Update: Revising Start/Soak Relationships for Light-Duty ... · 6/13/2018 · Emissions for...
Transcript of Update: Revising Start/Soak Relationships for Light-Duty ... · 6/13/2018 · Emissions for...
MOVES Motor Vehicle Emission Simulator
Update: Revising Start/Soak Relationships for Light-Duty Gaseous Emissions James Warila, Carl Fulper, Erin McCurry June 13, 2018
MOVES Review Work Group Meeting #8
Outline
• Background – Currently in MOVES
– Proposed revisions • Update to revisions presented at meeting (June 2017)
• Goal: update start/soak curves – Combine EPA and CARB data
• Analysis – PEMS results
– Dynamometer results
• Results – Compare PEMS, dyno results
– Development of revised curves
2
3
Background
• Currently in MOVES2014 – Start emissions calculated from FTP results
• “Cold Start” = Bag 1 – Bag 3 (g/start) – At “warm ambient” temperature
– “Operating mode” defined as “soak period” – Emission rates vary by soak period
• 0-6 min to 12+ hours
• Proposed update – Combine PEMS and dynamometer results
• PEMS testing by EPA – Presented at MRWG meeting, June 2017 – Updated with data for two additional vehicles
• Dyno testing by CARB – CARB test report: Page 117 of
https://www.arb.ca.gov/msei/downloads/emfac2017-volume-iii-technical-documentation.pdf
1.20
1.10
'
uu.•.•••••••••••••••i•• ••••••••••••••••••••••••••
1.00 ..
0.90 1:: (,:,
t;; 0.80 "C o 0.70 0 0
; 0.60
"' ti> 0 50 ~ . 0
.2 0.40 ~
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
0
..... , ·······t·······
~ ... ~:.~. ~trr-: I ~~ •.• :•·····r·•·········~······················ .~~t,,,-~t - 1 1 . . .....•.. . . . ~ . --~', .. - ... -~,,· .. ········r ········ __ ·•~if•_·· __ 7 ___ ··· 1:.- ~ NOx '·································
·- .. ... .. . ' ·-f-· ~ CO
········r· ········:1,.,,.···· · . . t ... -A- HC
------+,,,,.····· ······························ ~~ ............ •.•·······•:•.•······ · ===-=-=~r;==!r~:::---r-;,~~~ ·7~ 480 600 240 360
·· ····1· ·····
120
Soak Time (minutes)
Soak Curves in MOVES2014
Soak Fractions Applied to Cold-Start Emissions (opModeID = 108) to Estimate Emissions for Shorter Soak Periods (opModeID = 101-107)
Source: Sabate, S. Methodology for Calculating and Redefining Cold and Hot Start Emissions. California Air Resources Board, El Monte, CA. March 1996. Cited IN: Glover, E.; Carey, P. Determination of Start Emissions as a Function of Mileage and Soak time for 1981-1993 Model-year Light-Duty Vehicles. EPA 420-R-01-058. November, 2001.
4
New Data
• EPA in-house project – Measurement method (PEMS)
• Repeat drives on same route in Ann Arbor, MI with different soak periods
• Instrument: Sensors SEMTECH-DS • Covered in June 2017 presentation
– 6 vehicles • Tier 2 (5) and Tier 3 (1)
• Data obtained from CARB – Used in update for EMFAC2017 – Measurement method
• Dynamometer cycle aggregates (no “second-by-second” data) • California Unified cycle- Phase 1
– 32 LEV-II vehicles
5
Data Quality Analysis
• EPA PEMS Results – As discussed in June 2017 presentation, ensured capture of start
operation • Evaluated catalyst and oil temperatures, along with cumulative
emissions
• CARB Dynamometer Results – Assign to MOVES soak periods
– Verified that emission levels were comparable to PEMS results
• Analysis – Average g/start for each vehicle for each soak time
• See next slides
6
EPA
-C) -,.,, C 2 0 ,.,,
.!!? E w t:: ~ 1 -en ~ -0 ~
0
0 200 400 600 0 200 400 600 Soak Time (minutes)
+ AUDI 2010 A4 + HOND 2004 ACCORD DX + HOND 2009 FIT + TOTA 2007 SCION TC + 2009 CAMRY
+ BMW 2004 325i + HOND 2004 ACCORD LX + HYND 2006 SONATA + TOTA 2007 YARIS + 2009 EXPL
+ BMW 2005 325 i + HOND 2004 CRV + HYND 2007 ELANTRA + TOTA 2008 CAMRY XLE + 2009 OUTL
V h" I + CHRY 2007 CALIBER + HOND 2005 ACURA TL + MB 2005 C230 + TOTA 2008 ES350 + 2011 F150
e IC e + FORD 2004 FOCUS + HOND 2006 CIVIC + MB 2006 S500 + TOTA 2009 CAMRY + 2017 CAMRY
+ GM 2007 CTS + HOND 2006 ELEMENT + NISS 2009 SENTRA + TOTA 2009 COROLLA LE + 2017 F150
+ GM 2007 ION + HOND 2007 CIVI C + TOTA 2004 CAMRY LE + VOLK 2007 JETTA
+ GM 2008 MALIBU + HOND 2008 ACCORD + TOTA 2005 COROLLA + VOLV 2004 S60
THC: Average start emissions (g) by method and vehicle
7
EPA
2.0
-C) -,.,, C: 1.5 0 ,.,, ,.,, E W 1.0 ~ ns -Cl)
ns 0.5 -0 I-
0.0
0 200 400 600 0 200 400 600 Soak Time (minutes)
+ AUDI 2010 A4 + HOND 2004 ACCORD DX + HOND 2009 FIT + TOTA 2007 SCION TC + 2009 CAMRY
+ BMW 2004 325i + HOND 2004 ACCORD LX + HYND 2006 SONATA + TOTA 2007 YARIS + 2009 EXPL
+ BMW 2005 325 i + HOND 2004 CRV + HYND 2007 ELANTRA + TOTA 2008 CAMRY XLE + 2009 OUTL
• + CHRY 2007 CALIBER + HOND 2005 ACURA TL + MB 2005 C230 + TOTA 2008 ES350 + 2011 F150
Vehicle + FORD 2004 FOCUS + HOND 2006 CIVIC + MB 2006 S500 + TOTA 2009 CAMRY + 2017 CAMRY
+ GM 2007 CTS + HOND 2006 ELEMENT + NISS 2009 SENTRA + TOTA 2009 COROLLA LE + 2017 F150
+ GM 2007 ION + HOND 2007 CIVIC + TOTA 2004 CAMRY LE + VOLK 2007 JETTA
+ GM 2008 MALIBU + HOND 2008 ACCORD + TOTA 2005 COROLLA + VOLV 2004 S60
NOx: Average start emissions (g) by method and vehicle
8
-C) -en C: 0 ·- 10 en en E w t:= J9 5 Cl)
n, -0 l-
o
0
PEMS EPA
200 400 600 0 200 400 600 Soak Time (minutes)
+ AUDI 2010 A4 + HOND 2004 ACCORD DX + HOND 2009 FIT + TOTA 2007 SCION TC + 2009 CAMRY
+ BMW 2004 325i + HOND 2004 ACCORD LX + HYND 2006 SONATA + TOTA 2007 YARIS + 2009 EXPL
+ BMW 2005 325 i + HOND 2004 CRV + HYND 2007 ELANTRA + TOTA 2008 CAMRY XLE + 2009 OUTL
• + CHRY 2007 CALIBER + HOND 2005 AC URA TL + MB 2005 C230 + TOTA 2008 ES350 + 2011 F150
Vehicle + FORD 2004 FOCUS + HOND 2006 CIVIC + MB 2006 S500 + TOTA 2009 CAMRY + 2017 CAMRY
+ GM 2007 CTS + HOND 2006 ELEMENT + NISS 2009 SENTRA + TOTA 2009 COROLLA LE + 2017 F150
+ GM 2007 ION + HOND 2007 CIVIC + TOTA 2004 CAMRY LE + VOLK 2007 JETTA
+ GM 2008 MALIBU + HOND 2008 ACCORD + TOTA 2005 COROLLA + VOLV 2004 S60
15
CO: Average start emissions (g) by method and vehicle
9
Developing Soak Ratios
• Average mass results – By vehicle – By operating mode
• Correct for running-exhaust emissions – By subtracting result for 0-6 minute soak period – By vehicle – By operating mode
• Average results across vehicles – Separately for EPA and CARB fleets
• Calculate intermediate ratios – Normalize all soak periods to “cold start” – By dividing by the opModeID 108 emissions
• Calculate final ratios – Combine CARB and EPA results as a weighted average – By number of vehicles in each soak period
10
0.9
0.3
0.0
0 200 400 Soak Time (minutes)
600
Source + CARB
+ EPA
+ MOVES + EPA+ CARB Weighted Average
(with respect to number of vehicles)
THC: Proposed Soak Ratios
11
1
0
0 200 400 Soak Time (minutes)
600
Source + CARB
+ EPA
+ MOVES + EPA+ CARB Weighted Average
(with respect to number of vehicles)
3
NOx: Proposed Soak Ratios
12
:.:: ~ ~
1.00
0.75
~ 0.50 ~ 0 en
0.25
0.00
0 200 400 600 Soak Time (minutes)
Source + CARB
+ EPA
+ MOVES + EPA+ CARB Weighted Average
(with respect to number of vehicles)
0
CO: Proposed Soak Ratios
13
Summary and Conclusions
• Start/soak relationships differ from older results – NOx emissions highest at shorter soak periods
• We propose to update MOVES rates – For model years 2004 and later
– Using revised soak curves based on PEMS and Dyno data • For HC, CO, NOx
• Use HC curve for particulate matter (PM) rates, as we have done for MOVES2014
– For “warm” to “hot” starts only (opModeID 101-107)
– NOT updating Cold-start rates themselves (opModeID 108) • Still based on FTP results
14
Extra Slides
15
'.2 C. E :;- 20-Q) Q) C.
Cf) Q)
u E Q)
>
10-
o-
200 0
Soak Route Speed Profile
400 Trip Counter (seconds)
600
30-
EPA Drive Route
16
80
70
60 J: -~' ... 50
'a 0 0 0 a. 00
30
20
0
0 -I
0 .20 0 400 600 800
Tine, s
1000 ]200
Figure 1. Californ ia Unified cyc le- Phase 1 + 2
1 00
Speed Trace California Unified Cycle
Phase 1
17