Using Data to Drive Instruction
description
Transcript of Using Data to Drive Instruction
Using Data to Drive Instruction
Presented by Brooke Beavers and Jackie Gantzer
Overview
Why data driven instruction?
Using data in our schools
Different ways to look at data
Effective systems
Supports
WH
Y D
ATA
DR
IVE
N
INS
TR
UC
TIO
N?
•Provides our schools with accountability
•Offers feedback for teachers and administrators
• Presents resources to better communicate with students and families
•Assists teachers in targeting instruction
•Provides the school community opportunities to identify effective instructional strategies
•Drives Professional Development to meet the needs of each individual staff
•Allows staff to celebrate and capitalize on strengths and progress
Using data in our schools
School-Wide
Grade-Wide/Content Area
Class- Wide
School-Wide
Identify areas where entire staff can improve
Develop School Improvement Plans
Create School-Wide Goals and Timelines to meet these Goals
School-Wide Example
Tindley Math Curriculum2011 ISTEP+ Data
6th-8th Grade Averages:• ISTEP+ Pass Rate: 83% • ISTEP+ Pass+ Rate: 10%
Driving Question/Focus: How can we improve instruction to continue expanding our pass rate, while pushing more students towards the pass+ level?
ISTEP+ Applied Skills Average: 44% (lowest of all areas)
PR
OB
LEM
SO
LVIN
G:
MATH
EM
ATIC
S
•The Tindley Math Department included a writing portion as part of the Math Problem Solving Ladders this year
•Incorporating Critical Thinking was a data-based decision; students were struggling with communicating the steps they took to solve multi-step problems.
•All Grade levels made tremendous growth in mathematics on this year’s I-STEP.
The Numbers Don’t Lie…
Tindley Math Curriculum2012 ISTEP+ Data
6th-8th Grade Averages:
• ISTEP+ Pass Rate: 92% (+9%)• ISTEP+ Pass+ Rate: 27% (+17%)
Grade-Wide
Utilize grade-level/content area meetings to analyze data
Identify trends/strengths/weaknesses
Devise a plan
Develop and share resources
Put the plan into action
Grade-Wide Example
6th Grade
6TH
GR
AD
E D
ATA
DR
IVEN
IN
TER
VEN
TIO
N P
LAN
6th grade teachers at Tindley used Interim data to drive 7th period remediation groups.
Once a scholar was able to demonstrate mastery of specified skill deficits, he/she had the opportunity to “exit” out of 7th period.
Remediating as a grade level paid off. Skill levels increased and high-stakes tests produced effective gains.
6th Grade Data Driven Intervention Continued…
Scholars were sorted into re-teach groups based on areas of need.
6th grade teachers worked together to determine who would remediate specific subject areas based on success/expertise.
Grade-Wide Planning:Strategies to Incorporate
When deciding on strategies toutilize, the 6th grade team collaborated together…
“The proof is in the pudding…”
Language Arts Mathematics
85.8% 87.7%
This year was the most successful 6th grade I-STEP pass year for Tindley to date…
SO
ME T
HIN
GS T
O C
ON
SID
ER
…
What can building leaders do to promote teacher collaboration?
How do leaders promote the shift of just looking at averages to analyze student performance and begin to focus on the success of each individual student?
When can this type of collaboration occur? Consider school-wide systems that could be established to maximize time and effectiveness.
Despite compelling evidence indicating that working collaboratively represents best practice; teachers in many schools continue to work in isolation. “
- Educational Leadership, 2004
Class-Wide
Puts critical information into the hands of the individual teacher
Teachers examine and sort data
Teachers develop intervention plans based on skill deficits/areas of growth/enrichment
Strategic, targeted instruction occurs to improve student learning
Class-Wide Example
Duke Cohort, 6th grade boys
Looking at the big picture…Math Interim 2
Looking at the big picture…Reading Interim 2
Using Data to Plan
The teacher looked at her student’s overall scores and identified who was not proficient.
She then broke down the standards/skills scholars struggled with.
Planning Class-WideProficient Not-Proficient Intensive
Scholars were grouped
based on
proficiencies/deficits.
Planning Class-Wide:Strategies to Incorporate
When deciding on strategies toutilize, the teacher thought about which approach would work best for her individual student’s needs and engagement.
Planning Class-wide
Tailor InstructionAdditional Instruction
The teacher developed a plan and remediation schedule for all “non-proficient” scholars.
She shared this plan and its
importance with parents via
letter and personal phone
calls.
Planning Class-Wide
Tailor InstructionIntensive Instruction
Some students were going to need intensive instruction.
Things to consider•Effectiveness•Time Efficiency•Difficult Conversations
The numbers don’t lie…
Percent Pass ELA
Series10
20
40
60
80
100
25
90
Interim 2Interim3
Series10
20
40
60
80
100
55
85
Interim 2
Interim 3
Percent Pass Math
Interim results increased dramatically once targeted interventions based on data were put into place for the Duke cohort.
OB
SE
RVATIO
N FE
ED
BA
CK
+
DATA
Identify key indicators of success in the classroom
Accurately point out instructional deficits in the classroom
Create groups of students with similar learning targets and differentiate
Determine instructional interventions/enrichment
Identify skills that need to be re-taught/reemphasized
Examine/refine ladders to get the most “bang for your buck!”
6 Steps for Giving Effective Feedback
In partners, use the data provided to practice using the 6 steps for giving effective feedback.
Praise
Probe
Identify the problem and
action step
Practice
Plan ahead
Set time for follow-up
Celebrate Replicate Capitalize
CELEBRATE: successes, growth, progress› It’s good for morale, good for the soul
REPLICATE: methods used to reach success› If it worked once, it can work again
CAPITALIZE: the strengths in the building› People are hesitant to “brag.” We need to
exploit them and their talents
School-Wide Example
What did we do well?
Growth in math scores across the board
How did we do it?
Incorporation of writing and more advanced problem-solving expectations
How can we replicate and capitalize?
Incorporation of reader-response journals and more intensive writing expectations across the
board
Grade Level/Content Area Example
What did we do well?
By Interim 3, students in 6th and 8th grade were performing in the upper 70s in both Math and Reading.
How did we do it?
Both groups had embraced the data-drive, 7th period targeted instruction model. They “shared” scholars to work towards building skills for the whole grade.
How did/can we replicate and capitalize?
The 7th grade (who was performing in the upper 60s by Interim 3) incorporated the 7th period model of skill reinforcement/remediation. While we didn’t have another Interim to compare results to, it is easy to contribute the strong ISTEP+ performance to this instruction.
Next year, this model and system will be in place immediately, so that all teachers and scholars can capitalize on its success.
Teacher/Classroom Example
What did she do well?
One 9th grade teacher improved scholars’ essay scores from a 64% to a 78%.
How did she do it?
Incorporating Reader’s Response Journaling into class, holding high expectations for scholars ideas and conventions
How can we replicate and capitalize?
Next year, all Humanities and English classrooms will incorporate Reader’s Response Journaling every week to promote the same kind of critical thinking and exemplary writing we expect by the end of the year.
Application – Data Driven Decisions by School Leaders
Sample Data› Initial Reactions› Clarifying Questions› Next Steps
Application - ACUITY Predictive Test #1Given in late-September
Math Reading0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
ACUITY Pass ≈ 65%
74.5%
78.9%
School-Wide Results (6-8)
Pass Rate
69.7%
Pass Rate
77.8%
Application – School-Wide ACUITY Results
1) Initial Reactions?
2) Clarifying Questions?
3) Next Steps?
Application - ACUITY Predictive Test #1
6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Math
Math
Given in late-September
ACUITY Pass ≈ 65%
73.6%
66%
84%
Grade Level Results
56.6%
72.2%
80.2%
Application – Grade Level ACUITY Results
1) Initial Reactions?
2) Clarifying Questions?
3) Next Steps?
6A 6B 6C 6D 6E0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Math
74% 62
%
86% 79
% 67%
Application – Class-Level Results: 6th Grade
63%
45%
75%
68%
32%
Application – Grade Level ACUITY Results
1) Initial Reactions?
2) Clarifying Questions?
3) Next Steps?
Data Analysis Reflection Forms
Teachers fill out after each assessment. They determine:
• Class Average
• Skills of concern
• Plan to address skills
• Students of concern
• Plan to address students
Data Analysis Reflection Forms
Data Analysis Reflection FormsTeacher 6B
1) Initial Reactions?
2) Clarifying Questions?
3) Next Steps?
Data Analysis Reflection FormsTeacher 6E
1) Initial Reactions?
2) Clarifying Questions?
3) Next Steps?
Guide your teachers to
Resources… Peers ACUITY IDOE Website Learning Connection Brain Pop! Reading A-Z Atlas SMART Exchange You Tube/Teacher Tube betterlesson.org Celebrations and
Observations
In Conclusion…
Collecting and analyzing data is ESSENTIAL to our efforts of continuously increasing our effectiveness.
Without it, we don’t know where we’re going or why we’re doing what we’re doing.
Reflection
What are you looking forward to in regards to using data at your school?
What are some areas of concern you have about using data?