USDA FOREST SERVICE DEVELOPMENT OF THE 2012 LAND MANAGEMENT PLANNING RULE

Environmental Justice Conference April 13, 2012

Photographer: Bill Lea

National Forest System

National Forest Land Management

National Forest Land Management

National Forest Land Management

National Forest Land Management

National Forest Land Management

National Forest Land Management

USDA FOREST SERVICE DEVELOPMENT OF THE 2012 LAND MANAGEMENT PLANNING RULE

Environmental Justice Conference April 13, 2012

Photographer: Bill Lea

Focus of Our Discussion

Project or Activity Decision

Land Management Plans (Forests/Grasslands)

USFS Planning Rule

National Forest Management Act

We are here: USFS is

revising the Planning Rule

Why is a Planning Rule Important? Provides procedures to amend, revise,

and develop land management plans Required by the National Forest

Management Act (NFMA) of 1976 Plans set forth desired conditions and

guidance for management of National Forest System lands

Past Planning Rule Efforts

1982 Planning Rule All existing land management plans have been

issued under these regulations 2000 Planning Rule 2005 Planning Rule

Injunction by the courts for not preparing an EIS

2008 Planning Rule Injunction by the courts for an insufficient EIS The 2000 rule legally came back into effect,

with transition language allowing the Agency to use 1982 rule procedures

Input

Proposed rule informed by 26,000 written comments, a Science Forum, Tribal consultation, 35 public meetings, and 300 blog comments.

Released proposed rule and draft environmental impact statement in February 2011. 28 regional forums 300,000 comments

FS has reviewed, analyzed and responded to the comments in the development of the final rule. Published in the federal register April 9, 2012.

What did we do? - Tribes

Sensing - Collaboration+Consultation National Calls for Tribal leaders and

members Regional consultation meetings Travel Scholarships One on one consultation between Tribal

leaders and local FS line officers

What Tribes Told Us

Emphasis on the importance of proper tribal government to government consultation

Include tribes early in the planning process

Combine traditional tribal knowledge with current science

Proactively address climate change through monitoring, mitigation and adaption

What did we do? - Youth

Youth Caucus Increase understanding Provide a forum for youth to express their opinions Engage youth in the development of the rule

Scholarships Blog, Twitter, Web

What did we do? –Publics

National meetings were webcast Regional Meetings Scholarships Webinars, Twitter, Blog

Proof is In the Pudding

The purpose is to guide the development of collaborative and science-based land management plans that promote the ecological integrity of national forests and grasslands. Plans will guide management of NFS lands so that they are ecologically sustainable and contribute to social and economic sustainability; [] have the capacity to provide people and communities with ecosystem services and multiple uses that provide a range of social, economic, and ecological benefits for the present and into the future. These benefits include [] opportunities for recreational, spiritual, educational, and cultural benefits.

Public participation in all phases of the planning process.

Taking into account: the discrete and diverse roles, jurisdictions,

responsibilities, and skills of interested and affected parties

the accessibility of the process, opportunities, and information

Engage the Public:

Engage the Public:

including Tribes and Alaska Native Corporations, other Federal agencies, State and local governments, individuals, and public and private organizations or entities— early and throughout the planning process

Encourage Participation by:

those interested at the local, regional, and national levels

youth, low-income populations, and minority populations

private landowners who may be affected

federal agencies, Tribes, states, counties, and local governments

Consult

The responsible official shall: honor the government-to-

government relationship between federally recognized Indian Tribes and the Federal government

request information about native knowledge, land ethics, cultural issues, and sacred and culturally significant sites

Coordinate:

with the planning efforts of federally recognized Indian Tribes, Alaska Native Corporations, other Federal agencies, and State and local governments

Consider:

the objectives of Tribes, Alaska Native Corporations, other Federal agencies, State and local governments

opportunities for the plan to address the impacts identified or contribute to joint objectives

opportunities to resolve or reduce conflicts

Plans must include direction to: guide the contribution to social and

economic sustainability, taking into account: Social, cultural, and economic conditions Sustainable recreation Multiple uses that contribute to local,

regional, and national economies in a sustainable manner

ecosystem services cultural and historic resources and uses wildlife, fish, and plants; for hunting,

fishing, trapping, gathering, observing, subsistence, and other activities (in collaboration with federally recognized Tribes, ANCs, other Federal agencies, and State and local governments)

opportunities to connect people with nature

Plans must include direction for:

What’s next?

FACA Directives including public

involvement Implementation

What We Hoped to Accomplish Create a robust dialogue with groups of

diverse stakeholders on what should be in a new planning rule.

Discussion informed by the latest science.

Build relationships that can strengthen future Forest Service work.