Using revised Indicator 14 language

47
1 Using revised Indicator 14 language

description

Using revised Indicator 14 language. Purposes of Today’s Meeting. Become familiar with the federal post-school outcomes (PSO) requirements and how [ STATE ] meets those requirements Review [ STATE] PSO results Discuss the PSO results from [ DISTIRCT ] - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Using revised Indicator 14 language

Page 1: Using revised Indicator 14 language

1Using revised Indicator 14 language

Page 2: Using revised Indicator 14 language

Purposes of Today’s Meeting

1. Become familiar with the federal post-school outcomes (PSO) requirements and how [STATE] meets those requirements

2. Review [STATE] PSO results

3. Discuss the PSO results from [DISTIRCT]

4. Identify program strengths, areas in need of improvement

5. Develop an action plan by identifying the next steps, process, and timeline 22

Page 3: Using revised Indicator 14 language

Materials we will use today

Post-School Outcomes (PSO) Glossary

1 page summary describing how PSO data are collected in [STATE]

Summary of [STATE] PSO results

Guiding Questions to help identify program strengths & weaknesses related to post-school outcomes

Graphs of our district PSO data

Predictors of post-school success33

Page 4: Using revised Indicator 14 language

Purpose for Federal Collection & Reporting Requirements

Increased emphasis on accountability in education requires states to report to the public and Office of Special Education Programs information on 20 Indicators.

The Indicators are used to determine how well the state is meeting its responsibility under IDEA 2004.

The Indicators are also to be used within the state for system improvement.

4

Page 5: Using revised Indicator 14 language

Four Transition-Related Indicators

o Graduation (Indicator 1)

o Dropout (Indicator 2)

o Transition Planning through Quality IEP Goals & Services for Transition (Indicator 13)

o Post-School Outcomes related to employment and post-secondary education (Indicator 14)

5

Page 6: Using revised Indicator 14 language

A Critical Relationship

Quality IEPs

(Indicator 13)

Staying in school, Not

dropping out

(Indicator 2)

Graduating

(Indicator 1)

Positive post-school outcomes

(Indicator 14)

Kohler (NSTTAC), 2007

6

Page 7: Using revised Indicator 14 language

Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes

Percent of youth who are no longer in secondary school, had Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) in effect at the time they left school, and were enrolled in:

A. higher education

B. higher education or competitively employed

C. higher education or in some other postsecondary education or training program; or competitively employed or in some other employment

within one year of leaving high school. (20 U.S.C. 1416(a)(3)(B))

77

Page 8: Using revised Indicator 14 language

What are Positive Post-School Outcomes?

Higher Education

Competitive Employment

Some Other Postsecondary Education or Training

Other Employment

[OTHER OUTCOMES MEASURED BY THE STATE]

Post-school outcomes (PSO) refer to what youth do after leaving high school, specifically:

88

Page 9: Using revised Indicator 14 language

Why are PSO important?

One purpose of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA) 2004 is:

To ensure that all children with disabilities have available to them a free appropriate public

education that emphasizes special education and related services designed to meet their unique needs and prepare them for further education,

employment, and independent living.

Youth’s post-school outcomes is one measure of how well states meet this IDEA purpose.

IDEA Regulations §300.1(a)

99

Page 10: Using revised Indicator 14 language

We believe PSO are important because …

Group brainstorm:

1010

Page 11: Using revised Indicator 14 language

How are PSO Data Collected?

In [STATE], data are collect by [WHO COLLECTS THE DATA, e.g., a contractor or school personnel] between [ENTER MONTHS] using [METHOD OF DATA COLLECTION, e.g., a mailed survey or interview].

Data are collected from [YOUTH WITH DISABILITIES OR THEIR FAMILY/OTHERS] who had an IEP when they left school, including youth who graduate, age-out, drop out, or those expected to return & did not.

Each state determines how these data are collected.

1111

Page 12: Using revised Indicator 14 language

What Data are Collected? We collect data from youth while they are in school and one year after they have left school.

1212

Out of school:

Work and school experiences

Type of job or school

Number of hours working or in school

[ENTER STATE SPECIFC INFORMATION]

In school:

Demographic data (e.g., disability, race/ethnicity)

Program data (e.g., post-school goal, type of program they attended)

[ENTER STATE SPECIFC INFORMATION]

Page 13: Using revised Indicator 14 language

Commonly Used Terms

Higher EducationCompetitive employment Other postsecondary

education or training Some other employmentGraduateDropout

States define terms associated with PSO

1313

Page 14: Using revised Indicator 14 language

Higher Education means…

youth have been enrolled on a full- or part-time basis

in a community college (2-year program) or

college/university (4- or more year program)

for at least one complete term, at anytime in the year since leaving high school.

1414

Page 15: Using revised Indicator 14 language

Competitive Employment means…

that youth have worked for pay at or above the minimum wage in a setting with others who are nondisabled for a period of 20 hours a week for at least 90 days at any time in the year

since leaving high school. This includes military employment. 1515

Page 16: Using revised Indicator 14 language

youth have been enrolled on a full- or part-time basis

for at least 1 complete term at any time in the year since leaving high school

in an education or training program (e.g., Job Corps, adult education, vocational technical school that is less than a 2-year program). 1616

Some other postsecondary education or training means…

Page 17: Using revised Indicator 14 language

youth have worked for pay or been self-employed

for a period of at least 90 days at any time in the year since leaving high school.

This includes working in a family business (e.g., farm, store, fishing, ranching, catering services, etc.).

1717

Other employment means…

Page 18: Using revised Indicator 14 language

Additional Definitions:

Graduate means…[ENTER STATE’S DEFINITION]

Drop out means…[ENTER STATE’S DEFINITION]

Age-out means…[ENTER STATE’S DEFINITION]

1818

Page 19: Using revised Indicator 14 language

19

Page 20: Using revised Indicator 14 language

[STATE’S] PSO Data

Of the [NUMBER] who left high school, [SOME %] of the leavers contacted, responded to the [SURVEY OR INTERVIEW].

The responders were found to represent [LIST THE GROUPS FOR WHOM THE RESPONDERS WERE REPRESENTATIVE, i.e., GRADUATES, DROPOUTS, DISABILITY GROUPS, etc.]

Of those who responded, [SOME %] reported being enrolled in higher education, competitively employed, enrolled in some other postsecondary education or training program, or other employment since leaving high school.

These data represent youth who left school during the [200X-XX] school year.

2020

Page 21: Using revised Indicator 14 language

State’s Method of ExitOf the [TOTAL NUMBER] youth who left

school across the state…

2121

Graduated, 87%

Dropped Out, 4%

Aged Out, 2%

Other, 7%

Data Source: Sample PSO SY 200x-0x

Page 22: Using revised Indicator 14 language

State’s Engagement Rates Of the [TOTAL NUMBER] youth who responded to the

interview/survey across the state…

Working, 69%

In school, 12%

Both, 8%

Other, 4% Neither, 7%

Data Source: Sample PSO SY 200x-0x

22

Higher Education, 18%

Competitive Employment, 25%

Postsecondary Education or Training, 32%

Other Employment, 15%

Not Engaged, 10%

Page 23: Using revised Indicator 14 language

Now we will talk about the outcomes of our youth in [DISTRICT].

23

Page 24: Using revised Indicator 14 language

[DISTRICT’S] PSO Data

Of the [NUMBER] youth who left high school in our district, [SOME %] of the leavers contacted responded to the [SURVEY OR INTERVIEW].

Of those who responded, [SOME %] were engaged.

Specifically, [SOME %] were in higher education, [SOME %] competitive employment, [SOME %] some other postsecondary education or training, and [SOME %] in some other employment.

That leaves [SOME %] of our youth not engaged.

These data represent youth who left school during the [200X-XX] school year.

2424

Page 25: Using revised Indicator 14 language

What questions do you want to answer?

Brainstorm questions the group has about…

Graduation & dropout rates

Overall engagement rates in employment and post-secondary education

25

Page 26: Using revised Indicator 14 language

2626

Graduated, 78%

Dropped Out, 17%

Aged Out, 1%

Other, 4%

Data Source: Sample PSO SY 200x-0x

[DISTRICT’S] Method of ExitOf the [TOTAL NUMBER] youth who left

school across the district…

Page 27: Using revised Indicator 14 language

[DISTRICT’S] Engagement Rates Of the [TOTAL NUMBER] youth who responded to the

interview/survey across the district…

Working, 69%

In school, 12%

Both, 8%

Other, 4% Neither, 7%

Data Source: Sample PSO SY 200x-0x

27

Higher Education, 15%

Competitive Employment, 35%

Posecondary Education or Training, 18%

Other Employment, 19%

Neither, 13%

Page 28: Using revised Indicator 14 language

State & District Engagement Rates

State Target State Engagement District Engagement 0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

87% 87% 88%

28

Page 29: Using revised Indicator 14 language

State & District Engagement Rates by Method of Exit

29Graduated Dropped Out Aged Out Other0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

87%

4% 2%7%

78%

17%

1% 4%

State (N = ) District (N = )

Enga

gem

ent R

ate

Data Source: Sample (SY 200x-0x)

Page 30: Using revised Indicator 14 language

30

18%25%

32%

15%10%

15%

35%

18% 19%13%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Higher Education

Competitively Employed

Postsecondary Education or

Training

Other Employment

Neither

Enga

gem

ent R

ate

State (N = ) District (N = )

Data Source: Sample (SY 200x-0x)

State and District Engagement Rates

Page 31: Using revised Indicator 14 language

Drilling into the district’s engagement rate:

Females v. Males

Graduates v. Dropouts

Various Races/Ethnicities

Disability Categories

What other groups do you want to look at?

Let’s look at the percent of youth engaged in the post-school activities by the following categories:

31

Page 32: Using revised Indicator 14 language

What questions do you want to answer?

Brainstorm questions the group wants to answer about the engagement rates for…

32

Females v. Males Graduates v. Dropouts Various Races/Ethnicities Disability Categories What other groups do you want to

examine?

Page 33: Using revised Indicator 14 language

Brainstorm questions to answer about the engagement rates of males and females.

33

Are Males & Females engaged at the same or similar rate?

Page 34: Using revised Indicator 14 language

46%38%

4% 6% 6%

30%

20% 22%15% 13%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Higher Education Competitive Employment

Postsecondary Education &

Training

Other Employment Not Engaged

Males (n = ) Females (n = )

En

gag

em

en

t

Rate

34

Percent of Males & Females Engaged

34

Data Source: Sample (SY 200x-0x)

Page 35: Using revised Indicator 14 language

Are individuals by race/ethnicity groups engaged at the same or similar rate?

Brainstorm questions to answer about the engagement rates of youth with different races/ethnicities.

35

Page 36: Using revised Indicator 14 language

54%

20%24%

2% 0%

30%

0% 0%

40%

30%

53%

5%0%

14%

28%

50%

13%

3%

23%

11%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Higher Education Competitive Employment

Postsecondary Education &

Training

Other Employment Not Engaged

Caucasian (n = 510 ) All Other (n = 115) Af. American (n = 425) Hispanic (n = 150)

Engagement Rate by Race/Ethnicity CategoriesEn

gag

em

en

t R

ate

36

Data Source: Sample PSO SY 200x-0x

36

Page 37: Using revised Indicator 14 language

Brainstorm questions to answer about the engagement rates of youth with different disabilities.

37

Are youth with various disabilities engaged at the same or similar rate?

Page 38: Using revised Indicator 14 language

50%

3%

22% 23%

2%

22%

8%4%

33% 33%

1% 0% 1%

97%

1%

61%

2%

18% 16%

3%0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Higher Education Competitive Employment

Postsecondary Education &

Training

Other Employment

Not Engaged

SLD (n = ) ED (n = ) MR (n = ) AO (n = )

En

gag

em

en

t R

ate

38

Engagement Rate by Disability Categories

AO = All Other DisabilitiesData Source: Sample (SY 200x-0x)

Page 39: Using revised Indicator 14 language

VARIABLE VARIABLE VARIABLE VARIABLE0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

29%

78%

11%

18%

Axis Title

Axi

s Ti

tle

39

Additional Information Collected by [STATE]Results for [DISTRICT]

Page 40: Using revised Indicator 14 language

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

33%36%

11%

3%

17%

10%4% 6%

40% 40%

55%

27%

16%

2% 0%0%

40%

56%

2% 2%

SLD ED MR All Other

Axis Title

Axi

s Ti

tle

40

Post-School Outcomes of [Males]by [Disability Categories]

Page 41: Using revised Indicator 14 language

Thinking about Transition Related Program Improvement

In what areas are youth with disabilities doing well?

What areas need improvement?

What is the district doing well?

What does the district need to improve?

41

Page 42: Using revised Indicator 14 language

What does the Research Say?

Academic/General Education

Career Awareness

Community Experiences

Exit Exam Requirements/ High School Diploma Status

Interagency Collaboration

Occupational Courses

Paid Work Experience

Parental Involvement

School Integration

Self-Advocacy/Determination

Self-Care/ Independent Living Skills

Social Skills

Student Support

Transition Program

Vocational Education

Work Study

Predictors of Post-School Success

42

NSTTAC, 2008

Page 43: Using revised Indicator 14 language

Programmatic Strengths

Why does [DISTRICT] have positive outcomes for some leavers and not others?

What attributes can be associated with the outcomes, positive and negative?

What changes need to be made?

Think about the 16 predictors of post-school success and our high school transition and academic programs:

43

Page 44: Using revised Indicator 14 language

Action Planning

What are our next steps?

What do we need to do to improve the positive outcomes for our youth with disabilities?

44

Page 45: Using revised Indicator 14 language

Questions and Next Steps What questions do we still have? Where do we go from here?

When will we answer the unanswered questions?

Are other additional data needed to answer the unanswered questions?

When will we meet again?

What resources do we need to gather before we meet again?

What are the specific action steps we will take between now and our next meeting?

Who is missing?45

Page 46: Using revised Indicator 14 language

National Post-School Outcomes Center

www.psocenter.org

National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center

www.nsttac.org

National Dropout Prevention Center for Students with Disabilities

www.ndpc-sd 46

National Resources

Page 47: Using revised Indicator 14 language

For additional Information about PSO [STATE] Department of Education

[District]

47