Using Hard Technology to Make Prisons and Jails Safer : Does It Really Work? Dec.1, 2009 Lecture...

36
Using Hard Technology to Make Using Hard Technology to Make Prisons and Jails Safer : Does It Prisons and Jails Safer : Does It Really Work? Really Work? Dec.1, 2009 Lecture Dec.1, 2009 Lecture Professor James Byrne Professor James Byrne

Transcript of Using Hard Technology to Make Prisons and Jails Safer : Does It Really Work? Dec.1, 2009 Lecture...

Page 1: Using Hard Technology to Make Prisons and Jails Safer : Does It Really Work? Dec.1, 2009 Lecture Professor James Byrne.

Using Hard Technology to Make Prisons and Using Hard Technology to Make Prisons and Jails Safer : Does It Really Work?Jails Safer : Does It Really Work?

Dec.1, 2009 LectureDec.1, 2009 LectureProfessor James ByrneProfessor James Byrne

Page 2: Using Hard Technology to Make Prisons and Jails Safer : Does It Really Work? Dec.1, 2009 Lecture Professor James Byrne.

EExamplesxamples of Hard Technology of Hard Technology Innovations in Prison and Jail Innovations in Prison and Jail

SettingsSettings Contraband detection devicesContraband detection devices used in prison/jail used in prison/jail Duress alarm systemsDuress alarm systems for corrections officers in for corrections officers in

indoor and outdoor settingsindoor and outdoor settings Language translation devicesLanguage translation devices for use within prisons for use within prisons Remote monitoringRemote monitoring of inmate movements in cells and of inmate movements in cells and

throughout prisonthroughout prison Perimeter securityPerimeter security technology technology New cell extractionNew cell extraction technology technology Less than lethal forceLess than lethal force in prison in prison Other hard technologyOther hard technology applications in prisons and applications in prisons and

jails (e.g. the Supermax prison) jails (e.g. the Supermax prison)   

Page 3: Using Hard Technology to Make Prisons and Jails Safer : Does It Really Work? Dec.1, 2009 Lecture Professor James Byrne.

1.Contraband detection devices 1.Contraband detection devices used in prison/jailused in prison/jail

Page 4: Using Hard Technology to Make Prisons and Jails Safer : Does It Really Work? Dec.1, 2009 Lecture Professor James Byrne.

3 Types of Contraband Detection 3 Types of Contraband Detection Devices Used in Prisons and JailsDevices Used in Prisons and Jails

Concealed Weapon and Contraband Imaging Concealed Weapon and Contraband Imaging Detection Systems (CWCIDS):Detection Systems (CWCIDS): Hand-held and walk Hand-held and walk through metal detectors are the most frequently used through metal detectors are the most frequently used devices in prisons and jails.devices in prisons and jails.

LimitationsLimitations:: can not detect non-metallic objects, and can not detect non-metallic objects, and drugs.drugs.

Ion Mobility Spectrometer (IMS) Scanning:Ion Mobility Spectrometer (IMS) Scanning: effective in effective in identifying drugs, but better at detecting coke(90% identifying drugs, but better at detecting coke(90% accurate) than pot (24%). Mobile IMS scanners can be accurate) than pot (24%). Mobile IMS scanners can be used in cells.used in cells.

Backscatter X-RayBackscatter X-Ray: can detect metallic and non-metallic : can detect metallic and non-metallic contraband.contraband.

Limitations Limitations privacy, exposure to radiationprivacy, exposure to radiation

Page 5: Using Hard Technology to Make Prisons and Jails Safer : Does It Really Work? Dec.1, 2009 Lecture Professor James Byrne.

NIJ Public-Private Development NIJ Public-Private Development Initiatives: New DirectionsInitiatives: New Directions

One NIJ-sponsored pilot program that enjoyed success used a millimeter wave imaging system to scan visitors at the Graterford State Correctional Institution in Pennsylvania.

The imaging system can look through clothing to detect weapons, cell phones and nonmetallic objects.

Currently used by the TSA to scan passengers at airports, the system was tested and evaluated at Graterford, a maximum-security facility that houses about 3,100 inmates outside Philadelphia.

Page 6: Using Hard Technology to Make Prisons and Jails Safer : Does It Really Work? Dec.1, 2009 Lecture Professor James Byrne.

The Effectiveness of New Scanner The Effectiveness of New Scanner TechnologyTechnology

SpeedSpeed: : The Graterford system completed between 400 and 600 scans in a typical week, and each scan was completed in seconds. “It really didn’t slow down the [screening] process.”

CostCost: : The manufacturer made the system available for free during the testing period, and NIJ coordinated the pilot project because it provided an opportunity to do an operational evaluation in a correctional environment that involved a commercially available system.

DetectionDetection:: Overall, the millimeter wave system improved the contraband situation at Graterford. On several occasions, the system detected cell phones. It appears to deter smuggling.

LimitationsLimitations: : Although this technology detects contraband hidden under clothing, it does not detect contraband secreted in body cavities

Privacy ConcernsPrivacy Concerns: : Millimeter wave systems have been controversial because they present images of bodies so well — similar to nude photographs — that some people consider the systems intrusive.

Page 7: Using Hard Technology to Make Prisons and Jails Safer : Does It Really Work? Dec.1, 2009 Lecture Professor James Byrne.

New Portable Scanner Spots New Portable Scanner Spots Improvised weaponsImprovised weapons

Page 8: Using Hard Technology to Make Prisons and Jails Safer : Does It Really Work? Dec.1, 2009 Lecture Professor James Byrne.

2.Duress Alarm Systems for corrections 2.Duress Alarm Systems for corrections officers in indoor and outdoor settingsofficers in indoor and outdoor settings

Type I: Panic Button Alarm. These basic systems use buttons located on walls, underneath desks, and near doorways. Pushing a button transmits a dedicated signal to a central alarm console. Using visible and/or audible enunciations, the alarm console identifies the location of the event where the alarm was triggered.

Type II: Identification Alarm. In Type II systems, portable transmitters broadcast a wireless signal to a nearby sensor, which forwards the alarm to a central console. The alarm signal includes an identification code that tells the dispatcher who sounded the alarm. Because officers carry these transmitters with them, they can sound an alarm from almost anywhere within a facility.

Type III: Identification/Location Alarm. Type III systems operate much like Type II systems, with the added feature of tracking corrections facility staff members and pinpointing the alarm location. An extensive wireless infrastructure identifies, localizes, and tracks the transmitting device; the system may produce a positioning symbol on a console panel or a map-like display at a central alarm location.

Page 9: Using Hard Technology to Make Prisons and Jails Safer : Does It Really Work? Dec.1, 2009 Lecture Professor James Byrne.

TPASS 3 Evacuate IS-R Two-Way SignalingTPASS 3 Evacuate IS-R Two-Way Signaling Radio Radio

TransceivingTransceiving Personal Alert Safety System (PASS) Devic Personal Alert Safety System (PASS) Device.e.

Page 10: Using Hard Technology to Make Prisons and Jails Safer : Does It Really Work? Dec.1, 2009 Lecture Professor James Byrne.

There is no Independent Research There is no Independent Research on the Effectiveness of Duress on the Effectiveness of Duress

Alarm Systems Alarm Systems Identification/Location alarmsIdentification/Location alarms are viewed as are viewed as

the current “state of the art” but the cost of the current “state of the art” but the cost of purchasing these systems is much higher than purchasing these systems is much higher than the cost of the other two systems.the cost of the other two systems.

No independent evaluation findingsNo independent evaluation findings can be can be found to validate vendor claims of the found to validate vendor claims of the effectiveness of these 3 duress systems in in effectiveness of these 3 duress systems in in reducing officer injuries and deaths.reducing officer injuries and deaths.

New Duress systemsNew Duress systems are being designed to are being designed to incorporate both GPS and RFID technology.incorporate both GPS and RFID technology.

Page 11: Using Hard Technology to Make Prisons and Jails Safer : Does It Really Work? Dec.1, 2009 Lecture Professor James Byrne.

3.Language Translation Devices 3.Language Translation Devices for use within prisons for use within prisons

Page 12: Using Hard Technology to Make Prisons and Jails Safer : Does It Really Work? Dec.1, 2009 Lecture Professor James Byrne.

Types of Language Translation Types of Language Translation DevicesDevices

Voice Response Translators (VRT): a portable electronic translation device that emits short, prerecorded phrases in several languages.

CopTrans: a two-way translation software that allows two users to speak, each in his or her own language,and then translates into the other language.

Phraselator: a handheld, one-way, voice-to-voice translation system that translates English into one or more target languages.

SYSTRAN Software: offers desktop products, client/server systems, and Internet services that may be applicable to law enforcement and corrections in translating website content, documents, letters, e-mails, and other text into 36 languages.

Page 13: Using Hard Technology to Make Prisons and Jails Safer : Does It Really Work? Dec.1, 2009 Lecture Professor James Byrne.

Voice Response TranslatorsVoice Response Translators The Voice Response Translator (VRT) is currently being

tested in both military and various CJ environments.

The U.S. Department of Defense’s Special Operations Command and the Coast Guard have placed orders for the VRT, which costs $3,000 per unit and includes a 5-year warranty, training, and technical support.

The VRT user selects a language and speaks a trigger phrase in English into the VRT.

The VRT uses voice recognition technology to determine which phrase to emit in response to the spoken command.

http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/nij/nothlostfall03.pdfhttp://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/nij/nothlostfall03.pdf

Page 14: Using Hard Technology to Make Prisons and Jails Safer : Does It Really Work? Dec.1, 2009 Lecture Professor James Byrne.
Page 15: Using Hard Technology to Make Prisons and Jails Safer : Does It Really Work? Dec.1, 2009 Lecture Professor James Byrne.

4.Remote Monitoring of inmate 4.Remote Monitoring of inmate movements in cells and throughout movements in cells and throughout

prisonprison

Page 16: Using Hard Technology to Make Prisons and Jails Safer : Does It Really Work? Dec.1, 2009 Lecture Professor James Byrne.

Three Types of Remote Monitoring Three Types of Remote Monitoring TechnologyTechnology

1.Radio Frequency Identification Devices1.Radio Frequency Identification Devices (RFID): used to track (RFID): used to track inmate movements within prison. inmate movements within prison.

RFID systems are wireless; inmates wear transmitters that RFID systems are wireless; inmates wear transmitters that communicate real time prisoner location data to a central communicate real time prisoner location data to a central information centerinformation center

Extent of UseExtent of Use: implemented in several large state prison systems, : implemented in several large state prison systems, including California, Illinois, Michigan, and Ohio including California, Illinois, Michigan, and Ohio

2.Biometric Monitoring Systems2.Biometric Monitoring Systems, using hand geometry or , using hand geometry or fingerprint detection devices to allow/restrict access to locations fingerprint detection devices to allow/restrict access to locations within prison.within prison.

Extent of UseExtent of Use: No large scale use to date: No large scale use to date 33. . Smart Card SystemsSmart Card Systems, using credit card sized smart cards that , using credit card sized smart cards that

contain the inmate’s photo and a circuit chip that stores info about contain the inmate’s photo and a circuit chip that stores info about each inmate.each inmate.

Extent of UseExtent of Use: No large scale use to date: No large scale use to date

Page 17: Using Hard Technology to Make Prisons and Jails Safer : Does It Really Work? Dec.1, 2009 Lecture Professor James Byrne.

Pinpointing Prison Hotspots: Pinpointing Prison Hotspots: RFID TechnologyRFID Technology

One potentially promising approach involves radio frequency identification (RFID) technology, which uses small transponders called “tags” to track movements.

RFID tags can be attached to or incorporated into a variety of objects, such as wristbands.

Each tag has an integrated circuit and a tiny antenna to handle radio signals and can be used with a network of sensors — called RFID readers — to track movements.

Page 18: Using Hard Technology to Make Prisons and Jails Safer : Does It Really Work? Dec.1, 2009 Lecture Professor James Byrne.

Offender Location, Movement and Offender Location, Movement and Prison Management: Research Prison Management: Research

FindingsFindings Extent of Use: RFID technology has been used

to track inventory in warehouses, but its use in correctional facilities is relatively new.

A few correctional institutions have used the systems to provide information on prisoners’ movements and to alert staff if there is an unusual concentration of people in a certain area.

Movement information may prove useful in investigations to determine who was present in a certain part of a building at a particular time.

Page 19: Using Hard Technology to Make Prisons and Jails Safer : Does It Really Work? Dec.1, 2009 Lecture Professor James Byrne.

Expected RFID Outcomes : : Short Term Detection Increase Short Term Detection Increase

RFID makes possible closer and continuous monitoring of inmates and, thus, is expected to increase the detection of prohibited behaviors.

Many authorized movements, even when they result in inmate-on-inmate assaults, may have previously gone undetected or at least undocumented.

With RFID, these movements should result in a documented alarm, triggering protocols for officer response and documentation in facility incident data.

The short-term outcome of RFID introduction is an expected increase, rather than decrease, in the number of inmate behavior-related incidents tracked in facility data . .

Page 20: Using Hard Technology to Make Prisons and Jails Safer : Does It Really Work? Dec.1, 2009 Lecture Professor James Byrne.

Expected RFID Outcomes : : Long Term DeterrenceLong Term Deterrence

Indicators of unauthorized inmate activities are expected to “peak” early in the period following full implementation, (i.e., the point at which RFID reaches its maximum ability to detect previously undetected activities).

Subsequently, indicators of unauthorized inmate activities would begin to decline (as a result of deterrence).

This would be expected as (1) inmates become more certain that such activities will

be detected and negative consequences will result and (2) staff response protocols are adjusted for certain types of RFID alarms.

http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/225449.pdf

Page 21: Using Hard Technology to Make Prisons and Jails Safer : Does It Really Work? Dec.1, 2009 Lecture Professor James Byrne.

5.New Perimeter Security5.New Perimeter Security

Correctional facilities should always have a security technology enhancement plan (STEP).A STEP has several operational segments:

• Perimeter security. Includes lighting, fencing materials, electronic detection of movement on the perimeter, equipment for staff duty stations (sally ports, towers and vehicles) and electronic contraband detection.

• Staff and inmate communication. Involves technology related to intercoms, radios, telephones, emergency callback systems, pagers and cell phones.

• Contraband detection. Entails metal detectors, x-raymachines and technologies such as ion scanners.

http://www.justnet.org/TechBeat%20Files/STEP%20Up%20to%20Prison%20Security%20Planning.pdf

Page 22: Using Hard Technology to Make Prisons and Jails Safer : Does It Really Work? Dec.1, 2009 Lecture Professor James Byrne.

Perimeter security technologyPerimeter security technology Intended to deter Intended to deter

escape and prevent escape and prevent intrusion into prison intrusion into prison environments, environments, Oldcastle Security's Oldcastle Security's Guardtower solution Guardtower solution is a non-lethal is a non-lethal electric fence that electric fence that can detect wire can detect wire movement in any movement in any direction.direction.

Page 23: Using Hard Technology to Make Prisons and Jails Safer : Does It Really Work? Dec.1, 2009 Lecture Professor James Byrne.

Effectiveness of Perimeter Security Effectiveness of Perimeter Security TechnologyTechnology

Perimeter Security worksPerimeter Security works: Escape Attempts are rare; : Escape Attempts are rare; successful escapes are even rarer. We do not know successful escapes are even rarer. We do not know what works best, however.what works best, however.

New Technologies have not been evaluatedNew Technologies have not been evaluated:: 1.Additional video cameras and increased lighting1.Additional video cameras and increased lighting

have been introduced in several large prison systems, have been introduced in several large prison systems, but no independent evaluation of the cost effectiveness but no independent evaluation of the cost effectiveness of these new investments have been conducted to date.of these new investments have been conducted to date.

2.Sensor fences2.Sensor fences are also being implemented with claims are also being implemented with claims of low cost, low maintenance, and low false alarm rates; of low cost, low maintenance, and low false alarm rates; but no research can back up these claimsbut no research can back up these claims

Page 24: Using Hard Technology to Make Prisons and Jails Safer : Does It Really Work? Dec.1, 2009 Lecture Professor James Byrne.

6.New Cell Extraction Technology6.New Cell Extraction Technology

Page 25: Using Hard Technology to Make Prisons and Jails Safer : Does It Really Work? Dec.1, 2009 Lecture Professor James Byrne.

7.Less than Lethal Force in Prison7.Less than Lethal Force in Prison

Three Types of Non-Lethal Force Technology in Three Types of Non-Lethal Force Technology in Federal and State PrisonsFederal and State Prisons::

Oleoresin capsicum (pepper spray)Oleoresin capsicum (pepper spray) Diversionary (flash bang) devicesDiversionary (flash bang) devices Impact Munitions( bean bags, plastic, or rubber, bullets)Impact Munitions( bean bags, plastic, or rubber, bullets) Evaluation Research on the use of these weapons in Evaluation Research on the use of these weapons in

prison is not availableprison is not available..

Issue :Private Prisons and Non-Lethal ForceIssue :Private Prisons and Non-Lethal Force http://law.rightpundits.com/?p=705http://law.rightpundits.com/?p=705

Page 26: Using Hard Technology to Make Prisons and Jails Safer : Does It Really Work? Dec.1, 2009 Lecture Professor James Byrne.
Page 27: Using Hard Technology to Make Prisons and Jails Safer : Does It Really Work? Dec.1, 2009 Lecture Professor James Byrne.

8.New Prison Design: The 8.New Prison Design: The Supermax PrisonSupermax Prison

What is a Supermax?What is a Supermax? A New prison designed A New prison designed to control inmates defined as high violence risk, to control inmates defined as high violence risk, or who require special management due to their or who require special management due to their crime type( e.g. serial killers and terrorists)crime type( e.g. serial killers and terrorists)

Extent of UseExtent of Use: 1% of all prisoners( about 20,000 : 1% of all prisoners( about 20,000 inmates) are currently housed in a super-max inmates) are currently housed in a super-max facility, where they are confined to their cell for facility, where they are confined to their cell for up to 23 hours each day.up to 23 hours each day.

Evidence of EffectivenessEvidence of Effectiveness: mixed; Prison : mixed; Prison Wardens like it, but questions can be raised on Wardens like it, but questions can be raised on the use of this level of social isolation.the use of this level of social isolation.

Page 28: Using Hard Technology to Make Prisons and Jails Safer : Does It Really Work? Dec.1, 2009 Lecture Professor James Byrne.
Page 29: Using Hard Technology to Make Prisons and Jails Safer : Does It Really Work? Dec.1, 2009 Lecture Professor James Byrne.
Page 30: Using Hard Technology to Make Prisons and Jails Safer : Does It Really Work? Dec.1, 2009 Lecture Professor James Byrne.
Page 31: Using Hard Technology to Make Prisons and Jails Safer : Does It Really Work? Dec.1, 2009 Lecture Professor James Byrne.

9.The Problem of Cell Phones in 9.The Problem of Cell Phones in Prison: Detection Technology Prison: Detection Technology

Page 32: Using Hard Technology to Make Prisons and Jails Safer : Does It Really Work? Dec.1, 2009 Lecture Professor James Byrne.
Page 33: Using Hard Technology to Make Prisons and Jails Safer : Does It Really Work? Dec.1, 2009 Lecture Professor James Byrne.

Cell Phone Detection: New Cell Phone Detection: New TechnologyTechnology

At the At the New Jersey State PrisonNew Jersey State Prison inmate check-in inmate check-in starts with a seat on the B.O.S.S. chair. starts with a seat on the B.O.S.S. chair. 

The The "Bodily Orifice Security Scanner“( BOSS)"Bodily Orifice Security Scanner“( BOSS) detects any contraband prisoners may be hiding, detects any contraband prisoners may be hiding, anywhere inside themselves.anywhere inside themselves.

In the past corrections officers were looking for In the past corrections officers were looking for drugs and weapons but now they focus more and drugs and weapons but now they focus more and more on cell phones.more on cell phones.

Across the country mobile phones are finding a way Across the country mobile phones are finding a way into prisoner's hands.into prisoner's hands.

Nearly 400 cell phones were confiscated from Nearly 400 cell phones were confiscated from prisoners in prisoners in New JerseyNew Jersey last year. last year.

Page 34: Using Hard Technology to Make Prisons and Jails Safer : Does It Really Work? Dec.1, 2009 Lecture Professor James Byrne.

Why Do Prisoners Need Cell Why Do Prisoners Need Cell Phones? 3 ReasonsPhones? 3 Reasons

To Facilitate the commission of crimes To Facilitate the commission of crimes on the outside,on the outside,

To Help plan escapes,To Help plan escapes, To Tell friends on the outside to To Tell friends on the outside to

retaliate against witnesses who are retaliate against witnesses who are going to testify at trial against some of going to testify at trial against some of the inmates in jail.the inmates in jail.

Page 35: Using Hard Technology to Make Prisons and Jails Safer : Does It Really Work? Dec.1, 2009 Lecture Professor James Byrne.

Dogs and Cell Phone DetectionDogs and Cell Phone Detection

NJ Department of CorrectionsNJ Department of Corrections developed a new program to sniff out cell developed a new program to sniff out cell phones once they get inside of prisons, and prisoners: Dogs.phones once they get inside of prisons, and prisoners: Dogs.

New Jersey is one of the only states where the dogs are both trained and used New Jersey is one of the only states where the dogs are both trained and used by corrections officers. by corrections officers. 

"The [phone] odor is a little bit different from bomb training and narcotics "The [phone] odor is a little bit different from bomb training and narcotics training. [It] carries differently than those odors so we had to train the dogs how training. [It] carries differently than those odors so we had to train the dogs how to get in there closer and a little tighter.”to get in there closer and a little tighter.”

The dogs, mostly Labradors, have found the phones where corrections officers The dogs, mostly Labradors, have found the phones where corrections officers cannot: inside shoes, electrical outlets, behind plumbing, even in toilets. cannot: inside shoes, electrical outlets, behind plumbing, even in toilets.

http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local-beat/Prison-Cell-Phones-70402262.htmlhttp://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local-beat/Prison-Cell-Phones-70402262.html

Page 36: Using Hard Technology to Make Prisons and Jails Safer : Does It Really Work? Dec.1, 2009 Lecture Professor James Byrne.

Effectiveness of Hard Technology: Effectiveness of Hard Technology: A SummaryA Summary

Contraband detection devicesContraband detection devices: : positive preliminary positive preliminary research at one prison siteresearch at one prison site

Duress alarm systemsDuress alarm systems: : no evaluation researchno evaluation research Language translation devicesLanguage translation devices : : no evaluation researchno evaluation research Remote monitoringRemote monitoring : : ongoing evaluation, not yet ongoing evaluation, not yet

completedcompleted Perimeter securityPerimeter security technology technology: : no evaluation researchno evaluation research New cell extractionNew cell extraction technology technology: : no evaluation researchno evaluation research Less than lethal forceLess than lethal force in prison in prison: : no evaluation researchno evaluation research Supermax prisonSupermax prison: : limited and mixedlimited and mixed evaluation evaluation

research findingsresearch findings Cell phone Detection TechnologyCell phone Detection Technology: in development: in development