Unit II DC Machines
description
Transcript of Unit II DC Machines
-
1IFETCE/EEE/M.SUJITH/III YEAR/VI SEM/EE 2355/DEM/VER 1.0
-
DC MACHINES
Output Equations Main Dimensions - Magnetic circuit calculations Carters Coefficient - Net length of Iron Real & Apparent flux densities Selection of number of poles Design of Armature Design ofcommutator and brushes performance prediction using design values.
2
IFETCE/EEE/M.SUJITH/III YEAR/VI SEM/EE 2355/DEM/VER 1.0
-
DC MACHINESLIST OF SYMBOLS:
D = stator bore or armature diameter, m L = stator core length, m p = number of poles Z = Total numbers of armature conductors Iz = current in each conductor(Ia/A) , A E = induced EMF, V P = machine rating (power output),kW Pa = power developed by the armature, kW Q = kVA rating of the machine = flux per pole, Wb = pole pitch ( D/p), m Total Electric loading = p ; Total Magnetic loading = Iz Z Specific Electric loading = ac = Iz Z / D (amp.conductor/m) Specific magnetic loading = Bave = p/ DL (Wb/m2 )
3
IFETCE/EEE/M.SUJITH/III YEAR/VI SEM/EE 2355/DEM/VER 1.0
-
CONSTRUCTION OF A D.C MACHINE
4
IFETCE/EEE/M.SUJITH/III YEAR/VI SEM/EE 2355/DEM/VER 1.0
-
COMMUTATOR OF A D.C MOTOR
5
IFETCE/EEE/M.SUJITH/III YEAR/VI SEM/EE 2355/DEM/VER 1.0
-
6IFETCE/EEE/M.SUJITH/III YEAR/VI SEM/EE 2355/DEM/VER 1.0
-
7IFETCE/EEE/M.SUJITH/III YEAR/VI SEM/EE 2355/DEM/VER 1.0
-
D.C MACHINES-CONSTRUCTION D.C Machines used for industrial electric drives have 3 major parts
namely,i. Field system,ii. Armature, andiii. Commutator.
The field system is located on the stationary part of the machinecalled the stator and consists of ,i. main poles- are designed to produce the magnetic flux.ii. Interpoles placed in between the main poles& are
employed to improve the commutation.iii. frame or yoke- provides mechanical support to the
machine and also serves as a path for flux.
8
IFETCE/EEE/M.SUJITH/III YEAR/VI SEM/EE 2355/DEM/VER 1.0
-
The armature is the rotating part (or rotor) of a d.c machine andconsists of,i. Armature core with slots andii. Armature winding accomodated in the slots.
The conversion of energy from mechanical to electrical or vice-versa takes place in the armature.
The commutator is mounted on the rotor of the machine. The commutator and brush arrangement works like a
mechanical dual converter.
9
IFETCE/EEE/M.SUJITH/III YEAR/VI SEM/EE 2355/DEM/VER 1.0
-
OUTPUT EQUATION
The output equation relates the power developed in armature to the main dimensions and speed of the machine.
The main dimensions of a d.c machine are,i. Armature diameter (D) andii. Armature length (L).
Power developed in armature, Pa = Co D2 L n. Output coefficient, Co = 2 Bav ac x10-3
maximum gap density, Bg= Bav/kf= Bav/
Co in terms of Bg is given by, Co = 2 Bg ac x10-3
10
IFETCE/EEE/M.SUJITH/III YEAR/VI SEM/EE 2355/DEM/VER 1.0
-
Power developed by the armature, Pa is different from the rated power output P, of the machine.
The relationship between the two are,Pa = P/ for generatorsPa = P for motors
11
IFETCE/EEE/M.SUJITH/III YEAR/VI SEM/EE 2355/DEM/VER 1.0
-
CHOICE OF ARMATURE LENGTH:The factors to be considered for the choice of armature
length are,i. Costii. Ventilationiii. Voltage between adjacent commutator segmentsiv. Specific magnetic loading.Maximum value of armature core length,
Lmax = 7.5Tc Nc BavVa
Where Tc = turns per coilNc = no.of coils between adjacent segmentsBav = specific magnetic loadingVa = peripheral speed
12
IFETCE/EEE/M.SUJITH/III YEAR/VI SEM/EE 2355/DEM/VER 1.0
-
MAIN DIMENSIONSCHOICE OF ARMATURE DIAMETER:
The factors to be considered for the choice of armature length are,i. Peripheral speedii. Pole pitchiii. Specific electric loadingiv. Induced emf per conductorv. Power output.
Maximum value of armature diameter, Dmax= Pa x10-3
ac ez
13
IFETCE/EEE/M.SUJITH/III YEAR/VI SEM/EE 2355/DEM/VER 1.0
-
CHOICE OF SPECIFIC MAGNETIC LOADING:The choice of average gap density or specific magnetic loadingdepends upon the following:
Flux density in the teeth. Frequency of flux reversal. Size of the machine.
Large values of flux density results in increased field mmf. Highervalue of field mmf increases the iron loss, copper loss & cost of copper.
If frequency of flux reversal is high, then the iron loss in the armaturecore & teeth would be high.
It is possible to use increased value of flux density as the size of themachine increases.
14
IFETCE/EEE/M.SUJITH/III YEAR/VI SEM/EE 2355/DEM/VER 1.0
-
CHOICE OF SPECIFIC ELECTRIC LOADING:The choice of specific electric loading depends on the following:
Temperature rise. Size of the machine. speed of the machine. Armature reaction. Voltage. Commutation.
15
IFETCE/EEE/M.SUJITH/III YEAR/VI SEM/EE 2355/DEM/VER 1.0
-
The general relations
Flux () = (MMF/ Reluctance) , Wb ;
Reluctance(S) = (l /a) , A/Wb ;
Permeance = ( 1/S) , Wb/A ;
where l = length of the flux path, m ;
A = area of cross section for the flux path, m2 ; = permeability = o r ;o = absolute permeability = 4 x 10 -7 H/m and r = relative permeability.
Magnetizing force (H)= mmf per unit length
= flux x reluctance per unit length
= x(1/length)x (length /a) = x (1 /a)
= B/ . (where B=( / a)
(or ) B = H
16
IFETCE/EEE/M.SUJITH/III YEAR/VI SEM/EE 2355/DEM/VER 1.0
-
17
Magnetic circuit
calculations
Magnetic flux density
Reluctance for Air gap
In smooth armature
Open armature
slots
MMF for air Gap
-Smooth Armature-Open armature
slots
MMF for teeth
-Graphical Method-3 Ordinate method
-Bt1/3 Method
IFETCE/EEE/M.SUJITH/III YEAR/VI SEM/EE 2355/DEM/VER 1.0
-
Reluctance of air gap in machines with smooth armature
Reluctance of air gap in machines with open armature slotsWithout Fringing effect With Fringing effect
18
0
0
an
. . .sec . . . . .
gg
s
g
g
s
lS
LyS reluct cel airgaplength
permeabilityLy area of cross tion of airgap over one slot
0 ( ).
gg
s s
g
lS
L y ww slot width
0 ( )' .
gg
s cs s
cs
lS
L y k wk carter s coefficient slots
IFETCE/EEE/M.SUJITH/III YEAR/VI SEM/EE 2355/DEM/VER 1.0
-
Gap contraction factor for slots
Gap contraction factor for ducts
Stator slot pitch
Rotor slot pitch
19
's s
gss cs s s
y yky k w y
gdcd d d
LkL k n w
sss
DyS
2 gsr
r
D ly
S
. .. .
. . .
. . .
os
or
s
r
w stator slot openingw rotor slot openingS no of stator slotsS no of rotor slots
IFETCE/EEE/M.SUJITH/III YEAR/VI SEM/EE 2355/DEM/VER 1.0
-
20
Carters coefficient
Carters coefficient for stator slots
Carters coefficient for rotor slots
Gap contraction factor for stator slots
Gap contraction factor for rotor slots
11 (5 / )css g os
Kl w
11 (5 / )csr g or
Kl w
ssgss
ss css os
yKy k w
srgsr
sr csr or
yKy k w
..
slot openinggap length
IFETCE/EEE/M.SUJITH/III YEAR/VI SEM/EE 2355/DEM/VER 1.0
-
21
MMF for Air Gapmmf of air gap with smooth armature
mmf of air gap with open armature= gap expansion factor
Field form factor = air gap density over the pole pitchmaximum flux density in the air gap
800,000g av gAT B l
800,000g av g gAT B l kgk
avf
g
BkB
fpolearck
polepitch av av
gf
B BBk
IFETCE/EEE/M.SUJITH/III YEAR/VI SEM/EE 2355/DEM/VER 1.0
-
MMF CALCULATION FOR TEETH
Mmf required for teeth depends on area of cross section of tooth and flux passing through it
The area of cross section depends on dimensions of tooth which in turns depends on type of slots
Due to non uniform dimensions of the teeth, the following problems may be occurred
(i) The teeth are tapered. The path of flux is not constant and gives different values of flux density over the length of teeth
(ii) The sloth provides the parallel path for the flux, shunting the tooth .teeth normally worked in saturation region and therefore their permeability is low, the flux goes down to depth of the slots
22
IFETCE/EEE/M.SUJITH/III YEAR/VI SEM/EE 2355/DEM/VER 1.0
-
There are 3 methods employed for the calculation of MMF required for the teeth:-Graphical methodThe graph between the flux density and distance from the root of the tooth is drawn
Total mmf for tooth is
23
tt t
Bn A
. . .t mean t mean sAT at l at d
length of tooth slot depth
IFETCE/EEE/M.SUJITH/III YEAR/VI SEM/EE 2355/DEM/VER 1.0
-
24
There are 3 methods employed for the calculation of MMF required for the teeth:-
Three ordinate method(Simpsons rule)This method is based on assumption that the curve relating mmf per metre, at with flux density is a parabolaat1= at for the root of toothat2=at for the center of toothat3=at for the tip of tooth
Mmf required for the tooth
1 2 346mean
at at atat
t mean t mean sAT at l at d
IFETCE/EEE/M.SUJITH/III YEAR/VI SEM/EE 2355/DEM/VER 1.0
-
25
There are 3 methods employed for the calculation of MMF required for the teeth:-
Bt1/3 Method(most simplest method)
The method is based upon the assumption that value of mmf per metre, at obtained for flux density at a section one third of tooth height from the narrow end is the atmeanTotal mmf for tooth
1 13 3
t t s
t s
t
s
At at l at d
l dl teethlengthd slotdepth
IFETCE/EEE/M.SUJITH/III YEAR/VI SEM/EE 2355/DEM/VER 1.0
-
NET LENGTH OF IRON The length of the core is divided into packets of about 40 to 80 mm
width separated by vent spacers.
Vent spacers form ventilating ducts through which is air circulated andwidth normally varies from 8 to 10mm.
(Iron space factor) Stacking Factor: Ratio of actual length of iron in astack of assembled core plates to total axial length of stack.
Gross iron length = core length length of ventilating ducts
Net iron length
26
s d dL L n w
[ ]i i d dL k L n w
IFETCE/EEE/M.SUJITH/III YEAR/VI SEM/EE 2355/DEM/VER 1.0
-
27
REAL AND APPARENT FLUX DENSITIES
The flux entering in to armature from air gap flows in teeth
If the flux density in teeth is high, mmf acting on the teeth is high
Always = Real flux < apparent flux density
Real flux density
Apparent flux density
. . . ..app
total flux in slot pitchBtooth area
. . ..real
actual flux in toothBtooth area
IFETCE/EEE/M.SUJITH/III YEAR/VI SEM/EE 2355/DEM/VER 1.0
-
The apparent flux density
28
. . . . .. . . . .
( )
.
. . &
av
s i as i a
i i
i a
i i
a areal
a i
i areal a
i a
app real a
Total flux over a slot pitchBIron area over a slot pitch
A A
A AAB
A A
w k t B BA A
B B B K
IFETCE/EEE/M.SUJITH/III YEAR/VI SEM/EE 2355/DEM/VER 1.0
-
Ai= tooth width x net iron length = wtLiAa= total area iron area=Lys - wtLi
29
. ( . )
. ( . )air area over slotk
iron area over tooth
& 0.9
( 1)
.1.
: 1 1
i f f
a o real
real app a
real app o real
real app o real s
ss
i t
a s s t i ss
i t i t i
L S L SwhereB atB B B kB B at kB B at k
Lytotal areak kiron area L w
A L y w L LyNote K kA w L w L
IFETCE/EEE/M.SUJITH/III YEAR/VI SEM/EE 2355/DEM/VER 1.0
-
SELECTION OF NUMBER OF POLES: Selection of no.of poles depends on,
i. Frequencyii. Length of commutatoriii. Weight of iron partsiv. Labour chargesv. Weight of coppervi. Cross over & distortion of field form.
The no.of poles are chosen such that the frequency lies between 25 to 50 Hz.
30
IFETCE/EEE/M.SUJITH/III YEAR/VI SEM/EE 2355/DEM/VER 1.0
-
ADVANTAGES OF LARGE NUMBER OF POLES:The large number of poles results in the reduction of the following: Weight of armature core and yoke. Cost of armature and field conductors. Overall length and diameter of the machine. Length of commutator. Distortion of field form under load conditions.
DISADVANTAGES OF LARGE NUMBER OF POLES:The large number of poles results in increase of the following: Frequency of flux reversals. Labour charges. Possibility of flash over between brush arms.
31
IFETCE/EEE/M.SUJITH/III YEAR/VI SEM/EE 2355/DEM/VER 1.0
-
GUIDING FACTOR FOR CHOICE OF NO.OF POLES: The Frequency should lie between 25 to 50 Hz. The value of current per parallel path is limited to 200 amps, thus
the current per brush arm should not be more than 400 amps.Current per parallel path = Ia/P for lap winding.
=Ia/2 for wave winding.Current per brush arm = 2Ia/P for lap winding.
=Ia for wave winding.where, P= number of poles.
The armature mmf should not be too large.The normal values ofArmature mmf/pole are listed in the table:
32
IFETCE/EEE/M.SUJITH/III YEAR/VI SEM/EE 2355/DEM/VER 1.0
-
If there are more than one choice for no.of poles which satisfies theabove 3 conditions, then choose the largest value for poles.Thisresults in reduction in iron and copper.
Output (kW) Armature mmf/pole (AT)
Upto 100 5000 or less100 to 500 5000 to 7500
500 to 1500 7500 to 10,000
Over 1500 Upto 12,500
33
IFETCE/EEE/M.SUJITH/III YEAR/VI SEM/EE 2355/DEM/VER 1.0
-
SEPARATION OF D AND L:In D.C machines the separation of D and L depends onPole proportionsThe ratio of is usually between 0.64 to 0.72 (L/)Square pole (L/) choose as 0.7 and practically the value of (L/) is 0.7 to 0.9Moment of inertiaHigh inertia machines may required for impact load applications machines designed with larger diameterPeripheral speed.Should not exceed 30m/sVoltage between adjacent commutator segments.Maximum voltage between segments
Limiting values Bgm=1.2wb/m 2 , Va=30m/s, Ecm=30, Tc=1, L=0.4m
34
2cm gm a cE B LV T
IFETCE/EEE/M.SUJITH/III YEAR/VI SEM/EE 2355/DEM/VER 1.0
-
ARMATURE DESIGN
Design of armature winding involves:1. Choice of armature winding2. Number of armature conductor3. Number of armature coils4. Number of armature slots5. Cross section of armature conductors6. Armature voltage drop7. Depth of armature core
35
IFETCE/EEE/M.SUJITH/III YEAR/VI SEM/EE 2355/DEM/VER 1.0
-
CHOICES OF ARMATURE WINDING :DC machines employ 2 general types of double layer windings. They are: Simplex lap winding.
Progressive lap winding Retrogressive lap winding
Simplex wave winding.
These 2 types of windings primarily differ from each other in thefollowing factors:
The no.of coils between positive & negative brushes, i.e., no.ofparallel paths.
The manner in which the coil ends are connected to the commutatorsegments.
36
IFETCE/EEE/M.SUJITH/III YEAR/VI SEM/EE 2355/DEM/VER 1.0
-
COMPARISON OF LAP AND WAVE WINDING LAP WINDING WAVE WINDING
1.The number of parallel paths is = the no. of poles. (A=P)2.Equaliser connections have to be employed.3.It is used for large capacity machines when the current rating is >400A. 4.Current through a conductor is Ia/P.5.For a specified voltage rating, the no. of armature conductors required is P/2 times that of wave winding.
1.The number of parallel paths is two.2.Equaliser connections not needed.3.It is used for small and mediumcapacity machines .
4.Current through a conductor is Ia/2. 5.For a specified voltage rating, the no. of armature conductors required is 2/P times that of lap winding.
37
IFETCE/EEE/M.SUJITH/III YEAR/VI SEM/EE 2355/DEM/VER 1.0
-
LAP WINDING WAVE WINDING
6.Since the lap winding has large no. of conductors, the area required for insulation is moreand so the slot area will be large. Also the no. of coils will be large & cost will be high.
7.For a specified current rating the area of cross section of the conductor is 2/P times that of wave winding.
6.Since the wave winding has less no.of conductors, the area required for insulation is less and so the slot area will be less. Also the no.of coils will be less & cost will be less.
7.For a specified current rating the area of cross section of the conductor is P/2 times that of lap winding.
38
IFETCE/EEE/M.SUJITH/III YEAR/VI SEM/EE 2355/DEM/VER 1.0
-
NUMBER OF ARMATURE CONDUCTORS
Generated emf in the armature( )( )
min .int . tan
int. . . . . .
a m
a m
m
a m
a
E V I r generatorE V I r motorwherev ter al voltager ernal resis ceI r ernalvoltagedropnumber of armature conductors is given by
EZnp
IFETCE/EEE/M.SUJITH/III YEAR/VI SEM/EE 2355/DEM/VER 1.0
-
NUMBER OF ARMATURE COILS Single turn coils used for lap windings Multi turn coils used for wave windings The number of turns per coils and number of coils are so chosen that
the voltage between adjacent commutator segments is limited Normally the maximum voltage between adjacent segments at load
should not exceed 30V Average voltage between adjacent segments at no load
Maximum at load2c c c av aE T N B LV
2 ( )
( )c c c gm a
c c c gm a
E T N B LV lapE T N B LV wave
IFETCE/EEE/M.SUJITH/III YEAR/VI SEM/EE 2355/DEM/VER 1.0
-
NUMBER OF ARMATURE SLOTSFactors to be considered when selecting the number of armature slots Mechanical difficulties Cooling of armature conductors Flux pulsation CommutationGuiding factors for choice of number of armature slots Slot pitch (25mm to 35mm) small machines -20mm Slot loading = No of conductors in slot x current per conductor(not exceed 1500 ampere conductor) Flux pulsation (slot per pole is integral plus ) Commutation (Slots per pole must be > 9for better commutation process) Suitability of winding (lap or wave)
IFETCE/EEE/M.SUJITH/III YEAR/VI SEM/EE 2355/DEM/VER 1.0
-
SLOT DIMENSIONS
SLOT AREA = CONDUCTOR AREA / SLOT SPACE FACTOR Slot space factor lies in range of 0.25 to 0.4 The dimensions of tooth should be chosen such that the flux density of
tooth doesnot exceed 2.1wb / m2
Guideline for choosing the slot depth
Diameter of armature in m
Slot depth in mm
0.15 220.20 270.25 320.30 37
Diameter of armature in m
Slot depth in mm
0.40 420.50 45
IFETCE/EEE/M.SUJITH/III YEAR/VI SEM/EE 2355/DEM/VER 1.0
-
ARMATURE VOLTAGE DROP
Length of mean turn of armature winding
Projection of coil outside the core
Resistance of each conductor
Resistance of each parallel path
Armature voltage drop
2 2.3 5mt sL L z d
0.3 1.25s sL z d
1 .2
mt
s
La
.2
mt
z
Lza a
a aI r
IFETCE/EEE/M.SUJITH/III YEAR/VI SEM/EE 2355/DEM/VER 1.0
-
DEPTH OF ARMATURE CORE
Flux in the armature =(1/2) flux per pole
Area of armature core
Depth of armature
12a
1 .2
cc i c
c c
A L dB B
12c i c
dL B
IFETCE/EEE/M.SUJITH/III YEAR/VI SEM/EE 2355/DEM/VER 1.0
-
TYPES OF COMMUTATION: The phenomena of commutation is affected by the resistance of the
brush, reactance emf induced by leakage flux and rotational emf induced by armature flux.
Brush materials- Hard Carbon(20-30m/s), Metal graphite(20-30m/s), Electro graphite(30-60m/s), Natural Graphite (50-60m/s)
Based on the factors affecting the commutation, the process of commutation is classified into:
Resistance commutation. Retarded commutation. Accelerated commutation. Sinusoidal commutation.
45
IFETCE/EEE/M.SUJITH/III YEAR/VI SEM/EE 2355/DEM/VER 1.0
-
DESIGN OF COMMUTATOR AND BRUSHES
The number of commutator segments is equal to the number of coils. The commutator diameter Dc= 6080 % of the armature diameter (D). The peripheral speed is limited to 15m/s to 30m/s Each brush should not carry more than 70A Current carried by brush
Total brush contact area per spindle
Contact area of brushes in a spindleab =contact area of each brushnb =no. of brushes per spindle
46
2 / ( )( )
b a
b a
I I P lapI I wave
/b b bA I
b b bA n a
IFETCE/EEE/M.SUJITH/III YEAR/VI SEM/EE 2355/DEM/VER 1.0
-
Thickness of brush
Width of brush
Length of commutator
Cb= clearance between the brushes (usually 5mm)C1=clearance allowed for stagering the brushes (10mm for small machine
and 30mm for large machine)C2=clearance for allowing end play (10mm to 25mm)
Brush friction loss
Pb=brush contact pressure on commuator N/m2AB=pAb for lap winding ; AB=2Ab for wave winding ; Vc=peripheral speed of commutator m/s ; =coefficient of friction
47
(1 3)b ct to
b bb
b bb
A awn t t
1 2( )c b b bL n w c c c
bf b B cP P A V
IFETCE/EEE/M.SUJITH/III YEAR/VI SEM/EE 2355/DEM/VER 1.0
-
Commutator peripheral speed
Number of brushes per spindles
Actual commutator pitch
C=no. of commutator segments=no. of coils
48
c cV D n
.brush areab
b
InI
( 4 )cc cD always mmC
IFETCE/EEE/M.SUJITH/III YEAR/VI SEM/EE 2355/DEM/VER 1.0
-
LOSSES AND EFFICIENCY IN DC MACHINES
I2R losses : copper loss in
i) Armature ii) Field iii) Inter pole winding
Rotational losses :i) Friction & windage losses (bearings & commutator)ii) Iron loss
a) Hysteresis loss .b) Eddy current loss.
For the calculation of copper losses , the total length and area cross section of each of the windings should be first calculated.
49
IFETCE/EEE/M.SUJITH/III YEAR/VI SEM/EE 2355/DEM/VER 1.0
-
Peripheral speed, v 45 m/s Frequency of flux reversal, f 50 Hz Current per brush arm 400 A Armature MMF per pole 7000 A The MMF required for the air gap = 50% of the
armature MMF. Gap contraction factor = 1.1 The current per brush arm (Ia) = 2Ia/p For square poles: L = D/p In the design process, choose of poles based on f & Ib and then
calculate D and L.
50
PERFORMANCE PREDICTION USING DESIGN VALUES.
IFETCE/EEE/M.SUJITH/III YEAR/VI SEM/EE 2355/DEM/VER 1.0