Using Agri-Environmental Indicators in Policy: The Canadian Experience
description
Transcript of Using Agri-Environmental Indicators in Policy: The Canadian Experience
Using Agri-Environmental Indicators in Policy: The
Canadian Experience
Greg Strain, DirectorAgri-Environmental Policy Bureau
2
Achieving environmental sustainability in agriculture has become more complex than ever…
Environmental issues are not new to agriculture, but public scrutiny of environmental costs of agricultural production has been increasing: Water quality issues, pesticide run-offs, fish kills Restrictions on intensive livestock operations Increased consumer awareness of environmental standards of food production
Environmentally sustainable production is increasingly an issue at an international level. key to demonstrate Canada is meeting emerging international standards to
ensure continued market access.
Agriculture is also vulnerable to environmental problems Water shortages Invasive species
3
There are many questions posed by policy decision-makers…
What key factors are affecting environmental performance of the sector, and how will it evolve?
What are the cost and benefits of current environmental trends?
What is the relationship between policies / programs and environmental health?
Which mix of policy and/or program measures is likely to achieve desired environmental outcomes with the most efficiancy?
4
All decision-makers share a common need for environmental information…
Objective and reliable information Is the current environmental performance satisfactory Expected future evolution How is the performance likely to change in response to decisions they make
Historic approaches have focussed on economic information, and largely ignored environmental impacts Risk achieving economic goals at the expense of environmental objectives
Work is underway to develop and refine agri-environmental information and tools to integrate this information in decision-making Agri-Environmental Indicators Integrated Economic-Environmental Modeling Agri-Environmental Valuation
5
Agri-Environmental Indicators (AEIs)…
CanadaLand area: 909 million haFarm area: 67.5 million ha Cultivated land: 61 % Pastureland: 30 % Other land : 9 %Average farm area: 273 ha
CanadaLand area: 909 million haFarm area: 67.5 million ha Cultivated land: 61 % Pastureland: 30 % Other land : 9 %Average farm area: 273 ha
6
Agri-Environmental Indicators (AEIs)…
General approach Risk-based models Integration of biophysical data (climate, soil, landscape) with land use and land
management data (remote sensing, surveys)
Criteria Policy relevant Science-based and objective Understandable and unambiguous to interpret Regionally responsive Feasible to obtain Sensitive to changes in land use and land management
Calculated at Soil Landscapes of Canada polygon level Scale 1:1,000,000 In Canada, there are over 3,000 SLCs with significant agricultural activity Typical size varies (10,000 to 1,000,000 ha) Model results can be extrapolated to broader scales
7
Multidisciplinary approach Bring quantitative, science-based information into the policy debate Enable forward looking analysis to evaluate policy options and scenarios
Integrate economic model with environmental models Policy Model : CRAM (Canadian Regional Agricultural Model) Biophysical Models : Agri-Environmental Indicators
Assess various farm management scenarios relative to a Business as Usual (BAU) baseline
Generate information on Land use change for major activities Area of major crops Summerfallow and tillage practices Livestock numbers Economic impact on both producers and consumers
Integrated Economic-Environmental Modeling
8
Analytical Framework…
Changes in Resource Allocation vs. BAU• land use• cropping patterns• tillage practices• livestock numbers
Changes in Resource Allocation vs. BAU• land use• cropping patterns• tillage practices• livestock numbers
Policy Scenarios• select farm level actions for positive environmental impacts (BMPs)•select regions, commodities, costs, changes in productivity• determine realistic adoption rates
Policy Scenarios• select farm level actions for positive environmental impacts (BMPs)•select regions, commodities, costs, changes in productivity• determine realistic adoption rates
Policy Scenarios modelled in
CRAM
Policy Scenarios modelled in
CRAM
Economic Outcome
s
Economic Outcome
s
AEI Models:soil, water and
air quality; biodiversity
AEI Models:soil, water and
air quality; biodiversity
Biophysical data:• climate• soils
Biophysical data:• climate• soils
Environm.
Outcomes
Environm.
Outcomes
Policy process• quantitative assessment• trade-off analysis
Policy process• quantitative assessment• trade-off analysis
Economics and markets• Business as Usual
Economics and markets• Business as Usual
9
A practical example: the Agriculture Policy Framework…
Under the APF, Canada’s Agriculture Ministers have agreed to: accelerate environmental action, covering all farms
achieve measurable and meaningful environmental goals in the areas of air, water, and soil quality, and biodiversity
Significant new resources have been committed to support the actions needed to meet these environmental goals
Ministers agreed on indicators, targets, timetables and approaches for environmental goals related to: air, water, soil, biodiversity and
farm environmental management
Integrated Economic/Environmental modeling used to set targets AEIs used over time to assess results
10
High
Low Low High
Standard
T3
T2
T1
En
viro
nm
enta
l per
form
ance
Adoption of BMPs and Alternative Land Uses
A practical example: setting APF targets…
Beneficial on-farm action
Baseline
11
A practical example: setting APF targets…
Needed an integrated analysis of expected environmental outcomes (all interconnected)
Soil Quality• erosion• soil carbon• nitrogen
Soil Quality• erosion• soil carbon• nitrogen
Water Quality• nitrogen• phosphorus• pesticides• pathogens
Water Quality• nitrogen• phosphorus• pesticides• pathogens
Air Quality• GHG (CO2, N2O,
CH4)• Ammonia, PM• Odour
Air Quality• GHG (CO2, N2O,
CH4)• Ammonia, PM• Odour
Biodiversity• habitat use• species at risk
Biodiversity• habitat use• species at risk
Nutrient Balance• carbon cycle• nitrogen cycle
Nutrient Balance• carbon cycle• nitrogen cycle
Farm Resource Management• land use • crops• livestock
Farm Resource Management• land use • crops• livestock
12
A practical example: setting APF targets…
A suite of Agri-Environmental Indicators was selected, based on priorities and availability: Risk of soil erosion from water and wind
Residual Soil Nitrogen and Risk of water contamination from nitrogen
Soil Carbon and Greenhouse gas emissions
Biodiversity - wildlife habitat
Scenarios were selected for the analysis – potential changes in key driving factors (land use, farm management): Soil Management (increase conservation tillage, decrease summerfallow, increased use
of forage in rotations, conversion of marginal land to permanent cover)
Pasture Management (increase use of complimentary and rotational grazing)
Nutrient Management (better matching of N to crop requirements)
Livestock Management (improve management of protein in diets)
Shelterbelts and Plantation Forestry (increase use of forestry on marginal land)
13
A practical example: setting APF targets…
-50%
-40%
-30%
-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
GHG IROWCN(Que)
Residual N WaterErosion (Alta)
WindErosion(Sask.)
Biodiversity
-50%
-40%
-30%
-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
GHG IROWCN(Que)
Residual N WaterErosion (Alta)
WindErosion(Sask.)
Biodiversity
National Summary of the Percentage Change in AEIsfrom 2008 BAU for Low, Medium and High Adoption Rates
National Summary of the Percentage Change in AEIsfrom 2008 BAU for Low, Medium and High Adoption Rates
14
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
1990 1999 2010
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
1990 1999 2010
Potential reductionsfrom Business as Usual (BAU) [5 to 20 Mt with
incentives]
Potential reductionsfrom Business as Usual (BAU) [5 to 20 Mt with
incentives]
Gap(6.5 Mt)
Gap(6.5 Mt)
Mt
CO
2e
BAU without sinksBAU without sinks
BAU with sinksBAU with sinks
6% below 19906% below 1990
A practical example 2: GHG reduction…
15
Limitations of Analysis
Limited to management practices known to have beneficial environmental outcomes that are captured by existing models Data availability poses constraints in modeling
Spatial differences between CRAM and AEI models
Lack of farm level cost information
16
Future Directions : Policy Analysis
Continue work on developing and improving the robustness of the models and quality of outputs Climate Change – Mitigation and Impact & Adaptation
Update / Refine APF targets
Build on previous success in influencing the policy debate Next generation of agri-environmental programming
Environmental Goods and Services
Strategic Environmental Assessments (e.g. WTO)
Develop the aspect of Agri-Environmental Valuation (economic valuation) Express biophysical environmental indicators or trends in dollars
Allow true cost-benefit analysis of policy options
17
For more information…
Agri-Environmental Indicator Report (2005) www.agr.gc.ca/env/naharp-pnarsa
Quantitative Analysis of the Impact of Agricultural Management Strategies on Environmental Indicators http://www.agr.gc.ca/spb/rad-dra/publications/isie/ise_e.pdf