UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ...€¦ · Suite 1000, Fort Lauderdale,...
Transcript of UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ...€¦ · Suite 1000, Fort Lauderdale,...
3982626-2
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION
www.flsb.uscourts.gov
IN RE: Chapter 11 Case
RUDEN McCLOSKY P.A.,1 Case No. 11-
Debtor.
___________________________________/
DEBTOR’S APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL, ON AN INTERIM AND FINAL BASIS,
OF EMPLOYMENT OF BERGER SINGERMAN, P.A. AS COUNSEL FOR DEBTOR
IN POSSESSION NUNC PRO TUNC TO THE PETITION DATE
Ruden McClosky P.A. (the “Debtor”), pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 327(a), Fed. R. Bankr. P.
2014(a) and 2016, and Local Rules 2014-1(A) and 2016-1(A), hereby files this Debtor’s
Application for Approval, on an Interim and Final Basis, of Employment of Berger Singerman,
P.A. as Counsel for Debtor in Possession Nunc Pro Tunc to the Petition Date (the
“Application”) seeking approval on an interim and final basis of the employment of the law firm
of Berger Singerman, P.A. (“Berger Singerman”), to represent the Debtor in Possession as
general counsel in this case, nunc pro tunc to the Petition Date (as defined below). In support of
the Application, the Debtor relies upon the Declaration of Joseph J. Luzinski in Support of the
Debtor’s Chapter 11 Petition and Request for First Day Relief (the “First Day Declaration”) and
the Declaration of Paul Steven Singerman, on Behalf of Berger Singerman, P.A. as Proposed
Counsel for Debtor-In-Possession (“Singerman Declaration”), and respectfully represents the
following:
1 The address of the Debtor is 200 E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 1500, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301, and the
last four digits of the taxpayer identification number of the Debtor are 7357.
Case 11-40603-RBR Doc 7 Filed 11/01/11 Page 1 of 30
3982626-2
2
I. Jurisdiction
1. This Court has jurisdiction over this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334.
This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A). Venue is proper in this District
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1408. The statutory predicate for the relief requested herein is 11
U.S.C. § 327(a).
II. Background
2. On the date hereof (the “Petition Date”), the Debtor filed a voluntary petition for
relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §§ 101-1532.
3. The Debtor is operating its business and managing its affairs as a debtor-in-
possession. 11 U.S.C. §§ 1107(a) and 1108.
4. For a detailed description of the Debtor and its operations, the Debtor respectfully
refers the Court and parties in interest to the First Day Declaration.
III. Relief Requested and Basis Therefor
5. The Debtor believes that it is in the best interests of its estate to retain Berger
Singerman as general counsel in this Chapter 11 case.
6. The Debtor believes that the attorneys of Berger Singerman are qualified to
practice in this Court and are qualified to advise the Debtor on its relations with, and
responsibilities to, the creditors and other interested parties.
7. The professional services that Berger Singerman will render include, but are not
limited to, the following:
(a) To give advice to the Debtor with respect to its powers and duties as
debtor-in-possession and the continued management of its business operations;
Case 11-40603-RBR Doc 7 Filed 11/01/11 Page 2 of 30
3982626-2
3
(b) To advise the Debtor with respect to its responsibilities in complying with
the United States Trustee’s Operating Guidelines and Reporting Requirements and with the rules
of the Court;
(c) To prepare motions, pleadings, orders, applications, adversary
proceedings, and other legal documents necessary in the administration of this case;
(d) To protect the interests of the Debtor in all matters pending before the
Court; and
(e) To represent the Debtor in negotiations with its creditors and in the
preparation of a plan.
IV. Authority for Relief
8. The Bankruptcy Code allows a debtor, with the Court’s approval, to employ one
or more attorneys “that do not hold or represent an interest adverse to estate, and that are
disinterested persons.” 11 U.S.C. § 327(a).
9. To the best of the Debtor’s knowledge, except as disclosed in the Singerman
Declaration attached hereto as Exhibit “A,” neither Paul Steven Singerman (“Singerman”) nor
Berger Singerman has any connection with the creditors or other parties in interest or their
respective attorneys. As set forth in the Singerman Declaration, to the best knowledge of
Singerman, neither Singerman nor Berger Singerman represents any interest adverse to the
Debtor.
10. The Singerman Declaration, containing a verified statement as required under
Rule 2014 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, is attached and demonstrates that
under these circumstances, Singerman and Berger Singerman are disinterested as required by
Section 327(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.
Case 11-40603-RBR Doc 7 Filed 11/01/11 Page 3 of 30
Case 11-40603-RBR Doc 7 Filed 11/01/11 Page 4 of 30
3982626-2
5
I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am admitted to the Bar of the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida, and that I am in compliance with the additional
qualifications to practice before this Court as set forth in Local Rule 2090-1(A).
Dated: November 1, 2011 BERGER SINGERMAN, P.A.
Proposed Counsel for Debtor in Possession
200 S. Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 1000
Miami, FL 33131
Telephone: (305) 755-9500
Facsimile: (305) 714-4340
and
350 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1000
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
Telephone: (954) 525-9900
Facsimile: (954) 523-2782
By: /s/ Paul Steven Singerman
Paul Steven Singerman
Florida Bar No. 378860
Leslie Gern Cloyd
Florida Bar No. 303305
Case 11-40603-RBR Doc 7 Filed 11/01/11 Page 5 of 30
3982626-2
EXHIBIT “A”
(Singerman Declaration)
Case 11-40603-RBR Doc 7 Filed 11/01/11 Page 6 of 30
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION
www.flsb.uscourts.gov
IN RE: Chapter 11 Case RUDEN McCLOSKY P.A.,1 Case No. 11-
Debtor. ___________________________________/
DECLARATION OF PAUL STEVEN SINGERMAN ON BEHALF OF BERGER
SINGERMAN, P.A. AS PROPOSED COUNSEL FOR DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION
1. I am Paul Steven Singerman. I am an attorney and shareholder of the law firm of
Berger Singerman, P.A. (“Berger Singerman”). Our firm maintains offices for the practice of law at
200 South Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 1000, Miami, Florida 33131; 350 E. Las Olas Boulevard,
Suite 1000, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301; 125 South Gadsden Street, Suite 300, Tallahassee,
Florida 32301 and 2650 North Military Trail, Suite 240, Boca Raton, Florida 33431. I am familiar
with the matters set forth herein and make this Declaration in support of the Debtor’s Application
for Approval, on an Interim and Final Basis, of Employment of Berger Singerman, P.A. as Counsel
for Debtor in Possession Nunc Pro Tunc to the Petition Date (the “Application”).
2. In support of the Application, I disclose the following:
(a) Unless otherwise stated, this Declaration is based upon facts of which I have
personal knowledge.
(b) In preparing this Declaration, I reviewed a list of all of the creditors of the
Debtor, and non-debtor parties to executory contracts and unexpired leases with the Debtor, as
1 The address of the Debtor is 200 E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 1500, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301, and the last
Case 11-40603-RBR Doc 7 Filed 11/01/11 Page 7 of 30
2
provided by the Debtor, as well as the results of a UCC search conducted by Berger Singerman in
respect of filings against the Debtor.2 I compared the information obtained thereby with the
information contained in our law firm’s client and adverse party conflict check index system. The
facts stated in this Declaration as to the relationship between other lawyers in our law firm and the
Debtor, the Debtor’s creditors, the United States Trustee, other persons employed by the Office of
the United States Trustee, and those persons and entities who are defined as disinterested persons in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code are based on the results of my review of our firm’s conflict
check index system. Specifically, I have caused to be (i) conducted a computer search of our firm’s
records in respect of all of the names referred to in the first sentence of this paragraph 2(b) and (ii)
disseminated a written request for information to all of the attorneys in our firm regarding
connections to the Debtor and the creditors of the Debtor. Based upon such search, our firm does
not represent any entity in a matter which would constitute a conflict of interest or impair the
disinterestedness of Berger Singerman. Because Berger Singerman (formerly Berger Davis &
Singerman, P.A. and previously Berger & Davis, P.A.) has been in existence since 1985 and does not
maintain computerized records of all cases during those years, it is impossible to state with certainty
whether the firm has ever represented any existing creditor of the Debtor.
3. Berger Singerman’s client and adverse party conflicts check system is comprised of
records regularly maintained in the course of business of the firm and it is the regular practice of the
four digits of the taxpayer identification number of the Debtor are 7357. 2 Since Ruden McClosky P.A. (formerly Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster & Russell, P.A. and previously
Ruden, Barnett, McClosky, Smith, Schuster & Russell, P.A.) has been in existence since 1959, Berger Singerman has not conducted a search of the names of current and former clients of Ruden McClosky P.A., as that would be an unmanageable and burdensome task. Accordingly it is impossible to state with certainty whether the Berger Singerman has ever represented or currently represents a former or existing client of the Debtor.
Case 11-40603-RBR Doc 7 Filed 11/01/11 Page 8 of 30
3
firm to make and maintain these records. It reflects entries that are noted in the system at the time
the information becomes known by persons whose regular duties include recording and maintaining
this information. I am one of the persons who is responsible for the supervision of the department
of our firm which keeps this system up-to-date, and I regularly use and rely upon the information
contained in the system in the performance of my duties with the law firm and in my practice of
law.
4. A search of our firm’s conflicts check system revealed the following matters, none of
which impairs my or our firm’s disinterestedness or constitutes any conflict of interest:
a) Ruden McClosky P.A. (“Ruden” or the “Debtor”), through several lawyers,
including Michael R. Bakst, Esq., represents Soneet R. Kapila in his capacity as Chapter 7 trustee of
the Trafford Distributing Center, Inc. bankruptcy case pending before the Honorable A. Jay Cristol
(Case No. 11-23492-AJC). Berger Singerman serves as special litigation counsel to Mr. Kapila in
connection with the Trafford Distributing Center, Inc. Chapter 7 case, principally regarding a
pending adversary proceeding (Adv. Pro. No. 11-1999-AJC), which began as a lawsuit filed in
Broward County, Florida Circuit Court (Case No. CACE 11009808), against Ruden attorneys
Michael R. Bakst (“Mr. Bakst”) and George S. Fender (“Mr. Fender”), but was subsequently
removed to the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida (the “Removed
Adversary”). Ruden is not a named defendant in the Removed Adversary. Berger Singerman
represents Ruden, and named Defendants Mr. Bakst and Mr. Fender regarding the Removed
Adversary and, in connection therewith, entered into an engagement letter dated May 31, 2011 with
each of Ruden, Mr. Bakst and Mr. Fender. The engagement letter provides, in part, that Ruden is
responsible for fees and costs incurred by Berger Singerman. The Order dated June 8, 2011
Case 11-40603-RBR Doc 7 Filed 11/01/11 Page 9 of 30
4
approving the retention of Berger Singerman as special counsel to Mr. Kapila provides, in part, that
the Court approved Ruden’s agreement to pay Berger Singerman any unpaid fees or reimbursable
expenses incurred by Berger Singerman in connection with its representation. As of the date of this
Declaration, Berger Singerman has received payment of $4,574.20 from Ruden. Berger Singerman
will not accept any further payment of fees or expenses from Ruden. Berger Singerman will not seek
or accept any fees or reimbursement of expenses from Mr. Bakst or Mr. Fender either. Instead,
Berger Singerman shall look only to the Trafford bankruptcy estate to be paid any outstanding fees or
costs, or fees or costs that will be incurred in the future. For the avoidance of doubt, Berger
Singerman waives the right to seek payment of outstanding fees or reimbursement of expenses, or
fees or costs that will be incurred in the future, from Ruden, or from Mr. Bakst or Mr. Fender, in
connection with the foregoing representations;
b) Michael R. Bakst is a shareholder of Ruden. Berger Singerman represents, as
special counsel, Michael R. Bakst, in his capacity as Chapter 7 Trustee of the estate of Ali M. Jaferi,
Case No. 08-23903-BKC-PGH (the “Jaferi Bankruptcy Estate”), which is pending in the United
States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida, before the Honorable Chief Judge Paul
G. Hyman, Jr. Further, Berger Singerman represents Michael R. Bakst, in his capacity as Chapter 7
Trustee of the Jaferi Bankruptcy Estate, in the state court case captioned CB Loan Purchase
Associates, LLC v. AJ Petroleum II, LLC, Flovest, LLC, BPS R.E. Holdings, LLC, VMD Financial
Services, Inc., Robert Half International, Inc., David Hayes, Rosalee Rogovin and Unknown Tenant;
Case No. 502008 CA 37372XXXXMB AW, which is pending in the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth
Judicial Circuit, in and for Palm Beach County, Florida. In addition, Michael R. Bakst has appeared
in cases or proceedings in which Berger Singerman has appeared, including, but not limited to, cases
Case 11-40603-RBR Doc 7 Filed 11/01/11 Page 10 of 30
5
in which Berger Singerman represents debtors or creditors where Michael R. Bakst is the trustee.
Berger Singerman does not deem these representations to constitute conflicts in this case;
c) Berger Singerman has represented various clients whose interests may have
been adverse to Ruden in that they have incurred a debt to Ruden in matters that are wholly unrelated
to the instant bankruptcy case. In addition, Berger Singerman has worked and appeared in a number
of matters that are wholly unrelated to the instant bankruptcy case in which Ruden and its attorneys
have also been involved;
d) Soneet R. Kapila is listed as a notice party of the Debtor. In addition to the
representation of Mr. Kapila, as special litigation counsel, as disclosed in paragraph 4(a) above,
Berger Singerman also represents Mr. Kapila in his fiduciary capacities as (i) trustee; (ii) plan
administrator; and (iii) receiver, and (iv) in various bankruptcy and state court litigation matters that
are wholly unrelated to the instant bankruptcy case. In addition, Berger Singerman represents
various clients in matters that are wholly unrelated to the instant bankruptcy case, where Mr. Kapila
acts as the Chapter 7 trustee. Further, Berger Singerman represents a client in a litigation matter that
is wholly unrelated to the instant bankruptcy case, with respect to a post confirmation trust, wherein
Mr. Kapila was appointed examiner of the trust;
e) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. is listed as a creditor of the Debtor. Berger
Singerman has represented Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (f/k/a Wachovia Bank) in matters that are wholly
unrelated to the instant bankruptcy case. As of this date, Berger Singerman has no active
representations of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Further, Berger Singerman has represented Wells Fargo
Financial Leasing in matters that are wholly unrelated to the instant bankruptcy case. In addition,
Berger Singerman has represented a number of clients who are adverse to Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Case 11-40603-RBR Doc 7 Filed 11/01/11 Page 11 of 30
6
Wachovia Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Finance in that they have incurred a debt to Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A., Wachovia Bank, N.A. and/or Wells Fargo Finance in matters wholly unrelated to the
instant bankruptcy case;
f) Ruden has retained, subject to the approval by this Court, the services of
Development Specialists, Inc. (“DSI”) to provide restructuring management services to the Debtor,
including providing the services of a Chief Restructuring Officer, Joseph J. Luzinski (the “DSI
Retention Application”). Joseph J. Luzinski (“Luzinski”) is a Senior Vice President at DSI and
heads DSI’s Miami office. In addition, Daniel J. Stermer (“Stermer”) is employed by DSI in its
Miami Office. Berger Singerman makes the following disclosures with respect to DSI, Luzinski, and
Stermer, each of which is wholly unrelated to the instant bankruptcy case and does not constitute a
conflict in this case or impair my or our firm’s disinterestedness:
(i) Berger Singerman represents Luzinski as the Plan Administrator of
HNI HoldCo, Inc. (f/k/a Medical Staffing Network Holdings, Inc.), et al.; Case No. 10-29101-BKC-
EPK, which is pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida,
before the Honorable Erik P. Kimball;
(ii) Berger Singerman represents HearUSA, Inc. (“HearUSA”) as debtor-
in-possession in the Chapter 11 case of In re HearUSA, Inc., Case No. 11-23341-BKC-EPK, which
is pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida, before the
Honorable Erik P. Kimball. DSI was retained in the HearUSA case to provide restructuring
management services to HearUSA, and Luzinski was appointed as HearUSA’s Chief Restructuring
Officer;
(iii) Berger Singerman represents Luzinski, first as Chapter 11 Trustee and
Case 11-40603-RBR Doc 7 Filed 11/01/11 Page 12 of 30
7
now as Chapter 7 Trustee, in the case of In re National Gold Exchange, Inc. (“NGE”), Case No.
8:09-bk-15972-MGW, pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of
Florida, before the Honorable Michael G. Williamson;
(iv) Berger Singerman represents Luzinski, as Assignee, in the Assignment
for the Benefit of Creditors case captioned In re Newport Operating Corp. (“Newport”),Case No. 11-
09661-CA-40, pending in the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit, in and for Miami-Dade
County, Florida, before the Honorable Gill S. Freeman;
(v) Berger Singerman represents Luzinski, as Assignee, in the Assignment
for the Benefit of Creditors case captioned In re Fantasi International Corp. (“Fantasi”), Case No.
10-23528 CA 40, pending in the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit, in and for Miami-
Dade County, Florida, before the Honorable Gill S. Freeman;
(vi) Berger Singerman represents Luzinski, as Chapter 11 Trustee of the
estate of In re Prestige Motorcar Gallery, Inc. (“Prestige”), Case No. 11-40011-LMK, pending in
the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Florida, Tallahassee Division, before
the Honorable Lewis M. Killian, Jr.;
(vii) Berger Singerman represents Luzinski as Chapter 11 Trustee of the
estate of In re Prestige Imports of Thomasville, Inc. (“Thomasville”), Case No. 11-40010-LMK,
pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Florida, Tallahassee
Division, before the Honorable Lewis M. Killian, Jr.;
(viii) Berger Singerman represented Luzinski, as Receiver of defendants,
T.M.C. Marketing, Inc. and John Pacheco (Office of the Attorney General, Department of Legal
Affairs, State of Florida vs. T.M.C. Marketing, Inc. d/b/a The Millionaire’s Club and John Pacheco,
Case 11-40603-RBR Doc 7 Filed 11/01/11 Page 13 of 30
8
Case No. 97-19036(08)) in a State Court action. This case was closed in 1999;
(ix) Berger Singerman represented Pam Am Liquidating Corporation in a
post confirmation Chapter 11 liquidating trust. Luzinski was appointed as the Chief Executive
Officer and President of Pam Am Liquidating Corporation during that time. This case was closed in
2004;
(x) Berger Singerman represented two entities called KLLM, Inc. and
KLLM Transport Services, Inc. (the “KLLM Entities”). Luzinski and his colleagues at DSI, acting
as fiduciaries for a division of the State of New York Department of Insurance (in its capacity as the
assignee of an entity affiliated with Bernard Ebbers) were involved in the governing body of KLLM
and directed Berger Singerman’s work as counsel to the KLLM Entities. Berger Singerman’s
representation of KLLM has been terminated;
(xi) Berger Singerman represents an equity holder in the Chapter 11
bankruptcy case of In re LP Watch Group, Inc. (“LP Watch”), Case No. 10-29919-JKO, pending in
the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida, before the Honorable John
K. Olson. DSI was retained to provide restructuring management services to LP Watch, and
Luzinski was appointed as its Chief Restructuring Offer;
(xii) Berger Singerman represents Stermer as Receiver of defendants, Relief
Group International, LLC, Auto Relief Group, LLC, Auto Relief Group II, LLC; Auto Relief Group
10, LLC; Royal Telco, LLC; Heartland Trust, LLC; Royal Telco II, LLC and all other entities
operated, controlled or otherwise associated with those defendants’ activities in the state court case
captioned Office of the Attorney General, Department of Legal Affairs, State of Florida v. Relief
Group International, LLC, Auto Relief Group, LLC, Auto Relief Group II, LLC, Auto Relief Group
Case 11-40603-RBR Doc 7 Filed 11/01/11 Page 14 of 30
9
10, LLC, Royal Telco, LLC, Royal Telco II, LLC, Heartland Trust LLC, John J. Boyle, and John J.
Boyle III; Case No. 10-25743, pending in the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, in
and for Broward County, Florida;
(xiii) Berger Singerman represents Stermer as Receiver over certain real
property which is the subject of the state court case captioned TBOM Mortgage Holding, LLC v.
Cassandra Canty, John Doe #1, Unknown Tenant in Possession, and Jane Doe #1, et al.; Case No.
CACE 10003052 (14), pending in the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, in and for
Broward County, Florida;
(xiv) Berger Singerman represents Stermer as Assignee in the Assignment
for the Benefit of Creditors case captioned In re Peer Center, Inc.; Case No. 09-15728 CACE 05,
pending in the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Broward County, Florida;
(xv) Berger Singerman currently represents and has represented Stermer as
the Receiver in various state court proceedings pending in the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth
Judicial Circuit, in and for Broward County, Florida, as well as a removed proceeding pending in the
United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida;
(xvi) Stermer was formerly employed as an associate attorney in Berger
Singerman’s Fort Lauderdale office, and has not been employed by Berger Singerman since 2000;
(xvii) Berger Singerman has worked on a number of matters that are wholly
unrelated to the instant bankruptcy case in which DSI has been involved, both as co-advisor and as
an advisor or a fiduciary to an adverse party;
(xviii) In addition to the matters listed above, Berger Singerman has
represented past and current DSI team members in their fiduciary capacities in connection with
Case 11-40603-RBR Doc 7 Filed 11/01/11 Page 15 of 30
10
wholly unrelated maters. Further, in the past, Berger Singerman has represented creditors and other
parties in interest in matters adverse to DSI and/or Luzinski and/or Stermer. Finally, certain lawyers
with our firm are personal friends of Mr. Luzinski, Mr. Stermer, and other of their colleagues at DSI;
and
(xix) Finally, I and other Berger Singerman lawyers and staff members are
personal friends of a number of DSI principals and employees.
g) United Way of Broward County is listed as a creditor or notice party of the
Debtor. Berger Singerman represents United Way of Broward County in matters that are wholly
unrelated to the instant bankruptcy case;
h) Jewish Federation of Broward County is listed as a creditor or notice party of
the Debtor. Berger Singerman represents Jewish Federation of Broward County in a matter that is
wholly unrelated to the instant bankruptcy case;
i) Arent Fox LLP is listed as a creditor or notice party of the Debtor. Berger
Singerman represents Arent Fox LLP in a matter that is wholly unrelated to the instant bankruptcy
case;
j) Gibraltar Private Bank and Trust is listed as a creditor or notice party of the
Debtor. Berger Singerman represents Gibraltar Private Bank and Trust in matters that are wholly
unrelated to the instant bankruptcy case;
k) Florida Department of Financial Services is listed as a creditor or notice party
of the Debtor. Berger Singerman represents Florida Department of Financial Services in matters
that are wholly unrelated to the instant bankruptcy case;
l) St. Thomas Aquinas High School is listed as a creditor or notice party of the
Case 11-40603-RBR Doc 7 Filed 11/01/11 Page 16 of 30
11
Debtor. Berger Singerman represents St. Thomas Aquinas Performing Arts in matters that are wholly
unrelated to the instant bankruptcy case;
m) Akerman Senterfitt (“Akerman”) is listed as a creditor or notice party of the
Debtor. Berger Singerman currently represents Michael I. Goldberg, a shareholder at Akerman, as
the Court appointed receiver for various entities in connection with a state court action pending in
the Circuit Court for the 11th Judicial Circuit, in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida, which is
wholly unrelated to the instant bankruptcy case. In addition, Berger Singerman formerly represented
Mr. Goldberg as the receiver for DB Atlanta, LLC, in connection with the Chapter 11 bankruptcy
case of In re DB Atlanta, LLC, Case No. 08-11293-RAM, which was pending in the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida. In addition, Berger Singerman has
represented a number of clients who are adverse to Akerman in that they have incurred a debt to
Akerman in matters that are wholly unrelated to the instant bankruptcy cases. Further, certain
professionals employed by Akerman may have been and are presently involved in cases in which
Berger Singerman was and is also involved. Finally, I and other Berger Singerman lawyers and staff
members are personal friends of a number of Akerman lawyers and staff members;
n) Robb & Stucky Limited LLLP (“Robb & Stucky”) is listed as a notice party of
the Debtor. Berger Singerman represents Robb & Stucky Limited LLLP as the Debtor-in-Possession
in Case No. 8:11-02801-CED, which is pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
Middle District of Florida, before the Honorable Caryl E. Delano. Ruden was not listed as a creditor
or party in interest in the Robb & Stucky case, and did not file a Proof of Claim in the Robb &
Stucky case;
o) There are numerous creditors or parties in interest of the Debtor which have
Case 11-40603-RBR Doc 7 Filed 11/01/11 Page 17 of 30
12
been creditors of, or adverse to, other entities represented by Berger Singerman in cases and matters
wholly unrelated to the instant bankruptcy case. These entities are: American Arbitration
Association, American Cancer Society, Alternative Legal Copy Service, Inc., Ambius, Inc., American
Law Institute, AMPCO System Parking, American Heart Association Greater Southeast Affiliate,
American Lung Association, American Express, American Express Travel, American Express Travel
Related Services, American Heart Association, American Planning Association, AT&T, AT&T
Mobility, Aspen Publishers, Attorney’s Title Insurance Fund, Inc., Attorney’s Title Insurance
Company, Aroma Coffee Service, AT&T Advertising Solutions, Avita Coffee & Provision, Bank of
America, N.A., BellSouth, Board of County Commissioners, Bluegreen Corporation, Branch Banking
& Trust Company a/k/a BB&T, Bright House Networks, Boys & Girls Club, Broad and Cassel,
Bradley Specialties, Broward County Property Appraiser’s Office, Broward County, Broward
County Tax Collector, Brown & Brown of Florida, Inc., Cambridge Transportation, CDW Direct,
LLC, Century Link, CCH Incorporated, Choice Reporting Services, Inc., Cintas Document
Management, Chicago Title Insurance Company, Chartis, City of Boca Raton, City of Coral
Gables, City of Doral, City of North Miami, City of Plantation, City of Pompano Beach, City of Fort
Lauderdale, City of Miami, City of Sunrise, City of St. Petersburg, City of Deerfield Beach, City of
West Palm Beach, City of Orlando, City of Dania Beach, City of Pembroke Pines, City of
Tallahassee, Clerk of Circuit Court, Clerk of Courts, Clerk of the Courts – Miami-Dade County,
Clerk of the Court of Broward County, Collier County Tax Collector, Comcast, Commonwealth
Land Title Insurance Company, Coca-Cola Enterprises, Coverall North America, Inc., CorpDirect
Agents, Costco, CSC, D&B, Daily Business Review, Day-Timers, Inc., Department of Revenue, Doris
Maloy, Tax Collector, Doug Belden, Tax Collector, CT Corporation Systems, Crystal Springs,
Case 11-40603-RBR Doc 7 Filed 11/01/11 Page 18 of 30
13
Department of State, Dell Financial Services, Dell Marketing LP, Division of Corporations, Dixie
Blueprint Services, Inc., EDP Supply South, Inc., Esquire Deposition Services, EverBank, First
American Title Insurance Company, Fedex, Fidelity National Credit, Fidelity National Title
Insurance Company, First United Bank, Florida Cancer Specialists, Florida Department of State,
Florida Department of Revenue, Florida Department of Health, Florida U.C. Fund, Florida Power
& Light Co., Florida Trend, Florida Today, Muzak, Florida Property Search, Inc., Ford Motor
Credit Co., LLC, Focus Four LLC d/b/a Muzak of West Palm Beach, Equifax Information Services,
FIA Card Services, Florida Department of Transportation, Fisher & Phillips LLP, Florida Bankers
Association, Google, Inc., Grand Bank & Trust of Florida, GrayRobinson, P.A., Greater Boca Raton
Chamber of Commerce, Guardian Life Insurance Co., Healthport, Greenberg Traurig, P.A., IKON
Office Solutions, Hillsborough County Tax Collector, Home Depot, Hometown News, Huckleberry
Notary Bonding, Inc., IBI Group, Inc., Iberia Bank, Internal Revenue Service, Iron Mountain, J.P.
Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Jack Brown & Associates, James Publishing, Inc., Kids in Distress,
Kenny Nachwalter, P.A., Kaufman, Rossin & Company, Kmart, Matthew Bender & Co., LexisNexis,
Martin County Clerk of Court, Lawyers Title Insurance, Mediation, Inc., March of Dimes, Matson-
Charlton Surety Group, Memorial Hospital West, Miami-Dade County, Nova Southeastern
University, Merrill Lynch, Miami-Dade County Tax Collector, Milner, Inc., National Notary
Association, Network Reporting Corporation, Modular Mailing System, Ocala Star-Banner, Mutual
of Omaha, Office Depot, Old Republic Title Insurance Co., Oracle, Orange County Tax Collector,
Orlando Sentinel, OJF Services, Inc., Palm Beach County, Palm Beach County Tax Collector, Palm
Beach County Property Appraiser, Paetec, Ouellette & Mauldin, Palm Beach County Board,
PACER Service Center, PepsiAmericas, Postmaster, PNC Bank, Premiere Global Services, Platinum
Case 11-40603-RBR Doc 7 Filed 11/01/11 Page 19 of 30
14
Plus for Business, Publix, Quality Water Supply, Regions Bank, Rock Legal Services &
Investigations, Unum Provident, Florida Department of Financial Services, Recall Secure
Destruction, Reliance Standard, Register of Deeds, Sam’s Club, Salmon & Dulberg, Safeguard
Business Systems, Sears Credit, Scripps Treasure Coast, Secretary of State, Shutts & Bowen, South
Florida Business Journal, Signs By Tomorrow, Society for Human Resource, Supermedia, State of
Florida, Standard Parking, Standard Coffee Service, Staples, State of Michigan, Stearns Weaver
Miller Weissler Alhadeff & Sitterson, P.A., St, Lucie County Tax Collector, State Street Bank and
Trust Company, St. Petersburg Times, St. Lucie Chamber of Commerce, Sun-Sentinel, T-Mobile,
SunTrust, Palm Beach County Tax Collector, Taylor Morrison, Inc., Teachers Insurance and
Annuity Association of America, Town of Davie, Sweetapple, Broeker & Varkas, P.L., Home Depot,
The New York Times Company, Palm Beach Post, The Huntington National Bank, School Board of
Broward County, SunTrust Bank, Tax & Accounting – R&G, Toojay’s, Thomson CompuMark,
Tigerdirect, Thompson Publishing Group, Inc., United Healthcare Insurance Company, US
Bancorp, Town of Davie, United Bank, Triangle Fire, Inc., United Healthcare of Florida, Inc.,
Tropical Reporting, Inc., U.S. Legal Support, United States Treasury, Unum Life Insurance Co.,
United States Postal Service, Unum Provident, Universal Court Reporting, Inc., Urban Land
Institute, UPS, Verizon, Verizon Florida LLC, Verizon Wireless, Verizon Business, Veritext Florida
Reporting Co., Verizon Florida, Inc., US Bancorp, U.S. Postal Service, Weiss, Serota, Helfman,
Pastoriza, Cole & Boniske, P.A. f/k/a Weiss, Serota, Helfman, Pastoriza & Guedes, Wachovia Bank,
N.A., Wells Fargo, Wachovia, Wells Fargo Finance, Xerox Corporation, Xerox Capital, Wall Street
Journal, Wolters Kluwer and Zimmer Deputla;
p) There are numerous creditors or parties in interest of the Debtor which Berger
Case 11-40603-RBR Doc 7 Filed 11/01/11 Page 20 of 30
15
Singerman has formerly represented in entirely unrelated matters, but in respect of which Berger
Singerman presently has no active representations. These parties include American Express,
American Express Travel, Alan M. Routman, M.D., Anti-Defamation League of B’Nai B’Rith, AT&T,
Bank of America, BellSouth, Broward County Bar Association, City of Pompano Beach, City of Fort
Lauderdale, City of Miami, City of Tallahassee, City of Miramar, CT Corporation System, First
Union National Bank of Florida, Greater Fort Lauderdale Tax Council, Markborough Florida, Inc.,
PNC Bank, Pulte Home Corporation, Qwest, Qwest Communications, Regions Bank, Standard
Coffee Service, Sun Sentinel, SunTrust Bank, Stearns Weaver, The Broward Alliance, The Kelley
Law Firm, University of Miami, Verizon Business, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Yarnall Warehouse,
Inc.;
q) Individuals by the names of Andrew Gordon, Anthony DuBois, Anthony Davis,
Armando Lacasa, Barrington Staples, Bernard F. Pettingill, Jr., PhD., Bruce Goorland, Christopher
D. Moore, David Bernstein, David Wood, Debra A. Johnson, James O’Connor, Jr., Jennifer
Robinson, Joseph M. Wortley, Harry Smith, Harry E. Smith, Joe Miller, Marvin Rosen, Steve M.
Anderson, Steve Anderson, Robert Chase, Robert Schwartz, Mark Grant, Mary M. Morgan, Samuel
Fields, Thomas Brown and Valerie Staples (collectively, the “Individuals”) are listed as creditors or
parties in interest of the Debtor. Berger Singerman has represented third parties in wholly unrelated
matters whose interests may have been adverse to one or more of the Individuals. It is impossible for
our firm to confirm with certainty that the individuals associated with the third party representations,
are the same Individuals listed as creditors or parties in interest of the Debtor;
r) Individuals by the names of Stephen Brown, Thomas Brown, Marvin S.
Rosenblatt, David K. Blattner and Debra M. Johnson are listed as creditors or notice parties of the
Case 11-40603-RBR Doc 7 Filed 11/01/11 Page 21 of 30
16
Debtor. Berger Singerman formerly represented individuals by the same names. It is impossible for
our firm to confirm with certainty that the Stephen Brown, Thomas Brown, Marvin S. Rosenblatt,
David K. Blattner and Debra M. Johnson that were formerly represented by Berger Singerman are
the same individuals that are creditors or parties in interest of the Debtor;
s) Individuals by the names of Laz L. Schneider, Audrey Foy, Marci Shaffer,
Monica Lazarus and Meris Villalona were previously employed by Ruden (formerly Ruden,
McClosky, Smith, Schuster & Russell, P.A. and previously Ruden, Barnett, McClosky, Smith,
Schuster & Russell, P.A.) and are currently employed by Berger Singerman;3
t) Greenspoon Marder, P.A. (“Greenspoon”) is listed as a creditor of the Debtor.
Greenspoon is also the proposed purchaser of substantially all of the Debtor’s assets. Individuals
by the names of Veronica Leon, Roseann Casiano and Rida Lee Alston were previously employed by
Greenspoon, and are presently employed by Berger Singerman. 4 In addition, the Chief Financial
Officer of Greenspoon, Scott Ross, is personally known by and to Paul A. Avron, an attorney at
Berger Singerman who is working on the instant bankruptcy case. Further, Berger Singerman has
represented clients who are adverse to Greenspoon in that they have incurred a debt to Greenspoon
in matters that are wholly unrelated to the instant bankruptcy case. Finally, Berger Singerman may
have appeared in the past in matters in which Greenspoon has also appeared;
u) Berger Singerman represents privately held as well as public companies in out
3 Due to the confidential nature of this case, Berger Singerman did not inquire of its employees regarding any
connection any of them may have to the Debtor until mid-afternoon on October 31, 2011. Berger Singerman will supplement this Declaration to disclose additional employees of Berger Singerman who were formerly employed by Ruden and additional connections Berger Singerman employees have to the Debtor, if any. 4 Due to the confidential nature of this case, Berger Singerman did not inquire of its employees regarding any
connection any of them may have to Greenspoon until mid-afternoon on October 31, 2011. Berger Singerman will supplement this Declaration to disclose additional connections Berger Singerman employees
Case 11-40603-RBR Doc 7 Filed 11/01/11 Page 22 of 30
17
of court and restructuring matters (the “Non-Debtor Clients”). Several creditors of the instant Debtor
may be creditors of one or more of our firm’s Non-Debtor Clients. Berger Singerman’s
representation of the Non-Debtor Clients does not impair Berger Singerman’s disinterestedness or its
ability to represent the Debtor in this case.
5. Berger Singerman submits that none of the foregoing representations or connections
constitutes a conflict of interest or in any way impairs its disinterestedness in this case.
6. Other than as set forth in this declaration, Berger Singerman neither holds nor
represents any interest adverse to the Debtor and is a “disinterested person” within the scope and
meaning of Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.
7. Neither I nor our firm has or will represent any other entity in connection with this
case, and neither I nor our firm will accept any fee from any other party or parties in this case,
except the Debtor-in-Possession, unless otherwise authorized by the Court.
8. On October 19, 2011, the Debtor retained Berger Singerman to act as its counsel in
connection with insolvency and restructuring matters. Since that date, Berger Singerman has
provided pre-petition insolvency and restructuring services to the Debtor.
9. On October 19, 2011, Berger Singerman received an initial retainer from the Debtor
in the amount of $75,000.00 (the “Initial Retainer”), which was deposited into the trust account of
Berger Singerman. On October 31, 2011, Berger Singerman applied the Initial Retainer in payment
of its pre-petition fees and expenses.
10. In addition, on October 31, 2011, Berger Singerman received an additional retainer
from the Debtor in the amount of $150,000.00 (the “Bankruptcy Retainer”), which was deposited
have to Greenspoon, if any.
Case 11-40603-RBR Doc 7 Filed 11/01/11 Page 23 of 30
18
into the trust account of Berger Singerman. Berger Singerman will hold the Bankruptcy Retainer
as security for the fees and costs that may be awarded to it by the Court in this case.
11. The professional fees and costs incurred by Berger Singerman in the course of its
representation of the Debtor in this case shall be subject in all respects to the application and notice
requirements of 11 U.S.C. §§ 327, 330 and 331 and FRBP 2014 and 2016.
12. The current hourly rates for the attorneys at Berger Singerman range from $225.00 to
$625.00. The current hourly rates of Paul Steven Singerman and Leslie Gern Cloyd, the
shareholders who will be principally responsible for Berger Singerman’s representation of the
Debtor, are $595.00 and $555.00, respectively, and the current hourly rates of the of-counsel and
associate attorneys who will work on this matter range from $225.00 to $455.00 per hour. The
current hourly rates for the legal assistants and paralegals at Berger Singerman range from $75.00 to
$195.00. Berger Singerman typically adjusts its hourly rates annually on January 1st.
13. There is no agreement of any nature, other than the shareholder agreement of our
firm, as to the sharing of any compensation to be paid to the firm. No promises have been received
by Berger Singerman nor any member, or associate thereof as to compensation in connection with
this case other than in accordance with the provisions of the Bankruptcy Code.
14. No attorney in our firm holds a direct or indirect equity interest in the Debtor,
including stock or stock warrants, or has a right to acquire such an interest.
15. No attorney in our firm is or has served as an officer, director or employee of the
Debtor within two years before the Petition Date.
16. No attorney in our firm is in control of the Debtor or is a relative of a general partner,
director, officer or person in control of the Debtor.
Case 11-40603-RBR Doc 7 Filed 11/01/11 Page 24 of 30
19
17. No attorney in our firm is a general or limited partner of a partnership in which the
Debtor is also a general or limited partner.
18. No attorney in our firm is or has served as an officer, director or employee of a
financial advisor that has been engaged by the Debtor in connection with the offer, sale or issuance
of a security of the Debtor, within two years before the Petition Date.
19. No attorney in our firm has represented a financial advisor of the Debtor in
connection with the offer, sale or issuance of a security of the Debtor within three years before the
filing of the petition.
20. No attorney in the firm has any other interest, direct or indirect, that may be affected
by the proposed representation.
21. Except as forth herein, no attorney in our firm has had or presently has any material
connection with the captioned Debtor, the Debtor’s creditors, any other party in interest or their
respective attorneys and accountants, the United States Trustee, or any person employed in the
Office of the United States Trustee (but the undersigned and many employees of Berger Singerman
have personal relationships and friendships with attorneys at the Office of the United States Trustee
in the Southern District of Florida), on any matters in which the firm is to be engaged, except that I,
our law firm, and our attorneys (i) may have appeared in the past, and may appear in the future, in
other cases in which one or more of said parties may be involved; and (ii) may represent or may
have represented certain of the Debtor’s creditors in matters unrelated to this case.
22. This concludes my Declaration.
Case 11-40603-RBR Doc 7 Filed 11/01/11 Page 25 of 30
Case 11-40603-RBR Doc 7 Filed 11/01/11 Page 26 of 30
3982626-2
EXHIBIT “B”
(Proposed Order)
Case 11-40603-RBR Doc 7 Filed 11/01/11 Page 27 of 30
3982729-1
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION
www.flsb.uscourts.gov
IN RE: Chapter 11 Case
RUDEN McCLOSKY P.A.,1 Case No. 11-
Debtor.
___________________________________/
INTERIM ORDER APPROVING THE EMPLOYMENT OF BERGER SINGERMAN,
P.A. AS COUNSEL FOR THE DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION NUNC PRO TUNC TO
PETITION DATE
THIS MATTER came before the Court on the _____ day of November, 2011 at ___:___
___.m. in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, upon the Debtor’s Application for Approval, on an Interim and
Final Basis, of Employment of Berger Singerman, P.A. as Counsel for Debtor in Possession Nunc
Pro Tunc to the Petition Date (the “Application”) [D.E. ____], the Declaration of Joseph J. Luzinski
in Support of the Debtor’s Chapter 11 Petition and Request for First Day Relief (the “First Day
Declaration”) [D.E. ____], and the Declaration of Paul Steven Singerman, on Behalf of Berger
Singerman, P.A., as Proposed Counsel for Debtor-in-Possession (the “Singerman Declaration”)
1 The address of the Debtor is 200 E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 1500, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301, and the last
four digits of the taxpayer identification number of the Debtor are 7357.
Case 11-40603-RBR Doc 7 Filed 11/01/11 Page 28 of 30
2 3982729-1
attached to the Application as Exhibit “A.” The Application requests entry of an order, on an
interim and final basis, approving the Debtor-in-Possession’s employment of Berger Singerman,
P.A. to represent it as general counsel in this Chapter 11 case. The Court has jurisdiction over the
matters raised in the Application pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334(b). This is a core
proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A). The relief requested in the Application is in the
best interests of the Debtor, its estate, and its creditors. The Singerman Declaration makes relevant
disclosures as required by Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2014 and Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2016. The Singerman
Declaration contains a verified statement as required by Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2014 demonstrating that
Paul Steven Singerman and Berger Singerman, P.A. are disinterested as required by 11 U.S.C. §
327(a), and the Court hereby finds that Singerman and Berger Singerman are disinterested. Pursuant
to 11 U.S.C. § 327(a), Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2014(a) and Local Rule 2014-1(A), the Court is authorized
to grant the relief requested in the Application. Upon the record herein, and after due deliberation
thereon good and sufficient cause exists for the granting of the relief as set forth herein.
Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED that:
1. The Application is APPROVED, on an interim basis.
2. The employment by the Debtor, as debtor-in-possession, of Berger Singerman, P.A.,
as general counsel, in this Chapter 11 case is APPROVED pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 327(a), on an
interim basis, pending a final hearing as set forth below.
3. The employment of Berger Singerman, P.A. by the Debtor shall be nunc pro tunc to
the Petition Date.
4. Berger Singerman, P.A. shall apply for compensation and reimbursement of costs,
pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 330 and 331, at its ordinary rates, as they may be adjusted from time to
Case 11-40603-RBR Doc 7 Filed 11/01/11 Page 29 of 30
3 3982729-1
time, for services rendered and costs incurred on behalf of the Debtor. Berger Singerman, P.A. will
apply for compensation and reimbursement of costs.
5. The Court shall conduct a final hearing (the “Final Hearing”) on the Application on
________________ ___, 2011 at ___:___ __.m., United States Bankruptcy Court,
299 E. Broward Boulevard, Courtroom 308, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301.
6. Entry of this Interim Order is without prejudice to the rights of any party-in-interest to
interpose an objection to the Application, and any such objection will be considered on a de novo
standard at the Final Hearing.
7. This Court shall retain jurisdiction to hear and determine all matters arising from or
related to the implementation of this Order.
# # #
Submitted by:
Paul Steven Singerman, Esq.
BERGER SINGERMAN, P.A.
200 S. Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 1000
Miami, FL 33131
Telephone (305) 755-9500
Facsimile: (305) 714-4340
Copy furnished to:
Paul Steven Singerman, Esq.
(Attorney Singerman is directed to serve a copy of this Order upon all interested parties upon receipt
and file a Certificate of Service.)
Case 11-40603-RBR Doc 7 Filed 11/01/11 Page 30 of 30