Update on Entry Capacity Substitution Transmission Workstream 6 th March 2008 Summary of...
-
Upload
rafe-howard -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Update on Entry Capacity Substitution Transmission Workstream 6 th March 2008 Summary of...
![Page 1: Update on Entry Capacity Substitution Transmission Workstream 6 th March 2008 Summary of consultation responses.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649f415503460f94c608c1/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Update on Entry Capacity Substitution
Transmission Workstream6th March 2008
Summary of consultation responses
![Page 2: Update on Entry Capacity Substitution Transmission Workstream 6 th March 2008 Summary of consultation responses.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649f415503460f94c608c1/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Introduction
Last PCR introduced several fundamental changes to the entry regime which included Entry Capacity Substitution
A key intention of the policy measures is to ensure that capacity does not become sterilised, i.e. an obligation at one ASEP where capacity is not required does not prevent use of that capacity elsewhere.
Key Licence deliverables are; Entry Capacity Substitution Methodology Statement Submit to the Authority for approval by 6th January 2009 Amendment of Incremental Entry Capacity Release Methodology
Statement to include substitution. On 1st February National Grid issued consultation document
seeking views on a range of issues.
![Page 3: Update on Entry Capacity Substitution Transmission Workstream 6 th March 2008 Summary of consultation responses.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649f415503460f94c608c1/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Capacity Available for Substitution.
• What proportion of baseline capacity should be withheld from QSEC auctions (and substitution) for use in later auctions (the current Licence requirement is 10%)?
Proportion withheld
20% > 10% zero%
In favour 7 1 1
Other comments
Prevents development of liquid secondary capacity market
![Page 4: Update on Entry Capacity Substitution Transmission Workstream 6 th March 2008 Summary of consultation responses.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649f415503460f94c608c1/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Capacity Available for Substitution.
• Should allocated capacity or forecast flows be used in defining substitutable capacity?
• Licence defines substitution of “unsold non-incremental obligated entry capacity”.
• Would forecast flows impact TBE data?Definition of
sterilised capacityAbove forecast
flowsAbove allocations
In favour 5 3
Other comments Need to consider projects in developments
Impact of TBE Yes = 4 No = 2
• Alternative suggestion• Use previous year’s peak flow.
![Page 5: Update on Entry Capacity Substitution Transmission Workstream 6 th March 2008 Summary of consultation responses.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649f415503460f94c608c1/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Single Quarter Problem.
Where capacity is currently booked at an ASEP for a single quarter in the future should this prevent capacity at that ASEP, to the level booked, being available for substitution in the period prior to that booking?
Users say this should not prevent substitution but a workable solution is not evident at this stage.
In favour Against
Should this prevent substitution? 1 5
Create rules to prevent short-term, distant, bookings? 1 3
Should substitution be time limited? 3 + 1 maybe 1Should a surrender mechanism be created? 4 1
![Page 6: Update on Entry Capacity Substitution Transmission Workstream 6 th March 2008 Summary of consultation responses.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649f415503460f94c608c1/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Lower NPV Test.
Should different User Commitment tests be applied for incremental capacity satisfied from substitution and from investment?
Comments Combined Substitution / Investment & Competing Bids is
complex, but should not be an issue with a single test.
In favour Against
Same Test 6 1 (relate to actual costs)
![Page 7: Update on Entry Capacity Substitution Transmission Workstream 6 th March 2008 Summary of consultation responses.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649f415503460f94c608c1/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Exchange Rate Cap.
• To avoid excessive capacity degradation should capacity substitutions be prohibited if the exchange rate exceeds a specified value?
• If yes, what should the cap on exchange rates be?
Cap on Exchange Rates
<=1.5:1 2:1 <10:1 10:1 Don’t know No cap
1 1 2 2 1 0
![Page 8: Update on Entry Capacity Substitution Transmission Workstream 6 th March 2008 Summary of consultation responses.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649f415503460f94c608c1/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Availability of Capacity for Substitution.
Should National Grid substitute capacity to release incremental capacity ahead of 42 months?
If yes, should any limit be placed on the timing of such release, e.g. 18 months, 30 months?
Should substitution be limited to single donor ASEP or should combinations (substituted at different times) be allowed?
Responses Mainly in favour of early release (from 18 months) provided
capacity has previously been available in AMSEC. Is this feasible? QSEC / AMSEC do not overlap sufficiently.
Impact on incentives to be considered.
![Page 9: Update on Entry Capacity Substitution Transmission Workstream 6 th March 2008 Summary of consultation responses.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649f415503460f94c608c1/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Other Issues.
New Entry Points Support for a delaying substitution until a “regular”
QSEC auction. Unlikely to be an issue with April 2009 implementation
date. Assuming UNC mod implemented for April 2009 QSEC.
Alternative Economic Test / User Commitment No support for changing now. Willing to review.
Reserve Price Discounts Conflicting views; 1 totally against discounts, 3 in
favour.
![Page 10: Update on Entry Capacity Substitution Transmission Workstream 6 th March 2008 Summary of consultation responses.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649f415503460f94c608c1/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Other Issues.
We would be interested in people’s thoughts as to how the substitution process may impact upon other elements of the entry capacity regime.
6 respondents specifically commented on the need for more time to consider potential consequences
5 refer to a “holistic” approach; consider interactions. 4 respondents identify potential price increases as a
consequence of substitution
1 reference to regulatory Impact Assessment.
![Page 11: Update on Entry Capacity Substitution Transmission Workstream 6 th March 2008 Summary of consultation responses.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649f415503460f94c608c1/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Next Steps
Arrange workshops Establish workgroup. Develop policy / processes.
National Grid to draft Entry Capacity Substitution Methodology Statement
Contains process to identify donor ASEPs and quantities. Incremental Entry Capacity Release Methodology Statement
Likely to include most of the business rules to be developed
National Grid consultation to commence Nov 2008 Submit to Authority for approval by 6th January 2009 May need to be earlier to accommodate Impact Assessment