Value Engineering Change Proposal Of ... - ppts.icidonline.org

11
29/01/2015 1 By: Saeed Pourshahidi Value Engineering Change Proposal Of Irrigation and Drainage Networks in Ramhormoz - Iran September 2014

Transcript of Value Engineering Change Proposal Of ... - ppts.icidonline.org

29/01/2015

1

By:Saeed Pourshahidi

Value Engineering Change Proposal

Of Irrigation and Drainage Networks in

Ramhormoz - Iran

September 2014

29/01/2015

2

$ 100 m Saving of modifying Design flood in a Dredging Project of Karun River

Introduction

29/01/2015

3

Third development

block

5

General Plan

Gross area 5588 hectares

Net area about 5000 hectares

14 units

6

29/01/2015

4

Annual average rainfall = 305 mm

Absolute maximum temp = 52.8 celcius

Absolute minimum temp = - 2.3 celcius

Average annual evapotranspiration = 1775 mm

Main climatic characteristics

7

29/01/2015

5

Value Engineering Team Members

Explicit

Implicit

Tacit

10

20

70

LEARNING SOLUTIONS

Training

Best Practices

Experiential Learning

LIFE APPROACH

Trial & Error

Apprenticeship

Experience

Knowledge Iceberg

10

29/01/2015

6

Site Visit

29/01/2015

7

FAST Diagram

DevelopAgriculture

Distributwater

Improve root environment

Participate People

Control Flow

Uniform Slope

Eliminate Soil Texture

Change Current System

Drain runoff

Empower farmer

Interact with people

Create duct

Create Barrier

Collect and direct runoff

Dry the Springs

Occupy Land

Exit (Exhaust) Excess salt water

Train Farmers

Low Pressure Pipe

Land Leveling

Subsurface drainage

Surface drainage

Water Users'

Associations

Water structures

Facilitate Traffic

Improve productivity

ATF

Brain Storming Session

29/01/2015

8

List of VE Proposals

Value IndexTitle of PropposalRow

1.22Designing Based on the possible use of plastic gated pipes (hydro flume)1

1.23Reduction of pipes diameter2

1.1Using Pressurized Irrigation3

1.1Using GRP Pipes instead of PE4

1.06Reduction of the specific discharge (flow per unit area)5

1.3Optimizing land leveling operations6

1.98Changing main conveyance open channels to pipeline 7

1.1Use of sand around polyethylene pipe of sizes greater than 350 mm8

1.05Measurement equipment for water delivery10

1.38Pilot Farm12

1.35Increasing lateral spacings13

1.54Change in lateral alignment according to the natural slope14

29/01/2015

9

Change in lateral alignment according to the natural slope

Layout of subsurface drains (Base Case)

Lateral spacing = 80 m

Lateral length = 500 m

Pipe collector spacing = 80 m

Number of collectors = 8

Lateral diameter = 100 and 125 mm

Collector diameter = 160 and 300 mm

Layout of subsurface drains (Proposed Case)

Lateral spacing = 100 m

Lateral length = 1000 m

Pipe collector : no needed

Lateral diameter = 100 and 125 mm

29/01/2015

10

Benefits of proposed modification:

Use of the natural slopeConstant drain depth along the lateralLower sedimentation because of

steeper slopeNo need for any type of collectorsLesser land loss

19

Proposed layout Contracted layout

Ave. slope= 0.003

0.0

01

20

29/01/2015

11

Benefits of alteration of the direction of lateral drains were:

• Cost Saving of 23 billion Rials ( about 0.9 million USD)

•No need for any type of collector drains;

• Constant depth of the laterals;

• Lower sedimentation risk in the drains because of higher water velocity; and

• Easier maintenance.

Conclusion

This was an example to show that VE can make it possible toreduce the cost and/or increase the productivity of a project.

In this case the saving due to all proposals was estimated to be 80billion Rials ( 3.2 million USD).