UNIT TWO: POPULATION

Population Intro Why important to study?

• More people on earth than at any other time in history (6.5 bill)

• World’s pop increased faster in second half of 20th C than ever before

• People are living longer – past 50 yrs global life expectancy has increased by 20 yrs

Population Intro (cont.)

• Almost all global pop growth is occurring in LDCs…poorest countries growing fastest…in some cases leads to famine and human suffering

• People are living longer – past 50 yrs global life expectancy has increased by 20 yrs

DEMOGRAPHY

Demography: study of human population

Most demographers agree world pop growth is slowing

Project pop will plateau at @ 12 billion some time in 21st Century

How Get Demographic Information? --The Census

The US Census is taken every 10 years to count the population of the country.

Gender, Age, Race, Income, Disabilities, Education . .

The #’s are important as they determine government funding

Many protest that not all of the population is counted – homeless, undocumented

UN collects data on world population, as well as, The World Bank and Population Reference Bureau

DEMOGRAPHY

Historically, pop growth has been steady but certain events have checked it…..disease has been and continues to be biggest threat

The Plague Spanish Flu

2.1 Population Concentrations

Ecumene: portion of earth’s surface occupied by permanent human settlement• ¾ world pop live on 5% of

earth’s surface….Why?• Dry Lands• Wet Lands• High Lands• Cold Lands

2.1 Population Concentrations 2/3 of world pop lives in 4

regions• 1.) EAST ASIA (E. China,

Japan, Taiwan, Koreas 1/5 of the world’s

population Clustered near the coast China has 20 large urban

areas, but 2/3 pop is rural China = world #1 in

population 3/4 of Japan and Korea is

urban

4 Populous Regions – (cont.d)• 2.) SOUTH ASIA (India,

Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka)1/5 of the world’s population

Clustered near riversConfined by natural boundaries (Himalayas . . .)

India = world #2 in population

¾ rural/farmers

4 Populous Regions – (cont.d)

• 3.) EUROPE – E and W…mostly urban

• mostly urban• 1/9 of the world’s population

4 Populous Regions – (cont.d)

• 4.) SE Asia (islands of Java, Sumatra, Borneo, Papua New Guinea, Philippines, Vietnam, Thailand) Indonesia = world #4Mostly ruralMainly islandsClustered near rivers and deltas

Mostly rural, but very congested cities

Top 10 Populous Nations

1. China 6. Pakistan 2. India 7. Russia 3. U.S.A. 8. Bangladesh 4. Indonesia 9. Nigeria 5. Brazil 10. Japan

• China and India expected to flip flop

• U.S. will stay #3 b/c of immigration• LDCs taking top spots from MDCs

Population Density

Arithmetic Density: total # of people divided by total area of land • Highest = Bangladesh, Japan,

Netherlands• Remember high pop (China) not

necessarily high pop density

Problems with Arithmetic Density

Arithmetic Density does not always accurately portray population distribution.

• Can be misleading b/c is an average• Examples: Egypt had a population

of 73.3 million in 2004, and an arithmetic density of 190 per square mile. However, 98% of the population lives on only 3% of the land making the density meaningless.

• US = 78/sq mile, but Manhattan is 67,000/sq mile and Loving, TX .1/sq mile

Population Density (cont.d)

Physiological Density: ratio of people to a given unit of cultivable/arable land (suited for agriculture)• i.e. can you feed your

population?• Can be high b/c of high pop

density or poor land• Ex: US 404/sq mile of arable

land Egypt 9,073/sq mile of

arable land

Agricultural Density Definition: ratio of farmers to

the amount of arable land. MDC’s have LOW Agricultural

Density because of technology.

Putting Agriculture and Physiological densities together allows you to look at the relationship between population and resources.

Density Chart

Arithmetic Density

Physiological Density

Agricultural Density

Canada 3 65 1

US 32 175 2

Egypt 79 2296 251

Japan 338 2695 46

India 356 690 163

Netherlands 398 1748 23

Bangladesh 1127 1927 472

2.2 POPULATION GROWTH

Rule of Thumb….• Pop increases rapidly where many

more born than die• Slowly where births barely exceed

deaths• Decreases where deaths

outnumber births• Increases when people move in

and decreases when people move out

Pop Change…measured 3 ways

1. Crude Birth Rate “CBR”: total # of births for every 1,000 alive

2. Total Fertility Rate “TFR”: average # of children a woman will have during child bearing yrs. Affected by: culture, religion, lifestyle, is child econ asset or drain, access to birth control, mother’s education and career

Population Change (cont.d)

3. Natural Increase Rate “NIR”: • NIR = CBR – CDR• Calculates % by which pop grows

each yr.• Ex: CBR = 20, CDR = 5, NIR =

1.5%• Excludes migration – only natural

increase• A negative NIR means pop

decreasing• World NIR peaked in 1963 at 2.2%• World NIR has declined in last 20

yrs.

What determines a nation’s NIR? Factors to consider

Economic development Education Gender Empowerment – status

and power of women Health Care Culture (i.e. Catholics or

Mormons) Public Policy (ex: China one child)

Factors determining a nation’s NIR – (cont.d)

Conclusions….countries w/ low econ development, low education, low gender empowerment, but w/ lower infant mortality rates b/c of improved health care, cultural traditions favoring fertility, and no public policy limiting pop growth...have HIGHEST rates

Where are these countries?

LDCs: sub Sahara Africa, parts of Middle East, parts of L. America

In MDCs pop growth is not natural but due to immigration

Irony – fastest growing places are least equipped to deal w/ the growth

Doubling Time Doubling Time: # of yrs needed for a

pop to double• Formula 70/NIR…ex: NIR is 2.6 % DT

is 70/2.6 = 27 years• Pop growth is

compounded/exponential (if rate stays steady at 3% you’ll add more raw numbers each yr b/c base gets bigger)

• At 3% rate, DT is less than 25 yrs. Taking place in SS Africa, parts of ME, and parts of Central America

MORTALITY CDR

Infant Mortality Rate: annual # of deaths of infants under 1 yr compared w/ total # of births• In some parts of SS Africa is 10%

Life Expectancy: # or yrs a newborn can expect to live..75 in most MDCs, late 30s in some parts of Africa

Population Growth Curves

S Curve – historical growth

J Curve – exponential growth (fixed percentage)

Demographic Momentum

The tendency for pop growth to continue despite strict family planning b/c of young pop in child bearing yrs• Asia and LA 33% of pop under 15• Africa 40% of pop under 15• Ex: In 2002 both UK and S. Korea

had fertility rate of 1.6. But projections for 2025, older UK will decline by 2 mill and youthful SK will add 2 mill.

2.3 Demographic Transition Model

4 stage model shows similar process of pop change in all societies over time

Every country is at some stage The model is irreversible…you do

not go back

STAGE ONE: LOW GROWTH

Very high CBR and CDR cancel each other out

Almost no long term natural increase Most of human history spent in stage

one No country is here today

STAGE TWO: HIGH GROWTH

Rapidly declining CDR but CBR remains high and = very high NIR• @ 1750 – late 1800s nations in Ind Rev (Eur

and N. America) moved into stage 2. Improved agric and health care dropped CDR.

• First time in world history to have significant growth

• LDCs entered stage 2 @1950 when MDCs diffuse improved medical tech (vaccines) to LDCs.

• Most of Africa in stage 2 today

STAGE THREE: MODERATE GROWTH

CBR rapidly declines and CDR continues to decline slowly. NIR begins to moderate

CBR drops b/c of social customs – access to birth control, infant mortality rate drops, women in work force, kids become econ drain

Eur and NA enter - first half of 20th C Asia and parts of LA moved here in recent

yrs

STAGE FOUR: LOW GROWTH

Very low CBR and CDR produce almost no long-term natural increase and possibly a decrease

Zero pop growth: CBR and CDR =• TFR of 2.1 produces zero growth

Most Euro countries in stage 4 today Countries w/ negative NIR…Russia

and Japan (shrinking)

Possible Stage Five?

In future if higher CDR than CBR you’ll have irreversible pop decline.

If a country stays in stage 5 without

migration it will eventually cease to exist

Generalities of the Model

No one in stage 1; only a few have reached stage 4

Model has 2 big breaks w/ the past• First break: sudden drop in death rate

(stage 2) from technology and has taken place everywhere

• Second break: sudden drop in birth rate (stage 3) comes from changing social customs and has not taken place everywhere

2.4 Population Structure and Composition

Population pyramids…show age and gender groups. How do MDC’s and LDC’s differ?

• 1.) Sex Ratio: # of males per 100 females. In general slightly more males born, but women outlive men

Eur and NA 95 males: 100 females World wide 102 males: 100 females

Pop Structure and Composition – cont’d.

2.) Age Distribution• Dependency Ratio: # of people too old or

young to work, compared to # of people in productive yrs.

% of pop under 15 = % over 65 divided by % in between 15-65 multiplied by 100

Tells you how many dependents for every 100 workers

Stage 2 countries: ratio is 1:1 (1 worker for every dependent) Dependents are young

Stage 4 countries ratio is 2:1 (2 workers for every dependent) Dependents are young and old

Age Distribution – cont’d

• Graying of the pop in MDCs – more than ¼ of all govn’t expenditures in US, Canada, Japan, and W. Eur goes to Social Security, health care, and other programs for the elderly

• Baby Boomer Cohort in US (born 1946-1964)…what does this mean for you?

• Generation X = 1965-1980

Population Structure and Composition – cont’d

Race and Ethnicity: Hispanics now largest minority in US (recently passed African Americans)• 11% of US pop is foreign born

50% of that from LA 50% of that from Mexico

What do you see? Why?

Overpopulation and Sustainability

Should we worry @ overpopulation?• Thomas Malthus – 1798 wrote “Essay on

the Principle of Pop” and argued people need food to survive and have

natural desire to reproduce Food prod increases arithmetically and pop

increases geometrically/exponentially Predicted pop growth would eventually

outpace people’s ability to produce food leading to starvation and famine

Malthus and his theory

Neo Malthusians

Argue that 2 characteristics of recent pop growth make Malthus’ argument even more frightening• Esp high growth in LDCs• Pop growth outpacing econ dev in many LDCs

(i.e. income rises 20% but pop rises 30%, so some LDCs worse off than they were 30 yrs ago)

• Paul Erlich – most prominent neo-Malthusian. Wrote “Population Bomb” in 1968 – warned of mass starvation due to overpopulation

http://overpopulationisamyth.com/overpopulation-the-making-of-a-myth

Critics of Malthus

Malthus did not account for ability of people to increase food prod dramatically w/ new technology (go to video 3)

Malthus did not foresee family planning and birth control and drop of CBR/NIR

Malthus did not recognize that famine is usually NOT related to a lack of food but to unequal dist of food – Marxist approach (Moderate approach)

http://overpopulationisamyth.com/overpopulation-the-making-of-a-myth

Population and Sustainability

Carrying Capacity: # of people a given area can maintain…surpassed in densely populated places

Overpopulation implies a breach of an area’s carrying capacity. Also involves• Over consumption of resources• Inefficient allocation of goods• Unsustainable land use• MDC’s blame LDC’s – have too many babies• LDCs blame MDCs – consume disproportionate

share of world’s resources

Control of Population

Pro-Natalist Policies – government policies to promote reproduction and bigger families• Ex. Tax breaks

Anti-Natalist – government and social policies that discourage reproduction to reduce pop growth rates• Tax breaks for sterilization• One-child policies – may lead to gender imbalance

Control of Population

Improve local and state economies• Better school, more eco opportunities

Reduce CBR through the use of contraception • Family planning programs in LDCs• Why is this sometimes difficult?

Epidemiological Transition Model

At times high CDR have lowered NIR Stage 1: Pestilence and Famine: i.e.

infectious diseases…ex: Black Plague 1350s kills ½ Eur pop

Stage 2: Receding Pandemics: improved sanitation, nutrition, medicine of Ind Rev decreases spread of infect diseases

Epidemiological Transition Model Cont’d

Stage 3: Degenerative and Human Created Diseases• Fewer deaths from infectious diseases• Increase in chronic disease associated w/ aging

(heart disease and cancer) Stage 4: Delayed Degenerative Diseases –

degenerative diseases linger but life exp is extended trough medical advances (bypass, radiation, chemo, etc.)

Epidemiological Transition Model Cont’d

Possible Stage 5 – Reemergence of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases• Evolution of new strains of bacteria (TB,

polio, malaria)• Poverty – people cannot afford drug

treatment (TB)• Improved travel diffuses diseases faster

(AIDS)