USA vs. Derby Consent Decree

download USA vs. Derby Consent Decree

of 24

Transcript of USA vs. Derby Consent Decree

  • 8/10/2019 USA vs. Derby Consent Decree

    1/24

    UNITEll STATES DISTRICT COURT

    DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

    P l a i n t i f f

    v .

    CITY OF DERBY ~ONNECTICUI ,}

    D e f e n d a n t .

    C i v i l A c t i o n No .

    CONSENT DECREE

    Case 3:14-cv-01594-WWE Document 3 Filed 10/28/14 Page 1 of 24

  • 8/10/2019 USA vs. Derby Consent Decree

    2/24

    TABLE OF CONTENTS

    I BACKGROUND..

    I L J U R I S D I C T I O N 2

    I I I PARTIES BOUND 2

    I V DEFINITIONS 2

    V . STATEMENT OF PURPOSE 5

    VI. PAYMENT OF RESPONSE COSTS 5

    V I I FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONSENT DECREE 6

    V I I I COVENANTS BY L A I N T I F F : 8

    IX . RESERV~iTIONS OF RIGHTS BY UNITED STATES 9

    X . COVENANTS BY SETTLING DEFENDANT 1 0

    XI. EFFECT OF SE TTLEM~NT/CONTRIBUTION 1 1

    X I I RETENZ I4N OF RECORDS 13

    X 1 I I NOTICES AND SUBMISSIONS 1 ~

    X I V. RETENTION OF U R I S D I C T I O N 1 6

    XV. INTEGRATION/APPENDIX 1 7

    X V I . LODGING AND OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC OMMENT 1 7

    XVII . S I G N ATO ~ Z I E S / S E RV I C E 1 7

    XVIII . FINAL UllGIVIENT 18

    z i

    Case 3:14-cv-01594-WWE Document 3 Filed 10/28/14 Page 2 of 24

  • 8/10/2019 USA vs. Derby Consent Decree

    3/24

    r ~ ~ y : c e ~ t z ~ l n i ~ ~

    A. The U n i t e d S t a t e s of America U n i t e d S t a t e s ) , on b e h a l f of h e A d m i n i s t r a t o rof h e

    U.S. nvironmental P r o t e c t i o n A g e n c y EPA ) , i l e d a complaint n t h i s m a s t e r p u r s u a n t t o

    S e c t i o n 1 0 7 of h e Comprehens ive Environmental Resp onse, ompensa t ion , nd L i a b i l i t y A c t ,

    42 U.S.C. 9 6 0 7 C E R C L A ) , e e k i n g re imbursement of e s p o n s e c o s t s i n c u n ~ e d o r t o b e

    i n c u r r e d f o r r e s p o n s e a c t i o n s t a k e n a t o r i n c o n n e c t i o n w i t h t h e r e l e a s e o r t h r e a t e n e d r e l e a s e of

    h a z a r d o u ss u b s t a n c e s a t t h e O ' S u l l i v a n ' s I s l a n d S i t e i n De r b y, C o u n t y of New a v e n ,

    C o n n e c t i c u t t h e S i t e ) .

    B. I n r e s p o n s e t o t h e r e l e a s e o r t h r e a t e n e d r e l e a s e of hazardous u b s t a n c e s a t o r f rom t h e

    S i d e , EPA n d e r t o o k r e s p o n s ea c t i o n s a t t h e S i t e p u r s u a n t t o S e c t i o n 104 of CERCLA 2 U.S.L.

    ~ 9604.

    C . I n p e r f o r m i n gr e s p o n s e a c t i o n s a t t h e S i t e , EPA as n c u r r e d . r e s p o n s e c o s t s a t t h e

    S i t e .

    D . The U n i t e d S t a t e s a l l e g e s t h a t S e t t l i n g Defendant s a e s p o n s i b l e p a r t y p u r s u a n t t o

    S e c t i o n 1 0 7 ( x )of CERCLA 2 U.S.C. 6 0 7 ( a ) .

    E . The d e f e n d a n t t h a t has n t e r e d i n t o t h i s Consent Decree ` S e t t l i n g Defendant ) oes

    n o t admi t any i b i l i t yt o P l a i n t i f f a r i s i n g o u t of h e t r a n s a c t i o n s o r o c c u r r e n c e sa l l e g e d i n t h e

    c o m p l a i n t .

    F . T h e Uni ted S t a t e s has rev iewed t h e F i n a n c i a l I n f o r m a t i o n s u b m i t t e d b y e t t l i n g

    Defendant o d e t ~ r m i r l e whether e t t l i n g Defendant s f i n a n c i a l l y a b l e t o pay r e s p o n s e c o s t s

    i n c u r r e d a t t h e S i t e . Based u p o n h i s F i n a n c i a l I n f o r m a t i o n , t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s h a s d e t e r m i n e d

    t h a t S e t C l i n g Defendant a s l i m i t e d f i n a n c i a l a b i l i t y ~ p a y o r r e s p o n s e c o s t s i n c l t r r e d a t t h e S i t e .

    G. T h e U n i t e d S t a t e s a n d S e t t l i n g Defendant g r e e , a n d t h i s C o ur t b y n t e r i n g t h i s

    Case 3:14-cv-01594-WWE Document 3 Filed 10/28/14 Page 3 of 24

  • 8/10/2019 USA vs. Derby Consent Decree

    4/24

    C o n s e n t .D e c r e e f i n d s , t h a t t h i s Consent D e c r e e h a s b e e n n e g o t i a t e d b y t h e P a r t i e s i n g o o d f a i t h ,

    t h a t s e t t l e m e n t o f h i s m a t t e r wi thou t u r t h e r l i t i g a t i o n and w i t h o u t t h e a d m i s s i o n o r a d j u d i c a t i o n

    o f n y i s s u e o f a c t o r l a w i s a p p r o p r i a t e a n d w i l l avo id prolonged a n d compl ica ted l i t i g a t i o n

    b e t w e e n t h e P a r t i e s , a n d . t h a t t h i s C o n s e n t D e c r e e i s f a i r , r e a s o n a b l e , a n d i n t h e p u b l i c i n t e r e s t .

    THEREFORE i t h t h e consen t o f h e P a r t i e s t o t h i s D e c r e e , t i s ORDERED

    ADJUDGED AND DECREED:

    I I . JURISDICTION

    1 . P h i s C o u r t h a s u r i s d i c t i o n o v e r t h e s u b j e c t m a t t e r o f h i s a c t i o n p u r s u a n t t o 28 U . S . C .

    ~ 1 . 3 3 1 a n d 1 3 4 5 a n d 4 2 U . S . C . ~ 9607 a n d 9613 b) nd a l s o h a s p e r s o n a l j u r i s d i c t i o n over

    S e t t l i n g Defendan t . S o l e l y f o r t h e p u r p o s e s o f h i s Consent D e c r e e a n d t h e u n d e r l y i n g

    c o m p l a i n t ,S e t t l i n g D e f e n d a n t w a i v e s l l o b j e c t i o n s and d e f e n s e s t h a t i t may a v e t o j u r i s d i c t i o n

    o f h e C o u r t o r t o v e n u e i n t h i s D i s t r i c t . S e t t l i n g Defendant s h a l l not c h a l l e n g e e n t r y o r t h e te rms

    o f h i s C o n s e n t D e c r e e o r t h i s C o u r t ' s j u r i s d i c t i o n t o e n t e r a n d e n f o r c e t h i s Consent Decree .

    I I I . PARTIES BOUND

    2. T h i s Consent D e c r e e i s b i n d i n g u p o n t h e United S t a t e s , a n d u p o n S e t t l i n g Defendan t ,

    a n d t s s u c c e s s o r s a n d . a s s i g n s . Any h a n g e i n o w n e r s h i p o r c o r p o r a t e o r o t h e r l e g a l s t a t u s ,

    i n c l u d i n g but n o t . l i m i t e d t o , a n y t r a n s f e r o f s s e t s o r r e a l o r p e r s o n a l p r o p e r t y , s h a l l i n n o w a y

    a l t e r t h e s t a t u s o r r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s o f e t t l i n g D e f e n d a n t under t h i s Consent Decree .

    I V. DEFINITIONS

    3 . Unless o t h e r w i s e e x p r e s s l y prov ided i n t h i s Consent D e c r e e , t e r m s used i n t h i s

    C o n s e n t D e c r e e t h a t a r e d e f i n e d i n CERCLA r i n r e g u l a t i o n s p r o m u l g a t e d under CERCL~

    s h a l l h a v e t h e m e a n i n g s a s s i g n e d t o t h e m i n CERCLA r i n s u c h r e g u l a t i o n s . W h e n e v e r t e rms

    l i s t e d b e l o w a r e used i n t h i s Consent D e c r e e o r i f s a p p e n d i c e s ,t h e # o l l o w i n gd e f i n i # i o n s s h a l l

    Case 3:14-cv-01594-WWE Document 3 Filed 10/28/14 Page 4 of 24

  • 8/10/2019 USA vs. Derby Consent Decree

    5/24

    a p p l y :

    a . CERCLA h a 1 1 mean h e Gomprenensive Environmental Response,

    Compensation, and L i a b i l i t y A c t , 42 . S , C . 9 6 0 1 - 9 6 7 5 .

    b . Consent Decree h a l l mean h i s Consent Decree and t h e Appendix a t t a c h e d

    h e r e t o . I n t h e event o f o n f l i c t between t h i s Consent Decree and t h e Appendix, h e Consent

    Decree h a l l c o n t r o l .

    c . ' `Day or day h a l l mean a calendar day. I n comput ing any p e r i o d o f ime

    under h i s Consent Decree, where h e l a s t d a y wo u l d a l l on a Saturday, u n d a y y , or e d e r a l . or

    S t a t e h o l i d a y , t h e p e r i o d s h a l l run n t i l t h e c l o s e o f u s i n e s s o f h e next working day.

    d. DOJ h a l l mean h e U . S . Department o f u s t i c e and t s s l t c c e s s o r

    departments, g e n c i e s , or n s t r u m e n t a l i t i e s .

    e . E f f e c t i v e Date h a l l mean. h e d a t e upon w h i c h t h e a p p r o v a l . o f h i s Consent

    Decree s recorded o n h e Court 's d o c k e t .

    f EYA h a l l mean h e U . S . nvironmental r o t e c t i o n A g e n c y and t s

    successor d e p a ~ t m e n t s ,a g e n c i e s , or n s t r u m e n t a l i t i e s .

    g . EPA azardous Substance Superfund h a l l mean h e Hazardous Substance

    Superfund e s t a b l i s h e d b y h e I n t e r n a l Revenue Code, 26 U . S . C . 5 0 7 .

    1 1 F i n a n c i a l Information h a l l mean those i n a n c i a l documents d e n t i f i e d i n

    Appendix A .

    i I n t e r e s t s h a l l mean n t e r e s t a t the a t e s p e c i f i e d f o r i n t e r e s t o n investments

    o f h e E I ' A Hazardous Substance Superfund e s t a b l i s h e d by 26 U.S.C. ~ 907, ompounded

    annually o i l October 1 o f each y e a r , i n accordance with 42 . S . C . b07(~) . The p p l i c a b l e r a t e

    o f n t e r e s t s h a l l b e h e r a t e i n e f f e c t a t t h e time the n t e r e s t a c c r u e s . The a t e o f n t e r e s t i s s u b j e c t

    Case 3:14-cv-01594-WWE Document 3 Filed 10/28/14 Page 5 of 24

  • 8/10/2019 USA vs. Derby Consent Decree

    6/24

    t o change on October 1 of ach y e a r .

    j . P a r a g r a p h h a l l m e a n a p o r t i o n of h i s C on s e n t Dec r e e i d e n t i f i e d b y a n

    A r a b i c numera l O r a n upper a r l o w e r c a s e l e t t e r

    k . P a r t i e s s h a l l m e a n t h e Uni ted S t a t e s a n d S e t t l i n g Defendant .

    1 P a s t Response Costs h a l l m e a n l l c o s t s , i n c l u d i n g b u t n o t l i m i t e d t o d i r e c t

    a n d . i n d i r e c t c o s t s , t h a t EPA r DOJ n b e h a l f of EPA as p a i d a t o r i n c o n n e c t i o n w i t h t h e S i t e

    th rough A u g u s t 7 , 2 0 1 4 , l u s accrued I n t e r e s t on l l such c o s t s through such d a t e .

    m. P l a i n t i f f ' s h a l l m e a n t h e Uni ted S t a t e s .

    n . RCR~ h a l l m e a n t h e S o l i d Wa s t e Disposa l Act , s a m e n d e d , 2 U . S . C .

    6901-6992 a l s o k n o w n a s t h e Resource Conservat ion a n d R e co ve r y A c t ) .

    o . Sec t ion h a l l mean. a p o r t i o n of h i s Co n se n t D e c ree i d e n t i f i e d b y a Roman

    numeral .

    p . S e t t l i n g D e f e n d a n t h a l l m e a n t h e C i t y of D e r b y, o n n e c t i c u t .

    q . ` ` S i t e s h a l l m e a n t h e O ' S u l l i v a n ' s I s l a n d Super fund s i t e , encompass ing

    approximately 6 c r e s , l o c a t e d a t t h e c o n f l u e n c eof h e Housa tonic a n d N a ug a tuck R i v e r s i n

    D e r b y, New a v e n Coun ty, o n n e c t i c u t . T h e S i t e i s g e n e r a l l y d e s i g n a t e d b y t h e f o l l o w i n g

    p r o p e r t y d e s c r i p t i o n : geographic c o o r d i n a t e sof h e S i t e a r e approximately 4 1 1 8 ' 4 8 . 0 7 o r t h

    l a t i t u d e a n d 7 3 4 ' 5 2 . 7 3 w e s t o n g i t u d e ; t i s bounded . b y t h e Housatonic R i v e r , t h e N a u g a t u c k

    R i v e r , a n d Rou te 8 , w h i c h b o u n d a r i e sform a n approximate t r i a n g l e measur ing 1 8 0 0 f t b y 1 4 0 0 f t

    b y 2 0 0 0 f t .

    r State h a l l m e a n t h e S t a t e of o n n e c t i c u t .

    s . U n i t e d S t a t e s s h a 1 1 m e a n t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s of A m e r i c a a n d each

    department , agency, a n d i n s t r u m e n t a l i t y of h e U n i t e d S t a t e s , i n c l u d i n g EPA.

    Case 3:14-cv-01594-WWE Document 3 Filed 10/28/14 Page 6 of 24

  • 8/10/2019 USA vs. Derby Consent Decree

    7/24

    V. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE

    4 . By n t e r i n g i n t o t h i s Consen t Decree , h e mutua l b j e c t i v e o f h e P a r t i e s i s f o r S e t t l i n g

    Defendan t o m a k e a cash p a y m e n t o r e s o l v e t s a l l e g e d c i v i l l i a b i l i t y f o r P a s t Response Costs t

    t h e S i t e under e c t i o n 107 o f CERCLA 2 U.S.C. 9607 , s p r o v i d e d i n t h e Covenants by

    P l a i n t i f f i n S e c t i o n V I I I , a n d u b j e c t t o t h e R e s e r v a t i o n s o f i g h t s by Uni ted S t a t e s i n S e c t i o n

    VI. P YMENT OF RESPCINSE COSTS

    5 . P a y m e n t by e t t l i n g Defendan t o r P a s t Response C o s t s . By e c e m b e r 31, 2014, r

    w i t h i n 3 0 days f t e r t h e E f f e c t i v e Date , wh icheve r s l a t e r , S e t t l i n g Defendan t h a l l pay o EPA

    $675,000.00 l u s a n d d i t i o n a l s u m o r I n t e r e s t o n h a t a m o u n t a l c u l a t e d f r o m t h e E f f e c t i v e

    D a t e t h rough t h e d a t e o f paymen t .

    6. S e t t l i n g Defendan t h a 1 1 m a k e p a y m e n t t hops: / /www.pay.gov t o t h e U.S.

    D e p a r t m e n t o f u s t i c e account , n accordance w i t h i n s t r u c t i o n s provided t o S e t t l i n g Defendant by

    t h e F i n a n c i a l L i t i g a t i o n Uni t { FLU ) f h e U.S. t t o r n e y s O f f i c e f o r t h e D i s t r i c t o f

    Connect icu t f t e r t h e E f f e c t i v e Date. T h e p a y m e n t n s t r u c t i o n s provided b y h e FLU h i l l

    i n c l u d e a o n s o l i d a t e d D e b t o l l e c t i o n Sys tem { C D C S ) u m b e r , h i c h s h a l l be used t o

    i d e n t i f y a l l payment s e q u i r e d t o be m a d e n acco rdan c e w i t h t h i s Consen t Decree . T h e FLU

    s h a l l p r o v i d e t h e p a y m e n t n s t r u c t i o n s t o :

    T h o m a s T h o m p s o nFinance i r e c t o r1 E l i z a b e t h S t r e e t D e r b y, CT 6418,

    ' I ~ tho~son , d e r b ~ c l . g o v

    o n b e h a l f o f e t t l i n g Defendant. S e t t l i n g Defendan t may h a n g e h e i n d i v i d u a l t ~ or e c e i v e

    Case 3:14-cv-01594-WWE Document 3 Filed 10/28/14 Page 7 of 24

  • 8/10/2019 USA vs. Derby Consent Decree

    8/24

    payment n s t r u c t i o n son t s b e h a l f b y p r o v i d i n gw r i t t e n n o t i c e of u c h change o I ~ O J and EPA n

    accordance w i t h S e c t i o nX I I I N o t i c e sa ~ 1 dS u b m i s s i o n s ) .

    7 . D e p o s i tof ayment. T h e o t a l a m o u n t o be p a i d p u r s u a n tt o P a r a g r a p h5 a be

    d e p o s i t e dby EPA n t h e EPA aza rdous S u b s t a n c eS u p e r f i i n d .

    8 . N o t i c eof P a.~ t h e dine of payment , e t t l i n g Defendant h a l l send n o t i c e t h a t

    payment a s been made ; a) o EPA n accordance w i t h S e c t i o nX I I I N o t i c e sand S u b m i s s i o n s ) ;

    ( b ) o DOJ y e m a i l o r by m a i l i n a c c o r d a n c ew i t h S e c t i o n~ I ~ I I{ N o t i c e sand S u b m i s s i o n s ) ;and

    ( c ) o t l ~ eEPA i n c i n n a t i Finance O f f i c e by email o r by r e g u l a r m a i l a t :

    E m a i l : c i n w d a c c t s r e c e i v a b l e ~ ~ e p a . ~ o v

    R e g u l a r m a i l : EPA i n c i n n a t i F i n a n c eO f f i c e26 W. a r t i n L u t h e r K i n g Dr iveC i n c i n n a t i . ,O h i o 4268

    S u c h n o t i c e s h a l l r e f e r e n c e t h e CDCS u m b e r , i t e / S p i l l I D N u m b e r O 1 M 3 , nd D J 0 - 1 1 - 3 -

    10354.

    VII . FAILURE TO COMELY WITH CONSENT DECREE

    9 . I n t e r e s t on L a t e P a y e n t s I f S e t t l i n g Defendant a i l s t o m a k e h e payment under

    Paragraph 5 Payment by S e t t l i n g Defendant o r P a s t Response Costs) by h e r e q u i r e d d u e d a t e ,

    I n t e r e s t s h a l l c o n t i n ~ z et o a c c r u eon h e u n p a i db a l a n c e f rom t h e E f f e c t i v e Date h r o u g h . h e d a t e

    of a y m e n t . .

    1 0 . S t i p u l a t e d P e n a l t y .

    a . I f any amounts du e o EPA nder P a r a g r a p h5 Payment by e t t l i n g Defendant

    f o r f a s t Response C o s t s )a r e n o t . p a i d by h e r e q u i r e d d a t e , S e t t l i n g D e f e n d a z i ts h a l l be n

    v i o l a t i o n of 7 i s Consent Decree and s h a l l pay o SPA, s a t i p u l a t e d p e n a l t y , i n a d d i t i o n t o t h e

    I n t e r e s t r e q u i r e d by a r a g r a p h9 , 4 0 0 e r day h a t s u c h p a y m e n t . s l a t e .

    1

    Case 3:14-cv-01594-WWE Document 3 Filed 10/28/14 Page 8 of 24

  • 8/10/2019 USA vs. Derby Consent Decree

    9/24

    b. Stipulated penalties are due and payable within 30 days after the date of the

    demand for payment ofthe penalties by EPA. All payments to EPA under this Paragraph shall

    be identified as stipulated penalties and shall be made by Fedwire Electronic Funds Transfer

    ( EFT ) to:

    Federal Reserve Bank ofNew York_aAccounr -

  • 8/10/2019 USA vs. Derby Consent Decree

    10/24

    1 2 . Payments m a d e under h i s S e c t i o n s h a l l b e i n a d d i t i o n t o any o t h e r remedies o r

    s a n c t i o n s a v a i l a b l e t o P l a i n t i f f b y v i r t u e of e t t l i n g Defendant s a i l u r e t o c o m p l 5 rw i t h t h e

    r e q u i r e m e n t sof h i s Consent Decree .

    ~ . Notwiihstanding any o t h e r p r o v i s i o n of h i s S e c t i o n , t h e United S t a t e s m a y, n i t s

    l ~ n r e v i e w a b l ed i s c r e t i o n , w a i v e paym e n t of a n y p o r t i o n of h e s t i p u l a t e d p e n a l t i e s t h a t h a v e

    accrued p u r s u a n t t o t h i s Consent Decree . P a y m e n t of t i p u l a t e d p e n a l t i e s s h a l l n a t excuse

    S e t t l i n g Defendant f r o m paymen t s r e q u i r e d b y S e c t i o n VI r f r om performance of any o t h e r

    r e q u i r e m e n t sof h i s Consent Decree .

    VIIL COVENANTS BY LAINTIFF

    1 4 . E x c e p t s s p e c i f i c a l l y p r o v i d e d i n S e c t i o n IX R e s e r v a t i o nof i g h t s b y Uni ted

    S t a t e s ) , t h e United S t a t e s covenants not o sue o r t o t a k e a d m i n i s t r a t i v e a c t i o n a g a i n s t S e t t l i n g

    Defendant p u r s u a n t t o S e c t i o n 1 0 7 ( a ) of CERCLA 2 U . S . C . b 0 7 { a ) , o r e c o v e r P a s t

    Response C o s t s . T h e s e covenants h a l l t a k e e f f e c t u p on t h e E f f e c t i v e Date. T h e s e covenants a r e

    c o i 7 d i t i o n e d upon t h e s a t i s f a c t o r y performance b y Sea l ing Defendant of t s o b l i g a t i o n s under h i s

    Consent Decree . T h e s e covenants a r e a l s o c o n d i t i o n e d up on t h e v e r a c i t y and completeness of

    t h e F i n a n c i a l I n f o r m a t i o n provided t o SPA y S e t t l i n g Defendant and t h e f i n a n c i a l , i n s u r a n c e ,

    and indemnity c e r t i f i c a t i o n m a d e b y S e t t l i n g Defendant n Paragraph 30 . I f h e F i n a n c i a l

    I n f o r m a t i o n p r o v i d e db y S e t t l i n g Defendant, r t h e f i n a n c i a l , i n s u r a n c e , o r indemnity

    c e r t i f i c a t i o n m a d e b y S e t t l i n g Defendant n Paragraph 3 0 , s s u b s e q u e n t l y determined b y EPA o

    b e a l s e o r , n any m a t e r i a l r e s p e c t , i n a c c u r a t e , S e t t l i n g Defendant h a l l ~ ~ ~ o r f i t ~a l l payments

    m a d e p u r s u a n t C o t h i s Consent Decree and t h e s e covenants and t h e c o n t r i b u t i o n p r o t e c t i o n i n

    Paragraph 22 h a l l b e n u l l and v o i d . S u c h o r f e i t u r e s h a l l not c o ns t i t u t e l i q u i d a t e d d a m a ges n d .

    s h a l l not n any w a y o r e c l o s e t h e United S t a t e s r i g h t t o pursue any o t h e r c a u s e s of c t i o n

    Case 3:14-cv-01594-WWE Document 3 Filed 10/28/14 Page 10 of 24

  • 8/10/2019 USA vs. Derby Consent Decree

    11/24

    a r i s i n g f rom S e t t l i n g D e f e n d a n t s a l s e or m a t e r i a l l y i n a c c u r a t e i n f o r m a t i o n . T h e s e c o v e n a n t s

    e x t e n d o n l y t o S e t t l i n g D e f e n d a n t a n d d o n o t e x t e n d t o a n y o t h e r p e r s o n .

    IX. RESERVATIONS OF RIGHTS BY UNITED STATES

    1 5 . T h e U n i t e d S t a t e s r e s e r v e s a n d t h i s C o n s e n t D e c r e e i s withou t p r e j u d i c e t o a l l r i ~ h f i s

    a g a i n s t S e t t l i n g D e f e n d a n t w i t h r e s p e c t t o a l l m a t t e r s n o t e x p r e s s l y i n c l u d e d w i t h i n P a r a g r a p h

    1 4 . N o t w i t h s t a n d i n g a n y o t h e r p r o v i s i o n o f h i s C o n s e n t D e c r e e , h e U n i t e d S t a t e s r e s e r v e s a l l

    r i g h t s a g a i n s t S e t t l i n g D e f e n d a n t w i t h . r e s p e c t t o :

    a . l i a b i l i t y f o r f a i l u r e o f e t t l i n g D e f e n d a n t o m e e t a r e q u i r e m e n t o f h i s

    C o n s e n t D e c r e e :

    b . l i a b i l i t y f o r c o s t s i n c u r r e d o r t o b e n c u r r e d b y t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s t h a t a r e

    n o t w i t h i n t h e d e f i n i t i o n o f a s t R e s p o n s e C o s t s ;

    c . l i a b i l i t y f o r i n j u n c t i v e r e l i e f o r a d m i n i s t r a t i v e o r d e r e n f o r c e m e n t u n d e r

    S e c t i o n 1 f l 6 o f CERCLA 2 .S .C , ~ 9 60 6 ;

    d . c r i m i n a l l i a b i l i t y ;

    e . l i a b i l i t y f o r d a m a g e s o r i n j u r y t o d e s t r u c t i o n o f o r l o s s o f a t u r a l r e s o u r c e s

    a n d f o r t h e c o s t s o f n y n a t u r a l r e s o u r c e d a m a g e s s e s s m e n t s ;a n d

    f . l i a b i l i t y a r i s i n g f r om t h e p a s t p r e s e n t o r f u t u r e d i s p o s a l r e l e a s e o r t h r e a t o f

    r e l e a s e o f h a z a r d o u s u b s t a n c e p o l l u t a n t o r c o n t a m i n a n t o u t s i d e o f h e S i t e .

    1 6 . N o t t ~ i t h s t a n d i n ga n y o t h e r p r o v i s i o n o f h i s C o n s e n t D e c r e e , h e U n i t e d S t a t e s

    r e s e r v e s a n d t h i s C o n s e n t D e c r e e s w i t h o u t p r e j u d i c e t ~ ot h e r i g h t t o r e i n s t i t u t e o r r e o p e n t h i s

    a c t i o n o r t o c o m m e n c e a n e w a c t i o n s e e k i n g r e l i e f o t h e r t h a n a s p r o v i d e d i n t h i s C o n s e n t

    D e c r e e , f t h e F i n a n c i a l I n f o r m a t i o n o r t h e I n s u r a n c e I n f o r m a t i o np r o v i d e d b y e t t ~ l i n g ~

    D e f e n d a n t , r t h e f i n a n c i a l i n s u r a n c e or i n d e m n i t y c e r t i f i c a t i o n m a d e b y S e t t l i n g D e f e n d a n t n

    P a r a g r a p h .3 0 , s f a l s e o r i n a n y m a t e r i a l r e s p e c t i n a c c u r a t e .

    Case 3:14-cv-01594-WWE Document 3 Filed 10/28/14 Page 11 of 24

  • 8/10/2019 USA vs. Derby Consent Decree

    12/24

    X. COVENANTS Y SETTLING DEFENDANT

    1 7 . S e t t l i n g Defendan t c o v e n a n t s n o t o sue a n d a g r e e s n o t t o a s s e r t a n y c l a i m s o r

    c a u s e s o f c t i o n a g a i n s t t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s , o r i t s c o n t r a c t o r s o r e mp loy e e s , w i t h r e s p e c t t o t h e

    S i t e a n d t h i s C o n s e n t D e c r e e , n c l u d i n g but n o t I i m i C e dt o :

    a . any d i r e c t o r i n d i r e c t c l a i m f o r r e i m b u r s e m e n t f r o m t h e EPA - 3 a z a r d o u s

    Subs t ance S u p e r f i i n d b a s e d o n S e c t i o n s 1 0 6 b ) 2 ) , 10 7 , 11, 112 , r I 3 o f C ~ E R C L A ,42 U.S .C .

    9 6 0 b b ) 2 ) , 9 6 0 7 , 9 6 11 , 9 6 1 2 , r 9 b 3, r a n y o t h e r p r o v i s i o n o f aw ;

    b . any c l a i m a r i s i n g o u t o f h e r e s p o n s e a c t i o n s a t t h e S i t e f o r w h i c h t h e P a s t

    Response Costs ~ l e r ei n c u r r e d , i n c l u d i n g any c l a i m u nd e r t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s C o n s t i t u t i o n , t h e

    C o n s t i t u t i o n o f h e S t a t e C o n n e c t i c u t , 7 e Tu c k e r het , 2 8 U .S ,C . 1491, h e E q u a l A c c e s s o

    J u s t i c e Act, 2 U.S .C . ? 4 1 2 , r a t common a w ; r

    c . any c l a i m p u r s u a ~ l t t o S e c t i o n 1 0 7 o r 11 3 o f CERCLA 2 U. S .C . 9 6 0 7 r

    9 6 1 3 , e c t i o n 7002(a ) f RCRA 2 U.S .C . ~ 7 2 a ) , o r s t a t e l a w f o r P a s t R e s p o n s e C o s t s .

    1 8 . Excep t a s p r o v i d e d i n Paragraph 2 0 c l a i m s a g a i n s t o t h e r P R P s ) n d Paragraph 2 5

    ( R e s J u d i c a t a a n d o t h e r D e f e n s e s ) , h e s e covenants s h a l l not apply i n t h e e v e n t e Uni ted S t a t e s

    b r i m s a cause o f c t i o n o r i s s u e s a n o r d e r p u r s u a n t t o a n y o f h e r e s e r v a t i o n s s e t f o r t h i n S e c t i o n

    I X R e s e r v a t i o n so f i g h t s b y 1 J n i t e d S t a t E s ) , o t h e r t h a n i n P a r a g r a p h 1 5 . a . l i a b i l i t y f o r f a i l u r e t o

    m e e t a r e q u i r e m e n t o f h e C o n s e n t D e c r e e ) r 1 4 . d . c r i m i n a l l i a b i l i t y ) , but only t o t h e e x t e n t t h a t

    S e l ~ t l i n g D e f e n d a n t ' s c l a i m s a r i s e f r o m t h e s a m e r e s p o n s e a c t i o n o r r e s p o n s e c o s t s t h a t t h e U n i t e d

    S t a t e s i s s e e k i n g p u r s u a n t t o t h e a p p l i c a b l e r e s e r v a t i o n .

    1 9 . N o t h i n g i n t h i s C o n s e n t D e c r e e s h a l l b e d e e m e d t o c o n s t i t u t e a p p r o v a l o r

    p r e a u t h o r i z a t i o n o f a c l a i m w i t h i n t h e m e a n i n g o f e c t i o n 111 o f CERCLA 2 , S .C . 6 11 , r

    40 . 1 ~ . R . 3 0 0 . 7 0 0 d ) .

    1 0

    Case 3:14-cv-01594-WWE Document 3 Filed 10/28/14 Page 12 of 24

  • 8/10/2019 USA vs. Derby Consent Decree

    13/24

    2 0 . S e t t l i n g D e f e n d a n t a g r e e s n o t t o a s s e r t a n y c l a i m s a n d t o w a i v e a l lc l a i m s o r c a u s e s

    of c t i o n ( i n c l u d i n g b u t n o t l i m i t e d t o c l a i m s o r c a u s e s of c t i o n u n d e r S e c t i o n s 1 0 7 ( a ) a n d 113

    of CERCLA h a t i t m a y ~ a v e o r r e s p o n s e c o s t s r e l a t i n g t o t h e S i t e a g a i n s t a n y o t h e r p e r s o n

    w h o s a p o t e n t i a l l y r e s p o n s i b l e p a r t y u n d e r CERCLA t t h e S i t e . This w a i ~ ~ e rs h a l l n o t a p p l y

    w i t h r e s p e c t t o a n y d e f e n s e , c l a i m , o x c a u s e of c t i o n t h a t S e t t l i n g D e f e n d a n t m a y have a g a i n s t

    a n y p e r s o n i f such p e r s o n a s s e r t s a c l a i m o r c a u s e of c t i o n r e l a t i n g t o t h e S i t e a g a i n s t S e t t l i n g

    D e f e n d a n t .

    X I . EFFECT OF SETTLEMENT/CONTRIBUTION

    2 E x c e p t .a s p r o v i d e d i n P a x a g r a p h2 0 , o t h i n g i n t h i s C o n s e n t D e c r e e s h a l l b e

    c o n s t r u e d t o c r e a t e a n y r i g h t s i n , o r g r a n t a n y c a u s e of c t i o n t o , a n y p e r s o n n o t a P a r t y t o t h i s

    C o n s e n t D e c r e e . Excep t a s p r o v i d e d i n S e c t i o n X c o v e n a n t s b y S e t t l i n g D e ~ ~ e n d a n t ) ,each of

    t h e P a r t i e s e x p r e s s l y r e s e r v e s . a n y a n d a l l r i g h t s ( i n c l u d i n g , b u t n o t l i m i t e d t o , p u r s u a n t t o S e c t i o n

    113 of CERCLA, 2 U . S . C . 9b13) , e f e n s e s , c l a i m s , d e m a n d s , a n d c a u s e s of c t i o n t h a t i t ma y

    have w i t h r e s p e c t t o a n y m a t t e r , t r a n s a c t i o n , o r o c c u r r e n c e r e l a t i n g i n a n y w a y t o t h e S i t e a g a i n s t

    a n y p e r s o n n o t a P a r t y h e r e t o . Nothing i n t h i s C o n s e n t D e c r e e d i m i n i s h e st h e r i g h t of h e U n i t e d

    S t a t e s , p u r s u a n t t o S e c t i o n 1 1 3 0 2 ) n d 3 ) of CERCLA, k 2 U . S . C . 9 6 1 3 0 2 ) - 3 ) , o p u r s u e

    a n y such p e r s o n s t o o b t a i n a d d i t i o n a l r e s p o n s e c o s t s o r r e s p o n s e a c t i o n a n d t o e n t e r i n t o

    s e t t l e m e n t s t h a t d i v e r i s e t o c o n t r i b u t i o n p r o t e c t i o n p u r s u a n t t o S e c t i o n 11 3 0 2 ) .

    2 2 . t h e P a r t i e s a g r e e , a n d b y e n t e r i n g t h i s C o n s e n t D e c r e e t h i s C o u r t . f i n d s , t h a t t h i s

    C o n s e n t D e c r e e c o n s t i t u t e s a j u d i c i a l l y - a p p r o v e d s e t t l e m e n tp u r s u a n t t o which t h e e t k l i r ~ g

    D e f e n d a n t h a s , a s of h e E f f e c t i v e D a t e , e s o l v e d l i a b i l i t yt o t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s w i t h i n t h e

    mean ing of e c t i o n 1 1 3 ( ~ ( ~ 2 )of C E R C ~ L A ,42 U . S . C . 6 I 3 ( ~ ~ { 2 ) ,a n d s e i ~ t ~ i t l e dt o p ~ ~ o t e c t i o n

    f rom c o n t r i b u t i o n a c t i o n s o r c l a i m s a s p r o v i d e d b y S e c t i o n 1 1 3 ( ~ ~ ( 2 )of GF,RCI .A, r a s l n a y b e

    Case 3:14-cv-01594-WWE Document 3 Filed 10/28/14 Page 13 of 24

  • 8/10/2019 USA vs. Derby Consent Decree

    14/24

    o t h e r w i s e p r o v i d e d by l a w, o r t h e ' ` m a t t e r s a d d r e s s e d n t h i s C o n s e n t D e c r e e . The m a t t e r s

    a d d r e s s e d n t h i s C o n s e n t D e c r e e a r e T a s tR e s p o n s e C o s t s , p r o v i d e d I z o w e v e ~ ~ ,t h a t i f t h e U n i t e d

    S t a t e s e x e r c i s e s r i g h t s u n d e r t h e r e s e r v a t i o ~ l s i n S e c t i o n IX R e s e r v a t i o n s o f i g h t s by Uni ted

    S t a t e s ) , o t h e r t h a n i n P a r a g r a p h s 1 5 . a ( l i a b i l i t y f o rf a i l u r e t o m e e t a r e q u i r e m e n t o f C o n s e n t

    D e c r e e ) r S . d . c r i m i n a l l i a b i l i t y ) , t h e m a t t e r s a d d r e s s e d n t h i s C o n s e ~ s tD e c r e e w i l l n o

    l o n g e r i n c l u d e t h o s e response c o s t s o r r e s p o n s e a c t i o n s t h a t a r e w i t h i n t h e s c o p e o f h e e x e r c i s e d

    r e s e r v a t i o n .

    2 3 . The a r t i e s f u r t h e r a g r e e , a n d by e n t e r i n g t h i s C o n s e n t D e c r e e t h i s C o u r t i n d s , t h a t

    t h e compla in t i l e d by t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s i n t h i s a c t i o n i s a c i v i l a c t i o n w i t h i n t h e m e a n i n g o f

    S e c t i o n 1 1 3 ( 1 ) ( 1 )o f CERCLA 2 . S . C . 9 6 1 3 0 ( 1 ) , n d t h a t t h i s C o n s e n t D e c r e e c o n s t i t u t e s

    a j u d i c i a l l y - a p p r o v e d s e t t l e m e n t p u r s u a n t t o which S e t t l i n g D e f e n d a n t h a s , a s o f h e E f f e c t i v e

    D a t e , e s o l v e d l i a b i l i t y t o t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s w i t h i n t h e m e a n i n g o f e c t i o n 1 1 3 ( f ~ ( 3 ) { B )o f

    CERCLA 2 U . S . C . 6 1 3 ( f j ( 3 ) ( B ) .

    24. S e t t l i n g D e f e n d a n t h a l l , with e s p e c t t o a ny s u i t o r claim brought by t f o r m a t t e r s

    r e l a t e d t o t h i s C o n s e n t D e c r e e , o t i f y EPA n d DOJ n w r i t i n g n o l a t e r than 6 0 d a y s p r i o r t o t h e

    i n i t i a t i o n o f uch s u i t o r c l a i m . S e t t l i n g D e f e n d a n t l s o s h a l l , w i t h r e s p e c t t o a n y s u i t o r c l a i m

    b r o u g h t . g a i n s t i t f o r m a t t e r s r e l a t e d t o t h i s C o n s e n t D e c r e e , z o t i f y TPA n d DOJ n w r i t i n g

    w i t h i n t e n d a y s a f t e r s e r v i c e o f h e compla in t o r c l a i m u p o n t . I n a d d i t i o n , S e t t l i n g D e f e n d a n t

    s h a l l n o t i f y EPA n d D O . T w i t h i n t e n d a y s f t e r s e r v i c e o r r e c e i p t o f n y Mo t i on o r S u m m a r y

    J u d g m e n t , a n d w i t h i n t e n d a y s f t e r r e c e i p t o f ny o r d e r f r om a c o u r t . s e t t i n g a a s e f o r t r i a l ,f o r

    m a t t e r s r e l a t e d t o t h i s C o n s e n t D e c r e e .

    2 5 . I n a n y u b s e q ~ . i e n ta d m i n i s t r a t i v e o r j u d i c i a l proceed ing i n i t i a t e d by t h e Uni ted S t a t e s

    f o r i n j u n c t i c ~ e r e l i e f , r e c o v e r y o f esponse c o s t s , o r o c h e r r e l i e f r e l a t i n g t o t h e S i t e , Sca l ing

    12

    Case 3:14-cv-01594-WWE Document 3 Filed 10/28/14 Page 14 of 24

  • 8/10/2019 USA vs. Derby Consent Decree

    15/24

    D e f e n d a n t h a l l n o t a s s e r t , a n d may o t m a i n t a i n ,a n y d e f e n s eo r c l a i m b a s e d .u p o n t h e p r i n c i p l e s

    o f a i v e r, e s j u d i c a t a , c o l l a t e r a l e s t o p p e l , i s s u e p r e c l u s i o n ,c l a i m- s p l i t t i n g , o r o t h e r d e f e n s e s

    b a s e d u p o n a n } r c o n t e n t i o n . t h a t t h e c l a i m s a i s e d b y t h e Uni ted S t a t e s i n t h e subsequen t

    proceed ing w e r e o r shou ld l a v e b e e n b r o u g h t i n t h e i n s t a n t c a s e ; p r o v i d e d ,h o w e v e r , h a t n o t h i n g

    i n t h i s P a r a g r a p h a f f e c t s t h e e n f o r c e a b i l i t y o f h e C o v e n a n t s b y P l a i n t i f f s e t f o r t h i n S e c t i o n V I I I .

    X I I . RETENTION OF RECORDS

    2 6 . U n t i l t e n y e a r s a f t e r t h e E f f e c t i v e D a d e , e t t l i n g D e f e n d a n t h a l l p r e s e r v ea n d r e t a i n

    l l n o n - i d e n t i c a l c o p i e s o f e c o r d s , r e p o r t s , d o c u m e n t s , a n d o t h e r i n f o r m a t i o n ( h e r e i n a f t e r

    r e f e r r e d t o a s R e c o r d s ) i n c l u d i n g r e c o r d s i n e l e c t r o n i c f o r m ) now n i t s p o s s e s s i o no r c o n t r o l

    o r t h a t c o m e n t o i t s p o s s e s s i o no r c o n t r o l , t h a t r e l a t e i n an y m a n n e r t o i t s l i a b i l i t y under

    CERCLA i t h r e s p e c t t o t h e S i t e , y ~ o v z d e c ~h o t i v e v e r , t h a t S e t t l i n g D e f e n d a n t , s a p a r t y w h o s

    p o t e n t i a l l y l i a b l e a s a n o w n e r o r o p e r a t o r o f h e S i t e , m u s t e t a i n , i n a d d i t i o n , l l R e c o r d s now n

    i t s p o s s e s s i o n o r c o n t r o l o r t h a t c o m e i n t o i t s p o s s e s s i o no r c o n t r o l , t h a t r e l a t e t o t h e l i a b i l i t y o f

    any o t h e r person under CERCLA i t h r e s p e c t t o t h e S i t e . E a c h o f h e a b o v e e c o r d r e t e n t i o n

    requ i rements s h a l l apply r e g a r d l e s s o f a n y c o r p o r a t e r e t e n t i o n p o l i c y t o t h e c o n t f a r y :

    2 7 . At h e c o n c l u s i o no f h e r e c o r d r e t e n t i o n p e r i o d , S e t t l i n g D e f e n d a n t h a l l n o t i f y EPA

    a n d DOJ t l e a s t 90 d a y s p r i o r t o t h e d e s t r u c t i o n o f a n y s u c h R e c o r d s , a n d , u p o n r e q u e s t b y E PA .

    o r I ~ O J , a i d excep t s prov ided i n P a r a g r a p h 2 8 ( P r i v i l e g e da n d P r o t e c t e d C l a i m s ) , e t t l i n g

    D e f e n d a n t h a l l d e l i v e r any s u c h R e c o r d s t o EPA

    2 8 . P r i v i l e g e d a n d r o t e c t e d C l a i m s .

    a . S e t t l i n g D e f e n d a n t n a y a s s e r t t h a t l l o r p a r t o f a R e c o r d i s p r i v i l e g e d o r

    p r o t e c t e d a s p r o v i d e d u n d e r f e d e r a l l a w, r o v i d e d i t c o m p l i e s w i t h P a r a g r a p h 2 . b . , a n d except

    a s prov ided i n P a r a g r a p h 2 8 . c .

    13

    Case 3:14-cv-01594-WWE Document 3 Filed 10/28/14 Page 15 of 24

  • 8/10/2019 USA vs. Derby Consent Decree

    16/24

    b . I f S e t t l i n g D e f e n d a n t s s e r t s a c l a i m of r i v i l e g e o r p r o t e c t i o n , t s h a l l

    p r o v i d e P l a i n t i f f w i t h t h e f o l l o w i n g i n f o r m a t i o n r e g a r d i n g s u c h Record : t s t i t l e ;i t s d a t e ; t h e

    n a m e , i t l e a f f i l i a t i o n ( e . g . , c o m p a n y o r f i r r n ) , a n d a d d r e s s of h e a u t h o r , e a c h a d d r e s s e e , a n d of

    e a c h r e c i p i e n t ; a d e s c r i p t i o n of h e R e c o r d s c o n t e n t s ; a n d t h e p r i v i l e g e o r p r o t e c t i o n a s s e r t e d . I f

    a c la im of r i v i l e g e o r p r o t e c t i o n a p p l i e s only t o a p o r t i o n of a Record , e t t l i n g D e f e n d a n t h a l l

    p r o v i d e t h e R e c o r d t o P l a i n t i f f n r e d a c t e d f o r m t o m a s k h e p r i v i l e g e d o r p r o t e c t e d i n f o r m a t i o n

    o n l y . S c a l i n g D e f e n d a n t h a l l r e t a i n a l l R e c o r d s h a t t c la ims t o b e p r i v i l e g e d o r p r o t e c t e d u n t i l

    t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s h a s h a d a r e a s o n a b l e o p p o r t u ~ l i t y t o d i s p u t e t h e p r i v i l e g e or p r o t e c t i o n c l a i m

    a n d a n y s u c h d i s p u t e h a s b e e n r e s o l v e d i n t h e S e t t l i n g Defendan t s f a v o r .

    c . S e t t l i n g D e f e n d a n t may m a k e n o c la im of r i v i l e g e o r p r o t e c t i o n r e g a r d i n g :

    any d a t a r e g a r d i n g t h e S i t e , i n c l u d i n g b u t o t l i m i t e d t o , l l

    sampl ing , n a l y t i c a l , m o n i t o r i n g , h y d r o g e o l o g i c ,s c i e n t i f i c , chemica l , a d i o l o g i c a l , o r

    e n g i n e e r i n gd a d a , o r t h e p o r t i o n of any o t h e r R e c o r d t h a t ev idences c o n d i t i o n s a t o r around t h e

    S i t e ; o r

    i i . t h e p o r t i o n of a n y R e c o r d t h a t S e t t l i n g D e f e n d a n t s r e q u i r e d t o

    c r e a t e o r g e n e r a t e p u r s u a n tt o t h i s C o n s e n t D e c r e e .

    2 9 . B u s i n e s s C o n f i d e n t i a l Cla ims . S e t t l i n g D e f e n d a n t may s s e r t t h a t a l l o r p a r t of a

    R e c o r d s u b m i t t e d t o P l a i n t i f f u n d e r h i s C o n s e n t D e c r e e s b u s i n e s s c o n f i d e n t i a l t o t h e e x t e n t

    p e r m i t t e d b y a n d i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h S e c t i o n 1 ( ~ 4 ( e ) ( 7 ~of CFRCLA 2 U . S . G . 9 6 0 4 { e ) ( 7 ) ,a nd

    40 . F . I Z . 2 . 2 0 3 ( b } . S e t t l i n g D e f e n d a n t h a l l s e g r e g a t e a n d c l e a r l y i d e n t i f y a l l R e c o r d s o r p a r t s

    t h e r e o f s u b ~ n i t t c d under t h i s C o n s e n t D e c r e e f o r w h i c h S e t t l i n g D e f e n d a n t a s s e r t s a b u s i n e s s

    c o n f i d e n t i a l i t y c l a i m . Re o r d s s u b m i t t e d t o EPA e t e r m i n e d t o b e c o n f i d e n t i a l b y EPA i l l b e

    accorded t h e p ~ o t e c t i o n s p e c i f i e d i n 40 C,F.R. a r t 2 , S u b p a r t B . I f n o c la im of o n f i d e n t i a l i t y

    14

    Case 3:14-cv-01594-WWE Document 3 Filed 10/28/14 Page 16 of 24

  • 8/10/2019 USA vs. Derby Consent Decree

    17/24

    a c c o m p a n i e s R e c o r d s w h e n they a r e s u b m i t t e d t o EPA r i f EPA has n o t i f i e d S e t t l i n g D e f e n d a n t

    t h a t t h e R e c o r d s a r e n o t . c o n f i d e n t i a l under t h e s t a n d a r d s o f e c t i o n 1 0 4 { e ) 7 ) o f CERCLA r 40

    C . F. R . a r t 2 u b p a r t B, h e p u b l i c may e g i v e n a c c e s s t o such R e c o r d s w i t h o u t f u r t h e r n o t i c e

    t o S e t t l i n g Defendan t .

    3 0 . S e t t l i n g D e f e n d a n t e r t i f i e s i n d i v i d u a l l y t h a t , t o t h e b e s t o f t s k n o w l e d g e a n d . b e l i e f ;

    a f t e r thorough i n q u i r y , t h a s :

    a . not a l t e r e d , m u t i l a t e d , d i s c a r d e d , d e s t r o y e d o r o t h e r w i s e d i s p o s e d o f a n y

    R e c o r d s o t h e r t h a n i d e n t i c a l c o p i e s ) r e l a t i n g t o i t s p o t e n t i a l l i a b i l i t y r e g a r d i n g t h e S i t e s i n c e

    ~ ~ o t i f i c a t i o n o f o t e n t i a l l i a b i l i t y b y t h e Uni ted S t a t a s o r t h e S t a t e a i d t h a t t has u l l y compl ied

    with a n y a n d l l EPA n d S t a t e r e q u e s t s f o r i n f o r m a t i o n r e g a r d i n g t h e S i t e p u r s u a n t t o S e c t i o n s

    1 0 4 e ) a n d 1 2 2 e ) o f CERCLA 2 . S . C . 9 6 0 4 e ) a n d 9 6 2 2 e ) , a n d S e c t i o n 3 0 0 7 o f RCR~

    42 . S . C . 6927 , a n d S t a t e law;

    b . s u b m i t t e d t o EPA i n a n c i a l i n f o r m a t i o n t h a t f a i r l y , a c c u r a t e l y , a n d m a t e r i a l l y

    s e t s f o r t h i t s f i n a n c i a l c i r c u m s t a n c e s ,a n d t h a t t h o s e c i r c u m s t a n c e s have not m a t e r i a l l y changed

    b e t w e e n t h e t i m e t h e f i n a n c i a l . i n f o r m a t i o n w a s s u b m i t t e d t o EPA n d t h e t i m e S e t t l i n g

    D e f e n d a n t e x e c u t e s t h i s C o n s e n t Decree ; a nd

    c . f u l l y d i s c l o s e d a n y i n f o r ~ n l a t i o n r e g a r d i n g t h e e x i s t e n c e o f a n y i n s l t r a n c e

    p o l i c i e s o r i n d e m n i t y agreements t h a t may over claims r e l a t i n g t o c leanup o f h e S i t e , and

    s u b m i t t e d t o EPA p o n r e q u e s t such i n s u r a n c e p o l i c i e s , indemni ty agreements , a n d i n f o r m a t i o n ,

    X I I I . NOTICES AND SUBMISSIONS

    3 1 . Wheneve r, u n d e r t h e t e rms o f h i s C o n s e n t Decree, o t i c e i s r e q u i r e d . t o b e given o r a

    d o c u m e n t s r e q u i r e d t o b e s e n t b y o n e p a r t y t o a n o t h e r , i s h a l l b e d i r e c t e d t o t h e i n d i v i d u a l s a t

    t h e a d d r e s s e s s p e c i f i e d below, n l e s s t h o s e i n d i v i d u a l s o r t h e i r s u c c e s s o r s g i v e n o t i c e o f a

    1 5

    Case 3:14-cv-01594-WWE Document 3 Filed 10/28/14 Page 17 of 24

  • 8/10/2019 USA vs. Derby Consent Decree

    18/24

    c h a n g e t o t h e o t h e r P a r t i e s i n w r i t i n g . W r i t t e n n o t i c e a s s p e c i f i e d i n t h i s S e c t i o n s h a l l c o n s t i t u t e

    c o m p l e t e s a t i s f a c t i o n o f any w r i t t e n n o t i c e requ i rement o f h e C o n s e n t D e c r e e w i t h r e s p e c t t o

    DOJ, PA, nd S e t t l i n ; Defendan t , e s p e c t i v e l y .

    As o DOJ y e r n a i L e e s c d c ~ y. e n r d , c s d o j ~ o v

    Re : D J 0 - 11 - 3 - 1 0 3 5 4

    As o DOJ y m a i l : EES a s e M a n a g e m e n t U n i tU . S . D e p a r t m e n t o f u s t i c eE n v i r o n m e n t a n d N a t u r a l Resources D i v i s i o n

    P, O . B o x 7 611Wa s h i n g t o n , D . C . 20044-7b11

    Re : DJ 0 - 11 - 3 - 1 0 3 5 4

    As o EPA: Cynth ia A. L e w i s , e n i o r E n f o r e c , m e n tC o u n s e lU . S . EPA, e g i o n

    5 Pos t O f f i c e Square , u i t e 1 0 0Mail C o d e O E S O 4 - 3Boston , MA 2 1 0 9 - 3 9 1 2

    As o S e t t l i n g D e f e n d a n t : M a y o r A n i t a . Dugat to

    D e r b y C i t y Hal l

    E l i z a b e t h S t r e e t

    D e r b y, T 0 6 4 1 8

    C o p y o : T h o m a s . We l c h , E s q .We l c h , Teodos io , S t a n e k Blake, LLC

    3 7 5 B r i d g e p o r t Av e n u eS h e l t o n , C t 0 6 4 8 4

    C o p y ~ o : G a r y B. O ' C o n n o r , E s q .P u l l m a n o m l e y, LLC

    9 0 S t a t e H o u s e S q u a r e , 1 3 l o o rH a r t f o r d , CT 6 1 0 3

    X I V. RETENTION OF JURISDICTION

    32 . This C o u r t h a l l r e t a i n j u r i s d i c t i o n over t h i s m a t t e r f o r t h e purpose o f n t e r p r e t i n g

    a n d e n f o r c i n g t h e t e rms o f h i s C o n s e n t Decree .

    1 6

    Case 3:14-cv-01594-WWE Document 3 Filed 10/28/14 Page 18 of 24

  • 8/10/2019 USA vs. Derby Consent Decree

    19/24

    XV. INTEGRATION/APPENDIX

    3 3 . T h i s C o n s e n t D e c r e e and t s appendix c o n s t i t u t e t h e f i n a l comple te a n d e x c l u s i v e

    a g r e e m e n t a n d u n d e r s t a n d i n ga m o n g t h e P a r t i e s w i t h r e s p e c t t o t h e s e t t l e m e n te m b o d i e d i n t h i s

    C o n s e n t Decree . T h e a r t i e s a c k n o w l e d g e t h a t t h e r e a r e n o r e p r e s e n t a t i o n s agreements r

    u n d e r s t a n d i n g sr e l a t i n g t o t h e s e t t l e m e n to t h e r than t h o s e e x p r e s s l yc o n t a i n e di n t h i s C o n s e n t

    Decree . A p p e n d i x A i s t o f h e f i n a n c i a l d o c u r n ~ n t s s u b m i t t e dt o EPA y S e t t l i n g Defendan t

    i s a t t a c h e d t o a n d i n c o r p o r a t e di n t o t h i s Consent Decree .

    X V I . LODGING AND OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC OMM NT

    3 4 . T h i s Consent Decree s h a l l be lodged w i t h t h e C o u r t o r a p e r i o d o f not l e s s t h a n 3 0

    days f o r p u b l i c n o t i c ea n d c o m m e n t . T ' h eUni ted S t a t e s r e s e r v e s t h e r i g h t t o w i t h d r a w o r

    w i t h h o l di t s consen t f t h e c o m m e n t s r e g a r d i n g t h e C o n s e n t D e c r e e d i s c l o s e f a c t s o r

    c o n s i d e r a t i o n st h a t i n d i c a t e t h a t t h i s C o n s e n t D e c r e e i s i n a p p r o p r i a t e i m p r o p e r r i n a d e q u a t e .

    S e t t l i n g Defendant c o n s e n t st o t h e e n t r y o f h i s Consent Decree without u r t h e r n o t i c e .

    3 5 . I f o r any r e a s o nt h i s C o u r t s h o u l d d e c l i n e t o a p p r o v e t h i s Consent Decree i n t h e

    f o r m p r e s e n t e d t h i s a g r e e m e n t i s v o i d a b l e a t t h e s o l e d i s c r e t i o n o f r l y P a r t y and t h e t e rms o f h e

    a g r e e m e n t may ot be used a s ev idence i n an y l i t i g a t i o n between C h eP a r t i e s .

    XVII. IGNATORIESISERVICE3 b . E a c h undersigned r e p r e s e n t a t i v eo f he S e t t l i n g I 3 e f e n d a n ta n d t h e A s s i s t a n tA t t o r n e y

    G e n e r a l U . S . D e p a r t m e n t o f u s t i c e E n v i r o n m e n t a n d N a t u r a lResources D i v i s i o n o r h i s / h e r

    d e s i g n e e c e r t i f i e s t h a t h e o r s h e i s a u t h o r i z e d t o e n t e ri n t o t h e t e rms a n d c o n d i t i o n so f h i s

    C o n s e n t D e c r e e a n d t o e x e c u t eand b i n d l e g a l l y s u c h P a r t y t o t h i s d o c u m e n t .

    3 7 S e t i l i n g Defendant a g r e e s not ~ oo p p o s e e n t ~ y of h i s C o n s e n t D e c r e e b y t h i s C o u r t o r

    17

    Case 3:14-cv-01594-WWE Document 3 Filed 10/28/14 Page 19 of 24

  • 8/10/2019 USA vs. Derby Consent Decree

    20/24

    t o c h a l l e n g e a n y p r o v i s i o n of h i s Consent Decree n l e s s t h e Uni ted S t a t e s has n o t i f i e d S e t t l i n g

    D e f e n d a n t n w r i t i n g t h a t i t n o l o n e r u p p o r t s e n v y o f h e C o n s e n t D e c r e e .

    3 8 . S e t t l i n g Defendant s h a l l i d e n t i f y on t h e a t t a c h e d s i g n a t u r e page h e n a m e and

    a d d r e s s of an agent w h o s a u t h o r i z e d t o a c c e p t s e r v i c e of r o c e s s by mail on b e h a l f of h a t P a r t ~ ~

    w i t h r e s p e c t t o l l m a t t e r s a r i s i n g under o r r e l a t i n g t o p h i s C o n s e n t Decree . S e t t l i n g Defendant

    hereby a g r e e s t o a c c e p t s e r v i c e i n t h a t m an ne r a n d t o waive t h e formal s e r v i c e r e q u i r e m e n t s s e t

    f o r t h i n Rule f h e f e d e r a l Rules of i v i l Procedure a n d a ny a p p l i c a b l e l o c a l r u l e s of h i s

    Count n c l u d i n g but not l i m i t e d t o s e r v i c e of a s u m m on s . T h e a r t i e s a g r e e t h a t S e t t l i n g

    D e f e n d a n t n e e d n a t f i l e an answer t o t h e complaint i n t h i s a c t i o n u n l e s s o r u n t i l t h e C o u r t .

    e x p r e s s l y d e c l i n e s t o e n t e r t h i s C o n s e n t Decree .

    XVIIL FINAL JUDGMENT

    3 9 . U p o n e n t r y of h i s Consent D e c r e e by h e Court h i s C o n s e n t D e c r e e s h i l l c o n s t i t u t e

    t h e f i n a l j u d g m e n t between a n d a m o n g t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s a n d t h e S e t t l i n g Defendant . T h e C o u r t

    e n t e r s t h i s j u d g m e n t as a i n a l j u d g m e n t under F e d . R . Civ. P . 54 a n d 58 .

    SO ORDERED HIS D Y OF 014

    Uni ted S t a t e s D i s t r i c t J u d g e

    Case 3:14-cv-01594-WWE Document 3 Filed 10/28/14 Page 20 of 24

  • 8/10/2019 USA vs. Derby Consent Decree

    21/24

    S i g n a t u r e Page o r C o n s e n t .Decree Rega rd ing O S u l l i v a n s I s l a n d S u p e r f u n d S i t e .

    FQR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

    / . s / E l l e n MahanELLEN MAC - I A ND e p u t y S e c t i o n ChiefU . S . Depa r tmen t of u s t i c eEnvi ronmen t a n d N a t u r a l Resources D i v i s i o nEnvironmenta l Enfo rcemen t S e c t i o n .P. O . Box 7611Washington, D . C . 20044-7611

    / s / P e t e r ~. Kaut s

    PETER . KAUTSKYT r i a l A t t o r n e yU . S . Depa r tmen t o f u s t i c eEnvi ronmen t and N a t u r a l Resou rcesEnvironmenta l Enfo rcemen t S e c t i o n

    P. O . Box 7611Washington, D . C . 20044-7611

    D E I RT ~ R EM ALYU n i t e d S t a t e s A t t o r n e y

    D i s t r i c t of o n n e c t i c u t

    / s / L z s a E . P e r k i n sL I S A E. P E R ~ K I N S{c t23164 ja s s i s t a n t U n i t e d S t a t e s A t t o r n e yU . S . A t t o r n e y s O f f i c eH a r t f o r d O f f i c e

    4 5 0 M a i n S t r e e t , Room 2I i a r t f o r d , C o n n e c t i c u t0 6 1 0 3Te l . : ( 8 6 0 ) 47-1101

    F a x . :( 8 6 0 ) 6 0 - 7 9 7 9l i s a . p e r k i n s @ u s d o j . g o v

    1 9

    Case 3:14-cv-01594-WWE Document 3 Filed 10/28/14 Page 21 of 24

  • 8/10/2019 USA vs. Derby Consent Decree

    22/24

    S i g n a t u r e Fage o r C o n s e n t D e c r e e Regard ing O S u l l i v a n s I s l a n d S u p e r f u n d S i t e .

    / s / H. u r t i s S ~ a l d i n

    H. CURTIS PALI~INGRegiona l A d m i n i s t r a t o r ,R e g i o n 1

    U.S. Envi ronmenta l r o t e c t i o n Agency

    ~ Post O f f i c e S q u a r e -Su i te 100

    Boston M 210 9 - 39 12

    / s / Cynthia A. Lewis

    CYNTHIA A. LEWISSenior E n f o r c e m e n t C o u n s e l

    U.S. EPA e g i o n 1

    5 Pos t f f i c e Square u i t e . 1 0 0M a i l C o d e O E S O 4 - 3Boston M 2109-3912

    Case 3:14-cv-01594-WWE Document 3 Filed 10/28/14 Page 22 of 24

  • 8/10/2019 USA vs. Derby Consent Decree

    23/24

    S i g n a t u r e Page o r Consen t Dec ree Regarding O S u l l i v a n s I s l a n d Superfund S i t e .

    FOR THE CITY OF DERBY, ONNECTICUT:

    10 /2 /2014 1 . s / A n z t aI ~ u g a t t o

    Dated Name p r i n t ) : Anita DugattoT i t l e : M a y o r C i t y o f D e r b yAddress : 1 E l i z a b e t h S t . , Derby CT

    A g e n t Author ized t o Accep t e r v i c e o n Behal f of b o ~ ~ e - s i g n e dP a r t y :

    Naive: T h o m a s . We l c h Esq .

    C o m p a n y : We l c h Teodosio Stanek Blake LLC

    T i t l e : C o r p o r a t i o nCounsel i t y of Derby

    Address : 375 ~ 3 r i d g e p o r tAv e n u e h e l t o n , CT 6 4 8 4

    Phone : 03 /925 .3000e m a i l : t w e l c h n awtsb law.eom

    2 1

    Case 3:14-cv-01594-WWE Document 3 Filed 10/28/14 Page 23 of 24

  • 8/10/2019 USA vs. Derby Consent Decree

    24/24

    APPENDIX A

    LIST OF FINANCIAL DOCUMENTS

    i t y of e rby A u d i t e d F i n a n c i a l S t a t e m e n t s f o r t h e F i s c a l Years Ended June 30 ,

    2 0 0 8 h r o u g h2010 .

    C i t y of e rby r a f t f i n a n c i a l p r i n t o u t s f o r t h e F i s c a l Ye a r Ended June 3 0 , 0 1 1

    ( d a t e d October 1 1 , 2 0 1 1 ) .

    i t y of e rby e d e r a l S i n g l e Audi t and S t a t e S i n g l e A u d i t , i s c a l Years Ended June 30 ,

    2 0 0 9 and 2 0 1 0 i n c o n 7 p l e t e c o p y ) .

    C i t y of e rby f f i c i a l S t a t e m e n t 2,545,000 G e n e r a l O b l i g a t i o n Refunding B o n d s , s s u e

    o f 009 , a t e d May 7 , 009 .

    C i t y oFDerby, udget document s o r ?010-11 .

    t e m i z e d C o s t S u m m a r y and Regional a y r o l l C o s t s , O S u l i i v a n s I s l a n d S u p e r f i i n d S i t e

    { J u l y 21 , 0 0 8 o June , 2010) , e p o r t e d a s of une , 0 1 0 .

    e t t e r f rom S h e i l a O ' M a l l e y Ci ty of e r b y i r e c t o r of c o n o m i c and C o m m u n i t y

    D e v e l o p m e n t and G r a n t s A d m i n i s t r a t i o n )t o Sharon e n n e l l y (U .S . EPA eg ion 1 ) ,

    d a t e d October 4 , 0 1 0 .

    Town r o f i l e , C o n n e c t i c u t Depar tmen t of c o n o m i c and C o m m u n i t y Deve lopmen t , une

    2002 .

    a p i t a l Ilan R e q u e s t , 2 0 0 6 - 0 7 i s c a l Year r a f t .

    2 2

    Case 3:14-cv-01594-WWE Document 3 Filed 10/28/14 Page 24 of 24