University of Minnesota School of Statistics February 2012

5
University of Minnesota School of Statistics February 2012 George R. Brown School of Engineering STATISTIC

description

George R. Brown School of Engineering STATISTICS. Charles Geyer. University of Minnesota School of Statistics February 2012. “David Lane” of Math Stat. Applications of MCMC - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of University of Minnesota School of Statistics February 2012

Page 1: University of Minnesota School of Statistics February 2012

University of Minnesota

School of Statistics

February 2012

George R. Brown School of Engineering STATISTICS

Page 2: University of Minnesota School of Statistics February 2012

“David Lane” of Math Stat• Applications of MCMC

– Complicated (hierarchical) Bayesian models; Spatial statistics; Markov (but non-Poisson) spatial point processes; Spatial lattice processes (Ising models, Potts models, Bayesian image reconstruction); Statistical genetics; monte Carlo maximum likelihood and Monte Carlo EM; Bayesian decision theory.

• MCMC methodology– Regeneration in MCMC; simulated tempering, parallel

tempering, umbrella sampling; MCMC so-called diagnostics; Samplers: slice, independence, random walk, MALA, hit and run, Gibbs; Kinda-sorta MCMC: Griddy gibbs, Langevin diffusion, others.

• A Helpful Soul2

Page 3: University of Minnesota School of Statistics February 2012

Only Yesterday…• DeMoivre/Laplace/Gauss/Normal 1733ff• 1930’s: d.f., r.v., SLLN, CLT, cumulant, LIL

– Covariance, Cauchy & unif distribs, Martingale• 40’s: “p-value,” , p.d.f., asymp. eff.• 50’s: Bayesian, Bayes estimate (Wald);

– Geom. distrib., superefficiency, dec. theory, completeness, EV distrib, cusum, Gauss-Markov, K-S, K-L

• 60’s: p.m.f., Dirichlet (SSW), shrinkage (JRT)• 70’s: Boxplot, Bootstrap, penalized likelihood (GdM,

RAT, JRT)

3

Page 4: University of Minnesota School of Statistics February 2012

Off the Beaten Track• Le Cam: ℓ(θ)-quadratic θMLE~N(,I-1)

– No IID, no LLN, no CLT, no N>k (I.e., N=1)• Radically Elementary Probability (Nelson, ‘87)

– There is no spoon, nor continuum– Infinitesimals exist and are rigorous a.s.

• Teaching Paradigms– “The beauty of the theory is hidden by the mess”– “We ... start with Kolmo’s axioms and ... just when the students

are thoroughly confused, [we] drop the whole subject. ..”– “Unlike LeCam, I am unbothered …. because of my familiarity

with computer intensive statistical methods.”

4

Page 5: University of Minnesota School of Statistics February 2012

Today• “Aster” Models• Dennis Cox

– Pd.D.(1980) University of Washington– Rice Systems and Synthetic Biology Group– Ken Kennedy Institute for Information

Technology– Editor/Assoc Editor(s)

• Journal of Probability and Statistics• Scandinavian Journal of Statistics• Statistical Computing. Encyclopedia of

Environmentrics• Bayesian Analysis

5