Unidentified Flying Vehicles

7/29/2019 Unidentified Flying Vehicles

1/6

Unexplained Flying Vehicles

Peter Thomson 1999/2002

The development of ideas for the charged sheath vortex started withsome simple experiments, and I later applied it to the development oftornados.

It was only later that I considered how it might apply to a containment

vessel for fusion power, and for a flying vehicle.

That work in turn reminded me of an exercise supposedly

hypothetical with several students, analysing unexplained sightings

of flying vehicles. This is what I wrote at that time:

Unexplained Flying VehiclesMy interest in flying vehicles started at an early age when I stood with

my mother at our dining room window and watched a silvery

horizontal line low in the western sky. The object slowly moved downtoward the horizon, leaving behind a trail that looked like black smoke.

The line shrank and disappeared.

As I watched the smoke trail for several minutes, it started to blow

out, but in different directions along its length. The way the trail blew

out indicated high altitude winds, and an object appearing at high

altitude low on the horizon implied the short silvery line we observedwas very long. The silvery line might have been several aircraft flying

wing-tip to wing-tip in formation, the central one laying a smoke trail,

possibly part of a flying display - I don't know.

I am working on the hypothesis that most observations of unidentified

flying vehicles are hoaxes, balloons, or like mine, possibly aircraft in

an unexpected attitude or situation. But I am also assuming that a

small and unknown proportion are of unidentified flying vehicles.

Is there any information in those reports that can suggest whetherthey are real or imaginary vehicles, and if real suggest how they work?

The first characteristic of reports I am rejecting is any report of size or

distance. Unless you can identify precisely what you are looking at,you cannot estimate either size or distance. By definition you don't

know what its surface features are.


2/6

You can measure apparent angular size, such as comparing the size of

an unknown object with a known object at a known distance. You can

also estimate the distance of an unknown object if it passes in front ofor behind a known object, but only if it actually obscures the known

object. Passing nearby is not sufficient. Neither can you tell how far in

front or how far behind it is.

My father worked for a time as an aircraft crash investigator. He told

me that frequently untrained observers would report that an aircraftwent down in flames, when in reality the aircraft flew into the ground

and exploded. These observers often reported lots of little details

accurately, but constructed their own 'story' of the events in which the

little details were out of sequence.

Far more accurate were the individual details recorded by military

personnel who knew they were going to be asked for a report on what

they observed.

So in analysing the data I have looked at the individual details of a

report rather than the overall story.

I have paid more attention to military reports, where the personnel

involved may have believed that what they were observing were their

own sides secret developments - in which case their debriefing may be

checked by someone who knew what they have actually observed - orthey may think they are seeing secret developments by 'the other

side'. In which case again I would expect them to report as accuratelyand objectively as possible what they see.

I have also paid more attention when, what might be insignificant

details are collaborated by independent observers from a different

location who are not aware of each others reports.

My analysis led to a small list of significant features:

A bright blue white light from the front of the vehicle. A single anular bulge round a vehicle, or two anular bulges round

a longer vehicle. Non aerodynamic shape Can hover, or travel at high velocity faster than sound, or match

speed of aircraft. Faster than sound does not produce sonic boom. Able to accelerate and change direction with great rapidity. Only intermittently detected by radar.


3/6

Failure of electrical equipment nearby.My hypothesis is that if such a vehicle exists, a single propulsion

mechanism should be possible that is highly efficient and displays all

these features as essential components of its functioning. This

mechanism needs to be based on simple physics - with no factor Xthat answers everything and explains nothing.

The corollary of this is that if I can devise such a mechanism, then

these unknown flying vehicles are real!

I think I have devised exactly the mechanism suggested in that much

earlier study. Many of the features described in ufo reports were

consistent, but had no logical explanation in the text books ofpropulsion systems and aircraft design. The idea of the aerospike as a

mechanism for achieving aerodynamic properties for non-aerodynamic

vehicles is now well understood. The fusion vortex engine provides the

specific reasons for the design structures and mechanisms described,and predicts most of the side effects reported from ufos

The only conclusion that I can come to is that somebody is alreadyflying such vehicles, and alas, I have not made the dramatic

breakthrough that I thought, or invented a new power generation

system.

However, my next line of research was perhaps the most puzzling.

In trying to deduce what systems might be able to demonstrate fusion

within a charged sheath vortex, I was following up the possibility ofintroducing heavier atomic nuclei such as mercury, and using thecharged sheath vortex to compress this until the lighter fuel nuclei

fused.

This seemed a reasonable hypothesis, so I started searching the

literature to see if anyone had considered this within conventional

fusion research, or whether anything anomalous had been reported

when working with mercury or mercury vapour in conditions where a

charged sheath might develop.

The searches revealed no results from fusion research, a few

references that might be anomalous results from moving positive

charge within mercury.


4/6

What did appear were some ancient Indo/European stories translated

from Sanskrit.

I could dismiss stories of flying people and chariots as being the stuff

of story tellers and legends, but it was the incidental detail that caught

my attention. Detail that made coherent sense if the vehiclesdescribed were powered by a charged sheath fusion engine. Too many

technologically consistent details for the stories to have been created

by an agricultural culture moving out of the stone age!

These flying vehicles are described as being powered by a vortex of

mercury. In order for the mercury vortex to work it needs an iron box.If you open the iron box, radiation from the contents of the box will

burn your skin, like bad sunburn. These vehicles fly with a musical

hum. They dont have a powerful rear exhaust, and they only fly within

the atmosphere. There are other vehicles that fly with a powerful rearexhaust, and a roar like thunder that can be used to fly into space.

The stories make a very clear distinction between the capabilities of

these two types of vehicles.

We also learn that over time this knowledge was lost, and the mercury

vortex ceased to work when the contents of the iron box no longer

burnt.

The stories also describe complete flying cities, which if this technologywere real would not be a problem. What makes me guess that the

technology was real is the way the story describes the way theinhabitants of the city behaved after their city was shot down in abattle. Not as people with their roots in agriculture would behave, butas we might expect people whose only experience of life is a modern

technological civilisation might behave on losing their technology.

Unfortunately the weapons described in these stories could also be

made using fusion power from a charged sheath vortex. When you

know how the technology works it is very difficult to see these writings

as pure stories from the distant past. There is simply too muchconsistent and working technology in them. These stories can only be

fragments of history from the distant past. Twisted, altered,misremembered, but still enough technology remains in these

accounts to say with a lot of certainty, we are not the first

technological civilisation on this planet.

Such a civilisation may have been very local, not a world-wide globalcivilisation like our own. Somewhere it must have left its traces. Many


5/6

of those traces may remain on the continental shelf exposed for the

duration of the ice age and now submerged, but there is another vast

depository of technological activity on this planet the ice fields ofGreenland and Antarctica that have collected the atmospheric dust

year by year since the last ice age started. The ice that formed at the

time of the Roman empire stores the lead and copper dust of itssmelters and mines, but what of the many centuries and millenniabefore that?

This information is copyright Peter Thomson 2001-2004

anomalies unidentified flying vehicles ***

http://homepage.ntlworld.com/ufophysics/biblio.htm

Paul E Potter

anomalies unidentified flying vehicles tigerbay

Hi, you write a very good and clear artical, but i would like to put

some points to you please.

Has anyone done ice tests from around 10 to 20000 yrs ago to see if

there was an increase in mercury an the atmosphere, and how long did

this increase last for?

Secondly can you explain how the inhabitance behaved that was different

from iron age man. And lastly, if iron age man was not half advanced

then how did they manage to win the fights (battles) and bring down a

floating city? Please reply

anomalies unidentified flying vehicles

paulreason
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/ufophysics/biblio.htm


6/6

Ufo`s are, or use a ring of spinning white vapor to conceal their

light,These [mechanical like in movement] wheels have a ball at its

front and produce a green rainbow aura to spin on the peripheral after

the light is released.They appear initially as a vortex which unfolds a

opaque Nimbus type cloud at ground level that moves across the surface

with substantial speed.These wheels can hover above the ground or dart

back and forth in the sky.We call them UFO`s History calls them -Cherubim -Merkebah-ophanin-thunderbirds etc.They appear with a storm.

A perfect example of these vortexes is from within the Bible.

This is how they have been described.Thunder-whirlwind-

great[thick]cloud-wheels-rings with lamps, brightness like the bow that

is in the day of rain -glory[light].In my opinion They are the cause of

crop circles and this is based on a visible personal

experience.T.O.R.R.O. HERE IN THE U.K THINK THEY ARE SOME UNDISCOVERED

RARE NATURAL PHENONEMON[that only appears at night] with a scientific

explanation ,but they are certainly not of a natural cause that is for

sure.

Thank you.Paul

Copyright Peter Thomson 2012-December-13

Unidentified Flying Vehicles

Documents

Transcript of Unidentified Flying Vehicles