United Nations Development Programme Bureau for Crisis Prevention & Recovery Bangkok, Thailand
description
Transcript of United Nations Development Programme Bureau for Crisis Prevention & Recovery Bangkok, Thailand
A common framework for post-disaster needs assessment & support of disaster recovery & reconstruction in high-
risk countries
United Nations Development ProgrammeBureau for Crisis Prevention & Recovery
Bangkok, ThailandNovember 2010
Presentation Order Why a Common Framework? Reflections on Recent PDNA Experiences
Scope
Results expected
Timeframe
Resource requirements
The PDNA Process
Why a common framework? Without common framework, key opportunities and
obligations for recovery will be missed Without common framework, institutions will conduct
parallel assessments, e.g., Pakistan: 2009 Post Conflict Needs Assessment, 2010 Monsoon Floods Damage and Needs Assessment and 2010 Flood Impact on MDG Analysis = 3 separate multi-sectoral recovery frameworks
Resources for recovery, including reconstruction, must be rationalised, prioritised and sequenced in order to be efficient and effective.
Scope: Conceptual FrameworkUnder Government Leadership
Scope(s) Scope of regimes
Recovery, including Early Recovery, and ReconstructionDamage and Loss Assessment (DaLA) and Human Development
Recovery Needs Assessment (HRNA) Geographical Scope
Physical area of damage onlyFull implication of disaster
Scope of data collectionSecondary onlyPrimary and secondary
Scope of sectorsNational Accounts onlyBroader range
Scope, continued Scope of institutional involvement under
government leadershipGovernment, WB, UN only (Moldova ‘10, Namibia
‘09)Strong NGO (Indonesia ‘09, Senegal ‘09)Weak/Absent NGO (Philippines ’09, Burkina Faso ‘09)EU support• Technical (JRC, EU member states)• Financial (Most)
Timeframes (Recent Examples)
Country Bangladesh
Madagascar
Myanmar Haiti Indonesia Burkina
Faso Senegal Phillipines
CrisisCyclone Nov. 15
'07
Cyclone Feb. 17-20 '08
Cyclone May 2
'08
Hurricanes Aug. - Sept.
'08
Earthquakes, Sept. 30 - Oct. 1, '09
Floods Sept. '09
Floods Aug. '09
Storms, Sept.-
Oct. '09
PDNA start Dec. '07 April '08 June '08 Oct. '08 Oct. '09
Oct.-Nov. ‘09
Oct. '09 Oct.-Nov '09
Final Report
April '08 May '08 July '08 Nov. '08 Dec. '09 Aug-10 Dec. '09 Dec. '09
Results
Comprehensive recovery frameworks and strategies
Linkages between humanitarian and development efforts
Reduction in numbers of parallel/duplicate assessments
Pledging Conferences
Resources Required Myanmar 2008, Cyclone Nargis, Village Tract
Assessment$1.1 million for survey11 days field work, 11 days data input, 12 days
analysis11 member core team, 45 enumerators
PDNA Haiti 2010 Earthquake353 Haitian and foreign experts2 venues; $300,000 procurement, support/admin
staff?? Foreign Expert Travel, per diem, etc.
Resources, Continued Support for limited deployment of UN agency
experts, $40,000-$80,000/agency – with additional costs borne by UN agency in country
Operations, in-country logistics and administrative support to PDNA teams by UN for smaller PDNAsIndonesia, ’09: $75,000Burkina Faso ’09: $27,507Philippines ’09: $21,276
Costs to governments – staff time, opportunity costs, logistics, etc.
PDNA ProcessDecision to Conduct a PDNA Planning Mission
Government decision Partner consultation if international assistance required (ASEAN, UN,
World Bank, EU, others)PDNA Planning Mission
Composition of PDNA teams Stakeholder Engagement Reconnaissance Establishment of the PDNA Management Structure Agreement on PDNA Scope and Objectives, Agreement on Recovery
Sectors Initiate Assessment Methods, Instrumentation & Sampling Identification of Resource Requirements (human, logistics and
financial) Draft and agree Terms of Reference
Conducting a PDNA
Formation of the PDNA assessment Teams Training/ orientation of PDNA Data collection, analysis/ Information
gathering Recommendations, Priority Response
Options, “Recovery Pathway”, Recovery Framework
Report writing
PDNA Management Structure High Level Management team
E.g. President/PM/key Minister, UN Resident Coordinator, World Bank Country Director, EU Delegate, ASEAN Delegate, etc.
Oversees the process, provide strategic guidance, take key decisions & ensure the availability of resources for PDNA conduct
PDNA Coordination Team Works under government leadership & high level team to
manage day-to-day planning & management of assessment & drafting of recovery framework
Sector TeamsLine and other ministry experts and ASEAN/UN/WB/EU or other
sectoral specialists to collect &integrate data on damage, losses, human development impacts & needs.
PDNA Support Teams Technical Support Cell
Information and communication technology, information, mapping, logistics, translation, etc.
Report SecretariatSupport the production of sector assessment
reports and recovery frameworks.
Forming Sector Teams
Understanding the thematic key issues particular to the disaster
Choosing key information and the appropriate data collection techniques
Collecting data Conducting analysis Producing sector report including the recovery
framework Global guidance & templates are available…
Sector Team Strategies
Joint Planning
Sub-team for the valuation of damage and losses
Sub-team for the human development recovery assessment
Single Assessment Report for Sector
Data/ Information Management Process: Data collection, processing, analysis,
interpretation , storage, dissemination, monitoring , etc.
Consultative process: Key users of CI and key actors in recovery
including: affected communities (men, women, youth, elderly, leaders, etc.) national and local authorities, CBOs, private sector, NGOs, donors, international agencies, etc.
Information, Data & Other Input
Analysis ProcessIdentify Baseline and Parameters
Coordinate with Humanitarian Clusters to integrate early recovery
needs (e.g., “SOS”)
Facilitate validation by National & Local Authorities and Stakeholders
Identify areas of strategic recovery
Align with Gov Planning priorities, andinfuse disaster risk reduction measures
Determine priority needs and interventions
Data Sources
Baseline (secondary data):National statistics, demographic, social, economic
characteristicsTypical sources of information: recent household surveys;
updated maps, sectoral baselines, cadasters Impact assessment (secondary data):
Post-disaster remote sensing, Humanitarian needs assessments, Government’s preliminary assessment reports, NGOs/UN agency situation reports,, etc..
Field verification and stakeholder consultation (primary data)
REPORT WRITING
Ensure that major partners each provide a report writer. This:Ensures balance of perspectiveFacilitates data/information/analysis exchanges
with sectoral teamsSpreads the writing burdenPromotes transparency
Thank you
• Questions, Observations or Comments?