ttle Law

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA

FALL 1972

VOLUME VIII

NUMBER I

From the Dean's Desk:

The Year in Review This issue of the Journal features the report of the

Law School Alumni Annual Giving Campaign for 1971-72. Achieving a new high, the campaign demon­strates the depth of alumni faith in legal education and scholarship at Penn. Annual Giving provides en­richment to our educational program, colloquia and book nights, research assistants and the multitude of other activities which the University budget cannot support. Those of us at the School who see the results of annual giving on a daily basis want to assure all of you whose contact is less frequent that your efforts as campaign workers and contributors are productive in a very tangible way, and very much appreci­ated. Once again, we express our gratitude to John F. E. Hippe!, L'26, General Chairman of Law School Annual Giv­ing, and to each of his campaign cohorts. I also wish to express appreciation to Lloyd Herrick, the Dean's Assistant for Alumni Affairs, for his dedicated service in both the planning and execution of the annual giving effort.

The year 1971-72 has been mixed with accomplish­ment and excitement, and with tension and stress . As you know, the Faculty adopted a new curricular de­sign. When implemented fully it should provide unique educational opportunities for our students­earlier legal sophistication, exposure to a fuller array of societal problems in which legal process has a role, patterns for concentration in special areas of interest, more independent work and seminars, and greater clinical activity. Full implementation of the new cur­riculum will be achieved only when we have succeed­ed in enlarging our faculty. In the meantime, we have made important starts and have provided a model for many other law schools.

Our admissions policy has been reexamined and altered. My Annual Report will discuss the new policy in detail. Suffice it for now to note that in the future more emphasis will be placed on an applicant's indi­vidual academic performance in college, and less on the particular college in which he or she performed. At the same time, the applicant ' s individual LSAT score will continue to play a significant role since, more than any other single factor , it has a positive correlation with actual performance in law school. We have also recognized, however, that many of our very highly qualified applicants are indistinguishable from each other by any totally objective criteria. This small group, just below those with the highest academic qualifications, are pooled. In filling out the class of 200, the Admissions Committee draws from the pool with the help of such factors as unusual work or military experience, superior graduate school per­formance , and alumni parentage. With over 3100 applicants, it is understandable that the class is chosen largely from entirely objective criteria , but we are hopeful that our experience will show it wise to use relatively subjective criteria in selecting from a small pool of people who are not otherwise distinguishable in any reliable way.

Questions of "pass/fail" grading, student voting in Faculty meetings, and tenure decisions have created division . Some of these problems have been discussed in the Journal before; some will be discussed in this and subsequent issues, and in my Annual Report. I wish only to say here that the concerns of those who differ with School policy and decisions are respected. Premises and procedures are open to re-examination as we continue the endless process of self-education out of which we seek an environment which will assure a quality of legal education for our students and of legal scholarship for all the world that one has come to expect of Penn.

Owen Roberts Lecture- March 22

2 LAW ALUMNI JOURNAL

l/le UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA

Law ournal FALL 1972

VOLUME VIII

NUMBER I

TABLE OF CONTENTS

From The Dean's Desk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

Sloane On Law Libraries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

Prisoner's Rights Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

Law Alumni Day Revisited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

Commencement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

Trial Of An Issue Of Fact . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

James Wilson-A Look At His Life ...................... 10

Women In The Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

Tribulations Of A Review Editor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

Quarantine Drug Addicts? ............................... 15

Alumni Annual Giving-1971-72 Report . . . .... . ........... 17

t)VOTE8 News Notes ............................................. 38

Alumni Notes ...... .... . ..... .. . . . . ........ .. . ... . ...... 40

Faculty And Staff Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45

Necrology ............................................... 47

Editor: John Michael Willmann, '70

Contributing Editor: Mary M. Broderick

Alumni Advisory Committee: Robert V. Massey, '31 J. Barton Harrison, '56

Secretary: Katherine Merlin

THE LAW ALUMNI JOURNAL IS PUBLISHED THREE TIMES A YEAR BY THE LAW ALUMNI SOCIETY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA FOR THE INFORMATION AND ENJOY­MENT OF ITS MEMBERS.

PLEASE ADDRESS ALL COM­MUNICATIONS AND MANU­SCRIPTS TO:

The Editor

LAW ALUMNI JOURNAL University of Pennsylvania Law School 3400 Chestnut Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104

IN THIS ISSUE:

Fall 1972

Law Libraries­A Comparison Page 4

Law Alumni Day Revisited

Page 6

Klaus Honored At Commencement

Page 7

$ A.A.G. Report 1971-1972 Page 17

3

Law Librarian Colllpares Firlll And Law School

Different Challenges Presented to Author By Each 'Institution'

By Richard Sloane Biddle Law Librarian

The purpose of this article is to contrast and com­pare two kinds of institutions: the large Wall Street firm (Cravath) and the topflight law school (Pennsyl­vania)-but only from the vantage point of their li­braries.

It is an interesting fact that the two most articulate insiders who have written about law firm and univer­sity life in our day, Louis Auchincloss [Powers of Attorney] and Mary McCarthy [Groves of Academe] respectively, have filled their readers with such despair as to persuade them either to flee to the hills or apply the torch to both Wall Street and the campus. Are their portraits distorted? Not to them, certainly.

My view-neither bird's eye nor worm's eye-was altogether different. After 20 years in the Cravath office, I never felt the urge to run or burn. Nor after nearly a year at Penn has either thought crossed my mind.

What is the Cravath firm like? It is a large firm , but not an impersonal one. When I left last July, there were about 165 lawyers, compared to a Penn faculty of fewer than 30 and a student body of more than 600. The firm occupied two floors and part of a third near the top of the 60-story Chase Manhattan Bank Building in New York. Its accounting machines and storage files, with their supporting personnel , were located in nearby buildings. Each of the Chase Build­ing floors is nearly the size of a Center City block running from Market to Chestnut Streets in Philadel­phia.

Through the entrance doors you can see Mr. Seward's combination desk-chair (it predates the Alaska Purchase). Across from the desk is a wall chart that traces the firm's membership from 1819 to the

4

present. In a bookcase nearby are Cravath 's briefs and some other mementos of the firm's practice .

Down the hall is the Cravath library of nearly 30,000 volumes. The nine-man library staff expands to about 15 in the summer in order to assist the newly hired second-year law students, each of whom tries to make a reputation for himself in 60 days. We thought that they were doing it by reading-or at least removing from the shelves-about I ,000 books each during that time. Or so it seemed to our stack attendants who had to reshelve them.

What is different about the Cravath firm? I cannot contrast it with the great Philadelphia firms, but I know how it differs from most of the New York firms. It is more flexible . Its members are willing, indeed eager, to try new ideas-if the ideas seem sensible.

I can illustrate this best by reference again to the library because I know it best. When I went there to become their librarian , I had never opened a law book. Yet they were willing to experiment if I was.

Some time after that, but long before I even began to study law, an old pro of a lawyer at Cravath asked me if I would like to try writing an appellate brief. It was to be in defense of a $3,000,000 law suit against the owners of a ship that had been lost at sea. That they used the brief virtually as I wrote it is a tribute to their courage. That they won the case was a stroke of good fortune-especially for me-because it led indirectly to law study, admission to the bar and eventually-to the Univer~ity of Pennsylvania.

(Continued .on page 36)

Richard Sloane

LAW ALUMNI JOURNAL

.---------;Prisoner's Rights Program

Students Act As Counsel For Pennsylvania Prisoners

By Jonathan Silver

Over the past few years the courts, particularly the federal courts, have begun to reverse a former policy of refusal to entertain the legal challenges of state and federal prisoners to the conditions of their incarcer­ation. " He is for the time being the slave of the State," Ruffin v. Com., 62 Va. (21 GRA TT .) 790, 796 (1871), was the universal judicial response to prison­ers' rights suits for a long period of time . Ev~ntually, the judges rejected the analogy, but retamed the conclusion that they ought not to insist that the Con­stitution be enforced in prison. Recently, however , many courts have held that prisoners ' complaints can state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

In several recent cases courts have found substan­tial Constitutional violations within prisons , and have entered far-reaching orders to remedy the situation. The Prisoner's Rights Litigation program at the Law School is a manifestation of the developing concern over prison conditions.

Because nearly all prisoners' complaints are filed prose and in forma pauperis, many are poorly drafted and not overly legible . It is generally assumed that many of the complaints are frivolous. Those f~ct~rs resulted in the failure of the United States D1stnct Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to process , litigate , and dispose of prisoners ' rights complaints as promptly as desirable . Many open cases were as much as three years old.

In the fall of 1971 , Judge Thomas A. Masterson , whose excellent judicial reputation includes a real concern for the fates of the persons who become involved in the criminal justice system, decided that the prisoners' rights docket deserved more attention. He conceived the idea of using law student man-power to assist the prisoners and the courts in that endeavor. Judge Masterson communicated with Professors P~ul Bender and Ralph Spritzer of this law school, and w1th professors of other area law schools. He sugg~sted that if a sufficient number of law students were mter­ested in acting as appointed counsel in pro se prison­ers' rights actions, the Court might adopt a local rule permitting such assignments.

Mr. Bender and Professor Martha Field met with John Myers , a third-year student and then Chairman of the Prison Research Council, and myself. Bender thought that Judge Masterson's idea was a worthwhile

Fall 1972

one and that if student interest was sufficient the law sch~ol should participate in the program. He , Spritzer and Field, agreed to act as faculty supervisors for the students who would be appointed. It was suggested to us that the Prison Research Council offices could serve as a good administrative center for the program. We agreed to act in that capacity.

When some thirty students responded favorably to the idea Judge Masterson was informed that the program' seemed feasible from our point of vi~w. Temple's Law School also submitted an affirmat1v~ report. The Court then adopted local rule 9Yz to permit the appointment of law student counsel.

Rule 9Y2 applies to all civil rights and habeas corpus matters. The prisoner must consent in writing to the appointment of a law student to handle his ~ase. A third-year law student is permitted to appear m co~rt in any proceeding in connection with the case to wh1ch he has been appointed. A second-year law student may appear at any pre-trial stage of a civil rights case. Students must be certified by the dean of the law school as being of good character and competent legal ability. No compensation of any kind may be re­ceived.

It was then decided that the initial cases should be assigned to members of Mr. Spritzer's Litigation Seminar. The development of those cases served as a pilot for the cases which were subsequently assigned to other students. Presently , the Court sends copies of pro se complaints to the Prison Research Council, after leave to proceed in forma pauperis has been granted . (It had been agreed that Temple would handle complaints from Philadelphia city jails (Holmesb~rg), and that we would handle cases from the state pnson at Graterford.) We then recommend appointments to the Court. If the Court accepts the recommendation, appointed counsel is then in a position to begin to work on his case.

Counsel's first step is normally to look at the docu­ments on file at the courthouse. Some files contain only a brief conclusory complaint and an equally brief answer, usually including a motion to dismiss. On the other hand , some files are fairly well developed. In at least one case, both parties had moved for summary judgment and submitted affidavits and briefs. The Court had granted defendant's motion, then granted

(Continued on page 33)

5

Ernest Scott, '29 Receives A ward On Alumni Day

Former Law Alumni Society president Ernest Scott, '29, received the Law School's Distinguished Service Award at Law Alumni Day on April 27.

Presentation of the award was made by Henry T . Reath, '48, chairman of the seven-member Distin­guished Service Award Committee.

Scott received the award, which was the third in the five-year history of the committee, for his service to the Law School, the University and the city of Philadelphia.

"How do you write about a man whose life and service to others is marked-not by empty words and unfulfilled promises-but by action and accomplish­ment?" Reath said in making the presentation.

"We can say, as those who know him well can attest, that he has always exhibited inspired leader­ship , extraordinary courage, brilliance of mind and soundness of judgment; that he has always been a prodigious worker , seeking after perfection and fre­quently finding it-by his quiet manner that inspires others to emulate his fine example."

Scott has been chairman of the Law School's Board of Trustees and is a life trustee of the University. He has served as chancellor of the Philadelphia Bar Association and President of the United Fund in Philadelphia.

He is senior partner in the Philadelphia firm of Pepper, Hamilton and Scheetz.

Flanagan and Hyland

6

The Alumni Day program began with a luncheon honoring the Quinquennial Classes between 1907 and 1972 , and was highlighted by a ceremony honoring the Fifty Year Class.

Main speaker at the luncheon was Biddle Law Librarian Richard Sloane, who directed his remarks to the proliferation of legal publications and their increasing costs.

Sloane proposed the establishment of a law book and law firm library clinic as one aid to Philadelphia firms who have questions about acquisition, cost, and management of legal materials.

Additionally , he highlighted three developments in the area which , he believes, have at least raised the consciousness of book publishers about the attitudes of their consumers.

The first is an article by Robert Taylor summing up the complaints many practitioners have against the

Scott, Wolfman and Reath

publishers. (55 ABA Jr. 553 (1969). The second development is the two-year-old inves­

tigation into publishing practices by the Federal Trade Commission. Sloane cautioned against optimism with respect to a report on that investigation: "There are so many more vulnerable and defenseless consumers than lawyers in this country, they (FTC) point out , that surely we can take care of ourselves."

The Special Committee on Law Book Publishing Practices established by the American Bar Associa­tion in 1970, is the third development listed by Sloane.

Composed of five lawyers, including Sloane, the committee, according to his own admission, accom­plished "only a little more than the FTC."

"Our single accomplishment to date: they have promised to eliminate misleading statements from their advertising . . . But in response to our major complaints-excessive pricing and unnecessary sup­plementation-we obtained no promises."

A seminar on the financial plight of local govern-(Continued on page 37)

LAW ALUMNI JOURNAL

Law School Honors Klaus At Graduation C.L.S. President Praised For Service To Community

William R. Klaus, partner in the Philadelphia law firm of Pepper , Hamilton and Scheetz, and president of the board of trustees of Community Legal Services, Inc. , received the Law School's Honorary Fellowship on May 22 at the Law School Commencement cere­mony in the Law School courtyard.

Klaus has been president of the trustees of Com­munity Legal Services since he led the Philadelphia Bar Association group responsible for its founding in 1966. He presently serves as vice-chairman of the Philadelphia Bar Association and as a vice-president of the National Legal Aid and Defender Association. He is also a director of the Philadelphia Urban Coali­tion and of the Greater Philadelphia Movement.

Klaus received the Honorary Fellowship from Dean Bernard Wolfman and then addressed the law gradu­ates and guests . The graduating class included 204 J.D . recipients, one S.J .D., and seven masters de­grees.

In the American Bar Association , Klaus is chairman of the Standing Committee on Legal Aid and Indigent Defendants and is a former chairman of the Commit­tee on Right to Legal Services . In the Pennsylvania Bar Association, he is a member of the House of Delegates, the founder and present chairman of the Section on Service to the Public, and past chair­man of the Section on Corporation, Banking, and Business Law . In 1966, Mr. Klaus was the first recip­ient of the Philadelphia Bar Association's Award for Services to the Bar in organizing Community Legal Services.

The citation to Mr . Klaus read : "Your career at the Bar provides a striking example

of the lawyer who has pursued the private practice of the profession with energy and distinction, yet has always found time and strength for the insistent de­mands of public service. You have shown wisdom, resourcefulness and determination in the continuing effort to make the legal profession more responsive to public needs and to make its services available to the indigent and the oppressed. Overcoming wide­spread inertia and resistance , you were the moving force in the organization of Community Legal Serv­ices in the City of Philadelphia . Elected its first Pres­ident in 1966, you have continued in that post to the

Fall 1972

present day. In the various professional and civic organizations of which you are a member , you have consistently emphasized the public responsibilities of the legal profession rather than parochial concerns, addressing yourself to the development of legal serv­ice programs, to the protection of civil rights and to problems of housing and urban law.

We hold you in esteem and commend your example to the future lawyers who go forth from this school."

Klaus is a graduate of the Carnegie Institute of Technology and of Temple University Law School.

The Honorary Fellowship of the Law School was established in 1965 to provide appropriate recognition each year to a lawyer who has distinguished himself or herself by combining an active professional career with outstanding public service .

Previous recipients of the Honorary Fellowship are J. LeVonne Chambers , Jr., senior partner in the Charlotte , N.C., law firm of Chambers, Stein, Ferguson and Lanning; Joseph L. Rauh , Jr., a partner in the Washington , D. C. law firm of Rauh and Silard , and counsel to the late Joseph Yablonski in his cam­paign for the presidency of the United Mine Workers Union ; Mrs. Marion Wright Edelman , director of the Washington Research Project of Clark College's Center for Public Policy; Ralph Nader , head of the

(Continued on page 34)

Klaus and Jane Sommer, '72 Prexy

7

Dean Wolfman Addresses The Class Of '72

8 LAW ALUMNI JOURNAL

Trial Of An Issue of Fact:

Spectators Crowd Classroom For Litigation With A Light Touch

By Charles Sweet "Your Honor, do I understand the Court to be

refusing to hear testimony or argument on the inherent differences between men and women?"

"That is correct, counsel. On the contrary, this Court takes judicial notice that no such inherent dif­ferences exist. Please proceed with another line of questioning. ''

While the above colloquy might not typify the scene in many traditional trial courts , it is without doubt highly unusual emanating from the classroom of an establishment law school. Yet this exchange (which will be explained shortly) was only one of many somewhat lighthearted moments in this year's Trial of An Issue of Fact course , which ranged from dead seriousness to frequent whimsy and occasional hilarity.

This course is one of the very few in law school for the student who is interested in trial work , as virtually all of the coursework in law school empha­sizes appellate cases and appellate advocacy tech­niques . This course stressed trial techniques and was run , insofar as possible , as if it were a real courtroom populated with approximately fifty lawyers all trying the same case .

Trial of an Issue was taught by Professor A. Leo Levin and Assistant District Attorney James D. Crawford , along with a host of eminent trial practi­tioners from the Philadelphia Bar , and a number of respected Judges from various Philadelphia and Pennsylvania Courts. On one occasion the class was so fortunate as to have Chief Justice Benjamin Jones of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court sitting as guest judge. As it turned out , the Chief Justice knew a great deal more about the subject being litigated-valuation of coal land-than anyone had anticipated. Needless to say , the class benefitted greatly from the presence of the many guests who generously donated their time.

However , in a very real sense , the actual instructors were the students themselves . In the process of going through each facet of a trial from voir dire to cross examination to closing argument , each student was expected to participate actively on several occasions . While the majority of participants were prepared in advance for their leap into the icewater of litigation , there were frequent spontaneous "volunteers" in the traditional military sense. The quality of advocacy varied greatly , of course , but the most penetrating lessons we.re often learned from the mistakes made , as well as from the demonstrations of technique. Sine~

Fall 1972

the quality of advocacy rose measurably during the semester, it seems safe to speculate that lessons learned in the crucible of a trial-even a mock trial­tend to be well remembered.

Student reaction to the course was generally very favorable. At the outset the course was greatly over­subscribed so that selection of those enrolled was by lottery. Because the class sessions had considerable entertainment as well as educational value, they were

Leo Levin well attended, not only by the students but invariably by a number of spouses and other guests. (As a matter of fact, the author ' s three year old daughter attended eight of the last nine class sessions, consuming animal crackers in the back of the room at the rate of one box per class hour. She managed to get introduced to Chief Justice Jones , and received an honorary grade of "distinguished ," although the students enrolled were graded on a Pass/Fail basis.)

The negative comments centered around the large size of the class and an insufficient number of hours to cover all the material. Both of these problems will be alleviated in the coming year , as the course will

(Continued on page 35)

9

School's First Professor

Wilson's Mark Ren1ains On School; Also Felt On High Court And Nation

By Julian Karpoff, '71

If you ask any schoolboy or even a first year Penn Law student "Who was a delegate to the Second Continental Congress , a signer of the Declaration of Independence , a Colonel in the Pennsylvania militia , a member of the Confederation Congress , a delegate to the Constitutional Convention, a member of the Pennsylvania ratifying convention , a member of the Pennsylvania Constitutional Convention of 1790, a member of the first Supreme Court of the United States and first professor of law at the University of Pennsylvania ," you would most likely draw a blank. Beside the main entrance of the old Law School building a marker reads

Law Department

of the University

First Professor James Wilson

1790

Aside from this, a James Wilson Law Club (read: Beer and Basketball Society), a dilapidated hotel and road­side historical marker in Carlisle, Pennsylvania, and a gravesite near William Penn's in downtown Phila­delphia there is little remembrance of that great man.

James Wilson was active in virtually every impor­tant political event of the critical early years of the Republic. He was an Enlightenment intellectual. He was the colleague and confidant of the Founding Fa­thers, including Ben Franklin, Sam Adams, Alexander Hamilton, James Madison , John Dickinson and others. In addition he was an engaging individu­al-complete with warts . In recognition of these achievements and for the sheer pleasure of the histor­ical perspective: I submit the following account of the life and career of a distinguished man.

James Wilson was a Scotsman . He was born in 1742 to a yeoman farmer and his wife in the lowlands near St. Andrews, on the east coast of Scotland. The area was relatively prosperous , marked by economic de­mocracy and Calvinism. The elder Wilsons were Presbyterian and were both literate, if mainly for the purpose of Scripture study. The area had an intellec­tual tone, being close to the university towns of Edin­burgh and St. Andrews and the scene of religious fervor. In addition, Scotland was enjoying a renais­sance at the time, as the names Hume , Berkeley and Smith, among others. indicate.

10

As a first son, Wilson was pledged to the Lord's work and , as such, slated for an education. In addition to the standard family religious instruction he was sent to the parish school to study Sallust and Virgil, Eu­clid's geometry , penmanship and rhetoric. In 1757, at the age of 14, Wilson graduated from the grammar school and took an examination for a bursarship, or scholarship , at the University of St. Andrews in the fishing town of the same name. He was awarded funds

Wilson's Roadside Marker

and entered college in November of 1757. In the 16th century St. Andrews had been the center

of Reformation activists, but by the early 18th century it had decayed and was described by Daniel Defoe in 1727 as "a grass-grown place of desolation ." How­ever, by Wilson's time the University was making a come-back under the stewardship of a new Provost. The course of studies included Latin, Greek, mathe­matics, logic , moral philosophy, ethics and natural and political philosophy. It is likely that Wilson was intro­duced to the latest learning of the day, including Newton, Locke, and Berkeley. However , he was apparently unswayed and, upon completion of 4 years

LAW ALUMNI JOURNAL

of college, entered the school of divinity at the same University in 1761.

The death of Wilson's father in 1762 ended his study of divinity. To support his family Wilson was forced to become a tutor and so remained until 1765 when his sisters were married and his brothers employed. He then went to Edinburgh to take a course in book­keeping and accounting. Apparently that calling did not beckon or there appeared to be more opportunity for a commoner in America, or both , for Wilson soon thereafter laid plans to go to America. The cost of the journey-approximately £20 , the yearly income of an artisan-was raised by borrowing, a practice that was to haunt Wilson in later years.

In 1765, at the age of 23, Wilson landed in New York and made his way to Philadelphia. He had a letter of introduction to a trustee of the College of Philadelphia-Ben Franklin's forerunner of the Uni­versity of Pennsylvania-and was appointed as a tutor. He served out the year 1765-66 and was award­ed a honorary master's degree in 1766. In the same year, funded by a loan from a cousin also in Pennsyl­vania, Wilson began studying law under John Dickin­son. His notebooks reflect that he studied pleadings, forms, contracts, replevins, torts and land law. In addition, he studied Cicero, Hume, Montesquieu, Blackstone, Hale, Bracton and Coke. He also studied the Pennsylvania constitution and the government of England. The course of study lasted less than a year.

Wilson's legal education was played against the background of increasing friction with the mother country. The French and Indian war had recently ended, providing England considerable new real estate in the interior of the continent, which brought with it increased defense costs. Theretofore, the principal source of revenue had been the sometimes-enforced Molasses Act of 1733. The Sugar Act of 1764 lowered the duty, but made it enforceable. This was followed by the Stamp Act in 1765 and the Townsend Duties on imports and tea. The Colonial response included general agitation , a declaration by James Otis and Dickinson's Letters of a Pennsylvania Farmer. There can be no doubt that these events were also a part of Wilson's education.

Upon completion of his apprenticeship to Dickin­son-and perhaps sensing a surfeit of lawyers in Philadelphia-Wilson removed to Reading in Berks County. Reading was, at the time, a rough frontier town and was said to boast a fair ratio of taverns to settlers. There was commercial fishing and barge traf­fic on the Schuylkill and the principal industry was making felt hats. Business for Wilson was slow, how­ever , and he had to travel to Chester, Lancaster, and Carlisle for clients. Apparently the court house clique disfavored newcomers, for he had but 3 cases in the February 1767 term of the Berks County Common Pleas Court.

While struggling to launch his legal career, Wilson dabbled in journalism. He collaborated on a column called The Visitant, which appeared in the Pennsyl-

Fall 1972

Wilson Hotel In Carlisle, Pa.

vania Chronicle in 1768. It concerned such topics as happiness, courtship, manners and philosophy. He also wrote an outspoken piece on the colonial cause, but it was not to be published until 1774.

Business in Reading gradually picked up. Also, Wilson met his bride-to-be, Rachael Bird, of a promi­nent Reading family, but he nonetheless moved on to Carlisle, in 1770. He was married in 1771, bought a house at the corner of Penn and Hanover Streets and established a household. He was 29.

Carlisle, which had an even greater ratio of taverns

Karpoff, Second From Right, With Wilson Law Club, Circa 1970, And Picture Of James Wilson

II

to settlers than Reading, afforded unbounded oppor­tunity at the time. The area was newly settled-giving rise to extensive land litigation-and lawyers were scarce. His clientele broadened and his reputation spread as far as Philadelphia, as a Philadelphia trading company relied on his services. Wilson still travelled the circuit with the Provincial Court of Appeal, how­ever, and doubtless became acquainted with his col­leagues from around the colony.

By 1772 Wilson was prosperous enough to purchase 2 horses and a cow, but apparently neglected to pay his ·debt to his sponsors in Scotland, as corre­spondence indicates. He became the father of a daughter in the same year.

His practice continued to expand and in 1773 he was called upon to represent Westmoreland County in a boundary dispute with certain would-be Virgin­ians in southwestern Pennsylvania. (At the time, what is now West Virginia was a part of Virginia.) Larger events were to eclipse the dispute.

The early 1770's saw the beginning of the end .of British colonial rule. In quick succession, the British vessel Gaspe was burned; the Committees of Corre­spondence were formed; the Tea Act passed; the Boston Tea Party put on by Sam Adams and his Sons of Liberty; and the Coercion Acts passed. A series of public meetings in May and June of 1774 in Phila­delphia urged that meetings be held around the prov­ince.

The meeting in Carlisle took place in July, 1774. Wilson, a leader of this meeting, was appointed to the local Committee of Correspondence. He was also appointed a representative to a province-wide con­vention to be held in Philadelphia.

The Philadelphia meeting opened its deliberations by affirming allegiance to the King-independence was not yet an idea whose time had come, and Penn­sylvania was a conservative colony. A committee appointed to pi:opose instructions for the Assembly included Wilson and Dickinson. The report, mostly Dickinson's work, had a distinctly conservative and legalistic tone. The Assembly , complying with the instructions, appointed delegates to a general con­gress, which was to become known as the First Con­tinental Congress. The Assembly's choices, however, were from among its own numbers. It is important to note, as later events will verify, that the provincial government was, in 1774, in firmly loyal hands. The power structure of the colony was dominated by a Quaker oligarchy and the Proprietary forces, closely allied with the Penns. The opposition came from the westerners and yeoman farmer class.

Meanwhile Wilson resurrected and published his 1768 tract on the colonial cause. It was similar to other works of the time-John Adams' "Novang]us" [New England] and Jefferson's "Summary View of the Rights of British America." The tone was definitely legalistic. Allegiance to the King was unquestioned. Rather, the propagandists asserted that Parliament had no right to tax the colonies arbitrarily. Wilson's

12

tract, "Considerations on the Nature and Extent of the Legislative Authority of the British Parliament ," included the concept that sovereignty lies with the people , not with any government, a view which was to be central in Wilson's statesmanship.

The next year, 1775, saw Wilson chosen as a dele­gate to another provincial convention, the principal purpose of which was to place a stamp of approval on the work of the (First) Continental Congress. The meeting also adopted high resolves and submitted to an oration by Wilson on the justice of the colonial cause and the tyrannies of Britain.

Upon returning to Carlisle, Wilson helped to form the Cumberland Militia, made up of 3000 "Associa­tors ," the Pennsylvania version of New England Minutemen. The Pennsylvania Assembly made him a Colonel at its May, 1775 session.

The Assembly also saw fit to select Wilson as a delegate to the Second Continental Congress. The mood had changed since the previous Congress. The confrontations at Lexington and Concord occurred in April, 1775. Boston was under siege and the New England militia was gathering. In Pennsylvania the conservatives declined in influence. Dickinson, who had appeared a middle-of-the-roader was now viewed as a conservative. The member_ship of the Second Congress included such radicals· as John and Sam Adams, John Hancock and Patrick Henry. In addition, George Washington, John Jay and Wilson were in the middle camp.

Events overtook the Congress. Ethan Allen took Fort Ticonderoga in the name of the "great Jehovah and the Continental Congress." Various provinces requested advice on policy matters from the Congress, which itself was uncertain of its role and unsure of its authority, a condition which was to plague its entire existence. A committee , including Wilson, was estab­lished to consider the matter. The committee's report was temporizing, but still Congress could not avoid the fact that it now had an army assembled near Boston. Washington was selected as its Commander.

The Battle of Bunker Hill, on June 24, 1775, from which the Continental Army withdrew for lack of ammunition, underscored the need to finance and supply the forces. A committee , once again including Wilson, was appointed to arrange for the printing of $2 million in paper currency.

Another committee, also including Wilson, was ap­pointed to consider securing the friendship of the Indian nations. The committee suggested that the colonies be broken into 3 departments and that com­missioners be appointed for each department. Wilson was appointed a commissioner for the middle depart­ment. Armed with cloth , worsted caps, beads , thim­bles, powder and lead, ivory combs, broadcloth coats, duffle and shroud (cloth), linen handkerchiefs and ruffled shirts, plumed hats and calimoncoe, Wilson traveled to Pittsburgh in August of 1775 and secured a treaty with the Delawares.

LAW ALUMNI JOURNAL

Wilson returned to Congress in late 1775. Old prob­lems still pressed. General Washington was contin­ually requesting supplies. Congress turned to com­missioning privateers-legal pirates-for sources of supplies. Another committee, including Wilson, was selected to determine the disposal of maritime prizes. The report suggested all prizes be confiscated, but that admiralty courts be established to oversee the process.

Early in 1776 Wilson moved that Congress declare its intentions "respecting an Independency." A com­mittee, again including Wilson, was appointed to prepare an address to the inhabitants of the colonies on the issue. The resulting work was largely Wilson's and in the name of legitimate authority asserted that

Women In

temporary deviations must be made from the provin­cial constitutions. Once again the sovereignty of the people was affirmed. In conclusion, it was asserted that America must be free. Meanwhile, Tom Paine's Common Sense was published. The mood of Congress shifted again; the final step toward independence was approaching.

It will be instructive at this point to contemplate Wilson's rise from debtor immigrant in 1765 to leading figure at the Continental Congress in 1775. First off, as de Toqueville was to note some 60 years later, lawyers constitute the American aristocracy . In his early years of practice Wilson doubtless made many acquaintances among the Pennsylvania Bar. Also, it

(Continued on page 32)

The Law

Black Alumna On Temple Law Faculty By Cyndi Bloom

Law School alumna Germaine Ingram ('71) is the first Black woman ever appointed to a position on the faculty of Temple University School of Law. With the Fall semester, she will be an Assistant Professor teaching Torts and Constitutional Law.

Miss Ingram entered the Law School in 1968 with a degree in Political Science from Syracuse Universi­ty. Law School was an entirely new experience for her, she reca:Jis: "When I first thought about studying law, I envisioned staying with it only two years at the most, but I found the experience exciting and challenging with an opportunity to learn an entirely new mode of thinking.''

Having graduated from the Law School last year, she now clerks for the Han. Theodore 0. Spaulding, Judge of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

A native Philadelphian, Miss Ingram was raised at 11th and Fairmount Sts. She remembers growing up in an active household with five brothers and sisters. Her father, prior to his death nine years ago, was a successful real estate broker in North Philadelphia, and her mother , at that time , worked in real estate sales. After her father's death, Miss Ingram's mother undertook the responsibility of raising her six children by working for and receiving the broker's license which enabled her to continue with her husband's work. Miss Ingram relates a great deal of her own pursuit of an "independent means of fulfillment," to her mother's continued independence , courage and competent abilities.

Germaine Ingram's teenage days were filled with violin lessons and studies at Girls' High. Thoughts of entering Syracuse University as a mathematics major became a reality for her in 1964. However, once settled into the university routine, she soon became disenchanted with college math and changed her major to political science.

There were 20 women students in her class at the

Fall 1972

Germaine Ingram, '71

13

Law School, and she remembers very little prejudice by the faculty against women. She does recall, "Some professors were hostile towards women, but most of the problem came during the first year from our own fellow students. They criticized us for taking the seat of some soldier fighting in Viet Nam. We were also accused of merely husband hunting.'' Personally, Miss Ingram says she did not feel, "out of place as a woman or as a Black student."

A capable and intelligent student, she participat:d in the Law Students Civil Rights Research Council , the Black Students Union and a High School Teaching Project. While a member of the Civil Rights Research Council, she worked on the Philadelphia bail project interviewing inmates at the Philadelphia Detention Center and at Holmesburg Prison.

As a third-year law student, Miss Ingram clerked with prominent Philadelphia attorney Austin Norris. She recalls particular fascination with the work: "Austin Norris draws extremely interesting cases which often have quite an impact on society. He is a man of extraordinary intellect and drive. Working with him, I had an opportunity to research and prepare cases which I believe will have an impact on the development of the law, particularly in the area of eminent domain."

Analyzing the educational atmosphere at Penn, Miss Ingram commented, "I received a good educa­tion at Penn. What I really appreciated was the facul­ty's accessibility to the students. There was never a clear demarcation between students and faculty. I believe the atmosphere stimulated a healthy competi­tion and exchange among students."

She began clerking for Judge Spaulding immediately after graduation, and thus did not meet with many of the career problems which confronted her fellow female class members. "Many of them," she states , "had difficulty getting jobs in law firms. It seems the first criteria most firms applied was whether or not a woman was on the Law Review and secondly what her marital plans were."

''But the stereotype of women in the law is beginning to change. Women are no longer assumed to be unattractive and overly aggressive."

Her year with Judge Spaulding has been most eventful and educational. Candidly she reveals, "I am happy with my clerkship although at first I was as­tounded by the mass of cases flowing through the office. My notion of a methodical process oriented toward individual treatment of cases was somewhat undermined. I have received :1 tremendous exposure to a broad cross-section of substantive law which wasn't available in law school.

"With Judge Spaulding I have had the opportunity to be more than a mere research assistant. I've had the opportunity to help develop the direction of the law. I have also been afforded substantial discretion in selecting cases for dissenting opinions and in de­vising solutions to the issues they present."

(Continued on page 36)

14

Review's Staffs Hit By Changes In Body Times Editors Face Frustration In Mixing Work And Study

The Law Review, entering its 121st volume, and its 77th year of publication under the Law S~hool ' s auspices, is as much a part of the school as the l_Ibrary , its faculty , or Hsieh-chai. But in one respect It must necessarily remain set apart-it has its own system of recording time.

It is nothing new to observe that similarities _be­tween the months printed on the cover of the Review and those appearing on the calendar are fortuitous. (The uncharitable would say they are not to be found at all.) More significant than the chronology of pub­lication dates however , is the timekeeping of the Review's productive processes. Here, particularly, the Review's life-cycles and those of the school are dramatically at odds.

The new associate editor learns this when he dis­covers that attached to his membership is a rider requiring his re~urn to the Ia~ s~hool a month before his peers. Once classes begm, It often deve!ops that his courses appear not to meet as regularly as tho~e his fellows are enrolled in. And day by day, his working hours are likely to be a bit longer. Weekdays and weekends blur; night and day become less dif­ferentiated. The work filling this time runs the gamut of the Review's activities-it varies from the neces­sary drudgery of proofreading, throug~ the mo~e sub­stantively concerned, but still techmcally-o_r~ented, chores of technical-cite-checking and sub-editmg, to the research and creative effort required by writing. December, on the Review's official schedule , is an off month-a nod of acknowledgment to exams and se­mester break-but even then a number of editors sandwich in additional worktime. The beginning of a new term, the start of new courses, cause hardly an interruption in the pace of the Review's work.

The more significant break comes in early March, when-a week "or two prior to spring-a new board of officers is elected, and the Review begins a new "year." Associates not elected t? the ~oard ~an ex­pect to find only slightly more mmutes m thei_r days, as they become third-year editors and contn~ue to research and write substantial pieces but are relieved, when their successors arrive, of the Review's techni­cal work. The new board may expect to spend the first half of its term in office at work completing the predecessor board's volume, but consoles itself with

LAW ALUMNI JOURNAL

the expectation that a successor board will do it the same favor. Exams in early May disrupt the Review's work briefly, and some editors are always chagrined to discover that the course they most often cut was the course they might have found most fascinating, and as a result come to regret the fact that the Re­view's time frames, for all their uniqueness, cannot include more than 24 hours in a day. By 2 or 3 weeks after exams, all but one or two members of the board will have left for summer jobs-cut short to 7 or 8 week tenures, and in August (in 1972, July 31st) new associates arrive and the cycle repeats. The satisfac­tions derived from Law Review may differ from indi­vidual to individual, but in almost all cases include the sense of camaraderie generated by any difficult experience shared with others. Beyond this, the per­fectionist, the advocate of a cause, or the credential­collector who values the Review's not-to-be-gainsaid advantages in job-seeking, may each pursue their own goals.

The Review's publication schedule was last year cut back from eight issues annually to six, in order to give fuller treatment to worthier topics, rather than to further the overwriting of some areas of the law. In the past year the content of the Review has includ­ed articles and comments on Serrano v. Priest, securi­ties law, the Pentagon Papers, public participation in administrative proceedings, parole, and similarly timely topics.

In the course of their work, the Review's editors garner counsel from a number of sources. Most fre­quently, the faculty contribute ideas and criticism. But practitioners, and alumni particularly, are an espe­cially welcome source of advice. The Review is cur­rently attempting to augment and better structure its contact with this quarter through the formation of a Law Review Alumni Association, with membership automatic for former editors and open to all alumni who wish to assist their school's publication. Inter­ested readers are invited to write the Review.

Domestic Vietnam?

Quarantine Addicts To Reduce Crime By James C. Luitweiler, '14

IS AMERICA RUNNING SCARED?

This is a logical conclusion from Life's leading article in their January 14th issue, which in bold black face answers the question-

ARE YOU PERSONALLY AFRAID OF CRIME? by the following tabulation:

78% sometimes feel unsafe in their own homes 80% in big cities are afraid in the streets at night 43% of families were crime victims last year 30% keep a gun for self-defense 41% say their police protection is inadequate

This tabulation was not a figment of some writer's imagination, but is the synthesis of some 43,000 of its readers across the country responding to Life's questionnaire sent out after their November 19th arti­cle about "fortress on E. 78th Street, New York City."

Recently Vice-President Agnew in a television newscast reported President Nixon's decision to spend $140 million on the Federal Government's "battle against crime," which Mr. Agnew forecasts will reduce crime by 5%. Take 5% off the above tabulation and what have you left? One is reminded of the fable of the old woman who tried to sweep back an incoming tide with her broom.

Is this battle against crime to mushroom into an­other domestic Vietnam, with equally sorry results; worse perhaps because it is a battle in our own back yards?

Fall 1972

One respondent to Life's questiOnnaire from Greenville, S. C.-of all places!-is pictured in Life's issue of January 14th, returning home with a drawn revolver in his right hand. He opines the U. S. must spend billions, not millions, to stop drug traffic.

The writer who lived some 50 years in and about New York City witnessed that proud metropolis

Luitweiler, Circa 1914

15

metamorphized in from the mecca, with its Statue of Liberty beckoning Europeans to come to America to enjoy life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, into one of the world ' s worst crime centers with 50% of the heroin addicts concentrated in it. Certainly the above percentages would apply to New York City and perhaps also to some of our larger Southern cities.

This writer was impelled to spend summer before last in Scandinavia, where he had spent many years between the two world wars, to take samplings to determine whether what was transpiring in the United States was duplicated there. Conclusion: No, except in Sweden where some Swedes attributed their wave of drug addiction to the influx of a horde of American army deserters and draft dodgers. Unless they were ' remittance men ' with support from their families in America, they were without visible means of support until they found a lucrative income by becoming drug pushers.

This writer listened to a lengthy debate on how England was facing up to the drug problem. Now a resident of North Carolina, it led him to write a letter to Governor Scott of North Carolina on December 29th with a novel suggestion of how to 'undercut' the crime wave. In essence the suggestion was that the State set an example modelled on England's experi­ence; namely, instead of jailing drug users the State should pass a law authorizing drug users to go to physicians and, in strict confidence obtain a prescrip­tion for the drugs the physician determines was nec­essary to continue their habit, such drugs to be fur­nished free or at cost by State agencies, without pilloring the patients publicly as criminals. This could have two effects: (I) Deprive pushers of their lucrative business and force them to leave the State; and (2) remove the necessity for drug addicts to resort to robberies and burglaries to raise money to pay for their drugs, and so reduce the incidence of crime. Of course, should drug addicts continue to commit crimes they would be apprehended and dealt with as crimi­nals. But the mere possession of drugs alone would thereafter not be a crime.

This letter to the Governor brought a reply from the Acting Director of the North Carolina Drug Au­thority. This brought a second letter from me. For­tunately the views expressed in this second letter were reinforced by two articles appearing in the Charlotte Observer under dates of January 9th and lOth. Th~se articles were in flat contradiction to the statement of the Director of the North Carolina Drug Authority that England's "program has proven to be a failure and drug addiction is more prevalent today in England than it ever has been."

The suggestion about a change in the State's policy vis-a-vis drug users may seem cynical in that it pro­vides no cure for drug addiction. But it has precedent in the treatment of disease epidemics which separates the healthy from the afflicted by quarantining the latter. There is ample evidence of the success of such policies. Witness the stamping out of the black plague

16

of Manchuria by Dr. Richard P. Strong, of Harvard University , and later his success with the typhus epidemic in the Balkans. The writer heard these stories from Dr. Strong himself when serving at a later date as his secretary.

Of course it is recognized that the policy suggested might well drive drug pushers into the other 49 States. But if the Carolinas could furnish proof of the work­ability of their plan, it would probably be followed by action elsewhere, including the Federal Govern­ment. It would certainly be less costly than spending hundreds of millions on chasing drug addicts and criminals underground.

Granting the contention that the plan offers no cure for drug addiction , might it not be more effective if treatment of drug users was left to the medical pro­fession instead of to bureaucrats?

There is evidence that using drugs in moderate doses does not incapicitate the users from doing useful and gainful work. Drug users are mainly youths and if they can be encouraged to take jobs and perform acceptable work, it might restore lost ambition and gradually win them away from drugs. Certainly it would remove the incentive to commit crimes to pro­vide the wherewithal for their habit.

Why drug addiction and crime aren't epidemic in Norway and Iceland is the subject of another article by the writer, which is still an unpublished manu­script.

There is so much going on in America of a con­structive nature by the majority of the people , that if these healthy, vigorous and ambitious youths could be quarantined against drug pushers and not forced to "run scared," our future might be a bright one.

Let's not have another domestic Vietnam!

II Letters To The Editor II To The Editor:

No doubt the entire Law School community is said to be indebted to Prof. Gorman for his efforts con­cerning the Law School curriculum. It is unfortunate that his energies appear to have been misdirected and his suggestions, as presented in the Journal, less than useless.

The central fault is his apparent failure to start from purpose, that is, to recognize and articulate the as­serted shortcomings of the status quo and to identify the interests involved. Upon this omission , all that follows is irretrievably far afield.

Specifically, one might ask what is the purpose of law school? What is to be learned in law school? What is the best method to accomplish this? Why do stu­dents come in the first place and what motivates them? What occurs under the present system? Why is morale so bad? Why do graduates leave enervated and de-testing the experience? ·

In addition, it should be asked whether the method

(Continued on page 34)

LAW ALUMNI JOURNAL

II SPECIAL REPORT II

Fall 1972 17

18

LAW OF"F'ICES

01!1ERMAYER, REBMANN, MAXWELL & HIPPEL

14TI-I FLOOR PACKARD BUILDING

G. RUHLAND RE:BMANN , JR. JOHN f . E:. HIPPE:L RICHARD W. THORINGTON H. CLAYTON LOUDE:RBACK HERBE:RT A . fOGE:L WILLIAM G. Q'N(ILL

DAVID f . MAXWELL GE:ORGE B . CLOTHIER fRANK E. HAHN, JR. WILLIAM J . fUCHS ROBERT W. LEES WILLIAM f . SULLIVAN, JR WALTER R . MILBOURNE

PHIL.ADEL.PHIA, PA. ISII02

AREA CODE 215 LOCUST 8 - 7911

CABLE " EOMER"

fRANKLIN 5. tO ~<tON OS llt04- 1845

JOHN J . LOMBARD, JR. LEON J . OBERMAYER

HUGH SCOTT COUNSEL

A . GRANT SPRECHER BARTON P. JE:NKS m HOWARD H. L(WIS

H . THOMAS fELIX , ll ALAN C . KAUffMAN GRAHAM( P. RICHARDS , JR. JAMES LEWIS GRiffiTH PAUL C . HE:INTZ

ANTHONY f . VISCO , JR. PE:TE.R M. BREITL I NG

L . DAVID WILLISON, :m JOHN L . JENK I NS

HUGH C . SUTHE:RLAND 'NALTER BEH, tt

~OBERT I. WHITE: LAW

Dean Bernard Wolfman The Law School University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104

Dear Bernie:

August 1, 1972

The results of our 1971-72 Law School Alumni Annual Giving campaign will be fully documented in the next edition of the Law Alumni Journal. I am happy t~ report that our total of $132,461 is the highest amount ever achieved.

This success is attributable to the dedicated work of our volunteer workers, to the loyalty and generosity of alumni, and to the interest in the Law School shown by the parents of students and others who are not alumni.

Although I am somewhat disappointed that our total is only $2,300 greater than last year, I feel that we have laid ·the groundwork for a substantial leap forward next year. I am deeply grateful to our chairmen, and to our class and re­gional agents. I know that I speak for them in thanking every individual who recognized the needs of the Law School and who responded by making their personal contributions to our Annual Giving pr?gram. '

Sincerely,

r-.0

JFEH:mca

LAW ALUMNI JOURNAL

Fall 1972

UNIVERSITY of PENNSYLVANIA PHILADELPHIA 19104

The Law School

OFFICE OF THE DEAN

August 8,, 1972

Dear John:

It was a pleasure to receive your letter of August 1, reporting that our 1971-72 Law School Alumni Annual Giving campaign reached a record total of $132,461. The leader­ship and hard work that you and your organization of volunteer workers exhibited have been remarkable.

I agree with your evaluation that the groundwork has been laid for a significant increase next year both in number of participants and in total dollars contributed. Thanks to your Annual Giving team, .our alumni are becoming increasingly aware that successful Annual Giving programs are indispensable to our Law School.

I am indeed grate·ful to you, to your co-workers, and to our alumni for being so responsive to the needs of the Law School.

BW:rdb

John F. E. Hippe!, Esquire 1418 Packard Building Phi·ladelphia, Pennsylvania 19102

Sincerely,

~ Bernard Wolfman

19

BENJAMIN FRANKLIN

ASSOCIATES

THE BENJAMIN FRANKLIN ASSOCIATES ARE A UNIVERSITY-WIDE GROUP OF ALUMNI AND FRIENDS WHO CONTRIB­UTE ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS OR MORE TO ALUMNI ANNUAL GIVING. LISTED ARE LAW SCHOOL ALUMNI WHO JOINED THE BENJAMIN FRANKLIN ASSOCIATES.

THE FELLOWS OF THE BENJAMIN FRANKLIN ASSOCIATES, THE HIGHEST LEVEL OF tONJfRIBUTION IN ALUMNI ANNUAL GIVING, HONORS THOSE WHO CONTRIBUTE FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS OR MORE TO ALUMNI ANNUAL GIVING.

Chairman for the Law School -Richard P. Brown, Jr., L'48

FELLOWS OF THE BENJAMIN FRANKLIN ASSOCIATES W. James Macintosh, W'22, L'26

*Bernard G. Segal, L'31

BENJAMIN FRANKLIN ASSOCIATES *Philip W. Amram, C'20, L'27 Gustave G. Amsterdam, C'30, L'33

*Walter W. Beachboard, C'29, L'32 *Richard P. Brown, Jr., L'40 *Edwin H. Burgess, L'14 Sylvan M. Cohen, C'35, L'38 Robert Dechert, C' 16, L'21

*L. Leroy Deininger, L'14 in memory of

Hon. J. Whitaker Thompson *Richard M. Dicke, L'40 *Aaron M. Fine, C'43, L'48 Max Freedman, W'23, LNA

*Kenneth W. Gemmill, L'35 *George B. Gifford, L'12,

Estate of

*John F. Headly, L'27 *John F. E. Hippe!, C'23, L'26

Charles M. Justi, W'22, L'27 Harold E. Kohn, C'34, L'37 Robert C. Ligget, W'I3, L~17

*John T. Macartney, W'44, L'49 *William A. Marquard, Jr., W'40, LNA *Baldwin Maull, L'25 *John L. McDonald, L'40 J. Wesley McWilliams, W'15, L'15

*Albert B. Melnik, C'24, L'27 *Morton Meyers, C'22, L'25 *Leon J. Obermayer, W'08, L'08 *Marvin Schwartz, L'49 *Ernest Scott, C'25, L'29

*Robert Trigg, L'51 *Wendell E. Warner, L'24

*To recognize those Benjamin Franklin Associates gifts allocated solely to the Law School.

WILLIAM DRAPER LEWIS

ASSOCIATES

Chairman-BARTON E. FERST, L'44

TO HONOR THE MEMORY OF WILLIAM DRAPER LEWIS, DEAN OF THE LAW SCHOOL FROM 1896 TO 1914, THE WIL­LIAM DRAPER LEWIS ASSOCIATES WAS FOUNDED IN RECOGNITION OF CON­TRIBUTIONS OF FIVE HUNDRED DOL­LARS OR MORE TO LAW SCHOOL AN­NUAL GIVING.

Anonymous Ashby M. Larmore, L'31 Daniel Lowenthal, L'31 Desmond J. McTighe, L'25 Philip F. Newman, L'17 Thomas A. O'Boyle, L'40 Gilbert W. Oswald, L'34 Lipman Redman, L'41 Evan Y. Semerjian, L'64 G. William Shea, L'36

William B. Arnold, L'29 Prof. Martin J. Aronstein, L'65 Hon. francis Shunk Brown, Jr., L'16 Clive S. Cummis, L'52 Barton E. Ferst, L'44 Joseph P. Flanagan, Jr., L'52 Bernard M. Guth, L'58 Leon C. Holt, Jr., L'51

20 LAW ALUMNI JOURNAL

0 ~'lVTURY

CENTURY CLUB

CENTURY CLUB MEMBERSHIP IS AWARDED IN RECOGNITION OF CONTRIBUTIONS OF ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS OR MORE TO LAW SCHOOL ALUMNI ANNUAL GIVING. TH E SUSTAINING FELLOWS OF THE CENTURY CLUB ARE THOSE MEMBERS WHO EXCE ED THE BASIC MEMBERSHIP REQUIREMENTS AND AS­SIST THE SCHOOL BY CONTRIBUTING TWO HUNDRED AND FIFTY DOLLARS OR MORE . .

Alexander B. Adelman , L'3l Sadie T. M. Alexander , L'27 John T. Andrews, Jr. , L '64 Jerome B. Apfel , L'54 Louis D. Apothaker , L '56 William W. Atterbury , Jr. , L '50 Frank B. Baldwin III, L '64 Henry W. Balka, L '26 Augustus S. Ballard , L '48 Samuel Bard, L'36 Jay D. Barsky, L '45 John G. Bartol , Jr., L '52 Hyman L. Battle , Jr., L'49 Max M Batzer , L '33 Lewis B. Beatty , Jr. , L '49 Robert M. Beckman, L'56 Thomas J. Beddow, L '39 Harry P . Begier , Jr. , L '64 Hon . John C. Bell , Jr. , L ' l7 Joseph Bell, L '37 Martin M. Bell , L '48 Robert K . Bell , L '24 J. Glenn Benedict , L '27 John G. Berg, L '67 Leonard J. Bernstein , L '34 Franklin H. Berry , L'28 John H . Bertolet , L ' 31 Claire U. Biehn , L '37 Henry M. Biglan, L '39 G. William Bissell , L'64 Allen D. Black, L'66 Samuel A. Blank , L '32 Charles J . Bloom, L '71 Stanley W. Bluestine , L '54 Fred Blume, L '66 Richard L. Bond , L '56 ]3ernard M. Borish , L'43 Clifford M. Bowden, L '28 John P. Bracken , L '39 Christopher Branda, Jr. , L '51 Joseph Brandschain , L'28 Gerald Broker , L '59 Hon Hazel H. Brown , L '24 William H . Brown III , L '55 Herman M. Buck , L'35

Fall 1972

SUSTAINING FELLOWS OF THE CENTURY CLUB

S. Samuel Arsht, L'34 Frederic L. Ballard , L '42 Hon. Alexander F. Barbieri , L ' 32 Ralph M. Barley, L'38 Marshall A. Bernstein , L '49 Robert M. Bernstein , L ' 14 John Bertman, L '57 William C. Bodine , L'32 Raymond J. Bradley, L'47 Floyd E . Brandow, Jr., L '54 Mitchell Brock , L'53 E. Calvert Cheston, L '35 Mrs. Joseph A. Coleman Stuart Coven, L '51 Harold Cramer , L'51 Guy G. deFuria, L'28 Park B. Dilks , Jr. , L '51 Bernard Eskin , L'35 Myer Feldman, L'38 Eugene C. Fish , L '34 John R. Gibbet , L '64 Louis J. Goffman , L '35 Robert A. Hauslohner, L'50 William S. Hudders , L '29

Chairman-HAROLD CRAMER, L'51

CENTURY CLUB MEMBERS

Edward V. Buckley, L'24 Neil W. Surd , L'51 Francis J. Burgweger , Jr. , L '70 Joseph W. P. Burke, L'39 Thomas J . Burke, L '49 Walter M. Burkhardt , L ' l4 John Butterworth , L '53 E . Braclay Cale , Jr. , L'62 J. Scott Calkins , L '52 Robert J. Callaghan, L ' 33 James D. Carpenter, L'08 Hon. Curtis C . Carson , Jr., L '46 Benjamin E. Carter , L '58 Louis J. Carter, L '49 Meyer L. Casman, L ' 17 Harry Cassman , L ' l2 Sidney Chait , L '33 Keron D . Chance , L'38 Frederick J. Charley , L '41 Morris Cheston , L '28 Dr. Roland J . Christy , L '34 Hon . Joseph S. Clark, Jr. , L '26 Roderick T. Clarke , L '36 William N. Clarke , L '42 Harrison H. Clement , L'37 Donald S. Coburn , L '66 W. Frederic Colclough , L '30 Ira B. Coldren , Jr. , L '52 Marvin Comisky , L '41 William H. Conca, L '34 George H. Conover , Jr. , L '52 Charles R. Cooper, Jr., L'47 Jerome J. Cooper , L ' 51 A. Lynn Corcelius, L '41 Henry B. Cortesi, L'63 Robert I. Cottom , L '41 J. Harry Covington III , L'38 Stephen A. Cozen , L '64 Cassin W. Craig, L'49 Albert J . Crawford , Jr. , L '39 James D. Crawford , L '62 Samuel S. Cross , L '49 Thomas F. Cunnane, L'63 Edward I. Cutler , L '37 Mrs . Florence S. Davidow, L '37 J. Lawrence Davis, L '28

William F. Hyland, L '49 Edward A. Kaier , L'33 Bernard V. Lentz, L '36 W. Barclay Lex, L'l2 Paul A. Mueller, Jr., L'55 David H. Nelson , L '49 Michael A. Orlando III , L '58 Isidor Ostroff, L'30 Charles C. Parlin , Jr., L'49 Raymond M. Pearlstine , L'32 Robert E. Penn , L '60 Franklin Poul, L'48 Walter N . Read, L'42 G. Ruhland Rebmann, Jr. , L'22 Pace Reich , L'54 Hon. Theodore 0. Rogers , L '40 Edwin P. Rome, L'40 Alex Satinsky , L '37 John N. Schaeffer , Jr. , L '37 Mr. & Mrs. Dorrance Sexton Herbert M. Silverberg, L '68 Steward E. Warner, L '27 Morris L. Weisberg, L'47 Morris Wolf. L '03 Dean Bernard Wolfman , L '48

David J . Dean, L'27 Daniel deBrier , L'29 Raymond K . Denworth, Jr., L '6l Harry T . Devine, L'36 Samuel Diamond , L '55 Ralph B. D'Iorio, L'49 Pasquale J. DiQuinzio, L '54 M. Carton Dittmann , Jr . , L '38 James B. Doak , L '35 Robert J . Dodds , Jr. , L '40 Robert J . Dodds III , L '69 Robert B. Doll , L '47 Miss Ethel F. Donaghue , L'20 Charles H . Dorsett , L '35 Herbert G. DuBois , L '36 Wayland F. Dunaway III, L '36 William H. Easburn III , L'59 Murray S. Eckel!, L'59 Nathan L. Edelstein , L'28 Joseph L. Ehrenreich, L'l6 Hon. Jay H. Eiseman , L '33 WilliamS. Eisenhart, Jr. , L '40 Mr. & Mrs. Robert R. Endicott Neil G. Epstein , L'65 Leonard L. Ettinger, L '38 Harold Evans , L ' IO Neil K. Evans , L '64 Martin S. Evelev , L '58 John K. Ewing III , L '27 Samuel E. Ewing, L'30 William B. Farran, L'41 Richard J. Farrell , L'41 Nelson P. Fegley , L ' ll Albert J. Feldman , L '53 Anthony G. Felix, Jr. , L'34 Howard W. Fineshriber, L'33 Joseph M. First , L '30 Joseph H . Flanzer, L '33 Peter Florey , L '50 Caleb Foote , L '53 Prof. Jefferson B. Fordham Leon S. Forman , L'39 Michael D. Foxman, L'61 Bernard Frank , L ' 38 Edward P . Frankel , L '36

21

A. Fred Freedman , L '56 Solomon Freedman, L'34 James A. Freyer, L '65 Sidney W. Frick , L '40 Calvin J . Friedberg, L'35 Edward H . P. Fronefield, L '24 Fred T. Fruit, L ' ll Carl W. Funk , L '25 Hon. Isaac S. Garb , L'56 Marvin Garfinkel, L '54 Milton B. Garner , L '36 Morris B. Gelb , L'29 Frank H . Gelman, L'35 Lewis M. Gill, L'36 John E. Gillmor, L '62 ·M. Kalman Gitomer, L '50 Howard Gittis, L '58 Thomas P. Glassmoyer, L '39 Fred P. Glick , L'35 Stuart B. Glover , L '28 Albert H. Gold , L'48

in memory of Harvey B. Levin , L '48

Hyman Goldberg, L '37 Samuel A. Goldberg, L'23 Larry J. Goldsborough , L '57 Mr. & Mrs. Lothar H . Goold Joseph K. Gordon , L'51 Arthur R. Gorr, L'59 Joseph A. Grazier , L '28 Oliver F. Green, Jr., L '51 Harry A. Greenberg, L'38 Mr. Bruce H. Greenfield Robert W. Greenfield , L '30 W. Edward Greenwood , Jr., L '29 The late Hon. George W. Griffith , L '23 Robert S . Grodinsky, L '50 Miss Mary E. Groff , L '32 Hon. Bernard M. Gross , L '59 Paul D. Guth , L'56 Frank E. Hahn , Jr. , L'35 Rayner M. Hamilton , L'61 Will iam D. Harkins , L'22 Charles Harris, L'59 Hon . Doris May Harris , L '49 David C. Harrison, L '55 J. Barton Harrison, L'56 Francis J . Hartman, L '55 Jeffery C. Hayes, L'71 John S. Hayes , L'59 Donald W. Hedges, L'47 Jesse G. Heiges, L'38 Paul W. Heil, L'66 Carl E. Heilman, L'39 Charles A. Heimbold, Jr. , L'60 Col. Edmond H. Heisler , L '51 Charles J. Hepburn, Jr. , L '35 Lloyd S. Herrick , W'50 Carl J. W. Hessinger, L '40 George W. Heuer , Jr., L'41 Jack R. Heyison , L '38 Steward A. Hirschhorn, L'66 Irving M. Hirsh , L'55 Donald E . Hittle, L '42 Hon. T. Linus Hoban, L'I7 Edward B. Hodge , L '31 Abraham Hofferman , L'34 Romer Hollera n, L '68 Richard V. Holmes, L'56 Marcus S. Hottenstein , L '99 Andrew Hourigan , Jr. , L '40 Samuel L. Howell , L'll Richard A. Huettner, L'52 Philip L. Hummer, L'61 Hon. James Hunter III , L'39 Hon. Daniel H. Huyett III, L '48 Richard S. Hyland , L '60 Thomas M. Hyndman, L'II Joseph G. Jackson, L'29 Charles S. Jacobs, L '36 Howard M. Jaffe , L '61 Paul L. Jaffe , L'50

22

Hon . Robert B. Johnson , L '27 Thomas McE. Johnston, L'24 John P . Jordan , L '28 Ben F . Kaito , L '54 Norman J. Kalcheim , L '30 John 0 . Karns, L'57 Allan Katz , L '60 Solomon Katz , L '48 David J . Kaufman , L'55 Ernest R. Keiter, L ' 19 Hon. Bernard J. Kelley , L'26 Joseph H. Kifer , L '29 David Kittner , L'51 John P. Knox , L '53 Charles G. Kopp , L '60 Meyer Kramer, L '44 William H. Kresch , L '30 Goncer M. Krestal , L '57 David H. Kubert , L '32 Vincent J. Labrasca, L'41 Miss Marlene F. Lachman , L '70 Hon. Gregory G. Lagakos , L '38 Robert M. Landis , L'47 Mrs . Sue N. Lang, L '71 William W. Lanigan, L'57 George C. Laub, L '36 Samuel S. Laucks , Jr. , L '42 Hon. S. Frank Laveson , L'28 Henry W. Lavine , L '60 Nathan Lavine , L'31 Samuel P. Lavine , L'28 Daniel J. Lawler , L'62 James F . Lawler, L'51 Arthur W. Lefco , L'71 Arthur W. Leibold , Jr. , L '56 Anthony S. Leidner, L '61 William T. Leith , L '41 Prof. A. Leo Levin , L '42 Harvey Levin, L '58 Leonard Levin , L '50 Russell R. Levin , L '47 Hon. Louis E. Levinthal, L ' 16 A. Harry Levitan , L'35 William J . Levy , L '64 S. Cyrus Lewis , L ' 31 Herbert M. Linsenberg, L '51 Hon. Abraham H. Lipez, L'29 William Lipkin , L'33 Louis Lipschitz, L '27 S. Gerald Litvin , L '54 H . Allen Lochner, L '39 Samuel S. Logan, Jr. , L '41 Edwin Longcope, L '35 Edwin P. Longstreet , L'15 Arthur S. Lorch , L '37 David P. Loughran, L'62 The late Edwin A. Lucas, L ' 17 Bernard H . Lundy, L '60 Carl P. Lundy , L ' 33 William F . Lynch II, L'49 Edward W. Madeira, Jr. , L '52 Harry K. Mad way , L '36 D. Arthur Magaziner , L'14 Elias Magi!, L'30 Wm . Morris Maier , L'35 Michael H . Malin, L'60 David S. Malis, L'll Richard B. Malis, L '40 Paul Maloney, L '33 Frank H . Mancill , L'I4 Alan W. Margolis, L '58 Robert Margolis , L '48 David H . Marion , L '63 Jerome L. Markovitz, L'33 Francis E. Marshall, L '48 William B. Marshall , L '40 Ralph S. Mason , L '39 William L. Matz, L '29 Robert F . Maxwell , L '48 Milford L. McBride , Jr. , L '49 John F . McCarthy, Jr., L'48

Daniel J. McCauley , Jr. , L '41 Thomas McConnell Ill , L'22 John B. McCrory , L '51 Hon. Barron P. McCune , L '38 Walter P . McEvilly , L '39 Stephen J . McEwen, Jr. , L '57 Ellis H . McKay, L '53 George W. McKee , Jr., L '34 Edward M. Medvene, L '57 Thomas F. Meehan , Jr., L'54 Edward B. Meredith , L'51 Leon I. Mesirov , L '34 Charles W. Miles III , L '36 A. Arthur Miller , L '34 William E . Miller , Jr. , L '49 Mrs . Dorothea G . Minskoff , L '34 Charles J . Moos , L'41 John T . Mulligan , L '59 Prof. Robert H . Mundheim Alexander L. Nichols , L '31 David W. Niesenbaum, L '28 Eugene A. Nogi , L '32 H. Christopher Nolde , L'62 Roderick G. Norris , L '53 Philip S. Nyman, L'62 David W. O 'Brien , L '49 James E . O 'Connell, L'51 Martin J. O'Donnell , L'49 Edward J . O'Halloran , L '52 Wilson H. Oldhouser, L'52 Harris Ominsky , L '56 Thomas N. O'Neill , Jr., L'53 George Ovington, Jr., L'07 Hon. Israel Packel , L '32 Henry N . Paul, Jr. , L '25 Henry D. Paxson , Jr. , L '29 Lawrence M. Perskie , L'49 Marvin D. Perskie, L '48 Morris Pfaelzer II , L'38 John C. Phillips , L '39 I. David Pincus, L '43 Harry Polikoff, L '31 Herman I. Pollock, L '27 Robert C. Porter, L'39 Harry A. Poth , Jr. , L'36 Herman B. Poul, L '38 John Byron Prather, L'27 Calvin K. Prine, L '53 Samuel F . Pryor III , L'53 Louis C . Pulvermacher, L '51 Alfred W. Putnam, L'47 R. Stewart Rauch , Jr. , L '41 John F. Rauhauser , Jr. , L'48 Henry T . Reath, L'48 Clarence P. Reberkenny, L'52 G. Hayward Reid , L '48 P. Herbert Reigner , L ' 17 Curtis R . Reitz , L'56 Russell R. Reno , Jr., L '57 Paul H . Rhoads , L'31 David F. Richardson, L'65 Grover C. Richman , Jr. , L'35 Michael J. Roach , L'69 Victor J . Roberts , Jr. , L'37 · Richard M. Rosenbleeth , L'57 David H . Rosenbluth , L'33 Harold S. Rosenbluth , L '50 Adolph G. Rosengarten, Jr. , L '30 Hon . Max Rosenn, L'32 Robert A. Rosin , L'61 John Ross , L'35 Michael J . Rotko , L '63 Hon. Joseph D. Roulhac , L'48 William Rowe , L'27 Alexander N . Rubin , Jr. , L'50 William M. Ruddock, L'25 John J . Runzer , L '58 HenryS. Ruth , Jr. , L'55 Marshall A. Rutter, L'59 Maurice Saeta, L' 17 Hon . Herbert W. Salus , Jr. , L '48 W. Albert Sanders, L'31

LAW ALUMNI JOURNAL

..

Hon. Edwin H. Satterthwaite, L'40 H . James Sautter, L' 14 Joseph H. Savitz, L'58 James W. Scanlon, L'30 Henry W. Scarborough , Jr., L'36 Raymond C. Schlegel, L'54 Carl W. Schneider, L'56 Andrew J. Schroder II, L '30 Lloyd J. Schumacker, L'30 Louis B. Schwartz, L'35 Murray M. Schwartz, L'55 Emanuel G. Scoblionko, L '34 W. Frazier Scott, L'39 Bernard L. Segal , L '59 Irving R. Segal, L'38 Mr. F. Joseph Sensenbrenner David E. Seymour, L'60 David V. Shapiro, L'44 Milton H. Shapiro, L'40 Mrs. NormaL. Shapiro, L'51 William J . Sharkey, L'58 William S. Sharninghausen, L'39 Samuel P. Shaw, Jr., L'42 Robert M. Shay, L'61 Hon. Charles A. Shea, Jr. , L'36 Stanford Shmukler, L'54 David S. Shrager, L '60 Morris M. Shuster, L'54 Joel D. Siegel, L'66 Nathan Silberstein, L'33 Seymour S. Silverstone, L'25 John P . Sinclair, L'39 Steven A. Skalet, L'71 Edward L. Snitzer, L'55 Alvin L. Snowiss, L'55

PARENTS Max Freedman, Chairman Mrs . Joseph A. Coleman Mr. Kjeld Damsgaard Mr. Norman Davidoff Mrs. Eleanor C. Edgar Mr. & Mrs. Robert R. Endicott Rev. Louis D. Feder Mr. Robert G. Frederick Mr. Edward Freint Mrs. Rosalind F. Gold Mr. & Mrs. Lothar H. Goold Mr. Bruce H. Greenfield Mrs. William P. Gross Mr. Robert Hoe V Mr. Sydney S. Kaplan Mr. & Mrs. Gordon L. Keen Mr. George Makdisi Mr. & Mrs. Anthony C. Olowinski Mrs. William N. Papian Mr. Maynard Petkun Mr. & Mrs . Jesse Ross Mr. F. Joseph Sensenbrenner Mr. & Mrs. Dorrance Sexton Mr. & Mrs. J. Karl Stark Mr. Lester J. Tanner Mr. & Mrs. Belmont VerStanding Mr. Herbert J. Waxman Mr. Gerald Weiner

NON ALUMNI Prof. Jefferson B. Fordham Miss Ellen Frater

in memory of Edward L. Frater, L '3 1

Max Freedman Lloyd S. Herrick, W'50 Mr. & Mrs. Stephen G . Lax

in memory of Harvey B. Levin, L'48

*deceased

Fall 1972

Elvin R. Souder, L'42 Oscar F . Spicer, L '59 Benjamin F. Stahl, Jr., L'39 Sidney S. Stark, L'32 Burton K. Stein, L '64 Lee N. Steiner, L'49 Hon. James L. Stern, L '33 John M. Stocker, L'41 J . Tyson Stokes , L'31 J. Pennington Straus, L '35 James A. Strazzella , L'64 Ms. Gertrude Strick , L'53 C. Leo Sutton, L'27 Marc L. Swartzbaugh, L '61 Edward J. Swotes, L'17 Kenneth Syken, L'52 John T. Synnestvedt, L'52 Hon. Harry A. Takiff , L'37 Myles H. Tanenbaum, L'57 Louis M. Tarasi , Jr., L'59 Howard W. Taylor, Jr., L'39 William E. Taylor, Jr., L'44 William J . Taylor, L'52 S. Robert Teitelman, L'41 Michael L. Temin, L'57 George W. Thompson , L'48 Thomas J. Timoney, L'52 Charles C. Townsend, L'27 William F. Trapnell, L '51 Leon B. Traub, L '30 Edward D. Trexler, Jr., L'36 Stanton L. Triester, L'52 Eugene K. Twining, L'33 Frdderick VanDenbergh, Jr., L'37 Charles B. P. VanPelt, L'49 E. Norman Veasey, L'57

CONTRIBUTORS William A. Marquard, Jr. Mrs. Samuel Mink

in memory of Samuel Mink, L'33

Prof. Covey T. Oliver Prof. Robert H. Mundheim

Fred T. Fruit Samuel L. Howell Thomas M. Hyndman Michael Korn David S. Malis

Mrs . Theodore Rosen CLASS OF 1912 in memory of , Harry N. Brenner H~n. Theodore Rosen, L 22 Harry Cassman

Dr. Juhus W1shner George B. Gifford ,

CLASS OF 1899 Marcus S. Hottenstein

CLASS OF 1903 Morris Wolf

CLASS OF 1904 Walter Cook Longstreth

CLASS OF 1907 George Ovington, Jr.

CLASS OF 1908 Isaac Ash James D. Carpenter Leigh M. Morss Leon J. Obermayer

CLASS OF 1909 Russell Wolfe

CLASS OF 1910 Harold Evans Sidney Loewenstein *Philip Sterling

CLASS OF 1911 Nelson P. Fegley

Estate of W. Barclay Lex James C. Peacock Wilton W. Webster

CLASS OF 1913 Samuel R. Rosenbaum

CLASS OF 1914 J. Charles Adams Robert M. Bernstein Edwin H . Burgess Walter M. Burkhardt L. Leroy Deininger

in memory of Hon. J . Whitaker Thompson

Domenic Furia D. Arthur Magaziner Frank H. Mancill Mark T. Milnor H. James Sautter

CLASS OF 1915 Justin S. Bamberger David D. Goff Clarence E. Hall Edwin P. Longstreet J. Wesley McWilliams Thomas Reath

Mr. & Mrs. M. Belmont VerStanding Harry P. Voldow, L '31 Mrs. Virginia B. Wallace, L '50 John A. Walter, L'60 Guy E . Waltman, L'29 Michael Waris, Jr., L'44 Mrs. Helen Moran Warren, L'30 Gilbert Wasserman, L'61 Wilton W. Webster, L'12 Mr. Gerald Weiner Jerome B. Weinstein, L'34 Lewis Weinstock, L'40 H . John Weisman, Jr., L'42 Morris Weisman, L'27 Aaron Weiss, L'l6 Robert T . Weniger, L'38 Carroll R. Wetzel, L'30 Edward S. Weyl, L'28 David H. Wheeler, L'61 Hon. C. Norwood Wherry, L'53 Samuel K. White, Jr., L'47 Thomas R. White, Jr., L'36 William White, Jr., L'38 Hon. Roy Wilkinson, Jr., L'39 William C. Wise, L'33 Morton Witkin, L'l7 Marvin M. Wodlinger, L'60 Joseph C . Woodcock, Jr., L'53 Sidney T. Yates, L'54 H. Albert Young, L'29 John R. Young, L'30 Norman P. Zarwin, L'55 Judah Zelitch, L'27 Ronald Ziegler, L'60 Lloyd R. Ziff, L'7 1 David B. Zoob, L'27

CLASS OF 1916 Hon. Francis Shunk Brown, Jr. Joseph L. Ehrenreich Harry G. Lenzner Hon . Louis E. Levinthal Hon. Thomas M. Lewis Thomas E. Shipley Aaron Weiss

CLASS OF 1917 Harry E . Apeler Hon. John C. Bell, Jr. Meyer L. Casman Hon. T. Linus Hoban Robert C. Ligget *Edwin A. Lucas Philip F. Newman Mrs. Rose Perlman P. Herbert Reigner Maurice Saeta Edward J. Swotes Morton Witkin

CLASS OF 1918 Ernest N. Votaw

CLASS OF 1919 Ernest R. Keiter

CLASS OF 1920 Ellis Brodstein Miss Ethel F. Donaghue Hon. Harold L. Ervin Hon. Thomas K. Finletter Arthur Littleton Harry Polish Eugene H . Southall Donald H. Williams

*deceased

23

CLASS OF 1921 Albert B. Melnick Stanley Jakubowski Austin Gavin , Jr.

Francis H. Bohlen , Jr. Thomas P. Mikell Norman J. Kalcheim Henry Greenwald Herman I. Pollock Joseph Kaplan Sidney E. Jaffe Robert Dechert John Byron Prather Herman Krakovitz Edward A. Kaier Armand L. Koethen William Rowe William H. Kresch Joseph M. Leib Clarence G. Myers Raymond Saltzman Hon. I. Harry Levin William Lipkin John Russell, Jr. Manuel Sidkoff Elias Magi! Carl P. Lundy Joseph Smith Hon . Frederick B. Smillie Clarence Mesirov Paul Maloney William I. Woodcock, Jr. C. Leo Sutton Isidor Ostroff Jerome L. Markovitz

CLASS OF 1922 Charles C. Townsend Adolph G. Rosengarten , Jr. Francis J. Morrissey , Jr. Stewart E. Warner James W. Scanlon Henry B. Oestreich

Franklin H . Bates Morris Weisman Andrew J. Schroder John B. Pearson W. Meade Fletcher, Jr. W. Nelson West Lloyd J. Schumacker John E. Power, Jr. William D. Harkins John H. Wharton Norman Snyder David H . Rosenbluth Thomas McConnell III Judah Zelitch Leon B. Traub Col. Francis M. Sasse Edward A. G. Porter David B. Zoob Mrs. Helen Moran Warren Nathan Silberstein G. Ruhland Rebmann, Jr. Carroll R. Wetzel Hon. James L. Stern Miss Sybil U. Ward CLASS OF 1928 John R. Young Edward G. Taulane, Jr. Allen H. White

Alexander S. Bauer Eugene K. Twining CLASS OF 1931 William C. Wise

CLASS OF 1923 Franklin H. Berry Alexander B. Adelman Samuel R. Wurtman Clifford M. Bowden

Samuel A. Goldberg Mrs . Esther G. Brandschain Nathan Agran *Hon. George W. Griffith Joseph Brandschain Philip I. N. Alperdt CLASS OF 1934 Holman G. Knouse Morris Cheston Arthur W. Bean S. Samuel Arsht Hon. Felix Piekarski J. Lawrence Davis John H. Bertolet William D. Barfield John G. Rothermel Guy G. DeFuria Natt M. Emery , Jr. Leonard J. Bernstein

Fred W. Deininger Samuel Handloff Dr. Roland J. Christy CLASS OF 1924 Nathan L. Edelstein Edward B. Hodge William H. Conca

*David H. Frantz Israel I. Jamison Louis W. Cramer Robert K. Bell Stuart B. Glover Ashby M. Larmore Mrs. Irene R. Dobbs Benjamin N . Brown Joseph A. Grazier Nathan Lavine Anthony G. Felix , Jr. Hon. Hazel H. Brown Martin Greenblatt S. Cyrus Lewis Eugene C. Fish Edward V. Buckley William C . A. Henry Daniel Lowenthal Edward Fishman Mrs. Ida Creskoff Louis Ingber John B. Martin Solomon Freedman Edward P. Fronefield John P. Jordan Robert V. Massey, Jr. Abraham Hefferman Thomas McE. Johnston S. Frank Laveson Jack J. McDowell C. Sumner Katz Richard H. Klein Samuel P. Lavine Alexander L. Nichols George W. McKee, Jr. Philip S. Polis Hon . Paul S. Lehman Martin H . Philip Leon I. Mesirov Wende ll E. Warner Abraham Levin Harry Polikoff A. Arthur Miller

CLASS OF 1925 Thomas R. MacFarland, Jr. Shalon Ralph Mrs. Dorothea G. Minskoff James A. Montgomery, Jr. Paul H. Rhoads Gilbert W. Oswald

Meyer E. Cooper David W. Niesenbaum George M. D. Richards Ernest D. Preate Carl W. Funk Lloyd L. Rosenberg Hon . Samuel J. Roberts Harold B. Saler Samuel R. Greenwald Benson N. Schambelan W. Albert Sanders Emanuel G. Scoblionko Charles P. Larkin, Jr. A. Allen Simon Willis H. Satterthwaite Milton C. Sharp Abram L. Lischin Lawrence M. C. Smith Bernard G. Segal Morris Smith Baldwin Maull Leon Sobel J. Tyson Stokes Jerome B. Weinstein Desmond J. McTighe Robert S. Taylor , Jr. Allen C. Thomas , Jr. Morton Meyers Joseph Weintraub William H. Vincent CLASS OF 1935 Henry N. Paul, Jr. Edward S. Weyl Harry P. Voldow

Jerome G. Blank William M. Ruddock Mrs. Edith H. West Herman M. Buck Walter Seiler *deceased E. Calvert Cheston Seymour S. Silverstone CLASS OF 1932 James B. Doak Geoffrey S. Smith CLASS OF 1929 Hon . Alexander F. Barbieri Charles H. Dorsett Hon. J. Colvin Wright William B. Arnold Walter W. Beach board Bernard Eskin

Herman Cohen M. Robert Beckman Calvin J. Friedberg CLASS OF 1926 Daniel deBrier Samuel A. Blank Gordon W. Gabell Henry W. Balka Lawrence E. Frankel William C. Bodine Frank H. Gelman Julius C . Baylinson Morris B. Gelb Miss Mary E. Groff Kenneth W. Gemmill Hon. Joseph S. Clark , Jr. W. Edward Greenwood, Jr. David H . Kubert Fred P. Glick Hon. Gerald A. Gleeson William S. Hudders Mrs . Rose Landy Louis J. Goff man Rev. Edward B. Guerry Joseph G. Jackson Eugene A. Nogi Frank E. Hahn , Jr. John F . E. Hippe! Joseph H. Kifer Hon. Israel Packel Leonard Helfenstein Hon. Bernard J. Kelley Hon. Abraham H. Lipez Raymond M. Pearlstine Charles J. Hepburn , Jr. W. James Macintosh William L. Matz Harold R. Prowell Donald V. Hock Frank M. Travaline, Jr. Henry D. Paxson Hon. Max Rosenn Charles W. King

Sidney Schulman Sidney S. Stark Robert F. Lehman CLASS OF 1927 Ernest Scott Edward Z . Winkleman A. Harry Levitan , Herman P. Abramson Louis Sherr Daniel W. Long Sadie T. Alexander Martin L. Steiger CLASS OF 1933 Edwin Longcope Philip W. Amram Guy E. Waltman Gustave G. Amsterdam Josiah Macy, Jr. , J. Glenn Benedict H. Albert Young Hon. C. Wilson Austin Wm. Morris Maier Alvin W. Carpenter CLASS OF 1930 Max M. Batzer Daniel F. Marple Cecil I . Crouse Robert J. Callaghan Nathan L. Reibman David J. Dean Samuel A. Armstrong Sidney Chait Grover C . Richman, Jr. John K. Ewing, III George M. Brodhead Martin B. Ebbert John Ross John F. Headly W. Frederic Colclough Hon. Jay H. Eiseman Louis B. Schwartz Harold H. Hoffman Samuel E. Ewing Eugene H. Feldman Boyd L. Spahr , Jr . Hon. Robert B. Johnson Joseph First Howard W. Fines.hriber *Harry E. Sprogell Charles M. Justi Sydney Gerber Edward First J. Pennington Straus Louis Lipschitz J. Russell Gibbons Joseph H. Flanzer T. F. Dixon Wainwright

Samuel E. Gilbert *deceased Robert W. Greenfield *deceased

24 LAW ALUMNI JOURNAL

Albert C. Weymann, Jr. Irving Wilner Arnold Winokur

CLASS OF 1936

Sydney S. Asher , Jr. Samuel Bard John Bishop, VI Roderick T. Clarke Alfred F. Conard Harry T. Devine Herbert G. DuBois Wayland F. Dunaway, III Edward P. Frankel Milton B. Garner Lewis M. Gill Charles S. Jacobs George C. Laub Bernard V. Lentz Berthold W. Levy Harry K. Madway Hon. Edwin S. Maimed Charles W. Miles, III John N. Osterlund Harry A. Poth, Jr. Blair N. Reiley , Jr. Joseph Rhoads Henry W. Scarborough, Jr. G. William Shea Hon. Charles A. Shea, Jr. Karl H. Strohl Edward D. Trexler , Jr. Thomas R. White , Jr. John K . Young

CLASS OF 1937

Mrs. Anne F. Baxter Claire G. Biehn Harrison H. Clement Edward I. Cutler Mrs. Florence Davidow Dr. Lawrence 0. Ealy Albert B. Gerber Hyman Goldberg Herman F. Kerner Harold E. Kohn Benjamin S. Loewenstein Arthur S. Lorch Randal Morgan Norman L. Plotka Bayard H . Roberts Victor J. Roberts, Jr. Alex Satinsky John N. Schaeffer, Jr. Lester J. Schaffer Hon. Harry A. Takiff Frederick Van Denbergh , Jr. Ernest R. Vonstarck Benjamin Weinstein

CLASS OF 1938 Ralph M. Barley Samuel B. Blaskey Theodore L. Brubaker Keron D. Chance Richard N. Clattenburg Sylvan M. Cohen J. Harry Covington, III M. Carton Dittmann , Jr. Leonard L. Ettinger Myer Feldman Robert N. Ferrer Lockwood W. Fogg, Jr. Bernard Frank Richard W. Goslin, Jr. Harry A. Greenberg Jesse G. Heiges Jack R. Heyison Harry L. Jenkins , Jr. C . Clothier Jones , Jr. Hon. Gregory G. Lagakos Maurice Levin

Fall 1972

Erwin Lodge Hon. Barron P. McCune John L. Owens Irwin Paul Morris Pfaelzer, II Herman B. Poul Solon L. Rhode, Jr. Roger Scattergood Irving R. Segal John S. Simpson Charles M. Solomon James A. Sutton Robert T. Weniger William White, Jr.

CLASS OF 1939 Mrs. Roxana Arsht Thomas J. Beddow Henry M. Biglan John W. Bohlen John P. Bracken Phi lip A. Bregy Joseph W. P. Burke T. Sidney Cadwallader, II Albert J. Crawford, Jr. Fronefield Crawford William H. Egli Leon S. Forman William L. Fox Thomas P. Glassmoyer Carl E. Heilman James Hunter, III Arthur R. Kane , Jr. H. Allen Lochner Ralph S. Mason LeRoy S. Maxwell Sherwin T. McDowell Walter P. McEvilly Miss Doris E. Montgomery John C. Phillips Robert C. Porter W. Frazier Scott W. Simms Sharninghausen John P. Sinclair W. Lloyd Snyder, Jr. Elias W. Spengler Benjamin F. Stahl , Jr. Aaron S. Swartz, III Howard W. Taylor, Jr. Robert Ungerleider Hon Roy Wilkinson , Jr.

CLASS OF 1940 Hon. Mark Addison Samuel A. Breene John C. Decker Richard M. Dicke Robert J. Dodds, Jr. William S. Eisenhart, Jr. Sidney W. Frick Carl J. W. Hessinger Andrew Hourigan, Jr. Theodore B. Kingsbury , III Richard B. Malis William B. Marshall John L. McDonald Samuel V. Merrick Clinton F. Miller Arthur E. Newbold, III Thomas A. O'Boyle William R. Reynolds Hon. Theodore 0 . Rogers Edwin P. Rome David J. Sal a man Hon. Edwin H. Satterthwaite Mrs. Helen Solis-Cohen Sax Robert W. Sayre Jacob Seidenberg Milton H. Shapiro A. Dix Skillman Lewis Weinstock Adam G. Wenchel

CLASS OF 1941 Horace R. Cardoni Hon. Paul M. Chalfin Frederick J. Charley John R. Clark Marvin Comisky A. Lynn Corcelius Robert I. Cottom John J. Dautrich Edward M. David William B. Farran Richard J. Farrell Oscar Goldberg Louis Goldstein Edmund L. Harvey George W. Heuer , Jr. John I. Hook , Jr. Vincent J . Labrasca William T. Leith Samuel S. Logan, Jr. William J. Lowry, III Daniel J . McCauley, Jr. Charles J. Moos R. Stewart Rauch , Jr. Roy J. Waychoff Lipman Redman Milton W. Rosen Leonard Sarner William J. Scarlett Bernard J. Smolens John M. Stocker Wilson Stradley Edwin K. Taylor S. Robert Teitelman Robert C. Walker , Jr. Paul A. Wolkin

CLASS OF 1942 Frederic L. Ballard Philip E . Barringer L. Alton Blake Pershing N. Calabro Watson S. Campbell William N. Clarke Thomas F. Gill John R. Graham Donald E. Hittle Hon . Robert L. Kunzig Samuel S. Laucks, Jr. Dr. A. Leo Levin Charles E. Rankin Walter N. Read William Z . Scott Mrs. Mabel D. Sellers Craig M. Sharpe Samuel P. Shaw, Jr. Elvin R. Souder Thomas B. Steiger H. John Weisman , Jr.

CLASS OF 1943 Joseph N. Bongiovanni, Jr. Bernard M. Borish William J. Dickman Charles M. Kschinka Austin M. Lee I. David Pincus Joseph Shanis Ellis W. VanHorn, Jr. Edward Williams, Jr. James G. Yocum

CLASS OF 1944 Mrs. Trudell G. Brown Theodore A. Evans Barton E. Ferst Meyer Kramer L. Stanley Mauger Carl F. Mogel G. Selden Pitt David V. Shapiro

William E. Taylor, Jr. Michael Waris , Jr. Paul L. Wise

CLASS OF 1945 Jay D. Barsky Mrs. Jane Mcintyre Mrs. Marcella C. White

CLASS OF 1946 Hon. Curtis C. Carson, Jr. Robert G. Erskine, Jr. John L. Esterhai Mrs. Janet B. Macht John R. Miller H. Warren Ragot Harold Tull William H. G. Warner

CLASS OF 1947 Sidney Apfelbaum Samuel S. Blank Raymond J. Bradley Charles R. Cooper, Jr. Emerson L. Darnell Robert B. Doll Justin G. Duryea Leon Ehrlich Donald W. Hedges George M. James Robert M. Landis Russell R. Levin William H. Mann Alfred W. Putnam Henry W. Sawyer Richard M. Sharp Hon. Donald W. Van Artsdalen Morr is L. Weisberg Samuel K. White, Jr.

CLASS OF 1948 Walter Y. Anthony, Jr. John M. Bader Augustus S. Ballard Martin M. Bell James C . Bowen Richard P. Brown, Jr. Hon. James E. Buckingham Charles M. Donnelly Aaron M. Fine Robert P. Frankel Albert H. Gold

in memory of Harvey B. Levin

David Goldberg Harry M. Grace Gordon D. Griffin John I. Hartman , Jr. Joseph F. Harvey Hon. Daniel H. Huyett, III John H. James Solomon Katz Noyes E. Leech Marvin Levin Robert Margolis Francis E. Marshall Robert F. Maxwell John F. McCarthy, Jr. Marvin D. Perskie Franklin Poul John F. Rauhauser, Jr. Henry T. Reath G. Hayward Reid Donald Reuter George R. Rittenhouse Hon. Joseph D. Roulhac Samuel B. Russell Lester H. Salter Hon. Herbert W. Salus, Jr.

25

Scott W. Scully Charles S. Shapiro E. Eugene Shelley George W. Thompson Mrs. Mildred L. Weisberg Elkins Wetherill Leonard S. Wissow Dean Bernard Wolfman Milton A. Wollman John F. Zeller, III

CLASS OF 1949. February Francis Ballard Hyman L. Battle, Jr. Lewis B. Beatty, Jr. William F. Bohlen Thomas J. Burke Alan H. Cassman Cassin W. Craig Samuel S. Cross Ralph B. D'Iorio Hon. George C. Eppinger Gordon W. Gerber M. Stuart Goldin James W. Hagar A. C. Reeves Hicks George Katz, Jr. William F. Lynch, II John T. Macartney Lawrence E. Macelree Milford L. McBride, Jr. Lambert B. Ott Frank M. Perna Lawrence M. Perskie Lee N. Steiner William D. Valente Charles B. P. VanPelt William T. Walsh Howard Yarus

CLASS OF 1949, June William H. Bayer Marshall A. Bernstein Francis J. Carey Louis J. Carter Basil S. Cole, Jr. Hon. Doris May Harris William M. Hebrank William F. Hyland Fred H . Law, Jr. Herman H. Mattleman William E. Miller, Jr. Edward W. Mullinix David H. Nelson David W. O'Brien Martin J. O'Donnell James A. O'Neill Charles C. Parlin, Jr. Marvin Schwartz Edward M. Spector

CLASS OF 1950 Morton Abrams William W. Atterbury, Jr. J. William Barba Arthur C. Dorrance, Jr. John W. Douglass Peter Florey John R. Gauntt M. Kalman Gitomer Richard J. Gordon Charles H. Greenberg Robert S. Grodinsky Robert A. Hauslohner John F. Heinz Thomas M. Hyndman, Jr. Paul L. Jaffe Hon. D . Donald Jamieson Stephen J. Korn Leonard Levin Solomon Lubin

26

Merton J. Matz Charles F . Mayer Joseph Grant McCabe, III William G. O'Neill Stanley W. Root, Jr. Harold S. Rosenbluth Alexander N. Rubin, Jr. Sylvan H. Savadove Richard V. Scarpitti Avlin R. Schomer Lawrence E. Stengel Frank K. Tarbox Thomas Thatcher Mrs. Virginia B. Wallace Hon. Henry H. Wiley

CLASS OF 1951 C. Thomas Attix, Jr. Marvin K. Bailin Milton Becket Haro,ld Berger Christopher Branda, Jr. Neil W. Burd William J. Carlin Jerome J. Cooper Stuart Coven Harold Cramer Park B. Dilks, Jr. John F. A. Earley Jay S. Fichtner Sidney Ginsberg Martin S. Goodman Joseph K. Gordon Oliver F. Green, Jr. Gerald J. Haas Francis B. Haas, Jr. John P. Hauch, Jr. George J. Hauptfuhrer, Jr. Col. Edmond H. Heisler Leon C. Holt, Jr. Henry M. Irwin David Kittner James F. Lawler Robert L. Leininger Herbert M. Linsenberg Col Robert F. Maguire John B. McCrory Edward B. Meredith James E. O'Connell William J. C. O'Donnell Donald G. Oyler James C. N. Paul James H. Peters Louis C. Pulvermacher David M. Satz, Jr. Joseph J. Savitz Henry G. Schaefer, Jr. Edward M. Seletz Mrs. Norma Levy Shapiro J. Marlin Shreiner Robert M. Smith John D. Smyers Thomas J. Sullivan William F. Trapnell Robert S. Trigg

CLASS OF 1952 John G. Bartol, Jr. Mrs. Juliet T. Brace J. Scott Calkins John P. Chandler Ira B. Coldren, Jr. George H. Conover, Jr. Clive S. Cummis Allen I. Dublin Joseph P. Flanagan, Jr. Maxwell P. Gorson Robert S. Hass Richard A. Huettner Alvin J. Ivers William A. Kelley, Jr. Edwin R. Lowry

William J. Lubic Edward W. Madeira, Jr. Edward J. O'Halloran Wilson H. Oldhouser William P. Quinn Clarence P. Reberkenny Benjamin F. Schweyer Walter I. Summerfield, Jr. Kenneth Syken John T. Synnestvedt William J. Taylor Thomas J. Timoney Stanton L. Triester Seth W. Watson, Jr. Minturn T. Wright, III

CLASS OF 1953 Miss Margaret P. Allen E. Boyd Asplundh Nathaniel A. Barbera Leonard Barkan Richard A. Bausher Don B. Blenko Hon. Jack Brian Mitchell Brock Mrs. Elizabeth H. Carson Gordon Cavanaugh William F. Chester, Jr. William Fearen Albert J. Feldman Louis S. Fine A. Theodore Plum Caleb Foote Joseph H. Foster John C. Garner G. Taylor Hess Bernard M. Kimmel John P. Knox Henry C. Maiale Donald R. McKay Ellis H. McKay William E. Mikell George A. Moore, Jr. Edgar E. Moss, II Ronald B. Myrter Roderick G. Norris C. Lee Nutt, III Thomas N . O 'Neill, Jr. Calvin K. Prine Samuel F. Pryor, III Donald T. Puckett David N. Savitt William B. Scatchard, Jr. Richard B. Smith Arthur R. G. Solmssen Alan M. Spector Ms. Gertrude Strick David E. Wagoner Sheldon M. Weiss Hon. C. Norwood Wherry Alan D. Williams, Jr. Joseph C. Woodcock, Jr.

CLASS OF 1954 Jerome B. Apfel Paul C. Astor Jerome R. Balka Hon. Edward J. Blake Stanley W. Bluestine John H. Bo:;:ic, Jr. Floyd E. Brandow, Jr. Berel Caesar Bruce L. Castor Aims C. Coney, Jr. Chester T. Cyzio Pasquale J. DiQuinzio Carl A. Frahn Marvin Garfinkel William L. Glosser Manuel H. Greenberg Garry G. Greenstein

Robert T. Healey Ralph V. Jones Richard J. Jordan Ben F. Kaito Richard H. Knox S. Gerald Litvin Henry C. McGrath Thomas F. Meehan, Jr. Gerald J. Mongelli William J. Purcell Pace Reich Raymond C. Schlegel Robert M. Scott Stanford Shmukler Morris M. Shuster Barry R. Spiegel George S. Stewart, III William A. Whiteside, Jr. Mrs. Joan P. Wohl Edward A. Woolley Sidney T. Yates

CLASS OF 1955 William H. Brown, III Joel C. Coleman Samuel Diamond Milton A. Feldman William A. Goichman David C. Harrison Francis J. Hartman Irving M. Hirsh W. Scott Johns, III David J. Kaufman Robert L. Kendall, Jr. Norman M. Kranzdorf Edwin Krawitz Arthur H . Moss Paul A. Mueller, Jr. Betram S. Murphy Barton L. Post S. White Rhyne, Jr. Angus M. Russell Henry S. Ruth, Jr. Murray M. Schwartz Edward L. Snitzer Alvin L. Snowiss D. Charles Valsing Barry B. Wohlman Norman P. Zarwin

CLASS OF 1956

Herbert J. Abed on Louis D. Apothaker Edward F. Beatty, Jr. Robert M. Beckman George L. Bernstein Donald K. Bobb Richard L. Bond Paul C. Dewey Angelo A. DiPasqua John A. Erickson Paul A. Feiner Henry B. Fitzpatrick, Jr. Leon H. Fox, Jr. A. Fred Freedman Hon. Isaac S. Garb Paul D. Guth J. Barton Harrison Richard V. Holmes Alan G. Kirk, II Arthur W. Leibold, Jr. Richard L. McMahon Mrs. Mercea P. Mears James W. Moore Hon . Milton 0. Moss Harris Ominsky Mrs. Ruth R. Percy Curtis R. Reitz John S. Schmid Carl W. Schneider Leonard S. Slavit

LAW ALUMNI JOURNAL

Donn P. Slonim L. Carter Anderson Silas Spengler Dr. Barlow Smith Philip G. Auerbach

John A. Herdeg

John A. Vuono Donald Beckman William T. Sutphin Burton Hoffman

Hon. John M. Wajert Joseph Beller Lowell S. Thomas, Jr. Garry Hyatt

Vincent X. Yakowicz John W. Brock, Jr. Thomas T. Trettis, Jr. Steven D. Ivins

Gerald Broker Nicholas Vadino, Jr. Warren J. Kauffman

CLASS OF 1957 John A. Walter

Richard L. Cantor Charles M. Weisman Edmond M. Kirby Daniel J . Lawler

John E. Backenstoe James J. Casby Jr. Alvin M. Weiss John Bertman Philip Cherry ' David L. Williams

David P. Loughran

Isaac H. Clothier Jonathan S. Cohen Marvin M. Wodlinger Spencer A. Manthorpe

Robert S. Cohen George C. Corson, Jr. Ronald Ziegler Edwin S. Moore, III

Michael M. Dean John J. Cowan Stephen J. Moses

James N . Diefenderfer William H. Eastburn, III Francis W. Murphy

Mrs. Patricia H. Frankel Murray S. Eckell CLASS OF 1961 Alexander Neave

Mahlon M. Frankhauser Seymour H. Feingold Jared H. Adams H. Christopher Nolde

Larry J. Goldsborough Gerald F. Flood Jr Edward N . Adourian, Jr. Philip S. Nyman

George C. Greer William J. Geen' · James H. Agger Lewis F. Parker

Ronald H. Isenberg Murray C. Goldman Paul R. Anapol Robert M. Philson

John 0. Karns Arthur R. Gorr Lewis Becker Alan J. Pogarsky

S. Philip Klein Austin B. Graff Bernard D. Beitch Martin M. Pollock

Goncer M. Krestal Hon. Bernard M. Gross Lawrence F. Corson John H. Potts

Seymour Kurland Charles H . Harris Raymond K. Denworth, Jr. Charles B. Pursel

William W. Lanigan John S. Hayes Mrs. Ruth M. Force Richard J. Sharkey

William G. Mal kames Selwyn A. Horvitz Michael D. Foxman Louis P. Silverman

James F. McClure, Jr. John R. Rudders Fredric J. Freed Martin W. Spector

Stephen J. McEwen, Jr. David M. Jordan Robert A. Freedman Clayton H. Thomas, Jr.

Edward M. Medvene Edmund H. Kase, III Bernard Glassman James M Mulligan Thomas 8. Moorhead Rayner M. Hamilton

CLASS OF 1963

D. Frederick Muth Alvin S. Moses Mrs. Ann E. Harrison Steven A. Arbittier

Russell R. Reno, Jr. John T. Mulligan Peter Hearn David C. Auten

Stephen I. Richman Peter C. Paul Joseph J. Horvath Phillip H. Baer

Richard M. Rosenbleeth Peter H . Pfund James N. Horwood Donald V. Berlanti

Edward E. Russell Martin B. Pitkow Philip L. Hummer Aaron D. Blumberg

R?nald N. Rutenberg George F. Reed Howard M. Jaffe Harold Bogatz

Richard G. Schneider G. Wayne Renneisen Anthony L. Joseph Robert P. Browning

Myles H. Tanenbaum James L. Rosenbaum Michael Joseph A. Richard Caputo

Michael L. Temin Marshall A. Rutter Malcolm B. Kane Abraham J. Chasnoff

E. Norman Veasey Bernard L. Segal Lewis S. Kunkel , Jr. Henry 8 . Cortesi

Ronald P. Wertheim Walter A. Smith Herbert W. Larson Robert J. Cotton

Simon R. Zimmerman, III Oscar F. Spicer Anthony S. Leidner Thomas F. Cunnane Alan R. Squires Paul G. Levy Nicholas P. D'Amico

CLASS OF 1958 Joseph F . Strain Wilfred F . Lorry Mrs. Joanne R. Denworth

Harris C. Arnold, Jr. Louis M. Tarasi, Jr. Jack K. Mandel Lowell H . Dubrow

Duffield Ashmead, III Ira P. Tiger William B. Moyer Melvyn Freeman

Bennett I. Bardfeld John D. Wilson Spencer G. Nauman, Jr. Edward M. Glickman

Albert R. Seal CLASS OF 1960 S. Allen Needleman Jay L. Goldberg

Harold J. Berger David F. Norcross Frederick P. Hafetz

S. David Brandt David Acton Robert A. Rosin John L. Harrison, Jr.

Benjamin E. Carter Charles J. Bogdanoff Robert M. Shay Harold Jacobs

Arthur M. Dolin Jesse H. Choper Anthony J. Sobczak Albert W. Johnson, III

Martin S. Evelev Ralph H. Clover David L. Steck Arthur S. Karafin

J . Harold Flannery , Jr. Preston L. Davis Marc L. Swartzbaugh Morris C. Kellett

Hon. Michael V. Franciosa Edward I. Dobin Gilbert Wasserman Martin N. Kroll

Philip R. Frieder John F . Dugan David H. Wheeler Robert Kruger

Howard Gittis Frank Federman Bruce B. Wilson Judah I. Labovitz

Sidney R. Granite Melvin S. Feldman Lawrence E. Wood John J. Langenbach

Bernard M. Guth Gordon Gelfond Roger S. Young Gerald M. Levin

John G. Harkins , Jr. Lewis J . Gordon Edward K. Zuckerman Arthur L. Levine

Henry R. Heebner, Jr. Frank E . Greenberg Arnold Machles

Raymond L. Hovis John S. Halsted CLASS OF 1962 David H. Marion

Aaron M. Kress Edmund G. Hauff Milton D. Abowitz Sidney G. Masri

Michael G. Kurcias Charles A. Heimbold, Jr. Mrs. Andrea C. Balliette John H. McGrail

Harvey Levin John H. Higgs William M. Balliette, Jr. Paul R. Melletz

Alan W. Margolis Richard S. Hyland Leigh W. Bauer Gustav E. Michaelis

John P. McKenna, Jr. I. Grant lrey , Jr. Martin M. Berliner Henry F. Miller

George B. McNelis Allan Katz Mrs. Barbara P. Berman Joseph L. Monte, Jr.

Ramon R. Obod Rodman Kober R. David Bradley Louis H. Nevins

M_ichael A. Orlando, III Charles G. Kopp Jonas Brodie EarJ J. Patterson, III

Littleton W. Roberts, Jr. Henry W. Lavine Phillip R. Burnaman ~I Reiseman

Ronald R. Rosenberg Frank H. Lewis E . Barclay Cale, Jr. Lerbert Riband, Jr.

John J . Runzer Randall D. Luke James D. Crawford CDR J. Ashley Roach

Joseph H. Savitz Bernard H. Lundy Kenneth M. Cushman Michael J. Rotko

Allan B. Schneirov Michael H . Malin Mrs. Judith N. Dean Charles A. Shaffer

Edwin W. Semans, Jr. Robert A. Miller George C. Decas Stephen A. Sheller

William J. Sharkey Roland Morris Richard D. Ehrlich Daniel C. Soriano, Jr.

David J. Steinberg Samuel W. Newman Barton H. Finkelstein Max Spinrad

Richard W. Stevens Benjamin S. Chrenstein Nick S. Fisfis Albert M. Stark

Marvin Weiss Robert E. Penn Joel Friedman David C. Toomey

Elliott Yampell Hugh A. A. Sargent John E. Gillmor Michael D. Varbalow

CLASS OF 1959 David E . Seymour Herbert Goldfeld

Thomas R. White III

David S. Shrager Stephen R. Goldstein M;s. Faith R. Wh'ittlesey

Louis J. Adler Edwin L. Solot Gerald E . Haughey Miss Susan P. Windle Edwin D. Wolf

Fall 1972 27

CLASS OF 1964 John T. Andrews, Jr. Richard A. Ash Steven T. Atkins Peter F. Axelrad Frank B. Baldwin, III Michael M. Baylson Harry P. Begier, Jr. G . William Bissell George C. Bradley Earl T. Britt Stephen A. Cozen George M. Dallas David Dearborn Francis W. Deegan Marshall A. Deutsch Neil K. Evans Peter A. Eveleth Donald G. Farrell Frank Felleman H. Robert Fiebach Dennis M . Flannery Michael 0. F loyd Michael H. Frankel Robert G. Fuller, Jr. Marvin F. Galfand John R. Gibbel L. Anthony Gibson Henry A. Gladstone James Greenberg Richard J. Haber Cary R. Hardy Henry S. Hilles, Jr. James G. Hirsh George H . Jackson, III Richard A. Jacoby Alan K. Kaplan William J. Levy Mrs. Frederica K. Lombard Charles M. Marshall Samuel H. Nelson Bruce S. Nielsen David C. Patten David L. Robinson Christopher R. Rosser Melvyn B. Ruskin Herbert F . Schwartz Evan Y. Semerjian Howard Shapiro Burton K. Stein James A. Strazzella Jerome R. Verlin Edward F. VonWettberg, Ill Peter C. Ward Richard D. Wood, Ill

CLASS OF 1965 Martin J. Aronstein Harvey Bartle, Ill Robert E. Benson Harold P. Block George G. Breed Paul J . Bschorr Henry T. Dechert Albert L. Doering, III Charles H. Dorsett, Jr. Alfred J. Dougherty Neil G . Epstein James A. Freyer Merrit B. Gavin Richard Gordimer Allan B. Greenwood David D. Hagstrom Gilbert W. Harrison Paul C. Heintz John F. Hellegers Richard M. Horwood Stephen L. Hymowitz James W. Jennings James H. Johns, Jr. Mrs. Carol A. Kipperman Richard F . Kotz

28

William M. Labkoff William H. Lamb Alan M. Lerner Benjamin Lerner Albert L. Lingelbach Harry R. Marshall , Jr. William J. Morehouse Rod J. Pera Stephen W. Peters Ernest D. Preate, Jr. Carl S. Rauh Harry E . Reagan , III David F. Richardson David P. Ross Blair L. Sadler Peter V. Savage Joseph T. Stratman Neil H. Tannebaum Welsh S. White John T. Williams Parker H. Wilson James A. Wimmer

CLASS OF 1966 David J. Ackerman John N . Ake, Jr. David J. Anderson Mrs. Carol R. Aronoff Edward C. Bierma Allen D. Black James B. Blinkoff Fred Blume D. Barlow Burke, Jr. Norman F . Caplan Henry D. Cavanna Donald S. Coburn Philip L. Cohan Stephen M. Courtland Roger F . Cox James Eiseman, Jr. Allan M. Elfman Burton D. Fretz Lawrence A. Garber Mark E. Goldberg Marvin S. Goldklang Roger L. Goldman Paul W. Heil Bruce G. Hermelee Stewart A. Hirschhorn Robert S. Hodavance John P. Howland Elliott Klein Gerald Kobell Jeffrey K. Kominers Mark Landis Joseph E . Lastowka, Jr. Robert P. Lawry Marvin E. Lesser Michael A. Levin William N . Levy Leroy S . Maxwell, Jr. John R. Merrick Miss Patricia A. Metzer Mrs. Stephanie W. Naidoff Will iam D. Parry Samuel S. Pearlman Elliot B. Platt David Plimpton Daniel Promislo William M. Robinson Daniel R. Ross Michael A. Sand Palmer K. Schreiber Joel D. Siegel Miss Mary J. Snyder Richard D. Steel Peter M. Stern Edward D. Temoyan Glen A. Tobias Robert I. Toll Michael B. Vath Dr. Geoffrey D. D. Walker

Richard N. Weiner Bernhardt K. Wruble

CLASS OF 1967 Gregory G. Alexander John G. Berg G. Thomas Bowen Ira Brind Stephen J. Cabot Stewart R. Cades Melvyn L. Cantor Capt. Michael Q. Carey Edward T. Chase Mark H. Chazin Harold K. Cohen Mrs. Irene H. Cotton Stephen P. Dicke Jeffrey L. Dow Daniel A. Durkin Andrew M. Epstein Robert L. Friedman Donald G. Gavin Carmen L. Gentile William Goldstein William B. Gray Dr. William C. Hewson Wi ll iam A. Humenuk M. Richard Kalter Arthur L. Klein William H . Kuehnle James B. Leonard Ms . Dale P. Levy Nessim Levy Michael W. Lillie John C. Newcomb Robert C. Ozer Norman Pearlstine Martin D. Polevoy W. Bourne Ruthrauff Paul E. Shapiro William V. Strauss, Jr. John J. Stubbs, Jr. Dennis R. Suplee Mrs. Sharon K. Wallis Lawrence Weiner A. Ronald Wilkoc Warren E. Wins low, Jr. David B. Zwirn

CLASS OF 1968 Stanton V. Abrams Richard L. Bazelon Richard I. Beattie, Jr. Thomas A. Bell David Bender Stanley J. Bernstein Daniel E. Cohen Peter H. Dodson Joseph Jackson Eaton, III Dr. William E. Elwood John W. Fischer Lawrence J. Fox Earl R. Franklin Jeffrey M. Freedman William F. Gieg Mrs. Dayle S. Ginsburg Mark D. Gordon Murray A. Greenberg Mrs. Gail S. Halperin Richard E. Halperin H. Ben Hander Lawrence B. Hannah Thomas D. Henderer Romer Holleran Robert A. Jones W. Dennis Keating John T. Kehner Brian T. Keirn Ward T. Kelsey William 0. LaMotte, III Norman E. Levine David H. Lissy

David S. Litwin Michael T. McMenamin William Morrow Charles M. Newbrand Mrs. Joy K. Pollock Arthur H. Rainey Thomas A. Reed Miss Paula Rosenthal Miss Enid Rubenstein Kenneth A. Saga! Arthur E. Schramm , Jr. John D. Schupper William W. Schwarze Leonard A. Segal Howard L. Sheeler John 0. Shirk Herbert M. Silverberg Norman B. Skydell Rudolph A. Socey, Jr. Clifford H. Swain Peter S. Thompson Jere R. Thomson Gilbert E. Toll Mark M. Weinstein Alfred H. Wilcox Richard H. Woods

CLASS OF 1969 Stephen M . Adelson Jary R. Baer William A. Burck , III Miss Brigid E. Carey Brian Clemow Neil H. Cogan George W. Davies Robert J . Dodds , III Dennis J. Orabelle William D. Eggers Spencer W. Frank , Jr. Henry Y. Goldman Charles A. Gordon Albert P. Hegyi John F. Hunsicker, Jr. Lee M. Hymerling Clifford B. LePage, Jr. Mrs. Marjorie G. Marinoff John F. Meigs J. Gregg Miller Searle E. Mitnick Mrs. Margaret M. Powers William R. Powers, Jr. Michael J. Roach William G . Rogerson Howard J. Rubinroit Miss Carol 0. Seabrook Richard P. Sills Courtney C. Smith, Jr. Mrs. Susan R. Stern Richard W. Stevenson Jeffrey M. Stopford Stephen C. Tausz Samuel 0. Tilton Gregory A. Weiss Bradford F. Whitman Hugh D. Wise, Ill Stephen G. Young

CLASS OF 1970 Mrs. Joyce G. Ackerman Mark L. Austrian Paul Bernbach Joseph C. Bright, Jr. James N. Bryant Francis J. Burgweger, Jr. Carroll J . Cavanagh Howard L. Dale Robert N. Davenport, Jr. James W. Fry, Jr. Miss Lois R. Goodman I. Michael Greenberger Mrs. Marcia D. Greenberger Frederick B. Henry

LAW ALUMNI JOURNAL

Stephen N. Huntington Edward J. Kaier Anthony S. Kaufmann Alexander Kerr Jeffrey P. Korn John E. Kratz , Jr. Miss Marlene F. Lachman Steven B. Lapin Richard M. Leisner Ralph B. Levy Fred H. Marcusa Mrs. Jane Lang McGrew Thomas J. McGrew John W. Morris Roy A. Nierenberg John W. Reading Lanny M. Saga!

Stephen A. Saltzburg Charles H. Scherer Mrs. Mary E. Schwab Alfred E. Shilling David R. Straus Ralph N. Teeters Gary Tilles Richard T. Tomar Mrs. Leslie L. Tomenson Robert K. Vincent, Jr. Jonathan Vipond, III Steven R. Waxman George H. Weiler , III Arthur G. Weinstein Edward H. Weis J. Michael Willmann

ABOVE AVERAGE

These classes equalled or bettered the over-all Alumni participation of 33%

Class Agent Per Cent 1899 100 1920 Donald H. Williams 62 1911 David S. Malis 60 1921 William I. Woodcock, Jr. 58 1904 50 1914 Frank H. Mancill 48 1944 Barton E. Ferst 46 1928 Joseph Brandschain 43 1938 M. Carton Dittmann, Jr. 41 1939 Miss Doris E. Montgomery 41 1954 Morris M. Shuster 41 1925 Desmond J . McTighe 40 1927 C . Leo Sutton 40 1933 Nathan Silberstein 40 1935 Frank E. Hahn, Jr. 39 1960 John A. Walter 39 1912 W. Barclay Lex 38 1961 Wilfred F. Lorry 38 1963 Herbert S. Riband , Jr. 38 1964 William J. Levy 38 1951 Henry M. Irwin 37 1962 Kenneth M. Cushman 37 1908 Isaac Ash 36 1923 36 1948 Franklin Poul 36 1941 Paul A. Wolkin 35 1953 Leonard Barkan 34 1968 Thomas A. Ralph and Alfred H. Wilcox 34 1924 33 1945 33 1950 Stephen J. Korn 33 1957 Richard G. Schneider 33

CLASS OF 197 1

Marc S. Alpert Jules E. Bernard, III James D. Beste Stewart A. Block Charles J. Bloom James S. Boynton James S. Bryan Henry S. Bryans Miss Rose J. Candeloro Frank G. Cooper Craig Currie Gary C. Gomes Jeffery C. Hayes Steven P. Katz Mrs. Sue N. Lang

Arthur W. Lefco Jack P. Levin G. Craig Lord Joel W. Messing W. William Petrick Thomas R. Schmuhl Andrew J. Schwartzman Michael K. Simon Richard M. Singer Steven A. Skalet E. Clinton Swift, Jr. Bruce L. Thall James Weiner Theodore A. Young Arthur A. Zatz Lloyd R. Ziff

CLASS PERFORMANCES

GREATEST NUMBER OF DOLLARS CONTRIBUTED

Class Agent Amount 1931 $12,666 1927 C. Leo Sutton 5,255 1948 Franklin Poul 5,168

GREATEST NUMBER OF CONTRIBUTORS

Class Agent Number 1966 James F. Bell III 59 1968 Thomas A. Ralph and

Alfred H. Wilcox 57 1963 Herbert S. Riband, Jr. 54 1964 William J. Levy 54

BEST PER CENT OF PARTICIPATION (Classes of 25 or more)

Class Agent Per Cent 1928 Joseph Brandschain 43 1938 M. Carton Dittmann, Jr. 41 1939 Miss Doris E. Montgomery 41 1954 Morris M. Shuster 41

BEST PERCENT OF PARTICIPATION (Classes of less than 25)

Class Agent Per Cent 1899 100 1920 Donald H. Williams 62 1911 David S. Malis 60

A GLANCE AT TEN YEARS OF ANNUAL GIVING

Year Number of Per Cent Amount 1966-67 1904 43 105,454. Contributors Participation Contrib-1967-68 1857 40 118,491. uted

1962-63 1680 41 63,389. 1968-69 1760 37 118,187. 1963-64 1791 42 72,935. 1969-70 1631 33 121,762. 1964-65 1860 42 87,164. 1970-71 1736 35 130,166. 1965-66 1920 43 102,124. 1971-72 1668 33 132,461.

Fall 1972 29

CORPORATE GIFT PROGRAM

A total of 27 forward-looking companies matched, wholly or in part, the gifts that their employees, officers and directors made to Law Alumni Annual Giving in the 1971-1972 campaign.

Alumni who are eligible to have their gifts matched are urged to send their company's form in order that the Law School may benefit from it. The matching amount is also credited to you, your class, and your region. The Alumni Office will be glad to supply information to any alumnus who may be in a position to suggest the establishment of a matching gift plan in his company.

The companies who participated in the 1971-72 Law School Alumni Annual Giving campaign are listed below.

AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS, INC.

AMERICAN STANDARD, INC.

ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY

ARTHUR ANDERSON COMPANY

BRISTOL-MYERS COMPANY

CHASE MANHATTAN BANK FOUNDATION

COVINGTON & BURLING

DIAMOND SHAMROCK CORPORATION

FORD FUND EDUCATIONAL AID PROGRAM

GENERAL ELECTRIC FOUNDATION

HERCULES, INC.

INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA

JOHNSON AND HIGGINS

MARINE MIDLAND CO~PORATION

McGRAW-HILL PUBLISHING COMPANY

MERCK COMPANY

OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM

OLIN MATHIESON CHARITABLE TRUST

PAN AM CHARITABLE FOUNDATION, INC.

PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY

PENNWALT FOUNDATION

PITTSBURGH NATIONAL FOUNDATION

PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY

SMITH, KLINE & FRENCH FOUNDATION

STANDARD OIL COMPANY (INDIANA)

WESTINGHOUSE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION

SUMMARY OF REGIONS (Areas other than Pennsylvania, with 15 or more alumni)

Chairman-LIPMAN REDMAN, L'41

Number No. parti- Per Cent R~gion

California Chairman Alumni cipating Participation

Los Angeles Marshall Rutter, L'59 77 21 27 San Francisco 49 6 12

Delaware *Wilmington Herbert W. Larson, L'61 91 33 36

*District of Columbia Charles B. Ruttenberg, L'49 299 110 37

Illinois Chicago Richard J. Farrell, L'41 33 6 18

Massachusetts *Boston Philip S. Nyman, L'62 58 23 40

New Jersey Atlantic County Robert Neustadter, L'56 52 15 29

*Mercer County Edward B. Merdith, L'51 44 18 41

*New York City Richard M. Dicke, L'40 267 87 33

Ohio *Cleveland Henry W. Lavine, L'60 30 10 33

*These Regions equalled or bettered the over-all alumni participation of 33 per cent.

The following Pennsylvania counties outside of the Delaware Valley area equalled or exceeded the overall total of 33%

Berks County with 38%; Lackawanna, 33%; Lancaster, 34%; Lehigh, 36%; and York, 39%.

Amount

$1,690 210

1,735

5,935

520

1,200

715 875

6,779

543

30 LAW ALUMNI JOURNAL

REPORT OF CLASSES Chairman-ANDREW HOURIGAN, JR. , L'40

1971-72 1970-71

No. in No. Per cent No. in No. Per cent Class Giving Giving Amount Class Giving Giving Amount

Class Ageni

Parents 27 $1,635 .00 14 $1,545.00 Non AJumni II 2,081.00 23 1,241.00

1899 I I 100 100.00 I 1903 Morris Wolf 4 25 250.00 5 I 20 100.00 1904 2 50 25.00 2 I 50 25.00 1905 5 6 2 33 1,025.00 1906 John Martin Doyle 4 4 I 25 50.00 1907 4 I 25 100.00 4 I 25 100.00 1908 Isaac Ash II 4 36 1,175.00 12 6 50 1,340.00 1909 Russell Wolfe 7 I 14 10.00 9 I II 10.00 1910 14 3 21 165.00 15 5 33 290.00 1911 David S . Malis 10 6 60 615.00 12 8 67 565.00 1912 W. Barclay Lex 16 6 38 1,546.88 18 5 28 1,015.25 1913 Samuel R. Rosenbaum 13 I 8 75.00 15 3 20 90.00 1914 Frank H . Mancill 21 10 48 2,840.00 24 10 42 2,715.00 1915 21 5 24 580.00 23 10 44 2,584.82 1916 Joseph L. Ehrenreich 24 7 29 825.00 24 10 42 980.00 1917 Rodney T. Bonsall 39 12 31 1,920.00 40 12 30 1,935.00 1918-19 10 2 20 235.00 10 2 20 230.00 1920 Donald H . Williams 13 8 62 295.00 14 6 43 385.00 1921 William I. Woodcock, Jr. 12 7 58 688.31 13 8 61 770.00 1922 34 8 24 631.00 34 12 35 715 .00 1923 14 5 36 277.00 16 5 31 262 .00 1924 30 10 33 1,490.00 31 8 26 1,422.81 1925 Desmond J. McTighe 35 14 40 3, 125.00 37 13 35 2,065.00 1926 Joseph G. Feldman 28 9 32 1,598.00 30 II 37 2,697.00 1927 C. Leo Sutton 72 29 40 5,255.00 73 33 45 6,335.00 1928 Joseph Brandschain 72 31 43 2,000.00 74 28 38 2,212.00 1929 75 18 24 2,860.00 77 27 35 3,420.00 1930 J. Russell Gibbons 85 27 32 2,005.00 87 29 33 1,715.00 1931 103 32 31 12,666.25 105 54 51 8,639.06 1932 Walter W. Beach board 85 15 18 2,670.00 87 20 23 2,942.50 1933 Nathan Silberstein 82 33 40 2,735 .38 82 33 40 3,115.00 1934 Dr. Roland J. Christy 75 24 32 2,432.50 76 26 34 3,323.19 1935 Frank E. Hahn, Jr. 88 34 39 3,575.00 90 33 37 3,127.81 1936 Milton B. Garner 95 29 31 2,906.00 97 27 28 2,615.00 1937 Hon. Harry A. Takiff 89 23 26 2,655 .00 91 25 27 2,821.76 1938 M . Carton Dittmann, Jr. 81 33 41 2,737.00 82 35 43 2,702 .00 1939 Miss Doris E. Montgomery 86 35 41 2,423.75 86 37 43 2,320.00 1940 Lewis Weinstock 93 27 29 3,420.00 93 27 29 3,920.00 1941 Paul A. Wolkin 96 34 35 2,510.00 98 33 34 3,113.13 1942 Frederic L. Ballard 66 21 32 1,560.00 66 19 29 1,371.50 1943 Richard E. McDevitt 50 10 20 340.00 50 13 26 630.00 1944 Barton E. Ferst 24 II 46 1,070.00 24 10 42 895.00 1945 9 3 33 115.00 9 3 33 210.00 1946 John L. Esterhai &

John R. Miller 26 8 31 230 .00 26 8 31 220.00 1947 Robert M. Landis 74 17 23 1,282.50 75 21 28 2,873 .50 1948 Franklin Poul 130 47 36 5,167.50 130 47 36 4,070.75 1949F Charles B. P. VanPelt 87 26 30 2,375.00 87 28 32 3,075.00 1949J Louis J. Carter 72 20 28 2,960.00 73 22 30 1,675.00 1950 Stephen J . Korn 101 33 33 1,835.00 100 35 35 1,931.00 1951 Henry M. Irwin 126 46 37 4,396.02 127 43 34 3,557.39 1952 Joseph P. Flanagan, Jr. 119 30 25 2,710.00 118 35 30 2,291.80 1953 Leonard Barkan 132 45 34 2,505.00 132 48 36 2,320.00 1954 Morris M. Shuster 88 36 41 2,205 .00 89 39 44 1,945.00 1955 Irving M. Hirsh &

Robert L. Kendall , Jr. 102 26 26 1,810.00 100 33 33 2,170.00 1956 Henry B. FitzPatrick &

Hon. Isaac S. Garb 125 34 27 1,743 .00 122 39 32 2,008 .00 1957 Richard G. Schneider 99 33 33 2,075.00 96 38 40 2,323.00 1958 George B. McNelis 127 35 28 2,389.38 124 42 34 1,985.00 1959 Joseph Beller !53 46 30 1,970.00 lSz 42 28 2,085.00 1960 John A. Walter 116 45 39 2,265.00 Ill 51 46 2,478.75 1961 Wilfred F. Lorry 112 43 38 1,825.00 Ill 43 39 1,905.00 1962 Kenneth M. Cushman 127 47 37 1,625 .93 123 46 37 1,260.00 1963 Herbert S. Riband, Jr. 142 54 38 1,665.00 135 47 35 1,215.00 1964 William J. Levy 142 54 38 3, 163.70 140 53 38 2,838.10 1965 Harvey Bartle III 146 46 32 1,665.54 141 51 36 1,787.42 1966 James F. Bell III 190 59 31 1,700.35 184 70 38 1,725.00 1967 Jacob P. Hart &

Lawrence Weiner 171 43 25 840.00 168 39 23 560.00 1968 Thomas A. Ralph &

Alfred H. Wilcox 169 57 34 1,355.44 171 50 29 890.00 1969 George W. Davies &

Gregory A. Weiss 191 37 19 730.00 188 47 25 860.00 1970 Franklin L. Best &

Robert K. Vincent 150 45 30 861.00 140 29 21 530.00 1971 Jeffery C. Hayes &

Lloyd R. Ziff 161 29 18 949.00

5,181 1,668 33% $132 ,461.43 5,016 1,736 35% $130,165.53

Fall 1972 31

Wilson (Continued from page 13)

should be noted that in the 18th century a literate man was rare enough, while anyone with an education or library was regarded a scholar. Finally, Wilson poured hard work and careful thought into his political un­dertakings, all resulting in his rise in the ranks.

Considerable politicking preceded the July 4th dec­laration, however. Wilson, although a major figure at the Second Continental Congress, was reluctant to take a stand for independence because of the instruc­tions the Pennsylvania Assembly had given its dele­gates. Meanwhile, the radicals, or Whigs, pressured the_Assembly. To assuage them, the Assembly voted ·to mcrease and reapportion its numbers; elections were held May 1, 1776. The mQderate Whigs, Tories (Conservatives), and a limited franchise combined to hold the line.

Abetted by Bay Staters Elbridge Gerry and John Adams, the radicals grew impatient. Congress passed a res<?lution declaring that "it is necessary that the exercise of every kind of authority under the said Crown should be totally suppressed and all the powers of government [be] exerted under the authority of the people of the Colonies [the 1776 version of "All power to the people?]." This was the radicals' cue. Petitions were circulated and meetings held. The Pennsylvania Assembly was confronted by a crowd in the yard of the Stat~ House (now Independence Hall) on May 20. The radicals declared the Assembly dissolved. The Tories countered that the Congressional resolution ~as a recommendation only; counter petitions were Circulated. A provincial convention was called for June 18.

Finally, the Assembly yielded and voted to alter its instruction to its delegates in Congress. All the while Wilson had been silent. While he was anxious that Congress address the issue, he was chary of taking the big step. At a vote in Congress on July I, 1776 only 9 states voted for the Declaration of Independ­ence_. Pennsyi:vania vo~ed against: 3 delegates, in­~ludm_g ~ranklm and Wilson, for; 4 delegates, includ­mg Dickmson and Robert Morris, against. It is un­known what manner of persuasion was applied but on July 2, Dickinson and Morris did not take 'their seats. Pennsylvania, along with all but New York voted to declare independence. The unfolding of events reflected Wilson's legalism and conservatism. It appears he _and others were reluctantly swept up by a force which would not be resisted.

Soon thereafter Congress framed the Articles of Confederation. Among the issues confronted were certai~ colonies' claims to western lands, repre­sentatiOn and taxation of slaves and representation of smaller states. Wilson spoke for ceding land claims to the national government, against tax breaks for slavery, against slavery itself and to allay small states' anxieties.

32

The war news was bad. The Quebec expedition had failed. New York fell and Washington and the Conti­nental Army were being pursued toward Philadelphia. Congress withdrew to Baltimore.

Wilson was appointed to more committees: to con­sider the state of the army; and to plan for executive departments. The problems of finance and supply persisted. Wilson had occasion, however, to fashion what may be the first instance of porkbarrellegislation of the new republic: he had Congress establish an army depot in Carlisle. (The original structure still stands and serves as a museum on the grounds of the Army. War College.)

The news of Washington's victory at Trenton on Christmas Eve, 1776 heartened the cause and permit­ted Congress to return to Philadelphia. But the prob­lems dragged on into 1777. Representatives of the New England states had met and threatened currency depreciation. Congress was faced with a delicate problem: to permit such outflanking of the national government would be dangerous; also, to censure the action could upset the fragile Confederation. A com­mittee, including Wilson, was appointed. A moderate recommendation was forthcoming, but Wilson wanted to uphold Congress' power to disapprove state acts affecting the common interest. Wilson turned his at­tentions to financial matters. He supported a sound system of finance, meaning stiff taxes, but Congress could not agree. The military news was mixed: victory at Bennington; Washington was pressed by General Howe's maneuvering.

In Sept~mber, 1777 the Pennsylvania Assembly re­moved Wilson from Congress. The new state govern­ment which formed in Pennsylvania in July of 1776 was controlled by doctrinaire radicals. The Constitu­tion of 1776, for instance, had judges removable by the Assembly. A convention reviewed all legislation every 7 years and an oath was required of all voters. The _new charter did, however, extynd the franchise, modify th~ debtor's laws and break the grip of the eastern oligopoly. A debate raged statewide, marked by ~requent riots. Wilson, a staunch opponent of the radicals from the beginning, led a movement which attempted to replace the 1776 Constitution, but to no avail. It is curious to note that Wilson was at first too liberal for the Assembly in 1775 and then recalled for being too conservative only 2 years later.

The ousted and defeated Wilson returned to Carlisle in late 1777. It was to be a temporary stay, however, for while in Congress Wilson had rubbed elbows with the leading men of the day and had made some valu­able commercial contacts. This, combined with the fact that the Carlisle area was in hostile radical hands, led Wilson to move his household to Philadelphia.

Thus he ended 9 years in Carlisle and began a new career as prominent lawyer, businessman, politico and public citizen. He was 36.

It was the summer of 1778. The British had just abandoned Philadelphia after wintering there. (Wash­ington and the Continental Army had wintered at

LAW ALUMNI JOURNAL

Valley Forge under less hospitable conditions.) Re­venge was in the air and the radicals rose to the occasion. British sympathizers were indicted daily. Wilson defended a number of them. In his defense he carefully traced the law of treason, citing Foster, Hale , Strange, the statute of 25 Edward III (1351) and Blackstone to the effect that treason required an overt act and proof by two witnesses. The arguments failed to persuade the courts. Nine years later , however, Wilson served on a committee at the Constitutional Convention which drafted the clause embodying these two elements.

In December, 1778 Wilson was involved 'in an ad­miralty suit which touched on the tacky question of national-state relations. A British merchant ship, the Active, with 4 impressed American sailors aboard, was heroically captured by those sailors and, with the aid of a Pennsylvania-commissioned vessel, the Con­vention, and a privateer, the Gerard, was brought into Philadelphia. The Admiralty Court of Pennsylvania awarded one-fourth to the crew of the Convention, one-fourth to the Gerard, one-fourth to the state, and one-fourth to the 4 sailors. Benedict Arnold, with funds from taking graft as military governor of Phila­delphia, bought up the sailors' claim and retained Wilson to appeal the case to the Court of Commis­sioner set up by Congress. (It will be recalled that in 1775 Wilson had served on the committee which recommended establishing this Court.) The Court in­creased the share. However, the Pennsylvania au­thorities declined to enforce the judgment. Writs and injunctions followed, but to no avail. The claim was eventually settled in 1809, but not before going up to the U.S. Supreme Court. No doubt the episode impressed upon Wilson the need for more authority in the national government. The case also enhanced his reputation as a practitioner and benefited his prac­tice, which he came to call "the retail business of the law." It may be of interest that Benedict Arnold's rights reverted to the sailors when he was unmasked.

Meanwhile, the state political struggles continued. Wilson again campaigned against the Constitu­tionalists. He engaged in a squabble with Tom Paine and an Alamo-style pitched battle. On October 4, 1779 numerous ill-disciplined and ill-disposed militia­men occupied Philadelphia. A group gathered at a tavern at Tenth and Race Streets and fortified itself with drink and invective. By and by the mob began to cry "Get Wilson" and moved toward his house. Wilson and a small band of Anti-Constitutionalists, or Republicans, convened on Second Street. As the militiamen approached, the Republicans fell back to Wilson's house at Walnut and Third Streets. Despite attempts at restraint by militia officers and Republican leaders, shots rang out and an assault was made on the house. Only the appearance of the President of Pennsylvania and the Philadelphia City Troop averted a showdown. Five men were killed and 17 wounded. Wilson judiciously took refuge in the country for two weeks. The episode ended when, in March of 1780

Fall 1972

a general pardon was declared for all concerned. Despite the demands of the political situation, Wil­

son had attention to give to various business enter­prises. He sought to be a supplier of the French Navy and embark on other commercial ventures, but do­mestic currency instability hindered his efforts. At the same time Congress was having. its usual difficulties in paying its bills for munitions. As a result, Wilson and other leading Philadelphians established the Bank of Pennsylvania in March, 1780. The Bank made a promising start, but Wilson was unable to persuade the Assembly to make the Bank its fiscal agent. The Bank went out of business in September.

Wilson's scheme was an advanced one. A close student of the fledgling science of political economy, Wilson was foresightedly aware of the requirements of modern public finance. He did not give up the notion and, in 1781, sold Congress on the idea of a national banking system. The Bank of North America was chartered. With the aid of sleight-of-hand and other methods this bank got off to a strong start.

Before long, curiously, Wilson's political and busi­ness involvements merged. In 1785 the Republicans mounted a new attack on the Constitutionalists, who countered by attacking the Bank of North America. The Bank refused to accept Pennsylvania's recent issue of currency. The Constitutionalists charged that all difficl}lty stemmed from the bank which had al­legedly sucked all specie out of Pennsylvania and sent it abroad in exchange for European luxuries for rich merchants. The Bank's State charter-it operated under State and Congressional charters-was under attack.

(Continued on page ,40)

Prisoners (Continued from page 5)

plaintiff's motion to reconsider, and eventually va<;at­ed its previously entered judgement. Some of the com­plaints ramble illegibly for pages, while others articu­late the plaintiff's grievance surprisingly well.

The file usually gives counsel some idea of what the case is all about. He then attempts to locate and communicate with his client. Such communication may take the form of a personal interview at Grater­ford, or, if the client has been released, here at the law school. If the client has been transferred to an­other part of the state, communication must be by mail.

The object of the client interview is to clarify the factual issues involved. As a result, counsel will nor­mally take one or more of several actions. Often, counsel will move to file an amended complaint. Dis­covery procedures, usually by interrogatory pursuant to Rule 33, but in other forms as well, are begun. Occasionally counsel will conclude that the action is either moot or frivolous. In such cases the client may file a motion to withdraw the complaint, or counsel

33

may move to withdraw himself. In most cases the defendant files a motion to dismiss

. or a motion for summary judgement. Appointed coun­sel will normally file appropriate documents to oppose such motions. Counsel also prepares a brief in op­position to the defense motions. Occasionally the fruits of discovery suggest that a plaintiff's motion for sumni~y judgement is appropriate. In such cases the motion is filed and a brief in support of the motion is submitted.

The subject-matter of the complaints includes near­ly all of the conditions of imprisonment. One plaintiff seeks wages for labor he was required to perform as a convicted but unsentenced prisoner. Two ask for damages from allegedly racially motivated prison job demotions. Several . complain of grossly improper medical attention, resulting in great pain and some permanent disabilities. Many ask for injunctions with regard to prison mail censorship and prison discipli­nary procedures. Others seek relief from the physical conditions of punitive segregation; i.e., solitary. Some prisoners complain that prison officials interfere with their access to the courts. In one case papers which a prisoner needed to perfect an appeal were mailed to him special delivery. He received them over four days later. Although the fault may lie with either Postal Service or the prison mail room, the result was that the Superior Court refused to docket the appeal.

Prisoner's complaints also raise issues that are not directly related to the conditions within the walls. One plaintiff succeeded in obtaining a reversal of his con­viction. The conviction had been obtained with the help of an involuntary confession. Now the plaintiff asks for financial compensation for the loss of his Fifth Amendment rights. Some federal prisoners complain that the failure of the federal parole board to give reasons when it denies parole is a deprivation of due process. Other prisoners complain that the state ought to be required to permit them to vote, especially since it continues to tax them.

We have been assigned nearly 50 cases thus far. Only a few of those cases have gone to trial. Most are in various pre-trial stages. Some have been dis­missed without a trial, either for failure to state a claim, or summary judgement motion, or as moot.

Motley v. Rundle, 11 Cr.L. 2087, CA #41023 (E.O. Pa. 3/29/72), appeal filed, 4/26/72, a recently decided case, though not technically a part of the Penn Law School program, helps to illustrate the service which the program performs for the prisoners, and its ability to make new law. In Motley, Al Hester, at the time a third-year student at Penn, represented the plaintiff. Hester was appointed under Rule 9~, but not through the law school nor under the supervision of one of the professors here. The plaintiff alleged that while incarcerated at Graterford he had worked in the weave shop at $0.69 per day. He was transferred from Gra­terford to Holmesburg to appear at a post-conviction hearing, pursuant to a petition which he had filed. Upon his return to Graterford, plaintiff was not as-

34

signed to work at the weave shop, but rather on the "run". His pay at the latter job was $0.15 per day . Plaintiff alleged that racial prejudice motivated the prison officials' failure to return him to the higher­paying job.

When defendant failed to file any response whatev­er to the Complaint, Chief Judge Joseph Lord III granted plaintiff's motion for the entry of judgement by default. Judge Lord denied defendant's subsequent motion to re-open the judgement, and set the case for trial on the amount of damages.

Following trial at which Mr. Hester appeared for plaintiff, Judge Lord awarded $1,461.70 in damages. Four-hundred sixty-one dollars and seventy cents was computed specifically to compensate plaintiff for wages he would have earned at the better job. The remainder of the award, $1,000 was to compensate plaintiff simply for the deprivation of a constitutional right, and for certain speculative collateral conse­quences. The tenor of the opinion strongly suggests that most of the $1 ,000 was intended to compensate for the deprivation of the right, without reference to actual damage. It is believed that the Motley case is the first one which compensated a plaintiff solely for the loss of a constitutional right.

We think that the Prisoners' Rights Litigation pro­gram has enjoyed substantial success in its first half­year of operation. Prisoners whose claims were un­likely ever to receive a fair hearing now have a trained, capable, energetic advocate. The Court will be able to dispose of its prisoners' civil rights suits with the knowledge that each case receives the atten­tion of someone trained to look for, and hoping to find, possible merit to the claim. The students have the opportunity to handle a case from start to finish, in a developing, difficult, exciting area of the law. They receiye invaluable practice in drafting docu­ments for submission to the Court. They appear be­fore the Judge, and come to understand what advo­cacy is all about. Finally, of course, they may be able to vindicate the rights of a person whose chances of success without them were negligible.

Collllllenceinen t (Continued from page 7)

Center for Study of Responsive Law; Charles Mor­gan, Atlanta attorney active in civil rights causes; John P. Nelson, Jr., New Orleans attorney active in representing civil rights cases; and Henry Sawyer, Philadelphia attorney active in the American Civil Liberties Union and Americans for Democratic Ac­tion.

Letters (Continued from page 16)

of "critical analysis" is overdone in law school. Should law school teach some substantive matenal?

LAW ALUMNI JOURNAL

Is the Socratic method productive in the second or third years? Is the concern with esoteric subjects, however timely, well advised, or to the exclusion of comprehensive treatment of more elemental aspects of law?

What Prof. Gorman presents instead is a series of 20 resolutions: 3 deal with scheduling; 5 with grading; 3 with work-study programs; 2 with group study pro­grams; and I each with recommended readings, a legal methods course, an orientation course, an advocacy course, and independent reading courses. The two remaining resolutions advise that "courses in a wide variety of subject matter" be offered and that the other 19 resolutions be implemented.

Several of these resolutions strike a familiar note; recent graduates will recall The Life of the Law and Jud Pro. Other resolutions suggest present methods: seminars, Appellate Advocacy and Legal Methods. Only two of the resolutions appear to display any merit: work-study programs and independent reading programs. It will be noted that both of these tend to phase out law school. Indeed, if work-study were to include work in a regular law school, legal education will have come full circle. The independent reading alternative is attractive because at least it is a time­tested method.

I spoke with Prof. Gorman approximately a year ago on these matters. He said my ideas were reac­tionary and accused me of asking for "spoon feeding" in wanting courses with some content. Or, as I have heard it said too many times, "Oh, no, we don't tefich law. We teach the method." Then I had no response, but now I submit that that stance and Prof. Gorman's report are patently inadequate.

Julian Karpoff

Trial _(Continued from page 9)

be run over the entire year' with half the session being held with small groups rather than the full class.

Trial of an Issue was also the vehicle for an in­novative experiment this past year; the session in­volving closing argument to the jury was done with the presence of videotape, with sound and instant replay capability, on closed circuit TV. The value of an instant replay of a football play is viewed rather differently by the halfback who sweeps around end for a touchdown than it is by the linebacker who ~issed the tackle. It is apparent that two advocates might view an instant replay of courtroom action with similarly varied degrees of enthusiasm. Yet the po­tential training value of videotape for the fledgling lawyer is equally as great as for the rookie football player. The instant replay gives you the invaluable ability to step back and watch yourself in action-with all your flaws hanging out. It is anticipated that this formidable and graphic educational technique will be used more fully in the coming year, hopefully in connection with small group sessions. If successful,

Fall 1972

it could well be transplanted to other similar courses in law school.

One of the participants in the videotape session was Burton Caine of Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis­Cohen. A frequent guest at the Monday evening classes, Mr. Caine's quietly persuasive summation to the jury on this occasion was a pleasure to watch. The Trial of an Issue class in the coming year will be treated to Mr. Caine's style of advocacy on a regular basis, as he will ·join Mr. Crawford in teaching this year's class. This high level of instructional ability coupled with the increased emphasis on individual participation seems to ensure that the forthcoming course will be even more rewarding than the past class.

The finale of the course this year was a full scale criminal trial, stretching over an afternoon and eve­ning. The case involved arson, along with several lesser crimes, and was based on the record of the preliminary hearing in an actual trial following the· firebombing of College Hall several years ago. The identity of the defendant, however, was changed to that of a militant feminist formerly employed by the University.

The guest judge for this session was Han. Lisa Richette from the Philadelphia Common Pleas Court. The roles of the defendant and numerous witnesses were filled principally by lawyers from various offices throughout Philadelphia who were available to the prosecution and defense teams for about a week prior to the trial for preparation. Their availability and willingness to cooperate with the prosecution or de­fense, however, was prearranged by the instructors so as to simulate reality.

The conduct of the trial was highly interesting and eventful, involving argument on defense motions for suppression of evidence and mistrial, attempts by student advocates to cross examine witnesses who were actually seasoned litigators, and several lengthy and well acted diatribes by one witness which relegat­ed both the prosecution and defense to the status of "male chauvinist pigs." The Bench rose admirably to the occasion, as is evident from the brief excerpt of her dialogue with the prosecution, paraphrased at the beginning of this article. One prosecution witness, testifying that one of the arsonists "ran like a girl" was totally chagrined at the Court's insistence that the witness, a male Wharton School student, demon­strate that style of running. Despite his insistence that such a demonstration was a physical impossibility, the Court remained steadfast, and the witness gamely gave a creditable performance as a girl running, caus­ing a brief total breakdown in courtroom decorum.

Ultimately, the trial ended in a hopelessly hung jury, with the defense persuading all but three jurors of the defendant's innocence. Although the perform­ance of counsel was hardly without flaws, the external difficulties of staging such a trial and the extensive preparation required make the successful result a credit to the efforts of Professor Levin and Mr. Crawford.

35

The author heartily recommends the course to all who are interested, either as members of the class, observers, or as future guests participating as demon­strating attorneys or judges.

lngralll (Cotinued from page 14)

In citing disadvantages of the system experienced during her clerkship, Miss Ingram recounts, "I have realized how haphazard the law can be sometimes­with its tremendous caseload it often seems to be a grinding out process. It is frustrating to see how political and economic factors in certain instances account for disparities in the quality of justice among litigants."

Considering her teaching career at Temple, she is both apprehensive because she has never taught, and also challenged by the thought of new experiences and opportunities to expand her own education.

"I have no political aspirations," she states, "right now I want to become a competent teacher and get the most experience from the opportunity that has just been presented me.''

Library (Continued from page 4)

Hardly a day went by during my years there that we failed to read in The New York Times or the Wall Street Journal a report of a matter that we had worked on a day or two earlier. One of the most exciting of them I have related elsewhere: At the height of Sena­tor Joseph McCarthy's career, he demanded time to appear on CBS television to answer a report of Ed­ward R. Murrow's. Senator McCarthy supplied to CBS his filmed speech a few days in advance. Among his exhibits were some 10 documents by which the Senator attempted to prove that our government was overrun with Communists. He flashed each of those documents on tt.e screen for a second. But he partially concealed their title pages with his hands. I was given blow-ups of those film strips and asked to identify the documents within 48 hours. In most cases only a portion of a government seal and fragments of a few words or dates and document numbers were visible. The CBS lawyers understood that they were all Congressional documents. To my surprise, most of them proved to be reports of subversive investigat­ing committees in New York, California and Mas­sachusetts. Only a few were federal documents. All 10 were identified in time for Murrow's use on his CBS telecast in reply.

More recently the Cravath firm was retained to defend the House of Representatives in an action brought in the U.S. Supreme Court by a New York congressman whom the House had refused to seat.

36

In the course of that case and because of it, the library acquired a great number of books on the history of parliaments and the rights of legislators that only a fine law school library could expect to own. Penn has them all. They covered the period from the signing of the Magna Carta in 1215 to the present day.

Contrary to published reports, there is no computer in the Cravath library. Nor is there one at the Biddle Law Library. But to the extent that machines can eliminate repetitive tasks , Cravath uses them.

For example , access to memoranda of law at Cra­vath-as in most large firms-has always been a per­plexing problem. We attempted to solve it by prepar­ing new abstracts of all the bound volumes of legal memoranda written in the past 20 years. The abstracts were turned over to Aspen Corporation, a computer service center. Aspen produced a "Key Word in Context" index to the abstracts. It can be expanded indefinitely.

To my knowledge , this was the first successful law firm experiment with computerized indexing on a fairly large scale. The library's abstracting, indexing and bibliographical uses of computers can be expected to grow.

The results of experiments with computerized re­search that we conducted at Cravath a few years ago, however, were inconclusive. In those experiments, lawyers competed with a machine on a products lia­bility problem. In one case, the lawyers did a work­manlike job, but the machine failed. In a second experiment, the quality of the results was nearly equal; but the machine was faster. One of the Cravath partners quipped about the results to a very new associate, "Now that we have this machine, I guess we won't need you much longer."

The firm's managing partner put the matter in better perspective , "This firm has been practicing law a long time. If it is a simple question, we don't need a computer to answer it; we already know the answer. And if it is a difficult question, we wouldn't trust it to a computer."

What about the burning issues of the day: race, civil rights, consumer protection and environmental prob­lems? Their impact on the Cravath library has been comparable to their effect at Penn. The shift in em­phasis in book buying in those fields has been greater at Penn in the past two or three years, but library staff participation in research has been greater at Cravath--doubtless a matter of personal, rather than law firm or law school, policy or preference.

During the Carswell controversy, for example, the library at Cravath (and at other Wall Street firms) was the scene of research by both sides, with library staff members assisting.

It is a fact of law firm life that client problems come first. But the issues of race discrimination and envi­ronmental protection are no strangers to large cor­porate clients. The scope of the firm library's research in many cases is no different from that performed by the various Nader teams . The Nader and law firm aims

LAW ALUMNI JOURNAL

sometimes even coincide. Not long ago one member of the Cravath firm

defended a steel manufacturer against a charge of race discrimination in the promotion of its employees. In resolving that problem, he observed, "My hardest job was to persuade the white union foremen that they had to comply with the law, too."

The non-professional library staff at Penn is union­ized; at Cravath it is not. The members of both are drawn from several races and nationalities and their problems are no different from those of people all over. There is a preponderance of men, chiefly stu­dents and aspiring writers, at Cravath. There is a greater number of women on the library staff at Penn. There were always a few assistants on the Cravath library staff who had great intellectual gifts. But their tenure was usually short. There is greater stability among the Penn library staff members.

I might mention one distressing development among the law school libraries in New York that has not yet affected Philadelphia. New York school libraries are discouraging outside use of their facilities by imposing high fees and eliminating service to practicing law­yers.

On the other hand, one of the most gratifying fea­tures of the Penn law school library is the excellent rapport its staff has achieved with the members of the Philadelphia bar. Miss Nancy Arnold, our Refer­ence Librarian, ChJ:isty Ridley, our Documents Li­brarian, Mrs. Marta Tarnawsky, our Foreign Law Librarian, Mrs. Betty Warner, our Acquisitions Li­brarian, Paul Gay, the Assistant Librarian, and other library staff members at Penn offer a research service both by telephone and in person that the New York schools began to curtail some 10 years ago. True, the change at the New York schools was dictated in part by finances and in part by an increase in student enrollment, without a comparable increase in library staff size. But damage to school relations with the bar was the inevitable result. No matter what the financial strains at Penn, great care will be taken to maintain the present lines of communication between its library and the Pennsylvania bar.

Another unique service at the Penn library is its work with prisoners in penitentiaries throughout Pennsylvania. One library staff member at Biddle handles stacks of prisoner letters requesting copies of court opinions each week, in addition to performing her other reference services.

Because Philadelphia is smaller than New York, its law libraries are necessarily fewer in number. For a librarian, the most useful fact about the Cravath loca­tion in New York is that there are four other law libraries in the same building-each with book collec­tions of comparable size. Those collections are a source of duplicate runs of books that are indispensi­ble to a busy firm. I have known days when even six copies of a particular volume of Federal Supple­ment could not satisfy the need-and no copy was left for "Xeroxing". But more important, the- librari-

Fall 1972

ans in those four firms are a source of information in answering puzzling legal questions. Moreover, within a radius of two or three blocks there are a dozen other law librarians with similar gifts. Together with the bar association, New York Law Institute and court librarians, they form a network of information specialists.

The professional advantage to each of them is that they share one another's information. Thus, New York lawyers command the services of all when they employ only one of them.

What about the future? Must the physical size of law libraries expand forever? Probably not. Do the developing techniques of microforms and compact book storage offer a hope of containing, if not con­tracting, the sheer bulk of those libraries? Probably yes.

The 240,000 volume book collection at the Univer­sity of Pennsylvania Law School is now eight times as large as that of Cravath. The library serves about four times as many readers with a staff only twice the number at Cravath. But it includes eight profes­sionals on its library staff, compared to one at the law firm.

The intellectual resources of the Biddle Law Li­brary go back to the first stirrings of legal thought. Those resources include one of the best foreign law book collections on the eastern seaboard. The Anglo­American book collection is superb and it is growing. Like every law school library, it faces financial prob­lems. And in a few years, it will have space problems too. But if the library staff, faculty and administration at Penn, and its student body and alumni continue to show the ingenuity and concern for it that they have shown in the past, then the future of the Biddle Law Library-among the great law school libraries of the country-is secure.

Alumni Day (Continued from page 6)

ment, with special emphasis on Serrano v. Priest, highlighted the afternoon portion of Law Alumni Day.

University Professor Jefferson B. Fordham mo­derated the panel which included William F. Hall, Jr., regional counsel, Region III, Housing and Urban De­velopment Department; Professor Stephen R. Gold­stein, '62; and the Honorable William H. Wilcox, secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Com­munity Affairs.

In addition to the presentation of the Distinguished Service Award, the business meeting included reports by outgoing Law Alumni Society President William F. Hyland and Dean Bernard Wolfman, and election of officers.

In his report, Dean Wolfman spoke about changes in the School, including changes in the curriculum, new admissions policies, and faculty changes, not the

37

least of which is the departure of former Dean Jeffer­son B. Fordham.

The new officers of the Society are President: Jo­seph P. Flanagan, Jr., '52; First Vice-President : Edwin P. Rome, '40; Second Vice-President: Thomas N. O'Neill, Jr., '53; Secretary: David H. Marion, '63; and Treasurer: Sharon Kaplan Wallis, '67.

Elected to the Board of Managers were Hon. Doris May Harris, '49, whose term will expire in 1976; John G. Harkins, Jr., '58, whose term will expire in 1975 and Carol 0. Seabrook, '69, whose term will also expire in 1975.

The day ended with a supper in the foyer of the new Law Building.

NEWS NOTES Louis J. Goffman, '35, has been named to head the

Friends of the Biddle Law Library. The other members of the committee are Richard Sloane, Biddle Law Librarian; Edwin Wolf, head of the Library Company of Philadelphia; William F. Hyland, .'49; Edwin P. Rome, '40; David H. Marion, '63; Leonard L. Ettinger, '38; John G. Harkins, Jr., '58; Mary Ellen Talbott, '63; Thomas E. Wood, '66; Richard J. Farrell, '41; G. William Shea, '36; and Donald M. Swan, Jr., '53.

Dean Wolfman announces that Jane Freedman has established the Abraham L. Freedman Memorial Fund in honor of her late husband, the Hon. Abraham L. Freedman of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. According to Dean Wolfman, the fund ''may be augmented by Jane Freedman and others who wish to honor his memory.'' The proceeds of the fund will be ''available at the discretion of the dean to assist the school in programs of insJruction in advocacy, clinical activities and special lectures and programs of significant interdisciplinary context.''

Harold E. Kohn, '37, has established the J. C. Kohn Fund, in honor of his father. The fund is intended to supplement the loan funds available for students and is an experiment which will provide the basis for a partially income-contingent repayment program.

Hon. William H. Hastie, senior judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, will deliver the Owen J. Roberts Memorial Lecture on March 22, 1973.

Justice Harry Blackmun of the U. S. Supreme Court will act as presiding judge in the Keedy Cup Finals on April 6, 1973.

The Murry Waldmans hosted a reception for the Law Alumm ::society on August 17 in San Francisco during the annual meeting of the American Bar Asso­ciation. Mr. Waldman was graduated from the Law School in 1952.

38

Dean Wolfman hosted the dedication of the Sydney L. Weintraub Rare Book Room in the Biddle Law Library on May 19th,

A luncheon honoring Mr. and Mrs. Weintraub, of Miami, Fla., followed the dedication. Mr. Weintraub

Weintraub Room Dedication

is a member of the class of 1925. The Rare Book Room is named in his honor in appreciation for his generosity to the Law School.

Pennsylvania Attorney General J. Shane Creamer addressed the first year luncheon scheduled for September II at the Houston Hall auditorium.

LAW ALUMNI JOURNAL

Carroll R. Wetzel, '30, has been named to head the Law School Development Committee. The committee is charged with launching and following through on capital fund raising.

The other members of the committee -are Dean Wolfman; Hon. Arlin M. Adams, '47; Philip W. Amram, '27; S. Samuel Arsht, '34; Frederic L. Bal­lard, '48 ; John Ames Ballard, '48; Richard P. ·Brown, Jr., '48; Morris Cheston, '28; Richard M. Dicke, '40 ; Louis J . Goffman, '35; Kenneth W. Gemmill, '35; John G. Harkins, Jr. , '58 ; Philip Newman , '17; and Robert L. Trescher, '37.

Apparently unhappy with a decision last spring by the tenured faculty denying tenure to faculty member David Filvaroff and the faculty's earlier rejection of a pass/fail grading system, 140 students in the first year class signed a resolution of "no confidence" in Dean Bernard Wolfman during the spring examination period.

Student "spokesmen" Elizabeth Freedman, Nancy Weinman, Pat DeCarlo, Mark Friedman and Emund Tiryak made the results of the poll available to the Journal and expressed their "disillusionment" at what they characterized as the "dean's lack of understand­ing. ''

The negative vote represented approximately 93% of those voting and roughly two-thirds of the entire class. Second and third year students were not in­cluded in the poll .

Faculty leaders contacted by the Journal expressed "total and complete confidence" in the dean , noting that the decisions which seemed to underly the first­year students' reactions were the result of the actions of either the whole faculty or the tenured faculty, and not the dean alone. Some faculty members charac­terized the first-year student vote as "baseless" and "irrational."

In a joint statement, President Martin Meyerson and Provost Curtis R. Reitz declared: "We firmly support both the Dean and the Faculty in their decisions. In doing so we reject the statement of lack of confidence in our Dean. He is among the most distinguished of deans of law schools."

Summer vacations precluded comprehensive inter­viewing of faculty and students. However, one grad­uating student, Patricia L. Freeland , noted that "the current no-confidence petition is reminiscent of an earlier Law School incident in which students placed large black X's on the doors of faculty members who voted against a pass/fail grading system. I have always had the highest respect for Dean Wolfman, . .. and I continue to have the utmost confidence in his lead­ership of the School."

Because vacations prevented any independent, comprehensive analysis of student, facu{ty or alumni opinion concerning the issues involved in this contro­versy by the Journal. the mal!azine invites repre-

Fall 1972

sentatives of all factions and facets of opmwn to submit their views for consideration for publication in the next issue of the magazine.

All submissions will be considered. Those which are duplicative will be rejected. As usual the editors reserve the right to edit to meet space limitations. All submis­sions must be signed of course.

On July I, 1972, Associate Professor Martin J. Aronstein, L'65, and Associate Professor Stephen R. Goldstein, L'62, were promoted to the rank of Pro­fessor of Law. On the same date, Assistant Professor Bruce Ackerman was promoted to the rank of Asso­ciate Professor of Law and Public Policy Analysis.

The accreditation team that visited the Law School last February on behalf of the American Bar Associa­tion and Association of American Law Schools con­cluded its 37 page report by saying:

The Law School of the University of Pennsylvania is one of the nation 's great law schools, with effec­tive leadership, an excellent though too small fa­culty , a very good though inadequately supported library , an ample and fully adequate physical plant, and a promising and exciting new program of legal education under way. The Council of the American Bar Association

adopted a resolution in light of the accreditation report commending the Law School on the excellence of its program.

Provost Reitz

39

(Continued from page 33)

Wilson, who was, coincidentally, a heavy borrower at the Bank, made an appeal to Congress on its behalf. He argued that the authority of the national govern­ment to charter the Bank in the first place was an implied power and that the obligation of contracts could not be impaired. Both points were to become cornerstones of Constitutional law and theory. He also cited the service of the Bank to the revolutionary cause, that the specie outflow would exist even with­out the Bank, and that banks were necessary for economic development.

Nonetheless, the Assembly voted to revoke the Bank's State charter. Stock prices, confidence and cash reserves tumbled. The Bank secured a Delaware charter and contemplated moving down the river. Another campaign was made upon the Assembly, including the rhetoric of Tom Paine-now on Wilson's side-but again the Bank lost. Finally, the 1786 elec­tions returned a pro-Bank majority to the Assembly. The charter was renewed in the spring of 1787.

Meantime Wilson was deeply involved in a very popular post-war pastime: land speculation. Actually his land dealings dated from his days in Reading, but his holdings increased markedly through the 1780's. These included a large portion of stock in the Illinois­Wabash Company, which controlled 60,000,000 acre~, and interests in other land companies in Pennsylvania, Virginia, Ohio and New York. In addition, he was a joint owner of a nail factory up the Delaware River. These ventures were, needless to say, founded on borrowed capital. Land investment required a small down payment in exchange for a preliminary warrant, which authorized the speculator to survey the land and file a plat. Upon payment of the balance, clear title would issue. The potential for financial embar­rassment is obvious.

Despite the shady overtones, land investors viewed themselves as promoters of the country's develop­ment. Indeed, they looked down upon mere "spec­ulators." Wilson authored a pamphlet, "On the Im­provement and Settlement of Lands in the United States" -a tract on tracts-which reflected this perspective, mixed with more political economy.

In 1782 Wilson was appointed to represent the State in a boundary dispute with Connecticut over the Wyoming Valley in northeastern Pennsylvania. Under the Articles of Confederation, Congress was the last resort of appeal in such cases. The procedure for selecting the tribunal was for the parties to alternately strike names off a Jist of 3 men from each state until only 13 were left. The method, apparently patterned after Grenville's Act for deciding disputed parlia­mentary elections, was dubbed "knocking the brains out of the committee."

The tribunal convened in Trenton in November of 1782. At one point Connecticut pleaded that their original Indian deed had been lost and submitted a copy. Later the original deed appeared. Wilson traced the development of the two states, offered 39 Indian deeds of his own, and alleged that Pennsylvanians had settled the disputed area 20 years before the New Englanders. The Court found for Pennsylvania, mark­ing another milestone on behalf of national level judi­cial review.

Mr. Karpoff's fascinating account of the life of James Wilson will be concluded in the next issue of the Journal.

A graduate of Drew University, Karpoff is currently in private practice in Carlisle, Pa., to which vicinity James Wilson also ventured some 209 years ago.

ALUMNI NOTES 1902

HON. EDWIN 0. LEWIS, of Philadelphia, celebrat­ed his ninety-third birthday on July 12. He is slated to receive the Park Ranger Award, the highest honor the National Park Service bestows.

1908 LEON J. OBERMAYER, of Philadelphia, was one of four members of the class of 1904 of Philadelphia's Central High School who attended the class' 68th annual reunion in May. The others are ISSAC ASH, '08, ABRAHAM E. HURSHMAN, 'IOand THOMAS M. HYNDMAN, '11.

1921 ARMAND L. KOETHEN, of Louisville, Ky., has become an honorary life member of the Kentucky State Bar Association and of the Louisville Bar Asso­ciation.

40

1926 F. M. TRAVALINE, JR., of Collingswood, N.J., has been appointed a member of the Board of Trustees of Camden County College.

1930 HON. BENJAMIN R. JONES, of Philadelphia, Chief Justice of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, is one of five alumni who hold membership in the new 15 member Judicial Council of Pennsylvania. The other alumni are RICHARD HENRY KLEIN, '24, of Sun­bury, Pa.; HON. CLINTON BUDD PALMER, '40, President Judge of the Northampton County Court of Common Pleas; HON. JAMES S. BOWMAN, '43, Judge of the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania; HON. D. DONALD JAMIESON, '50, President Judge of the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas; and JAMES STRAZZELLA, '64, vice dean of the Law School.

LAW ALUMNI JOURNAL

Strazzella

1931 BERNARD G. SEGAL, of Philadelphia , has been elected to the board of directors of the Industrial Valley Bank and Trust Company.

Fall 1972

1936 NATHAN C. STALLER, of Wildwood, N.J., was appointed Judge of the Cape May County Court in 1970.

1938 SYLVAN COHEN, of Philadelphi~, reports that the class of 1938 held a reunion at the Merion Golf Club in May. Among those in attendance was the HON. GREGORY LAGAKOS, of the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas. ·

1939 JOHN P. BRACKEN , of Philadelphia, received the William Penn Award of the Greater Philadelphia Chamber of Commerce, for his "long and continuing years of leadership given and being given not only to Greater Philadelphia but the nation itself." He was also named to the Independence National Historical Park Advisory Commission.

1940 FRANK C. P. McGLINN, of Philadelphia, has been promoted to executive vice president of The Fidelity Bank. He. is also serving as chairman of the Pennsyl­vania Finance Committee for the Reelection of the President.

1942 JULIUS MAYNOR, of Charlottesville, Va., has be­come manager contracts/legal of the National Radio Astronomy Observatory.

41

1948 ALBERT E. TURNER, III, of Dallas, Pa., who was superintendent of claims for Pennsylvania Millers Mutual Insurance Company and worked at WBRE in Wilkes-Barre on weekends, is now expanding into private law practice.

1949 PETER M. WARD, of New York City, has become president of the Board of Trustees of St. George's School in Newport, R.I.

1950 FREDERICK C. N. LITTLETON, of Philadelphia,

has been promoted to senior vice president of The Fidelity Bank.

1951 ALVIN DIAMOND, of Willow Grove, Pa., has be­come counsel for Foodarama Supermarkets, Inc., which operates 70 supermarkets in Pennsylvania, New York, New Jersey and Connecticut.

1953 GORDON CAVANAUGH, of Bethesda, Md., has become executive director of a newly-formed Housing Assistance Council funded by the Office of Economic Opportunity for the purpose of conducting national programs to improve the production of low income housing in rural areas and small towns. CHARLES B. STROME, JR., has been elected vice president and counsel for the Equitable Life Assur­ance Society of the United States. S. DONALD WILEY, of Fox Chapel, Pa., has been elected senior vice president, secretary and general counsel of the H. J. Heinz Company and has also

42

been elected to the company's board of directors. 1954

EDWARD J. BLAKE, of Philadelphia, has been ap­pointed a judge of the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas. He is also court administrator for the Common Pleas Court. MANUEL H. GREENBERG, of Atlantic County, N.J., has been appointed judge of the Atlantic County Court by New Jersey Governor William T. Cahill.

1956 PETER J. LIACOURAS, of Gladwyne, Pa., has been named dean of the Temple University School of Law. HARRIS OMINSKY, of Philadelphia, has been ap­pointed membership chairman for the Jewish Ys and Centers of Greater Philadelphia (JYC).

1958 BENNETT I. BARDFELD, of Vineland, N.J., reports that his wife gave birth to their third child, Lisa Jennifer, in July of last year. The Bardfeld 's have two other children, a son Leonard, 61;2 and a daughter Kim, 5. JOHN J. GRAUER, of East Cain, Pa., has become executive vice president of the American Acceptance Corp. ELWOOD J. HEERWAGEN, JR., has become attor­ney for Nuclear Fuel Services, Inc. WILLARD D. LORENSEN, has been appointed dean of the West Virginia University Law School.

1959 CHARLES E. MATHER, III, of Philadelphia, has been elected director of Central Penn National Bank.

LAW ALUMNI JOURNAL

FRANK C. McLAUGHLIN, of New York City, has joined Fleming, Berger, Kent and Company as a general partner. He served as vice chairman of the 25th annual conference of the Financial Analysts Federation, where he spoke on "The Practicability of Managing Other People's Money."

1960 JOHN A. WALTER, of Lebanon, Pa., has been elected Illustrious Potentate of Rajah Temple, A.A.O.N.M.S., Reading, Pa. and its 8100 nobles. Together with its 172 sister Temples in North Ameri­ca, Rajah will celebrate I 00 years of shrine this year as the 19 orthodox hospitals and 3 burns institutes the Shrine owns and operates in Mexico , the United

States and Canada continue to benefit from the efforts of over 900,000 Shriners. RONALD ZIEGLER, of Philadelphia, has been elected chairman of the Public Utility Law Section of the Pennsylvania Bar Association. He was formerly assistant counsel to the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission and is now a partner in the firm of Tubis , Schwartz & Ziegler.

.1961 ARTHUR J. ENGLAND, JR., of Tallahassee, Fla. , has become consumer adviser and special counsel to Florida Governor Reubin Askew. He previously

Fall 1972

served as special tax counsel to the Florida House of Representatives. DAVID F. NORCROSS , of Moorestown, N.J., has been appointed special assistant to New Jersey Gov­ernor William T. Cahill. He had previously served as the Governor's assistant counsel.

1962 LEIGH S. RATINER, of Annandale, Va., has been appointed to the new position of director for ocean resources in the office of Hollis M. Dole, Assistant Secretary of the Interior for Mineral Resources. He was previously staff director of the office of ocean affairs for the Secretary of Defense. In the new position, he will have responsibility for developing and recommending policy regarding the rights of the

United States to develop ocean resources in the con­text of negotiations leading toward new international treaties.

1963 CHARLES A. PRICE, of Minneapolis, Minn., for­merly antitrust counsel to 3M Company, is now asso­ciated with the St. Paul, Minn ., firm of Oppenheimer, Brown , Wolff, Leach & Foster. FAITH RYAN WHITTLESEY, of Haverford Town­ship, Pa., has won the Republic nomination to the Pennsylvania Legislature from the 166th district, beating out her six male opponents.

1964 BERYL RICHMAN DEAN, has become pre-law advisor in the Vocational Advising Center of .the University's Dean of Students' Office. JEROME J. FORMAN, of Browns Mills, N.J., an­nounces the formation of the new partnership of Apell, Forman and Howard with offices at Lakehurst Road , P.O. Box 95, Browns Mills, N.J. WILLIAM T. ONORATO, of London, England, has been awarded a Ph.D. in International Law from the University of Cambridge. His study was made possi­ble through the grant of a Gowen Graduate Fellowship by the Law School from 1965 to 1968. Topic of his

43

thesis was ''Apportionment of an International Com­mon Petroleum Deposit;" it will be published next year. JAMES ROBERT PARISH, of New York City, is the author of "The RKO Gals," to be published by Ar­lington House, and is editor of "An Index to Major Performers' TV Credits," to be published by Scare­crow Press.

1965 J. JOSEPH FRANKEL, of Newark, N.J. , has been promoted to assistant general counsel by the Pruden­tial Insurance Company, Newark, N.J. DAVID D. HAGSTROM, of Poughkeepsie, N.Y., has become associated with the Poughkeepsie firm of Van

·DeWater and Van DeWater. He was previously an attorney in the law department of Diamond Shamrock Corporation, Cleveland, Ohio. PETER HANKS, of Melbourne, Australia, will be visiting Europe (Max Planck Institute, Heidelberg , and Cambridge University) and North America (York University and the University of Pennsylvania) during 1972-73 and reports that he is anxious to make contact with friends from the classes of 1965, '66 and '67.

1966 STEPHEN BRETT, of Denver, Colo., has become associated with the Denver firm of Dawson , Nagel, Sherman & Howard. MICHAEL M. COLEMAN, of Philadelphia, is now associated with the Philadelphia firm of Pepper, Hamilton & Scheetz. MORTON GOLDFEIN, of Morristown, N.J., has become a member of the Morristown and East Orange firm of Teltser & Greenberg. EDWARD F. MANNINO, of Philadelphia, has be­come a member of the firm of Dilworth, Paxson, Kalish, Levy & Coleman. RICHARD ROYAL WIER, JR., of Wilmington, Del., has been appointed state prosecutor for Delaware by Attorney General N. Laird Stabler, Jr. RICHARD N. WEINER, '66, an assistant attorney general of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and chief counsel to the Pennsylvania Securities Commis­sion, has been elected chairman of the executive committee of the Young Lawyers Section of the Philadelphia Bar Association. At the same time , MARJORIE. G. MARINOFF, '69, was elected vice chairman; HENRY A. STEIN, '65, was elected sec­retary, and LOUIS N. MARKS, '69, was elected treasurer.

1967 JOHN C. FOX, of Somerville, N.J., has been elected a director of GarDoc, Inc., a New Jersey corporation specializing in graphic media. ROBERT C. OZER, of Buffalo, N.Y., has been ap­pointed attorney-in-charge of the United States Department of Justice Strike Force Against Organized Crime and Racketeering in Buffalo, N.Y. STEPHEN SCHOEMAN, of New Rochelle, N.Y., ran unsuccessfully as an independent progressive candidate for the New Rochelle city council.

44

JONATHAN SCHWARTZ, of Beverly Hills , Cal., announces the formation of Schwartz & White. He was formerly a staff attorney with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. DAVID B. ZWIRN, of New York City , has been appointed assistant in the Manhattan District Attor­ney's Office.

1968 MURRAY A. GREENBERG, of Miami Beach, Fla. , announces the formation of the Miami Beach firm of Greenberg & Greenberg. He was formerly an assistant Dade County attorney. THOMAS D. HENDERER, of Wilmington , Del., has become an assistant secretary of the Trust Depart­ment of Wilmington Trust Company. DAVID LISSY, of Washington, D.C. , has become special assistant to the Secretary of State. RICHARD N. TOUB , of London, England, has an­nounced that he will continue the practice of United States and international law at 55 Park Mansions , 149 Knightsbridge, London, SW1X, 7QT. NOLAN N. ATKINSON, JR., of Ardmore , Pa., is director of the Ardmore Community Development Corporation, which plans to build 16 condominium units in South Ardmore. When they are completed, they will be the first new housing for blacks in South Ardmore in this century. THOMAS R. OWENS, of Oakland, Cal., announces the formation of his partnership with Steven H. Gold­farb under the firm name of Goldfarb & Owens , with offices at 1970 Broadway, Suite 1045 , Oakland, Cal. 94612. He also writes that he is interested in forming a local chapter of the Law Alumni Society in Northern California and invites alumni in that area to contact him. THOMAS E. DORAN, of Philadelphia, has become associated with the firm of Dilworth , Paxson, Kalish, Levy & Coleman. STEPHEN G. YOUNG, of Philadelphia, is currently serving as director of research of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's Criminal Procedural Rules Commit­tee. He earned an LL.M. from the New York Uni­versity Law School.

1970 STEVEN STONE, of Philadelphia, was elected Democratic committeeman of the 8th division of Philadelphia's 5th ward. EDWARD H. WEIS , of Philadelphia, is now assigned to the Federal Courts Division of the Defender Asso­ciation of Philadelphia. JOHN MICHAEL WILLMANN, of Philadelphia, has become public relations coordinator and press secre­tary for the Pennsylvania Committee for the Reelec­tion of the President. He was previously Deputy Court Administrator for Public Information and Planning in Philadelphia Common Pleas Court.

1971 ROBERT B. LAMM, of New York City , was married in January to the former Carol Ann Lew, a 1968 graduate of the University.

LAW ALUMNI JOURNAL

JOHN M. CUNNINGHAM, of Washington, D.C., has become an assistant to the director of the Bureau

of Consumer Protection of the Federal Trade Com­mission.

JACK W. TAPPER, of Marlton, N.J., has become associated with the Mt. Holly firm of Dimon, Haines and Bunting.

WILLIAM J. MOSES, of Philadelphia, has been ap­pointed corporate counsel of Lincoln Bank. He pre­viously served as law clerk to Hon. John J. Kitchen, U.S. District Court, Camden, N.J.

1971

SANDRA SHERMAN, of Menlo Park, Calif., is now employed at the Nuclear Energy Division of General Electric in San Jose, Calif. She had spent II months in the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice.

1972 PATRICKR.RILEY, of Pittsburgh; Pa., and his wife, Margaret, are the parents of a boy, Stephen Francis, born May 7. Riley writes "Stephen considerately waited till his dad finished exams before making his appearance.''

FACULTY & STAFF NOTES ALEXANDER M. CAPRON became assistant

professor of law on July I. A 1969 graduate of the Yale Law School, he spent the past two years as a lecturer and research associate at Yale. Prior to that he clerked for a year with Chief Judge Bazelon of the D.C. Circuit Court. His principal interest is in the field of law and medicine, particularly the legal and ethical questions surrounding genetics, transplants and human experimentation.

STEPHEN J. ·scHULHOFER has been appointed assistant professor of law. A 1967 summa cum laude graduate of the Harvard Law School, he served two years as law clerk to the late Justice Hugo Black.

Fall 1972

Since then he has been practicing at Coudert Freres in Paris. His principal teaching and research interests are in substantive criminal law.

J. LeVONNE CHAMBERS, senior partner in the Charlotte, N.C. firm of Chambers, Stein, Fergus~n & Lanning will be a lecturer at the Law School during the spring semester giving a seminar on civil rights. The Chambers firm was the first interracial law firm in North Carolina.

In 1971, Chambers received the Honorary Fellow­ship at the Law School's commencement exercises. That year he had argued before the U.S. Supreme Court the case in which desegregration, with the use of busing, was ordered for the schools of Charlotte and Mecklenberg County, North Carolina.

45

DAVID SLAWSON, professor at U.S.C., who is currently on leave serving as General Counsel to the Pr_ice Control Commission, will be at the Law School during~he coming year teaching Corporations and a seminar on Wage and PriCe Control.

FRANKUN E. ZIMRING, a member of the Chicago faculty, wiii be at the Law School in the fall teaching and doing research in areas of substantive criminal law.

WILLIAM W. VAN ALSTYNE, of Duke Univer­sity, will be a visiting professor during the spring semester, teaching one section of Constitutional Law.

Professor GEORGE L. HASKINS spent a week in London early in June for conferences with members of the Royal Commission on Historical Manuscripts with respect to its methods of indexing and preserving legal papers and local court records. Professor Has­kins, who is president of the American Society for Legal History, anticipates that a comparable nation­wide effort will soon be made in the United States-

46

with a goal of preserving legal and historical papers­as the result of the May 16 resolution of the American Revolutionary Bicentennial Commission. The resolu­tion, which was unanimously adopted, was originally sponsored by several organizations including the American Society for Legal History.

Professor Haskins also reports that he spent a con­siderable amount of time in London at the British Museum and the Public Record Office doing research on early English sources of American colonial law.

He has been appointed to serve on a newly formed Law School Advisory Council to the ABA's Commit­tee on the Uniform Probate Code.

ARNOLD J. MILLER, assistant dean for admis­sions and student aid, was on the administrative staff of the National Institute for Trial Advocacy whose first four-week summer session was held in Boulder, Colorado June 25 through July 21.

HON. ARLIN M. ADAMS, '47, Judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, will offer a seminar on The First Amendment in the fall.

HON. A. LEON HIGGINBOTHAM, JR., judge of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, will offer a year-long seminar in Racism and the American Legal Process. He has previously taught a · seminar at the Law School on Blacks and the Law.

ILOCHI A. OKAFOR, currently a candidate for the S.J.D. degree at the Law School, will offer a course in African Law during the spring semester. He has his LL.M. degree from the Law School.

SHARON KAPLAN WALLIS, '67, currently head of the North Philadelphia Tenants' Union, will offer a course in Women's Rights next spring. She is plan­ning to open a private law firm specializing in cases involving women's rights.

Returning to the Law School after leaves of absence are BRUCE ACKERMAN, who was visiting at the Yale Law School faculty; ROBERT GORMAN, who taught at U.S.C. and LOUIS SCHWARTZ, who was doing research in France on multi-national corpora­tions.

PAUL MISHKIN will spend the fall as visiting professor at Berkeley and the spring on sabbatical, doing research on the Supreme Court at the Center for Advanced Studies in the Behavioral Sciences at Palo Alto.

LAW ALUMNI JOURNAL

JOHN M. STEADMAN will spend the coming year as visiting professor at the Georgetown Law Center.

ROBERT MUNDHEIM will be on sabbatical for the coming year, doing research here and in Japan, primarily in the area of financial institutions. He has been invited to give a series of seminars on American securities regulation by the Japan Securities Research Institute in Tokyo during the first week of October. The seminar will be held for representatives of leading

1909 RICHARDT. McSORLEY, Drexel Hill , Pa., March 14.

1910 J. ERNEST NACHOD, Glenside, Pa., February 16.

1916 . HON. CHARLES A. WATERS, Margate, N.J., May 23. BENJAMIN B. HOAR, Philadelphia, June 11 .

1917 EDWIN A. LUKAS, Villanova, Pa., April 5. PAUL E. THOMAS, Meadville , Pa., February 8.

1922 ARTHUR B. VAN BUSKIRK, Ligonier, Pa., April 6. RAYMOND P. LEEMHUIS, Erie, Pa. , July 4.

1923 HON. GEORGE W. GRIFFITH, Ebensburg , Pa. , March HENRY R. HEEBNER, Wynnewood , Pa. , May 10.

1926 LEON SACKS, Philadelphia, March 11 .

Fall 1972

Japanese financial institutions and the most influential Japanese scholars in the corporate and securities field. Mr. Mundheim has also been in voted to address the Osaka Stock Exchange in Japan.

Dean BERNARD WOLFMAN addressed the Maine Bar Association in Kennebunkport, Maine on June 26. His topic was "New Trends in American Legal Education. "

Professor BRUCE H. ACKERMAN presented a speech in June to the United States Judicial Confer­ence for the Second Circuit on "The Future of Envi­ronmental Law." He has been asked to serve as program chairman for the 1973 meeting of the Ameri­can Society for Legal and Political Philosophy.

PIERRE BONASSIES, of the Faculty de Droit , Universite Aix-Marseille, will be a visiting professor during the fall semester, teaching one course in Com­parative Law and another in the European Economic Community.

FAIRFAX LEARY, JR., professor of Law at the Temple University School of Law, will be Visiting William A. Schnader Professor of Commercial Law for the coming academic year, teaching courses in Consumer Law and Creditors' Rights. He spent the past year in Washington serving as Ralph Nader 's adviser on consumer protection.

MIRJAN DAMASKA, who had been a visiting professor of law, has joined the full-time faculty. He formerly taught at the University of Zagreb in Yu­goslavia. He came to the Law School in 1966-67 and again last year to teach comparative law. Next year he will teach criminal law.

1927 LEWIS PAWLING, Selinsgrove, Pa., October 28, 1971.

1928 DAVID H. FRANTZ, Vineyard Haven, Mass., February 20.

1933 EDWARD G. TAULANE, JR., Haverford, Pa. , June 19.

1936 ROBERT G. KELLY, Wynnewood, Pa., February 20.

1937 RANDAL MORGAN, Chestnut Hill , Pa. , July 4.

1948 HARVEY B. LEVIN, Philadelphia, May 7. LEWIS M. JACK, Indiana, Pa., December 21 , 1971.

1957 RICHARD M. NEVILLE, Cork, Ireland , April 27, 1971 .

1959 JOHN B. MAYBEE, Dover, Del., April 13.

47

UNIVERSITY of PENNSYLVANIA

LAW REVIEW

PRESENTS

VOLUME 121

The Law Review is now taking subscription orders for Volume 121. Representative articles and comment~ planned for the 6 issues of this volume include:

Sale of a Law Practice. A Statutory Definition of Death. "Constructive Concerted Activity" and Individual Rights: The Northern Metal-lnterboro Split. Retroactive Application of Ameliorative Criminal Legislation. Nits, Grits and Soft Information in SEC Filings.

Why not join your many fellow alumni who have found the Review to be a valuable practical tool and one that offers stimulating insights into developing legal concepts and trends?

3400 CHESTNUT STREET PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLY ANIA 19104

RETURN REQUESTED

Please enter my subscription for Volume 121.

Name .................................... .

Address ........................... . ...... .

0 Enclosed is my check for $12. 0 Please bill me.

Return to: University of Pennsylvania Law Review 3400 Chestnut Street Philadelphia, Pa. 19104

1 --I )

Non-Profit Org.

U. S. Postage PAID

Permit No. 2147 Philadelphia, Pa.

l I