Using Choral Reading and Cooperative Groups to Promote Language Learning for ELL Students
-
Upload
unity-pope -
Category
Documents
-
view
27 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Using Choral Reading and Cooperative Groups to Promote Language Learning for ELL Students
Using Choral Reading and Cooperative Groups to Promote
Language Learning for ELL Students
Using Choral Reading and Cooperative Groups to Promote
Language Learning for ELL Students
Ed. 703.22Seminar in Applied Theory
and Research II Susan Chan
Ed. 703.22Seminar in Applied Theory
and Research II Susan Chan
Research DesignResearch Design Quasi-experimental: (X2) - no control group
One designated treatment group:
- Participants are not randomly assigned.
• One group pretest-posttest design: (OXO)
- Single group is pre-tested using a WRAP running record (O). - Single group is exposed to a treatment (X). (choral reading) - Single group is post-tested using a WRAP running record
(O).
Quasi-experimental: (X2) - no control group
One designated treatment group:
- Participants are not randomly assigned.
• One group pretest-posttest design: (OXO)
- Single group is pre-tested using a WRAP running record (O). - Single group is exposed to a treatment (X). (choral reading) - Single group is post-tested using a WRAP running record
(O).
Threats to Internal ValidityThreats to Internal Validity
1) History
2) Maturation
3) Testing/Pretest Sensitization
4) Instrumentation
5) Mortality
6) Statistical Regression
7) Selection-Maturation Interaction
1) History
2) Maturation
3) Testing/Pretest Sensitization
4) Instrumentation
5) Mortality
6) Statistical Regression
7) Selection-Maturation Interaction
Threats to External ValidityThreats to External Validity
1) Pretest-Treatment
2) Selection-Treatment Interaction
3) Treatment Diffusion
4) Experimenter Effects
5) Reactive Arrangement/Participants Effects (novelty)
1) Pretest-Treatment
2) Selection-Treatment Interaction
3) Treatment Diffusion
4) Experimenter Effects
5) Reactive Arrangement/Participants Effects (novelty)
Assessment on Word FamiliesAssessment on Word Families
020406080
100
Test Scores
1 2 3 4 5 6
Student
Pre-test and Post-test
Pre-test
Post-test020406080
100
Test Scores
1 2 3 4 5 6
Student
Pre-test and Post-test
Pre-test
Post-test
Data: Pre-test and Post-test Chart
Data: Pre-test and Post-test Chart
Assessment on Word Families Assessment on Word Families Student Pre-test Post-test
1 45% 60%
2 65% 75%
3 30% 50%
4 70% 85%
5 55% 75%
6 35% 60%
Parental Involvement and Student Achievement
Parental Involvement and Student Achievement
Rating Scale (x-axis)
(1): Never (2): Once a month(3): Once a week(4): 2 or 3 times a week(5): Daily
Correlation: + 0.99 rxy
Positive r: X Y
Rating Scale (x-axis)
(1): Never (2): Once a month(3): Once a week(4): 2 or 3 times a week(5): Daily
Correlation: + 0.99 rxy
Positive r: X Y
Correlation Between Student
Achievement and Parent Reading to
Child
0%10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0 2 4 6
Frequency of Parental Involvement
Student Scores
Series1
Linear (Series1)
Survey: Parental InvolvementSurvey: Parental InvolvementParent Involvement Information Form All information you provide will remain completely confidential. Directions: Please indicate how often you or your child do the following activities. (Use the key below to show how often you do each activity and place your response (choosing the appropriate number) on the space provided to the right. Key to Rating Scale (on average): (1): Never (2): Once a month (3): Once a week (4): 2 or 3 times a week (5): Daily 1. Read to child.
Survey Results - ChartSurvey Results - Chart
Parent Response: (x)
(1): Never(2): Once a month(3): Once a week(4): 2 or 3 times a week(5): Daily
Student Scores
Post-test: (y)
Parent Response: (x)
(1): Never(2): Once a month(3): Once a week(4): 2 or 3 times a week(5): Daily
Student Scores
Post-test: (y)
Child x-axis y-axis
1 5 90%
2 4 80%
3 2 55%
4 3 70%
5 1 40%
6 4 85%
CorrelationCorrelation
Evaluating the correlation between frequency of parent reading to child and reading level, the results show an excellent and positive correlation coefficient, rxy = 0.99.
This indicates that the frequency of a parent reading to a child has an effect on reading levels.
Evaluating the correlation between frequency of parent reading to child and reading level, the results show an excellent and positive correlation coefficient, rxy = 0.99.
This indicates that the frequency of a parent reading to a child has an effect on reading levels.
ReferencesReferences
O’Oconner-Petruso, S.,(2008) Stat.scales.analyses.threats.design.ppt.
O’Oconner-Petruso, S.,(2008) Stat.scales.analyses.threats.design.ppt.