A

Su

3

D

 All Language A

85%

Proficient

All Language Art

0% 20%

24%

10%

4%

ubstantial

Sufficient

Partial

Minimal

WASATCH DISTRPro

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

80% 82%74

3rd G

rade

Lang

uage

Arts

4th G

rade

Lang

uage

Arts

5th G

rade

Lang

uage

Art

6th G

rade

Lan

7th

% P

rofi

cien

t

District Percent P

rts - % Proficie

15%

Not Proficient

ts - Mastery Lev

40% 60%

61%

RICT Language Artsoficiencies

4%80%

88%94% 91%

rtsan

guag

e Arts

th G

rade

Lang

uage

Arts

8th G

rade

Lang

uage

Arts

9th G

rade

Lang

uage

Arts

10th

Gra

de La

ngua

11th

Gra

Proficient by Core 

nt

vels

80%

s - %

% 93% 89%

uage

Art.

..

rade

Lang

uage

Art.

..

A

A

Subs

Suf

M

1

3

% P

rofi

cien

t

UTAH

Subject:  

All Mathematics

71%

Proficient

ll Mathematics -

0% 20%

25%

16%

13%

stantial

fficient

Partial

Minimal

WASATCH DISTRPro

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

79% 82%77%

3rd G

rade

Math

4th G

rade

Math

5th G

rade

Math

6th G

rade

H CONSOLIDATE

- % Proficient

29%

Not Proficient

- Mastery Levels

40% 6

45%

%

RICT Mathematics oficiencies

73%79% 78% 77%

e Math

7th G

rade

Math

Pre-

Algeb

raGeo

metry

Al

ED APPLICATION

s

60%

- %

64%

27%

Algeb

ra I

Algeb

ra II

All

All

0

Substantial

Sufficient

Partial

Minimal

WASAT

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

4th G

rade

S5

% P

rofi

cien

t

N NEEDS ASSES

Science - % Pro

75%

25

Proficient Not Pro

Science - Maste

% 20%

27%

17%

8%

TCH DISTRICT Scie

70%76% 73% 70%

Scien

ce

5th G

rade

Scien

ce

6th G

rade

Scien

ce

7th G

rade

Scien

ce

8th G

rade

SEa

rth

SSMENT

oficient

%

oficient

ery Levels

40% 60%

48%

ence - % Proficien

79%

67%

85%81%

e Scie

nce

rth Sy

stems S

cienc

eBio

logy

Chem

istry

ncies

78%

Phys

ics

DD

 

2

 

Demographic CatDistrict Percent P

D

All StAfricaAmeAsianCaucHispaMultiPacifFemaMaleEconNot ESWDNot SMobiNot MELL Not E

2010 Graduation

WaStat

tegories Proficient: 

Demographic Categories

Students an American rican Indian n casian anic iple Races fic Islander ale

e n Disadv Econ Dis

D SWD ile Mobile

ELL

n Rate: 

AStud

satch  te 

UTA

LangWasatc85.4%66.7%90.9%64.3%89.9%61.3%100.0%100.0%88.1%82.9%74.0%92.3%56.0%90.1%71.5%85.9%32.1%89.3%

All dents  Cauca

90%90%

H CONSOLIDAT

guage Arts ch State% 82.2%% 64.6%% 62.2%% 81.8%% 86.4%% 64.6%% 82.4%% 73.0%% 85.3%% 79.2%% 71.6%% 88.7%% 50.5%% 86.7%% 67.0%% 83.1%% 35.4%% 85.0%

asian Hispa92%92%

TED APPLICATIO

Mathe Wasatc% 70.5%% 66.7%% 72.7%% 50.0%% 75.0%% 48.8%% 62.5%% 0.0%% 70.8%% 70.2%% 58.8%% 78.3%% 45.0%% 74.7%% 52.3%% 71.3%% 33.2%% 73.4%

anic/Latino79%74%

ON NEEDS ASSES

hematics ch State% 68.5%% 45.1%% 44.7%% 71.4%% 73.6%% 47.7%% 67.7%

56.1%% 68.5%% 68.6%% 57.9%% 75.3%% 42.6%% 72.2%% 50.5%% 69.7%% 29.7%% 71.0%

oEconom

Disadvant%%

SSMENT

ScieWasatch

75.4% 62.5% 66.7% 53.8% 81.5% 42.7% 66.7% 50.0% 73.6% 77.0% 61.2% 84.0% 46.4% 80.0% 53.0% 76.3% 20.9% 79.2%

mic tages ELL81% 8381% 72

ence State

69.8% 44.0% 41.6% 67.0% 76.3% 43.0% 69.5% 46.4% 68.0% 71.5% 55.7% 78.2% 40.7% 73.8% 48.9% 71.1% 18.2% 72.8%

L  SWD3% 89%2% 85%

 

 

E

S

English Language

Students with Dis

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%

2007

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

2007

Lan

S

e Learner Gap: 

sabilities Gap: 

2008 2009 201

Science

Ell Not Ell

2008 2009 2010

nguage Art

SWD Not SWD

UTA

 

 

10 2011

0 2011

s

1

H CONSOLIDAT

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%

2007

ELL La

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

00.0%

2007 20

M

SWD

TED APPLICATIO

2008 2009 2010

anguage Ar

Ell Not Ell

008 2009 2010 2

Math

D Not SWD

ON NEEDS ASSES

 

0 2011

rts

1

20110.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

SSMENT

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%

2007 20

M

E

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

2007 2008

Scie

SWD

008 2009 2010

Math

Ell Not Ell

2009 2010 201

ence

Not SWD

 

  

2011

11

E

 EBD                  

Economically Dis

Elementary ReadBenchmarks‐  DIBLES Performa

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

2007

Lan

sadvantaged Gap

ding 

ance End of 2010 

2008 2009 201

guage Arts

ED Not ED

UTA

p: 

 

0 2011

s

0%

K

1st

2nd

3rd

4th

5th

6th

H CONSOLIDAT

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

2007 2

10% 20%

TED APPLICATIO

2008 2009 2010

Math

ED Not ED

30% 40%At or Above

ON NEEDS ASSES

 

2011

2

4

6

8

10

50% 60%Below Well 

SSMENT

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

00.0%

2007 20

Sc

ED

70% 80%Below

008 2009 2010 2

cience

D Not ED

% 90% 10

 

2011

00%

G1                   2            

Goals: 1) Improve Acade         Description

DescriptiBy 2015, the distriby 7% in Measuragrades 10categoriethe distri

           PerformanIn Readinabove thestudents Assessmemeasure        1.1) P       1.2) E       1.3) I

 2) Closing the Ac             Descriptio

For the 212%; majproficien

             PerformaWe will mfrom the disadvant

           2.1)            2.2)             2.3) 

emic Achievemen:  on:  all students will rct will meet the Agrades 3‐8, and sble Outcomes in 0‐12. By 2015, Wes of Math, Sciencct increases the nnce Measure:  ng/Language Artse proficient levelin third grade, sient. We will measthe number of stProvide a GuaranEnsure Effective Increase Student

hievement Gap on:  011‐2012 school jor ethnic groupscy.  ance Measure: measure the percdisaggregated dataged students, sEnhance CollaboClose the Gap thIncrease Studen

 

UT

nt  

reach proficiencyAnnual Measurabsustaining growthMathematics by asatch High Schoce, English and renumber of studen

 we will measurein Reading/Langxth grade, and stsure the number tudents that takenteed and ViableInstruction for A Achievement by

year, Wasatch C, economically di

entage of studenata between the students with disorative System ohrough Extendednt Achievement b

TAH CONSOLIDA

y or better in Reable Outcomes in Lh in grades 9‐12. increasing the nuool students will seading on the ACTnts taking the AC

e the percentage uage Arts on thetudents in Algebrof students com

e the ACT during t Curriculum LL Students y Increasing Pare

ounty School Disisadvantaged stu

nts who are at or whole group andabilities, and studf Intervention  d Learning Opporby Increasing Par

ATED APPLICAT

ding/Language ALanguage Arts byFor the 2011‐201umber of studentscore at one poinT Assessment. FoCT Assessment.  

of students in th State Core Assesa; who are at or apleting Algebra btheir eleventh gr

ent and Commun

trict will decreasdents, students w

above the proficd the following sudents with limite

rtunities ent and Commun

TION NEEDS ASS

Arts and Mathemay increasing the n12 school‐year, thts reaching proficnt above the Utahor the 2011‐2012

ird grade, sixth gssment. In Matheabove the proficiby the ninth gradade year, and co

ity Involvement

e the discrepancywith disabilities, a

iency level in Reaub‐groups; major d English proficie

nity Involvement

SESSMENT 

atics. For the 201number students he district will meciency by 7% in gh State average in2 school‐years, a n

rade, and eighth ematics, we will mient level in   Mate. For the ACT asmpare the result

 

y between the foand students wit

ading/Language Ar ethnic groups, eency.  

t 

10‐2011 school‐yreaching proficieeet the Annual rades 3‐8, and 10n each of the new baseline will

grade; who are ameasure the  percthematics on thessessment we wilts to the state ave

ollowing sub‐grouh limited English 

Arts and Mathemeconomically 

ear, ency 

0% in 

l be  set as 

at or centage of e State Core l erage.  

ups by 

matics 

 

D

“

 

M

•••• 

V

W••••

District Mission S

“To prepare con

 

MEASUREABLE 

• Increase profi• Increase profi• Increase profi• Increase profi

VALUE STATEM

We believe in: • Enculturating • Providing acce• Practicing Effe• Ensuring respo

Statement: 

nfident, compet

OUTCOMES 

ciency to 100% ciency to 100% ciency to 100% ciency to 100% 

MENT: 

the young in a sess to knowledgective teaching monsible steward

UT

tent, literate yo

in reading and in fractions andfor 6th & 8th grfor 9th grade A

social and politige for all childremethods. dship of schools

TAH CONSOLIDA

outh by implem

mathematics fod related conceprade Language AAlgebra 1. 

cal democracy.n and youth. 

. 

ATED APPLICAT

menting a focuse

or 3rd graders bpts to 100% for Arts. 

TION NEEDS ASS

ed core curricul

y 2015. 6th graders by 

SESSMENT 

lum.” 

  2015.