URDSP Sequence 011

7/27/2019 URDSP Sequence 011

1/10

The World Bank

Page 1 of 10

PublicDisclosureCopy


Report No: ISR8029

Implementation Status & Results

Indonesia

URBAN SECTOR DEVELOPMENT AND REFORM PROJECT (P071296)

Operation Name: URBAN SECTOR DEVELOPMENT AND REFORMPROJECT (P071296)

Project Stage: Implementation Seq.No: 11 Status:ARCHIVED Archive Date: 03-Dec-2012

Country: Indonesia Approval FY: 2005

Product Line: IBRD/IDA Region: EAST ASIA AND PACIFIC Lending Instrument: Specific Investment Loan

Implementing Agency(ies): Ministry of Public Works, DG Human Settlements

Key Dates

Board Approval Date 07-Jun-2005 Original Closing Date 30-Jun-2011 Planned Mid Term Review Date 15-Apr-2008 Last Archived ISR Date 03-Apr-2012

Effectiveness Date 18-Jan-2006 Revised Closing Date 31-May-2013 Actual Mid Term Review Date 16-Mar-2009

Project Development Objectives

Project Development Objective (from Project Appraisal Document)

The project development objective is to assist the Borrower to strengthen local governance and improve the provision of selected urban services by participating UrbanLocal Governments (ULGs) and additional participating ULGs.

Has the Project Development Objective been changed since Board Approval of the Project?

Yes No

Component(s)

Component Name Component Cost

Urban Reform and Institutional Support Component 9.00

Urban Investment Component 52.12

Overall RatingsPrevious Rating Current Rating

Progress towards achievement of PDO Moderately Satisfactory Moderately Sat isfactory

Overall Implementation Progress (IP) Moderately Satisfactory Moderately Sat isfactory

Overall Risk Rating

Implementation Status Overview

The project is nearing completion of physical works and governance reforms being undertaken by 10 urban local governments (ULGs). The investment subprojects are mostly aimed

at upgrading and rehabilitating public markets, and have already provided better, cleaner, and more modern facilities for vendors and customers, and increased revenues foroperation and maintenance. The ULGs have also strengthened governance by improving transparency and accountability, systematically disclosing public information, establishing

complaints handling mechanisms, evaluating performance of contractors/suppliers, improving financial management regulations and systems, and f inalizing the national urban

strategy, policy, and economic development plans.


2/10

The World Bank

Page 2 of 10



Report No: ISR8029

Locations

Country First Administrative Division Location Planned Actual

Indonesia Not Entered Kotamadya Yogyakarta

Indonesia Not Entered Toboli

Indonesia Not Entered Propinsi Sulawesi Tengah

Indonesia Not Entered Kabupaten Sidenreng-Rapang

Indonesia Not Entered Kotamadya Semarang

Indonesia Not Entered Kotamadya Parepare

Indonesia Not Entered Kota administratip Palu

Indonesia Not Entered Palopo

Indonesia Not Entered Kabupaten Musibanyuasin

Indonesia Not Entered Kabupaten Manokwari

Indonesia Not Entered Mangkang

Indonesia Not Entered Kota Administratip Cimahi

Indonesia Not Entered Kotamadya Blitar

Indonesia Not Entered Kemirimuka

Indonesia Not Entered Kecamatan Gamping

Indonesia Not Entered Kabupaten Sleman

Indonesia Not Entered Desa Umbulharjo

Indonesia Not Entered Kecamatan Pangkajene

Indonesia Not Entered Kotamadya Depok

Indonesia Not Entered Kecamatan Moutong

Indonesia Not Entered Lakessi

Results

Project Development Objective Indicators


3/10

The World Bank

Page 3 of 10



Report No: ISR8029

Indicator Name Core Unit of Measure Baseline Current End Target

Increased revenue, operations and

maintenance expenditures, and satisfactionrates among users and consumers of selected

urban services in at least 70% of ULGs withcompleted subprojects

Percentage Value 0.00 30.00 70.00

Date

Comments

18-Jan-2006

Overall ULG target (70%) is

based on achievement of four

sub-indicators that each havetheir own targets, and are inturn determined by individual

baselines and valuesachieved for each subproject.

At inception of the project,overall baseline is zero as the

project investments have notyet taken place.

18-Jul-2012

30 % ULG have increased

monthly revenue. At least

another 30 % ULGs arepreparing the USDRP-financed infrastructure to

operation. tThe PBME for assessing

users revenue andsatisfaction will be prepared

prior project closing.However, 10% ULGs have

carried out satisfaction surveyto traders and resulted that

more than 50% traders satisfyto the facilities provided and

the use of infrastructure

31-May-2013

Target value is the

percentage of participating

ULGs with completedinvestment sub-projects thathave achieved the individual

goalsin each of the four sub-indicators.

70% of ULGs increase their local revenue fromurban services financed by the project by at

least 10%

Percentage

Sub Type

Breakdown

Value 0.00 30.00 70.00

Date

Comments

18-Jan-2006

Sub-indicator based onindividual baselines for each

ULG and subproject. Data arecollected through municipal

records on revenues fromeach facility or service.

18-Jul-2012

30 % ULG have increasedmonthly revenue. At least

another 30 % ULGs arepreparing the USDRP-

financed infrastructure tooperation

31-May-2013

Percentage of ULGs withcompleted subprojects that

have met the revenue target.

70% of ULGs increase expenditures for O&Mof infrastructure financed by the project by at

least 10%

Percentage

Sub Type

Breakdown

Value 0.00 0.00 70.00

Date

Comments

18-Jan-2006

Sub-indicator based onindividual baselines for each

ULG and subproject. Data arecollected through municipal

records on O&M expendituresfor each service infrastructure

financed by the project.

18-Jul-2012

Seven ULGs have completedsubprojects in which five

ULGs have subprojects inoperation, but data on O&M

expenditures is not yetavailable.

31-May-2013


have met the O&Mexpenditure target.

Percentage of ULGs in which at least 50% ofusers express increased satisfaction in doing

business in the improved facility.

Percentage

Sub Type

Breakdown

Value 0.00 0.00 70.00

Date

Comments

18-Jan-2006

Baseline is zero because thetarget is based on percentage

of ULGs meeting targets for

18-Jul-2012

Data will be collected throughan impact assessment

(PBME) conducted either a

31-May-2013



4/10

The World Bank

Page 4 of 10



Report No: ISR8029

user satisfaction in facilitiesthat were not yet improved

and in some cases notidentified. Increased

satisfaction for individualsubprojects will not include

and ex-ante baseline butrather through a survey of

current users who also wereusers of the unimproved

infrastructure. "Users" refersto vendors orother

stakeholders that use thefacilities improved through

project investments toconduct business activities

and provide commercialservices.

year after each subproject'sinfrastructure becomes

operational, or at the close ofthe project. However, 10%

ULGs have carried outsatisfaction survey to traders

and resulted that morethan50% traders satisfy to the

facilities provided and the useof infrastructure

have met the user satisfactiontarget.

Percentage of ULGs in which at least 50% of

consumers express increase satisfaction ofusing the facilities

Percentage

Sub Type

Breakdown

Value 0.00 0.00 70.00

Date

Comments

18-Jan-2006

Baseline is zero because thetarget is based on percentage

of ULGs meeting targets forconsumer satisfaction in

facilities that were not yetimproved and in some cases

not identified. Increasedsatisfaction for individual

subprojects will not includeand ex-ante baseline but

rather through a survey of

current consumers who alsowere consumers of theservices before they were

improved. "Consumers" refersto customers of vendors or

recipients of servicesprovided through the facilities.

18-Jul-2012

Data will be collected throughan impact assessment

(PBME) conducted either ayear after each subproject's

infrastructure becomesoperational, or at the close of

the project. However, 10%ULGs have carried out

satisfaction survey to tradersand resulted that morethan

50% traders satisfy to the

facilities provided and the useof infrastructure

31-May-2013


have met the consumersatisfaction target.

Intermediate Results Indicators


5/10

The World Bank

Page 5 of 10



Report No: ISR8029

Indicator Name Core Unit of Measure Baseline Current End Target

Participating ULGs have public feedback

mechanisms in place incl:(i) the use of at leastone type of media(s) for public complaints-

managed by complaint handling unit; (ii)availability

Text Value 0.00 (i) 70%; (ii) 100%; (iii) 70% 80

Date

Comments

18-Jan-2006

At the inception of the project,

baseline was zero as the

project has not started itsfacilitation and values varyacross ULGs. Information is

collected during thesupervisions missions and

recorded in the AideMemoires with qualitative

information on the progress.Indicators were only specified

in June 2010 during projectrestructuring.

18-Jul-2012

70 % ULGs have a systematic

use of media for managing

complaints and feedback100 % ULGs have specificunit to manage

70 % ULGs have SOP ofcomplaints handling

31-May-2013

Participatory planning process: (i) allocation of

block grants to kecamatan and/or kelurahan

from the ULG and/or from at least oneagencywith Standard Operating Procedure for the useof block grants

Text Value 0.00 70% ULGs has block grant

mechanism or indicative

budget

50

Date

Comments

18-Jan-2006

At the inception of the project,baseline was zero as the

project has not started itsfacilitation and values vary

across ULGs. Information iscollected during the

supervisions missions andrecorded in the Aide

Memoires with qualitativeinformation on the progress.

Indicators were only specifiedin June 2010 during project

restructuring.

18-Jul-2012

70% ULGs has block grantmechanism or indicative

budget

31-May-2013

Participating ULGs practicing sound Fin. Mgt:(i) issuance of local regulation (PERDA or

Decree or Perbup/Perwal) on Principle ofRegional Financial Management; (ii) Issuance

of local regulation

Text Value 0.00 9i) 100%; (ii) 100%; and (iii)70%

80

Date

Comments

18-Jan-2006




18-Jul-2012

100 % ULGs have localregulation concerning the

Principle of Regional Finance100% ULGs have local

regulation concerningPolicies, Systems, and

31-May-2013


6/10

The World Bank

Page 6 of 10

PublicDisclosu

reCopy


Report No: ISR8029




restructuring.

Procedures for thePreparation and Execution of

APBD70 % ULGs published annual

audited financial report

Center of Excellence: (i) Unit Informasi

Pembangunan Permukiman dan Bangunan(UIP2B) functioned as a Prov. Center of

Excellence to support reforms in the ULGs inthe province; (ii) Work Plan for

Text Value 0.00 1 PIP2B is established.

Organizational structure andbudget are available, and

annual work plan is issued

Center of Excellence: at least

1 Province has (i) and (ii)Local Economic Development

and City DevelopmentStrategy: At least 60%of

Partic ipating ULGs have (i)and at least 50% of

Participating ULGs having theLED-focu sed City

Development Strategyachieve (ii)

Date

Comments

18-Jan-2006


baseline was zero as theproject has not started its

facilitation and values varyacross ULGs. Information is




in June 2010 during project

restructuring.

18-Jul-2012

1 PIP2B is established.

Organizational structure andbudget are available, and

annual work plan is issued

31-May-2013

Participating ULGs implemented subprojects:(i) Participating ULGs sign Sub- project Loan

Agreements (SLAs) with Ministry of Finance forurban investment subprojects; (ii) Participating

ULGs complete

Text Value 0.00 (i) 10 ULGs; (ii) 7 ULGs (i) 100% of ParticipatingULGs signed SLAs (ii) At

least 80% of ParticipatingULGs completed construction

of urban investmentsubproject

Date

Comments

18-Jan-2006



facilitation and values vary

across ULGs. Information is

18-Jul-2012

100 % ULGs have signed

SLA70 % ULGs have completed

subproject construction

31-May-2013


7/10

The World Bank

Page 7 of 10

PublicDisclosu

reCopy


Report No: ISR8029





Participating ULGs practicing soundProcurement: (i) Min. 75% of the bids be

awarded within the bid validity period, andpublicizedin the public domain, e.g. website,

local bulletin; (ii) Min 50% of

Text Value 0.00 i) 90%; (ii) 100%; (iii) 30% inprogress

At least 60 % of participatingULGs achieve (i) and (ii) and

at least 60% of participatingULGs achieve (iii)

Date

Comments

18-Jan-2006








18-Jul-2012

awarded the bids within bid

validity period, however only90% of ULGs published the

bid award in the publicdomain, e.g. website, local

bulletin(ii) 100% ULGs have national

certified tender committee(iii) At least 30% ULGs are

preparing institutions andmechanism for giving award

to best-performers

31-May-2013

Transparency, Participation and Accountability:ULGs that post semi-annual updates on

websites or in printed media for specifiedinformation


Date

Comments

18-Jan-2006







restructuring.

18-Jul-2012

Value: varies across ULGs,range from 70-100% for six

types of specified informationhave been published in

websites or in printed media(details are shown in the

following six indicators below)

31-May-2013

Value: At least 80% ofparticipating ULGs post the

specified information at sixmonths intervals


8/10

The World Bank

Page 8 of 10

PublicDisclosu

reCopy


Report No: ISR8029

Transparency, Participation and Accountability:

ULGs that post semi-annual updates onwebsites or in printed media for information on

local development activities/programs


Date

Comments

18-Jan-2006



facilitation and values vary

across ULGs. Information iscollected during thesupervisions missions and




18-Jul-2012

100% ULGs published local

development activities/programs on the website or

printed media

31-May-2013

Value: At least 80% of

Participating ULGs post theinformation on local

development activities/

programs at six monthintervals

Transparency, Participation and Accountability:

ULGs that post semi-annual updates onwebsites or in printed media for specified

information: Mid-term development Plan(RPJMD)


Date

Comments

18-Jan-2006








18-Jul-2012

90% ULGs published

summary RPJMD on thewebsite or printed media

31-May-2013

Value: At least 80% of

Participating ULGs post theinformation on RPJMD at six

month intervals

Transparency, Participation and Accountability:ULGs that post semi-annual updates on

websites or in printed media for specifiedinformation: summary of Local Budget (APBD)

Percentage Value 0.00 60.00 80.00Date

Comments

18-Jan-2006






Indicators were only specified

18-Jul-2012

70% ULGs publishedsummary of local budget of

the ongoing FY, and 60%published summary of budget

realization of previous FY

31-May-2013

Value: At least 80% ofParticipating ULGs post the

information on the summaryof APBD at six month

intervals


9/10

The World Bank

Page 9 of 10

PublicDisclosu

reCopy


Report No: ISR8029


Data on Financial Performance (as of 09-Oct-2012)

Financial Agreement(s) Key Dates

Project Ln/Cr/Tf Status Approval Date Signing Date Effectiveness Date Original Closing Date Revised Closing Date

P071296 IBRD-47860 Effective 07-Jun-2005 20-Oct-2005 18-Jan-2006 30-Jun-2011 31-May-2013

P071296 IBRD-77600 Effective 06-Jul-2009 06-Jul-2009 06-Jul-2009 30-Jun-2011 31-May-2013

P071296 TF-53555 Effective 20-Oct-2005 20-Oct-2005 18-Jan-2006 30-Jun-2011 31-May-2013

Disbursements (in Millions)

Project Ln/Cr/Tf Status Currency Original Revised Cancelled Disbursed Undisbursed % Disbursed

P071296 IBRD-47860 Effective USD 45.00 45.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

P071296 IBRD-77600 Effective USD 45.00 38.44 6.57 34.64 3.80 90.00

P071296 TF-53555 Effective USD 5.00 5.00 0.00 4.26 0.74 85.00

Disbursement Graph

Key Decisions Regarding Implementation

The next supervision mission is scheduled for December 2012. It will include discussion of final steps to complete unfinished works and activities prior to project closing, and plans forensuring the long-term sustainability of project investments.


10/10

The World Bank

Page 10 of 10

PublicDisclosu

reCopy


Report No: ISR8029

Restructuring History

Level one Approved on 04-Jun-2010, Level two Approved on 13-Apr-2011, Level two Approved on 14-Jun-2012

Related Projects

There are no related projects.

URDSP Sequence 011

Documents

Transcript of URDSP Sequence 011