&Van Dyke - Defense Technical Information · PDF fileFoth & Van Dyke! I I February 23, 1988...

~E~ &Van Dyke*~.: v,,:> et s & nviroamental Managemet Division

Re.port

LANDFILL SAMPLING & ANALYSISUSARC, WEST SILVER SPRING DRIVEMilwaukee, Wisconsin

DTbZiOfEl I ECTE

PREPARED FOR: JUL 10 199'

FORT MC COYSparta, Wisconsin

PROIECT NO.: HA00916-6P

SCOPE I.D. #: 86M94

February 1988 locio

Foth & Van Dyke and Associates Inc.2737 S. Ridge RoadP. 0 tkox 19012rC.,te Bay, Wisconsm S4307-9012

41"'472500 08

Foth & Van Dyke!I

February 23, 1988 86M94-3I

Mr. Vincent SchettiniEngineering Planning & Services DivisionFort McCoySparta, WI 54656

Dear Mr. Schettini:

IRE: Landfill Sampling and AnalysisUSARC, West Silver Spring Drive,jMilwaukee, Wisconsin

Foth & Van Dyke is submitting ten copies of the report titled,Landfill Sampling and Analysis, USARC, West Silver Spring Drive,Milwaukee, Wisconsin dated February 1988. This investigationwas conducted in accordance with the scope of work in DeliveryOrder #7.

IIf you have any questions, please contact us.Sincerely,

FOTH & VAN DYKE

Janis Schallhorn Kesy James C. Fa bach, P.E.Project Hydrogeologist Director of Operations

JSK/JCF:psl Acce 'n iKJ NTIS CR

Enclosures DuO OR'

~~~~U, c. f , '

By

DOut at o .....

I DiAA-0,Our Reputation Is Built On One Project... Yours

Foih & Van DNt'e and Assouates Inc 2737 S Ridge Road • P 0 Box 19012 Green Bay, WI 54307-9012 414/497-2500

*JAMEcS C.oFAHRBACHI ~E-1485

LANDFILL SAMPLING AN~D ANALYSIS <N Gree 4.y

USACWEST SILVER SPRING DRIVENAMILWAUKEE,WICNN

Prepared for:

I FORT MC COYSPARTA, WISCONSIN

Prepared by:

IFOTH & VAN DYKE and Associates Inc.2737 S. Ridge Road

P.O. Box 19012

Green Bay, Wisconsin 54307-9012____________

NOVEMBER 1987

Foth & Van DykeCorihFoh&VnDkanAscatsnc

2737 zi. Ridge RoadCoyih@ oh&VnDkadAscatsI.P 0 Box 19012 1988Green Bay, Wisconsin 54307-9012414/497-2500

I

ITABL ME OF CONTENTS

!PAGE

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................ i

1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................ ........ 1

2 0 SITE BACKGROUND ....... 3

3.0 GROUNDWATER FLOW ........... ....... .............. 4

4.0 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND ANALYSIS .... 6

4.1 Introduction.................................... 6

4.2 Procedures ................ ................... 84.2.1 Field Procedures .................... 81 4.2.2 Analytical Procedures .................. 12

5.0 GROUNDWATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT ................ 13

5.1 Introduction ............................ ..... 135.2 Volatile Organic Compound (VOCs) ... ........... 135.3 Inorganic Parameters ........................ -. 16

6.0 LUNDFILL CAP ANALYSIS ............... ........... 22

6.'2 Introduction ..................................... 226.2 Field Procedures ...................... 226.3 Soil Tests .... .. ............................... 236.4 Cap Analysis .................................. ..... 23

1 7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...................... 27

7.1 Conclusions ................................... 277.2 Recommendations .... ........................ 27

REFERENCES ............................ 28

III

'I

I LIST OF TABLES

TABLE NO. 3-1 Groundwater Elevations................... 5TABLE NO. 5-1 VOCs Detected and Sampling Points

Where Detection Occurred DuringJanuary 1987 .............. .............. 14

TABLE NO. 5-2 WDNR Established PAL+ and ES+ for VOCDetected in Monitoring Wells .............. 17

TABLE NO. 5-3 WDNR Established PAL+ and ES+ forInorganic Parameters Analyzed.......... 18

TABLE NO. 6-1 Summary of Cover Thickness and Type ....... 24

ILIST OF FIGURES

FIGURE NO. 1-1 Site LocationMap......................... 2FIGURE NO. 6-1 Landfill Cap Profiles ..................... 26I

LIST OF APPENDICES

APPENDIX A Drawing No. C-2, 1 of 2

Groundwater Contour Map

APPENDIX B Laboratory Results for Groundwater Analyses

B-1 Inorganic ParametersB-2 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

APPENDIX C Drawing No. C-2, 2 of 2

ITopographic and Boring Location MapI APPENDIX D Cap Boring Logs

APPENDIX E Soil Testing Results

II

II

I

I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Foth & Van Dyke and Associates Inc. was retained by the U.S.

Army Corps of Engineers to investigate the groundwater and the

landfill cap at the USARC, West Silver Spring Drive, Milwaukee,3 Wisconsin. Five rounds of groundwater and surface water samples

were collected from 15 monitoring points in the vicinity of the

site. These- samples were analyzed for selected organic and

inorganic parameters.

Soil borings were drilled through the landfill cap on a 200 foot

grid. Grain size (sieve and hydrometer) and Atterberg limits

were determined on selected soil samples from the borings.

j Our main conclusions of the investigation are:

1. Vinyl chloride exceeded NR 140 standards in five

I monitoring wells.

2. The vinyl chloride appears to be from a source other

than the USARC landfill.

3. Chloride exceeded the PAL in four monitoring wells each

during one sampling period.

Arsenic was detected in well P-109A at the PAL during

one round.

Cadmium was detected in wells P-109A and OW-106B at

over the PAL during the September sampling only.

i 86M94

II

I

I The PAL for iron was exceeded in nine of the monitoring

wells. The highest concentration of iron occurred in

Iwells P-10A, P-102A, and P-105A.Sulfate exceeded the PAL in eleven monitoring wells and

the ES in one well (OW-llIB). The wells with the

highest sulfate concentration were P-108A, P-109A,

1 P-105A, OW-lIIB, OW-101B, and P-101A.

1 4. The groundwater in the study area has been impacted.

Iron, sulfate, and vinyl chloride occurred at elevated

levels in numerous wells both upgradient and

downgradient of the USARC landfill.

5. The landfill cap is inadequate. Approximately 75% of

the cap has less than the two feet of clay required by

IWisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR).

IIII

ii

II

I .0 INTRODUCTION

In December 1986, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha

District retained Foth & Van Dyke to conduct a groundwater and

landfill cap investigation at the USARC landfill. The USARC

landfill is located at 4828 West Silver Spring Drive in the City

of Milwaukee, Milwaukee County, Wisconsin (Refer to Figure

No. 1-1).

This report titled Landfill Sampling and Analysis; USARC, West

Silver Spring Drive, Milwaukee, Wisconsin presents the findings

of the groundwater sampling and landfill cap soil borings. The

investigations included five rounds of sampling from groundwater

monitoring wells and surface water, analyses of the water

samples, soil borings in the landfill cap and soil testing.

In this report we describe all field and laboratory procedures,present all field and laboratory data collected and an analysis

of the data.

II

I 186M94

I

I-N

Jr

tao*: ; •, 1-,," - .. *-.*." .:- _-___-=% i II., . . * .o.-

.... - - ,

- - .. .... ... .., . , ., E o . . o ,.. . _

2 . -' .

...,,+ ... ,--. . .. : S * .e .I : o.. .-... ,,'."3+ *. ° 1 " *° • "GRACELA N:D S *h .. .l"" . _z ....tn.

: ,,, * , " -:.. II. .~- -,+c cu | .... u ,'

an. -

'11j'!, d :2.

2-7

S1 11 q v

, .-5 F_,-- . . - .. . - -E - = -"AT I...N -" + + .7 ,U " '1 --" "

I -' ..I '. -~ C d I +, +" , .

4t $. ,,a MILTAF

I, . . .. . ., h. ,

3 4 T3 1 -.. I I ' I . , - -

FIGURE NO. 1-IFORT McCOY, WISCONSIN

LANDFILL SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS, USARCWEST SILVER SPRING DRIVE, MILWAUKEE, WI

SITE LOCATION MAP

SCALE: 1: 24000 1 ATE: 11/3/87

PREPARED0 BY: P0TH & VAN DYKE ,BY: SAG

2 86M94

IS 2.0 SITE BACKGROUND

Two areas of landfilling are known to exist on the USARC site.Another area of landfilling is documented north of the USARC

site at the State of Wisconsin Havenswood Environmental Center

(WDNR, 1986).

According to Donohue's report (1985), the Milwaukee Sanitation

Department disposed of approximately 500,000 cubic yards ofsolid waste on the present complex site between 1957 and 1966.

The waste deposited at the site was furniture, appliances,

street sweepings, leaves, tin cans, bottles, ashes, cinders and

I sewer pipe. No industrial or hazardous waste was accepted.

Also, no putrescible materials were accepted. The fill depth onthe USARC site ranges from six to eight feet across much of the

site, with depths of 12 to 14 feet in areas of the quarry ponds

(WDNR, 1986).

I

I1

3 86M94

I

II

3.0 GROUNDWATER FLOWITo examine the groundwater flow at the USARC site, water levelswere measured in the on-site wells. Water level measurements

were obtained during the groundwater sampling rounds. Thesewater levels are shown in Table No. 3-1.

Water levels obtained on September 28, 1987, were used toconstruct the water table contour map (Refer to Drawing No. C-1,1 of 2 in Appendix A). This water table contour map indicatesthat there is a water table high located in the south centralportion of the site in the vicinity of well nest OW-108B/P-108A.

Flow from thiis area moves outward towards the north, east and

west. The landfill is most likely the cause of this groundwatermound. Fle4 on the western portion of the site (west of LincolnCreek) appears to be to the south to southwest. Horizontalgradients at the site range from 0.003 to 0.02 ft/ft. To better

Idefine groundwater flow at the site, two to three more wellnests would be needed.

IWell nests OW-108B/P-108A, OW-lllB/P-lIIA and OW-109B/P-109A

indicate recharge conditions (downward gradients) occurring in

this area. Wells OW-101B/P-101A, OW-102B/P-102A, OW-105B/P-105Aand OW-106B/OW-106A show slightly discharging conditions (upward

f gradien:s).

4 86M94

I

II

TABLE NO. 3-1

Groundwater Elevations

IDate Measured

Well # 1/27/87 3/25/87 5/26/87 7/28/87 9/28/87IOW-101B 675.58 675.89 676.64 675.35 676.21P-101A 676.05 676.28 677.16 675.69 676.67OW-102B 676.04 676.35 677.09 675.71 676.64P-102A 675.95 676.20 676.95 675.59 676.56OW-104B 680.67 677.32 678.22 676.13 677.24OW-105B 670.84 670.84 671.58 670.80 671.39P-105A 671.74 672.25 672.76 671.75 672.44OW-106B 669.88 670.95 670.74 669.33 670.54P-106A 670.06 670.65 670.73 669.97 670.78OW-108B 686.25 687.61 688.09 685.52 687.63P-108A 680.31 681.65 682.45 679.88 682.18OW-109B 679.99 681.62 682.48 679.57 681.92P-109A 679.59 681.08 681.80 679.13 681.36OW-I1B 681.26 683.31 684.15 681.26 683.66P-lIA 677.80 679.31 680.58 677.76 679.87

II

I

1 86M494

II

4.0 GROMIDWATER SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND ANALYSIS

4.1 Introduction

I Twelve groundwater monitoring wells, two surface water pointsand one seepage point were sampled as outlined below in January,

I March, May, July and September 1987. These samples werecoii=cted to determine water quality near the old landfill at

Ithe USARC, West Silver Spring Drive, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.The 12 groundwater monitoring wells sampled were:

OW-101B OW-104B P-108A

P-101A P-105A P-109A

OW-102B OW-106B OW-109B

P-102A OW-108B OW-IIB

Two surface water samples were collected from Lincoln Creek, one

upstream and one downstream of the landfill. A seepage pointfrom the landfill to Lincoln Creek also was sampled. The

Iseepage point was not sampled in January 1987. The seepagepoint was frozen in January and therefore, could not be located.IThe water samples were analyzed for the following parameters:

field temperature barium

field pH chloride

field conductivity sulfate

COD chromium

BOD5 mercur-y

dissolved iron lead

I 86M94

toaI~aliit arsenic

Iro-i as !IH3clr dotr-dt

I The results of the analyses are in Appendix B_

Also, during the january sarmling, all the sazpling points were

sanpled for the followding 32 VOCs:

benzene 1, l-dichloroethylene

bromoform 1 ,2-dichloroethylene

bromom-ethane dichloromethane

carbon tetrachloride 1 ,2-dichlorooropene

I chlorobenzene cis-l, 3-dichloropropene

I chioroethane trans-l, 3-dichloropropene

2-chl-oroethylviny. ether etbylbenzeneI chloroform 1,1,2, 2-Itetrachlcoroethane

chioromethane tetrachioroethylene

dibromochioromethane toluene

1 ,2-dichlorobenzene 1,1, l-trichloroethane1 1, 3-dichlcrobenzene 1,1, 2-trichior&oethane

1, 4-dichlorobenzene trichioroethylene

dichiorobromoinethane .vinyl chloride1,Iihootaetihoolooehn1, 1-dichioroethane tichorofluoromethane

7 8 6M9 4

II

During the July !987, sampling round selected monitoring points

I were resa-led for VOCs as outlined below:

I Well VOCS

OW-O1B,P-102A, OW-102B 1,2-dichioroethylene

vinyl chloride

I P-lOlA,P-105A vinyl chloride

I P-108B tetrachIoroethylene

upstream, downstream tetrahloroethylene

1,2-dichloroethyleneI

£ The VOC results are contained in Appendix B.

14.2 Procedures

4.2.1 Field Procedures

jSampling was performed in accordance with WDNR recommended

sampling procedures. The sampling procedures used are outlined

below:

1. The depth to water (DTW) and total depth (TD) of the

monitoring well was measured using an electronic water

level meter (Watermaker water level indicator, Johnson

Division, UOP). The difference between these

measurements is multiplied by 0.65 to calculate the

volume (four static well volumes in gallons) to be

purged from the well prior to sampling.

1 8 86M94

I

II

I Sanple calculation -

V urge = ( (TD-DTWR) (conversion) (4 volumes)2V purge = (3.14) (1 in) (TD-DT-) (I foot/12 in) 2

3* (7.48 gal/feet ) (4 vol,-mes)

V purge = (0.65) (TD-DTW)

If the standing water volume is six feet, the purging

Ivolume would be four gallons.

2. The purging volume was then removed from the well with

a teflon bailer and nyloa rope. The bailer and rope

Iwas rinsed completely with deionized water prior topurging.

3. After the monitoring well was purged, the groundwater

sample was collected using a teflon bailer. The bailer

was lowered and raised slowly and two, one-liter

transfer bottles were filled with groundwater in a

manner which limits sample aeration. When a VOC sample

was taken, it was collected first. The sample for VOC

analysis was placed in two 40 ml glass vials with

teflon lined caps. When capped, the vial was free of

air bubbles.

4. A portion of the sample was tested at the well for

specific conductivity, pH and temperature. Color, odor

and turbidity characteristics were also observed. A

Lakewood Instruments Model PC combined pH/specific

conductivity meter was used. This meter corrects

9 86M94

I

II

specific conductivity to 250C and is calibrated at

I least once per sampling event for pH and specific

conductivity. For pH, buffer solutions at pH 4, pH 7

I and pH 10 are used during calibration. A standard

laboratory thermometer ('C) was used to measure

I temperature.

5. Appropriate samples for indicator parameters and

primary and secondary drinking water standards analysis

were filtered through a 0.45 micron membrane. A

JGeotech 2.4 1 -:er barrel filter tank, pressurized with

nitrogen gas, was used to filter groundwater samples.

jThe tank was rinsed thoroughly with about 500 ml of

deionized water between each sample. A 0.45 micron

four inch diameter nitro cellulose (Schleicher &

Schuell, BA85) filter with a course prefilter (#24

glass, Schleicher & Schuell) was used. The filters

were replaced between each sample. The samples were

than properly preserved as outlined below:IParameter Preservative

I Alkalinity Cool 4"C

Hardness HNO 3

COD H 2SO 4

BOD 5 Cool 4"C

Dissolved iron HNO3

Nitrogen as NO2 & NO3 Coul 4"C

Ammonia as NH3 H2So4Barium (Ba) HNO 3

Chloride (Cl) None

Sulfate (SO4 ) Cool 4"C

10 86M94

I

II

Chromium (Cr) HNO3

Mercury (Hg) HNO3Lead (Pb) E[RO 3

Cadmium (Cd) HNC 3

Arsenic (As) HNO 3

I Boron (B) HNG3

The pH of the first sample filtered was checked with

the pH meter to verify the amount of each acid (nitric

or sulfuric) that must be added to attain a pH of <2.

Bottles were then packed into a cooler along with

freezer packs to maintain a temperature of 4°C.i6. All equipment used by Foth & Van Dyke was cleaned

I between wells by triple rinsing with

distilled/deionized water to prevent cross

contamination. A new bailing line was used for each

well.

7. After collection, the samples were mainta ed under

chain-of-custody for transportation of the samples to

Ithe laboratory. Samples were transported by vehicle to

the chemistry laboratory at Foth & Van Dyke's Green Bay

I office within 24 hours after collection. The sample

bottles were transferred from the shipping coolers into

laboratory refrigerators for pre-analysis storage. VOC

vials were packed in styrofoam coolers, containing a

freezer pack and mailed to Enviroscan.

11 86M94

*1

I8. The samples from Lincoln Creek were collected by

dipping the bottles into the Creek. The bottles were

held with the mouth of the bottle upstream to allow the

j water to flow into the bottle.

JThe sample from the seepage point was collected by

holding the bottle under the seep and allowing the

water to flow into the bottle.

4.2.2 Analytical Procedures

The VOC samples were analyzed at Enviroscan of Rothschild,

Wisconsin. Sample analyses of priority pollutant volatile

organics was done in accordance with EPA method 601 from Methods

for Organic Chemical Analysis of Municipal and Industrial

Wastewater, EPA 600/4-28-057. A Verian Vista 6000 gas

chromotographic equipped with photoionization (PID) and hall

detectors in series along with a reporting integrator to

integrate peak areas was used for the analysis.

The inorganic parameters were analyzed by Foth & Van Dyke's

laboratory in accordance with the latest edition of Standard

Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater.

1 12 86M94

I

5.0 GROUNDWATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT

5.1 Introduction

In January, March, May, July and September 1987, groundwater and

surface water quality were analyzed in the vicinity of the USARC

complex. The groundwater quality for both organic and inorganic

parameters is discussed below.

5.2 Volatile Organic Compound (VOCs)

In January 1987, the 12 monitoring well samples and the two

stream samples at the USARC site were analyzed for VOCs. In

July 1987, six monitoring well samples and the two streamj samples were analyzed for selected VOCs as outlined in Section

4.1. The seepage point sample was analyzed for VOCs in March

1987. The results of the VOC analyses are contained in

Appendix B.

ISix of the 12 monitoring wells sampled in January 1987, showedVOC detections. The wells with detections were OW-101B, P-101A,

OW-102B, P-102A, OW-105A, and P-108B. There were low detections

( 1 ppb) of VOCs in the upstream and downstream samples

J collected from Lincoln Creek.

Table No. 5-1 summarizes the VOCs detected and the sampling

points at which the detections occurred.

The VOCs most often detected in the monitoring wells were

1,2-dichloroethylene and vinyl chloride. 1,2-Dichloroethylene

was detected in three of the monitoring wells (OW-101B, OW-102B

1 13 86M94

I

TABLE NO. 5-1

VOCs Detected and SamplingPoints Where Detections Occurred During

January 1987

IVOC Sample Location

I1, 1-Dichioroethane OW-10iB, P-102A, OW-102B

1,2-Dic'hioroethylene OW-10iB, P-102A, OW-102B, Downstream

Trichioroethylene OW-102B

Vinyl Chloride OW-10lB, P-102A, P-l0lA, OW-102B,

P-105A

Toluene P-108A, OW-109B

Tetrachloroethylene OW-108B, Upstream, Downstream

I Chloroform Upstream, Downstream

Dichlorbromomethane Upstream, Downstream

14 86M494

III and P-102A). 1,2-Dichloroethylene concentrations ranged from

4.0 to 39.9 parts per billion (ppb). Vinyl chloride was

detected in five of the monitoring wells (OW-101B, P-101A, OW-

102B, P-102A and P-105A). Vinyl chloride concentrations ranged

from 3.0 to 336 ppb.

The VOCs detected in both the upstream and downstream samples

consisted of chloroform, dichlorobromomethane and

tetrachloroethylene. The concentrations of these VOCs were, in

general, the same in both the upstream and downstream samples.

1,2-Dichloroethylene was detected at 0.4 ppb in the downstream

sample and not in the upstream sample. The seepage point sample

analyzed in March 1987 had no detection of VOCs. The July 1987,VOC analyses were done on selected compounds to confirm these

Icompounds presence in the groundwater and surface water. The

July analyses confirmed the 1,2-dichloroethylene and vinyl

chloride in the groundwater. 1,2.-Dichloroethylene andtetrachlorothylene were not detected in the stream samples in

1July 19t7.

Many of the low level detects (<1 ppb) of VOCs are believed to

be false positive values for any of the following reasons:

1. Carry over during laboratory analysis.

2. Laboratory contamination.

3. Contamination during sampling.

For example, the 0.1 ppb toluene detected in OW-108A and OW-109B

are most likely false positives picked up during sampling, since

0.2 ppb toluene was detected in the field blank.

15 86M94

.I

II

Three of the VOCs detected in the groundwater at the USARC site

have NR 140 preventive action limits (PALs) and enforcement

standards (ESs) established by WDNR. These VOCs their PALs and

ESs and the wells in which exceedances occurred are listed in

Table No. 5-2. This table is based on the site having a design

management zone (DMZ) of 300 feet or the property boundary

Im whichever is less. Based on NR 140 there are no ES exceedances.

All wells where VOC concentrations are greater than the ES are

within the DMZ or the property boundary. Therefore, these

exceedances are only exceedances of the PALs.

Tetrachloroethylene concentrations exceeded the PAL in well

P-108B in January and when resampled in July 1987

tetrachloroethylene was not detected. Therefore, this detection

Imay have been a false positive. Dichloromethane was detected in

one well at 0.3 ppb which is below the PAL of 15 ppb. Vinyl

Ichloride exceeded the PAL (0.0015 ppb) in five monitoring wells

(OW-101B, P-101A, OW-102B, P-102A and P-105A).

Vinyl chloride is a known carcinogen. The main application of

vinyl chloride is as a monomer unit in plastics due to the high

reactivity of the vinylic bond under process conditions. Vinyl

chloride is used to make plastics, vinyl alcohol and resins.I5.3 Inorganic ParametersIIn January, March, July and September 1987, groundwater samples

from 12 site monitoring wells were analyzed for inorganic

parameters (Refer to Appendix B.) Table No. 5-3 lists the

inorganic parameters which have PALs and ESs established per

NR 140. Also, listed in Table No. 5-3 are the wells in which

exceedances occurred at least once during the five months of

sampling. All wells except OW-104B are within the property

boundaries. All other wells sampled are within the 300 foot DMZ

except well OW-lllB. Therefore, the only ES exceedances which

could occur would be in wells OW-IIB and OW-104B.

16 86M94

I TABLE NO. 5-2

WDNR Established PAL+ and ES + forI VOCs Detected in Monitoring Wells

Wells ExceedingVOC PAL (ppb) ES (ppb) PAL ES

Tetrachioroethylene 0.1 1.0 P-108B None

IDichioromethane 15.0 150 None None

IVinyl chloride 0.0015 0.015 OW-101B* IP-101A None

OW-102BP-102A

* I P-105A

I PAL+ Preventive Action LimitES+ Enforcement Standard

17 8 7M9 4

0- 0 00 0 0 0 0 0H

440 0 3:0 Hq 0O

Q) I 1 0 10 No 10 PP4 I 4 -P 40

0 >4 %Ms 'm MM-

to +p

4 '4-) toW N H- Wn 0 LO04 (D 0 0 0 0 0 0

10 0 0 0 0

Cz 4 p t H LO

.-H

4-) RS

0

ImI LO N1 H LO 0 InAr3: 4 in 0 0 0 0 0 00

* 4H 0 0 0 0 0 0In N N ;C OrH0 H.

4-)4.)

C4)>0

U) 4-i Io V) C. 0

O 0 r. 0 >- 0

0 4 0 0 P >1 P r.0~ *H g:l 4J- Prl f4- r' -

to 0 p 0) *HA g 1 0 0 0 4-4 +p- H- 4)0 0 Mo p- 10 CO H- 5-i 5CO C H 5-i - CO CO 0 0 4 w

P.. U Z' .1 ~ U ~ U

18 86M94

iI

Chloride exceeded the PAL in four monitoring wells each during

1 one sampling period. Chloride concentrations ranged from 5 to

200 ppm in the monitoring wells. In general, the highest

concentrations of chloride occurred in wells OW-101B, P-101A,

OW-102B, and P-102A. These wells are located north (upgradient)

of the site.

The PAL for iron was exceeded in nine of the monitoring wells.

I Iron concentrations ranged from less than 0.10 ppm to 3.4 ppm.

The highest concentrations of iron occurred in wells P-101A,

P-102A and P-105A.

Sulfate (SO4 ) exceeded the PAL in 11 monitoring wells and the ES

in one well (OW-l1lB). Sulfate concentrations ranged from 75

ppm to 560 ppm. The wells with the highest sulfate

Iconcentrations were P-108A, P-109A, P-105A, OW-IIB, OW-101B andP-101A. These wells are 'located throughout the site area.IArsenic was detested in well P-109A at the PAL (0.005 ppm),

during one round. This detection occurred during the May round

of sampling.

1Cadmium was detected in wells P-109A and OW-106B at over the PAL(0.001 ppm) during the September sampling only. Barium, lead,

mercury and chromium were not detected in any of the'monitoring

wells. There is not an established PAL for boron. The drinking

water standard fcr boron is 1.0 ppm. Boron was detected at

levels less than 0.6 ppm, in all wells.

Specific conductivity, hardness and alkalinity were highest in

the northern wells, OW-101B, P-101A, OW-102B, P-102A and in the

southern wells P-105A, OW-108A and P-108A.

19 86M94

III BOD concentrations were between less than 6 ppm to 10 ppm. The

majority of the wells had BOD concentrations less than 6 ppm.

I The COD in the wells ranged from less than 5 ppm to 53 ppm.

I Overall the inorganic parameters generally had higher values in

the northern wells.!The upstream and downstream water quality in Lincoln Creek was

analyzed. The data indicated that water quality upstream of the

USARC landfill is similar to water quality downstream of the

USARC landfill. Specific conductivity ranged from 443 to 975

Iumhos/cm upstream and from 490 to 1049 umhos/cm downstream. The

concentration ranges for all parameters was similar upstream and

downstream. This indicates that the landfill is not impacting

the water quality in Lincoln Creek. All surface water data is

contained in Appendix B. The concefttrations of all the

parameters tested, except for iron, are below the drinking water

standards. In general the stream water quality is better than

the groundwater quality.

A leachate seep located at the site was sampled in March, May,

July and September 1987. The concentrations in the seepage

sample were lowest in July and highest in September (Refer to

Appendix B). Specific conductivity in the seepage samples was

generally over 1,300 umhos/cmo The seepage point sample

exceeded drinking water standards for iron, barium, mercury,

lead, cadmium and boron during September 1987.

i

20 86M94

ISummarvIWells OW-!01B, P-l0lA, OW-!02B and P-102A are upgradient of the

USATRC landfill. ,erefore, the vinyl chloride and elevated

inorganic parameters in wells OW-101B, P-103A, OW-102B and

P-102A are possibly the result of a source other than the USARC

site. The vinyl chloride in P-105A also is possibly the result

of a source other than the USP-RC site.IThe inorganic parameters which exceed the PAL's in wells P-105A,

j OW-106B, OW-108B, P-108A, P-109A, OW-104B, and OW-!!IB, may be

the result of the USARC landfill, natural background groundwater

quality or other practices in the area.

The elevated inorganic parameters in P-105A and OW-106B are

Ipossibly a result of the USARC landfill and/or the Havenswood

landfill. These wells are downgradient of both sites.

2I

I

I

'I- 1869

II

6.0 LANDFILL CAP 2ABLYSISI6.1 Introduction

I On February 24 and 25, 1987, 67 auger borings were drilled

through the landfill cap. The borings were done at 200 foot

I intervals in a grid formation covering the entire landfill area.

The WDNR letter of April 7, 1986, to the Department of the Army,1 84th Division requested borings on a 100 foot grid. Per. a

telephone conversation between Foth & Van Dyke and

Mr. John Krahling of the WDNR on February 23, 1987 the grid was

increased to 200 foot centers. According to Mr. Krahling, if

the extent of the landfill cap, soil type(s) and site boundaries

could be defined, a 200 foot grid was sufficient. Drawing No.

C-2, 2 of 2 in Appendix C shows the location of each of the cap

I borings.

16.2 Field Procedures

Each cap boring was advanced using a track mounted drill rig

B-55. All the cap borings were performed by Wisconsin Test

Drilling, Inc. of Schofield, Wisconsin. The borings were

Idrilled using 4 1/4 inch continuous flight augers. Each of the

borings was logged by a Foth & Van Dyke hydrogeologist as to the

soil type(s) and thickness of the cap material. Each boring was

backfilled with granular bentonite. The log of each boring is

contained in Appendix D.

1 22 86M94

I

II

6.3 Soil Tests

Soil tests coisisting of grain size (sieve and hydrometer) and

Atterberg limit analyses were done on 25 of the cap soil

samples. The results of these soil tests are contained in

Appendix E. The soil test results are also reported on the

I boring logs in Appendix D.

jI 6.4 Cap Analysis

Table No. 6-1 is a summary of the cover thickness at each boringlocation. The cover thickness at each boring is also shown on

the boring location map, Drawing No. C-2, 2 of 2, in Appendix C.

Five profiles of the landfill cap were drawn and are shown onFigure No. 6-1.IApproximately 75% of the landfill site has less than the two

1feet of clay landfill cover required by NR 180. Approximately

50% of the site has one foot or less of cover material. In many

portions of the site refuse such as concrete, wood and metal is

exposed. The landfill cap is damaged in many areas due to tanks

and heavy equipment traffic. Some areas of the site especially

on the east site of Lincoln Creek have only cinders on the

surface for cover.I

S23 8 6M9 4

II

TABLE NO. 6-1

Summary of Cover Thickness and Type

IGround Surface Cover Type of Cover

Boring # Elevations Thickness Material

B-I 685.20 (No Refuse) --

B-2 685.40 2 CLB-3 683.90 1' SmB-4 683.22 0.5' SCB-5 684.05 2' CL-MLB-6 681.47 3' CLB-7 678.55 2' CLB-8 681.80 11 CL-MLB-9 682.73 (No Refuse) --

B-10 680.70 (No Refuse)B-I 685.09 (No Refuse) --B-12 688.14 1' CL-MLB-13 687.60 2' CLB-14 687.79 1' SMB-15 686.54 1' SCB-16 687.03 1' CLB-17 687.76 0.3' CindersB-18 688.95 0.3' CindersB-19 690.54 0.25' SCB-20 689.27 0.5' CLB-21 687.46 1.5' CLB-22 685.01 1.5' SCB-23 687.09 2' SC/SC-SMB-24 688.69 2' CLB-25 689.75 0.25' dLB-26 693.92 2' CLB-27 689.91 2.5' CLB-28 687.34 0.25' CindersB-29 681.68 2' CL-MLB-30 688.30 0.5' CLB-31 691.71 0.5' CLB-32 690.65 (No Refuse) --

B-33 688.66 0.5' SPB-34 688.28 0.5' CLB-35 686.15 0.5' SPB-36 684.46 0.5' SCB-37 682.88 0.25' SC

24 86M94

I

TABLE N1O. 6-1 (Continued)

II Ground Surface Cover Type of Cover

Boring # Elevations Thickness Material

B-38 686.19 0.25' CLB-39 682.88 0.25' CLB-40 680.99 0.5' SCI B-41 684.01 1.5' CLB-42 688.96 (No Refuse) --

B-43 689.09 (No Refuse)B-44 682.12 'No Refuse) --B-45 686.48 0.25' CLB-46 690.06 0 No CoverB-47 690.12 0.16' CLB-48 693.45 0 No CoverB-49 692.11 0 No CoverB-50 688.89 0 No CoverB-51 687.72 1' CH/MHB-52 691.08 0,5' CLB-53 693.17 0 No CoverB-54 694.30 0.5' CLB-55 694.14 0.5' CLB-56 692.72 1.5' CLB-57 693.23 3' CLB-58 692.24 1.5' CL/MLB-59 691.65 2' CLB-60 690.16 2' MH/CHB-61 687.69 3' CLB-62 687.39 0.5' CLB-63 691.02 . 0.25! CLB-64 691.55 2' CLB-65 690.19 1.5' CL/MLB-66 688.17 0.5' CLB-67 690.30 0.5' CL

1 25 86M94

A

'690

BI1 B-14 B-13 B-12 _I

B-1B-2q

B-2 CL

CLI~R REFUSE REFUSE RE ) CL

6-4 ~ ~ EFS REFFSUSES~CS ~BEUS

680 REFUSE RFS

690~~~ 6902 -2 B2

REFUSEE

680k 680

B-524A' DB-52

B9 51 REF690

UREFUSE

L REFUSE

-- 680 680

IB' E B-47 ElB- 46 CL

- 690 690B-8B-45 REFUSE

REFUSE

18-41B-4 FUSE CLREFUSE

CL REFU E

REFU REFUSE - 680 680

FIGURE NO. 6-1FORT McCOY, WISCONSIN

LANDFILL SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS; USARCWEST SILVER SPRING DRIVE, MILWAUKEE, WI

LANDFILL CAP PROFILES

SCALE: HOR 1"z20 VERT 78 DATE: NOV 4, 1987

PREPARED BY: FOTH & VAN DYKE I BY: SAG

86M94

iI

7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONSi7.1 ConclusionsIVinyl chloride was detected in five groundwater monitoring wells

at the landfill. Since four of the monitoring wells with the

vinyl chloride detects are upgradient of the USARC site it

appears that a source other than the landfill is responsible for

the presence of vinyl chloride in the groundwater.

The groundwater at the landfill site has been impacted. The

parameters with elevated concentrations are hardness, sulfate

I and iron. With the exception of vinyl chloride and sulfate,

other parameter concentrations in the groundwater pose no threat

to human health or the environment.

The landfill cap is inadequate. The prasent cap does-not meet

the minimum two feet of clay cover required by WDNR.

7.2 Recommendations

Based on the results of the investigation, Foth & Van Dyke

recommends the following:

1. Prohibit the use of tanks and other heavy equipment on

the landfill cap so as not to do further damage to the

existing cap.

2. Install two to three additional well nests to further

define groundwater flow in the vicinity of the site.

1 27 86M94

I

I

IREFERENCES

IWisconsin Department of Natural Resources, April 17, 1986,

Correspondence to Department of the Army RE: Silver SpringLandfill.

Donohue, 1985, Landfill Impact Evaluation, USAR Center Complexand Training Area, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

I

I

III

I

128 86M494

I

~1-- 4

IIIIII

APPENDIX A

Drawing No. C-2-, lofGroundwater Contour Map

'III

*1

IIII

Z539.OO E2,539,5Q0 E

382 -~ --------

tGA 676.21 -- 6817

3824t - - ----------5676

68370 )

69j.

'9 922

669' .

E 2,540,000 E

N ~N,

.NN. V

76a 64 l'.-

T' * s bj

IN 6\782~~>S ~IN

V \>'819IN

66110

) PI4 2 890

eNN / // if

,

691 3 1

i .

6922 1*/ --

;'33

I Nc

,54( 2,540,500 E 2,541,000 E

__ ' 'i ) 689 C.- ,i.,\, -'o . i-

"- \ ',.", ' I ' "

', ;1 a

..- ,

~ -\ i/I691811661

- - - 905

N

417, 000 N

-690--

t V -

"V676.21 AND- MEASUREL.

416, 500 N-

-60 GROUNDWATER Co

-4-0-01 GROUNDWATER FL(

N

I

Lit

N

- -- I

- - - -a -.

.4.-.- -I - a ai

_,.,,,.. ,_, o _., . - -. LOCATION"676.2 AND ME'" 'M 1

1

COr "680'" GROUNDWATER CONTOURI

FLO AO' GROUNDWATER FLOW~ DIRECTION

E;' 7J0

1 6899

I '1$A

679~ *

6879

.

/7 885*

~~-\9f

I8 4

67776

6762

a Ad I-- - - =

% N'

£! -- , .\ , '--

,-,. . . - %

" I I / \I / .5.-

(114 L".898 K \" J! 2

~ ~~-A-678

- " 6 93 t

70

0"

-

' "-- -' /

/9

-.-. " -- 1 ------

I '

i 6"" /

11/

68/") i-,-I \ l-" .7

* % .- \ . -.,}- ,. / -- -* -

I //.f690~ 18 (

.-- *t'L - , Ii"

o.. - £ _. , -.- .-- .

~~i; 677.24 iP-104A 6898 . 1

. 6899 %/

6935 9-3--

s6873 87 I

• " \' ' ,/

-

, 3 _- ). , , ' "-t--,

/ > \\\ \

619, 1

69

_ (... /,

6 8.92 6938

68763 k 6945 ' ', /

1-10 8A

_ ,6.-- ,,.

" K- -\ M " TERj PA

' 416,500 N1-6; 9-

-680- - --

(j\ / 67.2

I I65O

;'6873

\\-- 416,000 N

1 693 8 ,

N/I (

. / /

if HE L ICIT

H '" ' + L -+---1

", /- 3

z n -0

T--

I - ~---- APPROXIMATE PROPERTY LINEA

APPROXIMATE L; I iT: 3 F FI LL

qV676.21 EX IST I NG MC%"R1'4' WELL LOCATION

00 N AND MEASUREMENT

CREEK680-GROUNDWATER CONTOUR

.o15 GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION4*~ AND GRADIENT

I MAP -:EPRODUCCED P- llCM TOPOGPAPHlC V, IHAlVc'NVO0CDS FOREST PRkESER'vE, L/tiYCOUNTY, WISCONSIN SHEETS I AND 2PREPARED BY OWEN AV'tRES AND a':)- ;ATCNC ,MADISON, WISONSIN

22 SITE LOCATION WITHWN SECI'iON, 26, T8\~',, F

4 3 EXISTING CONTOUR INTERVAL iS TWO FEET.

4 WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS TAKEN FROMWATER TABLE WELLS (OW-WELLS) ON

5 SEPTEMBER 28, 1987 BY FOTH 8 VAN DYKE.

DOON 5. GROUNDWATER CONTOUR INTERVAL IS TWO FEET.

S .- . / 6879 \

~ \ K ~ 79 ~-

\ -

6870

* I,(U,

67688-•

* \

6 . ;

67776 • -

/ "":",

670 5 4<67

JP4

, 6 : -.~7

6 2L

7 6 ,97

,6670.5 4 -5 6 L /

67/ ; 76

S ' U58t ", 0 /_,

Q, Q6L~ 9

877-

66A

685 6 / 8(?"

STMA ATE

-~ *6808

/ ' -

II N N '

-~ ~~ 693c1 6929%% ' 8 ~

11 7V09

W-0 80. HE~1 L -JT t

PAO

IN,,

~ QO 693 8

// (8

\ \r

z 416,0 No!PAT6f90KRJN

41,50'

9068.9 6938

689 L/\z

N. FRE YNO~

- 0 O&

688.6 9t

W-1 >FIo Q REPCI~

69148 6 8 . 6'REP B

-1111 > :-(\

zI < t0 DRAW/N BY

LI. (D cm HC3E~

3, EXISTING CONTOUR INTERVAL IS TWO FEET.

4. WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS TAKEN FROMWATER TABLE WELLS (OW-WELLS) ONSEPTEMBER 28, 1987 BY FOTH & VAN DYKE.

O0 N 5. GROUNDWATER CONTOUR INTERVAL IS TWO FEET.

Z FREV NO OAW C,.FPTC

Lo PROJ NO HA016-6P4A r NOV 5 19 6 70 &M DIRECTORA~H OF ENGINEERING AND FIOUEiNu

rb FORT McCOY, W ISCOP4.)

W L

O FIRE Coa0 LANDFILL SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS , USARC- WEST SILVER SPRING DRIVE, MILWAUKEE, WI

. - on USER REP

z GROUNDWATER CONTOUR MAP0z PlIO

co 0 PREPAR By SCALE.W~ 0 1I00'

, , DRAWN BY (l4it.F i.,NEIRI", siRVICES DRAWIN6 NOS It€ 4'-018 1867

Q "tow CHECKED BY ___ __-_ _ C I

Apt..r

2,539,000 E2,539,500 E

/P

b"-.

680 6817

N -101

B-5I'/I'

-16 / B '- "

--228

7° 7j B-3 E3-4 521

2 B 1 / . '6 - 2 . 2 5

8 I B B-27 f' 31

691

64 r 2 692

22 V-2NRB-~7 B 14 2/-i

II3 2

9,500 E 2,540,000 E

,,6792,, - * ..... I,,I .

68183-1

' " " '

- 4 . . __,

\' / ,

0B-4/ 6782 /

"6908 " " "6"9"

/, ; ,.,- / 7

. 5'-_;: , ,/ , ""

-, B,2, B- 3V\GiI

2 "b90 6 2 "9 '

S B -2

,- .2 " f

B •61 60--"19

.2o 2I

B-26-60

0 E 2.540,500 E 2.5.

"'- 679 2 L

/1683Y

-- '.7

16

*I /6782 A,7

2,'

-.- l ,' Q 68

5o

-. .. '"f 6918i

l68709-

\9 \ 0 5 6

' \ " B - 66 0 0 " " i,

5\ 5 \ ' - - -6 . 693O0 ) N \ , X%

. -6 f/-i,/,

6 9 , ,- 6 ~ - -- -- B6 \,6 e -' --

-- ',X IN

542,541,000 E

417, 000 N

689C I0 687 E81

81 /

69 ~ )92

' o I

- 956918

d416, 500 N

" ~6959

•~~~~ ,.' Q "l!/ .-' " "7" " - _

417, 000 N

LEGEND

-690- EXISTING GROUND CONTOUR

K.691 8EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION

TREES OR BRUSH

- EXISTING UNIMPROVED ROADWA"Y1~z~I ~ RAILROAD TRACKS

APPROXIMATE PROPERTY LINE

APPROXIMATE~ LIN41TS OF FILL-AOV 109 EXISTING MONITORING WELL

416,50 N -47 BORING LOCATION AND NUMBER AN416.00_ CREEK

NR r40 REFUSE

N

I,

LEGEND

-690-- EXISTING GROUND CONTOUR

* 691 8 EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION

S_ 2 TREES OR BRUSH

EXISTING UNIMPROVED ROADWAY

RAILROAD TRACKS

-- rn--- APPROXIMATE PROPERTY LINE

APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF FILL

A % 1 9 EXISTING MONITORING WELL

B-47 BORING LOCATION AND NUMBER AND CAP THICKNESS

. . CREEK

NR ,NO REFUSE

,( I j -6-902 k.' -6 9 Z , t

6i

.,.. ii " "",L.,"25'

NR ""-

B -t 21B-14 8-19 I -8261

fillft 6 ,2j i' .

,5 .2

6897

B -9 1 "o - I ( - . /

- 12 B-21 B-24

f 6879

1NNR Rd f5'68702

IN R

8NR B -1 0,-'. 5'2

-I -22 -2

li @ .25B-39 .25'

- -39 B-38

.51 .25o7 B,4 1 .. 8677j"6763 B\ ---40

___ L

"k

K 6911 ..~ 5 Z 930

B-2 BB 2- B-642 1

-- 69C:j. E693-

I --.2l

* ~~.25'~g-

'7 Z - 89 8 1.58

8-558

5' /5 2' B-521 8-24 B4 ~:$85

6879 \85-:6870 B-5Si5' 2'~~22 8-2 .5A 0B49'

688 B 4*'*8

65 56 5 688 B .- 45-

B- 02 5' 0

B-3

- 8-41 p

- .-. N

930 N / ,,

E8-64 /L

1,69. 9.90

f3,5/ 69554690

. \ ,P104A 6898

" " ""'"\ " "B-58 ,- " 4 , 9 9

\ > - 8 -5 7 j ' j !B5")>693 9 3 9.- ' 168

9 6.8 9 20\

,.9 5

"---_.- -s r/ ? ._ -" - t -

B-48"-- .~ i~ '- -- P-IO9AV! ' _i . \ ,

48" " / "' Li..6938B 4 6945 7

p, .69 / p, : .__.op,"

-- • ..QWI.; -

- 1 'E, / ;, j /-o-..69N\ ",. '/ ' 69z, ' 1 %....."4L"-I

'847 I"". -958

4&- \\\ /,HLI3 8E/ 9B-69 /P-1 08

i z 416, 500 N

' I1919 6919gi NI

6955

)W-104BZ/ 89 8

"87 -x 0 I 16873

k

\

8688

690

'\\693 7C N

693 8

, --) 9 06,O< 691 MtI O T \ \,

0

APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF FILL

I09 EXISTING MONITORING WELL

NB-47 BORING LOCATION AND NUMBER AND CAP THICKNESSNR N. . CREEK

NR NO REFUSE

NOTES

I MAP REPRODUCED FROM TOPOGRAPHIC MAPHAVENWOODS FOREST PRESERVE, MILWAUKEE

COUNTY, WISCONSIN. SHEETS I AND 2PREPARED BY OWEN AYRES AND ASSOCIATES,INC. , MADISON, WISONSIN.

2. SITE LOCATION WITHIN SECTION 26, T8N -R21E

3 CONTOUR INTERVAL IS TWO FEET.

4 SOIL BORINGS INSTALLED BY WISCONSINTEST DRILLING, INC. SCHOFIELD, WISCONSIN-FEBRUARY 1987

N

III - - 6870NR • NR 51 2

B-,O 10 B-1I " B-22 B-2

. 6885

678• I67

I I V 4--" -

/ .2 5''_ _ " '- B-39 B-38

1;"- - 1.5' B' 7-v0"- B4

67 '6763 \ I- B--41 --

, lk

676.2 6747

;7 0 b' o ~ ~ P 0-.c ~6A

, OW-05B 675067-

, / OWIOB 6771

* I -

' ' 6769,

I " , C,

6752 ./,.75 8--2,--- I -

22 B-2 3, ,2 "'1\ " .- ",

A.

6885 B-4E

-

--- B- 8 5 OtW B'-"4585/ .25' B -3" '

B -38 B-46~./E

.2 -..5 B- " / >. ' ".

"--~ ' B- 41 . ,," "--7 .", \/ 69, "

B B

1.5 E3 / ..-- /2*,

-.--

d7 74 N R

B-4 I 685 0 -5-i

.I ._ _ ..j ............... ....

679,~67

Q3b)

B-49"-"B~ ~ ~ ~ - 4P-10 AN63

0 9E3 \B-9 B-48'----1 '" , P-10A >' N9

•3 / / 9394 "5

P 0

I B-4 0 9 ," \

" " ,.6335 / ./ ,69 694

HE L J.' /

-go-" 6899

691.r I jI

902I

/. ~~~g o r " - !

I.

I9 8/69

oN"

I..

Se

\ 93 B

0- 9Bx,

- .<, 921/ A,\ _ -'i "-. " -\

692 6990

-,. ,M

/6 t,v"9 /,/ W \\ \f',, y

691 43 IR HE

I, , GI[ "

"41,5 00 PROJ NO H O

6994 9

6899, I PSA Y'- w LMRA.N - '

/9O 8 587? F IR FIE CHIEF

0

W9 LM 0

y62 <0 UERl' ITC

RDW NO DA'T DrSCRIPTION BY

oj NO HAO0916- 6P V 5 1987009'.)00 In PQ C 4016

a O&M 1 DIRECTORATE OF ENGINEERING AND HOUSINGzI

SAF'TY SIw-FORT McCOY WISCONSIN

z- FIRE CHIU LANDFILL SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS USARC0 r. WEST SILVER SPRING DRIVE, MILWAUKEE, WI

W--0 ) USER RCL

0Rz TOPOGRAPHIC AND BORING LOCATION MAPz Kl()o

W; 0 PREPARED BY SCAL.E

O : . DRA N B T( D idt f N 'IN R|N u, SO AA'C S DRAW IN G N O.

47-018-1867.0 (WO lj cCEEDBY _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ SHEFT. C- 2

MAECc~ Or' EtCfj~fJlV W AM)' PK_-W 2 O 2- mLw~s~mmmmmma

I

I:IIFI

APPENDIX B

I iaboratbry Results for Groundwater Analysts

1IIIIIIIII.

iIjI - -

IIII

I.- - - - APPENDIX D~1

I Inorganic Pazameter~

III *1

I

'II

ii

III

27 3 7 S. 0;.- 7 aP.O. Box 19012 -. .', 71 3T. '!0. 405051240ree.; -ay, --sc. 5 .a357-1

Cl0 S" e-r S rinz -oa4 Ca- -'IAaeress -Scope !.D.Billing Line o.

Liaison D. Possin'a3e of 2e-. S'rSer No.Telephone 1--o. (-2) -9-3 Result'- Sheet- ;.o. 35Z 10

"I Sa7le 1.. _--! 3 -1i o ! io_02 3 P-102 A (Y.-104Date Collected 1/27/37 1/27/77 ! /27/17 1/27/37 1/27/37

Date ?. "1:/2.^/37 1/29/27 1/29/'37 1/29/7 1/29/37

Parameters, units - - 2esuls -

C.O.D, g/i 13 29 23 49 9

-_.o.Y., 0. : , ' < < S 7 < 15I

Di:s. iron, :n-:/! < 0.03.4 < C.1.1 < 0.!0 < C.10

.:ardness, ig/l 660 623 540 3 0

.A1,a!inity, . /! 52C 410 470 3-3 30

:'02+':3-:, .c./! 0.35 < 0.05 < 3.05 0.19 < 0.05

.:o_- ::,:':/! ^.zz 0.42 1.0 0.57 0.13

r< 1 1.0 < i.3 < 1.0 < 1.0

I Ch1or i g/1 130 54 73 I

3uifates, 6g/! 2'3 250 210 230 120

I Thro~iu:, .g/l < 00C.5 < 0.005 < C.005 0.30 < 3.005

::er~cur-, ag/ < C.OOC < 0.0005 < 0< 0005 0335 < 3.0305

Lead, mg/! < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 3.005

Cadmium, ng/l < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001

Arsenic, -g/l < 9.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 9.005 < -.35

I co-ents:

/j in!: -

*1

i-L-i A,- VAII DYKE

Engineers/Architects LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS2737 S. Ridge RoadP.O. Box 19012 W.D.N.R. LAB CERT. NO. 405051240Green Bay, Wisc. 54307-9012

Client Silver Spring Road Sampled By MlJHAddress Scope I.D.

Billing Line No.Liaison B. Possin

Name of Rep. Supply Order No.Telephone Vo. (000) 000-0000 Result Sheet No. 35491.06

Sample I.D. 0-!01 B P-101 A 0W-102 A P-102 A 0W-104 B

Date Collected 1/27/87 1/27/87 1/27/87 1/27/87 1/27/87Date Received 1/29/87 1/29/87 1/29/87 1/29/87 1/29/87

Parameters, units ---------------------- Results-------------------------I

Boron, mg/l 0.23 0.16 0.28 < 0.02 < 0.02

IIIIIII

comments:

Signed: -,e'i Date:

I.

IFCT Aj, VA! D'_.qE-ngineers/Architects LA3ORATORY A':ALYSIS RESULTS2737 S. R.idge RoadP.O. Box 19012 q.D. 1.R. LAB C3RT..)O. 405051240Green 3ay, 'nisc. 54307-9012

Client Silver Spring Road Sa.pled 3-v EIJiAddress ScoDe I.D.

Billing Line N~o.Liaison B. Possin

N 3arie of Rep. Supply Order :lo.Telephone ',o. (000) 000-0000 Result Sheet No. 35491.02-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sam:1e T.D. 0:7-106 3 P-!05 " OW-10U D P-108 A 071-109 B

Date Collected 1/23/87 1/27/87 1/27/37 1/27/87 1/27/37"late eceive. 1/29/37 1/29/-7 1/29/7 1/20/7 1/29/37

Parameters, units - -------------------------- esults-------------------------

C.O.D, mg/! 21 18 12 11 < 5

3.C.D., rag/l < 6 < 6 < 6 < 5 < 6

Dis. Iron, mg/l < 0.13 2.9 < 0.10 0.15 < 0.10

Hardness, ig/ 480 730 920 960 400

Alkal inity, 2cj/l 300 4-0 590 640 360

I -102+:O3-7, mg/l < 0.05 < 0.05 0.30 (< 0.05 < 0.05

13- , /. 0.i5 0 .27 0.11) 0.17 < 0.I10

aru,-/i< !.0 < 1 . < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.3

I Chloride, -/i 30 150 17 27 6

Sulfates, .n /l 160 300 360 490 85

Chromiu, mg/ < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.0.S < 0.005

::ercurv', ig/i < 0.0005 < 0.0005 < 9.0005 < 0.0005 < 0.0005

Lead, mg/l < 0.005 < 0.005 < 3.005 < 0.005 < 0.005

Cad;.,ium, nc,/l < 0.0Cl < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001

Arsenic, -ag/l < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005corments:

/

j Signed: Date: -2

Ie

IFOZI AID VAIN DY:EEngineers/Architects LABO.,7. AIALYSIS RESULTS

2737 S. Ridge RoadP.O. Box 19012 W.D.N.R. LAB CERT. NO. 405051240Green Day, tvisc. 54307-9012

Client Silver Spring Road Sampled By 1.J1!Address Scope I.D.

Billing Line No.Liaison B. Possin

Pame of Rep. Supply Order No.Telephone No. (000) 000-0000 Result Sheet .o. 35491.05

Sample I.D. 01-106 3 P-105 A O!-108 A P-103 A OW-109 3

Date Collected 1/28/87 1/27/87 1/27/87 1/27/87 1/27/87Date .eceived 1/29/87 1/29/87 1/29/(37 1/29/87 1/29/87

I Parameters, units ---------------------- Results-------------------------

1 Boron, mg/i 0.10 0.36 0.49 0.28 0.23

IIIIIII

comments:

Signed: - Date: ___,_/, ___/__

I

IFOTH ADVA', DYKSEngineers/Architects LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS2737 S. Ridge RoadP.O. Box 19012 W.D.-1.R. LAB CERT. NO. 405051240

I Green Bay, Vlisc. 54307-9012

Client Silver Spring Road Sampled Dv 1IJN

Address Scope I.D.Billing Line 1.o.

Liaison B. PossinNa-me of Rep. Supply Order No.Telephone No. (000) 000-0000 Result Sheet No. 35491.03

SamDle I.D. OW-Il B P-109 A Upstream Downstream FieldBlank

Date Collected 1/27/87 1/27/07 1/28/87 1/28/37 1/27/37Date 2eceive." 1/29/C7 1/29/317 1/29/37 1/29/37 1/29/87

Parameters, units ---------------------- Results-------------------------

C.O.D, mg/! 29 < 5 14 9 < 5

I B.O.D., mg/i 5 < 6 < 6 < 6 < 6

Dis. Iron, mg/l < 0.10 < 0.10 0.13 0.32 < 0.10

Hardness, mg/] 730 600 250 250 < 2

Alkalinity, ;ag/1 510 290 170 200 < 10

N02+'!O3-:1, g/1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.23 0.17 < 0.05

1H3-., <g < 0.10 < 0.10 0.13 0.13 < 0.10

Barium, mg/ < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0

I Chloride, mg/l 7 4' 240 230 3

Su1fates, m.ig/l 250 300 44 56 < 5

I Chromium, .i-/i < 0.005 < 0.005 0.005 0.003 < 0.005

I ercurv, mg/l < 0.0005 < 0.0005 < 0.0005 < 0.0005 < 0.0003

Lead, mg/l < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005

I Cadmium, mg/l < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001

Arsenic, mg/l < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005I coianents:

Signed:_ D2 ate:

IFOTh AND VAI DYKEEngineers/Architects LABORATORY ANAJYSIS RESULTS2737 S. Ridge RoadP.O. Bo." 19012 .. D.N.R. LAB CERT. Ho. 405051240f Green Bay, Uisc. 54-307-9012

Client Silver Spring Road Sampled By I.JliAddress Scope I.D.

Billing Line No.Liaison 3. Possin

ilame of Rep. Supply Order No.Telephone 1o. (000) 000-0000 Result Sheet lo. 35491.04

Sample I.D. OW-Ill B P-109 A Upstream Downstream FieldBlank

Date Collecied 1/27/87 1/27/07 1/28/87 1/28/87 1/27/87Date Received 1/2/37 1/29/37 1/29/37 1/29/87 1/29/37

Parameters, units - ---------------------- Results-------------------------II oron, mg/l 0.1) 0.12 < 0.02 0.00 < 0.02

iII

I

IIII comments:

Signed: 1__2_Date:_____Date

IL 0

Tn4ILJ j (0C 0.

0 5; .-- : - ': -

> -

0 LA L

000

co C, 0~ CD U% O0 'o C j en 0 C

(J CdC0 '0 0 ' a 'o 'o 'o? -.o 'o uo -

0

CZ IL.0 0 0 0 0 c) 0'-

LUUIi ~~i- a'

000f

I-00

z u

0 ~. C)st C r

LU

0 a O j A

--------- - - - - -

IFOTH A:,MD VA:', DYXE-

I ngineers/Architects LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS2737 S. Ridge RoadP.O. Box 19012 W.D.N.R. LAB CERT. NO. 405051240

I Green Bay, Uisc. 54307-9012--------------------------------------------------------------------------Client Silver"Spring Road Sampled By MJHAddress Scope I.D.

Billing Line No.Liaison J. I'esy

I Name of Rep. Supply Order No.Telephone No. (000) 000-0000 Result Sheet No. 35777.01

Sample I.D. Upstream Downstream Seepage OT-101 B 'P-101 APoint

Date Collected 3/25/87 3/25/87 3/25/87 3/25/87 3/25/87I Date Received 3/26/37 3/26/37 3/26/37 3/26/37 3/26/37


C.O.D., mg/i 26 26 26 24 23

B.O.D., ma/l < 6 < 6 < 6 < 6 < 6

I Dis. iron, mg/ 0.31 0.44 5.7 0.16 3.4

Hardness, mg/! 300 370 790 710 680

Alkalinity, mg/l 210 250 660 540 420

'102+:1O3-::, mg/l 0.64 0.92 0.4 < 0.05 < 0.05

':!H3-"i, mg/l 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.1

I Barium, -.g/l < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0

Chloride, mg/! 170 170 55 65 "4

Sulfaces, mg/l 62 Q0 250 260 260

Chromium, mg/l < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005

?ercury, mg/l < 0.0005 < 0.0005 < 0.0005 < 0.0005 < 0.0005

I Lead, mg/l < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005

Cadmium, mg/i < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001

Arsenic, mg/l < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005comments:

S DtISigned : , ?,4, Date

Il

IFOrl' AND VA11 DYKEEngineers/Architects ,LABORlATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS2737 S. Ridge RoadP.O. Box 19012 W.D.IN.R. LAB CERT. INO. 405051240

I Green Bay, Wisc. 54307-9012

Client Silver Spring Road Sampled By 1IJHAddress Scope I.D.

Billing Line No.Liaison J. Kesy

Name of Rep. Supply Order ITo.I Telephone No. (000) 000-0000 Result Sheet No. 35777.02

Sample I.D. OT-1132 B P-102 A 011-104 B P-105 A "O1-106 B



I C.D., mg/i 34 <5 21 16 < 5

3.O.D., mg/l < 6 7 < 6 < 6 < 6

Dis. Iron, mg/l < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 2.8 < 0.10

Hardness, mg/l 370 600 540 760 560

Alkalinity, mg/l 500 430 340 430 390

I No2+:1-71-, mg/i 0.08 0.25 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

". A " .1, g!! 0.1 0.1 0.20 3< 0

3arium, mg/i < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0

Chloride, mg/1 24 33 14 100 20

Sulfates, mg/l 240 220 170 300 180

1 Chromium, mg/l < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005

:Iercurv, mg/i < 0.0005 < 0.0005 < 0.0005 < 0.0005 < 0.0005

Lead, mg/l < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0,005 < 0.005

Cadmium, mg/l < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001


Signed: - Date: '/ 12I - 6

I

I

FOTH A:-D VAIN DYNEEngineers/Architect's LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS2737 S. Ridge RoadP.O. Box 19012 W.D.1.R. LAB CERT. NO. 405051240

I Green Bay, Wisc. 54307-9012

Client Silver Spring Road Sampled By 1IJHAddress Scope I.D.


Name of Rep. Supply Order No.Telephone No. (000) 000-0000 Result Sheet Ho. 35777.03

Sample I.D. OW-103 B P-108 A 01--109 B P-109 A 0W-111 B

Date Collected 3/25/87 3/25/87 3/25/87 3/25/87 3/25/87

Date Received 3/26/87 3/26/37 3/26/87 3/26/37 3/26/37

Parameters, units- ---------------------- Results--------------------------

C.O.D., mg/l < 5 < 5 14 < 5 8

B.O.D., mg/l < 6 < 6 < 6 ( 6 < 6

Dis. Iron, mg/l < 0.10 0.21 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10

I Hardness, mg/l 1110 1160 440 620 850

Alkalinity, mg/i 7]0 670 370 290 610

NO2+:O3-:., mg/l 0.37 0.20 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.58

,H3:; mg/l 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3

I Barium, mg/l < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0

Chloride, mg/l 24 2' . 44 6

Sulfates, mg/1 480 560 100 290 284.

I Chromium, mg/l < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005

:arcury, mg/l < 0.0005 < 0.0005 < 0.0005 < 0.0005 < 0.0005

I Lead, mg/l < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005

Cadmium, z.g/l < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001

Arsenic, mg/l < 0.005 4 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005comments:

Signed: /Date: X, ,-2

IFOTH AND VAN DYXEEngineers/Architects LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS2737 S. Ridge RoadP.O. Box 19012 W.D.N.R. LAB CERT. NO. 405051240

I Green Bay, ilisc. 54307-9012

---------------------------------------------------------------------------Client Silver Spring Road Sampled By 11JH

f Address Scope I.D.Billing Line No.Liaison J. Kesy

Name of Rep. Supply Order No.Telephone No. (000) 000-0000 Result Sheet No. 35777.04----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sample I.D. FieldBlank

Date Collected 3/25/87Date Received 3/26/87

Parameters, units ---------------------- Results

C.O.D., mg/l < 5

B.O.D., mg/l < 6

Dis. Iron, mg/l < 0.10

I Hardness, mg/l < 2

Alkalinity, mg/l < 10

I !O2+: O3-'T, iag/ 0.03

":H3-.1, mg/l 0.2

I Barium, mg/! < 1.0

I Chloride, mg/l 7

Sulfates, mg/l < 5

I Chromium, mg/l < 0.005

:ercury, mg/. < 0.0005

I Lead, mg/l < 0.005

Cadmium, mg/i < 0.001

Arsenic, mg/l < 0.005comments:

Sn D

Signed: Date:

IFOTH AND VAN DYINEEngineers/Architects LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS2737 S. Ridge RoadP.O. Box 19012 W.D.N.R. LAB CERT. NO. 405051240I Green Bay, isc. 54307-9012

Cl.ient Silver Spring Road Sampled By JHAddress Scope I.D.


Vame of Rep. Supply Order No.Telephone No. (000) 000-0000 Result Sheet No. 35777.05

Sample I.D. OW-108 B P-108 A OW-109 B P-109 A "OW-Ill B


Parameters, units ---------------------- Results -------------------------IBoron, mg/l 0.60 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.12I

IIIIIII

comments:

I gd

iSigned: /4 Date

I

MOH AND VAN DY:,ESEngineers/Architect-s UABBORTORY ANALYS IS P.Zi3-LTS12737 S. Ridge RoadP.O. Box 19012 :;D!..L3CER. 110. 405051240IGreen Bay, Wisc. 54307-9012----------------------------- --------------------------- ------------------CI i e nt IS 3ilver Spring Road sa=m--a1fed 3vjAddress Sco~e -.D.

Billing Line Ho.Liaison j. -Nesy

N' ame ofI Rep. Supply Order NIo.ITelephone H~o. (000) 000-0000 Result Sheet- NIo. 35777.06---------------------------------------------------------------------

I Sample TLD. 0OW-102 B P-102 A (YI-104 B P-l05 A -OVI-l6 3


Parameters, unl---------------------------------- Resul ts -------------------------

B oron, mu_/l 0.44 0.33 0.05 0.25 3.07

coImns

SindIae: e 74

FM- AND VA Di IY.E~i -gineers/Architects r--QOg=_Q-TOv .2ILYSISRSLS2737 S. Ridge Road

,R41L

P.O. Eox 19012 W.D.1.R. LA3 CERT. 1O. 405051240I Green Bay, Wisc. 54307-9012

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Client S.i er'Spring Road Sampled 3v H.Address Scope Z.D.

Billing Line io.Liaison J. Kesy

N !ame of Rep. Supply Order No.Te!ehone No. (000) 000-0000 Result Sheet No. 35777.07

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

i Sarple T.D. Upstreari Downstream Seepage 0;-!0! 3 P-10i APoint


Parameters, units ---------------------- Results-------------------

Boron, mg/! C.06 0.0 0.92 0.43 0.13IIi

III

comments:

ISigned: -. , 1& Date: #

II

IFOTH X'1 VIAN DYZ-E

Eniner/Ac #-et _AOeTR 2YSTS RESULTS2737 S. Ridge RoadP.O. Box 19012 W....LAB CERT. NO. 405051240Green Bay, Uisc. 54307-9012

Client Silver Spring Road Sampled By WH

dress Scope I.D.Billing Line No.Liaison j. Kesy

Name of Rep. Supply Order No.I elephone No. (000) 000-COO Result Sheet No. 35777.08-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sample T.D. FieldBlank

Date Collected 3/25/37Date Received 3/26/87

Parameters, units ------------------------ Results-------------------------

Boron, mg/I 0.45

(

I

III

comments:

IISigned: < Date: $

I

0

00

0. 00000 0 . - 0..00-0 . 0

In1 . %I nfjc Dr .

u ca - -

10 10 10- 5 I-- 1, -. f- 10 U- *.. _

5 0 0 0 0 C Q 0 r CC Cj~~~~~~" 0. 0..0 .00 .0 ....-

CiLI

00 1

II0.q o'. 'I'-0 -0 .t z

ft em L .- -

.010

U- 0U -

cnU 0--00: 0 ~ 00. m cmN cmri e CM u cmOf r4 IiN e e

ui u1. 1 1 11 1 , 11 1 , , 10 00.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ gn 0.M <Prm u,2tn tn U ~n'^Pf

POTH AID VAN DYKEEngineers/Architects LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS2737 S. Ridge RoadP.O. Box 19012 W.D.N.R. LAB CERT. NO. 405051240Green Bay, UWisc. 54307-9012

--------------------------------- ------------------------------------------Client Silver Spring Road L.F. Sampled By IJHAddress Scope I.D. 861194


5 Name of Rep. Supply Order No.Telephone No. (000) 000-0000 Result Sheet No. 36135.01

I Sample I.D. Upstream Downstream Seepage OW-!01 B -P-lClAPoint



C.O.D., mg/l < 5 14 34 10 26

B.I .:x., mg/! < 6 < 6 < 6 < 6 < 6

Dis. Iron, mg/. 0.40 0.46 6.2 0.11 0.22

Hardness, mg/l 210 210 680 670 540

Alkalinity, mg/l 150 160 740 560 320

N02+.,03-N, mg/l 0.54 0.57 0.76 0.10 < 0.05

NH3-N, mg/l 0.5 0.4 7.7 1.0 0.9

Barium, mg/l < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0

Chloride, mg/l 53 54 64 54 86

Sulfates, mg/l 37 44 120 240 250

Chromium, mg/l < 0.005 < 0.005 0.006 < 0.005 < 0.005

Mercury, mg/l < 0.0005 < 0.0005 < 0.0005 < 0.0005 < 0.0005

Lead, mg/l < 0.005 < 0.005 0.038 < 0.005 < 0.005

Cadmuim, mg/l < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010


II Signed: II± I Date: Q 4J0 iZ.

I

I

IFOTH AND VAN DYKEEngineers/Architects LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS2737 S. Ridge RoadI

P.O. Box 19012 W.D.N.R. LAB CERT. NO. 405051240Green Bay, Wisc. 54307-9012

Client Silver Spring Road L.F. Sampled By MJHI Address Scope I.D. 86M94


Name of Rep. Supply Order No.Telephone No. (000) 000-0000 Pesult Sheet No. 36135.02

Sample I.D. 01-102 B P-102 A OW-104 B P-105 A -OW-106 B



C.O.D., mg/l 14 14 < 5 18 6

B.O.D., mig/l < 6 < 6 < 6 < 6 < 6

Dis. Iron, mg/l 0.11 0.22 < 0.10 1.7 0.20

I Hardness, mg/l 690 550 470 720 490

Alkalinity, mg/i 510 440 340 430 380

I N02+NO3-N, mg/l < 0.05 0.11 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

NH3-N, mg/l 0.9 0.7 0.2 0.2 < 0.1

Barium, mg/l < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0

Chloride, mg/il 31 42 9 100 21

Sulfates, mg/l 270 200 130 310 160

Chromium, mg/l < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005

Mercury, mg/l < 0.0005 - 0.00U3 < 0.0005 < 0.0005 < 0.0005

Lead, mg/l < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005

Cadmuim, mg/l < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010

Arsenic, mg/i < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005comments:

I Signed: _D ate: ,'?

I5

IFOTH AND VAN DYKEEngineers/Architects LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS2737 S. Ridge RoadP.O. Box 19012 W.D.N.R. LAB CERT. NO. 405051240Green Bay, Wisc. 54307-9012

Client Silver Spring Road L.F. Sampled By MJHAddress Scope I.D. 861194


Name of Rep. Supply Order No.Telephone No. (000) 000-0000 Result Sheet No. 36135.03

Sample I.D. 0W-108 B P-108 A OW-109 B P-109 A -OW-II B



I C.O.D., mg/l 10 14 < 5 6 6

B.O.D., mg/l < 6 < 6 < 6 < 6 < 6

I Dis. Iron, mg/l 0.19 0.20 0.10 0.25 < 0.10

I Hardness, mg/l 1010 1100 440 600 680

Alkalinity, mg/l 690 630 370 290 580

I N02+NO3-N, mg/l 0.67 0.40 < 0.05 0.08 0.11

NH3-N, mg/l < 0.1 < 0.1 0.7 0.5 0.3I| Barium, mg/l < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0

Chloride, mg/il 18 40

Sulfates, mg/l 420 520 91 280 210

Chromium, mg/l < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005

Mercury, mg/i < 0.0005 < 0.0005 < 0.0005 < 0.0005 < 0.0005

Lead, mg/l < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005

Cadmuim, mg/l < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010

Arsenic, mg/l < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.005 < 0.005comments:

I DSigned: /O - Date: .I

I


Client Silver'Spring Road L.F. Sampled By MJHj Address Scope I.D. 861194IBilling Line No.

Liaison J. KesyName of Rep. Supply Order No.Telephone No. (000) 000-0000 Result Sheet No. 36135.04---------------------------------------------------------------------------

i Sample I.D. 011-108 B P-108 A 0W-109 B P-109 A OW-Ill B


Parameters, units ---------------------- Results

Boron, mg/l 0.07 0.06 < 0.01 < 0.01 0.10

Depth to G/W, ' 8.49 14.03 12.51 13.08 6.78

pH, s.u. (field) 6.96 7.30 7.20 7.25 7.23

Spec. Cond. (field)* 1417 1552 698 920 1075

Color Lt. Brown V. Lt. Br. Lt. Brown Lt. Brown Lt. Brown

Odor No No No No No

j Turbidity Moderate Moderate Moderate V. Slight Moderate

iIII

comments: * Specific Conductivity reported as micro-mhos/cm. at 25 degreescelsius.

Signed: Date:

JU


Client Silver Spring Road L.F. Sampled By MJHAddress Scope I.Dz 86M94


I Name of Rep. Supply Order No.Telephone No. (000) 000-0000 Result Sheet No. 36135.05----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sample I.D. OW-102 B P-102 A OW-104 B P-105 A -OW-106 B



IBoron, mg/i 0.30 0.25 0.09 0.15 0.08

I Depth to G/W, ' 8.95 9.04 13.76 4.76 6.33

I pH, s.u. (field) 6.99 7.22 7.06 7.09 7.50

Spec. Cond. (field)* 1045 814 1245 860 1417

I Color Lt. Brown Lt. Brown Lt. Brown Lt. Brown Lt. Brown

Odor No Slight No Slight No

I Turbidity High Moderate Moderate Slight High

II

I

Icomments: * Specific Conductivity reported as micro-mhos/cm. at 25 degrees

celsius.

Signed: Date: o I

0


Client Silver Spring Road L.F. Sampled By MJHAddress Scope I.D. 86M94


I Name of Rep. Supply Order No.Telephone No. (000) 000-0000 Result Sheet No. 36135.06----------------------------------------------------- -----------------------

Sample I.D. Upstream Downstream Seepage OW-101 B -P-101 A

Point


Parameters, units ---------------------- Results-------------------------IBoron, mg/l 0.13 0.05 0.70 0.34 0.13

Depth to G/W, ' 10.25 9.70

I pH, s~u. (field) 7.22 7.31 6.98 6.73 7.30

Spec. Cond. (field)* 490 496 1358 1291 1064

Color Cloudy V. Lt. Br. Lt. Brown Lt. Brown V. Lt. Br.

Odor No No No No No

Turbidity V. Slight V. Slight Moderate High Slight

III

comments: * Specific Conductivity reported as micro-mhos/cm. at 25 degreesjcelsius.

Signed: ' Lr A Date: a lq,7

I

II0-c

In- .-

cc co ca ca 3 coc a .:m

u u L) v e I F L )n

- UJ . 0 0 0 0

00 CD .3 . . . .D 0

01 0- * - - - -C - -*L1

u u

I-u ca

1. % - s 0 t- Nf t- N' 0 1, N N 0 Nj I.

0Lf ~ ~ ~ ~ C C)' ~ ~ N 'L~'

I% I'3~3 00n 0N '0 . ' 0 n

N00In .tInN.0.N?

4 '1, 0 U- S ;z tL~ - 10 m 0 (V olILU 0t ING O I0t1 0 * 0 IN I? In

0~j 0 .0

IN~~ -r 1 c

U J3- 00 0 . ' 0 N 1 ' .

U)0.u j 0%f a0 0 0 0 0 0 %0 x

tu L)

CLV)r,. " L %L;

FOTH AND VAN DYKE

Engineers/Architects LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS

1 2737 S. Ridge RoadP.O. Box 19012 W.D.N.R. LAB CERT. NO. 405051240

Green Bay, Wisc. 54307-9012

I-----------------------------Client Silver Spring Road L.F. Sampled By MJHAddress Scope I.D. 86M94


Name of Rep. Supply Order No.I Telephone No. (000) 000-0000 Result Sheet No. 36476.01.I --------------------------------------------------------------

. Sample I.D. Upstream Downstream Seepage OW-101 B P-101 AI Point


II aaees nt ----------- Results---------------------------

C.O.D., mg/l ii 14 16 25 20

B.O.D., mg/l < 6 * < 6 * < 6 * 6 * < 6 *

Dis. Iron, mg/l 0.42 0.68 0.61 < 0.10 0.67

Hardness, mg/l 190 220 210 740 670

Alkalinity, mg/l 150 160 170 540 410

N02+NO3-N, mg/l 0.07 0.09 0.06 < 0.05 < 0.05

NF3-N, mg/l 0.3 0.1 0.4 0.7 0.4

Barium, mg/l < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0

Chlorides, mg/l, 43 40 44 57 80

Sulfates, mg/il 40 45 44 280 260

Chromium, mg/i 0.005 0.006 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005

Mercury, mg/l < 0.0005 < 0.0005 < 0.0005 < 0.0005 < 0.0005

I Lead, mg/l 0.005 0.009 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005

Cadmium, mg/l < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010

Arsenic, mg/l < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005comments: * Reset value.

Sge-7-: Date:Signed: ______________DaeII

FOTH AND VAN DYKE

Engineers/Architects LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS2737 S. Ridge RoadP.O. Box 19012 W.D.N.R. LAB CERT. NO. 405051240Green Bay, Wisc. 54307-9012

I-------------Client silver-Spring Road L.F. Sampled By MJHAddress Scope I.D. 86M94



Sample I.D. Upstream Downstream Seepage OW-101 B P-101 A



I Depth to G/W, ' 11.54 11.17

pH, s.u. (field) 6.65 6.84 6.73 6.87 6.64

I Spec. Cond. (field)* 443 479 477 1381 1258

I Color V. Lt. Br. V. Lt. Br. Lt. Brown Lt. Brown V. Lt. Br.

Odor None None None None None

I Turbidity Slight Slight Slight Moderate Slight

I

III

comments:

Signed: Date:

1FOTH AND VAN DYKEEngineers/Architects LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS2737 S. Ridge RoadP.O. Box 19012 W.D.N.R. LAB CERT. NO. 405051240Green Bay, Wisc. 54307-9012

-------------------------------------------------------Client Silver .Spring Road L.F. Sampled By MJHAddress Scope I.D. 86M94


Name of Rep. Supply Order No.Telephone No. (000) 000-0000 Result Sheet No. 36476.02--------------------------------------------------------------

Sample I.D. OW-102 B P-102 A OW-104 B P-105 A OW-106 B


Parameters, units ---------------------- Results-------------------

I C.O.D., mg/l 53 20 < 5 < 5 < 5

B.O.D., mg/l < 6 * 7 * 10 * < 6 * < 6 *

Dis. Iron, mg/l < 0.10 0.51 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10

Hardness, mg/l 630 590 540 720 550

Alkalinity, mg/l 480 460 330 410 400

I N02+NO3-N, mg/l < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

NH3-N, mg/l 1.4 1.1 0.7 0.5 < 0.1

Barium, mg/l < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0

Chlorides, mg/l 63 47 9 100 18

Sulfates, mg/l 180 160 160 290 130

Chromium, mg/l < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005

Mercury, mg/1 < 0.0005 < 0.0005 < 0.0005 < 0.0005 < 0.0005

Lead, mg/l < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005

Cadmium, mg/l < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010


Signed: ct Date-.:I ,f

FOTH AND VAN DYKEEngineers/Architects LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS2737 S. Ridge RoadP.O. Box 19012 W.D.N.R. LAB CERT. NO. 405051240Green Bay, Wisc. 54307-9012

-------I ------------- ------------------------------------------Client Silver Spring Road L.F. Sampled By JHAddress Scope I.D. 86M94.1 Billing Line No.

Liaison J. KesyName of Rep. Supply Order No.Telephone No. (000) 000-0000 Result Sheet No. 36476.05


Date Collected 7/28/87 7/28/87 7/28/87 7/28/87 7/28/87

Date Received 7/29/87 7/29/87 7/29/87 7/29/87 7/29/87

i Parameters, units ---------------------- Results-------------------------

IBoron, mg/l 0.31 0.34 0.10 0.23 0.05

Depth to G/W, ' 10.33 10.41 15.85 5.68 7.74

pH, s.u. (field) 6.77 7.06 7.02 6.95 7.05

Spec. Cond. (field)* 1180 1105 820 1100 805

Color Lt. Brown Cloudy Dr. Brown Lt. Brown Dr. Brown

Odor None Moderate None Slight None

I Turbidity High Slight High High Moderate

II

II

comments:

Signed: I_ _ _ _ _ Date: -! ,,II

IFOTH AND VAN DYKEI Engineers/Architects LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS2737 S. Ridge RoadP.O. Box 19012 W.D.N.R. LAB CERT. NO. 405051240Green Bay, Wisc. 54307-9012

Innnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn------------------------------Client Silver Spring Road L.P. Sampled By MJHAddress Scope I.D. 86M94



Sample I.D. OW-108 B P-108 A OW-109 B P-109 A OW-Ill B


Parameters, units ---------------------- Results-------

C.O.D., mg/l < 5 < 5 < 5 < 5 < 5

B.O.D., mg/l < 6 * < 6 * < 6 * < 6 * ( 6 *

Dis. Iron, mg/l < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10

Hardness, mg/i 1020 1150 470 650 830

Alkalinity, mg/l 710 640 390 310 590

N02+NO3-N, mg/l" 0.22 0.69 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.06

NH3-N, mg/l < 0.]. 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.2

Barium, mg/i < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0


Sulfates, mg/l 390 450 75 250 200

Chromium, mg/l < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005

Mercury, mg/l < 0.0005 < 0.0005 < 0.0005 < 0.0005 < 0.0005

Lead, mg/l < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005

Cadmium, mg/l < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010


Signed: ~CAJ~ADate: Q~~ei, , /qe-,I...


I-------------------------------------------------Client Silver Spring Road L.F. Sampled By MJHAddress Scope I.D. 86M94


Name of Rep. Supply Order No.Telephone No. (000) 000-0000 Result Sheet No. 36476.04---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sample I.D. OW-108 B P-108 A 014-109 B P-109 A OW-l11 B



Depth to G/W, ' 11.06 16.60 15.42 15.75 9.67

pH, s.u. ifield) 6.66 6.84 7.03 6.82 6.68

Spec. Cond. (field)* 1517 1562 712 978 1172

I Color Lt. Brown V. Lt. Br. Lt. Brown V. Lt. Br. Lt. Brown

Odor None None None None None

Turbidity Moderate Slight Moderate Slight High

II

comments:

Signed: Date: 1, Dte:7

II0; w= w c w 0 Cl

00

u 4 9 -1 - o - - 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

0U. t2t 2t t 2t

u% Ixt , V l0 o

-0 t2L 00

0 UN 4= CD UUU

0. I.ICuI-

0 e -r . .. .-

C ~~0. rNt 0C j~i- N t 0 '<zLUA

0 c

mC U 00 00 1 _0. 'T 'r m m~> t--> * *

0,~

wz0~ ui 0 iIL J

U). es. w m ow 0 w c

U.. w a-l0 0 l0 .ol0 .o 0

IFOITH AN-D VAN DYKEEngineers/Architects LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS2737 S. Ridge RoadP.O. Box 19012 W.D.N.R. LAB CERT. NO. 405051240Green Bay, Wisc. 54307-9012

Client Silver Springs Road L.F. Sampled By HJHAddress Scope I.D. 86,494


Name of Reo. Supply Order No.Telephone No. (000) 000-0000 Result Sheet No. 36840.01

Sample I.D. Upstream Downstream Seepage OW-101 B P-101 APoint

Date Collected 9/28/87 9/28/87 9/28/87 9/28/87 9/28/37Date Received 9/30/87 9/30/87 9/30 9/30/87 9/30/37

Parameters, units ---------------------- Reslt'. ....

I C.O.D., mg/ < 5 5 530 25 35

j B.O.D., mg/i < 6 <6 < 6 < 6

Dis. iron, mg/l 0.28 0.39 230 0.86 3.4

I Hardness, mg/i 340 300 860 760 1300

Alkalinity, mg/l 250 280 800 520 400

I 102+UO3-U, mg/l 1.1 1.2 0.05 0..12 0.08

I ,H3-1, mg/ 0.3 3.2 6.8 0.6 0.3

Barium, mg/i < 1.0 < 1.0 1.3 < 1.0 < 1.0

j Chlorides, mg/l 95 90 66 60 80

Sulfates, mig/l 68 84 120 280 220

Chromium, mg/l < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005'ercury, mg/i ( 0.0005 < 0.0005 0.0007 < 0.0005 < 0.0005

Lead, mg/l < 0.005 < 0.005 0.17 < 0.005 < 0.005

Cadmium, mg/l < 0.0010 < 0.0010 0.0094 < 0.0010 < 0.0010

Arsenic, mg/l < 0.005 < 0.005 0.220 < 0.005 < 0.005comments:

I Signed: Date: -L23LY7


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------Client Silver Springs Road L.F. Sampled By flJHAddress Scope I.D. 86..194Billing Line No.

Liaison J. KesyName of Rep. Supply Order No.Telephone Nko. (000) 000-0000 Result Sheet No. 36840.06

i Sample I.D. Upstream Downstream Seepage OW-101 B P-101 A

Point


Parameters, units ---------------------- Results-------------------------IBoron, mg/l 0.21 0.26 1.2 0.60 0.29IDepth to G/W, ' 10.68 10.19

pH, s.u. (field) 7.11 7.29 6.88 7.00 6.87

Sepc. Cond. (field)* 769 797 1384 1231 1165

Color V. Lt. Br. V. Lt. Br. Lt. Brown Lt. Brown Cloudy

Odor N~o No V. Slight No No

Turbidity V. Slight Slight Moderate High V. Slight

I

Icomments: * Specific Conductivity reported as micro-uhmos./cm. at 25 degrees

celsius.

Signed: Date:

1- 6• nUN -- .. . TT

FOTH AND VAN DYKEEngineers/Architects LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS2737 S. Ridge RoadP.O. Box 19012 W.D.N.R. LAB CERT. NO. 405051240Green Bay, Wisc. 54307-9012

Client Silver Springs Road L.F. Sampled By MJHAddress Scope I.D. 86f194


I Name of Rep. Supply Order No.Telephone No. (000) 000-0000 Result Sheet No. 36840.02




C.O.D., mg/i 20 25 5 10 15

B.O.D., mg/l < 6 < 6 < 6 < 6 < 6

Dis. Iron, mg/l 2.3 1.1 < 0.10 2.1 < 0.10

I Hardness, mg/l 900 680 540 820 570

Alkalinity, mg/! 440 420 320 420 390 *

I N02+103-N, mg/i 0.12 0.17 0.12 0.06 0.08

NH3-1, mg/l 1.2 1.2 0.3 0.2 0.1

Barium, mg/l < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0


Sulfates, mg/l 180 200 150 320 170

Chromium, mg/l < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005

'.Iercury, mg/l < 0.0005 < 0.0005 < 0.0005 < 0.0005 < 0.0005

Lead, mg/l < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005

Cadmium, mg/l < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 0.0029

Arsenic, mg/l < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005comments: * Holding time was exceeded.

! Signed: .. 7 Date: -IA 21IM

I

IFOTH AND VAN DYNEEngineers/Architects LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS2737 S. Ridge RoadP.O. Box 19012 W.D.U.R. LAB CERT. NO. 405051240Green Bay, Wisc. 54307-9012

----------------------------------------------------------------------------Client Silver Springs Road L.F. Sampled By MJHAddress Scope I.D. 861-194


Name of Rep. Supply Order No.Telephone No. (000) 000-0000 Result Sheet No. 36840.05----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sample I.D. OW-102 B P-102 A 0W-104 B P-105 A OW-106 B



Depth to G/;, ' 9.40 9.43 14.74 4.99 6.53

I pH, s.u. (field) 6.93 7.10 6.82' 6.95 6.87

Sepc. Cond. (field)* 1045 993 705 1203 856

Color Lt. Brown Lt. Brown Lt. Brown Lt. Brown Lt. Brown

Odor No No No No No

Turbidity High ;ioderate High High V. High

IiII

comments: * Specific Conductivity reported as micro-uhmos./cm, at 25 degreesIcelsius.

Signed : _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date : ____ ____ ____

I

IFOTH AND VAN DYKEI Engineers/Architects LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS2737 S. Ridge RoadP.O. Box 19012 W.D.N.R. LAB CERT. NO. 405051240Green Bay, Wisc. 54307-9012

--------------------------------------------------------------------------Client Silver Springs Road L.F. Sampled By 'IJHAddress Scope I.D. 861:94


SName of Rep. Supply Order No.Telephone No. (000) 000-0000 Result Sheet No. 36840.03---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sample I.D. 011-108 B P-108 A O1-109 B P-109 A .OW-I-I B



C.O.D., mg/l < 5 < 5 < 5 < 5 5

B.O.D., mg/l < 6 < 6 < 6 < 6 < 6

Dis. Iron, mg/l < 0.10 0.28 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10

Hardness, mg/l 1100 1400 490 620 930

Alkalinity, mg/l * 710 630 390 300 620

N02+N03-1, mg/l 0.66 0.10 0.08 0.11 0.07

NH3-_, mg/l < 0.1 < 0.i < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1

Barium, mg/l < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0

Chlorides, mg/1 13 26 1 40 1

Sulfates, mg/l 330 530 88 290 220

Chromium, mg/l < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005

ilercury, mg/i < 0.0005 < 0.0005 < 0.0005 < 0.0005 < 0.0005

Lead, mg/l < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005

Cadmium, mg/l < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 0.0012 < 0.0010

Arsenic, mg/l < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005comments: * Holding time was exceeded.

I Signed: O Date: A M, PAL1"

I

P0TH AND VAN DYN(EIEngineers/Architects LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTSS2737 S. Ridge Road

P.O.' Box 19012 W.D.N%.R. LAB CERT. No. 405051240IGreen Bay, wisc. 54307-9012--------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------IClient Silver Springs Road L.. Saripl-,ed By MJ 1Address Scope I.D. 69


SName of Rep. Supply Order No.1Telephone No. (000) 000-0000 Result She-et lNo 36840.04*

f Sa-mple I.D. 9OW--108 B P-108 A OW-109 B P-109 A *OW-111. B

IDate Coll'-ected 9 /28/87 9/28/87 9/28/87 9/28/87 9/28/87Date Received 9/30/87 9/30/87 9/30/87 9/30/87 9/30/87

Parameters, units-------------------------Results -------------------------

IBoron, mg/i 0.59 0.26 0.13 0.12 0.23

Depth to G/W, 8.95 14.40 13.07 13.52 7.27

IpH, s.u. (field) 6.87 6.72 6.68 6.75 6.63

Sepc. Cond. (field)* 1453 1578 750 976 1190

IColor Lt. Brown V. Lt. Br. Lt. Brown V. Lt. Br. Lt. Brown

Iodor No ITO No11 No ITO

Turbidity Moderate Slight Moderate Slight High

comments: *Specific Conductivity reported as micro-uhmos./cn. at 25 degreescelsius.

I Signed: o, 7Z" T fAU~O Date:

110

lit. LG N

ULn LAU

0. N LAa NN

U0 1C) 0000.00

to. 0r~ CD OO CDO

le 9 m 0 C)

o N V ca.r V voL V V V V '

LN 0 A L

CD 1'0 0 Q0 00 t0 0Q0 0 0tC%$N V V 00 10V V V V V C)

i

LA% 0 LA 4 Ln

to . 9 9 9 N

Q.LA'Tfm V G LA v v v v v 1in 0in 4

LA 0- LA g Lf%'0 CAC 0 0 C

Co 9 . . . 0

N Vn 'o .J V V.D0; T 30 V V D V V 10

in 0 LA - LfAm' 0 aOL 0 CD00 ) C

I.- 'r 0 0 0 O OO

N0 -r.C

I L' 0 C; 0~ a C C U CD) 0 0 .J 0 C o

Il; m v1 0

n 0 In I

U., (D.n9ni 0 -0 0 4 C

In 0 LA .- AI

10 07 In m

MNo0 0C 'tOO 10

C. N 0 N V 00 V V V V V D n

2n In

-C V% 0 In .~ LA

IN 00 000 C

00N. In 0 909 9 111 I

LnV in- IT v1

LnI 0~

N ' 00 0I n n IN-In 0 0 C.cz* -. .. t'O 000 0- N 000D-

O.I N- V D In- CV4 ; :C)0 V VD V Vo V Q -n1

InIn 0 In I

UM 0

. nIn 0 In A I

N. . 9n 9O.OOON 0:L 0 '60 00 I 0 00 0 0' Nl

In IT In -I-n F

Inn-r O O 0 . LA00 000 n'

fn 10 0 0 m c, fn QIn 0 In .D In 0 %0, In 00 0 . N.c 0cov v v v v c

N.i 0AD0 00 0 I N

C,, In Q 0 0 IA %0~N v vIn 000000ON.0 - % 00 0 0 00

in n v NQ N 0rvvv r

InIn 0 In I

0o Q n 000CD 0-:

N.~ Q 0- 00000-:5.. - '6000 O--0 v vv 00 0 0 '

% MIn M

(In 0n In - InIn 0 In "0 0 0 0.

N. w a 00 %0 O O N ou0L iu- oU C

Cu

CuCW!

m Co 42, o 00 40 'm C>0 -

C, w

9. 9 9"

W%' 0 U'-%

tn r-- AC0 C, 0 Cu~

8~ 01 0'C> Lw

0 CU . C V 0 V 0.V V V, VoC V I

00 0 '0% Lf

co . OCu W!00 '

0 'I' M C>= 0 V0 V V0 Co CD .0v r ~s v01 v v v v 0

in

I iti0 ULM

co . 9 C!.- m 100 ;D >C ; LM =CC>C>00 00 0 0 LM 0

LA in'

0n CD 00O 0 g w

S C-

co ~ 0 0 0 00D0 0 C> v 0 l > = CD C ,0 C u ,C- - 01-0 .0 0 0 - 0 vv

17 .r CD .C3 . 1

C3 .0000 9-9OO O9O9O O

-n V 'vr '

ON v v v

0f

10 Q C21 Q Q0 .-17 U'D0iv vI I~ 00 0 . '0 v vv

- n C>Ci r

in 0in i

L. >. l-ri~ 0c A. * C A Cui

CC

o", rm caI ~ ~ ~ 7 00 ZOU UZ. CO 00

I ca

1 ,P I 4 ,N9w C2 W%.0

C. C-

C 0 C ; c 0 8I 8-)Ci~ 00n %0

j~~~3 C3.V 0 V .~

m 0 6 c)c0 00 cCo CD

c. C, -C" 0o 0 00

VV V t 0 Pi V.0 v V V V V -

ju 0 LCjV

0. 0, ; C; c- CD 4 0o '

in Fn L1 o

L-1 ~ ~ ~ ~ I 0 c, -) 8 D CC ; ;C ;C

r- v v *~ t0v v an V V V v v

in C C 0 mI CD co

0 o - 9

' -o C3. 0 0 0 0 0

0 A V 01 40i' V V

Ino Qn 9 9 9Ln ~ I 0000c o C ' -*- 0 a'0 C ~ .-v. 0 - 0 00J 00 0 0

' SI n 0 0 o o 0 0 , 9 LM

Ln ~ I 0D C, CD o. CNoC 0 0 CD00 o 0 DCtv'

v o IIo v= 0nv v v v t

- C

I ~ ~~~ a. o ~~. ,~LQ

UL 20 a .c 1 00 C, a LW 0 U0.u o 4 o u o u- 3 u 9

- n Ln

Cu CD C, 3

AS 0r in i

-D c- Cu 0 0 0 c0 0co ~ V. 000200 q (D

V V

000000, t

LV00

in U' ft

co CV 019 000000 CusI -0 C; 0,c0. ;0 V t cu C) V) Co CD C 0 ocu

-> V r VO Vn 030. V C: V3 Let V V V

001 0- in ev

ImC LA inNoo%

-0 ASC

L" W ILr% C Co C -3 pCI-9 c ico 9 9 9

V% %0 C a -0I, v ' ,Q c g 'I0m!

9 N n

in . 2 cmiU

UN Ln

UN .0 CD 00000 9 9C. 9, C

W% C LAk - Ln

cu0Ln -4 a 0 0 0 0l 0> 0 0 m 0

LMco LrLAO Lm Le%

i, CA 0 CD Q (D-0 U'to 000 0. c oOOOcNm 0 C DaaC -

0 UN

LA lA D L% - LA

LAO0 0 C,0

c0 *o8C 0 %0 -T00QQ00.-t 0I V V fLn- Vo V V N V V V V V

0o %0c

LA% LA -I LA

0o 9 00 00 0 9 0:0 'Oo (D OO> .- N> C000 C OON,.C I %N V V V rO .

n LAO LA LANC!.

t 0 LA 0 0D0 0 0

LALnLn LA - LA

- 0C0 00 0. L0 0 00 M**J 10 0000

0 - Cjn0oD 0 0 0 CD N*1 - V Y.N olV V CV V v v V -

co ~LA 0 LA - LA%N 0 LAO D 0D 0D 00 ~ 2 O 0OO O N LVr V0 o0 V V 0 V V V V V 0 w

L 0n

LnC C 0 C)co 9 9 9 9uouc

-4 0 0 0 ;p

U, 0D LA L

WL 0 Q0

N , S

0. N~ n Lin

Lnin 0 tn Ln

I- N o OO O N

I,. V ,

v V i N0 V.4. VT VT V N

Ln

17 In It00~ L t0 C00O00D 0ol- N4C 10C Q0C C;oo oo -: J 0 00 OOON;8 D8 .3:A in v . ' V in? Vr vv V V v 0.

LA 0z LA

LA%L% 0D LA L

u v t LO V N.L co vv V v v (A

LA' 00 .D LACD90 00 In

0. V 0 V D 4L VD 0 0 VD V Q VD VD 0 N

LA LA -2 LANo 000009 . LA

(C LA LA. LA0.C DC ooo 0l Nl L

LA

LN .0LnL C 0 000000 N

-4 00

LA%LA 0) LA L

OOON -:99 99 rN o' 00a - cm 0 Q00Q00 0c.G

- ~ V - v LA V 1.. V V V V VMN Nl

Ln CD N - 0co peLA C DCD0 C

CN

CII

'InI3 L l

IULnLcu c

UC ICi

I~~~C InC0I -

0) .0 00

Ol Fn In pn DLI NI No 2LN

In 0 0 0 00%

1 0. N N

0, C) 0:DIn CD 0 c

a~I 00Nfn00'Ov v L

Inn

In 0D In %N3 (3 0.0 00000 N

10 a L 0 o 60 M 00 0 0 a~ In0(V ~ ' OO M OOO n v v

Innn 0 In-I

L. oO OO 0.

8 8 wJ'.0 0 00

u. In0mu iu ou0

APPENDTX B-Z

-volail e: raic Cowioula (VaCuj

ZIM PROANALYTICAL REPORTENIOMENTAL & ENERGY SYDTEME WWISCNS1 aSCERTiF3AflON. 737053130

ROTH8CHlLD. WISCONSIN 54474

FOR: P-I R715/3597211 TELEX A9.0495 PO ivrSrn

Foth & Van Dyke SAMPLED BY. Client2737 S. Ridge RoadP.O. Box 11997 DATE RECD: _2-2-87Green Bay, WI 54307-1997 REPORT DATE: 3-17-87

Attn: Mike Hastreiter APPROVED BY.- C~~!A

VOC Analysis (ug/1)

I DetectionEintit OW-101B P-102A O-102B cOW-104B P-105A

I Benzene 0.2 X X X X XBrorroforn 0.5 X X X X XBrcgaottethane 1.0 X X X X X' Carbon Tetrachloride 0.1 X X AX XChlorobenzene 0.1 x X X x xChioroethane 1.0 X X X X X

* 2-Chloroethylv inyl Ether 2.0 X X X X X3 Chloroform 0.1 X X X X X* Chlorcrtethane 6.0 X X X X X%

Dibrcxrtochloromethane 0.1 X X X X Xl 1,2-Dichloroben~zene 0.3 X X X X X1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.3 X X X X X1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.3 X X X X XI Dichlorobrormethane 0.1 X X X X X1,1-Dichioroethane 0.1 0.6 0.7 1.2 x x1,2-Dichioroethane 0.3 X X X X XI 1,1-Dichloroethylene 0.5 X X X X X1,2-Dichloroethylene 0.3 23.8 4.0 13.9 X XDichloromtethane 0.2 x X 0.3 X X1,2-Dichioropropane 0.5 X X X X Xl cis-l,3--Dichloropropene 0.3 X X X X Xtrans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1.0 X X X X XEthylbenzene 0.2 X X X X XI L,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.1 X X X X X'etrachloroethylene 0.1 X X X X XToluene 0.1 X X X X XI 1,1,1-Trichioroethane 0.1 X X X X X1,1,2-Trichioroethane 0.1 X X X X XTrichioroethylene 0.1 X X 1.0 X XVinyl Chloride 2.0 12.5 3.0 23.1 X 39.9I Trichlorofluorcrnethane 0.2 X X X X XDichlorodifluorcxnethane 2.0 X X X X X

I Zimrpro Analytical No. 25288 25289 25290 25291 25292

X = Analyzed but not detected

IAll analyses have been conducted in accordance with the Zimpro Inc. Analytical Services Quality Assurance Program2000-PP-87

ZIM PRIBANALYTICAL REPORTENVIONMNTA & NE)GY ZYSTEMS WWSONSIN MA CERTIFICATION NO. 737053130

ROTHSCHILD, W:10ISNSIN1"W 54474

I FOR: P.O.71 TLX ~D45~ Silver Spring

Foth & Van Dyke SAMPLED BY: Client2737 S. Ridge Road 228P.O. Box 11997 DATE RECD -28Green Bay, WI 54307-1997 REPORT DATE: 3-17-87

Attn: Mike Hastreiter APPROVED BY. ~ I

-i VOC Analysis (ug/l)

DetectionLimit P-l01A

Benzene 2.0 XBroioforr, 5.0 XI Brocatethane 10.0 xCarbon Tetrachloride 1.0 XI Chlorobenzene 1.0 XChioroethane 10.0 X2-Chioroethylvinyl Ether 20.0 XI Chloroform 1.0 XChloriethane 60.0 XDibroochloroatethane 1.0 XI ,2-Dichlorobenzene 3.0 X1,3-Dichlorobenzene 3.0 X1,4-Dichlorobenzene 3.0 XDichlorobroatcrnethane 1.0 XI 1,1-Dichioroethane 1.0 X1,2-Dichioroethane 3.0 X1,1-Dichioroethylene 5.0 XI 1,2-Dichioroethylene ' 3.0 XDichiorabtethane 2.0 x1,2-Dichioropropane 5.0 Xcis-1,3-Dichloropropene 3.0 Xtrans-1,3--Dichloropropene 10.0 X*1 Ethylbenzene 2.0 x1,1,2,2-Tetrachioroethane 1.0I Tetrachioroethylene 1.0 XToluene 1.0 X1,1,1-Trichioroethane 1.0 XI 1,1,2-Trichioroethane 1.0 XTrichioroethylene 1.0 xVinyl Chloride 20.0 336.Trichlorofluoraethane 2.0 XI Dichlorodifluoromfethane 20.0 X

Zimrpro Analytical N1o. 25287

IX = Analyzed but not detected

IAll analyses have been conducted in accordance with the Zimpro Inc. Ana-tcal Services Quality Assurance Program.

20COPP 87

ANALYTICAL REPORTEINIV11ONMENTAL. S ENESMY SY1EKMG YvSCONMt' LAB CUR1FmAlION No. 737=53DROTHUCHIL6, WISCONEIN 54474

FOR: PK-L715/359.7211 TELEX 29.0495 PO ivrSrn

Foth & Van Dyke2737 S. Ridge Road SAMPLED BY. ClientP.O. Box 11997 DATE RECD: 2-2-87

- Green Bay, WI 54307-1997REPORT DATE: 3-17-87

IAttn: Mike Hastreiter APPROVED BY: MflR4

VOC Analysis (ug/l)

Lirrt OW-106B P-108A OW-108B P-109A OW-109B

I Benzene 0.2 X X X X XBrcxrofori 0.5 X X X X XI Bramrcatethane 1.0 x x x X xCarbon Tetrachloride 0.1 X X X X XChlorobenzene 0.1 X X X X XI hioroethane 1.0 X X X X X2-Chioroethylvinyl Ether 2.0 X X X X XChloroform 0.1 X X X X XChlorcrniethane 6.0 X X X X XI Dibrofftchloromethane 0.1 X X - X X, X1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.3 X X X X Xl,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.3 X X X X XI 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.3 X X X X XDichlorobrorr#~nethane 0.1 X X X X X1,1-Dichioroethane 0.1 X X X X XI 1,2-Dichioroethane 0.3 X X X X X1,1-Dichioroethylene 0.5 X X X X X1,2-Dichioroethylene 0.3 X X X X XDichlorcnriethane 0.2 X X X X XI 1,2-Dichioropropane 0.5 X X X XXcis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.3 X X X X Xtrans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1.0 X X X X XI Ethylbenzene 0.2 X X X X X1,1,2,2-Tetrachioroetha ne 0.1 X X X X XTetrachloroethylene 0.1 X X 0.2 X XToluene 0.1 X 0.1 X X 0.1I 1,1,1-Trichioroethane 0.1 X X X X X1,1,2-Trichioroethane 0.1 X X X X XTrichioroethylene 0.1 X X X X xI Vinyl Chloride 2.0 X X X X XTrichiorofluoromethane 0.2 X X X X XDichiorodifluoraomethane 2.0 X X X X X

I Zifripro Analytical No. 25293 25294 25295 25296 25297


IAll analyses have been conducted in accordance with the Zimpro Inc. Analytical Services Quality Assurance Program.

2000-PP-87

I

I-KZIYPR0 ANALYTICAL REPORTENVIRONMENTAL& ENERGY SYSTEMS SNS LAB CFRMFCAN NO. 737053130ROTHI.4CHILO, WISCONSIN 5447-ZFOR 715/359.7211 TELEX 29-04S--

Foth & Van Dyke P.O. Silver Spring

2737 S. Ridge Road SAMPLED BY: ClientP.O. Box 11997 DATE REC'D: 2-2-87Green Bay, WI 54307-1997

REPORT DATE: 3-17-87

"1 Attn: Mike Hastreiter APPROVED BY: YW!A

VOC Analysis (ug/l)

Detection Field TripI Limit OW-111B Upstream Downstream Blank Blank

Benzene 0.2 X X X X XBromoform 0.5 X X X X XI Brcacffethane 1.0 X X X X XCarbon Tetrachloride 0.1 X X X X XChlorobenzene 0.1 X X X X XI Chloroethane 1.0 X X X X X2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether 2.0 X X X X XChloroform 0.1 X 1.0 0.9 X XChlorcffethane 6.0 X X X X XDibromochloromethane 0.1 X X X X X1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.3 X X X X X1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.3 X X X X X1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.3 X X X X XDichlorobromomethane 0.1 X 0.4' 0.2 X X1,l-Dichloroethane 0.1 X X X X Xl,2-Dichloroethane 0.3 X X X X X1,1-Dichloroethylene 0.5 X X X X X1,2-Dichloroethylene 0.3 X X 0.4 X XDichlorcmethane 0.2 X X X 0.2 0.21 ,2-Dichloropropane 0.5 X X x x xcis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.3 X X X X Xtrans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1.0 X X X X XI Ethylbenzene 0.2 X X X X X1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.1 X X X X XTetrachloroethylene 0.1 X 0.2 0.1 X XToluene 0.1 X X X 0.2 XI1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.1 X X X X X1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.1 X X X X XTrichloroethylene 0.1 X X X X XVinyl Chloride 2.0 X X X X XTrichlorofluoromethane 0.2 X X X X XDichlorodifluoromethane 2.0 X X X X X

I Zimpro Analytical No. 25298 25299 25300 25301 25302

X = Analyzed but not detectedIi All anaiyses have been conducted in accordance with the Zimpro Inc. Analytical Services Quality Assurance Program.

2000PP87

&7ZIV PRE ANALYTICAL REPORITEVIROIYMENYAL & EFNERGY SYSTEMS VflSCNMl LAS CUMMF]ATION NO. 737053130

ROTHSCHILD. WISCONSINJ 54474

FOR PH- 715 /359 -7211 TELEX 29-04S5P.. Sle rn

Foth & Van Dyke SMLDB: Cin2737 S. Ridge Rd. SMLDB: CinP.O. Box 11997 DATE REC'D: 3-31-87Green Bay, WI 54307-1997 REPOFR DATE: 4-27-87

Attn: Mike Hastreiter APPROVED BY: -'"Q~j

Detection

L Eimit_ Seepage Pt. Field BlankBenzene 1.0 X Xl Braooform 2.0 X X

Brnmtae4.0 X XCarbon Tetrachloride 0.5 X XChlorobenzene 2.0 X Xj Chloroethane2. X2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether 5.0 X xChloroform 0.5 X Xf Chloromethane 2.0 XDirmclrmtae0.5 X Xl,2-Dichlorobenzene 1.0 X X

l,3-Dichlorobenzene 1.0 X X1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1.0 X XDichlorobromomethane 0.5 Xl11-Dichloroethane 0.5 x xj ,2-Dichloroethane 0.5 x x1,1-Dichloroethylene 1.0 X Xl,2-Dichloroethylene 1.0 X XI Dichlorcmethane 1.0 X Xci,-Dichloropropne 2.0 X Xtras-1,3-Dichloropropene 20 X X

Etybnee1.0 xx1,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1.0 XXTetrachloroethylene 0.5 X XI Toluene 05Xl,l,2-Trichloroethane 0.5 XTrichloroetzhylene 0.5 X XVinyl Chloride 2.0 X XTrichlorofluorornethane 1.0 X XDichlorodifluoromethane 2.0 X XI Zinipro Analytical No. 27145 27146


All analyses have been conducted in accordance with the Zimpro Inc. Analytical Services Quality Assurance Program.20OD-PP 87

ILi7 ZIMVI:I___________

--. R ANALYTICAL REPORTINVIRONMENTAL & ENERGY SYSTEMS WISCON LAB CURTIF"CTtON NO. 737MS3130

ROTHSCHIL. WISCOONSIN 54474PH. 715 /359-7211 TELEX 29.0495

FOR: P.O. . 5748Foth & Van Dyke SAMPLED BY: Client2737 S. Ridge RoadP.O. Box 11997 DATE REC'D: 7-31-87Green Bay, WI 54307-1997 REPORT DATE: 8-28-87

" Attn: Dave Turriff APPROVED BY: _ _,_,

VOC Analysis (ug/l)

Detection

Limit Upstream Downstream

1,2-Dichloroethylene 1.0 x

Tetrachloroethylene 0.5 X X

Analytical No. 31055 31056


III ,

IIIII

I All analyses have baen conducted in accordance with the Zmpro Inc. Analytcal Services Quality Assurance Program.

2000-PP-87

I

L ZIIVUR0 ANALYTICAL REPORITENVIRONMEIAL S ENEIRGY =YSTIEM W=ONSIN LAB CERTIFICATiHN NO. 7370e3130

ROTHUCHILI, WISCONSIN 54474FOR . 715 / 359-7211 TELEX 29-0495 5748FOR: PO #. 5748 _ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _

Foth & Van Dyke2737 S. Ridge Road SAMPLED BY: ClientP.O. Box 11997 DATE REC'D: 7-31-87Green Bay, WI 54307-1997 REPORT DATE 8-28-87

Attn: Dave Turriff APPROVED BY:

IVOC Analysis (ug/l)

DetectionLimit OW-108B

Tetrachloroethylene 0.5 X

Analytical No. 31054


IiIIIIIIIIAll analyses have been conducted in accordance with the Zimpro Inc. Analytical Services Quality Assurance Program.

2000-PP.87

Elevation 682.73'

* 0 -1 Dark brown-LEAN CLAY, with'sand (CL)

I1'-5' Light brown SILT, with sand (SM)(moist, odor)

EOB 5' B-9 01-1'(CL)

LL = 46.3PI = 24.2

% P200 = 81.2% clay (0.002 mm) = 28.0

B-10 Elevation 680.70'

0'-1' Dark brown CLAY, with silt (CL)I 1'-3' Light brown SILT, with fine sand,* Itrace gravel (SM)

31-51 Light brown SAND, some gravel, trace silt (SP-SM)

jEOB 5'


0'-1' Dark brown CLAY, with silt (CL)1'-3' Dark brown CLAY, trace silt (CL)3s-51 Brown SILT, with sand, trace clay (SM)

EOB 5'


I 0'-1' Dark brown CLAY, with silt and sand (ML-CL)1'-5' REFUSE

I EOB 5'

I

III

ZIMI RE3ANALYTIAL RUEPORWWtCTMCM11 A7ZzC AE SWY S4474~dU~ B .

FOR ~ 5~-71 P.. k 5748

Fotrh & van Dyke 871r. - tClienfl

2737 S. Ridge Road 7-. 31-87P.O. Box 11997Green Bay, WI 54307-1997 OiAT-= 8-28-87

I Attrn: Dave Turriff A _______

IVOC Analysi s (ug/1)

Detw-ecti--'onL Limit P-101A P-105A

Vinyl Chloride 2.0 304. 19.1

AnalytLical No. 31049 31051

AlI nlssh encnu'e nacrac ihteZmpoIc nlta evcsQaiyAsrnePorm2OPP8

ZIMPREANALYTIAL REPORT~VONJTL £WiUGY YUTms WSXVQE LAS CT1rNOMH. 73n3

ROTHSCHILD. WISCONSUIN 54474Ik- 1 /3 97 1 TO. E~ L -:

C r-PO 5748Foth & Van byke SAIAPLEDBY-f Clienlt12737 S. Ridge RoadDAERC.7-18

U ~~P.O. Box 11997 DT ED -18Green Bay, WI 54307-1997 REPOFr DATE:- 8-2$-87

I ~Attn: Dave Turriff APPROVED BY. _______

I VOC Analysis (ug/1)

IDetection FieldILimit Blank

I1,2-Dichloroethylene 1.0Tetrachloroethylene 0.5 x

1Vinyl Chloride 2.0 X

Analytical No. 31057

I X =Analyzed but not detected

Al1nlsshv encnutdnacrac ihteZmpoIc nltciSri~sQaiyAsrnePorm200PP8

APPEND""IX C

Drawing No. C-2, 2 of 2Topographic. and Boring Location Map

APPkNOIX D

Can Boring L-egs

J-

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

__ _

_ _

_ _

_ __

_ _

__ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

_

LANDFILL SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS;USARC, West Silver Spring Drive, Milwaukee, Wisconsin

JAuger Borings drilled on February 24 and 25, 1987j B-I Elevation 685.20'

0'-51 Brown LEAN C7A.Y, with silt and gravel trace sand(CL) (no refuse)

EOB 5'


0'-2, Brown LEAN CLAY, trace sand and gravel (CL)2'-5' REFUSE

EOB 5'


0'-i Dark gray brown SAND,medium to fine, some silt (SM)(some glass and clinker)1.-51 REFUSE (wet @ 2f)

EOB 5' B-3 0.5'(SM)

% P200 = 30.0% clay (0.002 mm) = 5.5

B-4 Elevation 683.22'-6 0'-0.5' Dark gray brown CLAY, with sand (SC)

0-5'-5' REFUSE (wet)

EOB 5'

I

I


I 0'-2' Brown CLAY, with silt, trace gravel (CL-ML)2'-5' Brown SILT, with sand and trace refuse

EOB 5'


0'-3' Yellow brown LEAN CLAY, with sand (CL)3'-5' Brown to light brown SAND, fine to coarse,I with silt, trace refuse

EOB 5' B-6 1'-2I (CL)LL = 27.0PI = 12.3

% P200 = 77.0% clay (0.002 ram) = 23.5


0'-2' Dark grey brown CLAY, with silt (CL-ML)2'-5' Light brown to brown SAND, fine to medium

trace refuse (wet, with slight odor)

EOB 5'


0'-1' Dark grey brown LEAN CLAY, with silttrace gravel (CL-ML)

1'-5' Light brown SILT, with fine sand.1 and refuse (odor)

EOB 5'

II

II


'- Dark brown ZEM CLAY, withsand (CL)

*1'-5' Light brown SILT, with sand (SM)(moist, odor)

EOB 5' B-9 01-1'(CL)

LL = 46.3PI = 24.2

S% P200 = 81.2% clay (0.002 mm) = 28.0


0'-1' Dark brown CLAY, with silt (CL)I 1'-3' Light brown SILT, with fine sand,* Itrace gravel (SM)

3 '-5' Light brown SAND, some gravel, trace silt (SP-SM)

j EOB 5'


0'-1' Dark brown CLAY, with silt (CL)1'-3' Dark brown CLAY, trace silt (CL)3'-5' Brown SILT, with sand, trace clay (SM)

EOB 5'


I0'-i' Dark brown CLAY, with silt and sand (ML-CL)l'-5' REFUSE

I EOB 5'

I

III

II


I 0-2' Dark brown LEAN CLAY, with sand, trace gravel (CL)2'-5' "REFUSE

EOB 5' B-13 1.51(CL)

LL = 41.2PI = 19.7

% P200 = 73.9% clay (0.002 mm) = 26.0i


0'-l' Brown to light brown SILT, with sand (SM)1'-5' REFUSE

f EOB 5'


0'-i' Dark brown- to black CLAY, with sand and gravel(SC)

I i'-5' REFUSE

EOB 5'IB-16 Elevation 687.03'

0'-i' Dark brown LEAN CLAY, with sand (CL)1 ' -5' REFUSE

I EOB 5' B-16 0.5'(CL)

LL = 49.3PI = 25.0IP200 = 78.2

% clay (0.002 mm) 25.0


0'-0.3' Black cinders0.3'-5' REFUSE

I EOB 5'

ISI

I

I


I 0'1-0.5' Black cinders0.3'-5' REFUSE

I EOB 5'


0'-0.25' Black SAND and CLAY, with refuse (SC)j 0.25'-5' REFUSE

EOB 5'


0'-0.5' Brown LEAN CLAY, with sand and silt (CL)0.5'-01 REFUSE

EOB 5'


I 0'-1.5' Brown to dark LEAN CLAY, with sand (CL)1.5'-5' REFUSE

EOB 5' B-21 1.5'(CL)

LL = 34.7PI = 18.2P200 = 75.2

% clay t(0.002 mam) = 25.5IB-22 Elevation 685.01'

j 0'-1.5' Dark brown CLAY, with sand (SC)1.5'-5' REFUSE

I EOB 5'

I]II

B-23 Elevation 687.091

0 '-21 Brown SAND, with clay and gravel (SC/SC-SM)2'-5' REFUSE

EOB 5' B-23 V'-2(SC/Sc-SM)LL = 24.3PI = 8.7

*P200 = 39.2%Clay (0.002 nMM) =8.5

B-24 Elevation 688.691f 0'-2' Brown LEAN cLAy, with gravel and sand (CL)2'-51 REFUSE

EOB 5'

B-25 Elevation 689.75'01-0.251 Brown LEAN CLAY (CL)0.25'-51 REFUSE

BOB 5'


0' -2' Brown LEAN CLAY, with sand (CL)2'-51 REFUSE

BOB 5' B-26 1'(CL)

LL =34.7PI = 18.2

%P200 = 79.2J *clay (0002 mm) 29.5

( III


I 0'-2.5' Brown LEAN .CLAY, with sand (CL)2.5'-5' REFUSE

EOB 5' B-27 1'(CL)

LL = 34.7PI = 18.2P200 = 79.2

% clay (0.002 mm) = 29.5iB-28 Elevation 687.34'

*0'-0.25' Black cinders, mixed with clay0.25'-5' REFUSE

* f EOB 5'


0'-2' Brown CLAY, with silt (CL-ML)2'-5' Light brown SILT, with clay, trace gravel (ML)f (no refuse)

EOB 5'iB-30 Elevation 688.3'

0'-0.5' Dark brown LEAN CLAY, with sand (CL)0.5'-5' REFUSE

EOB 5' B-30 0.5'(CL)

LL = 31.8PI = 15.5

% P200 = 76.9% clay (0.002 mm) = 23.5

I B-31 Elevation 691.71'

0'-0.5' Brown SAND, with gravel (SP)0.5'-5' REFUSE

I EOB 5'

II

II

B-32 Elevation 690.6510'-5, Brown LEAN CLAY, with gravel, trace sand (CL)

EOB 5'


0'-0.51 Brown SAND, with gravel (SP)0.5'-5' REFUSE

EOB 5'

B-34 Elevation 68E.181

O'-0.5, Brown sandy LEAN CLAY (CL)0.5'-5' REFUSE

EOB 5' B-34 Surface(CL)

LL = 30.6PI = 13.9

% P200 = 64.4% clay (0.002 mm) 20.5


0'-0.5, Brown SAND, with gravel (SP)0.5'-5' REFUSE

EOB 5'


0'-0.5 Brown CLAY, with sand (SC)0.5'-51 REFUSE

EOB 5'

IIII


01-0.251 Brown LEAN CLAY, with sand (SC)

O.25'-5' REFUSE

EOB 5'

{B-38 Elevation 686.19'

01-0.251 Brown LEAN CLAY, with sand (CL)0.251-51 REFUSE


LL = 35.19PI = 17.0

t P200 = 75.1%clay (0.002 mm) =24.0


0'-0.251 Brown LEAN CLAY, with gravel (CL)0.25'-5' REFUSE

I EOB 5'

jB-40 Elevation 680.99'

0'-0.51 Dark gray brown SAND, fine-medium, with clayand gravel (SC)

0.5'-5' REFUSE

EOB 5' B-40 SurfaceI (SC)LL 33.6DT A114.3

%P200 = 35.7%clay (0.002 mm) =7.0

II


I 0'-1.5' Dark bro.i I. CLA__Y, with sand (CL)1.5'-5-1 REFUSE

IEOB 5 B-41 1'(CL)

-L, = 36.3PI = 19.6%P200 = 68.3

% clay (0.o0 m = 28.7


0 '-1.5' Brown LEIV CLAY, with sand (CL)1.5'-3' Dark brown =-AW CLAY, with gravel (CL) I3'-5' Light brown to bro-n CTAY, with silt (CL-bM)f (no refuse)

EOB 5'IB-43 Elevation 689.091'

0'-2' Brown LEAN CLAY, with gravel (CL)2'-3.5' Dark brown LEAN CLAY, with gravel (CL)3.5'1-' Light brown SILT, some clay (I4)

(no refuse)

BOB 5'


0'-3' Brown LEAN CLAY, with gravel (CL)

3'-5' Dark brown LEAN CLAY (CL)(no refuse)

EOB 5'

IIIII

1qIIII


0'-0.25' Dark browzi LE-A C-AY, with sand (CL)O.25'-5' IFUSE (hard drilling)

I FOB 5' B-45 Surface(CLT)

L -= 28.8IPI = 13.8

% P200 = 69.1* clay (0.002 r-m) = 17.0


0'-5' REFUSE

EOB 5'


0'-0.16' Dark brown LEA-N CLAY, with sand (CL)

0.16'-5' REFUSEi


LL = 32.1PI = 13.1

% P200 = 53.5% clay (0.002 mm) = 11.5


j 0'-5' REFUSE (appears to be cinders on surface)

EOB 5'


I 0'-5I REFUSE (appears to be cinders on surface)

EOB 5'III


I 01-51 REFUSE

j EOB 5'


I 01-i1 Dark brown FAT CLAY, with sand (CH/14H)V'-5' REFUSE (mixed with sand and clay)

IEOB 5' B-51 Surface(CIH'/!MH)

LL = 54.8I PI = 26.5%P200 = 80.9I % clay (0.002 mnn) =29.0


01-0.51 Dark brown --AN CLAY, w~th sand (CL)0.51-31 REFUSE

EOB 5' "3-52 01-51I (CL)LL = 49.6PI = 25.7P200 = 87.7

5clay (0.002 mm) =48.0

IB-53 Elevation 693.17'

01-5 ' REFUSE (appears to be cinders on surface)

EOB 5'


01-0.5' Brown LEAN CLAY, with sand (CL)I 0.51-5I REFUSE


LL = 26.0PI = 11.8

%P200 = 70.2ii %clay (0.032 mm) =21.5

, IB-55 Elevation 694.14'

0 '-0.5' Dark brown LEAN CLAY, with sand (CL)0.51-5' REFUSE

I EOB 5'

f B-56 Elevation 692.72'

0'-1.5' Dark brown LEAN CLAY, with sand (CL)1.5'-5' REFUSE

EOB 5' B-56 1.5'(CL)

LL = 41.0PI = 20.1

% P200 = 76clay (0.002 im) = 30.5


0'-3' Brown LEAN CLAY, with sand (CL)3'-5' REFUSE

EOB 5'


0'-1.5' Dark brown LEAN CLAY, with sand (CL/ML)1.5'-5' REFUSE

EOB 5' B-58 Surface(CL/ML)

LL = 43.3PI = 18.3P200 = 65.6

% clay (0.002 mm) = 22.5


0'-2' Brown LEAN CLAY, with sand (CL)I 2'-5' REFUSE

EOB 5'III

IB-60 Zlevation 690.16'

0'-2' Brown to dark brown SILT, little sand (Ifd/CH)2' -5' REFUSE

I EOB 5' B-60 2'

(HR/CH)LL= 65.1PI = 30.1

% P200 = 84.8% clay (0.002 m) 29.0


S0'-3' Dark brown to brown LEAN CLAY (CL)31-51 REFUSE

I EOB 5'


0'-0-5, Dark brown LEAN CLAY, with sand (CL)0.5 ' -5' REFUSE

EOB 5' B-62 0.5'(CL)LL = 37.6

PI = 16.3% P200 = 60.4

clay (0.002 mm) = 18.5

B-63 Elevation 691.02'0'-0.25, Dark brown LEAN CLAY, with sand (CL)0.25'-5, REFUSE

j EOB 5'

II

II

I

Iz


0'-2' Dark brown fo light brown LEAN CLAY,with sand (CL)

21-51 REFUSE

EOB 5' B-64 2'(CL)

LL = 27.4PI = 12.0

t P200 = 76.4% clay (0.002 mm) 22.5


0'-l.5' Dark brown LEAN CLAY, with sand (CL/ML)1.5'-5' REFUSE

EOB 5' B-65 1'(CL/ML)

LL = 37.4PI = 16.3P200 = 73.4

% clay (0.002 mm) = 24.5


0'-0.5' Brown LEAK CLAY, with sand (CL)0.5'-5' REFUSE

EOB 5' B-66 0.5'(CL)

LL = 30.6PI = 13.6

% P200 = 74.1% clay (0.002 mm) = 22.0


0'-0.5' Brown LEAN CLAY, with sand (CL)

0.5'-5' REFUSE

EOB 5'

III

APPENDIX E

Soil Testing Results

Fntn & Van Dyke PROJECT NO.:________I Foth & Van Dyke

!5I Engineers/Architects JOB NO.: 86M94

2737 S. Ridge RoadP.O. Box 19012 DATE: March 20-23, 1987I Green Bay, Wisconsin 54307-9012

1i 414/497-2500 REPORT NO.: 1

REPORT OF ANALYSIS OF AGGREGATES

-1 ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: Foth & Van Dyke CONTRACTOR:

PROJECT: USARC Silver Spring Landfill SOURCE: USARC Silver Sprin5 Drive

j REPORT OF TESTS OF: Analysis of Cover Material

SS;Oe weight % % Slpeafi- RECEIVED AT LABORATORY: March 18, 1987

Size or No. Retaned Retained Pa.sig cationsQUANTITY REPRESENTED: 167.7 g rams

3-Inch

-InchSUBMITTED BY: Janis Kesv of F&VD

11-Inch SAMPLED FROM: Boring B-3

-Inch IDENTIFICATION: Depth 0.5'

3l,-Inch DATE SAMPLED: February, 1987

1 '/2-Inch 0 0 100 INTENDED USE: .. Tndffi 11 COvpr

I 3/a-Inch 5.1 3.0 97.0 WASHED GRADATION: Yes

30.0No.4 15.5 9.2 87.8 PERCENT PASSING NO. 200 SIEVE %

No. 8 COLOR: 2.5 Y 3/2 - Very dark grayish browr

No.10 20.6 12.3 75.5 REMARKS: Glass and Clinker make up 10-12% of

No.16 the total sample.

No.20

No. 30

No.40 40.7 24.3 51.2

I No. 50

I No. 80

No.100 24.3 14.5 36.7

I No. 200 11.2 6.7 30.049.3 ..

Pan 50.3 30.0

II CHECKED BY:-_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

I FORM '329 A-I SI (Rev. 11/86)

... . ... . - .3~U

.. ...... ac

1-a -W-

C ..

1= ... < CL A

.... . .zj CO

t- 1P4 >

.. ... z 4

-. ~~L > - iC

m w

Z . cc. 0-

- -J C% .(

cc >-. . - -

-U 0L ccC-

3r +----~ --

>n~ 0 C

- .1 U1

LL Q)a

-U C-4 E

.l . -4-

U, ~ .. - -.--- - -

*~~C > J~1C

---- -.- .-. .-- --- U)

PH -- D H. C(A_ C) 0) /

0 0 0 0 -0- 0 c (-(1) c 1.U4U T m , uc

w .,. C d

0r 0 - <____~( -.- a <i

IFoth & Van Dyke

Engineers/Architects JOB NO.: 86M94

2737 S. Ridge RoadP. O. Box 19012 DATE: March 20-23, 1987

Green Bay, Wisconsin 54307-9012414/497-2500 REPORT NO.: 2

I REPORT OF ANALYSIS OF AGGREGATES

j ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: Foth & Van Dyke CONTRACTOR:

PROJECT: USARC Silver Spring Landfill SOURCE: USARC Silver Spring Drive

I REPORT OF TESTS OF: Analysis of Cover Material

Sieve Weight % % Spec RECEIVED AT LABORATORY: March 18, 1987

Size or No. Retained Retained Passing cauonsQUANTITY REPRESENTED: 220.0 grams

3-InchSUBMITTED BY: Janis Kesy of F&VD

2-Inch __________ ____

SAMPLED FROM:- Boring B-6I 12-lnch

l-Inch IDENTIFICATION: Depth 1'-2'

-/-Inch DATE SAMPLED: February 1987

1l2-Inch INTENDED USE: Landfi 11 rnupr

I a-Inch 0 0 100 WASHED GRADATION: Yes

No.4 5.9 2.7 97.3 PERCENT PASSING NO. 200 SIEVE 77%0

No. 8 COLOR: 10 YR. 5/4 - Yellowish brown

No.10 9.5 4.3 93.0 _.

No.16

No. 20 1__ _ _ _ _ __ _ _

No.30

No.40 12.2 5.5 87.5

1 No.50' No. 80 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

No.100 13.3 6.0 81.5

I No.200 9.8 4.5 77.0

Pan . 169.3 77.0

IS CHECKED BY" _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

FORM #329 A-i SI (Rev. 11/86)

.7 -7-~ii4

7* .. ... .JL >

*Z cca

F -.... . - - . . - I

~---. .---- .---- -. -

Lr1 0Li.

U--

I. In

IAL LU ui w c

uj 0 0

ILI

w, :: _ _ w..~- Aa

it-- - _ _ _ LU C/)l-

_ _) 3: U

w L a*ul

w It

I:..r . W.-- _

j CNg

(n_ 4

:- . . . ..... r

0n 00

a. cc ( U)I~~~ ~ -7 a- 0 0 0 U.1___________________

Foth & Van Dyke POETN .________

Enier/rhtcsJOB NO.: 86M9423S.Ridge Road

P.O0. Box 19012 DATE: March 20-23, 1987Green Bay, Wisconsin 54307-9012

414/497-2500REOTN.3


I ARCHITECT/ENG INEER: Fgth & Van Dyke CONTRACTOR:___________

PROJECT:- USARO Silver Spring landfill SOURCE: USARO Silver Svring Drive

J REPORT OF TESTS OF: Analysis of Cover--Material

Size WN. eight %% Specifi- RECEIVED AT LABORATORY: March 18, 1987Iia'ro Retainedl Retained Passing cations QUANTITY REPRESENTED: 277.9 grams

3-Inch ____ ____

2-IchSUBMITTED BY: -jans Kesv__of F&VD

11/2InchSAMPLED FROM: Boring B-9

1 1-Inch IDENTIFICATION: Depth 1'

I 3/4-Inch DATE SAMPLED: February. 1987

'Ia-Inch 0 0 100 INTENDED USE: Landifil over

3/a -Inch 8.5 3.1 96.9 WASHED GRADATION: -Ye s

No.4 1 1.0 1 .4 96.5 PERCENT PASSING NO. 200 SIEVE 81.2%

No. COOR: 10 YR. 3/4 -Dark brown

No.10 1.6 .6 95.9 ___

No.16

No. 20

INo.30__ _ _ _ _ _

No.40 6.7 2.4 93.T

1No.50 __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _1 _ _ _

I No. 80No.100 123.3 8.4 85.1 ___

1 No.200 11.1 4.0 81.1

Pan .3 225.7 81.2

I CHECKED BY:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _

I FORM 0329 A-1 SL (Rev. 11/86)

I - - - . . . . . --. . . .........I

.. .. II .. .... c

* ,, - - - =- - - - I a .L

I-fi- .C14--_c

* .. .. . , C... .. ..L 4,u

. . . . . . . . .~ .. . .. .U -.fC

.... .._._

~~4:D ____

o__ 0 4 L

Ln a

0j - 0

it. C. u

(A 2t Ct -1

-Jj Ci U)0

w LI

C2 C14~

W C; )CI

of U)

C14 z

C.)4.4.

- CN

UU

NMOHS~~~~c UZSNH.U~~ N~

-< < U

)~~~~~~ u_________________

Foth & Van Dyke PROJECT NO.:


2737 S. Ridge RoadP. O. Box 19012 DATE: March 20-23, 1987



ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: &CONTRACTOR:_



jSeve Weigt RECEIVED AT LABORATORY: March 18, 1987

Size or No. Retained Retained Passing caons QUANTITY REPRESENTiD: 251.7 grams

3-Inch SUBMITTED BY: Janis Kesy of F&VDSAMPLED FROM: Boring B-13

1 1/-Inch

1-Inch IDENTIFICATION: Depth 1.5'

3 IInch 0 0 100 DATE SAMPLED: February, 19871/-Inch 4.3 1.7 98.3 INTENDED USE: TLandfill Cover

%la-Inch 3.2 1.3 9 7.0 WASHED GRADATION: Yes

No.4 2.2 .9 96.1 PERCENT PASSING NO. 200 SIEVE 73.9 %

I No.8 COLOR: 10 YR. 3/3 - Dark brown

No.10 3.5 1.4 94.7

I No. 16

No.20

1 No.30

No.40 11.0 4.4 90.3

I No. 50

I No. 80

No.100 28.1 11.2 79.1

I No.200 13.2 5.2 73.9

186.2Pan 186.3 74.0

CHECKED BY-FORM #329 A-I SL (Rev. 11/as)

3C

_ _ Cl

cca

~~-7__ _ _ -

U o-~~~r z -C ' C

cc) . - .> u -

-- ------

-z-J.~IU)7 __

- . _ - - - - - -

U~~~cnl I--- *- - --

Lu _

___ __ __ U )U)

C'L

_ _ uJm_ _ __ _ _ w_ _ _ _ N__w__v_ ____ _0___________~ _j__ _ __ _ _ _ __ _ _

-______~c a.-- __ _ _ _

c -__ __ ____ I-

r-L 0 PROJECT NO.: I-Foth & Van Dyke&ree .A.cike's JOB NO.: 86M9.

-27S..-Rdge RoadP. O. Box %I0i2 DATE- March 20 co 24, 1957

Geen Bazy. V(zscoasn 5;3-9-W2_ _ _ _ _ _ _

- 4 250REPORT NO.: 5


ARCHITECLIENGINEER: Forn & Van Dyke CONTRACTOR-

PROJECT- S.RC Silver Spring Landfill SOURCE: USARC Silver Spring Drive

REPORT OF TESTS O" Analysis of Cover Material

______ !____ - I - , o , o~o March 18, 1987Se"n I . J 5 RECEIVED A- LAgORsTORY:

|_-_= ___ I i I QUA.%TY REPRESENTED- 169.5 grams

I_____nch_0 0__ 1 I SUBMITED BY: jaI Kesy of F&VDa2-Incii f_ _ _I_ __ oigBn

N 1 b I _ _._ 6_2.7 I _7.3_ PERCENTPSAMPLED FROM:. Bori B.26NO.i I OOR I0YR.12-VerydargrayishbroIDENTIFICATION:D

S O 1DATE SAMPLED- February, 1987

____. ___ __I

WI4I I INTENDED USE: Landfill Cover%1-InlchR

0 0 10WASHED GRADATION: Yes

No. 41.6 2.7 97.3 PERCENTPASSINGNO200 SIEV_8%

No. 8 J______I___I_ __ COLOR: 10 YR. 3/2 -Very dark grayish brown

No.10 I 6.2 j 3.7 J 93.6 I___No.15 ___I_______ NOTE: Small pieces of glass found in this

No.20 j ___I___ ___Isample.

No.30 I -__

No. 40 10.0 3.9 J87.7I___No.50

No.80

No.100 11.1 6.5 81.2

No.200 5.1 3.0 78.2

132.Pan 132.5 78.2

CHECKED BY.FORM '329 A-1 SL (Rev 11/86)

_ _ _... .- ...

w -

j~~~~- ---~ -- --------

U) _oU. U.

___________Fn Lis______ 4 )

0 C

.. . . .....

w ____...._ _ ....._ _ _V c1_______

0 0

0 L) aCL )

>- U J -Ji

LL 0-

07' U- L* 0

g--- 0U _ _ _

C4 C. 1: ~U) j m -c m0)

0n 10C

C))

c .-.u CO ~~

U) * >

0I 0 4

70 04 -. -

00

U) - ~ *J )

$4~10 00 M

... 01 Cl)>4 >

. . .. . . . . ................. . - 0

cc z., LJ (1

0 => -J 1-

0 s0

m 0 l t LLn v m~ NY 0C-D

NMOHS RZIS NVH.± UI3N.113 N3OUd 0r 0 4 00. ~ ( .. 4 00 c

iFoth & Van Dyke PROJECT NO.:_ _ _ __ _

Engineers/Architects JOB NO.: 86M942737S. Ridge Road March 20 to 24, 1987

P. O. Box 19012 DATE:Green Bay, Wisconsin 54307-9012

414/497-2500 REPORT NO.: 6


ARCHITECT/ENGINEER. Foth & Van Dyke CONTRACTOR:

PROJECT: USARC Silver Soring Landfill SOURCE: USARC Silver Spring Drive

REPORT OF TESTS OF: Analysis of Cover Material

RECEIVED AT LABORATORY: March 18, 1987Seve We~gflt I Sl~ecifi-

Size or No. Retained Retained Passing c3anons 210.0 grams_______ I QUANTITY REPRESENTED: 21.grs

3-inch SUBMITTED BY: Janis Kesy of F&VD

2-inch ____

SAMPLED FROM: Boring B-211 V.-Inch

1-nch IDENTIFICATION: Depth 1.5'

/-Inch DATE SAMPLED: February, 1987

'/1-Inch 0 0 100 INTENDED USE: Landfill Cover

%/8-Inch 1.6 .8 99.2 WASHED GRADATION: Yes

No.4 3.5 1.7 97.5 PERCENT PASSING NO. 200 31EVE 75.2 %

No.8 COLOR: 10 YR. 4/3 - Brown to dark brown

No.10 6.5 3.1 94.4 _.

No.16

No. 20

No.30

No.40 14.7 7.0 87.4

No.50

No. 80

No.100 17.4 8.3 79.1

No.200 8.3 4.0 75.1_ 157.6I _ _ _ _

1an 1 . 58.0 75.2

ICHECKED BY. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

FORM #329 A-1 SI (Rev 11/86)

S---- --

j-- ... .. - - _ _ _ _

- ---- ---- -- - ________>

j h:.::~Cc............. .. .......- 0

- - _-- ------ --- - -o

co___________________ _________________ ______________________________________________C6_

. . ... 0.

-. __ _ _- . .. . ... .. L

cn 0I n t! - TT-z

<~ cc_ - - - -

-.J 0~ 0::w :.- c z

C1 L'L) .......

co LI -j cc-- -.--. -.-- -.- U * , U

U) 0V5_ _ _ _ _ 2 CL-

C14

LI)

'n 2

.............- ------ . .wI.jI U

0 0~ 0 I' i f q C LU U

NMOHS 3ZIS NVHi U3NIdl INQ8d I r o o

lIFoth & Van Dyke PROJECT NO.:


2737 S. Ridge RoadP.O. Box 1,012 DATE: March 20 to 23. 1987jGreen Bay, Wisconsin 54307-9012

414/497-2500 REPORT NO.: 7


" ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: Foch & Van Dyke CONTRACTOR:PROJECT USARC Silver Spring Landfill SOURCE: USARC Silver Spring Drive


Seva Weig . RECEIVED AT LABORATORY: March 18, 1987

Size or No. Roe neag QUANTITY REPRESENTED:- 293.4 grams3-Inch ____

32Inch T SUBMITTED BY: Janis Kesy of F&VD

2-Incn SAMPLED FROM: Boring B-23I "l2-InCn

1-Inch IDENTIFICATION: Deth 1'-2'

3.-Inch 0 0 100 DATE SAMPLED: February, 1987

'/-Inch 37.7 12.8 87.2 INTENDED USE: Landfill Cover

%Ia-Inch 15.0 5.1 82.1 WASHED GRADATION: Yes

No.4 23.3 7.9 74.2 PERCENT PASSING NO. 200 SIEVE 39.2 %

No.8 COLOR: 10 YR. 4/4 -Dark yellowish brown

No.10 20.6 7.0 67.2

' No. 16

No. 20

No.30

No.40 34.8 11.9 55.3

No.50

I No. 80

No.100 32.3 11.0 44.3

I No.200 14.7 5.0 39.3114.C

Pan 115.0 39.2

CHECKED BY.FORM 1329 A-1 SL (Rev. 11/86)

co r

..-- -..- _ _ -- 3

.....--.. IsS- .- -t. -.--.- ,.Ll

* L......... _ __ _. ....... - . . I-I-~ .-. -- -- C

*~~... co En....-.- ---

-n Io U$ 0

........ .Z &L .0

.... C! c u. .

_ _ _.... .............. U. .

L: 0

Lai,

LZ L. 00

cn Z) L

-U ccm -J

CO U

2t .. .. ... .. .

>,_ 0 a (0

cc.'. 5

4- co . D0a

LL.-

C,

W11

a C

- -- -- ----.

LEH .. .. .. . .... < J C

______ __-__.____*..____ - . p

.. . - ....... CC

0 0 0 us

NMOHS 3ZIS N'VHL BMWH .LN3H cc 0 0

CL~ 4i (n U

I

Foth & Van Dyke PROJECT NO.:_ _ __ __Engineers/Architects JOB NO.: 86M94

2737 S. Ridge Road March 20 to 24, 1987P.O. Box 19012 DATE:

Green Bay, Wisconsin 54307-9012414/497-2500 REPORT NO.:8


" ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: Foth & Van Dyke CONTRACTOR:

PROJECT: USARC Silver Soring Landfill SOURCE: USARC Silver Spring Drive


RECEIVED AT LABORATORY: March 18, 1987Sieve Weigflt % Snecifi-

Size or No. Retained Retained Passing catons QUANTITY REPRESENTED: 239.1 grams

3-Inch SUBMITTED BY: Janis Kesy of F&VD

2-Inch

SAMPLED FROM: Boring B-261-nch _ IDENTIFICATION: Depth 1'

"1,-Inch j DATE SAMPLED: February. 1987

'12 I-nch I I INTENDED USE: Landfill Cover

~IoIflh I 0 0 I 10 fWASHED GRADATION: Yes

No.4 I 5.2 2.2 97.8 PERCENT PASSING NO. 200 SIEVE 79.2 %

I No.8 10 YR. 4/3 - Brown to dark brown

No.10 5.8 2.4 95.4

No. 16

I No. 20 _

I I - _ _ _ _No.30 ___ ______

No.40 13.I 5.4 90.0

No.50

I No. 80

No.100 17.0 7.1 82.9

I No.200 8.7 3.6 79.3189.

Pan . 189.4 79.2

Fineness Modulus

CHECKED BY:FORM #329 A SL (Rev 10/86)

L 0

U

.. . ............ .. . i . -.

.. .............. c

...... ...... 0o C. L

.1I.. .. .. .. ... in

L:

. . .... ... . -.. 0...

*~~ C!~ ~L

LU ~ - N

0

U ~ L at -* 0U LU c

0-

U- ma

- - - - - -- - - - - L

w (A .. L

LU,

C1

___ __~0LU>2.. CL

___ __ ___ __ 1 /, Lb -0

W 4 w 0

z 14 Lb

-~fl 0... 0-

0 .0

LU Lb

o 0 0c V) 0 0~0 L

LU - r C.

NMOHS BZIS NVHI U3NIdJ lN901d 0r 0(L ~ L wi<(


Engineers/Architects JOB NO.: 86M942737 S. Ridge Road

P. O. Box 19012 DATE: March 20 to 27, 1981Green Bay, Wisconsin 54307-9012

414/497-2500 REPORT NO.: 9


ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: Foth & Van Dyke CONTRACTOR:



______ ____________March 18, 1987

Sieve Weight % % Speifi- RECEIVED AT LABORATORY:

Size or No. Retained Retained Passing cations QUANTITY REPRESENTED: 144.2 grams3-InchVSUBMITTED BY: Janis Kesy of F&VD

2-Inch ____llknch I SAMPLED FROM: Boring B-3011 /2-Inch


I l-Inchn DATE SAMPLED: February, 1987

1'-Inch 0 0 100 INTENDED USE: Landfill Cover

I 3 a-Ilnch 1.7 1.2 98.8 WASHED GRADATION: Yes


S No. 8 COLOR: 10 YR. 4/4 - Dark yellowish brown

No.10 3.0 2.1 94.1

I No. 16

No. 20

I No.30

No. 40 6.8 4.7 89.4

No.50

I No. 80

No. 100 9.3 6.4 83.0

No.200 8.8 6.1 76.9i. 110.7________________ _______

P an .7 110.9 76.9

CHECKED BY: FORM"8329_A_1_SL_(Rev._11/86)FORM #329 A-1 SL (Rev. 11/86)

_Go

7----e... ... . .. j"

....... ... ... ....... ......... ........ .. al:..... ...... ........ --.. ..... ....

i . . .. .. : ... .... . .. .... .. . . ..... ... ""

;!F:.." ... ..".". " . . 2 . " .cc"". : :. . : "!.

I --.:. • : .' .-- ..--* -' .-.. -...-.:.. ,

.. ...... CL...

." . .. .. . ... . - CL us

.. ... ............... ........ .. . If) L_ U'

S...... .............

..... .-- -.. . I--*. . t.I.P;

,,, ~ ~.......... . . . . . . . . .

[T . - ...:: _ ._ _ _ _ 0 °.... -- - ..-- --_ -....-- -- - - -- ... .... .. .V

- . . .. . .......

o C

.... .... ........ .. ... ... ... ..... ..... . ....... +II

. . .. ... . .........

o u I= < _ _

(UU

t. . .. 9L

In99j 1 ( X1_

- 0CS LU i..

UN

cc In -

,v U,

.U . ..... - .I

- , 4% VLA N -

> ta

LU,

co IL 0)LL at >

... ..... In

cc * C) .

-~ it-K-----.--.------z..) U) U

I__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ a. .

NM H R...- 9.-.. U3,I IN3 dc 0 0

~0

Foth & Van Dyke PROJECT NO.:Engineers/Architects JOB NO.: 86M94

2737 S. Ridge RoadP. O. Box 19012 DATE: March 20 to 27, 1987

Green Bay, Wisconsin 54307-9012

414/497-2500 REPORT NO.: 10





Sieve Weight % % Spfi. RECEIVED AT LABORATORY: March 18, 1987

Size or No. Rtained Retained Passing cations 83.6 gramsQUANTITY REPRESENTED: 8. rm


2-Inch_____ ____ __ __

I SAMPLED FROM: Boring B-34

1.Inch IDENTIFICATION: Depth: Srface

IA-Ifch IDATE SAMPLED: February, 1987

'1/-Inch INTENDED USE: Landfill Cover

I /-Inch 0 0 100 WASHED GRADATION: Yes

No.4 3.8 4.5 95.5 PERCENT PASSING NO. 200 SIEVE 64. 4 %

No.8 5 COLOR: 10 YR. 4/3 - Brown to dark brown

No. 10 5.o 6.o 89,.5

I No.16

No. _

I No. 30

No.40 8.9 10.6 78.9

1 No.50

S No. 80

No. 100 8.4 10.0 68,9

No. 200 3.7 4.4 64.5

Pan 3.,53.8 64.4

CHECKED BY:FORM '329 A-1 SL (Rev 11/86)

00

.__........ 1 a..0-CU >

CP 0

_ _ 0.-fn

_____*e- h&)

.. ..... 04 -, - . - .

.. [......... a

a. CD .

'i-u 0

o~~~ MU( oIn~ a (C t

w -

I~L -_ __ __

ccU) (C

>1I=. .

c--

U-. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . .

>C -n CJ

S ui

V)5

~iI7 0

* ..- U)in

-- - - . .-- -,- .-.-.-- en

I C) C 'C FzS ~ 1 - * a co

LU)

- U -J0- m I

Lo

,-* 0 tn U)I (

(1 (D 0

co 0 1' 50 0f 0~ U.1NU -

0 U e

NMOHS RZIS VVHl M ~3IN3Ud a0 r-< 0<.4 U) U

IFoth & Van Dyke





Foth & VanDyke ____________i ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: CONTRACTOR:



SVe Weight %% Speci. RECEIVED AT LABORATORY: March 18, 1987

Size or No. Retained Retained Passing cationsQUANTITY REPRESENTED:- 140.2 grams


2-Inch______ ___ __

112-1nc~h SAMPLED FROM: Boring B-38

1-Inch IDENTIFICATION: Depth: Surface

/,.Inch DATE SAMPLED: February, 1987

'12-Inch 0 0 100 INTENDED USE: Landfill Cover

%a-Inch 1.5 1.1 98.9 WASHED GRADATION: Yes


I No.8 COLOR: 10 YR. 2/2 - Very dark brown

No. 10 5.0 3.6 93.2

No. 16 NOTE: Small amounts of asphalt and glass were

No.20 found in this sample.

1 No.30

I No. 40 10.2 7.3 85.9

No. 50

I No. 80

No.100 9.3 6.6 79.3

I No.200 4.5 3.2 76.1Fa 06..11 10 6.71 76.1

ICHECKED BV"

FORM #329 A.1 51 (Rev 11/86)

...... .. .. ..

....... .-- .-.-. ~.-

.~* .......... U

-- ----- --

u -- -- ------

...... I

0~ CAJ

1 .... .

C3.

C-

-. -

7 :..::7 ----- 0LA-I .... ..

CNN

. . . .. . . .. .-. . . . .. ,c

co2

___ zLU En

NMOHS ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t wZSNII~H1~3~CL <U)cI - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __m


I =e/A.c JOB NO.: 86M.94

M-7 SL Ridge RoadP. 0. Box 19012 DATE-- March 20 to 27, 1987

Geena 54307-9312414/4-250 REPORT NO.: 12


I ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: h & Van keCTOR-

PROJECT- USARC Silver Spring Landfill SOURCE: USARC Silver Spring Drive

" REPORT OF TESTS OF- Atalysis of Cover Fterial

RECEIVED AT LABORATORY: March 18, 1987

R z. ed Remwed I Pass--. _ _ _ II - j QUANTITY REPRESENTED- 100.1 gras

3jn iM Janis Kesy of F&VDSUBMI]-FED BY:

SAMPLED FROM: - Bring B40g 1 lk--Inc.'1 _ _ _I_ _ _ _ _

1-Inc IDENTIFICATION: Depth: Surface

-1/.-_nc 4 nc!DATE SAMPLED- February, 1987

/2nchF 0 0 100 INTENDED USE: Landfill Cover

Is-lnct 11.3 11.3 88.7 WASHED GRADATION: Yes

No.4 20.0 20.0 68.7 PERCENT PASSING NO. 200 SIEVE 35.7%

No.8 COLOR: 10 YR. 3/2 - Very dark grayish brown

No.10 10.2 10.21 58.5 1

No.16 NOTE: Small amounts of asphalt and glass

No.20 _were

found in this sample.

No.30

g No.40 10.2 10.2 48.3

No. 50

I No.80

No.100 9.3 9.3 39.0

I No.200 3.4 3.4 35.6

Pan 35. 35.7 35.7

I&1 CHECKED BY"FORM #329 A-i St (Rev. 11/86)

I '= " - -- ="

- - . . - -. .........

II

I .. ..... ....... .. !

. ... 4........CjP- _ ~ .... ...... Z c

II... . ........ .U

P,,

-L .... .. .

I__ ...... ..... -.--

- . - .. .. .... ...... ~

n CC4

LU 3 ......... . . . .. ~ C

Ln_______________________ 0

< aL wz 0. 0

NMC 3ZIS NVHI H-i ~Ud-Jj .( ,, cI ___________ ______E

Foth & Van Dyke P N: __Engineers/Architects JOB NO.: 86194





PROJECT: USARC Silver Spring .Landfill SOURCE: USARC Silver Spring Drive


I Siev Wezg2ie % % pea RECEIVED AT LABORATORY: March 18, 1987

Size or No. Reuuned Reaned Pas ing catons 223.4 gramsQUANTITY REPRESENTED:

3-Inch SUBMITTED BY: Janis.Kesy of F&VD

SAMPLED FROM: Boring B-41i 1 V-Inch

1-Inch IDENTIFICATION: Depth 1'

=I-Inch DATE SAMPLED: February, 1987

'1/2-Inch 0 0 100 INTENDED USE: Landfill Cover

I N/a-Inch 3.7 1.7 98.3 WASHED GRADATION: Yes

No.4 5.9 2.6 95.7 PERCENT P-SSING NO. 200 SIEVE 68.3 %

No.8 COLOR: 10 YR. 3/3 - Dark brown

No.10 11.2 5.0 90.7 ____

NO._16 NOTE: Small amounts of asphalt and glasswere found in this sample.No. 20

No.30

No.40 22.0 9.8 80.9

No. 50

I No. 80

No.100 20.0 9.0 71.9

I No.200 8.1 3.6 68.3152.z

Pan 1 152.5 68.3 1

II CHECKED BY"

FORM 8329 A-I SL (Rev. 11/86)

. . . . .C V _

LU

_ _ CL

UU

-I ......... - - ± -. ........ 0....

... . . . .- .. .. ...... . .... .. .. l

.............. ...... G

_j 0

...... LL..

.... ... ... ... ...

..... ...... W

C_ z

0 '

In 0 J. ~ .e L>0

.~~~ ~ .... Z

-u C C - .4 . ..... ... ... .... .. IUU,

LU -

I ...- . U,

~~Y71+ ..ZZ+-!777 ,4

Lu 0- ~ a. LLiL-

NMOH ~ISN~H1~NI 1N~U~d 4>-I _______________________V

I

Foth & Van Dyke oJECT No.Engineers/Architects JOB NO.: 86M94


Green Bay, Wisconsin 54307-9012414/497-2500 :_ __REPORT NO.:_ _4


I ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: Foth & Van Dyke CONTRACTOR:



Seve Weght % % Spi-. RECEIVED AT LABORATORY: March 18, 1987

Size or No. Retained Retained Passing cations 141.0 gramsQUANTITY REPRESENTED: 14.grm


2-InchI

SAMPLED FROM: Boring B-45

1-Inch IDENTIFICATION:- Depth: Surface

"Ac DATE SAMPLED- February, 1987a/4-Inch

'1-Inch 0 0 100 INTENDED USE: Landfill Cover

3/e-Inch 2.7 1.9 98.1 WASHED GRADATION: Ye:


No.8 COLOR: 10 YR. 4/4 - Dark yellowish brown

No.10 7.2 5.1 90.4

No. 16

No. 20

No. 30

No.40 11.9 8.4 82.0

No. 50

No. 80

No.100 12.1 8.6 73.4

No. 200 6.1 4.3 69.1

Pan 97.4 69.1

' CHECKED BY"FORM #329 A.1 SL (Rev. 11/86)

__ __ __ __ _~ ------- ~-----co' o I______________________________________ ____________________________________________

- ~ .CL

..... ... .... ..... c

.~~ .~ . ... . j . .... ....

... - .........----- u

4 .... ....-. . 1~~~-

.. . . . ......... L

rj ........... . .. ..... ......Lu C14

.a1.7":. .u ILI _

0l [1 0 -

:m . .. . .c L S _1111. .... Cc" ..-- Du L.. N 0

dC( i .- T 1 0

z ZJ Lu

S... L

.z ....

. ... .... .

.Ca

... .. .. .. .. .. ...... .. .. l 0.... .......... .. >

.. ~~~ ... .... - . C0_____________ .:j t. cd

.........

.. .....f. ... .. C

...... .. - -U,

.- .. . . .. . .

cc 5Lu I-u ~

, 4 Lu

a. ccJ a.O- - __________________________

Foth & Van Dyke PROJECT NO.:_ _ __ __Engineers/Architects JOB NO.: 86M94

2737 S. Ridge RoadP. 0. Box 19012 DATF"EMarch:20 to 27, 1987




PROJECT: USARC Silver Sp rin& Landfill SOURCE: USARC Silver Spring Drive


a Sieve Weight % % Specj RECEIVED AT LABORATORY: March 18, 1987

Size or No. Retained Retained Passing cations"QUANTITY REPRESENTED: 87.0 grams

3-nch SUBMITTED BY: Janis Kesv of F&VD

2-Inch1 l/-lnch SAMPLED FROM: Boring B-47

I _-___hIIDENTIFICATION: Depth: Surface

314-Inch DATE SAMPLED February. 1987

'12-Inch INTENDED USE: Landfill Cover

i-Inch 0 0 100 WASHED GRADATION: Yes

No. 4 7.9 9.1 90.9 PERCENT PASSING NO. 200 SIEVE 53.5 %

I No.8 COLOR: 10 YR. 3/2 - Very dark grayish brown

No.10 5.6 6.4 84.5

I No.16

No. 20

No. 30

No.40 10.3 11.8 72.7

No. 50

I No. 80

No.100 11.1 12.8 59.9

I No.200 5.6 6.4 53.5

46.4pan .1 46.5 53.4

II CHECKED BY:

FORM #329 g-1 SL (Rev. 11/86)

w

.. .. . . . . .C! a. - 6

...........0

..- ........ I........ --.... ... -t--<

tc.J 0 .11.4 0

............. .: ...... . 4 Z L 2 ' LA-

m w3) Z w)

U,

3t .. ... F ...

.. ...... ...

C4 : T.~ .... . .. .. c-j 100

CA at........... ... .. 0 3........

at. ..... . .v14

> ~ .Vi . .

06 .... .. .... ...

w

........... ......

. ... . .. . .. .... .. ..

.-. .. ..-. . ..........

..... ... . .. . .... . ..... .. .......-. c! I...... .... .w S.C4 1

. . . . . .. . . . .

0~~~~ fnw r ~ ~ N .

-~~~ ~ ~ ~... .M H .........I~.N~H~ 0 - < U, U

Foth & Van Dyke PROJECT NO.:________


2737 S. Ridge RoadP.O0. Box 19012 DATE: March 20 to 27, 1987

Green Bay, Wisconsin 54307-9012 ____________________________________

414/97-500REPORT NO.: 16


j ARCH ITECT/ENGI NEER: Foth & Van Dyke CONTRACTOR:

PROJECT: USARC Silver Spring -Landfill SOURCE: USARC Silver Spring Drive


Siev WegniRECEIVED AT LABORATORY: March 18, 1987I Size or No. Retained Retained Passing cations QUNIYRPENTD15.grm

1 -Inch SUBMITTED BY: Jan is Kesy of F&VD

SAMPLED FROM: Boring B-511 V.-Inch

1 - inchIDENTIFICATION: Depth: Surface

3I4.Inch DATE SAMPLED: February, 1987

'I.-Inch 0 0 100 INTENDED USE: Landfill Cover

% /-Inch 4.3 2.7 97.3 WASHED GRADATION: Yes

No. 4 . 1 . 1 97.2 PERCENT PASSING NO. 200 SIEVE 80.9%I No.8 COLOR: 10 YR. 2/2 -- Very dark brown

No.10 1.7 1.1 96.1 _____________________

I No.16 ___

No*.20__ _ _I

I No. 30

I No.40 6.6 4.2 91.9 ___

No. 50

I No. 80

No.100 13.9 8.8 83.1

I No.200 3.4 2.2 80.9

Pan 2.1127.4 80.9

I CHECKED BY: FORM #1329 A-1 SL (Rev. 11/66)

_ I 0 0

to .0 0

4>

... . ..... ....-..- -

.

-... - ---. ~ J

...... ... co

...... .. .. ... . i 0 L

0...... .....

1:1

.7u" .................. .......... ...

0 Lu . ....... a

V) p :L132:iirL1 .

LU * C U

LW -i.............. .

cc U) .z. rU j

U .. 6 .... .. ) I .... 2C

4z 1114 :6 n

ILL7-.1 CII

-- 4' ~a. ~ L

P. M.

.. ..........



2737 S. Ridge RoadP. O. Box 19012 DATE: March 20 to April 3, 1987

Green Bay, Wisconsin 54307-9012414/497-2500 17

REPORT NO.:

I •REPORT OF ANALYSIS OF AGGREGATES




Sieve Weight RECEIVED AT LABORATORY: March 18, 1987

Size or No. Retained Reained Passing cations QUANTITY REPRESENTED. 200.0 grams3-Inch

SUBMITTED BY: Janis Kesy of F&VD

2-Inch_____ _________________________ __

SAMPLED FROM: Boring B-521 1/-lnch

I-Inch IDENTIFICATION: Depth 0.5'

/4 .Inch DATE SAMPLED: February, 1987

I ',/-Inch INTENDED USE: Landfill Cover

3/a-Inch 0 0 100 WASHED GRADATION:- Yes

No. 4 1 . 1 .6 99.4 PERCENT PASSING NO. 200 SIEVE 87.9 %

I No.8 COLOR: 10 YR. 3/3 - Dark brown

No.10 2.9 1.5 97.9

No. 16 9__No. 20

No.30

No.40 7.1 3.6 94.3

I No.50

No. 80

No.100 10.6 5.3 89.0

g No.200 2.5 1.3 87.7

S an 175.8 1 87.9

CHECKED BY:FORM 8329 A-1 SL (Rev. 11/86)

Ci3

v-4

CLU

.... -.... . >.. . . - .. i .

.. .. ...... .. .. . '

. ........ . --------. CO. 0I,

....... :: ........... '

Ci)... .. . ..... ~0. ~.. . . .. .. . ... ... ...

. ............. .. .... ...._ _. . 7

C

.. .. ... ... N.. . .

.. ..... .. . .. ..a.. .. ..' :: i ........

.. ... .. . .

u 0

a..... . z

Ic.LU . U tI cc~ - i -

.. . . . . Z a

Caj.. .... LI

C6 ... . V- .. .... .J C

:T .. ... . 0.....

_ 0.

.. .. . .. .. .

0. .e) ( UI~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~. -. ._________________________ ..... L6____

Foth & Van Dyke PROJECT NO.:_ _______

Engineers/Architects JOB3 NO.: 86M94

2737 5. Ridge RoadMac20tApi3,18P.O0. Box 19012 DATE:Mac20oApi3,18

Green Bay, Wisconsin 54307-9012414/497-2500 RP TNO:18


ARCH ITECT/ENG IN EER: Foth & Van Dyke CONTRACTOR:

PROJECT: USARO Silver Sprinp Landfill - SOURCE: USARC Silver Spring Drive

j REPORT OF TESTS OF: Analysis of Cover Material

Sieve Weight % ecifi. RECEIVED AT LABORATORY: March 18, 1987I Size or No. Retained Retained Passing cations QUNIYRPENTD17.grm

3-Inch_____ __ __


2-InchSAMPLED FROM: Boring B-.541 VI-Inch

1-Inch IDENTIFICATION: Depth: Surface

3/4-Inch DATE SAMPLED: February. 1987

I lIaInch INTENDED USE: Laindfill1 Cover

% ~ -Inch 0 0 100 WASHED GRADATION: Yes

No.4 8.4 4.8 95.2 PERCENT PASSING NO. 200 SIEVE. 7.OJ2 %~____

' No.8 COLOR: 10 YR_ 5/4 -Ypllowigl brown

No.10 9.0 5.2 90.0 ___

I No. 16

No. 20

No.30 T___No.40 14.8 8.5 81.5

I No. 50

I No. 80

No.100 13.9 8.0 73.5

No.200 5.8 3.3 70.2 ___

Pan 121 122.1 .70.2

CHECKED BY: I FORM x329 A-1 SL. (Rev. 11/86)

- ~- - - - - - -- ~-0-

0-I

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _O

F_...._...._....._a c r

_ - O

. . .. - .. .... .. ------

......... .................. ....

U > .. ....-...... .

- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --.. ...... ........

Iu-

0 0 ........~i. ...-U,, -- T. -- -------------- -- U

I""" ~ ~ .- ..... ........ :2-. 0 .

... .. . ... .. ..... -- --

at ...... . .......... us <

1* f- Ui 2

LL.I..F....el u

c~ NJ~ - . . A

7 - L . . . . . . .. . . 0U

S - Z .. ~.a... ...

-- : . .... ......: : * 0

......-. . ... . . .. .. .. . ...- -u- I

U) U-..- D u;. . I

1 -........ - . . . . - .E-gggg

---- *. .- ~ 0i- - ~ ± i~ U)

2 M Z 0W U w m c 0 -

0 u

NMOHS 3ZiS NVHI H3NW lN30U~d 0IC

Foth & Van Dyke PROJECT NO:

Ens eae JOB NO.: 86M942737 & Ridge Road

P. O. Box 19012 DATE- !rch 20 ro A.ril 3, 1987Green Bay, WViconsin 54307-9012

414/47-2500 REPORT NO.:

i REPORT OF ANALYSIS OF AGGREGATES

" ARCHITECTIENGINEER: Forh & Van Dyke CONTRACTOR_

PROJECT: USARC Silver Sarinz Landfil! SOURCE: USARC Silver Saring Drive

j REPORT OF TESTS OF- An alyss of Cover Material

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ % -= 5R E C E IV E D A T L A B O R A T O R Y : M a r c h 1 8 . 1 9 8 7

-e No. Ra m im Itss., Sm QUANFITY REPRESENTED- 205.6 9rai's

3-Inchj____J____J________2-nch

SUBMIllED BY: Janis Kesv of F&VD

-Inh _SAMPLED

FROM: Borine B-56I "-nc1 -Inch IDENTIFICATION: Deth 1.5'

nlh-Inch DATE SAMPLED- February, 1987

v'I-Inch 0 0 1100 INTENDED USE: Landfill Cover

! s-Jnch 3.8 1.8 98.2 WASHED GRADATION: Yes

No. 4 8.5 4.1 94.1 PERCENT PASSING NO. 200 SIEVE-" 75.8 %

No.8 I COLOR: 10 YR. 3/2 - Very dark grayish brown

No.10 6.4 3.1 91.0

.No.16 I

No.20

No.30

No.40 10.9 5.3 85.7

I No. 5 8

No. 80

No. 100 12.6 6.1 79.6

I No.200 7.5 3.6 76.0

Pan 155.9 75.8

I

CHECKED BY-FORM X329 A-1 St (Rev 11/86)

.... ...... ...---- -- --- - . .__ _U

ido. -.... ... , - -. .S.........

ME ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -=r -.... ... ....

L . ... .. U

- --- --- -- ---

C ........ ......... . . ..-.

o .If

P- at.....-..... .-I. .......-- IEULU

L.- LU -z 0 i

z --------.. ... . ci~~ >L LU -J

z5 Z

C_ -'I co .. . . .. .. 3....LIC

c~~~~~~~~~ U .................. ....--

-t- . .. ........

. .1 ....

*~~ J-... .. .. ... . .

LUL

.... .. ... 4t

V) U,

.. ......... 0..

Va 0

g2 u

on cr U ,

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _0 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Foth & Van DykePROJECT NO.:


277 S. Ridge RoadP. O. Box 19012 DATE: larch 20 to Apri13, 1987



'1 ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: Foth & Van Dvke CONTRACTOR:



S:grn ji %RECEIVED AT LABORATORY: March 18, 1987

Sie r o.Rewned IRetained _______ cauans

3-Inch R___ ne_ R 1 Q U A N TITY R EPR ESEN TED : 14 2 .6 g ram s

2-Inch _SUPMITED BY: Janis Kesy of F&VD

* l2-Inch SAMPLED FROM: Boring B-58

-Inch IDENTIFICATiON: Deth: Surface

=/-Inch 0 0-- 100 DATE SAMPLED- February. 1987

ll -Inch 6.5 4.6 95.4 INTENDED USE: Landfill Cover

%8-Inch 2.0 1.4 94.0 WASHED GRADATION: Yes


I No. 8 I _______I I I_____ COLOR: _1YR._.3..-Dark brownNo. 10 5.5 3.9 1 86.8

( No.16 I _ _

No.20

j No.30

No.40 10.1 7.1 79.7

INo._50S No. 80

No.100 13.5 9.5 70.2

No.200 6.5 1 4.6 65.6 11

Pan 93.6 93.8 65.8

IS CHECKED BY" I FORM 9329 A-i St (Rev 11/86)

C-4*~ c.

-l) 0

LL-

. . - ~ -.. .......- --- ----

-----.- i---- --- ---I---. 4 -f - - If - - - ---- cc

C L L ...... 4 --.- -... ....-.......-

- - - - - -- - - -- - - --------- -.--- U

.~~. ..~ ...4 ..- ...-- - - -

K:-. :-2 1: : z a. z

_ 0~~~~-~c _ j::A.9 :::i:jLj ~ ~ jLL 0 0

CC In --

-~L fU . - $4

o~-------------------------------- --- -------- U

p..~~4 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

1 71 M)0 N

-. . . .. . . .... ..... .........~: ~ _

~:~-1 .. .. ..... ***

-. *.--...- I-aL1 1 fC

*~ ...... 04~.:~

US)-

.: .: : -.. . . ... .. ..-.....:

I-r.: US 2- a........................ ... w . .... ..

NMOI4S ~IS NH1 ~NIJiN~DH~d 4

Foth & Van Dyke PROJECT NO.:_ _ _ __ _Engineers/Architects JOB NO.: 86M942737 S. Ridge Road March 20 to April 7, 1987


414/497-2500 REPORT NO.: 21


ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: Foch & Van Dyke CONTRACTOR:



RECEIVED AT LABORATORY: March 18, 1987Sie Weight I Specifi-

Size or No. Retained Retained Passing cations QUANTITY REPRESENTED: 175.9 grams


2-Inch ____

SAMPLED FROM: Boring B-601 '.-Inchf IDENTIFICATION: Depth 2'

t/,,-Inch DATE SAMPLED: February. 1987

V.-Ianch I ______iNTENDED USE: Landfill Cover

31s-Inch 0 0 100 WASHED GRADATION: Yes

No.4 1.3 .7 99.3 PERCENT PASSING NO. 200 SIEVE 84.7 %

No.8 COLOR: 10 YR. 2/2 - Very dark brown

No.10 3.7 2.1 97.2

No. 16

No. 20

No.30

No.40 8.0 4.5 92.7

No.50

No. 80

No. 100 11.5 6.5 86.2

1No._200 2.5 1.4 84.8

an148.91 148.9 84.7

I

CHECKED BY"FORM 9329 A-1 SL (Rev 11/m,

I~~~~~ ..........-.-- .I

g..4...... - V .

L. u 0L6

ItI

CD o

... .. .... . .

...... ... ......... .. .. ..

.... ... -----+U . ..... .... . .. .

.. . .. . .. ... ..

. .. ... . ..........

.... E. -1 000L............. .. I CL z*n I LUL rLLz 3 *

LU 0 0 0 34

- .j LU

C4 C2 ':.?

Z LU

LU CL

o? .. ... . .....

4- -

. ... .... .. ..... A... ........ . . d

-C)

...... .. .s .... T. LU j w_ 4

0(U -4

... . . ...... .. ......... . - - .. .... ..... - - . .... V)

-0IU -U,4 ~

-. ........ a)N M O HS~ ..... .......ii N 3~



2737 S. Ridge RoadP. O. Box 19012 DATE: March 20 to April 7, 1987

Green Bay, Wisconsin 54307-9012414/497-2500 22

REPORT NO.:





Sieve Weigt %% Spec&- RECEIVED AT LABORATORY: March 18, 1987

Size or No. Retained R Passing cationseandQUANTITY REPRESENTED: 224. 1 grams

3-Inch


SAMPLED FROM: Boring B-62

1 1.-Inch


=/4-Inch DATE SAMPLED: February, 1987

'1/-Inch INTENDED USE: Landfill Cover

3la-Ilnch 0 0 100 WASHED GRADATION: Yes

No.4 18.2 8.1 91.9 PERCENT PASSING NO. 200 SIEVE" 60.3 %

No.8 COLOR: 10 YR, 3/2 - Very dark grayish brown

No.10 20.4 9.1 82.8

No.16 N. Sma amounts of metal and glass wereNo.20 found in this sample.

No.30

No.40 22.0 9.8 73.0

No. S0

No. 80

No. 100 18.8 8.4 64.6

No.200 9.5 4. 2 60.4

Pan 135.2 60.3

ICHECKED BY:

FORM *329 A-1 SL (Rev. 11/86)

CI3 C~j

03

-44 --- ..... n

..... .... .. .- .0 - (0

. ... ................. u

........I.... ....... L-

Iccn... ...

.. r:d:.7 :i:4) .1 ft ~. . . . . . I. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

.. . . . . . ... ... .. . ..

aj .. ~ :: .... I !i 1.: h 1 1. . - ..

I ..... .... 4 C

-L . . . .. ... .. U c

cn L

........ 'I I -

____... :::2L: _.. . -.

- 77.7 . .. .. . . . . . . . .. .

- ........ . co

c :LAi :.: ......... ........-. 0 N>~~~ :3 R lliE~~L~~z. ;z . . .........

...... ... ..... 1 l

4.0 4c. . . . . .........

- . .2...........

U_.. . .. . ................ .. V~

N _______ ..-....--..-. .-... .

c~Q U.

atH ZSNbH ~H±ND~

.. ...... .. _....._._._...........t.(n

Foth & Van Dyke PROJECT NO.:_ _______j Engineers/Architects JO O:86M94Z

27375S. Ridge Road JBN.

P. 0. Box 19012 DATE: March 20 to i~pril 7, 1987Green Bay, Wisconsin 54307-9012

414/97-2500 RPTNO:23

I REPORT Of ANALYSIS OF AGGREGATES

I ARCHIT ECT/ENGI NEER: Foth & Van Dyke -CONTRACTOR:PROJECT: USARC Silver Spring Landfill SOURCE: USARC Silver Spriniz Drive

REPORT OFTESTS OF:_.. Analysis of-Cover Material

*Sieve weight % Sped&i RECEIVED AT LABORATORY: March 18- 1987

Size or No. Retained Retained Passing QUNTTYRPRSETE: 24.0srm

3-Inch ____

2-nc JSUBMITTED BY: Janis Kesv of.F&VD

fSAMPLED FROM: Boring B-64

1 1-Inch IDENTIFICATION: Depth 2'

-1I4-Inch DATE SAMPLED: February. 1287

ll-Ic 0 0 100 INTENDED USE: L.~ndfill Cover

3/a-inch 33 13 98.7 IWASHED GRADATION: Yejs

No.4 40 1.6 3 . PERCENT PASSING NO. 200 SIEVE- 76-3%

No. 8 ___________fCOLOR:, 1C YR 9 /4 - Yp I I wi h hr1 .,nNo.10 6.7 . 2.7 94.4 ___

I No16 _ _ _ ___

No.20

No.30 __ _ _-_ _ _ _ _

No.40 12.3 5.0 89.4

I No. 50

I No. 80No.100 20.0 8.1 81.3

I No.200 12.1 4.9 76.4187.

Pan * 187.6 76.3

CHECKED BY: I FORM #329A-1 SL (Rev 1/&I

a,

.. ... .C4

. . . . . . . .. ---- -J

LU

. . ... .. U

......... ~ .:.: I;:'.::

.... ;. ............. ...... ..-. . . . .7.<

.. . . . ... . , . . .. .. .. it 0 U W

z 0

wt --

..... .... .

.1 i.;......... .............

c~... .....;iLAJ-...... ..

.:I::~.:.:.......... . ...... .... . .. .

U- .... .;*I.. ....

a)-

.. 4 . . . . ......... ....... ........ .. . . . .

-it-... -... I..*.- I.-*-.*.- -.- ---. w...... ... ILwtc

NU .... ...... -. ...- U

S. C.)

0. -J U.1

I __ _ __ _ _

Foth & Van DykeEngineers/Architects JOB NO.: 86M94

2737 S. Ridge RoadP. O. Box 19012 DATE: .March 20 to April 7, 1987




PROJECT: USARC Silver Spring Landfill SOURCE: USARC Silver Spring Drive'


S RECEIVED AT LABORATORY: March 18, 1987*Sieve Weight % % Speo~fi-

Size or No. Retained Retained Passing catons _ _ _ _ _

QUANTITY REPRESENTED:- 200.6 grams

3-InchInSUBMITTED BY: Janis Kesy of F&VD

SAMPLED FROM: Boring B-65l'/2-Inch

1-inch IDENTIFICATION: Depth 1'

3/-Inch DATE SAMPLED: February. 1987

I1/-Inch INTENDED USE: Landfill Cover

i 3/a-Inch 0 0 100 WASHED GRADATION: Yes


I No.8 COLOR: 10 YR. 3/4 - Dark yellowish brown

No.10 6.0 3.0 93.3

* No. 16

No.20

No.30

No.40 12.8 6.4 86.9

I No. 50

I No. 80

No. 100 19.3 9.6 77.3

No.200 7.8 3.9 73.4

Pan .1 147.2 73.4

I CHECKED BYfORM 1329 A-1 St (Rev 11/86)

040

p 0.

u0.

IL

....................... ......... .... ........ ... .... L-5

. ........ .........

i t , ... ......

u ... .. ...............

..... .....

-j LL I _ ___ __

II.

cc Cd) a)

w cc -2if

-.... Ci I

~ :::::~1::. ~ ~ LU ) 4 *

1. 0

at (f))

____ I - 0. J ( l) U

Foth & Van Dyke PROJECT NO.:______I Engineers/Architects JOB NO.: 86M942737S. Ridge Road March 20 to April 7, 1987


414/497-2500 251. REPORT NO.:


'I ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: Foth & Van Dyke CONTRACTOR:



RECEIVED AT LABORATORY: March 18, 1987Sieve Weight % % Spcifi-

Size or No. Retained Retained Passing cations _ 87_8_gramsQUANTITY REPRESENTED: 187.8 grams

3-InchS -Inch SUBMITTED BY: Janis Kesy of F&VD

SAMPLED FROM:- Boring B-66

11I/-Inch1-Inch IDENTIFICATION: Depth 0.5'

3/4-Inch DATE SAMPLED: February, 1987

'12-Inch INTENDED USE: Landfill Cover

a/a-Inch 0 0 100 WASHED GRADATION: Yes

No.4 2.2 1.2 98.8 PERCENT PASSING NO. 200 SIEVE' 74.0 %

I No.8 COLOR:- 10 YR. 4/4 - Dark yellowish brown

No.10 5.1 2.7 96.1

I No.16

No. 20

No.30

No.40 10.2 5.4 k 90.7

I No.50

No. 80

No.100 16.8 8.9 81.8

No.200 14.5 7.7 74.1

Pan . 139.0 74.0

CHECKED BY:FORM 8329 A-1 SL (Rev. 11/86)

M En-

IL E _ _ _ _ _EF =.

- --------

4MI - .. u-.-*.~...8 . - -

*o co 0 0 *--~-

* ----- ---- *-------------4 ----------------- Z 0

z ZW -4T

-~~~---- - ----- M -- - - - - - - - -

t -. --- - - ----. . ...-... - ------ 0

..............---. -. --. .- .. ...- u a 4

-------- ------------ - - - S--- - .. ......

I . ..-. ....... ..- - . . ...- . - -

r:. * '- -*.... .- ........ CL- a

........ En co~. . . .- t..........- .. . -.* 00 -

D -4

--- -. .- .-.... - - -

_ - _ _ ~ ~ - E E -~ -

p4l

P4~~~~f Q----- ~

0. LO q< MI CVl)

&Van Dyke - Defense Technical Information · PDF fileFoth & Van Dyke! I I February 23, 1988...

Documents

Transcript of &Van Dyke - Defense Technical Information · PDF fileFoth & Van Dyke! I I February 23, 1988...