the study of the validity and reliabiltiy of the scale for secondary ...
Validity, reliabiltiy and alignment to determine the effectiveness of assessment
-
Upload
mirea-mizushima -
Category
Education
-
view
490 -
download
0
Transcript of Validity, reliabiltiy and alignment to determine the effectiveness of assessment
![Page 1: Validity, reliabiltiy and alignment to determine the effectiveness of assessment](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062820/58a50a361a28ab8e1c8b4bc7/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
VALIDITY, RELIABILTIY AND ALIGNMENT TO DETERMINE THE
EFFECTIVENESS OF ASSESSMENT
![Page 2: Validity, reliabiltiy and alignment to determine the effectiveness of assessment](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062820/58a50a361a28ab8e1c8b4bc7/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
ASSESSMENT
VALIDITY RELIABILITY
STRATEGIES STANDARDS
ALIGNMENT
![Page 3: Validity, reliabiltiy and alignment to determine the effectiveness of assessment](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062820/58a50a361a28ab8e1c8b4bc7/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
ASSESSMENT Assessment is the process of gathering and discussing information from multiple and diverse sources in order to develop a deep understanding of what students know, understand, and can do with their knowledge as a result of their educational experiences. (Huba and Freed,2000)
![Page 4: Validity, reliabiltiy and alignment to determine the effectiveness of assessment](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062820/58a50a361a28ab8e1c8b4bc7/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
VALIDITY- refers to what the assessment is actually testing.
RELIABILITY- refers to the consistency of the
assessment.
ALIGNMENT- refers to the connection between learning objectives, learning activities and assessment
![Page 5: Validity, reliabiltiy and alignment to determine the effectiveness of assessment](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062820/58a50a361a28ab8e1c8b4bc7/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
A. VALIDITYDefinitions:Validity - refers to what the assessment is actually testing - refers to how accurately a conclusion, measurement or concept corresponds to what is being tested - defined as the extent to which an assessment accurately measures what it is intended to measure.
![Page 6: Validity, reliabiltiy and alignment to determine the effectiveness of assessment](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062820/58a50a361a28ab8e1c8b4bc7/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Factors Affecting Validity:1. Student’s reading ability - Educators should
ensure that an assessment is at the correct reading level of the students.
2. Student self-efficacy - If students have low self-efficacy or beliefs about their abilities in the particular area they are being tested in, they will typically perform lower.
3. Student test anxiety level - Students with high test anxiety will underperform due to emotional and physiological factors
![Page 7: Validity, reliabiltiy and alignment to determine the effectiveness of assessment](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062820/58a50a361a28ab8e1c8b4bc7/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Types of Validity:1. Face Validity - ascertains that the measure appears to be
assessing the intended construct under study. 2. Construct Validity - is used to ensure that the measure is
actually measure what it is intended to measure and not other variables
3. Criterion-Related Validity - is used to predict future or current performance - it correlates test results with another criterion of interest.
4. Formative Validity - when applied to outcomes assessment it is used to assess how well a measure is able to provide information to help improve the program under study.
5. Sampling Validity - ensures that the measure covers the broad range of areas within the concept under study
![Page 8: Validity, reliabiltiy and alignment to determine the effectiveness of assessment](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062820/58a50a361a28ab8e1c8b4bc7/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Kinds of Validity Claim:
1. Predictive evidence - form of construct validation that examines whether performance on an assessment is strongly related to real-world success in the domain that the assessment is meant to reflect.
2. Consequential evidence - refers to the kinds of consequences an assessment and its uses have for learners and for instruction.
![Page 9: Validity, reliabiltiy and alignment to determine the effectiveness of assessment](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062820/58a50a361a28ab8e1c8b4bc7/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Why is validity necessary?While reliability is necessary, it alone is not sufficient. For a test to be reliable, it also needs to be valid
Ways on how to improve validity:1. Make sure your goals and objectives are clearly defined and operationalized. 2.Match your assessment measure to your goals and objectives. 3.Get students involved; have the students look over the assessment for troublesome wording, or other difficulties. 4. If possible, compare your measure with other measures, or data that may be available.
![Page 10: Validity, reliabiltiy and alignment to determine the effectiveness of assessment](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062820/58a50a361a28ab8e1c8b4bc7/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
B. RELIABILITYDefinitions:
Reliability - refers to the consistency of the assessment
- the degree to which an assessment tool produces stable and consistent results
![Page 11: Validity, reliabiltiy and alignment to determine the effectiveness of assessment](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062820/58a50a361a28ab8e1c8b4bc7/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Factors Affecting Reliability:
1. The length of the assessment 2. The suitability of the questions or tasks for the students being assessed.3. The phrasing and terminology of the questions.4. The consistency in test administration 5. The design of the marking schedule and moderation of marking procedures.6. The readiness of students for the assessment
![Page 12: Validity, reliabiltiy and alignment to determine the effectiveness of assessment](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062820/58a50a361a28ab8e1c8b4bc7/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Types of Reliability:1. Test-retest reliability - is a measure of reliability
obtained by administering the same test twice over a period of time to a group of individuals.
2. Parallel forms reliability - is a measure of reliability obtained by administering different versions of an assessment tool to the same group of individuals
3. Inter-rater reliability - is a measure of reliability used to assess the degree to which different judges or raters agree in their assessment decisions
![Page 13: Validity, reliabiltiy and alignment to determine the effectiveness of assessment](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062820/58a50a361a28ab8e1c8b4bc7/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
4. Internal consistency reliability - is a measure of reliability used to evaluate the degree to which different test items that probe the same construct produce similar results.
a.) Average inter-item correlation - It is obtained by taking all of the items on a test that probe the same construct determining the correlation coefficient for each pair of items, and finally taking the average of all of these correlation coefficients
b.) Split-half reliability – The process of obtaining this begun by “splitting in half” all items of a test that are intended to probe the same area of knowledge in order to form two “sets” of items.
![Page 14: Validity, reliabiltiy and alignment to determine the effectiveness of assessment](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062820/58a50a361a28ab8e1c8b4bc7/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
C. ALIGNMENTDefinition: It is the connection between
learning objectives, learning activities and assessment
OBJECTIVES ACTIVITIES ASSESSMENT
![Page 15: Validity, reliabiltiy and alignment to determine the effectiveness of assessment](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062820/58a50a361a28ab8e1c8b4bc7/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
3 Components of Alignment:1. Objectives - What do I want students to know
how to do when they leave this course?2. Activities - What kinds of activities in and out
of class will reinforce my learning objectives and prepare students for assessments?
3. Assessment - What kinds of tasks will reveal whether students have achieved the learning objectives I have identified?
![Page 16: Validity, reliabiltiy and alignment to determine the effectiveness of assessment](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062820/58a50a361a28ab8e1c8b4bc7/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Why is alignment important? Proper alignment keeps you going in the
right direction. If assessments are misaligned with objectives or strategies, it can undermine both student motivation and learning.
![Page 17: Validity, reliabiltiy and alignment to determine the effectiveness of assessment](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062820/58a50a361a28ab8e1c8b4bc7/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
HOW CAN WE DEVELOP AN EFECTIVE ASSESSMENT?
StrategiesStandardsAlignment
![Page 18: Validity, reliabiltiy and alignment to determine the effectiveness of assessment](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062820/58a50a361a28ab8e1c8b4bc7/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
STRATEGIES FOR DEVELOPING AN EFFECTIVE ASSESSMENT
1. Remember the effect of assessment on student learning behaviors and outcomes.2. Align the course assessment with the learning outcomes and curriculum.3. Prepare students for assessment by providing formative tasks and explaining the structure of the assessment for their course.
![Page 19: Validity, reliabiltiy and alignment to determine the effectiveness of assessment](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062820/58a50a361a28ab8e1c8b4bc7/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
STRATEGIES…4. Design quality assessment tasks and items.5. Review Assessment Data.6. Understand how to set standards and grade cut-offs.7. Give feedback to students.
![Page 20: Validity, reliabiltiy and alignment to determine the effectiveness of assessment](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062820/58a50a361a28ab8e1c8b4bc7/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
STANDARDS1. Assessment of Higher-Order
Cognitive Skills2. High-Fidelity Assessment of Critical
Abilities3. Assessments that Are Internationally
Benchmarked4. Use of Items that Are Instructionally
Sensitive and Educationally Valuable
![Page 21: Validity, reliabiltiy and alignment to determine the effectiveness of assessment](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062820/58a50a361a28ab8e1c8b4bc7/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
1. Assessment of Higher-Order Cognitive Skills
One widely used approach in conceptualizing knowledge and skills represented in curriculum, teaching, and assessment Webb’s Depth of Knowledge (DOK) taxonomy.
Using the DOK framework as a guide, if assessments are to reflect and encourage transferable abilities, a substantial majority of the items and tasks (at least two-thirds) should tap conceptual knowledge and abilities.
![Page 22: Validity, reliabiltiy and alignment to determine the effectiveness of assessment](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062820/58a50a361a28ab8e1c8b4bc7/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge (DOK) taxonomy
![Page 23: Validity, reliabiltiy and alignment to determine the effectiveness of assessment](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062820/58a50a361a28ab8e1c8b4bc7/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
2. High-Fidelity Assessment of Critical Abilities
This standard identifies a number of areas of knowledge and skills that are clearly so critical for college and career readiness that they should be targeted for inclusion in new assessment systems. As described in the standard, these includes: Research Analysis and Synthesis of Information Experimentation and Evaluation Communication in Oral, Written, Graphic, and Multi-Media
Forms Collaboration and Interpersonal Interaction Modeling, Design, and Complex Problem Solving
![Page 24: Validity, reliabiltiy and alignment to determine the effectiveness of assessment](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062820/58a50a361a28ab8e1c8b4bc7/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
3. Assessments that Are Internationally Benchmarked
The assessments should be as rigorous as those of the leading education countries, in terms of the kind of content and tasks they present, as well as the level of performance they expect.
Such assessments sought were, in order of importance: 1) teamwork2) problem solving3) interpersonal skills4) oral communications5) listening skills
![Page 25: Validity, reliabiltiy and alignment to determine the effectiveness of assessment](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062820/58a50a361a28ab8e1c8b4bc7/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
4. Use of Items that Are Instructionally Sensitive and
Educationally Valuable
Assessment tasks should also be instructionally sensitive and educationally useful. That is, they should 1) represent the curriculum content in ways that respond to instruction, and 2) have value for guiding and informing teaching.