Update on fish value chain development in Uganda
-
Upload
ilri -
Category
Technology
-
view
1.570 -
download
1
Transcript of Update on fish value chain development in Uganda
Update on fish value chain development in Uganda
Malcolm Beveridge (WorldFish Center)
CGIAR Research Program on Livestock and FishPlanning meeting
Nairobi, 27-29 September 2011
rationale - need
• Africa: the aquaculture sector has the greatest need of support to develop at scale
• two countries: focus, focus, focus …
• screening criteria
need
– fish is a high proportion of total animal protein intake
– national food and nutrition security assessments indicate current situation as ‘low’ or ‘at risk’
– baseline production indicates potential for effective intervention
rationale - potential
CountryUndernourishment1
(% of population <5)
Fish Consumption2 (% of total Animal
consumption)Aquaculture Production3
(tonnes in 2008)Egypt 31 38 693,815Nigeria 41 45 143,207Uganda 39 63 52,250United Rep of Tanzania 44 65 11,308Madagascar 53 33 11,081Zambia 46 56 5,640Ghana 29 74 5,594Kenya 36 38 4,452
1Source: World Health Statistics (2010) 2Source: Speedy (2003). Global Production and Consumption of Animal Source Foods. Journal of Nutrition. 133: 4048S- 4053S; 3FAOStat (online query)
• markets for fish developed to a scale that will support a value scale focus
• potential to meet demand within 5-7 years
rationale - partnerships
• in-line with national/ regional and international development agencies’ policies
• NGO development partners have identified aquaculture value chains as fruitful areas for investment
rationale - opportunities for learning
Uganda Egypt
Uganda – general vision and outcome
General Vision
• With partners, we will work to understand our chosen aquaculture value chains so that we can identify market-based interventions which, when implemented, can help develop efficient, pro-poor and sustainable value chains.
Outcome
• Increase supplies of affordable, nutritious food, generating equitable benefits to actors throughout the value chain.
Uganda – potential for impact
Value Chain Outcomes
VC Component Seed Feed Fish Production
Inputs and Services Widespread use of productive, fast growing broodstock strains that meets present and future anticipated needs of farmers
Development of affordable, nutritionally and environmentally sound aquaculture feeds
Farmers able to access quality seed, feed and technical advice that meets their needs
Production Widespread use of productive, fast growing seed that meets present and future anticipated needs of farmers
Reliable supplies of nutritionally sound, affordable and environmentally friendly feeds that meet the needs of farmers
Increased farmed fish production and consumption by the poor
Processing Reduced seed losses, reduced costs and increased production
Affordable quality feeds available to all producers
Increased quantities of affordable and nutritionally sound fish and fish products in markets
Marketing Demand led-increases in development and use by farmers of quality seed from genetically improved strains
Strong demand for quality and profitable feeds by farmers
Strong demand for - and increased access to - farmed fish products by poor and vulnerable consumers
• Average per capita fish consumption in target regions increases towards recommended levels by 21%
• 12,000 households improve their standard of living through participation in the value chain
Impacts
• # Identified VC constraints resolved or lessened.
• X% increase in identified value chain effectiveness metrics.
Intermediate Outcome
Ultimate Outcome
• 100% increase in fish annual production for target markets by 2017.
• 50% increase in the number of households participating in fish value chains
Inputs &
Services
Production
Transport&
Processing
Marketing
Inputs &
Services
Production
Transport&
Processing
Marketing
Inputs &
Services
Production
Transport&
Processing
Marketing
Seed Feed
Fish
Equitable efficient value chains
/transport
Uganda – existing resource inventory
• little engagement prior to 2010
– BMZ-funded project on governance of fisheries, Lake Victoria (2010-2013)
August 2010 – CRP 3.7
• Step 1: selection of value chains
• Step 2: mixed methods preliminary value chain analysis
• Step 3: preliminary identification of constraints and opportunities
Uganda – CRP engagement to date
Inputs &
Services
Production
Transport&
Processing
Marketing
Inputs &
Services
Production
Transport&
Processing
Marketing
Inputs &
Services
Production
Transport&
Processing
Marketing
Inputs &
Services
Production
Transport&
Processing
Marketing
Seed Feed
Production
Step 3: semi-structured interviews
• what do the value chains look like and are they functioning well?
• where are the key constraints?
• are there barriers to the socially marginalized securing equitable employment benefits?
• does an increase in aquaculture production increase fish consumption by the poor and improve health?
• Step 4: market-based solutions
• what interventions will most likely deliver greatest impacts on poverty and hunger per sum invested?
Uganda – value chain developmentOctober – December 2011
• with partners secured ASARECA* funding for detailed VCAs
• Steps 1-2: select and map VCs
• Step 3: identify market based solutions
January 2012 – March 2014
• Step 4: assess market based solutions
• Steps 5-6: implement interventions
– M & E
– refine approaches* Association for Strengthening Agricultural Research in East and Central Africa
on-going and impending projectsCurrently Funded Projects
Level of effort, areas of focus (roughly approximate to resource allocation but reflecting areas where outputs and outcomes are expected)
Project title
% mapped to CRP3.7
Location, Countries Species Donor End date
mm/yy
Funds remaining at
end 2011 (1000s of $)
Technology development VC Development Targeting, gender & impact
Animal health
Genetics/
Feeds Ecosystem
Sectoral and
Policy
VC Assessment
VC Innova
Spatial,
systems & HH
Gender &
equity
M&E and
impactbreeding
tion
Reduced Competition in tilapia - Year 3
100%
Bangladesh, Uganda, Egypt, M'sia, Vietnam, Ghana, Malawi
Tilapia University of Wageningen
Jun-12 7 100%
Aquaculture development in ASARECA region 100%
Uganda Tilapia, Clarias gariepinus
ASARECA Feb-14 164 20% 10% 10% 20% 20% 20%
• total = ~$US 0.2 million; mostly genetics
Impending Projects (strong likelihood of funding)Level of effort, areas of focus (roughly approximate to resource allocation
but reflecting areas where outputs and outcomes are expected)Project title (Probability)
% mapped
to CRP3.7
Location, Countries Species Donor End date
mm/yy
Total funding (1000s of $)
Technology development VC Development Targeting, gender & impact
Animal health
Genetics/
Feeds Ecosystem
Sectoral and
Policy
VC Assessment
VC Innova
Spatial,
systems & HH
Gender &
equity
M&E and
impactbreeding
tion
Aquaculture for food security, poverty alleviation and nutrition (75%)
50%Bangladesh, Zambia, Uganda
Aquaculture
EC Oct-14 75 25% 25% 50%
Genetic technologies for AQ in SSA (50%) 100%
Uganda, Ghana, Malawi, Kenya
Tilapia CIDA Jun-14 288 100%
sub-component work plans and activities
sub-component work plans (2012)
Priority Outcomes
1. VCA team built
2. Capacity in VCA methods built among partners
3. Improved understanding of aquaculture VCs and their structure and efficiency
4. VC development methodologies adopted by partners
Priority Outputs
5. Develop implementation plan
6. Baseline study conducted
7. VCA completed for various aquaculture VCs in Uganda
8. Analytical framework for VC development to meet objectives developed
9. Market based VC development interventions identified and prioritized
sub-component work plans – (2012)
Priority Organizational, Capacity Development and Communication Activities
1. Recruit a VC expert, Zambia (Uganda)
2. Restructure team to match CRP needs
3. Identify and develop collaboration on innovation across 3.7 Centers
Priority Resource Mobilization Activities
4. VCA and VC development
5. Work with CRP partners to raise funds for cross-project evaluation of VCA process, development of better metrics and guidelines
sub-component work plans – 2013
Priority Outcomes
1. Institutional frameworks and governance of aquaculture VCs in Uganda understood
2. Fish production increased, jobs created, increased profitability, more equitable share of benefits among VC actors achieved
3. Fish prices stabilized
Priority Outputs
4. Results from VC pilot development interventions assessed and most promising interventions implemented
5. Results from VC development disseminated
6. Analysis of relationships between fish production, prices and consumption completed
7. Review paper and policy brief on VCA and VC development in aquaculture completed
sub-component work plans – 2013
Priority Organizational, Capacity Development and Communication Activities
1. Continued team building to meet evolving program needs
2. Analysis of skills gaps identified and recruitment pursued
Priority Resource Mobilization Activities
3. Collaborative efforts with partners to seek funds for expansion of VC analysis work in Uganda pursued
implementation plan – 2012
Uganda – key strategic partners
• Public sector
– DoF, NAADS, Department of Animal Resources
– Ministry of Livestock
– NARO, Kajjansi Research station
• Makerere University
• NGOs
– CRS
• CG Centers
gaps, resource mobilization needs and opportunities
funding gap, needs and opportunities
• new country; new value chains; large funding gap
• baseline
• funding for technology development
• funding for VC analysis
fin