USACE Silver Jackets, the Missouri State Risk Management ... · MfSMA Conference, State Risk...
48
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® MfSMA Conference, State Risk Management Team Meeting “Things You Want To Know…” USACE Silver Jackets, the Missouri State Risk Management Team and State Hazard Mitigation Brian Rast, PE, CFM, PMP Silver Jackets Coordinator for Kansas and Missouri Kansas City District April 12, 2013
Transcript of USACE Silver Jackets, the Missouri State Risk Management ... · MfSMA Conference, State Risk...
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG®
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG®
MfSMA Conference, State Risk Management Team Meeting “Things You Want To Know…”
USACE Silver Jackets, the Missouri State Risk Management Team and State Hazard Mitigation
Brian Rast, PE, CFM, PMP
Silver Jackets Coordinator for Kansas and Missouri
Kansas City District April 12, 2013
Presenter
Presentation Notes
-Intro – myself and mention Randy Scrivner and SRMT present -Meetings like this are the perfect thing for SJ because it is about improving how we leverage the network of agencies so we can accomplish more hazard mitigation work -More information in the back: =Heartland Engineer, 2 SJ articles =News release =Limited copies of slide handouts =Fact sheet on website addresses where to find more 279103472
BUILDING STRONG®
Topics
The solution to the hazards of natural disasters is not a silver bullet. No single agency can completely solve flood hazards alone. Flood risk management is a shared
responsibility.
During responses to disasters, FEMA is known for blue jackets, and the Corps, red.
Multiple agencies working together to lessen the effects of disasters are like links in a chainmail coat of armor, and such a metal jacket is the most resilient to disasters.
That’s a silver jacket.
2
Things you want to know…
Why the name?
Presenter
Presentation Notes
What is the partnering opportunity? Actions for Risk Reduction Tools Silver Jackets Pilot Projects Annual Workshop (ITOs!) Status Updates Website SHMP Interagency Comm-Plan Reg SRMT CRS
BUILDING STRONG®
Lead by the Missouri State Emergency Management Agency (SEMA) Participation from federal agencies, including FEMA, National Weather
Service, US Geological Survey, NRCS and others State agencies, such as MDNR and many others
3
State Risk Management Team
BUILDING STRONG® 4
State Risk Management Team Top 3 Team Activities: 1. State Hazard Mitigation Plan
Updates 2. Inundation Mapping & LiDAR
Sharing 3. Working Disasters & Exercises
The team is interested in ► Inundation Mapping, ► Flood Fighting, ► Flood Mitigation, ► Levees, ► Interagency Grant Programs, ► and Sharing LiDAR and Flood
Risk Related Information.
Mitigation
Preparation / Training
Response
Recovery
Event
Partnerships •Hazard mitigation planning •Floodplain management plans •Pre- & post- response & recovery activities
BUILDING STRONG® 5
What is ? Silver Jackets is the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Civil Works program enabling participation in the states’ hazard mitigation teams. This is about collaboration between USACE, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, and other federal, state and local agencies to create an interagency team at the state level to develop and implement solutions to state natural hazard priorities. The Silver Jackets Program provides a formal and consistent strategy for an interagency approach to planning and implementing measures to reduce the risks associated with natural hazards.
Background
Presenter
Presentation Notes
This is the USACE Civil Works program enabling participation in the SRMT. Some of the states use the name Silver Jackets, however, many of the teams have existed longer than the inception of Silver Jackets around 2009. The Lead Silver Jackets Coordinator for USACE in Missouri directly participates on the SRMT, representing all the USACE districts within the state at the team’s regular meetings. Each district also has a Silver Jacket Coordinator. The lead coordinator provides regular status updates, available on request. The status updates provide detail information on active USACE projects and programs, including specific project information that is useful during the FEMA Risk MAP Discovery Phases. The Silver Jackets Coordinators will participate in the FEMA Risk MAP Resiliency Meeting.
BUILDING STRONG® 6
The primary goals are to
• leverage information and resources,
• improve risk communication to the public in a unified effort,
• and create a mechanism to collaboratively solve issues and implement initiatives.
Background
Presenter
Presentation Notes
This is the USACE Civil Works program enabling participation in the SRMT. Some of the states use the name Silver Jackets, however, many of the teams have existed longer than the inception of Silver Jackets around 2009. The Lead Silver Jackets Coordinator for USACE in Missouri directly participates on the SRMT, representing all the USACE districts within the state at the team’s regular meetings. Each district also has a Silver Jacket Coordinator. The lead coordinator provides regular status updates, available on request. The status updates provide detail information on active USACE projects and programs, including specific project information that is useful during the FEMA Risk MAP Discovery Phases. The Silver Jackets Coordinators will participate in the FEMA Risk MAP Resiliency Meeting.
BUILDING STRONG® 7
The program's desired outcomes are Reduced flood risk
Improved situational awareness, where agencies better understand and leverage each other's programs
Collaboration between various agencies, coordinated programs, cohesive solutions
Multi-agency technical resource for state and local agencies
Mechanism for establishing relationships to facilitate integrated solutions post-disaster
Background
Presenter
Presentation Notes
This is the USACE Civil Works program enabling participation in the SRMT. Some of the states use the name Silver Jackets, however, many of the teams have existed longer than the inception of Silver Jackets around 2009. The Lead Silver Jackets Coordinator for USACE in Missouri directly participates on the SRMT, representing all the USACE districts within the state at the team’s regular meetings. Each district also has a Silver Jacket Coordinator. The lead coordinator provides regular status updates, available on request. The status updates provide detail information on active USACE projects and programs, including specific project information that is useful during the FEMA Risk MAP Discovery Phases. The Silver Jackets Coordinators will participate in the FEMA Risk MAP Resiliency Meeting.
BUILDING STRONG®
Flood Earthquake Hurricane wind Wildfire Tornado
Storm surge Landslide Erosion Severe winter weather Extreme temperatures
Tsunami Drought Lightning Hail Subsidence
8
Natural Hazards
USACE mission exists in those underlined
Risk Communication
State’s Hazard
Mitigation Efforts
BUILDING STRONG®
The USACE Flood Risk Management (FRM) Program is the umbrella program
for all our programs related to the hazards of flooding.
9
Interagency Levee Task Forces (on Missouri and Mississippi Rivers)
Coastal Storm Damage Reduction Public Affairs Office
Planning, Regulatory, Environmental FRM Planning Center of Expertise
Federal Task Force, E011988, Unified National Plan R&D, Critical Infrastructure, CERB, IWR International
Interagency Flood Risk Management Committee
Silver Jackets Flood Plain Management Services Planning Assistance to States Emergency Response P.L. 84-99 Levee Program Dam & Levee Safety FRM Business Line
Natural Hazard Priority 1: FRM
Presenter
Presentation Notes
<CONSIDER A STORY OR A READING, ie. DeSoto’s account of the flooding of the Mississippi River>
BUILDING STRONG®
Calls for Proposals so far in three categories:
1. Silver Jackets
► 6 proposals (2011-2012)
► 5 accepted
2. Floodplain Management Services
► 7 proposals
► TBD by May
3. Public Involvement (due 19 Apr 2012)
► Nine regional government engagements (Interagency Floodplain Area Roundtables)
► Multiple FEMA and USACE projects
10
Types of Pilot Projects
BUILDING STRONG® 11
The Communication Challenge
BUILDING STRONG® 12
The Communication Challenge
BUILDING STRONG®
Flood Risk Management Life Cycle
Mitigation
Preparation / Training
Response
Recovery
Event
Partnerships •Hazard mitigation planning •Floodplain management plans •Pre- & post- response & recovery activities
“Getting Ready” Actions taken BEFORE the event, including planning, training, and
preparations
• Flood Risk Management system assessment / inspections
• Monitoring / forecasting threats • State and Local Coordination • Reservoir operations • Flood Fight Preparation
“The Flood Fight” Actions taken DURING the initial
impact of a disaster, including those to save lives and prevent further
property damage
• Emergency system strengthening • Monitor and report flood impact • Monitor system performance • Support State / Local Flood Fight
“Getting back on our feet” Actions taken AFTER the initial impact, including those directed
toward returning to normalcy.
• Repair damaged systems • Assess and document system
performance • Implement mitigation measures /
system improvements
“Driving Down the Risks”
Measures that PREVENT a disaster, reduce its
chance of happening, or reduce its damaging
effects. • Modify mitigation plans • Identify future mitigation
opportunities • Develop system improvements
BUILDING STRONG®
Flood Risk Management Life Cycle
Mitigation
Preparation / Training
Response
Recovery
Event
Partnerships •Hazard mitigation planning •Floodplain management plans •Pre- & post- response & recovery activities
“Getting Ready” Actions taken BEFORE the event, including planning, training, and
preparations
• Flood Risk Management system assessment / inspections
• Monitoring / forecasting threats • State and Local Coordination • Reservoir operations • Flood Fight Preparation
“The Flood Fight” Actions taken DURING the initial
impact of a disaster, including those to save lives and prevent further
property damage
• Emergency system strengthening • Monitor and report flood impact • Monitor system performance • Support State / Local Flood Fight
“Getting back on our feet” Actions taken AFTER the initial impact, including those directed
toward returning to normalcy.
• Repair damaged systems • Assess and document system
performance • Implement mitigation measures /
system improvements
“Driving Down the Risks”
Measures that PREVENT a disaster, reduce its
chance of happening, or reduce its damaging
effects. • Modify mitigation plans • Identify future mitigation
opportunities • Develop system improvements
BUILDING STRONG®
Flood Risk Management Life Cycle
Mitigation
Preparation / Training
Response
Recovery
Event
Partnerships •Hazard mitigation planning •Floodplain management plans •Pre- & post- response & recovery activities
“Getting Ready” Actions taken BEFORE the event, including planning, training, and
preparations
• Flood Risk Management system assessment / inspections
• Monitoring / forecasting threats • State and Local Coordination • Reservoir operations • Flood Fight Preparation
“The Flood Fight” Actions taken DURING the initial
impact of a disaster, including those to save lives and prevent further
property damage
• Emergency system strengthening • Monitor and report flood impact • Monitor system performance • Support State / Local Flood Fight
“Getting back on our feet” Actions taken AFTER the initial impact, including those directed
toward returning to normalcy.
• Repair damaged systems • Assess and document system
performance • Implement mitigation measures /
system improvements
“Driving Down the Risks”
Measures that PREVENT a disaster, reduce its
chance of happening, or reduce its damaging
effects. • Modify mitigation plans • Identify future mitigation
opportunities • Develop system improvements
BUILDING STRONG®
Where we need to be…
Mitigation
Preparation / Training
Response
Recovery
Event
Partnerships •Hazard mitigation planning •Floodplain management plans •Pre- & post- response & recovery activities
“Getting Ready” Actions taken BEFORE the event, including planning, training, and
preparations
• Flood Risk Management system assessment / inspections
• Monitoring / forecasting threats • State and Local Coordination • Reservoir operations • Flood Fight Preparation
“The Flood Fight” Actions taken DURING the initial
impact of a disaster, including those to save lives and prevent further
property damage
• Emergency system strengthening • Monitor and report flood impact • Monitor system performance • Support State / Local Flood Fight
“Getting back on our feet” Actions taken AFTER the initial impact, including those directed
toward returning to normalcy.
• Repair damaged systems • Assess and document system
performance • Implement mitigation measures /
system improvements
“Driving Down the Risks”
Measures that PREVENT a disaster, reduce its
chance of happening, or reduce its damaging
effects. • Modify mitigation plans • Identify future mitigation
opportunities • Develop system improvements
BUILDING STRONG®
Things you want to know…
Questions
17
BUILDING STRONG®
Things you want to know… Risk assessments and Levee Safety Action
Classifications Dam inundation mapping information Dam emergency action plans On going projects available through
SimSuite Please come to the follow up session this morning for more! A chance for USACE and SRMT to get to know YOUR CONCERNS.
18
BUILDING STRONG®
Topics
19
Find Out More… The State Risk Management Team and USACE Silver Jackets
Silver Jackets Program with States’ Hazard Mitigation Teams, Missouri
http:// www.nfrmp.us/state
http:// www.nfrmp.us/state/factMissouri.cfm
Email questions to
Presenter
Presentation Notes
What is the partnering opportunity? Actions for Risk Reduction Tools Silver Jackets Pilot Projects Annual Workshop (ITOs!) Status Updates Website SHMP Interagency Comm-Plan Reg SRMT CRS
BUILDING STRONG®
Thank you for your time!
20
BUILDING STRONG®
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG®
MfSMA Conference, State Risk Management Team Meeting “Things You Want To Know…”
USACE Feedback Session on Levee Safety and Silver Jackets Pilot Projects
Brian Rast, PE, CFM, PMP
Silver Jackets Coordinator for Kansas and Missouri
Kansas City District April 12, 2013
Presenter
Presentation Notes
-Intro – myself and mention Randy Scrivner and SRMT present -Meetings like this are the perfect thing for SJ because it is about improving how we leverage the network of agencies so we can accomplish more hazard mitigation work -More information in the back: =Heartland Engineer, 2 SJ articles =News release =Limited copies of slide handouts =Fact sheet on website addresses where to find more 279103472
BUILDING STRONG® 22
Evolution of a Corps Mission
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Within the Corps, we’re transitioning from the concept of FDR to FRM. In the past, the Corps thought it was managing risk, as it applied the engineering and standards approach to performance & design. Early legislation authorized “flood control” in response to devastating losses [e.g., swamp acts 1850; FCAs of 1917, 1936, 1938(n-s), 1944, etc.] We can’t really control floods, but we can modify water flows in space and time The Corps purpose is reducing damages from floods, but what is really needed is best practices including Risk assessment Management Communication Instead of pursuing a project-construction focused definition, the Corps will define its Civil Works mission as helping manage risks to human life, ecosystems, and the economy. Risk management provides the best approach, including an approach that’s science-based, transparent, and collaborative decision process.
BUILDING STRONG®
Shared Flood Risk Management
23
Measures for driving down flood risks:
Residual Risk
Federal / State / Local
Federal / State / Local
Federal / State / Local
Federal / State / Local
Federal / State / Local / Individual
State / Local
Local
Outreach
Natural Storage
Structural
Non – Structural
Contingency Plans
Building Codes
Zoning
Insurance Individual / NFIP
Initial Risk
All Stakeholders contribute to reducing risk!
Ris
k
Shared Flood Risk Management
Presenter
Presentation Notes
This graph illustrates the definition of flood risk management, and carries our message that some risk will remain no matter what measures are in place. We have transitioned from flood control to flood damage reduction and now to flood risk management The graph shows just a few of the tools that can be used to buy down or manage risk Note that the tools are shared as is the responsibility for flood risk management, some of the tools lie within the responsibility of the nonfederal entities Also note that there will always be a residual risk and the goal is to collaboratively reduce the residual risk to acceptable levels.
BUILDING STRONG®
Accomplishments with hazard mitigation team ► Steady presence in state hazard mitigation team meetings since 2009 ► Regular “Status Update” reports (originally for upward reporting) ► Invitational Travel Orders (ITOs) to FRM workshop, 3 years in a row ► ITOs to Natural Hazards workshops ► Pilot Projects: 3 (as of Dec 2012)
24
Silver Jackets in KC District
BUILDING STRONG®
Recent initiatives with hazard mitigation teams Missouri River & Mississippi Interagency Levee Tasks
Forces Interagency communication tools
► Interagency Communication Plan, starting with FEMA <-> USACE, May 2011
► Dam and Levee Safety Action Classifications ► New Silver Jackets Risk Communication Document in KS
and MO regarding Interim risk reduction measures ~ hazard mitigation actions
25
Silver Jackets in KC District
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Per the January 9, 2013, interagency pow wow at FEMA VII on SHMPs, it is evident there is a significant desire for federal participation in the state hazard mitigation teams
BUILDING STRONG®
Continuing initiatives with hazard mitigation teams Webinars and webinar services SimSuite geospatial flood risk management tool
► Standard graphics for the floodplain manager / planner at federal, state and even county and city levels
► Includes USACE NLD, USGS NHD, and even NWS forecasting data
26
Silver Jackets in KC District
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Per the January 9, 2013, interagency pow wow at FEMA VII on SHMPs, it is evident there is a significant desire for federal participation in the state hazard mitigation teams
BUILDING STRONG®
Wildcat Creek Manhattan, KS a floodplain management plan flood forecast inundation mapping
Cross Creek Rossville, KS flood forecast inundation mapping
Missouri River Inundation Maps flood inundation mapping
► Parkville, MO to Leavenworth, KS ► River miles 377 to 398
development of a process for consistent FIM for remainder of Missouri River
Big Blue River Riley and Pottawatomie County, KS flood forecast inundation mapping below a dam
27
Pilot Projects in KS and MO
BUILDING STRONG®
Topics Things you want to know…
Emergency action plans updated annually and in hands of local EM officials
Dam break inundation maps are available for most of the dams now
How many USACE dams with needed hazard mitigation actions (affecting MO)? ► Nine
28
Dam Safety Program
Presenter
Presentation Notes
What is the partnering opportunity? Actions for Risk Reduction Tools Silver Jackets Pilot Projects Annual Workshop (ITOs!) Status Updates Website SHMP Interagency Comm-Plan Reg SRMT CRS
BUILDING STRONG®
Topics Things you want to know…
Periodic inspections
Levee Safety Action Classifications
Risk communication by levee sponsors required
Hazard mitigation actions
29
Levee Safety Program
Presenter
Presentation Notes
What is the partnering opportunity? Actions for Risk Reduction Tools Silver Jackets Pilot Projects Annual Workshop (ITOs!) Status Updates Website SHMP Interagency Comm-Plan Reg SRMT CRS
BUILDING STRONG®
Topics
30
Levee Safety Program Things you want to know…
the universe of levees
Presenter
Presentation Notes
What is the partnering opportunity? Actions for Risk Reduction Tools Silver Jackets Pilot Projects Annual Workshop (ITOs!) Status Updates Website SHMP Interagency Comm-Plan Reg SRMT CRS
BUILDING STRONG® 31
Joint Efforts with State Risk Management Team
Internal efforts “Stove pipes make us blind,”
FEMA Annual RAD Workshop, Dec/2011 USACE Guidance
► NFRMP guidance • Districts’ internal Flood Risk
Mgmt. Programmatic Plans, pending
• Districts Silver Jackets Programmatic Plan, complete
► Levee engineering circular development and Levee Safety Action Classifications
► Silver Jackets guidance drafted, official release 2013
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Per the January 9, 2013, interagency pow wow at FEMA VII on SHMPs, it is evident there is a significant desire for federal participation in the state hazard mitigation teams
BUILDING STRONG®
Critical cooperation needed through hazard mitigation teams (continued)
32
Joint Efforts with State Risk Management Team
External efforts Silver Jackets can lead the change which will help SRMT STATE HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN (SHMP)
► Only as good as the risk assessments available ► Benefits from access to further detail on a natural
hazards from all agencies ► A role in risk communication to the SHMP exists for
each federal agency General thirst for federal participation Significant need for federal agencies’ data Concept document integrating USACE districts’ information
to both KS and MO drafted to inform the 3 year revision cycle of the SHMP
January 9, 2013, interagency pow wow at FEMA VII on SHMPs, states are requesting the data needed to make their hazard mitigation investment strategy more effective
Robert Gonsalves
BUILDING STRONG®
More specific accomplishments with the SRMT
Pilot projects, Missouri River Inundation Maps, two reaches
Disaster recovery and preparation
► Earthquake exercises and continuity of operations ► Joplin, MO tornado recovery, MJ Jason Evers, NWK
Topics in cooperative risk communication work
► New Madrid Floodway, MJ Jon Korneliussen, MVM ► Brush Creek Watershed Planning, Carol Grimaldi, BC Community
Partners ► Risk MAP, various watersheds
New website for sharing cooperative work
► http://www.nfrmp.us/state/factMissouri.cfm
Sharepoint web-office 33
Accomplishments with State Risk Management Team
BUILDING STRONG®
Proposed ideas
Interagency Floodplain Area Roundtable (IFAR) Program to include more effective interaction, with local officials in 9 regions of Missouri
Assist state teams in encouraging FEMA Community Rating System
► survey to better engage communities
Annual flood summit
► Possibly in Kansas City ► Multiple agencies ► Intended for local and county officials
across the Midwest ► Coincide with
NWS Flood Awareness Week
34
State Risk Management Team
BUILDING STRONG®
What Can Cooperation Among Agencies on State Hazard Mitigation Teams Do?
Share information on risk - Why? ► Other agencies can use risk assessments to prepare and mitigate hazards.
Our actions, your actions - How do they inform the SHMP? (interim risk reduction measures) ► Other agencies manage the hazards differently, and may not understand the
other agencies’ roles. They may be able to reinforce communication. Processes vary – What processes get enabled?
► Pre-meditated hazard mitigation (stage one action prepares way for effective action later) is needed to take advantage of the higher public interest, after an event.
Same message, different agencies - How can state teams assist communities in the communicate and reduce (flood) risk? ► Consolidate known risks in the SHMP with lead actions, specific at the more
local level in county HMPs Stove pipes make us blind - Why meet periodically with SRMT?
► Situational awareness enables better hazard mitigation reducing costs to the state from future damages
35
Presenter
Presentation Notes
What are Interim Risk Reduction Measures? • Interim Risk Reduction Measures (IRRMs) are effective, interim actions taken to reduce inundation risks posed by a levee system while longer term solutions are planned and implemented. IRRMs are a critical part of responsible, adaptive flood risk management and recognize the dynamic nature of flood risk. Even levee systems that may not pose high risks can benefit from IRRMs.
BUILDING STRONG®
Topics
36
Find Out More… The State Risk Management Team and USACE Silver Jackets
Silver Jackets Program with States’ Hazard Mitigation Teams, Missouri
http:// www.nfrmp.us/state
http:// www.nfrmp.us/state/factMissouri.cfm
Email questions to
Presenter
Presentation Notes
What is the partnering opportunity? Actions for Risk Reduction Tools Silver Jackets Pilot Projects Annual Workshop (ITOs!) Status Updates Website SHMP Interagency Comm-Plan Reg SRMT CRS
BUILDING STRONG® 37
BUILDING STRONG®
Extra Slides
Not part of presentation
38
BUILDING STRONG®
Topics What’s Silver Jackets?
Dam and Levee Safety
Interagency Communication Planning
► Comm-Plan
► Floodplain Area Roundtable Meetings
39
Overview
Presenter
Presentation Notes
For the 8 a.m. agenda item, I will give an overview of what Silver Jackets has been doing in Missouri and begin a segue to other USACE activities in levee safety, dam safety, and emergency management that relate to the state led hazard mitigation efforts, including the data USACE is providing to complement the state hazard mitigation plan. In the 9:15 agenda item, USACE team members from the various programs and districts can give much more information floodplain managers want to know and collect feedback. First, Silver Jackets success stories will be covered in more detail, specifically featuring the pilot project, Missouri River Inundation Mapping and recapping on Wildcat Creek, a Kansas team pilot project. Second, Levee Safety Action Classifications (LSAC) will be coming out over the next three years, and the LS project manager(s) can comment on the logistics. The Dam Safety PMs will also be welcome to present. Some state agency and USACE staff will be listening to issues the local floodplain managers have encountered. Of paramount importance during this time will be to gather ideas for pilot project proposals that will be developed in the summer for Silver Jackets funding. Other USACE programs will also be offered, including the FloodPlain Management Services. OLD What is the partnering opportunity? Actions for Risk Reduction Tools Silver Jackets Pilot Projects Annual Workshop (ITOs!) Status Updates Website SHMP Interagency Comm-Plan Reg SRMT CRS
BUILDING STRONG®
Topics
Find out more ► Why the name?
► What’s an LSAC?
40
Breakout Session for State
BUILDING STRONG®
Topics
text ► ttext
41
text
Presenter
Presentation Notes
What is the partnering opportunity? Actions for Risk Reduction Tools Silver Jackets Pilot Projects Annual Workshop (ITOs!) Status Updates Website SHMP Interagency Comm-Plan Reg SRMT CRS
BUILDING STRONG®
The State Risk Management Team and USACE Silver Jackets Find Out More…
Silver Jackets Program with States’ Hazard Mitigation Teams http:// www.nfrmp.us/state http:// www.nfrmp.us/state/factMissouri.cfm
Wildcat Creek Pilot Project, Manhattan, Kansas ► Interagency White Paper
http://www.awra.org/proceedings/Spring2012/doc/abs/BrianRast_5ad7b2de_7818.pdf ► USACE National FRM Program Workshop Presentation
http://www.nfrmp.us/frmpw/docs/WORKSHOP/Plenary/4%20-%20Thursday/0830_Rast_121024_FRM-SJ%20Wildcat_Ck_FULL.pdf http://www.nfrmp.us/frmpw/docs/WORKSHOP/Plenary/4%20-%20Thursday/0830_Rast_120822_Wildcat_Handout.pdf
► Flood Forecast Inundation Map http://water.weather.gov/ahps2/inundation/inundation.php?gage=mwck1
[email protected] SimSuite Webviewer
http://rsc.usace.army.mil/SimSuite/External-Users Email questions to
42
BUILDING STRONG®
What Can Agencies on State Hazard Mitigation Teams Do?
Will this information be useful? What can it be used for? How does this process align with the state’s hazard mitigation
plan (SHMP)? How will it inform the SHMP? What Actions does this process enable? How can state teams assist communities in the
communication of flood risk (and LSAC assignment)? What can participating agencies do to help communities at
risk? Can team collaboratively work with communities to reduce and manage risk?
Are there additional coordination activities needed? ► Two-way updates through state team meetings? ► Closer coordination with communities? ► Impacts to SHMP process?
43
BUILDING STRONG®
Flood Risk Management Life Cycle
Mitigation
Preparation / Training
Response
Recovery
Event
Partnerships •Hazard mitigation planning •Floodplain management plans •Pre- & post- response & recovery activities
“Getting Ready” Actions taken BEFORE the event, including planning, training, and
preparations
• Flood Risk Management system assessment / inspections
• Monitoring / forecasting threats • State and Local Coordination • Reservoir operations • Flood Fight Preparation
“The Flood Fight” Actions taken DURING the initial
impact of a disaster, including those to save lives and prevent further
property damage
• Emergency system strengthening • Monitor and report flood impact • Monitor system performance • Support State / Local Flood Fight
“Getting back on our feet” Actions taken AFTER the initial impact, including those directed
toward returning to normalcy.
• Repair damaged systems • Assess and document system
performance • Implement mitigation measures /
system improvements
“Driving Down the Risks”
Measures that PREVENT a disaster, reduce its
chance of happening, or reduce its damaging
effects. • Modify mitigation plans • Identify future mitigation
opportunities • Develop system improvements
BUILDING STRONG®
National Flood Risk Management
Silver Jackets • IFRMC • FIFM-TF • ILTF / RFRMT Roundtables • Regional FRM Teams • CERB
EO 11988 • PL 84-99 • Section 404 Unified National Plan • Risk MAP
Disaster Response • Mitigation
Land Use Planning / Zoning • Emergency Services Contingency Response • Evacuation • Flood Fighting
Water Resources Management • Building Codes Floodproofing • Environmental Protection
FEMA • DOI • EPA • NOAA / NWS NOAA CSC • USBR • HUD • USDS • DHS
NRCS • Tribes • States • Locals
Planning • FMPS / PAS • Levee and Dam Safety FRM Business Line • FRM PCX • Regulatory Environmental • R&D • International • Coastal
National Flood Risk Management
Presenter
Presentation Notes
This graph illustrates the definition of flood risk management, and carries our message that some risk will remain no matter what measures are in place. We have transitioned from flood control to flood damage reduction and now to flood risk management The graph shows just a few of the tools that can be used to buy down or manage risk Note that the tools are shared as is the responsibility for flood risk management, some of the tools lie within the responsibility of the nonfederal entities Also note that there will always be a residual risk and the goal is to collaboratively reduce the residual risk to acceptable levels.
BUILDING STRONG® 46
Missouri River Inundation Mapping
BUILDING STRONG® 47
Levee Protected Areas
BUILDING STRONG®
Missouri River Inundation Maps
48
Missouri River Mapping
