University of Nigeria Research Publications

OSUAFOR, Promise Chu

Aut

hor

PG/M.Ed/91/12740

Title

The Need for Private Investment in Teacher Education in Nigeria: A Survey of

Colleges of Education in Some States

Facu

lty

Education

Dep

artm

ent

Education

Dat

e

January, 1994

Sign

atur

e

I'X PLEA PAGE

05 f.ciuca?tl nn I n sCtTir. Easte rn States submit; ted

Date : Date :

s t u d e n t Cn the bpar tment of Education and

f er caursc and reseatch work fa- t h ~ dwrcc

r e p o t t 1 s or?q+nal and has not been submCtCod

in part w f u l l far any other diploma OF drgr~c

of t h q s or any other UniversCty.

Significance of t h e Study . .. ;cope of t h e Study .. .. %sea-ch I ' l ~ e s k tctrls a + , s

H y c o t h ~ s c s . . . . ...I.

r'hr Concept of ~ ' e a c h ~ r Cducatfon ..-. h r - p o s ~ of 1~3chey Education ... Investmwtt i n icacher Eclucation In Nigeria , Past and Present ..a .... Need for P r i v a c ~ XnvcsLn+nt In S ~ a c h e r Educat 1 nn f n Jigt5ria ..OO

C H A P I E " . lHmCE: KEIHODOLOGY AND PVOCEDUnE

Design of che Study .... .I.. . L O . Area of the Study . *. . .. m. ..., Populatton of t h c study . .... ..mu

Sarnplc and Sampllng technique ... I - . a

I n s t r u r n ~ n t f o r Data C o l l e c t i o n . . .*.a

Val l -da t lon of t h e f n s t r u m n t .... ..,. "eliablltty of t h e I n s ~ r u m c n t . . . .*.. Le thnd of Data C ~ l l ~ c t i o n . C O O I... P ~ t h o d of D a t a A n a l y s i s *..* ....

ChAE-l'En E'I VE;

Giscusstan of F i n d i n g s .,. .... ..-. Surrmary and Conclustons . . .. .. I.I. Educatq m a 1 I m p l i c a t i o n s . .O.*. .... *e~arr~m~ndatlnns ..,. .... - a .... S u g g e s t t ~ n s for f u r t h e r Study ... I.I.

"ErI-'CnLNCES

A P P E N D I X 1:

A P P F - N D f X 2:

A P F E N D I X 4 :

A P P L N D I X 5 :

**.. 0 . 0 . ..I. +..I ..I.

W e s t T o n n a i r e . . . . I . . m .* I . Computation of Student t-test .. and Chi-square far Hypothesis one

Computa t tcn of Chi-Squ=e f o v Hypt-thesis A'wo .. .... .... Student t - t ~ s t table ,.,, .... Chk-Square t a b l ~ . e n . ..I.

+ L * + . . , * * *

PAGE - 33 33

33

34

35

36

37

38

38

39

40

57

63 67

69

71

72

77

8 3

87

89

90

A typica l Coiicqe of t;clucaLlon chatqe.

Sample for c h ~ study and dist - lbuclon.

Obf cct 9 vcs af L'e qckr F,ducnt f mn as

LtarCsctca l data for t e s t l n g h y p o t h ~ s i s

r n ~ (I:.trinr. ? - R, strongly aqree).

Stat1 s ~ i c a l d a t a for tcstlny I iypothcs i s

t w n .

of chl-square (Ha ) 1

xc

I'he daca a b t a i n ~ d f r n m t h c two s a c s ~ l f t h e

ques t l .mmat~e were analysrd and u s c d t n anrwer c h c

res~arch questl m s an2 hypotheses. I ' r n m c h e r e s u l t s

cf thr a n a l y s i s , t h c follow+nq f f n d t n a s w p r e made f r e m

t h e r e s r a r c h qucst i m s :

1. t h e r e a r e c c a l l y smmr dlff~rcnccs b e t w o n

Gnvernmmt and prtvate investors ever what thc

ebf ectf vos nf Ceacher C$ucat 1 en are.

2. Factors t h a t wxourai e d e r ~ n d e n c y of L'~3cher

Craininq Instl tutqons on Governn\nnt f r v funding w ~ v t

? . d ~ n t ! f i c d ,

3. Factors t h a t make fop p f v a c e under-invcstrncnt Jn

S P R C ~ P ~ Fducati on w e r ~ a l s o i d ~ n t r f t ~ d .

4. kays to cnccrurag~ c h e p r t v a e ~ sector t n invpst i n

r e a c h e r EducatCan I n N i q e r i a w e w e outlined.

From c he Hypat h e s e s :

I r'hr analysf s of t h e f t r s t srctinn of t h r J . t ~ n ~ s an

t h c o b j f i ~ t i v e s of teacher Fducation showcd t h a t the re

Cs significant d i f f c t t n c ~ i n t h ~ obj - e t C v e s cf Jcach-r

Educetfon between Gbvcrnmant and c h ~ p - t v ? t ~ i q v e s t e r s

I n Niqeria.

x ! f

2. I'he rcsult 97 the analvsqs 04 t h e sccmd rcectinn

of the Items on fnvestmrnt showed t h a t t h ~ r e 7s

sisnificant dtffetencc i n the level of inve~tment f n

Zeachpr Fducat* rn b e t w e n G o v ~ r n w n t and t h ~ p-qvpte

s ~ e t o r i n N l a e r f a .

Besr~d on the f l ~ d i n o s , t h p r e s c a r c h e t r n ~ c l n the

f c l l l l o w i n ~ wvmri mendatlons:

1. that a Natfnnal i ~ a c h e r Fducatfon Founc_'atqnn be

apt up e n secupe rell a b l ~ fundlna f nr N1crc~i-w i ' e ~ c h r r

Education Autmr?mnus "esourccs SeparaEp f r ~ i Cnvr~vnwrl f :

funds. he fund s h o u l d be nanaqpr' by a P a a d nf f ruster

who shcruld invite p i v a c e i n F C v f e u a l s t n brcnrr- sharp

hcrlde-a,

2. Each C n l l m e nf rcklcat4nn shnuld cnrnnr 3~ r p r r m s of

i ts Alumni and inauaurace Alumni Fnemlfr~nt.

3. Gnv~rnn~rnt should denim$ obll qatory f?-nmcf a1

cnntrThut l r~ frnm bCq bus lnmss n-qaniset tmc PC: r ~ r t ~ l f

t h s t r c n n c 4 b u t f . m t r? reacher T l u c a t i a ~ ,

4. C m t r s c c n . - 5 fn Colleq~s of F76ucatfnl) ~ h n u l r ?-P m9C'e

t n pay 5% of t h ~ contract valurr. deducted f r o m snrlrc*.o

and credited t o the Callccc Fund.

Scope of t h e stud^: r ' h ~ s c u r y W A S carrtpd cot in f iw C d leqes af

' . c ! u c f i c ~ n n rn chc T , = I P L O ~ S t e t c s of Niqcda namely,

4. Tn what ways can t h ~ p i v a z e s ~ c t o r ht

Hypot hese?:

From the w s ~ a w h ~ U P S C ~ e n s , t h e f nllawing

research hypotheses wcra arctculated nnd tested

a t t h e 0.05 l e v e l of s i a n r f l c a n c ~ , Hn J h p r ~ 1 s 1 '

no si~nificant difference in the abjrcttvrs of

k v ~ r n r n p n t and prtvprtc! investo-6 In N ~ q e r i a ,

fla2, i h ~ r e is no s i q n i f +cant d t f f p - ~ n c ~ I n t h r level

of i n w s t m e n t in Jeachrr r d u c a c ? m b ~ t w r r n L'nvrrnrn-nt

and p d v a t ~ f n v ~ s t n p s tn N t g ~ 4 - a .

'5 7- ,<.:. -9 - , * , , r - z.: 3 = y. 0.. . - ?-joy +kn w p q - ~

,-.,.c - l , n - , , 7 --w.,.. 7 7 r . 7 . v .V;F-: .. . b!!r;.rytlnly qJ.l-fip?+!.~)ry: f-+rll

r p ? . e - w - m + FIT-,-* ' - .. -I-. - hTn t 1. ;* n r-j.p4 r 0* +.PR$I e r n

r : n t - , - - . - m n l . -.A,J:.r.*?L. o , > ~ - : ~ V , P . ? P ! r E L , n.tt,~?7?-!.r-n. fl? ?nr?:'-\+~-

;.',-': 7. g,.,,? f.7 - P . .. c n ~ + \ - - . - : ~ ~ , ~ f , ~ f , h - n? . f~?c 0 4 t p r

f"-.py,pt'. rq rp~+,--..- . p-' - r - l . - ? v ,p-.f-l-{:1r .f ,m !-.>e C f : . ~ i , ~ r p - - J f . J . p ~ )

' - C T - * ~ n ~ ~ * ~ l * 'I? -2 -L .! . . . .. m - t,':-n:! - h ,?,hqt; j.nrtq l.??:p

P9' - - r r . . 7 P *--i. -.- P' FP ,-*-. - ~ r ! ? ~ r ' . r : , - n r l f-.hn i c q l i \ C Q w < , p ' J . ; ? . ~ f i d

- .- T - - - 1 . ..-. , , r ; ~ t t p m v 4 ; t,n f',!.?. ~ ~ ~ t n i . 2

,*7w- ,.-? :-'.. r - 7 1 - 7 - 7 7 - : ; + . i 7 7 < .,,:; ,.?..;;1-+.:.~~;7-r: :,:-iF- --:,mp.Tn of

. . - .,,; - ; - . ..,- - -. - - ' , ,* (. - ? .-. . I - . -

* I.. .. r - . - a + .

Purpose of reacher Education i n Niqerfa:

.li.,- - 7 7 . F ; - r , . . --.- - - , - ! . . - t:: ~r-!r .p -. .-::c: tf-?::. j.n

.y , .. ,-. ,- , . . - - r . 7 Y ' , ? -:.!l r . r- ! r. ': - - - - -. t ,--y.l??- i -I:,]-:c:~ T ~ I C F ~ ~ C , ~

Investment in reacher E d u c a t i o n in Nioer ia , --

P a s t an? P r e s e n t : .Ulsc--- u r .--

Need f o r P r i v a t e Investment fn Peacher Educatfon :.5 :!<ye!-'! * : ..-

-'T,:' 7d-: Sangle for t h e S t u d y and t h e i-d -

D ? s t r f 52;' on ----

!- .Lf "7, f r*nr? '_ 1 , + , - i 2 ?n.--?jy- ";,I k , ~ .. .. !

, , . . - . .. -. - - - - . T.U. , I t " r ?

.. .' ! 1 1 . . - - m I * . 0. " , , ?.IT ; If-

9 1 ' (4

C . , .-. ", -. I

77. - ? . . - , ~ ' . Y T ~ - - . , . . . ... . C. .;. '. 9 . , 1,' " ,>:- 1, 1'

. - . . .- . -- . . . . - . ., '.. I

1 --_C-*__L- -----. --.

Validation ~f t h e Ins trument: C. - .- . ! . - - ' . * r * . - . a - ' - . - - A - -9 , - -. -*. . ' I-.. -.-P - -. - ,.

_ _ I : . . - . _ . .-. . ..+.- -7. . : .* :- ,-.- 9 . - t F;-t ? - v . . , _ .. _ , . . , - >..., . , - 2 , . , . ,-, r . . r . . , 7 . . r . : .,.. r - . - r .'-• ' r - . . ' . - . - ,~ - . - . .

. . -ir.,, -. -. . . - 1 .\ - .?'. . c .. - - ..-, <. ' r. .- .- _~ -? +-, - . - .. ,

I . . , , . *.. ,~ . f.7. $ , . . - . . C . -*-..

t

-- T n ,lr:Tr.'-,.! 9 . . , ' .-'1. 1"' ".",.?!.!,.?f., !,':r. , - , . , . - . a . - . . *: . .. -. . .-. - 9 -

c I: - - - , . ..-. 1 - ' ' - :' .: 9 r - 7 t- y.:. :: y-n, *-;':,- cc?-;.- , = , _ _ . d -.- ,, 1. - - .- > _ '

,-. . f l -,-..-• . . , - r , .. k,f- F,;: - m f J vni; :;:-I- rs -.

,?, ?n-Jl.?!.fVtn? E r%v'i.d hr m~ewr\mfl t n rrm+-?-?-v +.F to

t.hp p l ~ r f mr' $19 mw!yTtf,r-r? pS kf.\3 V n v - 8 0.P

"n~-+.n~t. 7-w n RP? P T ~ P T ~ F ~ \ C S Y f h p ~ P Y . ~ * ? - J ,. . . rr

*P~?TC??. 07 ?bra . . rn . 7.!.~+v n p vrlr-~n*?.qp !.r, ?l:r at.^:,

'3 + W h p Vt~.l ckniq?.? he m8~7p.pmP om, f k p h-d-r: p * w.r:

co"+-~+"w~.?~vmws~g,

!!a h r h rln?.?, c r ? ~ ~ 157 v3t1 ~p).! on r%*-?.P *.s-?* - ~ - ? c

F:m.?nq- TkPn+rr.l~nk r F n r e ?.hc ? T r n r p ' . ?F.--*I.? hq

rmynr~mrcv l tr) r n ~ ~ m r t ,q w p ~ f l . r c t ?.-)r.-e =-r+f-* -I-

%n F nm hi.t.?-~*.y pq*

!=a tnilj.1.d. +n7. F! m r? OF,-??. c~t.! nv * r).mt. r? hcl nn . n * r t ~ -9

?.$n?t.?.hr v(t3. t h e O ~ ? P C + , ? V P S nnJ ?t-t+.?r*.+A-?- A?

+.'l e W?.?. +? *s m f' y r 7 v c 3 t?. on

pn~frmm~r.+ , . h r 7 ~ f ? _ r ) d ~ - * m + ~ h l . r w . ~ ~ ~ *---V!.T?.

t ? ~ ~ t ~ . h r ~ t . ~ ~ f p ~ .rCym MA q t)vr??.n nrr) n r * ~ + . v+.! om- .- y:

n ~ ~ t O ? +.'?F?.Y c m ~ t ~ ! - h + t n n ?ti k h n *,n-vrz? nf

mfi-chny W!t~pntt m-c 9 1 ~ h Fttnnr rtl?r*?.r' hh P-1-1. O?

fWrV?r?,-rt.!.nn W?t.t*tv.

7, Tcmf.-ctn~q h - n f l . ? . tW-P+pcmC F P C ~ + ~ C + t- ! n +&r.

Fn?l. ~ T P p:33!-7.? )?q ~ R R P to w*? W ~ l l p f,hl? ~ ~ L y - r - t :

mf.!~.ns fln+~rt.;.r? * y m R ~ F C P F PRJ c r - r Y + r P +n +.%P

Pn71 VFI *?n?.

Cera, Fo (1975) *If a Schaal f l u n k s must etudrnte pay?" 2'1e !Jew York 2 ? m ~ s , -unc?ay 8 ,

Enaohwo, J o 0 . (1982) nCaat-Bcncflt a n a l y s i ~ and the Inv~strn-nt factor I.n ~clucat!m - an emberreal ! .nvest lqaf im oC c h ~ D ~ ? W ~ C C + Face of ?"turns

Okeke, E.

Okekc , R,

( a ) SA - Strongly Acrrtc

and items 9 - 14 i n qucst im ' A ' and i tems 1 - 10 in c u e a t f w ' D b wqth thc keys F S / N b .

Hamr of T n s t i t u t l m t

PrI.ncl.pa1 Off lccr 7 Cellrqr Contract w 17 Student 1 7

. s/~Q. X t ems

I' r

P ' m a c M r Lcucatim T E P ~ f ~ 8 l for sac:' o-ecr,nnr:q c C ~ v c l , a p v n t of i ~ V , C I P * ? ii. t

fl

whether there t a na arlgnik.lcsni; r!i.Cf*-~nc~! i n thp

reapma-a 1.

0.222

t - c a l 0.222

t - t 3 h l ~ u a ? u ~ a ?,la5

t - c a l t - t a b l e

rhrrcf ate the Nul l h y p t h c s i a of no siqnltf tcant

diffrrcnc~ is r c j ~ c t e d .

m 1- 178

t - c a l 1 1.178

t - t a b l c v a l u + - 2.145

t -cal t - t a b l e

Ehrttfow t h e Null hypothesfs of na mLqnif1cant

diffrrcnce is e jec ted .

APPFND,XX 2E

Calculation of Chh-square to f5.M aut whethcr

a+ feacbrr Educat l an br twcn GClegr managrrnent and

Standard DFviatlan Pable f a t HD 1.

lher t f are Hull h y p a t h e ~ i s df no sqqnlf icant

APPErJgx 3 -- ..-- CrllniRatCm of Chi-aquare t o f 4 r l f l cut whether

i n w a t m ~ n t i n Cpachc+ Ertucat t m brtwten t hc G-wmmrnt

and thc prfvate scctar In N1q~rf .a .

For t h e rcsannws nf t h e Pwvosts and t h e Prtvatc

scctnr, See tab le 4.2,

.%nndsrd D r v i e t i m Jable far HO ::

2 . nsn 7 ,n74 ;? . n l v

2 ,ilr,.\

2 . nm

7 , ('.',Ii 2 .I);%

? I1.LC:

2 . n . ~ ;