Updated Stall Procedure

21
Update on stall procedure May 2011 17th Performance and Operations Conference Presented by Xavier LESCEU – Test Pilot & Operational Expert Pilot 17 th Performance and Operations Conference in Dubai

description

New Stall recovery procedure

Transcript of Updated Stall Procedure

Page 1: Updated Stall Procedure

Update on stall procedure

May 201117th Performance and Operations Conference

Presented byXavier LESCEU – Test Pilot & Operational Expert Pilot

17th Performance and Operations Conference in Dubai

Page 2: Updated Stall Procedure

© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.

Contents

May 201117th Performance and Operations Conference

Stall phenomenon1

AoA control2

Stall recovery3

New procedure4

Conclusion5

Page 3: Updated Stall Procedure

© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.

Aerodynamic Review

Page 3

For a given configuration, a given speed and a given altitude,

Lift is only linked to AoA

For a given aircraft configuration and speed

An aircraft stalls for a given AoA

May 201117th Performance and Operations Conference

Page 4: Updated Stall Procedure

© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.

Stall

• A loss of speed can result in an aircraft reaching the stall AoA

• BUT it remains an AoA issue

Stall is only an AoA problemLow speed is a common contributing factor

Page 4

May 201117th Performance and Operations Conference

Page 5: Updated Stall Procedure

© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.

Contents

May 201117th Performance and Operations Conference

Stall phenomenon1

AoA control2

Stall recovery3

New procedure4

Conclusion5

Page 6: Updated Stall Procedure

© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.

AoA Control – Pitch control effect

The pitch control is a direct AoA commandThe elevators control DIRECTLY the AoA.

A nose down command has an IMMEDIATE effect :

AoA

CG

Page 6

Nose down command ⇒ AoA decrease

May 201117th Performance and Operations Conference

Page 7: Updated Stall Procedure

© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.

AoA Control – Thrust effect

• Aircraft with engines below the aircraft Center of Gravity⇒Thrust has a significant pitch effect

Thrust increase ⇒ AoA increase

CG

Thrust increase

AoA

Page 7

May 201117th Performance and Operations Conference

Page 8: Updated Stall Procedure

© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.

Contents

May 201117th Performance and Operations Conference

Stall phenomenon1

AoA control2

Stall recovery3

New procedure4

Conclusion5

Page 9: Updated Stall Procedure

© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.

Stall Recovery When Aircraft is stalled

• FIRST: AoA MUST BE REDUCED• Release back pressure on stick or column

• Nose down pitch input may be needed

Note : Increasing thrust has an adverse effect on AoA reduction for Aircraft with engines below aircraft CG

• SECOND: If speed needs to be recovered• When stall indications cease, increase thrust with care due to

possible pitch up effect

AoA comes first, speed second

Page 9

May 201117th Performance and Operations Conference

Page 10: Updated Stall Procedure

© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.

A380 Stall in flight testMay 201117th Performance and Operations Conference

Page 11: Updated Stall Procedure

© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.

Approach to Stall v/s Stall

Approach to Stall

• Stall indications already presentArtificial stall warningsSome natural stall warning indications may be present

• Progressive airflow separation

• Trajectory controllable with decreasing margin for manoeuvring

Page 11

Stall

• Stall indications Artificial stall warningsNatural stall warnings

BuffetingLack of pitch authorityLack of Roll controlInability to arrest descent

• Airflow separated from wing

• Trajectory no longer controllable

The change from approach to stall v/s actual stall is not easy to determine, even for a specialist.

May 201117th Performance and Operations Conference

Page 12: Updated Stall Procedure

© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.

Approach to Stall v/s Stall recovery procedure

• The classic recovery procedure associated with “Approach to stall” was characterized by a recovery focusing on:

Maximum thrust application

Minimum loss of altitude

• Whereas the recovery procedure from an “Actual stall” has always focused on:

AoA reduction as first action, followed by a speed recovery if needed

Page 12

May 201117th Performance and Operations Conference

Page 13: Updated Stall Procedure

© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.

Need for procedure change• Drawbacks associated with this dual recovery approach are:

TOGA application may lead to an increase of the AoAReluctance to apply nose down inputChallenge to identify the change from “Approach to stall” to “Actual stall”

• Numerous accidents where the “Approach to Stall” recovery procedurewas applied whereas the aircraft was actually stalledor generated a stall through thrust effect

Page 13

A single procedure focusing on AoA reduction, as a first action, required to cover both

the “Approach to Stall” and the “Actual Stall” recovery:

It is called the “Stall Recovery” procedure

May 201117th Performance and Operations Conference

Page 14: Updated Stall Procedure

© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.

Contents

May 201117th Performance and Operations Conference

Stall phenomenon1

AoA control2

Stall recovery3

New procedure4

Conclusion5

Page 15: Updated Stall Procedure

© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.

New Procedure

•The FAA Stall Recovery Working Group issued a generic “Stall Recovery” procedure • A generic procedure for ALL types of aircraft

• One single procedure to cover ALL stall conditions

• Prevent full thrust/TOGA from being first action

• Focus on AoA reduction

Page 15

May 201117th Performance and Operations Conference

Page 16: Updated Stall Procedure

© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.

Generic Stall Recovery Procedure

STALL WARNING OR AERODYNAMIC STALL RECOVERY PROCEDURE

Immediately do the following at the first indication of stall (buffet, stick shaker, stick pusher, or aural or visual indication) during any flight phases except at lift off.

1. Autopilot and autothrottle…………………………….…… Disconnect

Rationale: While maintaining the attitude of the aircraft, disconnect the autopilot and autothrottle. Ensure the pitch attitude does not change adversely when disconnecting the autopilot. This may be very important in mis-trim situations. Manual control is essential to recovery in all situations. Leaving one or the other connected may result in in-advertent changes or adjustments that may not be easily recognized or appropriate, especially during high workload situations.

Page 16

May 201117th Performance and Operations Conference

Page 17: Updated Stall Procedure

© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.

Generic Stall Recovery Procedure

2. a) Nose down pitch control… Apply until out of stall (no longer have stall indications)b) Nose down pitch trim…….………………………………………..As needed

Rationale: a) The priority is reducing the angle of attack. There have been numerous situations where flight crews did not prioritize this and instead prioritized power and maintaining altitude. This will also address autopilot induced full back trim.

b) If the control column does not provide the needed response, stabilizer trim may be necessary. However, excessive use of trim can aggravate the condition, or may result in loss of control or in high structural loads.

3. Bank………………………….…………………………………….….Wings Level

Rationale: This orientates the lift vector for recovery.

Page 17

May 201117th Performance and Operations Conference

Page 18: Updated Stall Procedure

© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.

Generic Stall Recovery Procedure

4. Thrust ……………………………………………………………….. As Needed

Rationale: During a stall recovery, many times maximum power is not needed. When stalling, the thrust can be at idle or at high thrust, typically at high altitude. Therefore, the thrust is to be adjusted accordingly during the recovery. For engines installed below the wing, applying maximum thrust can create a strong nose up pitching moment, if speed is low. For aircraft with engines mounted above the wings, thrust application creates a helpful pitch down tendency. For propeller driven aircraft, thrust application energizes the air flow around the wing, assisting in stall recovery.

5. Speed Brakes…………………….………………………………………. Retract

Rationale: This will improve lift and stall margin.

6. Return to the desired flight path.

Rationale: Apply gentle action for recovery to avoid secondary stalls then return to desired flight path.

Page 18

May 201117th Performance and Operations Conference

Page 19: Updated Stall Procedure

© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.

Contents

May 201117th Performance and Operations Conference

Stall phenomenon1

AoA control2

Stall recovery3

New procedure4

Conclusion5

Page 20: Updated Stall Procedure

© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.

Conclusion

•Working together with other aircraft manufacturers, we have:

Agreed the principle with the FAA Stall Recovery Working GroupIssued a harmonized procedure focusing on AoAreduction as a first action

•The procedure was published mid-May 2010 and the corresponding FCTM end of May 2010.

Page 20

May 201117th Performance and Operations Conference

Page 21: Updated Stall Procedure

© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.

May 201117th Performance and Operations Conference

© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. This document and all information contained herein is the sole property of AIRBUS S.A.S. No intellectual property rights are granted by thedelivery of this document or the disclosure of its content. This document shall not be reproduced or disclosed to a third party without the express written consent of AIRBUS S.A.S. This document and its content shall not beused for any purpose other than that for which it is supplied. The statements made herein do not constitute an offer. They are based on the mentioned assumptions and are expressed in good faith. Where the supportinggrounds for these statements are not shown, AIRBUS S.A.S. will be pleased to explain the basis thereof.AIRBUS, its logo, A300, A310, A318, A319, A320, A321, A330, A340, A350, A380, A400M are registered trademarks.