Validation of Acute Stroke in Medicare Data against WHI Kamakshi Lakshminarayan, MD, PhD presented...
-
Upload
melanie-holmes -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of Validation of Acute Stroke in Medicare Data against WHI Kamakshi Lakshminarayan, MD, PhD presented...
Validation of Acute Stroke in Medicare Data against WHI
Kamakshi Lakshminarayan, MD, PhD presented by Dale Burwen, MD, MPH
WHI Investigators Meeting
May 3-4, 2012
Preliminary results; do not distribute
1
Writing Group
• Kamakshi Lakshminarayan • Dale Burwen• Joe Larson• Beth Virnig• Wolfgang Winkelmayer• Norrina Allen• Monica Safford• Marian Limacher
2
Background
• Starting in 2010, stroke outcomes in WHI will be adjudicated in only a quarter of participants
• Medicare data provide potential for expanding outcome ascertainment
• Little is known about validity of Medicare claims for ascertaining neurologist adjudicated strokes
3
Objective
Compare agreement between various algorithms to detect stroke hospitalizations in Medicare claims data and neurologist adjudicated stroke outcomes in WHI
4
Methods – Study Population
Inclusions
• Observational study women• With Medicare Parts A&B,
Fee-For-Service at the time of WHI enrollment 1993-1998N=27,739
• Those who age into Medicare Parts A&B, Fee-For-Service after enrollment until 2007 N=21138
• Total N = 48,877
Exclusions
• Managed care at the time of their WHI enrollment
• Participants are censored as they enter into managed care
• Those with WHI adjudicated stroke outcomes prior to CMS eligibility are excluded
• Participants are censored 7 days after WHI stroke
5
Methods• Randomly split into training & test data sets• Training set N = 24,432 • Test set N = 24,495• Analysis to date confined to training set
6
Stroke in WHI
• Rapid onset of persistent neurologic deficit attributed to obstruction or rupture of brain arterial system.
• Deficit is not known to be secondary to brain trauma, tumor, infection, or other cause.
• Deficit must last > 24 hours unless death supervenes or there is a lesion compatible with an acute stroke on CT or MRI.
7
Defining stroke in Medicare
Used 1993-2007 hospital data (MedPAR file)
8
Definition ICD-9 code Code Position
1. All stroke 430, 431, 433.x1, 434.x1, 436, 437.1x, 437.9x
Any position
2. Primary position stroke Same as above Primary position
3. Ischemic stroke 433.x1, 434.x1, 436, 437.1x, 437.9x
Any position
4. Hemorrhagic stroke 430, 431 Any position
Results pertain to the 1st definition
Events Included in Analysis
Universe of events:– WHI confirmed strokes after neurologist
adjudication– All hospitalization claims from Medicare data
(stroke and non-stroke)– Goal is to classify each claim into stroke vs. not
• Definition of matched events: – WHI stroke & CMS stroke +/- 7 days
• Sensitivity analysis with wider intervals (14 days)
9
Match Results (Stroke in any diagnosis position)
WHI Yes WHI No
CMS Yes 478 374
CMS No 105 55995
10
Kappa 0.66
Reasons for Disagreement
WHI Yes, CMS No(N=105)
• Hospital claim found +/- 7days; but claim did not have diagnosis codes meeting stroke definition
• No hospital claim found +/- 7 days; outpatient stroke according to WHI
• No hospital claim found +/- 7 days
54% (n=57)
5% (n=5)
41% (n=43)
11
Reasons for Disagreement
WHI No, CMS Yes(N=374)
• Self-report of stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA), with hospitalization +/- 7 days – Adjudicated as TIA or carotid disease – Adjudicated as no outcome– Not adjudicated due to administrative
reasons
• Self-report of other hospitalization • No report of hospitalization
– (case ascertainment of WHI)
24% (n=89)
7% (n=28)
13% (n=50)
3% (n=11)
21% (n=78)
55% (n=207)
12
Original vs. Modified Analysis
WHI Yes WHI No
CMS Yes 478 374
CMS No 105 55995
13
WHI Yes WHI No WHI No Hospitalization ReportedOr Administrative denials
CMS Yes 478 156 218
CMS No 100 55995
Outpatient strokes 5
Validation Performance
Original Analysis
• Sensitivity: 82.0%• Specificity: 99.3% • PPV: 56.1% • Kappa: 0.66
Modified Analysis
• Sensitivity: 82.7%• Specificity: 99.7%• PPV: 75.4%• Kappa: 0.79
14
Validation PerformancePrimary Position
Original Analysis
• Sensitivity: 73.9%• Specificity: 99.6% • PPV: 63.9% • kappa: 0.68
Modified Analysis
• Sensitivity: 74.6%• Specificity: 99.8%• PPV: 82.3%• kappa: 0.78
15
Discussion• Initial WHI vs. Medicare agreement was moderate• Key reason for a CMS event without WHI match was
lack of WHI report of hospitalization – Possible reasons: Inadequate recall; disability/death
and lack of proxy report• Limiting analysis to CMS events that could be
evaluated with WHI medical records increased PPV to 75% – Primary position diagnostic codes PPV = 82%
• False positives due to TIA were in a minority; mainly other diagnosis
16
Discussion (cont.)• A key reason for WHI stroke without matching CMS
stroke was that WHI picked up a lot of strokes coded with a variety of other diagnosis codes. – However, there was no predominant code to suggest how
to modify our algorithm
• Another important reason was lack of CMS hospital claim within the selected time interval (+/- 7 days)– Wider time interval picked up a minority
17
Next Steps• Further exploration of reasons for
disagreement • Test additional algorithms • Consider incorporation of Medicare
procedures/diagnoses for rehabilitation– To increase specificity for stroke vs. TIA, and
current vs. historical stroke
18
Thank you!
Questions?
19