UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA - Varsity Field · • evaluate and apply the different capital budgeting...
Transcript of UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA - Varsity Field · • evaluate and apply the different capital budgeting...
OBJECTIVES
In order to achieve the specific outcome you should be able
to:
• apply the concept of time value of money with regards to
relevant cash flows;
• describe the components of cost of capital;
• evaluate and apply the different capital budgeting
techniques for long term decision-making purposes;
• identify the relevant cash flows of different projects;
• account for the effects of taxation in capital budgets; and
• identify and evaluate the qualitative factors of different
projects.
3
INTRODUCTION
• Knowledge of basic taxation principles is a prerequisite for
the successful studying of this learning area. It is therefore
critical that you review the taxation module of Financial
Accounting before attempting to study this learning area.
4
INTRODUCTION
• Capital budgeting is the analysis and evaluation of
investment projects that normally produce benefits over a
number of years (long term investment decision)
5
WHY IS CAPITAL BUDGETING
IMPORTANT?
• Firm’s future success may depend on current investment decisions
• Remain competitive / Develop new products / Research & development
• Significant amount of resources are tied up in such decisions and difficult to reverse
• Tied up for a considerable number of years
• More difficult to adjust to changing conditions due to term
• Over-investment: costs too high. Invest too little: lose market share (inferior products or insufficient capacity to meet demand)
• Timing of expansion or contraction critical.
6
STEPS TO CAPITAL BUDGETING
1. Define objectives
2. Search for investment opportunities
3. Measure payoffs of opportunities
4. Select projects with payoffs > cost of capital
5. Obtain authorisation
6. Obtain financing
7. Implement
8. Post-implementation audit
7
CAPITAL BUDGETING TECHNIQUES
ACCOUNT FOR TVM
• Net Present Value (NPV)
• Internal Rate of Return
(IRR)
– Modified Internal Rate of
Return (MIRR)
IGNORE TVM
• Payback
– Discounted payback
• Accounting Rate of
Return (ARR)
8
NET PRESENT VALUE
• NPV = Discounted future cash flows less initial investment
• Net present value is found by subtracting the present
value of the after-tax outflows from the present value of
the after-tax inflows.
• By using DCF techniques and calculating PVs we can
compare the return on capital projects with an alternative
equal risk investment in securities traded in the financial
market.
Discount rate
• Cost of capital or Minimum required rate of return
• Acknowledges the time value of money & represents the opportunity cost of an investment elsewhere.
9
NPV (Cont.)
Example
Year 0 1 2 3
Cash flow (10) 4 4 5
10% discount rate
What is the NPV?
Should we accept the project?
10
NPV (Cont.)
• A positive NPV represents the amount with which
shareholders’ wealth will be increased
11
Decision criteria
If NPV > R0, accept the project
If NPV < R0, reject the project
If NPV = R0, technically indifferent
NPV (Cont.)
ADVANTAGES
• Uses cash flows (not profit)
• Rand amount indicates the actual value added to shareholders’ wealth
• Takes time value of money into account
• Makes the right re-investment assumption (only one answer is possible)
DISADVANTAGES
• Absolute Rand amount (not comparable between projects)
• Have to know the cost of capital figure in advance
12
Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
• IRR = The actual or true interest rate earned on an
investment over the course of its economic life, or the rate
that causes the present value of net future cash flows to
equal the cost of the initial investment (NPV = 0).
• The IRR is the project’s intrinsic rate of return.
14
Decision criteria
If IRR > cost of capital, accept the project
If IRR < cost of capital, reject the project
If IRR = cost of capital, technically indifferent
IRR (Cont.)
ADVANTAGES
• Uses cash flows
• Takes the time value of
money into account
• Don’t need to know WACC
in advance (yet essential for
independent projects)
• % is comparable between
projects
• Easy to understand
(commonly used)
DISADVANTAGES
• Inappropriate with unconventional cash flows (2 IRRs result)
• Inappropriate for mutually exclusive projects of different sizes (answer conflicts with NPV results) – does not take the size of the initial investment into account (compare R1 investment with R1.75 return against R1m investment with a R300 000 return)
16
CASH FLOWS
• Only relevant cash flows (excluding sunk cost, including opportunity cost)
• Commencement: – Purchase price of new machine
– Sales price of existing (old) machine
– Tax effects of sale (Year 1)
– Working capital investment (JIT )
17
CASH FLOWS (Cont.)
• Operating cash flows: – After tax Not allocated costs (e.g. head office and
depreciation)
– Changes in working capital levels (PROVIDED not already cash based)
– Ignore all financing costs (already included in WACC)
– Tax allowances, e.g. S12C: 40% (in full), 20%, 20% & 20%
18
CASH FLOWS (Cont.)
• End-of project cash flows: – Proceeds on the sale of the asset
– Taxable recoupment or scrapping allowance
– Capital gains tax
– Return of working capital
19
CASH FLOWS (Cont.)
• Depreciation is NOT a cash flow.
• The wear-and-tear allowance granted by SARS should,
however, be taken into account when performing the TAX
calculation.
20
PAYBACK
• The payback method simply measures how long (in
years and/or months) it takes to recover the initial
investment.
• The maximum acceptable payback period is determined
by management.
• If the payback period is less than the maximum
acceptable payback period, accept the project.
• If the payback period is greater than the maximum
acceptable payback period, reject the project.
21
PAYBACK (Cont.)
• The payback method is widely used by large firms to
evaluate small projects and by small firms to evaluate
most projects.
• It is simple, intuitive and considers cash flows rather than
accounting profits.
• It also gives implicit consideration to the timing of cash
flows and is widely used as a supplement to other
methods such as net present value and internal rate of
return.
22
PAYBACK
ADVANTAGES
• Easy to use and understand
• Useful for initial sifting process
• Appropriate with liquidity constraints
• Appropriate when future or cash flows are particularly uncertain
DISADVANTAGES
• Ignores the time value of money
• Ignores cash flows after the payback period (bias against LT projects)
• Fails to take into account differences in the timing of proceeds which are earned during the payback period, when comparing projects.
• Leads to a short term focus
24
DISCOUNTED PAYBACK
• Time required for discounted cash flows to recover initial
cash outlay.
Most NB shortcomings
• Ignores cash flows after the payback period
• High initial cash flows preferred
Advantages
• Easy to use
• Appropriate for initial sifting (rough risk indicator)
• Takes time value of money into account.
25
ACCOUNTING RATE OF RETURN (ARR)
ARR (also return on investment or return on capital employed)
= Average annual net income
Average investment
= R142 000 / [(R1 100 000 + 0) / 2]
= 26%
Measures the effectiveness with which management uses the assets of the co
26
ARR (Cont.)
ADVANTAGES
• Well-known ratio
• Easy to interpret
DISADVANTAGES
• Uses profit instead of cash flows
• Ignores the time value of money
• Result will be the same for projects with high income initially and low income in later years as for projects with low income initially and high income in later years
• May lead to sub-optimal decision-making by management (performance measurement)
27
CHOICE OF TECHNIQUE
• On a purely theoretical basis, NPV is the better
approach because:
– NPV assumes that intermediate cash flows are
reinvested at the cost of capital whereas IRR assumes
they are reinvested at the IRR,
– Certain mathematical properties may cause a project
with non-conventional cash flows to have zero or more
than one real IRR.
• Despite its theoretical superiority, however,
financial managers prefer to use the IRR
because of the preference for rates of return.
28
CAPITAL RATIONING
• ‘Soft’ cap rationing – not willing to issue capital or provide financing (internal);
• ‘Hard’ cap rationing – external constraints
30
CAPITAL RATIONING (Cont.)
If the project is divisible, use the profitability index (Current value of cash inflow / Investment)
Project Cost NPV PI
A R4,0m R0,60m 1,15
B R3,0m R0,54m 1,18
C R5,0m R0,45m 1,09
D R2,5m R0,426m 1,17
E R1,0m R0,20m 1,20
Capital limited to R6m: Choose E, B & 80% of D
If projects are not divisible, test all combinations to find combo that will maximise NPV (e.g. A + E [which has an opportunity cost attached due to R1m capital not utilised], C + E, B + D, B + E, D + E).
Max = B + D
Multi-period cap. rationing – use LP.
May also apply a higher discount rate.
31
UNEQUAL LIVES
Three methods: • Replacement chain – A 5yrs; B 7yrs. – lowest
common multiple 35 yrs – impractical • Equivalent annual annuities • Terminal value (shorter life span)
32
UNEQUAL LIVES (Cont.)
Example WACC: 14% Proj. A: Cost R5,2m; inflow R2,8m 3yrs Proj. B: Cost R8,0m; inflow R2,5m 6yrs Replacement chain: A: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 (5,2) 2,8 2,8 2,8 (5,2) 2,8 2,8 2,8 (5,2) 2,8 2,8 (2,4) 2,8 2,8 2,8 NPV of A = 2,178 (for 3 yrs = R1,301) NPV of B = 1,722 Choose A
33
UNEQUAL LIVES (Cont.)
Equivalent annual annuities
A: R1,301 / 2,322 = R0,560
B: R1,722 / 3,889 = R0,443
Choose A
34
UNEQUAL LIVES (Cont.)
Choose a terminal value
Assume a company has to decide which machine to pick. The project’s economic life is 10 years. Machine 1 will last for 8 years and machine 2 for 6 years.
The machines are not going to be replaced over and over for a period of 24 years.
Therefore accept that each machine will be replaced ONLY once, and include a terminal value (sales value) in the NPV calculation at the end of year ten. Discount cash flows for both machines for 10 year period.
35
INFLATION
2 options:
• Include inflation in cash flows and discount rate or
• Use the real rate and real cash flows
Preferred: Nominal!
• Real rates may ONLY be used if there is either NO inflation, or ALL cash flows increase with exactly the same inflation rate.
36