understanding the mechanisms of the checkpoint arrest.
Mutation of many checkpoint arrest pathways forces cells into mitosis. By silencing
checkpoint signalling such as ATM/ATR-Chk1/Chk2 signalling, recovery may be achieved.
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
43
Little information is known about the inactivation of ATR but possibly involves its mutually
dependent binding partner, ATRIP (Yang et al., 2004). By blocking ATM/ATR signalling
pathways it relieves the negative regulation of cell cycle controllers such as Cdc25s and
consequently G2/M progression. Some examples are; mutations of 14-3-3 binding sites on
Cdc25B caused cells to rapidly overcome G2 checkpoint arrest (Giles et al., 2003, Schmitt et
al., 2006) and mutation of Chk1 activating phosphorylation sites will overcome the
checkpoint (Walworth et al., 1993, Walworth and Bernards, 1996).
Dephosphorylation and degradation events are largely involved in checkpoint recovery.
Several phosphatases such as Wip1 and PP2A have identified roles in checkpoint recovery
to dephosphorylate such checkpoint proteins as Chk2, Chk1, γH2AX and p53 (Chowdhury et
al., 2005, Keogh et al., 2006, Shreeram et al., 2006, Lindqvist et al., 2009). Ubiquitin-
dependent proteasome-mediated degradation is also thought to play an essential role for
checkpoint recovery. The identification of SCFβTrCP as a switch between arrest and recovery
was acknowledged due to its ability to impose a checkpoint arrest by Chk1 dependent
degradation of Cdc25A, and checkpoint recovery via degradation of Wee1 and Claspin.
Interestingly, both the degradation of Wee1 and Claspin are Plk1 dependent. The trigger to
the SCFβTrCP switch is not well understood but components of the pathway such as Plk1
signalling remain less elusive.
Although it was once suspected that cyclin/CDK activity was inhibited during a checkpoint
arrest recent evidence has shown that low levels of CDKs are required during the G2
checkpoint to regulate transcription of genes required for recovery, such as Plk1, cyclin A
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
44
and cyclin B (Alvarez-Fernandez et al., 2010a, Alvarez-Fernandez et al., 2010b). In particular,
low levels of cyclin A/CDK are required to phosphorylate FoxM1, relieving the auto-
repressor N terminal domain of FoxM1 (Laoukili et al., 2008b) and leading to the expression
of FoxM1 dependent G2/M genes. This pathway for checkpoint recovery may also involve
Cdc25 as depletion of Cdc25B blocked cells from entering mitosis after a checkpoint arrest
(Goldstone et al., 2001).
1.8 G2/M regulation by cyclin A/CDK2 and cyclin B/CDK1
Cyclins A and B were the first cyclins identified in sea urchin eggs and were shown to be
synthesised during each cell cycle and degraded during mitosis (Evans et al., 1983, Swenson
et al., 1986, Standart et al., 1987). In human cells both cyclin A and cyclin B are essential for
G2/M progression.
There are three types of cyclin B, B1, B2 and B3. Cyclin B3 was the most recently identified,
it binds CDK2 and has important meiotic functions (Nguyen et al., 2002). Unlike cyclin B3,
cyclins B1 and B2 both bind CDK1 but localise to different sites within the cell. Cyclin B1 is
the predominant cyclin B required for mitosis, which is why cyclin B1 nullizygous mice are
not viable (Brandeis et al., 1998).
Cyclin B/CDK1 activation is highly coordinated and the initial activation of cyclin B/CDK1
occurs in the cytoplasm and at the centrosomes (De Souza et al., 2000a, Jackman et al.,
2003). This leads to the abrupt translocation and increased concentration of cyclin B/CDK1
to the nucleus approximately 5 minutes prior to NEB in HeLa cells (Pines and Hunter, 1991,
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
45
Bailly et al., 1992, Gallant and Nigg, 1992, Ookata et al., 1992, Hagting et al., 1999). The
increased activity of cyclin B/CDK1 is dependent on the continual nuclear translocation of
cyclin B/CDK1 which is essential for driving mitotic events. Activation of cyclin B/CDK1 in the
nucleus involves the phosphorylation of its cytoplasmic retention site and the consequent
dephosphorylation by Cdc25 family members to enhance activity (Hoffmann et al., 1993, Li
et al., 1997, Yang et al., 1998, Hagting et al., 1999, Yang et al., 2001, Bulavin et al., 2003a,
Bulavin et al., 2003b, Walsh et al., 2003, , Margolis et al., 2006b, ,). The increase of cyclin
B/CDK1 in the nucleus was thought to involve a block of nuclear export by Plk1 dependent
phosphorylation events (Toyoshima-Morimoto et al., 2002, Yuan et al., 2002, Jackman et al.,
2003). However, later evidence revealed CDK1 localisation in the nucleus can be attributed
to an increase in nuclear import (Gavet and Pines, 2010). The specifics of the nuclear import
are unclear but it may be linked to associations with unidentified, nuclear import/export
factors ( Li et al., 1997, Hagting et al., 1999).
The ability of cyclin B/CDK1 activation levels to control the timing of these mitotic events
was demonstrated by the classic study by Masui and Markert ‘cytoplasmic control of
nuclear behaviour....’, where the cytosol of a metaphase oocyte can induce metaphase in an
interphase ooctye (Masui and Markert, 1971). In addition, initial cyclin B/CDK1 activity
levels cannot promote later mitotic events that require higher cyclin B/CDK1 activity levels
(Lindqvist et al., 2007). Gavet and Pines (2010) also showed that different thresholds of
cyclin B/CDK1 activity induced different mitotic events. For example, the initial activation of
cyclin B/CDK1 at the centrosomes is linked to the conversion of an interphase centrosome
to a MTOC and regulates microtubule nucleation and mitotic spindle formation (Gabrielli et
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
46
al., 1996, De Souza et al., 2000a) which begins in late G2 phase. This is followed by
chromosome condensation after initial formation of the mitotic spindle (Li et al., 1997,
Hagting et al., 1999) and leads to the translocation of cyclin B/CDK1 into the nucleus and
NEB (Gavet and Pines, 2010).
The timing of cyclin B/CDK1 activation is shown to be dependent on the activity of cyclin
A/CDK2 activity (De Boer et al., 2008) and is the reason that a number of groups have
independently demonstrated that cyclin A depletion or CDK2 inhibition results in a G2 phase
delay (Fung et al., 2007, Gong et al., 2007a). There are two types of cyclin A, cyclin A1 and
A2. Studies of knockout mice revealed that cyclin A2 is required for viability whereas cyclin
A1 expression is confined to germ cells and is required only for male fertility (Liu et al.,
1998, Lele and Wolgemuth, 2004, Wolgemuth et al., 2004). However others have shown
that in fibroblasts cyclin A (A1 and A2) and cyclin E have redundant roles required for cell
proliferation but in contrast cyclin A is essential for hematopoietic and embryonic stem cell
proliferation (Kalaszczynska et al. 2009). Cyclin A associates with CDK2 (Pines and Hunter,
1990, Tsai et al., 1991, Clarke et al., 1992, Kobayashi et al., 1992, Lees and Harlow, 1993)
and localises the complex to the nucleus (Maridor et al., 1993). A small pool has also been
shown to localise to the centrosome in late G2 phase (De Boer et al., 2008). Cyclin A/CDK2
has biphasic activation, with a small pool being activated in S phase (Girard et al., 1991,
Walker and Maller, 1991, Pagano et al., 1992, Zindy et al., 1992), but the major pool being
activated in early G2 phase (Lehner and O'Farrell, 1990, Whitfield et al., 1990, Walker and
Maller, 1991, Pagano et al., 1992, Knoblich and Lehner, 1993, Furuno et al., 1999,,
Goldstone et al., 2001, Hu et al., 2001, De Boer et al., 2008).
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
47
The mechanism by which cyclin A/CDK2 regulates the timing of cyclin B/CDK1 activation is
unclear. The G2 phase Cdc25B-dependent activation of cyclin A/CDK2 is blocked in G2
phase checkpoint arrested cells, and the expression of a mutant form of CDK2 that does not
require Cdc25 dependent activation bypassed the G2 phase checkpoint (Goldstone et al.,
2001). Interestingly, ATM/ATR inhibitors can relinquish the block in cyclin B/CDK1
activation, but not cyclin A/CDK2 activation in response to DNA damage, suggesting that the
Cdc25B-dependent activation of cyclin A/CDK2 is independent of ATM/ATR during the
checkpoint arrest (Goldstone et al., 2001). There is also evidence that cyclin A/CDK2 can
regulate ATR signalling (Hu et al., 2001, Jazayeri et al., 2006, Myers et al., 2007). Together,
these data point to an undefined role for cyclin A/CDK2 and its immediate upstream
activator Cdc25B in the G2 phase checkpoint arrest.
Cyclin A is degraded during mitosis (Jacobs et al., 2001) but in early mitosis cyclin A/CDK2 is
required for correct spindle assembly (Beamish et al., 2009). Without cyclin A/CDK2 spindle
rotation occurs due to the absence of proper spindle attachments (Beamish et al., 2009).
Overall, cyclin A/CDK2 has important roles in both G2 and mitosis and also in response to
the checkpoint. However, the other pathways that may be involved in these cyclin A/CDK2
regulated processes are not well defined.
1.9 Chk1 regulation
The phosphorylation of Chk1 on Ser317 and Ser345 in response to DNA damage has been
identified as a major mechanism of Chk1 regulation. These sites can also be found
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
48
phosphorylated in unperturbed cells suggesting that they function during this time to
regulate Chk1. Mutational analysis of these sites has been used to demonstrate their roles
both in response to damage and during an unperturbed cell cycle.
Phosphorylation of Ser317 and Ser345 regulate Chk1 kinase activity, in particular during the
DDR. The basal level of these phosphorylations is increased dramatically in response to DNA
damage however mutation of Ser317 or Ser345 to either alanine (phospho-inhibitory) or
aspartate (phospho-mimicking) did not affect the basal level of Chk1 kinase activity with or
without DNA damage (Gatei et al., 2003). However, others have shown that mutation of
Ser345 affects Chk1 activity and its ability to arrest cells during the checkpoint (Capasso et
al., 2002). Only a kinase dead mutant of Chk1 (D130A) was able to abolish Chk1 activity with
or without DNA damage in response to damage (Gatei et al., 2003). Collectively these
results demonstrate that the precise role for Chk1 during the G2 checkpoint is still
undefined and that mutational analysis of Ser317 and Se345 may not be the best tool for
use in Chk1 regulatory studies.
Mutation of Ser317 to alanine caused decreased phosphorylation of Ser345 (Niida et al.,
2007, Walker et al., 2009); however mutation of Ser345 did not noticeably impact Ser317
phosphorylation suggesting that Ser317 influences phosphorylation on Ser345. Functional
analysis of Ser317 and Ser345 has also been conducted using mutational analysis of these
sites (Niida et al., 2007). The commonality that exists between the two sites is that single
inhibitory mutations result in impaired checkpoint arrests, however the literature
demonstrates the difference these sites have on Chk1 function and localisation (Niida et al.,
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
49
2007, Wilsker et al., 2008). Independent of Ser317 status, Chk1 phosphorylated on Ser345
was found located at the centrosome (Wilsker et al., 2008) and prevented the premature
activation of CDK1 during a normal cell cycle and a G2 phase checkpoint arrest (Kramer et
al., 2004, Loffler et al., 2006). Ser345 is located within a 14-3-3 consensus binding motif
(Capasso et al., 2002, Jiang et al., 2003). The disruption of 14-3-3 binding caused by Ser345
mutation could be the reason for the differences seen with single site Ser317 or Ser345
mutants and may also be another reason why Chk1 mutants are not useful tools for Chk1
studies.
Evidence is mounting that the C terminus of Chk1 mediates critical aspects of Chk1 function
(Palermo et al., 2008, Wang et al, 2012) . Chk1 is predominantly a nuclear protein and in the
absence of damage Chk1 phosphorylated on Ser317 and Ser345 is found associated with
chromatin (Jiang et al., 2003, Smits, 2006, Smits et al., 2006). Nuclear levels of
phosphorylated Chk1 on Ser317 and Ser345 increase in the presence of DNA damage (Jiang
et al., 2003). Phosphorylated Chk1 Ser317 and Ser345 are also evident in the cytoplasm
following DNA damage, suggesting that Chk1 phosphorylation can promote cytoplasmic
translocation from the nucleus after DNA damage. However, Alanine mutation of both
Ser317 and Ser345 promoted cytoplasmic localisation suggesting these phosphorylations
are more likely to promote nuclear localisation (Jiang et al., 2003).
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
50
1.9.1 The role of Chk1 during an unperturbed cell cycle
There is evidence that a basal level of Chk1 activity is present during an unperturbed cell
cycle (Capasso et al., 2002, Gatei et al., 2003, Zhang et al., 2006b, Xu et al., 2012) and
correlates with the observation that phosphorylated Chk1 is present during an unperturbed
cell cycle, which is often unmentioned by publishing authors. Along with the fact that Chk1-/-
is embroyic lethal in muce, collectively, this suggests a role for active Chk1 during an
unperturbed cell cycle.
Chk1 inhibition during an unperturbed cell cycle enhances the rate of mitotic entry (Tang et
al., 2006). Chk1 can regulate mitotic entry by two possible mechanisms. Firstly, similar to its
role in the DDR, Chk1 phosphorylates and inhibits Cdc25B during an unperturbed cell cycle;
however the phosphorylation sites differ from the sites phosphorylated in response to
damage. When cells are deficient of Chk1, Cdc25 is not inhibited by Chk1 which results in
premature activation of CDK1 (Chen et al., 2003) and cells proceed uncontrollably into
mitosis. In particular, Chk1 negatively regulates Cdc25B by phosphorylating several sites
including Ser230 and Ser563 (Schmitt et al., 2006), during G2 phase therefore governing
mitotic entry. Ser230 phosphorylation of Cdc25B occurs at the centrosomes and contributes
to the timing of mitotic entry (Schmitt et al., 2006). Chk1 phosphorylated at Ser345 can also
localise at the centrosomes (Wilsker et al., 2008) in an unperturbed cell cycle and confirms
that active Chk1 present during an unperturbed cell cycle regulates Cdc25B activation at the
centrosomes. Recent work shows that Chk1 is capable of controlling the activation of Polo-
like kinase 1 (Plk1) during an unperturbed cell cycle as well as during the DNA damage
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
51
response. Chk1 depletion was shown to cause an increase in Plk1 activity (Tang et al., 2006).
However enhanced Plk1 levels and activation are known to coincide with mitotic entry and
therefore could be a consequence of increased mitotic entry caused by Chk1 inhibition.
These are clear indications that Chk1 has the ability to control G2 phase progression,
however it is unknown if other mechanisms are involved.
Chk1 also has critical roles during S phase, such as maintaining replication fork integrity.
Consequently, depletion of Chk1 results in replication fork stalling, possible collapsed forks
and aberrant replication forks (Petermann et al., 2008) but at the same time can lead to the
activation of adjacent and possibly suppressed origins (Maya-Mendoza et al., 2007).
Therefore, it is unsurprising that the rate of replication forks is affected by Chk1 loss, in fact
the rate is decreased by half in Chk1 knockout cells when compared to wildtype cells
(Petermann et al., 2006).
Chk1 removal results in an inability of cells to sustain a mitotic arrest ( Zachos et al., 2007,
Zachos and Gillespie, 2007, Carrassa et al., 2009). Specifically, Chk1 has a role during mitosis
to oversee the correct segregation of the genome, thus explaining why the absence of Chk1
leads to misaligned chromosomes followed by mitotic catastrophe (Niida et al., 2005). This
may be linked to the role of Chk1 during the spindle assembly checkpoint where it is
required to control the activation of Aurora B and BubR1 by phosphorylation and
localisation (Zachos et al., 2007). Without the correct functioning of spindle checkpoint
components, such as Chk1, the fidelity of mitosis is at risk.
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
52
1.9.2 Chk1 inactivation
Once active, Chk1 is required until the repair of damage is complete. The inhibition of Chk1
must be timed correctly as premature inactivation results in mitotic catastrophe (Latif et al.,
2004). Decreased Ser317 and Ser345 phosphorylation correlates with checkpoint exit.
Dephosphorylation of these sites can be achieved by protein phosphatase 1 (PP1), and in
the absence of PP1 the checkpoint arrest is extended (den Elzen and O'Connell, 2004,
Kuntziger et al, 2012).
More recently a new mode of negative regulation of Chk1 has been uncovered. Chk1 was
inhibited by phosphorylation on Ser286 and Ser301 catalysed by CDK1 during mitosis. First
indications demonstrated that these phosphorylation events were required to inhibit Chk1
for mitotic progression (Shiromizu et al., 2006). Later, these phosphorylation events were
also shown to control Chk1 localisation. Mutational analysis revealed that these
phosphorylation sites are required for the cytoplasmic localisation of Chk1 from the
nucleus. Further investigation found that these inhibitory phosphorylation sites can be
phosphorylated in response to DNA damage also. During the DDR cyclin A/CDK2 is most
likely responsible for Chk1 phosphorylation on Ser286 and Ser301, as cyclin B/CDK1 is
inactivated during this time (Ikegami et al., 2008). Phosphorylation of these sites in
response to DNA damage does not correlate with the earlier suggestion that these sites
were inhibitory. The evidence that these inhibitory phosphorylations occur on the same
Chk1 molecule also phosphorylated on the activating sites implies the function of these
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
53
sites remains elusive. A great deal of further investigation is required to understand the
timing of these phosphorylations and their role during G2/M progression.
1.10 Hypothesis
Chk1 is a central component of the ATR/ATM dependent G2 checkpoint whose role and
regulation during G2/M progression is not yet well defined. Cyclin A/CDK2 is a major
regulator of G2 phase progression and like Chk1 has the ability to control cyclin B/CDK1
activation. The ability of Chk1 to regulate cyclin B/CDK1 activity is well known but the
mechanism/s by which cyclin A/CDK2 regulates cyclin B/CDK1 activation is less well known.
There is evidence that cyclin A/CDK2 activity is required during the G2 phase checkpoint but
its function is poorly understood. In this study the mechanism(s) by which G2 phase cyclin
A/CDK2 regulates the timing of cyclin B/CDK1 activation and entry into mitosis will be
examined, as well as the contribution of cyclin A/CDK2 to the G2 phase checkpoint. Due to
Chk1s very strong role in G2/M progression, the initial hypothesis of this study is that cyclin
A/CDK2 regulates the activity of Chk1 in normal G2 phase progression by suppressing Chk1
activity to permit cyclin B/CDK1 activation and mitotic entry. The second hypothesis is that
cyclin A/CDK2 has a similar role and utilises similar mechanisms to suppress Chk1 in
recovery from the G2 phase checkpoint arrest. Third, we will look beyond Chk1 and
determine the involvement of additional known or unknown G2/M proteins to act within
these pathways.
Chapter 1 – Literature Review
54
1.11 Significance
The understanding of the cell cycle and its regulation has come a long way in the last
decade. However the details of pathways involved in cell cycle regulation, particularly G2/M
phase transition and the G2 phase checkpoint, are still being determined. This study
contributes to developing and enhancing this knowledge. Checkpoints are often defective in
cancers, therefore understanding their detailed pathways and components may allow for
further development or identification of better targets for anticancer therapies.
1.12 Aims of the study
Specifically, this study will elucidate pathways involved in normal G2/M progression as well
as during a G2 checkpoint response. The regulation of G2 phase by cyclin A/CDK2 will be
particularly examined. The specific aims of this study are-
1. How does cyclin A/CDK2 regulate G2/M progression?
2. Is Chk1 active during an unperturbed cell cycle and what is its role?
3. Does cyclin A/CDK2 regulate G2 phase Chk1 to contribute to normal G2/M progression
and checkpoint recovery?
4. What other G2/M pathways may be regulated by cyclin A/CDK2 to allow mitotic entry?
55
Chapter 2
Materials and Methods
Chapter 2 – Material and Methods
56
All chemicals used were of analytical grade rand were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Castle
Hill, NSW, Australia), Invitrogen (Mulgrave, VIC, Australia), Merck Chemicals (Kilsyth, Victoria,
Australia), Calbiochem (Darmstadt, Germany) and Univar (Taren Pt, NSW, Australia), unless
otherwise indicated. All solutions were prepared using Milli-Q purified water and autoclaved
or filter-sterilized through 0.22μm filters when appropriate. All glassware used for cell or
bacterial culture was sterilized prior to use. Restriction enzymes were purchased from New
England Bio Labs (Ipswich, MA, USA). All tissue culture materials were purchased from
Invitrogen unless otherwise indicated. Protease inhibitors (Complete Mini-EDTA-free
protease inhibitor cocktail) were obtained from Roche (Dee Why, NSW, Victoria). All PCR
primers and siRNA were synthesised and purchased from Invitrogen unless stated.
2.1 Antibodies
All antibodies were stored as per manufacturer’s instructions for short term use, at either 4°C
or -20°C. The dilution of antibodies for immunoprecipitations (IPs) refers to the final dilution
of antibody used in the total IP reaction volume, after the addition of protein A beads and
cell lysates. Dilutions used for immunoblotting (IB) and immunofluorescence (IF) are given in
Table 2.1 also.
Chapter 2 – Material and Methods
57
Table 2.1 Antibodies List.
Dilution used per application
Antibody Name
Source IB IF IP
ACA Home made (mouse)
1:1000
Cdc25B Santa Cruz (C-20) (rabbit) 1:100
CDK1 PY15 Cell Signalling (rabbit) 1:1000
Cdh1 Abcam (mouse)
1:100
Chk1 Abcam (goat)
1:100 1:50
pChk1 S286 Gift from Dr Masaki Inagaki (mouse) 1:100
pChk1 S301 Gift from Dr Masaki Inagaki (mouse) 1:100
pChk1 S317 Bethyl Labs (rabbit)
1:50
pChk1 S317 Cell Signalling (rabbit) 1:1000
1:50
Chk1 S345 Cell Signalling (rabbit) 1:500 1:50
Chk2 Cell Signalling (rabbit) 1:500
pChk2 T68 Abcam (rabbit) 1:500
Claspin Abcam (goat) 1:5000
cyclin A Santa Cruz (H-432) (rabbit) 1:1000 1:200 1:50
cyclin B Home made (rabbit) 1:100
Flag Invitrogen (mouse) 1:1000 1:100 1:100
GFP Cell Signalling (mouse) 1:1000 1:100
pMek1 T286 Cell Signalling (rabbit) 1:500 1:100
MPM2 Abcam (mouse)
1:100
Chapter 2 – Material and Methods
58
2.2 Cell Biology Methods.
2.2.1 Cell culture
HeLa cells (Human cervical carcinoma cell line) were grown in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagles
Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% Serum Supreme, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 1 M
Hepes, 2 mM L-Glutamine. Cells were incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2.
FO2 (ATR defective; Seckel Syndrome derived cell line), NFF (Neonatal Foreskin Fibroblasts),
and WI38 (Untransformed Fibroblasts) cells were grown in DMEM supplemented with 10%
Foetal Bovine Serum and 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 1 M Hepes, 2 mM L-Glutamine.
HeLa cells stabling expressing Cherry tagged α-tubulin were grown in the same conditions as
the parental HeLa cells.
U2OS Myc-Cdh1 inducible cells were grown in DMEM supplemented with 10% Fetal Bovine
Serum, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 1 M Hepes, 2 mM L-Glutamine and 2 µg/mL tetracycline. Cells
Myc Cell Signalling (mouse) 1:1000 1:100
PCNA DAKO (mouse) 1:10 000
Plk1 Abcam (mouse) 1:500 1:100
Plk1 pT210 Abcam (mouse) 1:500
α-tubulin Sigma Aldrich (mouse)
1:500
γ-tubulin Sigma Aldrich (mouse)
1:500
Wee1 Cell Signalling (rabbit) 1:1000
Chapter 2 – Material and Methods
59
were incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2. For Cdh1 induction cells were washed 3 times for 10
minutes in warmed phosphate buffered saline (PBS). Cells were then incubated in the media
listed above, but without tetracycline addition.
2.2.2 Cell Synchronisation
For thymidine synchrony experiments, cells were treated with 2.5 mM thymidine
supplemented media for 16-24 h. Cells were then washed three times with pre-warmed PBS
and then once with pre-warmed DMEM before adding growth media supplemented with 24
μM thymidine and 24 μM 2’deoxycitidine. This allows a release of cells from their G1/S
arrest. After an 8 h release the majority of cells are in G2 and were then blocked again with
thymidine (2.5 mM) for 16-24 h. Cells were then washed as above, and full medium
supplemented with 24 µM thymidine and 24 μM 2’deoxycitidine was used to release cells
from the arrest. These cells were then collected at the indicated times and analysed by FACs
and immunoblotting or visualised for cell cycle progression by time lapse microscopy.
2.2.3 Cell Treatments
G2 cell cycle checkpoint arrest with Etoposide was achieved with addition of 1 μM Etoposide
(Sigma Aldrich) into complete medium and incubated for approximately 16-24 h. For mitotic
synchronisation, cells were treated with nocodazole (Sigma Aldrich) in complete medium for
16 h at a final concentration of 0.5 µg/ml. Mitotic cells lose their adherence to the dishes,
thus were collected by simply removing media and manually disrupting cell attachment, a
technique known as a “mitotic shake off”. Roscovitine (rosco) (Sigma Aldrich) was used at 50
Chapter 2 – Material and Methods
60
μM for indicated times to inhibit both CDK1 and CDK2 activity. CDK2 inhibitor (Calbiochem),
Ro09 3033, was used at concentrations and indication times, as specified in individual
experimental figure legends. CDK1i RO-3306 (Calbiochem) was used at 9 µM, CDK2i PHA-
533533 (Courtesy of Professor Grant McArthur (Peter Mac (Victoria, Australia)) was used at 4
µM or as indicated (Deans et al., 2006, Pevarello et al., 2005a, Vassilev et al., 2006). The
proteasome inhibitor, MG132 (Calbiochem (La Jolla, CA, USA)) was used at 20 µM. Chk1
inhibitor, SB 218078 (Calbiochem), was used at 2.5 µM or as indicated in individual
experimental figure legends. Caffeine (Sigma Aldrich) was used at 5 mM. Plk1i (BI 2536)
(Selleckchem, Boston, USA) was used at concentrations indicated in individual experimental
figure legends. DMSO (Sigma Aldrich) treated samples were used as controls and cells were
treated with the same volume of DMSO as used for the active comparison.
Cells treated with UV(R) where washed three times for 10 minutes with pre-warmed PBS.
After the last wash, a minimalistic amount of PBS was applied to the monolayer of cells
adhered to the dish. Cells were then radiated with the specified amount of UV(R). Once
complete, PBS was removed and completed media was applied to the cells. Cells were
returned to the incubator until required.
2.2.4 Transfection Treatments
2.2.4.1 Plasmid transient transfection
For transient transfection of Flag-Chk1 constructs (Gift from Prof Kum Kum Khanna, Qld
Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Australia), Myc-Cdh1, Cherry-Cyclin A, GFP and Myc
Chapter 2 – Material and Methods
61
plasmids, cells were plated onto 10cm2 dishes or 6-well plates and allowed to attach for 18 h.
Cells were then transfected with 1 µg/mL of the relevant DNA plasmid in either 10 cm2 or 6
well plates. Lipofectamine 2000 reagent (Life Technologies) was used according to the
manufacturer’s instructions. Transfection medium was replaced with the appropriate
medium for the cell line and incubated for a further 24 h, or until specified, at 37°C with 5%
CO2.
2.2.4.2 siRNA transfection
Table 2.2 lists the siRNA used in this study. Included are the sequences, concentrations of the
siRNA supplied by Ambion (Austin, TX, USA), Invitrogen and Dharmacon (Lafayette CO, USA).
Note that the amount of the control (N) siRNA is intentionally not listed as the concentration
used varied depending on the concentration of the targeted siRNA used in the experiment.
To transfect siRNA duplexes, Lipofectamine 2000 Reagent was used as per manufacturer’s
instructions. All samples were collected for analysis 24 h after transfection or as specified in
the experiment. However, for transfection of NFF, cells were transfected using the same
method but the transfection reagent was replaced with Darmafect 1 (Dharmacon)
transfection reagent, which provided better transfection efficiency in this cell line.
Chapter 2 – Material and Methods
62
Table 2.2 List of siRNA.
siRNAs Target Sequence (5’ 3’) Supplier Final conc. (nM)
Control/nonsense
(Con/N) aatgatctacctgttaagagtcctgtctc Invitrogen -
Chk1 tcgtgagcgtttgttgaac Invitrogen 30
cyclin A
A1 aaggatcttcctgtaaatgatgagc Invitrogen 50
A2 taaacctaaagtgggttacatg Invitrogen 50
A3 ggaaagtcttaagccttgtctca Invitrogen 50
A4 Not Available – product # 2512 Ambion 50
A5 Not Available – product # 2514 Ambion 50
Chk2 c1 aaacgccgtcctttgaatatt Invitrogen 90
c2 aagaacctgaggagcctaccc Invitrogen 90
c3 aatgtgtgaatgacaactact Invitrogen 90
Claspin (Clasp) aaggaaagaaaggcagccaga Invitrogen 40
Cdh1
Cdh1 A ccacaggauuaacgagaau Dharmacon Smartpool 40
Cdh1 B ggaacacgcugacaggaca Dharmacon Smartpool 40
Cdh1 C gcaacgaugugucucccua Dharmacon Smartpool 40
Cdh1 D gaagaagggucuguucacg Dharmacon Smartpool 40
2.2.5 Cell fixation and immunofluorescent labelling
All cell lines were cultured to near confluence, and harvested by trypsinisation. Cells were
diluted 3- to 10-fold and cultured overnight onto poly-L-lysine- (0.1 mg/mL) or fibronectin-
(20 μg/mL) coated glass coverslips, washed twice with PBS, and fixed in either 4°C 4%
paraformaldehyde (PFA) (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA) for 20 minutes at
room temperature (RT), followed by permeabilisation with 0.1% saponin for 10 minutes at RT
or treated with methanol (MeOH) for 5 minutes at -20 °C. Cells were washed twice with PBS,
and blocked for 30 minutes at room temperature with 2.5% Bovine Serum albumin (BSA).
Chapter 2 – Material and Methods
63
This was followed by primary antibody incubation at RT for 1 h, or 4C overnight diluted with
0.1% BSA in PBS. For control incubations, the primary antibody was omitted (Cellomic
experimentation (with pChk1 S317 antibody, see section 2.2.6). Cells were washed twice with
PBS and incubated simultaneously with the relevant secondary antibodies and the DNA
marker DAPI (4’-6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole) where relevant, in 0.1% BSA in PBS, for 1 h at
RT in the dark. After washing twice in PBS, coverslips were mounted onto glass slides using
Prolong Gold (Invitrogen) and stored at 4°C.
Secondary antibodies used were conjugated-Alexa 488 and Alexa 555 (Invitrogen) and were
used at a 1:250 dilution (8 μg/ml). DAPI (1 μg/mL) was included with the secondary
antibodies. Samples were imaged using either a Zeiss Apotome widefield fluorescence
microscope or a Zeiss 510 Meta confocal microscope. Images were analysed using Zeiss
AxioVision or Zen confocal software. Images were processed using Adobe Photoshop or
ImageJ freeware.
2.2.5.1 Cyclin A staining
Cells were fixed for 5 minutes with methanol at -20°C. Prior to incubation with blocking
solution (2.5% BSA/PBS) cells were incubated on ice for 5 minutes with 2% digitonin/PBS.
Cells were then blocked and stained for cyclin A (Santa Cruz (Santa Cruz, CA, USA)) as per
section 2.2.3
Chapter 2 – Material and Methods
64
2.2.5.2 pChk1 staining
Coverslips were incubated in 3% PBA/PBS for 30 minutes on ice and permeabilised for 20
minutes on ice with 0.5% Triton X-100/PBS. Cells were then blocked and stained for pChk1
Ser345 (Cell Signaling) as per section 2.2.3.
pChk1 Ser317 immunofluorescent staining using antibody purchased from Bethyl
(Montgomery, TX, USA) was carried out after fixing cells with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA)
(method outlined in section 2.2.5).
2.2.5.3 Plk1 staining
Coverslips were fixed for 5 minutes with 3% PFA/PBS and permeabilised for 5 minutes with
2% Triton X-100/PBS. This was then followed by 5 minutes incubation with methanol at 20°C.
Coverslips were fixed for 5 minutes with 3% PFA, 2% sucrose in PBS. Triton X-100 (0.5%) was
then added for 5 minutes at 4°C. Further permeabilisation was carried out by incubating cells
for 5 minutes at room temperature in 0.5% Triton X-100 in 20 mM HEPES pH 7.4, 3 mM
MgCl2, 50 mM sodium chloride, 300 mM sucrose, 0.02% Sodium Azide solution. This was
then immediately removed and methanol was added for 5 minutes at -20°C. Coverslips were
then washed twice with PBS and incubated in 3% BSA/PBS in a humidified chamber for 30
minutes for blocking. After blocking, primary antibody was diluted in 3% BSA/PBS plus 0.02%
Sodium Azide and incubated on cells for 1 h in a humidified chamber. Primary antibody was
removed by three 20 minute washes with PBS followed by secondary antibody incubation
along with DAPI. Secondary antibodies were diluted in 3% BSA and incubated for 30 minutes
Chapter 2 – Material and Methods
65
in a humidified chamber. Lastly the coverslips were washed with five 20 minute washes with
PBS before mounting onto slides.
2.2.6 Microscopy and image acquisition
2.2.6.1 Immunofluorescence microscopy
Immunofluorescence microscopy was performed using a Zeiss Apotome widefield
microscope equipped with a cooled CCD camera. Images were taken using 40x, 60x or 100x
oil objectives, through appropriate filter sets for DAPI, FITC/Alexa488, and Cy3 fluorophores,
using exposure times optimised for each field photographed. ImageJ freeware or Adobe
Photoshop programmes were used in post-capture processing and analyses of digital images.
2.2.6.2 Confocal laser scanning microscopy
Confocal microscopy was performed using a Zeiss 510 Meta laser scanning spectral confocal
microscope. Images were acquired using Plan APO 63x or 100x oil objectives, and
fluorescence emissions were captured sequentially using line and frame averaging to reduce
noise through standard filters. The 488nm, 543nm and 633nm lasers were used to excite
Alexa-488, Cy3 and Cy5 fluorophores, respectively. For cell cycle-regulated expression and
co-localization studies, confocal scan settings were standardised using control cells stained
with either primary antibody in the presence of the relevant peptide, or with the secondary
antibody only, to exclude signals obtained through non-specific antibody staining.
Chapter 2 – Material and Methods
66
2.2.6.3 Time lapse imaging
For live imaging of cells, cells were cultured in a 6 well plate format and transfected, as
specified. Plates were transferred to a live cell imaging chamber (Zeiss) and maintained at
37C with 5% CO2 in the dark until imaging was required using the Zeiss Cell observer
microscope. Transfected cells were serially imaged with a 20x objective over 15 min intervals
using transmitted light. Fluorescent filter sets were used when GFP or Cherry tagged cell lines
were used. Scoring of these samples was conducted manually and approximately 200 cells
per condition were counted.
2.2.7 FACS Analysis
All FACS samples in this study were quantified for cellular DNA content by flow cytometry,
cells were washed in PBS twice and then fixed in 70% ethanol overnight at -20°C. After
fixation cells were washed in PBS, and then resuspended in 500 μL of solution containing 25
μg/mL of propidium iodide (PI) and 25 μL of RNase A (1 mg/mL) in PBS. After staining with PI
for approximately 15 minutes, samples were filtered and analysed using the FACs Calibur (BD
Biosciences) system. 10,000 cells were acquired per sample. Cell Quest Software was used
for the acquisition and FlowJo was used for analysis.
2.2.7.1 Chk1 expressing FACS analysis
Cells co-transfected with Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) and Flag-Chk1 constructs were
analysed by FACS to determine the DNA profile of the positively expressing GFP cells. For GFP
Chapter 2 – Material and Methods
67
detection by FACS, cells were fixed and stained as above for DNA content with PI. Acquisition
required a 488-nm laser emitting at 635 nm to detect the positive GFP expressing cells and a
PI laser to acquire this data simultaneously. Analysis of 50,000 cells was acquired and was
conducted using FlowJo software. Only the DNA profile of the positively expressing cells was
analysed.
2.2.7.2 MPM2 FACS
To specifically detect mitotic cells, cells were fixed as above. After fixation, cells were washed
twice with PBS and then resuspended in blocking solution for 1 h at room temperature.
Blocking solution consists of 1% BSA (Sigma Aldrich) in Phosphate buffered saline plus tween
20 (PBST). Monoclonal MPM2 antibody (Abcam, 1:100 (San Francisco, CA, USA)) was added
directly to each sample, suspended thoroughly and gently agitated for 1 h at room
temperature. Cells were washed twice with PBS and then incubated with secondary
antibody, Alexa 488 goat anti mouse IgG (Invitrogen) diluted 1:250 in blocking solution, for 1
h at room temperature in the dark. All following steps had minimised exposure to light. Cells
were washed twice in PBS and resuspended in solution containing 25 μg/mL PI and 25 μL of
RNase A (1 mg/mL) in PBS. After staining with PI for 15 minutes, samples were filtered and
analysed by a FACs Calibur. For mitotic analysis 50,000 cells were scored per sample. Analysis
was conducted using FlowJo software.
Chapter 2 – Material and Methods
68
2.2.8 Cellomics
Each cell line was cultured as indicated above and seeded into 96 well flat bottomed view
plates at 5000 cells per well for high content image analysis using the Cellomics high content
imager. Cells were then washed in PBS, fixed with ice-cold methanol for 20 minutes at -20°C
and stained with pChk1 S317 (Bethyl) as indicated above. DAPI (1 µg/mL) (Sigma Aldrich) was
used to stain DNA when incubating cells with the secondary antibody (1:250). DAPI was used
as it has superior quantitative binding to DNA, providing better discrimination of the cell
cycle phases. Cells were stored in PBS in darkened conditions at 4°C until analysis with the
Cellomics ArrayScan VTI high-content imager (from Thermo Scientific, 10x objective, XF93
filter set) using Cellomics ArrayScan software. Approximately 2000 cells were scored for each
cell line and controls stained with secondary antibody only were analysed to eliminate
background fluorescence. The DNA content/DNA intensity was used to ascertain the cell
cycle distributions. This allowed for the discrepancy between G1, S and G2/M populations.
The same conditions were also carried out on controls which were then subtracted from the
samples. Floating bar graphs display the mean including three standard deviations and the
range represents the 95 percentile of each population.
Chapter 2 – Material and Methods
69
2.3 Molecular Biology Methods
2.3.1 Plasmid list
The following table lists all plasmids used in this thesis. Many of these plasmids were gift from various
colleagues. The methods used for the generation of the vectors required for the thesis are detailed in
the subsequent sections.
Table 2.3 List of Plasmids
PLASMID NAME VECTOR BACKBONE
Cherry α-tubulin mCherry-C1
Cherry Chk1 S286 mCherry-C1
Cherry Chk1 S301 mCherry-C1
Cherry Chk1 SS286,301AA mCherry-C1
Cherry Chk1 WT mCherry-C1
Cherry Cyclin A mCherry-C1
Flag Chk1 WT pCI-neo
Flag Chk1 S286A pCI-neo
Flag Chk1 S301A pCI-neo
Flag Chk1 SS286,301AA pCI-neo
Flag Chk1 SS317,345DD S286A pCI-neo
Flag Chk1 SS317,345DD S301A pCI-neo
Flag Chk1 SS317,345DD SS286,301AA pCI-neo
GFP pEGFP-C1
GST-Chk1 pGex 4T-1
GST-Chk1 S286A pGex 4T-1
GST-Chk1 S301 pGex 4T-1
GST-Chk1 SS286,301AA pGex 4T-1
Myc Cdh1 pX-MYC
Myc Cdh1 AAA pX-MYC
Myc-Plk1 pRcCMV
PBD-GFP pEGFP-C1
Chapter 2 – Material and Methods
70
Cherry α-tubulin, Myc-Cdh1, Myc-Cdh1 AAA and Myc-Plk1 were gifts from Nichole Den Elzen
(Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Queensland), Claus Sorensen (Biotech Research
and Innovation Centre, University of Copenhagen) and Erich Nigg (The Centre of Molecular
Life Sciences, University of Basel) respectively.
2.3.1.1 Generation of S286A, S301A and SS286,301AA
pCI-neo Flag Chk1 constructs (Chk1 WT; Chk1 SS317,345AA; Chk1 SS317,345DD) were gifts
from Dr Kum Kum Khanna. Chk1 was cloned into this vector using EcoR1 and Sal1 restriction
sites.
Using the Stratagene site directed mutagenesis protocol both Ser286 and Ser301 were
mutated to alanine using the primers listed in Table 2.3. Primers were designed using
Intergrated DNA technologies’ web-based Oligo Analyser 3.0 primer design programs
available online.
Table 2.4 List of Chk1 mutagenesis primers used.
Primer Sequence (5' → 3')
286A Forward gag tca ctt cag gtg gtg tgt cag agg ctc cca gtg g
286A Reverse cca ctg gga gcc tct gac aca cc acct gaa gtg act c
301A Forward cca att tgg act tcg ctc cag taa aca gtg c
301A Reverse gca ctg ttt act gga gcg aag tcc aaa tgg g
Chapter 2 – Material and Methods
71
2.3.1.2 Preparation of competent cells
2mL Lysogeny broth (LB) medium was inoculated with XL1-blue or BL21 Escherichia coli (E-coli)
bacterial strains and incubated at 37C overnight with orbital shaking at 250 rpm. A 2 mL
overnight culture was used to inoculate 200 mL LB medium in the presence of 15 μg/mL
tetracycline (XL1-blue only) and cultured for a further 4 h in 1 L culture flasks, or until the
absorbance at 600 nm read approximately 0.6. Cultures were then chilled on ice, and
centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 15 minutes at 4C in sterile 250 mL centrifuge bottles. Pelleted
bacteria were washed twice with 200 mL sterile Milli-Q purified water. Bacteria were
transferred to 50 mL Falcon tubes and washed once with 20 mL 10% glycerol. Bacterial
pellets were then resuspended in an equal volume of 10% glycerol and either used
immediately or aliquoted into eppendorf tubes and stored at -80C until use.
2.3.1.3 Transformation of bacteria
Bacteria were transformed with plasmids or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) reactions using
the heat shock method. DNA was added to competent Escherichia Coli and incubated on ice
for 30 minutes. Samples were then heat shocked for 45 seconds at 42 °C and placed back on
ice for 2 minutes. Bacteria were then transferred into 1 mL of LB media and grown for 1 h
with gentle shaking at 37°C. Bacteria were then plated onto LB agar plates containing
appropriate antibiotics and incubated inverted overnight at 37°C.
Chapter 2 – Material and Methods
72
2.3.1.4 Screening for positive clones
Bacterial colonies were picked into 2 mL LB medium containing appropriate antibiotics, and
shaken at 250 rpm overnight at 37°C. Bacteria were pelleted and DNA extracted as per the
Promega DNA purification kit protocol. Samples were diluted used 100 μL of RNase/DNase
free water supplied by Promega (Wisconsin, USA) and stored at -20°C. The DNA was further
subjected to sequencing to confirm positive mutants.
2.3.1.5 Sequencing
600 ng of mini-prep plasmid DNA purified using the Promega DNA miniprep kit as per
instructions, was added into a 1.5 mL eppendorf tube along with 6.4 pmol of sequencing
primer. Samples were then sent for sequencing to the Australian Genome Research Facility
(AGRF) at the University of Queensland (UQ) St Lucia campus. Sequence traces were checked
visually with Applied Biosystems sequence scanner software, to ensure that subcloned
inserts were in the correct reading frame.
The sequencing primer used for pCI-neo was the universal T7 primer (5’
TAATACGACTCACTATAGGG 3’).
2.3.1.6 Large scale plasmid DNA preparation
Following sequence verification of plasmid inserts, large quantities (100 μg-1 mg) of plasmid
DNA were prepared using the Qiagen Hi-Speed Plasmid Purification kit, according to the
manufacturer’s instructions. DNA concentration and purity were determined by absorbance
Chapter 2 – Material and Methods
73
at 260 nm, and the ratio of absorbance at 260 nm to absorbance at 280 nm, respectively.
DNA was digested and gel electrophoresis conducted to confirm plasmid purification.
2.3.1.7 Restriction enzyme digests
Restriction digests were carried out according to manufacturer’s instructions using the
recommended buffers, except that BSA at a final concentration of 100 μg/mL was added to
all reactions. Vectors for ligation were treated with shrimp alkaline phosphatase (Promega),
according to manufacturer’s instructions prior to ligation reactions, to reduce end-to-end
vector re-ligation frequency.
2.3.1.8 Agarose gel electrophoresis
DNA of interest was electrophoresed in agarose gels prepared at appropriate concentrations
in TBE (Tris/Borate/EDTA) (pH8.0) buffer, containing 0.2 μg/mL ethidium bromide. Lambda
DNA cut with Hind III/ Eco RI or a 100 base pair DNA ladder (Invitrogen) were used as DNA
markers. Following electrophoresis, gels were photographed under UV(R) illumination with a
BioRad (Hercules, CA, USA) CCD camera using Molecular Analyst software.
2.3.1.9 Ligation
DNA ligations were performed in 10 μL reactions using 25-50 ng vector DNA and an
insert:vector ratio of approximately 5-10:1. Reactions were carried out in the presence of T4
DNA ligase (1 U/10 μL) and 100 μg/mL BSA according to manufacturer’s instructions
Chapter 2 – Material and Methods
74
(Invitrogen). The relevant amount of vector DNA was ligated in an additional reaction as a
negative control; this was used to provide a base-line colony count for subsequent
transformations.
2.3.2 Plasmid construct cloning
2.3.2.1. Generation of Cherry-Chk1 and GST-Chk1 constructs
Chk1 was cloned from the pCI-neo vector using EcoR1 and Sal1 digestion. This produced a
fragment of 1.4 kb, which was excised from the DNA electrophoresis gel. Purification of gel
bands was conducted using the Promega gel purification kit as per instructions. mCherry
vector and pGex4T-3 were both digested with EcoR1 and Sal1.
Cherry-Chk1 ligations were screened for insertion by conduction of single and double
restriction enzyme digestions with EcoR1 and Sal1. If correct, these constructs were further
tested by cell culture transfection and immunoblotting of samples.
Both constructs were sequenced to confirm positive mutations. Sequencing was carried out
as per section 2.3.1.5 and primers used for sequencing the constructs are listed in Table 2.4.
Table 2.5 List of sequencing primers used.
Sequencing Primer Sequence (5' → 3')
mCherry (reverse) gaaatttgtgatgctattgc
pGex 4T-3 (forward) gggctggcaagccacgtttggtg
Chapter 2 – Material and Methods
75
After positive identification, clones were subjected to large scale DNA purification as per
section 2.3.1.6. This was followed by confirmation of DNA digestion and DNA gel
electrophoresis as per sections 2.3.1.7 and 2.3.1.8 respectively.
2.3.2.2 Generation of PBD-GFP
Myc-Plk1 was used to generate PBD-GFP. The PBD was expressed from the parental plasmid
using the sequencing primers in Table 2.6. PCR products were resolved by agarose gel
electrophoresis (Section 2.3.1.8) and the amplified PBD was purified from the agarose gel
using a Promega DNA purification kit. Purified PBD was ligated into a pGEMTeasy cloning
vertor to make use of restriction sites for cloning into a fluorescenct GFP containing vector.
pGEMTeasy-PBD was digested with EcoRI. Restriction digests were resolved by agarose gel
electrophoresis and the PBD band (of approximately 800 base pairs) was purified using the
Promega DNA purification kit. The EcoRI digested PBD was then digested with SalI, which was
possible due to the removal of a SalI site from the pGEMTeasy cloning vector. PBD with EcoRI
and SalI cut ends assisted the cloning into the recipient vector in the correct orientation.
Finally, PBD digested with EcoRI and SalI was ligated into eGFP-C1 pre-digested with EcoRI
and SalI. Ligated products were screened with sequential digests using EcoRI and then SalI
enzymes. Positive clones were then transfected into cells to confirm the correct cloning of
PDB-GFP.
Chapter 2 – Material and Methods
76
Table 2.6 PBD-GFP cloning primers
Primer name Sequence (5'-->3')
Forward Primer ctgaccattccaccaaggttttc
Reverse Primer ggcagagttccggaggatt
2.4 Protein Biochemistry Methods
2.4.1 Immunoblot Analysis
Cells were lysed by suspension in Universal Lysis Buffer (ULP) (50 mM Tris pH7.4, 150mM
NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 2 mM EGTA, 25 mM NaF, 0.2% Triton X-100, 0.3% NP40, 25 mM β-
glycerophosphate and 5 µg/ml aprotinin, 5 µg/ml leupeptin, 0.1 mM PMSF) and incubated for
30 minutes at 4°C. Cell lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 13,200 rpm for 15 minutes.
Protein estimation by BioRad Bradford Assay allowed equalisation of all lysates, and 20 µg of
protein was resolved by 10% sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
(SDS-PAGE). Proteins were then transferred to Hybond-C nitrocellulose membrane
(Amersham Biosciences, USA) using the semi dry transfer method. Membranes were blocked
in 5% skim milk powder solution in PBS with 0.1% Tween 20 (PBST) for 30 minutes and
incubated in the required antibody overnight at 4°C.
After incubation with the appropriate antibody, membranes were washed in PBST for 3 x 10
minutes. Membranes were then incubated with the appropriate Horseradish Peroxidase
(HRP) conjugated secondary antibody (Zymed (Mulgrave, VIC, Australia) 1:2000) for 1 h at
room temperature. Finally, membranes were washed for 10 minute intervals for 1 h with
Chapter 2 – Material and Methods
77
PBST or TBST (Tris-buffered Saline plus 0.1% Tween 20), depending on the antibody
specificity, before detection by enhanced chemiluminescence (Perkin Elmer, Massachusetts,
USA) using the Fisher Biotech Imaging system. Quantitative image analysis was performed
using ImageJ freeware.
2.4.2 Immunoprecipitation
For co-immunoprecipitation experiments, specified amounts of protein were pre-cleared
with either protein G (Flag immunoprecipitation) or A sepharose (Chk1 and cyclin A
immunoprecipitation) beads for 1 h at 4˚C. Pre-cleared extracts were collected by
centrifugation at 2,000 rpm for 0.5 minute at room temperature (RT) then incubated with the
appropriate antibody/conjugated beads for 2 h at 4˚C. Immune complexes were collected
with protein A or G Sepharose beads for 1 h at 4˚C and washed four times with ULP. The
immunoprecipitated protein complexes were eluted with SDS sample buffer and the sample
boiled for 5 minutes.
Lysates immunoprecipitated with Cyclin A-protein A coupled beads were first pre-cleared
with protein A beads. Anti-Flag M2 affinity gel (Invitrogen) was used for Flag
immunoprecipitation and lysates were precleared with protein G. Chk1 immunoprecipitation
was carried out using protein A beads. IgG (Invitrogen) was used as a control for IP
experiments. The amount used was equivalent to the antibody being used in the experiment.
Chapter 2 – Material and Methods
78
2.4.2.1 Antibody coupling to protein A beads
1 mL protein A beads were washed twice with PBS and then twice in conjugation buffer
(50 mM Tris pH 7.6, 150 mM NaCl, 2% BSA). The beads were then suspended in 1 mL volume
in conjugation Buffer, along with 20 μL of cyclin A (Santa Cruz H-432; 200 µg/mL) antibody or
0.4 µL of rabbit-IgG (Invitrogen; 10 mg/mL) and incubated on a rocker for 1 h at RT. The
supernatant was then removed after spinning for 5 minutes at 3,000 g. The beads were then
transferred to a 15 mL tube with 10 mL Na Borate buffer, pH 9.0 and washed twice,
centrifuging at 3,500 rpm for 4 minutes at RT. Covalent coupling of the antibody was
achieved by adding 50 mg DMP (dimethyl pimelimidate, Sigma Aldrich D8388) to 10 mL Na
Borate Buffer plus beads, ensuring a pH > 8.3 and incubating for 30 minutes at RT with
rocking.
The reaction was stopped by pelleting beads and adding 10 mL 0.2 M ethanolamine, pH 8.0.
The beads were washed once and then incubated for 2 h at RT with rocking. Ethanolamine
was removed by washing twice with PBS. The beads were further washed with 1 mL 100 mM
glycine pH 3.0, followed by a wash with 1 mL 100 mM Tris pH 8.0. Lastly, beads were washed
in PBS, ensuring pH ≈7.4 and resuspended in 1 x bed volume of PBS with an addition of Na
Azide to 0.02%.
Chapter 2 – Material and Methods
79
2.4.3 Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and
immunoblot analyses
2.4.3.1 SDS-PAGE
Protein extracts were resolved using SDS-PAGE on 4, 7 or 10% polyacrylamide gels. The
percentage gel used would be based on the protein to be detected. Equal amounts of protein
or fractions of equivalent volume were diluted with 5x SDS-PAGE sample buffer (1 M Tris pH
6.8; 20% glycerol; 2% SDS; 20% β-mercaptoethanol; 0.01% bromophenol blue), boiled for 5
minutes, and then separated alongside a Precision Plus Protein Dual colour standard (BioRad)
on polyacrylamide minigels in running buffer (25 mM Tris; 250 mM glycine; 0.1% SDS pH 8.3)
at 130 Volts for 1½ to 2½ h. The resolving and stacking gel compositions are outlined below
in Table 2.5 (volumes are sufficient for 2 mini-gels).
Table 2.7 Components and Volumes used for SDS-PAGE gels
Resolving Gel Stacking Gel REAGENT 10% 7% 4%
1M Tris pH 8.8 (mL) 2.5 2.5 2.5 --
1M Tris pH 6.8 (mL) -- -- -- 0.5
Water (mL) 3.96 4.96 5.96 2.72
10% SDS (µL) 100 100 100 40
30% bis- acrylamide (mL) 3.3 2.33 1.33 0.68
TEMED (µL) 12 12 12 5
10% APS (µL) 100 100 100 80
Chapter 2 – Material and Methods
80
In some cases, proteins were visualised by staining with Coomassie Brilliant Blue for 20
minutes with rocking, followed by de-staining in de-stain solution (45% methanol; 10% glacial
acetic acid) for 1 h.
2.4.3.2 Immunoblot transfer
For immunoblot analyses, proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and electro-transferred to
nitrocellulose filters (Millipore) as follows. Transfer materials were pre-soaked in transfer
buffer (25 mM Tris; 250 mM glycine; 20% methanol; 0.005% SDS) prior to assembly in the
BioRad semidry transfer cassette. 4 pieces of filter paper were placed onto the cassette,
followed by the nitrocellulose membrane and the gel on top of the membrane. Care was
taken during each assembly step to exclude air bubbles. The gel was then overlayed with 4
more pieces of filter paper. The cassette was then closed and proteins were transferred at
either 15 Volts for 12 minutes (7 and 10% gels) or 25 minutes (4% gel). Protein loading was
analysed using Ponceau S (1% ponceau S; 1% glacial acetic acid) staining of filters.
2.4.4 Cyclin A/CDK2 kinase assay
2.4.4.1 Induction of recombinant protein expression in E.coli BL21 cells
5 mL overnight cultures of BL21 bacteria transformed with pGex4T3-Chk1 WT, pGex4T3-Chk1
S286A, pGex4T3-Chk1 S301A or pGex4T3-Chk1 SS286,301AA were used to inoculate 50 mL
cultures at 1/200 dilution. Cultures were incubated at 37C, and shaken at 250 rpm for
approximately 4 h or until the absorbance at 600 nm was approximately 0.6, indicating log-
Chapter 2 – Material and Methods
81
phase growth. Recombinant protein expression was induced by addition of 0.5 mM IPTG
(Isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside) and incubating at 30C, shaking at 250 rpm for 2 h.
BL21 bacteria were pelleted and washed once with ice-cold STE (10 mM Tris pH 8, 150 mM
NaCl, 1 mM EDTA). Proteins were isolated by resuspending pellets in isotonic lysis buffer (55
mM DTT, 2 mM PMSF, 2% sarcosyl) with 1 mg/mL lysosome (1mL lysis buffer per 50mL
culture) and incubating on ice for 40 minutes. This was followed by brief sonication for 2
minutes. For the isolation of soluble extracts, lysates were centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 30
minutes at 4C and supernatants removed. Protein product sizes were verified by
electrophoresing pre- and post-induction protein samples on 10% SDS-PAGE gels, followed
by Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining (G-250). Proteins were then bound to GST beads by
incubation of the supernatant with 400 μL of beads, along with 2.5% Triton X-100, for 2 h
rotation at 4 °C. Beads were then collected by centrifugation at 1500 rpm for 2 minutes at
4°C. To wash, beads were resuspended in PBS and collected by centrifugation at 1500 rpm
for 1 minute at 4 °C. This was repeated 3 times, followed by a high salt wash with 1 M NaCl in
PBS and another 2 washes in PBS alone. Beads were stored as a 50% slurry in PBS plus
protease cocktail inhibitor at 4°C. For prolonged storage samples were kept at either -20°C or
-80 °C
2.4.4.2 In vitro kinase assay.
Equal volumes were taken of each purified GST-Chk1 sample (300-500 ng) and washed twice
with kinase buffer (KB) (20 mM Tris pH7.4, 1 mM DTT). The supernatant was removed and
samples resuspended in 30 μL of reaction buffer (20 mM Tris pH7.4, 15 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM
Chapter 2 – Material and Methods
82
ATP, 1 mM DTT and 25 mM β-glycerophosphate) containing 5 μCi *γ32P] and recombinant
cyclin A/CDK2 (Cell Signalling). The reaction was incubated for 15 minutes at 30 °C and then
stopped by the addition of 6 μL of SDS-PAGE loading buffer. Samples were then boiled at
100°C for 5 minutes before resolving by SDS-PAGE (10%).
Gels were then stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue, as per 2.4.3.1. Gels were then sealed
and exposed to X-ray film (Fuji Film Corporation) overnight at -80°C.
83
Chapter 3
Active Chk1 is present in unperturbed G2 phase
Chapter 3 – Active Chk1 present in G2 phase
84
3.1 INTRODUCTION
The control of cell cycle progression is reliant on cyclin / CDK complexes. The progression of
cells from G2 phase into mitosis is of critical importance as mitosis is the pivotal stage where
daughter cells will segregate to form two independent functioning cells. The process of
mitosis is complex and to ensure cells are capable of completing it successfully, they are
examined for correct functionality during the G2 phase before they enter this final stage of
the cell cycle.
The cyclin/CDK complexes required during the transition from G2 into mitosis are cyclin
A/CDK2 which functions during G2 phase and cyclin B/CDK1 which is the predominant mitotic
complex. The activation of the cyclin B/CDK1 complex, and therefore subsequent mitotic
entry, is conducted by a family of phosphatases known as the Cdc25s. Cdc25s are specific
activators of cyclin/CDK complexes and catalyse the removal of inhibitory phosphorylations,
Thr14 and Tyr15. In addition to the activation of cyclin B/CDK1 initiated by Cdc25B, active G2
phase cyclin A/CDK2 is required for the subsequent activation of cyclin B/CDK1 and mitotic
entry.
If DNA damage is detected during a cell cycle, appropriate checkpoints are activated;
enabling cells to stop cycle progression until all damage is resolved. Complex and structured
signalling events take place in order for the checkpoint to be implemented, but invariably
cyclin/CDK complexes are the final target of checkpoint signalling which halts cell cycle
progression. There are a number of checkpoints throughout the cell cycle. Of specific
interest here is the G2 phase checkpoint. The type of DNA damage inflicted upon the cell
Chapter 3 – Active Chk1 present in G2 phase
85
governs the responding G2 phase checkpoint signalling pathway utilized; the ATR-Chk1
pathway responds to single stranded DNA damage and the ATM-Chk2 pathway to double
strand DNA damage. There is evidence that these two pathways can cooperate in response
to DNA double strand breaks (DSBs), with ATR-Chk1 activated as a response to repair
intermediates involving ssDNA (Banin et al., 1998, Zhao and Piwnica-Worms, 2001).
The central effector kinase of the G2 phase DNA damage checkpoint is Checkpoint kinase 1
(Chk1). Chk1 is a multifunctional kinase which until recently was thought to only function in
response to DNA damage. The essential importance of ATR-Chk1 function is demonstrated
by the embryonic lethality of both ATR-/- and Chk1-/- mice (Liu et al., 2000, Takai et al., 2000)
compared to the viable although cancer prone ATM and Chk2 knockout mice (Barlow et al.,
1996, Elson et al., 1996, Xu et al., 1996, Takai et al., 2002). In response to DNA damage, Chk1
is phosphorylated by ATR at two activating sites in humans, Ser317 and Ser345 (Zhao and
Piwnica-Worms, 2001). Its regulation and functioning is thought to be dependent on these
phosphorylation events (Capasso et al., 2002) therefore Ser317 and Ser345 phosphorylation
have been used as indicators of Chk1 activation. Although each of these phosphorylation
sites have been linked to the control of different Chk1 functions/localizations (Wilsker et al.,
2008) they are both phosphorylated rapidly in response to damage. Phosphorylation of these
sites may be sequential as response to UV(R) damage requires Ser317 phosphorylation for
subsequent phosphorylation of Ser345 before Chk1 can activate downstream checkpoint
proteins. Despite the strong evidence that the Ser317 and Ser345 phosphorylations reflect
Chk1 activation, mutational analysis disputes this fact. The phospho inhibitory Chk1
Ser317Ala (serine mutated to alanine) and Ser317Ala/Ser345Ala double mutant is still active,
Chapter 3 – Active Chk1 present in G2 phase
86
with kinase activity level similar to wildtype constructs, while the kinase dead mutant (lysine
38 substituted to methionine) had no kinase activity (Tapia-Alveal et al., 2009). These data
suggest that although phosphorylation sites Ser317 and Ser345 are required for activation
they are not necessarily an appropriate representation of the activity status of Chk1.
However the two remain closely linked as high levels of phosphorylated Ser317 and Ser345
correspond to the arrest of cells in G2 phase and reduction in these phosphorylations
corresponds to the resolution of the damage and re-entry into the cell cycle. The detection of
Chk1 kinase activity and the presence of Ser317 and Ser345 phosphorylations during an
unperturbed cell cycle suggests that a basal level of Chk1 remains primed during a normal
cell cycle so that the cell can rapidly respond to DNA damage (den Elzen and O'Connell, 2004,
Harvey et al., 2004, Latif et al., 2004, Niida et al., 2007, ), but the question still remains as to
the role of Chk1 during a normal cell cycle.
Although the predominant purpose of these is to implement a checkpoint response, these
phosphorylations are detected under normal conditions and this has been observed in
several publications (Harvey et al., 2004, Latif et al., 2004, Niida et al., 2007) without
investigation into the purpose of its presence. Several recent publications have proposed
important roles for Chk1 under normal conditions during G2 phase and mitosis (Schmitt et
al., 2006, Wilsker et al., 2008, Matsuyama et al., 2011). Combined, these data suggest that
the basal level of activated Chk1 present during an unperturbed cell cycle may be linked to as
yet unknown roles of Chk1 during a normal cell cycle.
Chapter 3 – Active Chk1 present in G2 phase
87
The aim of this chapter, therefore, was to investigate the presence of Chk1
phosphorylation/activation throughout the different stages of the cell cycle in order to
determine if phosphorylated Chk1 (pChk1) levels remained constant or fluctuate throughout
the cell cycle.
3.2 RESULTS
3.2.1 Activated Chk1 is present during an unperturbed cell cycle.
To demonstrate the activation of Chk1 in the cell cycle with and without DNA damage we
used immunoblotting and FACS analysis. Chk1 phosphorylation and thereby activation was
strongly induced by G2 phase checkpoint activators Etoposide or Ultraviolet Radiation
(UV(R)) treatment, which are known to require Chk1 activity and increased Chk1
phosphorylation (Ser317 and Ser345) (Figure 3.1 A and B). Increased Ser345 phosphorylation
is only shown here in response to UV(R) treatment, however it is known to be activated in
response to DNA damage by Etoposide and, although not shown here, it is demonstrated
later in this study. The increased phosphorylation of Chk1 corresponded to a G2 checkpoint
arrest, confirmed by propidium iodide (PI) FACS (Figure 3.1 A and B, right hand panels) and
an increase of the G2 phase marker, CDK1 phosphorylated on Tyr15 (PY15) (only shown here
with Etoposide treatment). Phosphorylated Chk1 Ser317 is also clearly seen in the untreated
asynchronously growing HeLa cells in both experiments (Figure 3.1 A and B). Unlike the DNA
damage response, the presence of Chk1 phosphorylation did not appear to correspond to
activation of the G2 checkpoint arrest, as seen by FACS profiles (Figures 3.1 A and B, left hand
Chapter 3 – Active Chk1 present in G2 phase
88
panels). These data could suggest that this low level of phosphorylated Chk1 was not
sufficient to induce an arrest but was present as part of a surveillance mechanism to rapidly
respond to any damage when it occurs. Alternatively, perhaps this phosphorylated Chk1 is
not active, with additional modifications required for either the activation or maintaining
Chk1 in an inactive state.
Although active Chk1 was phosphorylated on both Ser317 and Ser345, the phospho-Ser317
antibodies (denoted here after as pChk1) were used predominantly throughout this study as
the antibodies were more reliable than the phospho-Ser345 antibody available. As activated
Chk1 was present during an unperturbed cell cycle, as seen in Figure 3.1, the activation
status of Chk1 throughout the different stages of the cell cycle was investigated (Figure 3.2).
Samples of HeLa cells were collected after synchronization with a double thymidine
synchrony block and collected at the indicated time points and analysed by FACS and
immunoblotting for pChk1 and other cell cycle markers. FACS analysis was also performed to
determine the cell cycle phase of each sample collected. Immunoblotting using PY15, as a
marker of G2 phase, and cyclin B, which becomes elevated in mitosis, was used to further
distinguish between these two phases of the cell cycle. pChk1 (the upper band as indicated
by an arrow) (Figure 3.2) was detected at release from the thymidine arrest (0 h), increasing
in S phase and then persisting through G2 phase (6-10 h), before declining as cells began to
enter mitosis (10-12 h), as indicated by the reduction in PY15 at these later time points
(Figure 3.2). Thus, Chk1 appears to be phosphorylated in S and G2 phase cells without
Chapter 3 – Active Chk1 present in G2 phase
89
Figure 3.1 pChk1 is present in asynchronously growing cells but strongly induced in response to
DNA damage.
A. HeLa cells were treated with 10 J/cm2 of UV(R) B (Ultraviolet radiation B) and collected 24 h
after exposure. Samples were collected for immunoblotting and FACS analysis. Cells were
immunoblotted for phospho-Chk1 Ser317 and Ser345, Chk1 and the loading control, α-
tubulin. For FACS analysis, cells were stained with propidium iodide for DNA content.
B. HeLa cells were treated with 1 µM Etoposide and collected 24 h after drug addition.
Samples were collected for immunoblotting and FACS analysis. Cells were immunoblotted
for pChk1 Ser317, Chk1 and PY15 antibody which detects CDK1 phosphorylation on tyrosine
15 and is a marker of G2 phase accumulation. α-tubulin was used as a loading control. For
FACS analysis cells were stained with propidium iodide for DNA content.
Chapter 3 – Active Chk1 present in G2 phase
90
Figure 3.2 Active Chk1 is present during an unperturbed cell cycle.
HeLa cells were synchronised using a double thymidine block release protocol (See section 2.2.2).
Cells were collected at indicated time points after blockade release (0-14 h). Samples were divided
and analysed by immunoblotting or FACS. For immunoblot analysis lysates were immunoblotted for
activated Chk1 phosphorylated on S317 (pChk1; top band as indicated by arrow), total Chk1 protein,
inactive CDK1 (PY15) and cyclin B (top band as indicated by arrow). Immunoblotting of PCNA was
used as a loading control. Asynchronous cells were used as a control. PI FACS analysis was carried out
and cell cycle populations were quantified with FlowJo software. The percentage of cell cycle phases
for each time point is represented in the graph.
Chapter 3 – Active Chk1 present in G2 phase
91
any damage present. Phospho antibodies were used to detect the activation status of other
important G2 checkpoint proteins Chk2 (pChk2 T68, data not shown) and activated p38MAPK
(pp38) and no changes were detected across the cell cycle (Figure 3.2). PCNA levels were
used as a loading control.
To confirm the presence of elevated pChk1 in G2 phase cells, and remove any potential
artifacts that may arise from a thymidine-induced synchrony, the specificity of the pChk1
siRNA was first checked. Immunoblot data was used to show the efficiency of Chk1 the siRNA
to deplete Chk1 and pChk1. The results showed an approximate 50% reduction in Chk1 levels
(Figure 3.3 A, lane 1 vs. lane 3). The effects of Chk1 siRNA on pChk1 levels and checkpoint
function was assessed by treating cells with siRNA prior to treatment with Etoposide, which
was used to induce a G2 checkpoint arrest. This clearly demonstrated the effectiveness of
the siRNA to reduce pChk1 levels and checkpoint activation (Figure 3.3 A, lanes 2 and 4.
pChk1 indicated by the arrow). The depletion of Chk1 resulted in the failure of the G2
checkpoint arrest allowing cell cycle progression and mitotic entry. This was demonstrated by
the larger presence of the G1 peak seen by FACS. An increased presence of mitotic cells was
evident by the typical mitotic rounded phenotype in the Chk1 siRNA treated sample
compared to the control (Figure 3.3 C). The reduction in PY15 levels accordingly
demonstrated that the number of G2 phase cells decreased with Chk1 siRNA and inversely
the number of mitotic cells increase as shown by cyclin B levels (Figure 3.3 A, lane 2 vs. 4)
To analyse further the presence of pChk1 in an unperturbed cell cycle, pChk1 S317 antibody
was tested for specificity using immunofluorescene. Cells treated with Chk1 siRNA were
stained with pChk1 Ser317 antibody and DAPI for DNA. The images in Figure 3.4 A
Chapter 3 – Active Chk1 present in G2 phase
92
Figure 3.3 Chk1 siRNA effectively removes Chk1 and its typical functions.
A. Exponentially growing HeLa cells were transfected with 30 nM Chk1 siRNA or a nonsense (N)
control siRNA. Cells were then either treated or not with Etoposide and collected 24 h after
drug addition. Samples were then immunoblotted for pChk1 (top band of image) and Chk1
to determine knockdown, and also markers of cell cycle progression, PY15 and cyclin B.
Chapter 3 – Active Chk1 present in G2 phase
93
PCNA was used as a loading control. The arrow indicates the pChk1 band and the lower
band is a non-specific band detected by the antibody.
B. Samples from A were fixed and stained with propidium iodide to assess DNA content by
FACS.
C. Before harvesting the cells for A and B, images of the cells were captured using a Zeiss
inverted microscope. Arrows are used to indicate mitotic cells.
Chapter 3 – Active Chk1 present in G2 phase
94
demonstrate the specificity of the antibody to be used for the analysis of the future
experiments in Figure 3.4.
With the specificity of the pChk1 antibody established, quantitative image analysis of
asynchronously grown cultures from a number of different cell lines stained with the same
pChk1 antibody and DAPI was conducted. The analysis was used to confirm the synchrony
data above and to also give a true representation of pChk1 levels during the cell cycle in the
absence of any artefacts that the thymidine synchrony may have induced. This was
performed using a Cellomics VTi ArrayScan, a high content imaging system which assessed
and quantified the immunofluorescent staining of individual cells. The cells were seeded in a
96 well plate format, fixed and immunostained for pChk1 and DAPI. The individual cell cycle
stages were determined using DNA intensity which increases from G1 to S and G2/M and was
based on DAPI staining. The fluorescent intensity of pChk1 staining was analysed for each cell
and plotted against the DNA content. Controls stained with secondary antibody alone were
used to determine the background fluorescent intensity of the cells. Quantitative image
analysis was performed on 5,000 - 10,000 cells of asynchronously growing HeLa, Neonatal
Foreskin Fibroblasts (NFF), A2058 (melanoma cell line; data not shown), HT144 (an ATM
deficient melanoma cell line), and FO2 cells (an ATR defective Seckel syndrome cell line). The
analysis displayed here is from the HeLa data (Figure 3.4 B and C), the analysis of the other
cell lines is similar to the HeLa data and can be found in Appendix 1 (Figure 10.1). The
histogram is based on the DNA content of the cells analysed for pChk1 intensity. The
histograms were used to set parameters of the cell cycle phases. The scatter plot is a
comparison between the pChk1 (dark data points) levels and the background (light data
Chapter 3 – Active Chk1 present in G2 phase
95
Figure 3.4 Cellomics data confirms the presence of pChk1 in an unperturbed cell cycle.
A. HeLa cells were seeded on to coverslips and were transfected with nonsense control siRNA
(NS) or with Chk1 siRNA (Chk1 si). 24 h post transfection cells were fixed with MeOH and
stained for pChk1 Ser317 (Bethyl Ab)(red), γ-tubulin (green) and DAPI (blue).
B. HeLa cells were seeded into a 96 well plate, fixed with MeOH and stained with or without
pChk1 Ser317, detected by secondary antibody Alexia 555, and DAPI for DNA content. Cells
stained with Alexia 555 only, were used to determine background intensities of the assay.
The dot plot displays pChk1 intensities (dark data points) and background intensities (light
data points). The histogram is based on DNA content quantified using DAPI staining of DNA
content. 2n represents G1 phase cells and 4n represents G/M cells. .
C. Quantification of the results was carried out by defining the cell cycle phases based on the
Chapter 3 – Active Chk1 present in G2 phase
96
DNA intensity histograms, as in B. The graph represents the mean plus three standard
deviations; the range represents the 95 percentile. The results were corrected for
background intensities. The Etoposide treatment was used as a control and accordingly
results in elevated pChk1 levels.
Chapter 3 – Active Chk1 present in G2 phase
97
points) levels. All cell lines showed the same trend where pChk1 levels increase with cell
cycle progression, with the highest intensity evident during G2/M (Figure 3.4 C). For HeLa cell
data, it is evident that the G2/M phase population (cells with 4 n DNA content) is
approximately one and a half fold higher than the G1 population (cells with 2n DNA content).
Etoposide treated cells were used as a positive control and accordingly showed higher levels
of pChk1. This analysis by Cellomics confirmed that pChk1 is present within unperturbed cells
and this is independent of any synchrony effects. The immunoblot and Cellomics data in
Figures 3.2 and 3.4 together demonstrate that pChk1 is readily detectable in unperturbed S
and G2 phase cells. Although the immunoblot data showed the highest level of pChk1 during
S phase (Figure 3.2) this may be a consequence of the chemical synchronization as the
Cellomics data showed the highest levels during G2/M (Figure 3.4).
3.2.2 ATR is responsible for Chk1 phosphorylation in an unperturbed cell cycle during G2
phase.
In response to damage, Chk1 is activated by ATR, but there is also evidence of overlap
between the ATM and ATR checkpoint signalling pathways (Gatei et al., 2003, Jazayeri et al.,
2006). When thymidine synchronised HeLa cells were treated with the ATM/ATR inhibitor,
caffeine, at release from the synchrony arrest, the levels of pChk1 detected in early S phase
time points (0-4 h) are relatively unaffected (Figure 3.5 A), however G2 phase pChk1 was
completely absent (compare 6 and 8 h time points of Figures 3.2 and 3.5 A; these
experiments were performed in parallel). Although caffeine addition clearly delayed S phase
Chapter 3 – Active Chk1 present in G2 phase
98
Figure 3.5 Chk1 phosphorylation by ATR in G2 phase is required for timely mitotic entry.
A. HeLa cells were treated as in Figure 3.2, however at the same time as release of cells from
thymidine block, 5 mM of caffeine was added to all thymidine treated samples. As in 3.2,
Chapter 3 – Active Chk1 present in G2 phase
99
samples were collected for immunoblotting and FACS. Lysates for immunoblotting were
immunoblotted with pChk1 S317 (pChk1), Chk1, cyclin B, PY15 and PCNA. PI FACS analysis
was carried out and cell cycle populations were quantified with FlowJo software. The
percentage of cell cycle phases for each time point is represented in the graph.
B. HeLa cells were synchronised in G2 phase and left untreated (CONT) or treated with 5 mM
caffeine (CAFF) or 2.5 µM Chk1i. Cells were then followed by time lapse microscopy,
visualised every 15 minutes and then scored for timing of entry into mitosis. Mitosis was
scored once the rounded mitotic phenotype became visible. The accumulative data is
displayed here as a percentage. The result was confirmed by conducting the experiment in
triplicate and the best representation was chosen for publishing.
C. HeLa cells were synchronised in G2 phase and left untreated (CONT) or treated with Chk1
siRNA or 2.5 µM Chk1i overnight. Cells were then followed by time lapse microscopy,
visualised every 15 minutes and then scored for timing of entry into mitosis. Mitosis was
scored once the rounded mitotic phenotype became visible. The accumulative data is
displayed here as a percentage. The result was confirmed by conducting the experiment in
triplicate and the best representation was chosen for publishing.
D. FO2 cells were treated as in A. FO2 cells treated with 2 mM of Hydroxyurea (HU) for 24 h
were collected and used as a positive control of Chk1 activation.
Chapter 3 – Active Chk1 present in G2 phase
100
it accelerated the kinetics of entry into mitosis, with an abrupt decline in PY15 levels
occurring between 8 and 10 h after release in the presence of caffeine as opposed to 10 h in
the parallel experiment (compare Figure 3.2 with Figure 3.5 A). This acceleration was also
observed with caffeine or a Chk1i addition to thymidine synchronised G2 phase cells and
followed by live cell time lapse microscopy (Figure 3.5 B). Cells were assessed for their timing
of entry into mitosis, based on the appearance of the rounded mitotic morphology. A similar
result was observed with Chk1 siRNA treatment and Chk1i, although the effect of Chk1 siRNA
was weaker (Figure 3.5 C). Interestingly, Chk1i was consistently less efficient than caffeine at
accelerating mitotic entry which could be an effect of caffeine’s multiple targets (Bode and
Dong, 2006, Bode and Dong, 2007). This data along with additional data from the laboratory
produced using ATM and Chk2 inhibitors (data not shown) demonstrates that ATR-Chk1
signalling is present active during normal G2 phase and contributes to controlling the timing
of mitotic entry.
To confirm the presence of pChk1 as a specific ATR dependent phosphorylation event,
synchronised FO2 cells from an ATR deficient Seckel Syndrome patient (with functional ATM)
were analysed for their pChk1 levels during cell cycle progression (Figure 3.5 D). As indicated
by FACs, FO2 cells did not synchronise with thymidine as efficiently as HeLa cells which could
be due to a slower growth rate. However cyclin B and PY15 levels demonstrate the G2 and M
phase time points. pChk1 was detected in G1/S phase (0-2 h) and in the positive control
(hydroxyurea treated (HU)), however pChk1 was not detected in S and G2/M phase samples
(4-10 h) (Figure 3.5 D). Therefore Chk1 is normally activated by ATR during the S and G2
phases of the cell cycle and its activity is required to control the timing of mitotic entry.
Chapter 3 – Active Chk1 present in G2 phase
101
3.2.3 pChk1 localises to the centrosomes during mitosis.
A large congregation of proteins localise to the centrosomes during late G2 and mitosis,
including ATM and ATR (Zhang et al., 2007). During interphase, pChk1 Ser317 appears more
predominant in the nucleus, present in punctuate nuclear structures, with also weaker
dispersed staining of the cytoplasm (Figure 3.6 A). From the start of prophase when the
chromosomes begin to condense and the mitotic spindle forms, pChk1 S317 appeared to
localise to the centrosomes. This localisation is maintained until metaphase, but was not
present from telophase through to the completion of mitosis, cytokinesis (Figure 3.6 A). Co-
staining with α-tubulin, a marker of the mitotic spindle which originates from the
centrosome, confirmed the centrosomal localisation of pChk1 Ser345 (Figure 3.6 B).
Therefore, both Ser317 and Ser345 phosphorylated forms of Chk1 were present at the
centrosomes during mitosis. Chk1 siRNA, validated previously, was used to determine the
specificity of the pChk1 antibody in the immunofluorescent analysis of cells. HeLa cells
treated with or without Chk1 siRNA were immunofluorescently stained for pChk1 Ser345, α-
tubulin (used to identify the mitotic spindle and the location of the centrosomes) and DAPI to
identify the DNA. Treatment with Chk1 siRNA ablated the centrosomal staining in mitotic
cells (Figure 3.6 B). To confirm the specificity of pChk1 Ser345 staining at the centrosomes,
cells were treated with caffeine, an inhibitor of ATM/ATR. pChk1 staining was essentially lost
with caffeine treatment (Figure 3.6 C), demonstrating that this is an ATR dependent
phosphorylation event.
Chapter 3 – Active Chk1 present in G2 phase
102
Figure 3.6 pChk1 is present at the centrosomes in G2 and Mitosis of an unperturbed cell cycle.
A. Asynchronous HeLa cells were grown on poly-L-lysine coated coverslips, fixed with methanol
and then stained with pChk1 S317 antibody (pChk1) (Bethyl Ab)(red) and DAPI for DNA
(blue). Arrows indicate centrosomal localisation.
B. HeLa cells treated with or without 30 nM Chk1 siRNA were fixed with methanol and stained
for pChk1 Ser345 (pChk1) (green), α-tubulin (red) and DAPI for DNA (blue). Images were
Chapter 3 – Active Chk1 present in G2 phase
103
taken of mitotic cells to demonstrate the presence of Ser345 at the centrosomes. Arrows
indicate the loss of Ser345 localisation at the centrosomes seen with Chk1 siRNA treatment.
C. To demonstrate whether the centrosomal localisation of pChk1 is due to ATR dependent
phosphorylation, HeLa cells were treated for 10 h with or without 5 mM of caffeine and
then treated as in A. These cells were co-stained for pChk1 Ser345 (pChk1) (green) and DAPI
for DNA (blue) only.
D. Asynchronously growing HeLa cells were fixed with methanol and stained for pChk1 S317
(pChk1) (red), γ-tubulin (green) and DAPI for DNA (blue). Arrows indicate the G2 phase
separating centrosomes.
Chapter 3 – Active Chk1 present in G2 phase
104
Although pChk1 localises at the centrosomes during mitosis (Figure 3.6) the question remains
regarding the localization of the pChk1 during G2 phase. Staining with pChk1 whilst co-
staining with the centrosome marker, γ-tubulin, confirms the localisation of pChk1 S317 at
the centrosomes earlier than mitosis during late G2 phase. Late G2 phase was indicated by
the beginning of centrosome separation whilst cells displayed no chromosome condensation
(Figure 3.6 D, indicated by arrows). It also shows that pChk1 is predominantly nuclear during
G2 phase. Therefore Ser317 is able to localise at the centrosomes during both G2 and
mitosis.
3.3 DISCUSSION
The critical importance of Chk1 to the normal cell cycle is shown by the embryonic lethality
of Chk1-/- knockout mice (Takai et al., 2000), as well as the mitotic catastrophe and death
which occurs upon depletion of Chk1 (Niida et al., 2005). The presence of activated pChk1 in
unstressed cells has now been reported by a number of groups (Walworth et al., 1993,
Walworth and Bernards, 1996). It has now been shown to be present at the centrosome in
the absence of DNA damage signals, where it specifically regulates Cdc25B to control normal
mitotic progression (Capasso et al., 2002, Jackson et al., 2002, Kramer et al., 2004, Loffler et
al., 2006, Wilsker et al., 2008, Tibelius et al., 2009). The data presented in this chapter, in
combination with published work demonstrates clearly that pChk1 S317 and S345 can
localise to the centrosomes (Wilsker et al., 2008). Whilst pChk1 S317 was localised to the
centrosomes it was also present in the nucleus during an unperturbed cell cycle. Although
no specifically localized pool of pChk1 was targeted, inhibition of Chk1 in G2 phase drives
Chapter 3 – Active Chk1 present in G2 phase
105
premature entry into mitosis, demonstrating that the activated pChk1 functions during G2 to
control the timing of entry into mitosis.
ATR knockout results in embryonic lethality, but this is not the case for ATM-/- where
offspring are viable, suggesting ATM is non-essential to the unperturbed cell cycle (Beamish
et al., 1996, Brown and Baltimore, 2000, Shiloh, 2001). Here, it was found that the function
of Chk1 during G2 phase is ATR dependent. The role of ATR was determined using several
methods including the use of FO2 cells, caffeine treatment and ATR knockdown.
Unfortunately, HeLa cells treated with ATR pSuper shRNA to deplete ATR levels were not
viable. FO2 cell data did show strong evidence of ATR involvement in the S and G2 phase
Chk1 activation, and although we did not have access to the ATR complemented cells to
formally confirm ATR involvement the caffeine data confirmed the involvement of ATM/ATR
in this role. Although the data could not rule out any involvement of ATM, other data in the
laboratory has shown that a specific ATM inhibitor had little effect on the rate of mitotic
entry, and that effect was possibly to slow progression into mitosis. The lack of any
detectable level of activated Chk2 present in an unperturbed cell cycle was further evidence
for a lack of involvement of ATM in normal G2 phase progression. The levels of pChk1
strongly correlate to the extent of the G2 checkpoint induced. From the Cellomics data
(Figure 3.4 B and C) it is evident that, of the cell lines tested, HeLa cells were most strongly
arrested in G2 phase and accordingly have the highest intensity readings of pChk1 compared
to the other less affected cell lines (Figure 3.4 B and C compared to Appendix 1). The
phosphorylation of Chk1 during normal G2 phase does not induce a checkpoint arrest as seen
with pChk1s role during the DDR but inhibition or depletion of Chk1 in an unperturbed cell
Chapter 3 – Active Chk1 present in G2 phase
106
cycle, as it does in G2 checkpoint activated cells, drives premature mitotic entry, implying
that Chk1 can control the timing of mitotic entry even in the absence DNA damage. Based on
the Cellomics data, the levels of pChk1 are highest during G2/M but the data also show a
strong presence of pChk1 during S phase. In fact, the synchronization data show the highest
levels of pChk1 during S phase however this is most likely an effect of synchronization and
accounts for the discrepancy between the two sets of data. A role for pChk1 in S phase is
plausible, as mutation of Chk1 Ser317 to Alanine results in DNA replication abnormalities in
the absence of exogenous stress (Wilsker et al., 2008). Chk1 is also activated in response to
replication fork stalling. This is expected to be noticeable in tumour cell lines that have a
predisposition to DNA damage that would lead to replication stress even during an
unperturbed cell cycle (Mohindra et al., 2002, Brooks et al., 2012). In addition, Chk1 has the
ability to regulate Cdc25A degradation during the S phase checkpoint resulting in the
inhibition of CDK2 and the suppression of DNA replication by phosphorylation of serines 123,
178, 278, and 292 (Zhao et al., 2002b, Goloudina et al., 2003, Hassepass et al., 2003,
Sorensen et al., 2003). The same phosphorylations of Cdc25A by Chk1 in response to the S
phase checkpoint can also occur in an unperturbed cell cycle and therefore this may be the
same mechanism for regulation by Chk1 of normal DNA replication (Sorensen et al., 2003).
Chk1 function has been reported to be of importance during mitosis. This is based on the
observations that depletion of Chk1 by siRNA results in a metaphase arrest and activation of
the spindle assembly checkpoint due to the presence of lagging chromosomes and therefore
the inability of these chromosomes to align in a metaphase plate (Tang et al., 2006).
However, it is more likely that these mitotic effects of Chk1 inhibition are a consequence of
Chapter 3 – Active Chk1 present in G2 phase
107
premature mitotic entry caused by Chk1 inhibition. In experiments conducted by others
members of the Gabrielli laboratory on the specific consequence of Chk1 inhibition during G2
phase, it was found to have relatively little effect on the immediate mitosis, but the
continued presence of Chk1 inhibitor affected proceeding mitoses and resulted in similar
mitotic defects to those observed with inhibition of Chk1 in S phase (Brooks et al., 2012;
unpublished data from the Gabrielli Laboratory). This is similar to reports demonstrating that
either deletion of Chk1 or inhibition of Chk1 with a small molecule inhibitor in S phase
induced premature and aberrant mitosis that was dependent on Cdc25B (Niida et al., 2005,
Loffler et al., 2006). The aberrant mitotic phenotype was identical to the “paraspindle”
phenotype originally observed by this lab with Cdc25B overexpression (Gabrielli et al., 1996).
The centrosomal pool of Chk1 has been reported to contribute significantly to regulating
mitotic entry. Initial activation of cyclin B/CDK1 occurs at the centrosomes and leads to the
full activation of cyclin B/CDK1 ( De Souza et al., 2000b, Jackman et al., 2003). Premature
activation of cyclin B/CDK1 can result in premature mitotic entry which can be due to the
inability of Chk1 to regulate Cdc25B at the centrosome (Kramer et al., 2004, Loffler et al.,
2006). Enhanced mitotic entry caused by inhibition of Chk1 could be a result of lost negative
regulation of Plk1 (Tang et al., 2006), and/or regulation of Cdc25B at the centrosomes
(Schmitt et al., 2006). Because pChk1 is detected at the centrosome it is likely that Chk1 is
active during G2 phase to undertake these roles. Despite identifying the requirement of
active Chk1 to control mitotic entry, the exact phosphorylation status and the regulation of
Chk1 that is required for this control of G2/M progression is currently unknown.
Chapter 3 – Active Chk1 present in G2 phase
108
The functional studies of Ser317 and Ser345 phosphorylation have uncovered potentially
differing roles for these sites in normal G2/M regulation. Ser345 was not detected on the
centrosomes during G2, whereas we and others have found Ser317 localised at the
centrosomes during G2 phase (Wilsker et al., 2008). Mutational analysis also confirms that
phosphorylation governs the localization and, potentially, roles of Chk1. The Ser345 Alanine
mutant, Ser345Ala, is unable to dissociate from the chromatin and causes mitotic
catastrophe, whereas Ser317Ala prevents mitotic catastrophe and is able to still localize to
the cytoplasm, like wildtype Chk1 (Niida et al., 2007). Therefore, the function and localization
of Chk1 is strongly governed by site specific phosphorylation events. Although the DNA
damage response causes a rapid phosphorylation of both Ser317 and Ser345, the distinct
roles of each phosphorylation event in an unperturbed cell cycle may provide further insights
into the roles and regulation of Chk1 in normal cell cycle progression.
The surprising finding here was that pChk1 levels present in G2 phase appeared to be
relatively reduced as cells entered mitosis, although the levels of pChk1 Ser317 at the
centrosomes during mitosis remained relatively stable until anaphase. Based on Chk1’s role
during the DNA damage response, it would be expected that the presence of phosphorylated
Chk1 would result in a G2 phase arrest and an inability for cells to enter mitosis. However,
from the current data and that of others, it is clear that the presence of pChk1 does not stop
cells from entering mitosis, contrary to the checkpoint function of Chk1. Therefore, I
hypothesize that, although pChk1 Ser317 is associated with activity, during mitosis it only
indicates that the kinase is activated, but to allow mitotic entry further modifications, most
likely further phosphorylation event/s, must occur during G2 phase to inhibit the activity of
Chapter 3 – Active Chk1 present in G2 phase
109
Chk1. These hypothetical inhibitory phosphorylations may also result in changes in
localization and functioning of Chk1 away from its normal substrates and regulators. The
formulation of the hypothesis was supported by a publication that identified inhibitory
phosphorylation of Chk1 by cyclin B/CDK1 that occur in mitosis (Shiromizu et al., 2006), and
these phosphorylations affected the localization of Chk1 (Enomoto et al., 2009). The
disruption of Chk1 localisation by phosphorylation events has been shown previously with
Chk1 Ser317 and Ser345 mutants. These mutants show disruption to the 14-3-3 binding and
therefore localization within the nucleus and potential activity of the Chk1 (Jiang et al., 2003,
Dunaway et al., 2005). Alternatively, if inhibitory phosphorylations are not the answer then
another hypothesis would be a pChk1 threshold which allows for pChk1 present at low levels
to monitor cell cycle integrity without causing a G2 phase arrest.
It is common to assume Chk1 activity based on the phosphorylation of Chk1 on Ser317 and
Ser345. As already mentioned, these phosphorylation sites govern the localization and
functions of Chk1. However, the effects of mutation of Ser317 and Ser345 phosphorylation
sites would suggest a more complex picture. Analysis of the phosphorylation mutants of
these sites suggests that they are not only catalytic activation sites. Ser317 and Ser345
mutation to Alanine (Ser317Ala and Ser345Ala) cause defects to the G2 checkpoint due to
the inability of the activation caused by phosphorylation on Ser317 and Ser345 (Capasso et
al., 2002) but, confusingly, analysis of the phospho mimicking Aspartate mutants of Ser317
and Ser345 (Ser317D and Ser345D) showed they had a similar kinase activity to Alanine
mutants (Capasso et al., 2002, Gatei et al., 2003). This data suggests that the Ser345D mutant
affects the 14-3-3 binding required for Chk1 localisation and activity (Capasso et al., 2002),
Chapter 3 – Active Chk1 present in G2 phase
110
and this is also a likely explanation for the Ser317D mutant. Although these mutants have
been used to determine the importance of these phosphorylations in response to damage,
the phosphorylations themselves may not be good determinants of Chk1 activity and
function during the G2/M transition. To address this issue and to determine the true activity
of Chk1 during the G2/M transition, Chk1 kinase assays were attempted. Although a range of
conditions for the kinase assay were investigated, all methods failed to produce detectable
levels of kinase activity in vitro, even when assaying Chk1 kinase activity upon DNA damage
treatment. Therefore the assays were abandoned and the activity of Chk1 during the G2/M
transition cannot be conclusively determined. Premature mitosis caused by removal or
inhibition of Chk1 and the likelihood of inhibitory phosphorylations during mitosis suggests
that Chk1 activity is required during G2 phase and is not required during mitosis. However,
the latter is not fully established and raises some important questions.
To determine how Chk1 phosphorylation events influence mitotic entry would be difficult
based on the published data regarding Chk1 mutants, as well as the possibility of potential
inhibitory phosphorylation events. Further investigation and better tools are required to
study Chk1’s role in G2/M phase. The presence of pChk1 during an unperturbed cell cycle is
now a vastly published fact, but at the time of this study it was a novel finding that ATR-Chk1
signalling and their kinase activities were required to regulate normal mitotic entry. It was
also a novel finding that Chk1 Ser345, as well as Ser317, could also localize to the
centrosomes during mitosis. We were also able to establish that pChk1 can localize at the
centrosomes earlier during G2 phase. The centrosomal localization of Chk1 may later provide
insight into further roles of the kinase during this time. Collectively, we have added to an
Chapter 3 – Active Chk1 present in G2 phase
111
ever increasing base of evidence that investigates Chk1s normal G2/M role. Now that this
role for active Chk1 has been confirmed we believe that Chk1 could tie into another
regulatory G2/M pathway that is being currently investigated within the laboratory. This
pathway is the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay pathway and in the next chapter its role
and some of its known mechanisms and targets will be presented.
112
Chapter 4
Characterising the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2
phase delay
Chapter 4 – Characterising the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
113
4.1 INTRODUCTION
Understanding the mechanisms regulating normal cell cycle control is essential to determine
how defects can contribute to tumourgenesis. The cyclin A/CDK2 complex is required
through S and G2/M phases of the cell cycle to regulate S phase progression and the timely
progression into mitosis. Cyclin A/CDK2 has an established S phase role (Hu et al., 2001), and
is the predominant cyclin/CDK complex activated during G2 phase and reaches its peak
activity in this same phase (Gu et al., 1992, Pagano et al., 1992, Rosenblatt et al., 1992)
although its contribution to G2 phase progression is not well understood. In addition, cyclin A
is not degraded by the APC/C (Anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome) proteasome
complex until prometaphase, suggesting a role for cyclin A/CDK2 during G2/M phase
progression.
The role of cyclin A/CDK2 during G2 phase of the cell cycle is controversial due to a lack of
phenotype in Cdk2 knockout mice (Berthet et al., 2003, Ortega et al., 2003) and CDK2 siRNA
treatment of cancer cells (Tetsu and McCormick, 2003). On the other hand, microinjection of
cyclin A targeted antibodies delayed tissue culture cells from entering mitosis (Clarke et al.,
1992) and induction of dominant negative CDK2 after G1 phase in synchronised U2OS cells
blocked cells in G2 phase (Hu et al., 2001). Furthermore, cells from Drosophila mutants
lacking cyclin A also arrested in G2 phase after the maternal cyclin A had been exhausted
(Knoblich and Lehner, 1993). Additionally, microinjection of active cyclin A/CDK2 caused a
more rapid mitotic entry (Furuno et al., 1999). This latter data suggest that cyclin A/CDK2
acts as a rate limiting component of G2/M progression.
Chapter 4 – Characterising the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
114
Cyclin B/CDK1, the predominant mitotic cyclin/CDK, is activated after cyclin A/CDK2 in late
G2 phase and drives mitotic entry. The initial activation of cyclin B/CDK1 occurs at the
centrosomes and within the cytoplasm and establishes positive feedback loops to further its
activation (De Souza et al., 2000a, Jackman et al., 2003). This involves the phosphorylation of
cyclin B/CDK1 on its cytoplasmic retention site leading to nuclear import and the
phosphorylation of Cdc25 family members to enhance interaction with critical phosphatases
required to dephosphorylate negative regulatory phosphorylation sites, all of which sustain
its full activation (Yang et al., 1998, Hagting et al., 1999, Yang et al., 2001, Peter et al., 2002,
Bulavin et al., 2003a, Bulavin et al., 2003b, Walsh et al., 2003, Margolis et al., 2006b). The full
activation of cyclin B/CDK1 results in chromosome condensation after initial formation of the
mitotic spindle (Li et al., 1997, Hagting et al., 1999).
Cyclin A/CDK2 has been shown as an established regulator of cyclin B stabilisation, but not
activation, through indirect inhibition of APC/C which is required for cyclin B/CDK1
destruction (Lukas et al., 1999b). There is also evidence from Xenopus studies that show
cyclin A/CDK is capable of stimulating cyclin B/CDK1 dependent mitotic events such as
microtubule nucleation at the centrosomes (Buendia et al., 1992). Collectively the data
establishes a clear, yet not fully understood role for cyclin A/CDK in the control of mitotic
machinery and mitotic entry.
Cyclin/CDK complexes also have very specific roles in checkpoint regulation. Checkpoints act
to prevent the cell from cycling while it is affected by specific stresses, halting the cell cycle
to allow repair of any damage that may have been incurred. This requires the sustained
Chapter 4 – Characterising the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
115
inhibition of cyclin/CDK complexes which is achieved by specific checkpoint signalling
pathways. The apical checkpoint kinases ATM/ATR are activated in response to specific DNA
damage and initiate checkpoint signalling upon their recruitment to the sites of the damage.
ATM and ATR activate downstream targets Chk2 and Chk1 (Checkpoint kinase 2 and 1),
respectively, and the loss of this signalling affects the cell’s ability to arrest at the checkpoint.
Chk1 has been studied extensively and its function during the G2 phase DNA damage
checkpoint is to phosphorylate and inhibit the Cdc25 family which causes sustained inhibition
of cyclin B/CDK1, therefore maintaining the checkpoint arrest and blocking mitotic entry
(Furnari et al., 1997). Chk1 has a central role during the G2 phase DNA damage checkpoint,
and loss of Chk1 or its activator ATR, results in failure of checkpoint arrest.
Although cyclin B/CDK1 is essential for mitotic entry, it is both G2 phase cyclin A/CDK2 as
well as cyclin B/CDK1 that are held inactive during a G2 phase DNA damage checkpoint to
ensure cells cannot enter mitosis (Goldstone et al., 2001). The stable expression of functional
cyclin A/CDK2 causes abrogation of the G2 phase checkpoint and CDK2 null cells were unable
to exit the checkpoint (Chung and Bunz 2010, Walker et al., 1995). Collectively, the data
implies that not only does cyclin A/CDK2 appear to be a rate limiting protein of normal G2/M
progression in non-murine cells but it may also be required in some capacity for the G2 phase
checkpoint.
Although the importance of cyclin A/CDK2 during G2 phase is evident, its precise role and the
pathways involved remain unclear. This study establishes the role of cyclin A /CDK2 in G2
phase. We have identified the requirement of cyclin A /CDK2 for both normal and checkpoint
Chapter 4 – Characterising the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
116
G2/M transition and also determined a mechanism of action for cyclin A/CDK2 in normal
G2/M transition. The mechanism identified is the requirement of cyclin A/CDK2 to correctly
coordinate cyclin B/CDK1 activity and mitotic events such as chromosome condensation and
microtubule nucleation.
4.2 RESULTS
4.2.1 Cyclin A depletion delays G2 phase progression and entry into mitosis
To examine the role of cyclin A/CDK2 in G2/M progression three different cyclin A siRNA
target sequences, each with differing efficiencies were used to deplete cyclin A (Figure 4.1 A).
After 24 h treatment with cyclin A siRNA the protein levels were reduced by up to 70% and
cell cycle profiles demonstrated that cyclin A depletion resulted in an increase in the G2/M
phase population when compared to controls (Figure 4.1 B). The G2/M phase populations of
cyclin A A1 and A3 siRNA treated cells increased by two fold, whereas the A2 siRNA which did
not deplete cyclin A as effectively (Figure 4.1 A) showed a smaller accumulation of cells in
G2/M phase. To differentiate between G2 and M phase populations a marker of G2 phase,
CDK1 phosphorylation on tyrosine 15 (PY15), was used. PY15 levels accumulate in cyclin A
siRNA treated cells compared to the controls (Figure 4.1 C), demonstrating the predominance
of the G2 phase population of cells over the mitotic population of cells. Etoposide, known to
induce a strong G2 arrest was used as a positive control and accordingly caused a strong
increase in PY15 levels (Figure 4.1 C).
Chapter 4 – Characterising the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
117
Figure 4.1 Cyclin A siRNA causes a G2 phase delay.
A. Exponentially growing HeLa cells were transfected with 50 nM of one of three siRNA
directed against cyclin A (A1, A2, or A3), a nonsense (N) siRNA, or treated with lipofectamine
alone (C). Cells were harvested after 24 h, and immunoblotted for cyclin A and CDK2. Data
contributed by Dr Leonore De Boer. Blot Quantification was conducted by Vanessa Oakes
using ImageJ software. All treatments were compared to the intensity of the CDK2 loading
control and standardised to the control (C).
B. FACS profiles of the DNA content of cells transfected with A1, A2, A3 cyclin A siRNA,
nonsense (Non) siRNA or mock transfected (Con) at 24 h, as in A. The percentage of cells in
G1, S and G2/M phases are shown in descending order in the top right corner of each
profile. Data contributed by Dr Leonore De Boer.
C. HeLa cells were treated with Etoposide (1 μM) (Etop) for 16 h to arrest the cells in the G2
phase, or transfected with either cyclin A A1 siRNA (A1), nonsense siRNA (N) or mock
transfected (C) and harvested at 24 h. Lysates were immunoblotted for PY15. Data
contributed by Dr Leonore De Boer.
Chapter 4 – Characterising the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
118
D. Mock transfected (Con) and cyclin A (A1, A2 or A3) siRNA transfected HeLa cells were
synchronised with thymidine and followed by time lapse microscopy. Cells were scored for
timing of entry into mitosis; >100 cells were counted for each treatment. This data is
representative of four independent experiments and the best representation was chosen
for publishing. Data is presented as cumulative mitotic index scored from the time (h) after
release from thymidine block. Data contributed by Dr Leonore De Boer.
Chapter 4 – Characterising the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
119
To determine the effect of cyclin A on G2 phase, HeLa cells were synchronised in early S
phase by a thymidine block and the time required to enter mitosis was assessed using live
cell time lapse microscopy. Cyclin A siRNA transfected HeLa cells showed a delay of entry into
mitosis by 3-4 h compared to the control siRNA transfected cells. This delay was observed
with all three cyclin A siRNAs (Figure 4.1 D) and confirms a G2 phase delay as a specific result
of cyclin A knockdown.
4.2.2 Inhibition of CDK2 with a specific inhibitor delays G2 phase progression into mitosis.
Cyclin A forms a complex with binding partner CDK2 in S phase and this complex reaches
maximal activity in G2 phase (Goldstone et al., 2001, De Boer et al., 2008). By inhibiting the
catalytic activity of cyclin A’s binding partner, CDK2, we can determine whether the G2 delay
seen with cyclin A siRNA was due to the specific loss of the cyclin A /CDK2 complex. The
contribution of CDK2 to the G2 phase delay was examined using a specific small molecule
inhibitor of CDK2, Ro09-3033 (CDK2i). This is a highly selective inhibitor of CDK2 (IC50 20
nM), and inhibits by binding irreversibly to the ATP binding site of CDK2 (Stead et al., 2002).
To ensure only G2 phase CDK2 was inhibited, synchronised HeLa cells were treated with two
different concentrations of CDK2i in early G2 phase (7 h post release). Mitotic entry was
assessed by live cell time lapse microscopy. When compared to the control, both CDK2i
treated samples delayed any entry into mitosis by at least 4 h (Figure 4. 2 A). 0.3 µM of CDK2i
delayed progression to a lesser extent than 0.5 µM, producing an expected dose dependent
result. This delay was similar to that caused by cyclin A knockdown (Figure 4.1 D) as would
be expected if CDK2’s binding partner was cyclin A. This experiment also demonstrated the
Chapter 4 – Characterising the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
120
role of cyclin A/CDK2 in regulating entry into mitosis was a G2 phase specific, and from here
forth this delay is termed as the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 phase delay.
Published work has shown that the CDK2i used displayed 10 fold in vitro selectivity for CDK2
compared to CDK1, compared to its in vivo selectivity which may not be as strong due to the
higher dose required to inhibit CDK2 in cells (2 μM in vivo compared to its in vitro IC50 of 20
nM) (Stead et al., 2002). However, the G2 phase delay seen with the lower concentration of
CDK2i (Figure 4.2 A; 0.3µM CDK2i) may suggest otherwise. In addition, cyclin A forms an
active complex with CDK1 for a short period in late G2/beginning of mitosis, which could
conceivably be involved in regulating mitotic entry also (Mitra et al., 2006). Therefore, it was
important to determine the specificity of the CDK2i.
Recombinant Cdc25B phosphatase was used to determine the effect of CDK2i on CDK2
and/or CDK1 kinase activity. The activity of CDK2 was completely lost after CDK2i, which
could not be recovered in vitro by the addition of recombinant Cdc25B. CDK2i treatment also
blocked G2/M phase cyclin B1/CDK1 activation but this was recovered with addition of
recombinant Cdc25B, demonstrating the selectivity of the CDK2i for the cyclin A/CDK2
complex. The lack of CDK1 activity in CDK2i treated cells (without Cdc25B addition) is similar
in the control lane (Figure 4.2 B; compare lanes 5 and 1). Although this indicates that CDK2
doesn’t affect CDK1 activity, there is a small level of CDK1 activity in the control sample and
suggests that there may be some regulation of CDK1 activity by CDK2, which may contribute
to mitotic entry.
Chapter 4 – Characterising the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
121
Figure 4.2 CDK2i causes a G2 phase delay which was due to specific CDK2 inhibition.
A. Thymidine synchronised HeLa cells were treated without (Con; closed diamonds) or with 0.3
µM (open squares) and 0.5 µM CDK2i (Ro09-3033) (open triangles). CDK2i was added at 7 h
after synchrony release (early G2 phase) then followed by time lapse microscopy. The
cumulative mitotic index was scored. The result was confirmed by conducting the
experiment in triplicate and the best representation was chosen for publishing.
B. Thymidine synchronised HeLa cells were treated with 0.5 µM Ro09-3033 (CDK2i) at 6 h after
release from thymidine arrest (early G2 phase). 8 h post thymidine release/2 h after
addition of CDK2i, cells were harvested in late G2 phase for analysis. G2 phase, control cells,
was collected at the same time as CDK2i treated samples (8 h post thymidine release).
Mitotic samples (M) were collected approximately 9 h after thymidine release. Cells were
collect for FACS and activity assays. Samples for FACS analysis were collected and treated as
Chapter 4 – Characterising the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
122
detailed in Chapter 2. The DNA content of these samples is shown and demonstrates the
synchronicity of each sample. Cells were lysed and CDK2 and CDK1 immunoprecipitates
were assayed for histone kinase activity either without or with pre-incubation with
recombinant Cdc25B. Kinase data contributed by Dr Brian Gabrielli.
C. Asynchronous HeLa cells were either untreated (Con), treated with the indicated
concentrations of CDK2i (Ro09-3033), or 50 µM roscovitine (rosco) for 10 h then harvested.
The cells were analysed by MPM2 staining of the mitotic population. Quantification of the
FACS data was conducted to determine the percentage of the mitotic population in each
treatment. Total number of cells counted per condition was 10 000. Data was combined for
three independent experiments. Error bars represent the standard deviation.
D. Thymidine synchronised HeLa cells were treated without (circles) or with 1 µM (open
triangle), 2 µM (closed triangles) or 4 µM (squares) CDK2i (PHA-533533). CDK2i was added
at 7 h after synchrony release (early G2 phase) and followed by time lapse microscopy. The
cumulative mitotic index was scored. The result was confirmed by conducting the
experiment in triplicate and the best representation was chosen for publishing.
Chapter 4 – Characterising the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
123
To further demonstrate the specificity of this CDK2i Ro09-3033, its effects were compared to
the CDK 1 / 2 inhibitor, roscovitine. The CDK inhibitors were added to asynchronously
growing HeLa cell cultures for 10 h and the mitotic index was assessed by staining for the
mitotic phosphoprotein marker MPM2 and its level determined by FACS. This revealed that
Ro09-3033 treated cells are able to enter mitosis, whereas roscovitine treatment blocked
cells from entering mitosis (Figure 4.2 C). The lack of reduction of mitotic cells was
representative of the transient delay caused by CDK2i treatment (Figure 4.2 A), compared to
a complete block in mitotic entry with CDK1 inhibition, demonstrating that the delay was not
a consequence of direct inhibition of CDK1. CDK2i caused an increase in the proportion of
mitotic cells when compared to the control, however this was due to a delay of cells in
mitosis which has been previously observed with cyclin A depletion/CDK2 inhibition (Fig 4.1
D; data not shown, (Beamish et al., 2009).
During the course of the study, another inhibitor of CDK2, PHA-533533, was acquired
(Pevarello et al., 2004) (IC50 = 37 nM). The drug was tested for its ability to delay mitotic
entry like that seen with Ro09-3033 (Figure 4.2 A). The selectivity of this compound for CDK2
was previously tested and shown to have a 5 fold higher selectivity for CDK2 compared to
CDK1 (Pevarello et al., 2005b). A dose dependent delay in mitotic entry was observed, the
most effective being the highest concentration of PHA-533533 (4 µM), which delayed mitotic
progression by 2 h (Figure 4.2 D). This second CDK2i was acquired after Ro09-3033 became
unavailable for further studies, and was used throughout the second half of this study.
Collectively the data in Figure 4.2 demonstrates the G2 delay as a consequence of the G2
phase specific inhibition of cyclin A/CDK2.
Chapter 4 – Characterising the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
124
4.2.3 Cyclin A/CDK2 regulates the timing of centrosomal cyclin B/CDK1 activation
The activation of cyclin B/CDK1 in prophase is initiated at the centrosomes and within the
cytoplasm which in turn drives nuclear translocation and full activation of nuclear cyclin
B/CDK1. Activation of cyclin B/CDK1 at the centrosomes correlates with increased
microtubule nucleation required for the formation of the mitotic spindle, which occurs prior
to nuclear envelope disassembly (De Souza et al., 2000a, Jackman et al., 2003). To determine
whether the centrosomal pool of cyclin B/CDK1 was affected by cyclin A/CDK2 depletion or
inhibition, microtubule foci representing the increased microtubule nucleation at the
centrosomes were assessed in HeLa cells stably expressing a Cherry-tagged α-tubulin by live
cell time lapse microscopy. Cells treated with cyclin A siRNA formed two microtubule foci,
however these foci persisted on average approximately 40 - 50 minutes longer than in
controls (normally <30 min, Figure 4.3 A) before forming a mitotic spindle (Figure 4.3 B and
C). This result was also observed in cells treated with low dose CDK2i Ro09-3033 but to a
lesser extent than cyclin A siRNA treatment (Figure 4.3 D). Quantification of synchronized
CDK2i treated samples demonstrates a delay of microtubule foci formation by approximately
3 h (Figure 4.3 E) which corresponds to the 3-4 h delay seen in the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent
G2 delay (Figures 4.1 D and 4.2 A), indicating that although the centrosomal mitotic events
preceded the nuclear events by up to 1 h, this was still delayed when compared to the
controls. The data indicate that cyclin A/CDK2 may be required for the coordinated timing of
the centrosomal and nuclear activation of cyclin B/CDK1. Further observation of cyclin A
siRNA treated cells revealed that the formation of microtubule foci was also delayed which is
evident by the condensation of the microtubules that eventually form the mitotic spindle
Chapter 4 – Characterising the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
125
Figure 4.3 Cyclin A siRNA and CDK2i disconnect the coordinated activation of centrosomal and
nuclear pools of cyclin B/CDK1.
A. HeLa cells stably expressing cherry α-tubulin were transfected with a control, nonsense,
siRNA and synchronised with thymidine. 5 h post release for the synchrony cells were
followed by time lapse video microscopy. Cells were imaged every 10 min by live cell time
lapse microscopy (minutes are indicated in the top left corner of each imaged timeframe).
The Cherry filter set was used to produce fluorescent images of α-tubulin displayed.
Chapter 4 – Characterising the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
126
B. HeLa cells stably expressing cherry α-tubulin were transfected with cyclin A (A3) siRNA and
synchronised with thymidine. 5 h post release for the synchrony cells were followed by time
lapse microscopy. Cells were imaged every 10 min by live cell time lapse microscopy
(minutes are indicated in the top left corner of each imaged timeframe).
C. Cells shown in A and B where quantitated for the length of time taken between microtubule
foci appearance until spindle formation. Over 100 cyclin A siRNA (A1) and over 60 nonsense
(N) and mock transfected (C) cells with detectable microtubule foci were counted.
Experiment conducted by Vanessa Oakes and analysis by Dr Brian Gabrielli.
D. Thymidine synchronised cherry α-tubulin HeLa cells were treated with or without 0.3 µM
CDK2i (Ro09-3033) in G2 phase (7 h post release) and followed by time lapse microscopy.
Cells were imaged every 15 min. Cells were quantitated for the length of time starting from
the appearance of microtubule foci until spindle formation. Approximately 100-150 CDK2i
and over 80 nonsense (C) treated cells with detectable microtubule foci were counted.
Experiment conducted by Vanessa Oakes and analysed by Dr Brian Gabrielli.
E. Thymidine synchronised cherry α-tubulin HeLa cells were treated with 0.3 µM CDK2i (Ro09-
3033) in G2 phase (7 h post release) and followed by time lapse microscopy. Cells were
imaged every 15 min. Over 80 control (diamonds) and CDK2i treated (triangles) cells with
detectable microtubule (Mt) foci/nucleation were counted and scored with respect to the
timing of initial foci formation. Only cells which displayed foci for at least one frame were
counted. The result was confirmed by conducting the experiment in duplicate and the best
representation was chosen for publishing. Experiment conducted by Vanessa Oakes and
analysed by Dr Brian Gabrielli.
Chapter 4 – Characterising the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
127
(Figure 4.3 A and B). Microtubule foci, like those shown in Figure 4.3 A, also stain for γ-
tubulin indicating they are centrosome containing structures required for the formation of
the mitotic spindle (data not shown). Therefore with loss/inhibition of cyclin A/CDK2, the
activation of cyclin B/cdk1 appears to be delayed which causes the delay in time taken for
the microtubule foci to form the mitotic spindle. This delay causes the consequent delay of
mitotic nuclear events including the activation of the total pool of cyclin B/cdk1.
Examination of this mitotic phenotype by immunofluorescent staining required the use of
markers of cyclin B/cdk1 activation and mitosis. During normal mitosis phosphorylated
histone H3 Ser10 (pH3) levels increase (Hendzel et al., 1997, Goto et al., 1999, Preuss et al.,
2003), and Mitotic Protein Marker (MPM2) by immunostaining is evident. pH3 is a marker of
chromosome condensation, while MPM2 decorates both the mitotic centrosomes and
condensed chromosomes. MPM2 recognizes phospho-epitopes present in mitotic proteins.
Although the precise spectrum of epitopes that MPM2 recognizes is not fully defined, a
major MPM2 recognition sequences contains phosphorylated threonine /serine residues
followed by a proline. These specific sites are phosphorylation sites for cyclin B/cdk1
(Stukenberg et al., 1997, Westendorf et al., 1994) but are not restricted to cyclin B/cdk1
alone. Activation of other mitotic kinases such as Polo like kinase 1 (Plk1) and Mitogen
activated protein kinase (MAPK) are indicated by MPM2 staining also (Alvarez et al., 1991,
Clark-Lewis et al., 1991, Gonzalez et al., 1991, Logarinho and Sunkel, 1998, Wang et al., 2007,
Vanderheyden et al., 2009). Both of these markers were used to assess the normal
occurrence of prophase events of microtubule foci and chromosome condensation.
Chapter 4 – Characterising the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
128
During a normal prophase, these markers detect chromosome condensation and MPM2 in
addition can detect formation of microtubule foci. As seen in Figure 4.4 A control (N) a
prophase cell is stained for pH3 in the nucleus, which indicates nuclear envelop breakdown
and microtubule foci are formed as indicated by α-tubulin staining. Depletion of cyclin A
causes a noticeable portion of cells with prophase-like microtubule foci (determined by -
tubulin staining) and lack nuclear staining normally seen with pH3 staining (Figure 4.4 A;
cyclin A (A1) siRNA treatment). This corresponded to an absence of chromosome
condensation normally detectable by MPM2 or pH3 staining (Figure 4.4 A and B).
Interestingly, MPM2 staining indicated that the microtubule foci were present without any
sign of chromosome condensation in cyclin A depleted cells (indicated by arrows in Figures
4.4 B). This suggested that the two prophase events, chromosome condensation and
microtubule focus formation, that are normally closely coupled (as shown to occur at the
same time in Figure 4.4 B control (N)) became uncoordinated in cyclin A depleted cells. To
describe this phenotype better we employed the use of the term ‘preprophase’. The
preprophase cells display microtubule foci formation, without any evidence of chromosome
condensation.
MPM2 staining, which identified both chromosome condensation and microtubule foci, was
used to score the preprophase phenotype (Figure 4.4 C). As indicated by the scoring, there
was a significant accumulation of preprophase cells in cyclin A depleted samples (Figure 4.4
B, A1 treated), where only the microtubule foci were stained. Although a small portion of
preprophase cells was present in control samples, the majority have a normal prophase
Chapter 4 – Characterising the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
129
appearance where MPM2 staining of condensed DNA was evident at the same time as
microtubule foci formation (Figure 4.4 B; N).
The detection of increased microtubule nucleation and MPM2 staining at the centrosomes in
cyclin A depleted cells suggested the presence of activated cyclin B/cdk1 at the centrosomes.
To determine the activation of cyclin B/cdk1, the specific cyclin B/cdk1 mitotic
phosphorylation of Mek1 on threonine 286 (pMek1 T286), was used as a marker
(Rossomando et al., 1994). All mitotic cells stained for pMek1 T286, with specific prophase
staining of microtubule foci and condensed chromosomes. pMek1 T286 stained the
microtubule foci in both control prophase cells and cyclin A depleted preprophase cells
(Figure 4.4 D; indicated by arrows), however it was not found in the nucleus of cyclin A
depleted preprophase cells and only became present in the nucleus once chromosome
condensation had occurred (Figure 4.4 D; observe the difference between the cells in the A1
treatment image). Roscovitine, the cdk 1 and 2 inhibitor, treatment caused an almost
complete loss of pMek1 T286 MPM2 nuclear and spindle pole staining (data not shown),
confirming the use of pMek1 T286 as a marker of cyclin B/cdk1 activity. These data confirm
that the delay of cyclin B/cdk1 activation seen in these experiments is a direct result of the
cyclin A/cdk2 loss/inhibition, although the centrosomal activation of cyclin B/cdk1 appears
less affected than the nuclear mitotic activation.
4.2.4 Cyclin A / CDK2 localises to the centrosomes in late G2 phase.
These surprising effects of cyclin A /CDK2 depletion/inhibition on microtubule nucleation at
the centrosome suggested that the complex itself may localise to the centrosomes to
Chapter 4 – Characterising the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
130
Figure 4.4 Cyclin A/CDK2 is required for coordinated cyclin B/CDK1 activity.
Asynchronously growing HeLa cells were transfected with 50 nM of cyclin A siRNA A1 and A3 or a
nonsense control (N). 24 h post transfection cells were stained for;
Chapter 4 – Characterising the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
131
A. phosphoSer10 H3 (pH3), α-tubulin and DAPI for DNA. pH3 staining of cyclin A siRNA treated
cells shows nuclear staining in a metaphase cell, whereas the adjacent prophase cell (indicated
with the arrowhead) shows microtubule foci formation by α-tubulin staining but no nuclear
pH3 staining.
B. MPM2, α-tubulin and DAPI for DNA. The exposure time for MPM2 is identical for both control
and cyclin A siRNA samples. Note the staining of microtubule foci in both control (indicated by
arrowheads adjacent to brightly stained nucleus) and cyclin A depleted cells by α-tubulin and
MPM2 staining. The lack of MPM2 nuclear staining signifies no chromosome condensation has
occurred in cyclin A depleted samples.
C. Cells from B. displaying prophase-like microtubule foci were scored for detectable chromosome
condensation. Cells displaying microtubule foci in the absence of chromosome condensation
were scored as preprophase (filled columns) and those that displayed both were scored as
prophase (open columns). This data represents the average and standard deviation of three
independent experiments. *P = 0.025, **P = 0.015.
D. pMek1 T286 (marker of cyclin B / CDK1 activity), α-tubulin and DAPI for DNA. pMek1 T286
stained the microtubule foci of all mitotic cells, shown by arrows. Nuclear pMek1 T286 was
present in control cells but was lacking in cyclin A siRNA treated samples, representative of no
chromosome condensation. Exposure times for pMek1 T286 were kept constant whilst imaging.
Scale bars represent 10 µm. Arrows indicate centrosomes.
Chapter 4 – Characterising the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
132
regulate cyclin B/CDK1 activity. It has previously been suggested that cyclin A can localize to
the centrosomes (Bailly et al., 1992, Pagano et al., 1992, den Elzen and Pines, 2001), although
minimal data have been presented to support these claims, and the localization of CDK2 at
the centrosomes was unknown. A mild permeabilisation of cells prior to fixing was used to
remove cytoplasmic CDK2 and cyclin A. This allowed the visualization of centrosomal CDK2
and cyclin A and its co-localisation with the centrosomal marker, γ-tubulin (Figure 4.5 A;
indicated by arrows). The centrosomal localization of cyclin A occurs during G2 phase once
the centrosome pair begins to separate but before microtubule nucleation occurs. CDK2
staining revealed that CDK2 also localizes to the centrosomes during the same time indicated
by the condensed chromosomes. Arrows are used to mark the separating centrosomes
(Figure 4.5 B). Cyclin A depletion revealed that the centrosomal localization of CDK2 was
dependent on cyclin A (Figure 4.5 B).
4.2.5 Cyclin A/CDK2 depletion or inhibition affects the exit from G2 / M checkpoint.
Implementation of a checkpoint arrest requires the inhibition of cyclin/CDK complexes to put
a ‘brake’ on cell cycle progression. The exit of cells from a G2 checkpoint requires the
removal of this braking system to promote mitotic entry. The inhibition of cyclin B/CDK1
activation is essential for the implementation of the G2 checkpoint, and its activation is
required for mitotic entry after the release from the checkpoint arrest. The involvement of
cyclin A/CDK2 in the G2 checkpoint had not been examined in any detail previously. In light
of the data in this study where we show the control of cyclin B/CDK1 activation and normal
mitotic entry by cyclin A/CDK2, it was assumed that cyclin A/CDK2 could have a similar role in
Chapter 4 – Characterising the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
133
Figure 4.5 Cyclin A/CDK2 localises to the centrosomes in late G2 phase.
A. Asynchronous growing HeLa cells were seeded onto glass coverslips and then fixed,
detergent permeabilised and stained with DAPI for DNA (blue), cyclin A (green) and γ-
tubulin (red). Image is of the prophase cell displayed was taken using a Zeiss Apotome
widefield microscope equipped with a CCD camera. Arrows indicate the position of
centrosomal staining.
B. HeLa cells were treated without (Con) or with 50 nM cyclin A (A1) siRNA. 24 h post
transfection cells were fixed, detergent permeabilised and stained with DAPI for DNA (blue),
CDK2 (green) and γ-tubulin (red). Images show the co-localisation of CDK2 at the
centrosomes in two different control cells and the loss of CDK2 from the centrosomes
Chapter 4 – Characterising the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
134
caused by cyclin A depletion. Arrows indicate the position of centrosomal staining. Images
were taken with a Zeiss Apotome widefield microscope equipped with a CCD camera
Chapter 4 – Characterising the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
135
mitotic entry from a G2 phase checkpoint arrest. Cyclin A/CDK2 was known to be inhibited
to implement the checkpoint, and a mutant of CDK2 that did not require Cdc25-dependent
activation was able to bypass the checkpoint (Goldstone et al., 2001, Chow et al., 2003)
suggesting that the activation of cyclin A/CDK2 might impact on the G2 phase checkpoint. In
addition, Cdc25B is essential for checkpoint exit (Goldstone et al., 2001, Bugler et al., 2006)
and its major role is the activation of G2 phase cyclin A/CDK2 (Goldstone et al., 2001),
supporting the notion that cyclin A/CDK2 activation is required for exit from the checkpoint
arrest.
The DNA damaging agent Etoposide was used to activate the G2 phase DNA damage
checkpoint by activation of ATR/Chk1 and downstream signalling. Caffeine, an ATM/ATR
inhibitor, was used to block this signalling and force cells to exit the G2 phase checkpoint
arrest. Cells were visualized by live cell time lapse microscopy to determine whether exit
from the checkpoint was affected by either cyclin A depletion or CDK2 inhibition. Control
cells exited the checkpoint and entered mitosis at a much faster rate than cells treated with
either cyclin A siRNA A1 or A3 (Figure 4.6 A) or CDK2i PHA-533533 (Figure 4.6 B). Treatment
with PHA-533533 caused a greater block in checkpoint exit which was most likely a result of
more complete inhibition of CDK2 as opposed to the partial knockdown of cyclin A. This
demonstrates the specific requirement of cyclin A/CDK2 for exit from a checkpoint arrest,
commonly referred to as checkpoint recovery. With cyclin A depletion or CDK2 inhibition, a
significant portion of cells underwent apoptosis which possibly indicated that cyclin A/CDK2
was also required for the continued viability of the damaged cells (data not shown).
Chapter 4 – Characterising the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
136
Figure 4.6 Cyclin A/CDK2 is required for exit from a G2 phase checkpoint arrest.
A. Mock transfected (N) and cyclin A (A1 or A3) siRNA transfected HeLa cells were treated with
Etoposide (1 µM) overnight to arrest cells in the G2 phase checkpoint. Cells were forced to
exit the checkpoint with addition of 5 mM caffeine (at time zero). Cells were analysed for
their mitotic entry using live cell time lapse microscopy directly after caffeine addition.
>100 cells for each treatment were counted for their timing of mitotic entry. The result was
confirmed by conducting the experiment in triplicate and the best representation was
chosen for publishing.
Chapter 4 – Characterising the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
137
B. HeLa cells were treated with Etoposide overnight to arrest them in a G2 phase checkpoint.
Cells were treated, 30 min prior to caffeine (5 mM) addition, with either DMSO (Cont) or
CDK2i at a concentration of either 2 μM or 4 μM of CDK2i (PHA-533533). Cells were
analysed for their mitotic entry using live cell time lapse microscopy. >100 cells per
treatment were counted for their timing mitotic entry. A significant proportion of CDK2i
treated cells died via apoptosis which may explain why the mitotic accumulation never
exceeded 30%. The result was confirmed by conducting the experiment in triplicate and the
best representation was chosen for publishing.
Chapter 4 – Characterising the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
138
We also determined whether the Chk1i (SB 218078) had a better ability to allow exit from
the checkpoint in either cyclin A depleted cells or CDK2 inhibited cells. Compared to caffeine
treatment, Chk1i treatment more strongly inhibited the exit of cyclin A depleted cells from
the checkpoint (Figure 4.7 A). Chk1i treatment of CDK2i treated cells also showed a dramatic
decrease in the number of cells entering mitosis (Figure 4.7 B). Like the caffeine experiment
of Figure 4.6 B, many cells underwent apoptosis. Control cells in which the central kinase,
Chk1 - which is required to implement the checkpoint – has been inhibited, enter mitosis
readily. The consequence of cyclin A/CDK2 depletion/inhibition on checkpoint exit is
noticeable when compared to the control. As Chk1i inhibition could not be used to overcome
the checkpoint in cyclin A/CDK2 depleted/inhibited cells it was evident that cyclin A/CDK2
has an important role in checkpoint exit.
4.3 DISCUSSION
This study confirms the importance of cyclin A/CDK2 during G2 phase of the cell cycle. A
number of studies now confirm the role of cyclin A/CDK2 in regulating the timing of cyclin
B/CDK1 activation and entry into mitosis (Furuno et al., 1999, Hu et al., 2001, Mitra and
Enders, 2004, Fung et al., 2007, Gong et al., 2007a, ). In addition, this study has contributed a
functional role of cyclin A/CDK2 in the timing and co-ordination of the centrosomal and
nuclear activation of cyclin B/CDK1 and mitotic events.
Several publications have now determined a role for cyclin A/CDK2 during G2 phase,
however, the proposed mechanisms for its G2 phase role vary. One group reported that
Chapter 4 – Characterising the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
139
Figure 4.7 Cyclin A/CDK2 is required for exit from a G2 phase checkpoint arrest.
A. Control transfected (NS) and cyclin A (A1) siRNA transfected HeLa cells were treated with
Etoposide (1 µM) overnight to arrest cells in the G2 phase checkpoint. Cells were forced to
exit the checkpoint with either addition of 5 mM caffeine or 1 μM Chk1i (SB 218078). Cells
were analysed for their mitotic entry using live cell time lapse microscopy. >100 cells for
each treatment were counted for their timing of mitotic entry and the cumulative data is
shown here. The result was confirmed by conducting the experiment in triplicate and the
best representation was chosen for publishing.
Chapter 4 – Characterising the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
140
B. HeLa cells were treated with Etoposide overnight to arrest them in a G2 phase checkpoint.
Cells were treated either with 2 μM or 4 μM of CDK2i (PHA-533533) 30 min prior to addition
of 1 μM of Chk1i (SB 218078). Cells were analysed for their mitotic entry using live cell time
lapse microscopy. >100 cells per treatment were counted for their timing mitotic entry and
the cumulative data is shown here. A significant proportion of CDK2i treated cells died by
apoptosis which may explain why the mitotic accumulation never exceeded 20%. The result
was confirmed by conducting the experiment in triplicate and the best representation was
chosen for publishing.
Chapter 4 – Characterising the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
141
cyclin A depletion by shRNA (short hairpin RNA) caused an increase of Wee1 activity along
with a decrease in Cdc25C and Plk1 activity (Fung et al., 2007). However, they reported that
only the depletion of Wee1 bypassed the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 phase delay.
Consequently they found that increased Wee1 activity caused the inhibition of CDK1, and
delayed mitotic entry which reflects the results shown here of delayed cyclin B/CDK1
activation caused by cyclin A siRNA or CDK2i addition. The type of analysis carried out
however does not exclusively determine that Wee1 activity is enhanced during the specific
cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay. Therefore whether the timing of enhanced Wee1 activity
correlates to the delay in cyclin B/CDK1 activity, as seen with cyclin A depletion/CDK2
inhibition, is not known. More recently, cyclin A/CDK2 was shown to directly phosphorylate
Wee1 (Li et al., 2010). Although this phosphorylation was not shown to affect the activation
of Wee1, it does affect its localization. Normally Wee1 enters the cytoplasm upon mitotic
entry (Heald et al., 1993, Baldin and Ducommun, 1995, Katayama et al., 2005) and without
cyclin A/CDK2 phosphorylation Wee1 remains in the nucleus, therefore affecting cyclin
B/CDK1 activation and consequently mitotic entry (Li et al., 2010). This phosphorylation
event strongly suggests a role for Wee1 in the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 phase delay.
Another group reported that cyclin A removal by siRNA did not affect the activation of cyclin
B/CDK1 (Gong et al., 2007b). The biochemical analysis of cyclin B/CDK1 activity assays used in
this study was most likely not sensitive enough to detect the short delay seen with cyclin A
removal. The advantage of my analysis, which uses markers of cyclin B/CDK1 activity, is that
it is single cell analysis and gives a better representation of the exact timing of cell cycle
phases and events affected by cyclin A removal.
Chapter 4 – Characterising the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
142
Activation of cyclin B/CDK1 occurs at the beginning of mitosis. Active cyclin B/CDK1 is first
detected at the centrosome during prophase before the full activation of the remaining
cytoplasmic and nuclear pools occurs. The time between the initial activation at the
centrosomes and the remainder of cyclin B/CDK1 is no more than 20-30 minutes (De Souza et
al., 2000a, Kramer et al., 2004). Depletion or inhibition of cyclin A/CDK2 dissociated this
normally tight link between centrosomal and nuclear mitotic events and cyclin B/CDK1
activation. How cyclin A/CDK2 regulates the timing of cyclin B/CDK1 activation remains
unknown. As mentioned previously, the activation of Wee1 could be a contributing factor
(Fung et al., 2007), as could the role of cyclin A which targets cyclin B into the nucleus to
promote nuclear envelop breakdown (Gong et al., 2007a). Another possible G2/M regulator
that could be involved in the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay is Plk1. The activity of Plk1
was shown to be diminished in cyclin A depleted cells but when over-expressed,
constitutively active Plk1 did not overcome the G2 delay caused by cyclin A shRNA treatment
(Fung et al., 2007). Plk1 is a major regulator of G2/M progression regulating Wee1 stability
(Watanabe et al., 2004, Watanabe et al., 2005), Aurora A (Seki et al., 2008a, van Leuken et
al., 2009), and regulation of APC/Cdh1 (Hansen et al., 2004) and thereby the degradation of
many important mitotic proteins. Although over-expression of Plk1 did not affect the cyclin
A/CDK2 dependent G2 phase delay, it does not fully exclude the involvement of Plk1. The
activity of Plk1 is greatly dependent on its localization established by its Polo box domain
(PBD). Binding to the PBD is governed by the recognition of phospho-epitopes primed by
other kinases (Lee et al., 2008). So, even though over-expressed Plk1 could not overcome the
cyclin A/CDK2 delay, this could be due to the inability of Plk1 to localize and therefore
Chapter 4 – Characterising the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
143
function correctly. Therefore, determining if Plk1 localisation is affected by cyclin A depletion
or CDK2 inhibition would be necessary to determine Plk1’s involvement in the cyclin A/CDK2
dependent G2 phase delay.
Cdc25B is an activator of cyclin B/CDK1 and is required for its initial activation at the
centrosomes. Aurora A phosphorylates Cdc25B at the centrosome just prior to Cdc25B
activation of cyclin B/CDK1 at the centrosome (Dutertre et al., 2004). As cyclin A siRNA and
CDK2i treatment caused a delay in cyclin B/CDK1 activation at the centrosome, this could
suggest that cyclin A/CDK2 is regulating an Aurora A/Cdc25B dependent event that is
required for the centrosomal activation of cyclin B/CDK1 (Cazales et al., 2005). Aurora A has a
prominent role during mitosis and in particular is required for correct spindle formation
(Andrews et al., 2003, Schmitt et al., 2006, Hoar et al., 2007, Sardon et al., 2008, Cowley et
al., 2009, Asteriti et al., 2011). In cyclin A/CDK2 depleted/inhibited cells the mitotic spindle
forms correctly. Therefore Aurora A is not a likely target of cyclin A/CDK2 and is not
contributing to the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 phase delay. However, Aurora A dependent
regulation of Cdc25B may be responsible for overcoming the delayed activation of the
centrosomal cyclin B/CDK1 caused by cyclin A/CDK2 loss. This could further explain the time
difference between the activation of centrosomal cyclin B/CDK1 and remaining pools of
cyclin B/CDK1. The latter would not be Aurora A dependent.
The mechanism by which cyclin A/CDK2 contributes to the exit from a checkpoint arrest is
examined further in the following chapters. However, it is likely that the mechanism is
similar, if not the same, as the role of cyclin A/CDK2 during normal G2/M phase progression.
Chapter 4 – Characterising the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
144
Some recent data has shown the importance of CDK2 in the G2 checkpoint. In this report it
was shown that double knockout p53 and CDK2 cells are unable to arrest at the G2
checkpoint (Chung and Bunz, 2010) whereas p53 wildtype cells reinforce the checkpoint.
This can be achieved in many ways including p53 repression of cyclin A and cyclin B
(Desdouets et al., 1996, Innocente et al., 1999, Levesque et al., 2005, Frum et al., 2009) or
inhibition of CDK1 via p21 (Xiong et al., 1993, Harper et al., 1995, Bunz et al., 1998,
Satyanarayana et al., 2008, Lossaint et al., 2011) so that cells cannot enter mitosis. Therefore
the role of cyclin A/CDK2 during the G2 checkpoint is dependent of p53. In the model HeLa
cell system used here, p53 and Rb activities are defective due to the human papilloma virus
(HPV) but there is some evidence of minimal p53 activity in these cells which may be
sufficient enough to reinforce the checkpoint (Matlashewski et al., 1986, May et al., 1991,
Johnson et al., 2002). Other checkpoint proteins such as ATM and ATR do not seem to
reinforce the checkpoint. As treatment with caffeine demonstrates that the mechanism is
independent of ATM and ATR signalling. It is likely that the reported role for Cdc25B in the
checkpoint exit may be contributing to the required activation of cyclin A/CDK2.
Further investigation has identified several mechanisms for cyclin A/CDK2 action in the G2/M
checkpoint. One group has shown the regulation of several mitotic regulators, Cdc25A, Chk1,
cdc6 and ATRIP by cyclin A/CDK2 in response to the checkpoint activation (Chung and Bunz,
2010). Although there is conflicting data that suggests Cdc25A is the regulator of cyclin
A/CDK2 (Timofeev et al., 2009), our laboratory demonstrated that Cdc25B is the major
regulator of cyclin A/CDK2 (Gabrielli et al., 1997), and expression of a CDK2 mutant that does
not require Cdc25-depedent activation bypasses the checkpoint arrest (Goldstone et al.,
Chapter 4 – Characterising the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
145
2001), further supporting the role for cyclin A/CDK2 in checkpoint recovery. Based also on
the fact that cyclin A/CDK2 activation is required for checkpoint exit, this may indicate that
cyclin A/CDK2 could target a feedback loop that could involve indirect activation of Cdc25B.
During normal G2/M progression there is evidence that cyclin A/CDK2 can control its own
activation by the inhibition of its inhibitor Wee1 (Li et al., 2010). Therefore it seems likely
that cyclin A/CDK2 activity is required for mitotic progression from a checkpoint and that it
may stimulate its own activation and cyclin B/CDK1 activation by regulating Wee1. Another
possibility would be through its reported regulation of stimulating FoxM1 transcription
(Wierstra and Alves, 2006, Laoukili et al.,2008b, Alvarez-Fernandez et al., 2010). FoxM1 is
responsible for the transcription of several mitotic kinases such as Plk1 and Cdc25B, whose
presence is required for cells to exit a checkpoint (Costa, 2005, Alvarez-Fernandez et al.,
2010,). This provides evidence that cyclin A/CDK2 may stimulate its own positive feedback
loop by controlling the activation of FoxM1. This agrees with other data that reveals minimal
cyclin A/CDK2 activity must be retained during a G2 checkpoint, so as to allow checkpoint
recovery through activating FoxM1 and enhancing transcription of important checkpoint exit
genes (Laoukili et al., 2008b, Alvarez-Fernandez et al., 2010). Interestingly, Cdc25B
expression is also regulated by FoxM1. This implies that the activation of some cyclin A/CDK2
by Cdc25B is required for its subsequent activation of FoxM1 to allow exit from a G2
checkpoint.
Here I have demonstrated that cyclin A/CDK2 regulates the timing of cyclin B/CDK1 activation
and entry into mitosis. It also regulates the connection between the timing of the
centrosomal and nuclear mitotic events. In addition, it has a novel role in regulating exit
Chapter 4 – Characterising the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
146
from the G2 phase checkpoint arrest. Interestingly ATM/ATR or the Chk1i could not be used
to overcome the failure of cells to exit an ATR/Chk1 dependent checkpoint when
depleted/inhibited of cyclin A/CDK2. This may indicate that cyclin A/CDK2 is required to
relieve the cells from the checkpoint by somehow affecting the activity of Chk1 which is
required for the implementation of the checkpoint. In the next chapter I will further
investigate the possible mechanism by which cyclin A/CDK2 controls G2/M progression and
how this involves Chk1.
147
Chapter 5
Chk1 is required to implement the cyclin A/CDK2
dependent G2 phase delay
Chapter 5 – Chk1 is required to implement the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
148
5.1 INTRODUCTION
Cyclin A/CDK2 is a major regulator of G2 phase and its depletion delays G2 phase progression
(Fung et al., 2007). The delay is caused by a loss of coordination of key mitotic events which
is a result of delayed cyclin B/CDK1 activation. The mechanism by which cyclin A/CDK2
regulates cyclin B/CDK1 activation and subsequent progression into mitosis is unknown.
G2/M phase checkpoint mechanisms also regulate cyclin B/CDK1 and progression into
mitosis, and we have shown that cyclin A/CDK2 is required for exit from the G2 phase
checkpoint arrest, suggesting that cyclin A/CDK2 may regulate checkpoint proteins. As shown
previously in chapter 3, ATR-Chk1 has a role in the normal regulation of cyclin B/CDK1 and
G2/M transition suggesting that cyclin A/CDK2 may act by regulating this signalling pathway.
Chk1, the effector kinase of the G2 phase checkpoint, is activated by ATR on Ser317 and
Ser345 in response to checkpoint activation. These phosphorylations have also been
demonstrated to be essential for normal G2/M progression in an unperturbed cell cycle
(Kaneko et al., 1999, Zhao et al., 2002a, Zhao et al., 2002b, Sorensen et al., 2003). The
essential role of Chk1 is evident from the embryonic lethality caused by Chk1 knockout.
Although the name might imply that Chk1 and Chk2 are related they are in fact structurally
unrelated. However, they are both serine/threonine kinases activated in response to DNA
damage. Chk2 knockouts do not cause embryonic lethality and although Chk2 is stably
expressed throughout the cell cycle, Chk2 activation is not present in the absence of DNA
damage, unlike Chk1.
Chapter 5 – Chk1 is required to implement the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
149
Chk1 has a normal cell cycle, S phase checkpoint (Zhao et al., 2002b, Sorensen et al., 2003)
and a critical G2/M phase checkpoint function (Gatei et al., 2003, Xiao et al., 2003). siRNA
studies have demonstrated the important role of Chk1 in normally-timed mitotic entry,
where its removal causes a premature mitosis, chromosome misalignment and mitotic
spindle checkpoint activation (Tang et al., 2006, Zachos et al., 2007). Chk1 regulates Cdc25
and Wee1 activity (Peng et al., 1997, Kumagai et al., 1998, Zeng et al., 1998, Furnari et al.,
1999, Lee et al., 2001, Rothblum-Oviatt et al., 2001, Stanford and Ruderman, 2005, Schmitt
et al., 2006) and these targets are most likely responsible for the mitotic disturbances seen
with Chk1 siRNA treatment. Chk1 has specifically been shown to phosphorylate Cdc25B at
the centrosome to control the initial activation of cyclin B/CDK1 and therefore mitotic entry
(Schmitt et al., 2006). This published work, and work presented in Chapter 3, clearly
demonstrates Chk1 functions in controlling G2/M transition.
Thus, Chk1 and cyclin A/CDK2 appear to have similar roles in regulating the activation of
cyclin B/CDK1 and mitotic entry. The similarity of functions suggests that these two
important G2/M phase kinases are acting within the same pathway or adjacent pathways.
Data from the previous chapter, chapter 4, demonstrated that cyclin A/CDK2 may be
required to regulate Chk1 to release cells from a G2 Chk1-dependent checkpoint. In this
chapter I have used both Chk1 siRNA and inhibitors to determine whether Chk1 is involved in
the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay.
Chapter 5 – Chk1 is required to implement the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
150
5.2 RESULTS
5.2.1 Chk1 contributes to the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay.
CDK2 inhibition and cyclin A depletion caused a G2 phase delay in asynchronously growing
cells (Chapter 4, Figures 4.1 and 4.2). This G2 phase delay was reflected by an increase in the
G2/M population and an increase in PY15 levels and was reminiscent of the G2 phase delay
imposed in response to DNA damage, which ultimately inhibits the cdc25-dependent
activation of cyclin B/CDK1. To determine the mechanism of the G2 phase delay imposed in
response to cyclin A/CDK2 depletion/inhibition, the role and contribution of potential key G2
phase checkpoint proteins was investigated.
Immunoblot analysis of cyclin A siRNA treated cells revealed an accumulation of activated,
Ser317 phosphorylated Chk1 (pChk1) in these cells (Figure 5.1 A, lane 3 arrow indicates
pChk1). Quantification of pChk1 levels confirmed the significant increase in pChk1 levels seen
with cyclin A knockdown (Figure 5.1 A; bar graph). Cyclin A depletion caused the signature
accumulation of the G2 phase marker, PY15. Using Chk1 siRNA, as previously used in Chapter
3, revealed that the simultaneous knockdown of cyclin A and Chk1 unsurprisingly leads to a
reduction of pChk1 levels when compared to the cyclin A only depleted sample. This also
correlated to the reduction of PY15 levels, indicating a loss of the G2 phase delay (Figure 5.1
A, Lane 5). The Chk1 siRNA only treatment displayed similar levels of cyclin A and PY15 as the
controls (Figure 5.1 A; compare lanes 1 or 2 with lane 4). The level of cyclin A and Chk1
knockdown was equivalent when used either singularly or in combination and neither
resulted in destabilisation of the other protein.
Chapter 5 – Chk1 is required to implement the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
151
Figure 5.1 Chk1 depletion causes reversal of the cyclin A dependent G2 phase delay.
A. Asynchronous HeLa cells were either mock transfected (C) or transfected with control,
nonsense, siRNA (N), cyclin A siRNA (A1), Chk1 siRNA (Chk1) or cyclin A and Chk1 siRNA.
Cells were harvested after 24 h and analysed by immunoblotting for the activated pSer317
Chapter 5 – Chk1 is required to implement the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
152
Chk1 (pChk1), cyclin A (cyc A), Chk1, PY15, and PCNA as a loading control. The arrow
indicates the specific pChk1 band, whilst the asterisk indicates an unspecific band detected
by the pChk1 antibody. The lower band was not detected by the unphosphorylated Chk1
antibody and was not depleted by Chk1 siRNA indicating it as a non-specific band. The bar
graph shows the quantification of pChk1 levels in samples collected 24 h post transfection
with siRNA, cyclin A siRNA (A1 and A3) or nonsense siRNA (NS). Immunoblots were analysed
using ImageJ software. Results were formulated from 3 independent experiments. Double
asterisk indicates p value of <0.01.
B. Samples from A were analysed for their DNA content using PI FACS. The FACS data is of the
G2/M population from 3 independent experiments and was analysed by Cell Quest. Error
bars represent standard deviations.
C. HeLa cells treated with either nonsense (solid circles), cyclin A siRNA A1 (open circles), A1
and Chk1 siRNA (squares) or A1 and Chk1 inhibitor (triangles) were thymidine synchronised
and followed by time lapse microscopy 6 h after synchrony release. Cells were scored for
entry into mitosis, over 200 cells were counted in each case. This is a typical result from
three independent experiments. The result was confirmed by conducting the experiment in
triplicate and the best representation was chosen for publishing.
D. Asynchronous HeLa cells were either mock transfected (C), transfected with 50 nM of
nonsense (N) or cyclin A siRNA (A1-A5). Etoposide treatment overnight (1 µM) was used as a
positive control. Lysates were collected 24 h post transfection and immunoblotted for
pChk1 (light exposure, top), pChk2 T68, Chk2, pp38, p38, cyclin A and PCNA as a loading
control. Arrows indicate bands of interest, whilst the asterisk indicates an unspecific band.
ImageJ was used to quantify band intensity.
Chapter 5 – Chk1 is required to implement the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
153
E. NFF cells were transfected with either nonsense siRNA (N) or cyclin A siRNA (A1). 24 h post
transfections cells were lysed and immunoblotted for pChk1 S317 (pChk1), cyclin A, PY15
and PCNA. Arrow indicates bands of interest, whilst the asterisk indicates an unspecific
band.
Chapter 5 – Chk1 is required to implement the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
154
FACS analysis of these samples correlated with the immunoblot data and revealed an
accumulation of G2/M phase cells with cyclin A siRNA treatment (Figure 5.1 B). There was
also a two fold increase in the MPM2 positive mitotic population with cyclin A depletion
(from 1.5 to 3%) (data not shown), but this small increase could not account for the large
increase in G2/M population observed with cyclin A depletion, indicating that the majority of
cells were in G2 phase (consistent with findings in Chapter 4). Co-depletion of Chk1 reduced
the G2/M phase levels to that seen in controls, confirming the reduction in G2 delay with co-
depletion observed by immunoblot analysis (Figure 5.1 A and B). Chk1 siRNA by itself did not
affect the proportion of G2/M phase cells (Figure 5.1 B). MPM2 staining demonstrated that
the M phase proportion of cells was relatively unchanged with any treatment other than
cyclin A siRNA alone treatment (data not shown). The mitotic accumulation seen with cyclin
A knockdown was shown to be a direct consequence of cyclin A/CDK2 knockdown/inhibition
which has been previously published (De Boer et al., 2008, Beamish et al., 2009).
To assess the potential involvement of Chk1 in the cyclin A dependent G2 phase delay,
synchronised HeLa cells were treated with siRNA and assessed for timing of entry into mitosis
by live cell time lapse microscopy (Figure 5.1 C). Cyclin A siRNA treated cells (open circles)
were delayed in their entry into mitosis compared to the control (C) (closed circles), as shown
previously (Chapter 4; Figure 4.1 D). When cyclin A depleted cells were treated in
combination with either Chk1 siRNA (squares) or with Chk1 inhibitor (Chk1i; SB 218078,
triangles) cells entered mitosis at a faster rate than cyclin A siRNA alone treated cells (Figure
5.1 C). Cells were treated with the Chk1i in early G2 phase (5 h after release) while Chk1
siRNA treatment caused Chk1 depletion from the beginning of the synchrony. Based on the
Chapter 5 – Chk1 is required to implement the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
155
timing of Chk1 treatment, the inhibitor data shows that G2 phase Chk1 is likely to be
contributing to the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay. Interestingly, Chk1 siRNA or inhibitor
treatment did not completely reverse the effects of cyclin A depletion, suggesting that there
could be other contributors to the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay in addition to Chk1.
This could however be the result of incomplete Chk1 knockdown/inhibition. The results do
however, demonstrate a definite role for Chk1 in the cyclin A dependent G2 delay.
The activation status of other important checkpoint kinases, such as Chk2 and p38, that are
reported to impose a G2 phase delay in response to DNA damage were assessed in cyclin A
depleted cells. Cyclin A siRNAs A1-A3 were used as well as 2 additional cyclin A siRNA, A4 and
A5, all of which caused an efficient reduction in cyclin A levels (Figure 5.1 D). No change in
either endogenous Chk2 or p38 levels or the activated counterparts, using activation specific
phospho-antibodies p38 and pChk2 T68, was detected when comparing controls and cyclin A
depletion. However they were both elevated in the Etoposide treated positive control. The
increased pChk1 levels, and the lack of increase of other known G2 phase checkpoint
regulators indicated that only Chk1 was involved in the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 phase
delay. An increase in pChk1 levels caused by cyclin A siRNA was also seen is NFF cells (Figure
5.1 E) and U20S cells (data not shown). Accordingly, further investigations focused on the
role of Chk1 during G2 phase regulation and its relationship with cyclin A/CDK2.
Chapter 5 – Chk1 is required to implement the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
156
5.2.2 Inhibition of G2 phase CDK2 causes an accumulation of G2 phase cells and activated
Chk1.
To determine whether pChk1 also accumulated with direct inhibition of CDK2, cells were
treated with 0.5 μM of CDK2i (Ro09-3033) for 24 h and the level of pChk1 assessed.
Compared to an untreated control, the level of pChk1 was noticeably increased. When cells
were co-treated with CDK2i and Chk1i, the levels of pChk1 reduced to the same levels as that
seen in the control. In addition to the increase of pChk1, the levels of the G2 phase marker,
PY15, were also increased with CDK2i treatment and reduced by co-treatment with Chk1i
(Figure 5.2 A). The pChk1 and PY15 data demonstrated that CDK2i treatment, as with cyclin A
depletion, causes an accumulation of G2 phase cells that involves activated Chk1, and
indicates that normal G2 progression requires the cyclin A/CDK2 complex in some manner
regulating Chk1 activation and function.
To assess whether the G2 phase accumulation observed with CDK2i treatment was due to a
delay in G2 phase, and the degree of bypass of any delay with Chk1i co-treatment, time lapse
microscopy of synchronised HeLa cell cultures was performed. Thymidine synchronised HeLa
cells treated with CDK2i (PHA-533533) in G2 phase (6 h after synchrony release) displayed a
lengthened G2 phase by over 2 h (Figure 5.2 B). The delay was reduced by the co-treatment
of cells with Chk1i, with these cells entering mitosis at an almost identical rate as the control
cells (Figure 5.2 B). This recovery was more complete than that seen in Figure 5.1 C with
cyclin A knockdown. This data supports the conclusion that Chk1 was required to implement
the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 phase delay. It does not however suggest as strongly as
Chapter 5 – Chk1 is required to implement the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
157
Figure 5.2 CDK2 inhibition confirms a role for pChk1 Ser317 in the cyclin A / CDK2 dependent G2
delay.
A. HeLa cells were treated for 24 h with 0.5 µM CDK2i (Ro09-3033) then without or with Chk1i
(2.5 µM) for a further 5 h. Control cells (Con) were treated with DMSO, for the same total
time as CDK2i plus chk1i treated samples. Cells were harvested and analysed by
immunoblotting for activated Chk1 (pChk1), Chk1, PY15 and PCNA as a loading control.
B. HeLa cells were synchronised using the double thymidine method, at 6 h post the final
release when cells were entering G2 phase they were either untreated or treated with 2 µM
CDK2i (PHA-533533) . 1 h after CDK2i addition, Chk1i (2.5 µM) was added to one of the
CDK2i treated samples and then analysed by time lapse microscopy. The cumulative mitotic
index was scored. The result was confirmed by conducting the experiment in triplicate and
the best representation was chosen for publishing.
Chapter 5 – Chk1 is required to implement the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
158
Figure 5.1 C that other pathways may be involved in the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 phase
delay.
5.2.3 Chk2 siRNA cannot overcome the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 phase delay.
As Chk1 and Chk2 appeared to have overlapping functions in terms of imposing a G2 phase
delay, it was important for this study to specifically define any potential involvement of Chk2
in the cyclin A dependent G2 phase delay. We were previously unable to detect any changes
in the level of activated Chk2, Chk2 phosphorylated on Thr68 (pChk2) in cyclin A depleted
cells (Figure 5.1 D). To investigate the possible contribution of Chk2 to the cyclin A/CDK2
dependent G2 phase delay three independent Chk2 siRNA were developed from published
sequences (Gire et al., 2004, Astuti et al., 2009, Seror et al., 2009) and tested on
asynchronously growing or Etoposide treated HeLa cells (Figure 5.3 A). Chk2 levels showed
that c3 was the most effective siRNA at reducing Chk2 levels. pChk2 levels were very low in
asynchronously growing cultures (Figure 5.3 A lanes 1-4) but there appeared to be a clear
reduction of pChk2 with c1 and c3 siRNA. Because of the low levels of asynchronous pChk2 it
was more ideal to observe pChk2 levels after Etoposide treatment. Etoposide treatment in
Chk2 siRNA treated cells showed a significant reduction in pChk2 levels (Figure 5.3 A). Of the
three Chk2 siRNA used (c1-c3), c3 was the most potent in reducing pChk2 and Chk2 levels in
both asynchronous and Etoposide treated cells.
In further experiments Chk2 siRNA c3, which appeared to be the most efficient at reducing
Chk2, was used to determine whether depleting Chk2 affected the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent
G2 delay. Synchronised HeLa cells co-depleted of cyclin A and Chk2 by siRNA were followed
Chapter 5 – Chk1 is required to implement the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
159
Figure 5.3 Chk2 does not have a role in the cyclin A dependent G2 phase delay.
A. Exponentially growing HeLa cells were transfected with 90 nM of one of three siRNA
directed against Chk2 (c1, c2, or c3) or a nonsense (N) siRNA. After transfection cells were
either treated with or without 1 µM Etoposide overnight. Samples collected 24 h after siRNA
Chapter 5 – Chk1 is required to implement the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
160
treatments were immunoblotted for pChk2 T68 to determine knockdown and PCNA as a
loading control.
B. HeLa cells were transfected with control, nonsense, siRNA (N) (circles), cyclin A siRNA (A3)
(triangles), nonsense and Chk2 siRNA c3 (upside down triangles), or A3 and Chk2 siRNA c3
(vertical lines). 24 h after transfection cells were synchronised with thymidine and followed
by live cell time lapse microscopy from 6 h after thymidine release. Cells were scored for
entry into mitosis; over 200 cells were counted in each case. This is a typical result from
three independent experiments. The result was confirmed by conducting the experiment in
triplicate and the best representation was chosen for publishing.
C. After completion of the experiment in B, cells were collected and immunoblotted for siRNA
targeted proteins cyclin A and Chk2 to confirm knockdown. PCNA was used as a loading
control. Quantification of immunoblots was performed using ImageJ software. Samples
were compared to the nonsense (N) minus Chk2 siRNA treatment.
Chapter 5 – Chk1 is required to implement the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
161
by time lapse microscopy. Cyclin A depleted cells by A3 siRNA (dashed line) caused a typical
G2 phase delay when compared to the controls (solid line). The cyclin A siRNA A3 induced G2
delay was not affected by co-depletion of Chk2 (Figure 5.3 B). Immunoblot data of these
samples showed that cyclin A and Chk2 were successfully depleted in the relevant samples
(Figure 5.3 C). Based on this data it appears that Chk2 is not involved in the cyclin A/CDK2
dependent G2 delay.
5.2.4 ATR phosphorylates Chk1 to impose the cyclin A dependent G2 phase delay.
Since ATR appeared to be responsible for the activation of Chk1 during a normal G2 phase,
the contribution of ATR to the increased level of activated Chk1 in cyclin A depleted cells was
examined. To demonstrate ATR involvement, cyclin A depleted cells were treated with
caffeine to inhibit ATM/ATR activity. Cyclin A depletion with cyclin A A1 siRNA produced the
expected G2/M phase and PY15 accumulation, which was reduced with caffeine addition
(Figure 5.4 A). To examine the kinetics of the effects of caffeine treatment in G2 phase cells,
time lapse microscopy was conducted (Figure 5.4 B). Cyclin A depletion caused the typical
cyclin A dependent G2 phase delay (long dashed line), and this delay was reduced with the
addition of caffeine in G2 phase (6 h post release from thymidine synchrony) (short dashed
line). The caffeine treatment of cyclin A depleted cells increased the rate of mitotic entry
compared to control cells (solid line) but did not result in a complete recovery. This
correlated with previous data demonstrating that Chk1 inhibition promoted faster mitotic
entry (Chapter 3 Figure 5 B and D), indicating that ATR-Chk1 signalling regulates normal G2
Chapter 5 – Chk1 is required to implement the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
162
phase progression and is required to implement the cyclin A/ CDK2 dependent G2 phase
delay.
To confirm that the G2 phase delay was dependent on ATR specifically, ATR deficient FO2
cells were used to demonstrate the role of ATR. Cyclin A siRNA treatment of FO2 cells
effectively depleted cyclin A protein but was unable to induce a G2 phase delay. This was
shown by both the absence of a G2/M phase or PY15 accumulation in the cyclin A depleted
samples. Additionally, there was no accumulation of pChk1 detected in the cyclin A depleted
FO2 cells (Figure 5.4 C). This demonstrates that Chk1 is specifically phosphorylated by ATR
when cyclin A is depleted, and that this is required to implement a G2 phase delay.
5.2.5 Activated Chk1 is not a consequence of cyclin A siRNA induced DNA damage.
Because pChk1 is associated with DNA damage, it was important to determine whether the
increased pChk1 observed with cyclin A siRNA treatment was a consequence of DNA damage
caused by the siRNA. In response to DNA damage, sites of damage recruit many DNA
damage proteins required for signalling and repair of the damage. The phosphorylation of
Histone H2AX (γ- H2AX) occurs in response to DNA damage and accumulation of γ-H2AX
levels is commonly used as a marker of DNA damage (Rogakou et al., 1999, Sedelnikova et
al., 2002). Immunoblotting for γ-H2AX demonstrated the expected increase in Etoposide
treated samples. Basal levels of γ-H2AX were detected in untreated (control) and nonsense
siRNA controls (N), and there was no increase of γ-H2AX in cyclin A siRNA treated samples
(A1 and A3) (Figure 5.5 A). Cyclin A knockdown was sufficient in both A1 and A3 samples as
Chapter 5 – Chk1 is required to implement the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
163
Figure 5.4 ATR is required to phosphorylate Chk1 to induce the cyclin A dependent G2 phase delay.
A. HeLa cells were transfected with either nonsense (N) or cyclin A siRNA (A1) and after 8 h
treated without or with 5 mM caffeine for 16 h. Cells were harvested and analysed by FACS
or immunoblotted for the indicated proteins. Data contributed by Dr Leo De Boer.
B. HeLa cells were transfected with either nonsense (Control; solid line) or cyclin A siRNA (A1;
broken line) and synchronised with thymidine. At 6 h post release, when cells are in G2
phase, cyclin A siRNA (A1) treated cells were treated with 5 mM caffeine (A1 + caff; grey
line). Cells were then followed by live cell time lapse microscopy, visualised every 15
Chapter 5 – Chk1 is required to implement the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
164
minutes and then scored for timing of entry into mitosis. Approximately 200 cells were
counted per treatment. The result was confirmed by conducting the experiment in triplicate
and the best representation was chosen for publishing.
C. Asynchronously growing FO2 cells were either mock transfected (C) or transfected with
nonsense (N) or cyclin A (A1) siRNA, then harvested after 24 h. Cells were analysed by FACS
and immunoblotted as in A. PCNA was used as a loading control.
Chapter 5 – Chk1 is required to implement the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
165
shown by cyclin A immunoblotting (Figure 5.5 A). Cells from the same experiment were also
subjected to the Comet assay which detects DNA damage by single cell electrophoresis
where damaged/fragmented DNA damage creates tailing/smearing. DNA damage was readily
detectable in positive controls treated with hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) but no effect was seen
in controls or cyclin A siRNA treated samples (data not shown). The absence of any increase
in markers of DNA damage used, demonstrates that cyclin A siRNA does not induce any
further DNA damage above control levels. Thus increased pChk1 levels seen with cyclin A
siRNA were not a consequence of DNA damage induced by cyclin A siRNA, confirming the
involvement of pChk1 in the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay.
5.3 DISCUSSION
It is undeniable that Chk1 is a key protein required for normal development based on the
embryonic lethality of Chk1-/- knockout mice (Takai et al., 2000). Whether this also correlates
to an essential role in the cell cycle is unknown. However, based on its important role in
several well documented cell cycle processes, this suggests that the two may be linked. On
the other hand, there is published work that provides conflicting evidence that cell cycle
progression can occur without Chk1. In DT40 cells without functional Chk1, the cells are
viable but have a slower growth rate (Zachos et al., 2003). These cells are, however, prone to
spontaneous apoptosis and so it is unknown if these cells are capable of completing a correct
cell cycle. Correct completion of the cell cycle is an essential process critical for genomic
stability and, if affected, will result in apoptosis. Therefore, this also points to Chk1 being a
critical cell cycle regulator.
Chapter 5 – Chk1 is required to implement the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
166
Figure 5.5 Cyclin A siRNA does not cause DNA damage.
HeLa cells were either untransfected or transfected with nonsense (N) or cyclin A siRNA (A1 and A3),
synchronised by thymidine and collected as they transited through G2 phase (6 h post release). HeLa
cells treated with 1 μM Etoposide overnight were used as a positive control. Whole cell lysates were
blotted for γH2AX, cyclin A, PY15 and α-tubulin as a loading control. Data was obtained by
collaboration with Dr Francis Stevens.
Chapter 5 – Chk1 is required to implement the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
167
It has been determined that not only does Chk1 have an important role in the response to
DNA damage but it also has an important role in regulating the timing of normal G2/M
transition. Both of these roles require Chk1 activity to regulate cyclin B/CDK1 activation and
thereby limit the rate of mitotic entry (Capasso et al., 2002, Gatei et al., 2003, Schmitt et al.,
2006,).
Another rate limiting complex controlling entry into mitosis is cyclin A/CDK2. Cyclin A/CDK2
has been established as a G2 phase regulator (Goldstone et al., 2001, Fung et al., 2007) that
controls the activation of cyclin B/CDK1 and, consequently, several key mitotic events,
thereby governing mitotic entry (Fung et al., 2007, Gong et al., 2007a). By depletion of cyclin
A or inhibition of CDK2, cells are delayed in G2 phase due to delayed activation of cyclin
B/CDK1. Direct regulation of cyclin B/CDK1 by cyclin A/CDK2 is unlikely and is most probably
by indirect regulation of other important G2 regulator/s that are capable of influencing cyclin
B/CDK1 activation, such as Chk1. Based on Chk1’s role during G2 phase by regulation of cyclin
B/CDK1 activation, Chk1 stands out as a likely target of cyclin A/CDK2 regulation during G2
phase.
From data presented here it is likely that this is the case. As shown, Chk1 interacts with cyclin
A/CDK2 and is thought to be regulated in some way by cyclin A/CDK2. An interaction
between cyclin A/CDK2 and Chk1 can occur at the centrosomes during G2 phase allowing
cyclin A/CDK2 to regulate Chk1. Chk1 also has other reported G2 functions at the
centrosomes and this involves the negative regulation of Cdc25B which in turn blocks cyclin
B/CDK1 activation to control mitotic entry (Schmitt et al., 2006). Therefore, it is possible that
Chapter 5 – Chk1 is required to implement the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
168
interaction between cyclin A/CDK2 and Chk1 at the centrosomes is required to provide relief
of the regulation of Cdc25B by Chk1 and allow timely mitotic entry.
Data from the previous chapter (Chapter 4, Figure 4.7) and this chapter imply that cyclin
A/CDK2 may inactivate Chk1 to allow mitotic entry. This potentially involves inhibitory
phosphorylation of Chk1. Known inhibitory phosphorylations on Chk1, such as Ser280 by Akt,
are required for checkpoint exit (Puc et al., 2005). More recently, two novel phosphorylation
Chk1 sites, Ser286 and Ser301 (Shiromizu et al., 2006), have been identified. These residues
were first identified as cyclin B/CDK1 target phosphorylation sites that were potentially
inhibitory with phosphorylations occurring during normal mitosis and appearing to influence
Ser317 and Ser345 phosphorylation (Ikegami et al., 2008).
If cyclin A/CDK2 can in fact negatively regulate Chk1 by phosphorylation, we hypothesised
that these inhibitory phosphorylation sites may be phosphorylated earlier in G2 phase by
cyclin A/CDK2 to permit mitotic entry. Thereafter, cyclin B/cdk1 would contribute to the
same phosphorylation events in mitosis to allow mitotic progression. Shortly after
formulating this hypothesis others published that cdk2 could phosphorylate Ser286 and
Ser301 in vitro which impacted mitotic entry (Ikegami et al., 2008).
The main activating kinase of Chk1, ATR, is necessary to phosphorylate Chk1 during G2 phase
to implement the cyclin A/cdk2 dependent G2 delay. However, the data do not rule out any
involvement of ATM. If cyclin A/cdk2 is capable of inhibiting Chk1 via phosphorylations
during the G2/M transition then this would either require the prior removal of G2 phase
Ser317 and Ser345 phosphorylations or involve Ser286 and Ser301 phosphorylation
Chapter 5 – Chk1 is required to implement the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
169
overriding the activating Ser317 and Ser345 phosphorylations to render Chk1 inactive.
Because the activating phosphorylations are present in G2 phase and are reduced upon
mitotic entry (Chapter 3, Figure 3.2), it is difficult to speculate on the exact status of these
phosphorylations during this transitional period. However, published work shows that Ser317
and Ser345 phosphorylations can occur at the same time as Ser286 and Ser301
phosphorylations (Ikegami et al., 2008) therefore it is likely that Ser286 and Ser301
phosphorylations occurs prior to the dephosphorylation of Chk1 on Ser317 and Ser345.
Therefore, whether Ser286 or Ser301 is required to enhance the dephosphorylation of
Ser317 or Ser345 or to simply inactive Chk1 is unknown.
The involvement of Chk1 had previously been ruled out in the cyclin A/cdk2 dependent G2
delay due to the inability to see an increase in pChk1 levels by immunoblotting (Gong and
Ferrell, 2010). Our data does not agree with this but also suggest that Chk1 is not the only
protein affected by cyclin A/cdk2 depletion/inhibition. The incomplete recovery of mitotic
entry seen with Chk1 inhibition suggested that there are other compensatory pathways that
cyclin A/cdk2 may be required to regulate in order to control mitotic entry. Another
important mitotic regulator, Wee1, has been implicated as a key component of the cyclin
A/cdk2 dependent G2 delay. This same published data ruled out the involvement of either
Cdc25 or Plk1 (Fung et al., 2007). Although the combined removal of cyclin A and Wee1 does
restore cyclin B/cdk1 activity and the number of mitotic cells, implicating the decline of the
cyclin A/cdk2 dependent G2 delay, it does not determine if this is an effect of the Wee1
removal in the cells depleted of cyclin A with siRNA. To more conclusively confirm the role of
Wee1 in the cyclin A/cdk2 dependent G2 delay further single cell analysis should be used to
Chapter 5 – Chk1 is required to implement the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
170
demonstrate the effects of Wee1 removal on the recovery of cyclin B/cdk1 activation, which
is delayed by cyclin A removal.
Chk1’s established roles have already identified it as a central effector of G2/M transition in
either a normal or checkpoint response transition. Chk1 has the ability to directly control the
activation of cyclin B/cdk1 through the regulation of its negative regulator, Wee1 (Lee et al.,
2001, Calonge and O'Connell, 2006), and its positive regulator, Cdc25 (Furnari et al., 1999,
Uto et al., 2004, Loffler et al., 2006, Schmitt et al., 2006). Therefore, the possible direct
inhibitory regulation of Chk1 by cyclin A/cdk2 could enhance the activation of Cdc25B and
would also cause a decrease in Wee1 activity. Once the activation of cyclin B/cdk1 is
achieved the sustained inhibition of Chk1 would promote a cyclin B/cdk1 positive feedback
loop (Pomerening et al., 2003, Lindqvist et al., 2005) where cdk1 could itself continue the
regulation of both Cdc25 (Izumi and Maller, 1993, Shen et al., 1998, Lu et al., 1999, Margolis
et al., 2006b) and the inhibition of Wee1 (Ayad et al., 2003, Watanabe et al., 2004, Kim et al.,
2005, Watanabe et al., 2005, Okamoto and Sagata, 2007).
Chk1 is not the only G2/M kinase that can regulate both Cdc25 and Wee1. There are reports
that Plk1 can phosphorylate and regulate both Cdc25B and Wee1 to promote mitotic entry
(Lobjois et al., 2009). For example, Plk1 can promote the degradation of Wee1 (Lee et al.,
2001, Rothblum-Oviatt et al., 2001, Katayama et al., 2005, Stanford and Ruderman, 2005)
and enhance the nuclear localization of Cdc25 to allow its activation of cyclin B/cdk1 in the
nucleus (Toyoshima-Morimoto et al., 2002). Furthermore, Plk1 and Chk1 seem to be able to
regulate each other - whilst Chk1 causes negative regulation of Plk1, Plk1 can likewise
Chapter 5 – Chk1 is required to implement the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
171
mediate the suppression of Chk1 by the indirect regulation of its activating partner Claspin
(Yoo et al., 2004). Due to Plk1’s ability to regulate G2/M transition in a similar manner to
Chk1 it is likely that it could be part of the compensatory pathway that is involved in the
cyclin A/cdk2 dependent G2 delay. Although overexpression of active Plk1 does not
overcome the cyclin A/cdk2 dependent G2 delay, it does not rule out any specific effect on
the timing of cyclin B/cdk1 activation or that of other key mitotic events (Fung et al., 2007).
In addition, the activity of Plk1 is governed by its localization and therefore determining the
effects of cyclin A/cdk2 removal/depletion on Plk1 localisation may provide further
confirmation of its non-involvement.
The data confirms that Chk1 has a definitive role in G2 phase which impacts the timed entry
into mitosis. The increase of pChk1 Ser317 seen with cyclin A depletion and cdk2 inhibition
were required to implement the G2 phase delay that was typical of cyclin A/cdk2
depletion/inhibition. The use of Chk1i and siRNA implies, further, that the activation of Chk1
is required to induce the delay and suggests that this involves Chk1 co-ordination of cyclin
B/cdk1 activation at the centrosomes to allow mitotic entry. The mode of cyclin A/cdk2’s
regulation of Chk1 is unknown but we hypothesize that the interaction between cyclin
A/cdk2 and Chk1 is required for inhibitory phosphorylation of Chk1 on Ser 286 and 301 and
accordingly for control of mitotic entry. Proving the regulation of Chk1 by cyclin A/cdk2 is the
next step to further uncovering the pathway involving cyclin A/cdk2 and Chk1 in the
regulation of G2 phase progression.
172
Chapter 6
Cyclin A/CDK2 regulation of Chk1
Chapter 6 – cyclin A/CDK2 regulation of Chk1
173
6.1 INTRODUCTION
The centrosome is a small membraneless organelle that is critical for cell cycle progression
(Lukasiewicz and Lingle, 2009). It has a complex structure and undergoes its own cycle of
replication, growth and division that is linked to but separate from the cell cycle (Nigg and
Stearns, 2011). The centrosome cycle regulates the duplication and maturation of a single
centrosome into mother and daughter centrosomes, so that each resultant daughter cell
from the cell division cycle is provided with a centrosome. The cycle begins during S phase
and by G2 the duplicated centrosomes migrate to opposite poles of the cell, to facilitate
formation of the mitotic spindle during mitosis and allowing each resultant daughter cell to
inherit a centrosome (Nigg and Stearns, 2011).
The spindle poles are the microtubule organising centres (MTOC) of the mitotic cell. The
spindle consists of a centrosome at either side of the cell during mitosis, which directs
microtubule polymerisation towards the condensed chromosomes. The microtubules attach
to the sister chromosomes via kinetochores and then individual chromosomes are retracted
towards opposite poles of the cell during anaphase. This allows for each daughter cell to
acquire a single copy of the genome once the cell division is complete. Once the mitotic
spindle has facilitated genome segregation during mitosis, the spindle disassembles and all
that remains is the single centrosome inherited by each of the daughter cells.
A small pool of the mitotic complex cyclin B/ CDK1 is initially activated at the centrosomes
and precedes the full activation of cyclin B/CDK1 (Jackman et al., 2003). Prior to cyclin
B/CDK1 localisation and activation at the centrosome during the G2/M transition, cyclin A/
Chapter 6 – cyclin A/CDK2 regulation of Chk1
174
CDK2 localises to the centrosomes in late G2 phase when centrosome separation has
occurred, and this is required for the timely activation of cyclin B/CDK1 and mitotic entry (De
Boer et al., 2008). The mechanism by which cyclin A/CDK2 regulates this G2/M transition and
whether this involves its localisation at the centrosome is currently unknown. Chk1 is also
known to localise to the centrosome where it regulates the activation of Cdc25B which in
turn regulates cyclin B/CDK1 activation and mitotic entry (Schmitt et al., 2006). The
mechanism regulating Chk1 activation at the centrosome is currently unknown, although the
localisation of cyclin A/CDK2 and its demonstrated role in regulating centrosomal cyclin
B/CDK1 activity suggests a connection between these kinases at the centrosomes is required
to control G2/M progression.
The removal and/or inhibition of the cyclin A/CDK2 complex caused a G2 phase delay in
which Chk1 plays a critical role (Chapter 5). In this study we were also able to show that
cyclin A/CDK2 is required to facilitate the exit of cells from a Chk1 dependent G2 phase
checkpoint arrest. The use of both ATM/ATR and Chk1 inhibitors could not rescue the lack of
checkpoint exit caused by cyclin A depletion or CDK2 inhibition. This data strongly suggests
that there is a regulatory pathway during G2 phase that requires cyclin A/CDK2 regulation of
Chk1. The presence of active Chk1 during G2 phase and the ability of active Chk1 to cause a
G2 phase arrest implies the likelihood that cyclin A/CDK2 may negatively regulate Chk1 to
allow entry into mitosis. Although the mechanism by which cyclin A/CDK2 may regulate Chk1
is unknown, it is possible that this might in turn regulate Cdc25 and therefore cyclin B/CDK1
activity to control mitotic entry.
Chapter 6 – cyclin A/CDK2 regulation of Chk1
175
A possible mode of Chk1 regulation by cyclin A/CDK2 is based on the ability of cyclin B/CDK1
to directly phosphorylate Chk1 Ser286 and Ser301 which was shown to inhibit Chk1 activity
(Shiromizu et al., 2006). The similar substrate specificity of cyclin B/CDK1 and cyclin A/CDK2
lead to the hypothesis that cyclin A/CDK2 catalyses Chk1 Ser286 and Ser301
phosphorylations during late G2 to promote mitotic entry. The interaction of cyclin A/CDK2
and Chk1 and this mode of regulation is investigated in this Chapter.
6.2 RESULTS
6.2.1 pChk1 and Cyclin A co-localise during G2 phase.
It has already been demonstrated that pChk1 can localise to the centrosomes during G2
phase and mitosis (Chapter 3 Figure 3.6), and cyclin A/CDK2 also localised to the
centrosomes during G2 phase (Chapter 4 Figure 4.4 and 4.5). Immunofluorescent staining of
cells for pChk1 and cyclin A demonstrated that both localise predominantly to the nucleus
but clear centrosomal staining was also evident. A cell was determined to be in late G2 phase
when the separation of the centrosomes was evident prior to nuclear envelope breakdown
and chromosome condensation. Such cells were identified and as the arrows indicate, cyclin
A/CDK2 and pChk1 co-localised to the centrosomes in late G2 phase (Figure 6.1 A, as
indicated by arrows). Staining for Chk1 confirmed Chk1 and cyclin A co-localised during G2
phase (Figure 6.1 B). Although cells were only stained for cyclin A, it was assumed that CDK2
Chapter 6 – cyclin A/CDK2 regulation of Chk1
176
Figure 6.1 Cyclin A and Chk1 co-localise at the centrosomes.
A. Asynchronous HeLa cells were grown on coverslips, fixed and immunostained for cyclin A
(green), pChk1 Ser317 (pChk1) (red), and DAPI for DNA (blue). Arrow heads indicate the
centrosomes. Both images are of G2 phase cells as determined by the separation of the
centrosomes. Images were taken using a Zeiss Apotome widefield microscope equipped
with a CCD camera.
B. Cells were treated and fixed as in A), stained for Chk1 (green), Cyclin A (red) and DAPI for
DNA (blue). Arrow heads indicate the centrosomes. The image is of G2 phase cells as
determined by the separation of the centrosomes. Image was taken using a Zeiss Apotome
widefield microscope equipped with a CCD camera
Chapter 6 – cyclin A/CDK2 regulation of Chk1
177
would be present at this time as CDK2 localisation at the centrosomes was previously
determined to be cyclin A dependent (Chapter 4 Figure 4.5)(De Boer et al., 2008). Although
the localisation of these proteins at the centrosomes had been reported previously, it was
important for this study to determine whether they co-localised during G2 phase. Based on
their co-localisation it was plausible to hypothesise that cyclin A/CDK2 and Chk1 may interact
during G2 phase and that this may facilitate the direct regulation of Chk1 by cyclin A/CDK2.
6.2.2 Chk1 and Cyclin A interact during G2 phase.
To confirm an interaction between cyclin A/CDK2 and Chk1, co-immunoprecipitation
experiments were conducted. Cyclin A and Chk1 are both approximately 50 kDa, which runs
very close to the IgG heavy chain when resolved by SDS-PAGE and makes detection of the
endogenous proteins problematic. To bypass this difficulty, we over-expressed a Cherry
tagged Cyclin A construct in HeLa cells. Chk1 complexes were immunoprecipitated using
polyclonal Chk1 antibody, and immunoblot analysis of co-immunoprecipitated proteins
revealed that Cherry-cyclin A specifically associates with Chk1. No Cherry-cyclin A was
detected in the control immunoprecipitation confirming the specificity of the interaction
(Figure 6.2 A). To confirm this interaction, Flag tagged Chk1 was over-expressed and cyclin A
antibody coupled to protein A beads was used to immunoprecipitate Cyclin A associated
protein complexes. Cells were either treated with or without nocodazole to arrest them in
mitosis. Nocodazole treatment was used as a negative control as cyclin A is degraded in
mitosis. Phosphorylated Mek1 T286 (pMek1 T286), a mitotic marker was used to confirm the
synchronisation. While cyclin A was reduced with nocodazole treatment, so were Chk1
Chapter 6 – cyclin A/CDK2 regulation of Chk1
178
Figure 6.2 Cyclin A and Chk1 co-immunoprecipitate
A. 1 mg of protein was extracted from asynchronous HeLa cell lysates either transfected with
or without Cherry-cyclin A DNA. Immunoprecipitation using Chk1 antibody demonstrated
that Cherry-cyclin A binds to Chk1. A control sample treated with protein A sepharose beads
Chapter 6 – cyclin A/CDK2 regulation of Chk1
179
only and no Chk1 antibody (CONT) were used to demonstrate the specificity of the
interaction. 20 μg of lysates was used to observe the expression of the Cherry-cyclin A
construct and the presence of Chk1. PCNA was used as a loading control.
B. Cells transfected with or without Flag-Chk1 were treated overnight with or without
nocodazole. Nocodazole treated samples were collected by detaching the mitotic cells with
a mitotic shake off. Cyclin A antibody was coupled to protein A beads prior to
immunoprecipitation. Chk1 antibody was then used to detect endogenous and exogenous
binding of Chk1 to Cyclin A. Anti-rabbit IgG antibody coupled to protein A beads was used as
a control to confirm that no non-specific binding was occurring and that the interaction
between cyclin A and Chk1 was specific.
Chapter 6 – cyclin A/CDK2 regulation of Chk1
180
levels (Figure 6.2 B). Endogenous Chk1 was stable in mitosis, but the Flag-Chk1 was unstable
in nocodazole treated cells. Endogenous Chk1 was detected in all cyclin A
immunoprecipitates and not detected in control samples immunoprecipitated with the
control anti-rabbit IgG, which confirmed the specificity of the interaction (Figure 6.2 B; lower
band). The exogenous, Flag-Chk1 was also detected in asynchronously growing cells
immunoprecipitated with cyclin A. Although this does not establish a direct interaction
between cyclin A/CDK2 and Chk1, it does demonstrate that cyclin A/CDK2 is in a complex
with Chk1.
6.2.3 Cyclin A can phosphorylate Chk1 on Ser286 and Ser301.
Two novel phosphorylation sites on Chk1, Ser286 and Ser301, were identified as inhibitory
sites phosphorylated by cyclin B/CDK1 in mitosis (Shiromizu et al., 2006). The data pointing to
cyclin A/CDK2 potentially regulating Chk1, and the interaction between these proteins
demonstrated above, suggested that cyclin A/CDK2 could phosphorylate these sites in G2
phase to inhibit Chk1 and allow timely mitotic entry. To examine whether cyclin A/CDK2
could directly phosphorylate these sites in vitro, Glutathione S-Transferase (GST) fused to full
length Chk1 wildtype (WT) or Chk1 with phospho site mutations of serines (S or Ser) 286 and
301 to alanine (A or Ala) were generated. Single site mutations, Chk1 Ser286 to Ala (S286A)
and Chk1 Ser301 to Ala (S301A), and a double mutant, Chk1 Ser286 to Ala and Ser301 to Ala
(SS286,S301AA) were compared to a wild type (WT) Chk1 control. The phosphorylation of
Chk1 was determined by assessing the ability of recombinant cyclin A/CDK2 kinase to
phosphorylate the GST-Chk1 constructs. The kinase was first tested and found to be capable
Chapter 6 – cyclin A/CDK2 regulation of Chk1
181
of phosphorylating a histone H1 control (data not shown). Cyclin A/CDK2 was capable of
phosphorylating the WT and S301A Chk1 constructs, and there also appeared to be minor
phosphorylation of the S286A mutant and even less phosphorylation of the SS286,301AA
double mutant (Figure 6.3). No phosphorylation of the GST control was expected or evident
(Figure 6.3, Lane 1). These results demonstrate that cyclin A/CDK2 is able to phosphorylate
specifically Chk1 Ser286 and to a lesser extent, possibly Ser301. The largest reduction in
phosphorylation was seen with the double, SS286,301AA, mutant and this data suggests that
the phosphorylations are perhaps an ordered event, where Ser286 is required for the
subsequent phosphorylation of Ser301.
6.2.4 Over-expression of Chk1 delays mitotic entry.
Once it had been established that cyclin A/CDK2 could phosphorylate Chk1 in vitro on Ser286
and, if it is an ordered event, Ser301 also, the Chk1 phosphorylation mutant constructs,
inserted into mammalian expression vectors, were used to determine their effect on mitotic
entry. Based on the hypothesis that phosphorylation of these sites by cyclin A/CDK2 during
G2 phase should inhibit Chk1 and allow mitotic progression, Ala mutants should delay mitotic
entry due to the lack of Chk1 phosphorylation and subsequent inhibition.
The Chk1 mutants were cloned into two mammalian expression vector systems to create
Flag-Chk1 and Cherry-Chk1 constructs. These Chk1 mutants were generated in a Chk1 Ser317
and Ser345 phospho-mimicking mutant background, where the serines were mutated to
aspartate (Asp or D) residues. This was based on the assumption that the inhibitory site
Chapter 6 – cyclin A/CDK2 regulation of Chk1
182
Figure 6.3 Cyclin A/CDK2 phosphorylates Chk1 in vivo
Purchased recombinant cyclin A/CDK2 and GST-Chk1 constructs were combined and a 32P-γ-ATP in
vitro kinase assay performed. Samples were resolved by SDS-PAGE and stained with Coomassie
Brilliant Blue (G-250). Phosphorylated bands were visualised by autoradiography. A photograph of
the Coomassie stained gel (lower panel) is used to show equal loading between samples. GST-Chk1 is
75 kDa band and GST is a 25kDa band (indicated with arrows). Numbers to the left of the lower panel
indicate the molecular weight in kDa’s of the marker bands. Arrows indicate the bands as per
labelling. .
Chapter 6 – cyclin A/CDK2 regulation of Chk1
183
Figure 6.4 Chk1 SS317,345DD, with S286A and S301A mutations do not delay in G2 phase
A. HeLa cells were co-transfected with GFP plasmid (2 µg) and the indicated Flag Chk1 plasmid
(2 µg) (SS317,345AA, S286A, S301A, SS286,301AA). 24 h post transfection cells were fixed
with 70 % Ethanol and stained with PI. 2D FACS was carried out to determine the DNA
content of the GFP co-transfected population. Scatter plots show the gated, GFP positive,
Chapter 6 – cyclin A/CDK2 regulation of Chk1
184
cells (red boxes, percentages of the cell population are shown within). Cell cycle profiles of
the gated population are shown on the left. Percentages of cell cycle phases, G1, S and
G2/M (of the gated population) are shown in the top right hand corner in descending order.
All samples were gated except for the ungated control (untransfected control), where a
representation of the entire cell population is shown as a control. Analysis was conducted
using FlowJo software.
B. Samples for immunoblotting were collected from the experiment conducted in A) to
confirm the expression of Flag and GFP. Samples were immunoblotted for Flag, GFP and
PCNA, used as a loading control.
Chapter 6 – cyclin A/CDK2 regulation of Chk1
185
phosphorylations occurred on the already activated Chk1 to inhibit the kinase activity. Single
S286A and S301A mutants, and the double mutant, SS286A,S301AA, were made in Flag-Chk1
SS317,345DD mutant background and against the SS317,345DD construct as a control. Cells
were co-transfected with GFP to identify Chk1 transfected cells. Analysis by FACS data
revealed no difference in the G2/M populations of Flag-Chk1 expressing cells (Figure 6.4 A),
even though a similar level of overexpression of each sample was achieved (Figure 6.4 B) This
negative result may have been due to the Aspartate mutations of sites, Ser317 and Ser345.
Mutation of Ser345 had previously been reported to affect 14-3-3 binding to these sites and
therefore produce a catalytically defective Chk1 (Capasso et al., 2002, Jiang et al., 2003,
Dunaway et al., 2005). Therefore Chk1 mutations of Ser286 and Ser301 were generated in a
Chk1 Ser317 and Ser345 wild type background and the involvement of Ser286 and Ser301
was re-examined.
HeLa cells were transfected with Flag-Chk1 constructs, treated with Etoposide and then
forced into mitosis with caffeine addition, and fixed for immunofluorescent staining 6 h after
caffeine addition. We had previously used this system to demonstrate that cyclin A/CDK2
depletion/inhibition appeared to be required to inhibit Chk1 to control checkpoint exit
(Chapter 5). Flag-Chk1 expressing cells were then scored as either G2 phase or mitotic. This
experiment demonstrated that a lower proportion of wild type (WT) Flag-Chk1 expressing G2
phase cells had entered mitosis compared to either single, S286A or S301A, or double,
SS286,301AA mutants which all drove similar proportions of the over expressing cells into
mitosis (Figure 6.5 A). Cells were also scored for apoptosis which is not presented here.
Apoptosis was very noticeable in the WT samples and may indicate that the overexpression
Chapter 6 – cyclin A/CDK2 regulation of Chk1
186
Figure 6.5 Chk1 Ser286 and Ser301 Alanine mutants cause a delay of mitotic entry.
A. HeLa cells were either mock transfected (CONT) or transfected with 2 μg of Flag Chk1 constructs
WT, S286A, S301A or SS286,301AA. 6 h post transfection cells were treated overnight with
Chapter 6 – cyclin A/CDK2 regulation of Chk1
187
Etoposide (1 μM). The following day 5 mM caffeine was added to each sample and incubated
for a further 6 h, after which coverslips were fixed with methanol. Cells were stained with Flag
antibody and DAPI for DNA and scored as either mitotic or G2 phase based on the morphology
of the DNA. Only the Flag staining cells were scored for the Chk1 transfected samples and the
mock control cells were counted randomly. Approximately 200 cells were counted per
experiment and the experiment was conducted in triplicate.
B. HeLa cells were co-transfected with GFP plasmid (2 μg) and the indicated Flag Chk1 plasmid (2
μg). A GFP only control (not co-transfected with Flag Chk1 plasmid) was transfected with 4µg of
plasmid. 24 h post transfection cells were collected for analysis. Cells were fixed with 70%
ethanol and stained with PI. 2D FACS was carried out to analyse cell cycle profiles of positively
transfect cells. Positively transfected cells were analysed by gating the GFP positive population.
Scatter plots show the gated, GFP positive, cells (red boxes, percentages of the cell population
are shown within). Cell cycle profiles of the gated population are shown on the left. All samples
were gated except for the ungated control (Control) which was not transfected with either GFP
or Flag-Chk1 and is a representation of the entire cell population. Analysis was conducted using
FlowJo software.
C. The experiment in B) was conducted in triplicate. All samples were analysed using FlowJo and
the percentage of cells in the representative cell cycle phases was determined. The data
presented is the mean G2/M population versus the G1 population. Error bars are representative
of standard deviations. A p value of 0.026 was obtained from a T-test conducted using the GFP
and SS286,301AA values.
D. Samples for immunoblotting were collected from the experiment conducted in B) to confirm
the expression of Flag and GFP. Samples were immunoblotted for Flag, GFP and PCNA, used as a
loading control.
Chapter 6 – cyclin A/CDK2 regulation of Chk1
188
of WT Chk1 can cause cell cycle aberrations and apoptosis. This was made evident by the
large difference between the WT and control scorings. The mutants did not display a similar
presence of apoptotic cells as the WT and perhaps this reflects the inability of these cells to
enter mitosis readily. This data indicated that the inability of Chk1 to be phosphorylated on
Ser286 or Ser301 caused a delay in mitotic entry, however it opposes the ordered
phosphorylation theory suggested from Figure 6.3.
This initial observation was further investigated using FACS analysis of transfected cells to
determine whether the mutants caused an increase in the G2/M population. This required
co-transfection of Flag constructs with a GFP vector to identify the transfected cells. Two
dimensional FACS was used to analyse the DNA content of the GFP co-transfected cells
(Figure 6.5 B). As indicated in Figure 6.5 B, the double Chk1 SS286,301AA mutant produced
the greatest increase in the G2/M phase population when compared to the G1 population.
S286A caused a slightly larger increase in G2/M compared to S301A, which reflects the kinase
data and supports the theory of an ordered phosphorylation. Although this data does not
produce significant values, this could reflect the numerous pathways that are required to
regulate G2/M progression. The experiment shown in Figure 6.5 B was conducted in triplicate
and the ratio of the G2/M population compared to the G1 population is presented. Although
the WT Chk1 caused a similar result to the SS286,301AA double mutant, compared to the
GFP control the ratio of G2/M phase cells compared to the G1 population was significantly
larger (Figure 6.5 C). There was also a slight increase in both the single mutants despite the
overexpression of each sample being similar (Figure 6.5 D). Despite not being evident earlier,
this data provided new evidence that overexpression of WT Chk1 is also responsible for an
Chapter 6 – cyclin A/CDK2 regulation of Chk1
189
increased G2/M population, for which the reason remains unclear. This type of analysis
detects G2/M populations and could not be used to detect specific increases in G2 phase but
provides strong evidence that overexpression of Chk1 SS286,301AA double mutant may
cause a G2 phase delay.
To further characterise the delay of these S286A and S301A mutants in G2 phase time lapse
microscopy was used. For these experiments, Cherry-Chk1 were used to identify transfected
cells. The Cherry mutants were scored for their timing of mitotic entry. It is a well noted
observation that cell transfection delays mitotic entry and this is also evident in this data
when comparing the untransfected control (CONT) to the Cherry transfected control
(Cherry). As shown in Figure 6.6 A, the Chk1 SS286,301AA double mutant did not cause a
significant delay of entry into mitosis compared to cells expressing Cherry vector alone. This
was possibly a consequence of the inability of the Cherry tagged mutant proteins to be
phosphorylated on the activating phosphorylation sites, Ser317 and Ser345. Analysis of
lysates demonstrated that both single and double mutants were devoid of activating
phosphorylations, even in the presence of DNA damage. On the other hand, Cherry Chk1 WT
(WT) could be phosphorylated on both Ser317 and Ser345 activating sites (Figure 6.6 B).
Therefore while the WT construct could be activated and it does not appear to delay mitotic
entry further than the Cherry vector control or the SS286,301AA double mutant.
As the Cherry mutants were unable to be normally phosphorylated on Ser317 and Ser345,
cells were co-transfected with GFP and Flag-Chk1 constructs and followed by time lapse
microscopy. The effect of these mutations on normal G2/M progression and checkpoint exit
Chapter 6 – cyclin A/CDK2 regulation of Chk1
190
Figure 6.6 Cherry-Chk1 constructs have impaired Ser317 and Ser345 phosphorylation.
A. HeLa cells were untransfected (CONT) or transfected with the indicated Cherry constructs
(WT or SS286,301AA). The Cherry only construct was used as a control. Cells were
synchronised with thymidine and scored for their mitotic entry using time lapse microscopy.
Chapter 6 – cyclin A/CDK2 regulation of Chk1
191
Only Cherry expressing cells (excluding the CONT), identified by the fluorescent imaging
were scored. Approximately 200 cells were counted per condition and the cumulative
mitotic index is shown. The result was confirmed by conducting the experiment in triplicate
and the best representation was chosen for publishing.
B. HeLa cells were transfected without (CONT) or with the indicated Cherry-Chk1 constructs. 6
h post transfection, cells were treated with Etoposide for 16 h. Lysates were generated from
these cells and then analysed for the levels of pChk1 Ser317, pChk1 Ser345, Chk1 and PCNA
(loading control). Endogenous Chk1 and Cherry-Chk1 are labelled and indicated by the
arrows. The asterisk indicates an unspecific band or possible truncation of the Flag-Chk1
plasmid.
Chapter 6 – cyclin A/CDK2 regulation of Chk1
192
Figure 6.7 Flag Chk1 constructs are phosphorylated on Ser317 and delay mitotic entry.
A. HeLa cells were transfected without (CONT) or with the indicated Flag-Chk1 constructs. 6 h
post transfection cells were treated with Etoposide for 16 h. Cells lysates were analysed for
pChk1 Ser317, Chk1 and PCNA (loading control). The Flag constructs ran just above the
endogenous Chk1. Arrows indicate the appropriate bands.
B. HeLa cells were transfected with GFP only (CONT) or co-transfected with the indicated Flag-
Chk1 constructs. Cells were then synchronised with thymidine and scored for their mitotic
entry using time lapse microscopy. Only GFP expressing cells were scored. Approximately
200 cells were counted per condition and the cumulative mitotic indexes are shown. The
result was confirmed by conducting the experiment in triplicate and the best representation
was chosen for publishing.
Chapter 6 – cyclin A/CDK2 regulation of Chk1
193
was assessed. Normal G2/M transition was analysed by the thymidine synchronisation of
cells, while checkpoint exit was assessed by treating cells with Etoposide and forcing the exit
from the checkpoint by the addition of caffeine. The mutants were first tested for their ability
to be phosphorylated on the activating phosphorylation, Ser317. Both the wild type and
double mutant Flag-Chk1 constructs were readily phosphorylated on the activating Ser317
site (Figure 6.7 A). Time lapse microscopy revealed that during normal G2/M progression,
wild type Chk1 produced a delay in mitotic entry by less than 1 h, whereas the SS286,301AA
double mutant produced a slightly extenuated delay (Figure 6.7 B). A similar minor delay was
also observed in the G2 phase checkpoint exit system, with again the double mutant having a
similar effect as the wild type protein (data not shown). These data suggest that
phosphorylation of Ser286 and Ser301 may be required for mitotic entry, but overexpression
of wild type Chk1 also sufficiently delayed entry into mitosis.
6.2.5 In vivo phosphorylation of Chk1 Ser286 and Ser301 is not dependent on cyclin
A/CDK2.
Commercial phospho specific Ser286 and Ser301 Chk1 antibodies became available from
ABCAM during this study but were found to be inadequate. Non-commercial antibodies were
then obtained courtesy of Dr Masaki Inagaki of the Aichi Cancer Centre Research Institute,
Japan. Ser286 and Ser301 phosphorylations are known to occur during mitosis therefore the
antibodies were initially tested on cells arrested in mitosis. These phosphorylation site
specific antibodies only detected immunoprecipitated Chk1 (Figure 6.8 A, lanes 1 and 2).
While both antibodies were able to detect immunoprecipitated Chk1 phosphorylated in
Chapter 6 – cyclin A/CDK2 regulation of Chk1
194
Chapter 6 – cyclin A/CDK2 regulation of Chk1
195
Chapter 6 – cyclin A/CDK2 regulation of Chk1
196
Figure 6.8 Chk1 phosphorylation on Ser286 Ser301
A. Lysates were collected from HeLa cells treated with or without 0.5 µM nocodazole for 16 h.
These lysates were used for immunoprecipitation with Chk1 antibody or anti-goat IgG as a
control (Cont). Lysate and immunoprecipitation samples were resolved by immunoblot and
detected with pChk1 S286, pChk1 S301, and Chk1 antibodies (as indicated by arrows). The
strong bands visible in control lanes (Cont IP) are IgG bands.
B. HeLa cells transfected with nonsense (N) or cyclin A siRNA (A3) were treated with 0.5 µM
nocodazole for 16 h. Samples were immunoprecipitated with Chk1 and resolved by SDS-
PAGE. Immunoblot analysis for pChk1 S301 and Chk1 were carried out on samples that had
been immunoprecipitated for Chk1. Lysates were immunoblotted for cyclin A to check for
knockdown and PCNA to check equal sample loading. The quantification of Chk1 S301 levels
were determined by measuring the mean intensities of bands compared to the nonsense
control (N), using ImageJ software.
C. HeLa cells were either untransfected or transfected with nonsense (N) or cyclin A siRNA (A3)
and then thymidine synchronised. Untransfected synchronised cultures were treated for 2h
with 4 µM CDK2i (PHA-533533) 5 h post thymidine release. All samples were collected 7 h
post release. Nocodazole treated HeLa cells were used as controls, immunoprecipitated
with Chk1 antibody (+), or control anti-goat IgG antibody immunoprecipitation from the
same lysates (-). Immunoprecipitated complexes were immunoblotted for pChk1 S301,
pChk1 S317 and Chk1, lysates were immunoblotted for cyclin A, PY15 and PCNA. The
quantification of Chk1 S301 levels were determined by measuring the mean intensities of
bands compared to the nonsense control (N), using ImageJ software.
.
Chapter 6 – cyclin A/CDK2 regulation of Chk1
197
D. HeLa cells transfected with nonsense (N) or cyclin A (A3) siRNA were treated with Etoposide
for 16 h. Untransfected HeLa cells were treated for 16 h with Etoposide, before addition of 4
µM of CDK2i (PHA-533533) for 2 h. Samples were immunoprecipitated with Chk1 antibody,
resolved by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted for pChk1 S301, pChk1 S317 and Chk1. Lysates
were immunoblotted with cyclin A and PCNA to confirm knockdown and loading. The
quantification of Chk1 S301 levels were determined by measuring the mean intensities of
bands compared to the nonsense control (N), using ImageJ software.
E. HeLa cells transfected with scrambled (N) or cyclin A (A3) siRNA were treated with
Etoposide for 16 h. Untransfected HeLa cells were treated with 16 h with Etoposide before 2
h incubation with 4 µM CDK2i (PHA-533533) or 9 µM CDK1i (Ro 3306). All samples were
then treated for 5 h with 5 mM caffeine. Samples were immunoprecipitated with Chk1
antibody, resolved by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted for pChk1 S301, pChk1 S317 and Chk1.
Lysates were immunoblotted with cyclin A, pMek1 T286, PY15 and PCNA to confirm
knockdown. The quantification of Chk1 S301 and S317 levels were determined by
measuring the mean intensities of bands compared to the nonsense control (N), using
ImageJ software. All samples were compared to the levels of endogenous Chk1 and then
standardised to the control (N).
Chapter 6 – cyclin A/CDK2 regulation of Chk1
198
mitosis, the Ser301 antibody was more sensitive than the Ser286 antibody. Although Ser301
was not identified as a strong phosphorylation site for cyclin A/CDK2 (Figure 6.3), there was
evidence of ordered phosphorylation and therefore, for all further analysis we used the
Ser301 antibody only.
We investigated whether the mitotic phosphorylation of Ser301 was dependent on cyclin A.
siRNA depletion greatly reduced cyclin A levels in mitotic samples, but there was little effect
on Ser301 phosphorylation in these samples (Figure 6.8 B). Because cyclin A/CDK2 controls
mitotic entry and is most active in G2 phase, the effect of cyclin A depletion on Ser301
phosphorylation was analysed in G2 phase samples. Chk1 Ser301 phosphorylation was
minimally affected by cyclin A depletion, and in some cases was slightly increased, as seen in
thymidine treated samples (Figure 6.8 C). This was not due to insufficient knockdown as
indicated by immunoblotting of the lysates. Surprisingly, CDK2i treatment caused a marked
reduction of Ser301 levels. Examination of Chk1 Ser317 phosphorylation confirmed the
increased Chk1 activation caused by either cyclin A siRNA or CDK2i treatment (Figure 6.8 C).
Immunoblot analysis of Etoposide treated samples revealed an expectedly large amount of
Chk1 pSer317 phosphorylation levels. At the same time a low level of Ser301
phosphorylation was also evident and was reduced further by either cyclin A siRNA or CDK2i
treatment (Figure 6.8 D). When the control cells (N) were released from the checkpoint
arrest with caffeine, the levels of Chk1 Ser301 increased while Ser317 was greatly reduced.
Ser301 was highest in the control (N), reduced in the cyclin A siRNA (A3) treated samples,
and absent in CDK1 and CDK2 inhibitor treated samples (Figure 6.8 E). Inversely, the level of
Chapter 6 – cyclin A/CDK2 regulation of Chk1
199
Chk1 phosphorylated on Ser317 was reduced in both the control (N) and cyclin A siRNA (A3)
treated samples but remained elevated in the CDK inhibitor treated cells (Figure 6.8 E). The
effect of the CDK2i was stronger than cyclin A knockdown, which is likely to reflect the
incomplete removal of the cyclin A/CDK2 complex by siRNA compared to degree of inhibition
by the CDK2i. This mirrors earlier findings where CDK2i more strongly affected exit from the
checkpoint arrest than did cyclin A siRNA (Chapter 4 Figure 4.6). Both CDK inhibitors are
known to block checkpoint exit and accordingly the mitotic marker pMek1 T286 was
completely absent in the CDK inhibitor treated samples, and corresponded to high levels of
the G2 phase marker, PY15. While cyclin A knockdown was sufficient, the cells were able to
exit the checkpoint as seen by elevated levels of pMek1 T286, however they were delayed
slightly as seen by a minor elevation in PY15 levels (Figure 8 E). This data supports the
suggestion that Ser301 is an inhibitory phosphorylation, as it accordingly increases in samples
that required inactive Chk1 so that they can exit a checkpoint.
6.2.6 Chk1 mutants do not change localisation.
The localisation of proteins is important for them to carry out their specific roles. To
determine whether Ser286 and Ser301 phosphorylations affect the localisation of Chk1,
immunofluorescence staining was carried out on cells transfected with S286A and S301A
mutants. HeLa cells transfected with Flag-Chk1 constructs were synchronised in G2 phase by
treatment with either thymidine or Etoposide. Cells stained with Flag antibody were analysed
for Chk1 localisation. The exposure time for all images was kept constant however the level
of expression varied from cell to cell. Despite this, the localisation of the WT and double
Chapter 6 – cyclin A/CDK2 regulation of Chk1
200
mutant appeared very similar in both G2 synchronised treatments, with predominantly
nuclear staining and some cytoplasmic staining (Figure 6.9). The single mutants also
displayed predominantly nuclear localisation with both treatments (data not shown). The
data does not correlate to published data that showed WT Chk1 to be predominantly
cytoplasmic, while the double SS286,301AA double mutant is nuclear (Enomoto et al., 2009).
This further reflects our results where WT and SS286,301AA overexpression appeared to act
similarly to delay cell cycle progression.
6.3 DISCUSSION
Data from Chapter 5 suggested cyclin A/CDK2 negatively regulates Chk1 activation. During
the time of this study novel phosphorylation sites on Chk1, Ser286 and Ser301, were
identified as cyclin B/CDK1 phosphorylation sites that inhibit Chk1 in mitosis (Enomoto et al.,
2009). It was therefore hypothesised that these sites may also be phosphorylated by cyclin
A/CDK2 in G2 phase and during exit from the G2 phase checkpoint arrest, to inhibit Chk1
thereby allowing mitotic entry. Cyclin A/CDK2 was indeed capable of associating with Chk1,
although this was not identified as a specific G2 phase interaction. However, based on the co-
localisation data cyclin A/CDK2 and Chk1 interact in G2 phase as both are detected at the
centrosomes during centrosome separation. Chk1 has been reported to negatively regulate
cdc25B at the centrosomes during G2 phase (Schmitt et al., 2006). This could explain the G2
phase delay, if cyclin A/CDK2 was not present to negatively regulate Chk1 activity, then Chk1
would continue to negatively regulate cdc25B at the centrosome and cause a delay of mitotic
entry. Based on this data, it seemed possible that cyclin A/CDK2 was imposing some mode of
Chapter 6 – cyclin A/CDK2 regulation of Chk1
201
Figure 6.9 SS286,301AA mutation does not affect Chk1 localisation
HeLa cells were transfected with the indicated Chk1 constructs. These cells were synchronised with
overnight treatment with 1 µM Etoposide (etop O/N treatment) or thymidine and collected in G2
phase (6 h post release) (G2 thy). After fixation with methanol, the cells were stained with Flag and
DAPI for DNA. Images of positively transfected cells in G2 phase were taken using the Zeiss Apotome
Fluorescent microscope with 100x oil objective.
Chapter 6 – cyclin A/CDK2 regulation of Chk1
202
regulation which involved interaction with Chk1 during G2 phase, possibly at the
centrosomes. The remainder of the study concentrated on the mode of Chk1 regulation
implemented by cyclin A/CDK2. In particular the role of Chk1 phosphorylation on, Ser286 and
Ser301 during G2 phase was investigated.
In Chapter 3, I confirmed the presence and importance of activated Chk1 during G2 phase.
Based on this data and the working hypothesis, it seemed likely that Ser286 and Ser301
phosphorylation by cyclin A/CDK2 occurred at the same time or just after activating
phosphorylations to inhibit G2 phase Chk1. It was later demonstrated that phosphorylation
of Chk1 on Ser286 and Ser301 could occur on the same molecule of Chk1 phosphorylated on
Ser317 and Ser345 (Ikegami et al., 2008). The analysis of Ser286 and Ser301 mutated to
Alanine in a Ser317 and Ser345 phospho mimicking construct presented no G2 phase delay.
This either reflects that these inhibitory phosphorylations cannot overcome the activating
phosphorylations and cannot occur at the same time on the same Chk1 molecule, unlike a
previous report (Ikegami et al., 2008), or that 14-3-3 binding of these mutants is affected. As
mentioned previously, in Chapter 3, the Ser345 phosphorylation site lies within a conserved
14-3-3 binding motif, and mutation of this site affects 14-3-3 binding and therefore
localisation and function of Chk1 (Dunaway et al., 2005). In fact the phospho mimicking Chk1
mutation disrupts 14-3-3 binding and is catalytically inactive (Jiang et al., 2003). Based on the
possible side effects of the phospho mimicking mutations, it was decided to mutate Ser286
and Ser301 to Alanine in Chk1 wildtype constructs so that Ser317 and Ser345
phosphorylation could occur naturally, and found that these constructs did cause a G2 phase
delay. Only Flag-tagged constructs and not Cherry-tagged constructs delayed entry when
Chapter 6 – cyclin A/CDK2 regulation of Chk1
203
compared to transfected controls, the identified difference being that they were able to be
phosphorylated on Chk1 Ser317. Therefore unlike the Cherry-tagged versions, these
constructs were normally activated and suggests that this phosphorylation is required to
impose a G2 phase delay. Unlike, Enomoto et al. (2009) who advocated that Ser286 and
Ser301 Alanine mutants cause a G2 phase delay of only 2 h compared to a wild type Chk1
control, the data presented here does not support this. Unexpectedly a similar delay of the
SS286,301AA double mutant compared to the Chk1 WT was seen in the present study. This
was not evident with the Cherry tagged constructs and this is possibly due to the inability of
the constructs to be phosphorylated on activating phosphorylations to the same extent as
the Flag Chk1 WT construct. Alternatively, the natural phosphorylation of inhibitory sites was
perhaps sufficient enough to allow timely mitotic progression. The discrepancy in results
between this study and others may be explained by the experimental systems used. Unlike
the analysis of transient transfections conducted as part of this study, Enomoto et al. (2009)
used inducible Chk1 cell lines. The use of inducible cell lines enables the timed expression of
Chk1 in all cells during a particular stage of the cell cycle compared to the transient Chk1
over-expression used in this study, which allowed variations in the amount of Chk1 expressed
as well as its untimely expression throughout an entire cell cycle.
Although the inducible expression of wildtype Chk1 used by Enomoto et al. et al (2009) did
not appear to induce a G2 phase delay, it has previously been reported that Chk1
overexpression causes a G2 phase delay in yeast (Walworth et al., 1993), which was linked to
enhanced phosphorylation CDK1 Tyr15 levels (O'Connell et al., 1997, Rhind et al., 1997,
Lopez-Girona et al., 1999, Raleigh and O'Connell, 2000, Lopez-Girona et al., 2001a). It is
Chapter 6 – cyclin A/CDK2 regulation of Chk1
204
unsurprising that overexpression of Chk1 could delay mitosis, as Chk1 depletion causes the
hastening of mitotic entry (Chapter 3). As reported here, Chk1 WT overexpression resulted in
a delay compared to controls. It is possible that by overwhelming the cell with a high level of
Chk1 leads to an imbalance between active and inactive Chk1, with a possible tip towards a
larger amount of active Chk1, therefore resulting in a mitotic delay. To balance out the levels
Chk1 when overexpressing Chk1 constructs, I attempted to generate siRNA resistant Chk1
constructs so that endogenous levels of Chk1 could be depleted at the same time as
overexpression. Although the use of Chk1 siRNA resistant constructs would have better
avoided an imbalance of Chk1 protein levels, unfortunately the siRNA resistant Chk1
constructs were not used in this study because no further time could be invested into the
development of these constructs.
The data presented confirms that Chk1 Ser286 and Ser301 can be phosphorylated by cyclin
A/CDK2 in vitro as reported by others (Ikegami et al., 2008). In agreement with published
data, it was also demonstrated that a larger decrease of phosphorylation occurred with the
S286A mutant than the S301A mutant. Although the in vitro data demonstrated
phosphorylation by cyclin A/CDK2, there remains no evidence for the in vivo phosphorylation
of these sites by cyclin A/CDK2. Investigation of these sites in vivo revealed that cyclin
A/CDK2 was most likely not the predominant kinase responsible for these phosphorylations.
As shown, CDK2i caused only a small reduction in G2 phase Ser301 phosphorylation, while
cyclin A siRNA did not change Ser301 phosphorylation. Although phosphorylation by cyclin
A/CDK2 cannot be completely dismissed, the CDK1i data strongly suggested that cyclin
B/CDK1 is likely to be the major kinase required for Ser286 and Ser301 phosphorylation
Chapter 6 – cyclin A/CDK2 regulation of Chk1
205
during G2 phase and mitosis. The specificity of the CDK1i inhibitor used and the
concentration at which it was used cannot be used to refute the involvement of CDK1
(Vassilev et al. 2006, Ma et al. 2009). If cyclin B/CDK1 is the predominant kinase required for
Ser286 and Ser301 phosphorylation then it is possible that a small pool of cyclin B/CDK1
becomes activated at late G2, to inhibit Chk1 by phosphorylation of Ser286 and Ser301 and
allow mitotic entry. This could also potentially feed into the already well-established cyclin
B/CDK1 self-activation loop, due to Chk1 inhibition resulting in Cdc25B, and therefore cyclin
B/CDK1, activation. However it is possible that cyclin A/CDK2 dependent activation of cyclin
B/CDK1 could contribute to the phosphorylation status of Ser286 and Ser301. Cyclin A/CDK2
could also contribute by providing the initial phosphorylation of Chk1 Ser286 and Ser301
which, soon after, is taken over by cyclin B/CDK1. The latter may be likely as Ser286 and
Ser301 can be phosphorylated in the G2 checkpoint and it is well known that cyclin B/CDK1 is
kept inactive during this time, while a small pool of cyclin A/CDK2 is required during the
checkpoint to allow checkpoint exit (Laoukili et al., 2008b, Alvarez-Fernandez et al., 2010,
Alvarez-Fernandez and Medema, 2010).
Interestingly, during the checkpoint exit, an increase in cyclin B/CDK1 is required for mitotic
entry and as shown here correlates with an increase in Ser301 phosphorylation and a
decrease in Ser317 phosphorylation. Cyclin A siRNA or CDK inhibitors, both of which are
known to affect the checkpoint exit, reduced Ser301 phosphorylation. The specificity of the
CDK1i has been shown by others (Ma et al., 2009) and infers that CDK1 is the predominate
kinase required for Ser286, Ser301 phosphorylation. However the results imply that cyclin
A/CDK2 is either directly or indirectly involved in the phosphorylation of the Ser286 and
Chapter 6 – cyclin A/CDK2 regulation of Chk1
206
Ser301 sites. The data also confirms the initial publication that these phosphorylations occur
predominantly in mitosis.
Interestingly Ikegami et al. (2008) published that Chk1 activating phosphorylations, Ser317
and Ser345, could occur at the same time as the inhibitory, Ser286 and Ser301,
phosphorylations during a G2 checkpoint. It is not uncommon for active and inhibitory
phosphorylations to occur on the same protein molecule, for example Tyr15 inhibitory
phosphorylation of CDK1 can occur at the same time as the activating phosphorylation on
Thr161. In this situation CDK1 is held inactive but once Tyr15 phosphorylation is removed it
will allow activation of CDK1. As Chk1 is required to be active during a checkpoint, this
suggests that the Chk1 inhibitory phosphorylations are present because the protein is not
fully activated yet or that Ser286 and Ser301 are not the full story required for inhibition. It
was shown here that the activating and inhibitory phosphorylations could occur at the same
time under either normal or checkpoint conditions but that during the checkpoint response
these phosphorylations occurred at markedly opposite levels to one another, further
promoting the theory that Ser286 and Ser301 are inhibitory phosphorylations required
during mitosis and for checkpoint exit. This same observation was not clear in the normal G2
samples. This may be due to the different experimental approach used for these two
experiments - thymidine synchronisation versus the DNA damaging drug Etoposide.
However, if these sites are not inhibitory sites than perhaps they indirectly impact Chk1
activity and are more strongly required to control Chk1 localisation, which is important for
Chk1 G2/M function. It has been reported that, Ser286 and Ser301 are phosphorylated to
Chapter 6 – cyclin A/CDK2 regulation of Chk1
207
permit Chk1 localisation in the cytoplasm (Enomoto et al., 2009), which most likely promotes
further cyclin B/CDK1 activation and consequently mitotic entry. On the other hand, active
Chk1 phosphorylated on Ser317 and Ser345 is predominantly nuclear (Jiang et al., 2003). We
and others have shown that the alanine mutants of Ser286 and Ser301 localise to the nucleus
(Enomoto et al., 2009), possibly resembling the active form of Chk1. Unlike the published
data, in this study WT Chk1 localised similarly to the SS286,301AA double mutant and not
evenly throughout the cell as reported by others. This could be a result of the increased
phosphorylation of Ser317 observed on wildtype Chk1 and Chk1 Ala mutants (Figure 6.7). As
both constructs, WT and SS286,301AA double mutant, localised to the nucleus (Figure 6.9)
this indicates that both are representative of the active form of Chk1, thereby functioning
accordingly and delaying mitotic entry. Therefore it is possible that the reason the
SS286,301AA double mutant does not delay mitotic entry when compared to the control is
because the WT construct is acting in a similar fashion to delay mitotic entry.
In summary, I have shown that the negative regulation of Chk1 by cyclin A/CDK2 during G2
phase is unlikely to involve phosphorylation on Ser286 and Ser301. These sites appear to be
major cyclin B/CDK1 phosphorylation sites that are catalysed during mitosis. Thus in the next
Chapter I have attempted to investigate the mechanisms by which cyclin A/CDK2 regulates
Chk1 activation.
208
Chapter 7
Identification of other G2 phase pathways
regulated by cyclin A/CDK2
Chapter 7 –Other cyclin A/CDK2 regulated pathways
209
7.1 INTRODUCTION
In the previous chapters I have presented evidence that Chk1 is a contributor to the cyclin
A/CDK2 dependent G2 phase delay, however the incomplete recovery of the cyclin A/CDK2
dependent G2 delay by Chk1 siRNA or Chk1i demonstrated that other pathways also
contribute to the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay. One possible candidate is Plk1. Plk1 is
an essential mitotic kinase that is also required for G2/M progression. Plk1 has a role in
mitotic entry and in exit from a G2 phase checkpoint, similar to that found by us for cyclin
A/CDK2. In addition, others had demonstrated a reduction in Plk1 activity with cyclin A
depletion (Fung et al., 2007). Re-introduction of a constitutively active Plk1 construct does
not rescue the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 phase delay and monopolar asters that are
diagnostic of Plk1 inhibition (van Vugt et al., 2004b, Sumara et al., 2004, Hanisch et al., 2006)
are not evident in cyclin A depleted cells, suggesting that Plk1 activity is not affected by cyclin
A/CDK2 depletion or inhibition.
Plk1 structure includes a unique conserved region known as the polo box domain (PBD) that
governs Plk1 function and localisation. The PBD recognises a phospho-specific motif on Plk1
substrates and therefore Plk1 is ‘primed’ by phosphorylation events catalysed by other G2/M
phase kinases ( Lee et al., 1999, Jang et al., 2002a, Seong et al., 2002, Elia et al., 2003b, Park
et al., 2010). Phosphorylation of these sites produces a binding site for Plk1 through its PBD
and allows for direct contact of Plk1 with its substrate. CDK1 is known to regulate Plk1
localisation by the phosphorylation of many Plk1 substrates ( Qi et al., 2006, Wong and Fang,
Chapter 7 –Other cyclin A/CDK2 regulated pathways
210
2007, Zhang et al., 2009a). As CDK1 and CDK2 have similar substrate specificities it is possible
that cyclin A/CDK2 may also prime Plk1 targets, however this has not been investigated.
Cdh1 is one of two co-activators of the E3 ubiquitin ligase APC/C (Anaphase-promoting
complex/cyclosome). Although Cdh1 is specifically required for APC/C function in late mitosis
and G1 phase (Schwab and Dreyer, 1997, Sigrist and Lehner, 1997, Visintin et al., 1997, Fang
et al., 1998b, Kramer et al., 1998, Zachariae et al., 1998b, Jaspersen et al., 1999), Cdh1
targets the destruction of many important G2/M proteins including Plk1. This function of
Cdh1 as well as others is required during the G2 phase checkpoint (Bassermann et al., 2008).
Regulation of Cdh1 occurs by cyclin/CDK inhibitory phosphorylation and Cdc14B phosphatase
that removes these phosphorylations, stimulating APC/C binding and activation. In budding
yeast the non-phosphorylated form of Cdh1 is able to bind and activate APC/C (Kramer et al.,
2000). Both cyclin A/CDK2 and cyclin B/CDK1 can regulate Cdh1 (Sorensen et al., 2001) and
cyclin A/CDK2 is reported to regulate Cdh1 in S phase (Lukas et al., 1999a). Without cyclin A’s
negative regulation of APC/C, premature degradation of APC/C targets may occur, including
cyclin A itself (Geley et al., 2001), cyclin B1 (King et al., 1995), Aurora A or B (Stewart and
Fang, 2005, van Lueken et al., 2009), Plk1 (Lindon and Pines, 2004), FoxM1 (Laoukili et al.,
2008a, Park et al., 2008) and the other APC co-activator Cdc20, (Prinz et al., 1998, Pfleger and
Kirschner, 2000), all of which will ultimately affect mitotic entry.
Cdh1 also has a role during the G2 phase checkpoint arrest, where when activated during the
checkpoint, it leads to the destabilisation of Plk1 (Bassermann et al., 2008). The reactivation
of Cdh1, required for checkpoint arrest, was shown to be a consequence of the
Chapter 7 –Other cyclin A/CDK2 regulated pathways
211
dephosphorylation of the cyclin A/CDK2 phosphorylation sites on Cdh1 by Cdc14B
(Bassermann et al., 2008). Based on this data, it is important to determine if premature
activation of Cdh1 and therefore the premature degradation of its known targets could be
contributing to the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay.
While many Cdh1 substrates are degraded during the checkpoint, one of the more important
targets of APC/CCdh1, Claspin, is not. Claspin is an adapter protein of Chk1 and is essential for
ATR phosphorylation and activation of Chk1 during a checkpoint response (Kumagai and
Dunphy, 2000, Lin et al., 2004, Sorensen et al., 2004, Liu et al., 2006, Wang et al., 2006). In
response to damage, Chk1 phosphorylation on Ser317 and Ser345 requires ATR to
phosphorylate Claspin in the Chk1 binding domain to facilitate Claspin-Chk1 binding and
further phosphorylation of Chk1 by ATR (Bennett and Clarke, 2006). Although Claspin is a
Cdh1 substrate, its stability is protected during the DNA damage response by the
deubiquitination enzyme, Usp28. This is so Claspin can maintain the checkpoint by sustaining
Chk1 activation (Bassermann et al., 2008). Claspin turnover is also controlled by SCFβTrCP, and
the deubiquitinase USP7 can block this ubiquitination-mediated degradation (Faustrup et al.,
2009). βTrCP degradation of Claspin requires Plk1 dependent phosphorylation (Peschiaroli et
al., 2006), however the mechanism for Plk1 binding to Claspin is unclear. These multiple
pathways provide a flexible means to regulate the important ATR/Chk1 pathway (Faustrup et
al., 2009). Claspin stability is variable during an unperturbed cell cycle, but its levels are
known to follow a similar pattern to pChk1, which are present from S phase and continue
until they decline with mitotic entry (Bennett and Clarke, 2006). The constant degradation
and turnover of Claspin governs its function during the checkpoint, and this mechanism may
Chapter 7 –Other cyclin A/CDK2 regulated pathways
212
similarly regulate its activity during an unperturbed cell cycle. The phosphorylation of Claspin
by ATR on Ser916, which facilitates Chk1 binding and it’s phosphorylation by ATR, is present
at low levels within an asynchronous population (Bennett et al., 2008). Therefore, it is likely
that pChk1, required during an unperturbed cell cycle and hence during the cyclin A/CDK2
dependent G2 delay, requires Claspin function as it does in a checkpoint.
In this chapter I have investigated the potential contribution of Cdh1, Plk1 and Claspin during
a cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay. In detail, the specific ability of cyclin A/CDK2 to affect
Plk1 PBD functions, Cdh1 degradation and Claspin stability which impacts pChk1s role have
been examined.
7.2 RESULTS
7.2.1 Plk1 inhibition resembles cyclin A/CDK2 depletion/inhibition.
Plk1, like cyclin A/CDK2, is important for G2 phase and treatment with Plk1 inhibitor (Plk1i)
produces a phenotype similar to cyclin A/CDK2 depletion/removal. Previously, cells depleted
of cyclin A or inhibited for CDK2 were shown to produce a mitotic delay associated with off-
centred and tilted mitotic spindles (Beamish et al., 2009). Inhibition of Plk1 can lead to the
formation of monopolar asters (Sunkel and Glover, 1988, Llamazares et al., 1991, Lane and
Nigg, 1996, Qian et al., 1998, Sumara et al., 2004, van Vugt et al., 2004b, Peters et al., 2006,
McInnes et al., 2006, Lenart et al., 2007), this phenotype was observed when we treated
asynchronous cells with Plk1i and assessed after 18 h (data not shown), when Plk1i (BI 2536)
was used to treat late G2 phase cells, bipolar spindles were commonly observed. However,
Chapter 7 –Other cyclin A/CDK2 regulated pathways
213
60% of these bipolar mitotic spindles were off-centred (Figure 7.1 A and E), reminiscent of
the effect caused by cyclin A depletion.
In addition to producing a similar mitotic phenotype, Plk1i treatment also delayed mitotic
entry (Figure 7.1 B) when compared to a DMSO control (crossed line). The IC50 for this Plk1
inhibitor is 0.83 nM (Steegmaier et al., 2007) and in this experiment two different
concentrations of Plk1i were tested. While 1 μM treatment with Plk1i caused a slight delay
(thin dashed line), 5 μM treatment (thick dashed line) delayed G2 phase to a similar extent as
cyclin A siRNA (A3) treatment (solid line). The concentration required to delay mitotic entry
was significantly higher than the concentrations of Plk1i, approximately 100 nM, required to
cause mitotic spindle defects (Lenart et al., 2007, Haupenthal et al., 2012). It is suspected
that the higher concentrations used here to delay mitotic entry, were required to inhibit not
only Plk1 but possibly other Plks.
The polo box domain (PBD) of Plk1 is required to localise Plk1 correctly during the cell cycle
and facilitate its function. Over expression of a PBD-GFP (PBD) construct acts as a dominant
mutant, blocking endogenous Plk1 from binding to its normal specific locations (Hanisch et
al., 2006). Using a PBD-GFP construct we were able to determine the involvement of Plk1
kinase activity and correct localisation of Plk1 in normal G2/M progression. HeLa cells
transfected with either a GFP control vector or PBD-GFP (PBD), synchronised with thymidine
block release, were analysed for mitotic entry by live cell time lapse microscopy. PBD
overexpression slowed mitotic entry significantly compared to the GFP control (Figure 7.1 C),
similar to the effect of Plk1i and cyclin A depletion (Figure 7.1 B). The expression of the
Chapter 7 –Other cyclin A/CDK2 regulated pathways
214
constructs was confirmed by immunoblotting (Figure 7.1 C; immunoblot). This delay caused
by the PBD-GFP construct suggested that both the kinase activity and localisation of Plk1 are
important for normal G2/M progression. In addition, the overexpression of PBD-GFP
confirmed that results seen with Plk1i treatment was due to inhibition of Plk1 and was less
likely a consequence of the inhibition of other Plks. Cells transfected with PBD-GFP for 24 h
were collected and stained to confirm expression of the construct and with α-tubulin to
determine the position of the mitotic spindle. As can be seen in Figure 7.1 D the mitotic
spindle (red) is off centred within the cell. This is comparable to the Plk1i treated cell in
Figure 7.1 A. The quantification of this phenotype revealed that PBD expression increased the
proportion of off-centred spindles by up to 60 % of the bipolar spindles observed, and was
similar to the proportion observed with the Plk1i (Figure 7.1 E). Thus it appears that cyclin
A/CDK2 and Plk1 are acting in a common pathway to regulate proper spindle formation, and
this requires correct localisation as well as Plk1 activity.
7.2.2 Cyclin A siRNA causes mislocalisation of Plk1.
To determine the specific effect of cyclin A/CDK2 on Plk1 function and/or localisation, cyclin
A depleted cells were analysed for their Plk1 protein levels and its localisation. Whilst Plk1
levels were unchanged in cyclin A depleted G2 phase samples compared to the control
(Figure 7.2 A), the levels of Plk1 and the activating phosphorylation on Plk1 pT210 were
reduced by 60 % in cyclin A depleted cells arrested in mitosis with the microtubule
depolymerisation drug, nocodazole (Figure 7.2 B).
Chapter 7 –Other cyclin A/CDK2 regulated pathways
215
Figure 7.1 Plk1 inhibition causes phenotypes similar to cyclin A/CDK2 depletion/inhibition.
A. Asynchronously growing HeLa cells were treated with 5 μM Plk1i or DMSO (CONT). 24 h post
treatment, cells were stained for α-tubulin, ACA (anti-centromere antibody), and DAPI for DNA.
Chapter 7 –Other cyclin A/CDK2 regulated pathways
216
B. Thymidine synchronised HeLa cells were either transfected with cyclin A A3 siRNA (solid line),
treated with DMSO (CONT: crossed line) or with 1 µM (thin dashed line) and 5 µM Plk1i (BI
2536) (thick dashed line). The inhibitor and DMSO were added 5 h post synchrony release (early
G2 phase) then followed by time lapse microscopy. The cumulative mitotic index was scored.
The result was confirmed by conducting the experiment in triplicate and the best
representation was chosen for publishing.
C. HeLa cells were transfected with GFP or PBD-GFP (PBD) expression plasmids and synchronised
with thymidine. 5 h post thymidine release, cells were followed by time lapse microscopy. The
cumulative mitotic index of the GFP expressing cells was scored. After the completion of the
microscopy the cells were collected, lysed and immunoblotted to check for the expression of
the transfected constructs. Samples were immunoblotted with GFP antibody. The result was
confirmed by conducting the experiment in triplicate and the best representation was chosen
for publishing.
D. HeLa cells were transfected with GFP or PBD-GFP expression plasmids collect 24 h transfection
and stained for GFP, α-tubulin and DAPI for DNA. Mitotic cells were observed and imaged for off
centred spindles. Arrows indicate the centrosomal localisation of PBD-GFP. Data contributed by
Dr Brian Gabrielli.
E. Quantitation of the percentage of cells containing off centred mitotic spindles in experiments
similar to those shown in A and D. Data from three independent experiments, each counting at
least 100 mitotic cells, has been combined and error bars represent SEM. Data contributed by
Dr Brian Gabrielli.
Chapter 7 –Other cyclin A/CDK2 regulated pathways
217
We confirmed that reintroduction of Plk1 could not overcome the cyclin A dependent delay
as previously reported (Figure 7.2 C; (Fung et al., 2007)). We also analysed the effect of
cyclin A depletion and simultaneous overexpression of Myc-tagged Plk1 (Myc-Plk1) on cells
exiting a G2 phase checkpoint arrest. Cell cultures were treated with Etoposide to impose a
G2 phase checkpoint arrest, then released with caffeine for 10 h, fixed and scored as either
G2 phase or mitotic cells by microscopy. Scoring demonstrated that a lower percentage of
cells were able to enter mitosis with co-transfection of cyclin A siRNA, and that over
expression of Myc-Plk1 did not reduce this delay significantly (Figure 7.2 D). Collectively,
these data demonstrate that Plk1 activity was not affected by cyclin A/cdk2
depletion/inhibition.
The ability of PBD to displace endogenous Plk1 binding and produce similar phenotypes as
cyclin A depletion indicated that perhaps the mislocalisation of Plk1 was the main
consequence of cyclin A depletion. This would explain why Plk1 overexpression could not
overcome cyclin A dependent G2 phase delay, as it was possibly due to the inability of Plk1 to
bind its critical substrates because of the loss of pre-priming of Plk1 substrates by cyclin
A/cdk2. To assess whether Plk1 substrate binding and localisation was dependent on cyclin
A/cdk2, the localisation of Plk1 was observed in cells depleted of cyclin A. Plk1 has very
distinctive mitotic localisation, specifically at the centrosomes and the kinetochores
(Golsteyn et al., 1995, Ahonen et al., 2005, Wong and Fang, 2005, Qi et al., 2006). We
examined mitotic Plk1 localisation with or without cyclin A knockdown. In nonsense siRNA
transfected controls, Plk1 localised normally to the centrosomes and kinetochores, whereas
cyclin A siRNA caused a noticeable reduction in Plk1 localisation at these sites (Figure 7.3 A
Chapter 7 –Other cyclin A/CDK2 regulated pathways
218
Figure 7.2 Plk1 overexpression did not contribute to delayed mitotic entry caused by cyclin A siRNA
treatment.
A. Asynchronously growing HeLa cells were transfected with 50 nM of cyclin A siRNA A3 or a
nonsense siRNA control (N). Cells were treated with thymidine, released for 6 h, collected, lysed
and immunoblotted for Plk1, cyclin A, pMek1 T286, PY15 and PCNA.
Chapter 7 –Other cyclin A/CDK2 regulated pathways
219
B. Asynchronously growing HeLa cells were transfected with 50 nM of cyclin A siRNA A3 or a
nonsense siRNA control (N). Transfected cells were treated with nocodazole (0.25 μM) for
approximately 16 h, then collected, lysed and immunoblotted for cyclin A, Plk1, Plk1 (pT210)
and PCNA.
C. Asynchronously growing HeLa cells were transfected with 50 nM of cyclin A siRNA A3 or a
nonsense siRNA control (N). Cells were also co-transfected with Myc-Plk1 or an empty Myc
vector control, and GFP to identify the transfected cells. After transfection cells were
synchronised with thymidine. 6 h post release cells were followed by time lapse microscopy.
The cumulative mitotic index of GFP expressing cells was scored. After the completion of
microscopy the cells were collected, lysed and immunoblotted for Plk1, cyclin A and PCNA to
check for the knockdown and/or expression within each sample. PCNA was used to determine
equal loading. The result was confirmed by conducting the experiment in triplicate and the best
representation was chosen for publishing.
D. Asynchronously growing HeLa cells were transfected with 50 nM of cyclin A siRNA A3 or a
nonsense siRNA control (N) and/or Myc Plk1 or the empty vector control. 6 h post transfection
cells were treated with Etoposide (1 μM) for 16 h. After Etoposide incubation, caffeine was
added to force cells into mitosis. 10 h post caffeine addition cells were fixed and stained for
Myc, α-tubulin and DAPI for DNA. Only Myc tag expressing cells were scored as either remaining
in G2 phase or progressing into mitosis. Percentage of the total cell number is presented for
each condition and approximately 200 cells were counted per condition. Results are
representative of three independent experiments.
Chapter 7 –Other cyclin A/CDK2 regulated pathways
220
and B). Although specific co-staining with markers such as γ-tubulin for centrosomes and ACA for
kinetochores has not been performed it is well recognised in the literature that Plk1 localises to these
localisations and the images of Figure 7.3 A and B clearly resemble these unique localisations. The
regulation of a pool of Plk1 during mitosis by cyclin A/cdk2 suggested that cyclin A/cdk2 may
also affect Plk1 binding to specific proteins during G2 phase, although it was not possible to
readily discern specific localisation of endogenous Plk1 in G2 phase.
To determine if normal G2 phase localisation of Plk1 at the centrosomes was affected by
cyclin A/cdk2, a preliminary analysis using the PBD-GFP construct in G2 phase synchronised
cells was conducted. G2 phase cells were identified by their separating centrosomes, as
indicated by γ-tubulin staining. Immunofluorescence of PBD-GFP showed that PBD binding
was not affected by cdk2 inhibition (Figure 7.3 C). The GFP only controls showed no
localisation to the centrosomes, whereas the PBD-GFP construct was evident at the
centrosomes with or without cdk2i treatment. Therefore cyclin A/cdk2 only affects the
mitotic localisation of Plk1 which most likely leads to the similar mitotic ‘rotating spindle’
phenotype. Although this data demonstrated that G2 phase centrosome Plk1 localisation is
not affected by cyclin A/cdk2 this was a preliminary experiment and was not quantified. In
addition, the timing of sample collection and treatment with cdk2i could contribute to this
result. Therefore, further experimentation would be required to conclusively show that Plk1
centrosomal localisation during G2 phase is not affected by cdk2i.
Chapter 7 –Other cyclin A/CDK2 regulated pathways
221
Chapter 7 –Other cyclin A/CDK2 regulated pathways
222
Figure 7.3 Cyclin A affects Plk1 localisation at the centrosomes and kinetochores in mitosis.
A. Asynchronously growing HeLa cells were transfected with 50 nM of cyclin A siRNA A3 or a
nonsense control (CONT). 24 h post transfection cells stained for Plk1 and DAPI for DNA.
Images were taken of cells in prophase.
B. Cells were treated as in A with additional co-staining of α-tubulin. Images were taken of
cells in metaphase. Arrows indicate centrosomes.
C. HeLa cells were transfected with GFP or PBD-GFP and synchronised with thymidine. 5 h post
thymidine release (S phase), cells were treated with either DMSO or 4 μM of CDK2i. At 8 h
post thymidine release cells were fixed with methanol and stained for γ-tubulin (red) and
DAPI for DNA (blue). Images were taken of cells in G2 phase, where evidence of separating
centrosomes was apparent. Arrows indicate the position of the centrosomes.
Exposure times for images within each experiment were kept consistent. Images were taken using a
Zeiss Apotome widefield microscope with 100x oil objective.
Chapter 7 –Other cyclin A/CDK2 regulated pathways
223
Chapter 7 –Other cyclin A/CDK2 regulated pathways
224
Figure 7.4 Cdh1 levels are reduced with cyclin A/CDK2 depletion/inhibition.
A. Asynchronously growing HeLa cells were transfected with 50 nM of cyclin A siRNA A3 or a
nonsense control (N). 24 h post transfection cells were collected, lysed and immunoblotted
for cyclin A, Cdh1, and PCNA. . The bar graph shows the quantification of Cdh1 levels in
samples collected 24 h post transfection with siRNA, cyclin A siRNA (A1 and A3) or nonsense
siRNA (NS). siRNA treated samples were also compared to an untransfected control (Con).
Immunoblots were analysed using ImageJ software. Results were formulated from 5
independent experiments. The asterisks indicate p value of <0.05.
B. Asynchronously growing HeLa cells were transfected with 50 nM of cyclin A siRNA A1 and
A3, a nonsense control (N) or a lipofectamine treated only control (C). Cells were
synchronised with thymidine. 5 h post release cells were treated with or without 20 µM of
MG132 for 2h. All samples were then collected 7 h post thymidine release. All samples were
collected in G2 phase at 7 h post thymidine release. Samples were lysed and
immunoblotted for Cdh1, cyclin A, and PCNA.
C. Asynchronously growing HeLa cells were transfected with 50 nM of cyclin A siRNA A3 or a
nonsense control (N). 24 h post transfection cells were stained for Cdh1, cyclin A and DAPI
for DNA. Images on the left are the merged images.
D. HeLa cells were blocked in G2 phase with Etoposide (1 µM) for approximately 16 h. Cells
were then treated +/- CDK1i (9 µM) or CDK2i (4 µM) for the indicated time points.
Asynchronous (As) and Etoposide (et) only treated cells were used as controls. All samples
were lysed and immunoblotted for Cdh1, the G2 phase marker, PY15 and PCNA.
Chapter 7 –Other cyclin A/CDK2 regulated pathways
225
7.2.3 Cdh1 level is reduced with cyclin A depletion.
Cdh1 regulates Plk1 levels, and Cdh1 activity has been reported to be regulated by cyclin
A/CDK1/2 (Zhou et al., 2003, Reber et al., 2006). To investigate the effect of cyclin A
depletion on Cdh1 levels, we examined the effect of cyclin A siRNA on Cdh1 levels. Cdh1
levels were reduced by approximately 50% in cyclin A depleted cells compared to a nonsense
transfected control (Figure 7.4 A). Quantification of Cdh1 levels confirmed the significant
decrease in Cdh1 levels seen with cyclin A knockdown (Figure 7.4 A; bar graph). Cdh1 levels
were also reduced in G2 phase synchronised cells but to a lesser extent (Figure 7.4 B; lanes 1-
4). In addition, immunofluorescence data showed that cyclin A reduction accordingly caused
a reduction in Cdh1 staining when compared to controls (Figure 7.4 C). The
immunofluorescent staining did not appear to demonstrate any Cdh1 mislocalisation caused
by cyclin A depletion. To determine whether cyclin A/CDK2 was affecting proteasome
mediated degradation of Cdh1, we treated controls and cyclin A depleted cells with the
proteasome inhibitor, MG132, for 2 h. Treatment of G2 phase cells with MG132 increased
Cdh1 levels in nonsense treated cells, demonstrating that Cdh1 is normally controlled by
proteasome mediated degradation (Figure 7.4 B). MG132 treatment also increased Cdh1
levels in the cyclin A depleted cells, and increased the levels by a similar extent to the control
samples. This was also noted by comparing the quantification of the appropriate untreated
samples to the MG132 treated sample. This revealed an average mean increase in Cdh1
levels with MG132 treatment of 0.67 with a standard deviation of 0.08. This suggests that
cyclin A/CDK2 was not affecting the stability of Cdh1 through proteasome mediated
degradation.
Chapter 7 –Other cyclin A/CDK2 regulated pathways
226
To determine whether the effects of cyclin A depletion were due to inhibition of the cyclin
A/CDK2 or CDK1 complex, Etoposide treated G2 phase checkpoint arrested cells were
treated with either the CDK2 or CDK1 inhibitor (CDK2i and CDK1i), and levels of Cdh1
assessed at several time points after caffeine addition. CDK2i treatment caused a reduction
in Cdh1 levels after 5 h whereas the CDK1i had little obvious effect (Figure 7.4 D). Although
the effect of the CDK2i was not immediate, it did indicate that cyclin A/CDK2 and not CDK1
was involved in regulating the level of Cdh1. In addition, the 5 h effect of the CDK2i on Cdh1
levels suggests that it might be a transcriptional effect that cyclin A/CDK2 has on Cdh1
(Figure 7.4 D). More recent work from the Gabrielli Laboratory shows that it is not a stability
effect that cyclin A/CDK2 has on Cdh1. To determine whether the reduction in Cdh1 was
contributing to the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay, Cdh1 was reintroduced into cells
depleted of cyclin A. U2OS cells expressing an inducible Cdh1 were transfected with
nonsense or cyclin A siRNA (A3) and then synchronised with thymidine. Upon thymidine
release, cells were treated with tetracycline to induced Cdh1 expression. Time lapse
microscopy was then used to determine the timing of mitotic entry. As previously reported,
cyclin A siRNA (A3) caused a G2 phase delay but Cdh1 induction did not positively impact the
duration of this delay (Figure 7.5 A; compare solid line with long dashed line). Likewise CDK2i
produced a G2 phase delay (Figure 7.5 A; vertical dashed line), which was also unaffected by
Cdh1 induction. Induction of Cdh1 alone produced a G2 phase delay similar to cyclin A
depletion/CDK2 inhibition. Immunoblotting of samples induced for various times showed a
steady increase of Cdh1 that reaches a maximum at 6 h (Figure 7.5 B). Compared to the 50 %
reduction of Cdh1 levels with cyclin A knockdown (Figure 7.4 A), the level of Cdh1 induction
Chapter 7 –Other cyclin A/CDK2 regulated pathways
227
Chapter 7 –Other cyclin A/CDK2 regulated pathways
228
Figure 7.5 Cdh1 overexpression does not rescue the cyclin A/CDK2 G2 phase delay and itself inhibits
mitotic entry.
A. A U2OS cell line with a tetracycline repressed Myc-Cdh1 vector was transfected with nonsense
control (N) or cyclin A (A3) siRNA. Post transfection, cells were synchronised with thymidine.
Upon thymidine release, tetracycline was removed from the media to allow Cdh1 induction. For
CDK2i treated samples, 4 µM of inhibitor was added at 6 h post thymidine release. After CDK2i
addition cells were followed by time lapse microscopy. The cumulative mitotic index was
scored. The result was confirmed by conducting the experiment in triplicate and the best
representation was chosen for publishing.
B. U2OS cells that stably express Myc-Cdh1 were maintained in tetracycline containing media to
repress Myc-Cdh1 expression. Tetracycline was removed in induced Myc-Cdh1 expression by
washing cells three times with warmed PBS. The media was then replaced onto cells without
the addition of tetracycline. Cells were then collected at the indicated time points after
tetracycline removal. An untreated sample (uninduced) that did not express Myc-Cdh1 due to
incubation with tetracycline was used as a control. Quantification was carried out using ImageJ
software and samples were standardised to the PCNA loading control and equalised to the
uninduced control.
C. Samples from A were collected after the completion of microscopy, lysed and immunoblotted.
Samples were immunoblotted for Cdc25B, cyclin B, pChk1, cyclin A, Cdh1, PY15 and PCNA.
D. HeLa cells were co-transfected with either an empty vector control (MYC), Myc-Cdh1 WT (Cdh1
WT) or Myc-Cdh1 AAA (Cdh1 AAA), and a GFP expression vector. Cells were synchronised with
thymidine, released and followed by time lapse microscopy. Only the GFP expressing cells were
scored. The cumulative mitotic index was scored. After the microscopy was complete cells were
collected, lysed and immunoblotted for Cdh1, Plk1, cyclin A and PCNA. The result was confirmed
Chapter 7 –Other cyclin A/CDK2 regulated pathways
229
by conducting the experiment in triplicate and the best representation was chosen for
publishing.
E. U2OS cells with a tetracycline inducible Myc-Cdh1 vector were either induced for Cdh1 (-
tetracycline) or not (+ tetracycline). 24 h post induction samples were collected and fixed for
FACS with ethanol. FACS was conducted to determine the cell cycle profiles of these samples.
The dashed lines indicate the G1 and G2/M phase populations. The S phase population is in
between the lined section.
Chapter 7 –Other cyclin A/CDK2 regulated pathways
230
at 6 h was 8 fold greater than endogenous levels. Thus, the lack of rescue may simply reflect
the massive effects of Cdh1 over expression. The effects of Cdh1 overexpression on G2/M
phase regulatory proteins revealed that induction of Cdh1 decreased the levels of Cdc25B,
cyclin A and cyclin B1, and in the level of the inactive form of CDK1 (PY15), although this is a
consequence of the reduced levels of cyclin A and B (Figure 7.5 C). Cyclin A and cyclin B1 are
known targets of Cdh1 (Raff et al., 2002, Zhou et al., 2002, Zhou et al., 2003). Interestingly
there was also a very minor but noticeable reduction in pChk1 levels with Cdh1 induction.
To determine whether these results were specific for the inducible Cdh1 cell line, we
conducted transient transfection of Cdh1 in HeLa cells. We used a wild type Myc-Cdh1 (Cdh1
WT) construct and a constitutively active triple Ala Cdh1 mutant, Myc-Cdh1 AAA (Cdh1 AAA),
which is a mutation of the cyclin binding site of Cdh1 (amino acids 445-447, Arg-Val-Leu all
mutated to Ala) and cannot be inhibited by cyclin A/CDK2 (Sorensen et al., 2001). When
transiently over expressed, both constructs produced a similar mitotic delay (Figure 7.5 D) as
observed with the inducible Cdh1 (Figure 7.5 B). Cdh1 overexpression caused a decrease in
Cdh1 substrates cyclin A and Plk1, although Plk1 levels were only reduced in the WT and not
the AAA mutant as reported previously (Sorensen et al., 2001). Lastly, FACS analysis of the
inducible U2OS cell line confirmed that a large induction of Cdh1 levels, such as that seen at
24 h (Figure 7.5 B), was able to cause a large accumulation of cells in G2/M phase (Figure 7.5
E) and correlates to this microscopy data.
Chapter 7 –Other cyclin A/CDK2 regulated pathways
231
7.2.4 Reduction of Cdh1 does not affect the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay.
Cdh1 overexpression reduced the levels of several important G2/M phase regulatory
proteins, and therefore we could not rescue the effect of cyclin A/CDK2 depletion using the
high level overexpression from these expression vectors. To directly determine whether the
reduced levels of Cdh1 seen with cyclin A/CDK2 depletion did contribute to the G2 phase
delay, Cdh1 levels were depleted using specific Cdh1 siRNA. Initially we assessed the efficacy
of the Cdh1 siRNA to deplete Cdh1 levels, and its functional consequence on the level of the
APCCdh1 substrate, Plk1. Only the most effective Cdh1 siRNA (Cdh1 A siRNA) is shown in the
data present, however several Cdh1 siRNA were tested and all resulted in a similar result as
in Figure 7.6 A. The Cdh1 siRNA reduced Cdh1 levels by approximately 70 % and increased
the levels of Plk1 (Figure 7.6 A). We next determined the rate of mitotic entry of cells
depleted of cyclin A and Cdh1 using time lapse live cell microscopy. Cdh1 depletion caused a
minor delay in G2 phase compared to cyclin A depletion, and co-depletion had no effect on
the cyclin A dependent effect (Figure 7.6 B). Immunoblots show that Cdh1 siRNA depleted
Cdh1 levels to below the levels caused by cyclin A siRNA treatment (Figure 7.6 C).
Depletion of Cdh1 with or without cyclin siRNA treatment during a checkpoint exit revealed
similar results to the same treatment of asynchronous cycling cells (Figure 7.6 D and 7.6 C).
These data demonstrate that the reduction in Cdh1 levels observed with cyclin A depletion
was unlikely to contribute to the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 phase delay.
Chapter 7 –Other cyclin A/CDK2 regulated pathways
232
7.2.5 Claspin is required during the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 phase delay to regulate
pChk1 levels.
Claspin is a co-activator of Chk1, required for Chk1 phosphorylation by ATR during checkpoint
activation and is also a Cdh1 substrate. During a checkpoint however Claspin is stabilised by
the deubiquitination enzyme USP28. To determine the involvement of Claspin in the cyclin
A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay and its ability to impact pChk1 levels, cyclin A depleted cells
were used.
Claspin was modestly increased (20-30%) in cyclin A siRNA treated samples (Figure 7.7 A).
Quantification of Claspin levels confirmed the significant increase in Claspin levels seen with
cyclin A knockdown (Figure 7.7 A; bar graph). As a Cdh1 target, Claspin levels were increased
or decreased when Cdh1 was inducted or removed respectively (Figure 7.7 B). Cells arrested
in mitosis with nocodazole were used as a negative control, as Claspin is known to be
degraded in mitosis (Mamely et al., 2006). Claspin is required for Chk1 activation therefore it
seemed probable that the increased Claspin detected in cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 phase
delay was responsible for enhanced pChk1 phosphorylation (Chapter 5 Figure 5.1 A) seen in
the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 phase delay. siRNA specific for Claspin was used to assess
the effects of Claspin depletion alone on G2/M phase progression and to determine whether
Claspin depletion could rescue the effect of cyclin A/CDK2 depletion. Specific siRNA
decreased Claspin levels by 50 % which resulted in a decrease in pChk1 levels by
approximately 40 % in Etoposide treated HeLa cells (Figure 7.7 C). This also led to a reduced
G2 phase checkpoint arrest, revealed by the increased G1 phase population/2n population as
seen by FACS (Figure 7.7 C; FACS histograms). This data shows that Claspin is required for
Chapter 7 –Other cyclin A/CDK2 regulated pathways
233
Chapter 7 –Other cyclin A/CDK2 regulated pathways
234
Figure 7.6 Cdh1 siRNA does not rescue the cyclin A/CDK2 G2 phase delay and delays mitotic
progression also.
A. Asynchronously growing HeLa cells were transfected with 40 nM of Dharmacon smart pool
Cdh1 siRNA (Cdh1 A) or a nonsense control (N). 24 h post transfection cells were collected, lysed
and immunoblotted for Cdh1, Plk1 and PCNA. Quantification was carried out using ImageJ
software. Samples were equalised to their PCNA loading controls and Cdh1 siRNA treatment
was standardised to the control.
B. HeLa cells transfected with either nonsense (N: crosses) or cyclin A siRNA A3 (dashed line) were
either co-transfected or not with 40 nM Cdh1 siRNA (Cdh1 A). Cells were thymidine
synchronised and followed by time lapse microscopy 6 h after synchrony release. Cells were
scored for entry into mitosis, over 200 cells were counted in each case. The result was
confirmed by conducting the experiment in triplicate and the best representation was chosen
for publishing.
C. After the completion of B, samples were lysed and immunoblotted for Cdh1, cyclin A and PCNA.
D. Samples were transfected as in B and were blocked in the G2 phase checkpoint with 16 h
Etoposide (1 μM) treatment after which caffeine (5 mM) was added to drive cells into mitosis.
The mitotic entry of cells was followed immediately after caffeine addition by time lapse
microscopy. Cells were scored for entry into mitosis and over 200 cells were counted in each
case. The result was confirmed by conducting the experiment in triplicate and the best
representation was chosen for publishing.
Chapter 7 –Other cyclin A/CDK2 regulated pathways
235
Figure 7.7 Claspin is increased with cyclin A depletion.
A. Asynchronously growing HeLa cells were transfected with 50 nM of cyclin A siRNA A1 and
A3, a nonsense siRNA control (N) or a lipofectamine treated only control (C). 24 h post
transfection cells were collected, lysed and immunoblotted for Claspin and PCNA. ImageJ
was used to quantify the intensities of Claspin bands, all were normalised to PCNA bands.
The bar graph shows the quantification of Claspin levels taken from 4 independent
experiments. HeLa samples were collected 24 h post transfection with siRNA, cyclin A siRNA
Chapter 7 –Other cyclin A/CDK2 regulated pathways
236
(A1 and A3) or nonsense siRNA (NS). Immunoblots were analysed using ImageJ software.
Double asterisk indicates p value of <0.01.
B. Myc-Cdh1 tetracycline inducible cells were either induced for Cdh1 (-tetracycline) or not (+
tetracycline). 24 h post induction samples were collected. HeLa cells were transfected with
nonsense siRNA or Cdh1 siRNA (Cdh1 A) or treated with 0.25 µM nocodazole (NOC) for 24 h.
After all treatments, samples were collected, lysed and immunoblotted for Claspin, Cdh1
and PCNA.
C. HeLa cells were transfected or not with Claspin siRNA. 6 h post transfection cells were
treated with 1 μM Etoposide for 16 h, after which they were collected. Samples were fixed
and analysed by PI FACS and lysed and blotted for Claspin, pChk1 and PCNA. The FACS
profiles are shown and the 2n and 4n peaks are labelled.
Chapter 7 –Other cyclin A/CDK2 regulated pathways
237
Chk1 activation and checkpoint arrest. The incomplete reduction in pChk1 levels or of the G2
checkpoint arrest suggests that the Claspin levels need to be further reduced to see more of
an effective bypass of the checkpoint arrest.
To determine the role of Claspin in the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 phase delay, it was
necessary to ensure that Claspin depletion was as complete as possible. To this end, the
effects of multiple rounds of Claspin siRNA treatment were assessed. Both 24 h and 48 h
treatment with Claspin siRNA efficiently depleted Claspin levels, and treatment on
consecutive days effectively reduced Claspin to below detectable levels (Figure 7.8) (Data for
24 h treatment with Claspin siRNA not shown). Immunoblotting for other G2/M phase
markers revealed that all Claspin siRNA treatments increased the level of G2 phase markers
Cdc25B, Wee1 and the inactive form of CDK1/2 (PY15). The level of pChk1 was reduced
compared to the nonsense control, which acts as a positive control for the functional
consequence of Claspin depletion.
To determine the impact of Claspin on the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay, cells were
depleted of cyclin A and Claspin individually, or co-depleted of both cyclin A and Claspin.
These cells were then synchronised with thymidine, followed by using time lapse live cell
microscopy and scored for their entry into mitosis. After which, the cells were analysed by
immunoblotting. The siRNA effectively reduced Claspin and cyclin A levels (Figure 7.8 B).
Cyclin A depletion alone increased Claspin and pChk1 levels as shown previously (Figure 7.7 A
and Chapter 5 Figure 5.1 A, respectively) and co-depletion with Claspin siRNA effectively
reduced the pChk1 levels to a similar level as the control (Figure 7.8 B), demonstrating that
Chapter 7 –Other cyclin A/CDK2 regulated pathways
238
Figure 7.8 Claspin siRNA can reduced pChk1 levels during the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay
but cannot rescue the delay.
A. HeLa cells were transfected twice within two consecutive days with either 50 nM Claspin
siRNA or nonsense (CONT) siRNA. 48 h post the initial transfection cells were collected,
lysed and immunoblotted for Claspin, Cdc25B, Wee1, Plk1, pChk1, PY15 and PCNA.
Chapter 7 –Other cyclin A/CDK2 regulated pathways
239
B. Samples from C were collected after the completion of the microscopy. These samples were
lysed and immunoblotted for Claspin, Wee1, cyclin A, pChk1 and PCNA.
C. HeLa cells transfected with either nonsense (N: circles), cyclin A siRNA A3 (dashed line) were
either co-transfected or not with 40 nM Claspin siRNA. All cells were thymidine
synchronised and followed by time lapse microscopy 5 h after synchrony release. Cells were
scored for entry into mitosis, over 200 cells were counted in each case. The result was
confirmed by conducting the experiment in triplicate and the best representation was
chosen for publishing.
Chapter 7 –Other cyclin A/CDK2 regulated pathways
240
the increased Claspin levels were likely to be responsible for the increased pChk1 levels seen
in cyclin A/CDK2 depleted cells. In this experiment Claspin siRNA also reduced pChk1 levels
as seen previously in Figure 7.7 C. When the effects of Claspin depletion were examined in
relation to mitotic entry, it was found that the cyclin A dependent G2 phase delay was not
overcome by co-depletion of Claspin. In fact, when Claspin siRNA was used either individually
or in combination with cyclin A siRNA, Claspin siRNA also caused a delay of entry into mitosis
(Figure 7.8 C). This finding supported the previous observation that G2 phase markers are
elevated with Claspin depletion (Figure 7.8 A). The results were not an artefact of off target
effects of the siRNA as four individual Claspin siRNAs, all which produced similar levels of
Claspin depletion, produced similar delays in entry into mitosis. This data suggested that
Claspin was responsible for the increased pChk1 levels in cyclin A depleted cells, but in
addition to its Chk1 regulatory role it may have other functions that affect the timing of
mitotic entry.
7.3 DISCUSSION
In this chapter, I have investigated the mechanism of the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 phase
delay. This included investigation of Plk1, Cdh1 and Claspin, for which the level of each was
shown to be affected by cyclin A siRNA or CDK2i treatment.
The similarities between cyclin A/CDK2 depletion/inhibition and Plk1 inhibition using either a
small molecule inhibitor or overexpression of the polo box domain strongly suggest that Plk1
and cyclin A/CDK2 function in the same regulatory pathway governing both mitotic entry and
localisation of the mitotic spindle. Although the concentration of Plk1i used to implement a
Chapter 7 –Other cyclin A/CDK2 regulated pathways
241
G2 phase delay was notably higher than required to produce spindle defects such as
monopolar asters. The fact that overexpression of Plk1 PBD (PBD-GFP) also results in a G2
delay suggested that the inhibition of other Plks was not greatly impacted. However, the
provider of the inhibitor, Selleckchem, has estabilished that the Plk1i BI 2536 can inhibit Plk2
and Plk3 but approximately 5 and 10 fold less, respectively. This is unsurprising as Plk2 and
Plk3 reportedly share only 39 and 36% sequence identity, respectively, to Plk1 over the PBD
residues 410–593, but not Plk4 (Chen et al., 2003). In addition, a more recent publication
showed that the PBD of Plk1-3 have overlapping localisations (Park et al. 2010). Collectively,
it appears that the high concentration of Plk1i used is likely affecting other Plk family
members. As Plk3, like Plk1, can regulate mitotic entry and cytokinesis (Ouyang et al. 1999,
Conn et al. 2000) and Plk3 has been shown to bind to Chk2 causing it to be involved in the G2
checkpoint (Bahassi el et al. 2006) means that the inhibition of Plk3 may be strongly
contributing to the results produced in this study when using high concentrations of Plk1i.
Based on the role of Plk1 and the data gathered it was hypothesised that cyclin A/CDK2 is
phosphorylating Plk1 substrates that direct Plk1 binding to its substrates through the polo
box domain of Plk1. Many Plk1 substrates are known to be phosphorylated by cyclin B/CDK1,
which facilitates Plk1 PBD binding (Yamaguchi et al., 2005, Wu and Liu, 2008, Zhang et al.,
2009b). Initial data has shown that whilst the mitotic localisation of Plk1 is affected by loss of
cyclin A, the G2 phase localisation of PBD was not affected by the loss of CDK2 activity (Figure
7.3), however further studies are required to confirm this data and the loss of Plk1 binding to
specific protein substrates. Cyclin A/CDK2 may be required for Plk1 localisation to a subset of
Plk1 substrates; however it clearly does not contribute to the Plk1 dependent separation of
Chapter 7 –Other cyclin A/CDK2 regulated pathways
242
mother and daughter centrosomes as no monopolar aster phenotype was observed with
cyclin A depletion. A proteomics approach should be undertaken in order to conclusively
determine whether cyclin A/CDK2 affects the binding of Plk1 to specific substrates during G2
phase.
Although the mitotic defects of Plk1 and cyclin A depletion/inhibition may involve as yet
unidentified G2 phase specific roles for Plk1 and cyclin A/CDK2, it may also reflect a
prominent mitotic role for these proteins. The decreased levels and defective localisation of
Plk1 observed in mitotic cells depleted of cyclin A demonstrates that Plk1 is regulated either
directly or indirectly by cyclin A/CDK2 during early mitosis, while cyclin A/CDK2 still has an
active presence. Cyclin A/CDK2 has the ability to regulate Plk1 transcription by the regulation
of FoxM1. If the decreased levels of Plk1 observed in mitosis were due to the inability of
cyclin A/CDK2 to active FoxM1 leading to Plk1 transcription then the effect would have been
seen in G2 phase levels of Plk1. However, it is clear from the data that G2 phase levels of
Plk1 in cyclin A depleted cells were unaffected (Figure 7.2). Interestingly, Wee1 is also
reduced in mitosis rather than in G2 phase. Plk1 is a target of Cdh1 and may account for the
reduction of Plk1 due to regulation of Cdh1 by cyclin A/CDK2. However, Wee1 is not a target
of Cdh1 therefore the reason for reduced Wee1 levels in mitosis is unknown. Although we
have shown that cyclin A/CDK2 depletion/inhibition reduced Cdh1 levels, perhaps the
remaining Cdh1 is more active due to the fact that cyclin A/CDK2 is not present to inhibit
Cdh1 activity, therefore leading to increased reduction of Cdh1 substrates such as Wee1 and
Plk1. The degradation of Plk1 by Cdh1 (Figure 7.5 D) is likely to lead to reduced Plk1 activity,
both of which are required for mitotic exit. Why this occurs in mitosis and not G2 is unknown
Chapter 7 –Other cyclin A/CDK2 regulated pathways
243
and further work is needed to confirm the activity of Cdh1 under these conditions to prove
this hypothesis. Although it is questionable, if Chk1 is able to negatively regulate Plk1 levels
(Tang et al., 2006), this pathway could also have influenced the results obtained at part of
this study.
This current study found that Cdh1 levels were reduced in cyclin A depleted cells, indicating
that this was not the pathway that cyclin A/CDK2 was affecting to cause reduced Plk1 levels.
Once active in G2 phase Plk1 has the ability to regulate its own transcription by the activation
of FoxM1. This only occurs once cyclin B/CDK1 has become active and it phosphorylates
FoxM1 allowing Plk1 to bind to FoxM1 (Fu et al., 2008). It is likely that the delayed activation
of cyclin B/CDK1 caused by cyclin A/CDK2 depletion/inhibition causes Plk1 to be unable to
bind and activate FoxM1, therefore negatively impacting on Plk1 levels. Although this
appears to be the most likely impact of cyclin A/CDK2 levels, it is possible that other
pathways not yet identified to control Plk1 stability are involved. The lack of data involving
Plk1 stability mechanisms may be an indication that this is a likely possibility.
This reduction in Cdh1 levels is unlikely to be an off target effect of the siRNA as other cyclin
A siRNA gave the same result (data not shown). The use of Etoposide demonstrated that the
effect of CDK2i on Cdh1 levels, which took approximately 5 h, was not a result of Cdh1
destabilisation caused by cyclin A/CDK2 depletion/inhibition. Although there is no real
evidence it does suggest a transcriptional effect by cyclin/CDK2 on Cdh1. In addition,
proteasome degradation of Cdh1 is not impacted by cyclin A/CDK2 as Cdh1 levels increased
in the cyclin A depleted cells as well as the controls. However, it cannot be ruled out that the
Chapter 7 –Other cyclin A/CDK2 regulated pathways
244
2 h treatment with proteasome inhibitor, MG132, was not sufficient to allow the complete
recovery of Cdh1 levels. Therefore transcriptional control of Cdh1 by cyclin A/CDK2 may
contribute to the decreased levels of Cdh1, however Cdh1 has also been shown to control its
own degradation via APC/C (Listovsky et al., 2004). This was shown by the introduction of
Cdh1 resulting in the increased degradation of itself (Listovsky et al., 2004). Therefore, if it is
possible that depletion of cyclin A can lead to an increase in Cdh1 activation then this may
coincide with the over stimulation of Cdh1 activity leading to its degradation and overall
decrease in the endogenous levels of Cdh1. Based on cyclin A/CDK2s ability to regulate Plk1
levels, further studies using another impartial Cdh1 substrate is required to understand the
stability of Plk1 and the activity status of Cdh1 at this time point.
Manipulation, both the overexpression and depletion, of Cdh1 levels was ineffective at
reducing the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay. Over expression of Cdh1 levels is capable of
causing a significant delay in mitotic entry and this correlated with its ability to regulate the
stabilisation of several crucial G2/M proteins such as cyclin B1. This study also used the
constitutively active Cdh1 AAA and Cdh1 WT constructs, both of which caused a mitotic
delay. Cdh1 AAA has previously been known to cause a G1/S delay while the WT did so to a
lesser extent (Sorensen et al., 2001) and this may correlate to the difference in Plk1 levels
seen with overexpression. WT overexpression, unlike Cdh1 AAA overexpression, caused a
reduction of Plk1 levels (one of its known targets) that is required for mitotic entry. One
possible explanation for the difference in Plk1 levels is that Plk1 localises to the cytoplasm in
S and G2 phase (Taniguchi et al., 2002), whereas Cdh1 is active within the nucleus, and our
Cdh1 AAA mutant predominantly localises to the nucleus (Zhou et al., 2003). Hence, it is
Chapter 7 –Other cyclin A/CDK2 regulated pathways
245
possible that localisation in separate cellular compartments may underlie the lack of effect
observed. Another important gene that is a reported Cdh1 substrate but was not
investigated in this study due to time constraints and lack of reagents was the transcription
factor FoxM1 (Park et al., 2008). FoxM1 is responsible for the transcription of several G2/M
proteins, such as cyclin B, cyclin A and Cdc25B (Costa, 2005), all of which we found to be
reduced with Cdh1 overexpression. Therefore, Cdh1 overexpression could cause either
increased degradation of its substrates such as cyclin B, and/or a decrease in their
transcription by FoxM1 degradation.
In response to G2 phase DNA damage, Cdh1 degradation of Claspin is blocked. Claspin is
required to promote the activation of Chk1 so that the checkpoint arrest is maintained. Our
data revealed that Claspin levels are increased and required for the activation of pChk1 in
response to cyclin A/CDK2 inhibition. Interestingly, Claspin siRNA could not rescue the
effects of cyclin A siRNA but was able to block the increase in pChk1 normally seen with
cyclin A/CDK2 depletion/inhibition. One possible explanation for this is the rate of DNA
replication, which has been shown to be greatly reduced with Claspin siRNA treatment
(Petermann et al., 2008). Others have also shown a reduced rate of proliferation with Claspin
siRNA (Lin et al., 2004) and therefore this may mask the ability of Claspin to rescue the cyclin
A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay. Further investigation is required to confirm an S phase delay
caused by Claspin depletion.
Claspin stability is governed by several deubiquitination activities. The deubiquitinase, USP7
(Faustrup et al., 2009), which contains several cyclin A binding sites, regulates SCFβTrCP
Chapter 7 –Other cyclin A/CDK2 regulated pathways
246
mediated degradation of Claspin (Mailand et al., 2006, Peschiaroli et al., 2006), whereas
USP28 can regulate the Cdh1 mediation degradation of Claspin (Zhang et al., 2006a,
Bassermann et al., 2008). In addition, Claspin degradation by SCFβTrCP involves PBD binding of
Plk1 which leads to further phosphorylation by Plk1 that promotes further degradation of
Claspin (Peschiaroli et al., 2006). As both cyclin A/CDK2 and Plk1 regulate Claspin levels,
cyclin A/CDK2 may prime Claspin to allow Plk1 PBD binding and degradation. Therefore, loss
of cyclin A/CDK2 activity would ultimately lead to the stabilisation of Claspin. Another
possibility is that the increased stability is an indirect consequence of the cyclin A/CDK2
dependent delayed activation of cyclin B/CDK1. The possibility that cyclin A/CDK2 could
control the deubiquitination enzymes, USP7 and USP28, should also be investigated.
Although the role of Claspin and the G2 phase role of Cdh1 are mostly restricted to the DNA
damage response pathways, the evidence presented here demonstrates roles for both
proteins during a normal G2 phase. In the absence of cyclin A/CDK2 activity increased Claspin
levels sustain pChk1 levels required for the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 phase delay. The
regulation of Claspin stability by cyclin A/CDK may involve its regulation by Plk1, however the
data presented for Cdh1 is more inconclusive. Therefore, further investigation is required to
determine if cyclin A/CDK2 can impact Claspin stability either by 1) affecting Plk1 PBD binding
to Claspin leading to its degradation, 2) cyclin A/CDK2 dependent reduction of Cdh1 levels or
3) cyclin A/CDK2 regulation of deubiquitinases such as USP7 or USP28. Overall, it is likely that
cyclin A/CDK2 is required in multiple pathways to control the stability of Claspin which
governs pChk1 levels and G2 phase progression.
247
Chapter 8
Final Discussion
Chapter 8 – Final Discussion
248
The work presented in the preceding chapters characterised a number of pathways regulated
by cyclin A/CDK2 and their involvement in the co-ordination of G2/M progression. The basis
for this study was to demonstrate the role for cyclin A/CDK2 during G2 phase progression.
We and others had demonstrated that depletion of cyclin A or inhibition of CDK2 delayed
progression through G2 phase (Fung et al., 2007, Gong et al., 2007a, De Boer et al., 2008).
Although KO MEFs demonstrate redundancies of Cdks and cyclins the somatic function of
cyclin A/CDK2 is not definitively clear from this model and the work in this thesis has
established the importance of cyclin A/CDK2 activity in the regulation of the timing of
progression from G2 phase into mitosis. Loss of cyclin A/CDK2 activity delayed the activation
of cyclin B/CDK1 and as demonstrated in Chapter 3 resulted in loss of the coordination of
centrosomal and nuclear mitotic events associated with cyclin B/CDK1 activity. Additionally,
Chapter 4 demonstrates that cyclin A/CDK2 also controls the recovery from the G2 phase
checkpoint arrest and progression into mitosis.
Chk1, a major contributor to the G2 phase checkpoint, is now known to be involved in
normal G2 phase progression (Jiang et al., 2003, Schmitt et al., 2006, Matsuyama et al.,
2011). Based on its established roles, Chk1 contribution towards the cyclin A/CDK2
dependent G2 delay was investigated. Having had established that pChk1 was present not
only during normal G2 phase progression but also with cyclin A/CDK2 depletion/inhibition,
the ability of cyclin A/CDK2 to regulate Chk1 was investigated. Previously, studies had
demonstrated that CDK1 phosphorylated Chk1 on Ser286 and Ser301 to cause inhibition in
mitosis. Therefore the hypothesis that cyclin A/CDK2 could phosphorylate Chk1 during G2
phase was formulated. Cyclin A/CDK2 phosphorylated Chk1 in in vitro kinase assays however
Chapter 8 – Final Discussion
249
the in vivo data did not support this. Others have published that CDK2 can phosphorylate
Chk1 on Ser286 and 301 in vitro (Ikegami et al., 2008). However, in combination with other
data from this study, it appeared more likely that cyclin B/CDK1 was the main kinase required
to phosphorylate Chk1 Ser286 and Ser301 in G2 phase and mitosis. Nevertheless, the timed
activation of cyclin B/CDK1, which is cyclin A/CDK2 dependent, may account for results that
show a small effect of cyclin A/CDK2 depletion/inhibition on these phosphorylation sites.
There is also the possibility that for a brief time in G2 phase cyclin A/CDK2 is required to
directly and initially phosphorylate Ser286 and Ser301. Further investigations are required to
determine the direct involvement of cyclin A/CDK2 but regardless of the kinase/s involved
there is strong evidence to suggest that these phosphorylations contribute to Chk1
inactivation which facilitates G2/M progression and G2 phase checkpoint arrest.
The effect of Chk1 Ser286 and Ser301 phosphorylation on G2/M progression, the G2
checkpoint and regulation of Chk1 localisation was investigated as part of this study.
Phosphorylation of Ser286 and Ser301 has been reported to lead to translocation of Chk1
from the nucleus to the cytoplasm (Enomoto et al., 2009). Under normal circumstances, Chk1
is reported to be predominantly located within the nucleus (Matsuyama et al., 2011). In
response to DNA damage an increase in activating phosphorylations (Ser317 and 345)
coincides with an influx of Chk1 into the nucleus. Dephosphorylation of Ser317 and Ser345
can be catalysed by PP2A (Leung-Pineda et al., 2006, Li et al., 2007), and is thought to
facilitate translocation of Chk1 into the cytoplasm and promote Chk1 inhibition that is
required for checkpoint recovery as well as unperturbed mitotic progression. The exact
timing of these events remains unclear and the length of time Chk1 must be phosphorylated
Chapter 8 – Final Discussion
250
on Ser286 and Ser301 to ensure dephosphorylation of Ser317 and Ser345 by PP2A, required
for mitosis, is unknown. As shown in earlier results, minimal Ser317 phosphorylation was
detected in mitosis, and published data has shown that activating phosphorylations, Ser317
and Ser345, and inhibitory phosphorylations, Ser286 and Ser301 can occur on the same Chk1
molecule during mitosis (Ikegami et al., 2008). Therefore, it is likely that both
phosphorylation events, activating and inhibitory, occur prior to mitotic entry. The theory
that phosphorylation of Ser286 and Ser301 can overcome Chk1 activation leading to Chk1
inhibition and mitotic entry, means that although the phosphorylated state of Ser317 and
Ser345 may be a surrogate of activity it may not be a marker of Chk1 activation during G2/M
phase progression. Consequently the dephosphorylation of Ser317 and Ser345 is likely to
occur at some time during mitosis. Additional work is essential to uncover the
phosphorylation status of Chk1 during specific stages of the cell cycle as the regulation of
Chk1 activity continues to be shown as a complex process (Wang et al. 2012). In fact the
contribution of Ser286 and Ser301 phosphorylation of Chk1 was shown recently to be
present and required to implement a checkpoint in response to DNA damage (Xu et al.,
2012). Although much of the work conducted in this study was used to determine the role
and regulation of Chk1 during G2/M by using overexpression vectors, it is evident that they
were not ideal for use in cell cycle investigational studies. In addition, the synchronisation
methods commonly used for cell cycle studies, such as this, never provide a solid
representation of all cells within the exact same phase of the cell cycle and although it is the
most ideal model available it cannot deliver the perfect results required. The model in Figure
Chapter 8 – Final Discussion
251
Figure 8.1 Model of Chk1 regulation during G2/M progression.
In G2 phase ATM/ATR phosphorylates Chk1 on Ser317 and Ser345. During late G2 phase, Chk1
phosphorylation on Ser286 and Ser301 may involve either cyclin B/CDK1 phosphorylation, governed
by the cyclin A/CDK2 regulation of cyclin B/CDK1, or possibly via direct phosphorylation by cyclin
A/CDK2 itself. Once phosphorylated in late G2 phase the removal of phosphorylations Ser317 and
Ser345 is likely catalysed by PP2A in the nucleus and leads to Chk1 inactivation and translocation into
the cytoplasm. Continued phosphorylation of Ser286 and Ser301 during mitosis (after cyclin A/CDK2
degradation) is solely dependent on cyclin B/CDK1 activity. Phosphorylation of Ser286 and Ser301 by
cyclin A/CDK2 is unknown and therefore is indicated by a dashed arrow.
Chapter 8 – Final Discussion
252
8.1 summarises the results obtained from this study and the hypothesised mode of Chk1
regulation in G2/M progression.
Claspin is a known adapter protein required for Chk1 phosphorylation. The ability of cyclin
A/CDK2 to regulate Claspin levels was a novel finding of this study. Additional work by an
Honours student that I supervised confirmed that both cyclin A depletion and CDK2
inhibition, stabilised Claspin levels (data not shown). Claspin influences the activation of Chk1
in response to DNA damage and stabilisation of Claspin has been shown to be responsible for
pChk1s involvement in response to DNA damage (Kumagai and Dunphy, 2000, Liu et al.,
2006, Wang et al., 2006, Bassermann et al., 2008, Lindsey-Boltz et al., 2009). During the cell
cycle, endogenous Claspin levels follow a similar pattern to pChk1 levels, and are highest in S
and G2 phases and drop off once cells begin to enter M phase (Mamely et al., 2006). The role
of Claspin in S phase will most likely be the reason for delayed mitotic entry caused by
Claspin siRNA (Figure 7.8 C) and hence why Claspin siRNA could not overcome cyclin A
depletion and/or CDK2 inhibition to the same extent as Chk1 siRNA treatment.
Recently, Claspin stability was shown to be involved in the release of cells from the G2
checkpoint arrest. During a G2 checkpoint arrest, Claspin is active and mediates the
activation of Chk1 whilst during recovery Claspin must be degraded by SCFβTrCP or APCCdh1
(Mailand et al., 2006, Mamely et al., 2006, Peschiaroli et al., 2006, Bassermann et al., 2008).
Addition of caffeine, and to a lesser extent Chk1 inhibitor, was unable to force G2 checkpoint
exit in cyclin A depleted cells and suggests the role of Claspin during the G2 checkpoint is not
the only pathway regulated by cyclin A/CDK2.The degradation of Claspin by the SCFβTrCP
Chapter 8 – Final Discussion
253
ubiquitin ligase during checkpoint recovery has been shown to be Plk1 dependent (Mailand
et al., 2006, Mamely et al., 2006, Peschiaroli et al., 2006, Bassermann et al., 2008). Plk1
regulates Claspin degradation (Mailand et al., 2006, Mamely et al., 2006, Peschiaroli et al.,
2006) by generating phosphodegrons required for βTrCP binding. Plk1 targets Claspin as well
as other targets such as Wee1 for degradation during the G2/M transition (Ang and Harper,
2004, Hansen et al., 2004, Moshe et al., 2004) and therefore also facilitates checkpoint
recovery. Plk1 inhibition necessary for the G2 checkpoint is ATM/ATR dependent (van Vugt et
al., 2001, Tsvetkov and Stern, 2005) and recovery from the checkpoint requires activation of
Plk1 by Aurora A. FoxM1 is responsible for the transcription of Plk1 and other G2 phase
proteins, such as cyclin B and Cdc25B that are required for mitotic entry. FoxM1 is positively
regulated by cyclin A/CDK2 phosphorylation and PP2A antagonises cyclin A/CDK2 activation
by dephosphorylation of FoxM1 (Laoukili et al., 2008b, Alvarez-Fernandez et al., 2011). The
possibility that cyclin A/CDK2 regulates FoxM1 transcription of Plk1 during G2 phase thereby
controlling the normal increase in Plk1 levels required for mitotic entry has been
investigated. The G2 phase protein levels of Plk1, cyclin B and Cdc25B appeared unchanged
in cyclin A depleted G2 phase samples. It is impossible to comment that all G2/M genes
dependent on FoxM1 activity are affected by a loss of cyclin A/CDK2, as conclusions can only
be made for those proteins investigated but it is suggested that the effects of cyclin A/CDK2
on FoxM1 activity require further attention. Cyclin A/CDK2 regulation of FoxM1 occurs in G2
phase and based on published work is likely to be required for checkpoint recovery (Laoukili
et al., 2008b, Alvarez-Fernandez et al., 2010). Although blocking cyclin A/CDK2 activation was
shown to be required for checkpoint arrest (Goldstone et al., 2001), a small portion of cyclin
Chapter 8 – Final Discussion
254
Figure 8.2 Claspin involvement and regulation during G2/M.
During G2 or the G2 checkpoint, Claspin is required for the ATR dependent activation of Chk1 (top
half of figure). During mitotic progression/checkpoint recovery (bottom half of figure) Plk1
phosphorylates Claspin and promotes degradation of Claspin by SCFβTrCP or APCCdh1 (dependent on the
type of stress that induces the G2 checkpoint). As indicated , cyclin A/CDK2 has the potential to
regulate Claspin levels during mitotic progression/checkpoint recovery. The mode of this regulation is
not yet clearly defined but may involve Plk1 regulation via FoxM1 or by other yet unknown
pathway/s. The grey colour specifies pathways, events, regulation of proteins that are blocked or not
functioning at that time point.
Chapter 8 – Final Discussion
255
A/CDK2 remains active specifically to activate FoxM1, to facilitate checkpoint recovery.
Whether the expression of FoxM1 dependent genes is affected when a G2 checkpoint is
activated in cells depleted of cyclin A/CDK2 was not determined, therefore further
information regarding FoxM1 activation is required to determine the pathways involved in
G2 phase checkpoint recovery. In addition there is evidence that Plk1 has the ability to
regulate FoxM1 activity and is dependent of CDK1 priming of FoxM1 (Fu et al., 2008). The
investigation of the mechanisms of FoxM1 regulation may be more difficult to determine due
to the normal changes in Plk1 levels seen upon mitotic entry and the evident delay of mitotic
entry caused by cyclin A/CDK2 depletion/inhibition. The overall contribution of the pathway
towards Claspin stability and the level of Claspin required to control checkpoint
recovery/mitotic progression is unknown, however Figure 8.2 below encompasses the
hypothesised pathways involved.
A possible mechanism for cyclin A/CDK2 regulation of Claspin stability is via regulation of
deubiquitinases that contribute to Claspin stability. During the G2 phase checkpoint
Bassermann et al. (2008) found that Claspin stability is protected from APCCdh1 degradation
by the action of USP28 (Ubiquitin-specific-processing protease 28). In addition to USP28,
USP7 is capable of binding and regulating Claspin stability also and has been found to protect
Claspin degradation by SCFβTrCP in response to stress (Faustrup et al., 2009). Although there is
currently no data that shows cyclin/CDK regulation of USP7 or USP28, USP28 can be
regulated by phosphorylation. USP28 is phosphorylated in an ATM-dependent manner and
can stabilise Chk2 in the absence or presence of damage such as IR (Zhang et al., 2006a). This
suggests that USP28 has a basal level of activity during an unperturbed cell cycle. Recent
Chapter 8 – Final Discussion
256
data from the Gabrielli lab has demonstrated that USP7 depletion rescues a cyclin A/CDK2
dependent reduction of Claspin levels and Chk1 activation (data not shown). This would
suggest that USP7 is involved in the regulation of Claspin and thereby pChk1 levels. To date
there are no reports of direct cyclin A/CDK2 regulation of the USP family and the Gabrielli
Laboratory have also been unable to show direct cyclin A/CDK2 interaction with USP7,
however further investigation is needed to reveal the mode of regulation.
Once Plk1 is active, how does the affinity of Plk1 for Claspin increase so as to promote
Claspin degradation? Interestingly, ATR phosphorylates Claspin in Xenopus, which facilitates
Plk1 docking to Claspin and thereby causing Chk1 inactivation and termination of the
checkpoint (Yoo et al., 2004). This has not yet been shown in a mammalian system, and the
kinase responsible remains unknown. The possibility that cyclin A/CDK2 was responsible for
priming Claspin for Plk1 binding was investigated due to the similarity between the Plk1
binding site and CDK2 phosphorylation site, but no evidence for a role of cyclin A/CDK2 in
promoting Plk1 binding to Claspin could be determined. However, the fact that cyclin A/CDK2
appeared to regulate Claspin levels suggested cyclin A/CDK2 could directly influence Claspin
levels by priming it for Plk1 dependent degradation. The localisation of Plk1 was used as an
indicator of cyclin A/CDK2 ability to prime Plk1 substrates. Although immunofluorescence
data suggested that cyclin A/CDK2 can control Plk1 localisation, it did not specifically
demonstrate Plk1 binding to particular substrates, such as Claspin. Additional
immunoprecipitation methods carried out by an Honours student at the time, Brittney
Harrington, confirmed that Plk1 and Claspin binding was not affected by cyclin A/CDK2 in G2
phase instead it appeared to be disrupted in mitosis only (data not shown). We have
Chapter 8 – Final Discussion
257
previously shown that cyclin A/CDK2 has a role in mitosis and this was to control the
phosphorylation of APC (adenomatous polyposis coli) and proper spindle assembly (Beamish
et al., 2009). Preliminary evidence in the laboratory has shown Plk1 can bind APC, but
whether the interaction is cyclin A/CDK2 dependent is currently inconclusive. Why the
interaction between Claspin and Plk1 is more greatly impacted, by a loss of cyclin A/CDK2, in
mitosis rather that G2 phase is currently unknown. Proteomics analysis of Plk1 substrates
affected by cyclin A/CDK2 depletion/inhibition has been conducted but to date has not
revealed any Plk1 binding proteins that are specifically dependent on cyclin A/CDK2
phosphorylation.
Work from the Gabrielli group and others have shown that Cdc25B and Plk1 have critical
roles during the G2 checkpoint. Inhibition of either Cdc25B or Plk1 blocks cells exiting the G2
phase checkpoint and also delays normal mitotic progression (van Vugt et al., 2004a).
Cdc25B-dependent G2 phase activation of cyclin A/CDK2 is blocked during the checkpoint
(Goldstone et al 2001). Reports have shown that a small portion of cyclin A/CDK2 remains
active and is required for the exit of cells from the checkpoint (Goldstone et al., 2001,
Alvarez-Fernandez et al., 2010, Duursma and Cimprich, 2010), therefore this could be the
reason why Cdc25B inhibition blocks checkpoint exit. The exact role of Plk1 in normal G2/M
progression is less clear than for Cdc25B. The question that arises is whether Plk1 is involved
in the same pathway/s as cyclin A/CDK2 during the G2 checkpoint and if its prominent role is
to implement the arrest or to block recovery or both? The role of Plk1 in checkpoint
recovery is to initiate the degradation of Wee1 and Claspin. There is evidence that CDK1 may
prime Wee1 for Plk1 binding to mediate its degradation. To date, it appears that Claspin
Chapter 8 – Final Discussion
258
stability is dependent on cyclin A/CDK2 activity, however direct priming of Claspin by cyclin
A/CDK2 to allow Plk1 binding is unknown. The fact that Plk1 overexpression cannot
overcome the effects of cyclin A depletion (Figure 7.1 and 7.2) and that the overexpression of
a PBD construct blocks cells in G2 phase, may reflect cyclin A/CDK2s ability to prime Plk1
substrates such as Wee1 and Claspin. However, others have reported that constitutively
active Plk1 can bypass the G2 checkpoint (Smits et al., 2000) and although this refutes the
suggestion that cyclin A/CDK2 is required to prime Plk1 substrates, perhaps the portion of
cyclin A/CDK2 that remains active during the checkpoint is sufficient to prime Plk1 substrates.
There is also the possibility that cyclin A/CDK2 is initially required to implement the arrest by
inhibiting Plk1 prior to regulating Plk1 localisation, explaining the observation that
constitutively active Plk1 can overcome the checkpoint. As mentioned previously, a reduction
in the activating phosphorylation of Plk1 (pT210) in G2 phase could not be accurately
assessed with the reagents available and little is known about the mechanisms that govern
Plk1 activity, except that its activation requires Aurora A activation (Macurek et al., 2008,
Seki et al., 2008b). Work done in the Gabrielli laboratory has ruled out cyclin A/CDK2s ability
to affect Aurora A activity under these circumstances, based on a lack of monospindle asters
in cyclin A depleted cells which are typical of Plk1 inhibition (Sunkel and Glover, 1988,
Llamazares et al., 1991, Lane and Nigg, 1996, Qian et al., 1998, Sumara et al., 2004, McInnes
et al., 2006, Lenart et al., 2007,) and Aurora A inhibition ( Glover et al., 1995, Roghi et al.,
1998, Berdnik and Knoblich, 2002, Hoar et al., 2007) (data not shown). However, the delay of
cyclin B/CDK1 activation at the centrosomes caused by cyclin A depletion/ CDK2 inhibition
could be a consequence of an indirect disruption to the regulation of Cdc25B by Aurora A,
Chapter 8 – Final Discussion
259
although this was not investigated as part of this study. The reduction of Plk1 activating
phosphorylation levels in mitosis caused by cyclin A depletion suggested that cyclin A/CDK2 is
able to regulate Plk1 protein levels. Plk1 proteolysis is required for proper mitotic exit and is
initiated by APCCdc20 and is completed by APCCdh1 in late mitosis. Although this study has
provided evidence for cyclin A/CDK2 regulation of Cdh1, the data does not entirely support
the regulation of Plk1 being temporally coordinated by this mechanism of Cdh1 regulation;
further work is clearly required to determine the exact effects that cyclin A/CDK2 may have
on Cdh1 activity and therefore its ability to regulate Plk1 levels.
Wee1 catalyses the inhibitory Tyr15 phosphorylation of CDK1/2 and was recently found to be
negatively regulated by cyclin A/CDK. In particular, cyclin A/CDK phosphorylates and inhibits
Wee1, and as a consequence affects G2/M progression (For an overview see Figure 8.3). An
Alanine mutant of this phosphorylation site on Wee1 blocks CDK inhibition and therefore
inhibits G2/M progression (Li et al., 2010). Wee1 is degraded upon mitotic entry via a βTrCP-
dependent mechanism and requires CDK1 or Plk1 phosphorylation for recognition by βTrCP
(van Vugt et al., 2004a, Smith et al., 2007). The possibility that cyclin A/CDK2 phosphorylation
of Wee1 leads to Wee1 degradation was not shown by Li et al 2010. however this may have
been obscured by the overexpression setting used. The regulation of Wee1 could be an
important contributor to the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay, where phosphorylation of
Wee1 by cyclin A/CDK2 could lead to Plk1 binding and Plk1 dependent SCFβTrCP degradation.
However, recent work from the Gabrielli lab has failed to detect any cyclin A/CDK2-
dependent Polobox domain binding within Wee1, although it may be that other regions of
Plk1 in addition to the Polobox are required for the cyclin A/CDK2-dependent binding.
Chapter 8 – Final Discussion
260
A recurrent theme of this study was that the data provided insight into the pathways
involved in the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay, but the data did not identify a dominant
pathway that accounted for cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 phase progression. This is thought
to be a result of the timing at which these events are being analysed. As a tightly regulated
and timed process the cell cycle is difficult to study and although the synchronisation
methods generate certain information about the pathways involved, it is not an exact
representation of the events occurring at a particular time point in the cell cycle. The cell line
predominantly used in this study was the HeLa cell line. These cells are used because of their
ideal cell cycle profile but unfortunately they have diminished levels of the important cell
cycle genes p53 and Rb (Hamada et al., 1996). Unlike Rb which functions during G1/S and
G1/S checkpoint, p53 does have roles during G2 phase however its roles appear to be
independent of the cyclin A/CDK2 delay as NFF cells, with functional p53, do delay in G2
phase. The cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay in NFF cells also caused an accumulation of
pChk1 (data not shown) and suggests that p53 is not involved in this cyclin A/CDK2 G2/M
regulated pathway. However, p53 has an established role during the G2 phase checkpoint
which can be impacted by a loss of cyclin A/CDK2 activity and therefore this may impact the
dependency that HeLa cells have on cyclin A/CDK2 during a G2 checkpoint arrest. In response
to IR, human cells without CDK2 rely on p53 dependent activation of the G2 checkpoint and
inversely cells without p53 rely on CDK2 dependent G2 checkpoint activation (Chung and
Bunz, 2010). The p53 dependent signalling occurs independently of ATR/ATM signalling
through p21 dependent inhibition of cyclin B/CDK1 to block mitotic entry. It is unknown if
HeLa cells have compensatory pathways used to control the G2 checkpoint in the absence of
Chapter 8 – Final Discussion
261
CDK2 as they lack functional p53. If not, this could account for the noticeable portion of cell
death in G2 phase arrested HeLa cells treated with cyclin A/CDK2 siRNA/inhibitor and forced
to exit the checkpoint with the addition of caffeine or Chk1 inhibitor (data not shown).
All of the proteins mentioned have established roles in both an unperturbed cell cycle as well
as the G2 checkpoint. The ATR-Claspin-Chk1 pathway is critical during the G2 checkpoint and
this study has also strongly confirmed its involvement during an unperturbed cell cycle. The
role of Chk1 during an unperturbed cell cycle appears to resemble its function during the G2
checkpoint. However, there are some checkpoint pathways that act differently during normal
cell cycle progression. For example, depletion of Cdc25B and Plk1 does not affect
unperturbed mitotic entry to the same extent as mitotic entry following checkpoint recovery
suggesting a difference in pathways utilised (van Vugt et al., 2004a). Therefore it cannot be
assumed that a protein’s checkpoint function and unperturbed cell cycle function are the
same in both situations. Chk1 involvement in the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay was
linked to the mediating protein Claspin. The regulation of Claspin in this pathway may involve
Plk1 dependent degradation by SCF. However, further investigation is needed, as cyclin
A/CDK2 appeared to only regulate Plk1 in M phase. Mitotic effects on Wee1 levels were also
noticed in cyclin A/CDK2 depleted/inhibited samples and may also involve Plk1 dependent
SCF degradation. The mitotic pathways affected by cyclin A/CDK2 were not examined as part
of this study but may be linked to the defective mitoses commonly observed in cyclin A/CDK2
depleted/inhibited samples (Beamish et al., 2009). Experimentation to determine Cdh1
involvement in the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2 delay was conclusive but showed only a
minor role for Cdh1. The preliminary evidence (data not shown) suggests that Cdh1 is
Chapter 8 – Final Discussion
262
involved in the regulation of Chk1 levels required for the delay via Claspin regulation. It may
be that Cdh1 regulation of Claspin stability contributes to increased pChk1 levels seen with
cyclin A/CDK2 depletion/inhibition. Although a reduction in Cdh1 levels was observed in
cyclin A/CDK2 depleted/inhibited samples, further informative data regarding the activity
status of Cdh1 is necessary to provide further insight into its involvement. Overall, there was
no sole dominant pathway identified that was involved in the cyclin A/CDK2 dependent G2
delay. It is apparent from this study that the master regulator of G2, cyclin A/CDK2, regulates
many pathways during G2 which consequently are affected when a loss of cyclin A/CDK2
activity occurs. The model in Figure 8.3 demonstrates some of the many pathways regulated
by cyclin A/CDK2 in G2/M. Much of this model is suggestive (Figure 8.3; dashed lines) and
additional work is required to confirm the exact role of these pathways in both the
checkpoint and unperturbed G2/M progression.
Chapter 8 – Final Discussion
263
Figure 8.3 A simplified schematic of G2 regulation involving cyclin A/CDK2.
Dashed lines indicate degradation pathways influenced by Cdh1 and Plk1 or FoxM1 transcription.
Some pathways may have more prominent roles during either an unperturbed G2/M progression or
G2 checkpoint but have not been excluded for their involvement in either of these processes. The
boxes indicate the G2/M proteins that are regulated by Cdh1 and FoxM1 that are most likely
regulated by cyclin A/CDK2.
264
Chapter 9
References
Chapter 9 – References
265
AGAMI, R. & BERNARDS, R. 2000. Distinct initiation and maintenance mechanisms cooperate
to induce G1 cell cycle arrest in response to DNA damage. Cell, 102, 55-66.
AHONEN, L. J., KALLIO, M. J., DAUM, J. R., BOLTON, M., MANKE, I. A., YAFFE, M. B.,
STUKENBERG, P. T. & GORBSKY, G. J. 2005. Polo-like kinase 1 creates the tension-sensing
3F3/2 phosphoepitope and modulates the association of spindle-checkpoint proteins at
kinetochores. Current biology : CB, 15, 1078-89.
ALBERTS, D. S., EINSPAHR, J., AICKIN, M., HIXSON, L., EARNEST, D., ROE, D. & POWELL, M.
1994. Validation of proliferation indices as surrogate endpoint biomarkers. Journal of cellular
biochemistry. Supplement, 19, 76-83.
ALVAREZ-FERNANDEZ, M., HALIM, V. A., APRELIA, M., LAOUKILI, J., MOHAMMED, S. &
MEDEMA, R. H. 2011. Protein phosphatase 2A (B55alpha) prevents premature activation of
forkhead transcription factor FoxM1 by antagonizing cyclin A/cyclin-dependent kinase-
mediated phosphorylation. The Journal of biological chemistry, 286, 33029-36.
ALVAREZ-FERNANDEZ, M., HALIM, V. A., KRENNING, L., APRELIA, M., MOHAMMED, S., HECK,
A. J. & MEDEMA, R. H. 2010a. Recovery from a DNA-damage-induced G2 arrest requires Cdk-
dependent activation of FoxM1. EMBO reports, 11, 452-8.
ALVAREZ-FERNANDEZ, M. & MEDEMA, R. H. 2010b. A new role for Cdks in the DNA damage
response. Cell Cycle, 9, 2915-6.
ALVAREZ, E., NORTHWOOD, I. C., GONZALEZ, F. A., LATOUR, D. A., SETH, A., ABATE, C.,
CURRAN, T. & DAVIS, R. J. 1991. Pro-Leu-Ser/Thr-Pro is a consensus primary sequence for
substrate protein phosphorylation. Characterization of the phosphorylation of c-myc and c-
jun proteins by an epidermal growth factor receptor threonine 669 protein kinase. The
Journal of biological chemistry, 266, 15277-85.
AMON, A. 1999. The spindle checkpoint. Current Opinion in Genetics and Development, 9, 69-
75.
ANDREWS, P. D., KNATKO, E., MOORE, W. J. & SWEDLOW, J. R. 2003. Mitotic mechanics: the
auroras come into view. Current opinion in cell biology, 15, 672-83.
ANG, X. L. & HARPER, J. W. 2004. Interwoven ubiquitination oscillators and control of cell
cycle transitions. Science's STKE : signal transduction knowledge environment, 2004, pe31.
ARELLANO, M. & MORENO, S. 1997. Regulation of CDK/cyclin complexes during the cell cycle.
The International Journal of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, 29, 559-73.
Chapter 9 – References
266
ASTERITI, I. A., GIUBETTINI, M., LAVIA, P. & GUARGUAGLINI, G. 2011. Aurora-A inactivation
causes mitotic spindle pole fragmentation by unbalancing microtubule-generated forces.
Molecular cancer, 10, 131.
ASTUTI, P., PIKE, T., WIDBERG, C., PAYNE, E., HARDING, A., HANCOCK, J. & GABRIELLI, B.
2009. MAPK pathway activation delays G2/M progression by destabilizing Cdc25B. The
Journal of biological chemistry, 284, 33781-8.
ASTUTI, P., BOUTROS, R., DUCOMMUN, B. & GABRIELLI, B. 2010. Mitotic phosphorylation of
Cdc25B Ser321 disrupts 14-3-3 binding to the high affinity Ser323 site. The Journal of
biological chemistry, 285, 34364-70.
ASTUTI, P., GABRIELLI, B. 2011. Phosphorylation of Cdc25B3 Ser169 regulates 14-3-3 binding
to Ser151 and Cdc25B activity. Cell Cycle, 10 (12), 1960-7.
AYAD, N. G., RANKIN, S., MURAKAMI, M., JEBANATHIRAJAH, J., GYGI, S. & KIRSCHNER, M. W.
2003. Tome-1, a trigger of mitotic entry, is degraded during G1 via the APC. Cell, 113, 101-13.
BACHE, M., DUNST, J., WURL, P., FRODE, D., MEYE, A., SCHMIDT, H., RATH, F. W. & TAUBERT,
H. 1999. G2/M checkpoint is p53-dependent and independent after irradiation in five human
sarcoma cell lines. Anticancer research, 19, 1827-32.
BAHASSI EL, M., MYER, D.L., MCKENNEY, R.J., HENNIGAN, R.F., STAMBROOK, P.J. 2006.
Priming phosphorylation of Chk2 by polo-like kinase 3 (Plk3) mediates its full activation of
ATM and a downstream checkpoint in response to DNA damage. Mutat Res, 596(1-2), 166-
76.
BAILLY, E., PINES, J., HUNTER, T. & BORNENS, M. 1992. Cytoplasmic accumulation of cyclin B1
in human cells: association with a detergent-resistant compartment and with the
centrosome. Journal of cell science, 101 ( Pt 3), 529-45.
BAKKENIST, C. J. & KASTAN, M. B. 2003. DNA damage activates ATM through intermolecular
autophosphorylation and dimer dissociation. Nature, 421, 499-506.
BALDIN, V., CANS, C., SUPERTI-FURGA, G. & DUCOMMUN, B. 1997. Alternative splicing of the
human CDC25B tyrosine phosphatase. Possible implications for growth control? Oncogene,
14, 2485-95.
BALDIN, V. & DUCOMMUN, B. 1995. Subcellular localisation of human wee1 kinase is
regulated during the cell cycle. Journal of cell science, 108 ( Pt 6), 2425-32.
Chapter 9 – References
267
BALL, H. L., MYERS, J. S. & CORTEZ, D. 2005. ATRIP binding to replication protein A-single-
stranded DNA promotes ATR-ATRIP localization but is dispensable for Chk1 phosphorylation.
Molecular Biology of the Cell, 16, 2372-81.
BANIN, S., MOYAL, L., SHIEH, S., TAYA, Y., ANDERSON, C. W., CHESSA, L., SMORODINSKY, N. I.,
PRIVES, C., REISS, Y., SHILOH, Y. & ZIV, Y. 1998. Enhanced phosphorylation of p53 by ATM in
response to DNA damage. Science, 281, 1674-7.
BARLOW, C., HIROTSUNE, S., PAYLOR, R., LIYANAGE, M., ECKHAUS, M., COLLINS, F., SHILOH,
Y., CRAWLEY, J. N., RIED, T., TAGLE, D. & WYNSHAW-BORIS, A. 1996. Atm-deficient mice: a
paradigm of ataxia telangiectasia. Cell, 86, 159-71.
BARR, F. A., SILLJE, H. H. & NIGG, E. A. 2004. Polo-like kinases and the orchestration of cell
division. Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology, 5, 429-40.
BASSERMANN, F., FRESCAS, D., GUARDAVACCARO, D., BUSINO, L., PESCHIAROLI, A. &
PAGANO, M. 2008. The Cdc14B-Cdh1-Plk1 axis controls the G2 DNA-damage-response
checkpoint. Cell, 134, 256-67.
BEAMISH, H., DE BOER, L., GILES, N., STEVENS, F., OAKES, V. & GABRIELLI, B. 2009. Cyclin
A/cdk2 regulates adenomatous polyposis coli-dependent mitotic spindle anchoring. The
Journal of biological chemistry, 284, 29015-23.
BEAMISH, H., WILLIAMS, R., CHEN, P. & LAVIN, M. F. 1996. Defect in multiple cell cycle
checkpoints in ataxia-telangiectasia postirradiation. The Journal of biological chemistry, 271,
20486-93.
BENMAAMAR, R. & PAGANO, M. 2005. Involvement of the SCF complex in the control of
Cdh1 degradation in S-phase. Cell Cycle, 4, 1230-2.
BENNETT, L. N. & CLARKE, P. R. 2006. Regulation of Claspin degradation by the ubiquitin-
proteosome pathway during the cell cycle and in response to ATR-dependent checkpoint
activation. FEBS letters, 580, 4176-81.
BENNETT, L. N., LARKIN, C., GILLESPIE, D. A. & CLARKE, P. R. 2008. Claspin is phosphorylated
in the Chk1-binding domain by a kinase distinct from Chk1. Biochemical and biophysical
research communications, 369, 973-6.
BENNETT, C.N., TOMLINSON, C.C., MICHALOWSKI, A.M., CHU, I.M., LUGER, D., MITTEREDER,
L.R., APRELIKOVA, O., SHUO, J., PIWINICA-WORMS, H., CAPLEN, N.J., HOLLINGSHEAD, M.G.,
GREEN, J.E. 2012. Cross-species genomic and functional analyses identify a combination
Chapter 9 – References
268
therapy using a CHK1 inhibotr and ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor to treat triple-negative
breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research, 14(4), R109.
BERDNIK, D. & KNOBLICH, J. A. 2002. Drosophila Aurora-A is required for centrosome
maturation and actin-dependent asymmetric protein localization during mitosis. Current
biology : CB, 12, 640-7.
BERTHET, C., ALEEM, E., COPPOLA, V., TESSAROLLO, L. & KALDIS, P. 2003. Cdk2 knockout
mice are viable. Current biology : CB, 13, 1775-85.
BLANCO, M. A., SANCHEZ-DIAZ, A., DE PRADA, J. M. & MORENO, S. 2000. APC(ste9/srw1)
promotes degradation of mitotic cyclins in G(1) and is inhibited by cdc2 phosphorylation. The
EMBO journal, 19, 3945-55.
BLASINA, A., DE WEYER, I. V., LAUS, M. C., LUYTEN, W. H., PARKER, A. E. & MCGOWAN, C. H.
1999. A human homologue of the checkpoint kinase Cds1 directly inhibits Cdc25
phosphatase. Current Biology, 9, 1-10.
BODDY, M. N., FURNARI, B., MONDESERT, O. & RUSSELL, P. 1998. Replication checkpoint
enforced by kinases Cds1 and Chk1. Science, 280, 909-12.
BODE, A. M. & DONG, Z. 2006. Molecular and cellular targets. Molecular carcinogenesis, 45,
422-30.
BODE, A. M. & DONG, Z. 2007. The enigmatic effects of caffeine in cell cycle and cancer.
Cancer letters, 247, 26-39.
BONNET, J., COOPMAN, P. & MORRIS, M. C. 2008. Characterization of centrosomal
localization and dynamics of Cdc25C phosphatase in mitosis. Cell Cycle, 7, 1991-8.
BOUTROS, R., LOBJOIS, V. & DUCOMMUN, B. 2007. CDC25 phosphatases in cancer cells: key
players? Good targets? Nature reviews. Cancer, 7, 495-507.
BRADHAM, C. & MCCLAY, D. R. 2006. p38 MAPK in Development and Cancer. Cell Cycle, 5,
824-8.
BRANDEIS, M. & HUNT, T. 1996. The proteolysis of mitotic cyclins in mammalian cells persists
from the end of mitosis until the onset of S phase. The EMBO journal, 15, 5280-9.
BRANDEIS, M., ROSEWELL, I., CARRINGTON, M., CROMPTON, T., JACOBS, M.A., KIRK, J., GANNON, J., HUNT, T. 1998. Cyclin B2-null mice develop normally and are infertile whereas cyclin B1-null mice die in utero. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 95(8):4344-9.
Chapter 9 – References
269
BRINKLEY, B. R. 2001. Managing the centrosome numbers game: from chaos to stability in
cancer cell division. Trends in cell biology, 11, 18-21.
BRONDELLO, J. M., BODDY, M. N., FURNARI, B. & RUSSELL, P. 1999. Basis for the checkpoint
signal specificity that regulates Chk1 and Cds1 protein kinases. Molecular and cellular
biology, 19, 4262-9.
BROOKS, K., OAKES, V., EDWARDS, B., RANALL, M., LEO, P., PAVEY, S., PINDER, A., BEAMISH,
H., MUKHOPADHYAY, P., LAMBIE, D. & GABRIELLI, B. 2012. A potent Chk1 inhibitor is
selectively cytotoxic in melanomas with high levels of replicative stress. Oncogene, Epub
ahead of print.
BROWN, E. J. & BALTIMORE, D. 2000. ATR disruption leads to chromosomal fragmentation
and early embryonic lethality. Genes and Development, 14, 397-402.
BUENDIA, B., DRAETTA, G. & KARSENTI, E. 1992. Regulation of the microtubule nucleating
activity of centrosomes in Xenopus egg extracts: role of cyclin A-associated protein kinase.
The Journal of cell biology, 116, 1431-42.
BUGLER, B., QUARANTA, M., ARESSY, B., BREZAK, M. C., PREVOST, G. & DUCOMMUN, B.
2006. Genotoxic-activated G2-M checkpoint exit is dependent on CDC25B phosphatase
expression. Molecular cancer therapeutics, 5, 1446-51.
BULAVIN, D. V., DEMIDENKO, Z. N., PHILLIPS, C., MOODY, S. A. & FORNACE, A. J., JR. 2003a.
Phosphorylation of Xenopus Cdc25C at Ser285 interferes with ability to activate a DNA
damage replication checkpoint in pre-midblastula embryos. Cell Cycle, 2, 263-6.
BULAVIN, D. V., HIGASHIMOTO, Y., DEMIDENKO, Z. N., MEEK, S., GRAVES, P., PHILLIPS, C.,
ZHAO, H., MOODY, S. A., APPELLA, E., PIWNICA-WORMS, H. & FORNACE, A. J., JR. 2003b. Dual
phosphorylation controls Cdc25 phosphatases and mitotic entry. Nature cell biology, 5, 545-
51.
BULAVIN, D. V., HIGASHIMOTO, Y., POPOFF, I. J., GAARDE, W. A., BASRUR, V., POTAPOVA, O.,
APPELLA, E. & FORNACE, A. J., JR. 2001. Initiation of a G2/M checkpoint after ultraviolet
radiation requires p38 kinase. Nature, 411, 102-7.
BULAVIN, D. V., SAITO, S., HOLLANDER, M. C., SAKAGUCHI, K., ANDERSON, C. W., APPELLA, E.
& FORNACE, A. J., JR. 1999. Phosphorylation of human p53 by p38 kinase coordinates N-
terminal phosphorylation and apoptosis in response to UV radiation. The EMBO journal, 18,
6845-54.
Chapter 9 – References
270
BUNZ, F., DUTRIAUX, A., LENGAUER, C., WALDMAN, T., ZHOU, S., BROWN, J. P., SEDIVY, J. M.,
KINZLER, K. W. & VOGELSTEIN, B. 1998. Requirement for p53 and p21 to sustain G2 arrest
after DNA damage. Science, 282, 1497-501.
BUREIK, M., RIEF, N., DRESCHER, R., JUNGBLUTH, A., MONTENARH, M. & WAGNER, P. 2000.
An additional transcript of the cdc25C gene from A431 cells encodes a functional protein.
International journal of oncology, 17, 1251-8.
BUSCH, C., BARTON, O., MORGENSTERN, E., GOTZ, C., GUNTHER, J., NOLL, A. & MONTENARH,
M. 2007. The G2/M checkpoint phosphatase cdc25C is located within centrosomes. The
international journal of biochemistry & cell biology, 39, 1707-13.
BYUN, T. S., PACEK, M., YEE, M. C., WALTER, J. C. & CIMPRICH, K. A. 2005. Functional
uncoupling of MCM helicase and DNA polymerase activities activates the ATR-dependent
checkpoint. Genes and Development, 19, 1040-52.
CALONGE, T. M. & O'CONNELL, M. J. 2006. Antagonism of Chk1 signaling in the G2 DNA
damage checkpoint by dominant alleles of Cdr1. Genetics, 174, 113-23.
CANMAN, C. E., LIM, D. S., CIMPRICH, K. A., TAYA, Y., TAMAI, K., SAKAGUCHI, K., APPELLA, E.,
KASTAN, M. B. & SILICIANO, J. D. 1998. Activation of the ATM kinase by ionizing radiation and
phosphorylation of p53. Science, 281, 1677-9.
CAPASSO, H., PALERMO, C., WAN, S., RAO, H., JOHN, U. P., O'CONNELL, M. J. & WALWORTH,
N. C. 2002. Phosphorylation activates Chk1 and is required for checkpoint-mediated cell cycle
arrest. Journal of cell science, 115, 4555-64.
CARNERO, A. & HANNON, G. J. 1998. The INK4 family of CDK inhibitors. Current Topics in
Microbiology and Immunology, 227, 43-55.
CARRASSA, L. & DAMIA, G. 2011. Unleashing Chk1 in cancer therapy. Cell Cycle, 10, 2121-8.
CARRASSA, L., SANCHEZ, Y., ERBA, E. & DAMIA, G. 2009. U2OS cells lacking Chk1 undergo
aberrant mitosis and fail to activate the spindle checkpoint. Journal of cellular and molecular
medicine, 13, 1565-76.
CARVALHO, A., CARMENA, M., SAMBADE, C., EARNSHAW, W. C. & WHEATLEY, S. P. 2003.
Survivin is required for stable checkpoint activation in taxol-treated HeLa cells. Journal of cell
science, 116, 2987-98.
CASENGHI, M., MERALDI, P., WEINHART, U., DUNCAN, P. I., KORNER, R. & NIGG, E. A. 2003.
Polo-like kinase 1 regulates Nlp, a centrosome protein involved in microtubule nucleation.
Developmental cell, 5, 113-25.
Chapter 9 – References
271
CASTRO, A., ARLOT-BONNEMAINS, Y., VIGNERON, S., LABBE, J. C., PRIGENT, C. & LORCA, T.
2002. APC/Fizzy-Related targets Aurora-A kinase for proteolysis. EMBO reports, 3, 457-62.
CAZALES, M., SCHMITT, E., MONTEMBAULT, E., DOZIER, C., PRIGENT, C. & DUCOMMUN, B.
2005. CDC25B phosphorylation by Aurora-A occurs at the G2/M transition and is inhibited by
DNA damage. Cell Cycle, 4, 1233-8.
CHA, H., WANG, X., LI, H. & FORNACE, A. J., JR. 2007. A functional role for p38 MAPK in
modulating mitotic transit in the absence of stress. The Journal of biological chemistry, 282,
22984-92.
CHAN, D. W., SON, S. C., BLOCK, W., YE, R., KHANNA, K. K., WOLD, M. S., DOUGLAS, P.,
GOODARZI, A. A., PELLEY, J., TAYA, Y., LAVIN, M. F. & LEES-MILLER, S. P. 2000. Purification
and characterization of ATM from human placenta. A manganese-dependent, wortmannin-
sensitive serine/threonine protein kinase. The Journal of biological chemistry, 275, 7803-10.
CHANG, L.J., EASTMAN, A. 2012. Decreased translation of p21waf1 mRNA causes attenuated
p53 signalling in some p53-wild-type tumours. Cell Cycle, 11(9), 1818-26.
CHEHAB, N. H., MALIKZAY, A., APPEL, M. & HALAZONETIS, T. D. 2000. Chk2/hCds1 functions
as a DNA damage checkpoint in G(1) by stabilizing p53. Genes and Development, 14, 278-88.
CHEHAB, N. H., MALIKZAY, A., STAVRIDI, E. S. & HALAZONETIS, T. D. 1999. Phosphorylation of
Ser-20 mediates stabilization of human p53 in response to DNA damage. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 96, 13777-82.
CHEN, C. C., KENNEDY, R. D., SIDI, S., LOOK, A. T. & D'ANDREA, A. 2009. CHK1 inhibition as a
strategy for targeting Fanconi Anemia (FA) DNA repair pathway deficient tumors. Molecular
cancer, 8, 24.
CHEN, M. S., RYAN, C. E. & PIWNICA-WORMS, H. 2003. Chk1 kinase negatively regulates
mitotic function of Cdc25A phosphatase through 14-3-3 binding. Moecular andl Cellular
Biology, 23, 7488-97.
CHEN, T., STEPHENS, P.A., MIDDLETON, FK., CURTIN, N.J. 2012. Targeting the S and G2
checkpoint to treat cancer. Drug Discovery Today, 17(5-6), 194-202.
CHENG, K.Y., LOWE, E.D., SINCLAIRE, J., NIGG, E.A., JOHNSON, L.N. 2003. The crystal structure
of the human polo-like kinase-1 polo box domain and its phospho-peptide complex. The
EMBO journal, 22, 5757-5768.
CHEOK, C. F., VERMA, C. S., BASELGA, J. & LANE, D. P. 2011. Translating p53 into the clinic.
Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 8, 25-37.
Chapter 9 – References
272
CHINI, C. C. & CHEN, J. 2003. Human claspin is required for replication checkpoint control.
The Journal of biological chemistry, 278, 30057-62.
CHINI, C. C. & CHEN, J. 2006. Repeated phosphopeptide motifs in human Claspin are
phosphorylated by Chk1 and mediate Claspin function. The Journal of biological chemistry,
281, 33276-82.
CHINI, C. C., WOOD, J. & CHEN, J. 2006. Chk1 is required to maintain claspin stability.
Oncogene, 25, 4165-71.
CHOW, J. P., SIU, W. Y., HO, H. T., MA, K. H., HO, C. C. & POON, R. Y. 2003. Differential
contribution of inhibitory phosphorylation of CDC2 and CDK2 for unperturbed cell cycle
control and DNA integrity checkpoints. The Journal of biological chemistry, 278, 40815-28.
CHOWDHURY, D., KEOGH, M. C., ISHII, H., PETERSON, C. L., BURATOWSKI, S. & LIEBERMAN, J.
2005. gamma-H2AX dephosphorylation by protein phosphatase 2A facilitates DNA double-
strand break repair. Molecular cell, 20, 801-9.
CHUNG, J. H. & BUNZ, F. 2010. Cdk2 is required for p53-independent G2/M checkpoint
control. PLoS genetics, 6, e1000863.
CIMPRICH, K. A. & CORTEZ, D. 2008. ATR: an essential regulator of genome integrity. Nature
reviews. Molecular cell biology, 9, 616-27.
CIMPRICH, K. A., SHIN, T. B., KEITH, C. T. & SCHREIBER, S. L. 1996. cDNA cloning and gene
mapping of a candidate human cell cycle checkpoint protein. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 93, 2850-5.
CLARK-LEWIS, I., SANGHERA, J. S. & PELECH, S. L. 1991. Definition of a consensus sequence
for peptide substrate recognition by p44mpk, the meiosis-activated myelin basic protein
kinase. The Journal of biological chemistry, 266, 15180-4.
CLARKE, C. A. & CLARKE, P. R. 2005. DNA-dependent phosphorylation of Chk1 and Claspin in a
human cell-free system. The Biochemical journal, 388, 705-12.
CLARKE, P. R., LEISS, D., PAGANO, M. & KARSENTI, E. 1992. Cyclin A- and cyclin B-dependent
protein kinases are regulated by different mechanisms in Xenopus egg extracts. The EMBO
journal, 11, 1751-61.
CLIBY, W. A., ROBERTS, C. J., CIMPRICH, K. A., STRINGER, C. M., LAMB, J. R., SCHREIBER, S. L.
& FRIEND, S. H. 1998. Overexpression of a kinase-inactive ATR protein causes sensitivity to
DNA-damaging agents and defects in cell cycle checkpoints. The EMBO journal, 17, 159-69.
Chapter 9 – References
273
COHEN-FIX, O., PETERS, J. M., KIRSCHNER, M. W. & KOSHLAND, D. 1996. Anaphase initiation
in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is controlled by the APC-dependent degradation of the
anaphase inhibitor Pds1p. Genes & development, 10, 3081-93.
CONN, C.W., HENNIGAN, R.F., DAI, W., SANCHEZ, Y., STAMBROOK, P.J. 2000. Incomplete
cytokinesis and induction of apoptosis by overexpression of the mammalian polo-like kinase,
Plk3. Cancer Res, 60, 6826–6831.
CORTEZ, D. 2005. Unwind and slow down: checkpoint activation by helicase and polymerase
uncoupling. Genes Dev, 19, 1007-12.
CORTEZ, D., GLICK, G. & ELLEDGE, S. J. 2004. Minichromosome maintenance proteins are
direct targets of the ATM and ATR checkpoint kinases. Proceedings of the National Academy
of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 10078-83.
CORTEZ, D., GUNTUKU, S., QIN, J. & ELLEDGE, S. J. 2001. ATR and ATRIP: partners in
checkpoint signaling. Science, 294, 1713-6.
COSTA, R. H. 2005. FoxM1 dances with mitosis. Nature cell biology, 7, 108-10.
COSTANZO, V., PAULL, T., GOTTESMAN, M. & GAUTIER, J. 2004. Mre11 assembles linear DNA
fragments into DNA damage signaling complexes. PLoS Biol, 2, E110.
COWLEY, D. O., RIVERA-PEREZ, J. A., SCHLIEKELMAN, M., HE, Y. J., OLIVER, T. G., LU, L.,
O'QUINN, R., SALMON, E. D., MAGNUSON, T. & VAN DYKE, T. 2009. Aurora-A kinase is
essential for bipolar spindle formation and early development. Molecular and cellular
biology, 29, 1059-71.
CRASTA, K., LIM, H. H., GIDDINGS, T. H., JR., WINEY, M. & SURANA, U. 2008. Inactivation of
Cdh1 by synergistic action of Cdk1 and polo kinase is necessary for proper assembly of the
mitotic spindle. Nature cell biology, 10, 665-75.
DALAL, S. N., SCHWEITZER, C. M., GAN, J. & DECAPRIO, J. A. 1999. Cytoplasmic localization of
human cdc25C during interphase requires an intact 14-3-3 binding site. Molecular and
cellular biology, 19, 4465-79.
DE BOER, L., OAKES, V., BEAMISH, H., GILES, N., STEVENS, F., SOMODEVILLA-TORRES, M.,
DESOUZA, C. & GABRIELLI, B. 2008. Cyclin A/cdk2 coordinates centrosomal and nuclear
mitotic events. Oncogene, 27, 4261-8.
DE SOUZA, C. P., ELLEM, K. A. & GABRIELLI, B. G. 2000a. Centrosomal and cytoplasmic
Cdc2/cyclin B1 activation precedes nuclear mitotic events. Experimental cell research, 257,
11-21.
Chapter 9 – References
274
DE SOUZA, C. P., ELLEM, K. A. & GABRIELLI, B. G. 2000b. Centrosomal and cytoplasmic
Cdc2/cyclin B1 activation precedes nuclear mitotic events [In Process Citation]. Experimental
Cell Research, 257, 11-21.
DEANS, A. J., KHANNA, K. K., MCNEES, C. J., MERCURIO, C., HEIERHORST, J. & MCARTHUR, G.
A. 2006. Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 2 Functions in Normal DNA Repair and Is a Therapeutic
Target in BRCA1-Deficient Cancers. Cancer Research, 66, 8219-26.
DEN ELZEN, N. & PINES, J. 2001. Cyclin A is destroyed in prometaphase and can delay
chromosome alignment and anaphase. The Journal of cell biology, 153, 121-36.
DEN ELZEN, N. R. & O'CONNELL, M. J. 2004. Recovery from DNA damage checkpoint arrest by
PP1-mediated inhibition of Chk1. The EMBO journal, 23, 908-18.
DENG, C., ZHANG, P., HARPER, J. W., ELLEDGE, S. J. & LEDER, P. 1995. Mice lacking
p21CIP1/WAF1 undergo normal development, but are defective in G1 checkpoint control.
Cell, 82, 675-84.
DESDOUETS, C., ORY, C., MATESIC, G., SOUSSI, T., BRECHOT, C. & SOBCZAK-THEPOT, J. 1996.
ATF/CREB site mediated transcriptional activation and p53 dependent repression of the
cyclin A promoter. FEBS letters, 385, 34-8.
DITCHFIELD, C., JOHNSON, V. L., TIGHE, A., ELLSTON, R., HAWORTH, C., JOHNSON, T.,
MORTLOCK, A., KEEN, N. & TAYLOR, S. S. 2003. Aurora B couples chromosome alignment
with anaphase by targeting BubR1, Mad2, and Cenp-E to kinetochores. The Journal of cell
biology, 161, 267-80.
DOREE, M. & HUNT, T. 2002. From Cdc2 to Cdk1: when did the cell cycle kinase join its cyclin
partner? Journal of cell science, 115, 2461-4.
DUNAWAY, S., LIU, H. Y. & WALWORTH, N. C. 2005. Interaction of 14-3-3 protein with Chk1
affects localization and checkpoint function. Journal of cell science, 118, 39-50.
DUPRE, A., BOYER-CHATENET, L. & GAUTIER, J. 2006. Two-step activation of ATM by DNA and
the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex. Nature Structural and Molecular Biology.
DUTERTRE, S., CAZALES, M., QUARANTA, M., FROMENT, C., TRABUT, V., DOZIER, C., MIREY,
G., BOUCHE, J. P., THEIS-FEBVRE, N., SCHMITT, E., MONSARRAT, B., PRIGENT, C. &
DUCOMMUN, B. 2004. Phosphorylation of CDC25B by Aurora-A at the centrosome
contributes to the G2-M transition. Journal of cell science, 117, 2523-31.
DUURSMA, A. M. & CIMPRICH, K. A. 2010. Checkpoint recovery after DNA damage: a rolling
stop for CDKs. EMBO reports, 11, 411-2.
Chapter 9 – References
275
EL-DEIRY, W. S., TOKINO, T., VELCULESCU, V. E., LEVY, D. B., PARSONS, R., TRENT, J. M., LIN,
D., MERCER, W. E., KINZLER, K. W. & VOGELSTEIN, B. 1993. WAF1, a potential mediator of
p53 tumor suppression. Cell, 75, 817-25.
ELIA, A. E., CANTLEY, L. C. & YAFFE, M. B. 2003a. Proteomic screen finds pSer/pThr-binding
domain localizing Plk1 to mitotic substrates. Science, 299, 1228-31.
ELIA, A. E., RELLOS, P., HAIRE, L. F., CHAO, J. W., IVINS, F. J., HOEPKER, K., MOHAMMAD, D.,
CANTLEY, L. C., SMERDON, S. J. & YAFFE, M. B. 2003b. The molecular basis for
phosphodependent substrate targeting and regulation of Plks by the Polo-box domain. Cell,
115, 83-95.
ELSON, A., WANG, Y., DAUGHERTY, C. J., MORTON, C. C., ZHOU, F., CAMPOS-TORRES, J. &
LEDER, P. 1996. Pleiotropic defects in ataxia-telangiectasia protein-deficient mice.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 93, 13084-
9.
ENOMOTO, M., GOTO, H., TOMONO, Y., KASAHARA, K., TSUJIMURA, K., KIYONO, T. &
INAGAKI, M. 2009. Novel positive feedback loop between Cdk1 and Chk1 in the nucleus
during G2/M transition. The Journal of biological chemistry, 284, 34223-30.
ESMENJAUD-MAILHAT, C., LOBJOIS, V., FROMENT, C., GOLSTEYN, R. M., MONSARRAT, B. &
DUCOMMUN, B. 2007. Phosphorylation of CDC25C at S263 controls its intracellular
localisation. FEBS letters, 581, 3979-85.
EVANS, T., ROSENTHAL, E. T., YOUNGBLOM, J., DISTEL, D. & HUNT, T. 1983. Cyclin: a protein
specified by maternal mRNA in sea urchin eggs that is destroyed at each cleavage division.
Cell, 33, 389-96.
FALCK, J., MAILAND, N., SYLJUASEN, R. G., BARTEK, J. & LUKAS, J. 2001. The ATM-Chk2-
Cdc25A checkpoint pathway guards against radioresistant DNA synthesis. Nature, 410, 842-7.
FANG, G., YU, H. & KIRSCHNER, M. W. 1998a. The checkpoint protein MAD2 and the mitotic
regulator CDC20 form a ternary complex with the anaphase-promoting complex to control
anaphase initiation. Genes & development, 12, 1871-83.
FANG, G., YU, H. & KIRSCHNER, M. W. 1998b. Direct binding of CDC20 protein family
members activates the anaphase-promoting complex in mitosis and G1. Molecular cell, 2,
163-71.
Chapter 9 – References
276
FAUSTRUP, H., BEKKER-JENSEN, S., BARTEK, J., LUKAS, J. & MAILAND, N. 2009. USP7
counteracts SCFbetaTrCP- but not APCCdh1-mediated proteolysis of Claspin. The Journal of
cell biology, 184, 13-9.
FEATHERSTONE, C. & RUSSELL, P. 1991. Fission yeast p107wee1 mitotic inhibitor is a
tyrosine/serine kinase. Nature, 349, 808-11.
FLATT, P. M., TANG, L. J., SCATENA, C. D., SZAK, S. T. & PIETENPOL, J. A. 2000. p53 regulation
of G(2) checkpoint is retinoblastoma protein dependent. Molecular and cellular biology, 20,
4210-23.
FOIJER, F., WOLTHUIS, R. M., DOODEMAN, V., MEDEMA, R. H. & TE RIELE, H. 2005. Mitogen
requirement for cell cycle progression in the absence of pocket protein activity. Cancer Cell,
8, 455-66.
FOLTZ, I. N., LEE, J. C., YOUNG, P. R. & SCHRADER, J. W. 1997. Hemopoietic growth factors
with the exception of interleukin-4 activate the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase
pathway. The Journal of biological chemistry, 272, 3296-301.
FORREST, A. R., MCCORMACK, A. K., DESOUZA, C. P., SINNAMON, J. M., TONKS, I. D.,
HAYWARD, N. K., ELLEM, K. A. & GABRIELLI, B. G. 1999. Multiple splicing variants of cdc25B
regulate G2/M progression. Biochemical and biophysical research communications, 260, 510-
5.
FRAPPART, P. O., TONG, W. M., DEMUTH, I., RADOVANOVIC, I., HERCEG, Z., AGUZZI, A.,
DIGWEED, M. & WANG, Z. Q. 2005. An essential function for NBS1 in the prevention of ataxia
and cerebellar defects. Nature Medicine, 11, 538-44.
FREIRE, R., VAN VUGT, M.A., MAMELY, I., MEDEMA, R.H. 2006. Claspin: timing the cell cycle
arrest when the genome is damaged. Cell Cycle, 5(24), 2831-4.
FRESHNEY, N. W., GOONESEKERA, S. D. & FEIG, L. A. 1997. Activation of the exchange factor
Ras-GRF by calcium requires an intact Dbl homology domain. FEBS letters, 407, 111-5.
FRUM, R., RAMAMOORTHY, M., MOHANRAJ, L., DEB, S. & DEB, S. P. 2009. MDM2 controls
the timely expression of cyclin A to regulate the cell cycle. Molecular cancer research : MCR,
7, 1253-67.
FU, Z., MALUREANU, L., HUANG, J., WANG, W., LI, H., VAN DEURSEN, J. M., TINDALL, D. J. &
CHEN, J. 2008. Plk1-dependent phosphorylation of FoxM1 regulates a transcriptional
programme required for mitotic progression. Nature cell biology, 10, 1076-82.
Chapter 9 – References
277
FUNG, T. K., MA, H. T. & POON, R. Y. 2007. Specialized roles of the two mitotic cyclins in
somatic cells: cyclin A as an activator of M phase-promoting factor. Molecular biology of the
cell, 18, 1861-73.
FURNARI, B., BLASINA, A., BODDY, M. N., MCGOWAN, C. H. & RUSSELL, P. 1999. Cdc25
inhibited in vivo and in vitro by checkpoint kinases Cds1 and Chk1. Molecular Biology of the
Cell, 10, 833-45.
FURNARI, B., RHIND, N. & RUSSELL, P. 1997. Cdc25 mitotic inducer targeted by chk1 DNA
damage checkpoint kinase. Science, 277, 1495-7.
FURUNO, N., DEN ELZEN, N. & PINES, J. 1999. Human cyclin A is required for mitosis until mid
prophase. The Journal of cell biology, 147, 295-306.
GABRIELLI, B. G., CLARK, J. M., MCCORMACK, A. K. & ELLEM, K. A. 1997.
Hyperphosphorylation of the N-terminal domain of Cdc25 regulates activity toward cyclin
B1/Cdc2 but not cyclin A/Cdk2. The Journal of biological chemistry, 272, 28607-14.
GABRIELLI, B. G., DE SOUZA, C. P., TONKS, I. D., CLARK, J. M., HAYWARD, N. K. & ELLEM, K. A.
1996. Cytoplasmic accumulation of cdc25B phosphatase in mitosis triggers centrosomal
microtubule nucleation in HeLa cells. Journal of Cell Science, 109 ( Pt 5), 1081-93.
GALAKTIONOV, K. & BEACH, D. 1991. Specific activation of cdc25 tyrosine phosphatases by B-
type cyclins: evidence for multiple roles of mitotic cyclins. Cell, 67, 1181-1194.
GALLANT, P. & NIGG, E. A. 1992. Cyclin B2 undergoes cell cycle-dependent nuclear
translocation and, when expressed as a non-destructible mutant, causes mitotic arrest in
HeLa cells. The Journal of cell biology, 117, 213-24.
GAO, D., INUZUKA, H., KORENJAK, M., TSENG, A., WU, T., WAN, L., KIRSCHNER, M., DYSON, N.
& WEI, W. 2009. Cdh1 regulates cell cycle through modulating the claspin/Chk1 and the
Rb/E2F1 pathways. Molecular biology of the cell, 20, 3305-16.
GARCIA-HIGUERA, I., MANCHADO, E., DUBUS, P., CANAMERO, M., MENDEZ, J., MORENO, S.
& MALUMBRES, M. 2008. Genomic stability and tumour suppression by the APC/C cofactor
Cdh1. Nature cell biology, 10, 802-11.
GARNER-HAMRICK, P. A. & FISHER, C. 1998. Antisense phosphorothioate oligonucleotides
specifically down-regulate cdc25B causing S-phase delay and persistent antiproliferative
effects. International journal of cancer. Journal international du cancer, 76, 720-8.
GATEI, M., SLOPER, K., SORENSEN, C., SYLJUASEN, R., FALCK, J., HOBSON, K., SAVAGE, K.,
LUKAS, J., ZHOU, B. B., BARTEK, J. & KHANNA, K. K. 2003. Ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated
Chapter 9 – References
278
(ATM) and NBS1-dependent phosphorylation of Chk1 on Ser-317 in response to ionizing
radiation. The Journal of biological chemistry, 278, 14806-11.
GATEI, M., YOUNG, D., CEROSALETTI, K. M., DESAI-MEHTA, A., SPRING, K., KOZLOV, S., LAVIN,
M. F., GATTI, R. A., CONCANNON, P. & KHANNA, K. 2000. ATM-dependent phosphorylation of
nibrin in response to radiation exposure. Nature genetics, 25, 115-9.
GAVET, O. & PINES, J. 2010. Activation of cyclin B1-Cdk1 synchronizes events in the nucleus
and the cytoplasm at mitosis. The Journal of cell biology, 189, 247-59.
GELEY, S., KRAMER, E., GIEFFERS, C., GANNON, J., PETERS, J. M. & HUNT, T. 2001. Anaphase-
promoting complex/cyclosome-dependent proteolysis of human cyclin A starts at the
beginning of mitosis and is not subject to the spindle assembly checkpoint. The Journal of cell
biology, 153, 137-48.
GILES, N., FORREST, A. & GABRIELLI, B. 2003. 14-3-3 acts as an intramolecular bridge to
regulate cdc25B localization and activity. The Journal of biological chemistry, 278, 28580-7.
GIRARD, F., STRAUSFELD, U., FERNANDEZ, A. & LAMB, N. J. 1991. Cyclin A is required for the
onset of DNA replication in mammalian fibroblasts. Cell, 67, 1169-79.
GIRE, V., ROUX, P., WYNFORD-THOMAS, D., BRONDELLO, J. M. & DULIC, V. 2004. DNA
damage checkpoint kinase Chk2 triggers replicative senescence. The EMBO journal, 23, 2554-
63.
GLOVER, D. M., LEIBOWITZ, M. H., MCLEAN, D. A. & PARRY, H. 1995. Mutations in aurora
prevent centrosome separation leading to the formation of monopolar spindles. Cell, 81, 95-
105.
GOLDSTONE, S., PAVEY, S., FORREST, A., SINNAMON, J. & GABRIELLI, B. 2001. Cdc25-
dependent activation of cyclin A/cdk2 is blocked in G2 phase arrested cells independently of
ATM/ATR. Oncogene, 20, 921-32.
GOLOUDINA, A., YAMAGUCHI, H., CHERVYAKOVA, D. B., APPELLA, E., FORNACE, A. J., JR. &
BULAVIN, D. V. 2003. Regulation of human Cdc25A stability by Serine 75 phosphorylation is
not sufficient to activate a S phase checkpoint. Cell Cycle, 2, 473-8.
GOLSTEYN, R. M., MUNDT, K. E., FRY, A. M. & NIGG, E. A. 1995. Cell cycle regulation of the
activity and subcellular localization of Plk1, a human protein kinase implicated in mitotic
spindle function. The Journal of cell biology, 129, 1617-28.
GONG, D. & FERRELL, J. E., JR. 2010. The roles of cyclin A2, B1, and B2 in early and late
mitotic events. Molecular biology of the cell, 21, 3149-61.
Chapter 9 – References
279
GONG, D., POMERENING, J. R., MYERS, J. W., GUSTAVSSON, C., JONES, J. T., HAHN, A. T.,
MEYER, T. & FERRELL, J. E., JR. 2007a. Cyclin A2 regulates nuclear-envelope breakdown and
the nuclear accumulation of cyclin B1. Current biology : CB, 17, 85-91.
GONG, D., POMERENING, J. R., MYERS, J. W., GUSTAVSSON, C., JONES, J. T., HAHN, A. T.,
MEYER, T. & FERRELL, J. E., JR. 2007b. Cyclin A2 regulates nuclear-envelope breakdown and
the nuclear accumulation of cyclin B1. Current Biology, 17, 85-91.
GONZALEZ, F. A., RADEN, D. L. & DAVIS, R. J. 1991. Identification of substrate recognition
determinants for human ERK1 and ERK2 protein kinases. The Journal of biological chemistry,
266, 22159-63.
GOTO, H., TOMONO, Y., AJIRO, K., KOSAKO, H., FUJITA, M., SAKURAI, M., OKAWA, K.,
IWAMATSU, A., OKIGAKI, T., TAKAHASHI, T. & INAGAKI, M. 1999. Identification of a novel
phosphorylation site on histone H3 coupled with mitotic chromosome condensation. The
Journal of biological chemistry, 274, 25543-9.
GOTTLIEB, E. & OREN, M. 1998. p53 facilitates pRb cleavage in IL-3-deprived cells: novel pro-
apoptotic activity of p53. The EMBO journal, 17, 3587-96.
GRAVES, P. R., LOVLY, C. M., UY, G. L. & PIWNICA-WORMS, H. 2001. Localization of human
Cdc25C is regulated both by nuclear export and 14-3-3 protein binding. Oncogene, 20, 1839-
51.
GROSSKORTENHAUS, R. & SPRENGER, F. 2002. Rca1 inhibits APC-Cdh1(Fzr) and is required to
prevent cyclin degradation in G2. Developmental cell, 2, 29-40.
GU, Y., ROSENBLATT, J. & MORGAN, D. O. 1992. Cell cycle regulation of CDK2 activity by
phosphorylation of Thr160 and Tyr15. The EMBO journal, 11, 3995-4005.
GU, Y., TURCK, C. W. & MORGAN, D. O. 1993. Inhibition of CDK2 activity in vivo by an
associated 20K regulatory subunit. Nature, 366, 707-10.
HAGTING, A., JACKMAN, M., SIMPSON, K. & PINES, J. 1999. Translocation of cyclin B1 to the
nucleus at prophase requires a phosphorylation-dependent nuclear import signal. Current
biology : CB, 9, 680-9.
HALL, M. C., WARREN, E. N. & BORCHERS, C. H. 2004. Multi-kinase phosphorylation of the
APC/C activator Cdh1 revealed by mass spectrometry. Cell Cycle, 3, 1278-84.
HAMADA, K., ZHANG, W. W., ALEMANY, R., WOLF, J., ROTH, J. A. & MITCHELL, M. F. 1996.
Growth inhibition of human cervical cancer cells with the recombinant adenovirus p53 in
vitro. Gynecologic oncology, 60, 373-9.
Chapter 9 – References
280
HAN, J., LEE, J. D., BIBBS, L. & ULEVITCH, R. J. 1994. A MAP kinase targeted by endotoxin and
hyperosmolarity in mammalian cells. Science, 265, 808-11.
HANISCH, A., WEHNER, A., NIGG, E. A. & SILLJE, H. H. 2006. Different Plk1 functions show
distinct dependencies on Polo-Box domain-mediated targeting. Molecular biology of the cell,
17, 448-59.
HANSEN, D. V., LOKTEV, A. V., BAN, K. H. & JACKSON, P. K. 2004. Plk1 regulates activation of
the anaphase promoting complex by phosphorylating and triggering SCFbetaTrCP-dependent
destruction of the APC Inhibitor Emi1. Molecular biology of the cell, 15, 5623-34.
HAREN, L., STEARNS, T. & LUDERS, J. 2009. Plk1-dependent recruitment of gamma-tubulin
complexes to mitotic centrosomes involves multiple PCM components. PloS one, 4, e5976.
HARPER, J. W., ADAMI, G. R., WEI, N., KEYOMARSI, K. & ELLEDGE, S. J. 1993. The p21 Cdk-
interacting protein Cip1 is a potent inhibitor of G1 cyclin-dependent kinases. Cell, 75, 805-16.
HARPER, J. W., ELLEDGE, S. J., KEYOMARSI, K., DYNLACHT, B., TSAI, L. H., ZHANG, P.,
DOBROWOLSKI, S., BAI, C., CONNELL-CROWLEY, L., SWINDELL, E. & ET AL. 1995. Inhibition of
cyclin-dependent kinases by p21. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 6, 387-400.
HARRISON, J. C. & HABER, J. E. 2006. Surviving the breakup: the DNA damage checkpoint.
Annual review of genetics, 40, 209-35.
HARTWELL, L.H., WEINERT, .T.A. 1989. Checkpoints: controls that ensure the order of cell
cycle events. Science, 246 (4930):629-34.
HARVEY, S. H., SHEEDY, D. M., CUDDIHY, A. R. & O'CONNELL, M. J. 2004. Coordination of DNA
damage responses via the Smc5/Smc6 complex. Molecular and cellular biology, 24, 662-74.
HASSEPASS, I., VOIT, R. & HOFFMANN, I. 2003. Phosphorylation at serine 75 is required for
UV-mediated degradation of human Cdc25A phosphatase at the S-phase checkpoint. The
Journal of biological chemistry, 278, 29824-9.
HAUF, S., COLE, R. W., LATERRA, S., ZIMMER, C., SCHNAPP, G., WALTER, R., HECKEL, A., VAN
MEEL, J., RIEDER, C. L. & PETERS, J. M. 2003. The small molecule Hesperadin reveals a role for
Aurora B in correcting kinetochore-microtubule attachment and in maintaining the spindle
assembly checkpoint. The Journal of cell biology, 161, 281-94.
HAUPENTHAL, J., BIHRER, V., KORKUSUZ, O., KOLLMUR, O., SCHMITHALS, C., KRIENER, S.,
ENGELS, K., PLELI, T., BENZ, A., CANAMERO, M., LONGERICH, T., KRONENBERGER, B.,
RICHTER, S., WAIDMANN, O., VOGI, T.J., ZEUZEM, S., PIIPER, A. 2012. Reduced efficacy of the
Chapter 9 – References
281
Plk1 Inhibitor BI 2536 on the progression of the Hepatocellular Carcinoma due to Low
Intratumoral Drug Levels. Neoplasia, 14(5), 410-9.
HEALD, R., MCLOUGHLIN, M. & MCKEON, F. 1993. Human wee1 maintains mitotic timing by
protecting the nucleus from cytoplasmically activated Cdc2 kinase. Cell, 74, 463-74.
HELT, C. E., CLIBY, W. A., KENG, P. C., BAMBARA, R. A. & O'REILLY, M. A. 2005. Ataxia
telangiectasia mutated (ATM) and ATM and Rad3-related protein exhibit selective target
specificities in response to different forms of DNA damage. The Journal of biological
chemistry, 280, 1186-92.
HENDZEL, M. J., WEI, Y., MANCINI, M. A., VAN HOOSER, A., RANALLI, T., BRINKLEY, B. R.,
BAZETT-JONES, D. P. & ALLIS, C. D. 1997. Mitosis-specific phosphorylation of histone H3
initiates primarily within pericentromeric heterochromatin during G2 and spreads in an
ordered fashion coincident with mitotic chromosome condensation. Chromosoma, 106, 348-
60.
HENGST, L. & REED, S. I. 1998. Inhibitors of the Cip/Kip family. Current Topics in Microbiology
and Immunology, 227, 25-41.
HERMEKING, H., LENGAUER, C., POLYAK, K., HE, T. C., ZHANG, L., THIAGALINGAM, S.,
KINZLER, K. W. & VOGELSTEIN, B. 1997. 14-3-3 sigma is a p53-regulated inhibitor of G2/M
progression. Molecular cell, 1, 3-11.
HIRAO, A., CHEUNG, A., DUNCAN, G., GIRARD, P. M., ELIA, A. J., WAKEHAM, A., OKADA, H.,
SARKISSIAN, T., WONG, J. A., SAKAI, T., DE STANCHINA, E., BRISTOW, R. G., SUDA, T., LOWE,
S. W., JEGGO, P. A., ELLEDGE, S. J. & MAK, T. W. 2002. Chk2 is a tumor suppressor that
regulates apoptosis in both an ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM)-dependent and an ATM-
independent manner. Molecular and cellular biology, 22, 6521-32.
HIRAO, A., KONG, Y. Y., MATSUOKA, S., WAKEHAM, A., RULAND, J., YOSHIDA, H., LIU, D.,
ELLEDGE, S. J. & MAK, T. W. 2000. DNA damage-induced activation of p53 by the checkpoint
kinase Chk2. Science, 287, 1824-7.
HOAR, K., CHAKRAVARTY, A., RABINO, C., WYSONG, D., BOWMAN, D., ROY, N. & ECSEDY, J. A.
2007. MLN8054, a small-molecule inhibitor of Aurora A, causes spindle pole and
chromosome congression defects leading to aneuploidy. Molecular and cellular biology, 27,
4513-25.
HODGSON, B., CALZADA, A. & LABIB, K. 2007. Mrc1 and Tof1 regulate DNA replication forks
in different ways during normal S phase. Molecular biology of the cell, 18, 3894-902.
Chapter 9 – References
282
HOFFMANN, I., CLARKE, P. R., MARCOTE, M. J., KARSENTI, E. & DRAETTA, G. 1993.
Phosphorylation and activation of human cdc25-C by cdc2--cyclin B and its involvement in
the self-amplification of MPF at mitosis. The EMBO journal, 12, 53-63.
HOLLOWAY, S. L., GLOTZER, M., KING, R. W. & MURRAY, A. W. 1993. Anaphase is initiated by
proteolysis rather than by the inactivation of maturation-promoting factor. Cell, 73, 1393-
402.
HONDA, R., OHBA, Y. & YASUDA, H. 1997a. 14-3-3 zeta protein binds to the carboxyl half of
mouse wee1 kinase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 230, 262-5.
HONDA, R., OHBA, Y. & YASUDA, H. 1997b. 14-3-3 zeta protein binds to the carboxyl half of
mouse wee1 kinase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 230, 262-265.
HSU, J. Y., REIMANN, J. D., SORENSEN, C. S., LUKAS, J. & JACKSON, P. K. 2002. E2F-dependent
accumulation of hEmi1 regulates S phase entry by inhibiting APC(Cdh1). Nature cell biology,
4, 358-66.
HU, B., MITRA, J., VAN DEN HEUVEL, S. & ENDERS, G. H. 2001. S and G2 phase roles for Cdk2
revealed by inducible expression of a dominant-negative mutant in human cells. Molecular
and Cellular Biology, 21, 2755-66.
HUANG, C., MA, W. Y., MAXINER, A., SUN, Y. & DONG, Z. 1999. p38 kinase mediates UV-
induced phosphorylation of p53 protein at serine 389. The Journal of biological chemistry,
274, 12229-35.
HUANG, C., ZHANG, Z., DING, M., LI, J., YE, J., LEONARD, S. S., SHEN, H. M., BUTTERWORTH,
L., LU, Y., COSTA, M., ROJANASAKUL, Y., CASTRANOVA, V., VALLYATHAN, V. & SHI, X. 2000.
Vanadate induces p53 transactivation through hydrogen peroxide and causes apoptosis. The
Journal of biological chemistry, 275, 32516-22.
HYKA-NOUSPIKEL, N., DESMARAIS J., GOKHALE, P.J., JONES, M., MEUTH, M., ANDREWS, P.W.,
NOUSPIKEL, T. 2012. Defecient DNA damage response and cell cycle checkpoints leads to
accumulation of point mutations in human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells, Epub ahead of
print.
IKEGAMI, Y., GOTO, H., KIYONO, T., ENOMOTO, M., KASAHARA, K., TOMONO, Y., TOZAWA, K.,
MORITA, A., KOHRI, K. & INAGAKI, M. 2008. Chk1 phosphorylation at Ser286 and Ser301
occurs with both stalled DNA replication and damage checkpoint stimulation. Biochemical
and biophysical research communications, 377, 1227-31.
Chapter 9 – References
283
INNOCENTE, S. A., ABRAHAMSON, J. L., COGSWELL, J. P. & LEE, J. M. 1999. p53 regulates a G2
checkpoint through cyclin B1. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United
States of America, 96, 2147-52.
ITAKURA, E., TAKAI, K. K., UMEDA, K., KIMURA, M., OHSUMI, M., TAMAI, K. & MATSUURA, A.
2004. Amino-terminal domain of ATRIP contributes to intranuclear relocation of the ATR-
ATRIP complex following DNA damage. FEBS Lett, 577, 289-93.
IZUMI, T. & MALLER, J. L. 1993. Elimination of cdc2 phosphorylation sites in the cdc25
phosphatase blocks initiation of M-phase. Molecular biology of the cell, 4, 1337-50.
JACKMAN, M., LINDON, C., NIGG, E. A. & PINES, J. 2003a. Active cyclin B1-Cdk1 first appears
on centrosomes in prophase. Nature cell biology, 5, 143-8.
JACKSON, A. P., EASTWOOD, H., BELL, S. M., ADU, J., TOOMES, C., CARR, I. M., ROBERTS, E.,
HAMPSHIRE, D. J., CROW, Y. J., MIGHELL, A. J., KARBANI, G., JAFRI, H., RASHID, Y., MUELLER,
R. F., MARKHAM, A. F. & WOODS, C. G. 2002. Identification of microcephalin, a protein
implicated in determining the size of the human brain. American journal of human genetics,
71, 136-42.
JACOBS, H. W., KEIDEL, E. & LEHNER, C. F. 2001. A complex degradation signal in Cyclin A
required for G1 arrest, and a C-terminal region for mitosis. The EMBO journal, 20, 2376-86.
JANG, Y. J., LIN, C. Y., MA, S. & ERIKSON, R. L. 2002a. Functional studies on the role of the C-
terminal domain of mammalian polo-like kinase. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences of the United States of America, 99, 1984-9.
JANG, Y. J., MA, S., TERADA, Y. & ERIKSON, R. L. 2002b. Phosphorylation of threonine 210 and
the role of serine 137 in the regulation of mammalian polo-like kinase. The Journal of
biological chemistry, 277, 44115-20.
JASPERSEN, S. L., CHARLES, J. F. & MORGAN, D. O. 1999. Inhibitory phosphorylation of the
APC regulator Hct1 is controlled by the kinase Cdc28 and the phosphatase Cdc14. Current
biology : CB, 9, 227-36.
JAZAYERI, A., FALCK, J., LUKAS, C., BARTEK, J., SMITH, G. C., LUKAS, J. & JACKSON, S. P. 2006.
ATM- and cell cycle-dependent regulation of ATR in response to DNA double-strand breaks.
Nature cell biology, 8, 37-45.
JEONG, S. Y., KUMAGAI, A., LEE, J. & DUNPHY, W. G. 2003. Phosphorylated claspin interacts
with a phosphate-binding site in the kinase domain of Chk1 during ATR-mediated activation.
The Journal of biological chemistry, 278, 46782-8.
Chapter 9 – References
284
JIANG, K., PEREIRA, E., MAXFIELD, M., RUSSELL, B., GOUDELOCK, D. M. & SANCHEZ, Y. 2003.
Regulation of Chk1 includes chromatin association and 14-3-3 binding following
phosphorylation on Ser-345. The Journal of biological chemistry, 278, 25207-17.
JOHMURA, Y., SOUNG, N. K., PARK, J. E., YU, L. R., ZHOU, M., BANG, J. K., KIM, B. Y.,
VEENSTRA, T. D., ERIKSON, R. L. & LEE, K. S. 2011. Regulation of microtubule-based
microtubule nucleation by mammalian polo-like kinase 1. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 11446-51.
JOHNSON, C. L., LU, D., HUANG, J. & BASU, A. 2002. Regulation of p53 stabilization by DNA
damage and protein kinase C. Molecular cancer therapeutics, 1, 861-7.
JULLIEN, D., BUGLER, B., DOZIER, C., CAZALES, M. & DUCOMMUN, B. 2011. Identification of
N-terminally truncated stable nuclear isoforms of CDC25B that are specifically involved in
G2/M checkpoint recovery. Cancer research, 71, 1968-77.
KALASZCZYNSKA, I., GENG, Y., LINO, T., MIZUNO, S., CHOI, Y., KONDRATIUK, I., SILVER, D.P., WOLGEMUTH, D.J., AKASHI, K., SICINSKI, P. 2009. Cyclin A is redundant in fibroblasts but essential in hematopoietic and embryonic stem cells. Cell, 138(2):352-65.
KALDIS, P. & ALEEM, E. 2005. Cell cycle sibling rivalry: Cdc2 vs. Cdk2. Cell Cycle, 4, 1491-4.
KALLSTROM, H., LINDQVIST, A., POSPISIL, V., LUNDGREN, A. & ROSENTHAL, C. K. 2005.
Cdc25A localisation and shuttling: characterisation of sequences mediating nuclear export
and import. Experimental cell research, 303, 89-100.
KANEKO, Y. S., WATANABE, N., MORISAKI, H., AKITA, H., FUJIMOTO, A., TOMINAGA, K.,
TERASAWA, M., TACHIBANA, A., IKEDA, K. & NAKANISHI, M. 1999. Cell-cycle-dependent and
ATM-independent expression of human Chk1 kinase. Oncogene, 18, 3673-81.
KARLSSON-ROSENTHAL, C. & MILLAR, J. B. 2006. Cdc25: mechanisms of checkpoint inhibition
and recovery. Trends in cell biology, 16, 285-92.
KARLSSON, C., KATICH, S., HAGTING, A., HOFFMANN, I. & PINES, J. 1999. Cdc25B and Cdc25C
differ markedly in their properties as initiators of mitosis. The journal of cell biology, 146,
573-84.
KASAHARA, K., GOTO, H., ENOMOTO, M., TOMONO, Y., TIYONO, T., INAGAKI, M.2010. 14-3-
3gamma mediates Cdc25A proteolysis to block premature mitotic entry after DNA damage.
The EMBO journal, 29(16), 2802-12.
Chapter 9 – References
285
KATAYAMA, K., FUJITA, N. & TSURUO, T. 2005. Akt/protein kinase B-dependent
phosphorylation and inactivation of WEE1Hu promote cell cycle progression at G2/M
transition. Molecular and cellular biology, 25, 5725-37.
KATOU, Y., KANOH, Y., BANDO, M., NOGUCHI, H., TANAKA, H., ASHIKARI, T., SUGIMOTO, K. &
SHIRAHIGE, K. 2003. S-phase checkpoint proteins Tof1 and Mrc1 form a stable replication-
pausing complex. Nature, 424, 1078-83.
KELM, O., WIND, M., LEHMANN, W. D. & NIGG, E. A. 2002. Cell cycle-regulated
phosphorylation of the Xenopus polo-like kinase Plx1. The Journal of biological chemistry,
277, 25247-56.
KEOGH, M. C., KIM, J. A., DOWNEY, M., FILLINGHAM, J., CHOWDHURY, D., HARRISON, J. C.,
ONISHI, M., DATTA, N., GALICIA, S., EMILI, A., LIEBERMAN, J., SHEN, X., BURATOWSKI, S.,
HABER, J. E., DUROCHER, D., GREENBLATT, J. F. & KROGAN, N. J. 2006. A phosphatase
complex that dephosphorylates gammaH2AX regulates DNA damage checkpoint recovery.
Nature, 439, 497-501.
KHANNA, K. K. & JACKSON, S. P. 2001. DNA double-strand breaks: signaling, repair and the
cancer connection. Nature genetics, 27, 247-54.
KHANNA, K. K., KEATING, K. E., KOZLOV, S., SCOTT, S., GATEI, M., HOBSON, K., TAYA, Y.,
GABRIELLI, B., CHAN, D., LEES-MILLER, S. P. & LAVIN, M. F. 1998. ATM associates with and
phosphorylates p53: mapping the region of interaction. Nature genetics, 20, 398-400.
KHOSRAVI, R., MAYA, R., GOTTLIEB, T., OREN, M., SHILOH, Y. & SHKEDY, D. 1999. Rapid ATM-
dependent phosphorylation of MDM2 precedes p53 accumulation in response to DNA
damage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,
96, 14973-7.
KIM, G. Y., MERCER, S. E., EWTON, D. Z., YAN, Z., JIN, K. & FRIEDMAN, E. 2002. The stress-
activated protein kinases p38 alpha and JNK1 stabilize p21(Cip1) by phosphorylation. The
Journal of biological chemistry, 277, 29792-802.
KIM, S. T., LIM, D. S., CANMAN, C. E. & KASTAN, M. B. 1999. Substrate specificities and
identification of putative substrates of ATM kinase family members. The Journal of biological
chemistry, 274, 37538-43.
KIM, S. Y., SONG, E. J., LEE, K. J. & FERRELL, J. E., JR. 2005. Multisite M-phase phosphorylation
of Xenopus Wee1A. Molecular and cellular biology, 25, 10580-90.
KING, R. W., JACKSON, P. K. & KIRSCHNER, M. W. 1994. Mitosis in transition. Cell, 79, 563-71.
Chapter 9 – References
286
KING, R. W., PETERS, J. M., TUGENDREICH, S., ROLFE, M., HIETER, P. & KIRSCHNER, M. W.
1995. A 20S complex containing CDC27 and CDC16 catalyzes the mitosis-specific conjugation
of ubiquitin to cyclin B. Cell, 81, 279-88.
KNOBLICH, J. A. & LEHNER, C. F. 1993. Synergistic action of Drosophila cyclins A and B during
the G2-M transition. The EMBO journal, 12, 65-74.
KO, L. J. & PRIVES, C. 1996. p53: puzzle and paradigm. Genes & development, 10, 1054-72.
KOBAYASHI, H., STEWART, E., POON, R., ADAMCZEWSKI, J. P., GANNON, J. & HUNT, T. 1992.
Identification of the domains in cyclin A required for binding to, and activation of, p34cdc2
and p32cdk2 protein kinase subunits. Molecular biology of the cell, 3, 1279-94.
KOPS, G. J., WEAVER, B. A. & CLEVELAND, D. W. 2005. On the road to cancer: aneuploidy and
the mitotic checkpoint. Nature reviews. Cancer, 5, 773-85.
KRAMER, A., MAILAND, N., LUKAS, C., SYLJUASEN, R. G., WILKINSON, C. J., NIGG, E. A.,
BARTEK, J. & LUKAS, J. 2004. Centrosome-associated Chk1 prevents premature activation of
cyclin-B-Cdk1 kinase. Nature Cell Biology, 6, 884-91.
KRAMER, E. R., GIEFFERS, C., HOLZL, G., HENGSTSCHLAGER, M. & PETERS, J. M. 1998.
Activation of the human anaphase-promoting complex by proteins of the CDC20/Fizzy family.
Current biology : CB, 8, 1207-10.
KRAMER, E. R., SCHEURINGER, N., PODTELEJNIKOV, A. V., MANN, M. & PETERS, J. M. 2000.
Mitotic regulation of the APC activator proteins CDC20 and CDH1. Molecular biology of the
cell, 11, 1555-69.
KRISTJANSDOTTIR, K. & RUDOLPH, J. 2004. Cdc25 phosphatases and cancer. Chemistry &
biology, 11, 1043-51.
KUMAGAI, A. & DUNPHY, W. G. 1996. Purification and molecular cloning of Plx1, a Cdc25-
regulatory kinase from Xenopus egg extracts. Science, 273, 1377-80.
KUMAGAI, A. & DUNPHY, W. G. 2000. Claspin, a novel protein required for the activation of
Chk1 during a DNA replication checkpoint response in Xenopus egg extracts. Molecular cell,
6, 839-49.
KUMAGAI, A. & DUNPHY, W. G. 2003. Repeated phosphopeptide motifs in Claspin mediate
the regulated binding of Chk1. Nature cell biology, 5, 161-5.
Chapter 9 – References
287
KUMAGAI, A., GUO, Z., EMAMI, K. H., WANG, S. X. & DUNPHY, W. G. 1998. The Xenopus Chk1
protein kinase mediates a caffeine-sensitive pathway of checkpoint control in cell-free
extracts. The Journal of cell biology, 142, 1559-69.
KUNTZIGER, T., LANDSVERK, H.B., COLLAS, P., SYLJUASEN, R.G. 2011. Protein phosphatase 1
regulators in DNA damage signaling. Cell Cycle, May 1:10(9), 1356-62.
LAFARGA, V., CUADRADO, A., LOPEZ DE SILANES, I., BENGOECHEA, R., FERNANDEZ-
CAPETILLO, O. & NEBREDA, A. R. 2009. p38 Mitogen-activated protein kinase- and HuR-
dependent stabilization of p21(Cip1) mRNA mediates the G(1)/S checkpoint. Molecular and
cellular biology, 29, 4341-51.
LAMPSON, M. A. & KAPOOR, T. M. 2005. The human mitotic checkpoint protein BubR1
regulates chromosome-spindle attachments. Nature cell biology, 7, 93-8.
LANE, H. A. & NIGG, E. A. 1996. Antibody microinjection reveals an essential role for human
polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1) in the functional maturation of mitotic centrosomes. The Journal of
cell biology, 135, 1701-13.
LAOUKILI, J., ALVAREZ-FERNANDEZ, M., STAHL, M. & MEDEMA, R. H. 2008a. FoxM1 is
degraded at mitotic exit in a Cdh1-dependent manner. Cell Cycle, 7, 2720-6.
LAOUKILI, J., ALVAREZ, M., MEIJER, L. A., STAHL, M., MOHAMMED, S., KLEIJ, L., HECK, A. J. &
MEDEMA, R. H. 2008b. Activation of FoxM1 during G2 requires cyclin A/Cdk-dependent relief
of autorepression by the FoxM1 N-terminal domain. Molecular and cellular biology, 28, 3076-
87.
LATIF, C., DEN ELZEN, N. R. & O'CONNELL, M. J. 2004. DNA damage checkpoint maintenance
through sustained Chk1 activity. Journal of cell science, 117, 3489-98.
LAU, C. C. & PARDEE, A. B. 1982. Mechanism by which caffeine potentiates lethality of
nitrogen mustard. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of
America, 79, 2942-6.
LAVIN, M. F. & SHILOH, Y. 1997. The genetic defect in ataxia-telangiectasia. Annual review of
immunology, 15, 177-202.
LEE, J., GOLD, D. A., SHEVCHENKO, A. & DUNPHY, W. G. 2005. Roles of replication fork-
interacting and Chk1-activating domains from Claspin in a DNA replication checkpoint
response. Molecular biology of the cell, 16, 5269-82.
LEE, J., KUMAGAI, A. & DUNPHY, W. G. 2001. Positive regulation of Wee1 by Chk1 and 14-3-3
proteins. Molecular biology of the cell, 12, 551-63.
Chapter 9 – References
288
LEE, J., KUMAGAI, A. & DUNPHY, W. G. 2003. Claspin, a Chk1-regulatory protein, monitors
DNA replication on chromatin independently of RPA, ATR, and Rad17. Molecular cell, 11, 329-
40.
LEE, J. C., LAYDON, J. T., MCDONNELL, P. C., GALLAGHER, T. F., KUMAR, S., GREEN, D.,
MCNULTY, D., BLUMENTHAL, M. J., HEYS, J. R., LANDVATTER, S. W. & ET AL. 1994. A protein
kinase involved in the regulation of inflammatory cytokine biosynthesis. Nature, 372, 739-46.
LEE, J. H. & PAULL, T. T. 2004. Direct activation of the ATM protein kinase by the
Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 complex. Science, 304, 93-6.
LEE, K., KENNY, A. E. & RIEDER, C. L. 2010. P38 mitogen-activated protein kinase activity is
required during mitosis for timely satisfaction of the mitotic checkpoint but not for the
fidelity of chromosome segregation. Molecular biology of the cell, 21, 2150-60.
LEE, K. S. & ERIKSON, R. L. 1997. Plk is a functional homolog of Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Cdc5, and elevated Plk activity induces multiple septation structures. Molecular and cellular
biology, 17, 3408-17.
LEE, K. S., PARK, J. E., KANG, Y. H., ZIMMERMAN, W., SOUNG, N. K., SEONG, Y. S., KWAK, S. J.
& ERIKSON, R. L. 2008. Mechanisms of mammalian polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1) localization: self-
versus non-self-priming. Cell Cycle, 7, 141-5.
LEE, K. S., SONG, S. & ERIKSON, R. L. 1999. The polo-box-dependent induction of ectopic
septal structures by a mammalian polo kinase, plk, in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 96, 14360-5.
LEE, M. H., REYNISDOTTIR, I. & MASSAGUE, J. 1995. Cloning of p57KIP2, a cyclin-dependent
kinase inhibitor with unique domain structure and tissue distribution. Genes and
development, 9, 639-49.
LEES, E. M. & HARLOW, E. 1993. Sequences within the conserved cyclin box of human cyclin A
are sufficient for binding to and activation of cdc2 kinase. Molecular and cellular biology, 13,
1194-201.
LEHNER, C. F. & O'FARRELL, P. H. 1990. The roles of Drosophila cyclins A and B in mitotic
control. Cell, 61, 535-47.
LELE, K. M. & WOLGEMUTH, D. J. 2004. Distinct regions of the mouse cyclin A1 gene, Ccna1,
confer male germ-cell specific expression and enhancer function. Biology of reproduction, 71,
1340-7.
Chapter 9 – References
289
LEMAIRE, M., FROMENT, C., BOUTROS, R., MONDESERT, O., NEBREDA, A. R., MONSARRAT, B.
& DUCOMMUN, B. 2006. CDC25B phosphorylation by p38 and MK-2. Cell Cycle, 5, 1649-53.
LENART, P., PETRONCZKI, M., STEEGMAIER, M., DI FIORE, B., LIPP, J. J., HOFFMANN, M.,
RETTIG, W. J., KRAUT, N. & PETERS, J. M. 2007. The small-molecule inhibitor BI 2536 reveals
novel insights into mitotic roles of polo-like kinase 1. Current biology : CB, 17, 304-15.
LENS, S. M., WOLTHUIS, R. M., KLOMPMAKER, R., KAUW, J., AGAMI, R., BRUMMELKAMP, T.,
KOPS, G. & MEDEMA, R. H. 2003. Survivin is required for a sustained spindle checkpoint
arrest in response to lack of tension. The EMBO journal, 22, 2934-47.
LEUNG-PINEDA, V., RYAN, C. E. & PIWNICA-WORMS, H. 2006. Phosphorylation of Chk1 by
ATR is antagonized by a Chk1-regulated protein phosphatase 2A circuit. Molecular and
cellular biology, 26, 7529-38.
LEUNG, T. W., LIN, S. S., TSANG, A. C., TONG, C. S., CHING, J. C., LEUNG, W. Y., GIMLICH, R.,
WONG, G. G. & YAO, K. M. 2001. Over-expression of FoxM1 stimulates cyclin B1 expression.
FEBS letters, 507, 59-66.
LEVESQUE, A. A., KOHN, E. A., BRESNICK, E. & EASTMAN, A. 2005. Distinct roles for p53
transactivation and repression in preventing UCN-01-mediated abrogation of DNA damage-
induced arrest at S and G2 cell cycle checkpoints. Oncogene, 24, 3786-96.
LEVINE, A. J. 1997. p53, the cellular gatekeeper for growth and division. Cell, 88, 323-31.
LI, C., ANDRAKE, M., DUNBRACK, R. & ENDERS, G. H. 2010. A bifunctional regulatory element
in human somatic Wee1 mediates cyclin A/Cdk2 binding and Crm1-dependent nuclear
export. Molecular and cellular biology, 30, 116-30.
LI, G., ELDER, R. T., QIN, K., PARK, H. U., LIANG, D. & ZHAO, R. Y. 2007. Phosphatase type 2A-
dependent and -independent pathways for ATR phosphorylation of Chk1. The Journal of
biological chemistry, 282, 7287-98.
LI, J., MEYER, A. N. & DONOGHUE, D. J. 1997. Nuclear localization of cyclin B1 mediates its
biological activity and is regulated by phosphorylation. Proceedings of the National Academy
of Sciences of the United States of America, 94, 502-7.
LI, M., SHIN, Y. H., HOU, L., HUANG, X., WEI, Z., KLANN, E. & ZHANG, P. 2008. The adaptor
protein of the anaphase promoting complex Cdh1 is essential in maintaining replicative
lifespan and in learning and memory. Nature cell biology, 10, 1083-9.
Chapter 9 – References
290
LIN, S. Y., LI, K., STEWART, G. S. & ELLEDGE, S. J. 2004. Human Claspin works with BRCA1 to
both positively and negatively regulate cell proliferation. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 6484-9.
LINDON, C. & PINES, J. 2004. Ordered proteolysis in anaphase inactivates Plk1 to contribute
to proper mitotic exit in human cells. The Journal of cell biology, 164, 233-41.
LINDQVIST, A., KALLSTROM, H. & KARLSSON ROSENTHAL, C. 2004. Characterisation of
Cdc25B localisation and nuclear export during the cell cycle and in response to stress. Journal
of cell science, 117, 4979-90.
LINDQVIST, A., KALLSTROM, H., LUNDGREN, A., BARSOUM, E. & ROSENTHAL, C. K. 2005.
Cdc25B cooperates with Cdc25A to induce mitosis but has a unique role in activating cyclin
B1-Cdk1 at the centrosome. The journal of cell biology, 171, 35-45.
LINDQVIST, A., VAN ZON, W., KARLSSON ROSENTHAL, C. & WOLTHUIS, R. M. 2007. Cyclin B1-
Cdk1 activation continues after centrosome separation to control mitotic progression. PLoS
biology, 5, e123.
LINDQVIST, A., RODRIGUEZ-BRAVO, V. & MEDEMA, R. H. 2009. The decision to enter mitosis:
feedback and redundancy in the mitotic entry network. The Journal of cell biology, 185, 193-
202.
LINDSAY, H. D., GRIFFITHS, D. J., EDWARDS, R. J., CHRISTENSEN, P. U., MURRAY, J. M.,
OSMAN, F., WALWORTH, N. & CARR, A. M. 1998. S-phase-specific activation of Cds1 kinase
defines a subpathway of the checkpoint response in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genes &
development, 12, 382-95.
LINDSEY-BOLTZ, L.A., SERCIN, O., CHOI, J.H., SANCAR, A. 2009. Reconstitution of human
claspin-mediated phosphorylation of Chk1 by the ATR (ataxia telangiectasia-mutated and
rad3-related) checkpoint kinase. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 284(48), 33107-14.
LINDSEY-BOLTZ, L.A., SANCAR, A. 2011. Tethering DNA damage checkpoint mediator proteins
topoisomerase IIbeta-binding 1 (TopBP1) and Claspin to DNA activated ataxia-telangiectasia
mutated and RAD3-related (ATR) phosphorylation of checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1). Journal of
Biological Chemistry, 286(22), 19229-36.
LINGLE, W. L. & SALISBURY, J. L. 2000. The role of the centrosome in the development of
malignant tumors. Current topics in developmental biology, 49, 313-29.
Chapter 9 – References
291
LISTOVSKY, T., OREN, Y. S., YUDKOVSKY, Y., MAHBUBANI, H. M., WEISS, A. M., LEBENDIKER,
M. & BRANDEIS, M. 2004. Mammalian Cdh1/Fzr mediates its own degradation. The EMBO
journal, 23, 1619-26.
LIU, D., MATZUK, M. M., SUNG, W. K., GUO, Q., WANG, P. & WOLGEMUTH, D. J. 1998. Cyclin
A1 is required for meiosis in the male mouse. Nature genetics, 20, 377-80.
LIU, F., STANTON, J. J., WU, Z. & PIWNICA-WORMS, H. 1997. The human Myt1 kinase
preferentially phosphorylates Cdc2 on threonine 14 and localizes to the endoplasmic
reticulum and Golgi complex. Mol Cell Biol, 17, 571-83.
LIU, Q., GUNTUKU, S., CUI, X. S., MATSUOKA, S., CORTEZ, D., TAMAI, K., LUO, G., CARATTINI-
RIVERA, S., DEMAYO, F., BRADLEY, A., DONEHOWER, L. A. & ELLEDGE, S. J. 2000. Chk1 is an
essential kinase that is regulated by Atr and required for the G(2)/M DNA damage
checkpoint. Genes & development, 14, 1448-59.
LIU, S., BEKKER-JENSEN, S., MAILAND, N., LUKAS, C., BARTEK, J. & LUKAS, J. 2006a. Claspin
operates downstream of TopBP1 to direct ATR signaling towards Chk1 activation. Molecular
and cellular biology, 26, 6056-64.
LLAMAZARES, S., MOREIRA, A., TAVARES, A., GIRDHAM, C., SPRUCE, B. A., GONZALEZ, C.,
KARESS, R. E., GLOVER, D. M. & SUNKEL, C. E. 1991. polo encodes a protein kinase homolog
required for mitosis in Drosophila. Genes & development, 5, 2153-65.
LOBJOIS, V., JULLIEN, D., BOUCHE, J. P. & DUCOMMUN, B. 2009. The polo-like kinase 1
regulates CDC25B-dependent mitosis entry. Biochimica et biophysica acta, 1793, 462-8.
LOFFLER, H., REBACZ, B., HO, A. D., LUKAS, J., BARTEK, J. & KRAMER, A. 2006. Chk1-
Dependent Regulation of Cdc25B Functions to Coordinate Mitotic Events. Cell Cycle, 5.
LOGARINHO, E. & SUNKEL, C. E. 1998. The Drosophila POLO kinase localises to multiple
compartments of the mitotic apparatus and is required for the phosphorylation of MPM2
reactive epitopes. Journal of cell science, 111 ( Pt 19), 2897-909.
LOPEZ-GIRONA, A., FURNARI, B., MONDESERT, O. & RUSSELL, P. 1999. Nuclear localization of
Cdc25 is regulated by DNA damage and a 14-3-3 protein. Nature, 397, 172-5.
LOPEZ-GIRONA, A., KANOH, J. & RUSSELL, P. 2001a. Nuclear exclusion of Cdc25 is not
required for the DNA damage checkpoint in fission yeast. Curr Biol, 11, 50-4.
LOPEZ-GIRONA, A., KANOH, J. & RUSSELL, P. 2001b. Nuclear exclusion of Cdc25 is not
required for the DNA damage checkpoint in fission yeast. Current biology : CB, 11, 50-4.
Chapter 9 – References
292
LOPEZ-GIRONA, A., TANAKA, K., CHEN, X. B., BABER, B. A., MCGOWAN, C. H. & RUSSELL, P.
2001c. Serine-345 is required for Rad3-dependent phosphorylation and function of
checkpoint kinase Chk1 in fission yeast. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of
the United States of America, 98, 11289-94.
LOSSAINT,G., BESNARD, E., FISHER, D., PIETTE, J, DULIC, V. 2011. Chk1 is dispensible for G2
arrest in response to sustained DNA damage when the ATM/p53/p21 pathway is functional.
Oncogene, 30(41), 4261-74.
LOWERY, D. M., CLAUSER, K. R., HJERRILD, M., LIM, D., ALEXANDER, J., KISHI, K., ONG, S. E.,
GAMMELTOFT, S., CARR, S. A. & YAFFE, M. B. 2007. Proteomic screen defines the Polo-box
domain interactome and identifies Rock2 as a Plk1 substrate. The EMBO journal, 26, 2262-73.
LOWERY, D. M., LIM, D. & YAFFE, M. B. 2005. Structure and function of Polo-like kinases.
Oncogene, 24, 248-59.
LOWERY, D. M., MOHAMMAD, D. H., ELIA, A. E. & YAFFE, M. B. 2004. The Polo-box domain: a
molecular integrator of mitotic kinase cascades and Polo-like kinase function. Cell Cycle, 3,
128-31.
LU, P. J., ZHOU, X. Z., SHEN, M. & LU, K. P. 1999. Function of WW domains as phosphoserine-
or phosphothreonine-binding modules. Science, 283, 1325-8.
LUKAS, C., SORENSEN, C. S., KRAMER, E., SANTONI-RUGIU, E., LINDENEG, C., PETERS, J. M.,
BARTEK, J. & LUKAS, J. 1999a. Accumulation of cyclin B1 requires E2F and cyclin-A-dependent
rearrangement of the anaphase-promoting complex. Nature, 401, 815-8.
LUKAS, J., SORENSEN, C. S., LUKAS, C., SANTONI-RUGIU, E. & BARTEK, J. 1999b. p16INK4a, but
not constitutively active pRb, can impose a sustained G1 arrest: molecular mechanisms and
implications for oncogenesis. Oncogene, 18, 3930-5.
LUKASIEWICZ, K. B. & LINGLE, W. L. 2009. Aurora A, centrosome structure, and the
centrosome cycle. Environmental and molecular mutagenesis, 50, 602-19.
LUNDGREN, K., WALWORTH, N., BOOHER, R., DEMBSKI, M., KIRSCHNER, M. & BEACH, D.
1991. mik1 and wee1 cooperate in the inhibitory tyrosine phosphorylation of cdc2. Cell, 64,
1111-22.
MA, H.T., TSANG, Y.H., MARXER, M., POON, R.Y.C. 2009. Cyclin A2-Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 2
Cooperates with the PLK1-SCF beta TrCP1-EMI1-Anaphase Promoting Complex/Cyclosome
Axis to promote genome reduplication in the absence of mitosis. Molecular and cellular
biology, 29(24), 6500-14.
Chapter 9 – References
293
MACUREK, L., LINDQVIST, A., LIM, D., LAMPSON, M. A., KLOMPMAKER, R., FREIRE, R.,
CLOUIN, C., TAYLOR, S. S., YAFFE, M. B. & MEDEMA, R. H. 2008. Polo-like kinase-1 is activated
by aurora A to promote checkpoint recovery. Nature, 455, 119-23.
MAILAND, N., BEKKER-JENSEN, S., BARTEK, J. & LUKAS, J. 2006. Destruction of Claspin by
SCFbetaTrCP restrains Chk1 activation and facilitates recovery from genotoxic stress.
Molecular cell, 23, 307-18.
MAILAND, N., PODTELEJNIKOV, A. V., GROTH, A., MANN, M., BARTEK, J. & LUKAS, J. 2002.
Regulation of G(2)/M events by Cdc25A through phosphorylation-dependent modulation of
its stability. The EMBO journal, 21, 5911-20.
MALUMBRES, M., BARBACID, M. 2009. Cell cycle, CDKs and cancer: a changing paradigm.
Nature reviews cancer, 9(3), 153-66.
MAMELY, I., VAN VUGT, M. A., SMITS, V. A., SEMPLE, J. I., LEMMENS, B., PERRAKIS, A.,
MEDEMA, R. H. & FREIRE, R. 2006. Polo-like kinase-1 controls proteasome-dependent
degradation of Claspin during checkpoint recovery. Current biology : CB, 16, 1950-5.
MANKE, I. A., NGUYEN, A., LIM, D., STEWART, M. Q., ELIA, A. E. & YAFFE, M. B. 2005. MAPKAP
kinase-2 is a cell cycle checkpoint kinase that regulates the G2/M transition and S phase
progression in response to UV irradiation. Molecular cell, 17, 37-48.
MARGOLIS, S. S., PERRY, J. A., FORESTER, C. M., NUTT, L. K., GUO, Y., JARDIM, M. J.,
THOMENIUS, M. J., FREEL, C. D., DARBANDI, R., AHN, J. H., ARROYO, J. D., WANG, X. F.,
SHENOLIKAR, S., NAIRN, A. C., DUNPHY, W. G., HAHN, W. C., VIRSHUP, D. M. & KORNBLUTH,
S. 2006a. Role for the PP2A/B56delta phosphatase in regulating 14-3-3 release from Cdc25 to
control mitosis. Cell, 127, 759-73.
MARGOLIS, S. S., PERRY, J. A., WEITZEL, D. H., FREEL, C. D., YOSHIDA, M., HAYSTEAD, T. A. &
KORNBLUTH, S. 2006b. A role for PP1 in the Cdc2/Cyclin B-mediated positive feedback
activation of Cdc25. Molecular biology of the cell, 17, 1779-89.
MARGOLIS, S. S., WALSH, S., WEISER, D. C., YOSHIDA, M., SHENOLIKAR, S. & KORNBLUTH, S.
2003. PP1 control of M phase entry exerted through 14-3-3-regulated Cdc25
dephosphorylation. The EMBO journal, 22, 5734-45.
MARIDOR, G., GALLANT, P., GOLSTEYN, R. & NIGG, E. A. 1993. Nuclear localization of
vertebrate cyclin A correlates with its ability to form complexes with cdk catalytic subunits.
Journal of cell science, 106 ( Pt 2), 535-44.
Chapter 9 – References
294
MARTINHO, R. G., LINDSAY, H. D., FLAGGS, G., DEMAGGIO, A. J., HOEKSTRA, M. F., CARR, A.
M. & BENTLEY, N. J. 1998. Analysis of Rad3 and Chk1 protein kinases defines different
checkpoint responses. The EMBO journal, 17, 7239-49.
MASUI, Y. & MARKERT, C. L. 1971. Cytoplasmic control of nuclear behavior during meiotic
maturation of frog oocytes. The Journal of experimental zoology, 177, 129-45.
MATLASHEWSKI, G., BANKS, L., PIM, D. & CRAWFORD, L. 1986. Analysis of human p53
proteins and mRNA levels in normal and transformed cells. European journal of biochemistry
/ FEBS, 154, 665-72.
MATSUOKA, S., ROTMAN, G., OGAWA, A., SHILOH, Y., TAMAI, K. & ELLEDGE, S. J. 2000. Ataxia
telangiectasia-mutated phosphorylates Chk2 in vivo and in vitro. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97, 10389-94.
MATSUYAMA, M., GOTO, H., KASAHARA, K., KAWAKAMI , Y., NAKANISHI, M., KIYONO, T.,
GOSHIMA, N., INAGAKI, M. 2011. Nuclear Chk1 prevents premature mitotic entry. Journal of
cell science, 124 (Pt13), 2113-9.
MAY, E., JENKINS, J. R. & MAY, P. 1991. Endogenous HeLa p53 proteins are easily detected in
HeLa cells transfected with mouse deletion mutant p53 gene. Oncogene, 6, 1363-5.
MAYA-MENDOZA, A., PETERMANN, E., GILLESPIE, D. A., CALDECOTT, K. W. & JACKSON, D. A.
2007. Chk1 regulates the density of active replication origins during the vertebrate S phase.
The EMBO journal, 26, 2719-31.
MAYA, R., BALASS, M., KIM, S. T., SHKEDY, D., LEAL, J. F., SHIFMAN, O., MOAS, M.,
BUSCHMANN, T., RONAI, Z., SHILOH, Y., KASTAN, M. B., KATZIR, E. & OREN, M. 2001. ATM-
dependent phosphorylation of Mdm2 on serine 395: role in p53 activation by DNA damage.
Genes & development, 15, 1067-77.
MCINNES, C., MAZUMDAR, A., MEZNA, M., MEADES, C., MIDGLEY, C., SCAEROU, F.,
CARPENTER, L., MACKENZIE, M., TAYLOR, P., WALKINSHAW, M., FISCHER, P. M. & GLOVER, D.
2006. Inhibitors of Polo-like kinase reveal roles in spindle-pole maintenance. Nature chemical
biology, 2, 608-17.
MEDEMA, R.H., MACUREK, L. 2011. Checkpoint recovery in cells: how a molecular
understanding can help in the fight against cancer. F1000 Biology Reports, 3(10).
MEDEMA, R.H., MACUREK, L., 2012. Checkpoint control and cancer. Oncogene, 31(21), 2601-
13.
Chapter 9 – References
295
MELCHIONNA, R., CHEN, X. B., BLASINA, A. & MCGOWAN, C. H. 2000. Threonine 68 is
required for radiation-induced phosphorylation and activation of Cds1. Nature Cell Biology, 2,
762-5.
MEYN, M. S. 1995. Ataxia-telangiectasia and cellular responses to DNA damage. Cancer
research, 55, 5991-6001.
MIKHAILOV, A., PATEL, D., MCCANCE, D. J. & RIEDER, C. L. 2007. The G2 p38-mediated stress-
activated checkpoint pathway becomes attenuated in transformed cells. Current biology : CB,
17, 2162-8.
MIKHAILOV, A., SHINOHARA, M. & RIEDER, C. L. 2004. Topoisomerase II and histone
deacetylase inhibitors delay the G2/M transition by triggering the p38 MAPK checkpoint
pathway. The Journal of cell biology, 166, 517-26.
MISTRY, H. B., MACCALLUM, D. E., JACKSON, R. C., CHAPLAIN, M. A. & DAVIDSON, F. A. 2008.
Modeling the temporal evolution of the spindle assembly checkpoint and role of Aurora B
kinase. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,
105, 20215-20.
MITRA, J. & ENDERS, G. H. 2004. Cyclin A/Cdk2 complexes regulate activation of Cdk1 and
Cdc25 phosphatases in human cells. Oncogene, 23, 3361-7.
MITRA, J., ENDERS, G. H., AZIZKHAN-CLIFFORD, J. & LENGEL, K. L. 2006. Dual regulation of the
anaphase promoting complex in human cells by cyclin A-Cdk2 and cyclin A-Cdk1 complexes.
Cell Cycle, 5, 661-6.
MOHINDRA, A., HAYS, L. E., PHILLIPS, E. N., PRESTON, B. D., HELLEDAY, T. & MEUTH, M. 2002.
Defects in homologous recombination repair in mismatch-repair-deficient tumour cell lines.
Human molecular genetics, 11, 2189-200.
MOORE, J. D., YANG, J., TRUANT, R. & KORNBLUTH, S. 1999. Nuclear import of Cdk/cyclin
complexes: identification of distinct mechanisms for import of Cdk2/cyclin E and Cdc2/cyclin
B1. The Journal of Cell biology, 144, 213-24.
MORGAN, D. O. 1995. Principles of CDK regulation. Nature, 374, 131-4.
MORRIS, M. C., HEITZ, A., MERY, J., HEITZ, F. & DIVITA, G. 2000. An essential phosphorylation-
site domain of human cdc25C interacts with both 14-3-3 and cyclins. The Journal of biological
chemistry, 275, 28849-57.
MOSHE, Y., BOULAIRE, J., PAGANO, M. & HERSHKO, A. 2004. Role of Polo-like kinase in the
degradation of early mitotic inhibitor 1, a regulator of the anaphase promoting
Chapter 9 – References
296
complex/cyclosome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of
America, 101, 7937-42.
MROSS, K., FROST, A., STEINBILD, S., HEDBOM, S., RENTSCHLER, J., KAISER, R., ROUYRRE, N.,
TROMMESHAUSER, D., HOESL, C. E. & MUNZERT, G. 2008. Phase I dose escalation and
pharmacokinetic study of BI 2536, a novel Polo-like kinase 1 inhibitor, in patients with
advanced solid tumors. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of
Clinical Oncology, 26, 5511-7.
MUELLER, P. R., COLEMAN, T. R., KUMAGAI, A. & DUNPHY, W. G. 1995. Myt1: a membrane-
associated inhibitory kinase that phosphorylates Cdc2 on both threonine-14 and tyrosine-15.
Science, 270, 86-90.
MUNDT, K. E., GOLSTEYN, R. M., LANE, H. A. & NIGG, E. A. 1997. On the regulation and
function of human polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1): effects of overexpression on cell cycle
progression. Biochemical and biophysical research communications, 239, 377-85.
MURAKAMI, H. & OKAYAMA, H. 1995. A kinase from fission yeast responsible for blocking
mitosis in S phase. Nature, 374, 817-9.
MURRAY, A and HUNT, T. 1993. The cell cycle: An introduction. W.H. Freeman & Co. New
York.
MYERS, J. S., ZHAO, R., XU, X., HAM, A. J. & CORTEZ, D. 2007. Cyclin-dependent kinase 2
dependent phosphorylation of ATRIP regulates the G2-M checkpoint response to DNA
damage. Cancer research, 67, 6685-90.
NAGATA, A., IGARASHI, M., JINNO, S., SUTO, K. & OKAYAMA, H. 1991. An additional homolog
of the fission yeast cdc25+ gene occurs in humans and is highly expressed in some cancer
cells. New Biology., 3, 959-968.
NAMIKI, Y. & ZOU, L. 2006. ATRIP associates with replication protein A-coated ssDNA through
multiple interactions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States
of America, 103, 580-5.
NGUYEN, T. B., MANOVA, K., CAPODIECI, P., LINDON, C., BOTTEGA, S., WANG, X. Y., REFIK-
ROGERS, J., PINES, J., WOLGEMUTH, D. J. & KOFF, A. 2002. Characterization and expression of
mammalian cyclin b3, a prepachytene meiotic cyclin. The Journal of biological chemistry, 277,
41960-9.
NIGG, E. A. 2001. Mitotic kinases as regulators of cell division and its checkpoints. Nature
reviews. Molecular cell biology, 2, 21-32.
Chapter 9 – References
297
NIGG, E. A. & STEARNS, T. 2011. The centrosome cycle: Centriole biogenesis, duplication and
inherent asymmetries. Nature cell biology, 13, 1154-60.
NIIDA, H., KATSUNO, Y., BANERJEE, B., HANDE, M. P. & NAKANISHI, M. 2007. Specific role of
Chk1 phosphorylations in cell survival and checkpoint activation. Molecular and cellular
biology, 27, 2572-81.
NIIDA, H. & NAKANISHI, M. 2006. DNA damage checkpoints in mammals. Mutagenesis, 21, 3-
9.
NIIDA, H., TSUGE, S., KATSUNO, Y., KONISHI, A., TAKEDA, N. & NAKANISHI, M. 2005.
Depletion of Chk1 leads to premature activation of Cdc2-cyclin B and mitotic catastrophe.
The Journal of biological chemistry, 280, 39246-52.
NIIDA, H., MURATA, K., SHIMADA, M., OGAWA, K., OHTA, K., SUZUKI, K., FUJIGAKI, H., KHAW,
A.K., BANERJEE, B., HANDE, M.P., MIYAMOTO, T., MIYOASI, I., SHIRAI, T., MOTOYAMA, N.,
DELHASE, M., APPELLA, E., NAKANISHI, E. 2010. Cooperative functions of Chk1 and Chk2
reduce tumour susceptibility in vivo. The EMBO journal, 29(20), 3558-70.
O'CONNELL, M. J., RALEIGH, J. M., VERKADE, H. M. & NURSE, P. 1997. Chk1 is a wee1 kinase
in the G2 DNA damage checkpoint inhibiting cdc2 by Y15 phosphorylation. The EMBO journal,
16, 545-54.
O'DRISCOLL, M., GENNERY, A. R., SEIDEL, J., CONCANNON, P. & JEGGO, P. A. 2004. An
overview of three new disorders associated with genetic instability: LIG4 syndrome, RS-SCID
and ATR-Seckel syndrome. DNA Repair (Amst), 3, 1227-35.
O'DRISCOLL, M., RUIZ-PEREZ, V. L., WOODS, C. G., JEGGO, P. A. & GOODSHIP, J. A. 2003. A
splicing mutation affecting expression of ataxia-telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein (ATR)
results in Seckel syndrome. Nature genetics, 33, 497-501.
OBATA, T., BROWN, G. E. & YAFFE, M. B. 2000. MAP kinase pathways activated by stress: the
p38 MAPK pathway. Critical care medicine, 28, N67-77.
OKAMOTO, K. & BEACH, D. 1994. Cyclin G is a transcriptional target of the p53 tumor
suppressor protein. The EMBO journal, 13, 4816-22.
OKAMOTO, K. & SAGATA, N. 2007. Mechanism for inactivation of the mitotic inhibitory
kinase Wee1 at M phase. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United
States of America, 104, 3753-8.
Chapter 9 – References
298
OOKATA, K., HISANAGA, S., OKANO, T., TACHIBANA, K. & KISHIMOTO, T. 1992. Relocation and
distinct subcellular localization of p34cdc2-cyclin B complex at meiosis reinitiation in starfish
oocytes. The EMBO journal, 11, 1763-72.
ORTEGA, S., PRIETO, I., ODAJIMA, J., MARTIN, A., DUBUS, P., SOTILLO, R., BARBERO, J. L.,
MALUMBRES, M. & BARBACID, M. 2003. Cyclin-dependent kinase 2 is essential for meiosis
but not for mitotic cell division in mice. Nature genetics, 35, 25-31.
OUYANG, B., LI, W., PAN, H., MEADOWS, J., HOFFMANN, I., DAI, W. 1999. The physical
association and phosphorylation of Cdc25C protein phosphatase by Prk. Oncogene, 1999, 18,
6029–6036.
OWEN-SCHAUB, L. B., ZHANG, W., CUSACK, J. C., ANGELO, L. S., SANTEE, S. M., FUJIWARA, T.,
ROTH, J. A., DEISSEROTH, A. B., ZHANG, W. W., KRUZEL, E. & ET AL. 1995. Wild-type human
p53 and a temperature-sensitive mutant induce Fas/APO-1 expression. Molecular and
cellular biology, 15, 3032-40.
OZERI-GALAI, E., SCHWARTZ, M., RAHAT, A. & KEREM, B. 2008. Interplay between ATM and
ATR in the regulation of common fragile site stability. Oncogene, 27, 2109-17.
PAGANO, M., PEPPERKOK, R., VERDE, F., ANSORGE, W. & DRAETTA, G. 1992. Cyclin A is
required at two points in the human cell cycle. The EMBO journal, 11, 961-71.
PAINTER, R. B. & YOUNG, B. R. 1980. Radiosensitivity in ataxia-telangiectasia: a new
explanation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of
America, 77, 7315-7.
PALERMO, C., HOPE, J.C., FREYER, G.A., RAO, H., WALWORTH, N.C. 2008. The importance of a
C-terminal conserved region of Chk1 for checkpoint function. PLoS One, 3(1), 1427.
PARK, H. J., COSTA, R. H., LAU, L. F., TYNER, A. L. & RAYCHAUDHURI, P. 2008. Anaphase-
promoting complex/cyclosome-CDH1-mediated proteolysis of the forkhead box M1
transcription factor is critical for regulated entry into S phase. Molecular and cellular biology,
28, 5162-71.
PARK, J. E., SOUNG, N. K., JOHMURA, Y., KANG, Y. H., LIAO, C., LEE, K. H., PARK, C. H.,
NICKLAUS, M. C. & LEE, K. S. 2010. Polo-box domain: a versatile mediator of polo-like kinase
function. Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 67, 1957-70.
PARKER, L. L., ATHERTON-FESSLER, S. & PIWNICA-WORMS, H. 1992. p107wee1 is a dual-
specificity kinase that phosphorylates p34cdc2 on tyrosine 15. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 89, 2917-21.
Chapter 9 – References
299
PARKER, L. L. & PIWNICA-WORMS, H. 1992a. Inactivation of the p34cdc2-cyclin B complex by
the human WEE1 tyrosine kinase. Science, 257, 1955-1957.
PARKER, L. L. & PIWNICA-WORMS, H. 1992b. Inactivation of the p34cdc2-cyclin B complex by
the human WEE1 tyrosine kinase. Science, 257, 1955-7.
PAULES, R. S., LEVEDAKOU, E. N., WILSON, S. J., INNES, C. L., RHODES, N., TLSTY, T. D.,
GALLOWAY, D. A., DONEHOWER, L. A., TAINSKY, M. A. & KAUFMANN, W. K. 1995. Defective
G2 checkpoint function in cells from individuals with familial cancer syndromes. Cancer
research, 55, 1763-73.
PAULOVICH, A. G. & HARTWELL, L. H. 1995. A checkpoint regulates the rate of progression
through S phase in S. cerevisiae in response to DNA damage. Cell, 82, 841-7.
PENG, C. Y., GRAVES, P. R., THOMA, R. S., WU, Z., SHAW, A. S. & PIWNICA-WORMS, H. 1997.
Mitotic and G2 checkpoint control: regulation of 14-3-3 protein binding by phosphorylation
of Cdc25C on serine-216. Science, 277, 1501-5.
PENG, S. Y., CHOU, S. P. & HSU, H. C. 1998. Association of downregulation of cyclin D1 and of
overexpression of cyclin E with p53 mutation, high tumor grade and poor prognosis in
hepatocellular carcinoma. Journal of hepatology, 29, 281-9.
PESCHIAROLI, A., DORRELLO, N. V., GUARDAVACCARO, D., VENERE, M., HALAZONETIS, T.,
SHERMAN, N. E. & PAGANO, M. 2006. SCFbetaTrCP-mediated degradation of Claspin
regulates recovery from the DNA replication checkpoint response. Molecular cell, 23, 319-29.
PETER, M., LE PEUCH, C., LABBE, J. C., MEYER, A. N., DONOGHUE, D. J. & DOREE, M. 2002.
Initial activation of cyclin-B1-cdc2 kinase requires phosphorylation of cyclin B1. EMBO
reports, 3, 551-6.
PETERMANN, E. & CALDECOTT, K. W. 2006. Evidence that the ATR/Chk1 pathway maintains
normal replication fork progression during unperturbed S phase. Cell Cycle, 5, 2203-9.
PETERMANN, E., HELLEDAY, T. & CALDECOTT, K. W. 2008. Claspin promotes normal
replication fork rates in human cells. Molecular biology of the cell, 19, 2373-8.
PETERMANN, E., MAYA-MENDOZA, A., ZACHOS, G., GILLESPIE, D. A., JACKSON, D. A. &
CALDECOTT, K. W. 2006. Chk1 requirement for high global rates of replication fork
progression during normal vertebrate S phase. Molecular and cellular biology, 26, 3319-26.
PETERS, U., CHERIAN, J., KIM, J. H., KWOK, B. H. & KAPOOR, T. M. 2006. Probing cell-division
phenotype space and Polo-like kinase function using small molecules. Nature chemical
biology, 2, 618-26.
Chapter 9 – References
300
PETRINI, J. H. 2000. The Mre11 complex and ATM: collaborating to navigate S phase. Current
Opinion in Cell Biology, 12, 293-6.
PEVARELLO, P., BRASCA, M. G., AMICI, R., ORSINI, P., TRAQUANDI, G., CORTI, L., PIUTTI, C.,
SANSONNA, P., VILLA, M., PIERCE, B. S., PULICI, M., GIORDANO, P., MARTINA, K., FRITZEN, E.
L., NUGENT, R. A., CASALE, E., CAMERON, A., CIOMEI, M., ROLETTO, F., ISACCHI, A.,
FOGLIATTO, G., PESENTI, E., PASTORI, W., MARSIGLIO, A., LEACH, K. L., CLARE, P. M.,
FIORENTINI, F., VARASI, M., VULPETTI, A. & WARPEHOSKI, M. A. 2004. 3-Aminopyrazole
inhibitors of CDK2/cyclin A as antitumor agents. 1. Lead finding. Journal of medicinal
chemistry, 47, 3367-80.
PEVARELLO, P., BRASCA, M. G., ORSINI, P., TRAQUANDI, G., LONGO, A., NESI, M., ORZI, F.,
PIUTTI, C., SANSONNA, P., VARASI, M., CAMERON, A., VULPETTI, A., ROLETTO, F., ALZANI, R.,
CIOMEI, M., ALBANESE, C., PASTORI, W., MARSIGLIO, A., PESENTI, E., FIORENTINI, F.,
BISCHOFF, J. R. & MERCURIO, C. 2005a. 3-Aminopyrazole inhibitors of CDK2/cyclin A as
antitumor agents. 2. Lead optimization. Journal of medicinal chemistry, 48, 2944-56.
PEVARELLO, P., BRASCA, M. G., ORSINI, P., TRAQUANDI, G., LONGO, A., NESI, M., ORZI, F.,
PIUTTI, C., SANSONNA, P., VARASI, M., CAMERON, A., VULPETTI, A., ROLETTO, F., ALZANI, R.,
CIOMEI, M., ALBANESE, C., PASTORI, W., MARSIGLIO, A., PESENTI, E., FIORENTINI, F.,
BISCHOFF, J. R. & MERCURIO, C. 2005b. 3-Aminopyrazole inhibitors of CDK2/cyclin A as
antitumor agents. 2. Lead optimization. Journal of medicinal chemistry, 48, 2944-56.
PFLEGER, C. M. & KIRSCHNER, M. W. 2000. The KEN box: an APC recognition signal distinct
from the D box targeted by Cdh1. Genes & development, 14, 655-65.
PIETERSMA, A., TILLY, B. C., GAESTEL, M., DE JONG, N., LEE, J. C., KOSTER, J. F. & SLUITER, W.
1997. p38 mitogen activated protein kinase regulates endothelial VCAM-1 expression at the
post-transcriptional level. Biochemical and biophysical research communications, 230, 44-8.
PINES, J. & HUNTER, T. 1990. Human cyclin A is adenovirus E1A-associated protein p60 and
behaves differently from cyclin B. Nature, 346, 760-3.
PINES, J. & HUNTER, T. 1991. Human cyclins A and B1 are differentially located in the cell and
undergo cell cycle-dependent nuclear transport. The Journal of cell biology, 115, 1-17.
PINES, J. & RIEDER, C. L. 2001. Re-staging mitosis: a contemporary view of mitotic
progression. Nature cell biology, 3, E3-6.
PIWNICA-WORMS, H. 1999. Cell cycle. Fools rush in. Nature, 401, 535, 537.
Chapter 9 – References
301
POLYAK, K., LEE, M. H., ERDJUMENT-BROMAGE, H., KOFF, A., ROBERTS, J. M., TEMPST, P. &
MASSAGUE, J. 1994. Cloning of p27Kip1, a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor and a potential
mediator of extracellular antimitogenic signals. Cell, 78, 59-66.
POLYAK, K., XIA, Y., ZWEIER, J. L., KINZLER, K. W. & VOGELSTEIN, B. 1997. A model for p53-
induced apoptosis. Nature, 389, 300-5.
POMERENING, J. R., SONTAG, E. D. & FERRELL, J. E., JR. 2003. Building a cell cycle oscillator:
hysteresis and bistability in the activation of Cdc2. Nature cell biology, 5, 346-51.
PORTER, L. A. & DONOGHUE, D. J. 2003. Cyclin B1 and CDK1: nuclear localization and
upstream regulators. Progress in cell cycle research, 5, 335-47.
PREUSS, U., LANDSBERG, G. & SCHEIDTMANN, K. H. 2003. Novel mitosis-specific
phosphorylation of histone H3 at Thr11 mediated by Dlk/ZIP kinase. Nucleic acids research,
31, 878-85.
PRINZ, S., HWANG, E. S., VISINTIN, R. & AMON, A. 1998. The regulation of Cdc20 proteolysis
reveals a role for APC components Cdc23 and Cdc27 during S phase and early mitosis.
Current biology : CB, 8, 750-60.
PUC, J., KENIRY, M., LI, H. S., PANDITA, T. K., CHOUDHURY, A. D., MEMEO, L., MANSUKHANI,
M., MURTY, V. V., GACIONG, Z., MEEK, S. E., PIWNICA-WORMS, H., HIBSHOOSH, H. &
PARSONS, R. 2005. Lack of PTEN sequesters CHK1 and initiates genetic instability. Cancer Cell,
7, 193-204.
QI, W., TANG, Z. & YU, H. 2006. Phosphorylation- and polo-box-dependent binding of Plk1 to
Bub1 is required for the kinetochore localization of Plk1. Molecular biology of the cell, 17,
3705-16.
QIAN, Y. W., ERIKSON, E., LI, C. & MALLER, J. L. 1998. Activated polo-like kinase Plx1 is
required at multiple points during mitosis in Xenopus laevis. Molecular and cellular biology,
18, 4262-71.
RAFF, J. W., JEFFERS, K. & HUANG, J. Y. 2002. The roles of Fzy/Cdc20 and Fzr/Cdh1 in
regulating the destruction of cyclin B in space and time. The Journal of cell biology, 157,
1139-49.
RAINGEAUD, J., GUPTA, S., ROGERS, J. S., DICKENS, M., HAN, J., ULEVITCH, R. J. & DAVIS, R. J.
1995. Pro-inflammatory cytokines and environmental stress cause p38 mitogen-activated
protein kinase activation by dual phosphorylation on tyrosine and threonine. The Journal of
biological chemistry, 270, 7420-6.
Chapter 9 – References
302
RALEIGH, J. M. & O'CONNELL, M. J. 2000. The G(2) DNA damage checkpoint targets both
Wee1 and Cdc25. Journal of cell science, 113 ( Pt 10), 1727-36.
RAPE, M. & KIRSCHNER, M. W. 2004. Autonomous regulation of the anaphase-promoting
complex couples mitosis to S-phase entry. Nature, 432, 588-95.
RAPE, M., REDDY, S. K. & KIRSCHNER, M. W. 2006. The processivity of multiubiquitination by
the APC determines the order of substrate degradation. Cell, 124, 89-103.
REBER, A., LEHNER, C. F. & JACOBS, H. W. 2006. Terminal mitoses require negative regulation
of Fzr/Cdh1 by Cyclin A, preventing premature degradation of mitotic cyclins and
String/Cdc25. Development, 133, 3201-11.
REINHARDT, H. C., ASLANIAN, A. S., LEES, J. A. & YAFFE, M. B. 2007. p53-deficient cells rely on
ATM- and ATR-mediated checkpoint signaling through the p38MAPK/MK2 pathway for
survival after DNA damage. Cancer Cell, 11, 175-89.
RHIND, N., FURNARI, B. & RUSSELL, P. 1997. Cdc2 tyrosine phosphorylation is required for the
DNA damage checkpoint in fission yeast. Genes & development, 11, 504-11.
RICKERT, P., SEGHEZZI, W., SHANAHAN, F., CHO, H. & LEES, E. 1996. Cyclin C/CDK8 is a novel
CTD kinase associated with RNA polymerase II. Oncogene, 12, 2631-40.
ROGAKOU, E.P., BOON, C., REDON, C., BONNER, W.M. 1999. Megabase chromatin domains
involved in DNA double-strand breaks in vivo. Journal of Cell Biology, 146, 905-916.
ROGHI, C., GIET, R., UZBEKOV, R., MORIN, N., CHARTRAIN, I., LE GUELLEC, R., COUTURIER, A.,
DOREE, M., PHILIPPE, M. & PRIGENT, C. 1998. The Xenopus protein kinase pEg2 associates
with the centrosome in a cell cycle-dependent manner, binds to the spindle microtubules
and is involved in bipolar mitotic spindle assembly. Journal of cell science, 111 ( Pt 5), 557-72.
ROSENBLATT, J., GU, Y. & MORGAN, D. O. 1992. Human cyclin-dependent kinase 2 is
activated during the S and G2 phases of the cell cycle and associates with cyclin A.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 89, 2824-8.
ROSSOMANDO, A. J., DENT, P., STURGILL, T. W. & MARSHAK, D. R. 1994. Mitogen-activated
protein kinase kinase 1 (MKK1) is negatively regulated by threonine phosphorylation.
Molecular and cellular biology, 14, 1594-602.
ROTHBLUM-OVIATT, C. J., RYAN, C. E. & PIWNICA-WORMS, H. 2001. 14-3-3 binding regulates
catalytic activity of human Wee1 kinase. Cell growth & differentiation : the molecular biology
journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 12, 581-9.
Chapter 9 – References
303
ROTMAN, G. & SHILOH, Y. 1999. ATM: a mediator of multiple responses to genotoxic stress.
Oncogene, 18, 6135-44.
ROUSE, J., COHEN, P., TRIGON, S., MORANGE, M., ALONSO-LLAMAZARES, A., ZAMANILLO, D.,
HUNT, T. & NEBREDA, A. R. 1994. A novel kinase cascade triggered by stress and heat shock
that stimulates MAPKAP kinase-2 and phosphorylation of the small heat shock proteins. Cell,
78, 1027-37.
RUDOLPH, J., EPSTEIN, D. M., PARKER, L. & ECKSTEIN, J. 2001. Specificity of natural and
artificial substrates for human Cdc25A. Analytical biochemistry, 289, 43-51.
SADHU, K., REED, S. I., RICHARDSON, H. & RUSSELL, P. 1990. Human homolog of fission yeast
cdc25 mitotic inducer is predominantly expressed in G2. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 87, 5139-5143.
SANTAGUIDA, S., VERNIERI, C., VILLA, F., CILIBERTO, A. & MUSACCHIO, A. 2011. Evidence that
Aurora B is implicated in spindle checkpoint signalling independently of error correction. The
EMBO journal, 30, 1508-19.
SANTAMARIA, A., NEEF, R., EBERSPACHER, U., EIS, K., HUSEMANN, M., MUMBERG, D.,
PRECHTL, S., SCHULZE, V., SIEMEISTER, G., WORTMANN, L., BARR, F. A. & NIGG, E. A. 2007.
Use of the novel Plk1 inhibitor ZK-thiazolidinone to elucidate functions of Plk1 in early and
late stages of mitosis. Molecular biology of the cell, 18, 4024-36.
SAR, F., LINDSEY-BOLTZ, L. A., SUBRAMANIAN, D., CROTEAU, D. L., HUTSELL, S. Q., GRIFFITH,
J. D. & SANCAR, A. 2004. Human claspin is a ring-shaped DNA-binding protein with high
affinity to branched DNA structures. The Journal of biological chemistry, 279, 39289-95.
SARDON, T., PESET, I., PETROVA, B. & VERNOS, I. 2008. Dissecting the role of Aurora A during
spindle assembly. The EMBO journal, 27, 2567-79.
SATYANARAYANA, A., BERTHET, C., LOPEZ-MOLINA, J., COPPOLA, V., TESSAROLLO, L., KALDIS,
P. 2008. Genetic substitution of Cdk1 by Cdk2 leads to embryonic lethality and loss of meiotic
function of Cdk2. Development, 135(20), 3389-400.
SATYANARAYANA, A., HILTON, M. B. & KALDIS, P. 2008. p21 Inhibits Cdk1 in the absence of
Cdk2 to maintain the G1/S phase DNA damage checkpoint. Molecular biology of the cell, 19,
65-77.
SATYANARAYANA, A., KALDIS, P. 2009. Mammalian cell-cycle regulation: several Cdks,
numerous cyclins and diverse compensatory mechanisms. Oncogene, 28(33), 2925-39
Chapter 9 – References
304
SCHMITT, E., BOUTROS, R., FROMENT, C., MONSARRAT, B., DUCOMMUN, B. & DOZIER, C.
2006. CHK1 phosphorylates CDC25B during the cell cycle in the absence of DNA damage.
Journal of cell science, 119, 4269-75.
SCHWAB, M. S. & DREYER, C. 1997. Protein phosphorylation sites regulate the function of the
bipartite NLS of nucleolin. European journal of cell biology, 73, 287-97.
SEDELNIKOVA, O.A., ROGAKOU, E.P., PANYUTIN, I.G., BONNER, W.M. 2002. Quantitative
detection of (125) IdU-induced DNA double-strand breaks with gamma-H2AX antibody.
Radiation Research, 158, 486-492.
SEGURADO, M. & TERCERO, J. A. 2009. The S-phase checkpoint: targeting the replication fork.
Biology of the cell / under the auspices of the European Cell Biology Organization, 101, 617-
27.
SEKI, A., COPPINGER, J. A., DU, H., JANG, C. Y., YATES, J. R., 3RD & FANG, G. 2008a. Plk1- and
beta-TrCP-dependent degradation of Bora controls mitotic progression. The Journal of cell
biology, 181, 65-78.
SEKI, A., COPPINGER, J. A., JANG, C. Y., YATES, J. R. & FANG, G. 2008b. Bora and the kinase
Aurora a cooperatively activate the kinase Plk1 and control mitotic entry. Science, 320, 1655-
8.
SEONG, Y. S., KAMIJO, K., LEE, J. S., FERNANDEZ, E., KURIYAMA, R., MIKI, T. & LEE, K. S. 2002.
A spindle checkpoint arrest and a cytokinesis failure by the dominant-negative polo-box
domain of Plk1 in U-2 OS cells. The Journal of biological chemistry, 277, 32282-93.
SEROR, C., RAZA, S. Q., BROTTES, F., SUBRA, F., PIACENTINI, M., PERFETTINI, J. L. & KROEMER,
G. 2009. Pro-apoptotic function of checkpoint kinase-2 in syncytia elicited by the HIV-1
envelope. Cell Cycle, 8, 438-42.
SHALOM-BARAK, T., QUACH, J. & LOTZ, M. 1998. Interleukin-17-induced gene expression in
articular chondrocytes is associated with activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases and
NF-kappaB. The Journal of biological chemistry, 273, 27467-73.
SHAPIRO, L., HEIDENREICH, K. A., MEINTZER, M. K. & DINARELLO, C. A. 1998. Role of p38
mitogen-activated protein kinase in HIV type 1 production in vitro. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95, 7422-6.
SHE, Q. B., CHEN, N. & DONG, Z. 2000. ERKs and p38 kinase phosphorylate p53 protein at
serine 15 in response to UV radiation. The Journal of biological chemistry, 275, 20444-9.
Chapter 9 – References
305
SHE, Q. B., MA, W. Y. & DONG, Z. 2002. Role of MAP kinases in UVB-induced phosphorylation
of p53 at serine 20. Oncogene, 21, 1580-9.
SHEN, M., STUKENBERG, P. T., KIRSCHNER, M. W. & LU, K. P. 1998. The essential mitotic
peptidyl-prolyl isomerase Pin1 binds and regulates mitosis-specific phosphoproteins. Genes &
development, 12, 706-20.
SHERR, C. J. & ROBERTS, J. M. 1995. Inhibitors of mammalian G1 cyclin-dependent kinases.
Genes Dev, 9, 1149-63.
SHERR, C. J. & ROBERTS, J. M. 1999. CDK inhibitors: positive and negative regulators of G1-
phase progression. Genes Dev, 13, 1501-12.
SHILOH, Y. 1997. Ataxia-telangiectasia and the Nijmegen breakage syndrome: related
disorders but genes apart. Annu Rev Genet, 31, 635-62.
SHILOH, Y. 2001. ATM (ataxia telangiectasia mutated): expanding roles in the DNA damage
response and cellular homeostasis. Biochem Soc Trans, 29, 661-6.
SHIROMIZU, T., GOTO, H., TOMONO, Y., BARTEK, J., TOTSUKAWA, G., INOKO, A., NAKANISHI,
M., MATSUMURA, F. & INAGAKI, M. 2006. Regulation of mitotic function of Chk1 through
phosphorylation at novel sites by cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (Cdk1). Genes Cells, 11, 477-85.
SHREERAM, S., DEMIDOV, O. N., HEE, W. K., YAMAGUCHI, H., ONISHI, N., KEK, C., TIMOFEEV,
O. N., DUDGEON, C., FORNACE, A. J., ANDERSON, C. W., MINAMI, Y., APPELLA, E. & BULAVIN,
D. V. 2006. Wip1 phosphatase modulates ATM-dependent signaling pathways. Molecular cell,
23, 757-64.
SIGRIST, S. J. & LEHNER, C. F. 1997. Drosophila fizzy-related down-regulates mitotic cyclins
and is required for cell proliferation arrest and entry into endocycles. Cell, 90, 671-81.
SMITH, A., SIMANSKI, S., FALLAHI, M. & AYAD, N. G. 2007. Redundant ubiquitin ligase
activities regulate wee1 degradation and mitotic entry. Cell Cycle, 6, 2795-9.
SMITH, G. C., CARY, R. B., LAKIN, N. D., HANN, B. C., TEO, S. H., CHEN, D. J. & JACKSON, S. P.
1999. Purification and DNA binding properties of the ataxia-telangiectasia gene product ATM.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 96, 11134-
9.
SMITH, J., THO, L.M., XU, N., GILLESPIE, D.A. 2010. The ATM-Chk2 and ATR-Chk1 pathways in
DNA damage signaling and cancer. Advances in cancer research 108: 73-112.
Chapter 9 – References
306
SMITS, V. A. 2006. Spreading the signal: dissociation of Chk1 from chromatin. Cell Cycle, 5,
1039-43.
SMITS, V. A., KLOMPMAKER, R., ARNAUD, L., RIJKSEN, G., NIGG, E. A. & MEDEMA, R. H. 2000.
Polo-like kinase-1 is a target of the DNA damage checkpoint. Nature cell biology, 2, 672-6.
SMITS, V. A., REAPER, P. M. & JACKSON, S. P. 2006. Rapid PIKK-dependent release of Chk1
from chromatin promotes the DNA-damage checkpoint response. Current biology : CB, 16,
150-9.
SONG, S., GRENFELL, T. Z., GARFIELD, S., ERIKSON, R. L. & LEE, K. S. 2000. Essential function of
the polo box of Cdc5 in subcellular localization and induction of cytokinetic structures.
Molecular and cellular biology, 20, 286-98.
SORENSEN, C. S., LUKAS, C., KRAMER, E. R., PETERS, J. M., BARTEK, J. & LUKAS, J. 2001. A
conserved cyclin-binding domain determines functional interplay between anaphase-
promoting complex-Cdh1 and cyclin A-Cdk2 during cell cycle progression. Molecular and
cellular biology, 21, 3692-703.
SORENSEN, C. S., SYLJUASEN, R. G., FALCK, J., SCHROEDER, T., RONNSTRAND, L., KHANNA, K.
K., ZHOU, B. B., BARTEK, J. & LUKAS, J. 2003. Chk1 regulates the S phase checkpoint by
coupling the physiological turnover and ionizing radiation-induced accelerated proteolysis of
Cdc25A. Cancer Cell, 3, 247-58.
SORENSEN, C. S., SYLJUASEN, R. G., LUKAS, J. & BARTEK, J. 2004. ATR, Claspin and the Rad9-
Rad1-Hus1 complex regulate Chk1 and Cdc25A in the absence of DNA damage. Cell Cycle, 3,
941-5.
STANDART, N., MINSHULL, J., PINES, J. & HUNT, T. 1987. Cyclin synthesis, modification and
destruction during meiotic maturation of the starfish oocyte. Developmental biology, 124,
248-58.
STANFORD, J. S. & RUDERMAN, J. V. 2005. Changes in regulatory phosphorylation of Cdc25C
Ser287 and Wee1 Ser549 during normal cell cycle progression and checkpoint arrests.
Molecular biology of the cell, 16, 5749-60.
STEAD, E., WHITE, J., FAAST, R., CONN, S., GOLDSTONE, S., RATHJEN, J., DHINGRA, U.,
RATHJEN, P., WALKER, D. & DALTON, S. 2002. Pluripotent cell division cycles are driven by
ectopic Cdk2, cyclin A/E and E2F activities. Oncogene, 21, 8320-33.
STEEGMAIER, M., HOFFMANN, M., BAUM, A., LENART, P., PETRONCZKI, M., KRSSAK, M.,
GURTLER, U., GARIN-CHESA, P., LIEB, S., QUANT, J., GRAUERT, M., ADOLF, G. R., KRAUT, N.,
Chapter 9 – References
307
PETERS, J. M. & RETTIG, W. J. 2007. BI 2536, a potent and selective inhibitor of polo-like
kinase 1, inhibits tumor growth in vivo. Current biology : CB, 17, 316-22.
STERNS, T., POLLAK, N., ECHTENACHER, B. & MANNEL, D. N. 2005. Divergence of protection
induced by bacterial products and sepsis-induced immune suppression. Infection and
immunity, 73, 4905-12.
STEWART, S. & FANG, G. 2005. Anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome controls the
stability of TPX2 during mitotic exit. Molecular and cellular biology, 25, 10516-27.
STIFF, T., WALKER, S. A., CEROSALETTI, K., GOODARZI, A. A., PETERMANN, E., CONCANNON,
P., O'DRISCOLL, M. & JEGGO, P. A. 2006. ATR-dependent phosphorylation and activation of
ATM in response to UV treatment or replication fork stalling. The EMBO journal, 25, 5775-82.
STRAUSS, B., ADAMS, R. J. & PAPALOPULU, N. 2006. A default mechanism of spindle
orientation based on cell shape is sufficient to generate cell fate diversity in polarised
Xenopus blastomeres. Development, 133, 3883-93.
STREBHARDT, K. 2010. Multifaceted polo-like kinases: drug targets and antitargets for cancer
therapy. Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 9, 643-60.
STUKENBERG, P. T., LUSTIG, K. D., MCGARRY, T. J., KING, R. W., KUANG, J. & KIRSCHNER, M.
W. 1997. Systematic identification of mitotic phosphoproteins. Current biology : CB, 7, 338-
48.
STUMPFF, J., DUNCAN, T., HOMOLA, E., CAMPBELL, S. D. & SU, T. T. 2004. Drosophila Wee1
kinase regulates Cdk1 and mitotic entry during embryogenesis. Current biology : CB, 14,
2143-8.
SUMARA, I., GIMENEZ-ABIAN, J. F., GERLICH, D., HIROTA, T., KRAFT, C., DE LA TORRE, C.,
ELLENBERG, J. & PETERS, J. M. 2004. Roles of polo-like kinase 1 in the assembly of functional
mitotic spindles. Current biology : CB, 14, 1712-22.
SUNKEL, C. E. & GLOVER, D. M. 1988. polo, a mitotic mutant of Drosophila displaying
abnormal spindle poles. Journal of cell science, 89 ( Pt 1), 25-38.
SWENSON, K. I., FARRELL, K. M. & RUDERMAN, J. V. 1986. The clam embryo protein cyclin A
induces entry into M phase and the resumption of meiosis in Xenopus oocytes. Cell, 47, 861-
70.
SZYJKA, S. J., VIGGIANI, C. J. & APARICIO, O. M. 2005. Mrc1 is required for normal progression
of replication forks throughout chromatin in S. cerevisiae. Molecular cell, 19, 691-7.
Chapter 9 – References
308
TAKAI, H., NAKA, K., OKADA, Y., WATANABE, M., HARADA, N., SAITO, S., ANDERSON, C. W.,
APPELLA, E., NAKANISHI, M., SUZUKI, H., NAGASHIMA, K., SAWA, H., IKEDA, K. &
MOTOYAMA, N. 2002. Chk2-deficient mice exhibit radioresistance and defective p53-
mediated transcription. The EMBO journal, 21, 5195-205.
TAKAI, H., TOMINAGA, K., MOTOYAMA, N., MINAMISHIMA, Y. A., NAGAHAMA, H.,
TSUKIYAMA, T., IKEDA, K., NAKAYAMA, K. & NAKANISHI, M. 2000. Aberrant cell cycle
checkpoint function and early embryonic death in Chk1(-/-) mice. Genes & development, 14,
1439-47.
TAKAO, N., KATO, H., MORI, R., MORRISON, C., SONADA, E., SUN, X., SHIMIZU, H., YOSHIOKA,
K., TAKEDA, S. & YAMAMOTO, K. 1999. Disruption of ATM in p53-null cells causes multiple
functional abnormalities in cellular response to ionizing radiation. Oncogene, 18, 7002-9.
TANG, J., ERIKSON, R. L. & LIU, X. 2006. Checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) is required for mitotic
progression through negative regulation of polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1). Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 11964-9.
TANIGUCHI, E., TOYOSHIMA-MORIMOTO, F. & NISHIDA, E. 2002. Nuclear translocation of
plk1 mediated by its bipartite nuclear localization signal. The Journal of biological chemistry,
277, 48884-8.
TAPIA-ALVEAL, C., CALONGE, T. M. & O'CONNELL, M. J. 2009. Regulation of chk1. Cell division,
4, 8.
TAPIA-ALVEAL, C., O'CONNELL, MJ. 2011. Methods for studying checkpoint kinases-Chk1.
Methods of Molecular Biology, 782, 171-9.
TAUCHI, H., KOBAYASHI, J., MORISHIMA, K., VAN GENT, D. C., SHIRAISHI, T., VERKAIK, N. S.,
VANHEEMS, D., ITO, E., NAKAMURA, A., SONODA, E., TAKATA, M., TAKEDA, S., MATSUURA, S.
& KOMATSU, K. 2002a. Nbs1 is essential for DNA repair by homologous recombination in
higher vertebrate cells. Nature, 420, 93-8.
TAUCHI, H., MATSUURA, S., KOBAYASHI, J., SAKAMOTO, S. & KOMATSU, K. 2002b. Nijmegen
breakage syndrome gene, NBS1, and molecular links to factors for genome stability.
Oncogene, 21, 8967-80.
TAYLOR, W. R. & STARK, G. R. 2001. Regulation of the G2/M transition by p53. Oncogene, 20,
1803-15.
TETSU, O. & MCCORMICK, F. 2003. Proliferation of cancer cells despite CDK2 inhibition.
Cancer Cell, 3, 233-45.
Chapter 9 – References
309
THOMPSON, L.H. 2012. Recognition, signalling, and repair of DNA double-strand breaks
produced by ionizing radition in mammalian cells: The molecular choreography. Mutat Res,
Jun 26, Epub ahead of print.
TIAN, H., FAJE, A. T., LEE, S. L. & JORGENSEN, T. J. 2002. Radiation-induced phosphorylation
of Chk1 at S345 is associated with p53-dependent cell cycle arrest pathways. Neoplasia, 4,
171-80.
TIBBETTS, R. S., BRUMBAUGH, K. M., WILLIAMS, J. M., SARKARIA, J. N., CLIBY, W. A., SHIEH, S.
Y., TAYA, Y., PRIVES, C. & ABRAHAM, R. T. 1999a. A role for ATR in the DNA damage-induced
phosphorylation of p53. Genes & development, 13, 152-7.
TIBELIUS, A., MARHOLD, J., ZENTGRAF, H., HEILIG, C. E., NEITZEL, H., DUCOMMUN, B.,
RAUCH, A., HO, A. D., BARTEK, J. & KRAMER, A. 2009. Microcephalin and pericentrin regulate
mitotic entry via centrosome-associated Chk1. The Journal of cell biology, 185, 1149-57.
TIMOFEEV, O., CIZMECIOGLU, O., HU, E., ORLIK, T. & HOFFMANN, I. 2009. Human Cdc25A
phosphatase has a non-redundant function in G2 phase by activating Cyclin A-dependent
kinases. FEBS letters, 583, 841-7.
TOMINAGA, K., MORISAKI, H., KANEKO, Y., FUJIMOTO, A., TANAKA, T., OHTSUBO, M., HIRAI,
M., OKAYAMA, H., IKEDA, K. & NAKANISHI, M. 1999. Role of human Cds1 (Chk2) kinase in
DNA damage checkpoint and its regulation by p53. Journal of biological chemistry, 274,
31463-7.
TOURRIERE, H., VERSINI, G., CORDON-PRECIADO, V., ALABERT, C. & PASERO, P. 2005. Mrc1
and Tof1 promote replication fork progression and recovery independently of Rad53.
Molecular cell, 19, 699-706.
TOYOSHIMA-MORIMOTO, F., TANIGUCHI, E. & NISHIDA, E. 2002. Plk1 promotes nuclear
translocation of human Cdc25C during prophase. EMBO reports, 3, 341-8.
TSAI, L. H., HARLOW, E. & MEYERSON, M. 1991. Isolation of the human cdk2 gene that
encodes the cyclin A- and adenovirus E1A-associated p33 kinase. Nature, 353, 174-7.
TSVETKOV, L. & STERN, D. F. 2005. Phosphorylation of Plk1 at S137 and T210 is inhibited in
response to DNA damage. Cell Cycle, 4, 166-71.
TUROWSKI, P., FRANCKHAUSER, C., MORRIS, M. C., VAGLIO, P., FERNANDEZ, A. & LAMB, N. J.
2003. Functional cdc25C dual-specificity phosphatase is required for S-phase entry in human
cells. Molecular biology of the cell, 14, 2984-98.
Chapter 9 – References
310
TYSON, J. J., CSIKASZ-NAGY, A. & NOVAK, B. 2002. The dynamics of cell cycle regulation.
BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology, 24, 1095-109.
UNSAL-KACMAZ, K. & SANCAR, A. 2004. Quaternary structure of ATR and effects of ATRIP
and replication protein A on its DNA binding and kinase activities. Molecular and cellular
biology, 24, 1292-300.
UTO, K., INOUE, D., SHIMUTA, K., NAKAJO, N. & SAGATA, N. 2004. Chk1, but not Chk2,
inhibits Cdc25 phosphatases by a novel common mechanism. The EMBO journal, 23, 3386-96.
VAN LEUKEN, R., CLIJSTERS, L., VAN ZON, W., LIM, D., YAO, X., WOLTHUIS, R.M., YAFFE, M.B.,
MEDEMA, R.H., VAN VUGT, M.A. 2009. Polo-like kinase-1 controls Aurora A destruction by
activation APC/C-Cdh1. PLoS One, 4(4):e5282
VAN VUGT, M. A., BRAS, A. & MEDEMA, R. H. 2004a. Polo-like kinase-1 controls recovery
from a G2 DNA damage-induced arrest in mammalian cells. Molecular cell, 15, 799-811.
VAN VUGT, M. A. & MEDEMA, R. H. 2004. Checkpoint adaptation and recovery: back with
Polo after the break. Cell Cycle, 3, 1383-6.
VAN VUGT, M. A., SMITS, V. A., KLOMPMAKER, R. & MEDEMA, R. H. 2001. Inhibition of Polo-
like kinase-1 by DNA damage occurs in an ATM- or ATR-dependent fashion. The Journal of
biological chemistry, 276, 41656-60.
VAN VUGT, M. A., VAN DE WEERDT, B. C., VADER, G., JANSSEN, H., CALAFAT, J.,
KLOMPMAKER, R., WOLTHUIS, R. M. & MEDEMA, R. H. 2004b. Polo-like kinase-1 is required
for bipolar spindle formation but is dispensable for anaphase promoting complex/Cdc20
activation and initiation of cytokinesis. The Journal of biological chemistry, 279, 36841-54.
VANDERHEYDEN, V., WAKAI, T., BULTYNCK, G., DE SMEDT, H., PARYS, J. B. & FISSORE, R. A.
2009. Regulation of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor type 1 function during oocyte
maturation by MPM-2 phosphorylation. Cell calcium, 46, 56-64.
VASSILEV, L. T., TOVAR, C., CHEN, S., KNEZEVIC, D., ZHAO, X., SUN, H., HEIMBROOK, D. C. &
CHEN, L. 2006. Selective small-molecule inhibitor reveals critical mitotic functions of human
CDK1. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103,
10660-5.
VISINTIN, R., CRAIG, K., HWANG, E. S., PRINZ, S., TYERS, M. & AMON, A. 1998. The
phosphatase Cdc14 triggers mitotic exit by reversal of Cdk-dependent phosphorylation.
Molecular cell, 2, 709-18.
Chapter 9 – References
311
VISINTIN, R., PRINZ, S. & AMON, A. 1997. CDC20 and CDH1: a family of substrate-specific
activators of APC-dependent proteolysis. Science, 278, 460-3.
VOGELSTEIN, B., LANE, D. & LEVINE, A. J. 2000. Surfing the p53 network. Nature, 408, 307-10.
WALKER, D. H., ADAMI, G. R., DOLD, K. M. & BABISS, L. E. 1995. Misregulated expression of
the cyclin dependent kinase 2 protein in human fibroblasts is accompanied by the inability to
maintain a G2 arrest following DNA damage. Cell growth & differentiation : the molecular
biology journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 6, 1053-61.
WALKER, D. H. & MALLER, J. L. 1991. Role for cyclin A in the dependence of mitosis on
completion of DNA replication. Nature, 354, 314-7.
WALKER, M., BLACK, E. J., OEHLER, V., GILLESPIE, D. A. & SCOTT, M. T. 2009. Chk1 C-terminal
regulatory phosphorylation mediates checkpoint activation by de-repression of Chk1 catalytic
activity. Oncogene, 28, 2314-23.
WALSH, S., MARGOLIS, S. S. & KORNBLUTH, S. 2003. Phosphorylation of the cyclin b1
cytoplasmic retention sequence by mitogen-activated protein kinase and Plx. Molecular
cancer research : MCR, 1, 280-9.
WALTON, M. I., EVE, P. D., HAYES, A., VALENTI, M., DE HAVEN BRANDON, A., BOX, G.,
BOXALL, K. J., AHERNE, G. W., ECCLES, S. A., RAYNAUD, F. I., WILLIAMS, D. H., READER, J. C.,
COLLINS, I. & GARRETT, M. D. 2010. The preclinical pharmacology and therapeutic activity of
the novel CHK1 inhibitor SAR-020106. Molecular cancer therapeutics, 9, 89-100.
WALWORTH, N., DAVEY, S. & BEACH, D. 1993. Fission yeast chk1 protein kinase links the rad
checkpoint pathway to cdc2. Nature, 363, 368-71.
WALWORTH, N. C. & BERNARDS, R. 1996. rad-dependent response of the chk1-encoded
protein kinase at the DNA damage checkpoint. Science, 271, 353-6.
WANG, I. C., CHEN, Y. J., HUGHES, D., PETROVIC, V., MAJOR, M. L., PARK, H. J., TAN, Y.,
ACKERSON, T. & COSTA, R. H. 2005. Forkhead box M1 regulates the transcriptional network
of genes essential for mitotic progression and genes encoding the SCF (Skp2-Cks1) ubiquitin
ligase. Molecular and cellular biology, 25, 10875-94.
WANG, Q., HIROHASHI, Y., FURUUCHI, K., ZHAO, H., LIU, Q., ZHANG, H., MURALI, R.,
BEREZOV, A., DU, X., LI, B. & GREENE, M. I. 2004. The centrosome in normal and transformed
cells. DNA and cell biology, 23, 475-89.
WANG, J., HAN, X., ZHANG, Y. 2012. Autoregulatory mechanisms of phosphorylation of
checkpoint kinase 1. Cancer Res, Aug 1:72(15), 3786-94.
Chapter 9 – References
312
WANG, Y., HUANG, S., SAH, V. P., ROSS, J., JR., BROWN, J. H., HAN, J. & CHIEN, K. R. 1998.
Cardiac muscle cell hypertrophy and apoptosis induced by distinct members of the p38
mitogen-activated protein kinase family. Journal of biological chemistry, 273, 2161-8.
WANG, Y., JACOBS, C., HOOK, K. E., DUAN, H., BOOHER, R. N. & SUN, Y. 2000. Binding of 14-3-
3beta to the carboxyl terminus of Wee1 increases Wee1 stability, kinase activity, and G2-M
cell population. Cell Growth Differ.2000.Apr.;11.(4.):211.-9., 11, 211-219.
WANG, R., HE, G., NELMAN-GONZALEZ, M., ASHORN, C. L., GALLICK, G. E., STUKENBERG, P.
T., KIRSCHNER, M. W. & KUANG, J. 2007. Regulation of Cdc25C by ERK-MAP kinases during
the G2/M transition. Cell, 128, 1119-32.
WANG, X., ZOU, L., LU, T., BAO, S., HUROV, K. E., HITTELMAN, W. N., ELLEDGE, S. J. & LI, L.
2006. Rad17 phosphorylation is required for claspin recruitment and Chk1 activation in
response to replication stress. Molecular cell, 23, 331-41.
WATANABE, N., ARAI, H., NISHIHARA, Y., TANIGUCHI, M., HUNTER, T. & OSADA, H. 2004. M-
phase kinases induce phospho-dependent ubiquitination of somatic Wee1 by SCFbeta-TrCP.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 4419-
24.
WATANABE, N., ARAI, H., IWASAKI, J., SHIINA, M., OGATA, K., HUNTER, T. & OSADA, H. 2005.
Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) phosphorylation destabilizes somatic Wee1 via multiple
pathways. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,
102, 11663-8.
WEGENER, S., HAMPE, W., HERRMANN, D. & SCHALLER, H. C. 2000. Alternative splicing in the
regulatory region of the human phosphatases CDC25A and CDC25C. European journal of cell
biology, 79, 810-5.
WEI, Y., YU, L., BOWEN, J., GOROVSKY, M. A. & ALLIS, C. D. 1999. Phosphorylation of histone
H3 is required for proper chromosome condensation and segregation. Cell, 97, 99-109.
WEINERT, T., KAOCHAR, S., JONES, H., PAEK, A. & CLARK, A. J. 2009. The replication fork's five
degrees of freedom, their failure and genome rearrangements. Current opinion in cell
biology, 21, 778-84.
WESTENDORF, J. M., RAO, P. N. & GERACE, L. 1994. Cloning of cDNAs for M-phase
phosphoproteins recognized by the MPM2 monoclonal antibody and determination of the
phosphorylated epitope. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United
States of America, 91, 714-8.
Chapter 9 – References
313
WHITFIELD, W. G., GONZALEZ, C., MALDONADO-CODINA, G. & GLOVER, D. M. 1990. The A-
and B-type cyclins of Drosophila are accumulated and destroyed in temporally distinct events
that define separable phases of the G2-M transition. The EMBO journal, 9, 2563-72.
WIERSTRA, I. & ALVES, J. 2006. FOXM1c is activated by cyclin E/Cdk2, cyclin A/Cdk2, and
cyclin A/Cdk1, but repressed by GSK-3alpha. Biochemical and biophysical research
communications, 348, 99-108.
WILSKER, D., PETERMANN, E., HELLEDAY, T. & BUNZ, F. 2008. Essential function of Chk1 can
be uncoupled from DNA damage checkpoint and replication control. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 20752-7.
WOLGEMUTH, D. J., LELE, K. M., JOBANPUTRA, V. & SALAZAR, G. 2004. The A-type cyclins and
the meiotic cell cycle in mammalian male germ cells. International journal of andrology, 27,
192-9.
WONG, O. K. & FANG, G. 2005. Plx1 is the 3F3/2 kinase responsible for targeting spindle
checkpoint proteins to kinetochores. The Journal of cell biology, 170, 709-19.
WONG, O. K. & FANG, G. 2007. Cdk1 phosphorylation of BubR1 controls spindle checkpoint
arrest and Plk1-mediated formation of the 3F3/2 epitope. The Journal of cell biology, 179,
611-7.
WORGUL, B. V., SMILENOV, L., BRENNER, D. J., JUNK, A., ZHOU, W. & HALL, E. J. 2002. Atm
heterozygous mice are more sensitive to radiation-induced cataracts than are their wild-type
counterparts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of
America, 99, 9836-9.
WORGUL, B. V., SMILENOV, L., BRENNER, D. J., VAZQUEZ, M. & HALL, E. J. 2005. Mice
heterozygous for the ATM gene are more sensitive to both X-ray and heavy ion exposure
than are wildtypes. Advances in space research : the official journal of the Committee on
Space Research, 35, 254-9.
WRIGHT, J. A., KEEGAN, K. S., HERENDEEN, D. R., BENTLEY, N. J., CARR, A. M., HOEKSTRA, M.
F. & CONCANNON, P. 1998. Protein kinase mutants of human ATR increase sensitivity to UV
and ionizing radiation and abrogate cell cycle checkpoint control. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95, 7445-50.
WU, X., YANG, Z., LIU, Y. & ZOU, Y. 2005. Preferential localization of hyperphosphorylated
replication protein A to double-strand break repair and checkpoint complexes upon DNA
damage. Biochemical Journal, 391, 473-80.
Chapter 9 – References
314
WU, Z. Q. & LIU, X. 2008. Role for Plk1 phosphorylation of Hbo1 in regulation of replication
licensing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,
105, 1919-24.
XIAO, Z., CHEN, Z., GUNASEKERA, A. H., SOWIN, T. J., ROSENBERG, S. H., FESIK, S. & ZHANG,
H. 2003. Chk1 mediates S and G2 arrests through Cdc25A degradation in response to DNA-
damaging agents. The Journal of biological chemistry, 278, 21767-73.
XIONG, Y., HANNON, G. J., ZHANG, H., CASSO, D., KOBAYASHI, R. & BEACH, D. 1993. p21 is a
universal inhibitor of cyclin kinases. Nature, 366, 701-4.
XU, N., LIBERTINI, S., BLACK, E. J., LAO, Y., HEGARAT, N., WALKER, M. & GILLESPIE, D. A. 2012.
Cdk-mediated phosphorylation of Chk1 is required for efficient activation and full checkpoint
proficiency in response to DNA damage. Oncogene, 31, 1086-94.
XU, Y., ASHLEY, T., BRAINERD, E. E., BRONSON, R. T., MEYN, M. S. & BALTIMORE, D. 1996.
Targeted disruption of ATM leads to growth retardation, chromosomal fragmentation during
meiosis, immune defects, and thymic lymphoma. Genes & development, 10, 2411-22.
YAMAGUCHI, S., OKAYAMA, H. & NURSE, P. 2000. Fission yeast Fizzy-related protein srw1p is
a G(1)-specific promoter of mitotic cyclin B degradation. The EMBO journal, 19, 3968-77.
YAMAGUCHI, T., GOTO, H., YOKOYAMA, T., SILLJE, H., HANISCH, A., ULDSCHMID, A., TAKAI,
Y., OGURI, T., NIGG, E. A. & INAGAKI, M. 2005. Phosphorylation by Cdk1 induces Plk1-
mediated vimentin phosphorylation during mitosis. The Journal of cell biology, 171, 431-6.
YANG, J., BARDES, E. S., MOORE, J. D., BRENNAN, J., POWERS, M. A. & KORNBLUTH, S. 1998.
Control of cyclin B1 localization through regulated binding of the nuclear export factor CRM1.
Genes & development, 12, 2131-43.
YANG, J., SONG, H., WALSH, S., BARDES, E. S. & KORNBLUTH, S. 2001. Combinatorial control
of cyclin B1 nuclear trafficking through phosphorylation at multiple sites. The Journal of
biological chemistry, 276, 3604-9.
YANG, J., XU, Z. P., HUANG, Y., HAMRICK, H. E., DUERKSEN-HUGHES, P. J. & YU, Y. N. 2004.
ATM and ATR: sensing DNA damage. World journal of gastroenterology : WJG, 10, 155-60.
YARDEN, R. I., PARDO-REOYO, S., SGAGIAS, M., COWAN, K. H. & BRODY, L. C. 2002. BRCA1
regulates the G2/M checkpoint by activating Chk1 kinase upon DNA damage. Nature
genetics, 30, 285-9.
Chapter 9 – References
315
YOO, H. Y., KUMAGAI, A., SHEVCHENKO, A. & DUNPHY, W. G. 2004. Adaptation of a DNA
replication checkpoint response depends upon inactivation of Claspin by the Polo-like kinase.
Cell, 117, 575-88.
YU, Q., GENG, Y. & SICINSKI, P. 2001. Specific protection against breast cancers by cyclin D1
ablation. Nature, 411, 1017-21.
YUAN, J., ECKERDT, F., BEREITER-HAHN, J., KURUNCI-CSACSKO, E., KAUFMANN, M. &
STREBHARDT, K. 2002. Cooperative phosphorylation including the activity of polo-like kinase
1 regulates the subcellular localization of cyclin B1. Oncogene, 21, 8282-92.
YUN, J., CHAE, H. D., CHOI, T. S., KIM, E. H., BANG, Y. J., CHUNG, J., CHOI, K. S., MANTOVANI,
R. & SHIN, D. Y. 2003. Cdk2-dependent phosphorylation of the NF-Y transcription factor and
its involvement in the p53-p21 signaling pathway. The Journal of biological chemistry, 278,
36966-72.
YUN, U. J., PARK, H. D. & SHIN, D. Y. 2006. p53 prevents immature escaping from cell cycle G2
checkpoint arrest through inhibiting cdk2-dependent NF-Y phosphorylation. Cancer research
and treatment : official journal of Korean Cancer Association, 38, 224-8.
ZACHARIAE, W., SCHWAB, M., NASMYTH, K. & SEUFERT, W. 1998a. Control of cyclin
ubiquitination by CDK-regulated binding of Hct1 to the anaphase promoting complex.
Science, 282, 1721-4.
ZACHARIAE, W., SHEVCHENKO, A., ANDREWS, P. D., CIOSK, R., GALOVA, M., STARK, M. J.,
MANN, M. & NASMYTH, K. 1998b. Mass spectrometric analysis of the anaphase-promoting
complex from yeast: identification of a subunit related to cullins. Science, 279, 1216-9.
ZACHOS, G., BLACK, E. J., WALKER, M., SCOTT, M. T., VAGNARELLI, P., EARNSHAW, W. C. &
GILLESPIE, D. A. 2007. Chk1 is required for spindle checkpoint function. Developmental Cell,
12, 247-60.
ZACHOS, G. & GILLESPIE, D. A. 2007. Exercising restraints: role of Chk1 in regulating the onset
and progression of unperturbed mitosis in vertebrate cells. Cell Cycle, 6, 810-3.
ZACHOS, G., RAINEY, M. D. & GILLESPIE, D. A. 2003. Chk1-deficient tumour cells are viable
but exhibit multiple checkpoint and survival defects. The EMBO journal, 22, 713-23.
ZENG, Y., FORBES, K. C., WU, Z., MORENO, S., PIWNICA-WORMS, H. & ENOCH, T. 1998.
Replication checkpoint requires phosphorylation of the phosphatase Cdc25 by Cds1 or Chk1.
Nature, 395, 507-10.
Chapter 9 – References
316
ZHAN, Q., ANTINORE, M. J., WANG, X. W., CARRIER, F., SMITH, M. L., HARRIS, C. C. &
FORNACE, A. J., JR. 1999. Association with Cdc2 and inhibition of Cdc2/Cyclin B1 kinase
activity by the p53-regulated protein Gadd45. Oncogene, 18, 2892-900.
ZHANG, D., ZAUGG, K., MAK, T. W. & ELLEDGE, S. J. 2006a. A role for the deubiquitinating
enzyme USP28 in control of the DNA-damage response. Cell, 126, 529-42.
ZHANG, S., HEMMERICH, P. & GROSSE, F. 2007. Centrosomal localization of DNA damage
checkpoint proteins. Journal of cellular biochemistry, 101, 451-65.
ZHANG, X., CHEN, Q., FENG, J., HOU, J., YANG, F., LIU, J., JIANG, Q. & ZHANG, C. 2009a.
Sequential phosphorylation of Nedd1 by Cdk1 and Plk1 is required for targeting of the
gammaTuRC to the centrosome. Journal of cell science, 122, 2240-51.
ZHANG, Y., LIU, Y., YANG, Y. X., XIA, J. H., ZHANG, H. X., LI, H. B. & YU, C. Z. 2009b. The
expression of PLK-1 in cervical carcinoma: a possible target for enhancing chemosensitivity.
Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR, 28, 130.
ZHANG, Y., QU, D., MORRIS, E. J., O'HARE, M. J., CALLAGHAN, S. M., SLACK, R. S., GELLER, H.
M. & PARK, D. S. 2006b. The Chk1/Cdc25A pathway as activators of the cell cycle in neuronal
death induced by camptothecin. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the
Society for Neuroscience, 26, 8819-28.
ZHAO, B., BOWER, M. J., MCDEVITT, P. J., ZHAO, H., DAVIS, S. T., JOHANSON, K. O., GREEN, S.
M., CONCHA, N. O. & ZHOU, B. B. 2002a. Structural basis for Chk1 inhibition by UCN-01. The
Journal of biological chemistry, 277, 46609-15.
ZHAO, H. & PIWNICA-WORMS, H. 2001. ATR-mediated checkpoint pathways regulate
phosphorylation and activation of human Chk1. Molecular and cellular biology, 21, 4129-39.
ZHAO, H., WATKINS, J. L. & PIWNICA-WORMS, H. 2002b. Disruption of the checkpoint kinase
1/cell division cycle 25A pathway abrogates ionizing radiation-induced S and G2 checkpoints.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99, 14795-
800.
ZHOU, B. B. & ELLEDGE, S. J. 2000. The DNA damage response: putting checkpoints in
perspective. Nature, 408, 433-9.
ZHOU, Y., CHING, Y. P., CHUN, A. C. & JIN, D. Y. 2003. Nuclear localization of the cell cycle
regulator CDH1 and its regulation by phosphorylation. The Journal of biological chemistry,
278, 12530-6.
Chapter 9 – References
317
ZHOU, Y., CHING, Y. P., NG, R. W. & JIN, D. Y. 2002. The APC regulator CDH1 is essential for
the progression of embryonic cell cycles in Xenopus. Biochemical and biophysical research
communications, 294, 120-6.
ZINDY, F., LAMAS, E., CHENIVESSE, X., SOBCZAK, J., WANG, J., FESQUET, D., HENGLEIN, B. &
BRECHOT, C. 1992. Cyclin A is required in S phase in normal epithelial cells. Biochemical and
biophysical research communications, 182, 1144-54.
ZOU, H., MCGARRY, T. J., BERNAL, T. & KIRSCHNER, M. W. 1999. Identification of a vertebrate
sister-chromatid separation inhibitor involved in transformation and tumorigenesis. Science,
285, 418-22.
ZOU, L. & ELLEDGE, S. J. 2003. Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA
complexes. Science, 300, 1542-8.
318
Chapter 10
Appendix
Chapter 10 – Appendices
319
10.1 Appendix 1
Chapter 10 – Appendices
320
Figure 10.1 Cellomics data confirms the presence of pChk1 in an unperturbed cell cycle.
Quantification of cell lines was carried out by defining the cell cycle phases based on DNA intensity
histograms, like that seen in Figure 3.4 B. The graph represents the mean plus three standard
deviations, the range represents the 95 percentile. The results of pChk1 (Ser317) were corrected for
background intensities. Etoposide treatment was used as a control and accordingly results in elevated
pChk1 levels.