UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC...
Transcript of UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC...
Pre-clinical radionuclide therapy dosimetry in several pediatric cancer xenografts
NCCAAPM Spring MeetingApril 15, 2016
Ian R. Marsh A. Besemer MSB. Bednarz PhD
Department of Medical PhysicsWisconsin Institutes for Medical Research
University of Wisconsin – Madison
DEPARTMENT OF
Medical PhysicsUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH
Targeted Radionuclide Therapy
0 0
Neuroblastoma 2nd most extracranial malignant solid
tumor of childhood High mortality rate in advanced stages
mIBG Established diagnostic (123I or 124I) and
therapeutic agent (131I) for NB treatment 90% of NB is mIBG avid since mIBG has
a similar transport mechanism to norepinephrine
mIBG TRT has become a standard treatment technique for recurrent or refractory cases of NB with response rates ranging from 20-37%
24/15/2016 | NCCAAPM Spring Meeting, La Crosse WI | Ian Marsh
(a.) 1.5 hr, (b.) 19.5 h (c.) 43.5 h, (d.) 115 h
Huang et al. (2015)
Targeted Radionuclide Therapy
0 0 34/15/2016 | NCCAAPM Spring Meeting, La Crosse WI | Ian Marsh
CLR1404 Cancer-targeted diagnostic and therapeutic agent Phospholipid ether analog with selective uptake in vitro and in vivo Promising initial in vitro data in a variety of different pediatric cell lines.
Prostate (PC-3) Glioma
Radiopharmaceutical Development
0 0 44/15/2016 | NCCAAPM Spring Meeting, La Crosse WI | Ian Marsh
• Patient-specific treatment planning
• Evaluate dose toxicity relationships
• Evaluate tumor dose response relationships
• Determine appropriate dose prescriptions
• Identify dose limiting organs
• Determine maximum tolerated doses
Discovery and Development
Pre-clinical Trials
Clinical Trials (Phase 1-4)
Clinical Implementation
Dosimetry
0 0
Limitations of standard OLINDA/EXM method Assumes homogeneous:
Organ/Tumor composition Radionuclide uptake Dose deposition
Phantom organs do not accurately represent individual patient’s organ shapes and relative spatial distribution
Dose errors of ± 20-60% have been reported1
RAPID Robust Monte Carlo internal dosimetry platform Developed at UW - Madison Reported MC doses 6-23% larger than OLINDA
54/15/2016 | NCCAAPM Spring Meeting, La Crosse WI | Ian Marsh [1] Divoli et al 2009
1
CT/PET Fusion
ROI Contouring
Monte Carlo Simulation
Geant4
At each time pt
PET/SPECT Pre-processing
CT
Radiobiological Modeling
Coregistration Kinetic Modeling
Total Absorbed Dose Integration
Dose (Gy/MBq)Structure Min Mean Max Brain 0.24 0.78 0.85Cord 0.11 0.21 0.58Lungs 0.20 0.69 0.82Heart 0.15 0.30 0.68Testes 0.09 0.18 0.36Tumor 0.23 0.90 1.51
DVH
ROI Dose Statistics and DVHs
Simulation Output
, , ,
Absorbed Dose Rate
020406080
100
0.0 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.0 1.3 1.5
Vol
ume
(%)
Dose (Gy/MBq)
Tumor
BED EQD2 EUD
3D Dose Distribution
AD
BED, EQD2, EUDE, NTCP, TCP
Pre-treatment Image Acquisition
Serial PET/CT or SPECT/CT imagesCourtesy of Abby Besemer
1
CT/PET Fusion
ROI Contouring
Monte Carlo Simulation
Geant4
At each time pt
PET/SPECT Pre-processing
CT
Radiobiological Modeling
Coregistration Kinetic Modeling
Total Absorbed Dose Integration
Dose (Gy/MBq)Structure Min Mean Max Brain 0.24 0.78 0.85Cord 0.11 0.21 0.58Lungs 0.20 0.69 0.82Heart 0.15 0.30 0.68Testes 0.09 0.18 0.36Tumor 0.23 0.90 1.51
DVH
ROI Dose Statistics and DVHs
Simulation Output
, , ,
Absorbed Dose Rate
020406080
100
0.0 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.0 1.3 1.5
Vol
ume
(%)
Dose (Gy/MBq)
Tumor
BED EQD2 EUD
3D Dose Distribution
AD
BED, EQD2, EUDE, NTCP, TCP
Pre-treatment Image Acquisition
Serial PET/CT or SPECT/CT imagesCourtesy of Abby Besemer
1
CT/PET Fusion
ROI Contouring
Monte Carlo Simulation
Geant4
At each time pt
PET/SPECT Pre-processing
CT
Radiobiological Modeling
Coregistration Kinetic Modeling
Total Absorbed Dose Integration
Dose (Gy/MBq)Structure Min Mean Max Brain 0.24 0.78 0.85Cord 0.11 0.21 0.58Lungs 0.20 0.69 0.82Heart 0.15 0.30 0.68Testes 0.09 0.18 0.36Tumor 0.23 0.90 1.51
DVH
ROI Dose Statistics and DVHs
Simulation Output
, , ,
Absorbed Dose Rate
020406080
100
0.0 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.0 1.3 1.5
Vol
ume
(%)
Dose (Gy/MBq)
Tumor
BED EQD2 EUD
3D Dose Distribution
AD
BED, EQD2, EUDE, NTCP, TCP
Pre-treatment Image Acquisition
Serial PET/CT or SPECT/CT imagesCourtesy of Abby Besemer
1
CT/PET Fusion
ROI Contouring
Monte Carlo Simulation
Geant4
At each time pt
PET/SPECT Pre-processing
CT
Radiobiological Modeling
Coregistration Kinetic Modeling
Total Absorbed Dose Integration
Dose (Gy/MBq)Structure Min Mean Max Brain 0.24 0.78 0.85Cord 0.11 0.21 0.58Lungs 0.20 0.69 0.82Heart 0.15 0.30 0.68Testes 0.09 0.18 0.36Tumor 0.23 0.90 1.51
DVH
ROI Dose Statistics and DVHs
Simulation Output
, , ,
Absorbed Dose Rate
020406080
100
0.0 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.0 1.3 1.5
Vol
ume
(%)
Dose (Gy/MBq)
Tumor
BED EQD2 EUD
3D Dose Distribution
AD
BED, EQD2, EUDE, NTCP, TCP
Pre-treatment Image Acquisition
Serial PET/CT or SPECT/CT imagesCourtesy of Abby Besemer
1
CT/PET Fusion
ROI Contouring
Monte Carlo Simulation
Geant4
At each time pt
PET/SPECT Pre-processing
CT
Radiobiological Modeling
Coregistration Kinetic Modeling
Total Absorbed Dose Integration
Dose (Gy/MBq)Structure Min Mean Max Brain 0.24 0.78 0.85Cord 0.11 0.21 0.58Lungs 0.20 0.69 0.82Heart 0.15 0.30 0.68Testes 0.09 0.18 0.36Tumor 0.23 0.90 1.51
DVH
ROI Dose Statistics and DVHs
Simulation Output
, , ,
Absorbed Dose Rate
020406080
100
0.0 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.0 1.3 1.5
Vol
ume
(%)
Dose (Gy/MBq)
Tumor
BED EQD2 EUD
3D Dose Distribution
AD
BED, EQD2, EUDE, NTCP, TCP
Pre-treatment Image Acquisition
Serial PET/CT or SPECT/CT imagesCourtesy of Abby Besemer
Monte Carlo
0 0 114/15/2016 | NCCAAPM Spring Meeting, La Crosse WI | Ian Marsh
CT → Geometry
Material Composition27 Major groups1
1 for air 1 for lung tissue 9 for soft tissues 15 for bone/skeletal
tissues 1 for high Z
[1] Schneider et al 2000 Phys. Med. Biol. 45 459–78[2] Tuli 2010
Monte Carlo
0 0 124/15/2016 | NCCAAPM Spring Meeting, La Crosse WI | Ian Marsh
CT → Geometry
Material Composition27 Major groups1
1 for air 1 for lung tissue 9 for soft tissues 15 for bone/skeletal
tissues 1 for high Z
Radionuclide Decay G4RadioactiveDecay
module Nuclear structure and
decay information from ENSDF database2
Source Position Location of decay is
uniformly sampled within each voxel
PET → Source
[1] Schneider et al 2000 Phys. Med. Biol. 45 459–78[2] Tuli 2010
Monte Carlo
0 0
Computer Clusters UW Center for High Throughput Computing (CHTC) cluster
25,000 CPU cores available Slices of the source distribution are simulated in parallel
RED lab KING cluster 64 CPU cores available Entire source distribution simulated in each job.
Output at Each Time Point Simulated until <1% relative error is achieved for the voxel mean dose 3D voxelized absorbed dose rate distribution 3D voxeleized relative error distribution
134/15/2016 | NCCAAPM Spring Meeting, La Crosse WI | Ian Marsh
Experiments
0 0 144/15/2016 | NCCAAPM Spring Meeting, La Crosse WI | Ian Marsh
Cell Line
Mouse ID No. of Imaging Time Points [hrs]
Initial Body Weight [g]
Injected Activity [μCi]
Activity/BW [μCi/g]
CHLA20
1 1, 24, 48, 72, 96 and 144 22.8 273 12.0
2 1, 24, 48, 72, 96 and 144 23 265 11.5
3 1, 24, 48, 72, and 96 23.3 271 11.6
4 1, 24, 48, 72, and 96 24.4 273 11.2
NB1691
1 1, 24, 48, 72, 96 and 144 22.7 274 12.1
2 1, 24, 48, 72, 96 and 144 31 272 8.8
3 1, 24, 48, 72, and 96 20.5 268 13.14 1, 24, and 48** 32.6 274 8.4
Tc71
1 1, 24, 48, 72, and 170 27.9 230 8.2
2 1, 24, 48, 72, and 170 24.1 227 9.4
3 1, 24, 48, 72, and 170 26.5 229 8.6
4 1, 24, 48, 72, and 170 20.4 232 11.4
Rh30
1 1, 24, 48, 72, and 170 23.5 230 9.8
2 1, 24, 48, 72, and 170 20.7 232 11.2
3 1, 24, 48, 72, and 170 20.2 231 11.4
4 1, 24, 48, 72, and 170 25.5 228 8.9
Experiments
0 0 154/15/2016 | NCCAAPM Spring Meeting, La Crosse WI | Ian Marsh
Cell Line
Mouse ID No. of Imaging Time Points [hrs]
Initial Body Weight [g]
Injected Activity [μCi]
Activity/BW [μCi/g]
CHLA20
1 1, 24, 48, 72, 96 and 144 22.8 273 12.0
2 1, 24, 48, 72, 96 and 144 23 265 11.5
3 1, 24, 48, 72, and 96 23.3 271 11.6
4 1, 24, 48, 72, and 96 24.4 273 11.2
NB1691
1 1, 24, 48, 72, 96 and 144 22.7 274 12.1
2 1, 24, 48, 72, 96 and 144 31 272 8.8
3 1, 24, 48, 72, and 96 20.5 268 13.14 1, 24, and 48** 32.6 274 8.4
Tc71
1 1, 24, 48, 72, and 170 27.9 230 8.2
2 1, 24, 48, 72, and 170 24.1 227 9.4
3 1, 24, 48, 72, and 170 26.5 229 8.6
4 1, 24, 48, 72, and 170 20.4 232 11.4
Rh30
1 1, 24, 48, 72, and 170 23.5 230 9.8
2 1, 24, 48, 72, and 170 20.7 232 11.2
3 1, 24, 48, 72, and 170 20.2 231 11.4
4 1, 24, 48, 72, and 170 25.5 228 8.9
0 0 164/15/2016 | NCCAAPM Spring Meeting, La Crosse WI | Ian Marsh
ROI Activity
CHLA20-2
NB1691-2
TC71-2
Absorbed Dose Rate Distribution
0 0 174/15/2016 | NCCAAPM Spring Meeting, La Crosse WI | Ian Marsh
3 hr
CHLA20-2
24 hrs 45 hrs 70 hrs 96 hrs 141 hrs
10-8
0
131I Absorbed Dose Rate ((Gy/s)/MBq)
Absorbed Dose Rate Distribution
0 0 184/15/2016 | NCCAAPM Spring Meeting, La Crosse WI | Ian Marsh
4 hr 25 hrs 46 hrs
NB1691-2
72 hrs 98 hrs 141 hrs
131I Absorbed Dose Rate ((Gy/s)/MBq)
10-8
0
Absorbed Dose Rate Distribution
0 0 194/15/2016 | NCCAAPM Spring Meeting, La Crosse WI | Ian Marsh
131I Absorbed Dose Rate ((Gy/s)/MBq)
10-8
0
1 hr 25 hrs 48 hrs 72 hrs 170 hrs
TC71-2
ROI Dose Stats
0 0 204/15/2016 | NCCAAPM Spring Meeting, La Crosse WI | Ian Marsh
Comparison to mIBG
0 0 214/15/2016 | NCCAAPM Spring Meeting, La Crosse WI | Ian Marsh
CH
LA20-2
mIBG
NB
1691-2
Seo, Youngho et al. (2016)
CLR1404CLR1404N
B1691
Conclusions
0 0 224/15/2016 | NCCAAPM Spring Meeting, La Crosse WI | Ian Marsh Seo, Youngho et al. (2016)
Summary Preliminary results show significant uptake and retention in
one NB cancer cell line (CHLA20) Similarities between pharmacokinetics between mIBG and
CLR1404 Initial characterization of pharmacokinetics of CLR1404 in
previously uninvestigated TC71
Future Work Complete dosimetry for remaining CHLA20, NB1691, TC71,
and Rh30 mice Comprehensive analysis of all dosimetry to draw conclusions
about uptake, retention, and dose limiting organs
Acknowledgements
0 0
Research Advisor Bryan Bednarz, PhD
UW RED Group Members Abby Besemer, MS Charlie Matrosic Andrew Shepard
Collaborators Mario Otto, MD Dana Baiu, PhD
234/15/2016 | NCCAAPM Spring Meeting, La Crosse WI | Ian Marsh
10 0 1
Thank You!
C&
N P
hoto
grap
hy
Thank You!
244/15/2016 | NCCAAPM Spring Meeting, La Crosse WI | Ian Marsh
Questions
TC71 Activity Distribution
TC71_11 at 72 hrs5.0E+054.0E+04 124I Activity (Bq/cc)
Targeted Radionuclide Therapy
0 0
MIBG Established diagnostic and
therapeutic agent for NB treatment Specifically targets NB cancer cells Diapeutic agent
264/15/2016 | NCCAAPM Spring Meeting, La Crosse WI | Ian Marsh
124I/ 123I
131I/125I
Diagnostic
Therapeutic
CLR1404 Cancer-targeted diapeutic agent Demonstrated selective uptake in
vitro and in vivo in rodent xenograft models of NB
Potentially target other cancers
131I/125I
124I/ 123I
Title
0 0
asdf
274/15/2016 | NCCAAPM Spring Meeting, La Crosse WI | Ian Marsh
Results
0 0 284/15/2016 | NCCAAPM Spring Meeting, La Crosse WI | Ian Marsh