Updated: November 3, 2009
description
Transcript of Updated: November 3, 2009
NYC Progress Reports for High Schools
Updated: November 3, 2009
2
High School Progress Reports
1. Purpose and Background
2. Overview of Progress Reports
a. Metrics
b. Peer / City Horizons
3. Confirmed Changes for the 2008-09 Progress Reports
4. Calculations of HS Progress Report measures
5. Appendix – Tools and Resources
3
WH
AT EVALUATE
ENFORCE CONSEQUENCES
ENABLE
HO
W
Progress ReportsGrades based on student outcomes
Quality ReviewsScores based on performance management criteria
Learning Environment SurveyParent, teacher, and student surveys about school environment
Federal and State EvaluationMeasures of schools’ Adequate Yearly Progress and accountability standing
Rewards Monetary bonuses
ConsequencesImmediate restructuring of chronically failing schools. Target setting for other D/F schools; if no improvement, leadership change after 2 and closure after 4 years
Aligned MechanismsCity and SSO performance targets, Principals’ Performance Review and bonuses, school-wide teacher performance bonuses
Periodic Assessments Diagnose and track progress
Achievement Reporting and Innovation System (ARIS)Fully integrated knowledge and data management
Children First IntensiveHands-on data training through Inquiry Teams
Knowledge ManagementSupport structures and tools for collaboration and knowledge sharing
School Accountability for NYC schools
4
Progress Report Guiding Principles
• Measure student outcomes as accurately as possible given the different challenges schools face
• Ensure that schools can verify and re-create metrics so schools understand how they are measured and how they can improve their performance
• Compare school performance to that of “peer schools” (schools serving similar student populations) and all schools Citywide
• Be criterion-referenced, not norm-referenced (all schools know their targets, the cut-offs for each grade, and can receive an A if they make significant progress)
• Produce outcomes that are not correlated with socioeconomic status, Special Education populations, or other demographic characteristics
• Incorporate direct input from parents, teachers, and students
5
Progress Report Overview
The Progress Report measures:
• Longitudinal progress with students (to and beyond proficiency)
• Mastery by all students of state learning standards as required by state and federal (NCLB) law
• Student attendance in school
• Closing of the achievement gap for high need populations
• Desired conditions for learning as assessed by hundreds of thousands of parents, teachers, and students
• Student readiness for high school (and ultimately) college success
• High school graduation and progress toward high school graduation
5
6
54.7%
81.1%
93.2%
Longitudinal progress to and beyond proficiency is directly related to success in high school and after
Progress Reports have been developed for most general education schools
• The first official Progress Reports were released in Fall 2007 (evaluating the 2006-2007 school year)• Elementary/Middle Schools (EMS)• High Schools (HS)• Transfer Schools (HST)
• Progress Reports for YABCs and Early Childhood schools have been developed and are currently slotted for the first official release in Fall 2009 (evaluating the 2008-2009 school year)
• Progress Reports for other school types, such as D75 and D79, are still under development
7Note: The “09 Progress Reports” refer to the Progress Reports that evaluate the 2008-09 school year
8
An evolving process
• After the 2006-07 release, we gathered feedback on the Progress Reports from Principals, parents, CSA, UFT, Panel for Educational Policy, School Support Organizations, and many other parties
• Based on this feedback, we made several changes to the Progress Reports for 2007-08
• We also held feedback sessions after the 2007-08 release; however, in an effort to provide stability to schools, only minor modifications were made to the Progress Reports for 2008-09
• Changes for the 2009-2010 release will be announced later this Fall
9
High School Progress Reports
1. Purpose and Background
2. Overview of Progress Reports
a. Metrics
b. Peer / City Horizons
3. Confirmed Changes for the 2008-09 Progress Reports
4. Calculations of HS Progress Report measures
5. Appendix – Tools and Resources
10
Progress Report (page 1)
Three ways of evaluating schools1. Progress Report grade2. Quality Review score3. NYS Education, Federal
Accountability Status
11
Progress Report Categories and ScoringGrade and
Overall ScoreOut of 100 points
(front page)
School Environment
15 points
Student Performance
25 points
Student Progress
60 points
Additional Credit
Up to 15 points
• Learning Environment Survey results
• Attendance
• Student test scores in ELA and Math (median proficiency and % Level 3/4)
• Student progress on ELA and Math test scores (avg. change and % making progress)
• Graduation rates (4-year and 6-year)
• Exemplary progress on test scores with high need students
• Exemplary progress in credit gains with high need students
• Learning Environment Survey results
• Attendance
• Credit accumulation
• Regents completion and pass rates
Elementary, Middle, and K-8 Schools
High Schools
12
High School Progress Reports
1. Purpose and Background
2. Overview of Progress Reports
a. Metrics
b. Peer / City Horizons
3. Confirmed Changes for the 2008-09 Progress Reports
4. Calculations of HS Progress Report measures
5. Appendix – Tools and Resources
13
School Environment – Surveys + Attendance
1. Academic Expectations
2. Communication
3. Engagement
4. Safety and Respect
School surveys tell us about the learning environment at each school. Survey results contribute 10 points to the Progress Report. Student attendance contributes another 5 points.
School Community
Parents Teachers
Students
14
EMS Student Performance and Progress
200
800
Scaled scores
State ELA and Math tests are graded on a scale of 200 to 800
Performance levels
The State decides what scaled scores correspond to each
performance level (1, 2, 3, or 4)
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Level 4
Proficiency Ratings
The City uses a more precise translation to distinguish among
students at each performance level
4.00 – 4.50
3.00 – 3.99
2.00 – 2.99
1.00 – 1.99Not meeting learning standards
Partially meeting learning standards
Meeting learning standards
Meeting learning standards with distinction
Proficiency
The Progress Report rewards progress for students at all levels of performance
Different cohorts of students Same cohorts of students
15
Imagine there are 20 3rd Graders at Gotham Elementary School
1
2 3
4
5 6
7
89 10
12
1315
11
1614
191817
20
Level 4 (Advanced)
Level 3 (Proficient)
Level 2
Level 1
1.00
2.99
3.00
2.00
1.99
4.50
4.00
3.99
• 20% (4 out of 20) of the 3rd Graders at Gotham ES are Proficient or Advanced
• If all we measured were Student Achievement, this would be the only measurement that would matter (and students 4-6 would be the main focus of attention)
16
These 20 students are now 4th Graders at Gotham Elementary School
1
2 3
45 6
7
89 10
12
1315
11
1614
191817
20
Level 4 (Advanced)
Level 3 (Proficient)
Level 2
Level 1
1.00
2.99
3.00
2.00
1.99
4.50
4.00
3.99
• The following year, when these students are 4th Graders, two more students are Level 3 and now 30% of students are Proficient or Advanced
17
2.00
1.99
• When these students are 5th Graders, 30% of students are still scoring at Levels 3 & 4, but…
Some of the students who scored at Levels 3 & 4 last year improve even more
Some of the students who
scored at Level 2 last year
improve within Level 2
Some of the students who
scored at Level 1 last year improve
to Level 2 or within Level 1
Finally, these students become 5th Graders at Gotham Elementary School
1.00
2.99
3.00
4.50
4.00
3.99
Level 4 (Advanced)
Level 3 (Proficient)
Level 2
Level 1
1
2 3 45 6
7
89
101213
15
11
16
14
191817
20
18
HS Student Performance and ProgressWe measure graduation rates as well as the key performance
indicators that track progress toward graduation
CreditsCredits
Credits
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3Graduation
• Advanced Regents Diploma with Honors
• Advanced Regents Diploma
• Regents Diploma
• Local Diploma
• GED
Regents(completion and pass rates)
English
Math
U.S. History
Global Studies
Science
+
19
High School: Weighted Regents Pass Rates
More weight is given to students with lower proficiency based on
the 8th grade New York State tests
The Weighted Regents Pass Rates measure progress made since the 8th grade ELA, Math, Science, and Social Studies tests
“Expected” Regents pass rate based on
8th grade proficiency
(%)
100%
90%
33%25%
1 2Decile
9 10
Weight 1.0 1.1 3.0 4.0
Illustrative
20
Closing the Achievement Gap
• We award schools “additional credit” for closing the achievement gap with high need populations
• Elementary/Middle/K-8 Schools earn additional credit through exemplary gains on State tests with their high need populations
• High Schools earn additional credit through exemplary gains based on credit accumulation and Regents results with their high need populations
1. English Language Learners
2. Special Education Students
3. Hispanic Students who are in the Lowest Third Citywide
4. Black Students who are in the Lowest Third Citywide
5. Other Students who are in the Lowest Third Citywide
5 NCLB Populations
The Progress Report rewards schools that close the achievement gap
21
High School Progress Reports
1. Purpose and Background
2. Overview of Progress Reports
a. Metrics
b. Peer / City Horizons
3. Confirmed Changes for the 2008-09 Progress Reports
4. Calculations of HS Progress Report measures
5. Appendix – Tools and Resources
22
Peer groups
• A peer group is a group of schools with similar student populations that serve approximately the same grade levels
> For elementary and K-8 schools, peer groups are determined based on a comparison of student demographics across schools
> For middle schools, peer groups are determined based on a comparison of student performance on ELA and Math test scores
> For high schools, peer groups are determined based on a comparison of student performance on ELA and Math test scores as well as student demographics
• Peer groups consist of up to 40 schools serving approximately the same grade levels (i.e., elementary schools have only other elementary schools in their peer group; same goes for middle schools, K-8 schools, and high schools)
• Each school has a unique peer group (so each school can be in the middle of its peer group)
23
Comparing results across peer schools and the City
Peer Horizon Scores(count 3X – 75%)
• Each school’s performance is compared to the performance of schools in its peer group
• The “Peer Horizon” is the range of outcomes achieved by the peer group (i.e., the top and the bottom score in the peer group for each measure)
City Horizon Scores(count once – 25%)
• Each school’s performance is also compared to the performance of all schools Citywide
• The “City Horizon” is the range of outcomes achieved by all schools Citywide (i.e., the top and the bottom score in the City for each measure)
The Peer Horizon scores count three times as much as the City Horizon scores because we want to emphasize the relative
performance of schools with similar student populations.
24
Example: Attendance (Peer Horizon)
School A has an attendance rate of 90%
• The attendance rates for schools in School A’s peer group ranged from 85% to 95%
• School A scored exactly in the middle between the lowest and highest score in its peer group
• Therefore, School A’s Peer Horizon score would be 50%
85% 95%90%
School A’s attendance is 50% of the distance
between the lowest and highest scores in its peer
group
50%
Lowest peer score*
Highest peer score*
Note: Minimums and maximums are established using +/- 2 standard deviations from the mean
25
School A has an attendance rate of 90%
• The attendance rates for all schools Citywide ranged from 80% to 95%
• School A scored exactly two thirds of the way from the lowest to the highest score among City schools
• Therefore, School A’s City Horizon score would be 67%
80% 95%90%
School A’s attendance is 67% of the distance
between the lowest and highest scores among City
schools
67%
Lowest City score*
Highest City score*
Note: Minimums and maximums are established using +/- 2 standard deviations from the mean
Example: Attendance (City Horizon)
.75 x (.50) + .25 x (.67) = .54
26
Example: Attendance Metric (5 points)
90%
85% 95%
50%
Peer Min* Peer Max*
Note: Minimums and maximums are established using +/- 2 standard deviations from the mean
80% 95%
67%
City Min* City Max*
counts for 75% counts for 25%
Weighted horizon score
.54 x 5 points = 2.7 Total points earned for attendance
Your School Relative to City Horizon:Your School Relative to Peer Horizon:
Your School’s Score:
27
High School Progress Reports
1. Purpose and Background
2. Overview of Progress Reports
a. Metrics
b. Peer / City Horizons
3. Confirmed Changes for the 2008-09 Progress Reports
4. Calculations of HS Progress Report measures
5. Appendix – Tools and Resources
28
1. Weighted Regents Pass Rates for students without 8th grade test scores
2. Student attendance
Confirmed changes to the High School Progress Report
29
More weight is given to students with lower
proficiency based on the 8th grade New York State tests
“Expected” Regents pass rate
based on 8th grade proficiency
(%)
100%
90%
33%
25%
10 9 Decile2 1
Illustrative
1.0 1.1 3.0 4.0Weight
• These measures award credit to schools for students who pass a Regents exam (with a 65 or higher), where the amount of credit is based on the student’s starting proficiency (i.e., a school receives more credit for helping a lower-performing student pass the exam)
• Students are assigned to a “decile” based on their 8 th grade proficiency in that subject (in previous years, students without 8th grade test scores were excluded from these measures; see following slides for how we will incorporate these students this year)
Change #1: Weighted Regents Pass Rates for students without 8th grade test scores
30
This year, students with missing 8th grade test scores will be assigned a “decile equivalent” based on their demographics
• Each student will be assigned a weight, which is a function of his demographic characteristics
• The weights are derived using the following system:
Demographic characteristic
Weight
Black/Hispanic +1
Free Lunch +1
Special Education +2
English Language Learner
+2(English Regents only)
Students with interrupted formal education (SIFE)
+1(English Regents only)
• Weight of zero (for English) – not B/H, not Free Lunch, not Special Education, not ELL
• Weight of seven (for English) – B/H, Free lunch, Special Education, ELL, SIFE
31
Student weight
Probability of passing
“Decile” points
0 89% 1.12
1 77% 1.31
2 70% 1.44
3 53% 1.97
4 49% 2.03
5 35% 2.86
6 19% 5.21
7 10% 10.00
• For students without 8th grade test scores, “decile” points are based on the historical pass rates of each demographic group (represented by students who have the same weight)
Illustrative
Probabilities of passing and “decile” weights – English Regents
32
Probabilities of passing and “decile” weights – Other Regents
Illustrative
Probability of Passing (based on historical pass rates)
“Decile” points
33
Change #2: Student Attendance
• We wanted to ensure that no school’s attendance outcome was adversely affected by the H1N1 virus
• Therefore, the 2008-09 Progress Report will only measure attendance up through April 30th, 2009
34
High School Progress Reports
1. Purpose and Background
2. Overview of Progress Reports
a. Metrics
b. Peer / City Horizons
3. Confirmed Changes for the 2008-09 Progress Reports
4. Calculations of HS Progress Report measures
5. Appendix – Tools and Resources
35
Calculations of Progress Report measures
• School Environment
– Survey scores
– Attendance
• Student Performance (4-year and 6-year)
– Graduation rate
– Weighted diploma rate
• Student Progress (ELA and Math)
– Percentage of students earning 10+ credits (in year 1, year 2, year 3)
– Percentage of students in the school’s lowest third earning 10+ credits (in year 1, year 2, year 3)
– Average completion rate for remaining Regents
– Weighted Regents pass rate (English, Math, Science, U.S. History, Global History)
36
School Environment (15 points)
• Survey scores – same measures as last year; 2.5 points each for four survey categories
– Academic Expectations
– Communication
– Engagement
– Safety and Respect
• Attendance – the total number of days attended by all students divided by the total number of days on the school’s register for all students (data can be reviewed using the RGAR screen in ATS); includes the attendance for all students on a school’s register at any point during the school year (September through June); 5 points
37
Student Performance (25 points)• Graduation rates are based on the graduation outcomes of all students in a
school’s graduation cohort
• The following criteria are used to determine a student’s cohort
– General Education students and any Special Education student who is not NYSAA-eligible: these students enter a cohort based on their 9th grade entry year
– Special Education students who are NYSAA-eligible: these students enter a cohort upon turning 17
• Students are attributed to the last diploma-granting school they attend prior to June 30th of their 4th year of high school
• The 4-year graduation rate reflects the number of students in the school’s 2005 cohort who graduate by August 2009 divided by the total number of students in the school’s 2005 cohort
• The 6-year graduation rate reflects the number of students in the school’s 2003 cohort who graduate by August 2009 divided by the total number of students in the school’s 2003 cohort
• GEDs and IEP diplomas are not included in the graduation rates, but are included in the weighted diploma rates
38
Student Performance (25 points)
Diploma TypeGraduation
Weight
With CTE-Endorsed Diploma
With Advanced
Designation in Arts
With Associates
Degree
GED 0.5 NA NA NA
IEP 1.0(NYSAA only)
NA NA NA
Local 1.0 1.5 NA 1.5
Regents 2.0 2.5 2.5 2.5
Advanced Regents 2.5 3.0 3.0 3.0
Advanced Regents with Honors
3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Graduation weights in ‘Weighted Diploma Rates’
Note: any weight in blue is doubled for a Special Education student or student who enters high school two or more years over-age
39
Student Progress (60 points) – Credits• Credit measures look at the percentage of students in year 1, year 2, and year 3 that earn
10 or more credits in that year (September through August)
• Students are attributed to schools on a semester basis using the following criteria
– Fall semester – a student must be on a school’s register as of January 1, 2009
– Spring semester – a student must be on a school’s register as of June 1, 2009
– Summer period – a student must be on a school’s register as of June 1, 2009
• If a student is on different school registers as of January 1 and June 1, that student’s outcome (10+ credits?) is shared 50% for each school. If a student is not on a school’s register on either January 1 or June 1, that student is excluded from the measure
• For the lowest third measures, students are assigned to the lowest third based on their average ELA and Math 8th grade proficiency. If a student only has one 8th grade test, we use that as the student’s proficiency. If a student does not have an ELA OR Math 8 th grade test, that student cannot qualify for the school’s lowest third
• Note: “year” is not equivalent to “grade” for these measures. A student who repeats 9 th grade would count in the “year 2” measure because it would be the student’s second year of high school
• Note: a student who drops out of a high school and does not re-enroll at another high school counts as earning zero credits until he finishes his “4 th year”, at which time he is no longer included in the credit measures
40
Activity – Total credits earned for credit measures
StudentFall
creditsSpring credits
Summer credits
Total credits
10+ credits?
(yes/no/NA)
A 6 6 0 12 Yes
B 4 5 0
C 5 4 1
D 3 5 1
E 4 6 0
F 7 2 0
G 3 4 3
H 6 0 0
Example of credit determinations(from the perspective of school 01M999)
41
StudentFall
creditsSpring credits
Summer credits
Total credits
10+ credits?
(yes/no/NA)
A 6 6 0 12 Yes
B 4 5 0 9 No
C 5 4 1 10 Yes
D 3 5 1 9 No
E 4 6 0 10 Yes
F 7 2 0 9 No
G 3 4 3 10 Yes
H 6 0 0 6 No
Example of credit determinations(from the perspective of school 01M999)
Activity – Total credits earned for credit measures
42
Activity – Attribution of students for credit measures
StudentDBN from
1/1/09DBN from
6/1/09
Weight for school 01M999
(100%/50%/0%)
A 01M999 01M999 100%
B 01M999 01M999
C 01M999 01M999
D 01M999 01M999
E 01M999 01M000
F 01M999 01M000
G 01M111 01M999
H 01M999 NA
Example of student attribution and weights for credit measures(from the perspective of school 01M999)
43
Activity – Attribution of students for credit measures
StudentDBN from
1/1/09DBN from
6/1/09
Weight for school 01M999
(100%/50%/0%)
A 01M999 01M999 100%
B 01M999 01M999 100%
C 01M999 01M999 100%
D 01M999 01M999 100%
E 01M999 01M000 50%
F 01M999 01M000 50%
G 01M111 01M999 50%
H 01M999 NA 0%
Example of student attribution and weights for credit measures(from the perspective of school 01M999)
44
Student Progress (60 points) – Regents
• The “Average Completion Rate for Remaining Regents” tracks a student’s progress toward passing (with a 65 or higher) the five core subject area Regents exams required for graduation with a Regents Diploma
• The five core subject areas are: ELA, Math, Science, U.S. History, and Global History
• If a student has already passed a Regents exam subject area, then passing additional exams in that subject area is irrelevant for this measure (i.e., if a student has previously passed the Math A Regents, any additional passes of either the Math A, Math B, or Integrated Algebra exam do not count for this measure)
• Students are not included in this measure until they are in their second year of high school
• As with credits, students are attributed to a school on a semester basis; if a student is on separate registers as of January 1 and June 1, his contribution to this measure is shared between the two schools (e.g., 50% of the numerator and 50% of the denominator goes to both schools)
• Note: a student who drops out of a high school and does not re-enroll at another high school counts as passing zero Regents per year until the end of his “4 th year”, at which time he is no longer included in this measure
45
Student Progress (60 points) – Regents
InformationStudents in their first year of HS
Students in their second year of HS
Students in their third year of HS
Students in their fourth year of
HS
Number of Regents still needed to
pass (denominator)
Excluded 5 minus number of Regents
subjects passed prior to high
school
5 minus number of Regents
subjects passed prior to third year
5 minus number of Regents
subjects passed prior to fourth
year
Number of Regents
passed this year
(numerator)
Excluded Number of Regents subjects
passed in first OR second year
of HS
Number of Regents subjects
passed in third year of HS
Number of Regents subjects passed in fourth
year of HS
• In general, we look at two pieces of information for each student
1. The number of Regents exams still needed to pass to graduate with a Regents diploma (a student’s contribution to the denominator)
2. The number of Regents exams passed in that school year (a student’s contribution to the numerator)
46
Example #1 – A student’s Regents history for ‘Average Completion Rate’ measure
Year of HS Regents outcomesNumber of Regents subjects passed in
this year
Number of Regents subjects still needed to pass at the start of the
year
1/2 Passed Global,Failed ELA,
Passed Math A
2 5
3 Passed ELA and Living Environment
2 3
4 Passed U.S. History 1 1
Regents history for one student
47
Example #2 – A student’s Regents history for ‘Average Completion Rate’ measure
Year of HS Regents outcomes Subjects PassedNumber of
Regents subjects passed in this year
Number of Regents subjects still needed to pass at the start of
the year
Pre-HS Passed Living Environment
Science NA NA
1 Passed Global,Failed Math A
Global NA NA
2 Failed ELA,Passed Math A
Math 2 4
3 Passed ELA and Chemistry
ELA 1 2
4 Passed U.S. History and Physics
U.S. History 1 1
Regents history for one student (from perspective of the high school)
48
Activity – A student’s Regents history for ‘Average Completion Rate’ measure
Year of HS Regents outcomes Subjects PassedNumber of
Regents subjects passed in this year
Number of Regents subjects still needed to pass at the start of
the year
Pre-HS Passed Integrated Algebra
1 Passed Living Environment
2 Failed Global
3 Passed Math BPassed Global
Failed ELA
4 Failed ELAPassed ELA
Passed U.S. HistoryPassed Chemistry
Regents history for one student (from perspective of the high school)
49
Activity – A student’s Regents history for ‘Average Completion Rate’ measure
Year of HS Regents outcomes Subjects PassedNumber of
Regents subjects passed in this year
Number of Regents subjects still needed to pass at the start of
the year
Pre-HS Passed Integrated Algebra
Math NA NA
1 Passed Living Environment
Science NA NA
2 Failed Global None 1 4
3 Passed Math BPassed Global
Failed ELA
Global 1 3
4 Failed ELAPassed ELA
Passed U.S. HistoryPassed Chemistry
ELAU.S. History
2 2
Regents history for one student (from perspective of the high school)
50
Student Progress (60 points) – Regents• The “Weighted Regents Pass Rate” measures award credit to schools for students that
pass a Regents exam (with a 65 or higher), where the amount of credit is based on the student’s starting proficiency (i.e., a schools receives more credit for helping a lower-performing student pass the exam). If a student’s starting proficiency is not available (i.e., missing 8th grade test score), the amount of credit is based on the student’s demographic characteristics
• There is one measure for each of the five Regents subject areas: ELA, Math, Science, U.S. History, and Global History
• Deciles are determined separately for all Regents exams (i.e., Chemistry deciles are different than Physics deciles, etc.)
• If a student takes the same exam more than once in the school calendar year (January through August administration), the highest exam score is used
• If a student has already passed a Regents exam, then passing that same Regents exam again (even with a higher score) or even failing that same Regents exam at a different time is irrelevant for this measure
• If a student takes a higher level Regents exam (e.g., Math B, Chemistry) and has already fulfilled the Regents requirement for that subject area (e.g., Math A, Living Environment), the results only count if they are positive (i.e., failing Math B after previously passing Math A does not count in the measure)
• As with credits, students are attributed to a school on a semester basis; January Regents are attributed to a school based on the student’s January 1 location; June and August Regents are attributed to a school based on the student’s June 1 location
51
Year of HS
Fall Regents outcomes
Spring Regents outcomes
Summer Regents outcome
Pass/Fail Outcome for Weighted Regents Pass
Rate measures
1 Math A – 57 Math A – 59 Math A – 65 Pass Math A
2 ELA – 45 ELA – 57 Math A – 78 Fail ELA
3 ELA – 68 Math B – 59 U.S. History – 67
Pass ELAPass U.S. History
4 Global – 75 Living Environment – 65
Math B – 72
U.S. History – 63
Pass GlobalPass Living EnvironmentPass Math B
Regents history for one student
Example – A student’s Regents history for ‘Weighted Regents Pass Rate’ measures
52
Year of HS
Fall Regents outcomes
Spring Regents outcomes
Summer Regents outcome
Pass/Fail Outcome for Weighted Regents Pass
Rate measures
1 Math A – 39 Living Environment – 62
Living Environment –
67
Fail Math APass Living Environment
2 Math A – 46 Living Environment – 75
Math A – 66ELA – 55
NA
3 ELA – 78 Chemistry – 45 Global – 67
4 U.S. History 78 Chemistry – 67Global – 62
NA
Regents history for one student
Activity – A student’s Regents history for ‘Weighted Regents Pass Rate’ measures
53
Year of HS
Fall Regents outcomes
Spring Regents outcomes
Summer Regents outcome
Pass/Fail Outcome for Weighted Regents Pass
Rate measures
1 Math A – 39 Living Environment – 62
Living Environment –
67
Fail Math APass Living Environment
2 Math A – 46 Living Environment – 75
Math A – 66ELA – 55
NA Pass Math AFail ELA
3 ELA – 78 Chemistry – 45 Global – 67 Pass ELAPass Global
4 U.S. History 78 Chemistry – 67Global – 62
NA Pass U.S. HistoryPass Chemistry
Regents history for one student
Activity – A student’s Regents history for ‘Weighted Regents Pass Rate’ measures
54
Student Fall DBNSpring DBN
Fall Regents outcome
Spring/Summer Regents outcome
Pass/Fail outcome for
01M999
Pass/Fail outcome for other school
1 01M999 01M999 Math A – 57 Math A – 59 Fail math NA
2 01M999 01M999 ELA – 45 ELA – 66
3 01M999 01M000 Global – 63 Global 65
4 01M999 01M000 Living Environment –
66
Living Environment – 64
5 01M000 01M999 U.S. History – 57
U.S. History – 59
Example of student attribution for Regents measure
Activity – Attribution of students for ‘Weighted Regents Pass’ measure
55
Student Fall DBNSpring DBN
Fall Regents outcome
Spring/Summer Regents outcome
Pass/Fail outcome for
01M999
Pass/Fail outcome for other school
1 01M999 01M999 Math A – 57 Math A – 59 Fail math NA
2 01M999 01M999 ELA – 45 ELA – 66 Pass ELA NA
3 01M999 01M000 Global – 63 Global 65 Fail Global Pass Global
4 01M999 01M000 Living Environment –
66
Living Environment – 64
Pass Living Environment
NA
5 01M000 01M999 U.S. History – 57
U.S. History – 59 Fail U.S. History
Fail U.S. History
Example of student attribution for Regents measure
Activity – Attribution of students for ‘Weighted Regents Pass’ measure
56
The point of all this?
To expand the sphere of success at every school
57
Contact us
• PR_Support at (212) 374-6646 or [email protected]
• Phil Vaccaro, Executive Director, School Performance, [email protected]
• Brook Fonzone, Implementation Manager, School Performance, DAAR [email protected]
58
High School Progress Reports
1. Purpose and Background
2. Overview of Progress Reports
a. Metrics
b. Peer / City Horizons
3. Confirmed Changes for the 2008-09 Progress Reports
4. Calculations of HS Progress Report measures
5. Appendix – Tools and Resources
59
A Progress Report Data File is sent to each school for data verification and potential inquiry work
60
A unique Progress Report Modeler is built for each school, allowing schools to simulate their scores
ARIS also provides schools with Progress Report information
61
For example, you can filter to view students in the Lowest Third Citywide
You can view the highest Regents score
each student has achieved by subject
Trainings are held throughout the year
62
The Progress Report website contains several public resources
63
http://schools.nyc.gov/Accountability/SchoolReports/ProgressReports/default.htm
1. Detailed result spreadsheets
2. Translation Guides 3. Educator Guides