Urbanization, Rural Transformation and Implications for...

PROCEEDINGS

Discussion No. 126 from 15 March to 12 April 2016 www.fao.org/fsnforum/forum/discussions/urbanization-rural-transformation

Global Forum on Food Security and Nutrition www.fao.org/fsnforum

Urbanization, Rural Transformation and Implications for Food Security Online consultation on the background document to the CFS Forum

Collection of contributions received

http://www.fao.org/fsnforum/forum/discussions/urbanization-rural-transformation

http://www.fao.org/fsnforum

2 Urbanization, Rural Transformation and Implications for Food Security Online consultation on the background document to the CFS Forum PROCEEDINGS


Table of Contents

Topic note .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 4

Contributions received ................................................................................................................................................................ 5

1. Angel Leyva Galán, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Agrícolas (INCA), Cuba ............................................ 5 2. John Kazer, Carbon Trust, United Kingdom .......................................................................................................... 6 3. JC Wandemberg, Sustainable Systems International, Ecuador ..................................................................... 6 4. Vethaiya Balasubramanian, Freelance Consultant, India ................................................................................ 6 5. Bert Cramer ........................................................................................................................................................................ 7 6. Manuel Moya, International Pediatric Association TAG on Nutrition, Spain .......................................... 8 7. Subhash Mehta, Devarao Shivaram Trust, India ................................................................................................. 8 8. Jim Boak, Salford Group Inc, Canada ........................................................................................................................ 9 9. Olegario Muniz, Soil Institute, Cuba ...................................................................................................................... 10 10. Eileen Omosa, We Grow Ideas, Canada ........................................................................................................... 11 11. Deborah Fulton, Facilitator of the discussion .............................................................................................. 12 12. Marie-Hélène Schwoob, Sciences Po Paris, France .................................................................................... 13 13. Kien Nguyen Van, Plant Resources Center (PRC), Viet Nam .................................................................. 13 14. Ophélie Robineau, CIRAD, France ..................................................................................................................... 14 15. Emile Houngbo, Agricultural University of Ketou (UAK), Benin .......................................................... 15 16. Hart Jansson, Malnutrition Matters, Canada ................................................................................................. 16 17. Florence Egal, Food Security and Nutrition expert, Italy ........................................................................ 17 18. Diana Lee-Smith, Mazingira Institute, Kenya ............................................................................................... 18 19. Subhash Mehta, Devarao Shivaram Trust, India ......................................................................................... 18 20. Florence Egal Food Security and Nutrition expert, Italy ......................................................................... 20 21. Aimée Hampel-Milagrosa, German Development Institute, Germany ............................................... 21 22. Hélène Delisle, University of Montreal, Canada .......................................................................................... 22 23. Olivia Muza, Consultant, Zimbabwe ................................................................................................................. 23 24. Myriam del Carmen Salazar Villarreal, Universidad Nacional De Colombia, Colombia ............. 23 25. Lal Manavado, University of Oslo affiliate, Norway ................................................................................... 24 26. Florence Scarsi, Ministry of Environment, Energy and Sea, France ................................................... 25 27. Fran Hall, Spain ......................................................................................................................................................... 26 28. Myriam del Carmen Salazar Villarreal, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Colombia .............. 26 29. Saydagzam Khabibullaev, "Land of Plenty Agro Distribution" LLC, "Real Estate Strong Partners" LLC, Uzbekistan .................................................................................................................................................. 27 30. Cascade Tuholske, PhD Student, UCSB Dept. of Geography, USA ......................................................... 29 31. John Weatherhogg, Italy ........................................................................................................................................ 29 32. Sarah Granados, FAO, Chile .................................................................................................................................. 30 33. Dror Tamir, Steak TzarTzar, Israel ................................................................................................................... 31 34. Jane Battersby, University of Cape Town, South Africa ........................................................................... 31 35. Peter Steele, FAO, Italy ........................................................................................................................................... 32




36. Thomas Forster, International Partners for Sustainable Agriculture, United States of America 35 37. Jess Halliday, Independent consultant and researcher, France ............................................................ 37 38. George Kent, Department of Political Science, University of Hawai'i, USA ...................................... 37 39. Ophélie Robineau, CIRAD, France ..................................................................................................................... 39 40. Constance Koukoui, Cités Unies France, France .......................................................................................... 39 41. Pradip Kumar Nath, National Institute Of Rural Development, India ................................................ 40 42. Camelia Adriana Bucatariu, FAO, Italy ............................................................................................................ 41 43. Luis Antonio Hualda, University of the Philippines Mindanao, Philippines .................................... 45 44. Jackson Kago, UN-Habitat, Kenya ...................................................................................................................... 46 45. Emily Mattheisen, FIAN International, Germany ........................................................................................ 48 46. Louison Lançon, FAO, Italy ................................................................................................................................... 53 47. Stineke Oenema, UNSCN, Italy ............................................................................................................................ 54 48. Deborah Fulton, Facilitator of the discussion .............................................................................................. 55 49. Vito Cistulli, FAO, Italy ........................................................................................................................................... 56 50. Uchendu Chigbu, TU München, Germany....................................................................................................... 57 51. Simone Borelli, FAO, Italy ..................................................................................................................................... 58




Topic note

Dear all,

Urbanization and the transformation of agriculture, food systems and rural spaces present challenges and opportunities for inclusive growth, poverty eradication, economic, environmental and social sustainability, and food security and nutrition. As a result, there is an increasing focus on rural-urban linkages and approaches which can address these issues in a holistic and integrated manner in order to fully address the challenges and maximize the opportunities.

This online consultation invites you to contribute to the elaboration of a background document that the CFS Secretariat is preparing to support the discussions at the Forum on Urbanization, Rural Transformation and Implications for Food Security to be held at CFS 43 in October 2016. The Forum’s outcomes will inform next year’s work which will be focused towards the development of policy guidance for endorsement at CFS 44 in October 2017.

The current working version of the Zero Draft is informed by input received during a technical workshop held in February 2016, where key areas and existing approaches related to addressing rural-urban linkages were discussed. In order to make best use of this online consultation, we invite you to reflect on the following questions:

Are the key challenges and opportunities related to food security and nutrition in the context of changing urban-rural dynamics addressed? Are there issues missing or any that are included that don’t seem directly related?

Is it clear how each of the dynamics explored affects food security and nutrition? If not, how could this be better clarified?

Have the key elements of governance issues and integrated approaches to addressing rural-urban linkages been captured? If not, what is missing?

Where/how do you think CFS can add the most value to current initiatives aimed at addressing food security and nutrition in the context of urbanization and rural transformation?

The outcomes of this online consultation, will feed into the further elaboration of the background document and design of the Forum at CFS 43.

We thank you in advance for your time and for sharing your knowledge and experiences with us.

Deborah Fulton,

CFS Secretary




Contributions received

1. Angel Leyva Galán, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Agrícolas (INCA), Cuba Ya exprecé en un debate mis puntos de vista al respecto. Pero quiero volver a expresar mi parecer.

Desde hace 21 años estoy evaluando agroecosistemas integrales de zonas rurales. Loas resultados son los mismos.

a) Escasa producción de proteinas, miel, pescado, oleaginosas y flores

b) Inexistencia de programas y diseños agrarios que impliquen el mejoramiento de la dieta humana

c) Escasa atención a la produccióin de alimento animal,.y para rriquecer la vida de los suelos

d) Escaso consumo de hortalizas y frutas en las áreas rurales.

e) Desconiocimiento de los requerimientosa diarios humanos (en cuanto a los grupos de alimentos no consideré las cantidades porque estas varian de una región a otra.

Hemos creado un índice IDA para definir que deben tener los agroecosistermas locales para garantizar "Soberanía alimentaria" Si lo consideran, puedo hacrle llegar la información, publicada un ejemplo en la Revista No. 7 Agroecología de Murcia España en 20012.

Atentamente,

Dr Angel Leyva Galán

INCA, La Habana, Cuba

English translation

I have already shared my views on this topic in a previous discussion. However, I would like to outline my ideas again.

I have been assessing integrated rural agro-ecosystems for the last 21 years. The outcome is always identical:

a) Low production of proteins, honey, fish, oilseeds and flowers

b) Lack of agricultural programs and designs entailing a dietary improvement

c) Little attention to feed production and soil enrichment

d) Limited consumption of vegetables and fruits in rural areas

e) Unawareness of the human daily requirements (regarding food groups, I did not consider the amounts as these vary from one region to another)

We have created an agro-ecosystem diversity index (known in Spanish as IDA) to define the requirements local agro-ecosystems must meet to ensure "food sovereignty". If you are interested, I can share relevant information, published in the Agro-ecology Journal (issue No. 7) of Murcia University (Spain) in 2012.

Yours sincerely,

Dr Angel Leyva Galán

National Institute of Agricultural Sciences (known in Spanish as INCA), Havana, Cuba




2. John Kazer, Carbon Trust, United Kingdom Typically smallholder production is assumed to require a large rural workforce. Will this still be available as urbanization procedes and food prices necessarily increase with demand from growing cities?

This pair of economic and population forces drove consolidation of agriculture into larger farms in every (?) urbanized country to date - what reason(s) are there to believe this will not continue to happen in countries which currently have large rural populations and smallholder predominant production?

3. JC Wandemberg, Sustainable Systems International, Ecuador CFS can add the most value to current initiatives addressing food security and nutrition in the context of urbanization and rural transformation by ensuring the active participation of those who have to live with the consequences of the decisions being made, however, this active participation is NOT possible or sustainable without proper knowledge or education. Hence, the need to link with local universities and/or research centers.

A MAJOR drag on every development effort is the pervasive bureaucratic structure, this restrictive organizational structure can and must be transformed into an expansive organizational structure through the Search Conference and Participative Design Workshop.

Eliminating Poverty through Open Systems Design & Proactive Adaptability (Sustainable Change and Development) http://www.fao.org/fsnforum/sites/default/files/resources/Eliminating%20Poverty%20Through%20Open%20Systems%20Design.docx

Best regards,

JC Wandemberg Ph.D.

SustainableSystemsINternational.Org

4. Vethaiya Balasubramanian, Freelance Consultant, India In most developing countries of Asia, smallholder agriculture and rural economy are in a state of severe stress due to continuous neglect of these sectors for over 20 years or more. Smallholder agriculture plays a crucial role in building rural economy and safeguarding rural livelihoods, providing employment to rural youth, assuring food and nutritional security to expanding population, and supporting rural demand for industrial goods and services that are essential for national economic growth. With expanding population and jobless growth in industrial sector, unemployment among youth is becoming a serious challenge to government authorities in Asia. Farming in the present form is also not attractive to youth. As a consequence, young people are migrating to cities in search of better employment and livelihoods. This is a double whammy because it is creating more slums in cities and depleting farm labor in villages. Most of the migrating rural youth are poorly educated and skilled and thus cannot compete for jobs with sophisticated urban youth, so they get frustrated and are easily lured by antisocial elements for carrying out all kinds of illegal activities inside and outside the countries.

This growing rural distress must be addressed as a priority by investing in rural infrastructure; providing adequate technical, institutional and policy support to smallholder agriculture; and training and skill development of rural youth for both farm and non-farm jobs. As per the convicted view of ex-president late Dr. Abdul Kalam, providing urban amenities in rural areas is the only way to reverse the trend of rural to urban migration. It is important to encourage the rural youth undertake agriculture


http://www.fao.org/fsnforum/sites/default/files/resources/Eliminating%20Poverty%20Through%20Open%20Systems%20Design.docx

http://www.fao.org/fsnforum/sites/default/files/resources/Eliminating%20Poverty%20Through%20Open%20Systems%20Design.docx



and related enterprises as a profession by making them attractive to them through proper training, skills development, provision of initial capital and inputs, and long-standing support for them to successfully develop their farming and related enterprises – precision farming, specialized crop production (e.g., organic farming), farm machine operation, repair and maintenance of tractors and other farm machines, input retailing, contract service providing, food processing, food transporting and retailing, dairy, backyard poultry, goats and sheep keeping, bee keeping, mushroom production, silk worm rearing, small-scale catering, etc. They can also be trained to develop skills on non-farm enterprises like plumbing, electrical wiring, masonry and construction works, medical attendants, rural health workers, teaching, tailoring, repair and maintenance of TVs, computers and other electronics, and so on to earn a decent living in villages and or nearby towns.

How to make agriculture attractive to rural youth? Here is a recipe for making agriculture attractive to youth: better irrigation, climate-smart technologies; appropriate mechanization; soil health and water quality management; rationalized subsidies and direct transfer of benefits to farmers; and full crop insurance to cover all crop losses and market volatility. Urban farming will enhance local food production, community building, greening of cities, and employment of urban youth. Last but not least, population control is critical for sustainable development. Finally, crop production in weather controlled poly-houses and hydroponic systems in urban and peri-urban areas will be technically sophisticated, more power intensive, and require large initial investment, but it will supply products year-round.

Last but not least, it is important to note that agricultural production cannot be increased forever to feed and support the uncontrolled population growth. According to spiritual guru Jaggi Vasudev (Tamil Nadu, India), there is no way to cap human activities and aspirations, so we need to limit our numbers by reducing our reproductive rate. Nations including India must have the courage, and the world religions must have the sense to see that increasing the population is going to be a disaster for all of us – for every creature on earth, not just for humanity.

5. Bert Cramer Hello,

Two points on the otherwise excellent zero draft Background Paper to CFS 43 Forum Discussion:

1. There remains a gap in facilitating proven resilient rural agricultural/food practices in peri- and urban settings. In particular, non-market practices of collective or common agriculture being displaced by corporate food regimes remains a powerful contributor to food security/ food sovereignty. See in particular: McMichael, P. (2005). GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT AND THE CORPORATE FOOD REGIME. Research in Rural Sociology and Development, 11, 269-303. Recognition of the role of non-market oriented, community food production practices in preventing or avoiding food insecurity remains limited.

2. Pertinent to point 1., an example of community oriented practices taking place in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan's informal settlements: (http://aryshkg.kloop.kg/2015/05/08/urban-greening/); and (http://aryshkg.kloop.kg/2015/06/03/pervye-plody-proekta-po-biokulturnomu-raznoobraziyu-v-novostrojkah-goroda-bishkek/).

Again, overall a great document. I look forward to seeing future iterations of it.

Best,

Bert Cramer


http://aryshkg.kloop.kg/2015/06/03/pervye-plody-proekta-po-biokulturnomu-raznoobraziyu-v-novostrojkah-goroda-bishkek/

http://aryshkg.kloop.kg/2015/06/03/pervye-plody-proekta-po-biokulturnomu-raznoobraziyu-v-novostrojkah-goroda-bishkek/



6. Manuel Moya, International Pediatric Association TAG on Nutrition, Spain Dear Ms. Fulton,

Please find below my comment and answers to this new topic.

General Comment:

In my opinion, the Draft (14 03 16) contains all the issues inherent to U-R transformation and it is a very good base for the forthcoming CFS 44 (2017). Having a medical background I am no prepared to answer all four questions. Only the following ones:

Q 1 Are the key challenges…

Yes, the changing urban-rural dynamics are well addressed. A new issue could be to demand that the processors of food to follow the high income countries’ rules. Probably some big companies have a double threshold depending of on the country’s status. Special attention should be paid to the sugary beverages and food. The problem of ‘Urbanization’ or U-R interlinkages merits special attention and care and perhaps the classical division between LM- and H-IC should include the interlinkage. Also from the beginning the concept of ‘malnutrition’ should be clear to avoid confusion with undernutrition/ underweight.

Q 4. Where /how do you think…

In my opinion voluntary rural organizations could contribute importantly to maintain the as yet not so contaminated rural food patterns.

Manuel Moya

IPA TAG-Nutrition

With my kindest regards

Manuel Moya Catedrático E/ E Professor & Head Editor in Chief of the Newsletter. International Pediatric Asociation (IPA) Chair of the IPA Technical Advisory Group on Nutrition Board of Directors of IPA Foundation Academician of the Real Academia de Medicina

7. Subhash Mehta, Devarao Shivaram Trust, India Dear colleagues

Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) on the lives and livelihoods of Asia's indigenous peoples and farmers as well as food safety and security in the region covers a larger group since it binds the 10-member ASEAN and six non-ASEAN countries - including China - with a combined population of over 3.5 billion while the well known 12-nation Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA) signed on 4 February this year only covers the region's 800 million people,

Representatives of developing countries need to be aware that RCEP be made friendlier to their needs, as negotiations for the RCEP like the TPPA – are also taking place behind closed doors and without the participation of all stakeholders (farmers, unions, indigenous peoples, health advocates, and other members of civil society, etc.) who must be invited and given a voice and full say in the deliberations for long term sustainability of rural urban communities.

Texts leaked from the RCEP negotiations indicate a strong push is being made to further increase the power of MNC seed companies, in contrast the rural poor needs:




· criminalise seed saving and exchange also

· restrictions on seed saving and exchange at a time when, under the extreme pressures of climate change, farmers need more diversity in their fields, not less;

· increase farmers' dependence on external inputs and raise their risks and costs of production, as well as result in increased seed prices and non availability of locally adapted seeds

· if seeds or traditional knowledge are compiled into databases and made available, MNCs like Monsanto and Syngenta could appropriate the knowledge and genetic resources of farming and indigenous communities.

The full GRAIN report can be read and downloaded here: https://www.grain.org/article/entries/5405-new-mega-treaty-in-the-pipeline-what-does-rcep-mean-for-farmers-seeds-in-asia,

also at: www.grain.org/e/5405

Foreign investment, law and sustainable development, A handbook on agriculture and extractive industries, IIED http://www.fao.org/fsnforum/sites/default/files/resources/IIED%20Foreign%20investment%2C%20law%20and%20sustainable%20development.pdf

Was The Green Revolution (GR) A Humanitarian Undertaking - Disaster in the Long Term? http://www.fao.org/fsnforum/sites/default/files/resources/sm%20Was%20The%20Green%20Revolution%20A%20Humanitarian.docx

8. Jim Boak, Salford Group Inc, Canada Unlike my more learned academic collegues I can only draw on my experience to provide input to the forum.

While it may seem off topic I would like to draw attention in the discussion to pilotless farm equipment as a means of increasing efficiency. This is marketed to farmers and comsumers on the elimination of risk to operators of planting, application and harvesting equipment.

I am concerned on a number of levels. We are replacing people with machines at an alarming rate and life is about people is it not?

No risks to the operator allows the use of crop protection products that are extremely leathal.

A pilotless vehicle is not just a pilotless vehicle - It could come to pass that it is ten's of thousands of pilotless vehicles at any given time. Presumably they are programmed to all shut down when signals are lost or scrambled. What if they dont shut down and how do we accomplish the tasks required if they do need to be shut down for an extended period of time?

Farms operating as family farms will become extinct and replaced with corporate factory farms and with that we will lose the intense competition that drives improvement, the love of the land, the pride in accomplishment and innovation.

With the resulting lowerd demand for human labor the country side will soon empty, infrastructure will be difficult to remain, rural towns will die. Cities will be greatly at risk in having to support a great many people with no jobs or low income jobs.


https://www.grain.org/article/entries/5405-new-mega-treaty-in-the-pipeline-what-does-rcep-mean-for-farmers-seeds-in-asia

https://www.grain.org/article/entries/5405-new-mega-treaty-in-the-pipeline-what-does-rcep-mean-for-farmers-seeds-in-asia

http://www.grain.org/e/5405

http://www.fao.org/fsnforum/sites/default/files/resources/IIED%20Foreign%20investment%2C%20law%20and%20sustainable%20development.pdf

http://www.fao.org/fsnforum/sites/default/files/resources/IIED%20Foreign%20investment%2C%20law%20and%20sustainable%20development.pdf

http://www.fao.org/fsnforum/sites/default/files/resources/sm%20Was%20The%20Green%20Revolution%20A%20Humanitarian.docx

http://www.fao.org/fsnforum/sites/default/files/resources/sm%20Was%20The%20Green%20Revolution%20A%20Humanitarian.docx



Food security and our entire social fabric may become wishful thinking.

best regards

Jim

9. Olegario Muniz, Soil Institute, Cuba La creciente Urbanización y Transformación Rural que ocurre a nivel global, tanto en el mundo Desarrollado como En Desarrollo, constituye una amenaza y a la vez, un reto para el objetivo de alcanzar la Seguridad Alimentaria.

Frente a esta realidad resulta necesaria trazar estrategias y una de ellas la constituye la Agricultura Urbana. Existen países en América Latina y El Caribe, como son Brasil y Cuba que han logrado un desarrollo de la misma.

En el caso de Cuba, existe el muy exitoso movimiento de la Agricultura Urbana y Suburbana. La Agricultura Urbana se desarrolla en el entorno de cada población o ciudad, mientras que la Agricultura Suburbana, a partir del perímetro exterior de cada población y puede extenderse aproximadamente unos 10 Km.

El Programa Nacional de la Agricultura Urbana está dirigido a convertir y mantener toda el área disponible (terrenos baldíos e improductivos) en el perímetro urbano de pueblos y ciudades, en jardines hortofrutícolas y a la vez, la crianza animal compatible con el medio. Esto incluye el cultivo de flores, plantas medicinales, forestación urbana, desarrollo de raíces, tubérculos y bananos; utilizando tecnologías agroecológicas, uso exclusivo de abonos orgánicos y medios biológicos, reciclaje intensivo de los residuos y un sistema de comercialización directa a la población. Existen diferentes formas de producción que incluyen los patios, parcelas y huertos intensivos, pero sin lugar a dudas que la forma más popular, la constituye los denominados Organopónicos, construidos en terrenos baldíos que muchas veces no disponen de suelos fértiles. En este caso se levantan canteros conformados por 50% de suelo (en ocasiones transportado) y 50% de abono orgánico (puede ser compost). Su principal prioridad es el abastecimiento de Hortalizas y Condimentos Frescos a la población aledaña. Existen en el país más de 4600 unidades de Organopónicos que producen más de 15 Kg por m2 anuales de productos agrícolas frescos, debido al elevado índice de rotación que se logra en los mismos.

Una importante función adicional de estas áreas es el desarrollo de la cultura y vocación agraria, nutricional y medioambiental de toda la población, con énfasis en la infantil.

Dr. Olegario Muñiz Ugarte

Instituto de Suelos

La Habana, Cuba

English translation

The increasing urbanization and rural transformation at global level, both in developed and developing countries, poses at the same time a threat and a challenge to the goal of achieving food security.

Faced with this reality, new strategies are required. Urban Agriculture is one of them. It has been successfully implemented in several countries in Latin America and the Caribbean, such as Brazil and Cuba.

In the case of Cuba, a very successful practice stands out: urban and suburban agriculture. Urban agriculture takes place within each town or city, while suburban agriculture is practiced beyond the city/town limits within a 10km radius.




The Urban Agriculture National Program aims to convert and maintain all the available wasteland and unproductive land within towns and cities in fruit and vegetable gardens, and, at the same time, enable animal breeding in an environmentally friendly way. This includes floriculture, cultivation of medicinal plants, urban afforestation, or cultivation of roots, tubers and bananas. It involves agroecological technologies, exclusive use of organic fertilizers and biological resources, intensive waste recycling and a direct marketing system. Gardens can be grown in backyards, plots and intensive orchards, but without doubt, organoponics is the most popular system: urban gardens built on wastelands usually lacking fertile soils.

In this case, flowerbeds beds containing equal parts of soil (sometimes brought from another source) and organic fertilizer (e.g. compost) are made. Its main priority is providing fresh vegetables and condiments to the surrounding population. In Cuba there more than 4600 organoponic units producing more than 15 kg per m2 per year of fresh agricultural products, due to their high turnover rate.

An important additional feature of these systems is the promotion of agricultural, nutritional and environmental culture and vocation among the entire population, especially among children.

Dr. Olegario Muñiz Ugarte

Soil Institute

Havana, Cuba

10. Eileen Omosa, We Grow Ideas, Canada The most conspicuous challenge is how to introduce rural areas to “development” without converting them into under-developed urban areas

I read through the Background Document and noted arising issues without indicating the section they relate to in the Zero Document. Below find my input:

Concepts do matter

• Linkages, partnerships, interdependencies; which one works better for reciprocal relationships between rural and urban areas?

• I am for rural-urban partnerships/interdependencies rather than linkages. Partnerships based on reciprocity encourage each (rural, urban) to be best at what they produce (food) in exchange for what the other produces, rather than linkages which result in rural linked to urban for the sake of supplying urban markets (to meet urban needs).

Access to information and communication technologies

• Rural areas no longer isolated islands.

• Transformations witnessed in markets and marketing. For example, in many countries of Africa, educated young people who have entered into agricultural production as a business are very conversant with communication technologies, markets and marketing. In a bid to satisfy urban profitable markets, rural households are left with less nutritious food items or cannot afford food as the pricing is uniform for rural, urban and international buyers – check out available websites for on-line food marketing.




• Aggressive marketing of food markets in urban areas results in the cultivation of food items geared more towards the needs of the market than food and nutritional needs of people in rural areas.

Rural-urban linkages

• Leads to marketing of “global” foods to rural people, especially over- processed food items with hard to comprehend food labels. The result is that rural households abandon familiar foods that previously provided for their nutritional security, for “modern” foods whose nutritional value they do not fully comprehend.

• Available information indicates that more business people are moving to rural areas to purchase land, lease land or contract rural farmers for the production of “new” foods. The bargaining powers not being at par, rural land owners/users end up with a lower bargain – for example they lease out or sell their lands for mono-crops (biofuels, animal feeds) for outside markets.

• Challenges in cases where rural areas increase production but lack the capability to market their products in urban settings = make losses to middle men.

• Embracing of “half the technology; in cases where rural-based farmers in a bid to produce more for available markets, invest available resources on agricultural inputs and are left with limited resources for processing, value adding, packaging, etc. The result is food loss and waste at the different stages of production or to middlemen who offer a faster way to dispose of agricultural produce, especially perishables.

Loss of agricultural biodiversity/nutrition

• When urban or international markets dictate the food varieties to be cultivated by rural farmers – the trend is more towards mono-cropping (economies of scale) than a diversity of food crops which previously provided for the nutritional needs of households.

Globalization

• Contributes to high levels of malnutrition in both rural and urban areas. For example the emerging global market for “organic” foods resulted in situations where organic foods from rural areas by-pass national urban and rural consumers for global markets that pay more for the foods.

• A current move towards globalization of practice results in more uniformity than context specific policies and governance structures. The result is that many national governments implement the international guidelines wholesome - cumbersome to contextualize into local realities.

• Who represents the “rural” in discussions where policy and legislation are formulated?

Regards

11. Deborah Fulton, Facilitator of the discussion Thank you to everyone who has provided comments and submitted ideas so far under the umbrella topic of urbanization and rural transformation. The inputs which zero in on the food security and nutrition specific aspects of urbanization and rural transformation are particularly useful in helping




consider how the Committee might add value to existing initiatives and facilitate policy convergence on this topic.

Thanks to those of you who have indicated specific studies or resources to draw from - that will assist us with elaborating the subsequent draft. I would like to encourage those who haven’t had the chance to comment yet to continue in this vein in highlighting key issues which may not have been addressed in the Zero draft and also directing us to useful studies or sources of data addressing the changing rural-urban dynamics.

In addition, we’d also love to hear more about what types of approaches have worked well, including those outlined in the Zero draft, but also any others and how you think these might be scaled-up across all regions and contexts to address challenges in achieving food security and nutrition for all.

Thank you again for taking the time to engage in the online discussion and in providing us your comments and input on the current Zero draft. We look forward to receiving further input.

Best,

Deborah Fulton

12. Marie-Hélène Schwoob, Sciences Po Paris, France About the fact that there is "evidence indicating that attempting to reduce rural to urban migration can lead to a number of negative consequences for food security and nutrition and that conversely there are both challenges and opportunities presented by the dynamic rural-urban linkages": It is not clear to me which evidence is referred to here. On my fieldwork in China, I could aknowledge on the opposite that governments sometimes force rural to urban migration without taking into account the fact that people staying in the countryside might not be able to take care of the land left uncultivated by migrants (too old/imperfections of the land tenure system/lack of access to financial services/lack of access to social security for migrants, etc.). This raises questions for the middle and long terme food security. I believe that middle and long term scenarios should be conducted to assess more precisely the risks associated with large scale rural-urban migration (not only in terms of food security but also in terms of the capacity of non-agricultural sectors to absorb all the labour surplus, in a context where the world economic growth does not drive industrialization anymore).

I believe that a strong focus should be put on the necessity to ensure stability (of jobs, revenues, food, etc.) in urban and rural areas. Whether formal or informal markets, temporary or permanent jobs, one of the key points is the human need for stability (and this could be brought also by alternative systems such as welfare systems, or better connection to consumers, or enabling law environment, etc....). Running middle and long term scenarios might be useful for that as well.

Finally, I think that territorial approaches and participatory approaches are necessary and this point is well underlined in the report.

13. Kien Nguyen Van, Plant Resources Center (PRC), Viet Nam Dear All,

It is nice to sharing knowledge, experience and interest to a pressing topic in developing countries. I just have 3 suggested points

1. Should planning, design to integrate multi-purposes of sub-areas inside and outside of cities including landscapes (meadow, ponds. lakes, ect), parks. entertainment places, ect for food production.




This could strengthen awareness and action of society to food issues;

Agriculture production in inner city could help to solve social issues in developing countries such as conserve culture, villages, pollutions, ect

2. Estimate food needs to develop plan of food production or delivers;

3. architect and planners should integrate green, economic, social, cleaning recycle solutions in their thinkings including food security. This will save resources and environment cost

Best regards,

KIEN

Mr. Nguyen Van Kien Plant Genebank Management Division

14. Ophélie Robineau, CIRAD, France Dear colleagues,

Territorial approaches and city-region approaches are really relevant to understand links between urbanization, rural transformation and food security. I would like to mention the approach by the “agri-urban system” (concept develop by the French research program DAUME) to understand the complexity of city-agriculture interactions at a regional scale. I used this approach in a research in the area of Bobo-Dioulasso, in Burkina Faso and it appeared to be really adapted to think in a holistic way of city-agriculture and urban-rural linkages. My focus was first urban agriculture but then, this framework brought me to the analysis urban-rural relationships of many different types. Indeed, the analysis was based on a systemic approach based on the intersection of three groups of interactions: i) spatial and historical interactions between nature, agriculture and the city, ii) the interactions between the urban system and agriculture, and iii) the interactions within the urban agricultural system (within the urban area and between urban and rural area). This is to identify how a variety of relationships between city and agriculture are developed and what is at stake in the existence and permanence of the agri-urban system (which is a component of the urban food system).

Based on this, I would like to mention 2 aspects that seem important and that I did not see clearly in the document:

• Linkages between rural and urban agriculture: urban agriculture depends on many resources brought by rural farming activities. Indeed, agro-industries (often localized in urban areas) process rural produces such as cotton, wheat… and generate by-products that are used for the feeding of urban livestock. Also, urban livestock provides manure highly demanded by urban and rural market gardeners. Thus, the city drives the development of urban agriculture but so do rural agriculture by providing inputs to urban farming activities (and vice-versa). This kind of interactions are often forgotten/invisible but engender many linkages between urban and rural inhabitants and sustain different form of agriculture and employment both in urban and rural areas.

• Space-time analysis are relevant to understand the mechanism of urbanization and rural transformation in the urban fringe (issue of Land Use): land planning policies impact seriously not only the transformation of farming activities, but also the type of actors who develop it. Tacit governance systems influence who and how people can have access to land or protect their land from urbanization processes. In these processes, many families, often the poorest and the ones with less political influence, loose their land and have to leave farming activities, as well




explained in the document. But wealthy families with political influence sometimes benefits from urban planning policies by having access to protected agricultural land of high value (where they invest in new farming activities). This has to be taken into account when taking about governance: informal forms of governance can have a great impact on the outputs of official planning policies.

Also, when talking about urban policies it is also important to take into the account the ones that put constraints on farming activities and have impacts on periurban agriculture. For example, in Argentina, raising preoccupations toward the use of pesticides/herbicides led to the adoption of municipal orders in many cities that prohibit the use of these inputs in a certain radius around urban settlements. Many issues raised then: the quality of the produces, the delocalization of farms farther from the city (for farmers who prefer to leave rather than changing their farming practices) which raises issues on local food systems, changes in the organizations of the markets, distrust of consumers… It is also the opportunity to develop new circuits, new forms of productions and new links between producers and consumers. Hence, another question that has to be asked is the model of production/commercialization existing in the territories, how they coexist and how they impact rural transformation and rural-urban linkages.

15. Emile Houngbo, Agricultural University of Ketou (UAK), Benin La campagne et la ville sont deux facettes d’une même réalité spatiale et socio-temporelle mue par l’accroissement de la population. Elles ne s’opposent donc pas. Autant la campagne est indispensable, autant la ville l’est. Dans le processus, tout se passe comme si « la ville chasse la campagne ». Au départ, l’homme a toujours souhaité vivre dans un milieu qui lui procure à la fois habitat et vivres. La campagne, espace à faible densité de population, constitue de ce fait le cadre propice à ce mode de vie pour la population. Elle est l’espace cultivé, de production de vivres et de matières premières pour les villes, le siège de la demande de produits manufacturés et d’équipements agricoles et artisanaux produits en ville. Mais, à mesure que la population augmente, les besoins sociocommunautaires augmentent et obligent à repousser la campagne pour que prenne place la ville, espace habité, urbanisé. Car, avec l’élévation de la densité de la population, il faut plus d’habitations et d’infrastructures sociocommunautaires (écoles, centres de santé, police, justice, adduction d’eau, éclairage public, …). Cette évolution ou transformation de la campagne en ville par l’urbanisation se fait selon le degré d’organisation des pays.

Pour les pays bien organisés, tout est planifié en sorte que, malgré l’urbanisation, certaines fonctions rurales ne disparaissent pas totalement, et donc les activités agricoles et forestières continuent de se faire dans la ville avec une ampleur plus ou moins modeste. Ce sont des pays qui disposent d’un bon plan d’aménagement de l’espace, des pays qui anticipent bien. En réalité, l’urbanisation n’exige pas systématiquement la disparition de la production agricole ; surtout que les besoins alimentaires demeurent et sont même plus grands du fait de la forte population. Si l’urbanisation suit un tel schéma, la sécurité alimentaire est améliorée dans les villes qui se créent ainsi. C’est le cas des villes comme Abidjan en Côte d’Ivoire et Ibadan au Nigeria où se développent, en plus des activités maraîchères, des spéculations agricoles de grand champ comme le manioc et la banane plantain. Ce n’est en revanche pas le cas dans toutes les villes africaines, notamment Cotonou au Bénin et Ouagadougou au Burkina Faso. Dans la Commune d’Abomey-Calavi au sud-Bénin, des espaces anciennement réservés pour l’agriculture et la conservation de l’environnement (zone de cultures annuelles, …) sont morcelés et transformés presque totalement aujourd’hui en habitations.

Pour plus d'informations, un article publié dans la revue AGRIDAPE est joint à ce texte.




http://www.fao.org/fsnforum/sites/default/files/resources/Article-Agridape_Villes-campagnes_OK.pdf

English translation

The countryside and the city are two facets of the same spatial and socio-temporal reality moved by the growth in population. Therefore, they are not opposed to one another. Just as the countryside is indispensable so is the city. In the process, everything goes on as if "the city chases the countryside." To begin with, man has always desired to live in an environment which provides both a home and food. The countryside, an area with low population density, constitutes for this reason an environment suited to this way of life for the people. It is the cultivated area, for production of foodstuff and raw materials for the cities, and the source of demand for manufactured products and equipment produced in town for agriculture and handicrafts. But, as the population grows, so do socio-communitarian needs increase and oblige the countryside to be pushed back in order that it may be replaced by the town, an inhabited urbanized area. For, with the increase in population density, more housing and socio-communitarian infrastructure are needed (schools, health centers, police, judiciary centers, water distribution matrices, street lighting ...). This evolution or transformation of the countryside into a town by urbanization takes place according to the extent to which a country is organized.

For well-organized countries, all is planned so that, despite urbanizaton, some rural functions do not totally disappear and therefore agricultural and forestry activities continue to be carried out in the town on a more or less modest scale. These are countries that have well thought out land use allocation, countries that are planning ahead. In actual fact, urbanization does not demand the systematic disappearance of agricultural production; above all because the need for food remains and is even greater because of the increase in the population. If urbanization follows such a system, food security is improved in the towns created in this way. It is the case of the cities like Abidjan in Ivory Coast and Ibadan in Nigeria where in addition to market gardening activities, commercial large scale agriculture is developed such as cassava and plantains. This is not, however, the case of all African cities, in particular Cotonou in Benin and Ouagadougou in Burkina Faso. In the Municipality of Abomey-Calavi in the south of Benin, areas traditionally reserved for agriculture and the conservation of the environment (areas of annual cropping ...) are today almost totally divided up and transformed into housing.

For more information, an article published in the review AGRIDAPE is annexed to this text.

16. Hart Jansson, Malnutrition Matters, Canada "Malnutrition Matters (www.malnutrition.org) is a small meta-social business (registered non-profit), that has made a contribution to increased food security, using sustainable micro-enterprise to benefit not only BoP consumers / beneficiaries, but also rural women entrepreneurs and smallholder farmers. In 2005 Malnutrition Matters (MM) had 13 small-scale soymilk systems in 8 countries, with the help of a US-based partner, Africare. MM now has over 300 small-scale systems deployed in 31 countries, 19 of them in sub-Saharan Africa, with the help of dozens of partners. The other 12 countries are: Belize, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, Guatemala, Honduras, India, Myanmar, North Korea, St. Lucia, Thailand, USA. There are now over 130,000 daily beneficiaries / customers getting additional protein and micro-nutrient-rich food, thanks to these 300 installations.

The problem we are addressing, chronic moderate malnutrition in developing countries, especially lack of protein and micro-nutrients, is a significant and fundamental problem for almost all developing countries. The approach of MM, to help incubate soy-food micro-enterprises in rural and urban settings, enables this problem to be tackled in a sustainable way, that creates self-funding employment for women and youth, in their own locale rather than far afield. The MM approach also creates economic






benefit for local farmers who can grow and sell soybeans for higher profit than other crops. It ensures a virtuous economic cycle where there is no profit leakage to outside companies, allowing the revenues and profits to remain in the local community, for maximum local economic benefit. The MM approach of direct human consumption of soy foods, is also far superior to the animal protein cycle from an environmental perspective, which requires 10 - 20 times as much land, energy and water to provide animal protein for human consumption. The soy foods are also typically 1/4 to 1/3 the cost of the equivalent animal protein, which enables the BoP pool to benefit."

Read more here: http://www.fao.org/fsnforum/sites/default/files/resources/MM_SUCCESS_IN_IMPROVED_FSN.docx

Regards,

Hart

17. Florence Egal, Food Security and Nutrition expert, Italy The interest of CFS is most welcome since linkages between SDGs 2 and 11 are key to the Sustainable Development Agenda. But it would be good to acknowledge and build upon the work carried out in this area, by FAO and other organisations, since at least the late 80s (e.g. FAO’s Committee on Agriculture 1989 Urbanization, food consumption patterns, and nutrition ftp://ftp.fao.org/es/esn/nutrition/urban/delisle_paper.pdf). A bibliography of FAO work in this area can be found on http://www.fao.org/fcit/fcit-publications/en

The CFS secretariat may want to check the final draft of the SOFA Special Chapter on Urbanization - Linking Development across the Changing Landscape http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/FCIT/PDF/sofa.pdf (Drescher and Iaquinta 2002) which was prepared within the Priority Area for Interdisciplinary Action Food for Cities; and the 2003 report to CoAg of the Interdepartmental Working Group on Food for the Cities and in particular the strategic recommendations for MTP 2004-2009 http://www.fao.org/docrep/MEETING/006/Y8500e.HTM.

In 2011, the FAO Food for the Cities multi-disciplinary initiative published a position paper entitled Food, Agriculture and Cities - Challenges of food and nutrition security, agriculture and ecosystem management in an urbanizing world http://www.fao.org/3/a-au725e.pdf - signed by Alexander Mueller, then Assistant |Director General, sustainable Development - as background document for a CFS side-event http://www.fao.org/fcit/meetingevents/37th-cfs-food-for-cities-side-event/en. This document could be seen as a good basis for an updated version five years later and the Secretariat may want to reconsider the initial decision to focus on post-2012 publications.

FAO’s Food and Nutrition Division (now Nutrition and Food Systems Division) has worked extensively on these issues, within its programme on Globalisation, Urbanisation and Nutrition Transition, see in particular FAO Nutrition Paper 83, Globalization of food systems in developing countries: impact on food security and nutrition http://www.fao.org/3/a-y5736e.pdf (2004). Given the present concern with obesity and diet-related diseases and the association of urbanisation, globalisation and changing lifestyles, it is recommended that the CFS paper be explicitly linked to the follow-up of ICN2.

Overall the draft as it stands has by and large adopted a classical supply-driven value chain approach. The Secretariat may want to focus more explicitly on food consumption and food systems, following on and linking to the work carried out by SOFA 2013 Food Systems for Better Nutrition; Word Food Day 2013 Healthy people depend on healthy food systems - Sustainable Food Systems for Food Security and Nutrition and the 2015 WFD event in Milan http://www.fao.org/world-food-day/wfd-at-milan-


http://www.fao.org/fsnforum/sites/default/files/resources/MM_SUCCESS_IN_IMPROVED_FSN.docx

ftp://ftp.fao.org/es/esn/nutrition/urban/delisle_paper.pdf

http://www.fao.org/fcit/fcit-publications/en/

http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/FCIT/PDF/sofa.pdf

http://www.fao.org/docrep/MEETING/006/Y8500e.HTM

http://www.fao.org/3/a-au725e.pdf

http://www.fao.org/fcit/meetingevents/37th-cfs-food-for-cities-side-event/en/

http://www.fao.org/3/a-y5736e.pdf

http://www.fao.org/world-food-day/wfd-at-milan-expo/en



expo/en ; the Sustainable Food systems programme http://www.fao.org/ag/ags/sustainable-food-consumption-and-production/en and the 10 Year Programme on Sustainable Food Consumption and Production http://www.unep.org/10yfp

And last but not least, specific attention should be given to indigenous people and their food systems.

So much for now. :-)

18. Diana Lee-Smith, Mazingira Institute, Kenya This is a very welcome document that will establish current global thinking on food and nutrition security in relation to urbanization. The discussion of definitions is correct in nailing the ongoing transformations in rural and urban facts on the ground and how meanings are evolving.

I have one major comment on the material treated in the paper -- an omission - and one point of emphasis that needs to be made.

Regarding the omission, under "Natural Resource Use and Flows" there needs to be a paragraph on the urban nutrient surplus in the form of NPK locked up in solid and liquid wastes and which is a potential input to food production, both urban and rural. This has been much studied in recent years and there are quite a few references from International Water Management Institute (IWMI) and the WHO/FAO guidelines on waste water re-use in agriculture (2006). See also your reference lxvii Thebo, Drechsel and Lambin (2014), also Prain, Karanja and Lee-Smith (2010) www.idrc.ca/EN/Resources/Publications/openebooks/492-5/index.html

I also attach a couple of my own articles that refer to this.

Cities feeding people: an update on urban agriculture in equatorial Africa

http://www.fao.org/fsnforum/sites/default/files/resources/EnvAndUrbzn22%282%29%20Lee-Smith%20pp%20483-500published.pdf

City: analysis of urban trends, culture, theory, policy, action

http://www.fao.org/fsnforum/sites/default/files/resources/CITY%20published%20paper.pdf

I want to suggest also that the section on "Food loss and waste" be broadened in its concept to encompass wider issues of waste and waste re-use in an ecosystemic way. (The way it is written currently is about "getting rid" of food waste).

The point of emphasis that I would like to see addressed concerns the discussion of and final conclusions on the production of perishables with high micro-nutrient value in urban and peri-urban areas. At present the text emphasises the income potential for farmers. It should also address the nutritional value for farmers, their children and the urban population in general. This point should be included in the Points emerging from the Lietrature and the Potential Roles for CFS.

For reference on this see the article by me and Davinder Lamba in Right to Food and Nutrition Watch Issue 7 2015

Thanks for this major paper and the opportunity to comment

19. Subhash Mehta, Devarao Shivaram Trust, India I am quoting Olivier De Schutter, UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food,


http://www.fao.org/world-food-day/wfd-at-milan-expo/en

http://www.fao.org/ag/ags/sustainable-food-consumption-and-production/en/

http://www.fao.org/ag/ags/sustainable-food-consumption-and-production/en/

http://www.unep.org/10yfp

http://www.idrc.ca/EN/Resources/Publications/openebooks/492-5/index.html



http://www.fao.org/fsnforum/sites/default/files/resources/CITY%20published%20paper.pdf



speaking at the 64th session of the UN General Assembly as upscaling of community seed banks, upholding ‘Farmers' Rights’ is even more relevant today with the serious effects of climate change being faced by our planet

“All States should: Support and scale-up local seed exchange systems such as community seed banks and seed fairs, community registers of peasant varieties, and use them as a tool to improve the situation of the most vulnerable groups,..”

BANKING FOR THE FUTURE: SAVINGS, SECURITY AND SEEDS

A short study of community seed banks in Bangladesh, Costa Rica, Ethiopia, Honduras, India, Nepal, Thailand, Zambia and Zimbabwe.

The Development Fund/ Utviklingsfondet

http://www.planttreaty.org/sites/default/files/banking_future.pdf

CHAPTER V: UP-SCALING COMMUNITY SEED BANKS TO IMPLEMENT FARMERS’ RIGHTS AND TOWARDS A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE FOR AGRICULTURE

To fully reap the benefits of community seed banks in enhancing farmers’ access and control of seeds, as well as their contribution to the conservation and sustainable use of crop genetic diversity, we will end this report with a set of policy recommendations.

Governments should:

• Establish and/or support community seed banks as part of their obligations to implement Farmers’ Rights and other provisions of the Plant Treaty, such as sustainable use and conservation of crop genetic diversity. Parties should support the up-scaling of community seed banks in order to reach as many farmers as possible, especially in marginalised areas.

• Integrate community seed banks in broader programmes on agricultural biodiversity, where the local seed banks should serve as a storing place for results of participatory plant breeding and participatory variety selection, and make such results accessible to farmers. Seed banks should also be venues for seed fairs for farmers to exchange and display their seed diversity.

• Include community seed banks in governments’ agricultural development strategies as a vehicle for adaptation to climate variability. Agricultural extension services would provide the best institutional infrastructure to embark on a scaling up of local seed bank experiences to a national level.

• Revise seed regulations and provisions on intellectual property rights to seeds to ensure Farmers’ Rights to save, use, exchange and sell farm-saved seeds.

• Redirect public subsidies from promoting modern varieties to fund the above mentioned activities.

Agricultural Research Institutions should:

• Ensure that farmers are given an informed choice between traditional and modern varieties. Extension services and government agricultural policies should be reviewed as to ensure this balance. There is a need to democratise agricultural extension systems so that it provides all kinds of information (e.g. about the role of formal and informal seed systems) in a transparent way without putting farmers’ varieties to a disadvantage.


http://www.planttreaty.org/sites/default/files/banking_future.pdf



• Extend their expertise and services for free to assist and support communities and NGOs in setting up and maintaining community seed banks. Their assistance and support should be based on the actual needs and capacities of the communities and local organisations seeking their expertise.

• Facilitate the access of communities and NGOs setting up community seed banks to other in situ as well as ex situ sources of seeds, if necessary and when required. They should help provide linkages among communities engaged in community seed banking and relevant institutions and organisations that may be able to support such efforts. Community seed banks are the bridge between in situ and ex situ conservation. Through them, national gene banks should make their acquisitions available to farmers.

Commercial seed sector should:

• Contribute to the Benefit Sharing Fund of the Plant Treaty, which in its turn should make sure that sufficient funds for supporting community seed banks are in place. The cost of conserving crop genetic diversity should not be borne by resource poor farmers in the Global South, but be shared by all who benefit from the commercialisation of this diversity.

• Multiply and produce farmers’ varieties for increased availability of locally adapted seeds.

NGOs should:

• Adopt a mechanism to share their skills and knowledge in establishing and maintaining community seed banks to interested communities, farmers’ organisations and other NGOs in and around the countries where they are based. The main role of NGOs is to promote community seed banks until governments have incorporated such banks in their formal systems like agricultural extension services.

• Strengthen community based management of agricultural biodiversity and avoid using community seed banks for promoting only modern varieties.

20. Florence Egal Food Security and Nutrition expert, Italy Great contributions so far. Let me add to my initial contribution which aimed to ensure continuity of and synergy between relevant processes. I am surprised that the title of the paper does not explicitly refer to nutrition. Thanks to Eileen for emphasizing that urban–rural linkages are a major determinant of malnutrition in rural areas, I quote:

“In a bid to satisfy urban profitable markets, rural households are left with less nutritious food items or cannot afford food as the pricing is uniform for rural, urban and international buyers – check out available websites for on-line food marketing. Aggressive marketing of food markets in urban areas results in the cultivation of food items geared more towards the needs of the market than food and nutritional needs of people in rural areas.

The success of quinoa means that it has become a commercial food in the Andes and that local consumers cannot afford it any longer.

“Leads to marketing of “global” foods to rural people, especially over-processed food items with hard to comprehend food labels. The result is that rural households abandon familiar foods that previously provided for their nutritional security, for “modern” foods whose nutritional value they do not fully comprehend.” City foods are often perceived as more modern and have gained a status symbol. Since




rice is now seen as the staple food in several Western Africa country, people are increasingly reluctant to eat millet or maize. And try petit mil or maize in Haiti… The role of often city-led food imports (like riz brisé in Sénégal) and food aid programmes have resulted in diet distortion and increased vulnerability of both poor producers and consumers in rural and urban areas.

It seems (again from the Andes) that increased use of cash vouchers (e.g. in conditional cash transfer programmes for nutrition) is leading beneficiary households to switch away from local products to buying from local supermarkets. Which undermines the livelihood of local farmers and often results in unhealthy diets. On the other hand cities like New York condition the use of cash vouchers to purchasing fresh fruits and vegetables from farmers markets, benefitting poor consumers health and providing a market to local farmers.

An essential dimension of more sustainable food systems should therefore be locally appropriate nutrition education and communication (promotion of sustainable diets for for both urban and rural consumers). Professor Moya rightly emphasizes the importance of traditional/indigenous rural diets and related food practices.

Dr. Omosa also rightly mentions increase purchase of land (and differences in bargaining power) in rural areas for business purposes. One should also mention recreational purposes (e.g. Cap Skirring in Casamance). And what about national parks?

Dr. Cramer bring up the urgent need to document “non-market oriented, community food production practices in urban and peri-urban areas meant to prevent or avoid food insecurity. Knowledge management to generate practice-based evidence will be key in the development of policy guidance.

Dr. Vethaiya Balasubramanian raises the issue of rural employment. It is indeed essential that we ensure the protection and promotion of jobs and decent employment in rural areas and many of these jobs are related to food and agriculture in the broad sense. Food processing for local markets and commercialisation of niche products, environmental services and ecotourism should be considered alongside smallscale agriculture production.

So much for now. Have a nice day everybody.

21. Aimée Hampel-Milagrosa, German Development Institute, Germany We would like to share a commentary that we published in our website recently. The commentary reacts to a book published by Oxford on Nutrition, but fits perfectly into this discussion.

http://www.die-gdi.de/en/the-current-column/article/cherry-picking-the-reasons-for-hunger-1

We should abstain from identifying only urbanization and an increasing population as root causes of food insecurity. Economic access to food plays a dominant role in explaining food insecurity. By overemphasizing nutritional and population aspects and downplaying or even ignoring income poverty and other factors affecting access, the food security perspective becomes economically and socially myopic and politically blind.

Food insecurity is a muddled and dynamic interplay of various elements, many of them heavily anchored to poverty. Poverty is a result of extremely low (or lack of) incomes in the majority of the population and/ or a lack of economic transfers, either based on social relations or by government transfer systems.

Without neglecting other reasons for low incomes in rural areas – such as low land and water endowments – incomes in rural areas are low because productivity in agriculture is low. In many poor countries smallholder yields are only 15-30% of their potential. This reduces the amount of production for subsistence and for selling on markets to purchase other much needed products and services, from food to education to health to communication. These are all required to improve basic living conditions


http://www.die-gdi.de/en/the-current-column/article/cherry-picking-the-reasons-for-hunger-1/



including food security and nutrition. Low agricultural sales and income also reduce local economic dynamics, do not create demand for labour and inputs, keep wages low and do not contribute to vibrant economic off-farm activities. The deeply needed social and cash transfers in poor countries are often lacking because a large part of the population is poor, lives off the informal sector , has no resilience against shocks such as droughts, floods and war, does not pay taxes and has only little political influence. This is poverty!

The engine for improving agricultural productivity and higher incomes for rural population often lies in a better integration into markets. To be integrated into the market, smallholders have to produce substantially higher yields through intensifying their production. This requires increased efforts of, for example, land, water, labour, biological resources and knowledge. If smallholders rely more on internal resources such as mulching, composting, manuring, multi-storey cropping, agro-forestry or irrigation, this usually requires more labour during critical periods which poor households do not have. They have to hire labour or invest in mechanization, which only is possible if additional capital is available.

Cash earnings from agricultural production require good and predictable marketing channels, as well as remunerative and stable prices . Assuming that indeed, a marketable surplus is achieved, the hurdle of bringing the produce to the market and selling it at competitive prices still needs to be overcome. They compete with other providers, either locally or internationally. In the case of communities that live in peripheral areas with negligible market access, integrating them into the value chains is a barrier that is extremely challenging to overcome.

Again, the link to the site is: http://www.die-gdi.de/en/the-current-column/article/cherry-picking-the-reasons-for-hunger-1

22. Hélène Delisle, University of Montreal, Canada Thank you for sharing this excellent draft. Several very relevant comments and suggestions were already submitted. However, I should like to underline a few challenges that could deserve more emphasis.

1. As suggested by one discussant, malnutrition has to be clearly defined right from the onset to include both undernutrition (which includes micronutrient malnutrition) and nutrition-related chronic diseases. The rural and the urban poor are more exposed to both forms of malnutrition and the resulting ‘double burden of malnutrition’ than their more affluent peers. We showed that the poor and women were particularly affected by the double burden, in urban Burkina Faso and Benin. This double burden of malnutrition is quite a challenge and it deserves more emphasis.

2. A more complete and clear definition of food security should be reminded, and whether or not it includes access to a diversified diet (qualitative dimension of food security). Access to food and nutrition information was part of the initial FAO definition but it seems to have been dropped or at least neglected. Both the quantitative and the qualitative dimensions of food security are to be addressed. I totally agree that food security indicators should be modulated for urban and rural areas.

3. A distinction is needed between ‘minimally-processed’ foods and ‘ultra-processed’ foods. The former are essential while the latter are not. The challenge is how to increase and improve local food processing in order to displace imported foods and drinks. The issue of increasing consumption of ultra-processed foods, mostly produced and marketed by the Big Food, is directly linked with increasing obesity and other nutrition-related chronic diseases. It cannot be overlooked anywhere. Local food systems have to be protected and made more efficient, even if they cannot feed the whole population.

4. We would suggest that more emphasis be given to the ‘pull’ effect that urban food demand should have on local production. This was highlighted in our discussion paper for FAO which Dr Florence Egal referred to. This would imply that local foods are valued, reversing the current trend. Social marketing






efforts are needed to counteract the effective and powerful commercial marketing of imported foods, fast food and carbonated beverages.

5. It has been convincingly argued elsewhere that food value chains may be acted upon with a nutrition lens in order to improve the nutritional profile of foods, and not only to increase efficiency and reduce waste. The integration of nutrition in food value chains may be considered.

6. In several industrial countries, several strategies are implemented to bring food producers and consumers closer together. One of these is the ‘Family Farmers’ approach whereby urban families sign contracts with local producers and pay in advance to get their basket of vegetables (and some local fruits) on a regular basis. Organic farms are primarily involved. Can such an approach not be applied in low and middle income country cities as a means of consuming local fresh products and supporting local food production while reducing the environmental damage?

7. As mentioned by Bert Cramer, community and traditional food practices contribute to food security and need to be better recognized. Several traditional plant or animal foods should also be valued and their consumption promoted.

8. Finally, I should like to give an example of an initiative linking nutrition and agriculture for improved health in Cotonou (Benin, West Africa). The project was implemented a few years ago with external and local funding. It links self-help groups formed several years earlier for the surveillance and prevention of nutrition-related chronic diseases, with a cooperative of urban food producers. The dual purpose is to increase vegetable consumption and to support local producers while improving the safety and quality of the produce (contact person: Dr Victoire Agueh, Director of the Regional Public Health Institute [email protected]).

Hélène Delisle, Ph.D., Professor Emeritus, Department of Nutrition Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Canada

23. Olivia Muza, Consultant, Zimbabwe Security of tenure shapes the dynamics of urbanization and rural transformation to a larger extent. Land grabbing for instance, creates food and nutrition insecurity. In the rural areas it competes with food and nutrition security related initiatives. It drives people away from their livelihoods. It increases urban migration. On the contrary, urban dwellers whose security of tenure is compromised have to negotiate new spaces of which rural areas is a key option.

24. Myriam del Carmen Salazar Villarreal, Universidad Nacional De Colombia, Colombia

Spanish original

Este es un tema que se debe manejar de manera particular y de acuerdo a los contextos. Colombia es un pais en dodne el conflicto armado ha genrado un amplio rango de desplazados y por lo tanto estos vienen a engrosar los cinturones de pobreza de las ciudades. De ahi que es urgente que desde el Estado se generen politicas publicas que favorezcan la produccion familiar en pequeña escala como huertas y produccion de especies menores con el fin de fortalecer la seguridad alimentaria y nutriconal familiar . Considero muy importante el fortalecer l agricultura urbana y periurbana sobre todo para estos contextos.

--

Myriam Del Carmen Salazar




In. Agronoma, M.Sc.

English translation

This is an issue that should be handled in a particular way, and according to the contexts. Colombia is a country where armed conflict has generated a wide range of displaced people, who have gone to swell the poverty belts of cities. Hence the urgency for the state to implement public policies that favor small-scale family production -like gardens- in order to strengthen family food and nutrition security. I consider very important to strengthen urban and peri-urban agriculture, especially in these contexts.

--

Myriam Del Carmen Salazar

In. Agronoma, M.Sc.

25. Lal Manavado, University of Oslo affiliate, Norway Implications of Urban Expansion and Rural Change for Food Security

Before we proceed to identify the implications of urban expansion and rural change for food security, it is necessary to see which aspects of them could have a significant impact on it.

Urban expansion has two main causes; urban birth rate and migration of people from outlying areas. The former leads to a gradual increase in the need for an adequate food supply to an urban centre, while the latter brings about an abrupt increase in it. So, other things being equal, urban expansion may result in a combination of those two increases in the need for food, which could threaten the food security of an urban centre.

At present, rural changes that need concern us represent emigration of people from the rural to urban centra. Most rural populations are engaged in agriculture related activities in a labour-intensive manner. A simple real-life observation is sufficient to convince anyone of this fact in many parts of Africa, Asia, South America, etc.

This would inevitably lead to a reduction in rural food production, which could have a significantly adverse effect on the food security of the outlying urban centra. Today, this can be easily observed around the big cities in Angola, South Africa, India, etc., etc.

At this point, it is essential to remember two things, viz., lack of food security entails hunger now, and its alleviation calls for urgent practical measures. Let us next look at the relevant aspects of the problem, with which we have to deal.

First, I will outline what we cannot do. We cannot wait for long term solutions while millions go hungry every day. It is unrealistic to talk about finding employment for the migrants for even if they are qualified and work exists, that does not entail an increase in food supplies to urban centra. Moreover, even if they found work, they will have to wait for their potential salaries to purchase food, which is highly uncertain for reasons described above.

Further, it is the rural poor who migrate to urban centra, and a considerable portion of them represent unskilled labour. It only requires a day’s observation tour to any of the immense camps/settlements/slums around the big cities I have noted earlier to see this stark fact of real life.

Even though urban expansion has become global, the extent of its adverse effect on food security, varies with the priority agriculture receives in a given country and people’s expectations. It is unfortunate that




in many poor and unevenly affluent countries, political sources elicit in people rather unrealistic expectations, which motivate them to migrate from their villages in search of ’a better life’.

This has resulted in millions of people exchanging their rural poverty with abject urban poverty involving greater deprivation. One may take it as a rule that in most affected countries, authorities give priority to ‘industrial development’, ‘high technology’, and ‘ICT’ as though that entails a commensurable increase in food supply!

Food security remains an unknown entity to millions of living people who live under appalling conditions around many large urban centra in Southern Africa, Asia, etc. They all have left their rural homes leaving once cultivated fields lying fallow today. So, this change in rural and urban demography will inevitably threaten food security by increasing the need for food at urban centra while reducing food production.

I suggest a two-pronged approach to resolve this problem insofar as it can be resolved in isolation. Obviously, common humanity demands an appropriate action to deal with hunger now, i.e., achieving a temporary food security by carefully targeted food supply, whose details are area dependent.

It may range from free distributions of food rations to subsidised food supplies, both of which ought to conform to the local food culture. Extra precautions ought to be taken to ensure that such food supplies end in the bellies of the hungry.

Remembering that this problem is endemic to poor and to countries where wealth is highly sequestered in a few hands, it is imperative that labour-intensive agriculture and the infra-structure it requires are given the highest priority. At the same time, it is necessary that the governments emphasise to the public how vital is agriculture to human well-being, and that it has logical priority over ‘high technology’ and ‘ICT’, which in the final analysis are mere means of secondary support to actual food production.

Hence, agriculture ought to be given the prestige it has in real life, for it is the sole means of sustaining life most of us have at our disposal. Let us underline the obvious; without food, there will be no life for anything else. Food security is the goal whose achievement ensures that we all have access to an adequate food supply.

Lal Manavado.

26. Florence Scarsi, Ministry of Environment, Energy and Sea, France Thanks for the paper which is very interesting. I agree with Dr Florence Egal that the CFS work should take into account work done by FAO and UNEP on food security and sustainable food systems. See below some reflexions about the paper.

• Q1 : Are the key challenges and opportunities related to food security and nutrition in the context of changing urban-rural dynamics addressed? Are there issues missing or any that are included that don’t seem directly related?

Globally, key challenges and opportunities related to food security and nutrition in the context of changing urban-rural dynamics are well addressed. I have two comments:

- for coastal territories, fisheries can play a major role in food security and nutrition, both in rural and urban areas. Fisheries should be strongly affected by climate change: it can be relevant to mention this issue when climate change and food security and nutrition are addressed page 13

- I agree that there are pros and cons both for short and long supply chains. However, environmental benefits of shorter supply chains don't mainly come from reduced food miles (mean of transport and




logistics are as significant as food miles considering the carbon footprint of transportation phase) but for consumption of seasonal products, role of local agriculture in climate change mitigation and adaptation and, indirectly, shift to more environmental friendly agricultural practises, see http://www.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/Buying-locally-the-benefits-are.html

• Where/how do you think CFS can add the most value to current initiatives aimed at addressing food security and nutrition in the context of urbanization and rural transformation?

- Knowledge sharing on practises and models which have worked and those that haven't and identification of lessons learned on this basis

- Guidelines on how implementing adequate governance allowing a transversal and multi-stakeholders approach

- Production of references, e.g. case-studies

Best regards,

Florence Scarsi

27. Fran Hall, Spain Globalización, dependencia y urbanización: la transformación reciente de la red de ciudades de América Latina, Jhon Williams Montoya

http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?pid=S0718-34022009000300001&script=sci_arttext

28. Myriam del Carmen Salazar Villarreal, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Colombia Spanish original

Es importante tener presente que lo más importane no es lograr la seguridad alimentaria, sino fomentar el logro de la Soberaia y Autonomia Alimentaria y nutricional para nuestra familias en toda Latinoamerica, Africa y Europa del Este. Se debe favorecer una recontricción de politicas publicas que favorezca la producción local y los sisteas y circuitos de comercializacön. PAra nadie es un secreto que en nuestros paises subdesarrollados las politicas neoglobalizantes, y la a pertura de mercados loque ha ocasionado cada dia es una completa dependencia y perdidad de eocnomias locales. SItuación que vulnera nuestro derecho a una alimenación sana, segura y soberana acorde a nuestra cultura. Colombia importa casi el 70% de los alimentos que se consumen, loc ual lo comparamos con la situacion de hace 15 años en donde eran la despensa de LAtinoamerica. Los tratados Internacionales libres son y seran mecanismos perversos de ahcer queperdamos nuestra soberania y que cada dia se vulnere mas nuestros derechos.

Es necesario volver alos campos a producir nuestros alimentos, pero desde el estado se deben fortalecer esto apartir de politicas que favorezcan y fortalezcan una produccion sostenible o sustentable que favorezca el d erecho a todo tipo de vida, que proteja nuestros bienes comunes, que cuide y conserve nuestra biodiversidad y agrobiodiversidad. Existen 102 agriculturas alternativas con las cuales podemos lograr una produccion mas respectuosa y sustentable.

Solo podemos hablar de seguridad, soberania y autonomia en el momento en que nuestros propios paises, estados y gobiernos defiendan y contruyan nuestras politicas , y que los modelos agropecaurios realmete sean creados de acuerdo a nuestras condiciones y no fiel coppia de los paises desarrollados.

Finalmente si deseo dejar bien claro que ninguna de las 102 agriculturas alternativas existentes como Agroecologia, Agricultura Ecologica, Agricultura biodinamica, Permaculura, etc NO ES NI SERA lo que


http://www.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/Buying-locally-the-benefits-are.html

http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?pid=S0718-34022009000300001&script=sci_arttext



ahora se conoce como agricultura ecoeficiente, que no es mas que seguir acabando con nuestros recursos naturales y nuestra biodiversidad.

English translation

Bearing in mind that promoting the attainment of Food and Nutrition Sovereignty and Self-Reliance for our families throughout Latin America, Africa and Eastern Europe is what matters most -rather than achieving food securit - is important. Public policies supporting local production and marketing systems and circuits should be fostered. It is no secret that neo-holistic policies and opening of markets in underdeveloped countries have led to complete dependence and ruined local economies. This infringes our right to culturally appropriate healthy, safe and sovereign food. Colombia imports nearly 70% of its food whereas 15 years ago it was Latin America’s larder. International treaties are and will be perverse mechanisms that contribute to the loss of our sovereignty and the increasing infringement of our rights.

We need to return to the fields to produce our food. The state must support this process by developing policies that promote and strengthen sustainable production, facilitate the right to all life forms, protect our common goods, and preserve our biodiversity and agro-biodiversity. There are 102 types of alternative agricultures which can lead to a more sustainable and environmentally friendly production.

Food security, sovereignty and self-reliance will only be achieved when our own countries, states and governments protect and design our policies. And when agricultural models are really designed considering our circumstances, and not simply copying those of developed countries.

Finally, I would like to make clear that NONE of the 102 existing types of alternative agricultures, including agro-ecology, organic farming, biodynamic agriculture, or permaculture, ARE (OR WILL BE) a form of what is now known as eco-efficient agriculture, an approach that continues to destroy our natural resources and biodiversity.

29. Saydagzam Khabibullaev, "Land of Plenty Agro Distribution" LLC, "Real Estate Strong Partners" LLC, Uzbekistan

Russian original

С Наилучшими пожеланиями Ваших успехов я хочу начать свои мысли по озвученной тематике!

Мне приятно, что начато обсуждение подобной темы: Урбанизация, Сельское Преобразование и Последствия для продовольственной безопасности.

Предмет фактически является важным во всех отношениях, но очень мало кто задумывается об этом. Да, эта тема, возможно, действительно широко не затронута в странах, где потребительский спрос высокий на сельскохозяйственные товары, но в таких странах, какими являются страны Средней Азии эта тематика очень актуальна. Не вдаваясь в подробности отвечу лишь по вопросам, которые приведены для обсуждения:


У этого процесса есть необратимая динамика роста, потому что все больше и больше рабочей силы будет стремится иметь доступ к еде, а она будет доступна все меньше и меньше людям. Для решения этих проблем будут вовлечены в факторы роста и плодоношение все больше инноваций, а оно сломает весь механизм, итогом конечно же будет изменение продовольственную безопасность в худшую сторону.





Этот процесс может быть реализовано с легкостью, он реализуется следующими путями: отслеживание правильного выращивания во время культивирования еды и заканчивается контролем перед выпуском продукции как пища, вплоть до попадания продукта на стол потребителя.


Есть много проблем подпадающие в категорию со сложными решениями в области продовольственной безопасности, но все они требуют собственного вклада, по крайней мере желанием действенные шаги в области сельскохозяйственного и пищевого производства.


Ценность этих инициатив должна быть основана на представлении возможности все возможного информационного оповещения, и она должна отражаться на проектах, направленных к вознаграждению вклада в решение продовольственной безопасности и пищи, независимо от того где она будет инициирована: в городах или сельских районах.

--

С уважением,

СаидАъзам Хабибуллаев

Ваш сообитатель во Вселенной.

English translation

With my best wishes for your success I would like to share my thoughts on the subject!

I’m excited that you’ve started the discussion on such a theme as ‘’Urbanization, Rural Transformation and Implications for Food Security’’.

In fact, the subject is important in all respects, but very few people give it a thought. The subject may be well covered in those countries that have high consumers demand for agricultural goods, but it is very much relevant for such countries as countries of Central Asia. Without going into details, I’ll answer only those questions that are listed for the discussion:


This process has an irreversible growth dynamic, since more and more workforce will seek access to food which will be less and less available to people. In order to solve these problems more and more innovation will be involved in growth factors and fruiting; therefore, it will destroy the whole mechanism and as a result change food security situation for the worse.


This process can be easily implemented. The ways for implementation are: monitoring the correctness of growing during food cultivation process and food control before it leaves to the market and until it gets to the consumer.





There are many issues that require complex solutions in the area of food security, but they all require personal contributions, at least a desire to take effective steps in the field of agricultural and food production.


The value of such initiatives should be based on enabling all sorts of awareness services, and it should affect those projects, that are aimed at rewarding contribution to food security and nutrition, regardless of where it was initiated - in cities or in rural areas.

With best regards,

SaidA'zam Khabibullaev

30. Cascade Tuholske, PhD Student, UCSB Dept. of Geography, USA Scale of analysis and cross-region effects are important consideration when assessing urban/rural transformation for food security and nutrition. Take land use for example. Rising household demand for meat in urbanizing China may be impacting deforestation in the Amazon. This has implications for household health in urban China, household livelihoods in the Amazon frontieer in Brazil, regional implications for the Amazon, and global implications for climate change.

Land use is just one example of why scale and cross-regional effects should be taken into account in many aspects of the rural-urban FSN linkages. Resource demand, markets, trades, etc. are a few other important issues that should be viewed through a lens that places an importance on scale of analysis. Indeed, fine-scale data for urban areas is lacking for much of the world. Data on urban processes is often published at the city, regional or country level. Yet cities tend to be highly heterogeneous. We need to understand what is happening within cities to best assess urban FNS needs. To developed sound FSN policies, household or neighbourhood level data would help created targeted interventions and programming.

31. John Weatherhogg, Italy My comment relates to around page 11 of the zero draft where there is a discussion of "pull" and "push" factors in off-farm employment.

UN studies some 20 years ago in Sri Lanka showed that about two-thirds of farm family income was derived off-farm. Where farmers have small land-holdings it is obviously the only way to support a family.

The fact that people who are perceived as "farmers" have other more important interests often seems to be not adequately appreciated in development planning. Initiatives such as Systems of Rice Intensification (SRI) always expect intensification in order to get better production and allow water saving.

In situations where the "farmer" is only on the farm for planting and harvest he may well not be interested in increasing his labour input, and certainly not in saving water. Similarly he will not be interested in moving into non-paddy crops. Paddy is the best crop for such part-time farmers.




This situation you see clearly in many areas of South and East Asia and also in Egypt, in the delta, where extension staff moan about the large areas of 'illegal' paddy cultivation, in situations where many farms are only around 0.5 ha with a family of 7.

No easy solution, just something that needs to be considered in planning. Ultimately land consolidation through sale or renting would allow the return of full-time farmers.

32. Sarah Granados, FAO, Chile Thanks for promote the discussion on this important topic. At least in Latin America and the Caribbean many process are ongoing looking to introduce a territorial approach for rural development, strengthening of local food systems and the improvement of food security and nutrition.

The main key challenges and opportunities related to food security and nutrition in the context of changing urban-rural dynamics are developed in the draft document.

Just a few comments:

• The information from LAC is scarce, especially on items as consumption patterns/diets/nutrition, employment/labor, trade/markets/value chains, climate change where data could be available. Some documents of reference would be: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4454s.pdf ; http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4072e.pdf ; http://www.fao.org/3/a-i3069s.pdf; http://www.fao.org/americas/recursos/panorama/2015/en/

• On “land use” issue some questions came to my mind, for instance, ¿what about cities located in very valuable agriculture lands, is there any mechanism to protect those agriculture areas from urban sprawl? ¿what about food security implications of land use change in periurban areas?. The answers could be found in the planning process of metropolitan areas, whatever it seems that FSN is non-priority topic when planning policies are discussed.

• Food loss and waste, as is formulated, sounds more as an indicator of a distortion of the food system, than a dynamic per se. For that reason this topic should be more related to “efficiency”, where the development of food systems under a more integrated way is required.

• The perception from the fisheries and aquaculture sector of urbanization and rural transformation could be more explained, especially for LAC, where this sector has claim for more attention and understanding. There are good platforms as the America’s Aquaculture Network conformed by 21 countries. http://www.fao.org/docrep/019/as224s/as224s.pdf

• Who are the “local rural authorities”? Who has the responsibility to design the rural areas? The paper should include some guidelines or criteria on territorial governance.

• Landscape management and local food systems could be good strategies to integrate urbanization and rural transformation with positive implications on food security.

• Where/how do you think CFS can add the most value to current initiatives aimed at addressing food security and nutrition in the context of urbanization and rural transformation?

• Facilitating the intersectorial dialogue for the formulation and implementation of public policies, especially on those regarding not only urban and rural, but territorial development.

• Analyzing and promoting mechanisms and incentives to local governments for more integrated food systems.

• An example of current initiative where these challenges will be addressed is: FAO Regional Initiative “Family Farming and Inclusive Food Systems for Sustainable Rural Development” for Latin America and the Caribbean (2016 – 2017) http://www.fao.org/3/a-i5414e.pdf

Best regards,


http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4454s.pdf

http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4072e.pdf

http://www.fao.org/3/a-i3069s.pdf

http://www.fao.org/americas/recursos/panorama/2015/en/

http://www.fao.org/docrep/019/as224s/as224s.pdf




Sara Granados (https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Sara_Granados3)

33. Dror Tamir, Steak TzarTzar, Israel Grasshoppers are the most widely eaten insect in the world, considered a delicacy in Africa, Asia, Central America and the Middle East. Providing superior nutrient content to almost any other animal source protein and is much more sustainable than any other alternative.

But today grasshoppers are mostly being collected in the wild.

The development of climate controlled industrial scale grasshopper farms may provide the lacking protein in large populations diet at a much lower cost for both people and environment.

34. Jane Battersby, University of Cape Town, South Africa Thank you for the useful and provocative document. I hope that the comments made will be useful. I write from the perspective of the work we have conducted with the African Food Security Urban Network (AFSUN) in 11 cities in 9 southern African countries and our Consuming Urban Poverty project, which focuses on secondary cities in Africa.

My comments do not speak directly to all four of your questions. I support the various interventions that have been made, particularly those that speak of the need to more closely align the work to nutrition concerns.

1. Many of the key issues are addressed. My fundamental concern with the document is the assumption of the strength of ongoing rural-urban linkages. As urban growth is increasingly the result of natural growth, and as the food system becomes ever more globalized, it is likely that these connections are just one kind of connection that cities have. Initial work from one of our projects tracking where fish sold by traders in a Copperbelt town in Zambia has found that although some fish is regionally procured, much of it originates in Namibia or even China. Likewise, at the Market in Kisumu, Kenya, the eggs had come from Uganda, and the chickens in a market in Maputo, Mozambique, from Brazil. If we are tracing food from field to fork we will see strong rural-urban linkages, but perhaps if we look from fork to field, a different set of linkages become evident. Both local and distance linkages are important for the resilience of the food system, and for rural livelihoods.

My concern about the focus on the city-region food system is that it encourages neglect of the global players shaping the food system and the ways in which powerful actors are ignored. Many of the policy responses that emerge as a result of this kind of framing are about supporting small scale farmers and perhaps traders, without considering the need to regulate and govern that large actors driving food system and consumption change.

The work on climate change could be elaborated to consider the impact of climate change along all points of the food system from production to consumption, and to consider the vulnerability of different types of food flow at different points (for example, in what ways is the supply chain (and storage component) of chicken vulnerable to climate change if you consider a supermarket supply chain that may cross continents and if you consider a chicken reared by a local small holder sold live in a local market?).

3. Governance: The point about decentralization is an important one, however, we have a concern that decentralization without an extension of the better understanding of food security issues in cities on the part of national and local governments will mean that policy and governance responses will merely reflect the “urbanization” of food security programming conceived in the rural realm (namely the promotion of urban agriculture). Without a clear understanding of the spatial and structural drivers of food insecurity in urban areas, policy and programmes will be poorly aligned, with local government


https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Sara_Granados3

http://www.afsun.org/

https://consumingurbanpoverty.wordpress.com/



merely implementing programmes from higher levels of government rather than “speaking up” to help formulate appropriate responses.

A second point within the governance discussions in the role of non-state actors. There are a number of authors who have been critical of the promotion of public-private partnerships in development, particularly within the realm of food security where large private sector players are viewed as having an important role in accelerating the nutrition transition. I would welcome a more nuanced representation of the role of non-state actors, and a broadening of the scope of who “non-state actors” are (for example, to what extent are small-scale traders and their associations viewed as non-state actors?).

Finally, the document is correct in highlighting the importance of secondary cities. It is important however, to note that these secondary cities have particular economic vulnerabilities, such as dependence on one industry (as in the case of cities in the Copperbelt Region of Zambia). If that industry should fail, the impact on food security and rural urban linkages is profound. A more important point is that these secondary cities may also have governance challenges, associated with limited capacity within government and a lack of supporting institutions.

4. In terms of value add, I think it would be important for the CFS to provide connections between the multiple large-scale research and policy projects working on city region food systems and urban food systems. Further, the issue of urban food insecurity is largely off national and local policy agendas. In order for it to become a part of national and local debates, it will be necessary for global agencies to raise its profile in international discussions. This is a key role for the CFS.

Other comments:

There appear to be some inconsistencies within the document. This is most likely the result of the authors managing such wide ranging and often conflicting literature. However, I think that some of these inconsistencies need to be recognized and addressed.

For example, much of the document suggests that urbanization is largely the result of migration from rural to urban, and that this sets up new and deeper forms of rural-urban linkages. However, on p. 7 it is noted that from 2000-2010 less than half the world’s urban population growth was the result of migration. If cities’ population growth in increasingly the result of natural growth, this would seem to be a challenge to the notion of increased rural-urban linkages.

While I fundamentally agree with the material in the first paragraph of p.8 that talks about how current dominant measures of poverty may under-estimate urban poverty (Satterthwaite’s perspective), the point is a little lost in the narrative. This could be strengthened, as it really gets to the heart of why the urban has not been an area of focus by agencies working on food security, and also why the urban is different and requires different responses.

At the start of the consumption patterns section changing diets are attributed to rising incomes. However, the second and third line of p. 9 contradict this. I would support the fact that increasingly consumption of ultra processed foods is an indicator of poverty as much as one of wealth. This suggests that there are some fundamental issues within the food system that require addressing.

I found the final section of the first paragraph of p. 10 hard to follow. Is it possible to make this clearer?

35. Peter Steele, FAO, Italy Importance of building sustainable livelihoods in cities

Contribution




My contribution focuses upon ‘infrastructure & services’; and generally promotes the role of the private sector in establishing the viability of urban communities. Herein is the importance of developing sustainable livelihoods that people in cities are able to live within the prevailing economic models. This links – broadly – with section #14 of the background paper – ‘infrastructure & services’. Priorities for ‘nutrition’ are down-graded.

First some background and a rhetorical question or two.

Narrow debate

With such a wide selection of subject choice – urban development in all its complexity – what is surprising with the current debate are the few contributions incoming; this is a great subject - the future for people worldwide in a few words. Perhaps those making up the food nutrition network may have been intimidated given the dominance of many other issues within the urban-rural dynamics – and particularly the secondary or tertiary nature of nutrition within the viability of the urban model, the provision of infrastructure and services, the invisibility of agriculture/food production to people in cities and, implicitly, the dominance of the supermarket as a provider of foods in most city neighbourhoods.

As a rule modern cities are unable to feed themselves from their own resources – people, land, etc. and depend upon an extensive catchment area away from the city in which to secure supplies of foods (and everything else) and then to transport, store and distribute it. Thus the importance of infrastructure & services to food security.

Sure, the fresh food markets remain available whilst there are large sectors of poor urban people but, eventually, neighbourhood trading centres in cities everywhere from Brisbane to Brussels are anchored by supermarkets. And, if that example is too OECD, then consider ‘Dar es Salaam to Delhi’. Not for nothing has the Shoprite supermarket raced up the African continent since majority rule in South Africa, or Westfield spread its model shopping malls from Australia to the world.

One other easy-to-make comment may be the limited number of people sharing the debate who are not nutritionists or pro-nutrition – the urban planners, engineers, city managers, economists and others. The reality of life for most people in cities is security of income – and this depends upon the education of those people and the ability of city managers to attract sufficient investment from the private sector – in employment creating ventures (including provision of urban services). In a word this means ‘livelihoods’. There is a sense in the debate that government is all powerful and that government will/should provide. This is rarely the case.

People are required to make good choices

The words that make up the title of this particular debate say it all – urbanization is the future for the majority people worldwide; with food production and most other issues of food security likely to be relegated to the rural (i.e. non-urban) environment wherein there will be smallholder and/or high value commercial production adjacent to cities (as there always has been) and, increasingly, distant production of the main staples most of which will be mechanized. Recognition of value chains and how to exploit them for profit is essential.

I appreciate that behind forecasts of this kind are a whole battery of assumptions that are easy to challenge. But you only have to look back to the recent past – to 1950, for example, when the world population was <2.5 billion through today’s population (estimated 7.5 billion) to projections that suggest 10 billion, and possible stability, for 2050. The world is slowly shifting to a workforce that will match the levels of agricultural employment typical of the OECD countries. Mechanized production is a competitive pull factor and, that key push factor, the majority people do not want to be farmers (or, at least, they make every effort to discourage their children into farming).




Key issues behind the need for higher and more efficient production (all crops/livestock for food, industries & energy) are those concerned with access to sufficient land/soils in which to produce the materials required. This will mean guarding/allocating existing resources required for national and, for best, regional production. The countries of the East African Community are a case in point wherein high population growth in and adjacent to the main cities is as damaging to agricultural production as the desertification of the northern lands and the destructive lattice network of timber/charcoal production that is clearing the trees and eroding the quality of soils alongside roads adjacent to major cities across the region (and ‘adjacent’ in this context means >200 km radius – typical of commercial trucking/haulage distances).

Importance of livelihoods

Implicit to discussions of this kind are the practicalities of providing security of food and employment today and, long-term, the need to invest in education and livelihoods. Security of the community follows when the young in particular are provided with the resources that will enable them to develop their own families. But resources are requirement for all people – not just the young.

Take this example from Senegal. Some time back I was part of a mission responsible for evaluating a food for work programme in a handful of towns and cities across the country. The agency had distributed foods in exchange for the work available from mainly young people who were employed in different WASH activities. This was all labour-intensive – people working mainly with hand-tools and wheelbarrows. Activities included clearing informal (but tenacious) rubbish dumps in the city – on waste lands, creek banks, open areas and similar – constructing more latrines and stand-pipes and rehabilitating previously defunct grey water/sewage disposal systems. Infrastructure was my responsibility.

In one elegant ex-colonial neighbourhood of Dakar there were young men and women working in what had previously been enclosed channels below the road paving in the streets – but which were completed blocked from floor to roof - literally mining the hard-packed organic deposits to re-open the channels to water flow. This was hard and dirty work. It turned out that the majority workers in the subterranean tunnels were university students working out-of-term-time; a scheme designed mainly for unemployed city youth had attracted that most privileged of national resources – the highly educated young.

Such was the lack of informal employment available in the city at that time that university students were prepared to undertake this most menial and physically demanding work in exchange for some basic foodstuffs. Whatever their training/education, these students had done the best they could in a strictly limited market when searching for jobs. The cost to local society with under-used resources of this kind has remained with me for many years.

It also puts into context the inability of city management to undertake work of this kind within routine maintenance systems. How many years had this neighbourhood been without this waste water system? Why dependence upon the small-scale social investment of an international agency? Where was oversight and supervision of city waste systems?

Food at cost plus

It may be – as described in his thoughtful analysis of rural-urban migration with all the contradictions involved with migrants exchanging rural poverty for urban poverty – that Lal Manavado of the University of Oslo is correct in his ascertain that ‘agriculture’ requires greater prestige in society (and there may well have been others making similar comment), but his conclusion to provide free and/or subsidised foods cannot be supported. Neither national nor city governments have the resources to support systems that provide basic goods and services long-term; and those programmes that do begin – for all the best of reasons (but usually for political expediency and/or natural disaster) – are difficult to stop once started.




For example, check the performance of the Egyptian government with food and energy programmes introduced since 1970; reforms remains in the pipeline, but are traditionally held in check by violent street demonstrations. Meanwhile, subsidies for bread alone cost the economy an estimated US$3.5 billion annually. Egypt is caught in that all-too-common situation of limited FDI inflow that has followed from the turmoil of the so-called ‘Arab Spring’ of 2010, and thus few choices with which to make a difference. Meanwhile, an estimated 750,000 new university graduates enter the job market each year.

Government clearly cannot provide; employment and livelihoods come from private investors exploiting market economies that offer stability and reliable returns.

Nutrition is personal

And, whilst sensible nutrition is good for people everywhere, this is not something that can easily be imposed – high quality recommendations (propaganda even) and access to suitable foods is essential but, ultimately, it is the people themselves that make choices – and particularly the people in cities who are not constrained by the traditions and/or isolation of rural communities. You only have to explore issues of eating for pleasure to realise that people are fickle where choice is available – eating what they like and in excessive quantities. Why should 63% of people in Australia – one of the world’s richest and best informed countries - be overweight and/or obese? And, if that sounds like a disaster in the happening, this thing about larger people also affects 73% women and 69% men in Egypt. Rich country – poor country, the models are much the same.

More food for thought then.

Peter Steele Agricultural Engineer Melbourne Australia

36. Thomas Forster, International Partners for Sustainable Agriculture, United States of America

Dear colleagues,

The CFS draft paper Urbanization and Rural Transformation: Implications for food security and nutrition seeks to build upon the February CFS technical workshop on this topic, and sets out a framework for further debate on complex interrelationships between urban and rural communities concerning food and nutrition security. Unfortunately the paper presents the complex challenges and opportunities in a sectoral and thematic approach that tends to reinforce the siloed, sectoral thinking that has led to many of the problems that plague rural to urban relations around the world today.

Integrated territorial development to strengthen rural urban linkages must address intersecting systems of supply and distribution, marketing systems, ecosystem services, social protection, food production and land tenure systems from rights based and holistic, multi-disciplinary, multi-sector and multi-actor approach. These intersecting systems have complementary functions but inequitable distribution of resources across the urban rural continuum. The CFS is the intergovernmental body that can and should address these intersecting systems and approaches.

In general, there is a non-committal treatment of whether certain policy and market forces, for example trade policy, land conversion/grabbing and climate change (just to name a few of the more contentious issues) impact the rural and urban poor and especially smallholders, positively or negatively. This projected neutrality may appease fundamentally divergent views on controversial topics that arose during the technical session, but it can also lead to a false complacency with the status quo.

Respectfuy,




Thomas Forster

In my view (as one participant in the February technical session) these divergent views are important to pursue in relation to the points of entry for particular disciplinary and sectoral positions (backing these positions with evidence and data where available) but that is only the first step to an intelligent approach to joined up systems thinking. For example entry points may through efforts to fortify global supply chains to feed cities in an uncertain world, or through efforts to empower smallholders or social movements in rural and urban settings to become active participants in strengthening the economic, social and environmental dimensions of food systems, or as city planners, managers, or place-based food movements.

There is an attempt to build from existing literature on urban rural linkages and territorial development in the draft paper. But there are some important contributions that are missing from past and current expert and practitioner deliberations. The 2012 cutoff to include literature in citations used for the technical session is not held to in the draft paper which mentions studies on the topic that go back two to three decades. A 2011 study for the FAO Food for Cities Interdisciplinary Initiative took a comprehensive approach that prefigured many of the insights of this paper, but treated the need for geographic specificity, horizontal and vertical integration of food system governance differently, and in ways that informed a number of subsequent studies that are cited in the paper. The 2011 paper, called Food, Agriculture and Cities: Challenges of food and nutrition security, agriculture and ecosystem management in an urbanizing world can be found here.

While there are likely issues that others will argue are missing, what I wish to call out is the urgent need to understand how the sectoral and thematic issues can be considered together and systemically at different levels of governance. The CFS draft paper acknowledges the many calls for “multi-actor, multi-level” integration of rural and urban, and points to a lack of detailed, concrete food system related cases of such integration. In fact there are current cases that should be incorporated from the FAO/RUAF City Region Food Systems Assessment and the Milan Urban Food Pact, among others. I would argue that this is one of the most important and valuable areas for the CFS to concentrate, though there will certainly themes such as land tenure, right to food, access to markets, social protection and other CFS work streams that need to be linked directly to the dynamics of urbanization and rural transformation.

The challenge of implementation for new goals and targets in the 2030 agenda including urbanization and rural transformation is in the CFS agenda. Thus the New Urban Agenda related to SDG 11 on sustainable urbanization as it addresses rural transformation will also be important to this workstream. It is noticeable how little the paper takes up the current framing debates about integrated territorial development and urban rural linkages in the context of Habitat III (which will produce the New Urban Agenda). Similarly there is little treatment of the integration of goals and targets related to SDG2 and other goals CFS will have the most engagement with as an intergovernmental body reporting annually to the ECOSOC High Level Political. If the CFS is to be concerned with the question of how rural urban linkages can be strengthened in inclusive, balanced and equitable ways, as part of the post 2013 and New Urban Agendas, then the framing for integrating goals such as 2 and 11, needs to be incorporated into the paper in later drafts. Indeed, some influential actors in the SDG implementation process are saying there will be “no 2 without 11”.

Importance of CFS as a space that champions rural values, communities and spaces cannot be underestimated, especially as in other intergovernmental spaces the urban predominates and the rural tends to disappear or even becomes invisible. With all the references to rural urban linkages and integrated territorial development, there are always going to be differences and qualities uniquely rural, where the natural environment and its careful stewardship is more pronounced and smaller towns and intermediate cities are closer to the populations of producers and caretakers of those natural resources. The balance of urban and rural interests at the territorial level will require the inclusion of subnational urban and rural authorities, and for this coming CFS43, it would be good to balance the planned Mayors




Summit on 14 October (Milan Urban Food Pact cities) with rural and territorial authorities attending the CFS.

37. Jess Halliday, Independent consultant and researcher, France Many thanks for the opportunity to comment on the draft document.

The draft captures some of the key principles concerning governance issues with increasing rural-urban linkages, such as the need for context-specific interventions, the importance of participation by marginalised actors who will be most affected by policy, vertical and horizontal governance gaps, and the role of non-state actors.

However a political economy approach would enable a more refined appreciation of the configuration of different actors and sectors involved in food policy at the local and regional levels and how the weight afforded to them differs between places. There are two paragraphs where the role of non local government actors in the policy making process is not fully acknowledged.

Firstly, under 'Evidence for Context Specific Interventions' the draft states that solutions need to be context specific 'in order to account for the local political structure, the relationship between rural and urban areas, and the local food security situation and food system structure, with the associated challenges and opportunities' (page 15). A political economy approach enables us to acknowledge that it is not only political or local government structures that can affect the applicability of solutions, but also the interactions and channels of influences between the state, society, and markets.

Secondly, the paragraph on 'Non-state Actors' states that 'coordination and collaboration extends beyond government, particularly as non-state actors are playing important roles in addressing challenges and opportunities associated with urbanization and rural transformation. For example, the private sector plays an integral role in housing provision and upgrading in rural and urban areas. While many civil society organizations are playing key roles in upskilling and facilitating access to information for smallholders to access markets in rural and urban areas.' (Page 17).

I agree that it is crucial to recognise the roles of civil society and the private sector but suggest that the examples do not sufficiently capture their involvement in policy development and implementation. In many cases the role of civil society groups goes considerably beyond information provision; civil society often plays a crucial advocacy role to gain support for policies and can hold local governments to account. In some places private sector standards, particularly over food safety issues, serve as benchmarks for more stringent public standards.

Please be advised that the International Panel of Experts on Sustainable Food Systems (IPES-Food) is currently preparing a report on the role of cities in building sustainable food systems that takes a political economy approach. Due for completion in September, this report would be a useful resource for future drafts of the background document.

38. George Kent, Department of Political Science, University of Hawai'i, USA Greetings –

Here are a few thoughts on Draft 14.03.16 of Urbanization and Rural Transformation Implications for Food Security and Nutrition and the comments that have been made about it.




In the Draft the paragraph on human rights on p. 5 speaks about several ways in which people’s well-being might suffer, but the relationship of these things to human rights is not explained. There is no follow-up in the document on the human rights theme.

On p. 8 the Draft says, “achieving food security and nutrition will require solutions targeting both rural and urban poor.” The targeting perspective means outsiders will provide the answers, and there will be “interventions”. This top-down orientation to dealing with food security issues can be very disempowering to those who are supposed to benefit from this work.

There is a need for discussion about how the local people themselves might themselves be important agents of change. The Draft does discuss the engagement of people in local communities, on p. 16, for example. However, it tends to see local people as subordinates in projects that come from outside, rather than seeing them as formulating and implementing their own programs of action.

The leaders of local communities have more potential impact on local food and nutrition security than anyone in Rome or Geneva or in their country’s capital. The higher-level agencies should do more to facilitate local leaders in their work. Global and national people could work with local leaders to formulate guidelines for local management of community food systems. Working out those guidelines could be a wonderful learning process for all who are involved.

The discussion of data (p. 15) is oriented toward providing information to national governments and international agencies so that they can make better decisions. Attention should also be given to ways in which data collection and analysis could be used to empower local leaders. (I discuss this in the section on Nutrition Status Information in a chapter on “Building Nutritional Self Reliance,” available at http://www2.hawaii.edu/~kent/BuildingNutritionalSelfReliance.pdf)

I agree with Dr. Hampel-Milagrosa’s message on April 1 about the importance of poverty as a cause of food insecurity. However, it is important to recognize that food security is not only a matter of economics. Food security also depends on social relations. Some people exploit others, and some people routinely support their neighbors. In stable, strong communities, where people look after one another’s well-being, no one goes hungry. We should work with that insight. There are many communities in which there is little money but the people are well nourished. Unfortunately, the importance of social relationships is not recognized in analyses that come from the top. There is no hint of it in the annual reports on The State of Food Insecurity in the World.

Some of the contributors to this discussion want to preserve smallholder agriculture in rural areas. They suggest various technological innovations, but recognize that there are many impediments. It is important to also consider social innovations, different ways of organizing food production, processing, marketing, etc. To illustrate, many large farms are organized as industrial operations, with one owner and many poorly paid laborers, operating in ways that exploit both people and the environment. More attention should be given to alternatives, such as organizing farms as cooperatives, with all workers having a share in ownership and decision-making. These different organizational models will have different impacts on local food security.

On March 23, 2016 Dr. Eileen Omosa pointed out that with better technology and better links to urban markets, the food security of rural households could be harmed. The seemingly inefficient smallholders often are important providers of food for the local non-farming poor, and those poor people are likely to be bypassed when the local farmers find ways to sell to richer people. Florence Egal also highlighted this point on April 1.

Dr. Omosa and Florence Egal also discussed the huge problem of land-grabbing by the rich, often undermining local food security. Where I live, much of the agricultural land is now controlled by seed producers who export the seeds and contribute nothing to the local food supply. That is land grabbing, not different from the earlier land grabbing for pineapple and sugar plantations.




Several people spoke about novel ways of producing food such as urban agriculture, vertical agriculture, rooftop gardens, etc. Poor people might not have the resources needed to do such things. There should be some discussion of what would ensure that the food would go to people who need it but have little money.

On March 29 Florence Egal pointed out, “Overall the draft as it stands has by and large adopted a classical supply-driven value chain approach” and suggested it might be useful to focus more explicitly on food consumption and food systems.” I fully agree.

One way to get into that would be to set aside global and national perspectives, and instead explore the issue at the community level.

The Draft focuses on urban and rural areas. It tries to cover many different kinds of situations. Perhaps this Global Forum could launch a follow-up discussion in which the primary unit of analysis is the community, the settings in which people live and relate to one another face-to-face. In many places this is the lowest level of governance. It is the setting in which local people can have the greatest influence.

Imagine that we are on the planning committee for designing a brand new community on a designated bit of land. That committee would have to talk about many things: the physical arrangements of houses and roads, the placement of farms and gardens, where shops would be placed, energy supply, waste disposal, recreation facilities, and so on. As part of that work the committee would have to plan the community’s food system, taking account of the geophysical character of the space and also the types of residents expected to live there. What would we propose? How could our favorite ideas be applied in this very specific place?

The planning committee could advise the community to create a Food Policy Council that would set up and oversee the local food system. What advice and guidelines would you include in its charter? This thought-experiment would be a difficult design challenge, but it would be easier to understand and easier to implement than trying to fix established large-scale food systems.

My question is, how should community food systems be designed? That should be the starting point for our thinking about how national, regional and global food systems should be designed.

George Kent

39. Ophélie Robineau, CIRAD, France To complete my previous contribution, here are a few references :

Robineau, O., 2013. Vivre de l’agriculture dans la ville africaine. Géographie des arrangements entre acteurs à Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso, Thèse de Doctorat, Université Montpellier 3, Montpellier.

Valette, E., Perrin, C., Soulard, C-T., 2012. Sustainable cities vs sustainable agricultures. A scientific project on agro-urban systems, North and South of the Mediterranean, in Conference Agriculture in an urbanizing society 2012, Wageningen.

Robineau, O., 2015. Toward a systemic analysis of city-agriculture interactions in West Africa: a geography of arrangements between actors, Land Use Policy, 49, 322-331.

40. Constance Koukoui, Cités Unies France, France Within the global consultation on Habitat III - The third conference on sustainable habitat - french local governments have been consulted to express their priorities for the New Urban Agenda.




However, as territories, their impact and areas of action go beyond the mere urban area, and local governements have insisted on the connexion between cities, periurban area and rural area. Their role is also to ensure the governance of territories through the coordination of the different level of organiza

Therefore we wish to share this consultation as a contribution for the forum on "Urbanization and transformation and implication for food security", as thinking about the evolution of the interaction within a local territory, necessarely implies a reflexion on localized food system, and how the rural area has to be in tune with urban area to secure local food.

http://www.fao.org/fsnforum/sites/default/files/resources/Priorit%C3%A9s%20Habitat%20III_Coll%C3%A8geElus.pdf

41. Pradip Kumar Nath, National Institute Of Rural Development, India In India the growing Urbanization and concomitant Infrastructure Development demanded for the same has put ample pressure on Agricultural Land and other commons that people depend upon for their livelihood. Commons like Grazing land, Wastelands which are in Government Khata i.e. (Government Record of Rights), Community Forest Lands and Forest per se are facing a lot of problems since their imminent transformation is called for due to Urbanization. The Land Acquisition Act (Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisation, Rehabilation and Resettlement Act 2013) has been in operation to smoothen the process Land Acquisition in order to facilitate the land use pattern for more productive use as per the requirement of people's welfare (Public Purpose).

Recently there is a move to come out with a legislation for Land Lease (In India) so that there will be no hurdles in bringing Land for a certain use without jeopardising the owner's interest.

NITI Ayoga(the new institution in lieu of the erstwhile Planning Commission of India) is busy for it's drafting.

Given the choice 40 percent of the Indian Farmer's are ready to leave Framing. This is for the fact that Agriculture is no more viable (as a livelihood option).

Food security not only demands the right quantity(per individual) but also a certain minimum level of nutrition. Taking this into consideration the optimum land (resource) use for deriving the food items in quantitative terms and ensuring nutrition security is himalyan task in our country. The food security act is a right step in this direction.

Even if a lot of new farming techniques along with high quality seeds(in terms of productivity) have come up in the Research Lab in our country, to face the above challenge in INDIA, it is yet to percolate to the field in a large extent(and scale) which can withstand the vagaries of Nature. Indian Farming is still dependent on Rain God.

Sustainable use of water, increasing productivity per drop of water have been the one of the major concern for the government.

Another dimension which has afflicted the urban areas in India is the large scale influx of Rural migration. Even if it may be seasonal or the circular migration, it has it's impart on Food availability and Food security.

Urbanisation changes the food habits due to several reasons.

When the dependence on traditional food items consumed by people undergoes severe changes, who are exposed to urbanization, Urban amenities, Fast food (mostly manufactured and packaged), it has a new spiral effect on the food basket requirement of a country calling for new equations for adjustment(both in terms of production & distribution).






For Example - Demand for more fruits, pulses, milk products, meat, egg, fish, leafy vegetables have given rise to change in land use pattern.

Diversion from cereal to other cash crops like cotton, chilly, corn(Maze), sugarcane, oilseeds(like sun flower) are few examples which are the direct offshoot of Urabanisation and concomitant spread of manufacturing sector in India. Alternative sources of energy like Jatropha for bio- fuel has it's consequences in INDIA also.

Even the two core manufacturing sectors like Alumina and Steel has called for more mining Activities and areas (for raw materials like lime stone, coal, Iron ore and Bauxite).

This have resulted in large scale people's protest not to allow multinational company to exploit these mining resources. The finest example was the rejection by the Gram Sabhas of 12 villages for Vedanta in NIYAMGARH Hills (for bauxite). This was again done at the behest of the Highest Judicial Authority i.e. the Supreme Court of India.

This dimension of Urbanisation leading to Industrialisation and challenge to food and nutrition Security when the diametrically opposite interest come face to face among the land resource user and land resource looser.

Uneven development let loose by government policies has not been accepted by the people at large who perceive serious loss to their livelihood and a challenge to their survival.

Pradip Kumar Nath,

Centre for Planning, Monitoring & Evaluation,

NIRDPR, INDIA

42. Camelia Adriana Bucatariu, FAO, Italy

Dear CFS Secretariat and Dear Contributors to the Urbanization, Rural Transformation and Implications for Food Security - Online consultation on the background document to the CFS Forum.

Please find below a contribution to the area of food loss and food waste prevention and reduction. The background document provided for this online consultation included food loss and waste in the Rural-Urban Dynamics and Implications for Food Security and Nutrition section.

The Second International Conference on Nutrition (ICN2), G20, CFS, Habitat III, African Union, CELAC, EU and numerous National Governments have prioritized food loss prevention and reduction. Local, national, regional, and global actions should strengthen and facilitate harmonization of terminologies and definitions; data quality and availability; enable vertical and horizontal policy interventions and public-private-civil society networks for effective investments with short, medium, and long time returns for all actors, including end consumers in rural, peri-urban, and urban areas.

Concrete tools and policy recommendations to facilitate and enable prevention and reduction of food loss and food waste at local, national, regional and global level are mentioned below:

Global policy frameworks

Sustainable Development Goal 12.3, 12.5 and SDG 2 : Goal 12. Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns; target 12.3 by 2030 halve per capita global food waste at the retail and consumer level, and reduce food losses along production and supply chains including post-harvest losses. SDG 12.3 is directly linked with SDG 2 and SDG 12.5. FAO is working on the Indicator for SDG 12.3: the Global Food Loss Index.




Zero Hunger Challenge includes addressing sustainability of all food systems and the aim of zero food loss and waste.

ICN2 Rome Declaration on Nutrition acknowledged “that current food systems are being increasingly challenged to provide adequate, safe, diversified and nutrient rich food for all that contribute to healthy diets due to, inter alia, constraints posed by resource scarcity and environmental degradation, as well as by unsustainable production and consumption patterns, food losses and waste, and unbalanced distribution.” Moreover, “food losses and waste throughout the food chain should be reduced in order to contribute to food security, nutrition, and sustainable development.” ICN2 Framework for Action has “Recommendation 11: Improve storage, preservation, transport and distribution technologies and infrastructure to reduce seasonal food insecurity, food and nutrient loss and waste.”1

Milan Urban Food Policy Pact (MUFPP) : Promoted by the Mayor of Milan. Signed in October 2015. Currently has 119 signatories. It includes: “develop sustainable dietary guidelines”, “encourage and support social and solidarity economy activities”, “help provide services to food producers in and around cities”, “support short food chains” and “enable food waste prevention, reduction, and management”. FAO is part of the Technical team2.

MUFPP aims to support policy coherence and was launched together with its Plan for Action and Selected Good Practices.

Recommended actions for food waste reduction and measurement Convene food system actors to assess and monitor food loss and waste reduction at all stages of the

city region food supply chain, (including production, processing, packaging, safe food preparation, presentation and handling, re-use and recycling) and ensure holistic planning and design, transparency, accountability and policy integration.

Raise awareness of food loss and waste through targeted events and campaigns; identify focal points such as educational institutions, community markets, company shops and other solidarity or circular economy initiatives.

Collaborate with the private sector along with research, educational and community-based organisations to develop and review, as appropriate, municipal policies and regulations (e.g. processes, cosmetic and grading standards, expiration dates, etc.) to prevent waste or safely recover food and packaging using a “food use-not-waste” hierarchy.

Save food by facilitating recovery and redistribution for human consumption of safe and nutritious foods, if applicable, that are at risk of being lost, discarded or wasted from production, manufacturing, retail, catering, wholesale and hospitality.

Committee of World Food Security (CFS): CFS 41 called on all concerned stakeholders to undertake cost-effective, practicable and environmentally sensitive actions according to their priorities and means to reduce food loss and waste through an enabling environment based on a “food use-not-loss-or-waste” hierarchy.

1 Source: http://www.fao.org/3/a-ml542e.pdf and http://www.fao.org/3/a-mm215e.pdf

2 http://www.fao.org/news/story/en/item/346393/icode/


http://www.fao.org/3/a-ml542e.pdf

http://www.fao.org/3/a-mm215e.pdf

http://www.fao.org/3/a-ml542e.pdf

http://www.fao.org/3/a-mm215e.pdf

http://www.fao.org/news/story/en/item/346393/icode/



Fig 1 Food-use-not-loss-or–waste hierarchy, adapted from CFS 41 by Bucatariu, C., 2015

Global Initiative on Food Loss and Waste Reduction

The Global Initiative on FLW Reduction takes a global to regional, national and local approach by developing strategies adjusted to the context-specific needs. The website of the Global Initiative on Food Loss and Waste Reduction http://www.fao.org/save-food provides information at local, national, regional, and global level, including a database with public, private, and civil society actions on FLW and a monthly newsletter. Brochure: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4068e.pdf

Definitional Framework of Food Loss

The Global Initiative on FLW Reduction has published, after a consultative process, a voluntary definitional framework of food loss.

Food loss is defined as “the decrease in quantity or quality of food” and are the agricultural or fisheries products intended for human consumption that are ultimately not eaten by people or that have incurred a reduction in quality reflected in their nutritional value, economic value or food safety. An important part of food loss is “food waste”, which refers to the discarding or alternative (non-food) use of food that was fit for human consumption – by choice or after the food has been left to spoil or expire as a result of negligence.

Most preferred

Least preferred

Safe and nutritious food available and accessible for human consumption

Food loss and wasteprevention and reduction at source

Recovery and redistribution of safe and nutritious

food for human consumption

Feed

Compost or energy

recovery

Disposal


http://www.fao.org/save-food




Food loss and waste measurement

FAO is working towards a common understanding of FLW, including enabling harmonization of terminology, definitions, methodologies, and impact assessment, e.g. on human nutrition.

FAO – Statistics Divisions working on the Indicator for the SDG 12.3: the Global Food Loss Index3.

FAO launched in December 2015 the Technical Platform on the Measurement and reduction of Food Loss and Waste4 together with IFPRI.

FAO working group on FLW developed Food loss analysis: causes and solutions. Case studies in the Small-scale Agriculture and Fisheries Subsectors Methodology5. Kenya case study (milk, banana, fish, maize) available. Other case studies are forthcoming.

Global Strategy on Improving Agricultural and Rural Statistics6 - FAO Statistics Division

FAO – Nutrition and Food Systems Division (ESN) is part of the Steering Committee for the Food Loss and Waste Protocol Accounting and Reporting Standard.7 Secretariat hosted by World Resources Institute (WRI); FAO – ESN is co-author and implementation partner for Prevention and reduction of food and drink waste in businesses and households – Guidance for governments, local authorities businesses and other organizations. Developed by WRAP-UK, for UNEP and FAO. The guidance is piloted at country level8 and is part of the Think.Eat.Save Campaign.

FLW impacts

Human nutrition:

Global variations in micro-nutrient losses in the fruit and vegetables supply chain9 Determination of micro-nutrient losses in food losses and waste (flw) in Norway and Kenya - implications

on food security and nutrition and methodologies for data collection10 Socio-economic and environmental:

3 http://unstats.un.org/sdgs/files/meetings/iaeg-sdgs-meeting-03/3rd-IAEG-SDGs-presentation-FAO--12.3.1.pdf

4 Technical Platform on the Measurement and reduction of Food Loss and Waste http://www.fao.org/platform-food-loss-waste/food-waste/definition/en/

5 http://www.fao.org/3/a-az568e.pdf ; http://www.fao.org/save-food/resources/casestudies/en/

6 http://gsars.org/en/about/

7 http://www.wri.org/our-work/project/global-food-loss-and-waste-measurement-protocol/documents-and-updates#project-tabs

8 http://www.fao.org/save-food/news-and-multimedia/news/news-details/en/c/293895/

9 http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/food-loss-reduction/CoP_English/Vit_A___C_Loss_FAO_7-region_Poster_1st_PHL_Congress_201510.pdf

10 http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/food-loss-reduction/CoP_English/Norway___Kenya_Poster_1st_PHL_Congress_201510.pdf

Source: FAO, 2014 - http://www.fao.org/3/a-at143e.pdf


http://unstats.un.org/sdgs/files/meetings/iaeg-sdgs-meeting-03/3rd-IAEG-SDGs-presentation-FAO--12.3.1.pdf

http://www.fao.org/platform-food-loss-waste/food-waste/definition/en/

http://www.fao.org/3/a-az568e.pdf

http://www.fao.org/save-food/resources/casestudies/en/

http://gsars.org/en/about/

http://www.wri.org/our-work/project/global-food-loss-and-waste-measurement-protocol/documents-and-updates%23project-tabs

http://www.wri.org/our-work/project/global-food-loss-and-waste-measurement-protocol/documents-and-updates%23project-tabs

http://www.fao.org/save-food/news-and-multimedia/news/news-details/en/c/293895/

http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/food-loss-reduction/CoP_English/Vit_A___C_Loss_FAO_7-region_Poster_1st_PHL_Congress_201510.pdf

http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/food-loss-reduction/CoP_English/Vit_A___C_Loss_FAO_7-region_Poster_1st_PHL_Congress_201510.pdf

http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/food-loss-reduction/CoP_English/Norway___Kenya_Poster_1st_PHL_Congress_201510.pdf

http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/food-loss-reduction/CoP_English/Norway___Kenya_Poster_1st_PHL_Congress_201510.pdf

http://www.fao.org/3/a-at143e.pdf



2014: Background paper on the economics of food loss and waste11 ; 2015: FAO – LEI, Wageningen UR, study: Potential Impacts on Sub-Saharan Africa of Reducing Food Loss and Waste in the European Union12; 2013: Food wastage footprint, impacts on natural resources and Toolkit, reducing the food wastage footprint13; 2014: Food wastage footprint, full cost accounting and Mitigation of food wastage, societal costs and benefits; 2015: Food wastage footprint and climate change

Recovery & Redistribution of safe and nutritious food for human consumption

Recovery of safe and nutritious food for human consumption is to receive, with or without payment, food (processed, semi-processed or raw) which would otherwise be discarded or wasted from the agricultural, livestock and fisheries supply chains of the food system. Redistribution of safe and nutritious food for human consumption is to store or process and then distribute the received food pursuant to appropriate safety, quality and regulatory frameworks directly or through intermediaries, and with or without payment, to those having access to it for food intake. http://www.fao.org/platform-food-loss-waste/food-waste/food-waste-reduction/country-level-guidance/en/ and http://www.fao.org/save-food/news-and-multimedia/news/news-details/en/c/288692/

FAO collaborates with the Global FoodBanking Network, the European Federation of Food Banks, the Italian Food Banks, and numerous other organizations to develop a concrete tool that can enable and facilitate action.

Contact for more information: [email protected]

Working Group (Interdepartamental) on Food Loss and Food Waste Prevention

43. Luis Antonio Hualda, University of the Philippines Mindanao, Philippines Dear Madam/Sir:

Some contribution to the consultation.


The implementation of decentralization provided local governments with an avenue to have greater control over local resources, which can be used to improve services and enhance the welfare of constituents. However, providing better services may involve greater expenses that will require a larger amount of funds, which can be obtained from generating greater revenues. Generation of local revenues can be increased by investing local resources and prioritizing economic activities that can have greater returns.

Strengthening of urban-rural linkages can potentially enhance the performance of food systems because it can provide for the efficient flow of commodities, inputs, information and technology. However, this will require coordination among local governments who generally have their autonomy because of decentralization. There is a need to look at the political dynamics in terms of the configuration or structure of governments. There may be a need to look at how collaboration between local governments can work to improve urban-rural linkages.

11 http://www.fao.org/3/a-at143e.pdf

12 http://www.fao.org/3/a-i5256e.pdf

13 http://www.fao.org/nr/sustainability/food-loss-and-waste/en/


http://www.fao.org/platform-food-loss-waste/food-waste/food-waste-reduction/country-level-guidance/en/

http://www.fao.org/platform-food-loss-waste/food-waste/food-waste-reduction/country-level-guidance/en/



mailto:[email protected]

http://www.fao.org/3/a-at143e.pdf


http://www.fao.org/nr/sustainability/food-loss-and-waste/en/




There is very little doubt that city/town planning can contribute to initiative addressing food security and nutrition. However, there is a gap in the knowledge and skills of city/town planners particularly in the area of integrating the food system in city/town plans. This was mentioned in Pothukuchi and Kaufman’s work in the US. This issue was also identified by the Meeting Urban Food Needs Project (MUFN). Technical assistance can be provided by the CFS in equipping these city/town planners with skills and knowledge to address the gap.

A Policy Guide Book that has a dynamic framework for addressing the concerns may be developed by the CFS.

Kind regards,

Luis

--

Luis Antonio T. Hualda

School of Management

University of the Philippines Mindanao

Davao City, Philippines

Website: www.upmin.edu.ph

44. Jackson Kago, UN-Habitat, Kenya Dear Colleagues,

Thanks for sharing this document that is relevant to the on going discussions in regard to the current discussions on City Region Food Systems and Urban-Rural Linkages even as the UN prepares for the Habitat III conference and the New Urban Agenda. The rise of urban systems has for sure and for long in the history of urbanisation affected the delicate balance between urban growth and food security. Urbanization has been a strong transformative force which has reshaped the world’s urban and rural landscapes and brought prosperity to many urban regions. However, urbanization forces have also led to various challenges and opened up new forms of inequality, unsustainability, polarization and divergence in development and incomes between urban and rural areas. Rural urban linkages thus became a thematic area that the UN through UN Habitat prioritized in its approach to promote sustainable regional and metropolitan development. This was done through resolution HSP/GC/25/L.9 passed during the 25th Session of the Governing Council of UN-Habitat that requested UN-Habitat 'to continue working closely with other intergovernmental organizations and stakeholders to strengthen urban-rural linkages focusing on knowledge exchange, policy dialogue and capacity development'

To address the hazy line along the urban-rural interphase especially as it related to food systems, a multipronged approach should be adopted that is country or region specific to ensure the data collected is more accurate and presents the right ‘urban-rural’ scenarios as depicted in different jurisdictions. It might be practically impossible to use a universal approach to mete individual country/regional depictions of urban vs. Rural.

****************************************************************************

The paper articulates well the key challenges and opportunities relating to food security in the draft document. The issues touch on how urbanization and urban-rural linkages impact on food systems from


http://www.upmin.edu.ph/



production to consumption, touching on consumption, distribution, waste and other related issues. The paper also clearly articulates the contribution of non-farm employment. The production component could be further elaborated, for instance touching on the role of small and intermediate towns in enhancing production, and how urbanization is shaping agricultural activities. The policy recommendations in terms of governance issues and integrated approaches could further be enhanced. Some of the specific comments are:

The definitions in the first section are clearly stated. The paper could also define ‘rural urbanization’ that could be relevant to this discussion. The sub-topic on pg 4: “What are the implications of the growing rural-urban linkages for food security and nutrition?” seems to focus more on the implications of urbanization as opposed to rural-urban linkages. It could briefly elaborate more on how urban-rural linkages impact on the whole food system chains from production to consumption.

The analysis on pg5 from a human rights perspective is good and could be strengthened by a mention of the related SDGs. The gender based aspects especially in relation to women could be more enhanced.

Pg6: The demographics and shifting settlements sub-topic is clearly elaborated especially in regard to the small and intermediate towns. More emphasis could be on implications to food systems. The potential of small and intermediate towns to food security could be further expounded to also include agri-based industries, food consumption and supply of farm products. The potential dividends of their growth can be harnessed to reverse the potential negative impacts of urbanization on food security as depicted.

Pg8: The section on consumption patterns could cover the impact of effects of consumption patterns in urban areas in influencing shift in livelihoods in rural areas. (This aspect seems to be covered in the pg 9 the last paragraph). The role played by the emerging preference of food crops and cash crops and its effect on food security could also be elaborated. The section on food loss and waste could also be linked to this section on consumption. On food markets, there is an unmentioned aspect of contraband food products/smuggled goods that flood local markets. Case in point is the Kenya Sugar Market that was dogged by inflows of cheap foreign sugar that out priced the locally produced sugar, and cascading impacts on local food growers and subsequent market constraints in providing products such as wheat, rice and sugar that are usually implicated in such trades. (Pg 9)

Pg10: The issue of the role of non-farm activities is well elaborated. This could be further analyzed in terms of the implications on rural urbanization in small and intermediate towns and territorial approaches. The section on land use in pg 12 could also cover issues of the effect of urban sprawl on land use, and the necessity of adoption of compact well planned urban settlements as a viable option that can help curb the unsustainable land use in peri-urban areas.

Pg 12 on natural resource flows, the flow of pollutants from urban to rural areas could also be highlighted especially in regard to food contamination. The demand for water resources and the role of resource conflicts in contributing to mass displacement of population, the subsequent impact on urbanization and overall food security could be mentioned. This is a pertinent issue in conflict regions around the world. This is also relevant to the climate change component that could mention mobility as a result of floods, drought and famines and its effect on urbanization in terms of increase in vulnerable population. How can urban-rural linkages address this? What is the effect on food systems?

Pg 14: The role of infrastructure as a transformative force in both urban and rural areas is highlighted. It could be more emphasized especially in regard to small and intermediate towns that are more directly linked to rural areas. A mention of access to farm inputs and access to finance in agriculture needs to be discussed in more detail in terms of the overall effect it injects into food (in)security. Also a mention of SDG 9 “Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation.” How does infrastructure influence food production? How do better serviced small and intermediate towns enhance food production, distribution and consumption?




The section of Governance issues on pg 14 could further be enhanced to cover for instance aspects of land governance; the role of local and metropolitan authorities in enhancing urban-rural linkages e.g the Milan Food Pact. Also the issue of decentralization, and how it can contribute to food systems. The section on integrated approaches also needs to be enhanced. It could also cover aspects like the system of cities under territorial approaches. (Could make reference on the report by IFAD on “Territorial approaches, rural-urban linkages and inclusive rural transformation: Ensuring that rural people have a voice in national development in the context of the SDGs”

On the potential role of CFS: having a community of practice/experts in your network is a great asset that will assist regions and countries implement the desirable food secure programmes and policies, and advice all stakeholders in the food systems and food ecosystems in a bid to improve food security. This will add value to CFS’ inputs into this discourse. Further CFS could strengthen the operationalization of urban-rural linkages for instance through some guiding principles on urban-rural linkages building on successful case studies.

Best Regards

Jackson Kago

Regional and Metropolitan Planning Unit,

Urban Planning and Design Branch, UN-Habitat

Enhancing URBAN-RURAL LINKAGES to Harness the Transformative Power of Urbanization for Sustainable Development

http://www.fao.org/fsnforum/sites/default/files/resources/URL%20flyer_2016.pdf

45. Emily Mattheisen, FIAN International, Germany CSM Input to the Urbanization and Rural Transformation FSN Forum This represents a collective input from the working group within the Civil Society Mechanism of the CFS- which includes the input from several different CSOs and Social Movements globally.

We thank the CFS Secretariat for putting together this paper and making an effort to distill the various information available. It is a big topic, and still needs some refinement. Before going throughout the paper, it’s important to first outline: what are the policy shifts that we want to see? And what is the role for the CFS?

Human rights are transversal and must be integrated into the policy analysis throughout as the center of the entire analysis, not just an afterthought or a sub topic. Human Rights, and specifically the realization of the right to adequate food and nutrition is at the core of the CFS mandate and within the Global Strategic Framework which guides the work of the CFS. Through the interaction with different issues in the document- from migration to climate change, access to resources and governance - a human rights analysis puts those most negatively affected at the center of the discussion, thus creating a clear entry point for putting communities at the center of the solutions. A Human Rights Based Approach must be employed, where the rights of women and indigenous people are respected. This is fundamental to the future success of the work in the CFS, and an added value of the CFS process. Within this framework other issues that were not fully addressed in this paper would also need to be addressed which include:

Equal access to resources for small scale food producers, both men and women (including, pastoralists and fishing communities)


http://www.fao.org/fsnforum/sites/default/files/resources/URL%20flyer_2016.pdf



Decent work and labor rights for all (in all levels of the food supply chain)

Full integration of nutrition- not just from a consumption/medical perspective.

Substantial issues that need to be considered in this paper are:

Internal learning of the CFS and utilizing the HLPE reports: the CFS has produced a wealth of information through the HLPE processes. It is fundamental that the CFS build greater internal coherence, by utilising these reports, which offer important insight into this topic, and that we have all collectively invested in as actors in the CFS.

Many of these reports would add greatly to this complex topic and provide more nuanced guidance on the linkages with different aspects and research of FSN. As it stands now, CSM does not feel that this has been done fully, and hopes to see a greater inclusion of past CFS documents in the next draft. In reality, this workstream can take the lessons from past CFS work and contextualize it into a territorial framework- or rather localizing the issues.

- Tenure, and access to resources and markets: It would strengthen the narrative of the report considerably to include these aspects that are part of other core CFS workstreams/existing policy.. The Tenure Guidelines were not mentioned at all, yet all aspects of the Guidelines are relevant here- as tenure in terms of FSN are not an issue only in rural areas- but specifically the section on spatial planning should be fully included in terms of integrated territorial planning. The Tenure Guidelines will support a more in-depth discussion on 1) local governance of tenure, 2) protection of peri-urban agricultural land from urbanization and speculation, and 3) tenure in urban areas for agriculture and food production, which is a fundamental means of FSN for many communities in impoverished urban centers of all sizes, and key to ensuring the right to adequate food and nutrition in both urban and rural areas.

Market access for small-scale producers: This is critical for territorial development (or in other words, stronger rural-urban linkages). A given territorial space can range from local, to transboundary to regional - as distinct from global - and can be located in rural, peri-urban or urban contexts. They are the dominant source of the food consumed in the world (leaving aside self-consumption), particularly in the Global South. They are also expanding steadily in the North. They are the markets in which smallholders have most presence and exercise most control, and which they access autonomously, individually or through their own associations.

These markets enable a greater share of value added to be retained and returned to farm level and hence they constitute an important contribution to fighting rural poverty, and increase the viability of small-scale peri-urban and urban agricultural production. Because of the decentralized nature of the food systems in which they are embedded, they help to counter the desertification of rural space. As 70% of the world’s food is produced by smallholders, this is an important factor, especially as it is generally estimated that only 20% of cities food needs can be supplied by urban agriculture.

Secure access by smallholders to land and other natural resources is, of course, a prerequisite to their survival. Territorial markets are defined by additional characteristics including the following:

Multiple functions beyond exchange of commodities, acting as spaces for social interaction, exchange of producers’ knowledge, redistribution of products like seeds, maintaining cultural identities.

Direct interaction between producers and consumers including on price negotiation and genuine short supply chains.

More climate-friendly logistics.

Less food waste in the entire food chain, including in artisanal processing and marketing.

Labor intensive systems that generate more employment per unit of value of merchandise in the case of small-scale food production.




Resilience deriving from the autonomy of smallholders, which has to be defended and strengthened.

There is reference in the draft to the problem of cheap importers undercutting local producers and the local market— this is clearly an issue of trade agreements, and it is critical that we clearly state this problem, as it was also discussed in the technical workshop to prepare this draft. International and bilateral free trade agreements consistently challenge the various elements of the right to adequate food; they challenge the sovereignty of states and communities, prevent the development of national and local economies, put economic pressure on small scale food producers, and challenge the right of non-food producing communities to have economic and physical access to healthy, local and culturally appropriate food.

-Public procurement – was not mentioned at all in the draft, and must be engaged with as both an issue on its own and a solution to strong territorial development. Public procurement constitutes an extremely important market for smallholders, and a way to source local, fresh foods in public institutions and is recognized to be a practical and useful policy tool. The experiences of Brazil and India are well-known but they are by no means the only ones and additional information needs to be collected and analysed. European Directive 2014/24/EU - EUR-Lex - Europa.eu and Directive 2014/25/EU - EUR-Lex - Europa.eu also support this approach. The CFS policy recommendation on food loss and waste also contains decisions towards improved procurement policies, stating that governments at all levels should be: “Assessing and improving, where relevant, public food procurement management and distribution policies and practices to minimize FLW while ensuring food safety and quality, safeguarding the environment, improving economic efficiency and pursuing social benefits, for instance facilitating access for small-scale food producers where appropriate”

As with any public policy, institutional procurement can be targeted to support a range of objectives according to the criteria and modalities that are applied. The focus should be on the criteria and conditions that should be applied for public procurement to work for smallholders and the constraints that need to be addressed, with a view to supporting positive rural transformation, for example.

-Decentralized governance and government structures: The conversation within the technical workshop, and within the literature on this topic (including the Habitat process) revolves a lot around better articulating the role of local governments (including at city, town, regional or territorial level) in implementing policy and governing towards FSN and the right to food and nutrition. The CFS has a clear role and responsibility to provide guidance on these issues. The UN HRC issued a report last year on the Human Rights obligations of local government (http://www.cisdp.uclg.org/sites/default/files/Local%20Gov%20Report.pdf ), which clarifies two main theoretical points: (1) the application of human rights in local administration is essential to democratic governance and (2) local authorities share the same human rights obligations as central governments, as all spheres of government within a treaty-bound state are equal duty holders under international human rights law. It is the responsibility of bodies such as the CFS to provide guidance to member states on how to better include all levels of government in policy implantation, as well as to provide a platform for civil society to make clear their expectations and needs at the local and territorial level as well in terms of policy for FSN and right to food and nutrition.

-Rural vs. urban:

The historical process of defining rural and urban, has effectively separated the rural and urban in policy making. As was discussed in the technical workshop, “territorial approaches” better characterizes the spatial frame of reference, the economic scope and the formative policy change that we are trying to achieve.

If we persist with the rural vs urban dichotomy, many things are lost when posing the topic of this workstream as “urbanization and rural transformation” the question clearly positions itself as to how should rural areas transform to better meet the needs of cities. The CSM position is that the fundamental


http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:JOL_2014_094_R_0065_01

http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32014L0025

http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32014L0025

http://www.cisdp.uclg.org/sites/default/files/Local%20Gov%20Report.pdf



issue is questioning the development paradigm that has made it difficult or even impossible to sustain rural livelihoods, and reconsider how we can transform urban development to create opportunities and fulfil the human rights of rural communities (and all communities for that matter). While the paper makes an effort to examine the uneven development patterns that cause these spatial shifts, and the complexities of changing territories, it fails to explore the real solutions that can make a genuine difference to food security and nutrition policy, as well as to realizing and operationalizing the human right to adequate food for communities in both rural and urban areas. Also missing is a clear exploration of the various barriers in the current food system to realizing rights and creating stronger and balanced territorial development.

Specific attention should also be dedicated to the issue of urban – fisheries questions. Many cities are also coastal, and the impacts on coastal traditional communities and small-scale fisheries should also be taken into consideration, not least because fish is an important part of these populations’ traditional staple diet. Issues to be considered are the following: land speculation and tourism that force traditional fisher communities off their lands/fishing grounds; destruction of mangroves, wetlands and estuaries that are the breeding grounds of many fish; and industrial fisheries that are a threat to both the environment and to coastal fishery communities’ livelihoods. Access to and preservation of these areas and traditional fishing rights are key to the right to food of these communities.

The city-region food system perspective that is put forward in the document is welcomed. We believe that for the CFS it is important that we use this concept but refer to it as territorial food systems- as this term overcomes all artificial boundaries and is a frame of reference and terminology that makes more sense to the actors of our various constituencies - including both civil society and Member States. In order to understand some of the nuances of this discussion, we recommend the authors of the paper to please include information and resoruces from this publication: http://www.ruaf.org/sites/default/files/UAM30.pdf

-Nutrition and social protection: It is disappointing that nutrition is not really dealt with in this paper. The literature on this topic is wide and diverse, some documents to look at are included as bibliographical references. In this context the issue of nutrition cannot be reduced the changing dietary patterns and food safety- these are symptoms of a larger systemic issues which is touched on, but not fully addressed. The food system that undercuts local markets, replaces local foods with imports (processed, sugar, etc.) is important, as is the fundamental problem of corporate influence in marketing, availability, etc..

Poverty does not exist in a vacuum. It is a symptom of larger structural inequalities, and has a clear link to the right to food in both rural and urban areas. Much literature on this issue and economic access to food exists. It is a question linked to issues of access to resources for growing food; many people in rural and urban areas cannot afford to access fresh food due to low income, physical lack of access to fresh food, insufficient possibilities to access the direct producer to consumer possibilities and other factors.. Much research has been carried out in the United States, Australia and other countries on food deserts. In developing countries, local traditional markets are threatened by the importation of cheap industrially grown food, often imported and unsafe. This is important in understanding socio-economic discrimination, as well as posing clear solutions in terms of the role of urban, metropolitan and territorial planning.

The document contains no reference or information on social protection mechanisms. This is surprising, as social protection is a key issue when discussing FSN and territorial approaches, and also there was an HLPE report and CFS policy document on Social Protection that should be referenced here, as should the materials from the ILO on social protection floors.

-The role of data: With the development of the SDGs, everyone is very preoccupied with gathering data and creating indicators to measure progress, but within this excitement about data we fail to understand that our current modes of data collection, metrics and even the questions that are being asked are


http://www.ruaf.org/sites/default/files/UAM30.pdf



limiting. Statistics and data are challenging, as data collected is rarely neutral and always has a specific goal that often leads to a limited/reductionist presentation of the issue. Measuring hunger is recognized as a challenge in the draft, and in fact a problem – current data does not? accurately capture “urban hunger”. However going beyond this, the data sets commonly used for measuring hunger are generally inadequate, and does not reflect the whole picture of hunger and malnutrition. Civil society and other actors have put forward criticisms of the SOFI over the past several years. Additionally, what data is actually collected is also problematic. For example, despite the importance of informal and territorial markets, they are not included in data collection systems, with negative impacts on the quality of the evidence base for public policies.

The draft also addresses that measuring employment is difficult as it doesn’t account for the range of activities in which families are engaged, or the informal activities that generate income. These areas are critical to understanding the real extent of the challenges families and communities face, and to proposing supportive policy solutions. We understand that data will be used: we wish to request that the authors ensure a critical lens is used in the methodologies for data collection and that they fully assess the limitations.

-Food waste and loss: It is important to distinguish local small-scale producer-to-consumer chains that are not wasteful, and that are based on decent living for farmers and farm workers and a fair price paid by consumers, such as Community Supported Agriculture , from the perpetuating of the current wasteful industrial system that recycles food through charities but does not imply any system change to the existing unsustainable system per se. Hypermarkets working with small-scale producers using contract farming is a trend that perpetuates a system by using a false solution and marketing it is “local short chain” agriculture. Please refer to the important work done in the CFS process on food loss and waste, which presents a more nuanced vision of the issue.

The issue of “efficiency” is often presented to introduce issues of mechanized farming, whereas there is evidence elsewhere to show that small-scale production and agroecology have more long-term beneficial impacts. Increased mechanization is not the answer: it uses more fossil fuels and contributes to climate change and relies on chemical inputs to combat soil depletion. Furthermore the negative externalities must be taken into account: this constitutes a different kind of waste. Agroecology based on low impact labour-intensive farming provides employment and is climate friendly. The current situation of FWL is a symptom of a larger problem, and creating policy and reviewing literature that support the development of sustainable local food systems inherently reduces waste.

Other resources to utilize:

• Accounting for Hunger: The Right to Food in the Era of Globalisation edited by Olivier De Schutter, Kaitlin Y Cordes

• on governance and Food Policy Councils: http://uknowledge.uky.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1046&context=kaleidoscope

• On food procurement: http://orgprints.org/17413/1/NATIONAL_REPORT_BIOFORSK_RAPPORT_Italy_FINAL.pdf

• http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/hlpe/hlpe_documents/HLPE_Reports/HLPE-Report-4-Social_protection_for_food_security-June_2012.pdf

• http://www.un.org/ga/second/64/socialprotection.pdf

• http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=15219&LangID=E

• http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1353829210000584


http://uknowledge.uky.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1046&context=kaleidoscope

http://orgprints.org/17413/1/NATIONAL_REPORT_BIOFORSK_RAPPORT_Italy_FINAL.pdf

http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/hlpe/hlpe_documents/HLPE_Reports/HLPE-Report-4-Social_protection_for_food_security-June_2012.pdf

http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/hlpe/hlpe_documents/HLPE_Reports/HLPE-Report-4-Social_protection_for_food_security-June_2012.pdf

http://www.un.org/ga/second/64/socialprotection.pdf

http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=15219&LangID=E

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1353829210000584



46. Louison Lançon, FAO, Italy Dear secretariat, contributors,

Please find below the contribution of the FAO-Food for the Cities Programme's team.

You can find, first, (1) general comments in regards to the background document, and secondly (2) a more in-depth presentation of the City Region Food Systems concept and how it can represent a relevant approach to address urbanization and rural transformation issues, and then some more practical insights by presenting and giving examples on how we operationalize it through the programme.

Best regards,

Louison Lançon, on behalf of the FAO's Food for the Cities Programme.

_________________

Contribution and comments

1. General comments:

- Good starting point as a background document. While it reflects on topics such as territorial approach, rural urban linkages, the document might serve better to reflect on the role of food security and nutrition in the wider territorial approach/rural urban linkage discourse.

- Similarly, impact of rural transformation and urbanization on natural resource is mentioned, but it can be strengthened with concrete examples on how land/forest/water management is mutually influential with urban space, and how that may also affect fisheries also considering the fact that three quarters of large cities are located on coastlines.

- The potential roles for CFS needs further elaboration (but it should be done in the next workshop seeing the timeline). One suggestion that can be made in this area is that the “urban” discourse represented in Habitat III is still very tilted towards “urban development” rather than a balanced rural and urban development. This needs a strong, more “rural” constituency such as the CFS platform to make a strong case on the need of balanced investment and policy prioritization. This also includes the need to look at the rural and urban contexts as a continuum, as part of a territory.

- The CFS platform may also further discuss the importance of inclusive food system in the urbanization discourse. Urban areas mostly “import” food from rural areas (near and far), in general this system is heavily dominated by few private companies and the tendency will only increase unless actions are taken. We need to highlight the need in building more inclusive food systems for smallholder farmers and businesses, from both surrounding and remote rural areas.

- We may also want to include the need in efficient flows of information between urban and rural areas in the background document. Indeed, as mentioned by Julio Berdegué et al., rural-urban linkages include reciprocal flows of information, especially on labour opportunities, markets and consumers preferences. It is a key element for rural dwellers, and farmers, so they can adapt their production to the demand and market requirements.

- CFS may also want to highlight the dwellers’ knowledge role’s in building food secure territories. Inappropriate consumption patterns and diets might not be just due to bad access to healthy food, but also to knowledge gaps and customs.

2. City Regions Food Systems concept, and how we operationalize through the programme




With its Food for the Cities Programme, FAO builds on the need to better understand and operationalize the concept of City Region Food Systems (CRFS) as a basis for further planning and informed decision making. City region food systems (CRFS) is proposed as an appropriate solution to support local institutions in assessing and governing the complex network of actors, processes and relationships connected to food production, processing, marketing, and consumption that exist in a given geographical region that includes a more or less concentrated urban centre and its surrounding peri-urban and rural hinterland; a regional landscape across which flows of people, goods and ecosystem services are managed. CRFS approach provides a critical lens for analysis, and at the same time supports on the ground policy transformation and implementation. Working a city region level can be a means to unpack the complexity of rural urban linkage to a practical level, with food being the entry point or common denominator.

The Programme provides assistance to local governments in identifying and understanding gaps, bottlenecks and opportunities for sustainable planning, informed decision-making, prioritizing investments, designing sustainable food policies and strategies to improve local food systems. In this process, cities define the city region food system as the most appropriate geographic scale to improve food security and nutrition and promote sustainable food systems.

The progamme is currently implemented in four cities: Colombo, Medellin, Lusaka and Kitwe.The boundaries CRFS are generally defined on the basis of the food flows of the main commodities consumed within the city regions. In addition, for data collection purposes, jurisdictional and natural boundaries are often used to define the CRFS boundaries.

The definition of CRFS boundaries is really context specific, for example:

- In Colombo (Sri Lanka), the CRFS boundaries are based principally on the food flows of the city’s most consumed commodities. But as the city dwellers’ diets are very diverse, various commodities are consumed and come from diverse and sometimes far away areas. For governance instances and action taking reasons, the CRFS boundaries definition has been based on demographic criteria, to end up covering a broad populated area of the Western Province (Colombo’s province), and so including local areas that allows the production of just a small part of the food consumed in the city;

- In Kitwe (Zambia), where the food supply is more localized, the definition of the boundaries has been based on the flows of the city’s most consumed commodities and on the administrative boundaries. The CRFS ends up covering a narrow area that still allows the production of an important part of the food consumed in the city.

- In Lusaka (Zambia), the CRFS boundaries are based on the food flows of the commodities that represent 60% of the amount of food consumed in the territory.

47. Stineke Oenema, UNSCN, Italy Dear colleagues, Please find below a few comments to the background paper to CFS43 Forum Discussion.

I have read the paper trying to focus on the implications for nutrition. The paragraph that is dedicated to nutrition does not tackle nutrition in a very structured nor consistent way. It does say something about consumption and household spending, but hardly anything about nutrition or malnutrition.

In order to be able to improve the nutrition element in the document it would be helpful to have a look at the following documents:

• The UNSCN statement on nutrition security of urban populations: This provides a very useful overview of nutritional issues related to urban contexts:




http://www.unscn.org/files/Statements/August_31-_UNSCN_World_Urban_Forum_6-_Statement_final_3108_finalfinal.pdf

• In addition I would like you to refer to the Global Nutrition Report 2015, which has a chapter on food systems, comparing the risks and opportunities for nutrition if there is a shift from one system to another. E.g. a shift from Rural systems to more industrialised and urban systems: more highly processed foods but also more diverse range of foods

• The HLPE report about Social Protection for Food Security also gives a good overview that is relevant in an urbanising context

• Finally: The Framework for Action of the ICN2 provides useful elements about urbanisation and nutrition ( e.g. relation to lifestyles).

I am very much willing to comment on a further draft of the document.

Kind regards

Stineke Oenema

UNSCN Coordinator c/o Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00153 Rome, Italy

Website: www.unscn.org

48. Deborah Fulton, Facilitator of the discussion Dear all,

I’d like to thank all of you for sending your input on not only the background document for the CFS Forum on Urbanization, Rural Transformation and Implications for Food Security and Nutrition, but also your thoughts on this topic more broadly. As many of you highlighted, this is a broad framing of an issue which is very context specific in terms of the resulting implications and dynamics for achieving food security and nutrition.

Your contributions will help us to revise the background document and also to plan for the Forum at CFS43 where these issues will be discussed, together with the role of CFS going forward on this work. The revised version of the background document will be available in all languages on the official documents page of CFS43 in early September. Thank you again for taking the time to share your knowledge and experience on this important issue.

Best,

Deborah Fulton

CFS Secretary




http://www.unscn.org/



49. Vito Cistulli, FAO, Italy General Comments

1. The paper provides a comprehensive review of issues related to the subject matter. However, the rationale, the logical flow and the fluidity of the text require some improvements. This would help to strengthen the focus of the main points emerging from the literature, some of which may not necessarily related to urbanization and rural transformation unless explanation is provided of how they are linked. For instance, the third bullet point of the chapter “Points Emerging from the literature” reads Malnutrition has become more of an issue than undernutrition. What is exactly the nexus with urbanization and/or rural transformation? The same applies to the fifth bullet point, etc.

Detailed comments

2. Section on What do we mean when we refer to urbanization and rural transformation

• The first paragraph, last sentence, states that urbanization is largely the result of migration. As a matter of fact, as rightly recalled on page 7 of this report (last paragraph), the evidence shows that most of the increase of urban population is due to natural growth. It would be advisable to nuance this statement by saying that migration also contributes with a significant share although not necessarily the main cause of urbanization.

3. Section on What are the implications of the growing rural-urban linkages for food security and nutrition.

• The suggestions is to inform from the very beginning that the linkages are through three types of movements/flows: people (long term and temporary migrations but also commuting), services (financial, public administration, but also environmental services including landfills, landscape, etc.) and goods (food among other things, taking into account that food is not produced only in rural areas but often in urban areas where processing, packaging, distribution, etc. of agricultural products takes place). This makes the boundaries and distinction between rural and urban areas blurred.

• The current section only mentions the challenge of migration (second paragraph). To be consistent the text should address all the three categories and explain where are the challenges and opportunities for food systems and FSN.

• In principle this is explained in the third paragraph, which requires some further elaboration. How the linkages can impact on productivity, employment, diversity of availability/consumption, services.? Moreover, a challenge/opportunity that is missing in terms of the possible impacts on rural transformation and development is the environmental issue. Urban sprawl reduces agricultural land and increases (often good agricultural land), rural land is generally used for waste disposal. On the other hand, urban population appreciates rural services in terms of outdoor recreation, etc. These are also opportunities for rural employment generation and livelihood improvement.

• The definition of food systems (footnote 4) is very useful. What is the source? Please note however that as defined by the High Level Panel of Experts on food security and nutrition (HLPE) “a sustainable food system (SFS) is a food system that delivers food security and nutrition for all in such a way that the economic, social and environmental bases to generate food security and nutrition for future generations are not compromised”




4. Section on Consumption patterns/diet/nutrition.

• The last paragraph mentions environmental hazards as one of the possible factors threatening food safety and health. This is fine but how relevant is it in the context of urban-rural linkages? The same applies also to the lack of infrastructures. It would be interesting to know if they affect differently urban and rural areas. Maybe the focus should be placed on the urban markets and street food and the related risks associated with lack of hygiene, etc. The last paragraph is very important and should also be emphasized.

5. Section on Trade/markets/value chains

• Two things that require more attention when addressing trade, markets and value chains is the environmental footprint (vaguely mentioned in the report) and price transmission often overlooked. Though no clear conclusions can be drawn on how price transmission work in a value chain, there is sufficient evidence that producers are often residual in the distribution of margins within the chain due to a number of market failures (fragmentation, information asymmetry, etc.). In these situations, value chain, short or long can be efficient but do not help develop rural livelihoods and increase farmers’ income. This can apply to both short and long value chains.

6. Section on land use.

• Another aspect that should be considered is the impact of urbanization on land prices/values. Land prices may increase as a result of urbanization and in general of food demand. This is happening already. This can also be an opportunity for farmers and rural households provided that land rights are well defined.

7. Section on natural resources use

• This section could also include environmental factors such as pollution (gas emission, energy intensive activities, etc.), waste disposal, etc.. This is also an area where rural urban linkages are strong.

8. Section on Governance issues.

• Could be merged with the section on vertical and horizontal coordination.

9. Section on initiatives.

• You may also wish to include the Joint FAO, OECD, UNCDF initiative on Territorial Approach to FSN Policy and make reference to the publication Adopting a Territorial Approach to FSAN Policy (forth coming). The publication will be launched officially in April 2016.

50. Uchendu Chigbu, TU München, Germany RECEIVED THROUGH LAND PORTAL (HTTPS://LANDPORTAL.INFO) Addressing rural-rural linkages

I find "rural-rural" linkages or exchanges missing in the discussion on "territorial approaches" and/or "smart systems" in pages 17-19 of the Zero Draft. I will like to suggest the inclusion of rural-rural linkages or exchanges (or partnerships, interrelationships, cooperations) within the territorial or/and smart systems approaches.


https://landportal.info/



In the context of food security, it is important to recognize that rural areas have to be primarily food secure to contribute to broader food security at regional or national levels. And as different rural areas have different concentration of agricultural or food systems, they need to partner and link with each order to attain a more balanced security and then have a stronger potential for urban-rural cooperation. Although little or no research efforts have been dedicated to rural-rural linkages, it has been in operation and only need to be further sensitized as part of the broader picture.

In another way (and from a system perspective), what I am saying is that the "rural" and "urban" as two systems and internally driven by sub-systems such as "urban-urban" and "rural-rural" first. But in the case of "rural" where the primary food sources are mostly generated, a "rural-urban" system that is not supported by a "rural-rural" system will not be sustainable to rural transformation, hence, will not have the best impact on global Food Security and Nutrition.

"Tenure security" and "tenure responsive land use planning"

The entire 26-page document has no word or phrase like "tenure security" or "land tenure security". Land use planning and land tenure security can provide strong links on how the issues mentioned in the Zero Draft can connect to food security.

Tenure security is directly connected to food security. Considering that most developing countries and rural areas depend largely on land-based activities and/or natural resources for their food security attainment, it will be good to mention the need to make land tenure more secure.

Concerning land use, let's give a thought to "tenure responsive land use planning" -that is conducting land use planning in ways that lead to tenure security improvement, hence, will have a high impact on food security.

51. Simone Borelli, FAO, Italy Zhuhai Declaration: make forests and trees central to Asia-Pacific's future urban planning "We wish to send a message... reaffirming our belief that forests and trees in and around cities are the key element to make cities in the Asia-Pacific region greener, healthier and happier and more resilient to climate change..." is one of the key statements in the Zhuhai Declaration, the outcome document of the First Asia-Pacific Urban Forestry Meeting, which calls for large-scale urban greening to improve the lives and livelihoods of citizens in the region's rapidly growing cities.

Read more in the meeting summary of the First Asia-Pacific Urban Forestry Meeting, co-organized by FAO, the Urban Forestry Research Center of the State Forestry Administration of the People's Republic of China, and the host city of Zhuhai, from 6 to 8 April, and read more about FAO's work on Urban and Peri-urban Forestry.


http://forestry.fao.msgfocus.com/c/17OZcNoPlAoncO

http://forestry.fao.msgfocus.com/c/17OZd6x08YjZGN

http://forestry.fao.msgfocus.com/c/17OZdpFaWmfCaM

http://forestry.fao.msgfocus.com/c/17OZdpFaWmfCaM

Urbanization, Rural Transformation and Implications for...

Documents

Transcript of Urbanization, Rural Transformation and Implications for...