The DSSAT cropping system model - Agricultural and Biological
Valdivia toa dssat-modeling_workshopamsterdam_2012-04-23
-
Upload
ccafs-cgiar-program-climate-change-agriculture-and-food-security -
Category
Technology
-
view
962 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Valdivia toa dssat-modeling_workshopamsterdam_2012-04-23
Tradeoff Analysis Model:
An Integrated Assessment Approach to Assess
Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation
Roberto O. Valdivia
John M. Antle
Jetse J. Stoorvogel
Lieven Claessens
April, 2012
GIS
DSSAT
DBMS
NUTMON
Policies
Survey
Weather
Economic
Models
GIS
DSSAT
DBMS
Leachp
Policies
Survey
Weather
Economic
models
GIS
DSSAT
DBMS
Leachp
TOA
Survey
Weather
Economic
Models
GIS
DSSAT
DBMS
Leachp
Policies
Survey
Weather
Models
Economic
GIS
DSSAT
DBMS
NUTMON
Survey
Weather
Economic
Models The Tradeoff Analysis Model is a
GIS-based system designed to
integrate disciplinary data and
models to implement the Tradeoff
Analysis approach.
Tradeoff Analysis is a process that can be used to:
- Support policy decision making
- Use quantitative analysis tools to
assess the sustainability of
agricultural production systems
The Tradeoff Analysis Model:
Integrated Bio-Physical and Economic Modeling
of Agricultural Production Systems
Implementing the TOA Approach: the TOA Software
A modular approach to integrate spatial data
and disciplinary models to simulate agricultural
systems.
Soils & Climate Data Economic Data
Crop/Livestock Models Economic Model
Land Use &
ManagementEnvironmental
Process Models
Economic
Outcomes
Environmental
Outcomes
Yield
General Circulation Models (GCM)
-The IPCC and Global circulation modelers coordinated an international effort
to jointly evaluate some standard climate scenarios
-Results are posted on the IPCC Data Distribution Centre
(http://ipcc-ddc.cru.uea.ac.uk/)
-The scenarios included a 0.5 or 1.0% annual increase in greenhouse gas
emissions with or without sulphate aerosols.
TOA: CC applications
METHODOLOGY
Download data from the IPCC data Distribution Centre
IPCCConvert program reads the GCM output files (one per
climate variable), compiles the data and converts them to
Dbase files
The GCM run for a global grid
with a relative coarse resolution.
It is difficult to identify an
appropriate point.
The Climchange program reads DSSAT weather
files and changes the Data according to the
climate change scenarios
The output weather files are used in the
TOA/DSSAT to get the Inprods for each one of the
climate change scenarios.
IPCCinterpol takes the 4 nearest
points and carryout a simple
linear interpolation between
those points.
base
AAGG
CCGG
EEGG
GGGG
HHGG
JJGG
NNGG
NNGS
JJGSHHGS
GGGS
EEGS
CCGS
AAGS
base
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000
Mean (Kg/Ha)
ST
D
Potato GG Model Potato GS Model
Potato yields by GCM Model: Mean vs. Standard deviation
GCMs: Precipitation vs. Temperature Change
-4.00
-3.00
-2.00
-1.00
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00
Temperature
Pre
cip
itati
on
AAGG CCGG EEGG HHGG AAGS CCGS EEGS HHGS NNGS NNGG GGGG GGGS JJGG JJGS
Data for La Encanada, Cajamarca, Peru
Yield vs. Altitude: Potato. La Encanada, Peru
0.0000
2000.0000
4000.0000
6000.0000
8000.0000
10000.0000
12000.0000
2800 3000 3200 3400 3600 3800 4000
Altitude
Inh
ere
nt
Pro
du
cti
vit
y Observed weather
GGGG Model
AAGG Model
CCGG Model
EEGG Model
HHGG Model
JJGG Model
NNGG Model
Yield vs. Altitude: Potato. La Encanada, Peru
0.0000
2000.0000
4000.0000
6000.0000
8000.0000
10000.0000
12000.0000
2800 3000 3200 3400 3600 3800 4000
Altitude
Inh
ere
nt
Pro
du
cti
vit
y Observed weather
GGGG Model
AAGG Model
CCGG Model
EEGG Model
HHGG Model
JJGG Model
NNGG Model
Includes only GG models
NNGGJJGG
HHGG
GGGG
EEGG
CCGGAAGG
BASE
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000 6500 7000 7500 8000 8500 9000
Mean NPV US$/Ha
ST
D
No terraces GG Low Prod Terraces GG Medium Prod Terraces GG High Prod terraces GG
No Terraces GS Low Prod terraces GS Medium Prod Terraces GS High Prod Terraces GS
La Encañada, Cajamarca Peru: Mean vs. Standard deviation of NPV for the
Scenarios: No terraces & Terraces (Low, Medium & High productivity). GG and GS
Models*
* Preliminary results, Do not cite.
Machakos, Kenya: Maize price change vs. Poverty gap under GCM Models
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80
Poverty Gap
Maiz
e P
rice (
TO
PS
)
AAGG AAGS CCGG CCGS EEGG EEGS GGGG GGGS GGHG HHGS
JJGG JJGS NNGG NNGS BASE
Incre
ase
Base Price
Machakos, Kenya: Maize price change vs. Poverty gap under GCM Models
0
Machakos, Kenya: Maize price change vs. Poverty gap under GCM Models
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80
Poverty Gap
Maiz
e P
rice (
TO
PS
)
AAGG AAGS CCGG CCGS EEGG EEGS GGGG GGGS GGHG HHGS
JJGG JJGS NNGG NNGS BASE
Incre
ase
Base Price
* Preliminary results, Do not cite.
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85
Poverty Gap
Dep
leti
on
Gap
Base Scenario MV3 CMPV3 Base Scen&Tradep37 Irrigation
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85
Poverty Gap
Dep
leti
on
Gap
Base Scenario MV3 CMPV3 Base Scen&Tradep37 Irrigation
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85
Poverty Gap
Dep
leti
on
Gap
Base Scenario MV3 CMPV3 Base Scen&Tradep37 Irrigation
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85
Poverty Gap
Dep
leti
on
Gap
Base Scenario MV3 CMPV3 Base Scen&Tradep37 Irrigation
Depletion Gap vs. Poverty Gap
For different technology scenarios In Machakos, Kenya
Observed weather
CCGS Model
* Preliminary results, Do not cite.
E
P
Q
P1
P0
Q1Q0
E0
E1
S
D0
D1
Map0
spatial distribution
Map1
spatial distribution
a
a’
b
b’
T
E
P
Q
P1
P0
Q1Q0
E0
E1
S
D0
D1
Map0
spatial distribution
Map1
spatial distribution
a
a’
b
b’
E
P
Q
P1
P0
Q1Q0
E0
E1
S
D0
D1
Map0
spatial distribution
Map1
spatial distribution
E
P
Q
P1
P0
Q1Q0
E0
E1
S
D0
D1
Map0
spatial distribution
Map0
spatial distribution
Map1
spatial distribution
Map1
spatial distribution
a
a’
b
b’
T
TOA Market Equilibrium Analysis
When is it needed?
Implementation:
• Execute TOA analysis for a range of prices
• Aggregate and estimate supply curve/demand curve parameters
• Solve for equilibrium
• Re-run TOA at equilibrium prices
Valdivia, R.O., J.M. Antle, and J.J. Stoorvogel, 2012. Coupling the Tradeoff Analysis Model with a
market equilibrium model to analyze economic and environmental outcomes of agricultural
production systems. Agricultural Systems, 110 (2012).
Valdivia, R.O., J.J. Stoorvogel, and J.M. Antle. 2012. Economic and Enviromental Impacts of Climate Change
and Socio-Economic Scenarios: A Case Study on a Semi-Subsistence Agriucltural Production System.
International Journal of Climate Change: Impacts and Responses, Volume 3 (2012)
y = -3,1797x + 0,0164
R² = 0,9522
y = 1,42x2 - 0,3596x - 0,6507
R² = 0,9931
-70,00%
-60,00%
-50,00%
-40,00%
-30,00%
-20,00%
-10,00%
0,00%
10,00%
20,00%
30,00%
40,00%
-60,00% -50,00% -40,00% -30,00% -20,00% -10,00% 0,00% 10,00% 20,00% 30,00%
Change in Nutrient
Depletion
Change in Poverty
No Intervention -ME Policy-Technology intervention ME No Intervention - W/o ME Policy Intervention w/o ME
This presentation and related information are
available at
http://tradeoffs.oregonstate.edu
www.tradeoffs.wur.nl
Other Applications:
Comparison of EP and MD: Carbon Contract Participation in Senegal Peanut Basin (scenario: 60 kg fertilizer + 50% crop
reside incorporation)
0
12500
25000
37500
50000
62500
75000
87500
100000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Participation Rate
Carb
on
Pri
ce
rho=.6 rho=.7 rho=.8 rho=.9 rho=.95 F_EP
Antle, J.M., B. Diagana, J.J. Stoorvogel and R.O. Valdivia. 2010. “Minimum-Data Analysis of
Ecosystem Service Supply in Semi-Subsistence Agricultural Systems: Evidence from Kenya
and Senegal.” Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 54:601-617.