Update on the Devonian Marcellus and Ordovician Utica ...
Transcript of Update on the Devonian Marcellus and Ordovician Utica ...
Update on the Regional Assessment of Gas Potential in the Devonian Marcellus and
Ordovician Utica Shales in New York
Richard Nyahay, James Leone, Langhorne Smith, John Martin, and Daniel Jarvie
Assessing unconventional shale gas plays in New York
• Identify high gas potential fairways using same geochemical methods applied to the Barnett and other successful shale gas plays
• These include TOC, vitrinite reflectance, hydrogen index and transformation ratios
• Create new structure and isopach maps of shale formations and potential gas producing intervals
Two Similar Black Shales: Devonian Marcellus and Ordovician Utica
• Deposition of both shalesfollowed lithosphericdownwarping associated with tectonic loading
• Both shales terminated by shallow shelf carbonates
• Both shales thicken to the east
The Ordovician Utica Shale
(Goldman, et al 1994)
Trenton Limestone in blue colors is time-equivalent to Utica Shale in brown colors: Primarily interested in Flat Creek and to a lesser
extent the Dolgeville Member
Tren
ton
Utic
a
Utica East-West Cross SectionU
tica
Dolgeville
Flat Creek
Trenton
Black River
Tren
ton
Utic
aTr
ento
n
Indian Castle
Utica Structure Contour Map
Utica gets deeper to the south
Utica Isopach Map
Utica formation thickens to the east
Utica Flat Creek Member
• Lowermost member of the Utica Formation• K-bentonites and graptolites used to match
key successions(Goldman, et al., 1994)• Dark gray to black, variably calcareous
shale with minor thin beds of argillaceous micrite and biomicrite (Lehmann, et al. 1995)
• Bounded by Dolgeville member on top
Utica - Flat Creek Member
Vertical calcite filled veins cutting Flat Creek Member in Chuctanunda Creek, Florida, NY
Utica Flat Creek Isopach Map
Utica Flat Creek member thickens to the southeast –In the end, this is likely to be the Utica Fairway map
Utica - Dolgeville Member
• Interpreted as a slope facies peripheral to the Trenton platform
• Tabular ribbon limestones and dark gray to black shale beds
• Several geochemically correlated K -bentonites• Bounded on top by Thruway unconformity • Slump folds occur immediately below the
unconformity• Folds are dominantly asymmetrical with a
westward vergence
Utica – Dolgeville Member
Asymmetrical slump fold in Dolgeville
Utica Dolgeville Isopach Map
Dolgeville thickens to southeast
Utica - Indian Castle Member
• Uppermost member of the Utica Formation blankets all of western NY
• Thin layers of fossil debris, phosphatic debris and quartz
• Condensed beds• K-bentonites used to match key successions• Sharp contact with underlying Steuben limestone,
more subtle contact where it overlies Dolgeville• Divided into the lower and upper sections
(Baird and Brett, 2002)
Utica - Lower Indian Castle Member
Characteristically hard, blocky shale with interbedded, tabular, impure limestone
Utica Upper Indian Castle
Monotonous fissile, black shale and silty black shale
Geochemical Study
• Using geochemistry in an attempt to define a general fairways for exploration in Utica and Marcellus
• Using the same Rock-Eval approach Jarvieet al used for the Barnett Shale
Used cuttings from 31 wells, and samples from 12 cores, 5 outcrops
Gas Production from Shales
• Gas production from tight shales requires maturation and cracking of oil that has been generated from live organic matter - need to have at least 2 percent TOC to begin with
• With increasing maturation carbon and hydrogen are lost from shale due to hydrocarbon generation
• Increasing thermal maturity therefore leads to decrease in TOC and hydrogen values
• Want shales with decent original TOC, with evidence that significant amounts of gas has formed from that TOC during thermal maturation
Geochemical Measurements
• TOC = Total organic carbon (%)• Live carbon including S1 (oil and gas present in
shale) and S2 (remaining kerogen)• Tmax = The temperature at peak evolution of S2
hydrocarbons from Rock Eval• Ro% = Vitrinite Reflectance (calculated from
Tmax)• HI= Hydrogen Index (S2 x100)/ TOC• TR= Transformation or conversion ratio calculated
from hydrogen index (HI)
Geochemical TOC Data
• Indian Castle < .5%• Dolgeville .5 - 1.5% • Flat Creek 1.5 - 3%
In Jarvie, et al., 2005 study TOC from cuttings were 2.36 times lower than samples from core; therefore this same dilution effect would be seen on other geochemical parameters
Productive shales are generally >2% TOC
Utica TOC Map
TOC increases to the SE as Utica (Flat Creek and Dolgeville members) also thickens in that direction
TOC Utica Cross Section
TOC increases in Dolgeville and increases more in the Flat Creek member
DispersedOrganicMatter:
the “source”of
oil + assoc. gas
Rock Sample
TOC
Live Carbon
Organic Matter (Kerogen)Oil
Gas
Total Organic Carbon (T.O.C.)
Dead Carbon
Dead Carbon
Rock-Eval TerminologyJarvie, 1991
TOC
Distribution of Organic Matter in Rock Sample (low maturity)
Live Carbon
Organic Matter (Kerogen)Oil
Gas
Total Organic Carbon (T.O.C.)
Dead Carbon
Dead Carbon
Oil Prone Gas Prone
S2 (and Tmax)S1 S4
Rock-Eval Terminology
Rock-Eval analysis - terminology
Jarvie, 1991
If S1 and S2 are very low, this means that almost all remaining carbon is dead carbon – the rock cannot and will not generate any more hydrocarbons
Rock-Eval or SR Analyzer “Pyrogram”
S1
S2
Tmax
Temperature trace (nonisothermalat 25oC/min)
300oC
600oC
Time (mins.)
Yield
S4
Jarvie, 1991
Oil gas present
Kerogen
•S1 = Free volatile hydrocarbons thermally flushed from a rock sample at 300°C•S2 =products that crack during standard Rock-Eval pyrolysis temperatures 300°C-
600°C
Rock-Eval or SR Analyzer “Pyrogram”
S1
S2
Tmax
Temperature trace (nonisothermalat 25oC/min)
300oC
600oC
Time (mins.)
Yield
S4
Jarvie, 1991
Oil gas present
Kerogen
In order to get a reliable Tmax, it is necessary that S2>S1 and the value of S2>0.2 - If S1>S2 or S2 has very low values (<0.2) that means that
there is very little remaining live carbon (kerogen or oil and gas)
432Tmax TOC S2 HI
5.21 19.80 380435 4.53 13.45 297437 4.11 10.27 250443 3.77 5.88 156455 3.41 1.81 53470 3.32 1.36 41
CONVERSIONTO OIL and
GAS
INCREASINGTHERMALMATURITY
89%36%
Remainingpotentialdecreases
Tmax increases
TOC HI
Experimental Conversion of Barnett Shale
Utica
2.3 <0.2 <10? Utica
Values so low it is hard to pick Tmax
Total Organic Carbon (TOC)
OMOilGas
Maturation of Organic Matter – modified from Jarvie
Total Organic Carbon (TOC)
O.M.OilGas
Dead Carbon
Dead Carbon
DeadCarbon
Total Organic Carbon (TOC)
OMOil Dead CarbonGas
Dead CarbonTotal Organic Carbon (TOC)
Dead Carbon
Utica Shale –almost all TOC dead carbon
Incr
ease
d M
atur
atio
n
Barnett Shale has samples with Barnett Shale has samples with range of maturation valuesrange of maturation values
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON (TOC, wt.%)
REM
AIN
ING
HYD
RO
CA
RB
ON
PO
TEN
TIA
L (m
g H
C/g
Roc
k)
Type I Oil Proneusu. lacustrine TYPE II Oil Prone
(usu. marine)
Mixed Type II / IIIOil / Gas Prone
Type IIIGas Prone
OrganicLean
DryGas Prone
Barnett ShaleMaturation
Trend
Utica Samples
Utica Tmax and Vitrinite Reflectance (Ro)
• Tmax is the temperature where S2 peaks• Because >95% of the S2 values in the Utica are too
low and/or <S1, the Tmax values are unreliable in the Utica Shale
• Tmax can be used in some cases to obtain a calculated value for vitirinite reflectance (Ro) by the formula Ro=0.0180*Tmax-7.16
• Because Tmax is unreliable in the Utica, it is not possible to calculate reliable values for Ro
Hydrogen Index
• Hydrogen Index (HI) is a calculation to determine the amount of hydrogen remaining in the shale
• HI = (S2*100)/TOC • HI decreases as thermal maturity increases
because S2 goes down• Again, S2 is uniformly very, very low in Utica so
the HI values largely driven by TOC –• Lower values are generally thought to be better in
Utica as they represent higher original TOC
Utica Flat Creek HI Map
Lowest values occur where TOC was highest in Flat Creek and Dolgeville
Artifact
Transformation Ratio
• Evaluates the conversion directly by measuring changes in the kerogen (organic matter) yields
• In order to calculate this ratio, you need the present day Hydrogen index (HIpd) and original Hydrogen index (HIo) (see Jarvie, et al., 2007 for formula)
• Areas with highest potential for production have values approaching 1, lower values = lower potential
Utica Flat Creek Transformation Ratio Map
Best TR values occur where the Flat Creek and Dolgeville occur – all of these values driven by higher TOC in those members
Wells with good Utica shows and TR Map
Inside the blue lines as defined by the transformation ratio might be a productive fairway for Utica Flat Creek prospects
New Utica wells and TR map
Inside the blue lines as defined by the transformation ratio are the newly drilled wells – awaiting results
Utica Flat Creek Isopach Map
The Utica Fairway is probably best defined by the Flat Creek Mbrisopach map – All of the Utica is supermature; the Flat Creek had the highest original TOC which drives HI and TR maps
feet
The Devonian Marcellus Shale
Primarily interested in Union Springs and Lowermost Oakta Creek Members
Marcellus Union Springs
• Organic rich thinly bedded blackish grey to black shale with thin silt bands
• The member is between the Cherry Valley and Onondaga Limestone
• Characterized as pyritiferous; farther east the Union Springs becomes the Bakoven member that becomes darker, less organic and has few limestone members
• Lenses in and out in localities in far Western New York
Marcellus Union Springs
Union Springs with vertical calcite filled fractures in the Onesquethaw Creek, Albany County, NY
Marcellus Cherry Valley
• Consists of skeletal limestones and shalyintervals
• Westward thinning of the Marcellus Formation in western and central New York leads to the condensation and union of the Cherry Valley limestones with limestones in the upper part of the Union Springs
Marcellus Cherry Valley
Cherry Valley dark shaly interval and limestone near Cherry Valley, NY
Marcellus Oatka Creek
• Upper member of the Marcellus Formation in Western and central New York
• Becomes Cardiff and Chittenango members in Central and Eastern New York
• Is confined in Western New York by Stafford and Onondaga limestones
• Farther east it is between the Stafford and Cherry Valley limestones where it is present
• Dark grey to black organic rich shale
Marcellus Oatka Creek
Oatka Creek shale in Oatka Creek, LeRoy, NY
Marcellus Isopach
Marcellus thickens to the east
Marcellus Structure Contour Map
Marcellus has a general east-west strike is gently dipping south
Map of Marcellus Geochemical Locations
33 wells, 2 cores, 9 outcrops
Marcellus TOC Map
TOC much higher in Marcellus than in Utica (up to 12%) TOC values are highest in central part of state and decrease to east
Marcellus Union Springs TOC Map
TOC in the Union Springs increases from the western part of NY to the central eastern side of NY
Marcellus Oatka Creek TOC Map
TOC increases in the Oatka Creek to the northeast and west-northwest
TOC Marcellus Cross Section
TOC increases in Oatka Creek and the Union Springs member
Tmax (deg C°) Marcellus
About half of the S2 values in the Marcellus can be trusted for Tmaxvalues – using these, Tmax increases to east as would be expected
Vitrinite Reflectance Calculation
• Vitrinite refelctance (Ro) is a measure of thermal maturity that can be done directly on plant matter
• Ro can be estimated from reliable Tmax data using the following calculation
• Ro (%)=(0.0180*Tmax)-7.16• The Tmax data in the Marcellus is much better than
the Utica – about half the points have useable S2 values
Vitrinite Reflectance (Ro%)
• Low maturity source rocks 0.0 – 0.55%
• Oil window 0.55% -1.0%• Condensate - wet gas
window 1.0 %- 1.40%• Dry gas window > 1.40%
• Low maturity source rocks 0.0 - 0.55%
• Oil window 0.55%- 1.15%• Condensate – wet gas
window 1.15% -1.40%• Dry gas window > 1.40 %
Well Cuttings Core
based on Jarvie, et al, 2005
Marcellus (Union Springs) Ro%
Optimum Ro% for Marcellus Union Springs is in the central and eastern New York
Marcellus (Oatka Creek) Ro%
Optimum Ro% for Oatka Creek is in eastern side of basin – based on this it is best to avoid western half of state
Marcellus Union Springs HI Map
Union Springs HI decreases to the east
Marcellus Oatka Creek HI Map
Oatka Creek HI decreases from west to east
Marcellus Oatka Creek Transformation Ratio Map
Marcellus Union Springs Transformation Ratio Map
New Marcellus wells and the TR Map
The geochemistry work that we have done suggest that the shales in this area are favorable - some wells drilled here have not produced
Marcellus• Some wells, such as the Beaver Meadows well,
were drilled in what is the geochemical fairway for Marcellus but were not completed and are assumed to be dry holes. Why?
• Other aspects may be equally important – completion/frac practices need to be refined – may need certain silica content– too much TOC?– Overcooked?
• More work is needed
Utica and Marcellus fairways
They overlap in eastern side of basin
Future Work
• Calculate and make maps of original TOC, S2 and HI
• Get analysis of gas samples from newer wells whenever possible
• Get mineralogy data for shales• Resample areas where data is questionable or
missing and test conclusions with new samples in fairways
• See what happens with newer wells in fairways that have new drilling/completion/frac concepts
Conclusions• The Marcellus and Utica Shales both contain fairways that
are favorable to gas exploration based on geochemical data• Both fairways occur in overlapping areas in the eastern
Southern Tier of the State where there are not many wells drilled to date
• Wells with good shows occur in predicted fairways• Within the Utica Shale, the Flat Creek and to a lesser
extent the Dolgeville Members, which both thicken to the east and pinch out to the west have the best potential
• In the Marcellus Shale, the Oatka Creek and Union Springs Members have the best potential
• The Marcellus is organically richer than the Utica
Acknowledgements
• John Martin for NYSERDA financial support
• Fortuna Energy • EOG Resources• Jay Leonard of Platte River Associates for
geochemical data on eastern most Utica well cuttings