University Admission in Russia: Do the Wealthier Benefit from Standardized Exams? Ilya Prakhov,...
-
Upload
milo-dennis -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of University Admission in Russia: Do the Wealthier Benefit from Standardized Exams? Ilya Prakhov,...
University Admission in Russia: Do the Wealthier Benefit from Standardized
Exams?
Ilya Prakhov, Maria Yudkevich
Center for Institutional Studies at the National Research University Higher School of Economics
Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2012
www.hse.ru
Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2012
Motivation
photo
photo
Admission reforms in Russia and the Unified State Exam (the USE, a standardized national exam) as a new mechanism of admission to universities.
Consequences:reduction of transaction costs concerning admissions (moving costs, costs of
application etc.);Less restricted college choice;No need for specific investment in pre-entry coaching.
THEORY suggests an increase in accessibility and equality of higher education.
But the wealthier can still benefit from the new system of admission:more resources to invest in the general preparation process;the level of income is related to revealed risk aversion;role of social and cultural capital in university choice.
Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2012
Objectives
photo
photo
Analysis of the differences in USE results for students from different income groups.
Analysis of impact of income status (family income level) on the preparatory strategies of students; their actual USE scores; choice of university.
Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2012
Results of empirical studies: effects of income on students’ achievement
photo
photo
students’ achievement is to a large extent defined by the socio-economic status of their families (Coleman et al, 1966)
positive and significant correlation between the level of parental income and the level of the student’s achievement (White, 1982)
positive non-linear relationship between income and a student’s academic performance (Hill, O’Neil, 1994)
positive effects of income have been proven not only by educational statistics, but by information gathered during the series of experiments (Morris et al, 2004)
consumption and education (Lebowitz, 1977)income, beliefs, and parental behavior (Davis-Kean, 2005)
Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2012
Results of empirical studies: impact of income on college choice
photo
photo
poorer students more often than others choose colleges with lower tuition fees, closer to their home, prefer living with their parents during their college years and less frequently decide to continue their studies after receiving their bachelor’s degree (Baird, 1977)
the level of income slightly affects the type of college chosen: SAT results constitute the main predictors of this kind of choice (Baird, 1984)
family and its characteristics significantly affect the process of choice and the final of educational institution (Chapman, 1981; Litten, 1982)
the difference in income between black and white students determines the divergence in their educational trajectories (Datcher, 1982)
students from less advantaged and more advantaged families consider different criteria when making their college choice (Delaney, 1988)
students from low income families tend to apply to less selective universities than richer students, irrespective of their achievement (Hearn, 1991)
Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2012
Features of Russian system of higher education
photo
photo
Dual-track tuition system: both state-subsidized (tuition-free) and tuition-paid places.
Students are admitted for tuition-free places on the assessment of applicants’ quality, regardless of their financial needs.
Rejection of university-specific exams.
The Unified State Examination:introduced nationwide in 2009two obligatory subjects: Russian (National language) and
Mathematicsextra preparation is possibletwo ‘waves’ in admission process
Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2012
Methodology and data
photo
photo
Research: pre-entry strategies and college choice in 2009-2010Geography: 16 biggest Russian citiesTiming: Fall 2010 (after admission)Sample: 1600 households (1165/901)Respondents: high school graduates (enrollees) and their parents Main variables:
the USE scores in Russian, Mathematics, average score in obligatory subjects, overall average results
level of income:
34.8%
47.6%
17.6%
Low incomeMedium incomeHigh income
Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2012
Income level and USE scores
photo
photo
Russian
Mathem
atics
Obligato
ry su
bjects
Overal
l ave
rage r
esult
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
65.6
57.4
61.5
57.8
66.6
61.464 62.8
71.5
6869.7 69.7
Low incomeMedium incomeHigh income
Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2012
Differences in USE results under fixed achievement (Mathematics)
photo
photoLow achievers Medium achievers High achievers
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
52.1
60.2
67.5
54.1
65.2
70.8
60.7
68.1
85.3
Low incomeMedium incomeHigh income
Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2012
Money expenditures on pre-entry coaching as a mechanism of improving the USE results
photo
photoPre-entry courses Lessons with tutors Total investment0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
796
16481537
2419
1459
2466
1523
1816
2189
Low incomeMedium incomeHigh income
Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2012
Returns from extra preparation (regression analysis)
photo
photo
Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2012
Returns from extra preparation (regression analysis)
photo
photo
Dependent variable
Coefficients
USE score in Russian
USE score in Mathematics
Average USE score in obligatory subjects
Overall average USE result
αj (Crossing) 20.648***(7.755)
-29.466***(9.657)
-4.409(8.026)
-32.576***(8.566)
βj (Income) 4.514***(0.811)
9.371***(1.010)
6.943***(0.839)
9.892***(0.893)
γj (Investment) 0.653***(0.070)
0.406***(0.087)
0.530***(0.073)
0.423***(0.075)
R2 0.100 0.092 0.104 0.154
Income positively and significantly affects USE results in all cases. The investment in pre-entry coaching is significant and has a positive effect on the scores as well. However, the investment effect is lower than the effect of income.
Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2012
Returns from extra preparation under fixed income
photo
photo
ijijjij InvestmentTotalY )1ln(
Dependent variableIncome group
USE score in Russian
USE score in Mathematics
Average USE score in obligatory subjects
Overall average USE result
Low 0.609*** -0.136 0.236** -0.284***
Medium 0.607*** 0.498*** 0.552*** 0.828***
High 0.999*** 0.878*** 0.938*** 0.404**
The marginal effect of investing in pre-entry coaching increases with the rise of the level of income for almost all USE results, aside from the average overall result. This means that the same amount of investments in pre-entry coaching have a higher return and are more effective for high income students.
Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2012
Relationship between university choice and income status
photo
photo
Families from the higher income group choose more expensive institutions. On average, richer students are admitted to universities with a higher level of
competition for state subsidized positions.At least for low and medium achievers, we can argue that the relationship
between level of income and university choice (where the indicator of choice is the average USE score among students who study for free) is significant and positive.
Average USE score
Level of income
SampleLow Medium High41 - 60 points 27.5% 12.4% 7.6% 16.9%61 - 80 points 68.7% 80.8% 80.3% 76.5%81 - 100 points 3.9% 6.8% 12.1% 6.7%Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2012
Conclusion
photo
photo
Wealthier households still can invest more financial resources in preparatory process which can result in their children’s increased final USE results.
There is a positive relationship between the level of income and USE results in Russian and Mathematics, as well as in the average score on obligatory subjects and the average overall USE result. This tendency is maintained even under fixed prior achievements before the start of the process of pre-entry coaching.
Students from wealthier families tend to choose additional ways of preparation more frequently, specifically pre-entry courses and classes with tutors.
Nevertheless, the higher amount of investments in pre-entry coaching is made by medium income families, but if we consider the effectiveness of such preparation, the richest students have greater benefits and the poorest gain significantly less.
Higher School of Economics , Moscow, 2012
Conclusion
photo
photo
A positive relationship between the level of income and the average USE score (indicator of college quality) for low achievers and medium achievers is revealed.
Income status is a significant factor which determines achievement (expressed in USE results), characteristics of pre-entry coaching and university choice. Thus, we cannot conclude that the introduction of the USE has provided equal access to higher education for all income groups of students.
20, Myasnitskaya str., Moscow, Russia, 101000Tel.: +7 (495) 628-8829, Fax: +7 (495) 628-7931
www.hse.ru