USA2 170519 2€¦ · Unpacking country-level performance for the UNITED STATES (INCLUDING CDC,...
2
- Yes No Did not participate in monitoring round Unknown or not applicable United States aggregate data IHP + DP Average Legend 2016 IHP+ MONITORING ROUND COMMITMENT TO ESTABLISH STRONG HEALTH SECTOR STRATEGIES WHICH ARE JOINTLY ASSESSED, AND STRENGTHEN ACCOUNTABILITY PARTNERS SUPPORT A SINGLE NATIONAL HEALTH STRATEGY COMMITMENT TO IMPROVE THE FINANCING, PREDICTABILITY AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT OF THE HEALTH SECTOR HEALTH DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION IS MORE PREDICTABLE DP participates in joint sector or sub-sector assessments of strategic plan (JANS) COMMITMENT TO CREATE AN ENABLING ENVIRONMENT FOR CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANISATIONS AND PRIVATE SECTOR PARTICIPATION IN THE HEALTH SECTOR CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANISATIONS ENGAGEMENT HEALTH AID IS ON BUDGET HOW TO READ THE PERFORMANCE PROFILE All data presented on this visual aid are self-reported by the development partner (DP), or provided by the ministry of health (MoH), the civil society organizations (CSOs) and private sector (PS) representatives in the 14 countries for which the DP reported (see list of countries at the back). All data provided by government, CSOs and PS have in principle been validated by MoH. Where possible, trends in performance are documented over the last 2 monitoring rounds (2014 and 2016). For complementary information such as the Country 2016 monitoring report please visit www.internationalhealthpartnership.net . DP supports private sector organisations (Support can include financing or technical support) DP supports CSOs. (Support can include consultation, financing, training and/or technical support) DP supports regional technical cooperation, e.g. communities of practice; south-south cooperation; triangular cooperation: DP uses national procurement and supply systems DP funds use national expenditure procedures. Note: data provided only for countries with CPIA 3.5 or higher. DP funds reported on budget Predictability of funds for future - DP has communicated forward looking expenditure for 3 years ahead to government DP funds disbursed to the government according to agreed timelines. DP participates in mutual accountability processes DP uses only national health sector indicators to monitor support MUTUAL ACCOUNTABILITY IS STRENGTHENED COMMITMENT TO ESTABLISH, STRENGTHEN AND USE COUNTRY SYSTEMS PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT (PFM) SYSTEMS ARE STRENGTHENED AND USED TECHNICAL SUPPORT IS COORDINATED AND SOUTH-SOUTH COOPERATION SUPPORTS LEARNING PROCUREMENT AND SUPPLY SYSTEMS ARE STRENGTHENED AND USED PRIVATE SECTOR ENGAGEMENT The 8 Effective Development Cooperation (EDC) practices in health are captured in 4 commitments. The first three commitments present the performance of the DPs against 6 EDC practices. The fourth commitment regards DP support to civil society and private sector. Development partner (DP) visual aid: UNITED STATES (INCLUDING CDC, USAID AND PEPFAR) 41% IHP+ DP average 29% United States 2014 2016 0.0 25% 100% 50% 75% 90% TARGET 53% 56% 43% 0% 2014 2016 0.0 25% 100% 50% 75% 90% TARGET 53% 63% 49% 72% 2014 2016 0.0 25% 100% 50% 75% 90% TARGET 37% 60% 19% 20% 2014 2016 0.0 25% 100% 50% 75% 90% TARGET 71% 53% 86% 98% 2014 2016 0.0 25% 100% 50% 75% 90% TARGET 73% 77% 60% 64% 46% IHP+ DP average 33% United States 75% 80% IHP+ DP average United States 82% IHP+ DP average 79% United States 0 20 40 60 80 100% Target 79% 74% 0 20 40 60 80 100% Target 79% 48% 0 20 40 60 80 100% Target 79% 73% 0 20 40 60 80 100% Target 79% 80%
Transcript of USA2 170519 2€¦ · Unpacking country-level performance for the UNITED STATES (INCLUDING CDC,...
-Yes NoDid not participate in monitoring round
Unknown or not applicableUnited States
aggregate dataIHP +DP AverageLegend
2016 IHP+ MONITORING ROUND
COMMITMENT TO ESTABLISH STRONG HEALTH SECTOR STRATEGIES WHICH ARE JOINTLY ASSESSED, AND STRENGTHEN ACCOUNTABILITY
PARTNERS SUPPORT A SINGLE NATIONAL HEALTH STRATEGY
COMMITMENT TO IMPROVE THE FINANCING, PREDICTABILITY AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT OF THE HEALTH SECTOR
HEALTH DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION IS MORE PREDICTABLE
DP participates in joint sector or sub-sector assessments of strategic plan (JANS)
COMMITMENT TO CREATE AN ENABLING ENVIRONMENT FOR CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANISATIONS AND PRIVATE SECTOR PARTICIPATION IN THE HEALTH SECTOR
CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANISATIONS ENGAGEMENT
HEALTH AID IS ON BUDGET
HOW TO READ THE PERFORMANCE PROFILEAll data presented on this visual aid are self-reported by the development partner (DP), or provided by the ministry of health (MoH), the civil society organizations (CSOs) and private sector (PS) representatives in the 14 countries for which the DP reported (see list of countries at the back). All data provided by government, CSOs and PS have in principle been validated by MoH. Where possible, trends in performance are documented over the last 2 monitoring rounds (2014 and 2016). For complementary information such as the Country 2016 monitoring report please visit www.internationalhealthpartnership.net .
DP supports private sector organisations (Support can include financing or technical support)
DP supports CSOs. (Support can include consultation, financing, training and/or technical support)
DP supports regional technical cooperation, e.g. communities of practice; south-south cooperation; triangular cooperation:
DP uses national procurement and supply systems
DP funds use national expenditure procedures. Note: data provided only for countries with CPIA 3.5 or higher.
DP funds reported on budget
Predictability of funds for future - DP has communicated forward looking expenditure for 3 years ahead to government
DP funds disbursed to the government according to agreed timelines.
DP participates in mutual accountability processes
DP uses only national health sector indicators to monitor support
MUTUAL ACCOUNTABILITY IS STRENGTHENED
COMMITMENT TO ESTABLISH, STRENGTHEN AND USE COUNTRY SYSTEMS
PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT (PFM) SYSTEMS ARE STRENGTHENED AND USED
TECHNICAL SUPPORT IS COORDINATED AND SOUTH-SOUTH COOPERATION SUPPORTS LEARNING
PROCUREMENT AND SUPPLY SYSTEMS ARE STRENGTHENED AND USED
PRIVATE SECTOR ENGAGEMENT
The 8 Effective Development Cooperation (EDC) practices in health are captured in 4 commitments. The first three commitments present the performance of the DPs against 6 EDC practices. The fourth commitment regards DP support to civil society and private sector.
Development partner (DP) visual aid: UNITED STATES (INCLUDING CDC, USAID AND PEPFAR)
41%
IHP+ DP average
29%
United States
2014 20160.0
25%
100%
50%
75%
90% TARGET
53%56%43%
0%
2014 20160.0
25%
100%
50%
75%
90% TARGET
53%63%
49%
72%
2014 20160.0
25%
100%
50%
75%
90% TARGET
37%
60%
19%20%
2014 20160.0
25%
100%
50%
75%
90% TARGET
71%
53%
86%98%
2014 20160.0
25%
100%
50%
75%
90% TARGET
73%77%
60% 64%
46%
IHP+ DP average
33%
United States
75%
80%
IHP+ DPaverage
UnitedStates
82%
IHP+ DP average
79%
United States
0
20
40
60
80
100%
Target 79%
74%
0
20
40
60
80
100%
Target 79%
48%0
20
40
60
80
100%
Target 79%
73%
0
20
40
60
80
100%
Target 79%
80%
Unpacking country-level performance for the UNITED STATES (INCLUDING CDC, USAID AND PEPFAR) -No or 0%
Did not participate in monitoring round
Unknown Target acheivedor exceeded
Progress made,but not yet on target ? Not applicable N/ALegend
ODA as % of GDP
2011
2013
2015
Percentage of ODA for health
DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE FOR HEALTH (DAH)
.20%2011
.18%2013
.17%2015
Percentage of ODA health by modality
MULTI & BIFUNDING
OTHER
SECTOR BUDGET SUPPORT
POOLED FUND CONTRIBUTIONS
PROJECTFUNDING
94%
0%
0%
4%
1%2011 2013
Total official development assistance (ODA)
$27,049$28,601
Milli
on U
S $
$27,402
2015
26%
28%27%
70%
70%
?
100%
-100%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A54%
?
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
68%
N/A
?
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
N/A
N/A
-
-
-N/A
-
-
-
-
?
-
-
- -
-
--
-
100%
-
-
100%91%
?-100%91%
?
?
96%
99%
73%
96%19%
35%
-
?
?
87%
?
100%
100%
?
?
-
-
-
-
-
100%
?
?
?
-100%
-
-
-
-
49%
N/A
---
N/A
?
N/A
N/A
?
100%
100%
?
-
100%
100%
?
N/A
-
-
-
-
N/A
-N/A
?
AFGHANISTAN
LIBERIA
MALINIG
ERIA
PAKISTAN
USAID
UGANDA
USAID
USAID
USAID
CDC INCLUDIN
G PEPFAR
USAID
USAIDBENIN
CAMBODIA
CAMBODIA
DRCMADAGASCAR
NIGERIA
SENEGAL
ZAMBIA
USAID
CDCUSAID
USAID
USAID
USAIDCDC
2016 IHP+ MONITORING ROUND
PARTICIPATION IN MA PROCESSES
USE OF M&E
% OF FUNDS DISBURSED
FORWARD LOOKING EXP
AID ON BUDGET
USE OF PFM
PROCUREMENT
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
CSO SUPPORT
PS SUPPORT
2014
2016
2014
2016
2014
2016
2016
2016
2014
2016
2016
2016
2016
2014
2016Target: 90%
Target: 85%
Target: 80%
