USIP FactBook 2015-2016 - CUNY

1

3/6/2017 CUNY Office of Undergraduate Studies USIP_FactBook_2015_2016

USIP FactBook 2015-2016

2


PageSection 1.1 Program Overview 3 Figure 1. Initial Remedial Needs of First-Time Freshmen University-Wide 3 Section 1.2. USIP Enrollment Trends 4 Figure 2. University-Wide USIP Enrollment Trends (Seats) 4 Table 1. USIP Four-Year Enrollment Trends: Year-Round 5 Table 2. USIP Five-Year Enrollment Trends: Summer 6 Table 3. USIP Four-Year Enrollment Trends: Non-Summer 7Section 2.1 Summer 2015: USIP Enrollment, Retention, and Student Profile 8 Figure 3. Admission Characteristics of Summer USIP Participants Retained in Fall 2015 8 Figure 4. Race/Ethnicity of Summer USIP Participants Retained in Fall 2015 9 Figure 5. High School Background of FTF Summer USIP Participants Retained in Fall 2015, Excluding NYC DOE Schools Table 4. Initial Remedial Needs of First-Time Freshmen, by College: Fall 2015 10 Table 5. USIP Participation of First-Time Freshmen with Initial Remedial Need, by College: Fall 2015 11 Table 6. Fall Retention of Students Enrolled in Summer USIP: 2015 12Section 3.1. Types, Characteristics, and Target Population of USIP Offerings 13 Table 7. USIP Enrollment and Offering Types: Summer 2015 14 Table 8. USIP Enrollment and Offering Characteristics: Summer 2015 15 Table 9. USIP Contact Hours Distribution: Summer 2015 16 Table 10. USIP Contact Hours Distribution: Non-Summer 2015-2016 17 Table 11. USIP Target Population Groups: Summer 2015 18Section 4.1. USIP Subject Enrollment and Pass Rates 19 Figure 6. USIP Subject Enrollment 2015-2016 19 Table 12. USIP Subject Enrollment: Summer 2015 20 Table 13. USIP Total Passing Rates: Summer 2015 21 Table 14. USIP Passing Rates in Offerings that Include CUNY Proficiency Exam: Summer 2015 22 Table 15. USIP Subject Enrollment: Non-Summer 2015-2016 23 Table 16. USIP Total Passing Rates: Non-Summer 2015-2016 24 Table 17. USIP Reading Passing Rates: 2015-2016 25 Table 18. USIP Writing Passing Rates: 2015-2016 26 Table 19. USIP Reading & Writing Passing Rates: Non-Summer 2015-2016 27 Table 20. USIP Math Passing Rates: Summer 2015 28 Table 21. USIP Math Passing Rates: Non-Summer 2015-2016 29 Table 22. USIP ESL Passing Rates: Non-Summer 2015-2016 30 Table 23. USIP Other Subjects Passing Rates: 2015-2016 31

Table of Contents

University Skills Immersion Program (USIP) FactBook2015-2016

9

3


Section 1.1 Program overview

Since its conception in 1985, the University Skills Immersion Program (USIP) provides tuition free opportunities for CUNY students to receive remedial or other types of instruction throughout the academic year. USIP serves a wide range of students, from first-time freshmen to continuing students in advanced standing. Although USIP offerings have expanded beyond remediation particularly over the last few years, addressing remedial needs of CUNY students remains one of the program’s primary goals. As presented in Figure 1, between years 2010 and 2015, as many as 58.9% of the entering freshmen class was assessed as having at least one remedial need. In community colleges, this number reached 82.8% in 2015.

54.2 58.9 58 56.3 57 56.3

43.3 52.9 53.4 51.4 51.7 50.9

22.3 18.3 16.5 15.8 15.8 15.2

33.5

24.9 21.4

18.8 20.4 22.1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

% o

f firs

t-tim

e fr

eshm

en a

dmits

Figure 1. Intial Remedial Needs of First-Time Freshmen Univeristy-Wide any math reading writing

To support students with remedial needs, USIP offers courses and workshops in math, reading, and writing, as well as ESL classes. Non-remedial offerings, which are more typical at senior colleges, support student success in additional subjects, such as psychology, biology, and chemistry. These non-remedial offerings take many forms, including early college orientations and preparatory workshops for gateway courses, such as College Algebra and English Composition. As with many successful education initiatives, USIP represents a coordinated effort among CUNY's Central Office, campus USIP directors, and local faculty and staff. The Central Office, in particular the Office of Undergraduate Studies and the Office of Academic Affairs, provides centralized administrative support in the form of incentive funds, summative and formative program evaluations, and policy oversight. College USIP Directors oversee local coordination of USIP programs, such as scheduling, local funds allocations, design and implementation of student outreach and recruitment strategies, and local data collection and reporting. Faculty and staff working as a part of USIP engage in curriculum development, student assessment and grading, and professional development for faculty and staff members.

4


Section 1.2. USIP Enrollment Trends

USIP expansion efforts, supported through the allocation of incentive funds by the Central Office, account for a substantial growth of both summer and non-summer offerings, as indicated in Figure 2. In the early years of USIP, the program operated only during the summer and winter terms. However, since the introduction of incentive funds, program offerings have been expanded to the fall and spring semesters. To better reflect these changes, we have substituted previously used designation of "Winter" offerings with "Non-Summer" offerings. For the purposes of funding and evaluation, the USIP academic year begins with the summer session, while sessions offered between fall and spring are considered non-summer. For instance, year-round enrollment for 2015-2016 consists of summer 2015 and non-summer sessions offered during fall 2015, winter and spring 2016. Tables 1 through 3 (pages 5-7) present campus-level data on USIP year-round, summer, and non-summer enrollment trends, respectively. A substantial increase in non-summer offerings in both comprehensive and community colleges reflects colleges' increased effort to serve their neediest students, as the proportion of students with initial remedial needs tends to be higher at those institutions.

18,529 17,941

21,194 22,388

16,695 14,726

15,720 16,101

1,834 3,215

5,474 6,287

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016

USI

P Se

ats

Figure 2. University-Wide USIP Enrollment Trends (Seats) Year-Round Summer Non-Summer

These expansion efforts are also reflected in the growing diversity of subjects and instructional model offerings. A more detailed account of offering characteristics is presented in Section 3.1 (pages 13-18). In order to aid program development and to accurately reflect programmatic outcomes, the Office of Undergraduate Studies, in collaboration with the Office of Institutional Research and Assessment, continuously refines its reporting methodologies not only to remain consistent with institutional policies but also to identify the best practices in program evaluation. Beginning with the academic year of 2015-2016, we made minor changes to the enrollment calculations for USIP evaluation. Specifically, participants with "WN" grades have been excluded from enrollment counts. Assignment of "WN" indicates that despite registering for an offering, a student never attended. Also, most of the USIP enrollment tables report seat-level data, and only a few report headcount. For seat-level data, a student is counted once for each offering in which they participate. When headcount is reported, a student is counted only once, regardless of how many offerings in which they participate. We consider seat-level enrollment to be the most accurate representation of program's size and

5


2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016N N N N

Baruch 353 306 509 456Brooklyn1 313 127 - 130City1 413 200 172 385Hunter 566 56 405 744John Jay 942 633 655 384Lehman 200 202 220 230Queens 219 175 431 440York 1,101 1,326 807 968Total Senior Colleges 4,107 3,025 3,199 3,737Medgar 1,290 1,647 2,111 2,154NYCCT 1,600 1,532 1,739 1,480Staten Island 1,804 2,308 2,167 2,104Total Comprehensive Colleges 4,694 5,487 6,017 5,738BMCC 1,972 1,942 2,754 3,407Bronx 1,461 1,198 2,112 1,505Hostos 1,597 2,231 2,552 2,388Kingsborough 2,215 1,440 2,199 1,970LaGuardia 1,215 1,276 1,089 1,045Queensborough 1,268 1,342 1,272 2,598Total Community Colleges 9,728 9,429 11,978 12,913Total University 18,529 17,941 21,194 22,388

1USIP data for summer 2014 are not available for Brooklyn and City Colleges.

Table 1USIP Four-Year Enrollment Trends: Year-Round

CollegeStudents Enrolled (Seats)

6


Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015

N N N N NBaruch 457 353 306 424 392Brooklyn1 989 313 127 - 130City1 424 413 200 - 99Hunter 159 566 56 268 475John Jay 1,174 942 633 655 374Lehman 901 200 202 220 230Queens 274 154 125 372 368York 1,101 1,101 1,326 537 609Total Senior Colleges 5,479 4,042 2,975 2,476 2,677Medgar 1,510 1,290 1,647 1,590 1,580NYCCT 1,690 1,600 1,395 1,522 1,320Staten Island 1,709 1,804 1,738 1,625 1,676Total Comprehensive Colleges 4,909 4,694 4,780 4,737 4,576BMCC 1,642 1,899 1,140 1,740 2,551Bronx 1,540 1,461 1,198 1,779 1,159Hostos 1,409 882 1,371 1,760 1,516Kingsborough 1,027 1,648 1,123 1,456 1,266LaGuardia 650 866 860 738 720Queensborough 919 1,203 1,279 1,034 1,636Total Community Colleges 7,187 7,959 6,971 8,507 8,848Total University 17,575 16,695 14,726 15,720 16,101

Table 2USIP Five-Year Enrollment Trends: Summer

College

1USIP data for summer 2014 are not available for Brooklyn and City Colleges.

Students Enrolled (Seats)

7


2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016N N N N

Baruch 0 0 85 64Brooklyn 0 0 0 0City 0 0 172 286Hunter 0 0 137 269John Jay 0 0 0 10Lehman 0 0 0 0Queens 65 50 59 72York 0 0 270 359Total Senior Colleges 65 50 723 1,060Medgar 0 0 521 574NYCCT 0 137 217 160Staten Island 0 570 542 428Total Comprehensive Colleges 0 707 1,280 1,162BMCC 73 802 1014 856Bronx 0 0 333 346Hostos 715 860 792 872Kingsborough 567 317 743 704LaGuardia 349 416 351 325Queensborough 65 63 238 962Total Community Colleges 1,769 2,458 3,471 4,065Total University 1,834 3,215 5,474 6,287

Table 3USIP Four-Year Enrollment Trends: Non-Summer

CollegeStudents Enrolled (Seats)

8


Section 2.1 Summer 2015: USIP Enrollment, Retention, and Student Profile

In this section, Table 4 (page 10) presents data on the initial remedial needs for first-time freshmen across individual colleges. Students' remedial needs are determined by their initial CUNY skills proficiency exam results, which could have been taken at a time other than the semester of enrollment. Some students are exempt from taking placement exams. Table 5 (page 11), in turn, shows how many of those with an initial remedial need participated in USIP during the summer 2015. A total of 14,164 students participated in USIP summer program in 2015, of which 12,508 students where retained in fall 2015. Table 6 (page 12) presents fall retention of summer USIP participants by college. Because of the technicalities of institutional data tracking, we can only report student profile data, such as admission status, race, ethnicity, and gender for the students who were retained in the fall. University-wide, the majority of retained USIP participants were female (60.6%). At senior colleges, female students accounted for 63.2% of retained USIP participants, while at comprehensive and community colleges, female students accounted for 56.2% and 62.1% of those retained, respectively. On average, retained USIP participants were 21.9 years old. USIP participants retained at senior colleges tend to be younger (19.7) than those at comprehensive (20.7) and community (23.2) colleges. University-wide, 17.5% of retained USIP participants were 25 years of age or older. Senior colleges had the lowest proportion (7.6%) of participants at or older than 25, compared to comprehensive (10.8%) and community (23.7%) colleges. University-wide, 15.1% of retained USIP students enrolled in fall semester part-time. At both senior and comprehensive colleges, the proportion of part-time USIP students was 8.4%. At community colleges, part-time enrollees accounted for 20.3% of USIP students retained in the fall. Both Figure 3 and Table 6 (page 12) present admission characteristics of USIP participants enrolled in fall 2015.

56% 35%

9%

Figure 3. Admission Characteristics of Summer USIP Participants Retained in Fall 2015

FTF < 30 credits > 30 credits

9


Figure 4 presents race/ethnicity of summer USIP participants retained in a fall, where Black and Hispanic students represent the two largest groups university-wide. Additionally, 35.2% of retained USIP participants university-wide were born outside of the US mainland (excluding those with unknown birthplaces). Community colleges had the largest proportion of retained USIP students born outside of the US mainland (39.6%) closely followed by Senior (33.6%) and Comprehensive (27.1%) colleges. Similar trends were observed among non-native English speaking students (excluding those with unknown language background). University-wide, English was not a native language for 38.7% of retained USIP. The proportion of these students at Community (46%) and Senior (42.6%) colleges was higher than it was at Comprehensive (26%) colleges.

0.5 0.4 0.4 0.6

15.2

25.2

10.9 14.7

34.1

22.7

46.4

31.1 36.9 38.4

25.0

42.4

13.3 13.4 17.3

11.2

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

Total Senior Comprehensive Community

Perc

enta

ge

Figure 4. Race/Ethnicity of Summer USIP Participants Retained in Fall 2015

American Indian/Native Alaskan Asian Black Hispanic White

The majority of retained USIP participants graduated from New York City public schools. Overall, 83.7% of all USIP participants graduated from NYC public schools. At both Senior and Comprehensive colleges, the proportion of NYC public school graduates was 86.7 %. At Community colleges, the number was slightly lower at 78.7%. As Figure 5 shows, the second largest group of students in USIP graduated from NYC private schools at 5.7% university-wide. Overall, 89.5% of all retained USIP participants are considered recent high school graduates, meaning that they graduated high school within 15 months of the start of the term. This number is the highest for Senior Colleges (98.5%), with Comprehensive (92.9%) and Community (81.7%) colleges having slightly smaller proportions of recent high school graduates among their retained USIP participants.

5.7 6.9 6.9

5.0

2.1

0.7 0.7 1.7 1.4 1.2 1.2

1.8

3.6

2.1 2.1

6.6

3.5 2.5 2.5

6.2

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

Total Senior Comprehensive Community

Perc

enta

ge

Figure 5. High School Background of FTF Summer USIP Participants Retained in Fall 2015, Excluding NYC DOE Schools

NYC Private NYS HS, Outside NYC US HS, Outside NYS Foreign HS GED

10


Needs Any Needs 1 Needs 2 Needs 3 Needs Math Needs Reading Needs Writing

N N % % % % % % %Baruch 1,477 1,411 2.1 1.9 0.1 0.0 1.8 0.1 0.3Brooklyn 1,340 1,264 11.7 11.0 0.7 0.0 10.4 0.8 1.2City 1,630 1,557 2.0 1.5 0.5 0.0 0.9 0.6 1.0Hunter 2,200 2,115 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.2John Jay 1,489 1,419 16.6 16.2 0.3 0.1 15.1 0.3 1.6Lehman 632 566 29.0 26.0 2.5 0.5 26.0 2.5 4.1Queens 1,547 1,444 4.6 3.1 1.4 0.1 2.4 1.7 2.1York 1,030 924 38.4 31.9 5.5 1.0 31.8 3.9 10.2Total Senior Colleges 11,345 10,700 9.7 8.6 1.0 0.1 8.1 0.9 1.9Medgar Evers 1,092 994 82.5 51.4 20.4 10.7 78.5 18.6 27.2NYCCT 3,405 3,272 60.0 42.7 12.4 4.9 53.7 10.9 17.5Staten Island 2,571 2,445 58.7 42.6 12.6 3.4 52.6 7.6 18.0Total Comprehensive Colleges 7,068 6,711 62.9 44.0 13.7 5.2 57.0 10.9 19.1BMCC 6,812 6,186 83.9 46.7 21.3 15.9 76.9 25.0 35.0Bronx 2,005 1,862 90.5 40.9 25.2 24.3 85.3 31.7 47.4Hostos 1,137 1,054 87.9 41.8 23.2 22.8 81.9 31.9 42.9Kingsborough 2,330 2,150 81.6 45.7 19.3 16.7 74.4 26.0 33.7LaGuardia 2,941 2,762 82.9 45.4 20.7 16.8 73.9 26.7 36.6Queensborough 3,354 3,103 74.9 44.9 19.6 10.3 65.8 20.6 28.8Total Community Colleges 18,579 17,117 82.8 45.1 21.2 16.5 75.3 25.8 35.8Total University 36,992 34,528 56.3 33.6 13.5 9.2 50.9 15.2 22.1

1Percentages are based on the number of students with known test status.

Table 4Initial Remedial Need of First-Time Freshmen, by College: Fall 2015

College First-time Freshmen

Remedial Need1

Known Test Status

Source: Office of Institutional Research and Assessment's Institutional Research Database (IRDB).

11


Total CohortKnown

Test Status

N N N % N %Baruch 1,477 1,411 29 2.1 24 82.8Brooklyn 1,340 1,264 148 11.7 110 74.3City 1,630 1,557 31 2.0 0 0.0Hunter 2,200 2,115 11 0.5 1 9.1John Jay 1,489 1,419 235 16.6 128 54.5Lehman 632 566 164 29.0 91 55.5Queens 1,547 1,444 66 4.6 41 62.1York 1,030 924 355 38.4 141 39.7Total Senior Colleges 11,345 10,700 1,039 9.7 536 51.6Medgar Evers 1,092 994 820 82.5 390 47.6NYCCT 3,405 3,272 1,964 60.0 819 41.7Staten Island 2,571 2,445 1,434 58.7 1,147 80.0Total Comprehensive Colleges 7,068 6,711 4,218 62.9 2,356 55.9BMCC 6,812 6,186 5,190 83.9 575 11.1Bronx 2,005 1,862 1,685 90.5 236 14.0Hostos 1,137 1,054 926 87.9 238 25.7Kingsborough 2,330 2,150 1,755 81.6 594 33.8LaGuardia 2,941 2,762 2,289 82.9 402 17.6Queensborough 3,354 3,103 2,324 74.9 590 25.4Total Community Colleges 18,579 17,117 14,169 82.8 2,635 18.6Total University 36,992 34,528 19,426 56.3 5,527 28.5

1 Percentage is based on the number of students with known test status.

Table 5 USIP Participation of First-Time Freshmen with Initial Remedial Need, by College:

Fall 2015

College

First-time Freshmen First-time Freshmen with Remedial Need

Need Remediation1

Participated in USIP Summer 2015


12


First-Time Freshmen

Under 30 Cummulative

Credits

Over 30 Cumulative

CredictsN N % % % %

Baruch 353 325 92.1 35.4 43.7 20.9Brooklyn 124 122 98.4 99.2 0.0 0.8City 96 93 96.9 51.6 11.8 36.6Hunter 183 180 98.4 86.7 3.3 10.0John Jay 374 367 98.1 97.3 1.9 0.8Lehman 225 223 99.1 100.0 0.0 0.0Queens 340 314 92.4 83.8 10.8 5.4York 395 331 83.8 73.4 16.0 10.6Total Senior Colleges 2,090 1,955 93.5 78.1 12.9 9.0Medgar Evers 1,116 985 88.3 47.4 40.6 12.0NYCCT 1,250 1,109 88.7 81.6 16.4 2.0Staten Island 1,621 1,443 89.0 85.1 12.8 2.1Total Comprehensive Colleges 3,987 3,537 88.7 73.5 21.7 4.8BMCC 2,429 2,136 87.9 30.3 57.3 12.4Bronx 1,078 926 85.9 27.0 62.5 10.5Hostos 1,266 1,040 82.1 24.1 60.6 15.3Kingsborough 1,161 1,030 88.7 64.7 21.0 14.4LaGuardia 683 580 84.9 74.3 24.5 1.2Queensborough 1,470 1,304 88.7 48.6 43.2 8.2Total Community Colleges 8,087 7,016 86.8 41.0 47.8 11.1Total University 14,164 12,508 88.3 56.0 35.0 9.0

Table 6Fall Retention of Students Enrolled in Summer USIP: 2015

1Students may have completed USIP at a college other than the college of Fall


College

Students Enrolled in

Summer 2015 USIP

USIP Participants Enrolled in Fall 20151

Admission Characteristics of USIP Participants Enrolled in Fall 2015

13


Section 3.1. Types, Characteristics, and Target Populations of USIP OfferingsOffering Types (Definitions) USIP provides a wide range of offering types as presented in Table 7 (page 14). The most common offerings are courses, workshops, and bridge interventions. An offering is considered a course if its curriculum mirrors or is identical to a course taught during a traditional full academic semester. Such offerings typically require more homework than any other type. A workshop denotes an offering with a more flexible curriculum than a course. Its content may focus on a targeted or general review and includes little to no homework. Primarily offered at senior colleges, a bridge is usually a non-remedial offering, targeting entering freshmen and transfer students. Such offerings usually provide an early introduction to college-level courses and general college experience orientations. On a lesser scale, some colleges offer bootcamps and intensives, offerings that do not fit any of the definitions presented above. Offering Characteristics Most USIP offerings have multiple characteristics as presented in Table 8 (page 15). Remedial offerings are designed to help students complete developmental education in reading, writing, and math. Some offerings include CUNY skill proficiency exams. Students enrolled in these offerings are required to take an official CUNY skill proficiency exam at some point during their participation in a program or upon its completion. CUNY skill proficiency exams, such as the CUNY Elementary Algebra Final Exam (CEAFE) and the CUNY Assessment Testing in Writing (CATW), are part of the criteria used by the university to determine students' eligibility to enroll in credit-bearing courses. Individual departmental and other local exams do NOT fall into this category. Additionally, some offerings include in-class or outside-of-class tutoring, or both. These interventions either have a tutor placed in a classroom assisting students throughout the intervention or require verified tutoring center attendance. Contact Hours USIP offerings also vary in their duration. Table 9 (page 16) and Table 10 (page 17) present the number of seats across a range of offering lengths for summer and non-summer sessions, respectively. We estimate intervention hours using the official CUNYfirst schedule. Calculated hours may differ slightly from the actual hours since, for example, our methodology does not account for times students do not meet in order to take a proficiency exam in a testing center. These categories should be understood as estimates that are not always directly related to offering types. Fully online sections are excluded from these calculations. Target Populations (Definitions) To maximize program effectiveness and better address students’ needs, USIP directors, faculty, and staff often design interventions to target specific groups of students. Table 11 (page 18) presents the seat enrollment in offerings identified by program directors as targeting entering freshmen, continuing students, repeating students, entering transfer students, or near-passing students. For the purpose of this report, entering freshmen are students for whom enrollment in USIP also marks their first enrollment in college. These students are typically recent high school graduates with no college credits and no previous history of college enrollment within or outside CUNY. Continuing students are students who have attended the college before. Near-passing students are those who were nearly successful on their most recent attempt to address a remedial need. Near-passing status of students is determined locally. Repeating students have participated in an offering or a course designed to address the same need before, but did not successfully pass it. Entering transfer students are those who are entering college as transfer from another college at the time of their USIP enrollment. These categories are not mutually exclusive, and a given offering may target multiple groups. Some offerings are explicitly open to all students and are designated with the category of Any. It should be noted that target population categories are reported by program directors at the section level and are NOT verified student-level attributes.

14


College Total Students Enrolled (Seats) Course Workshop Bridge Other

N % % % %Baruch 392 75.0 25.0 0.0 0.0Brooklyn 130 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0City 99 0.0 64.6 35.4 0.0Hunter 475 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0John Jay 374 29.7 28.9 41.4 0.0Lehman 230 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0Queens 368 31.8 4.3 63.9 0.0York 609 0.0 50.9 15.1 34.0Total Senior Colleges 2,677 19.5 35.7 37.1 7.7Medgar Evers 1580 2.3 73.4 0.0 10.1NYCCT 1320 91.5 7.1 1.4 0.0Staten Island 1676 88.1 11.9 0.0 0.0Total Comprehensive Colleges 4,576 62.5 33.4 0.4 3.7BMCC 2551 87.7 0.0 0.0 12.3Bronx 1159 58.0 42.0 0.0 0.0Hostos 1516 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0Kingsborough 1266 90.0 5.6 0.0 4.4LaGuardia 720 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Queensborough 1636 45.7 54.3 0.0 0.0Total Community Colleges 8,848 62.3 33.5 0.0 4.2Total University 16,101 55.2 33.8 6.4 4.6

Table 7USIP Enrollment and Offering Types: Summer 2015

Source: Data collected from Campus Immersion Directors

15


College Total Students Enrolled (Seats)

Enrolled in Remedial Offerings

Enrolled in Offerings

Leading to CUNY

Proficiency Exams

In-Class Tutoring

Outside-of-Class Tutoring

N % % % %Baruch 392 39.3 39.3 52.3 47.7Brooklyn 130 100.0 100.0 45.4 100.0City 99 0.0 16.2 0.0 77.8Hunter 475 0.0 0.0 38.7 66.5John Jay 374 28.9 4.8 100.0 58.6Lehman 230 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0Queens 368 100.0 100.0 74.5 0.0York 609 66.7 50.9 18.2 0.0Total Senior Colleges 2,677 52.1 45.8 53.7 43.3Medgar Evers 1,580 77.9 50.8 82.7 0.0NYCCT 1,320 93.3 91.7 0.0 0.0Staten Island 1,676 100.0 89.7 54.3 100.0Total Comprehensive Colleges 4,576 90.5 76.8 48.4 36.6BMCC 2,551 100.0 68.5 12.3 0.0Bronx 1,159 100.0 68.3 100.0 100.0Hostos 1,516 100.0 72.9 0.0 0.0Kingsborough 1,266 93.8 68.3 0.0 0.0LaGuardia 720 100.0 44.6 0.0 21.5Queensborough 1,636 100.0 100.0 67.3 49.4Total Community Colleges 8,848 99.1 73.1 29.1 24.0Total University 16,101 88.8 69.6 38.7 30.8

Source: Data collected from Campus Immersion Directors

Table 8USIP Enrollment and Offering Characteristics: Summer 2015

NOTE: While senior colleges do not enroll students with remedial needs, they provide summer remedial offerings for provisionally admitted students. Students who otherwise satisfy senior college’s admission criteria but do not initially pass CUNY skill proficiency exam can enroll in remedial offerings at that senior college to address their need. If a student achieves proficiency at the end of the offering, they are allowed to continue their enrollment at the senior college. If a student is not able to address their need, they cannot enroll and are usually offered admission to a comprehensive or community college, where they can complete their developmental education.

16


College Total Students Enrolled (Seats) 0-15 16-30 31-45 46-60 61-75 76-90 90+ Unknown

N % % % % % % % %Baruch 392 0.0 12.8 26.5 47.7 13.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Brooklyn 130 16.2 0.0 83.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0City 99 0.0 0.0 22.2 56.6 21.2 0.0 0.0 0.0Hunter 475 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0John Jay 374 0.0 2.4 35.6 26.5 0.0 0.0 35.6 0.0Lehman 230 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Queens 368 1.1 68.2 0.0 13.6 0.0 17.1 0.0 0.0York 513 0.0 64.3 14.0 21.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Senior Colleges 2,581 1.0 24.8 17.0 28.4 2.8 2.4 5.2 18.4Medgar Evers 1,580 0.0 3.6 22.2 7.0 63.9 2.3 0.9 0.0NYCCT 1,320 3.6 7.6 15.3 3.9 49.7 18.0 0.0 1.9Staten Island 1,676 0.0 0.0 19.6 29.1 8.8 39.9 2.5 0.0Total Comprehensive Colleges 4,576 1.0 3.4 19.3 14.2 39.6 20.6 1.2 0.5BMCC 2,551 0.0 0.0 18.0 22.4 0.0 51.2 0.0 8.5Bronx 1,159 0.0 33.3 3.8 21.3 9.7 29.2 1.6 1.0Hostos 1,516 0.0 33.2 63.7 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6Kingsborough 1,266 7.7 10.7 1.8 75.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.4LaGuardia 720 0.0 0.0 12.1 50.8 37.1 0.0 0.0 0.0Queensborough 1,636 0.6 22.2 7.5 24.6 5.1 0.6 38.8 0.6Total Community Colleges 8,848 1.2 15.7 19.2 29.1 5.2 18.7 7.4 3.4Total University 16,005 1.1 13.7 18.9 24.7 14.7 16.6 5.3 5.0

Table 9USIP Contact Hours: Summer 2015

Source: Contact hours are calculated based on CUNYfirst data

17


CollegeTotal Students

Enrolled (Seats)

0-15 16-30 31-45 46-60 61-75 76-90 90+ Uknown

N % % % % % % % %Baruch 64 0.0 0.0 76.6 23.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Brooklyn 0 - - - - - - - -City 286 0.0 0.0 40.6 38.5 9.8 3.8 7.3 0.0Hunter 269 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0John Jay 10 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Lehman 0 - - - - - - - -Queens 72 0.0 0.0 0.0 52.8 20.8 0.0 0.0 26.4York 289 0.0 55.7 20.8 23.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Senior Colleges 990 0.0 16.3 23.7 23.3 4.3 1.1 2.1 29.1Medgar Evers 574 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.4 68.8 5.4 0.0 13.4NYCCT 160 13.8 69.4 16.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Staten Island 428 0.0 0.0 0.0 54.9 45.1 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Comprehensive Colleges 1,162 1.9 9.6 2.3 26.3 50.6 2.7 0.0 6.6BMCC 856 0.0 14.0 0.0 62.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.1Bronx 346 0.0 39.0 61.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Hostos 872 0.0 1.9 57.3 40.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Kingsborough 704 19.9 8.7 9.5 19.7 39.6 0.0 0.0 2.6LaGuardia 325 0.0 0.0 15.4 72.3 0.0 9.2 3.1 0.0Queensborough 962 12.4 57.9 24.6 1.4 0.0 1.4 0.0 2.4Total Community Colleges 4,065 6.4 21.9 26.2 31.5 6.9 1.1 0.2 5.9Total University 6,217 4.5 18.7 21.3 29.2 14.6 1.4 0.5 9.7

Table 10USIP Contact Hours: Non-Summer 2015-2016

Source: Contact hours are calculated based on CUNYfirst data

18


College Total Students Enrolled (Seats) Freshmen Continuing Repeating Transfer Near Passing Any

N % % % % % %Baruch 392 87.0 39.3 48.2 69.4 0.0 0.0Brooklyn 130 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.4 0.0City 99 27.3 22.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.5Hunter 475 100.0 8.0 8.0 100.0 0.0 0.0John Jay 374 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Lehman 230 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Queens 368 68.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 31.8York 609 15.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 84.9Total Senior Colleges 2,677 71.7 8.0 8.5 27.9 2.2 25.6Medgar Evers 1,580 17.8 0.0 1.8 0.0 1.4 86.8NYCCT 1,320 80.7 12.7 12.7 0.0 6.2 6.7Staten Island 1,676 93.5 68.3 68.3 72.7 7.5 100.0Total Comprehensive Colleges 4,576 63.7 28.6 29.3 26.6 5.0 68.5BMCC 2,551 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0Bronx 1,159 58.0 58.0 42.0 58.0 42.0 0.0Hostos 1,516 8.3 61.1 2.4 0.0 6.8 32.0Kingsborough 1,266 75.4 24.6 24.6 75.4 13.3 0.0LaGuardia 720 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 90.6Queensborough 1,636 63.3 34.4 4.0 0.0 8.0 20.9Total Community Colleges 8,848 39.7 36.1 10.2 26.5 10.0 45.5Total University 16,101 51.8 29.3 15.3 26.8 7.3 48.7

Table 11USIP Target Population Groups: Summer 2015

Note: Presented categories are not mutually exclusive. Source: Data collected from Campus Immersion Directors

19


Section 4.1 USIP Subject Enrollment and Passing RatesSubject Enrollment USIP is offered primarily in the three main subjects of skill proficiency: reading, writing, and math. Some campuses offer combined reading and writing sections as part of USIP. Additionally, most campuses provide separate ESL offerings. As presented in Figure 6, math has the highest enrollment throughout the year, reflecting the highest proportion of remedial need across colleges presented earlier in Figure 1. Other subjects may include introductory workshops into college-level psychology, chemistry, biology or other subjects, depending on the locally determined need for such offerings. Table 12 (page 20) and Table 15 (page 23) presents subject enrollment by college for summer and non-summer offerings, respectively. Pass Rates It is important to note that while it might be true for some offerings; passing USIP does not always mean achieving proficiency. Within USIP, grades are assigned by the instructor or grading staff. Passing signifies that the student has met the passing criteria determined by the instructor or program. Passing an intervention may be required for a student to advance to the next-in-sequence course. Pass rates presented in this FactBook are calculated consistent with university grading policies. Various types of withdrawal rates are reported separately. W, WA and WD grades are considered official withdrawal grades and are excluded from students’ GPAs. WU represents an unofficial withdrawal and is counted by the university as failure. Table 13 (page 21) and Table 16 (page 24) show overall pass rates for summer and non-summer sessions, respectively. Table 14 (page 22) presents pass rates for those offerings that include CUNY skill proficiency exams. Tables 17 through 23 (pages 25-31) present subject level pass rates for colleges with reported enrollment in a given subject offering.

Other 3.2 Other 2.1 R & W 5.3 R & W 4.5

ESL 7.5 ESL 14.6

Reading 8.4 Reading 8.6

Writing 11.5

Writing 15.2

Math 64.1 Math 55.2

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Summer Non-Summer

Perc

ent

Figure 6. USIP Subject Enrollment 2015-2016

20


College

Total Students Enrolled (Seats)

Reading Writing Reading & Writing Math ESL Other

N % % % % % %Baruch 392 0.0 0.0 0.0 81.6 18.4 0.0Brooklyn 130 6.9 5.4 0.0 87.7 0.0 0.0City 99 0.0 0.0 34.3 43.4 0.0 22.2Hunter 475 27.8 21.1 0.0 38.7 0.0 12.4John Jay 374 0.3 42.8 0.0 44.9 0.0 12.0Lehman 230 0.0 0.0 59.1 40.9 0.0 0.0Queens 368 10.3 30.7 0.0 33.4 25.5 0.0York 609 0.0 11.8 0.0 60.9 0.0 27.3Total Senior Colleges 2,677 6.7 16.9 6.4 52.9 6.2 10.9Medgar Evers 1,580 4.9 14.1 0.4 67.8 0.0 12.7NYCCT 1,320 10.2 13.6 0.0 71.4 4.8 0.0Staten Island 1,676 5.0 14.1 1.0 69.0 10.9 0.0Total Comprehensive Colleges 4,576 6.4 14.0 0.5 69.3 5.4 4.4BMCC 2,551 12.7 5.6 0.0 70.8 10.9 0.0Bronx 1,159 17.3 16.2 0.0 61.1 5.4 0.0Hostos 1,516 2.4 11.6 16.6 69.3 0.0 0.0Kingsborough 1,266 11.6 16.6 4.3 63.7 2.0 1.8LaGuardia 720 10.7 1.4 0.0 78.5 9.4 0.0Queensborough 1,636 5.4 1.9 21.6 48.9 22.1 0.0Total Community Colleges 8,848 9.9 8.6 7.5 64.8 9.0 0.3Total University 16,101 8.4 11.5 5.3 64.1 7.5 3.2

Table 12USIP Subject Enrollment: Summer 2015

Source: CUNY Office of Undergraduate Studies

21


W, WA, WD WU Number

PassedIncludes

WithdrawalsExcludes

Withdrawals

N N N N N % %Baruch 392 392 4 9 288 73.5 76.0Brooklyn 130 113 0 1 102 78.5 79.1City 99 37 2 0 21 21.2 21.6Hunter 475 0 * * * * *John Jay 374 374 1 3 351 93.9 94.9Lehman 230 229 0 0 225 97.8 97.8Queens 368 107 4 0 88 23.9 24.2York 609 609 6 0 531 87.2 88.1Total Senior Colleges 2,677 1,861 17 13 1,606 60.0 60.7Medgar Evers 1,580 1,576 54 75 1126 71.3 77.6NYCCT 1,320 1,320 1 157 686 52.0 59.0Staten Island 1,676 1,645 133 0 1164 69.5 75.4Total Comprehensive Colleges 4,576 4,541 188 232 2,976 65.0 71.6BMCC 2,551 2,548 201 0 1519 59.5 64.6Bronx 1,159 915 0 101 637 55.0 60.2Hostos 1,516 1,376 0 208 553 36.5 42.3Kingsborough 1,266 1,193 12 52 822 64.9 68.4LaGuardia 720 678 0 0 529 73.5 73.5Queensborough 1,636 1,629 57 180 764 46.7 54.6Total Community Colleges 8,848 8,339 270 541 4,824 54.5 60.0Total University 16,101 14,741 475 786 9,406 58.4 63.4

* No seats with known outcomes

Table 13USIP Total Passing Rates: Summer 2015

Withdrawal Rate

College

Total with Known

Outcomes (Seats)

% Passed of Total Seats

Source: CUNY Office of Undergraduate Studies and Institutional Research Database

Total Enrolled (Seats)

NOTE: Because of a recent transition to a new reporting system, not all grades for USIP interventions offered this year have been captured. Pass rates reported in this FactBook are based on the actual enrollment numbers, with the number of known outcomes reported as a reference point. Pass rates that include withdrawals are calculated with withdrawal grades included in the denominator (e.g. Number Passed/Total Enrolled). Pass rates that exclude withdrawals are calculated excluding ALL withdrawal grades from the denominator (e.g. Number Passed/(Total Enrolled-(W, WA, WD, WU))). This methodology applies to Table 13 and Tables 16 through 23.

22


Enrolled Passed Enrolled Passed Enrolled PassedN % N % N % N %

Baruch 154 63.0 0 - 0 - 82 61.0Brooklyn 130 78.5 9 - 7 0.0 114 89.5City 16 43.8 0 - 0 - 9 66.7Hunter 0 - - - - - - -John Jay 18 38.9 1 100.0 17 35.3 0 -Lehman 230 97.8 0 - 0 - 94 94.7Queens 368 23.9 38 0.0 113 0.0 123 8.9York 310 76.8 0 - 72 58.3 238 82.4Total Senior Colleges 1,226 62.3 48 2.1 209 23.0 660 68.8Medgar Evers 802 60.8 77 40.3 167 55.1 551 65.0NYCCT 1,211 50.5 134 54.5 180 60.6 842 46.0Staten Island 1,503 66.8 83 68.7 237 57.8 984 73.4Total Comprehensive Colleges 3,516 59.8 294 54.8 584 57.9 2,377 61.7BMCC 1,748 58.2 219 62.1 144 55.6 1,189 58.9Bronx 791 54.0 154 69.5 135 31.9 458 53.9Hostos 1,105 29.5 37 0.0 176 11.9 640 38.0Kingsborough 864 69.1 147 54.4 192 52.6 446 79.1LaGuardia 321 70.1 77 76.6 10 100.0 234 66.7Queensborough 1,636 46.7 89 43.8 31 19.4 800 60.1Total Community Colleges 6,465 51.9 723 58.2 688 37.9 3,767 57.9Total University 11,207 55.5 1,065 54.7 1,481 43.7 6,804 60.3

Table 14USIP Passing Rates in Classes that Include CUNY Proficiency Exam: Summer 2015

WritingTotal Pass RateCollege Total Enrolled

Reading Math

Source: CUNY Office of Undergraduate StudiesPass rates for sections that include CUNY proficiency exams (PE) are based on the total number of enrolled students, where withdrawal rates are counted as failure. Passing an intervetnion which includes CUNY PE currently signals skill proficiency or advancement to the next-in-sequance develomental course for Math intervetnions. Pending planned policy changes, similar interpetations will be atributed to the Reading and Writing pass rates.

23


College

Total Students Enrolled (Seats)

Reading Writing Reading & Writing Math ESL Other

N % % % % % %Baruch 64 0.0 0.0 0.0 67.2 32.8 0.0Brooklyn 0 - - - - - -City 286 0.0 0.0 0.0 81.5 0.0 18.5Hunter 269 0.0 0.0 0.0 94.1 5.9 0.0John Jay 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0Lehman 0 - - - - - -Queens 72 8.3 4.2 0.0 34.7 52.8 0.0York 359 0.0 16.7 0.0 64.3 0.0 18.9Total Senior Colleges 1,060 0.6 5.9 0.0 74.1 7.1 12.4Medgar Evers 574 6.3 15.3 0.0 73.7 4.7 0.0NYCCT 160 15.6 33.8 0.0 50.6 0.0 0.0Staten Island 428 1.2 6.5 0.0 62.6 29.7 0.0Total Comprehensive Colleges 1,162 5.7 14.6 0.0 66.4 13.3 0.0BMCC 856 14.1 18.8 0.0 51.2 15.9 0.0Bronx 346 20.8 28.3 0.0 40.2 10.7 0.0Hostos 872 2.3 8.3 20.8 68.7 0.0 0.0Kingsborough 704 9.7 28.3 0.0 47.3 14.8 0.0LaGuardia 325 15.4 0.0 0.0 72.3 12.3 0.0Queensborough 962 14.0 19.8 10.3 17.5 38.5 0.0Total Community Colleges 4,065 11.5 17.7 6.9 47.0 16.9 0.0Total University 6,287 8.6 15.2 4.5 55.2 14.6 2.1

Table 15USIP Subject Enrollment: Non-Summer 2015-2016

Source: CUNY Office of Undergraduate Studies

24


W, WA, WD WU Number

PassedIncludes

WithdrawalsExcludes

WithdrawalsN N N N N % %

Baruch 64 64 0 1 41 64.1 65.1Brooklyn 0 - - - - - -City 286 201 14 0 114 39.9 41.9Hunter 269 3 3 0 * * *John Jay 10 10 0 0 10 100.0 100.0Lehman 0 - - - - - -Queens 72 63 1 1 30 41.7 42.9York 359 357 0 4 279 77.7 78.6Total Senior Colleges 1,060 698 18 6 474 44.7 45.8Medgar Evers 574 570 48 1 352 61.3 67.0NYCCT 160 160 0 3 120 75.0 76.4Staten Island 428 428 27 0 286 66.8 71.3Total Comprehensive Colleges 1,162 1,158 75 4 758 65.2 70.0BMCC 856 856 48 0 515 60.2 63.7Bronx 346 311 15 9 151 43.6 46.9Hostos 872 872 142 0 336 38.5 46.0Kingsborough 704 528 15 25 327 46.4 49.2LaGuardia 325 320 7 0 246 75.7 77.4Queensborough 962 944 29 100 442 45.9 53.1Total Community Colleges 4,065 3,831 256 134 2,017 49.6 54.9Total University 6,287 5,687 349 144 3,249 51.7 56.1


Table 16USIP Total Passing Rates: Non-Summer 2015-2016

Withdrawal RateCollege

Total with Known

Outcomes (Seats)




NOTE: Because of a recent transition to a new reporting system, not all grades for USIP interventions offered this year have been captured. Pass rates reported in this FactBook are based on the actual enrollment numbers, with the number of known outcomes reported as a reference point. Pass rates that include withdrawals are calculated with withdrawal grades included in the denominator (e.g. Number Passed/Total Enrolled). Pass rates that exclude withdrawals are calculated excluding ALL withdrawal grades from the denominator (e.g. Number Passed/(Total Enrolled-(W, WA, WD, WU))). This methodology applies to Table 13 and Tables 16 through 23.

25


W, WA, WD WU Number

PassedIncludes

WithdrawalsExcludes

WithdrawalsN N N N N % %

Brooklyn 9 0 * * * * * Hunter 132 0 * * * * * John Jay 1 1 0 0 1 100.0 100.0 Queens 38 2 2 0 * * * Total Senior Colleges 180 3 2 0 1 0.6 0.6

Medgar Evers 77 77 5 4 31 40.3 45.6NYCCT 134 134 0 10 73 54.5 58.9Staten Island 83 83 8 0 57 68.7 76.0Total Comprehensive Colleges 294 294 13 14 161 54.8 60.3BMCC 324 324 24 0 197 60.8 65.7Bronx 200 160 0 13 143 71.5 76.5Hostos 37 0 * * * * *Kingsborough 147 147 1 6 80 54.4 57.1LaGuardia 77 76 0 0 59 76.6 76.6Queensborough 89 89 5 4 39 43.8 48.8Total Community Colleges 874 796 30 23 518 59.3 63.1Total University 1168 1,090 43 37 679 58.1 62.4

N N N N N % %Queens 6 0 * * * * *Total Senior Colleges 6 0 * * * * *Medgar Evers 36 36 2 0 19 52.8 55.9NYCCT 25 25 0 0 19 76.0 76.0Staten Island 5 5 2 0 3 60.0 100.0Total Comprehensive Colleges 66 66 4 0 41 62.1 66.1BMCC 121 121 3 0 66 54.5 55.9Bronx 72 72 3 2 50 69.4 74.6Hostos 20 20 6 0 9 45.0 64.3Kingsborough 68 68 3 2 30 44.1 47.6LaGuardia 50 50 0 0 33 66.0 66.0Queensborough 135 130 2 7 69 51.1 54.8Total Community Colleges 466 461 17 11 257 55.2 58.7Total University 532 527 21 11 298 56.0 59.6

Source: CUNY Office of Undergraduate Studies and Institutional Research Database* No seats with known outcomes

USIP Reading Passing RatesTable 17

Withdrawal Rate

College

Total with Known

Outcomes (Seats)


Sum

mer

2015

Non-

Sum

mer

2015

-201

6


26


W, WA, WD WU Number

PassedIncludes

WithdrawalsExcludes

Withdrawals

N N N N N % % Brooklyn 7 0 * * * * * Hunter 100 0 * * * * * John Jay 160 160 1 1 146 91.3 92.4

Queens 113 1 1 0 0 0.0 0.0York 72 72 0 0 42 58.3 58.3Total Senior Colleges 452 233 2 1 188 41.6 41.9Medgar Evers 223 220 7 15 136 61.0 67.7NYCCT 180 180 1 17 109 60.6 67.3Staten Island 237 237 25 0 137 57.8 64.6Total Comprehensive Colleges 640 637 33 32 382 59.7 66.4BMCC 144 142 2 0 80 55.6 56.3Bronx 188 111 0 15 82 43.6 47.4Hostos 176 110 0 11 21 11.9 12.7Kingsborough 210 209 2 5 118 56.2 58.1LaGuardia 10 10 0 0 10 100.0 100.0Queensborough 31 31 2 2 6 19.4 22.2Total Community Colleges 759 613 6 33 317 41.8 44.0Total University 1,851 1,483 41 66 887 47.9 50.9

N N N N N % %Queens 3 0 * * * * *York 60 60 0 2 29 48.3 50.0Total Senior Colleges 63 60 0 2 29 46.0 47.5Medgar Evers 88 85 5 1 44 50.0 53.7NYCCT 54 54 0 1 28 51.9 52.8Staten Island 28 28 1 0 17 60.7 63.0Total Comprehensive Colleges 170 167 6 2 89 52.4 54.9BMCC 161 161 6 0 76 47.2 49.0Bronx 98 63 2 1 31 31.6 32.6Hostos 72 72 13 0 15 20.8 25.4Kingsborough 199 198 6 8 120 60.3 64.9Queensborough 190 187 1 23 68 35.8 41.0Total Community Colleges 720 681 28 32 310 43.1 47.0Total University 953 908 34 36 428 44.9 48.5


Sum

mer

2015

Non-

Sum

mer

2015

-201

6Table 18

USIP Writing Passing Rates

College

Total with Known

Outcomes (Seats)

Withdrawal Rate % Passed of Total SeatsTotal

Enrolled (Seats)

27


W, WA, WD WU Number

PassedIncludes

WithdrawalsExcludes

Withdrawals

N N N N N % %City 34 7 0 0 1 2.9 2.9Lehman 136 136 0 0 136 100.0 100.0Total Senior Colleges 170 143 0 0 137 80.6 80.6Medgar Evers 7 7 0 0 7 100.0 100.0Staten Island 16 16 1 0 12 75.0 80.0Total Comprehensive Colleges 23 23 1 0 19 82.6 86.4Hostos 252 215 0 24 62 24.6 27.2Kingsborough 54 54 0 5 39 72.2 79.6Queensborough 354 353 13 32 57 16.1 18.4Total Community Colleges 660 622 13 61 158 23.9 27.0Total University 853 788 14 61 314 36.8 40.4

N N N N N % %Hostos 181 181 25 0 48 26.5 30.8Queensborough 99 98 1 5 18 18.2 19.4Total Community Colleges 280 279 26 5 66 23.6 26.5Total University 280 279 26 5 66 23.6 26.5


Sum

mer

2015

Non-

Sum

mer

20

15-2

016

Table 19USIP Reading and Writing Passing Rates

College

Total with Known

Outcomes (Seats)

Withdrawal Rate % Passed of Total Seats


28


W, WA, WD WU Number

PassedIncludes

WithdrawalsExcludes

Withdrawals

N N N N N % %Baruch 320 320 4 9 241 75.3 78.5Brooklyn 114 113 0 1 102 89.5 90.3City 43 30 2 0 20 46.5 48.8Hunter 184 0 * * * * *John Jay 168 168 0 2 160 95.2 96.4Lehman 94 93 0 0 89 94.7 94.7Queens 123 24 1 0 11 8.9 9.0York 371 371 6 0 323 87.1 88.5Total Senior Colleges 1,417 1,119 13 12 946 66.8 68.0Medgar Evers 1,072 1071 42 56 751 70.1 77.1NYCCT 942 942 0 129 453 48.1 55.7Staten Island 1,157 1126 84 0 882 76.2 82.2Total Comprehensive Colleges 3,171 3,139 126 185 2,086 65.8 72.9BMCC 1,806 1805 167 0 1092 60.5 66.6Bronx 708 587 0 66 371 52.4 57.8Hostos 1,051 1051 0 173 470 44.7 53.5Kingsborough 807 735 8 35 539 66.8 70.5LaGuardia 565 542 0 0 422 74.7 74.7Queensborough 800 799 36 101 481 60.1 72.5Total Community Colleges 5,737 5,519 211 375 3,375 58.8 65.5Total University 10,325 9,777 350 572 6,407 62.1 68.1


Table 20USIP Math Passing Rates: Summer 2015

Withdrawal RateCollege

Total with Known

Outcomes (Seats)

% Passed of Total SeatsTotal Enrolled (Seats)

29


W, WA, WD WU Number

PassedIncludes

WithdrawalsExcludes

Withdrawals

N N N N N % %Baruch 43 43 0 0 28 65.1 65.1Brooklyn 0 - - - - - -City 233 198 11 0 114 48.9 51.4Hunter 253 3 3 0 * * *John Jay 0 - - - - - -Lehman 0 - - - - - -Queens 25 25 0 1 21 84.0 87.5York 231 229 0 2 182 78.8 79.5Total Senior Colleges 785 498 14 3 345 43.9 44.9Medgar Evers 423 422 41 0 277 65.5 72.5NYCCT 81 81 0 2 73 90.1 92.4Staten Island 268 268 14 0 219 81.7 86.2Total Comprehensive Colleges 772 771 55 2 569 73.7 79.6BMCC 438 438 34 0 316 72.1 78.2Bronx 139 139 6 6 50 36.0 39.4Hostos 599 599 98 0 264 44.1 52.7Kingsborough 333 160 0 1 95 28.5 28.6LaGuardia 235 230 6 0 188 80.0 82.1Queensborough 168 168 7 9 122 72.6 80.3Total Community Colleges 1,912 1,734 151 16 1,035 54.1 59.3Total University 3,469 3,003 220 21 1,949 56.2 60.4


Table 21USIP Math Passing Rates: Non-Summer 2015-2016

Withdrawal Rate

College

Total with Known

Outcomes (Seats)

Passing Rate Total Enrolled (Seats)


30


W, WA, WD WU Number

PassedIncludes

WithdrawalsExcludes

Withdrawals

N N N N N % %Baruch 72 72 0 0 47 65.3 65.3Queens 94 80 0 0 77 81.9 81.9Total Senior Colleges 166 152 0 0 124 74.7 74.7NYCCT 64 64 0 1 51 79.7 81.0Staten Island 183 183 15 0 76 41.5 45.2Total Comprehensive Colleges 247 247 15 1 127 51.4 55.0BMCC 277 277 8 0 150 54.2 55.8Bronx 63 57 0 7 41 65.1 73.2Kingsborough 25 25 1 0 24 96.0 100.0LaGuardia 68 50 0 0 38 55.9 55.9Queensborough 362 357 1 41 181 50.0 56.6Total Community Colleges 795 766 10 48 434 54.6 58.9Total University 1,208 1,165 25 49 685 56.7 60.4

N N N N N % %Baruch 21 21 0 1 13 61.9 65.0Hunter 16 0 * * * * *Queens 38 38 1 0 9 23.7 24.3Total Senior Colleges 75 59 1 1 22 29.3 30.1Medgar Evers 27 27 0 0 12 44.4 44.4Staten Island 127 127 10 0 47 37.0 40.2Total Comprehensive Colleges 154 154 10 0 59 38.3 41.0BMCC 136 136 5 0 57 41.9 43.5Bronx 37 37 4 0 20 54.1 60.6Kingsborough 104 102 6 14 82 78.8 97.6LaGuardia 40 40 1 0 25 62.5 64.1Queensborough 370 361 18 56 165 44.6 55.7Total Community Colleges 687 676 34 70 349 50.8 59.9Total University 916 889 45 71 430 46.9 53.8


Sum

mer

2015

Non-

Sum

mer

2015

-201

6Table 22

USIP ESL Passing Rates

College

Total with Known

Outcomes (Seats)

Withdrawal Rate Passing Rate Total

Enrolled (Seats)

31


W, WA, WD WU Number

PassedIncludes

WithdrawalsExcludes

Withdrawals

N N N N N % % City 22 0 * * * * * Hunter 59 0 * * * * *

John Jay 45 45 0 0 44 97.8 97.8York 166 166 0 0 166 100.0 100.0Total Senior Colleges 292 211 0 0 210 71.9 71.9Medgar Evers 201 201 0 0 201 100.0 100.0Total Comprehensive Colleges 201 201 0 0 201 100.0 100.0Kingsborough 23 23 0 1 22 95.7 100.0Total Community Colleges 23 23 0 1 22 95.7 100.0Total University 516 435 0 1 433 83.9 84.1

N N N N N % %City 53 3 3 0 * * *John Jay 10 10 0 0 10 100.0 100.0York 68 68 0 0 68 100.0 100.0Total Senior Colleges 131 81 3 0 78 59.5 60.9Total University 131 81 3 0 78 59.5 60.9


Sum

mer

2015

Non-

Sum

mer

2015

-201

6Table 23

USIP Other Subjects Passing Rates

College

Total with Known

Outcomes (Seats)

Withdrawal Rate Passing Rate Total

Enrolled (Seats)

USIP FactBook 2015-2016 - CUNY

Documents

Transcript of USIP FactBook 2015-2016 - CUNY