USCG R&D Center’s Analysis of Standard Boat Asset Project Office (APO’s) Metrics

USCG R&D Center’s Analysis of Standard

Boat Asset Project Office

(APO’s)Metrics

LT Sam Edwards

CG Measurement Summit ‘07

28 Nov 2007

04/09/23 23:48UNCLAS |Analysis of APO's metrics | LT Sam Edwards 2

R&D Center Analyses, Modeling & Simulation

Force Structure and Availability

Sector Operations (Multi-Unit and Missions)

Radar Detection Range

Cutter Chasing Go-Fast


Primary Standard Boat APO Goals

(1) Increase the Operational Availability for Assigned Classes of Standard Boats (i.e. RBS)

(2) Reduce the Annual Maintenance Cost for Assigned Classes of Standard Boats (i.e. RBS).


AnnualInvestment

Personnel System Ops& Upgrades

EngineeringSystem Ops& Upgrades

LogisticsSystem Ops& Upgrades

RBS APO “System Model” (Simplified)

BudgetRequest

MaintenanceCommunity - Sector - Depot

Actual Annual Availability

Annual Availability Gap

Desired Annual Availability

AnnualMaint’ Cost Gap

Desired Annual Maint’ Cost

Actual AnnualMaint’ Cost


AnnualInvestment

Personnel System Ops& Upgrades

EngineeringSystem Ops& Upgrades

LogisticsSystem Ops& Upgrades

Critical APO Measurement Points

BudgetRequest

MaintenanceCommunity - Sector - Depot

Actual Annual Availability

Annual Availability Gap

Desired Annual Availability

AnnualMaint’ Cost Gap

Desired Annual Maint’ Cost

Actual AnnualMaint’ Cost

(A)

(B)


Filtering Candidate Metrics Pool

Candidate APO Metrics

“Right” APO Metrics

Filters

Criticality / “So What” Test (Capability to ID Critical Problem(s) and/or Provide Insight into Corrective Action)

Implementation Cost (to set up APO Metric Data Collection Infrastructure)

Additional Recurring Labor Cost (to enter Selected APO Metric Data)


ALMIS Metrics Pass These Filters

Criticality / “So What” Test (Capability to ID Critical Problem(s) and/or Provide Insight into Corrective Action)

Implementation Cost (to set up APO Metric Data Collection Infrastructure)

Additional Recurring Labor Cost (to enter Selected APO Metric Data)

Filters ALMIS Attributes

ALMIS Is Being ImplementedFor standard boat APO. Therefore, these costs are already being incurred /accepted.

• Aviation and standard boat have Operational Similarities….• ALMIS metrics have evolved within aviation community.


Critical Questions

(1) What are the Available ALMIS Metrics?

(3) Do they need to be supplemented or modified for Standard Boat APO use?

(2) Which Metrics are Most Promising for Standard Boat APO use?


Metrics available in ALMIS

WebReport

Power PlayCube

•Created on demand•Can have long run-time•Fixed format

•Generated every 24 hours•Quickly accessible•Allow calculations•Allow drill-through•Configurable formatting

http://cgweb.comdt.uscg.mil/g-sea/gseaIntro.htm


Promising ALMIS-Available Metrics

Overall (As monitored by the APO IT Cell for APO Command Staff)

• Actual RBS % Fleet Available = ____% for FY 08

• Actual RBS Fleet Annual Maintenance Cost = $_______ for FY08 (Note: Aviation APO uses ALMIS Labor to calculate Maintenance Costs Quarterly and Annually)

Overall Diagnostic

• Dispatch Reliability Index (DRI)

• Percent Planned Monthly Hours Flown

• Not Mission Capable due to Unit-Level Maintenance (NMCM)

• Not Mission Capable Due to Supply (NMCS)

• Not Mission Cable Due to Depot-Level Maintenance (NMCD)


Promising ALMIS- Available Metrics

Logistics Support System ( As monitored by the APO Logistics Cell)

• Not Mission Capable due to Supply (NMCS)

• Total Stock Position (SP)…..Value of Inventory on Hand and On Order

• First Time Fill Rate…………..All Parts

• Cannibalization Hours...Number of Labor Hours to Obtain parts from other A/C

• Cost Drivers……Status of Parts that are most costly to keep asset operational

• Availability Degraders……Parts most likely to keep asset OOC


Promising ALMIS-Available Metrics

Personnel Support System ( As monitored by the APO IT Cell)

• Unit-Level Maintenance Loading Index (UMLI) = (Unit MLH total) PCS Assigned x 1378 where MLH = Maintenance Labor Hours 1378 = Labor Hours per person per year

• Unit-Level Experience Index (ULEI) = (time in aviation + time in AC type) # of Billets

• Overall Maintenance Effort Index (OMEI) = Depot + Unit Labor Hours Total Flight Hours (Note: Aviation APO is working to calculate this in ALMIS; presently problems with getting Depot-level contracting costs into ALMIS)

• Unit-level Maintenance Effort Index (UMEI) = Unit Labor Hours Total Flight Hours

The Below Metrics are Approved but Not yet Implemented in ALMIS


Promising ALMIS- Available Metrics

Engineering Support System ( As monitored by the APO Engineering Cell)

• Number of Priority 2 Requisitions per QTR or Per FY

• MTBF…….Note: Aviation APO calculates from ACMS; Performance & Reliability Summary (reported by part)

• Not Mission Capable due to Depot-Level Maintenance (NMCD)

• Not Mission Capable due to Maintenance (NMCM)

• Costs Drivers……Status of Parts that are most costly to keep asset operational

• Availability Degraders……Status of Parts that keep asset OOC

• Maintenance Time Reports……for Specific Types of Maintenance


Unit-LevelMaintenanceEffortIndex

Total Stock Position


0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%

8%

9%

10%

FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY 06

HH-60J USCG Target

SUPPLYH60 NMCS FY00-06


SUPPLY H60 NMCS (12-Month Tracking)

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

20%

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

HH-60J Target


SUPPLYAir Station First Time Fill Rate

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%

FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06

HC-130 HH-60 HH-65 HU-25


1%

6%

11%

16%

21%

26%

31%

07 Q3 06 Q4 07 Q1 07 Q2

C130 H60 H65 HU25

PERFORMANCEFLEET NMCM (Quarterly)


PERFORMANCE10-YEAR H60 NMCM

…And it is continuing to grow and grow


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06

HH-60J USCG Target

PERFORMANCEH60 7-YEAR AVAILABILTY


40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

07 Q3 06 Q4 07 Q1 07 Q2

C130 H60 H65 HU25 Target

PERFORMANCEH60 AVAILABILTY FY06


2 7 8 8 7 9 7 6 7 6 7 5 90

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06

Fiscal Year

PD

M C

ompl

etio

ns

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Avg

Mon

ths

in S

ervi

ce

(yel

low

line

)

PDMPRODUCTION RATE


Shore Facilty

C4ISR

Cutter

Patrol Boat

Standard Boat

Aviation

Aviation Metrics Relevancy

Maintenance Performance Metrics

Supply Performance Metrics

Asset Mission Performance Metrics

Independent APO Metrics Assessment

APO Types

100%0%Anticipate HighDegree of Similarity forMaintenance & Supply MetricsAcross APO’s


RDC Analysis Findings

(1) The aviation APO has evolved over the past decade an impressive set of APO Metrics, using ALMIS, that work for them.

(3) The decision to implement ALMIS for the standard boat APO provides an initial set of metrics that pass thru the Criticality, Implementation Cost, and Recurring Labor Cost Filters, which would be required for any new set of metrics.

(2) The majority of aviation APO Metrics appear to be directly applicable to the standard boat APO.

(4) It will be a significant amount of time before the standard boat APO Metrics will have stabilized such that they can be used with confidence.

(5) The ALMIS Database must be continually reviewed and cleansed by by APO staff, which are knowledgeable in the maintenance of the APO’s assets, even after the transition period.


RDC Analysis Recommendations

(1) The standard boat APO should initially use the aviation APO’s metrics as a point-of-departure for its own metrics.

(2) The standard boat APO should adequately staff (probably its Engineering Division) to review and cleanse its ALMIS database in a manner similar to the aviation APO.

(3) Even as the standard boat APO evolves the metrics that work best for it, the CG should use one IT system across the standard boat and aviation APOs in order to realize economics-of-scale.

USCG R&D Center’s Analysis of Standard

Boat Asset Project Office

(APO’s)Metrics

LT Sam Edwards

CG Measurement Summit ‘07

28 Nov 2007

USCG R&D Center’s Analysis of Standard Boat Asset Project Office (APO’s) Metrics

Technology

Transcript of USCG R&D Center’s Analysis of Standard Boat Asset Project Office (APO’s) Metrics