Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) for Early Site Specific Weed ...GmbH, Siegen, Germany), was used to...
Transcript of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) for Early Site Specific Weed ...GmbH, Siegen, Germany), was used to...
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) for Early Site Specific Weed Management
Title Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) for Early Site Specific Weed ManagementTitle (native language)
Category Recording or mapping technologyRobot or smart machine
Short summary forpractitioners (Practiceabstract) in English)
A quadrocopter platform with vertical take-off and landing (VTOL), model md4-1000 (microdronesGmbH, Siegen, Germany), was used to collect a set of aerial images at several flight altitudes over anexperimental crop-field. This UAV is equipped with four brushless motors powered by a battery andcan fly by remote control or autonomously with the aid of its Global Position System (GPS) receiver andits waypoint navigation system. Two sensors with different spectral and spatial resolutions wereseparately mounted on the UAV to be tested in this experiment: a still point-and-shoot camera, modelOlympus PEN E-PM1 (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), and a six-band multispectral camera,model Tetracam mini-MCA-6 (Tetracam Inc., Chatsworth, CA, USA).
Short summary forpractitionersWebsiteAudiovisual materialLinks to other websitesAdditional commentsKeywords Agricultural production systems | Farming practiceAdditional keywordsGeographical location(NUTS) EU
Other geographicallocationCropping systems Arable cropsField operations Weed controlSFT users Farmer | ContractorEducation level of users Apprenticeship or technical school educationFarm size (ha) 50-100
Scientific articleConfiguration and Specifications of an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) for Early Site Specific Weed
Title Management
Full citation Torres-Sánchez, J.; López-Granados, F.; De Castro, A.I.; Peña-Barragán, J.M. (2013). PLoS ONE,DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0058210
Effects of this SFTProductivity (crop yield per ha) No effectQuality of product No effectRevenue profit farm income No effectSoil biodiversity No effectBiodiversity (other than soil) No effectInput costs No effectVariable costs No effectPost-harvest crop wastage No effectEnergy use No effectCH4 (methane) emission No effectCO2 (carbon dioxide) emission No effectN2O (nitrous oxide) emission No effectNH3 (ammonia) emission No effectNO3 (nitrate) leaching No effectFertilizer use No effectPesticide use No effectIrrigation water use No effectLabor time No effectStress or fatigue for farmer No effectAmount of heavy physical labour No effectNumber and/or severity of personal injury accidents No effectNumber and/or severity of accidents resulting in spills property damage incorrectapplication of fertiliser/pesticides etc. No effect
Pesticide residue on product No effectWeed pressure No effectPest pressure (insects etc.) No effectDisease pressure (bacterial fungal viral etc.) No effect
Information related to how easy it is to start using the SFTThis SFT replaces a tool or technology that is currently used. The SFT is better than thecurrent tool no opinion
The SFT can be used without making major changes to the existing system no opinionThe SFT does not require significant learning before the farmer can use it no opinionThe SFT can be used in other useful ways than intended by the inventor no opinionThe SFT has effects that can be directly observed by the farmer disagreeUsing the SFT requires a large time investment by farmer agreeThe SFT produces information that can be interpreted directly disagree
View this technology on the Smart-AKIS platform.
This factsheet was generated on 2018-Apr-03 11:57:19.