Use of Wood Micro-Fibers to Increase Freezing and Thawing
Transcript of Use of Wood Micro-Fibers to Increase Freezing and Thawing
Center for By-Products Utilization
Use of Wood Micro-Fibers to Increase Freezing and Thawing Durability of
Concrete
by Tarun R. Naik, Yoon-moon Chun,
and Rudolph N. Kraus
Presented at the Terrence C. Holland Symposium, CANMET/ACI,Presented at the Terrence C. Holland Symposium, CANMET/ACI,Warsaw, Poland, May 2007Warsaw, Poland, May 2007
Center for By-Products Utilization
Micro-fibers from Pulp and Paper MillWastewater Treatment Residuals
• Solid residue removed from mill wastewater before the water is discharged or reused.
• Removed via a two-step (gravity/primary and biological/secondary).
• Usually, dewatered before disposal or beneficial use.
Center for By-Products Utilization
Mill Wastewater Primary
Clarifier
Dewatering
Primary Residual
Secondary Residual
Clarified WaterSecondary
Clarifier
Dewatered Residual
Recovered Water
Paper Mill Wastewater Treatment Process
Center for By-Products Utilization
Pulp and Paper Mill Residual Solids in Concrete
• Approximately 2/3 of the residual solids generated in the USA is either landfilled or burned.
• Because of cellulose fibers in the residual solids, the residual solids could become an economical source of fibers for use in concrete.
Center for By-Products Utilization
Reasons for Fiber Reinforcement of Concrete
• Inherently, concrete is a brittle material.
• By incorporating fibers into concrete, its toughness and tensile strength could be improved; and, also, shrinkage cracking could be reduced.
Center for By-Products Utilization
0100200300400500600700
Aspect Ratio,L/D
Tensile Strength(MPa)
Modulus ofElasticity (GPa)
SteelCarbonWood Cellulose
Properties of Micro-fibers
Center for By-Products Utilization
Pulp and Paper Mill Residual Solids in Concrete
• There have been very few investigations.• Best performance of concrete seems to be
achieved if the residual solids were collected prior to chemical conditioning and solidification.
Center for By-Products Utilization
Characterization of the Residuals
Seven sources of residual solids from various types of mills were selected.– Primary and/or combined (primary + secondary) residuals– Virgin-fiber and recycled-fiber residuals
• Physical and chemical properties determined.
• Effects of dispersants on sludge to separate fibers established.
Center for By-Products Utilization
Characteristics of Residuals
65.9 (43.6-99.6)LOI at 590°C (%)*57 (35-94)Wood Fiber (%)*
1.27 (0.85-1.68)Avg. Fiber Length, LL (mm)1.83 (1.56-2.17)Specific Gravity
153 (84-230)Moisture Content (%)*5 Virgin, 1 Recycled, 1 MixedFiber Origin
6 Primary, 1 Fiber reclaimType of Residual
* % of oven-dry mass.
Center for By-Products Utilization
Strength and Durability of Concrete Containing Residual Fibers
Mixture Proportions–Residual content of 0.65 to 1.5%.– Initial and final setting times evaluated.–Air-entraining admixture (AEA) was not
used.–HRWRA was used to adjust slump.
Center for By-Products Utilization
Mixture Proportions (per m3) and Fresh Properties
1.81.32.31.91.71.81.62.81.6Air Content (%)
75901257512518015090115Slump (mm)0.440.420.410.430.440.450.430.410.43W/Cm
10301050104010501030102010301030105019-mm Coarse Aggregate (kg)
841855847852841836848837856Sand (kg)
2400
3592.215.6WG
2410
3613.415.7WV
2420
3670.80
Ref2
2410
3651.58.5BR
24102440242023902430Unit Wt. (kg/m3)
363368363360368Cement (kg)5.53.53.01.80.8HRWRA (L)15.716.015.715.60Residuals (kg)
SIC2C1Ref1Mixture
Center for By-Products Utilization
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 20 40 60 80 100
Age (days)
Com
pres
sive
Stre
ngth
(MPa
)Ref. 1C1C2WGWV
Compressive strength of concrete (ASTM C 39)
Center for By-Products Utilization
Compressive strength of concrete (ASTM C 39)(cont’d)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 20 40 60 80 100Age (days)
Com
pres
sive
Stre
ngth
(MPa
)
Ref. 2BRIS
Center for By-Products Utilization
Specimen Reference barLength change test using a comparator (ASTM C 157)
Center for By-Products Utilization
Length change of concrete due to curing in water and drying in air
-0.06-0.05-0.04-0.03-0.02-0.010.000.010.02
0 50 100 150 200 250
Age (days)
Len
gth
Cha
nge
(%)
Ref. 2BRIS
Center for By-Products Utilization
Resistance of Concrete to De-icing Chemicals (ASTM C 672)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Salt Scaling Cycle
Scal
ing
Rat
ing
RBRIS
Center for By-Products Utilization
Change in Dynamic Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete Due to Freezing and Thawing (ASTM C 666 A)
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Freezing and Thawing Cycle
Rel
ativ
e D
ynam
ic M
odul
us o
f Ela
stic
ity (%
)
RBRIS
Center for By-Products Utilization
Residual Flexural Strength (ASTM C 1339)
• Concrete containing residuals showed slightly improved residual-strength than concrete without residuals.
Center for By-Products Utilization
Electrical Indication ofChloride Ion Penetrability Into Concrete (ASTM C 1202)
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
Ref.1
C1 C2 WG WV Ref.2
BR I S
Mixture Name
Cha
rge
Pass
ed (C
oulo
mbs
)
Very Low
Negligible
High
Moderate
Center for By-Products Utilization
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Ref. 1 C1 C2 WG WV Ref. 2 BR I S
Mixture Name
Mas
s Lo
ss A
fter
Six
Min
utes
of
Abr
asio
n (g
)
Mass loss of concrete due to abrasion
Center for By-Products Utilization
CONCLUSIONS
When compared to a reference concrete containing no residuals, concrete containing residuals exhibited:
• Slightly lower compressive strength• higher average residual-strength• Equivalent drying-shrinkage• Improved resistance to freezing and thawing• Equivalent or lower chloride-ion penetration
resistance and abrasion resistance.