Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis - Marquette University · 2013-08-26 · Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis...

15
FYE Program at Marquette University Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis July 2009 Writing Conventions 3 Proficient Outcome (A, AB) 2 Competent Outcome (B, BC, C) 1 Developing Outcome (CD, D, F) Rhetorical Negotiation of PURPOSE & AUDIENCE The written textEffectively expresses purpose in the introduction and thesis statement Effectively addresses class and teacher w/in common conversation about literacy Readers are definitely persuaded to consider the text’s ideas Purpose re rhetorical analysis is discernible but not explicit Addresses class and teacher w/in common conversation about literacy Readers are probably persuaded to consider the text’s ideas Vaguely expresses writer’s purpose in the intro Gives little attention to audience Readers are confused and/or insulted and are not persuaded to consider the text’s ideas ORGANIZATION/LOGIC Given the purpose and audience, the written textEmploys thesis statement that focuses writer’s summative point (“strong response”) about the text being analyzed. Appropriately addresses the three parts of the assignment: summary, rhetorical analysis, strong response Employs logical sequence of connected ¶s The organizational logic enhances a reader’s understanding of the text’s ideas Employs thesis statement that estab- lishes some organization for the paper Employs clear arrangement of ¶s The organizational logic assists a reader’s understanding of the text’s ideas Employs thesis statement that is formulaic or unrelated to the body ¶s Employs confusing arrangement of ¶s Organization problems make it diffi- cult for a reader to follow the text’s ideas DEVELOPMENT Given the purpose and audience, the written textEffectively frames ¶s around writer’s own points, which link to thesis Effectively uses summary, paraphrase, and quotation from the analyzed text as evidence supporting those points • Effectively employs tactics of exposition Frames ¶s around general statements Uses summary, paraphrase, & quotation to describe the analyzed text rather than to support points about it Employs tactics of exposition within paragraphs States general points that are vague, confusing, or unrelated to thesis; or pre- sents paragraphs without point sentences Paragraphs serve mainly to summarize the analyzed text Omits or uses confusing ¶ breaks INTEGRATING SOURCE MATERIAL Given the purpose and audience, the written text… Uses smooth, clear attributive phrases and consistent MLA style parenthetical citations when referring to material from the text being analyzed or to any external material that is not common knowledge Presents accurate MLA works cited list Uses attribution and internal MLA style citations with little awkwardness and few inconsistencies or errors Presents competent MLA works cited list Omits many attributive phrases and uses few or unclear internal MLA citations Relies extensively on quotations Presents incomplete or inaccurate MLA works cited list STUDENT EXPERTS ETHOS Given the purpose and audience, the written text employs an academic voice that… Demonstrates comprehensive understanding of the content Demonstrates personal engagement with the content (via the writer’s ideas, values, beliefs) Readers perceive this textual voice as reliable and trustworthy Demonstrates general understanding of the content Demonstrates some engagement with the content Readers perceive this textual voice as mostly unreliable Demonstrates little or no understanding of the content Demonstrates little or no personal engagement with the content Readers perceive this textual voice as unreliable READABILITY The written textContains few or no errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation Effectively uses sentences with clear subjects and verbs Uses well-chosen vocabulary for an effective academic style Contains some distracting errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, or uses ineffective sentence structure, but these problems do not interfere with a reader’s comprehension Uses largely appropriate academic word choices and style Contains numerous distracting errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, or sentence structure, some of which interfere with a reader’s understanding Contains vocabulary choices that are confusing or inappropriate for an academic style FYE Assessment Report Appendix B, FYE Rubrics September 2012

Transcript of Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis - Marquette University · 2013-08-26 · Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis...

Page 1: Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis - Marquette University · 2013-08-26 · Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis July 2009 Writing Conventions UDIENCE 3 – Uses well Proficient Outcome chosen vocabulary

FY

E P

rog

ram

at

Ma

rqu

ette

Un

iver

sity

Ru

bri

c fo

r S

cori

ng

En

gli

sh 1

– U

nit

1, R

het

ori

cal

An

aly

sis

July

20

09

Wri

tin

g C

on

ven

tion

s 3 –

Pro

fici

ent

Ou

tcom

e

(A,

AB

)

2 –

Com

pet

ent

Ou

tcom

e

(B, B

C,

C)

1 –

Dev

elo

pin

g O

utc

om

e

(CD

, D

, F

) R

het

ori

cal

Neg

oti

ati

on

of

PU

RP

OS

E &

AU

DIE

NC

E

The

wri

tten

text…

• E

ffec

tiv

ely e

xp

ress

es p

urp

ose

in

th

e

intr

od

uct

ion a

nd t

hes

is s

tate

men

t

• E

ffec

tiv

ely a

dd

ress

es c

lass

an

d t

each

er

w/i

n c

om

mo

n c

on

ver

sati

on

ab

ou

t li

tera

cy

Rea

der

s ar

e d

efin

itel

y p

ersu

aded

to

con

sid

er t

he

text’

s id

eas

• P

urp

ose

re

rhet

ori

cal

anal

ysi

s is

dis

cern

ible

bu

t no

t ex

pli

cit

• A

dd

ress

es c

lass

an

d t

each

er w

/in

com

mo

n c

on

ver

sati

on

ab

ou

t li

tera

cy

Rea

der

s ar

e p

rob

ably

per

suad

ed t

o

con

sid

er t

he

text’

s id

eas

• V

agu

ely e

xp

ress

es w

rite

r’s

pu

rpo

se i

n

the

intr

o

• G

ives

lit

tle

atte

nti

on

to

aud

ien

ce

Rea

der

s ar

e co

nfu

sed

an

d/o

r in

sult

ed

and

are

no

t p

ersu

aded

to

con

sid

er t

he

text’

s id

eas

OR

GA

NIZ

AT

ION

/LO

GIC

Giv

en t

he

purp

ose

and

aud

ien

ce,

the

wri

tten

tex

t…

• E

mp

loys

thes

is s

tate

men

t th

at f

ocu

ses

wri

ter’

s su

mm

ativ

e p

oin

t (“

stro

ng

resp

on

se”)

ab

ou

t th

e te

xt

bei

ng a

nal

yze

d.

• A

pp

rop

riat

ely a

dd

ress

es t

he

thre

e p

arts

of

the

assi

gn

men

t: s

um

mar

y,

rhet

ori

cal

anal

ysi

s, s

tro

ng r

esp

on

se

• E

mp

loys

logic

al s

equ

ence

of

con

nec

ted

¶s

T

he

org

aniz

atio

nal

lo

gic

enh

ance

s a

read

er’s

un

der

stan

din

g o

f th

e te

xt’

s id

eas

• E

mp

loys

thes

is s

tate

men

t th

at e

stab

-

lish

es s

om

e o

rgan

izat

ion

fo

r th

e pap

er

• E

mp

loys

clea

r ar

ran

gem

ent

of

¶s

Th

e o

rgan

izat

ion

al l

ogic

ass

ists

a

read

er’s

un

der

stan

din

g o

f th

e te

xt’

s id

eas

• E

mp

loys

thes

is s

tate

men

t th

at i

s

form

ula

ic o

r u

nre

late

d t

o t

he

body ¶

s

• E

mp

loys

con

fusi

ng a

rran

gem

ent

of

¶s

O

rgan

izat

ion

pro

ble

ms

mak

e it

dif

fi-

cult

fo

r a

read

er t

o f

oll

ow

th

e te

xt’

s id

eas

DE

VE

LO

PM

EN

T

Giv

en t

he

purp

ose

and

aud

ien

ce,

the

wri

tten

tex

t…

• E

ffec

tiv

ely f

ram

es ¶

s ar

ou

nd w

rite

r’s

ow

n

po

ints

, w

hic

h l

ink t

o t

hes

is

• E

ffec

tiv

ely u

ses

sum

mar

y,

par

aph

rase

,

and

qu

ota

tion

fro

m t

he

anal

yze

d t

ext

as

evid

ence

su

ppo

rtin

g t

ho

se p

oin

ts

• E

ffec

tivel

y e

mp

loys

tact

ics

of

exp

osi

tion

• F

ram

es ¶

s ar

ou

nd g

ener

al s

tate

men

ts

• U

ses

sum

mar

y,

par

aph

rase

, &

qu

ota

tio

n

to d

escr

ibe

the

anal

yze

d t

ext

rath

er t

han

to

sup

po

rt p

oin

ts a

bo

ut

it

• E

mp

loys

tact

ics

of

exp

osi

tion

wit

hin

par

agra

ph

s

• S

tate

s gen

eral

po

ints

th

at a

re v

agu

e,

con

fusi

ng,

or

un

rela

ted t

o t

hes

is;

or

pre

-

sen

ts p

arag

rap

hs

wit

ho

ut

po

int

sen

ten

ces

• P

arag

rap

hs

serv

e m

ain

ly t

o s

um

mar

ize

the

anal

yze

d t

ext

• O

mit

s o

r u

ses

con

fusi

ng ¶

bre

aks

INT

EG

RA

TIN

G S

OU

RC

E

MA

TE

RIA

L

Giv

en t

he

purp

ose

and

aud

ien

ce,

the

wri

tten

tex

t…

• U

ses

smo

oth

, cl

ear

attr

ibu

tive

ph

rase

s an

d

con

sist

ent

ML

A s

tyle

par

enth

etic

al c

itat

ion

s

wh

en r

efer

rin

g t

o m

ater

ial

fro

m t

he

text

bei

ng a

nal

yze

d o

r to

an

y e

xte

rnal

mat

eria

l

that

is

no

t co

mm

on

kn

ow

led

ge

• P

rese

nts

acc

ura

te M

LA

wo

rks

cite

d l

ist

• U

ses

attr

ibu

tio

n a

nd

in

tern

al M

LA

sty

le

cita

tio

ns

wit

h l

ittl

e aw

kw

ard

nes

s an

d f

ew

inco

nsi

sten

cies

or

erro

rs

• P

rese

nts

co

mp

eten

t M

LA

wo

rks

cite

d

list

• O

mit

s m

any a

ttri

bu

tive

ph

rase

s an

d u

ses

few

or

un

clea

r in

tern

al M

LA

cit

atio

ns

• R

elie

s ex

ten

sivel

y o

n q

uota

tions

• P

rese

nts

in

com

ple

te o

r in

accu

rate

ML

A

wo

rks

cite

d l

ist

ST

UD

EN

T E

XP

ER

T’S

ET

HO

S

Giv

en t

he

purp

ose

and

aud

ien

ce,

the

wri

tten

tex

t em

plo

ys

an

acad

emic

vo

ice

that

• D

emo

nst

rate

s co

mp

reh

ensi

ve

un

der

stan

din

g o

f th

e co

nte

nt

• D

emo

nst

rate

s p

erso

nal

en

gag

emen

t

wit

h t

he

con

ten

t (v

ia t

he

wri

ter’

s id

eas,

val

ues

, b

elie

fs)

R

ead

ers

per

ceiv

e th

is t

extu

al v

oic

e as

reli

able

an

d t

rust

wo

rth

y

• D

emo

nst

rate

s g

ener

al u

nd

erst

and

ing o

f

the

con

ten

t

• D

emo

nst

rate

s so

me

eng

agem

ent

wit

h

the

con

ten

t

Rea

der

s p

erce

ive

this

tex

tual

vo

ice

as

mo

stly

un

reli

able

• D

emo

nst

rate

s li

ttle

or

no

un

der

stan

din

g

of

the

con

tent

• D

emo

nst

rate

s li

ttle

or

no

per

son

al

engag

emen

t w

ith

th

e co

nte

nt

Rea

der

s p

erce

ive

this

tex

tual

vo

ice

as

un

reli

able

RE

AD

AB

ILIT

Y

The

wri

tten

text…

• C

on

tain

s fe

w o

r n

o e

rro

rs i

n s

pel

lin

g,

gra

mm

ar,

or

pu

nct

uat

ion

• E

ffec

tiv

ely u

ses

sen

ten

ces

wit

h c

lear

sub

ject

s an

d v

erb

s

• U

ses

wel

l-ch

ose

n v

oca

bu

lary

fo

r an

effe

ctiv

e ac

adem

ic s

tyle

• C

on

tain

s so

me

dis

trac

tin

g e

rro

rs i

n

spel

lin

g,

gra

mm

ar,

pu

nct

uat

ion

, or

use

s

inef

fect

ive

sen

ten

ce s

tru

ctu

re,

bu

t th

ese

pro

ble

ms

do

no

t in

terf

ere

wit

h a

rea

der

’s

com

pre

hen

sio

n

• U

ses

larg

ely a

pp

rop

riat

e ac

adem

ic w

ord

cho

ices

an

d s

tyle

• C

on

tain

s nu

mer

ou

s d

istr

acti

ng e

rro

rs i

n

spel

lin

g,

gra

mm

ar,

pu

nct

uat

ion

, or

sen

ten

ce s

tru

ctu

re,

som

e o

f w

hic

h

inte

rfer

e w

ith

a r

ead

er’s

un

der

stan

din

g

• C

on

tain

s vo

cab

ula

ry c

ho

ices

that

are

con

fusi

ng o

r in

app

rop

riat

e fo

r an

acad

emic

sty

le

FYE Assessment Report Appendix B, FYE Rubrics September 2012

Page 2: Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis - Marquette University · 2013-08-26 · Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis July 2009 Writing Conventions UDIENCE 3 – Uses well Proficient Outcome chosen vocabulary

FY

E P

rog

ram

at

Ma

rqu

ette

Un

iver

sity

Ru

bri

c fo

r S

cori

ng

En

gli

sh 1

– U

nit

2, A

cad

emic

Ex

posi

tion

July

20

09

Wri

tin

g C

on

ven

tio

ns

3 –

Pro

fici

ent

Ou

tcom

e

(A,

AB

)

2 –

Com

pet

ent

Ou

tcom

e

(B, B

C,

C)

1 –

Dev

elo

pin

g O

utc

om

e

(CD

, D

, F

)

Rh

eto

rica

l N

egoti

ati

on

of

PU

RP

OS

E &

AU

DIE

NC

E

The

wri

tten

text…

• E

ffec

tiv

ely a

rtic

ula

tes

pu

rpo

se i

n t

he

intr

od

uct

ion a

nd t

hes

is s

tate

men

t in

ter

ms

of

surp

risi

ng v

iew

an

d k

no

wle

dge

gap

• E

ffec

tiv

ely a

dd

ress

es a

ud

ien

ce a

s le

ss

info

rmed

th

an w

rite

r b

ut

par

t o

f th

e sa

me

con

ver

sati

on

abo

ut

glo

bal

pop

cult

ure

Rea

der

s ar

e d

efin

itel

y p

ersu

aded

to

con

sid

er t

he

text’

s id

eas.

• A

nn

oun

ces

sub

ject

mat

ter

in t

he

intr

od

uct

ion a

nd

/or

thes

is s

tate

men

t bu

t

pu

rpo

se r

e su

rpri

sin

g v

iew

an

d k

no

wle

dge

gap

rem

ain

s im

pli

cit

• A

ckn

ow

led

ges

au

die

nce

as

par

t o

f a

con

ver

sati

on

abo

ut

glo

bal

pop

cult

ure

Rea

der

s ar

e p

rob

ably

per

suad

ed t

o

con

sid

er t

he

text’

s id

eas.

• V

agu

ely e

xp

ress

es w

rite

r’s

pu

rpo

se i

n

the

intr

o;

thes

is i

s m

issi

ng,

vag

ue,

or

on

ly

des

crip

tive

(“al

l ab

out”

wri

tin

g)

• L

acks

atte

nti

on

to

su

rpri

sin

g v

iew

or

kn

ow

led

ge

gap

• G

ives

lit

tle

atte

nti

on

to

aud

ien

ce

Rea

der

s ar

e co

nfu

sed

an

d/o

r in

sult

ed

and

are

no

t p

ersu

aded

to

con

sid

er t

he

text’

s

idea

s.

OR

GA

NIZ

AT

ION

/LO

GIC

Giv

en t

he

purp

ose

and

aud

ien

ce,

the

wri

tten

tex

t…

• E

mp

loys

wri

ter’

s id

eas

as m

ain

po

ints

• E

mp

loys

logic

al a

rran

gem

ent

of

¶s

• E

mp

loys

logic

al a

rran

gem

ent

w/i

n ¶

s b

y

mo

vin

g f

rom

po

ints

to

par

ticu

lars

• E

ffec

tiv

ely c

on

clu

des

th

e p

aper

by

mo

vin

g b

eyo

nd

su

mm

ary

T

he

org

aniz

atio

nal

lo

gic

enh

ance

s a

read

er’s

un

der

stan

din

g o

f w

rite

r’s

po

ints

.

• U

nev

enly

use

s w

rite

r’s

idea

s as

mai

n p

ts

• E

mp

loys

clea

r ar

ran

gem

ent

of

¶s

• E

mp

loys

clea

r ar

ran

gem

ent

w/i

n ¶

s bu

t

inco

nsi

sten

t in

rel

atio

nsh

ip b

etw

een

poin

ts

and

par

ticu

lars

• C

on

clu

sion

co

nta

ins

mo

re t

han

su

mm

ary

Th

e o

rgan

izat

ion

al l

ogic

ass

ists

a

read

er’s

un

der

stan

din

g o

f w

rite

r’s

po

ints

.

• F

ocu

ses

on

rea

din

gs,

not

wri

ter’

s id

eas

• E

mp

loys

con

fusi

ng s

equ

ence

of

¶s

• E

mp

loys

con

fusi

ng a

rran

gem

ent

w/i

n ¶

s •

• E

mp

loys

no

co

ncl

usi

on

or

on

e th

at i

s a

rep

etit

ive

sum

mar

y

Lac

k o

f cl

ear

org

aniz

atio

n m

akes

it

dif

ficu

lt f

or

a re

ader

to

und

erst

and

wri

ter’

s

po

ints

.

DE

VE

LO

PM

EN

T

Giv

en t

he

purp

ose

and

aud

ien

ce,

the

wri

tten

tex

t…

• E

ffec

tiv

ely e

mp

loys

sum

mar

y a

nd

rhet

ori

cal

anal

ysi

s o

f re

adin

gs

• E

ffec

tiv

ely s

tate

s w

rite

r’s

reas

on

ing i

n

sup

po

rt o

f th

e th

esis

• E

ffec

tiv

ely s

tate

s ev

iden

ce,

supp

ort

ing

wri

ter’

s th

inkin

g w

ith

tex

tual

ref

eren

ces

(via

su

mm

ary,

par

aph

rase

, &

qu

ota

tio

n)

• E

mp

loys

mo

re s

um

mar

y t

han

an

alysi

s

• A

deq

uat

ely s

tate

s an

d i

llu

stra

tes

wri

ter’

s

reas

on

ing i

n s

upp

ort

of

the

thes

is

• A

deq

uat

ely s

tate

s ev

iden

ce,

sup

po

rtin

g

wri

ter’

s th

inkin

g w

ith

tex

tual

ref

eren

ces

(via

su

mm

ary,

par

aph

rase

, &

qu

ota

tio

n)

• D

oes

no

t d

emo

nst

rate

rh

eto

rica

l an

alysi

s

of

read

ings

and

con

tain

s to

o m

uch

sum

mar

y

• R

efer

s to

rea

din

gs

bu

t d

oes

n’t

co

nn

ect

them

to

wri

ter’

s th

inkin

g—

min

imal

use

of

sum

mar

y a

nd

par

aph

rase

INF

OR

MA

TIO

N L

ITE

RA

CY

Giv

en t

he

purp

ose

and

aud

ien

ce,

the

wri

tten

tex

t…

• E

ffec

tiv

ely f

ocu

ses

on

3 w

ell-

cho

sen

texts

, at

lea

st o

ne

w/

vie

w f

r. o

uts

ide

U.S

.

• U

ses

clea

r at

trib

uti

ve

ph

rase

s an

d

effe

ctiv

ely c

red

its

sou

rces

wit

h c

on

sist

ent

inte

rnal

ML

A s

tyle

par

enth

etic

al c

itat

ion

s

• P

rese

nts

acc

ura

te M

LA

wo

rks

cite

d l

ist

• D

iscu

sses

3 r

ead

ings,

at

leas

t on

e w

/

vie

w f

rom

ou

tsid

e U

.S.

• U

ses

attr

ibu

tio

n a

nd

cre

dit

s so

urc

es w

ith

inte

rnal

ML

A s

tyle

cit

atio

ns

wit

h o

nly

a

few

in

con

sist

enci

es o

r er

rors

• P

rese

nts

co

mp

eten

t M

LA

wo

rks

cite

d l

ist

• D

iscu

sses

3 r

ead

ings

un

even

ly,

w/o

adeq

uat

e at

ten

tio

n t

o v

iew

fr.

ou

tsid

e U

.S.

• O

mit

s m

any a

ttri

bu

tive

ph

rase

s an

d u

ses

few

or

un

clea

r M

LA

sty

le c

itat

ion

s

• P

rese

nts

in

com

ple

te o

r in

accu

rate

ML

A

wo

rks

cite

d l

ist

ST

UD

EN

T E

XP

ER

T’S

ET

HO

S

The

wri

tten

text

em

plo

ys

an

acad

emic

vo

ice

that

• D

emo

nst

rate

s th

oro

ugh

und

erst

and

ing o

f

con

ten

t

• D

emo

nst

rate

s p

erso

nal

en

gag

emen

t

wit

h c

on

ten

t

Rea

der

s p

erce

ive

this

tex

tual

vo

ice

as

reli

able

an

d k

no

wle

dgea

ble

.

• D

emo

nst

rate

s g

ener

al u

nd

erst

and

ing o

f

con

ten

t

• D

emo

nst

rate

s so

me

per

son

al e

ngag

emen

t

wit

h c

on

ten

t

Rea

der

s p

erce

ive

this

tex

tual

vo

ice

as

mo

stly

rel

iab

le a

nd

kn

ow

led

gea

ble

.

• D

emo

nst

rate

s m

inim

al u

nd

erst

and

ing o

f

con

ten

t

• D

emo

nst

rate

s m

inim

al e

ngag

emen

t w

ith

con

ten

t

Rea

der

s p

erce

ive

this

tex

tual

vo

ice

as

no

t p

arti

cula

rly r

elia

ble

or

kno

wle

dgea

ble

.

RE

AD

AB

ILIT

Y

The

wri

tten

text…

• C

on

tain

s fe

w o

r n

o e

rro

rs i

n s

pel

lin

g,

gra

mm

ar,

pu

nct

uat

ion

or

sen

ten

ce s

tru

ctu

re

(esp

. su

bje

ct p

osi

tion

, ac

tive

ver

bs,

par

alle

lism

, an

d t

ran

siti

on

s)

• U

ses

wel

l-ch

ose

n v

oca

bu

lary

an

d a

n

emp

loys

an e

ffec

tiv

e ac

adem

ic s

tyle

• C

on

tain

s so

me

dis

trac

tin

g e

rro

rs i

n

spel

lin

g,

gra

mm

ar,

pu

nct

uat

ion

, or

sen

ten

ce

stru

ctu

re, b

ut

thes

e er

rors

do

no

t in

terf

ere

wit

h c

om

pre

hen

sio

n

• E

mp

loys

a la

rgel

y a

pp

rop

riat

e ac

adem

ic

style

• C

on

tain

s nu

mer

ou

s er

rors

in

spel

lin

g,

gra

mm

ar,

pu

nct

uat

ion

, o

r se

nte

nce

stru

ctu

re,

som

e in

terf

erin

g w

ith

a r

ead

er’s

un

der

stan

din

g

• C

on

tain

s vo

cab

ula

ry c

ho

ices

co

nfu

sin

g

or

inap

pro

pri

ate

for

an a

cad

emic

sty

le

FYE Assessment Report Appendix B, FYE Rubrics September 2012

Page 3: Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis - Marquette University · 2013-08-26 · Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis July 2009 Writing Conventions UDIENCE 3 – Uses well Proficient Outcome chosen vocabulary

FY

E P

rog

ram

at

Ma

rqu

ette

Un

iver

sity

Ru

bri

c fo

r S

cori

ng

En

gli

sh 1

– U

nit

3, A

cad

emic

Arg

um

ent

Wri

tin

g C

on

ven

tio

ns

3 –

Pro

fici

ent

Ou

tcom

e

(A,

AB

)

2 –

Com

pet

ent

Ou

tcom

e

(B, B

C,

C)

1 –

Dev

elo

pin

g O

utc

om

e

(CD

, D

, F

)

Rh

eto

rica

l N

egoti

ati

on

of

PU

RP

OS

E &

AU

DIE

NC

E

The

wri

tten

text…

• U

ses

intr

o e

ffec

tivel

y t

o d

efin

e is

sue

in

a w

ay t

hat

ack

no

wle

dg

es c

om

pet

ing

per

spec

tives

• E

ffec

tiv

ely a

sser

ts m

ajo

r cl

aim

in

th

esis

stat

emen

t an

d g

ives

over

vie

w o

f ar

gu

men

t

(may

be

two

sen

ten

ces)

• I

ncl

ud

es e

ffec

tive

just

ific

atio

n s

ecti

on

• E

ffec

tiv

ely a

dd

ress

es a

ud

ien

ce a

s p

art

of

com

mo

n c

on

ver

sati

on

ab

ou

t en

vir

on

-

men

tal

issu

es b

ut

less

in

form

ed o

n

spec

ific

iss

ue

Rea

der

s ar

e d

efin

itel

y p

ersu

aded

to

con

sid

er t

he

text’

s id

eas.

• D

efin

es i

ssu

e in

in

tro

du

ctio

n i

n a

way

that

ack

no

wle

dges

co

mp

etin

g p

ersp

ecti

ves

• U

ses

thes

is s

tate

men

t to

pre

sen

t cl

aim

;

over

vie

w o

f ar

gu

men

t vag

ue

or

mis

sin

g

• I

ncl

ud

es j

ust

ific

atio

n s

ecti

on

• A

dd

ress

es a

ud

ien

ce a

s p

art

of

com

mo

n

con

ver

sati

on

abo

ut

envir

on

men

tal

issu

es

bu

t le

ss i

nfo

rmed

on

sp

ecif

ic i

ssu

e

Rea

der

s ar

e p

rob

ably

per

suad

ed t

o

con

sid

er t

he

text’

s id

eas.

• D

efin

es i

ssu

e vag

uel

y,

wit

ho

ut

ackn

ow

led

gin

g c

om

pet

ing p

ersp

ecti

ves

• U

ses

vag

ue

or

no

th

esis

sta

tem

ent,

or

thes

is i

s no

t ar

gu

able

• O

mit

s o

r giv

es l

ittl

e at

ten

tio

n t

o

just

ific

atio

n s

ecti

on

• G

ives

lit

tle

atte

nti

on

to

aud

ien

ce

Rea

der

s ar

e co

nfu

sed

an

d/o

r in

sult

ed

and

are

no

t p

ersu

aded

to

con

sid

er t

he

text’

s id

eas.

OR

GA

NIZ

AT

ION

/LO

GIC

S

ee A

BG

W 4

57

.

Giv

en t

he

purp

ose

and

aud

ien

ce,

the

wri

tten

tex

t…

• E

ffec

tiv

ely e

mp

loys

logic

al ¶

seq

uen

ce

to m

ake

and

def

end

cla

im

• E

ffec

tiv

ely e

mp

loys

logic

al

arra

ngem

ent

of

idea

s w

ith

in e

ach

• E

ffec

tiv

ely e

mp

loys

con

clu

sio

n t

hat

mo

ves

bey

on

d s

um

mar

y t

ow

ard

act

ion

Th

e o

rgan

izat

ion

al l

ogic

en

han

ces

a

read

er’s

un

der

stan

din

g o

f th

e te

xt’

s id

eas.

• E

mp

loys

reas

on

ably

cle

ar ¶

seq

uen

ce

• E

mp

loys

reas

on

ably

cle

ar a

rran

gem

ent

of

idea

s w

ith

in e

ach

• A

deq

uat

ely e

mp

loys

con

clu

sio

n t

hat

do

es m

ore

th

an s

um

mar

ize

Th

e o

rgan

izat

ion

al l

ogic

ass

ists

a

read

er’s

un

der

stan

din

g o

f th

e te

xt’

s id

eas.

• P

rese

nts

co

nfu

sin

g a

rran

gem

ent

of

¶s

• P

rese

nts

co

nfu

sin

g a

rran

gem

ent

of

idea

s

wit

hin

eac

h ¶

• E

mp

loys

vag

ue

or

sum

mar

y c

on

clu

sion

Th

e la

ck o

f p

urp

ose

ful

org

aniz

atio

n

mak

es i

t d

iffi

cult

fo

r a

read

er t

o u

nd

er-

stan

d t

he

text’

s id

eas.

DE

VE

LO

PM

EN

T

Giv

en t

he

purp

ose

and

aud

ien

ce,

the

wri

tten

tex

t…

• E

ffec

tiv

ely e

mp

loys

reas

on

s to

su

ppo

rt

thes

is a

rgu

men

t— m

akin

g a

nd

def

end

ing

a cl

aim

ab

ou

t a

deb

atab

le i

ssu

e

• E

ffec

tiv

ely u

ses

bo

dy ¶

s to

su

pp

ort

reas

on

s w

/ ev

iden

ce f

rom

rea

son

ing &

rese

arch

• S

mo

oth

ly i

nte

gra

tes

sou

rces

via

su

m-

mar

y,

par

aph

rase

, &

qu

ota

tion

as

nee

ded

• A

deq

uat

ely e

mp

loys

reas

on

ed

argu

men

t—m

akin

g a

nd

def

end

ing a

cla

im

abo

ut

a d

ebat

able

iss

ue

• A

deq

uat

ely s

tate

s w

rite

r’s

reas

on

s

(gen

eral

po

ints

) th

at s

upp

ort

th

e th

esis

• A

deq

uat

ely s

up

po

rts

reas

on

s w

/ ev

i-

den

ce f

r. r

easo

nin

g &

res

earc

h v

ia s

um

-

mar

y,

par

aph

rase

, &

qu

ota

tion

as

nee

ded

• D

oes

no

t d

emo

nst

rate

rea

son

ed

argu

men

t

• S

tate

s re

aso

ns

that

are

vag

ue,

co

nfu

sin

g,

or

un

rela

ted

to

th

e th

esis

• E

mp

loys

litt

le o

r n

o e

vid

ence

INF

OR

MA

TIO

N L

ITE

RA

CY

Giv

en t

he

purp

ose

and

aud

ien

ce,

the

wri

tten

tex

t…

• I

nte

gra

tes

effe

ctiv

ely,

sum

mar

izes

an

d

cou

nte

rs a

per

tin

ent

op

po

sin

g a

rgu

men

t

• E

ffec

tiv

ely e

mp

loys

rhet

ori

cal

anal

ysi

s

in d

iscu

ssio

n o

f al

l so

urc

es

• U

ses

clea

r at

trib

uti

ve

ph

rase

s an

d

effe

ctiv

ely c

red

its

sou

rces

wit

h c

on

sist

ent

inte

rnal

ML

A s

tyle

par

enth

etic

al c

itat

ion

s

• P

rese

nts

acc

ura

te M

LA

wo

rks

cite

d l

ist

• D

iscu

sses

op

po

sin

g a

rgu

men

t o

nly

bri

efly

• C

on

tain

s ev

iden

ce o

f rh

eto

rica

l an

alysi

s

• U

ses

attr

ibu

tio

n, an

d c

red

its

sou

rces

wit

h i

nte

rnal

ML

A s

tyle

cit

atio

ns

wit

h

on

ly a

few

in

con

sist

enci

es o

r er

rors

• P

rese

nts

co

mp

eten

t M

LA

wo

rks

cite

d

list

• O

mit

s tr

eatm

ent

of

op

po

sin

g a

rgu

men

t

• O

mit

s m

any a

ttri

bu

tive

ph

rase

s an

d u

ses

few

or

un

clea

r M

LA

sty

le c

itat

ion

s

• P

rese

nts

in

com

ple

te o

r in

accu

rate

ML

A

wo

rks

cite

d l

ist

C

on

tinu

ed o

n t

he

rever

se

July

200

9

FYE Assessment Report Appendix B, FYE Rubrics September 2012

Page 4: Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis - Marquette University · 2013-08-26 · Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis July 2009 Writing Conventions UDIENCE 3 – Uses well Proficient Outcome chosen vocabulary

FY

E P

rog

ram

at

Ma

rqu

ette

Un

iver

sity

Ru

bri

c fo

r S

cori

ng

En

gli

sh 1

– U

nit

3, A

cad

emic

Arg

um

ent

Wri

tin

g C

on

ven

tio

ns

3 –

Pro

fici

ent

Ou

tcom

e

(A,

AB

)

2 –

Com

pet

ent

Ou

tcom

e

(B, B

C,

C)

1 –

Dev

elo

pin

g O

utc

om

e

(CD

, D

, F

) S

TU

DE

NT

EX

PE

RT’S

ET

HO

S

the

wri

tten

tex

t em

plo

ys

an

acad

emic

vo

ice

that

• D

emo

nst

rate

s co

mp

reh

ensi

ve

un

der

stan

din

g o

f co

nte

nt

• D

emo

nst

rate

s p

erso

nal

en

gag

emen

t w

ith

con

ten

t via

wri

ter’

s id

eas,

val

ues

, b

elie

fs

Rea

der

s p

erce

ive

this

tex

tual

vo

ice

as

Tru

stw

ort

hy.

• D

emo

nst

rate

s g

ener

al u

nd

erst

and

ing o

f

con

ten

t

• D

emo

nst

rate

s so

me

per

son

al

engag

emen

t w

ith

th

e co

nte

nt

Rea

der

s p

erce

ive

this

tex

tual

vo

ice

as

mo

stly

tru

stw

ort

hy.

• D

emo

nst

rate

s li

ttle

or

no

un

der

stan

din

g

of

con

ten

t

• D

emo

nst

rate

lit

tle

or

no

per

sonal

engag

emen

t co

nte

nt

Rea

der

s p

erce

ive

this

tex

tual

vo

ice

as

no

t tr

ust

wo

rth

y.

RE

AD

AB

ILIT

Y

The

wri

tten

text…

• C

on

tain

s fe

w o

r n

o e

rro

rs i

n s

pel

lin

g,

gra

mm

ar,

pu

nct

uat

ion

, o

r se

nte

nce

stru

ctu

re

• E

ffec

tiv

ely u

ses

sen

ten

ces

wit

h c

lear

sub

ject

s &

ver

bs,

par

alle

lism

, tr

ansi

tion

s

• S

ho

ws

evid

ence

of

hav

ing a

tten

ded

to

old

-new

co

ntr

act

to e

nh

ance

rea

dab

ilit

y

• U

ses

wel

l-ch

ose

n v

oca

bu

lary

fo

r an

effe

ctiv

e ac

adem

ic s

tyle

• C

on

tain

s so

me

dis

trac

tin

g e

rro

rs i

n

spel

lin

g,

gra

mm

ar,

pu

nct

uat

ion

, or

sen

ten

ce s

tru

ctu

re, b

ut

thes

e er

rors

do

no

t

inte

rfer

e w

ith

co

mp

reh

ensi

on

• I

ncl

ud

es s

ente

nce

seq

uen

ces

that

nee

d

tran

siti

on

s, p

aral

lel

stru

ctu

re,

and

/or

app

lica

tion

of

old

-new

co

ntr

act

pri

nci

ple

s

• L

arg

ely e

mp

loys

app

rop

riat

e ac

adem

ic

style

• C

on

tain

s nu

mer

ou

s d

istr

acti

ng e

rro

rs i

n

spel

lin

g,

gra

mm

ar,

pu

nct

uat

ion

, or

sen

ten

ce s

tru

ctu

re,

som

e o

f w

hic

h

inte

rfer

e w

ith

a r

ead

er’s

un

der

stan

din

g

• C

on

tain

s no

evid

ence

of

atte

nti

on

to

tran

siti

on

s, p

aral

leli

sm,

or

the

old

-new

con

trac

t

• C

on

tain

s vo

cab

ula

ry c

ho

ices

co

nfu

sin

g

or

inap

pro

pri

ate

for

an a

cad

emic

sty

le

FYE Assessment Report Appendix B, FYE Rubrics September 2012

Page 5: Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis - Marquette University · 2013-08-26 · Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis July 2009 Writing Conventions UDIENCE 3 – Uses well Proficient Outcome chosen vocabulary

FY

E P

rog

ram

at

Ma

rqu

ette

Un

iver

sity

Ru

bri

c fo

r S

cori

ng

En

gli

sh 1

– U

nit

4, N

arr

ati

ve

Lit

era

cy

July

200

9

C

on

tinu

ed o

n r

ever

se

Wri

tin

g C

on

ven

tio

ns

3 –

Pro

fici

ent

Ou

tcom

e

(A,

AB

)

2 –

Com

pet

ent

Ou

tcom

e

(B, B

C,

C)

1 –

Dev

elo

pin

g O

utc

om

e

(CD

, D

, F

)

Rh

eto

rica

l N

egoti

ati

on

of

PU

RP

OS

E &

AU

DIE

NC

E

The

wri

tten

text…

• E

ffec

tiv

ely d

efin

es p

urp

ose

to e

xam

ine

the

rhet

ori

cal

imp

act

of

the

textu

al,

cult

ura

l, a

nd

eth

ical

dim

ensi

on

s of

a

nar

rati

ve

con

tain

ed w

ith

in a

tex

t th

at h

as

bro

ader

pu

rpo

ses

• E

ffec

tiv

ely a

dd

ress

es c

lass

an

d t

each

er

as a

n a

ud

ien

ce c

uri

ou

s to

rea

d a

bo

ut

lin

ks

amo

ng t

extu

al,

cult

ura

l, a

nd

eth

ical

dim

ensi

on

s o

f n

arra

tive

in t

his

con

text

Rea

der

s ar

e d

efin

itel

y p

ersu

aded

to

con

sid

er t

he

text’

s id

eas.

• D

efin

es p

urp

ose

to

exam

ine

the

rhet

ori

cal

imp

act

of

the

textu

al,

cult

ura

l, a

nd

eth

ical

dim

ensi

on

s o

f a

nar

rati

ve

con

tain

ed w

ith

in a

text

that

has

bro

ader

pu

rpo

ses

• A

dd

ress

es c

lass

an

d t

each

er a

s an

aud

ien

ce c

uri

ou

s to

rea

d a

bo

ut

links

amo

ng

textu

al,

cult

ura

l, a

nd

/or

eth

ical

dim

ensi

on

s

of

nar

rati

ve

in t

his

con

text

Rea

der

s ar

e p

rob

ably

per

suad

ed t

o

con

sid

er t

he

text’

s id

eas.

• V

agu

ely d

efin

es p

urp

ose

and

/or

do

es n

ot

stip

ula

te t

extu

al, cu

ltu

ral,

and

eth

ical

dim

ensi

on

s o

f th

e n

arra

tive

un

der

an

alysi

s.

• G

ives

lit

tle

atte

nti

on

to

aud

ien

ce.

Rea

der

s ar

e co

nfu

sed

an

d/o

r in

sult

ed a

nd

no

t p

ersu

aded

to c

on

sid

er t

he

text’

s id

eas.

OR

GA

NIZ

AT

ION

/LO

GIC

Giv

en t

he

purp

ose

and

aud

ien

ce,

the

wri

tten

tex

t…

• E

ffec

tiv

ely e

mp

loys

an i

nte

rpre

tive

thes

is s

tate

men

t to

org

aniz

e p

aper

• E

mp

loys

logic

al a

rran

gem

ent

of

¶s

• E

mp

loys

logic

al a

rran

gem

ent

of

idea

s

wit

hin

eac

h ¶

• E

ffec

tiv

ely i

ntr

odu

ces

and

con

clu

des

pap

er

Th

e o

rgan

izat

ion

al l

ogic

en

han

ces

a

read

er’s

un

der

stan

din

g o

f th

e te

xt’

s id

eas.

• A

deq

uat

ely e

mp

loys

an i

nte

rpre

tive

thes

is

stat

emen

t to

org

aniz

e p

aper

.

• E

mp

loys

clea

r ar

ran

gem

ent

of

¶s

• E

mp

loys

clea

r ar

ran

gem

ent

of

idea

s

wit

hin

eac

h ¶

• A

deq

uat

ely i

ntr

od

uce

s an

d c

oncl

ud

es

pap

er

Th

e o

rgan

izat

ion

al l

ogic

ass

ists

a

read

er’s

un

der

stan

din

g o

f th

e te

xt’

s id

eas.

• E

mp

loys

no

th

esis

sta

tem

ent

or

on

e th

at

do

es n

ot

org

aniz

e th

e p

aper

• E

mp

loys

con

fusi

ng a

rran

gem

ent

of

¶s

• E

mp

loys

con

fusi

ng a

rran

gem

ent

of

idea

s

wit

hin

eac

h ¶

• E

mp

loys

vag

ue

intr

od

uct

ion a

nd

/or

sum

mar

y c

on

clu

sio

n.

Lac

k o

f p

urp

ose

ful

org

aniz

atio

n m

akes

it

dif

ficu

lt f

or

a re

ader

to

und

erst

and

id

eas.

DE

VE

LO

PM

EN

T

Giv

en t

he

purp

ose

and

aud

ien

ce,

the

wri

tten

tex

t…

• E

ffec

tiv

ely e

mp

loys

gen

eral

po

ints

as

reas

on

s th

at s

up

po

rt t

he

thes

is

• E

ffec

tiv

ely s

tate

s an

d t

ies

in p

arti

cula

r

det

ails

(fr

om

nar

rati

ve,

co

nta

inin

g t

ext,

and

add

itio

nal

tex

ts)

as e

vid

ence

• E

ffec

tiv

ely i

nte

gra

tes

add

itio

nal

so

urc

es

(via

su

mm

ary,

par

aph

rase

, o

r q

uota

tio

n)

• A

deq

uat

ely e

mp

loys

gen

eral

po

ints

as

reas

on

s th

at s

up

po

rt t

he

thes

is

• A

deq

uat

ely s

tate

s an

d t

ies

in p

arti

cula

r

det

ails

(fr

om

nar

rati

ve,

co

nta

inin

g t

ext,

an

d

add

itio

nal

tex

ts)

as e

vid

ence

• A

deq

uat

ely i

nte

gra

tes

add

itio

nal

so

urc

es

(via

su

mm

ary,

par

aph

rase

, o

r q

uota

tio

n)

• D

oes

no

t ex

pla

in g

ener

al p

oin

ts a

s re

aso

ns

that

sup

po

rt t

he

thes

is, o

r st

ates

gen

eral

po

ints

that

are

vag

ue

or

con

fusi

ng

• E

mp

loys

litt

le o

r n

o e

vid

ence

, or

reli

es

pri

mar

ily o

n s

um

mar

y

• D

emo

nst

rate

s in

effe

ctiv

e u

se o

f ad

dit

ion

al

sou

rces

INF

OR

MA

TIO

N L

ITE

RA

CY

Giv

en t

he

purp

ose

and

aud

ien

ce,

the

wri

tten

tex

t…

• E

ffec

tiv

ely r

eco

gn

izes

an

d a

dd

ress

es

nee

ds

for

info

rmat

ion

fro

m e

xte

rnal

sou

rces

• E

ffec

tiv

ely e

mp

loys

rhet

ori

cal

anal

ysi

s

in d

iscu

ssio

n o

f al

l te

xts

• U

ses

clea

r at

trib

uti

ve

ph

rase

s an

d

effe

ctiv

ely c

red

its

sou

rces

wit

h c

on

sist

ent

inte

rnal

ML

A s

tyle

par

enth

etic

al c

itat

ion

s

• P

rese

nts

acc

ura

te M

LA

wo

rks

cite

d l

ist

• R

eco

gn

izes

an

d a

dd

ress

es n

eeds

for

info

rmat

ion

fro

m e

xte

rnal

so

urc

es

• P

ays

som

e at

ten

tio

n t

o r

het

ori

cal

anal

ysi

s

in d

iscu

ssio

n o

f te

xts

• U

ses

attr

ibu

tio

n a

nd

cre

dit

s so

urc

es v

ia

inte

rnal

ML

A s

tyle

par

enth

etic

al c

itat

ion

s

wit

h o

nly

a f

ew i

nco

nsi

sten

cies

or

erro

rs

• P

rese

nts

co

mp

eten

t M

LA

wo

rks

cite

d l

ist

• I

nad

equ

atel

y a

dd

ress

es n

eed

s fo

r

info

rmat

ion

fro

m e

xte

rnal

so

urc

es

• P

ays

litt

le o

r n

o a

tten

tio

n t

o r

het

ori

cal

anal

ysi

s in

dis

cuss

ion

of

texts

• O

mit

s m

any a

ttri

bu

tive

ph

rase

s an

d u

ses

few

or

un

clea

r M

LA

sty

le c

itat

ion

s

• P

rese

nts

in

com

ple

te o

r in

accu

rate

ML

A

wo

rks

cite

d l

ist

ST

UD

EN

T E

XP

ER

T’S

ET

HO

S

the

wri

tten

tex

t em

plo

ys

an

acad

emic

vo

ice

that

• D

emo

nst

rate

s co

nfi

den

t an

d

auth

ori

tati

ve

und

erst

and

ing o

f th

e co

nte

nt

• D

emo

nst

rate

s p

erso

nal

en

gag

emen

t

wit

h t

he

con

ten

t (i

dea

s, v

alu

es,

bel

iefs

)

Rea

der

s p

erce

ive

this

tex

tual

vo

ice

as

reli

able

.

• D

emo

nst

rate

s g

ener

al u

nd

erst

and

ing o

f

the

con

ten

t

• D

emo

nst

rate

s so

me

per

son

al e

ngag

emen

t

wit

h t

he

con

ten

t

Rea

der

s p

erce

ive

this

tex

tual

vo

ice

as

mo

stly

rel

iab

le.

• D

emo

nst

rate

s li

ttle

or

no

un

der

stan

din

g o

f

the

con

ten

t

• D

emo

nst

rate

s li

ttle

or

no

per

son

al

engag

emen

t w

ith

th

e co

nte

nt

Rea

der

s p

erce

ive

this

tex

tual

vo

ice

as

un

reli

able

.

FYE Assessment Report Appendix B, FYE Rubrics September 2012

Page 6: Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis - Marquette University · 2013-08-26 · Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis July 2009 Writing Conventions UDIENCE 3 – Uses well Proficient Outcome chosen vocabulary

FY

E P

rog

ram

at

Ma

rqu

ette

Un

iver

sity

Ru

bri

c fo

r S

cori

ng

En

gli

sh 1

– U

nit

4, N

arr

ati

ve

Lit

era

cy

Wri

tin

g C

on

ven

tio

ns

3 –

Pro

fici

ent

Ou

tcom

e

(A,

AB

)

2 –

Com

pet

ent

Ou

tcom

e

(B, B

C,

C)

1 –

Dev

elo

pin

g O

utc

om

e

(CD

, D

, F

)

RE

AD

AB

ILIT

Y

The

wri

tten

text…

• C

on

tain

s fe

w o

r n

o e

rro

rs i

n s

pel

lin

g,

gra

mm

ar,

pu

nct

uat

ion

, o

r se

nte

nce

stru

ctu

re

• E

ffec

tiv

ely u

ses

sen

ten

ces

wit

h c

lear

sub

ject

s &

ver

bs,

par

alle

lism

, tr

ansi

tion

s

• S

ho

ws

evid

ence

of

hav

ing a

tten

ded

to

old

-new

co

ntr

act

to e

nh

ance

rea

dab

ilit

y

• U

ses

wel

l-ch

ose

n v

oca

bu

lary

fo

r an

effe

ctiv

e ac

adem

ic s

tyle

• C

on

tain

s so

me

dis

trac

tin

g e

rro

rs i

n

spel

lin

g,

gra

mm

ar,

pu

nct

uat

ion

, or

sen

ten

ce

stru

ctu

re, b

ut

thes

e er

rors

do

no

t in

terf

ere

wit

h c

om

pre

hen

sio

n

• I

ncl

ud

es s

ente

nce

seq

uen

ces

that

nee

d

tran

siti

on

s, p

aral

lel

stru

ctu

re,

and

/or

app

lica

tion

of

old

-new

co

ntr

act

pri

nci

ple

s

• L

arg

ely e

mp

loys

app

rop

riat

e ac

adem

ic

style

• C

on

tain

s nu

mer

ou

s d

istr

acti

ng e

rro

rs i

n

spel

lin

g,

gra

mm

ar,

pu

nct

uat

ion

, or

sen

ten

ce

stru

ctu

re,

som

e o

f w

hic

h i

nte

rfer

e w

ith

a

read

er’s

un

der

stan

din

g

• C

on

tain

s no

evid

ence

of

atte

nti

on

to

tran

siti

on

s, p

aral

leli

sm,

or

the

old

-new

con

trac

t

• C

on

tain

s vo

cab

ula

ry c

ho

ices

co

nfu

sin

g o

r

inap

pro

pri

ate

for

an a

cad

emic

sty

le

FYE Assessment Report Appendix B, FYE Rubrics September 2012

Page 7: Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis - Marquette University · 2013-08-26 · Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis July 2009 Writing Conventions UDIENCE 3 – Uses well Proficient Outcome chosen vocabulary

Fir

st-Y

ear

En

gli

sh P

rog

ram

at

Ma

rqu

ette

Un

iver

sity

Rub

ric

for

Sco

ring

Ora

l Pr

ese

ntation

s in E

nglish

2, All U

nits

Ja

nu

ary 2

00

9

See o

ther

side f

or c

rite

ria r

elate

d t

o no

nverb

al asp

ect

s of

delive

ry.

CO

NV

EN

TIO

NS

3 –

Pro

fici

ent

Ou

tcom

e

(A,

AB

)

2 –

Com

pet

ent

Ou

tcom

e

(B, B

C,

C)

1 –

Dev

elo

pin

g O

utc

om

e

(CD

, D

, F

) 1. R

het

ori

cal

Neg

oti

ati

on

of

PU

RP

OS

E &

AU

DIE

NC

E

Th

e sp

eake

r…

• E

ffec

tiv

ely c

on

vey

s p

urp

ose

of

talk

nea

r

beg

inn

ing o

f p

rese

nta

tio

n

• E

ffec

tiv

ely e

stab

lish

es e

tho

s o

f co

lleg

e

stu

den

t ex

per

t: a

uth

ori

ty a

nd

en

gag

emen

t

• E

xp

lici

tly p

rovid

es b

ackgro

und i

nfo

rma-

tio

n c

onn

ecti

ng t

o p

rio

r cl

ass

dis

cuss

ion

Lis

ten

ers

are

def

init

ely p

ersu

aded

to

con

sid

er t

he

spea

ker

’s i

dea

s.

Th

e sp

eake

r…

• S

tate

s p

urp

ose

of

talk

• C

on

tro

ls m

ater

ial

suff

icie

ntl

y t

o c

on

vey

eth

os

of

coll

ege

stu

den

t ex

per

t

• P

rovid

es s

om

e b

ackgro

un

d i

nfo

rmat

ion

wit

hin

co

nte

xt

of

clas

s d

iscu

ssio

ns

Lis

ten

ers

are

pro

bab

ly p

ersu

aded

to

con

sid

er t

he

spea

ker

’s i

dea

s.

Th

e sp

eake

r…

• V

agu

ely e

xp

ress

es p

urp

ose

of

talk

or

leav

es i

t im

pli

cit

• S

eem

s o

ver

wh

elm

ed b

y c

on

ten

t, f

aili

ng

to c

on

vey

eth

os

of

coll

ege

stu

den

t ex

per

t

• G

ives

lit

tle

atte

nti

on

to

aud

ien

ce’s

info

rmat

ion

nee

ds

or

clas

sroo

m c

on

text

Lis

ten

ers

are

no

t p

ersu

aded

to c

on

sid

er

the

text’

s id

eas.

2. O

RG

AN

IZA

TIO

N/L

OG

IC

• A

rran

gem

ent

of

info

rmat

ion

and

id

eas

engag

es a

ud

ien

ce.

• I

ntr

od

uct

ion e

ffec

tiv

ely g

rab

s li

sten

ers’

atte

nti

on

and

fo

cuse

s p

urp

ose

.

• E

ffec

tiv

ely s

tate

d m

ain

po

ints

sta

nd

ou

t.

• T

ran

siti

on

s en

han

ce t

he

org

aniz

atio

n.

• C

on

clu

sion

wra

ps

up

pu

rpo

se o

f

pre

sen

tati

on i

n s

atis

fyin

g m

ann

er.

• A

ud

ien

ce c

an f

oll

ow

pre

sen

tati

on

’s

arra

ngem

ent

of

info

rmat

ion

an

d i

dea

s.

• I

ntr

od

uct

ion i

s gen

eral

ly f

ocu

sed

on

spea

ker

’s p

urp

ose

.

• M

ain

po

ints

are

cle

ar.

• T

ran

siti

on

s ar

e cl

ear.

• C

on

clu

sion

wra

ps

up

pu

rpo

se o

f

pre

sen

tati

on a

deq

uat

ely.

• L

ogic

beh

ind a

rran

gem

ent

of

info

rmat

ion

and

id

eas

is d

iffi

cult

to

fo

llo

w.

• C

urs

ory

in

tro

du

ctio

n l

acks

focu

s in

ter

ms

of

spea

ker

’s p

urp

ose

.

• M

ain

po

ints

are

dif

ficu

lt t

o i

den

tify

.

• T

ran

siti

on

s ar

e im

pli

cit

or

mis

sin

g.

• P

rese

nta

tio

n s

top

s ra

ther

th

an c

on

clud

es;

wra

p u

p o

f p

urp

ose

is

un

clea

r o

r m

issi

ng.

3. D

EV

EL

OP

ME

NT

OF

ID

EA

S

Th

e sp

eake

r…

• E

ffec

tiv

ely e

mp

loys

reas

on

s &

evid

ence

• U

ses

evid

ence

an

d r

easo

ns

that

eff

ecti

vel

y

engag

e w

ith

au

die

nce

’s v

alu

es a

nd

bac

k-

gro

und

kn

ow

led

ge

• M

eets

tim

e re

qu

irem

ents

Th

e sp

eake

r…

• A

deq

uat

ely e

mp

loys

reas

on

s &

evid

ence

• U

ses

evid

ence

an

d r

easo

ns

that

co

nn

ect

wit

h a

ud

ien

ce’s

val

ues

an

d b

ackg

roun

d

kn

ow

led

ge

• M

eets

tim

e re

qu

irem

ents

, b

ut

rush

ed

Th

e sp

eake

r…

• E

mp

loys

fau

lty r

easo

ns

and

/or

use

s

inad

equ

ate

supp

ort

ing e

vid

ence

• D

oes

no

t u

se e

vid

ence

an

d r

easo

ns

that

con

nec

t w

ith

aud

ien

ce’s

val

ues

an

d

bac

kgro

un

d

• D

oes

n’t

mee

t ti

me

req

uir

emen

ts

4. V

ER

BA

L D

EL

IVE

RY

• V

oca

bu

lary

is

wel

l ch

ose

n f

or

a cl

assr

oo

m

talk

.

• L

angu

age

is a

rtic

ula

ted

wel

l.

• C

on

ten

t em

anat

es f

rom

sp

eaker

’s

kn

ow

led

ge—

talk

is

no

t m

emo

rize

d o

r re

ad i

n

sen

ten

ces

fro

m n

ote

s.

• S

ente

nce

str

uct

ure

en

han

ces

list

ener

s’

com

pre

hen

sio

n—

pre

sen

tati

on

app

ears

to

hav

e b

een

wri

tten

/pla

nn

ed t

o b

e hea

rd.

• S

pea

ker

eff

ecti

vel

y m

od

ula

tes

vo

ice

vo

lum

e as

nee

ded

.

• S

pea

ker

eff

ecti

vel

y m

od

ula

tes

rate

of

spea

kin

g.

• S

pea

ker

co

nvey

s an

eff

ecti

ve

level

of

enth

usi

asm

.

• W

ord

ch

oic

es a

re a

pp

rop

riat

e fo

r a

clas

sro

om

tal

k.

• L

angu

age

is g

ener

ally

cle

arly

sp

oken

.

• S

pea

ker

ap

pea

rs u

nce

rtai

n a

t ti

mes

,

over

ly r

elia

nt

on n

ote

s o

r m

emo

riza

tio

n.

• S

ente

nce

str

uct

ure

do

es n

ot

inte

rfer

e

wit

h l

iste

ner

s’ c

om

pre

hen

sio

n b

ut

do

es

no

t ap

pea

r to

hav

e b

een

wri

tten

/pla

nn

ed

for

list

enin

g a

udie

nce

.

• S

pea

ker

ap

pro

pri

atel

y m

od

ula

tes

vo

ice

vo

lum

e as

nee

ded

.

• S

pea

ker

ap

pro

pri

atel

y m

od

ula

tes

rate

of

spea

kin

g.

• S

pea

ker

co

nvey

s a

gen

eral

ly a

pp

rop

riat

e

level

of

enth

usi

asm

.

• S

om

e vo

cab

ula

ry c

ho

ices

are

co

nfu

sin

g

or

inap

pro

pri

ate

for

a cl

assr

oo

m t

alk.

• L

angu

age

is t

oo

fre

qu

entl

y u

ncl

ear.

• T

alk i

s m

emo

rized

or

pri

mar

ily r

ead

,

mak

ing s

pea

ker

dis

tan

t fr

om

co

nte

nt

and

aud

ien

ce.

• S

ente

nce

str

uct

ure

in

terf

eres

wit

h

list

ener

s’ c

om

pre

hen

sio

n, ta

lk a

pp

ears

to

hav

e b

een

wri

tten

/pla

nn

ed t

o b

e re

ad.

• S

pea

ker

do

es n

ot

mo

du

late

vo

ice

vo

lum

e

as n

eed

ed.

• S

pea

ker

do

es n

ot

mo

du

late

sp

eed

of

pre

sen

tati

on a

s n

eed

ed.

• S

pea

ker

do

es n

ot

con

vey

an

ap

pro

pri

ate

level

of

enth

usi

asm

.

FYE Assessment Report Appendix B, FYE Rubrics September 2012

Page 8: Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis - Marquette University · 2013-08-26 · Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis July 2009 Writing Conventions UDIENCE 3 – Uses well Proficient Outcome chosen vocabulary

Jan

uar

y 2

00

9

5. N

ON

VE

RB

AL

DE

LIV

ER

Y

• S

pea

ker

’s p

ost

ure

, ges

ture

s, a

nd

fac

ial

exp

ress

ion

s en

han

ce d

eliv

ery.

• S

pea

ker

mak

es e

ffec

tiv

e ey

e co

nta

ct w

ith

aud

ien

ce m

emb

ers.

• S

pea

ker

’s a

ttir

e is

ap

pro

pri

ate

and

pro

fess

ion

al.

• S

pea

ker

eff

ecti

vel

y h

and

les

no

tes,

Po

wer

Po

int,

oth

er p

rop

s.

• S

pea

ker

’s p

ost

ure

, ges

ture

s, a

nd

fac

ial

exp

ress

ion

s d

o n

ot

inte

rfer

e w

ith

eff

ecti

ve

del

iver

y.

• S

pea

ker

lo

oks

at a

ud

ien

ce m

ore

th

an a

t

no

tes.

• S

pea

ker

’s a

ttir

e is

ap

pro

pri

ate

and

pro

fess

ion

al.

• S

pea

ker

is

no

t o

ver

ly d

epen

den

t o

n

no

tes,

Po

wer

Po

int,

oth

er p

rop

s.

• S

pea

ker

’s p

ost

ure

, ges

ture

s, a

nd

/or

faci

al

exp

ress

ion

s ar

e d

istr

acti

ng e

nou

gh

to

inte

rfer

e w

ith

eff

ecti

ve

del

iver

y.

• S

pea

ker

lo

oks

at n

ote

s m

ore

th

an a

t

aud

ien

ce.

• S

pea

ker

’s a

ttir

e is

in

app

rop

riat

e o

r

un

pro

fess

ion

al.

• S

pea

ker

is

over

ly d

epen

den

t on n

ote

s,

Po

wer

Po

int,

oth

er p

rop

s.

Not

e: Ind

ivid

ual in

stru

ctor

s m

ay w

ish t

o ad

d a

six

th lin

e

of c

rite

ria

rela

ted t

o vi

sual

aid

s fo

r or

al p

rese

ntat

ions

; in

deed,

if y

ou a

re r

equ

irin

g st

udent

s to

use

pre

sent

atio

n so

ftw

are

dur

ing

their

tal

ks

and y

ou a

re t

eac

hin

g th

em

how

to

use it

eff

ect

ively

, yo

u ar

e a

dvi

sed t

o est

ablish

gra

din

g st

andar

ds

for

this

asp

ect

of

the p

rese

ntat

ions

.

FYE Assessment Report Appendix B, FYE Rubrics September 2012

Page 9: Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis - Marquette University · 2013-08-26 · Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis July 2009 Writing Conventions UDIENCE 3 – Uses well Proficient Outcome chosen vocabulary

Fir

st-Y

ear

En

gli

sh P

rog

ram

at

Ma

rqu

ette

Un

iver

sity

Ru

bri

c fo

r S

cori

ng

En

gli

sh 2

– U

nit

1, V

isu

al

Lit

era

cy

Jan

uar

y 2

00

9

WR

ITIN

G C

ON

VE

NT

ION

S

3 –

Pro

fici

ent

Ou

tcom

e

(A,

AB

)

2 –

Com

pet

ent

Ou

tcom

e

(B, B

C,

C)

1 –

Dev

elo

pin

g O

utc

om

e

(CD

, D

, F

) R

het

ori

cal

Neg

oti

ati

on

of

PU

RP

OS

E &

AU

DIE

NC

E

Th

e w

ritt

en t

ext…

• E

ffec

tiv

ely e

xp

ress

es v

ia i

ntr

odu

ctio

n &

thes

is s

tate

men

t as

sign

ed p

urp

ose

to

anal

yze

an

d i

nte

rpre

t th

e rh

eto

rica

l im

pac

t

of

nar

rati

ve

and

cu

ltura

l el

emen

ts i

n t

wo

vis

ual

tex

ts w

/ “c

om

mo

n d

eno

min

ato

r”

• E

ffec

tiv

ely s

ho

ws

ho

w a

nal

yzi

ng t

he

two

vis

ual

s to

get

her

rev

eals

cu

ltu

ral

and

nar

rati

ve

dim

ensi

on

s an

d r

het

ori

cal

pu

rpo

ses

of

each

• E

ffec

tiv

ely a

dd

ress

es c

lass

an

d t

each

er

w/i

n c

om

mo

n c

on

ver

sati

on

ab

ou

t vis

ual

rhet

ori

c an

d n

arra

tive

Rea

der

s ar

e d

efin

itel

y p

ersu

aded

to

con

sid

er t

he

stud

ent’

s id

eas.

• E

xp

ress

es i

n i

ntr

odu

ctio

n a

nd

/or

thes

is

stat

emen

t as

sign

ed p

urp

ose

to

an

alyze

an

d

inte

rpre

t th

e rh

eto

rica

l im

pac

t o

f n

arra

tive

and

cu

ltu

ral

elem

ents

in

tw

o v

isu

al t

exts

• C

on

nec

ts r

het

ori

cal

effe

ct o

f n

arra

tive

and

cult

ura

l el

emen

ts i

n o

ne

text

to t

ho

se o

f th

e

oth

er

• A

dd

ress

es c

lass

an

d t

each

er a

s p

art

of

com

mo

n c

on

ver

sati

on

ab

ou

t vis

ual

rh

eto

ric

and

nar

rati

ve

Rea

der

s ar

e p

rob

ably

per

suad

ed t

o

con

sid

er t

he

stud

ent’

s id

eas.

• V

agu

ely e

xp

ress

es a

ssig

ned

pu

rpo

se t

o

anal

yze

an

d i

nte

rpre

t th

e rh

eto

rica

l im

pac

t

of

nar

rati

ve

and

cu

ltura

l el

emen

ts i

n t

wo

vis

ual

tex

ts—

thes

is u

ncl

ear,

mis

sin

g,

or

pu

rely

des

crip

tive

• I

gn

ore

s o

r in

adeq

uat

ely d

evel

op

s

rhet

ori

cal

effe

ct o

f n

arra

tive

& c

ult

ura

l

elem

ents

; d

iscu

ssio

n r

elie

s p

rim

aril

y o

n

form

al d

escr

ipti

on

of

the

vis

ual

tex

ts

• G

ives

lit

tle

atte

nti

on

to c

on

ver

sati

on a

nd

exp

erie

nce

sh

ared

wit

h a

ud

ien

ce

Rea

der

s ar

e n

ot

per

suad

ed t

o c

on

sid

er

the

text’

s id

eas.

OR

GA

NIZ

AT

ION

/LO

GIC

Giv

en t

he

pu

rpo

se a

nd

au

die

nce

,

the

wri

tten

tex

t…

• E

mp

loys

thes

is s

tate

men

t th

at r

esp

ond

s

spec

ific

ally

to

th

e in

terp

reti

ve

assi

gn

men

t,

focu

ses

the

pap

er,

and

fo

reca

sts

pap

er’s

org

aniz

atio

n

• E

mp

loys

logic

al a

rran

gem

ent

of

¶s

• E

mp

loys

logic

al a

rran

gem

ent

of

idea

s

wit

hin

par

agra

ph

s

• E

mp

loys

effe

ctiv

e in

trod

uct

ion

an

d c

on

-

clu

sio

n,

wh

ich

mo

ves

bey

on

d s

um

mar

y

Th

e o

rgan

izat

ion

al l

ogic

en

han

ces

a

read

er’s

un

der

stan

din

g o

f th

e te

xt’

s id

eas.

• E

mp

loys

thes

is s

tate

men

t th

at c

on

nec

ts

wit

h t

he

inte

rpre

tive

assi

gn

men

t, p

rovid

es

focu

s, a

nd

su

gges

ts a

n o

rgan

izat

ion

al l

ogic

for

the

pap

er

• E

mp

loys

clea

r ar

ran

gem

ent

of

¶s

• E

mp

loys

clea

r ar

ran

gem

ent

of

idea

s

wit

hin

mo

st p

arag

rap

hs

• E

mp

loys

a cl

ear

intr

odu

ctio

n a

nd

con

clu

sio

n

Th

e o

rgan

izat

ion

al l

ogic

ass

ists

a

read

er’s

un

der

stan

din

g o

f th

e te

xt’

s id

eas.

• L

acks

thes

is s

tate

men

t co

nn

ecti

ng t

o t

he

inte

rpre

tive

assi

gn

men

t, o

r la

cks

focu

s

that

co

nn

ects

to b

od

y o

f th

e p

aper

• E

mp

loys

con

fusi

ng a

rran

gem

ent

of

¶s

• E

mp

loys

con

fusi

ng a

rran

gem

ent

of

idea

s w

ith

in m

ost

par

agra

ph

s

• E

mp

loys

form

ula

ic i

ntr

odu

ctio

n a

nd

con

clu

sio

n d

isco

nn

ecte

d f

rom

in

terp

reti

ve

pu

rpo

se o

f th

e p

aper

Org

aniz

atio

n p

rob

lem

s m

ake

it d

iffi

-

cult

fo

r re

ader

to

und

erst

and t

ext’

s id

eas.

D

EV

EL

OP

ME

NT

Giv

en t

he

pu

rpo

se a

nd

au

die

nce

,

the

wri

tten

tex

t…

• E

ffec

tiv

ely d

evel

op

s b

od

y p

arag

rap

hs

cen

tere

d o

n w

rite

r’s

ow

n g

ener

al p

oin

ts,

wh

ich

ser

ve

as r

easo

ns

sup

po

rtin

g t

he

thes

is

• E

ffec

tiv

ely s

up

po

rts/

dev

elo

ps

thes

e

po

ints

wit

h d

etai

ls a

bo

ut

the

vis

ual

tex

ts

der

ived

fro

m p

erso

nal

ob

serv

atio

n,

idea

s

in s

ou

rce

texts

, an

d e

xte

rnal

res

earc

h

• A

deq

uat

ely c

ente

rs b

od

y p

arag

rap

hs

on

stat

emen

ts o

f w

rite

r’s

ow

n g

ener

al p

oin

ts,

wh

ich

su

ppo

rt t

he

thes

is

• A

deq

uat

ely s

up

po

rts/

dev

elo

ps

thes

e

po

ints

wit

h d

etai

ls a

bo

ut

the

vis

ual

tex

ts

der

ived

fro

m p

erso

nal

ob

serv

atio

n,

idea

s in

sou

rce

texts

, an

d e

xte

rnal

res

earc

h

• S

tate

s gen

eral

po

ints

th

at a

re v

agu

e,

con

fusi

ng,

or

un

rela

ted t

o t

hes

is;

or

pre

-

sen

ts p

arag

rap

hs

wit

ho

ut

po

int

sen

ten

ces

• P

rese

nts

det

ails

th

at f

un

ctio

n a

s

des

crip

tion

or

sum

mar

y,

bu

t n

ot

as

evid

ence

• O

r p

rovid

es t

oo f

ew s

up

po

rtin

g d

etai

ls

• O

mit

s o

r u

ses

con

fusi

ng ¶

bre

aks

WR

ITE

R’S

ET

HO

S

Giv

en t

he

pu

rpo

se a

nd

au

die

nce

,

the

wri

tten

tex

t em

plo

ys a

text

ua

l vo

ice

tha

t…

• D

emo

nst

rate

s co

nfi

den

t, a

uth

ori

tati

ve

un

der

stan

din

g o

f th

e as

sign

ed i

nte

rpre

tive

pu

rpo

se a

nd c

onte

nt

• D

emo

nst

rate

s p

erso

nal

en

gag

emen

t

wit

h p

urp

ose

& c

on

ten

t (v

ia t

he

wri

ter’

s

idea

s, i

nsi

gh

ts,

val

ues

, b

elie

fs)

Rea

der

s p

erce

ive

this

tex

tual

vo

ice

as

tru

stw

ort

hy.

• D

emo

nst

rate

s g

ener

al u

nd

erst

and

ing o

f

the

assi

gn

ed i

nte

rpre

tive

pu

rpo

se a

nd

con

ten

t

• D

emo

nst

rate

s so

me

per

son

al e

ngag

emen

t

wit

h p

urp

ose

& c

on

ten

t (v

ia t

he

wri

ter’

s

idea

s, i

nsi

gh

ts,

val

ues

, b

elie

fs)

Rea

der

s p

erce

ive

this

tex

tual

vo

ice

as

mo

stly

tru

stw

ort

hy.

• D

emo

nst

rate

s li

ttle

or

no

un

der

stan

din

g

of

the

assi

gn

ed i

nte

rpre

tive

pu

rpose

an

d

con

ten

t

• D

emo

nst

rate

s li

ttle

or

no

per

son

al

engag

emen

t w

ith

pu

rpo

se a

nd c

on

ten

t

Rea

der

s p

erce

ive

this

tex

tual

vo

ice

as

un

tru

stw

ort

hy o

r u

nco

nvin

cin

g

FYE Assessment Report Appendix B, FYE Rubrics September 2012

Page 10: Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis - Marquette University · 2013-08-26 · Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis July 2009 Writing Conventions UDIENCE 3 – Uses well Proficient Outcome chosen vocabulary

Fir

st-Y

ear

En

gli

sh P

rog

ram

at

Ma

rqu

ette

Un

iver

sity

Ru

bri

c fo

r S

cori

ng

En

gli

sh 2

– U

nit

1, V

isu

al

Lit

era

cy

Jan

uar

y 2

00

9

RE

AD

AB

ILIT

Y

Giv

en t

he

pu

rpo

se a

nd

au

die

nce

,

the

wri

tten

tex

t…

• C

on

tain

s fe

w o

r n

o e

rro

rs i

n s

pel

lin

g,

gra

mm

ar,

pu

nct

uat

ion

, o

r se

nte

nce

stru

ctu

re

• E

ffec

tiv

ely u

ses

sen

ten

ces

wit

h c

lear

sub

ject

s &

ver

bs,

par

alle

lism

, tr

ansi

tion

s

• S

ho

ws

evid

ence

of

hav

ing a

tten

ded

to

old

-new

co

ntr

act

to e

nh

ance

rea

dab

ilit

y

• U

ses

wel

l-ch

ose

n v

oca

bu

lary

fo

r an

effe

ctiv

e st

yle

• C

on

tain

s so

me

dis

trac

tin

g e

rro

rs i

n

spel

lin

g,

gra

mm

ar,

pu

nct

uat

ion

, or

sen

ten

ce

stru

ctu

re, b

ut

thes

e er

rors

do

no

t in

terf

ere

wit

h c

om

pre

hen

sio

n

• N

eed

s cl

eare

r su

bje

ct-v

erb

seq

uen

ces,

par

alle

l st

ruct

ure

s, o

r ex

pli

cit

tran

siti

on

s to

enh

ance

cla

rity

• N

eed

s ap

pli

cati

on

of

old

-new

co

ntr

act

pri

nci

ple

s to

en

han

ce r

ead

abil

ity

• L

arg

ely e

mp

loys

app

rop

riat

e ac

adem

ic

style

• C

on

tain

s nu

mer

ou

s d

istr

acti

ng e

rro

rs i

n

spel

lin

g,

gra

mm

ar,

pu

nct

uat

ion

, or

sen

ten

ce s

tru

ctu

re,

som

e o

f w

hic

h

inte

rfer

e w

ith

a r

ead

er’s

un

der

stan

din

g

• C

on

tain

s li

ttle

or

evid

ence

of

atte

nti

on

to s

ub

ject

-ver

b s

equ

ence

, p

aral

leli

sm,

tran

siti

on

s, o

r th

e o

ld-n

ew c

on

trac

t to

enh

ance

cla

rity

an

d r

ead

abil

ity

• C

on

tain

s vo

cab

ula

ry c

ho

ices

co

nfu

sin

g

or

inap

pro

pri

ate

for

an a

cad

emic

sty

le

INF

OR

MA

TIO

N L

ITE

RA

CY

G

iven

th

e p

urp

ose

an

d a

ud

ience

,

the

wri

tten

tex

t…

• E

ffec

tiv

ely a

dd

ress

es n

eed

fo

r

info

rmat

ion

fr

exte

rnal

so

urc

es

• E

ffec

tiv

ely e

mp

loys

rhet

ori

cal

anal

ysi

s

in d

iscu

ssio

n o

f al

l te

xts

• P

rovid

es c

lear

att

ribu

tive

ph

rase

s an

d

effe

ctiv

ely c

red

its

sou

rces

via

co

nsi

sten

t

inte

rnal

AP

A s

tyle

par

enth

etic

al c

itat

ion

s

• P

rese

nts

tho

rou

gh

and

acc

ura

te A

PA

refe

ren

ces

list

wit

h f

ew o

r n

o e

rrors

• E

ffec

tiv

ely p

rese

nts

th

e vis

ual

tex

ts

un

der

dis

cuss

ion

wit

h c

on

ven

tional

AP

A

form

at a

nd

cap

tion

s fo

r vis

ual

fig

ure

s

• A

dd

ress

es n

eed

fo

r in

form

atio

n f

rom

exte

rnal

so

urc

es

• D

evo

tes

som

e at

ten

tio

n t

o r

het

ori

cal

anal

ysi

s in

dis

cuss

ion

of

texts

• P

rovid

es a

ttri

bu

tio

n a

nd c

red

its

sou

rces

via

in

tern

al A

PA

sty

le p

aren

thet

ical

cit

atio

n

wit

h o

nly

a f

ew i

nco

nsi

sten

cies

or

erro

rs

• P

rese

nts

co

mp

eten

t A

PA

ref

eren

ces

list

wit

h f

orm

at e

rro

rs o

nly

, n

o c

on

ten

t er

rors

• I

ncl

ud

es t

he

vis

ual

tex

ts u

nd

er d

iscu

ssio

n

bu

t w

itho

ut

goo

d A

PA

fo

rmat

an

d c

apti

on

s

for

vis

ual

fig

ure

s

• I

nad

equ

atel

y a

dd

ress

es n

eed

fo

r

info

rmat

ion

fro

m e

xte

rnal

so

urc

es

• I

ncl

ud

es l

ittl

e o

r no

att

enti

on

to

rhet

ori

cal

anal

ysi

s in

dis

cuss

ion

of

texts

• I

ncl

ud

es t

oo

few

att

rib

uti

ve

ph

rase

s an

d

use

s fe

w o

r u

ncl

ear

AP

A c

itat

ion

s

• P

rese

nts

in

com

ple

te o

r in

corr

ectl

y

form

atte

d A

PA

ref

eren

ces

list

• I

ncl

ud

es t

he

vis

ual

tex

ts u

nd

er

dis

cuss

ion w

ith

out

atte

nti

on t

o A

PA

form

atti

ng,

or

fail

s to

in

clu

de

them

FYE Assessment Report Appendix B, FYE Rubrics September 2012

Page 11: Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis - Marquette University · 2013-08-26 · Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis July 2009 Writing Conventions UDIENCE 3 – Uses well Proficient Outcome chosen vocabulary

Fir

st-Y

ear

En

gli

sh P

rog

ram

at

Ma

rqu

ette

Un

iver

sity

Ru

bri

c fo

r S

cori

ng

En

gli

sh 2

– U

nit

2, N

ews

Lit

era

cy

Jan

uar

y 2

00

9

WR

ITIN

G C

ON

VE

NT

ION

S

3 –

Pro

fici

ent

Ou

tcom

e

(A,

AB

)

2 –

Com

pet

ent

Ou

tcom

e

(B, B

C,

C)

1 –

Dev

elo

pin

g O

utc

om

e

(CD

, D

, F

) R

het

ori

cal

Neg

oti

ati

on

of

PU

RP

OS

E &

AU

DIE

NC

E

Th

e w

ritt

en t

ext…

• E

ffec

tiv

ely e

xp

ress

es v

ia i

ntr

odu

ctio

n &

thes

is s

tate

men

t th

e as

sign

ed p

urp

ose

of

eval

uat

ing c

over

age

of

an e

ven

t b

y m

ult

iple

U.S

. &

inte

rnat

ion

al n

ews

med

ia

• E

ffec

tiv

ely d

evel

op

s th

e ar

gu

men

t b

y

app

lyin

g c

lear

ly a

rtic

ula

ted

eval

uat

ive

crit

eria

bas

ed o

n t

he

un

it’s

rea

din

gs

abo

ut

go

od

qu

alit

y j

ou

rnal

ism

• E

ffec

tiv

ely y

et b

riefl

y p

rovid

es n

eed

ed

con

textu

al i

nfo

rmat

ion

re

the

even

t an

d t

he

new

s so

urc

es u

nd

er d

iscu

ssio

n

• E

ffec

tiv

ely a

dd

ress

es c

lass

an

d t

each

er

w/i

n c

om

mo

n c

on

ver

sati

on

ab

ou

t th

e

reli

abil

ity o

f n

ews

rep

ort

s

Rea

der

s ar

e d

efin

itel

y p

ersu

aded

to

con

sid

er t

he

stud

ent’

s id

eas.

• E

xp

ress

es i

n i

ntr

odu

ctio

n a

nd

/or

thes

is

stat

emen

t th

e as

sign

ed p

urp

ose

of

eval

u-

atin

g c

over

age

of

an e

ven

t b

y m

ult

iple

U.S

.

and

in

tern

atio

nal

new

s m

edia

• D

evel

op

s th

e ar

gu

men

t b

y a

pp

lyin

g

exp

lici

t ev

alu

ativ

e cr

iter

ia b

ased

on

th

e

un

it’s

rea

din

gs

abou

t goo

d q

ual

ity

jou

rnal

ism

• P

rovid

es n

eed

ed c

on

textu

al i

nfo

rmat

ion

regar

din

g t

he

even

t an

d t

he

new

s so

urc

es

un

der

dis

cuss

ion

• A

dd

ress

es c

lass

an

d t

each

er a

s p

art

of

com

mo

n c

on

ver

sati

on

ab

ou

t th

e re

liab

ilit

y

of

new

s re

po

rts

Rea

der

s ar

e p

rob

ably

per

suad

ed t

o

con

sid

er t

he

stud

ent’

s id

eas.

• V

agu

ely e

xp

ress

es t

he

assi

gn

ed p

urp

ose

of

eval

uat

ing c

over

age

of

an e

ven

t b

y m

ult

iple

U.S

. an

d i

nte

rnat

ion

al n

ews

med

ia—

thes

is

per

hap

s un

clea

r, m

issi

ng,

or

pu

rely

des

crip

tive

• U

ses

vag

uel

y e

xp

ress

ed o

r o

ver

ly

gen

eral

ized

eval

uat

ive

crit

eria

wit

h m

inim

al

refe

ren

ce t

o t

he

un

it’s

rea

din

gs

• P

rovid

es i

nad

equ

ate

con

textu

al

info

rmat

ion

reg

ard

ing t

he

even

t an

d n

ews

sou

rces

und

er d

iscu

ssio

n O

R d

evo

tes

too

mu

ch s

pac

e to

su

mm

ariz

ing t

he

even

t

• G

ives

to

o l

ittl

e at

ten

tio

n t

o u

nit

rea

din

gs

and

dis

cuss

ion r

e jo

urn

alis

tic

reli

abil

ity

Rea

der

s ar

e n

ot

per

suad

ed t

o c

on

sid

er

the

text’

s id

eas.

OR

GA

NIZ

AT

ION

/LO

GIC

Giv

en t

he

pu

rpo

se a

nd

au

die

nce

, th

e w

ritt

en t

ext…

• E

ffec

tiv

ely e

mp

loys

thes

is s

tate

men

t th

at

mak

es a

n e

val

uat

ive

clai

m a

bo

ut

the

qu

alit

y

of

cover

age

acro

ss m

edia

ou

tlet

s an

d

ind

icat

es c

rite

ria

use

d f

or

the

eval

uat

ion

• E

mp

loys

logic

al a

rran

gem

ent

of

¶s

• E

mp

loys

logic

al a

rran

gem

ent

of

idea

s

wit

hin

par

agra

ph

s

• E

mp

loys

effe

ctiv

e in

trod

uct

ion

an

d c

on

-

clu

sio

n,

wh

ich

mo

ves

bey

on

d s

um

mar

y

Th

e o

rgan

izat

ion

al l

ogic

en

han

ces

a

read

er’s

un

der

stan

din

g o

f th

e te

xt’

s id

eas.

• P

rese

nts

th

esis

sta

tem

ent

wit

h e

val

uat

ive

clai

m a

bo

ut

qu

alit

y o

f co

ver

age

acro

ss

med

ia o

utl

ets

and

in

dic

ates

cri

teri

a u

sed

fo

r

the

eval

uat

ion

• E

mp

loys

clea

r ar

ran

gem

ent

of

¶s

• E

mp

loys

clea

r ar

ran

gem

ent

of

idea

s

wit

hin

mo

st p

arag

rap

hs

• E

mp

loys

a cl

ear

intr

odu

ctio

n a

nd

con

clu

sio

n, w

hic

h m

oves

bey

on

d s

um

mar

y

Th

e o

rgan

izat

ion

al l

ogic

ass

ists

a

read

er’s

un

der

stan

din

g o

f th

e te

xt’

s id

eas.

• L

acks

thes

is s

tate

men

t co

nn

ecti

ng t

o t

he

eval

uat

ive

assi

gn

men

t, a

nd

/or

pre

sen

ts t

hes

is

that

neg

lect

s to

in

dic

ate

crit

eria

use

d f

or

the

eval

uat

ion

• E

mp

loys

con

fusi

ng a

rran

gem

ent

of

¶s

• E

mp

loys

con

fusi

ng a

rran

gem

ent

of

idea

s

wit

hin

mo

st p

arag

rap

hs

• E

mp

loys

form

ula

ic i

ntr

odu

ctio

n a

nd

con

clu

sio

n d

isco

nn

ecte

d f

rom

ev

alu

ativ

e

pu

rpo

se o

f th

e p

aper

Org

aniz

atio

n p

rob

lem

s m

ake

it d

iffi

-cu

lt

for

read

er t

o u

nd

erst

and

tex

t’s

idea

s.

Rem

aini

ng t

hre

e c

ateg

orie

s ar

e o

n op

posi

te s

ide/n

ext

page

:

Deve

lopm

ent

, R

ead

abili

ty, Inf

orm

atio

n Lit

era

cy

FYE Assessment Report Appendix B, FYE Rubrics September 2012

Page 12: Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis - Marquette University · 2013-08-26 · Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis July 2009 Writing Conventions UDIENCE 3 – Uses well Proficient Outcome chosen vocabulary

Jan

uar

y 2

00

9

WR

ITIN

G C

ON

VE

NT

ION

S

3 –

Pro

fici

ent

Ou

tcom

e

(A,

AB

)

2 –

Com

pet

ent

Ou

tcom

e

(B, B

C,

C)

1 –

Dev

elo

pin

g O

utc

om

e

(CD

, D

, F

) D

EV

EL

OP

ME

NT

Giv

en t

he

pu

rpo

se a

nd

au

die

nce

,

the

wri

tten

tex

t…

• E

ffec

tiv

ely s

up

po

rts

thes

is c

laim

wit

h

bo

dy p

arag

rap

hs

exp

lain

ing t

he

crit

eria

-

mat

ch p

roce

ss t

he

wri

ter

is u

sin

g t

o

eval

uat

e th

e n

ews

rep

ort

s u

nd

er

dis

cuss

ion:

See

fra

mew

ork

on

AB

GW

43

9

• E

ffec

tiv

ely d

evel

op

s b

od

y p

arag

rap

hs

fro

m c

lear

po

int

sen

ten

ces

that

sta

te

wri

ter’

s re

aso

nin

g i

n w

rite

r’s

ow

n w

ord

s

• E

ffec

tiv

ely u

ses

sum

mar

y,

par

aph

rase

,

and

qu

ota

tion

to

pre

sen

t d

etai

led

evid

ence

illu

stra

tin

g a

nd

ela

bo

rati

ng u

po

n t

he

wri

ter’

s cr

iter

ia-m

atch

po

ints

• E

ffec

tiv

ely s

um

mar

izes

an

d r

esp

ond

s to

anti

cip

ated

ob

ject

ion

s to

cri

teri

a or

mat

ches

• A

deq

uat

ely s

up

po

rts

thes

is c

laim

wit

h

bo

dy p

arag

rap

hs

exp

lain

ing t

he

crit

eria

-

mat

ch p

roce

ss t

he

wri

ter

is u

sin

g t

o

eval

uat

e th

e n

ews

rep

ort

s u

nd

er

dis

cuss

ion:

See

fra

mew

ork

on

AB

GW

43

9

• A

deq

uat

ely d

evel

op

s b

od

y p

arag

rap

hs

fro

m c

lear

po

int

sen

ten

ces

that

sta

te

wri

ter’

s re

aso

nin

g i

n w

rite

r’s

ow

n w

ord

s

• A

deq

uat

ely u

ses

sum

mar

y,

par

aph

rase

,

and

qu

ota

tion

to

pre

sen

t d

etai

led

evid

ence

illu

stra

tin

g a

nd

ela

bo

rati

ng u

po

n t

he

wri

ter’

s cr

iter

ia-m

atch

po

ints

• A

deq

uat

ely s

um

mar

izes

an

d r

esp

ond

s to

anti

cip

ated

ob

ject

ion

s to

cri

teri

a or

mat

ches

• L

acks

sup

po

rt f

or

thes

is c

laim

bec

ause

bo

dy p

arag

rap

hs

do n

ot

adeq

uat

ely e

xp

lain

the

crit

eria

-mat

ch p

roce

ss t

he

wri

ter

is u

sin

g

to e

val

uat

e th

e n

ews

rep

ort

s un

der

dis

cuss

ion

:

See

fra

mew

ork

on

AB

GW

43

9

• P

rese

nts

bod

y p

arag

rap

hs

wit

ho

ut

clea

r

po

int

sen

ten

ces

stat

ing w

rite

r’s

reas

on

ing i

n

wri

ter’

s o

wn

wo

rds

• L

acks

adeq

uat

e ev

iden

ce t

o i

llust

rate

an

d

elab

ora

te u

po

n w

rite

r’s

crit

eria

-mat

ch p

oin

ts;

det

ails

too

fre

qu

entl

y f

un

ctio

n a

s d

escr

ipti

on

or

sum

mar

y,

no

t ev

iden

ce

• L

acks

adeq

uat

e su

mm

ary o

r re

spo

nse

to

anti

cip

ated

ob

ject

ion

s to

cri

teri

a or

mat

ches

• O

mit

s o

r u

ses

con

fusi

ng ¶

bre

aks

WR

ITE

R’S

ET

HO

S

Giv

en t

he

pu

rpo

se a

nd

au

die

nce

,

the

wri

tten

tex

t em

plo

ys a

text

ua

l vo

ice

tha

t…

• D

emo

nst

rate

s co

nfi

den

t, a

uth

ori

tati

ve

un

der

stan

din

g o

f th

e as

sign

ed e

val

uat

ive

pu

rpo

se a

nd c

onte

nt

• D

emo

nst

rate

s p

erso

nal

en

gag

emen

t

wit

h p

urp

ose

& c

on

ten

t (v

ia t

he

wri

ter’

s

idea

s, i

nsi

gh

ts,

val

ues

, b

elie

fs)

Rea

der

s p

erce

ive

this

tex

tual

vo

ice

as

tru

stw

ort

hy.

• D

emo

nst

rate

s g

ener

al u

nd

erst

and

ing o

f

the

assi

gn

ed e

val

uat

ive

pu

rpo

se a

nd

con

ten

t

• D

emo

nst

rate

s so

me

per

son

al

engag

emen

t w

ith

pu

rpo

se &

co

nte

nt

(via

the

wri

ter’

s id

eas,

in

sigh

ts,

val

ues

, b

eli

efs)

Rea

der

s p

erce

ive

this

tex

tual

vo

ice

as

mo

stly

tru

stw

ort

hy.

• D

emo

nst

rate

s li

ttle

or

no

un

der

stan

din

g o

f

the

assi

gn

ed e

val

uat

ive

pu

rpo

se a

nd

con

ten

t

• D

emo

nst

rate

s li

ttle

or

no

per

son

al

engag

emen

t w

ith

pu

rpo

se a

nd c

on

ten

t (v

ia

the

wri

ter’

s id

eas,

in

sigh

ts,

val

ues

, b

eli

efs)

Rea

der

s p

erce

ive

this

tex

tual

vo

ice

as

un

tru

stw

ort

hy o

r u

nco

nvin

cin

g.

RE

AD

AB

ILIT

Y

Giv

en t

he

pu

rpo

se a

nd

au

die

nce

,

the

wri

tten

tex

t…

• C

on

tain

s fe

w o

r n

o e

rro

rs i

n s

pel

lin

g,

gra

mm

ar,

pu

nct

uat

ion

, o

r se

nte

nce

stru

ctu

re

• E

ffec

tiv

ely u

ses

sen

ten

ces

wit

h c

lear

sub

ject

s &

ver

bs,

par

alle

lism

, &

tran

siti

on

s

• S

ho

ws

evid

ence

of

hav

ing a

tten

ded

to

old

-new

co

ntr

act

to e

nh

ance

rea

dab

ilit

y

• U

ses

wel

l-ch

ose

n v

oca

bu

lary

fo

r an

effe

ctiv

e ac

adem

ic s

tyle

• C

on

tain

s so

me

dis

trac

tin

g e

rro

rs i

n

spel

lin

g,

gra

mm

ar,

pu

nct

uat

ion

, or

sen

ten

ce s

tru

ctu

re, b

ut

they

do

not

inte

rfer

e w

ith

a r

ead

er’s

un

der

stan

din

g

• N

eed

s cl

eare

r su

bje

ct-v

erb

seq

uen

ces,

par

alle

l st

ruct

ure

s, o

r ex

pli

cit

tran

siti

on

s to

enh

ance

cla

rity

• N

eed

s ap

pli

cati

on

of

old

-new

co

ntr

act

pri

nci

ple

s to

en

han

ce r

ead

abil

ity

• L

arg

ely e

mp

loys

app

rop

riat

e ac

adem

ic

vo

cab

ula

ry

• C

on

tain

s nu

mer

ou

s d

istr

acti

ng e

rro

rs i

n

spel

lin

g,

gra

mm

ar,

pu

nct

uat

ion

, or

sen

ten

ce

stru

ctu

re,

som

e o

f w

hic

h i

nte

rfer

e w

ith

a

read

er’s

un

der

stan

din

g

• C

on

tain

s li

ttle

or

evid

ence

of

atte

nti

on

to

sub

ject

-ver

b s

equ

ence

, p

aral

leli

sm,

or

tran

siti

on

s

• C

on

tain

s li

ttle

or

evid

ence

of

atte

nti

on

to

the

old

-new

co

ntr

act

• C

on

tain

s vo

cab

ula

ry c

ho

ices

co

nfu

sin

g o

r

inap

pro

pri

ate

for

an a

cad

emic

sty

le

INF

OR

MA

TIO

N L

ITE

RA

CY

Giv

en t

he

pu

rpo

se a

nd

au

die

nce

,

the

wri

tten

tex

t…

• H

as e

ffec

tivel

y c

ho

sen

new

s so

urc

es t

hat

fit

gu

idel

ines

in

unit

ass

ign

men

t

• P

rovid

es a

cces

s to

all

fiv

e n

ews

sou

rces

via

th

e W

eb o

r cl

earl

y l

abel

ed p

aper

co

py

in p

ort

foli

o

• E

ffec

tiv

ely e

mp

loys

rhet

ori

cal

anal

ysi

s

in d

iscu

ssio

n o

f te

xts

• P

rovid

es c

lear

, ac

cura

te a

ttri

buti

on

an

d

effe

ctiv

ely c

red

its

sou

rces

via

co

nsi

sten

t

inte

rnal

AP

A s

tyle

par

enth

etic

al c

itat

ion

s

• P

rese

nts

tho

rou

gh

and

acc

ura

te A

PA

refe

ren

ces

list

wit

h f

ew o

r n

o e

rrors

• H

as c

ho

sen

new

s so

urc

es a

deq

uat

e fo

r

un

it a

ssig

nm

ent

• P

rovid

es a

cces

s to

all

fiv

e n

ews

sou

rces

via

th

e W

eb o

r cl

earl

y l

abel

ed p

aper

co

py

in p

ort

foli

o

• D

evo

tes

som

e at

ten

tio

n t

o r

het

ori

cal

anal

ysi

s in

dis

cuss

ion

of

texts

• P

rovid

es a

ttri

bu

tio

n a

nd c

red

its

sou

rces

via

in

tern

al A

PA

sty

le p

aren

thet

ical

cita

tio

n w

ith

few

in

con

sist

enci

es o

r er

rors

• P

rese

nts

co

mp

eten

t A

PA

ref

eren

ces

list

wit

h f

orm

at e

rro

rs o

nly

, n

o c

on

ten

t er

rors

• H

as c

ho

sen

new

s so

urc

es i

nad

equ

ate

for

a

com

pet

ent

app

roac

h t

o t

he

assi

gn

men

t

• D

oes

no

t p

rovid

e ad

equ

ate

acce

ss t

o a

ll

fiv

e n

ews

sou

rces

via

Web

or

clea

rly l

abel

ed

pap

er c

op

y i

n p

ort

foli

o

• I

ncl

ud

es l

ittl

e o

r no

att

enti

on

to r

het

ori

cal

anal

ysi

s in

dis

cuss

ion

of

texts

• I

ncl

ud

es t

oo

few

att

rib

uti

ve

ph

rase

s an

d/o

r

use

s to

o f

ew,

un

clea

r, i

nco

nsi

sten

t, o

r

inac

cura

te A

PA

sty

le p

aren

thet

ical

cit

atio

ns

• P

rese

nts

in

com

ple

te,

inco

rrec

tly f

orm

atte

d,

or

inac

cura

te A

PA

ref

eren

ces

list

FYE Assessment Report Appendix B, FYE Rubrics September 2012

Page 13: Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis - Marquette University · 2013-08-26 · Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis July 2009 Writing Conventions UDIENCE 3 – Uses well Proficient Outcome chosen vocabulary

Fir

st-Y

ear

En

gli

sh P

rog

ram

at

Ma

rqu

ette

Un

iver

sity

Ru

bri

c fo

r S

cori

ng

En

gli

sh 2

– U

nit

3, C

ivic

Lit

era

cy

Jan

uar

y 2

00

9

WR

ITIN

G C

ON

VE

NT

ION

S

3 –

Pro

fici

ent

Ou

tcom

e

(A,

AB

)

2 –

Com

pet

ent

Ou

tcom

e

(B, B

C,

C)

1 –

Dev

elo

pin

g O

utc

om

e

(CD

, D

, F

) R

het

ori

cal

Neg

oti

ati

on

of

PU

RP

OS

E &

AU

DIE

NC

E

Th

e w

ritt

en t

ext…

• E

ffec

tiv

ely e

stab

lish

es a

so

cial

iss

ue

as

a rh

eto

rica

l p

roble

m

• E

ffec

tiv

ely s

tate

s it

s p

urp

ose

/thes

is a

t

the

end o

r th

e b

egin

nin

g o

f th

e es

say

• E

ffec

tiv

ely a

dd

ress

es g

ener

al a

ud

ien

ce

of

New

swee

k “M

y T

urn

” re

ader

s

Rea

der

s ar

e d

efin

itel

y p

ersu

aded

to

con

sid

er t

he

text’

s id

eas.

• E

stab

lish

es a

so

cial

iss

ue

as a

rh

eto

rica

l

pro

ble

m

• S

tate

s it

s p

urp

ose

/th

esis

at

the

end

or

the

beg

inn

ing e

ssay

• A

dd

ress

es g

ener

al a

ud

ien

ce o

f

New

swee

k “M

y T

urn

” re

ader

s

Rea

der

s ar

e p

rob

ably

per

suad

ed t

o

con

sid

er t

he

text’

s id

eas.

• D

oes

no

t es

tab

lish

a s

oci

al i

ssue

as a

rhet

ori

cal

pro

ble

m

• V

agu

ely s

tate

s it

s p

urp

ose

/th

esis

• G

ives

lit

tle

atte

nti

on

to

aud

ien

ce

Rea

der

s ar

e n

ot

per

suad

ed t

o c

on

sid

er

the

text’

s id

eas.

OR

GA

NIZ

AT

ION

/LO

GIC

Giv

en t

he

pu

rpo

se a

nd

au

die

nce

,

the

wri

tten

tex

t…

• E

ffec

tiv

ely e

mp

loys

gen

re c

on

ven

tion

s

of

crea

tive

no

n-f

icti

on

• E

ffec

tiv

ely o

rgan

izes

¶s

• E

ffec

tiv

e o

rgan

izes

id

eas

wit

hin

eac

h ¶

• E

ffec

tiv

ely i

ntr

odu

ces

and

con

clu

des

the

essa

y,

avo

idin

g a

su

mm

ary c

on

clu

sion

Th

e o

rgan

izat

ion

al l

ogic

en

han

ces

a

read

er’s

un

der

stan

din

g o

f th

e te

xt’

s id

eas.

• C

lear

ly e

mp

loys

gen

re c

on

ven

tio

ns

of

crea

tive

no

n-f

icti

on

• C

lear

ly a

rran

ges

¶s

• C

lear

ly o

rgan

izes

id

eas

wit

hin

mo

st ¶

s

• A

deq

uat

ely i

ntr

od

uce

s an

d c

oncl

ud

es

the

essa

y

Th

e o

rgan

izat

ion

al l

ogic

ass

ists

a

read

er’s

un

der

stan

din

g o

f th

e te

xt’

s id

eas.

• I

nef

fect

ivel

y e

mp

loys

(or

om

its)

gen

re

con

ven

tion

s of

crea

tive

no

n-f

icti

on

• E

mp

loys

con

fusi

ng a

rran

gem

ent

of

¶s

• E

mp

loys

con

fusi

ng o

rgan

izat

ion

of

idea

s w

ith

in m

ost

¶s

• E

mp

loys

vag

ue

intr

od

uct

ion a

nd

/or

con

clu

sio

n

Org

aniz

atio

n p

rob

lem

s m

ake

it d

iffi

cult

for

a re

ader

to

un

der

stan

d t

he

text’

s id

eas.

D

EV

EL

OP

ME

NT

Giv

en t

he

pu

rpo

se a

nd

au

die

nce

,

the

wri

tten

tex

t…

• E

ffec

tiv

ely t

ells

a s

tory

lin

ked

to

lar

ger

soci

al i

ssu

e th

at w

ou

ld i

nte

rest

rea

der

s

• E

ffec

tiv

ely r

efle

cts

on

wh

at t

he

sto

ry

mea

ns

for

wri

ter

and

oth

ers,

usi

ng

refl

ecti

on

as

a fo

rm o

f tr

uth

-see

kin

g

• E

ffec

tiv

ely e

mp

loys

refl

ecti

on

s as

reas

on

s to

su

pp

ort

sta

ted p

urp

ose

/th

esis

• E

ffec

tiv

ely e

mp

loys

spec

ific

det

ails

to

dev

elo

p s

tory

an

d p

rovid

e ev

iden

ce f

or

refl

ecti

on

s

• A

deq

uat

ely t

ells

a s

tory

lin

ked

to

lar

ger

soci

al i

ssu

e th

at w

ou

ld i

nte

rest

rea

der

s

• A

deq

uat

ely r

efle

cts

on

wh

at t

he

sto

ry

mea

ns

for

wri

ter

and

oth

ers,

usi

ng

refl

ecti

on

as

a fo

rm o

f tr

uth

-see

kin

g

• A

deq

uat

ely e

mp

loys

refl

ecti

on

s as

reas

on

s to

su

pp

ort

sta

ted p

urp

ose

/th

esis

• A

deq

uat

ely e

mp

loys

spec

ific

det

ails

to

dev

elo

p s

tory

an

d p

rovid

e ev

iden

ce f

or

refl

ecti

on

s

• I

nef

fect

ivel

y l

ink

s st

ory

to

lar

ger

so

cial

issu

e th

at m

ay o

r m

ay n

ot

inte

rest

rea

der

s

• I

nef

fect

ivel

y r

efle

cts

on

wh

at t

he

sto

ry

mea

ns

for

wri

ter

and

oth

ers,

in

effe

ctiv

ely

usi

ng r

efle

ctio

n a

s a

form

of

tru

th-s

eekin

g

• I

nef

fect

ivel

y e

mp

loys

refl

ecti

on

s as

reas

on

s to

su

pp

ort

sta

ted p

urp

ose

/th

esis

• I

nef

fect

ivel

y e

mp

loys

spec

ific

det

ails

to

dev

elo

p s

tory

an

d p

rovid

e ev

iden

ce f

or

refl

ect

ion

s W

RIT

ER’S

ET

HO

S

Giv

en t

he

pu

rpo

se a

nd

au

die

nce

,

the

wri

tten

tex

t em

plo

ys a

text

ua

l vo

ice

tha

t…

• D

emo

nst

rate

s co

nfi

den

t, a

uth

ori

tati

ve

un

der

stan

din

g o

f th

e co

nte

nt

• D

emo

nst

rate

s p

erso

nal

en

gag

emen

t

wit

h t

he

con

ten

t (v

ia t

he

wri

ter’

s id

eas,

val

ues

, b

elie

fs)

Rea

der

s p

erce

ive

this

tex

tual

vo

ice

as

tru

stw

ort

hy.

• D

emo

nst

rate

s g

ener

al u

nd

erst

and

ing o

f

the

con

ten

t

• D

emo

nst

rate

s so

me

per

son

al

engag

emen

t w

ith

th

e co

nte

nt

Rea

der

s p

erce

ive

this

tex

tual

vo

ice

as

mo

stly

tru

stw

ort

hy.

• D

emo

nst

rate

s li

ttle

or

no

un

der

stan

din

g

of

th

e co

nte

nt.

• D

emo

nst

rate

s li

ttle

or

no

per

son

al

engag

emen

t w

ith

th

e co

nte

nt.

Rea

der

s p

erce

ive

this

tex

tual

vo

ice

as

un

tru

stw

ort

hy.

RE

AD

AB

ILIT

Y

Giv

en t

he

pu

rpo

se a

nd

au

die

nce

,

the

wri

tten

tex

t…

• C

on

tain

s fe

w o

r n

o e

rro

rs i

n s

pel

lin

g,

gra

mm

ar,

pu

nct

uat

ion

, o

r se

nte

nce

stru

ctu

re

• E

mp

loys

effe

ctiv

e “M

y T

urn

” st

yle

• C

on

tain

s so

me

erro

rs i

n s

pel

ling,

gra

mm

ar,

pu

nct

uat

ion

, o

r se

nte

nce

stru

ctu

re, b

ut

thes

e er

rors

do

no

t in

terf

ere

wit

h c

om

pre

hen

sio

n

• E

mp

loys

som

e el

emen

ts o

f a

“My T

urn

style

• C

on

tain

s nu

mer

ou

s er

rors

in

spel

lin

g,

gra

mm

ar,

pu

nct

uat

ion

, o

r se

nte

nce

stru

ctu

re t

hat

in

terf

ere

wit

h

com

pre

hen

sio

n.

• D

oes

no

t em

plo

y a

“M

y T

urn

” st

yle

FYE Assessment Report Appendix B, FYE Rubrics September 2012

Page 14: Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis - Marquette University · 2013-08-26 · Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis July 2009 Writing Conventions UDIENCE 3 – Uses well Proficient Outcome chosen vocabulary

Fir

st-Y

ear

En

gli

sh P

rog

ram

at

Ma

rqu

ette

Un

iver

sity

Ru

bri

c fo

r S

cori

ng

En

gli

sh 2

– U

nit

4, W

ork

pla

ce L

iter

acy

Ja

nuar

y 2

009

WR

ITIN

G C

ON

VE

NT

ION

S

3 –

Pro

fici

ent

Ou

tcom

e

(A,

AB

)

2 –

Com

pet

ent

Ou

tcom

e

(B, B

C,

C)

1 –

Dev

elo

pin

g O

utc

om

e

(CD

, D

, F

) R

het

ori

cal

Neg

oti

ati

on

of

PU

RP

OS

E &

AU

DIE

NC

E

Th

e w

ritt

en t

ext…

• E

ffec

tiv

ely d

efin

es a

wo

rkp

lace

pro

ble

m a

nd

pro

po

ses

a so

luti

on

• E

ffec

tiv

ely a

dd

ress

es a

n a

ud

ience

wh

o

has

th

e po

wer

to

so

lve

the

pro

ble

m,

wit

h

an e

ye

tow

ard

(a)

in

form

ing t

hem

, (b

)

per

suad

ing t

hem

, (c

) gen

erat

ing g

oo

d w

ill,

and

(d

) sa

vin

g t

hem

tim

e

• E

ffec

tiv

ely i

nd

icat

es w

het

her

ad

dre

ssee

has

req

ues

ted

a r

epo

rt o

r th

is i

s an

un

soli

cite

d r

eco

mm

end

atio

n

Rea

der

s ar

e d

efin

itel

y p

ersu

aded

to

con

sid

er t

he

text’

s id

eas.

• D

efin

es a

wo

rkp

lace

pro

ble

m a

nd

pro

po

ses

a so

luti

on

• A

dd

ress

es a

n a

ud

ien

ce w

ho

has

th

e

po

wer

to

so

lve

the

pro

ble

m,

wit

h a

n e

ye

tow

ard

(a)

in

form

ing t

hem

, (b

) p

ersu

adin

g

them

, (c

) gen

erat

ing g

oo

d w

ill,

an

d (

d)

savin

g t

hem

tim

e

• L

eaves

it

to r

ead

ers

to i

nfe

r w

het

her

add

ress

ee h

as r

equ

este

d a

rep

ort

or

this

is

an u

nso

lici

ted r

eco

mm

end

atio

n

Rea

der

s ar

e p

rob

ably

per

suad

ed t

o

con

sid

er t

he

text’

s id

eas.

• I

nef

fect

ivel

y d

efin

es a

wo

rkp

lace

pro

ble

m a

nd

/or

pro

po

ses

a so

luti

on

• D

oes

no

t ad

dre

ss a

n a

ud

ien

ce w

ho

has

the

po

wer

to

so

lve

the

pro

ble

m

• N

egle

cts

to w

rite

in

way

s th

at (

a) i

nfo

rm

aud

ien

ce,

(b)

per

suad

e au

die

nce

, (c

)

gen

erat

e go

od

wil

l, a

nd

/or

(d)

save

aud

ien

ce’s

tim

e

• D

oes

no

t in

dic

ate

wh

eth

er a

dd

ress

ee h

as

req

ues

ted

a r

epo

rt o

r th

is i

s an

unso

lici

ted

reco

mm

end

atio

n

Rea

der

s ar

e n

ot

per

suad

ed t

o c

on

sid

er

the

text’

s id

eas.

OR

GA

NIZ

AT

ION

/LO

GIC

Giv

en t

he

pu

rpo

se a

nd

au

die

nce

,

the

wri

tten

tex

t…

• E

ffec

tiv

ely e

mp

loys

bu

sin

ess

form

at

con

ven

tion

s

• E

ffec

tiv

ely o

rgan

izes

in

div

idu

al ¶

s

aro

und

maj

or

pro

ble

m-s

olu

tion

po

ints

(Th

ink:

topic

sen

ten

ces

& s

kim

mab

ilit

y.)

Th

e o

rgan

izat

ion

al l

ogic

en

han

ces

a

read

er’s

un

der

stan

din

g o

f th

e te

xt’

s id

eas.

• G

ener

ally

fo

llo

ws

bu

sin

ess

form

at

con

ven

tion

s

• O

rgan

izes

in

div

idu

al ¶

s ar

oun

d m

ajo

r

po

ints

(T

hin

k:

top

ic s

ente

nce

s &

skim

mab

ilit

y.)

Th

e o

rgan

izat

ion

al l

ogic

ass

ists

a

read

er’s

un

der

stan

din

g o

f th

e te

xt’

s id

eas.

• D

oes

no

t fo

llo

w b

usi

nes

s fo

rmat

con

ven

tion

s

• E

mp

loys

con

fusi

ng o

rgan

izat

ion

of

idea

s w

ith

in ¶

s (T

hin

k:

top

ic s

ente

nce

s &

skim

mab

ilit

y.)

Org

aniz

atio

nal

pro

ble

ms

mak

e it

dif

ficu

lt t

o u

nd

erst

and t

he

text’

s id

eas.

DE

VE

LO

PM

EN

T

Giv

en t

he

pu

rpo

se a

nd

au

die

nce

,

the

wri

tten

tex

t…

• H

as e

ffec

tivel

y s

elec

ted

th

e in

form

atio

n

to p

rese

nt

as s

upp

ort

mat

eria

l

• E

ffec

tiv

ely p

rese

nts

th

e in

form

atio

n i

n

term

s o

f re

ader

ben

efit

s an

d n

eed

s

• E

ffec

tiv

ely e

mp

loys

pu

rpo

se s

tate

men

t

and

pro

ble

m s

tate

men

t in

in

trod

uct

ion

• E

ffec

tiv

ely e

mp

loys

con

clu

sio

ns

and

reco

mm

end

atio

ns

• H

as s

elec

ted

ad

equ

ate

info

rmat

ion

to

pre

sen

t as

su

pp

ort

mat

eria

l

• A

deq

uat

ely p

rese

nts

in

form

atio

n i

n

term

s o

f re

ader

ben

efit

s an

d n

eed

s

• A

deq

uat

ely e

mp

loys

pu

rpo

se s

tate

men

t

and

pro

ble

m s

tate

men

t in

in

trod

uct

ion

• A

deq

uat

ely e

mp

loys

con

clu

sions

and

reco

mm

end

atio

ns

• H

as n

ot

sele

cted

in

form

atio

n t

o p

rese

nt

wel

l—to

o m

uch

, to

o l

ittl

e, o

r co

nfu

sin

g

• D

oes

no

t p

rese

nt

info

rmat

ion

in t

erm

s

of

read

er b

enef

its

and

nee

ds

• I

nef

fect

ivel

y e

mp

loys

or

om

its

pu

rpo

se

and

/or

pro

ble

m s

tate

men

ts i

n i

ntr

od

uct

ion

• I

nef

fect

ivel

y e

mp

loys

con

clu

sio

ns

and

reco

mm

end

atio

ns

WR

ITE

R’S

ET

HO

S

Giv

en t

he

pu

rpo

se a

nd

au

die

nce

,

the

wri

tten

tex

t em

plo

ys a

text

ua

l vo

ice

tha

t…

• D

emo

nst

rate

s a

con

fid

ent,

bu

sin

ess-

like

eth

os,

in

clud

ing a

war

enes

s o

f et

hic

al a

nd

legal

co

nce

rns

Rea

der

s p

erce

ive

this

tex

tual

vo

ice

as

kn

ow

led

gea

ble

an

d t

rust

wo

rth

y.

• D

emo

nst

rate

s an

ad

equ

ate

bu

sin

ess-

like

eth

os,

in

clud

ing s

om

e aw

aren

ess

of

eth

ical

an

d l

egal

co

nce

rns

Rea

der

s p

erce

ive

this

tex

tual

vo

ice

as

mo

stly

kn

ow

led

gea

ble

an

d t

rust

wo

rth

y.

• D

emo

nst

rate

s li

ttle

or

no

bu

sin

ess-

like

eth

os,

in

clud

ing l

ittl

e o

r no

aw

aren

ess

of

eth

ical

an

d l

egal

co

nce

rns

Rea

der

s p

erce

ive

this

tex

tual

vo

ice

as

un

kn

ow

led

gea

ble

an

d u

ntr

ust

wo

rth

y.

FYE Assessment Report Appendix B, FYE Rubrics September 2012

Page 15: Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis - Marquette University · 2013-08-26 · Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis July 2009 Writing Conventions UDIENCE 3 – Uses well Proficient Outcome chosen vocabulary

Jan

uar

y 2

00

9

RE

AD

AB

ILIT

Y

Giv

en t

he

pu

rpo

se a

nd

au

die

nce

,

the

wri

tten

tex

t…

• C

on

tain

s fe

w o

r n

o e

rro

rs i

n s

pel

lin

g,

gra

mm

ar,

pu

nct

uat

ion

or

sen

ten

ce

stru

ctu

re

• U

ses

wel

l-ch

ose

n v

oca

bu

lary

fo

r an

effe

ctiv

e w

ork

pla

ce s

tyle

• E

ffec

tiv

ely e

mp

loys

stra

tegie

s o

f

bu

sin

ess

style

(e.

g.,

yo

u-v

iew

str

ateg

y,

po

siti

ve

ph

rasi

ng,

clar

ity,

con

cise

nes

s,

clea

r su

bje

ct p

osi

tion

s)

• E

ffec

tiv

ely p

rovid

es i

n-t

ext

cita

tio

n o

f

sou

rce

mat

eria

ls a

s n

eed

ed

• C

on

tain

s so

me

erro

rs i

n s

pel

ling,

gra

m-

mar

, p

un

ctu

atio

n, o

r se

nte

nce

str

uct

ure

,

bu

t er

rors

do

no

t af

fect

co

mp

reh

ensi

on

• L

arg

ely e

mp

loys

app

rop

riat

e vo

cab

ula

ry

for

a w

ork

pla

ce s

tyle

• E

mp

loys

stra

tegie

s o

f b

usi

nes

s st

yle

(e.g

., y

ou

-vie

w s

trat

egy,

po

siti

ve

ph

rasi

ng,

clar

ity,

con

cise

nes

s, c

lear

su

bje

ct

po

siti

on

s)

• P

rovid

es c

itat

ion

s fo

r so

urc

e m

ater

ials

as n

eed

ed

• C

on

tain

s nu

mer

ou

s er

rors

in

spel

lin

g,

gra

mm

ar,

pu

nct

uat

ion

, o

r se

nte

nce

stru

ctu

re t

hat

aff

ect

com

pre

hen

sio

n

• C

on

tain

s vo

cab

ula

ry c

ho

ices

co

nfu

sin

g

or

inap

pro

pri

ate

for

a w

ork

pla

ce s

tyle

• T

oo

fre

qu

entl

y n

egle

cts

to e

mp

loy

elem

ents

of

app

rop

riat

e b

usi

nes

s st

yle

(e.g

., y

ou

-vie

w s

trat

egy,

po

siti

ve

ph

rasi

ng,

clar

ity,

con

cise

nes

s, c

lear

su

bje

ct

po

siti

on

s)

• D

oes

no

t p

rovid

e n

eed

ed c

itat

ion

s

Not

e: Ins

truc

tors

who

requ

ire a

cov

er m

emo

des

crib

ing

the c

onte

xt

for

the p

ropo

sal sh

ould

sti

pula

te c

rite

ria

for

their

gra

din

g of

that

mem

o, p

erh

aps

just

by

hav

ing

the

firs

t co

lum

n sa

y “t

he w

ritt

en

texts

.”

FYE Assessment Report Appendix B, FYE Rubrics September 2012