Training tomorrow's health care professionals, in exercise medicine, for tomorrow's patients.
Values of Tomorrow's City Managers
-
Upload
senol-mumay -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of Values of Tomorrow's City Managers
-
7/30/2019 Values of Tomorrow's City Managers
1/29
Exploring the (Generation) X Factor: Survey Results on the Values
of Tomorrows City Managers
by
Deborah A. Knudson, Ph.D. Student Justin Marlowe, Ph.D. Student (presenter)[email protected] [email protected]
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
P.O. Box 413, Bolton Hall 674
Milwaukee, WI 53201(414) 229-2369
Presented at the 2002 American Society for Public Administration National Conference
Phoenix, AZMarch 23-26, 2002
Abstract
Much has been said, both in academic circles and in the popular media, about the significant
value differences between Generation X and its predecessors. By some accounts, thisgenerations heightened emphasis on pragmatism, political disengagement, techno literacy,
flexibility, entrepreneurship, and other values may have significant effects on all aspects ofpublic life, especially public administration. However, most examinations of these value
differences have been anecdotal and journalistic rather than empirical. In this paper, we attemptto provide a methodologically sound commentary on the presence or absence of this conflict
within one specialty city management by systematically collecting comments from todaysmanagement assistants.
With these potential differences in mind, this paper has two objectives. First, it attempts to
discern whether these value differences actually exist. This question is addressed through a
survey instrument, distributed to management assistants in four states. These results are thencompared to similar, longitudinal results from another city management survey. With soundempirical claims established, the second section of the paper speculates about the impact these
value differences may have on city management, and public administration as a whole.
Please do not cite or reproduce any portion of this paper without the consent of the authors
-
7/30/2019 Values of Tomorrow's City Managers
2/29
2
Introduction
Since first appearing in 1991, Generation X (GX) has become the popular euphemism
for the collective characterization of Americans born between 1967 and 1978 (Bennett and
Rademacher 1997; Coupland 1991, 3). Since that time, media portrayals of this generation have
taken on a distinctly critical character, and popular descriptions of Xers have ranged from the
profoundly flaccid generation to the do nothing generation to the brain dead generation
(Holtz 1995). Without a doubt, GX carries with it a popular perception that may prove difficult
to shed. Today, however, this generations image has been recast somewhat, due to a recent
proliferation of prominent GX figures entering public life, electoral politics, and the popular
media corps. More recent accounts cast GX as pragmatic rather than apathetic,
technoliterate rather than brain-dead, flexible rather than fickle, entrepreneurial rather than
impatient, and so forth.
The debate surrounding the source of these observed generational differences is equally
polarized. Critics frequently cite the fact that GX grew up in an era of unprecedented prosperity,
insulated from war or sacrifice (Coupland 1991). The result, they claim, is a generation
willing to take for granted many of the amenities previous generations earned through hardship
and conflict. Xers refute such claims by citing the record high rates of divorce, deficit, urban
sprawl, latchkey children, and other pathological social ills they claim will cripple their
generation throughout its collective adult life (Holtz 1995). For many Xers, Watergate served as
an initial exposure to government and politics. The prospect of providing elderly care for Baby
Boomers, who outnumber Xers nearly 2 to 1, is itself a sobering prospect for GX. As a result,
Xers claim, their outlook is well-tempered, pragmatic, and localistic. Rather than acting in
pursuit of the higher, moral principles, that served as the catalyst for watershed Boomer
-
7/30/2019 Values of Tomorrow's City Managers
3/29
-
7/30/2019 Values of Tomorrow's City Managers
4/29
4
conceptual framework used in this research. Those contributions are described in greater detail
below.
This research attempts to parlay those findings into a broader understanding of how GXs
value differences may affect the future of city management, and public administration in general.
In order to do so, however, we must overcome a number of methodological and empirical
challenges that appear to have stifled fruitful research in the past. The first is the problem of
studying generations. Clearly, any generation is an interpretative construct subject to harsh
criticism from methodologists across the field. Rather than defend the concept against such
criticisms, this paper briefly outlines the development of generation as a heuristic device in
sociological research, and attempts to follow the guidelines provided there. The second
methodological challenge surrounds the study of values. Although it may be difficult to
effectively operationalize and define values in any robust sense, public administration
scholarship has put forth a sincere recent attempt to do so (Dehhardt 2001). In addition, research
on city management frequently addresses the question of dynamic values over time (Bresner
1999). This research attempts to draw on those findings in order to understand the future of city
management practice. And finally, research on GX in the public sector was nearly prohibited in
the past due to a lack of research subjects. Today, however, GX occupies a significant place in
the assistant city/county management ranks, and an ever-increasing presence among top
management. As a result, the present seems an appropriate time to conduct research of this sort.
Therefore, this paper proceeds in three parts. The first provides the theoretical
background necessary for a thorough understanding of generations and their role in shaping the
values, perceptions, and attitudes of our survey population. It begins with a brief discussion of
the development of generations as a tool in social research. The work of a number of
-
7/30/2019 Values of Tomorrow's City Managers
5/29
5
sociologists (Marias 1961; Ortega y Gasset 1962; Mannheim 1952) has proven especially useful
developing a theoretical framework for application to politics and public administration. It
continues by describing value differences that have been observed in the field so far, specifically
within the previously mentioned public personnel/human resources management literature. The
intersection of those two lines of inquiry provides the theoretical underpinning for our empirical
work on these issues. The second section describes the statistical findings resulting from a
survey of 52 municipal management assistants in Wisconsin, Ohio, New York, and southern
California.2
In administering the survey, our intent was two fold. First, we attempted to
compare management assistants responses to the results of a city manager survey (Bresner
1999) from 1994 and 1998. These longitudinal results, although not yet definitive, indicate that
todays assistants may have significantly different perceptions of their role as managers and the
stability of their profession. Second, the survey allows us to draw comparisons within the
management assistant population, due to the fact that the survey response included adequate
representation of both GX (those born 1968-1978) and Baby Boomers (those born 1948-1967).
As a result, we are able to demonstrate that these same differences exist within assistant ranks.
The final section provides some speculation about the future of city management, and public
administration in general, in light of these findings.
Generation X in the Public Sector: Theoretical and Conceptual Issues
The Problem of Interpreting and Studying Generations
The study of generations, and generational politics in particular, is a difficult undertaking. In
his seminal commentary on the problems of generations, Hungarian sociologist Karl
Mannheim (1952, 276-323), heavily influenced by the phenomenological movement as well as a
-
7/30/2019 Values of Tomorrow's City Managers
6/29
6
rediscovery of earlier contributions (Marias 1961 and Ortega y Gasset 1962), surveyed the state
of the theoretical practice. His analysis revolves around two key methodological considerations:
our types and definitions of social aggregates, and our general conception of time and progress.
His work approaches these questions from both a positivist perspective, which demands
operationalizing the totality of a generational experience for comparison purposes, and a
competing romantic-historicist perspective that attempts to describe the collective experience
that is itself a generational phenomena (276). Although qualitative studies have provided a
wealth of interesting conclusions, we proceed from a positivist perspective, and must consider
the collected individual activities of social aggregates. These social aggregates lend themselves
to a variety of classifications. One scheme, albeit imperfect, distinguishes between "community"
groups (Gemeinschaftsgebilde,families, tribes, etc.) and "association" groups
(Gesellschaftsgebilde, bureaucratic departments, political parties, etc.). The difficulty in
addressing issues of generations, class, or nation for instance lies in the fact that they fall
somewhere outside of these traditional conceptions (Beh 1996; also see Katznelson 1982).
For Mannheim, the formation of a historical generation was not simply the result the
proximity of birth dates, but a means of linking collective character, life cycle and social events.
Instead, historical generation must be understood, to borrow a phrase from C. Wright Mills
(1959), in terms of the "intersection of biography and history." Ultimately Mannheim proposed
the formation of historical generations with their own distinct consciousness orentelechyis, the
result of the intersection of three types of location: location in life- cycle (age), location in space
(geography), and location in time (history). With a few exceptions, most political science
inquiry has focused almost exclusively on age, or location in life-cycle, and tended to view
geographical and historical location as incidental.
-
7/30/2019 Values of Tomorrow's City Managers
7/29
7
Therefore, in order to make a definitive statement about generations, we must utilize
measures that account not only for age, but socioeconomic standing, life experience, and
geography as well. With certain reservations, the municipal management assistant population
meets these criteria. In many ways, the population is very homogenous. Most management
assistants share similar career interests and types of specialized knowledge. With some
exception and variation, most local governments provide roughly the same package of services
and serve the same basic functions from community to community. Specifically with regard to
education, it can be argued that curriculum and accreditation standards, such as those enforced
by the National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration, create uniformity
across the profession. At the same time, we find tremendous variety in region, racial and ethnic
variables, political culture, socioeconomic considerations, and a host of other variables that
impact city management practice. Therefore, we consider the municipal management assistant
population to be well-suited for analysis of generational-type questions.3
Generations and Value Conflicts in Public Administration
To date, the majority of the empirically and methodologically sound conclusions about
GX have grown out of a body of literature created by the personnel and human resources fields.
Beginning in the late 1980s, personnel managers in both the public and private sectors had
begun to realize tremendous differences between their GX and non-GX employees in terms of
motivation, career goals, incentives, communication, and many other common human resource
concerns (Jurkiewicz 2000). By the early 1990s, Xers in many public and private organizations
had clearly articulated a unique set of demands and expectations upon their employers. Since
-
7/30/2019 Values of Tomorrow's City Managers
8/29
8
that time, research on these differences has addressed a variety of concerns using many different
approaches.
Although the early work on the subject spoke with a profoundly cynical and prohibitive
tone (for examples see Tulgan 1999), current research has uncovered and described in detail
many of GXs unique tendencies. In addition, many of those findings have been translated into a
number of management strategies, methods, and models to account for these differences. Some
work has generated processes by which managers can mediate or alleviate conflict between
Xers and their colleagues from other generations (Eng 1996; Losyk 1997a; Losyk 1997b; Tulgan
1999; OBannon 2000; Zemke, Raines, and Filipczak 2000). Having only recently identified this
generations professional strengths and interests, a separate but related literature provides
recommendations for how firms can become a GX employer of choice (Corley 1999). Human
resource experts have also attempted to illustrate differences between GX and its predecessors in
terms of workplace performance, motivation, success, and incentives (Jurkiewicz and Brown
1998; Jurkiewicz 2000; Rosen 1999; Woolridge, Smith-Mason, and Bellamy 2000). At the core
of these findings lies the realization of a clear, recurring pattern of value differences unique to
GX.
Broadly speaking, GX differs from its predecessor Boomer generation in primarily three
ways. First, this generation seems to share a collective sense of pragmatism. Although no
comprehensive explanation can currently account for this trend, many Xers attribute their
emphasis on tolerance and flexibility to a backlash against their Boomer parents. Where the
civic turmoil of the 1960s and 1970s forced many Boomers to adopt and defend an overarching
sense ethics and morality (the anti-war movement, for instance), the lack of such turmoil in the
1980s and 1990s incubated GXs sense of pragmatism. This difference has manifested itself
-
7/30/2019 Values of Tomorrow's City Managers
9/29
9
several ways. For instance, a 1997 survey found that nearly one-third of Xers agreed with the
statement there is no single way to live, an affirmative response double that of the previous
generation (OBannon 2001, 102). This pragmatism is also evident in the GXs propensity for
entrepreneurship. A recent University of Michigan study, for instance, found that Xers are
starting businesses three times that of the Boomer generation (Morrison 1999). In the workplace,
many Xers claim to have not identified a career path, but rather prefer to make investments in
individual human capital (Jurkiewicz 2001). These differences have created serious perception
issues among some Boomers whom perceive GXs pragmatism as disloyalty or impatience
(Loysk 1997a). In any case, we expect this pragmatism to be reflected in our survey results.
A second, uniquely Generation X trait is balance. Having grown up during a period
characterized by record numbers of double income families, single working parents, and great
economic instability, GX is believed to place great emphasis on balancing work and family
demands. In fact, 57% of 2500 university students responding to a 2000
PriceWaterhouseCoopers survey cited attaining a balance between personal life and career as
their primary career goal, compared with 45% in 1997 (OBannon 2001). As a result, Xers are
reportedly placing a premium on flex-time, vacation and leisure time, telecommuting, and other
practices allowing for more time away from the workplace. Although Xers are not the first
generation to place such demands their employers, the pursuit of balance seems particularly
salient among them.
Finally, Generation X seems to have a very different notion of trust
Data Analysis and Results
-
7/30/2019 Values of Tomorrow's City Managers
10/29
10
Survey Methodology
In order to examine these questions empirically, we distributed a survey instrument to
267 municipal management assistants in Wisconsin, southern California, New York, and Ohio.
The instrument itself is unique in primarily two ways. First, it was distributed through electronic
mail.4
Given the subject matter, and a limited research budget, we took the opportunity to
engage in a widespread use of this now firmly established communication technology. The
instrument was also unique in that it consisted primarily of qualitative (or open-ended)
questions that were designed to elicit responses that were somewhat rhetorical in nature, but
could still be subjected to statistical analysis. However, as will be demonstrated later, none of
the responses to questions about motivations, policy preferences, and values were solicited by
the questionnaire. For instance, rather than listing policy priorities (in a manner similar to the
International City/County Management Associations methodology)5, we simply asked subjects
to list policy areas they planned to focus on in their careers. In some cases, the technique
yielded a body of responses too diffuse to be of any utility at this point. However, in some cases,
the responses were remarkably homogenous. In our opinion, the lack of any suggested responses
lends tremendous empirical support to the patterns were have identified. At the present, 52
surveys have been received and coded for a response rate just under 20%.6
Fortunately, the
responses were distributed almost evenly among Boomers and Xers, and we are able to draw
intra-sample comparisons as a result.7
It should be noted that we do not consider this to be a representative sample of the
universe of municipal management associations. Although such a sample is a goal for the future,
these results simply describe what might be considered the early stages of a work in progress.
Although there exists a great deal of variance in our current sample, we consider this paper a
-
7/30/2019 Values of Tomorrow's City Managers
11/29
11
description of early findings, emerging issues, and areas of potential further research rather than
a definitive empirical commentary on these research questions.
Although the instrument contained a total of ten question items in addition to
demographic information, this paper describes the results of three questions most relevant to the
research question at hand. Those questions surround 1) the motivating factors that led the
respondent to pursue a career in public service, 2) the policy areas the respondent considered
most important to their future city management practice, and 3) a normative question about the
values the respondent considered most important to a successful career in public service. The
questions themselves, and a more detailed explanation of the questionnaire itself is included in
Appendix A. In addition, the instrument included several questions that have been contained in a
previous, similar survey of city managers (Bresner 1999) that occurred in 1994 and 1998. These
questions address the individuals perceptions of stability and changing roles within the city
management profession, and are compared to past city manager responses. Although these
results are somewhat difficult to discern at this point, this survey allows for some initial
comparisons.
Results
In general, the survey results confirm some of the popular conceptions about generational
differences between Boomers and Xers, and roundly reject many others. The specific results are
discussed here.
Responses to a question about motivation question (What do you consider your top three
reasons for pursuing a career in municipal management?) indicate some potentially unique
findings. A total of 19 reasons were identified, and the seven receiving more than three
-
7/30/2019 Values of Tomorrow's City Managers
12/29
12
responses are reported in Table 2 below (a full list of reasons, policy areas, and values are
included in Appendix B along with sample responses and the coding scheme for each).
Table 1 Age Group Statistical Comparison of Motivation ResponsesSorted by Boomers and Xers
# of Boomer
Responses
# of Xer
Responses
ANOVA
(F-Test)
Pearson
Chi-SquareCramers V
Reasons for Career Choice
Public Service 15 11 2.830* 2.786* .231*Variety of Tasks/Challenges 10 7 .209 - -
Job security/stability 8 11 .191 - -Work with People 4 13 5.558** 5.202* .316*
Visible Difference 12 13 .064 - -
Interest/Talent 4 9 1.639 - -Fulfilling/Rewarding Career 7 3 2.881* 2.833* .233*
N = 52
* = significant at .1 level** = significant at .05 level
For each question examined, we have conducted an Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test to
determine if the responses vary significantly within the Boomer or GX cohort. In other words, a
significant ANOVA statistic indicates that one age cohort is significantly more likely than
another to provide that particular response. For those responses with significant ANOVA
statistics, additional Pearson Chi-Square and Cramers V statistics were calculated to determine
the strength of the potential relationship within the identified age cohorts.
In this case, two of the three career choice reasons unfortunately fall outside the
conceptual purview of the Boomer vs. GX discussion. A desire to work with people, although
reported significantly more often by GX, cannot yet be attributed to any generational differences.
The same logic applies to the perception of public service as a fulfilling/rewarding career, as it
was reported more often by the Boomer respondents. Instead, we are left to wonder if these
-
7/30/2019 Values of Tomorrow's City Managers
13/29
13
statistics are an artifact of these particular survey respondents. Although this trend will be more
closely examined if additional responses contribute to it, we are hesitant to attribute this
phenomenon to any generational differences. However, these results confirm one of our
standing hypotheses - that Boomers are significantly more likely to attribute their career
motivation to the pursuit of public service. The potential connections between this and other
findings is discussed later.
Responses to thepolicy concerns question (What are five policy areas that you plan to
focus on throughout your career?) are much more diffuse, but do indicate some striking trends.
Although approximately 40 response categories were identified, the top eight are reported in
Table 2.
Table 2 - Age Group Statistical Comparisons of Policy Priority
ResponsesSorted by Boomers and Xers
# of Boomer
Responses
# of Xer
Responses
ANOVA
(F-Test)
Pearson
Chi-SquareCramers V
Policy Areas
Economic Development 11 11 .219 - -
Personnel/Labor Relations 8 9 .008 - -Infrastructure 9 4 3.846* 3.714* .267*
Budget/Finance 14 12 1.220 - -Environmental Concerns 7 1 7.147*** 6.504** .354*
Quality Service Delivery 4 7 .523 - -Public Safety 1 4 1.508 - -
Civic Engagement 5 7 .122 - -
N = 52* = significant at .1 level
** = significant at .05 level*** = significant at .01 level
As might be expected, the emphasis across the profession on economic development,
budget/finance, and personnel/labor relations is reflected here. These three most popular
-
7/30/2019 Values of Tomorrow's City Managers
14/29
14
responses do not vary significantly across the two age cohorts. However, we do find that
Boomers place significantly more emphasis on infrastructure and environmental issues.
The instrument also included a question about theprofessional values managers bring to
their craft. Specifically, we asked What are three values that you consider important to a
successful career in municipal management? Again, answers were varied, and we recorded a
total of 32 discernable responses. Five values were cited by more than five participants, and they
are listed in Table 4. Here we observe a great deal of continuity between the two groups.
Regardless of generation, respondents highlight the importance of honesty/integrity, a
commitment to public service, and dedication as important professional values. At the same
time, the Boomer respondents are significantly more likely to cite ethics and a commitment to
continuing education and knowledge than their GX counterparts. Unfortunately, our theoretical
framework provides not explanation for the knowledge responses. However, it does capture the
results of the ethics question. That connection will be explained in greater detail later.
Table 3 - Age Group Statistical Comparisons of Values ResponsesSorted by Boomers and Xers
# of Boomer
Responses
# of Xer
Responses
ANOVA
(F-Test)
Pearsons
Chi-SquareCramers V
Values
Ethics 11 6 3.606* 3.498* .259*
Honesty/Integrity 7 14 2.345 - -Public Service 5 7 .122 - -
Dedication 5 7 .122 - -Knowledge/Intellect 8 3 3.843* 3.709* .270*
N = 52
* = significant at .1 level** = significant at .05 level
-
7/30/2019 Values of Tomorrow's City Managers
15/29
15
Finally, these results allow us to conduct a longitudinal comparison of respondents
perceptions ofstability and changing roles within the city management profession. Our
questionnaire included several questions included in two previous surveys of city managers,
conducted in 1994 and 1998 (Bresner 1999). This nationwide survey of 245 and 178 city
managers revealed two striking trends. Beginning in 1994, only 35% of responding managers
considered the city management profession as stable as in the five previous years. However,
these results reverse themselves in 1998, as roughly the same number (33%) saw the field as less
stable. The shifting roles question also lends empirical support to the now widely-held belief
that the traditional politics-administration dichotomy has shifted in some way. Although
managers seem to disagree on the exact nature and direction of that shift varied, these data show
more and more individuals subscribing to the notion of a changing role. Therefore, given these
results, we were presented with a unique opportunity to extend the analysis an additional four
years. We also modified the shifting roles question to include assistant managers perceptions
of shifts within the assistant ranks.
As shown in Table 5, our results are unable to confirm or reject the previously identified
trends in these data. Although 41.5% of our respondents perceive the field to be less stable than
it was when they entered the profession, the outstanding 35.8% prohibits us from drawing any
further conclusions. The same holds true for the shifting roles item, as 32.1% of our respondents
remain outstanding. For good measure, we conducted an ANOVA test of the responses to these
items between the Boomer and GX groups within our sample, and the statistically significant
result of this test for the stability question indicates a possible difference in perception on this
item between our two survey groups. Like many of the other findings noted here, this statistic
may warrant further attention in the future.
-
7/30/2019 Values of Tomorrow's City Managers
16/29
16
Table 4 - Longitudinal Comparisons of City Manager and Assistant City
Manager ResponsesPercent of Total Responses
Na
= 245
Nb
= 178Nc = 52
* = significant at .1 level
Discussion
In general, these results provide evidence of a Generation X effect with regard to
specific motivations, policy priorities, and professional values among todays management
assistants. We attribute these differences in part to GXs increased emphasis on pragmatism and
flexibility in government. The importance of public service, environmental policy, and
professional ethics, for instance, appear to be downplayed by the GX respondents. Each of these
trends seems in line with this generations hypothesized emphasis on pragmatism, since each
represents an absolute standard of some kind. Where Boomers seem to have equated public
service with a sense of altruism or civic duty, GX does not seem compelled by, or
1994 CityManagers
a
1998 CityManagers
b
2002 Asst. CityManagers
c
ANOVA (F-Test)between 2002 Xers
and Boomers
Stable?
As Stable 35 66 20.8 .081*Less Stable 63 33 41.5
Unknown/N.A. 2 1 35.8Changing CM Role?
Change 63 81 34 .311No Change 29 15 32.1
Unknown/N.A. 8 4 32.1Changing ACM Role?
Change - - 32.1 .263No Change - - 34
Unknown/N.A. - - 32.1
-
7/30/2019 Values of Tomorrow's City Managers
17/29
17
accustomed to a purely public service provider role for local government. As a result, this
finding seems absolutely congruent with our expectations, given that GX has grown up without
the formerly clear boundaries between the public, private, and non-profit sectors. Todays
emphasis on entrepreneurial, risk-taking, and other pragmatic government practices
(Osborne and Gaebler 1992; Osborne and Plasterik 1997) also reinforce the GX experience with
local government. Today, more than ever, it is extremely difficult to delineate between public
service, and a career in government, and as a result, GXs decreased emphasis on public service
motivations does not come as a surprise. The same logic applies to the findings for
environmental policy. While counterintuitive to our common understanding of GXs
environmental efficacy, it may be that management assistants from this generation see local
governments role in implementing environmental policy very differently from the Boomer
predecessors. Potential explanations may include the matching of environmental policy with
economic development policy (i.e. brownfield remediation, TIF utilization, etc.), the tremendous
growth of federal and state-managed environmental policies (i.e. Superfund, Coastal
Management Zones, etc.), and the increasingly important role of non-profits and non-
governmental organizations in the environmental arena. As a result, it seems local governments
role in addressing environmental concerns may be diminishing, and assistants responses reflect
this sentiment. Another potential explanation, exemplified by the recycling is garbage debate
(Tierney 1996), may also be playing out in these responses.8
The infrastructure results are curious for a number of reasons. On the one hand, they may
indicate a previously identified change in the profession. Where city managers, especially in
smaller communities were once expected to have extensive technical knowledge of public works
and transportation, todays manager may instead rely on infrastructure experts for technical
-
7/30/2019 Values of Tomorrow's City Managers
18/29
18
advice. The shift may also be further evidence of the shifting role of professional administration
from managers to facilitators of public service delivery (Nalbandian 1999). It may also be a
function of specialization, professionalization, and the blending of our traditional politics-
administration dichotomy model (Svara 1998; Kettl 2000; Cleveland 2000). In any case, it
appears todays assistants may be de-emphasizing this previously critical policy area.
At the same time, we are hesitant to generalize beyond the survey population at this time
for primarily two reasons. The first, as previously discussed, is the limitations of these data.
Although we plan to expand the survey population and sample size in the future, the present data
serve more of an exploratory role than an attempt to authoritatively answer these questions.
The second hesitation is due to the appearance of consensus on several of the most popular
responses to each question. For example, both generations seem to agree on the importance of
visible difference as a motivating factor, budget/finance and economic development as key
policy areas, and honesty/integrity as professional values. Without a doubt, these have been and
remain critical considerations of public administrators, regardless of age. As a result, it seems
that the generational differences we observe are present and important, but far more nuanced
than previously imagined.
Conclusion
These results indicate a clear challenge for future public administration scholarship. As
shown in this initial research commentary, the Generation X experience appears to have very
stylized, but significant impacts on public administration in the future. In the context of public
policy, the boundaries of that impact are yet unclear, and future research should attempt to trace
the GX effect in specific policy areas. For example, this work has spawned the hypothesis that
-
7/30/2019 Values of Tomorrow's City Managers
19/29
19
tomorrows managers, having grown up in an era of federal and state involvement in
environmental policy, seem to place less emphasis on local responsibilities. The same holds true
for traditional infrastructure concerns, which are also characterized today by an increasing
federal and state presence. Are there other areas in which the same effect might be observed?
Further, we must consider the prospect that todays managers are more likely to participate in the
policymaking process, primarily through opportunities that most federal and state agencies
provide local officials. Rather than simply implementing policy, it may be the case that GX
managers will be more willing to take part in its formulation.
The responses to the value question, which support the contention that GX is more
inclined to pragmatism, also pose some interesting challenges to public administration practice
and education. Given the fields emphasis on ethics, public service, performance measures, and
other standards, these results reveal a potential challenge to our current direction. Rather than
abiding by ethical or other absolute standards, it may be the case that some GXers promulgate
different guidelines based on personal conviction, community directives (in a sort of revival of
the politics-administration dichotomy), long-term policy concerns, or some other source. In
general, this finding may indicate an increased role for post-modernism in public administration
(Fox and Miller 1995; Denhardt 2001), a notion that seems contrary to much of the fields
current activity.
In any case, these results are initial and exploratory, and should be treated as such.
Ideally, future work will stake out the precise role that generational differences, especially
among GX, play in the art and craft of public administration. We have attempted here to provide
early answers to this interesting and important research question.
-
7/30/2019 Values of Tomorrow's City Managers
20/29
20
Notes
1. This is not to say, however, that public affairs scholars have ignored the GX phenomenon, orthe study of generations broadly conceived. Interestingly enough, Elazar (1976) explored therole of generations in political socialization in the late stages of his career. Generations have
also been the differentiating factor in a wide range of studies on subjects such as fiscal policy(MacMannus 1995), Social Security privatization (Lips 1998), electoral participation (Lyons and
Alexander 2000), and philanthropy (Marcus 2000). Specifically in public administration, theUniversity of Nebraska-Omaha recently launched a study exploring the new demands Generation
X will likely place on public administration education. These results, according to the authors,may reveal a number of modifications that will need to be made to MPA programs across the
field (UN-Omaha 2000). In all, generational phenomena have occupied a limited, but importantplace in the literature.
2. A few aspects of the sample population are worth noting. Municipal Management Assistants
includes the following occupational titles: assistant city/village/town/townshipmanager/administrator, assistant to the city/village/town/township manager/administrator,
administrative assistant to the city/village/town/township manager/administrator, administrativeanalyst, budget analyst, and management analyst. In spite of this variation, survey respondents
were screened according to their self-reported primary job duties. Those with duties fallingoutside the general purview of municipal management were excluded from the sample.
The choice of Wisconsin and Southern California is somewhat strategic. Both states have
established assistant associations, which facilitated the production of a mailing list and allowedfor variation in demographic, political, and socioeconomic characteristics of local government
within the sample. Clearly, California and Wisconsin are very different with regard to theseconsiderations. Another key variation is the role of the associations themselves and their
potentially socializing effect. In California, the Municipal Management Assistants of SouthernCalifornia have been established for more than 50 years, and currently boast a membership of
more than 400 drawn almost exclusively from 12 counties in Californias far southern region.Wisconsins organization, the Wisconsin Association of Municipal and County Management
Assistants was chartered in 2001, and currently includes less than 50 members statewide. As aresult, we find variation in the effect the professional association is likely to have on assistants
values and perceptions of their profession.
3. However, our ability to generalize about public administration as a whole may be limited dueto city managements unique professional culture.
4. Technically speaking, the instrument was sent as a MS Word attachment to an electronic mail
message composed and sent using Microsoft Outlook. Respondents were asked to open theattached survey instrument, add their answers, and return the document to an e-mail address
designated for completed surveys. Both the text of the e-mail message and the attached surveycontained a cover letter from the authors describing the project and instructions to facilitate
-
7/30/2019 Values of Tomorrow's City Managers
21/29
21
participation. Although the decision to utilize electronic mail instead of traditional paper mailwas primarily due to cost considerations, many of the survey respondents expressed appreciation
for the convenience offered by the paperless format. In addition, unlike a paper instrument,this format facilitates follow-up and repeat mailings equally well. At the present, no follow-up
mailing has occurred, and we are confident our overall response rate will increase several more
percentage points as a result. At the same time, it can be argued that the electronic formatreduces the generalizabilty of the sample population given that it excludes those communitiesthat do not use electronic communication as well as individual assistants who are either not able
or not willing to rely on computer-based communications. In any case, we are satisfied with thesuccess of this format, plan to utilize it in future research, and recommend it to other scholars.
5. It is worth noting that the survey population has been recently expanded to include northern
California, and will likely include several other states in the future.
6. In its annual State of the Profession Survey series, the ICMA typically asks respondents torate the importance of a series of issues to their jurisdiction on a 1 to 5 scale. Approximately
30 policy areas are included in a given year, and the index is modified annually to reflect currentconcerns.
7. The response population was also evenly split between males (48%) and females (52%).
Responses were also proportional to the number of surveys sent to each of the four states. Mostrespondents were from CA (76%), followed by WI (13%), OH (7%), and NY (3%).
8. A 1996 (Tierney)New York Times Magazine discussed the emerging rational choice or
cost benefit perspective on environmental policy. In short, it argues that landfill and otherwaste disposal technology has advanced to the point that the garbage produced by the entire
nation could be disposed of in a guaranteed safe landfill covering only few square miles. At thesame time, recycling technology has advanced at a much slower rate, making it inferior to
traditional waste disposal in a cost-benefit analysis. The author, and many who oppose theenvironmental lobbys well-entrenched stance, argue that consumers and local governments will
soon begin to find recyclings altruistic benefits outweighed by the falling cost of waste disposal.Again, the potential for pragmatism is well-demonstrated.
-
7/30/2019 Values of Tomorrow's City Managers
22/29
22
References
Beh, Andrew. 1996. Generations and Political Science: The Importance of Taking Time
Seriously. Paper presented at the Political Science Association Annual Conference,
Glasgow, April 9-12th, 1996. Available: http://www.soton.ac.uk/~psd/1996/beh.htm
Bennett, Steven Earl and Rademacher, Eric. 1997. The Disengaged Few. In Craig,
Stephen and Bennett, Steven Earl, eds.After the Boom: The Politics of Generation X(Lanham Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield).
Bresner, Kurt. 1999. Voices from City Hall: Results from Two National Surveys of Our
Profession.Public Management81(11): 14-20.
Cleveland, John Y. 2000. Changing Role of City Manager: Electoral Systems, PoliticalLinkages, and Role Legitimacy (Doctor of Public Administration Dissertation, Arizona
State University)
Corley, T. 1999. Becoming an Employer of Choice for Generation X: The Elements of theDeal.Journal of Career Planning and Employment(Summer: 21-16).
Coupland, Douglass. 1991. Tales of an Accelerated Culture (New York: Bantam Books).
Cunningham, Robert and Weschler, Louis. 2002. Theory and the Public Administration
Student/Practitioner.Public Administration Review 62(1): 104-109.
Denhardt, Robert. 2001. The Big Questions of Public Administration Education. PublicAdministration Review 61(5): 526-534.
Elazar, Daniel J. 1976. The Generational Rhythm of American Politics (Philadelphia: Center
for the Study of Federalism).
Eng, S. 1996. Managers Learn How Best to Motivate Generation X Workers.Knight-Ridder/Tribune Business News (10 April: 410).
Fox, Charles J. and Miller, Hugh T. 1995.Postmodern Public Administration: Toward Discourse
(Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications).
Goldberg, Jonah. 2000. X Marked the Spot.National Review 52, no. 12: 27-28.
Halstead, Ted. 1999. A Politics for Generation X.Atlantic Monthly (August: 33-42).
Hochschild, Arlie Russell. 2000. Coming of Age, Seeking an Identity. The New York Times.3/8/00, H1.
-
7/30/2019 Values of Tomorrow's City Managers
23/29
23
Holtz, Geoffrey T. 1995. Welcome to the Jungle: The Why Behind Generation X(New York: St.Martins Press).
Jurkiewicz, Carol J. 2000. Generation X and the Public Employee.Public Personnel
Management29(1): 55-75.
Jurkiewicz, Carol J. and Brown, Roger G. 1998. GenXers vs. Boomers vs. Matures:Generational Comparisons of Public Employee Motivation.Review of Public Personnel
Administration (18-37).
Katznelson, Ira. 1982. City Trenches (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Kettl, Donald. 2000. Public Administration at the Millenium: The State of the Field.Journal ofPublic Administration Research and Theory 10(1): 7-35.
Lips, Carrie. 1998. Generation X May Make Social Security Privatization a Winner. Cato
Institute Daily Updates. Available at http://www.cato.org/dailys/11-13-98.html.
Loysk, Bob. 1997a. How to Manage Xers.Public Management79(12): 6-7.
____. 1997b. Generation X: What They Think and What They Plan to Do.Public Management79(12): 4-9.
Lyons, William and Alexander, Robert. 2000. A Tale of Two Electorates: Generational
Replacement and the Decline of Voting in Presidential Elections.Journal of Politics62(4): 1014-1035.
MacMannus, Susan. 1995. Taxing and Spending Politics: A Generational Perspective.Journal
of Politics 51(3): 607-629.
Mannheim, Karl (ed. Paul Kecskemeti). 1952.Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge(New York: Oxford University Press).
Marcus, David L. 2000. Generation X Turns out to be Generous. U.S. News & World Report
128(7): 54-55.
Marias, Julian. 1961. Ortega and the Idea of Vital Reason.Dublin Review 222(45): 56-79.
Mills, C. Wright. 1959. The Sociological Imagination (London and New York: OxfordUniversity Press).
Morrison, David A. 1999. Targeting Twentysomethings: Strategies that Work(New York:
Bantam Books).
Nalbandian, John. 1999. Facilitating Community, Enabling Democracy: New Roles for LocalGovernment Managers.Public Administration Review 59(3): 187-197.
-
7/30/2019 Values of Tomorrow's City Managers
24/29
24
OBannon, Gary. 2001. Managing Our Future: The Generation X Factor.Public Personnel
Management30(1): 95-109.
Ortega y Gasset, Jose. 1962.Man and Crisis (New York: R.W. Norton).
Osborne, David and Gaebler, Ted. 1992.Reinventing Government: How the EntrepreneurialSpirit is Transforming America (New York: Penguin Books.)
Osborne, David and Plasterik, Peter. 1997.Banishing Bureaucracy: The Five Strategies for
Reinventing Government(New York: Bantam)
Svara, James. 1998. The Politics-Administration Dichotomy Model as Aberration.PublicAdministration Review 58(1): 51-58.
Tierney, John. 1996. Recycling is Garbage.New York Times Magazine 145(50474): 24-33.
Tulgan, B. 1999. The Managers Pocket Guide to Generation X(Minneapolis: The Lakewood
Publications).
University of Nebraska-Omaha. 2000. Generation X and Public Administration Education:Overview of the Project. Available at
http://www.unomaha.edu/~wwwpa/genx/overview_of_the_project.html.
Wah, Louisa. 2000. Managing GenXers Strategically.Management Review 89(3): 6.
Zemke, Ron, Raines, Claire, and Filipczak, Bob. 2000. Generations at Work: Managing theClash of Veterans, Boomers, Eers, and Nexters in Your Workplace (New York: Anacom).
-
7/30/2019 Values of Tomorrow's City Managers
25/29
25
Appendix A Survey Instrument
March 4, 2002
Department of Political ScienceUniversity of Wisconsin-MilwaukeeP.O. Box 413, Bolton Hall 674Milwaukee, WI 53201
Dear Municipal Management Assistant,
Currently, faculty and students in the Department of Political Science at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukeeare conducting a nationwide study of the values and attitudes of municipal management assistants. We wouldgreatly appreciate you taking the time to participate in this study by completing the attached questionnaire. Werealize the value of your time, and have constructed the instrument, which contains questions about your past,current, and expected future experiences, to be completed in only a few minutes. After completing thequestionnaire, please e-mail it, as an attachment or as the text of an e-mail message to [email protected].
We consider this project to be a very unique and important inquiry for primarily two reasons. First, it providesyou as a management assistant the opportunity to describe the challenges you face in your often neglected butcritical role. Second, and perhaps more importantly, it will provide us with important insights into the professions
future direction.
This survey is also unique in that it is being conducted exclusively through electronic mail. Please be assuredthat your responses are completely anonymous, will remain confidential, and will only be reported on anaggregate basis.
Thank you in advance for your participation. At your request, we will be more than happy to provide the resultsof this study. Please feel free to contact us at (414) 229-2369 with any questions or comments you may have.
Sincerely,
Robert J. Eger, Ph.D. Deborah A. Kndson Justin MarloweAssistant Professor Ph.D. Student Ph.D. Student
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Political Science DepartmentMunicipal Management Assistant Survey
This survey addresses municipal governments, which for our purposes includes cities, villages, towns, townships,and all other forms of local government.
Demographic Information:
Gender: Male____ Female_____
Year born:
Which of the following degrees have you earned?:(check all that apply)
High school diploma/G.E.D. _____ Associates Degree _____- in what field? ______________
Bachelor of Science _____ Bachelor of Arts _____- in what field? ________________ - in what field? ________________
Public Manager Certification _____ Master of Arts _____- in what field? ________________
Master of Public Administration _____ J.D. _____
-
7/30/2019 Values of Tomorrow's City Managers
26/29
26
Appendix A (cont.)
Ph.D. _____ Other: _______________________- in what field? _____________
How many years have you worked in municipal government in some capacity, including time spent in internships orother part-time or non-paid positions? _____
What is your current title? __________________________________
Please list and briefly describe five of your primary duties in your current position:
How many years have you been in your current position? _____
What is the population of the municipality where you are currently employed? _____________
Before being hired in your current position, what other employment and training experiences did you have? (check allthat apply)
_____ assistant manager_____ administrative assistant
_____ internship(s) with municipal government(s)_____ internship(s) with federal or state government agency_____ full-time position(s) with federal or state agency_____ internship(s) in the non-profit sector_____ full-time position(s) in the non-profit sector_____ full-time position(s) in the private sector_____ other: __________________________________ none
Short Answer Questions:
1. What do you consider your top three reasons for pursuing a career in municipal management?
2. In your experience, is the current focus of elected boards and commissions in local government onpromoting the common good or on promoting special interests? Please explain.
3. One aspect of civic infrastructure in a community is the quality of the citizen volunteers who serve onadvisory boards. In your experience, is finding qualified citizens to serve on these advisory boards aproblem? Why or why not?
4. In your opinion, has the assistant managers role in the municipal management profession changed sinceyour entered the field? Please explain.
5. In your opinion, has the managers role in the municipal management profession changed since you enteredthe field? Please explain.
6. Since you entered the profession, has municipal management become more or less stable? Please explain.
7. Do you plan to some day become the chief administrative officer (i.e. city manager/administrator) of amunicipal government?
Yes _________ No ___________ Undecided _________
8. What are 5 policy areas that you plan to focus on throughout your career? Please list them in order ofimportance.
9. In your opinion, what are the 5 most important policy areas that will face municipal managers and municipalmanagement as a profession in the future? Please list them in order of importance.
10. What are three values that you consider most important to a successful career in municipal management?
-
7/30/2019 Values of Tomorrow's City Managers
27/29
27
Appendix B Survey Responses
1. What do you consider your top three reasons for pursuing a career in municipal management?
- categories receiving more than 5 responses are reported in Table 2 above
public service benefits/stability/security belief in local control
emphasis on merit variety of the work immediate/visible differencesense of accomplishment similar previous experience uniqueness of the job
interest/talent in government contact with the local community passion
opportunity to work w/ people challenging work no profit margin to protect
growth/personal potential personality fit mentoring/encouragement to do so
improve governments image
8. What are 5 policy areas that you plan to focus on throughout your career? Please list them inorder of importance.
- categories receiving more than 5 responses are reported in Table 3 above
infrastructure quality of life environment
budget/finance technology/IT performance measurement/management
organization development project/program management none (elected officials make policy)constituency service cost effectiveness federal/state mandates
leadership planning/land use economic development/redevelopment
employee/labor relations public safety recreation/culture
public/private partnerships intergovernmental relations housing
civic engagement efficiency ethics
service delivery balancing needs and demands tax equityemergency management lobbying/advocacy manager/council relations
legislative analysis policy development neighborhood issues
rebuilding trust ensuring long-term viability
10. What are three values that you consider most important to a successful career in municipal
management?- categories receiving more than 5 responses are reported in Table 4 above
perseverance honesty/integrity knowledge/intelligence
flexibility efficiency caring/compassion
ethics loyalty communication
motivation professional/educational breadth responsiveness
sensitivity fairness professionalism
respect humor organization
deference service/public interest vision/long-term outlookcooperation personal satisfaction maintaining public trust
hard working multi-tasking energy/positive outlook
challenging leadership focus
passion/dedication balance
-
7/30/2019 Values of Tomorrow's City Managers
28/29
28
(UN-Omaha 2000). In all, generational phenomena have occupied a limited, but important place in the literature.2 A few aspects of the sample population are worth noting. Municipal Management Assistants includes the
following occupational titles: assistant city/village/town/township manager/administrator, assistant to the
city/village/town/township manager/administrator, administrative assistant to the city/village/town/townshipmanager/administrator, administrative analyst, budget analyst, and management analyst. In spite of this variation,
survey respondents were screened according to their self-reported primary job duties. Those with duties falling
outside the general purview of municipal management were excluded from the sample. The choice of Wisconsin
and Southern California is somewhat strategic. Both states have established assistant associations, which facilitated
the production of a mailing list and allowed for variation in demographic, political, and socioeconomic
characteristics of local government within the sample. Clearly, California and Wisconsin are very different with
regard to these considerations. Another key variation is the role of the associations themselves and their potentially
socializing effect. In California, the Municipal Management Assistants of Southern California have beenestablished for more than 50 years, and currently boast a membership of more than 400 drawn almost exclusively
from 12 counties in Californias far southern region. Wisconsins organization, the Wisconsin Association of
Municipal and County Management Assistants was chartered in 2001, and currently includes less than 50 members
statewide. As a result, we find variation in the effect the professional association is likely to have on assistantsvalues and perceptions of their profession.
3 However, our ability to generalize about public administration as a whole may be limited due to city managements
unique professional culture.4 Technically speaking, the instrument was sent as a MS Word attachment to an electronic mail message composedand sent using Microsoft Outlook. Respondents were asked to open the attached survey instrument, add their
-
7/30/2019 Values of Tomorrow's City Managers
29/29
29
answers, and return the document to an e-mail address designated for completed surveys. Both the text of the e-mail
message and the attached survey contained a cover letter from the authors describing the project and instructions to
facilitate participation. Although the decision to utilize electronic mail instead of traditional paper mail wasprimarily due to cost considerations, many of the survey respondents expressed appreciation for the convenience
offered by the paperless format. In addition, unlike a paper instrument, this format facilitates follow-up and repeat
mailings equally well. At the present, no follow-up mailing has occurred, and we are confident our overall responserate will increase several more percentage points as a result. At the same time, it can be argued that the electronic
format reduces the generalizabilty of the sample population given that it excludes those communities that do not use
electronic communication as well as individual assistants who are either not able or not willing to rely on computer-
based communications. In any case, we are satisfied with the success of this format, plan to utilize it in future
research, and recommend it to other scholars.5
In its State of the Profession Survey series, the ICMA typically asks respondents to rate the importance of aseries of issues to their jurisdiction on a 1 to 5 scale. Approximately 30 policy areas are included in a given year,
and the index is modified annually to reflect current concerns.6 It is worth noting that the survey population has been recently expanded to include northern California, and will
likely include several other states in the future.78 A 1999New York Times Magazine article framed the environmental policy debate from a very rational choice
perspective. In short, it argues that even though a substantial portion of GX was socialized to believe environmental
preservation was a somewhat altruistic pursuit, todays environmental policymakers realize..XXXXXXXX