Utility, Quality and Mobility: The Trans-Texas Corridor Plan

38
Utility, Quality and Mobility: The Trans-Texas Corridor Plan Aakash Bhatt Chi Wang Jason Yeh Prepared for Prof. Robert Strauss Public Expenditure Analysis Spring 2005 Innertrode Consultants:

description

Utility, Quality and Mobility: The Trans-Texas Corridor Plan. Prepared for Prof. Robert Strauss Public Expenditure Analysis Spring 2005. Aakash Bhatt Chi Wang Jason Yeh. Innertrode Consultants:. Today’s Agenda. Overview of the Trans-Texas Corridor Plan Costs Benefits Financing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Utility, Quality and Mobility: The Trans-Texas Corridor Plan

Page 1: Utility, Quality and Mobility:  The Trans-Texas Corridor Plan

Utility, Quality and Mobility: The Trans-Texas Corridor Plan

Aakash BhattChi WangJason Yeh

Prepared for Prof. Robert StraussPublic Expenditure AnalysisSpring 2005

Innertrode Consultants:

Page 2: Utility, Quality and Mobility:  The Trans-Texas Corridor Plan

Today’s Agenda

1. Overview of the Trans-Texas Corridor Plan

2. Costs3. Benefits4. Financing5. Synthesis – Sensitivity Analysis6. Concluding Thoughts

Page 3: Utility, Quality and Mobility:  The Trans-Texas Corridor Plan

1. Overview of the Trans-Texas Corridor Plan

2. Costs3. Benefits4. Financing5. Synthesis – Sensitivity Analysis6. Concluding Thoughts

Page 4: Utility, Quality and Mobility:  The Trans-Texas Corridor Plan

Texas Facts

Texas is a center for international trade activities, located at the crossroads of North America.

79% of all U.S. – Mexico trade flows through Texas ports of entry.

The population of Texas (22 million) has increased 65% since 1988

Source: http://www.corridorwatch.org/ttc/cw-where.htm

Page 5: Utility, Quality and Mobility:  The Trans-Texas Corridor Plan

1. Overloaded highway system due to population and passing traffic growth

2. Existing transportation infrastructure inadequate for future needs

3. Over-capacity leads to accidents4. Expanding existing highways is not cost-

effective 5. Hazardous material transporting is a

concern

Texas Transportation Issues

Page 6: Utility, Quality and Mobility:  The Trans-Texas Corridor Plan

Population Predicted to Grow Rapidly in Next 25 Years

• 2000 Total Population: 20,900,000

•2030 Projected Total Population: 33,000,000

Source: http://www.keeptexasmoving.com/pdfs/Texas_Population.pdf

Page 7: Utility, Quality and Mobility:  The Trans-Texas Corridor Plan

Increasing Truck Traffic a Threat to Transportation Safety

Source: http://www.keeptexasmoving.com/pdfs/Truck_Rail_Freight_Texas.pdf

•Freight Volume By Route (1998) •Truck and Rail Border Traffic by Year

Page 8: Utility, Quality and Mobility:  The Trans-Texas Corridor Plan

The TTC: 4,000 Miles of New Roads to Criss-cross the State

Priority Corridors

Other Proposed Corridors

Source: http://www.corridorwatch.org/ttc/cw-where.htm

Dallas

• Centerville

Houston

Page 9: Utility, Quality and Mobility:  The Trans-Texas Corridor Plan

Refined Study Area for Our Cost-Benefit Analysis

TTC-35

– Parallel to I-35

– Oklahoma Border to the Gulf Coast or Mexico

– 800 Miles in Length

Source: http://www.corridorwatch.org/ttc/cw-ttc35f2004map-start.htm

Page 10: Utility, Quality and Mobility:  The Trans-Texas Corridor Plan

TTC-35 Structure

Source: http://www.cintra.es/

Page 11: Utility, Quality and Mobility:  The Trans-Texas Corridor Plan

TTC Design Concepts

Source: http://www.cintra.es/

Page 12: Utility, Quality and Mobility:  The Trans-Texas Corridor Plan

TTC: A Long-Term Solution for Traffic Problems

Relieves congestionReduces pollutionRe-routes of hazardous material

transportation Increases safetySaves timeEnhances development of economy

Page 13: Utility, Quality and Mobility:  The Trans-Texas Corridor Plan

1. Overview of the Trans-Texas Corridor Plan

2. Costs3. Benefits4. Financing5. Synthesis- Sensitivity Analysis6. Concluding Thoughts

Page 14: Utility, Quality and Mobility:  The Trans-Texas Corridor Plan

Cost

Quantifiable cost- Construction cost- Operation cost-

Unquantifiable cost- Environmental cost: Air pollution and noise- Aesthetic Impact- Barrier to non-car owners

- Cost of Sprawl- Dead weight loss (DWL) from taxes and tolls

Page 15: Utility, Quality and Mobility:  The Trans-Texas Corridor Plan

Official Construction Cost Breakdown

Cost Table  

Item Cost/centerline mile

Roadway trucks/passenger vehicles 6997000

Grade-separation bridge structures 5175000

Interchanges 3195000

Commuter and freight rail 7357000

High-speed passenger rail 5000000

Utilities 3650000

Total 31374000

Page 16: Utility, Quality and Mobility:  The Trans-Texas Corridor Plan

Low Official Cost Per Mile

TTC costs 31.37 million per centerline mile AVG 4 lane freeway costs 20 million Estimated real cost = 40 - 60 million

Page 17: Utility, Quality and Mobility:  The Trans-Texas Corridor Plan

Operating Cost

Maintenance cost CostMaintenance cost per mile per lane 4656 lanes 2790800 miles 2232000

Page 18: Utility, Quality and Mobility:  The Trans-Texas Corridor Plan

Unquantifiable cost

– Dead weight loss– Environmental cost– Aesthetic impact– Barrier to non-car owners– Cost of sprawl

Page 19: Utility, Quality and Mobility:  The Trans-Texas Corridor Plan

Cost

 Officialestimate Worst Case

800 mile corridor (billion) 25.1 48right of way (billion) 2.34 7.6miscellaneous costs (billion) 1.6 4Real-estate tax loss for 50 yrs (billion) 1.17 5.36Financing Cost 19.6 29.41Maintenance Cost   0.06   0.06Deadweight Loss NA NAEnvironmental Cost NA NAOther Unquantifiable cost NA NATotal 50.36 94.44

Page 20: Utility, Quality and Mobility:  The Trans-Texas Corridor Plan

1. Overview of the Trans-Texas Corridor Plan

2. Costs3. Benefits4. Financing5. Synthesis – Sensitivity Analysis6. Concluding Thoughts

Page 21: Utility, Quality and Mobility:  The Trans-Texas Corridor Plan

The Benefits that Matter

Toll Revenues Congestion Relief Faster transport Safety Economic Growth

$60.7 Billion of Benefits Over 50 Years

Page 22: Utility, Quality and Mobility:  The Trans-Texas Corridor Plan

Toll Revenue Benefit

Assume Dallas-San Antonio corridor operational by 2010

Toll expected to be about $0.15/mile for cars and $0.48/mile for trucks

3.5% growth in traffic per year along I-35 TTC-35 is a partial substitute for I-35

$30 Billion Over 50 Years

Page 23: Utility, Quality and Mobility:  The Trans-Texas Corridor Plan

Congestion Benefit

Cost savings from congestion relief (37%)– Congestion($)/traveler given by 2002 Urban

Mobility Report Benefit for 80 mph speed limit (25%) Benefit for commercial vehicle time (37%)

$22.5 Billion Over 50 Years

Page 24: Utility, Quality and Mobility:  The Trans-Texas Corridor Plan

Truck lanes apart from car lanes (93%)– Includes monetary benefits + value of life– Lane designation benefit:cost ratio given by 2002

ATSSA Roadway Safety Program

Secure pipes for natural gas (7%)– Pipeline incident info given by Railroad

Commission of Texas

$1.25 Billion Over 50 Years

Safety Benefit

Source: HAZMAP website

Page 25: Utility, Quality and Mobility:  The Trans-Texas Corridor Plan

Economic Growth from TTC-35

The Perryman Group forecasts– 2.6 million permanent jobs – $585 million in annual expenditures

Using Fed. Highway Administration multipliers,– 259,000 person-years of employment generated– Equal to 5,183 jobs for 50 years

$7 Billion Over 50 Years

Page 26: Utility, Quality and Mobility:  The Trans-Texas Corridor Plan

1. Overview of the Trans-Texas Corridor Plan

2. Costs3. Benefits4. Financing5. Synthesis – Sensitivity Analysis 6. Concluding Thoughts

Page 27: Utility, Quality and Mobility:  The Trans-Texas Corridor Plan

Possible Financing Sources

Private Bonds Float Government Bonds Tolling Existing I-35 Federal funding Increase Gas Tax

"It is my belief that Texans, if given a choice, would prefer to pay an extra 10 cent per gallon gasoline tax rather than convert an existing highway to a toll road."— Senator Jeff Wentworth (November 7, 2003)

Source:http://www.senate.state.tx.us/75r/Senate/members/dist25/pr03/p110703a.htm

Page 28: Utility, Quality and Mobility:  The Trans-Texas Corridor Plan

Official Legislation about Financing

2001 S.B.4 Texas Mobility Fund2005 H.B.3588 Art. 5 Conversion of non-toll state high way Art. 7 Issuance of bonds and other securities

(<$3 Billions) Art. 9 Motor Vehicle Taxes Fees: Court fees and public safety fees

Source: http://www.corridorwatch.org/ttc/cw-hb3588-toc.htm

Page 29: Utility, Quality and Mobility:  The Trans-Texas Corridor Plan

1. Overview of the Trans-Texas Corridor Plan

2. Costs3. Benefits4. Financing5. Synthesis – Sensitivity Analysis6. Concluding Thoughts

Page 30: Utility, Quality and Mobility:  The Trans-Texas Corridor Plan

Costs BenefitsConstruction $29.04 Toll Revenue $18.04Operation $0.06 Congestion $14.84Financing $19.61 Safety $1.25Taxes Loss $1.65 Economic Development $6.97DWL $0.00 Total $41.11Total $50.3614Cintra :$29 - $36.7 billion dollarsNPV ($9)

Base case

CostAssumptions

2.70% Real estate tax rate0.06000 Cost per center mile

38.00000 Right of way20.00000 Miscellaneous costs

4.00% Financinf bond rate

BenefitAssumptions

6% Discount Rate3.15% Traffic Growth per year

45% Truck volume of I-35 that will use TTC I-3520% Car volume of I-35 that will use TTC I-350.15$ Toll per mile for cars0.48$ Toll per mile for trucks

1.30% inflation rate for car tolls2.30% inflation rate for truck tolls

1.25 passengers/vehicle13.45 $ per person per hour25% Lane designation portion of safety cost50% percentage of direct workers from Texas25% percentage of indirect workers from Texas10% percentage of workers from Texas

Page 31: Utility, Quality and Mobility:  The Trans-Texas Corridor Plan

Costs BenefitsConstruction $59.60 Toll Revenue $10.10Operation $0.06 Congestion $11.43Financing $29.41 Safety $0.55Taxes Loss $5.37 Economic Development $5.02DWL $0.00 Total $27.10Total $94.4396Cintra :$29 - $36.7 billion dollarsNPV ($67)

Worst Case

CostAssumptions

2.70% Real estate tax rate0.06000 Cost per center mile

38.00 Right of way20.00 Miscellaneous costs

6.00% Financinf bond rate

BenefitAssumptions

6% Discount Rate3.15% Traffic Growth per year

35% Truck volume of I-35 that will use TTC I-3510% Car volume of I-35 that will use TTC I-350.15$ Toll per mile for cars0.40$ Toll per mile for trucks

1.00% inflation rate for car tolls1.00% inflation rate for truck tolls

1 passengers/vehicle10 $ per person per hour

10% Lane designation portion of safety cost35% percentage of direct workers from Texas20% percentage of indirect workers from Texas

5% percentage of workers from Texas

Page 32: Utility, Quality and Mobility:  The Trans-Texas Corridor Plan

Parameters for the NPV predictionCostAssumptions

Uniform2.70% Real estate tax rate

0.06000 Cost per center mile (0.03137-0.06) billion38.00 Right of way (11.7-38) billion/4000 miles (2,34-7.6) billion/800 miles20.00 Miscellaneous costs (8-20) billion/4000 miles (1.6-4) billion/800 miles

6.00% Financinf bond rate (4%-6%)

BenefitAssumptions

Uniform6% Discount Rate 3%-6%

3.15% Traffic Growth per year 3.15%-3.85%35% Truck volume of I-35 that will use TTC I-35 35%-55%10% Car volume of I-35 that will use TTC I-35 10%-30%

0.15$ Toll per mile for cars 0.15-0.20.40$ Toll per mile for trucks 0.4-0.6

1.00% inflation rate for car tolls 1%-3%1.00% inflation rate for truck tolls 1%-3%

1 passengers/vehicle 1 --210 $ per person per hour 10--20

10% Lane designation portion of safety cost 10%-30%35% percentage of direct workers from Texas 35%-55%20% percentage of indirect workers from Texas 20%-30%5% percentage of workers from Texas 5%-15%

Page 33: Utility, Quality and Mobility:  The Trans-Texas Corridor Plan

Sensitivity Analysis by Crystal Ball Predictor – 2000 Trials

We have 95% confidence that there are 20% chance for this project have positive NPV.

Page 34: Utility, Quality and Mobility:  The Trans-Texas Corridor Plan

1. Overview of the Trans-Texas Corridor Plan

2. Costs3. Benefits4. Financing5. Synthesis – Sensitivity Analysis 6. Concluding Thoughts

Page 35: Utility, Quality and Mobility:  The Trans-Texas Corridor Plan

Problems or constraints

The Corridors do not directly connect large cities.

Topography will also be very important because of the high-speed rail component of the Corridor.

Corridor must be as straight and level as possible (no uphill or downhill grades or sharp turns).

Source: http://www.corridorwatch.org/ttc/cw-where.htm

Page 36: Utility, Quality and Mobility:  The Trans-Texas Corridor Plan

Concluding Thoughts

Should Texas stop the project?-Yes, because the NPV is negative for 80% of the time.

However, Texas already signed the contract, the project will continue.

The state government should hold off investments for other sections until TTC-35 shows promising results.

Page 37: Utility, Quality and Mobility:  The Trans-Texas Corridor Plan

Works Cited

Corridor Watch Org, http://www.corridorwatch.org/ttc/cw-where.htm Crossroads of the Americas: Trans Texas Corridor Plan,

http://www.keeptexasmoving.com/publications/files/ttc_report_full.pdf Question: Gas Tax Increase or Toll Roads?

http://www.senate.state.tx.us/75r/Senate/members/dist25/pr03/p110703a.htm Keep Texas moving Web, http://www.keeptexasmoving.com/ Cintra Web, http://www.cintra.es/ “ATSSA’s Roadway Safety Improvement Program: Economic Impact of $3.0 Billion

Annual Safety Initiative”, American Economics Group, Inc., November 2002 Railroad Commission of Texas Website, http://www.rrc.state.tx.us Perryman, Ray M., “The Net Economic Benefits of the Trans Texas Corridor,” The

Perryman Group, January 2002 HAZMAP website, http://www.hazmap.dfwinfo.com/risk_assessment/Chapter4.asp Schrank, David and Lomax, Tim, “2002 Urban Mobility Report”, Texas Transportation

Institute and the Texas A&M University System, June 2002 “Summary: Economic Impacts of Federal-Aid Highway Investment,” Federal Highway

Administration, December 1999

Page 38: Utility, Quality and Mobility:  The Trans-Texas Corridor Plan